December 07, 2010

Obama Begs Supporters to, Uh...Support Him
— Gabriel Malor

The White House is doing damage control tonight as "progressives" continue to lose their shit over the tax cut compromise. Obama released a special video message directed to his supporters a few hours ago. He all but pleads for understanding from the faithless wretches:

“I’ve counted on your support because you understand the importance of changing our politics, of doing the hard work of finding the common ground,” President Obama said in a video message to supporters released Tuesday night. “It’s not perfect but this compromise is an essential step on the road to recovery.”

“I know some folks – even good friends – are unhappy with the plan because, as with any negotiation, getting there required some give and take,” he said.

Click over for the video, if you like. He still looks like hell, like he's coming to pieces and he can't find the exit, though not as bad as he did for the press conference earlier today. Also: somebody needs to tell him to never wear a brown tie again in his life ever at all. Ever. At all.

I especially like the part where he concedes that the tax cut deal will force him to run for reelection on campaign to increase taxes:

And he vowed that “this is not the end of this fight. These tax cuts will expire in two years … and I will continue to make the case to the American people about why I don’t believe they should be renewed. In fact, I’m confident – as we make the tough choices to cut the deficit – it will become apparent that we can’t afford to extend these tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans one day longer.”

I wonder how it was that two years was selected. Obama wants none, the GOP wants a permanent cut. And they somehow whittled it down to the 2012 election season? Pure genius.

Oh, and a note on the Social Security payroll tax reduction. Here's how the White House put it:

The framework agreement reached by the administration includes an about 2%, employee-side payroll tax cut for over 155 million workers – providing tax relief of about $120 billion next year.This tax cut will have a major impact on jobs and growth – creating substantial numbers of jobs. It is widely recognized by economists across the political spectrum as a high bang for the buck way to boost growth and was cited by both major deficit reduction commissions as consistent with long term fiscal discipline.

A payroll tax cut has been endorsed by experts and commentators from across the political spectrum. Just last month, both the President’s Fiscal Commission and the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Debt Reduction Task Force described a payroll tax cut in 2011 as an effective way to spur growth and job creation. The tax cut legislation would provide for a transfer of General Revenues to the Social Security Trust Fund, ensuring no negative impact on Social Security solvency. And, as economist Nouriel Roubini wrote earlier this year, a payroll tax cut would spur growth because “for employees, the increased take-home pay would boost much-needed economic consumption and advance the still-crucial process of deleveraging households.”

This, along with the unemployment benefits extension I wrote about earlier, has taken a lot of hits from Republicans who are pissed that it doesn't do as much for the job situation as perhaps a reduction on the employer side of the ledger. True, but unemployment isn't the only issue on the table, and it's not even the main one when it comes to tax cuts.

The main issue when it comes to tax cuts is tax cuts. Are you going to tell me that in 2012, an election year, with a more Republican Congress than we have presently, and an economy still in the crapper (even by the White House's overgenerous predictions), the President is going to have any progress raising the payroll tax by two percent?

Because that's just what it will be. This year it's a "tax cut." Two years from now it's going to be a "tax hike." And it's not going to conveniently be taxes on "the rich", those easily-maligned boogymen who apparently keep taking food off the tables of their fellow countrymen. It's going to be a tax hike on ever dollar earned up to the cap by almost every taxpayer in America!

I can't even tell you how awesomely awesome that is. I mean-- I am Jack's tumescent cock.*

But WAIT, there's MORE. The flip side to every taxation issue is a spending issue. Stop your ass right there, look back up to what I quoted from the White House. Pare away the bullshit. Do you see it? Do you see what they did?

I'm going to tell you a story: Sometimes I get my nieces balloons from the store. Helium balloons, y'know. And they're great and all, but they hang around for days and days, even after they're no longer sticking to the ceiling and really just rolling around looking pathetic on the floor, and my nieces always cry if I throw them out before they're completely exhausted and basically empty sacks on the ground. So the trick is to deflate them in fairly short order so they're empty sooner and I can just pick 'em up and put them in the garbage. It helps to poke a hole in them.

One more time:

[...] The tax cut legislation would provide for a transfer of General Revenues to the Social Security Trust Fund, ensuring no negative impact on Social Security solvency.[...]

Do you see it now? The tax cut deal will poke a hole in the so-called "Social Security Trust Fund." Even the illusion of a trust fund cannot be sustained indefinitely. And, like I just got through explaining, this is not a temporary tax reduction, no matter how much Obama says it is.

This is the opening gambit in starving the beast. And I know, I know. Many Republicans don't want to kill Social Security, they just want to replace it. Great. This payroll tax scheme dispenses with the argument that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Because it will be impossible to argue that Social Security isn't broke while all it's helium has leaked out and it's a slightly damp sack on the carpet.

Democrats are going to be standing around in 2012, an election year with a bum economy, trying to run campaigns on raising taxes not just for the wealthy, but also for everyone else, and also on spending more on their collapsing Social Security regime.

I am Jack's aching nipples.

*See here, if you don't get that particular reference.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 06:54 PM | Comments (178)
Post contains 1125 words, total size 7 kb.

1 He'll be talking to the portraits pretty soon.

Posted by: eman at December 07, 2010 06:55 PM (b1GWR)

2

I won.

Wait.  What?

Posted by: B. Hussein Obama (D) Commander of Tides and Reducer of Ocean Levels at December 07, 2010 06:57 PM (bs5fH)

3 If all of the rich liberals think that they should be paying more there's nothing stopping them from ponying up more money. Except they're total hypocrites and use every tax loop hole available to them. As for Barry, the arrogant bastard deserves every beating he gets

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 07, 2010 06:58 PM (ttYEV)

4 How will America's national security be impacted when he goes full Queeg?  I see it coming soon.

Posted by: Cicero at December 07, 2010 07:00 PM (bs5fH)

5 Haha wow the George Martin thread got trashed quickly. WTF, this coming from a group that loves George Lucas and his anal sex dead ending Pulp Fiction style of great dialouge and characters. Indian Jones Crystal Skull??? Jar Jar Binks????

Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 07, 2010 07:01 PM (h2+O0)

6 7 Well it was strange when he called us all enemies when he disagreed with him on immigration. We are thru the looking glass already.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 07, 2010 07:04 PM (h2+O0)

7 The truly rich (Soros, Kennedy, Buffet, etc.) hire lawyers and accountants to shelter their funds so they don't really pay taxes at the rates the rest of us do, but interestingly enough, they never seem to belly up to the bar and just, you know, pay more than their "required" rate, even though it would be good for the country. But, when they tax the hell out of the middle class, it sure does slow down, if not stop altogether, the once uniquely American transition from being poor to being better off by dint of hard work. Guess it is fairer when most of are, and remain, poor and dependent.

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 07, 2010 07:04 PM (8nf3A)

8 “I’ve counted on your support because you understand the importance of changing our politics, of doing the hard work of finding the common ground,”

Dumbass, that's the LAST thing your base wanted from you.

Posted by: nickless© at December 07, 2010 07:06 PM (MMC8r)

9 Implementing the Obama tax increases on the wealthy would have only raised a pittance compared to all the other financial shenanigans going on with the gov't printing money, borrowing money, and spending money like these actions can be sustained.

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 07, 2010 07:07 PM (8nf3A)

10 interestingly enough, they never seem to belly up to the bar and just, you know, pay more than their "required" rate, even though it would be good for the country.

It's not really that they feel THEY don't pay enough, it's that they feel OTHER people don't pay enough.

Posted by: nickless© at December 07, 2010 07:08 PM (MMC8r)

11 His meltdown is amusing, yet frightening.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 07, 2010 07:08 PM (UOM48)

12 You know what they call the guy in a brown suit?

The guy from out of town.

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 07:08 PM (JpFM9)

13 2012 election cycle not 2014

Posted by: Ray at December 07, 2010 07:09 PM (BhMdF)

14 We are all "hostage takers" now.  What an idiot.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 07, 2010 07:09 PM (UOM48)

15 12--but they do it for the children (theirs, not ours).

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 07, 2010 07:10 PM (8nf3A)

16 No, Jane, we are the hostages! 

Thank God "the one" saved us from the Republicans.

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 07:11 PM (JpFM9)

17 How will America's national security be impacted when he goes full Queeg?

Libs are so mad at him, you could ask that question at Daily Kos right now and they wouldn't even know you were trolling.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 07, 2010 07:11 PM (BJzi5)

18 ITS THE SCHADENFREUDE JUBILATION HOUR!!!!

Posted by: ParisParamus at December 07, 2010 07:11 PM (del3r)

19 It is also interesting to me that the libs NEVER can be pinned down as to what is the right amount of taxes (tax rate) that the rich should pay

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 07, 2010 07:12 PM (8nf3A)

20

I think it was pretty neat today when he said that talking taxes with the GOP (with a huge mandate) was like negotiating with terrorists holding America hostage.  But then added, you don't negotiate with terrorists unless someone has gotten hurt.  Which is a new twist on that old hoary chestnut.  New polic in the making, perhaps?

And when he said that Republicans are definitely going to repeal middle-class tax cuts ASAP leaving those for the rich in place, that was AWESOME.  And when he said that tax cuts for millionares and billionares are the GOP's holy grail.

And that if the GOP wants a fight, they will find he's up to the challenge.  Just not this time.  But you wait, he's up for it.

Living in New England, I can't help but compare and contrast the pressers he and Rex Ryan gave in the last 24 hours.

Rex Ryan was more articulate, funnier, and more mature.  By far.

Posted by: Truman North at December 07, 2010 07:12 PM (HLGCA)

21 Libs are so mad at him, you could ask that question at Daily Kos right now and they wouldn't even know you were trolling.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 07, 2010 11:11 PM (BJzi5)


LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!

Posted by: nickless© at December 07, 2010 07:13 PM (MMC8r)

22 Don't you think we should invite some Kos Kids over to make it clear to us bitter clingers how "the one" is our Savior?

About now?   Ace shouldn't have banned Greg, he'd help us out.

Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 07:14 PM (JpFM9)

23 How many times did El Douche use the word "battle" today?  Jeebus.  The stupid 'tard thinks he's a frigging warrior now, what with the stitches in his widdle lip.  Sorry-assed excuse for a CiC.


Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 07, 2010 07:14 PM (UOM48)

24 2012 election season?

Posted by: jmflynny at December 07, 2010 07:14 PM (fP/nY)

Posted by: jmflynny at December 07, 2010 07:17 PM (fP/nY)

26 Well, that's all I needed to hear.  He's got my support and my vote 4EVAH!

(God, he's just so dreeeeamy!!!)

Posted by: Stupid Typical Fucking Moonbat at December 07, 2010 07:17 PM (EW49d)

27 Truman can you do me a favor? Do not talk about football, as a Redskins fan when talking about football you pretty much should rub salt in my eyes, stab me with a syphilis encrusted butter knife, and then roll me over and call Mandingo in to have his way with me.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 07, 2010 07:17 PM (h2+O0)

28 This is Starbucks!

Posted by: President Ebola at December 07, 2010 07:17 PM (b1GWR)

29 Gutless lick spittle.  He's been snowed, throwed, blowed, stewed, screwed and tattooed.  What a wuss.  My deceased great grandmother could take him two out of three falls when it was really important.

Posted by: Comanche Voter at December 07, 2010 07:18 PM (3ESDJ)

30 I really, really miss Major Garrett in the front row at the pressers.  He needed to be there today. 

Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 07, 2010 07:19 PM (UOM48)

31 I really, really miss Major Garrett in the front row at the pressers.  He needed to be there today.

Me too.

Posted by: jmflynny at December 07, 2010 07:20 PM (fP/nY)

32 Don't you think we should invite some Kos Kids over to make it clear to us bitter clingers how "the one" is our Savior?

All right. If I'm not back in ten minutes, send out a search party.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 07, 2010 07:21 PM (BJzi5)

33

29  as a Redskins fan

don't sweat it mr. pink, there's still time, in fact its not like Da Bears have a much better record or something.........oh wait..........forget it, my bad

Posted by: navycopjoe at December 07, 2010 07:22 PM (S9k9+)

34 34, Careful, please.

Posted by: eman at December 07, 2010 07:23 PM (b1GWR)

35 'night, all.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 07, 2010 07:24 PM (UOM48)

36

Mr. Pink?  Sorry.  But...

Coincidence?  I think not!  The Washington Redskins and the Washington Generals wear the same color uniforms.

Can't you root for the Ravens or something?

Posted by: Truman North at December 07, 2010 07:29 PM (HLGCA)

37 We're just so angry we going to stamp our feet and whine until....

What?  He made a video?  Just for us???

SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEALLLLL!!!!!!!!

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG!!!  This is better than that time I went on Oprah and she gave me a free waffle iron!!!!!

Posted by: KosKid at December 07, 2010 07:30 PM (EW49d)

38 AVENGE ME, BOYS!  AVENGE MEEEEE!!!

Posted by: Barry Dean Stanton at December 07, 2010 07:31 PM (OdjhZ)

39 2012 election season?

Thanks, jmflynny, total brain fart.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 07, 2010 07:34 PM (XVaFd)

40 Well at least Ravens fans arent Steelers bandwagon fans. They have that going for them.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 07, 2010 07:34 PM (h2+O0)

41 Careful, please.

Man, I nearly got trampled to death. It's like Mecca over there!

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 07, 2010 07:35 PM (BJzi5)

42 "...includes an about 2%, employee-side payroll tax cut for over 155 million workers – providing tax relief of about $120 billion next year."

I
ain't a brilliant mathematician like Paul Krugman, but if a 2% employee-side payroll tax break is equal to $120B, and if the employee contribution is half of the total payroll tax, then that means that the federal gubmint collects, um, ($120B * (100/.02) * 2) = $12 Trillion dollars in payroll taxes alone, not to mention income and sales taxes.  You bastards!

Posted by: skh.pcola at December 07, 2010 07:36 PM (vsFI8)

43 2012 election cycle not 2014 Posted by: Ray at December 07, 2010 11:09 PM I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this. I thought I was missing something where a 2-year extension somehow would be up for renewal in 4 years. I especially got confused when it was referred to twice in the post. Figured one time was a typo, but then when he said it again, I really thought I was missing something. The reason it is big that it is 2012 is, obviously, it's not just a simple election year, it's a Presidential election year. So, for some reason, they chose 2 years so they could fight this issue again in the middle of a Presidential campaign? Seems odd...

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 07, 2010 07:37 PM (NITzp)

44 The 2% reduction onthe employee side of the Social Security tax will have absolutely effect on creating jobs.  None...nada....zilch!!  It doesn't take the burden off of the employer.  Sure, the employee having 2% more take home pay will help a little if the money is spent in the economy.  But, that will take a good while to be realized and if like has happened in the past, the money will most likely be saved or pay-down debt.  Ultimately, little or no economic benefit.

Posted by: AZDREAMER at December 07, 2010 07:37 PM (l4f5R)

45 Hey typos that make 2 year tax extensions end in 2014 is why I come here. Please do not correct them.

Posted by: Mr. Pink at December 07, 2010 07:43 PM (h2+O0)

46  skh.pcola, the 2% reduction means that the employee payroll tax is being reduced from 6.2% to 4.2% on employee income. It's not a 2% reduction in the amount of payroll taxes the federal government takes.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 07, 2010 07:44 PM (XVaFd)

47 The reason it is big that it is 2012 is, obviously, it's not just a simple election year, it's a Presidential election year. So, for some reason, they chose 2 years so they could fight this issue again in the middle of a Presidential campaign? Seems odd...

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 07, 2010 11:37 PM (NITzp)

Odd for Obama. Smart for us.

Posted by: Oldcat at December 07, 2010 07:44 PM (CN+Qv)

48 Nigeria, meh.  Corruption charges from a kleptocracy are precisely, meaningless.

Well, from one worse than Congress, anyway.

Wait...

Bugger.

Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 07, 2010 07:45 PM (aoLEL)

49  Hey typos that make 2 year tax extensions end in 2014 is why I come here. Please do not correct them.

No, really, I totally blanked on a whole year. Somewhere a wire got crossed and I woulda sworn up and down that 2014 was the presidential election year. Which is crazy. Presidential election years are always leap years and 2014 isn't a leap year. Everyone knows that. Heh. Hehehe. *twitch*

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 07, 2010 07:47 PM (XVaFd)

50

Gah, the website won't let me post a link, even with tinyurl. What am I doing wrong?

Posted by: Grey Fox at December 07, 2010 07:47 PM (u4D3B)

51

I wonder how it was that two years was selected.

Hmmmmm.....  let's see......  Economy is so fucked up, chances of it turning around in the next 18 months are pretty small. 

Obama is also in a position to keep the economy from recovering, what with his continued attacks on the free-market and small business, all while maintaining a level of uncertainty that is like poison to long-term investment.

Meanwhile, Republicans made gains in the Senate and took control of the House.

Now, Obama (against his will, doncha know) goes along with the Republicans on the extension of the evil and despised tax cuts, even before they take their seats in January, all while making it very clear he is totally against this idea, but hey, whattya gonna do?

So, when unemployment is still floating around 9.5% in early 2012 and the economy is still in the shitter, just who do you think The Won is gonna blame as he's running for reelection?

Who rolled who again?

(by the way, thanks for the b-day card, Gabe!)

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 07:49 PM (EW49d)

52 So did any of those hard-hitting reporters at Bambi's press conference ask him why this wasn't taken care of when he had 60 Demorat votes in the Senate?

Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 07, 2010 07:51 PM (5I0Yr)

53 (by the way, thanks for the b-day card, Gabe!)

I hear it was a helluva party.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 07, 2010 07:55 PM (XVaFd)

54 The hard-hitting reporters were too busy waiting for their envelopes of unmarked Benjamins and free hookers.

Posted by: sifty at December 07, 2010 07:55 PM (MoA1d)

55

I hear it was a helluva party.

Well, from what I remember, yeah it wasn't bad.

Next time, nothing less than you actual attendance will be acceptable.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 07:57 PM (EW49d)

56

Anyone awake that can handle getting someone banned.  Raykon is still around after being previously banned currently shitting all over the ONT thread.  And if you really want to think of it as a good reason beyond you know him being a worthless troll that has been previously before, I'm sure you can infer this as a threat against the site.

416 Pretty sure, I can shut this site down, give me the word, God<, and I will do it :-)

Posted by: RayKon at December 07, 2010 11:37 PM (CFlmM)

Posted by: buzzion at December 07, 2010 07:58 PM (oVQFe)

57 Have not watched Oberjerk since way before the election but just turned it on to watch him explode. He is freaking out about Obama and the tax thing. Dayum. Love it!

Posted by: gesc at December 07, 2010 07:59 PM (31LCC)

58 Liberal Progressive Hopey/Changey Betrayal OverLoad Angst!!

Posted by: canopfor at December 07, 2010 08:07 PM (TObez)

59

He is freaking out about Obama and the tax thing. Dayum. Love it!

Damn, I didn't even think to watch Olberdouche!  May have to set the DVR for later tonight.

Watching Rachel Maddow run Obama's press conference.  Man, is this Maddow guy is pissed off!

And it's amazing how Obama still says his HRC bill covers "all Americans" then, 10 seconds later, says "Hey, it covers most Americans."

Lying fuck.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 08:07 PM (EW49d)

60 Brilliant analysis on the impact of the Democrats having to raise social security taxes in two years to fund a bankrupt pension.  Barry got rolled, battered and deep fried.   

Posted by: BigBoreCore at December 07, 2010 08:09 PM (qy0ZZ)

61 Seriously, Maddow looks like someone kicked him right in the balls.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 08:13 PM (EW49d)

62 You'd think they'd be thanking me for securing the strawberries!

Posted by: Pres. Toonces Queeg at December 07, 2010 08:15 PM (8lAR4)

63

Queef Olberdouche finally understands how Obama operates (go to the 8 minute mark):

"You rubes just don't get it."

Posted by: The Q at December 07, 2010 08:15 PM (2dOeM)

64

Gabe great post . . . again.  I am going to have to read it a couple of times though, it is that good.

I hadn't heard about the general revenue transfer piece though. 

For Obama to have lowered the employee tax on an entitlement that, according to the SOS Trustees' 2010 report is 41B in the red for the last fiscal year with 2014 the key year where those receiving will exceed those paying in on top of the Disability Insurance part of the fund set to go broke in 2018, Obama has just invalidated his core position on tax cuts being "irresponsible."

 

Posted by: journolist at December 07, 2010 08:21 PM (LwLqV)

65 Ooh.  That last part...if we can finally end the sleight-of-hand with SS and the general fund...that could finally wake folks up.

Still gotta get 'em to give up the gubmint cheez, but if you can start peeling folks away bit by bit...

Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 07, 2010 08:26 PM (aoLEL)

66 I feel a tinkle running right down my leg.

Posted by: Chrissy Matthews at December 07, 2010 08:29 PM (bgcml)

67 24 Don't you think we should invite some Kos Kids over to make it clear to us bitter clingers how "the one" is our Savior?

About now?   Ace shouldn't have banned Greg, he'd help us out.
Posted by: Kemp at December 07, 2010 11:14 PM

Raykon is trolling the ONT, maybe it can come here and post lyrics about how the looney lefties are handling their betrayal

Posted by: kbdabear at December 07, 2010 08:29 PM (vdfwz)

68

From today's lecture to America:

Q Thank you, Mr. President. YouÂ’ve been telling the American people all along that you oppose extending the tax cuts for the wealthier Americans. You said that again today. But what you never said was that you oppose the tax cuts, but youÂ’d be willing to go ahead and extend them for a couple years if ***the politics of the moment*** demand it.

So what IÂ’m wondering is when you take a stand like you had, why should the American people believe that youÂ’re going to stick with it? Why should the American people believe that youÂ’re not going to flip flop?

THE PRESIDENT: Hold on a second, Ben. This isnÂ’t the politics of the moment. This has to do with what can we get done right now.

[Imagine if Bush had said that today!]

Posted by: Rewrite! at December 07, 2010 08:34 PM (y/a/9)

69

THE PRESIDENT: Hold on a second, Ben. This isnÂ’t the politics of the moment. This has to do with what can we get done right now.

Smartest.  President.  Ever.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 08:39 PM (EW49d)

70 I really wish they would quite referring to them as the 'Bush Tax Cuts'.  Let's call them the 'Bush Tax Rates'.  Then it would be easier to pin 'tax increases' on the lefties.


Posted by: Original Mikey is now Uncle Mikey at December 07, 2010 08:43 PM (JnCUA)

71 I am only a simple caveman but I listened to hugh hewitt on the radio today go absolutely balistic being against the deal.

he wants it stopped becuase it was a backroom sellout, in his opinion, and didnt include the new members or the tea party.

his stance was (I could be wrong) all or nothing and that this was bad stuff on all levels including the death tax.


anyone want to deconstruct hughs argument, becuase if everything Gabriel Malor said is dead on, im at a loss squaring it with everything else ive heard today

Posted by: rumcrook at December 07, 2010 08:44 PM (60WiD)

72 BTW, Nazi's face looked like it was going to fall off.  Literally.
Posted by: iknowtheleft®© at December 08, 2010 12:37 AM

I told her not to touch that grail

Posted by: Dr Indiana Jones at December 07, 2010 08:44 PM (vdfwz)

73

What, we have to create them but Dems can save or create them?  Dang!

Yet again, we allow them to frame the story.

Where is our next Reagan?


Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 08:46 PM (EW49d)

74

THANK YOU FOR THIS POST.

 

This "horrible deal" as some conservatives have called it is Breakdown2-Election Bugaloo. The President is forced to beg his own party, with a neutered Dem congress falling to pieces over it. We will not only control the House in January but effectively have de facto control of the Senate as well, with Nelson, Lieberman, Tester, Webb and Manchin rotating in their R-siding. Lieb, Tester, Webb, Nelson and Manchin have to pretend to be about fixing shit anyway with 2012 over their head, but taking the "principled" position with the Obama-cooptive GOP just soliifies our power in the upcoming year.

It is a sandwich with a dried turd instead of dried tomatoes, but it is filet minon for us compared to what the Democrats are eating right now.

Posted by: CAC at December 07, 2010 08:48 PM (lV4Fs)

75 78 I am only a simple caveman but I listened to hugh hewitt on the radio today go absolutely balistic being against the deal.

he wants it stopped becuase it was a backroom sellout, in his opinion, and didnt include the new members or the tea party.

his stance was (I could be wrong) all or nothing and that this was bad stuff on all levels including the death tax.


anyone want to deconstruct hughs argument, becuase if everything Gabriel Malor said is dead on, im at a loss squaring it with everything else ive heard today

Posted by: rumcrook at December 08, 2010 12:44 AM (60WiD)

Well I believe the first thing to point out is that if we want to keep taxes from going up it can't include the new tea party candidates.  The tax cuts would expire before they were seated.

Posted by: buzzion at December 07, 2010 08:49 PM (oVQFe)

76 79 BTW, Nazi's face looked like it was going to fall off.  Literally.
Posted by: iknowtheleft®© at December 08, 2010 12:37 AM

I told her not to touch that grail
Posted by: Dr Indiana Jones


It's the loss of power from her gavel... once the power goes so does the force holding her togeather. soon it will only be a blob on the floor.

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 08:50 PM (eOxf1)

77

Look, you hostage-taker.....

o_O

Waitaminute......  are you calling me a Hostage??!?!?

How DARE you??!??!

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 08:51 PM (EW49d)

78 Lets say for laughs, the dems somehow scuttle this "deal" and all the tax RATES expire and everyone sees a tax increase. The new congress would most definitely pass a bill to change that, but in the meantime that playing out would really be something! Obama would be in even deeper shit!

Posted by: Dan at December 07, 2010 08:58 PM (1jzSs)

79 Gabe, I cited your UI extension post over at HA on Monday; well done. But are you sure of your facts?
 
I ran into this Malkin piece thru Lucianne in which she claims UI benefits are to be extended out for 155 weeks:
 
"State unemployment benefits last up to 26 weeks. Bipartisan-supported Washington mandates have raised that to 99 weeks. The current proposal would raise the total to 155 weeks. The cost of the joint federal-state program is borne by employers who pay state and federal taxes on a portion of wages paid to each employee in a calendar year."
 
Someone has their facts wrong and I think it is not you.

Posted by: GnuBreed at December 07, 2010 09:05 PM (h0RtZ)

80 87 Lets say for laughs, the dems somehow scuttle this "deal" and all the tax RATES expire and everyone sees a tax increase.
Posted by: Dan


Something is surely up, our congressman (welch) who's one of the stuck up pelosis ass dems had a telephone conference tonight to discuss financial responsibility. I declined as I knew it would be little more then a push to tax the rich for money.

Couple hrs later hes on Gretta V show pushing for that exact thing in the name of political financial responsibility. Every time Gretta hit him on waste or fraud in gov he said oh yes but without tax's on the bla bla bla. So it is a concerted effort by the leftard nation to either scold 0bozo or to really push for that they will never get.   

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 09:06 PM (1Ag/D)

81 This is still BS. Always compromising their way, now while sitting at the table with aces up in stud poker we don`t raise? This is a tactical win only that libheads are brainpainting everything in the general vicinity. Which is good.

Posted by: rightlysouthern at December 07, 2010 09:10 PM (l0mhx)

82 Oh and some more good news: A new report shows that nearly 1 in 4 of released Guantanamo releasees have returned to terrorist activities.
 
But don't worry; that number is expected to rise.
 
Couple this with the recent release of 598 Taliban types in Afghanistan, and we are talking about a target rich environment. Us as targets, I mean.

Posted by: GnuBreed at December 07, 2010 09:17 PM (h0RtZ)

83 93 Oh and some more good news:
Posted by: GnuBreed


but they love us now when they shoot and bomb us...

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 09:20 PM (1Ag/D)

84 As you guys know, I am a huge liberal.  I just want to go on record as stating unequivocally that Barack Obama is perhaps the biggest pussy I have ever known.  The guys has the spine of a tadpole.  He caves in on everything.  I just wanted you guys to know what the typical liberal thinks of Obama these days.

This is all just proof that the Big Money controls politics in America.  I believe that Obama is a liberal at heart, but not courageous enough to stand up for his values.  Republicans deserve to win because they have the courage to stand up for their twisted, selfish, immoral convictions.  I applaud you guys for being tough and backing down the pussy Democrats again.
Walter

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 09:21 PM (oA4y0)

85

Republicans deserve to win because they have the courage to stand up for their twisted, selfish, immoral convictions.

Take the shit out of your ears and listen to the arguments. 

Conservatism will set you free, moonbat.

Posted by: garrett at December 07, 2010 09:25 PM (QoP+8)

86 OMG Gabe is on fiah!!

Where the hell is that dude who shouts en fuego! anyways?

That's a damned provocative (as opposed to basic shit-stirring) propostion!

Bully for you, Gabe!

(I don't have any response to it right now.  I'm gonna think on it for a while...)

Posted by: Deety at December 07, 2010 09:26 PM (Jb3+B)

87 To the one who said, "I won", I say: na na na hey hey hey GOOD BYE please pass the popcorn watching the demomorons eat their savior has to be our sunshine moment in this this storm of economic doom...

Posted by: Laughingmyasoff at December 07, 2010 09:28 PM (YlXYu)

88

78 anyone want to deconstruct hughs argument,

You know who today's decision helps?

Posted by: The Q at December 07, 2010 09:29 PM (2dOeM)

89

Republicans deserve to win because they have the courage to stand up for their twisted, selfish, immoral convictions.

Twisted:  Recognizing that, throughout history, socialism fails every time it is tried.

Selfish:  "Obama's gonna pay my mortgage!" 

Immoral: Recognizing that money in the hands of the people is better used than money in the hands of the people.

Yeah, those damn Republicans are just pure evil.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:31 PM (EW49d)

90

Where the hell is that dude who shouts en fuego! anyways?

EN FUEGO!

Posted by: guy who shouts "en fuego" when the giy who shouts "en fuego" is busy at December 07, 2010 09:33 PM (EW49d)

91 Garrett, rich people play by different rules than you and I; they are taking capital away from hard working people like you and I; we have got to distribute the fruits of our land more equitably.  Do you really think any of those CEO's or Goldman Sachs thieves are worth $150M/year.  I respect the teacher or construction worker who works his ass off for $45,000 / year more than the slick thief who short sells a AAA rated toxic MBS' to a pension plan and makes millions.   You guys are backing the wrong people in my opinion.

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 09:34 PM (oA4y0)

92 Since this is the site for 'Scary Charts of the Day', I present:
 
A chart scarier than the unemployment one

Posted by: GnuBreed at December 07, 2010 09:34 PM (h0RtZ)

93

Immoral: Recognizing that money in the hands of the people is better used than money in the hands of the people.government.

dammit.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:35 PM (EW49d)

94

 they are taking capital away from hard working people like you and I

*tires to remember the last time a poor person offered me a job.......

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:36 PM (EW49d)

95 You guys are backing the wrong people in my opinion.
Posted by: Walter


It's not the people, it's the principal.
 Who's going to back you when it's you on the block?

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 09:37 PM (1Ag/D)

96

 they are taking capital away from hard working people like you and I

*tries to remember the last time a teacher or a union worker created a job....

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:37 PM (EW49d)

97

Do you really think any of those CEO's or Goldman Sachs thieves are worth $150M/year. 

Do you think a politician should make over $6million a year?

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:39 PM (EW49d)

98

slick thief who short sells a AAA rated toxic MBS' to a pension plan and makes millions.  

Do you really want to start discussing how much most Democrat politicians are worth? And then get into who is one your side?

Really?

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 09:41 PM (EW49d)

99

Hey.. was just listening to coast to coast (yeah yeah.. its for kicks) and the guest that was one was talking about wikileaks.  He said the original founder isn't Assange, but the guy who did all the paperwork and setup everything was CASS SUNSTEIN.

If true, that would explain why Obama didn't want to go after them..

It could also be why it seems the democrats are rudderless at the moment.. not putting their lameduck time to good use.  Because they're scared shitless.

This could not only bring down the whitehouse, but our dear leader could be tried for treason.  Oh god where is that new box of tissues

Posted by: John Frum at December 07, 2010 09:42 PM (qQG8/)

100 Wiserbud

twisted: supporting rich thieves;

selfish: supporting murder in Iraq (2003), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), Iran (1953), Honduras, Panama (etc to secure cheap oil, bananas, coffee for Americans

immoral: supporting murder in Iraq (2003), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), Iran (1953), Honduras, etc to secure cheap oil, bananas, coffee for Americans

you guys love installing murdering dictators around the world who will betray their own people to do business with American corporations just to enrich themselves and their families and friends.  Sick immoral bastards.

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 09:45 PM (oA4y0)

101

Even if its not true, it should be spread.

Sunstein was the one who talked about discrediting his 'enemies' aka republicans by spreading false info about them through conspiracy theories.

Spread it.  Nail Sunstein.  He's a dangerous self-annointed mastermind who belongs in a straight jacket

Posted by: John Frum at December 07, 2010 09:48 PM (qQG8/)

102 I don't know who the hell Jonathan Turley is, but he is kind of rocking C-SPAN II right now!

Posted by: Deety at December 07, 2010 09:51 PM (Jb3+B)

103 Holy shit!  Coffee (for Americans) is selfish AND immoral!

I thought it just stained your teeth.

P.S. Coffee for everyone else is altruistic and good
Posted by: iknowtheleft®©



Lefties know best.... and what does a tax increase that don't happen turn into small business putting dictators in charge and supporting murder?????

Only in a leftie mind void..

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 10:00 PM (1Ag/D)

104

I'm so sick of the avarice-driven politics of people like Walter. 

What others make is none of your business.  You want more cash, go out and get it.  Quit coveting other people's shit, you greedy bastard.

Posted by: rdbrewer at December 07, 2010 10:05 PM (rTYap)

105 I`m tired of poor people asking me for a job.

Posted by: rightlysouthern at December 07, 2010 10:06 PM (l0mhx)

106 I`m tired of poor people asking me for a job. I'm tired of these poor people trying to drink my coffee. Time to launch a coup.

Posted by: typical right winger at December 07, 2010 10:24 PM (SwkdU)

107 I'm tired of these poor people trying to drink my coffee. Time to launch a coup. Posted by: typical right winger


Ya a coup of coffee...

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 10:30 PM (A8x3Z)

108 What kind of illiterate, brain-washed numb skull thinks we were getting cheap oil out of Iran in 1953? I mean besides the kind of numb skull that doesn't read history. We weren't importing a whole lot of oil in 1953, but we were involved in a struggle against an evil empire called "The Soviet Union." Iran shared a long border with the USSR, but Walter probably reads maps almost as well as Obama.

Posted by: fluffy knows geography at December 07, 2010 10:42 PM (SwkdU)

109 123 What kind of illiterate, brain-washed numb skull thinks
Posted by: fluffy knows geography


They call it revisionist history fluffy..If they don't like it they revise it.

Posted by: beanervt at December 07, 2010 10:49 PM (6oimd)

110

twisted: supporting rich thieves;

George Soros

selfish: supporting murder in Iraq (2003), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), Iran (1953), Honduras, Panama (etc to secure cheap oil, bananas, coffee for Americans

No Cuba?  Oh, sorry, those are the "good" murderers.

immoral: supporting murder in Iraq (2003), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), Iran (1953), Honduras, etc to secure cheap oil, bananas, coffee for Americans

No Cuba?  Oh, sorry, those are the "good" murderers.


you guys love installing murdering dictators around the world who will betray their own people to do business with American corporations just to enrich themselves and their families and friends. 

BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!

Carter? 

Sick immoral bastards.

Your knowledge of history is pathetic, to say the least.

Posted by: wiserbud at December 07, 2010 10:54 PM (EW49d)

111 Democrats are going to be standing around in 2012, an election year with a bum economy, trying to run campaigns on raising taxes not just for the wealthy, but also for everyone else, and also on spending more on their collapsing Social Security regime.

And the MFM are going to suck it into overtime to get their gods re-elected. 

Yes?  O'Donnell?  Bielat?

Posted by: BeckoningChasm at December 07, 2010 10:55 PM (bvfVF)

112 Actually, we're kinda goood with murderous dictators.

Posted by: Starbucks Executives at December 07, 2010 10:56 PM (EW49d)

113

Murdering your political enemies?

What's wrong with that?

personal to Hugo Chavez:  Call me, lover.

Posted by: Sean Penn at December 07, 2010 10:58 PM (EW49d)

114 Fluffy, you idiot.  British Petroleum owned the largest refinery in the world in Iran 1953 which was nationalized by democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeq.  US CIA overthrew the Iranian government and took 40%  control of the oil.  You idiot. Read history.

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 10:58 PM (oA4y0)

115 Bielat? Barney Frank won't like losing his gavel. He's going to be quite the grumpy old banking queen by 2012.

Posted by: fluffy at December 07, 2010 11:01 PM (SwkdU)

116 You idiot. Read history. The CIA isn't British, Wally. How much oil was the US importing in 1953? Links are good. Provide one if you can. How long was the Iranian - USSR border? You know, the evil empire USSR. The one that murdered all those greedy, middle class peasants.

Posted by: fluffy at December 07, 2010 11:05 PM (SwkdU)

117 Walter, Walter, Walter.  You sorry, sad, simple sack of shit.  This twisted, selfish, immoral Republican drinks up your pussy-ass tears like fine wine.

Eat it. 

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 07, 2010 11:07 PM (OdjhZ)

118 129 Fluffy, you idiot.  British Petroleum owned the largest refinery in the world in Iran 1953 which was nationalized by democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadeq.  US CIA overthrew the Iranian government and took 40%  control of the oil.  You idiot. Read history.

Posted by: Walter at December 08, 2010 02:58 AM (oA4y0)

You mean the Prime Minister that overstepped his authority and proceeded to stage a coup against the constitutional monarch and rightful ruler of the country in the Shah?  In other words the CIA did not overthrow the Iranian government.  It helped to reinstall the rightful government..

Posted by: buzzion at December 07, 2010 11:09 PM (oVQFe)

119 Right wing murderous dictators USA has supported/installed over last few decades: Saddam Hussein, Saudi Royals, Kuwaiti royals, Egypt Mubarek, Pakistan Mubarek, we failed to install Chalabi in Iraq in 2003, every military dictator of South/Central America since 1950s, South African goons until world pressure forced us to switch, Shah of Iran, the dude who boils Muslims in Uzbekistan (so we can have an air base there), etc.

Left wing dictators like Mao, Kim, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc are horrible, but no Liberal supports those dudes.

Liberals support staying the fuck out of other countries business.  You guys want to control the world so you can import cheap commodities and do business and have strong corporate profits...at the expense of the powerless locals who get screwed.  this is immoral

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 11:13 PM (oA4y0)

120 This is sounding nuts, the extreme right wants to stop this tax deal as well as the Kos Kiddies... This is a win-win-win situations in every event outcome, obozo goes apeshiite on his normal rants, kos kiddies, msm going batShiite on obozo, pelosi & Reid in either going forward with tax deal or not then either destroy their demomoron base or obozo, not to mention spinoff outcomes for freshman house, 2012 elections, further confabs about taxes... In all this gaming, pass around more popcorn, the sun is going to come tomorrow...

Posted by: Laughingmyasoff at December 07, 2010 11:17 PM (6F1Bg)

121 Yeah that's right liberals support staying out of other countries business. 

Posted by: Bosnia and Kosovo at December 07, 2010 11:17 PM (oVQFe)

122 Left wing dictators like Mao, Kim, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc are horrible, but no Liberal supports those dudes.

Merry Christmas, Walter!

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 07, 2010 11:17 PM (OdjhZ)

123 iknowtheleft, you fucking idiot.  Mousadeq was offering to PURCHASE the refinery ..Nationalization does not mean take it over for nothing...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh  (if you trust wikipedia..but im sure you will accuse them of being liberals)

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 11:17 PM (oA4y0)

124 Buzzion, your stupidity achieves the highest levels......Moussadeq was the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. Period. This is not controversial. 

Posted by: Walter at December 07, 2010 11:20 PM (oA4y0)

125 we failed to install Chalabi in Iraq in 2003 Perhaps we simply let the Iraqis decide that one. We have the troops there, we could put anyone in office we want. Stick a purple finger in you eye. Left wing dictators like Mao, Kim, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc are horrible, but no Liberal supports those dudes. You don't get out much, do you? Pol Pot, there's a sticking point. The putative 'peace' movement in the US was opposed to war in SE Asia, until the US left. One of the worst mass murders of the 20th century goes on a rampage and the left yawns. You guys want to control the world so you can import cheap commodities and do business and have strong corporate profits...at the expense of the powerless locals who get screwed. this is immoral You have no idea what 'us guys' want. Stop projecting. Try listening.

Posted by: fluffy at December 07, 2010 11:24 PM (SwkdU)

126 143 Buzzion, your stupidity achieves the highest levels......Moussadeq was the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. Period. This is not controversial. 

Posted by: Walter at December 08, 2010 03:20 AM (oA4y0)

Yeah and Hitler was democratically elected too. So was that guy down in Honduras.  Niether of those statements are controversial either.  Niether is pointing out how all three attempted to overstep their authority.

Posted by: buzzion at December 07, 2010 11:30 PM (oVQFe)

127 Shut the fuck up, Walter.  You're out of your element.

Posted by: Donny Kerabatsos at December 07, 2010 11:32 PM (OdjhZ)

128 first!

Posted by: every asshole here at December 07, 2010 11:53 PM (GkMfH)

129 personal to Hugo Chavez: Call me, lover. Posted by: Sean Penn at December 08, 2010 02:58 AM A tyrant has to be concerned about appearances. Nutcases like you are bad for my image. Try Cuba.

Posted by: Hugo Chavez at December 07, 2010 11:57 PM (SwkdU)

130 Ace o' spades assholes gifted by China: 

China to hand out its own peace prize

Posted by: say cheese at December 08, 2010 12:07 AM (GkMfH)

131 China to hand out its own peace prize Can I get me a nomination here?

Posted by: Dalai Lama at December 08, 2010 12:13 AM (SwkdU)

132 Can I get me a nomination here? Posted by: Dalai Lama

Can't you take a damn hint?

Posted by: People's Republic o' Chinoseria at December 08, 2010 12:23 AM (GkMfH)

133 Fun fact: The Dalai Lama used to be on our payroll. We were giving him around $125K annually, but stopped. When he lost our funding is when he started the world wide PR campaign. Tell all your lefty friends and watch their heads explode!

Posted by: Central Intelligence Agency at December 08, 2010 12:30 AM (SwkdU)

134 at the expense of the powerless locals who get screwed. this is immoral


So I take it walter must be the front man for the localvore establishment..
.

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 12:50 AM (2j+Hf)

135 The truly rich (Soros, Kennedy, Buffet, etc.) hire lawyers and accountants to shelter their funds so they don't really pay taxes at the rates the rest of us do, but interestingly enough, they never seem to belly up to the bar and just, you know, pay more than their "required" rate, even though it would be good for the country.

No, once you get up into the "truly rich" category your income is no longer "earned income". This is where the laws were originally written to shit on the common man, contrary to the rhetoric shit out by the progressives who pushed the GD income tax on us.  Not only that, but there is no SS withholding on unearned income.

So where do they get their income? Mostly from capital gains which is taxed at a much lower rate. They also get income from dividends and interest but someone with half a brain would see that given out stupid punishing tax laws you would be better off getting your income by "buying and selling" rather than "keeping and investing". This is where our tax laws have become totally screwed.  And no the so-call "fair tax" will not fix that either.

The only way to fix this BS unfair system is to go to a simple flat tax on all income from all sources and regardless of the amount and with zero deductions. If your kid delivers newspapers and makes a couple of hundred dollars of income during the year then he pays a flat percentage of that income in taxes. That sounds tough but kids need to learn at an early age that the government maw will suck everything into it that they allow.

I am still waiting to see what the real "deal" with this tax deal is. The upcoming tax increase was going to impact me hard because about 1/4 of my current income is from "qualified dividends" at a lower rate. That would have been lost with the expiration and resulting tax increase.

And the way the media is talking now, it looks like this is really anything but a done deal. I am ambivalent about that because I do think when the new congress comes to town a better deal for Republicans can be made and it can be made retroactive.

I think Obama knows this too which is the only reason he was willing to sign off on this deal.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 12:54 AM (e4sSD)

136 Morning beanervt

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 12:55 AM (e4sSD)

137 We are having a heat wave here this morning compared to yesterday. Its 13.7°F right now.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 12:56 AM (e4sSD)

138 Morning Vic, and I agree with the flat tax. It's the only fair across the board tax so it will never happen...

How's the weather down there?

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 12:57 AM (2j+Hf)

139 Its 13.7°F right now.


You beat us at 18, but do you have 10 inchs of snow?

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 12:59 AM (2j+Hf)

140 Here is the "key" statement by the AP, dutifully published by Fox puts it:

The question was whether enough Democrats would join them in support, especially in the House, where liberal resentment of the president's concessions on tax breaks for the wealthiest runs strong.

Yes, lets repeat that mantra "Bush tax cuts for the rich".

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 12:59 AM (e4sSD)

141 You beat us at 18, but do you have 10 inchs of snow?

No snow yet but the Farmer's Almanac is predicting a lot of snow here this winter again. They predicted it last year but we only got one light dusting. It seemed to pass us by every time. The year before we got a lot of snow. 

Now that I don't have to go to work I can take the snow or leave it. When it snowed heavy here I used to be the one responsible for picking up the people who couldn't get in because I had a pickup truck that was high off the road.

In the early morning before the road graders packed the snow into glare ice if the level was above your car bumper you would not get anywhere.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:03 AM (e4sSD)

142 21F in Presque Isle, Maine

Posted by: fluffy at December 08, 2010 01:04 AM (SwkdU)

143 LOL, damn something ain't right when ME and VT are warmer than SC.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:08 AM (e4sSD)

144 No snow yet but the Farmer's Almanac is predicting a lot of snow here


The almanac hasn't been to "on it" with the forecast here either. Still it's good crapper reading material.

Some areas are reporting 22" of the white stuff more near the mountains. I don't mind driving it's the idiots that can't drive in it that you have to watch out for and there's a heck of a lot more of them in the last decade.

Glad to hear you can sit it out now, it's a perk of retirement that's well deserved..

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 01:15 AM (FbZ3x)

145 167 LOL, damn something ain't right when ME and VT are warmer than SC.
Posted by: Vic


Gorbull warming...hehee

Thursday night we're suppose to go down to 7 burrrr. You near the ocean or way inland?

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 01:17 AM (FbZ3x)

146

Here’s the next deal the radical commie SOBs are wanting since they lost their super-majority. And of course, they are blaming it on the Republican “Tax Cut for the Rich” logjam.

Tax Debate Fuels Democratic Effort to Eliminate Filibuster in New Session

Democratic lawmakers are ratcheting up a campaign to kill the filibuster after Republicans threatened last week to block any legislation until issues on tax cuts and the federal budget were resolved.

Senate Democrats, mostly junior members, are vowing next session to a majority vote that would eradicate the three-fifths vote requirement for legislation to move through the upper chamber.


I don’t think it is as simple as that but they stand zero chance of passing this. The filibuster thing is more than a “Senate Rule” as I understand it.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:19 AM (e4sSD)

147 Thursday night we're suppose to go down to 7 burrrr. You near the ocean or way inland?

I am pretty far inland which complicates things. It gets a lot colder here in the Winter and a lot warmer in the Summer than the nearest NOAA station which is located to the East. In fact, it is far enough East (Florence, SC) that it is impacted by the ameliorating effects of the ocean

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:22 AM (e4sSD)

148 BTW, the old Farmer's Almanac has actually been pretty damn accurate here in general. Much more so than the NOAA and weather services.

The problem here is that we lie in a transition region. We sit on the line that separates the "beach weather" from the "mountain weather". That line shifts back and forth as the wind patterns shift so predicting accurate weather for here is damn tough.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:25 AM (e4sSD)

149 And for you guys getting that warm weather, I have a feeling that this cold front is going to be moving in on you in a few days and my 13's are going to be your 8's and 9's.

And it just dropped some more so maybe we will beat yesterday. Yesterday's low was 13.0, it is now 13.3.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:28 AM (e4sSD)

150
The problem here is that we lie in a transition region

So you get the worst of it all.. I'm kind of the same, have the lake (champlain) which keeps it a little warmer until frozen on my east and the ridges where elevation starts to climb to my backdoor the west. It's like a pocket that can have higher snow or cold then 12 miles away in Burlington.

Posted by: beanervt at December 08, 2010 01:32 AM (FbZ3x)

151

Another commie election steal in MN


Source: Emmer to Concede in Minn. Gov. Race

Emmer trailed Dayton by nearly 9,000 votes heading into a recount that has changed little. A Democratic official close to Dayton said the senator hadn't received a call from Emmer. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to comment publicly on the matter.

In the Supreme Court's decision, justices said local officials were within their power to use more than one method for pairing the number of votes and voters. In some places, officials count slips of paper known as voter receipts rather than count signatures in polling place rosters. The goal is to make sure vote tallies in precincts match the number of voters.


Local officials can count all kinds of different ways to make sure a Democrat wins. I just can not believe that the courts openly rule crap like this. Perhaps they believe the people in MN are not paying any attention to this kind of shit.


Hey you assholes on the MN Supreme Court reading AOS. This is how revolutions in the banana republics got started. The influential citizens saw that the rule of law had become subverted and decided to eliminate the “subverters”.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:37 AM (e4sSD)

152 Keep on stomping your widdle foot, Bam-Bam...

Nobody cares or listens to you, anymore...

Posted by: backhoe at December 08, 2010 01:37 AM (0bk6W)

153 And for you guys getting that warm weather, I have a feeling that this cold front is going to be moving in on you in a few days and my 13's are going to be your 8's and 9's. Forecast for Saturday is high of 45. I don't see anything much lower than 20 for the next week. Ain't climate change grand?

Posted by: fluffy at December 08, 2010 01:37 AM (SwkdU)

154 So you get the worst of it all..

I wouldn't say that. Sometimes we avoid the bad shit too.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:38 AM (e4sSD)

155 Forecast for Saturday is high of 45.

We are supposed to be warming up by then; 58/38. LOL, we'll see. The normals here for this time of year are 59/39, not the 37/13 that we got yesterday.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:41 AM (e4sSD)

156 Or to be more accurate, 13/37 yesterday.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 01:44 AM (e4sSD)

157

From the Hill, this will piss you off

FCC push to regulate news draws fire

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) pushed back on Monday against a contention by a Democratic FCC commissioner that the government should create new regulations to promote diversity in news programming.

Barton was reacting to a proposal made last week by FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, who in a speech suggested that broadcasters be subject to a new "public values test" every four years.

The SOB wants the FCC to “regulate news content”. Now I am not happy with ANY of the network news programs, including Fox, but this is not the damn answer. The damn Democrat/commies already have every news agency in their back pocket so why in the hell is this Democrat asking for more government control of the news?

LetÂ’s not forget why the FCC was established to begin with. It was used to shutdown a radical who dissented with FDR.

This is another agency screaming to be zeroed out in 2011. Transfer frequency allotment to the Dept of interior, revoke all other regulations, and fire everybody.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 02:12 AM (e4sSD)

158 BTW, for those who want to know more about the FCC, why it was really created, and how it was initially used; Bing up Father Charles Coughlin.

True he was an initial supporter of FDR and his new deal (go figure) but he became disillusioned when FDR didn't move fast enough in converting the USA to communism.

FDR shut him down by creating the FCC and the "fairness doctrine". If you think the Supreme Court will protect us, think again.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 02:26 AM (e4sSD)

159 Damn Dick Morris is on Fox now with some really stupid shit:

Obama totally surrendered, no compromise.

This is the start of a 2012 primary fight.

Hillary will challenge him.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 02:28 AM (e4sSD)

160 How about this from Drudge; there are now 221 approved applications for exemption from Obamacare.

http://tinyurl.com/39pubvx

This is in addition to the built in exemption for unions.

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 02:33 AM (e4sSD)

161 Michelle Malkin broke the story about 222 waivers yesterday.

Her current lead story is about The Dream Act, which is to be voted upon today.

Some of the crimes an illegal could have committed and still get a pass under The Dream Act:

Examples of misdemeanors in California:

(1) Assault, CPC § 240

(2) Battery, CPC § 242

(3) Domestic Violence, CPC § 273.5

(4) Criminal Threats/Harassment, CPC § 244

(5) Reckless driving, CVC § 23103

(6) Possession of Firearms, CPC § 12020

(7) Indecent Exposure, CPC § 314

( Solicitation of Prostitution, CPC § 647

(9) Vandalism, CPC § 594

(10)Trespass, CPC § 602

Texas Penal Code

Examples of misdemeanors in Texas:

(1) Public Lewdness, Texas Penal Code § 21.07

(2) Indecent Exposure, Texas Penal Code § 21.08

(3) Terroristic Threats, Texas Penal Code § 22.07

(4) Burglary of Vehicles, Texas Penal Code § 30.04.

(5) Deadly Conduct, Texas Penal Code § 22.05

(6) Assault, Texas Penal Code § 22.01

(7) Soliciting Membership in a Criminal Street Gang, Texas Penal Code, § 71.022

( Soliciting Prostitution, Texas Penal Code § 43.02

(9) Unlawful Carrying of Weapons, Texas Penal Code § 46.02.

(10)Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity, Texas Penal Code § 71.02

New York Penal Law

Examples of misdemeanors in New York:

(1) Assault, New York Penal Law § 120.00

(2) Stalking, New York Penal Law § 120.45

(3) Forcible touching, New York Penal Law § 130.52

(4) Sexual abuse in the second degree, New York Penal Law § 130.60

(5) Unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, New York Penal Law § 135.05

(6) Endangering the welfare of a child, New York Penal Law § 260.10

(7) Insurance fraud in the fifth degree, New York Penal Law § 176.10

( Health care fraud in the fifth degree, New York Penal Law § 177.05

(9) Welfare fraud in the fifth degree, New York Penal Law § 158.05

(10)Criminal possession of methamphetamine manufacturing material in the second degree, New York Penal Law § 220.70


Posted by: Ed Anger at December 08, 2010 02:48 AM (7+pP9)

162 Is their video online of this press conference? I'd like to see his poor performance for my self/

Posted by: Mark at December 08, 2010 03:34 AM (nCmeo)

163 Left wing dictators like Mao, Kim, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc are horrible, but no Liberal supports those dudes.

Posted by: Walter at December 08, 2010 03:13 AM (oA4y0)

You lying sack of shit.  Who was reading Mao's little red book of quotations?  Hint, you probably huffed a few of their choads.  Speaking of cocksuckers, Billy Ayers and his ilk set things up nicely for Pol Pot to conduct genocide undisturbed by any of his fellow bombthrowers and jizz receptacles.  Commie libs were big Stalin supporters, you fucking idiot, who were first in favor of staying out of WW2 when the murdering Georgian gimp had a pact with Hitler and then wanted FDR to come to the aid of his fellow commie cripple when Adolph beat him to the punch on violating the deal.  And for your further education, Nazis were national socialists so you can fucking A well own those shitheads too.

I can't tell if you're too young to know what the fuck you're talking about or some senile prick from the sixties that did more acid than the entire Grateful Dead; either way you've got shit for brains and are an object of ridicule.

Posted by: Captain Hate at December 08, 2010 03:52 AM (ccPlf)

164 I don't know who the hell Jonathan Turley is, but he is kind of rocking C-SPAN II right now!
Posted by: Deety at December 08, 2010 01:51 AM

Deety, it's 5:00 a.m., are you up? Because I've got your answer: Turley is a lefty lawyer who's so far to the left that he hates Obama for being a pussy sellout. I know this from lurking MSNBC for laughs.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 08, 2010 04:04 AM (BJzi5)

165 LetÂ’s not forget why the FCC was established to begin with. It was used to shutdown a radical who dissented with FDR.

Honestly, this the first I have ever heard of this.  Do tell!

I guess I could just go and look it up on Wikipedia but since I'm not turning in a PhD dissertation, I'd rather go with a more trustworthy source like Vic!

I don't doubt it and it very much fits in with the picture of "the way the world works" that I've manage to construct so far but I've truly never even heard this before.

Posted by: Deety erasing gaps in her Knowledge at December 08, 2010 04:19 AM (Jb3+B)

166 13 degrees in St. Louis.

Fuck you, Al Gore.

Posted by: nickless© at December 08, 2010 04:23 AM (MMC8r)

167 I first saw Jonathan Turley on tv when Slick was in trouble for spooging Monica.  He seemed to be a reasonable guy at the time (iirc he liked to wear bow ties but didn't look as big an assbag as Will did) but I think the commies turned on him and he started getting excluded from all the *best* parties in DC because he seems to have lost his fucking mind and gone all in with the left.  Too bad....

Posted by: Captain Hate at December 08, 2010 04:23 AM (ccPlf)

168 I've always suspected that he begged for sex.  I never expected to see a demonstration of his technique...

Posted by: Alex at December 08, 2010 04:25 AM (yY28H)

169 Left wing dictators like Mao, Kim, Stalin, Pol Pot, etc are horrible, but no Liberal supports those dudes.

Posted by: Walter at December 08, 2010 03:13 AM (oA4y0)

That is some powerful self-delusion.

Fuck you, Walter, and change your name-- I don't like a clueless prick like you defiling the name of my sainted grandfather.

Posted by: nickless© at December 08, 2010 04:30 AM (MMC8r)

170 Deety, it's 5:00 a.m., are you up? Because I've got your answer: Turley is a lefty lawyer who's so far to the left that he hates Obama for being a pussy sellout. I know this from lurking MSNBC for laughs.

Yeah, he was making some speech in defense of some corrupt-ass judge from Louisiana, from what I can gather but he was doing it very well!

I'll admit it, sometimes I just like hearing corrupt rhetoric when it's done skillfully.

Content wise, it was complete horseshit but it was still one hell of a performance!


Posted by: Deety appreciates a fine Demagogue at December 08, 2010 04:31 AM (Jb3+B)

171 Deety, did you get the low down on the FCC?

Posted by: Vic at December 08, 2010 04:35 AM (e4sSD)

172 27 ... Nigeria's anti-corruption police ...

Now there are three words that I'd never thought I'd see strung together in one sentence! I guess the "I'll reward you handsomely if only you'd help me liberate a vast treasure locked away in an evil bank" email fraud no longer pays big bucks.

Posted by: ya2daup at December 08, 2010 04:36 AM (yRrAd)

173 GnuBreed, I talked to Michelle and she is making a correction to her column.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 08, 2010 05:02 AM (B2LxR)

174

Hey gabe, I thought the payroll tax reduction was a one year reduction, while the income tax rates extension was for two years, no?

And about the amount of the payroll tax reduction:  was the tax reduced by 2% (which is about $130/yr, max), or was the tax rate reduced by 2% of income (which is about $2000/yr, max).  I hope it is the latter, but all of the press reporting that I have seen, and the WH announcement online, says it is 2% of tax.  Has this deal been put to paper in an actual Bill or Resolution we can read?

Posted by: Mike F'n Castle! Delaware's most beloved politician at December 08, 2010 05:28 AM (K/USr)

175 It is cold up here in NH, with drop to 7 F by Friday.. Obama continues to put in one unusual performance after another..the haircut is getting a little strange as well. I think this man is coming undone. We are testing out our new plan for the CIA, folks at WalMart are being encouraged to spy on their fellow Americans... makes you wonder. Attention all WalMart shoppers, a middle eastern male in aisle 2!!!

Posted by: ford the IINO. Independent in name only at December 08, 2010 06:36 AM (Ki7fm)

176 Because it will be impossible to argue that Social Security isn't broke while all it's helium has leaked out and it's a slightly damp sack on the carpet.

TEABAGGER!

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at December 08, 2010 06:54 AM (mHQ7T)

177 "190 LetÂ’s not forget why the FCC was established to begin with. It was used to shutdown a radical who dissented with FDR." Um, the FCC was established to eliminatecommercial radio transmitters from stepping on each other on the same frequencies. Everything after that was mission creep by creeps with missions.

Posted by: richard mcenroe at December 08, 2010 07:46 AM (0GCID)

178 Everybody's missing the most important point here:

Bubble balloons.

Not crinkly aluminized mylar, not leaky latex, but a relatively soft, stretchy plastic like a beach ball. They're often clear.

My niece got me one over a week ago for my frrrth birthday, and it's still taut, even with a single pin-prick patched with scotch tape.

What you don't see in  this video is how Obama thinks about the fight that he just lost: He believes he gave in to Republican "hostage takers", with the American people as the hostages he's trying to save.

Unbelievably offensive: Republicans are hostage takers, and Obama gives in to hostage takers. I don't know which is worse.

Finally, as to taxes: How about this, O? For every percent increase in any bracket, you take an across-the-board whack at spending. I'm  sick of the assumption that spending can only ratchet up, and it's either raise taxes or go into debt.

Posted by: DJMoore at December 08, 2010 09:42 AM (auErC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
186kb generated in CPU 0.0704, elapsed 0.4097 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3637 seconds, 306 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.