December 17, 2010

Obama Ratifies Bush Tax Cuts As Liberal Policy
— Ace

He signed on the line that is dotted.

President Obama signed into law the most significant tax bill in nearly a decade Friday, a day after overcoming liberal resistance in Congress to continue for two more years tax breaks enacted under president George W. Bush and to provide a fresh federal boost for the tepid economic recovery.

The downsides: There is still pork in the deal that must be cut out as well as funds to implement ObamaCare. (It's possible that won't be an issue at some point this year.) And now that the tax deal is done and the Omnibus spending bill is defeated, to be replaced by a one-page continuing resolution for a month, that frees up the Senators, including our very own Brown, McCain, Collins, and Snowe, to start working their mischief on other matters.

Like the Dream Act -- a vote which may come tomorrow, and may pass.

DREAM is in fact amnesty, and, as Kaus argues, a deliberately complex amnesty which will create, by design, all sorts of corner-cases and hard cases that will push people towards a simpler solution (i.e., full and total amnesty).

Posted by: Ace at 12:55 PM | Comments (168)
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.

1

So they can't defund obibblecare next year?

Posted by: Flapjackmaka at December 17, 2010 12:59 PM (c5RQr)

2 So, the tax cuts are now a good idea Dems? Just can't keep up with you fucking idiots. What's next, Reagan was actually a good President?

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 12:59 PM (Jx0x6)

3 President Obama signed into law the most significant tax bill since bush signed it nearly a decade ago Friday


FIFT

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 17, 2010 01:00 PM (tf9Ne)

4 Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 17, 2010 05:00 PM (tf9Ne)

And the media cock-swabbers will praise him for one of the greatest tax-cuts in U.S. history. Spit.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:02 PM (Jx0x6)

5

Yeah, I'm chokin here.

I'm agreeing with those that said the Repubs' should of held ground and pushed for more cuts.

Damn Libs heads exploding. 

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (CyPWX)

6 Keep swallowing, Hussien.  Take big bites, and wash it down with leftie tears

I love the smell of victory in the morning........................

Posted by: SantaRosaStan at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (UqKQV)

7 I thought the funding for Obamacare was in the omnibus, not the tax bill. Was I wrong to think this?

Posted by: waiting at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (dX5s2)

8 Posted by: waiting at December 17, 2010 05:03 PM (dX5s2)

Yes, I believe it was in the omnibus.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:04 PM (Jx0x6)

9 Who even knows, they hide everything in everything else these days...

Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (GBXon)

10

I heard Hensarling say that the dream act would not make it through the Senate.  That was about a couple of weeks ago though.

Do they have the votes or not?  I think Reid is gonna bring it to a vote no matter what so he can say he at least tried.  Does anyone have a vote count?

Posted by: Roadking at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (3XzWF)

11 Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 05:04 PM (Jx0x6)

It's possible some got snuck into this as well.  If I were a Democrat who'd sacrificed his career for O'Care, I'd want to hedge my bets to ensure at least part of it actually took effect...

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (8y9MW)

12 And the media cock-swabbers will praise him for one of the greatest tax-cuts in U.S. history.

And as been explained her ad nausem, it isn't even a "tax cut"; They just extended the Bush tax rates out for a paltry 2 more years.  This isn't even going to be stimulative, it'll just prevent the pain of abruptly jumping back to the Clinton-era tax rates. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 01:06 PM (TiLRQ)

13 Brown says NFW! to the DREAM Act.

Not sure about the Maine Sisters.

Posted by: Andy at December 17, 2010 01:06 PM (5Rurq)

14 I see our dear leaders, to include Palin, are being real vocal about defeating the DREAM.

Posted by: Barbarian at December 17, 2010 01:06 PM (EL+OC)

15 I do hope they remember that they are attempting to pass something with the Dream Act that is as despised as Obamacare and what THAT cost them.

Posted by: Gmac at December 17, 2010 01:07 PM (k2Fyd)

16 Come on, GOP retards - you kept the wheels of the omnibus from rolling over you, do the same for amnesty!

Posted by: Vashta Nerada at December 17, 2010 01:08 PM (hiFDo)

17 I do hope they remember that they are attempting to pass something with the Dream Act that is as despised as Obamacare and what THAT cost them

The entire purpose of DREAM is to make sure votes like Obamacare never cost them again.  It's a Hugo Chavez "decree" maneuver without the bulbous pock-marked face.

Posted by: VJay at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (gQ+XA)

18 And as been explained her ad nausem, it isn't even a "tax cut"; They just extended the Bush tax rates out for a paltry 2 more years.  This isn't even going to be stimulative, it'll just prevent the pain of abruptly jumping back to the Clinton-era tax rates. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 05:06 PM (TiLRQ)


I know this, it is the current tax rates. But some in the media and Washington still cannot let go of the tax cut meme or the Dems fucked-up accounting methods which state that around 900 billion will be lost due to rates staying the same. They're the ones saying it.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (Jx0x6)

19 >> He signed on the line that is dotted.

You know what it takes to sell tax cuts?

It takes brass balls to sell tax cuts.

Posted by: dan-O at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (bRLuD)

20 Reid and Obama ride the short omnibus.

Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:13 PM (L4Q+b)

21 Here's where Dr. K is wrong on this (referring somewhat to the other thread).  Let's suppose for the sake of argument that the revenues would have gone up in 2011 had the tax rates risen as libos wanted. 

Any doubt...ANY DOUBT...that sometime next year a  new skittles & rainbows spending need would have been found to be urgently important, sucking up said new revenue and putting us right back in the same spot deficit-wise, but with higher taxes to boot?

If you're always late for your 8:15 meeting and the boss moves the time back to 8:30 to accommodate you...eventually you'll be late for that one as well.  It's not the start time that's the issue...it's you. 

The R's stance needs to be, until we've reduced spending significantly for at least 10 years to let those reductions and the results be clearly felt, absolutely no new revenue from tax increases. 


 




Posted by: The Hammer at December 17, 2010 01:14 PM (32ubA)

22

There's a reason they're calling it the DREAM Act.

You have to be asleep for it to pass.

Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:16 PM (2dOeM)

23 Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 05:16 PM (2dOeM)

Heh.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:17 PM (Jx0x6)

24 Always be closing.

Posted by: Dr. Varno at December 17, 2010 01:17 PM (QMtmy)

25

The funniest part is that 98.2% of NYC's useful idiots will believe Obama actually 'cut taxes' upon signing this bill to extend the Bush Tax Cuts.

 

The Joker is fucking Manhattan.

Hilarious!

 

Posted by: Susan at December 17, 2010 01:20 PM (uiBg/)

26 I'm from downtown, from Mitch and Murray.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 17, 2010 01:20 PM (o3bYL)

27 Here's a compromise on the Dream Act:

Let the part that grants citizenship for military service stand.  Military service is valuable to our country and dangerous.  The reward is equal to the costs.

Kill the part that grants it for going to college.  College has become a four-year party.  It benefits the student more than the country (although I will admit that college grads will pay higher taxes over time).  It seems like rewarding slackerhood.

(But guess what?  There are already laws on the books smoothing the way to citizenship for veterans.  Shhhh!  Don't tell anyone.)

Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 01:21 PM (mAm+G)

28 It must suck to be a legal immigrant, after paying all the money and jumping through all the hoops to become a legal citizen, to see that all the law breakers are going to get it handed to them on a silver platter.

Posted by: vaeriax at December 17, 2010 01:21 PM (wMOg6)

29

Anyone in Congress supporting DREAM should be placed on a Public List and told EXACTLY how the rest of AMERICA Feels about this issue. IMHO.

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 01:22 PM (CyPWX)

30 I don't think there's been nearly enough fear-mongering about the DREAM Act. Srsly, can we monger a little more fear, please?

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 01:23 PM (ztMRF)

31

28 Leo,

Apparently there's already laws on the books in regards to those serving in the military. It might be closer to five years than two, but after serving that long and being honorably discharged, the immigrants are made citizens.

Someone with more nuts and bolts knowledge can feel free to back me up on this or (prove me wrong).

Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:25 PM (2dOeM)

32 Sure.  Grandma won't get her hip replacement because Pedro needs his Gender Reassignment.

Posted by: SurferDoc at December 17, 2010 01:26 PM (o3bYL)

33 Srsly, can we monger a little more fear, please?

I'm scared. I just put on a Backstreet Boys song. What is happening to me?

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:26 PM (Jx0x6)

34 Just read a commentor at WSJ who said that UC was extended to 3 years because of the tax deal. This is one reason I didn't go into teaching. Because a some point, I would just give up and start pounding little Johnny's goddam head into the goddam wall. There is none so ignorant as he who just won't learn.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:27 PM (cX9pO)

35

Anyone in Congress supporting DREAM should be placed on a Public List, indicted and tried for treason told EXACTLY how the rest of AMERICA Feels about this issue. IMHO.

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 05:22 PM

Fixed.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:27 PM (Ulu3i)

36 It must suck to be a legal immigrant, after paying all the money and jumping through all the hoops to become a legal citizen, to see that all the law breakers are going to get it handed to them on a silver platter.

Not if you know how to play the game.

Posted by: B. Hussein Soetero at December 17, 2010 01:28 PM (ztMRF)

37 From what I understand, you don't have to actually graduate college, you just have to actually attend. One semester of spanish language and you are good.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 17, 2010 01:28 PM (xQAv5)

38 #34  I'm scared. I just put on a Backstreet Boys song. What is happening to me?

Have you been eating Kettle chips and drinking Juicy-Juices recently?  Do you feel the need to exfoliate and put on a dress? 

The answer is obvious.

Posted by: Alex Jones at December 17, 2010 01:30 PM (c0A3e)

39 38 From what I understand, you don't have to actually graduate college, you just have to actually attend. One semester of spanish language and you are good.

Watch for an explosion of online "colleges" geared towards getting illegals to meet this small requirement. 

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 01:32 PM (c0A3e)

40 Entire new cottage industries will be created and thrive on ways to fuck the country. Just by passing the DREAM Act.

Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:32 PM (L4Q+b)

41 Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 17, 2010 05:28 PM

If Janet "Nappy" Napolitano thinks you've attended, or wanted to attend, or drove past a college once, all she has to do is give you the official Free Pass.

The Act gives all power to the DHS honcho to decide who gets in and who doesn't..

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:34 PM (Ulu3i)

42 Let the part that grants citizenship for military service stand.  Military service is valuable to our country and dangerous.  The reward is equal to the costs.

You'll excuse me for remaining skeptical.

Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 17, 2010 01:34 PM (GBXon)

43 All an illegal will have to do is saunter into a Democrat's campaign office and ask to be  mentioned in a bleeding heart speech.

Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:35 PM (L4Q+b)

44 The answer is obvious.

Posted by: Alex Jones at December 17, 2010 05:30 PM (c0A3e)


Shit! Better call the local LGBT chapter (with a heavy emphasis on the T.)

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:37 PM (Jx0x6)

45 Let the part that grants citizenship for military service stand.  Military service is valuable to our country and dangerous.  The reward is equal to the costs.

No.  If you want to immigrate permanently to the United States, do so legally.  Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:37 PM (8y9MW)

46 Yes, there is a way for non-citizens to gain citizenship by spending time in the military. I believe it is six years, though you must be legal. I would extend that to children brought here illegaly who are proficient enough in English to not put themselves or others in danger in combat situations. Possibly a chance of English courses as part of the first years or so of service. If they were brought here as young children, they are probably able enough for service. This would apply to the individual, only.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (cX9pO)

47 Yeah, that whole "army of immigrants with no loyalty (and maybe a great deal of hatred) for the country" didn't work out very well for the Romans.

Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (L4Q+b)

48 No wonder they didn't want to secure the border-gotta get as many new Dems in the country as possible.

Posted by: vaeriax at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (wMOg6)

49

Watch for a new lobby against this.

The union of identity theft operators.

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 01:39 PM (QLiYt)

50 No.  If you want to immigrate permanently to the United States, do so legally.  Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 05:37 PM (8y9MW)


Because that would be racist you hairy-knuckled, banjo-playing guns and bible-clinging xenophobe!

Posted by: La Raza (translates to "the race") cognitive dissonance off. at December 17, 2010 01:40 PM (Jx0x6)

51 Fuck the DREAM Act.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:40 PM (GhAkx)

52 Any Republican who votes for the DREAM Act must be fired.

Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:41 PM (L4Q+b)

53

Ace has heard from me ad nauseum on the Dream Act.  But this is not idle chatter and a joke, this thing could still pass and be signed into law.

Folks, Reid filed for a cloture vote yesterday, Thursday and it's going for a full cloture i.e. debate cut off vote tomorrow, Saturday.  They still require a 2/5 majority to invoke cloture.

You better believe Reid has something up his sleeve here.  With earmarks being stripped out of the upcoming budget per the GOP's pledge, Reid and company see The Dream Act as a legsilative pay back and will be going for broke to get this passed.

Pressure must be mounted.

I have been working with some on the hill but more work is needed to defeat this. 

Call, and be vocal folks The Dream Act is anything but that and we are dealing with a progressive machine that is loaded for bear subsequent to the tax extension and omnibus retraction.

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:43 PM (LwLqV)

54

Any Republican who votes for the DREAM Act must be fired from a canon.

Am I right or am I right?

Posted by: Roadking at December 17, 2010 01:44 PM (3XzWF)

55

Correction - Senate requires 3/5ths vote i.e. 60 votes to achieve cloture and bring The Dream Act for an up or down vote.

Get crackin as Ace and Ed have said.

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:44 PM (LwLqV)

56

from a canon

Fired from a religous law?

Well, ok, if you say so. :-)

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:46 PM (cX9pO)

57 Think about the military provision for a minute.  If you require illegal kids to enlist for at least 6 year stints, can you imagine the political composition when they come out after being around a bunch of rabid military conservative soldiers.  Might actually be a blessing in disguise.

Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 17, 2010 01:47 PM (jbCcb)

58 From what I understand, you don't have to actually graduate college, you just have to actually attend. One semester of spanish language and you are good. Yes; and on line schools count. The biggest loophole is that even if they never attend, they're still safe for 10 years just by claiming they attend. In reality, if this passes and someone says they can't afford college, are we going to deport them? Or just pay for them to attend (and take another slot from a kid who is a citizen)?

Posted by: lasue at December 17, 2010 01:49 PM (S25IC)

59

Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?

What, you don;t believe in American Exceptionalism? You unpatriotic racist.

Posted by: Another Stupid Typical Fucking Moonbat at December 17, 2010 01:49 PM (YmPwQ)

60

No good can come from this de facto Amnesty Legislation.

The Civil Society can't exist if we pass laws to exempt people from laws that they refuse to follow.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:50 PM (GhAkx)

61

58

Not a guarantee.

Daily Kos' main dude is technically a vet.

Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:50 PM (2dOeM)

62

Cannon damn it.  No really canonize them.

Thanks Bigred.

 

Posted by: Roadking at December 17, 2010 01:52 PM (3XzWF)

63

If you knew all that was in the Dream Act some of you would need a defibrilator.

 

 

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:52 PM (LwLqV)

64 The other social services that will be needed in conjunction with this act...wonder what the ancillary costs will be to maintain those "students" and whichever family members they bring with them?

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 01:53 PM (QLiYt)

65 this will be henceforth known as the nightmare act

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 17, 2010 01:53 PM (eOXTH)

66

If you knew all that was in the Dream Act some of you would need a defibrilator.

With this Congress, one can only imagine.   Might as well jusr adopt the La Raza Action Statement and get it ver with.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:54 PM (GhAkx)

67 The Civil Society can't exist if we pass laws to exempt people from laws that they refuse to follow. Excellent nutshell

Posted by: fluffy at December 17, 2010 01:54 PM (4Kl5M)

68 Wait until these DREAM recipients apply for federal student loans, then not attend, then not pay them back.  I still believe these libs are intentionally trying to destroy this country, because they hate it.

Getting very close to John Galt time.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 17, 2010 01:55 PM (xQAv5)

69

36

I Agree, Thanks!

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 01:56 PM (CyPWX)

70

With the military option, it would be hard to find a loophole. Six years is six years.

You would probably get a more conservative group taking that option. Hispanics tend to be a conservative group to begin with. What you see are the activist fringe, like you do in most groups.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:56 PM (cX9pO)

71

GOP congressional leaders should have had a press conference on The Dream Act in order to build upon the momentum of the omnibus defeat and place border security as the primary non-starter to the bill.  

 

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:56 PM (LwLqV)

72 With this Congress, one can only imagine. Might as well jusr adopt the La Raza Action Statement and get it ver with. Note to Michael Steele: Want more support for re-election as party chair? Start referring to "La Raza" as "The Race". You're welcome.

Posted by: fluffy at December 17, 2010 01:57 PM (4Kl5M)

73

If you knew all that was in the Dream Act some of you would need a defibrilator. Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 05:52 PM

You could try, like, telling us if you know there's something even more toxic than what we've seen in there.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:57 PM (Ulu3i)

74

Big Red / Vic, what is the current count as best you can tell on nays for tomorrow's cloture vote?

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (LwLqV)

75 And the illegals will come by the millions into the Untied States.  And what will the politicians say to us?  Too fucking bad you dumb, legal, taxpaying idiots.  Shut up and pay your taxes so these new citizens can suck on more government teats.  We are getting a royal haunching from the very government that suppose to represent and protect us.  We are so fucked after they pass the Dream Act. 

Posted by: American citizen & taxpayer at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (r0u40)

76

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 05:56 PM (LwLqV)

This reeks of planning and strategery.  They'll never go for it.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (GhAkx)

77 Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 05:56 PM (cX9pO)

I don't care if there are loopholes.  This whole thing is toxic.  Besides, as has been pointed out, military service doesn't guarantee conservative thinking.  See also: Clarke, General Wesley.

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (8y9MW)

78 There are plenty of loopholes in this bill, including authority for the Sec. of Homeland Security to grant waivers virtually at will and retroactivity as of the day the bill is passed. In other words, we would be fucked as soon as 2012.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 02:00 PM (5z6/M)

79 I'm in favor of annexing northern Mexico and appointing military governors to run them for the next ten years or so. 

Posted by: Alex at December 17, 2010 02:01 PM (yY28H)

80 I knew someone would mention the Roman Empire.  If we would see that kind of numbers of illegal enlistees, then, yes, I might be worried.  We're simply not going to see that.  The situation would be more like the French Foreign Legion, which is actually mostly French and requires its enlistees to learn French.

I completely agree with enforcing our immigration laws.  I think it is the height of hypocrisy not to enforce them.  It is an "open-borders" mentality without the honesty to stand up for that position.  (And there can be some good arguments for open borders, but, of course, as Milton Friedman pointed out, you can't have both open borders AND a welfare state.)

I propose my compromise mostly as a way to call the bluffs of the Dems.  They know that the military option will have a negligible effect on the numbers of illegals--it's the most minimal and onerous kind of amnesty.

And as Sukie Tawdry pointed out, the military can have an assimilating and conservatizing effect on those illegal enlistees.  Of course, a lot of that will be lost if DADT is repealed because many of the more conservative servicemen will eventually leave.  But that's why neither bill should be passed as they now stand.  (Another compromise: repeal DADT--but restore the status quo ante: restate the incompatibility of homosexuality and military service.)

Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 02:01 PM (mAm+G)

81 J-list. No idea, really. It will be close, though. Depends on how much Ben Nelson really likes pizza. Remember, Reid thought he had omnibus lined up, too.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:02 PM (cX9pO)

82 DREAM is in fact amnesty, and, as Kaus argues, a deliberately complex amnesty which will create, by design, all sorts of corner-cases and hard cases that will push people towards a simpler solution (i.e., full and total amnesty).

Not really.  Secession is a simpler solution.  Anarchy will happen first though.

Posted by: TexBob at December 17, 2010 02:03 PM (7cXE7)

83

I propose my compromise ...

No Quarter.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 02:03 PM (GhAkx)

84 Aw. Looks like Nan won't be at the tax bill signing. Conflicts and all she says. #sourgrapes

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:04 PM (pLTLS)

85 Somebody has to stand up. I don't know who, but somebody has to stand up. This is bullshit. Somebody earlier said that we are probably the only country who does not enforce their border to the fullest extent. No motherfucker has the right to be here illegally! I don't give a shit what the circumstances are. Burn the phone lines, this cannot pass!

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (Jx0x6)

86 Want more support for re-election as party chair? Start referring to "La Raza" as "The Race". You're welcome.

Well, you see, you're not taking into consideration all the subtlety and nuances of the meaning of that word in Spanish. It doesn't mean race-race; it also means "Those who shall invade and destroy your lands and rob your culture and laugh in your face."

Posted by: Tus Vecinos at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (5z6/M)

87 "Hispanics tend to be a conservative group to begin with." In family matters perhaps,but politically speaking the vast majority are dyed in the wool socialist

Posted by: kj at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (SRLyD)

88 Speaking of legal immigrants and the hoops they have to jump through . Where is Tushar in the process , these days ?
Anyone know ?
He never calls . Guess we're too strident .

Posted by: awkward davies at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (YCW1b)

89

Oh and if you think it can't get worse over the next two years you're fooling yourself.

Tell me why this can't be us?

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (pLTLS)

90 I'm in favor of annexing northern Mexico and appointing military governors to run them for the next ten years or so. 

Posted by: Alex at December 17, 2010 06:01 PM (yY28H)


Well before we do that, we better recall the Predators from Afghanistan and Pakistan. There will be some killin' to do.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (Jx0x6)

91 Shouldn't Palin be screeching on FOX or something? Bueller?

Posted by: Barbarian at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (EL+OC)

92 "Hispanics tend to be a conservative group to begin with."


In family matters perhaps,but politically speaking the vast majority are dyed in the wool socialist

Yeah I'm counting on them trending conservative, when pretty much all I see and have seen my entire life is that they are constantly having revolutions and socialist takeovers. Not holding my breath that Latinos (not hispanics) know what the fuck they want since they continuously have been ruled even before the Spanish invasion.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (Jx0x6)

93

Tell me why this can't be us?

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 06:06 PM

Congress still has a couple of days to fit this in. I'm sure the lickspittle Dems (and a few RINOs) would love to give Osama Obama the power he wants.

BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (Ulu3i)

94 The loopholes are in the other parts of the bill. Military is a commitment that's hard to leave once you are there. We have that now. Anyone from anywhere can enlist if he meets the basic requirements. This has been a policy for at least 150 years. My gr-gr-grandfather got citizenship for his service in the Civil War. I'm just saying make it possible for someone who was brought here illegally as a child. The numbers would not be real large, and they have to meet other requirements, just as any enlistee.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:11 PM (cX9pO)

95

BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?

He does love a good Man-Date.

Posted by: Kal Penn at December 17, 2010 02:12 PM (GhAkx)

96 BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 06:10 PM (Ulu3i)


Not a damn thing.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:13 PM (Jx0x6)

97 96

BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?

He does love a good Man-Date.

Posted by: Kal Penn at December 17, 2010 06:12 PM (GhAkx)


Which reminds me: We really are through the looking glass when Kumar has an office in the White House.

Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (mAm+G)

98

Right, beyond the next few days even. He can do it well into the next two years via Exec. Order and other regulatory procedural mechanisms that can bypass Congress altogether. 

Fun times ahead. Buckle up.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (pLTLS)

99 McConnell on Fox just now saying DREAM won't get through the Senate.

Posted by: Retread at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (Z3VZ1)

100

@53: "Any Republican who votes for the DREAM Act must be fired."

Out of a cannon.  Into the sun.

Futurama'd up a little for ya, there.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:15 PM (xy9wk)

101

I grew up in NM & transplanted  to Texas.

I've got some good Hipansic friends, and some , well ya know, suckin'  THE TIT. 

There is possibility, use your Imagination.

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 02:16 PM (CyPWX)

102 McConnell sounds great on Special Report. Plus, he's got a obvious glint of pride in his eye.

Posted by: rdbrewer at December 17, 2010 02:17 PM (tIv9L)

103 Yeah I'll do it. If Congress doesn't have the balls, I'll just whip out my pen here and sign an EO giving amnesty. That will pave the way for the most new Democrat slaves since LBJ. Oh and by the way, you don't re-elect me in '12, I'll pardon that Mumia fellow from Pa. Cop killer my ass.

Posted by: Barack Obama at December 17, 2010 02:17 PM (Jx0x6)

104

@76: "We are so fucked after they pass the Dream Act."

Actually, only the country as currently drawn on a map is fucked.  Passing the Dream Act would certainly hasten its end.  However, that could easily result in Balkanization, which *might* see a new, smaller America that isn't run by lunatics.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:18 PM (xy9wk)

105

I know what it is like to live in a community where there is a huge group of illegals. If you don't know what that's like, count yourselves lucky.

 

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:18 PM (QLiYt)

106

It takes Brass Balls to pass Tax Cuts.

Go & do likewise (to the DREAM act & more)

Posted by: Blake at December 17, 2010 02:19 PM (JxrwH)

107

Plus, he's got a obvious glint of pride in his eye

I nutted on the arugula in the Whitehouse Fridge.

Posted by: Mitch McConnel at December 17, 2010 02:19 PM (GhAkx)

108 @100: did we not hear the same said of Obamacare? And what's with the GOP funding Obamacare implementation? What was so pressing about passing a tax bill now, instead of January?

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:19 PM (tJjm/)

109 Yeah, most of Latin America is a hellhole, but so were England and Germany when my ancestors came here. And the average Hispanic has probably as much in common with the La Raza clowns as I do with the white idiots that make up the usual lefty crowds.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:20 PM (cX9pO)

110 And what's with the GOP funding Obamacare

Wondering the same thing?

Posted by: Barbarian at December 17, 2010 02:20 PM (EL+OC)

111

average Hispanic

We aren't talking Hispanic.  We're talking illegal aliens.

 

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 02:22 PM (GhAkx)

112 My understanding is the average Chica can suck the paint of
a side of a barn.

Posted by: Barbarian at December 17, 2010 02:23 PM (EL+OC)

113 Were there actually funds for ObamaCare in the tax bill? because I thought they were in the omnibus, not this bill. Also, as far as ObamaCare is concerned, the 2nd vote to be held in January (supposedly) is a measure to repeal ObamaCare.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:25 PM (0g3ST)

114 The Joker is f***ing Manhattan.

Oh, that dirty louse!  I gave him my best years and this is how he repays me!  Why I oughta!

Posted by: Harley Quinn at December 17, 2010 02:25 PM (Sl9UE)

115
DREAM is in fact amnesty...

Amnesty is an offer not to prosecute if one/many come clean and stop their criminal behavior - this legalizes criminal behavior.

Posted by: Druid at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (RnujI)

116

@110: "And the average Hispanic has probably as much in common with the La Raza clowns as I do with the white idiots that make up the usual lefty crowds."

The average Russian wasn't a Communist.  The average German wasn't a Nazi.  The average Japanese wasn't a militarist.  The average bloke in Northern Ireland wasn't in the IRA/INLA/LVF/UDA,etc.  The average Basque isn't in ETA.  Hell, the average American colonist wasn't a Tory or a Patriot.  Etc., ad nauseum.

Doesn't matter what the average anyone does.  It matters what the committed extremists do.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (xy9wk)

117 The interesting thing I've seen in polling is that Hispanics aren't that crazy about amnesty, as a rule, but what they hate more are politicians who oppose amnesty.

The Democrats use it as a wedge issue to portray Republicans as anti-Hispanic.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (BvBKY)

118 @113: I have no problemo with any chica that can suck her own weight!

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (tJjm/)

119 My understanding is that Barbarian has a dick in his mouth.

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (QLiYt)

120 110 Yeah, most of Latin America is a hellhole, but so were England and Germany when my ancestors came here.

Not much has changed, as both England and Germany are slated to fall due to both overwhelming debt and aging/changing demographics.  Don't get me wrong, we are on that same curve, just a little behind them on the chopping-block.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 02:27 PM (e31H8)

121 Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 06:25 PM (0g3ST) You're correct, it was in the spending bill not the tax bill.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (TMB3S)

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (pLTLS)

123

garret, that is true. However, the point was made that most Hispanics were socialists, I just said I believed that wasn't true. As far as illegals, the only concession I would be will to make at this time was allowing military service as a path to citizenship only for children brought here when young, which is not really a large number.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (cX9pO)

124

Amnesty is an offer not to prosecute if one/many come clean and stop their criminal behavior - this legalizes criminal behavior.

 

That depends on your definition of 'criminal'.

Posted by: Bill Clinton former Esquire at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (GhAkx)

125 praise the lord for tax relief for the elites

Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 02:29 PM (0YS61)

126

#124,

I LoLd.  A lot. 

PS - answered your Q in the other thread...

Posted by: Blake at December 17, 2010 02:29 PM (JxrwH)

127
evenin, viruses

Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at December 17, 2010 02:30 PM (6cqZX)

128 @118: then we need to recruit more hispanic conservatives into office. It's hard to play that game when your opponents ARE hispanic.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:30 PM (tJjm/)

129 So which Rs are thinking about caving on DREAM? The usual suspects?

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:31 PM (0g3ST)

130 120 My understanding is that Barbarian has a dick in his mouth.

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 06:26 PM (QLiYt)


Sniff me.

Posted by: The Jock at December 17, 2010 02:31 PM (EL+OC)

131 This Congress is finished.  It has no business even trying to pass anything but the CR.  That's it.

Posted by: iknowtheleft at December 17, 2010 06:27 PM (G/MYk)

Agreed.  This is fundamentally anti-democratic.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 02:32 PM (BvBKY)

132 thanks, Blake! that makes the snub all the more delicious!

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:33 PM (pLTLS)

133

CoolCzech, welcome Marco Rubio, welcome Gov. Salazar of Col. I see a lot of Hispanic names in the Rep. group of elected officials in Texas. We're getting there.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:34 PM (cX9pO)

134 the ReamD bill is for those that want it, and good!

Posted by: steven livingston seagull at December 17, 2010 02:35 PM (0ES2x)

135 @131: Olympia and Mac, for starters. Looks like McCain is about to retire his Yosemite Sam schtick.

Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:36 PM (tJjm/)

136

Looks like McCain is about to retire his Yosemite Sam schtick.

He slobbers all over the sienna brown knob of Amnesty if it isn't an election year.  

 Always has.

Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 02:39 PM (GhAkx)

137 Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 06:29 PM (0YS61)

STFU, retard.

Posted by: Waterhouse at December 17, 2010 02:39 PM (XUuH5)

138 We aren't talking Hispanic.  We're talking illegal aliens.

This cannot be emphasized enough. The Saudi or Egyptian who gets a student visa but goes to work smuggling cigarettes for Hamas, and the pregnant Polish "tourist" who doesn't return home but stays with her anchor baby are just as illegally-resident as the Guatemalan who sneaks over the southern border (if he manages to get past the Mexican border police, mind you...).

Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 17, 2010 02:40 PM (4ucxv)

139 praise the lord for tax relief for the elites

Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 06:29 PM (0YS61)

 

Who farted?

Oh, it's john ryan. Nevermind.

Posted by: ErikW at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (zcXBn)

140 Let the part that grants citizenship for military service stand.  Military service is valuable to our country and dangerous.  The reward is equal to the costs.

No.  If you want to immigrate permanently to the United States, do so legally.  Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?

Actually there is ALREADY a program for that. The BS Dream Act reduces the time needed.

Aldo from what I understand they ALREADY have thousands lineup waiting for this to pass because they are "qualified already?. They are pushing this in this Lame *uck session because it will be their last real chance for a long time and they want it before the 2012 elections when they expect to have piles of instant new Dem voters in CA, AZ, NV, TX, NY, and NJ.

As for how the votes are lining up, that link to HA speaks to that issue somewhat. There is no clear list because although we expect to get several "moderates" stabbing us in the back again there are several Dems who are going to cross over and vote with the Repubs (we hope). We will have to watch how they vote on cloture. Dems like to vote FOR cloture on this kind of shit, then vote against the bill itself when the vote doesn't mean a damn thing. They can then tell their voters they voted against it when, in fact, they didn't.

At least this time McLame will vote against it so Grahamnasty will too. This will be a tight one on cloture, but like the "Tax Deal" if they get cloture it is a done deal.

So yes all you ACU haters, it will go down as a vote against amnesty even though they technically voted for it when they voted for cloture.

Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (e4sSD)

141 Heather, don't forget Bammy's aunt Petunia.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (cX9pO)

142 Only a Marxist fuckknob would think to label maintaining tax rates as "tax relief".

I think I'll continue breathing. To a Communist lackwit, this is "oxygen relief".

Posted by: Waterhouse at December 17, 2010 02:44 PM (XUuH5)

143
does anyone know how Paul Krugman is handling this?


Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at December 17, 2010 02:44 PM (hBqOU)

144

Yes, a hundred times to what HeatherRadish said.

Still, those are almost a statistical minority to the illegals from El Salvador, Guatemala and all the rest.

It's funny. It's easy to tell when the coyotes have gotten a large group through.

There are Americanized Mexicans. Then a large group of Indians, from who can tell where.

Very different groups of people. Act very differently. They have nothing in common with each other, even languages.

Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:46 PM (QLiYt)

145
He's sick?

I'll bet it's his heart -- as in heartache over Obama being an utter nincompoop.

Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at December 17, 2010 02:47 PM (6cqZX)

146 Any Republican who votes for anything more to come out of this lamest duck Congress (other than the CR) needs to have all seniority stripped and all committee assignments pulled.

Hell, if they didn't pull MooKow they are not going to pull any for any reason. That will never happen.

Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 02:48 PM (e4sSD)

147
So Krugman is dead-set against this?

Then it must be the right thing to do.

Posted by: Senator Soothsayer (R-AoS) at December 17, 2010 02:50 PM (hBqOU)

148 praise the lord for tax relief for the elites

Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 06:29 PM (0YS61)

Got a job, bucko?    Thank the so-called rich, dipshit.

Posted by: Steph at December 17, 2010 02:51 PM (kOSds)

149 The 10 Best-Dressed Republicans

Sarah made #9, which I thought the libs always maintained she was a "tacky dresser".

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:53 PM (0g3ST)

150 He blew a gasket and offered himself up to be a Chinese prisoner/organ donor.

That would be Tom Friedman.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 17, 2010 02:58 PM (S5YRY)

151

Those pushing for the Dream Act have been going at it 24/7 and are part of the progressive machine.  The Catholic Bishops are supporting it and there are literally hundreds of thousands of students who have been working on this and huge numbers have descended upon D.C.

They are pushing the Maine sisters hard and are making this into a "moral" argument.

This needs to be shut-down.

I am very concerned about this apart from Senator Jeff Sessions from Alabama, the GOP has been off their game on this, afraid to broach the progressives' narrative.

Remember how everyone was saying how Obamacare didn't have a chance?  I sure do and I kept saying wake up. 

These dems don't play by the rules and are controlling the narrative.

The Dream Act rewards law breaking and will signal the U.S. is unwilling to enforce it's own laws by making exceptions through Federal Statute. 

So, violating an exception ain't so bad now is it -  hey, come on in, the water and is warm along with these jokers' laws.

This thing has a 50 50 shot of passing.  Reid is rallying his folks right now.  That's why it was tabled and is now being reintroduced.

Call the senators, burn up the phone lines.

Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 02:58 PM (LwLqV)

152

Funny thing happened here in Wis. We changed the Assembly, Senate, and Gov. from dem to repub. In the lame duck session the other night, them dems wanted to extend the state workers union contract by 4 years so incoming Gov. Walker could not change it. It passed the Assembly but tied in the senate where the dem leader voted with the pubs to make it a tie vote. The measure failed. Dem leader said the people voted for Walker and the pubs, so the contract should by rights be left to the new gov. Senate then adjourned and went home.

Oh, the dem leader was removed from his post immediately after the failed vote.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 03:00 PM (cX9pO)

153 163 

What was up with the Condi Rice pic in the middle?

She actually looks rather good in it, and I hate those front panels with shiny bead-like attachments.

I only looked at a few frames, but all the "best dressed" men were just wearing the same suit, basically.  I guess it must all be in the tie.

Except David Drier. He's going for the 1920s look there.

Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 03:02 PM (0g3ST)

154 We have a hard enough time just cutting through the media filter to convince people that they should vote conservative. We can't overcome millions of new citizens who think Obama is God. UGH.

Posted by: Dan at December 17, 2010 03:28 PM (1jzSs)

155

I like some of what Pawlenty stands for, although I wouldn't vote for him in the primary, but this statement was stupid as hell.   Doesn't quite have a fighter instinct, does he?    Can we call him a quitter?

“Yes,” he answered when asked by the News Tribune editorial board this week whether, after the Republicans took control of the Minnesota Legislature in the Nov. 2 election, he wished he had run for another term.

“If I would have known then what I know now,” the Republican lamented, and “given what IÂ’ve been through and hoped to accomplish, but that (the DFL-controlled Legislature) blocked. But you canÂ’t predict the future. And of course, I made my decision after the 2008 election when President Obama and the Democrats swept everything. I looked at that and (decided against) having to go over there and ram heads with (DFL Sen. Larry) Pogemiller and (DFL Rep. Margaret Anderson) Kelliher and their like. (There was a) high probability of that. Hindsight is 20/20.”

Posted by: Steph at December 17, 2010 03:32 PM (kOSds)

156

The one good thing about this extension is the fact that it will force tax simplification to the forefront.

Obama is already talking about moving toward a flatter, simpler tax code.  The GOP should call his bluff and pass a straight flat tax with a reasonable standard deduction. 

Eliminate payroll taxes.  Eliminate capital gains.  Eliminate the estate tax.  Lower the corporate tax to 10%. 

Don't let a crisis go to waste.

Posted by: stickety at December 17, 2010 03:35 PM (ZzwJu)

157 This thing has a 50 50 shot of passing.

You know who could fuck us? Lisa Murkowski.

Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 04:18 PM (O4KLB)

158 If the DREAM Act passes, I'm done with the Republican Party.  No more money and no more votes.  Screw 'em.

I don't care if every Repub but Brown, Collins and Snow vote against it.  If it passes, I'm done.  I'll be in the bunker playing HALO.

Posted by: Cooter at December 17, 2010 04:49 PM (6Lv8l)

159 Would a teacher today even know who Marlowe and Shakespeare were?  And if they don't know, how could they grade anything anyway?

Posted by: Skookumchuk at December 17, 2010 04:53 PM (btzPD)

160 Damn Libtards.

Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 05:01 PM (CyPWX)

161 Trillion can make Democrats vote to prevent tax hikes. Is there anything it can't do? BTW, Build the Damn Fence.

Posted by: eman at December 17, 2010 05:15 PM (XXyJt)

162

 

The Dream act is once again - the worst congress in US history attemping to fuck the American people over... right until the end.

 

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 17, 2010 06:22 PM (0fzsA)

163 Brown for Governor + Cap & Trade + DREAM Act...

Frankly, I'm starting to warm to the idea of dropping a nuke on California. It could hardly be worse than what we have now.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at December 17, 2010 07:08 PM (bxiXv)

164 If the Dream Act passes, I don`t know, I just don`t know.

Posted by: Cold Hearted, Cold Blooded, Armed and Pissed Off at December 17, 2010 07:51 PM (FN9EA)

165 The presence strikes again.

Posted by: doug at December 17, 2010 09:58 PM (dDxif)

166

To summarize Obama's first two years, he has used Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Bill Clinton and yes, even George Bush as crutches, unable to accomplish anything on his own merits or with his own managerial skills.

In fact, even world leaders agree that he has done more harm than good. 

His cabinet consists entirely of sleazy, bumbling and incompetent fools like Holder, Clinton and himself. So why do we need that useless putz and anyone in his crappy administration?

It seems to me that we could get along just fine without a POTUS and his entire cabinet. For the first time in our country's history, the goverment would run smoother without them. What a bunch of habitual fuck-ups those imbecilic 52%ers elected. They sure elected their own kind.

Posted by: Brian at December 18, 2010 11:21 AM (sYrWB)

167 فندق الخيول الذهبية

Posted by: sakher at December 31, 2010 05:34 PM (7roFW)

168 فندق الخيول الذهبية

Posted by: sakher at December 31, 2010 05:35 PM (7roFW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
157kb generated in CPU 0.0661, elapsed 0.2759 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2273 seconds, 296 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.