October 08, 2010
— DrewM The Nobel Peace Prize has a hit and miss record over the years to say the least. Last year it reached ridiculous proportions when the award went to Barack Obama. Perhaps this year's award to an advocate for Chinese democracy (insert Guns N' Roses joke here, or not) will be a sign of better things to come.
The 2010 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded Friday to Liu Xiaobo, a jailed Chinese democracy activist, in a move that infuriated China's government and could heighten tensions with the West by re-focusing international attention on Beijing's human rights record.China responded by saying the decision violated the Nobel principles and could damage relations with Norway, where the Nobel Committee is based—even though the five-member body is independent of the government there.
The Nobel Committee said it decided to give the prize to Mr. Liu, who in December was sentenced to 11 years in prison, for his "long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China."
"Over the past decades, China has achieved economic advances to which history can hardly show any equal," it said. "China's new status must entail increased responsibility."
From the man who nominated Liu for the prize.
Liu’s writings express the aspirations of a growing number of China’s citizens; the ideas he has articulated in his allegedly subversive writings, ideas that are commonplace in free societies around the world, are shared by a significant cross section of Chinese society. Charter 08, for example, is a testament to an expanding movement for peaceful political reform in China. This document, which Liu co-authored, is a remarkable attempt both to engage China's leadership and to speak to the Chinese public about where China is and needs to go. It is novel in its breadth and in its list of signers—not only dissidents and human rights lawyers, but also prominent political scientists, economists, writers, artists, grassroots activists, farmers, and even government officials. More than 10,000 Chinese citizens have endorsed the document despite the fact that almost all of the original 300 signers have since been detained or harassed. In doing so they, too, exhibited exceptional courage and conviction. One of them, for example, a teacher in Yunnan province, reported that police contacted her three times asking her to renounce the Charter and proclaim the signer was some other person with the same name. She refused. To stand up for Liu Xiaobo is to stand with a growing number of men and women like her in China; to stand with all those who advocate for peaceful change in the world’s most populous nation.In fact, Liu Xiaobo is the kind of figure governments suppress at their peril. While he was a young university professor, Liu was a major protagonist in the final days of the Tiananmen Square protests, and, as I have already said, he is widely credited with preventing far greater bloodshed when government troops moved into the square. Liu admonished the students to make their own movement more democratic; he disarmed a group of workers who appeared with guns to protect the student demonstrators (there is stirring news footage of him seizing a rifle and smashing it at a Tiananmen rally shortly before the crackdown); and he helped persuade students to evacuate the square in the final hours. Deeply committed to non-violence and democracy, Liu has been able both to articulate and to channel the frustrations of the Chinese people for more than two decades. Stifling such a voice does nothing to address those frustrations, which one way or another will eventually find expression. China has, indeed, moved increasingly towards democracy and freedom in the last few decades.
Liu isn't a sexy and exciting pick like Obama was thought to be in 2009 but there is the advantage that he has actually done something of note, namely put his life on the line in the name of freedom.
Liu won't get 1/10 of the worldwide attention Obama did but then again, he won't be partying it up in Oslo with the world's professional 'peace' industry. Barring some surprising change in position by the Chinese government, Liu will be rotting away in a gulag.
Not all Nobel Peace Laureates are created equal.
Posted by: DrewM at
05:42 AM
| Comments (59)
Post contains 713 words, total size 5 kb.
This just in... Tom Freidman (D- uber-rich American Communist) doesn't give a fuck about a man rotting in a Chinese prison.
No - give that Noble prize to Obama again. Better yet, give the Noble prize to the scum sucking communist over-lords who rule China with a corrupt iron fist.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 08, 2010 05:47 AM (0fzsA)
Yeah, Chi-Coms, that's the way to get people to think you're all enlightened, threaten the country where an independent council meets, just because said independent council makes a choice with which you disagree.
Yeah, that'll work...
Posted by: AllenG at October 08, 2010 05:48 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: EC at October 08, 2010 05:48 AM (mAhn3)
Posted by: Vic at October 08, 2010 05:50 AM (/jbAw)
Baring some surprising change in position by the Chinese government, Liu will be rotting away in a gulag.
Barry: Those comrades know how to take care of their counter-revolutionaries. I wish I could do the same here.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 08, 2010 05:52 AM (1Jaio)
I heard that Obama called Oslo and told them to take his name of the list for this year
because he wanted Michelle's name on there.
Posted by: Mama AJ, CEO, Pudding Warmers R Us, Offical Sponsor of PuddingPAC at October 08, 2010 05:52 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 08, 2010 05:52 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 08, 2010 05:54 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at October 08, 2010 05:55 AM (FkKjr)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 08, 2010 05:56 AM (UOM48)
There is always next year, or the year after Ahmedinejad receives it.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 08, 2010 05:57 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 08, 2010 05:57 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: CoolCzech at October 08, 2010 05:57 AM (tJjm/)
Hint: Violent struggles are shorter and more effective.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 08, 2010 05:59 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 08, 2010 06:00 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Ben at October 08, 2010 06:00 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Washington at October 08, 2010 06:01 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 08, 2010 06:01 AM (0GFWk)
And maybe it's just my optimistic nature, but perhaps this will further aid in B. Hussein Obama's downfall as people realize the folly of their empty adorations when they compare the last 2 recipients side by side.
Posted by: The Drunken Conservative at October 08, 2010 06:02 AM (EffI7)
Posted by: polynikes at October 08, 2010 10:03 AM (m2CN7)
We're working on that.
Posted by: The Nobel Committee at October 08, 2010 06:05 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 08, 2010 06:05 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: John P, Squibob at October 08, 2010 06:06 AM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 08, 2010 06:07 AM (0GFWk)
I agree, except for a few. Lech Walesa in 1983(?) stood up to the USSR. That took balls and brains, and he was part of the beginning of the end of perhaps the worst evil of the 20th century (apologies to Mao and Hitler).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 08, 2010 06:08 AM (LH6ir)
The Peace Prize are given by politicians that has seniority but who the parties doesn't want in any serious position to do real damage. Sort of a consolation prize to keep them happy and out of the way.
That backfired monumentally last year, so they have probably been told over and over again by their party leadership during this year to shape up or else. Which is why they went with a safer choice and picked the one that the betting firms expected, I believe this was the front runner last year as well.
Posted by: Erik at October 08, 2010 06:09 AM (3mxBZ)
And even those are somewhat "political" (in terms of the popularity of the candidates, or lack thereof).
Posted by: Y-not at October 08, 2010 06:10 AM (osFsP)
16 Imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo wins Nobel Peace Prize for 'his long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights'
Hint: Violent struggles are shorter and more effective.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 08, 2010 09:59 AM (5aa4z)
that's an iffy proposition. Chinese wars and rebellions are often very very very costly
Check out the Taiping rebeliion, An Shi Revolt, Dungan Rebellion. Some of the deadlist events in all human histroy.
China is a massive country. An armed revolt, which won't happen, would results in easily millions of deaths, but likely tens of millions of deaths. Most would not come from fighting, but rather starvation and disease as a result of destroyed infrastructure in any conflict.
It is a safer bet to try it peacefully. The people have seem what capitalism can do for their lives and they like it, now they want to try freedom. It will happen eventually. I imagine the transition will be much more like Francisco Franco's fascist Spain to a democratic Spain than it was for the USSR to The Russian Federation and the CIS.
Posted by: Ben at October 08, 2010 06:10 AM (wuv1c)
God In Heaven! Why does the vice-president's wife need a cheif of staff? A job that has been described by it's first holder as "warm spit".
Hell, the President's wife doesn't need any staff and having them is unconstitutional. The VP shouldn't even have a house provided in DC.
Posted by: Vic at October 08, 2010 06:10 AM (/jbAw)
No, they gave it to somebody who symbolizes something, again. He's sitting in a jail cell "raising awareness". If he actually wanted to do something, it would require indirect fire support.
So no, this is yet another worthless "statement".
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 08, 2010 06:11 AM (5aa4z)
You are welcome, round-eye. Here is an additional bill for the metal "supplements" we put in those products.
Posted by: Chinese Gov't at October 08, 2010 06:11 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Neo at October 08, 2010 06:11 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: RushBabe at October 08, 2010 06:12 AM (a3Z62)
All wars are very very costly. Is the cost worth the prize? If freedom is that undervalued in China, then they've made their own bed.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 08, 2010 06:13 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 08, 2010 06:14 AM (X/WlY)
(there is stirring news footage of him seizing a rifle and smashing it at a Tiananmen rally shortly before the crackdown)
Stirring ...
The Nobel Prize for Peace has never been anything less than a total joke. Some years it's not as offensive to civilized people as usual, but it's always a bad joke. Now, news footage of him having seized the Nobel committee and smashing it into the ground ... that would have been stirring.
Posted by: Nobel Prize For Piece at October 08, 2010 06:18 AM (ZYD2H)
Posted by: t-bird at October 08, 2010 06:20 AM (FcR7P)
Chinese wars and rebellions are often very very very costly
All wars are very very costly. Is the cost worth the prize? If freedom is that undervalued in China, then they've made their own bed.
Chinese wars especially so.
Not in this case, I do not believe so. 10+ million lives for something that is going to happen in 30 years anyway doesn't seem like a fair trade off. China is 5,000 old. They've got the time. They are a slow country, they will get there. .It is going to happen and in China it would be better if it happened peacefully.
Posted by: Ben at October 08, 2010 06:20 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Captain Ned at October 08, 2010 06:28 AM (P1/uX)
Perhaps the colonists should've waited. Hey, Britain would've cut them loose by 1850, right?
Not picking a fight, but I believe people have a responsibility to secure freedom, if not for themselves then for subsequent generations.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 08, 2010 06:33 AM (5aa4z)
I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in their decision. But I think it's fair to say, No. 1, any one of us would be pretty angry; No. 2, that Oslo acted stupidly in not awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to me again this year.
Posted by: Barrack Obama at October 08, 2010 06:40 AM (4HTn/)
So ... the Nobel committee is saying that the long, distinguished history of Chinese culture and its antipathy towards individual freedom is ... objectively bad. Good to know that cultural relativism is dead. I wish we had some stirring news footage of Xiaobo smashing cultural relativism at Tiannamen ... That would have been worth a piece prize.
BTW, people being jailed and dying for going against the Chinese state are a dime a dozen ... literally. So ... the whole pathetic UN climate crime panel get a Piece Prize, but only one jailed Chinaman. Hmmm.
Posted by: Nobel Prize For Piece at October 08, 2010 06:40 AM (ZYD2H)
+1000
Pat Caddell, Chuck Norris and Darth Cheney WISH they had balls the size of Tank Man. Dude definitely has an honored seat in Valhalla.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 08, 2010 06:43 AM (P9+0W)
Posted by: buzzion at October 08, 2010 10:44 AM (oVQFe)
And in the odd confluence of leftist insanity, it was the Chinese who invented gun powder ... So, the Chinese should be the ones giving out Piece Prizes.
Posted by: Nobel Prize For Piece at October 08, 2010 06:46 AM (ZYD2H)
Posted by: waste93 at October 08, 2010 07:02 AM (1OUiB)
HAH! I guess the Nobel committee decided it had to try and rehabilitate its image a little given the pathetic debacle from last year.
"What do you think? Is Arafat still available?"
"Um, Arafat is dead sir. And he already won the Nobel anyway, which, I might add, wasn't viewed as terribly bright by a lot of people at the time, either."
"True, true. Dammit, what do these heathens WANT? What will make them happy and keep us from being just another punchline?"
"Well... I suppose we could give it to someone who's attempted to further the cause of peace, sir. There's this guy in China-"
"Is he black?"
"Er, no. He's Chinese."
"Damn. Well, it's a minority, so I guess we can make it work."
"Um, China is actually the most highly populated country in the w-"
"Whatever. Does he look good in a tux? He'll need to look good in a tux for the dinner party and pictures."
"He won't actually be able to attend the ceremony, sir - "
"WHAT?! But the publicity!"
"-on account of him currently rotting in a Chinese jail, sir."
"Oh. Well. Let it never be said that the Nobel Peace Prize Committee isn't devoted to the cause of political prisoners rotting in Chinese jails. In fact that sounds like a good slogan. The Nobel Peace Prize: Devoted to the Cause of Chinese Jails and Rotting Prisoners."
"You mean, devoted to the cause of PRISONERS rotting in Chinese jails, sir."
"Whatever. Get PR on it, they can sort out the wording. So what's this guy's name?"
"Liu Xiaobo, sir."
"Well, get Lil Bow Wow-"
"Liu XIAO-BO, sir."
"-or whatever his name is engraved on the trophy. By gum, we'll be the talk of the town! Awarding the Nobel to a Chinese dissident. Genius. I'm a genius!"
"Sure you are, sir."
Posted by: MWR at October 08, 2010 07:11 AM (4df7R)
Damage relations between China and Norway?
Really - why would Norway care? What will China do to Norweigian interests - refuse to buy herring?
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 08, 2010 07:12 AM (O9Cc8)
Is the Chinese government getting buck naked? I think you meant "Barring."
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at October 08, 2010 07:12 AM (5+Fvb)
Posted by: Ulises Jorge Bido at October 08, 2010 08:44 AM (StjxX)
Posted by: Guy who screwed Salma Hayek at October 08, 2010 09:09 AM (tJjm/)
Thousands of years of culture and class distinction have inhibited
Asian countries from truly being free. South Korea and Japan may be a
democracy and capitalistic but acceptance by its citizens that they are
born to a certain class and that's where they will remain is still
strong.
I don't think it's so much class distinction as the fact that Confucian societies value social order above all else. Democracy is often seen as disorderly and chaotic. (The mainlanders like to get all snarky when Taiwanese politicians get in fistfights in the legislature. Eh, I still prefer the corruption and messiness of democracy to authoritarian dictatorship, but clearly they don't see it that way.) It's just a completely different mindset. I think it's not that they don't want to be free, it's that they perceive "freedom" as an abstraction that is not worth sacrificing an orderly society. These are ideas that have been ingrained into the Chinese mind for millennia. The idea of democracy is still a relatively new one.
Mao was able to take control in a relatively short time because of what he and the Communists promised to give the Chinese people -- order. Which was something that the Kuomintang could never achieve. The whole country had basically been carved up into warlord kingdoms since the Republic was established. They were too busy fighting each other to really get anything done.
Also, the Chinese as a people are extremely averse to internal wars because of the terrible suffering they experienced during rebellions and wars in the past. Looting, starvation, etc. There's a proverb to the effect of, "better to be a dog in peacetime than a human being in war."
Posted by: Angry Beaver at October 08, 2010 09:37 AM (Mvrbi)
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at October 08, 2010 10:50 AM (/cH23)
Posted by: Guy who screwed Salma Hayek at October 08, 2010 11:13 AM (tJjm/)
Dude definitely has an honored seat in Valhalla.
Truth be told, the tank driver that didn't smear him into the pavement was just as brave if not braver. The Politburo knew who the tank driver was, yet wasn't sure who Tank Man was.
Posted by: Captain Ned at October 08, 2010 05:43 PM (P1/uX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2299 seconds, 187 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: chemjeff at October 08, 2010 05:46 AM (E97ku)