December 17, 2010
— Ace He signed on the line that is dotted.
President Obama signed into law the most significant tax bill in nearly a decade Friday, a day after overcoming liberal resistance in Congress to continue for two more years tax breaks enacted under president George W. Bush and to provide a fresh federal boost for the tepid economic recovery.
The downsides: There is still pork in the deal that must be cut out as well as funds to implement ObamaCare. (It's possible that won't be an issue at some point this year.) And now that the tax deal is done and the Omnibus spending bill is defeated, to be replaced by a one-page continuing resolution for a month, that frees up the Senators, including our very own Brown, McCain, Collins, and Snowe, to start working their mischief on other matters.
Like the Dream Act -- a vote which may come tomorrow, and may pass.
DREAM is in fact amnesty, and, as Kaus argues, a deliberately complex amnesty which will create, by design, all sorts of corner-cases and hard cases that will push people towards a simpler solution (i.e., full and total amnesty).
Posted by: Ace at
12:55 PM
| Comments (168)
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 12:59 PM (Jx0x6)
FIFT
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 17, 2010 01:00 PM (tf9Ne)
And the media cock-swabbers will praise him for one of the greatest tax-cuts in U.S. history. Spit.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:02 PM (Jx0x6)
Yeah, I'm chokin here.
I'm agreeing with those that said the Repubs' should of held ground and pushed for more cuts.
Damn Libs heads exploding.
Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (CyPWX)
I love the smell of victory in the morning........................
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (UqKQV)
Posted by: waiting at December 17, 2010 01:03 PM (dX5s2)
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (GBXon)
I heard Hensarling say that the dream act would not make it through the Senate. That was about a couple of weeks ago though.
Do they have the votes or not? I think Reid is gonna bring it to a vote no matter what so he can say he at least tried. Does anyone have a vote count?
Posted by: Roadking at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (3XzWF)
It's possible some got snuck into this as well. If I were a Democrat who'd sacrificed his career for O'Care, I'd want to hedge my bets to ensure at least part of it actually took effect...
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:05 PM (8y9MW)
And as been explained her ad nausem, it isn't even a "tax cut"; They just extended the Bush tax rates out for a paltry 2 more years. This isn't even going to be stimulative, it'll just prevent the pain of abruptly jumping back to the Clinton-era tax rates.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 01:06 PM (TiLRQ)
Posted by: Andy at December 17, 2010 01:06 PM (5Rurq)
Posted by: Gmac at December 17, 2010 01:07 PM (k2Fyd)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at December 17, 2010 01:08 PM (hiFDo)
The entire purpose of DREAM is to make sure votes like Obamacare never cost them again. It's a Hugo Chavez "decree" maneuver without the bulbous pock-marked face.
Posted by: VJay at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 05:06 PM (TiLRQ)
I know this, it is the current tax rates. But some in the media and Washington still cannot let go of the tax cut meme or the Dems fucked-up accounting methods which state that around 900 billion will be lost due to rates staying the same. They're the ones saying it.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (Jx0x6)
You know what it takes to sell tax cuts?
It takes brass balls to sell tax cuts.
Posted by: dan-O at December 17, 2010 01:10 PM (bRLuD)
Any doubt...ANY DOUBT...that sometime next year a new skittles & rainbows spending need would have been found to be urgently important, sucking up said new revenue and putting us right back in the same spot deficit-wise, but with higher taxes to boot?
If you're always late for your 8:15 meeting and the boss moves the time back to 8:30 to accommodate you...eventually you'll be late for that one as well. It's not the start time that's the issue...it's you.
The R's stance needs to be, until we've reduced spending significantly for at least 10 years to let those reductions and the results be clearly felt, absolutely no new revenue from tax increases.
Posted by: The Hammer at December 17, 2010 01:14 PM (32ubA)
Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:16 PM (2dOeM)
The funniest part is that 98.2% of NYC's useful idiots will believe Obama actually 'cut taxes' upon signing this bill to extend the Bush Tax Cuts.
The Joker is fucking Manhattan.
Hilarious!
Posted by: Susan at December 17, 2010 01:20 PM (uiBg/)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 17, 2010 01:20 PM (o3bYL)
Let the part that grants citizenship for military service stand. Military service is valuable to our country and dangerous. The reward is equal to the costs.
Kill the part that grants it for going to college. College has become a four-year party. It benefits the student more than the country (although I will admit that college grads will pay higher taxes over time). It seems like rewarding slackerhood.
(But guess what? There are already laws on the books smoothing the way to citizenship for veterans. Shhhh! Don't tell anyone.)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 01:21 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: vaeriax at December 17, 2010 01:21 PM (wMOg6)
Anyone in Congress supporting DREAM should be placed on a Public List and told EXACTLY how the rest of AMERICA Feels about this issue. IMHO.
Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 01:22 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 01:23 PM (ztMRF)
28 Leo,
Apparently there's already laws on the books in regards to those serving in the military. It might be closer to five years than two, but after serving that long and being honorably discharged, the immigrants are made citizens.
Someone with more nuts and bolts knowledge can feel free to back me up on this or (prove me wrong).
Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:25 PM (2dOeM)
Posted by: SurferDoc at December 17, 2010 01:26 PM (o3bYL)
I'm scared. I just put on a Backstreet Boys song. What is happening to me?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:26 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:27 PM (cX9pO)
Anyone in Congress supporting DREAM should be placed on a Public List, indicted and tried for treason told EXACTLY how the rest of AMERICA Feels about this issue. IMHO.
Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 05:22 PMFixed.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:27 PM (Ulu3i)
Not if you know how to play the game.
Posted by: B. Hussein Soetero at December 17, 2010 01:28 PM (ztMRF)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 17, 2010 01:28 PM (xQAv5)
Have you been eating Kettle chips and drinking Juicy-Juices recently? Do you feel the need to exfoliate and put on a dress?
The answer is obvious.
Posted by: Alex Jones at December 17, 2010 01:30 PM (c0A3e)
Watch for an explosion of online "colleges" geared towards getting illegals to meet this small requirement.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 01:32 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:32 PM (L4Q+b)
If Janet "Nappy" Napolitano thinks you've attended, or wanted to attend, or drove past a college once, all she has to do is give you the official Free Pass.
The Act gives all power to the DHS honcho to decide who gets in and who doesn't..
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:34 PM (Ulu3i)
You'll excuse me for remaining skeptical.
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at December 17, 2010 01:34 PM (GBXon)
Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:35 PM (L4Q+b)
Posted by: Alex Jones at December 17, 2010 05:30 PM (c0A3e)
Shit! Better call the local LGBT chapter (with a heavy emphasis on the T.)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 01:37 PM (Jx0x6)
No. If you want to immigrate permanently to the United States, do so legally. Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:37 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (cX9pO)
Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (L4Q+b)
Posted by: vaeriax at December 17, 2010 01:38 PM (wMOg6)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 05:37 PM (8y9MW)
Because that would be racist you hairy-knuckled, banjo-playing guns and bible-clinging xenophobe!
Posted by: La Raza (translates to "the race") cognitive dissonance off. at December 17, 2010 01:40 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: sifty at December 17, 2010 01:41 PM (L4Q+b)
Ace has heard from me ad nauseum on the Dream Act. But this is not idle chatter and a joke, this thing could still pass and be signed into law.
Folks, Reid filed for a cloture vote yesterday, Thursday and it's going for a full cloture i.e. debate cut off vote tomorrow, Saturday. They still require a 2/5 majority to invoke cloture.
You better believe Reid has something up his sleeve here. With earmarks being stripped out of the upcoming budget per the GOP's pledge, Reid and company see The Dream Act as a legsilative pay back and will be going for broke to get this passed.
Pressure must be mounted.
I have been working with some on the hill but more work is needed to defeat this.
Call, and be vocal folks The Dream Act is anything but that and we are dealing with a progressive machine that is loaded for bear subsequent to the tax extension and omnibus retraction.
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:43 PM (LwLqV)
Correction - Senate requires 3/5ths vote i.e. 60 votes to achieve cloture and bring The Dream Act for an up or down vote.
Get crackin as Ace and Ed have said.
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:44 PM (LwLqV)
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 17, 2010 01:47 PM (jbCcb)
Posted by: lasue at December 17, 2010 01:49 PM (S25IC)
Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?
What, you don;t believe in American Exceptionalism? You unpatriotic racist.
Posted by: Another Stupid Typical Fucking Moonbat at December 17, 2010 01:49 PM (YmPwQ)
No good can come from this de facto Amnesty Legislation.
The Civil Society can't exist if we pass laws to exempt people from laws that they refuse to follow.
Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:50 PM (GhAkx)
Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 01:50 PM (2dOeM)
Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 01:53 PM (QLiYt)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 17, 2010 01:53 PM (eOXTH)
If you knew all that was in the Dream Act some of you would need a defibrilator.
With this Congress, one can only imagine. Might as well jusr adopt the La Raza Action Statement and get it ver with.
Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:54 PM (GhAkx)
Posted by: fluffy at December 17, 2010 01:54 PM (4Kl5M)
Getting very close to John Galt time.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 17, 2010 01:55 PM (xQAv5)
With the military option, it would be hard to find a loophole. Six years is six years.
You would probably get a more conservative group taking that option. Hispanics tend to be a conservative group to begin with. What you see are the activist fringe, like you do in most groups.
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 01:56 PM (cX9pO)
GOP congressional leaders should have had a press conference on The Dream Act in order to build upon the momentum of the omnibus defeat and place border security as the primary non-starter to the bill.
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:56 PM (LwLqV)
Posted by: fluffy at December 17, 2010 01:57 PM (4Kl5M)
If you knew all that was in the Dream Act some of you would need a defibrilator. Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 05:52 PM
You could try, like, telling us if you know there's something even more toxic than what we've seen in there.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 01:57 PM (Ulu3i)
Big Red / Vic, what is the current count as best you can tell on nays for tomorrow's cloture vote?
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (LwLqV)
Posted by: American citizen & taxpayer at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (r0u40)
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 05:56 PM (LwLqV)
This reeks of planning and strategery. They'll never go for it.
Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (GhAkx)
I don't care if there are loopholes. This whole thing is toxic. Besides, as has been pointed out, military service doesn't guarantee conservative thinking. See also: Clarke, General Wesley.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 17, 2010 01:59 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 02:00 PM (5z6/M)
Posted by: Alex at December 17, 2010 02:01 PM (yY28H)
I completely agree with enforcing our immigration laws. I think it is the height of hypocrisy not to enforce them. It is an "open-borders" mentality without the honesty to stand up for that position. (And there can be some good arguments for open borders, but, of course, as Milton Friedman pointed out, you can't have both open borders AND a welfare state.)
I propose my compromise mostly as a way to call the bluffs of the Dems. They know that the military option will have a negligible effect on the numbers of illegals--it's the most minimal and onerous kind of amnesty.
And as Sukie Tawdry pointed out, the military can have an assimilating and conservatizing effect on those illegal enlistees. Of course, a lot of that will be lost if DADT is repealed because many of the more conservative servicemen will eventually leave. But that's why neither bill should be passed as they now stand. (Another compromise: repeal DADT--but restore the status quo ante: restate the incompatibility of homosexuality and military service.)
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 02:01 PM (mAm+G)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:02 PM (cX9pO)
Not really. Secession is a simpler solution. Anarchy will happen first though.
Posted by: TexBob at December 17, 2010 02:03 PM (7cXE7)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:04 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (Jx0x6)
Well, you see, you're not taking into consideration all the subtlety and nuances of the meaning of that word in Spanish. It doesn't mean race-race; it also means "Those who shall invade and destroy your lands and rob your culture and laugh in your face."
Posted by: Tus Vecinos at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (5z6/M)
Posted by: kj at December 17, 2010 02:05 PM (SRLyD)
Anyone know ?
He never calls . Guess we're too strident .
Posted by: awkward davies at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (YCW1b)
Oh and if you think it can't get worse over the next two years you're fooling yourself.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Alex at December 17, 2010 06:01 PM (yY28H)
Well before we do that, we better recall the Predators from Afghanistan and Pakistan. There will be some killin' to do.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:06 PM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Barbarian at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (EL+OC)
In family matters perhaps,but politically speaking the vast majority are dyed in the wool socialist
Yeah I'm counting on them trending conservative, when pretty much all I see and have seen my entire life is that they are constantly having revolutions and socialist takeovers. Not holding my breath that Latinos (not hispanics) know what the fuck they want since they continuously have been ruled even before the Spanish invasion.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (Jx0x6)
Congress still has a couple of days to fit this in. I'm sure the lickspittle Dems (and a few RINOs) would love to give Osama Obama the power he wants.
BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 02:10 PM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:11 PM (cX9pO)
BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?
He does love a good Man-Date.
Posted by: Kal Penn at December 17, 2010 02:12 PM (GhAkx)
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 06:10 PM (Ulu3i)
Not a damn thing.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at December 17, 2010 02:13 PM (Jx0x6)
BTW -- What is to stop the Traitor-in-Chief from issuing an executive order mandating amnesty?
He does love a good Man-Date.
Posted by: Kal Penn at December 17, 2010 06:12 PM (GhAkx)
Which reminds me: We really are through the looking glass when Kumar has an office in the White House.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (mAm+G)
Right, beyond the next few days even. He can do it well into the next two years via Exec. Order and other regulatory procedural mechanisms that can bypass Congress altogether.
Fun times ahead. Buckle up.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Retread at December 17, 2010 02:14 PM (Z3VZ1)
@53: "Any Republican who votes for the DREAM Act must be fired."
Out of a cannon. Into the sun.
Futurama'd up a little for ya, there.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:15 PM (xy9wk)
I grew up in NM & transplanted to Texas.
I've got some good Hipansic friends, and some , well ya know, suckin' THE TIT.
There is possibility, use your Imagination.
Posted by: JustME at December 17, 2010 02:16 PM (CyPWX)
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 17, 2010 02:17 PM (tIv9L)
Posted by: Barack Obama at December 17, 2010 02:17 PM (Jx0x6)
@76: "We are so fucked after they pass the Dream Act."
Actually, only the country as currently drawn on a map is fucked. Passing the Dream Act would certainly hasten its end. However, that could easily result in Balkanization, which *might* see a new, smaller America that isn't run by lunatics.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:18 PM (xy9wk)
I know what it is like to live in a community where there is a huge group of illegals. If you don't know what that's like, count yourselves lucky.
Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:18 PM (QLiYt)
Plus, he's got a obvious glint of pride in his eye
I nutted on the arugula in the Whitehouse Fridge.
Posted by: Mitch McConnel at December 17, 2010 02:19 PM (GhAkx)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:19 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:20 PM (cX9pO)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:25 PM (0g3ST)
Oh, that dirty louse! I gave him my best years and this is how he repays me! Why I oughta!
Posted by: Harley Quinn at December 17, 2010 02:25 PM (Sl9UE)
DREAM is in fact amnesty...
Amnesty is an offer not to prosecute if one/many come clean and stop their criminal behavior - this legalizes criminal behavior.
Posted by: Druid at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (RnujI)
@110: "And the average Hispanic has probably as much in common with the La Raza clowns as I do with the white idiots that make up the usual lefty crowds."
The average Russian wasn't a Communist. The average German wasn't a Nazi. The average Japanese wasn't a militarist. The average bloke in Northern Ireland wasn't in the IRA/INLA/LVF/UDA,etc. The average Basque isn't in ETA. Hell, the average American colonist wasn't a Tory or a Patriot. Etc., ad nauseum.
Doesn't matter what the average anyone does. It matters what the committed extremists do.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (xy9wk)
The Democrats use it as a wedge issue to portray Republicans as anti-Hispanic.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:26 PM (QLiYt)
Not much has changed, as both England and Germany are slated to fall due to both overwhelming debt and aging/changing demographics. Don't get me wrong, we are on that same curve, just a little behind them on the chopping-block.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 17, 2010 02:27 PM (e31H8)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (TMB3S)
garret, that is true. However, the point was made that most Hispanics were socialists, I just said I believed that wasn't true. As far as illegals, the only concession I would be will to make at this time was allowing military service as a path to citizenship only for children brought here when young, which is not really a large number.
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (cX9pO)
Amnesty is an offer not to prosecute if one/many come clean and stop their criminal behavior - this legalizes criminal behavior.
That depends on your definition of 'criminal'.
Posted by: Bill Clinton former Esquire at December 17, 2010 02:28 PM (GhAkx)
Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 02:29 PM (0YS61)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:30 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:31 PM (0g3ST)
Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 06:26 PM (QLiYt)
Sniff me.
Posted by: The Jock at December 17, 2010 02:31 PM (EL+OC)
Posted by: iknowtheleft at December 17, 2010 06:27 PM (G/MYk)
Agreed. This is fundamentally anti-democratic.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 02:32 PM (BvBKY)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 17, 2010 02:33 PM (pLTLS)
CoolCzech, welcome Marco Rubio, welcome Gov. Salazar of Col. I see a lot of Hispanic names in the Rep. group of elected officials in Texas. We're getting there.
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:34 PM (cX9pO)
Posted by: steven livingston seagull at December 17, 2010 02:35 PM (0ES2x)
Posted by: CoolCzech at December 17, 2010 02:36 PM (tJjm/)
Looks like McCain is about to retire his Yosemite Sam schtick.
He slobbers all over the sienna brown knob of Amnesty if it isn't an election year.
Always has.
Posted by: garrett at December 17, 2010 02:39 PM (GhAkx)
This cannot be emphasized enough. The Saudi or Egyptian who gets a student visa but goes to work smuggling cigarettes for Hamas, and the pregnant Polish "tourist" who doesn't return home but stays with her anchor baby are just as illegally-resident as the Guatemalan who sneaks over the southern border (if he manages to get past the Mexican border police, mind you...).
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 17, 2010 02:40 PM (4ucxv)
Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 06:29 PM (0YS61)
Who farted?
Oh, it's john ryan. Nevermind.
Posted by: ErikW at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (zcXBn)
No. If you want to immigrate permanently to the United States, do so legally. Why on Earth should we be the only nation on the planet that doesn't enforce its borders and citizenship requirements?
Actually there is ALREADY a program for that. The BS Dream Act reduces the time needed.
Aldo from what I understand they ALREADY have thousands lineup waiting for this to pass because they are "qualified already?. They are pushing this in this Lame *uck session because it will be their last real chance for a long time and they want it before the 2012 elections when they expect to have piles of instant new Dem voters in CA, AZ, NV, TX, NY, and NJ.
As for how the votes are lining up, that link to HA speaks to that issue somewhat. There is no clear list because although we expect to get several "moderates" stabbing us in the back again there are several Dems who are going to cross over and vote with the Repubs (we hope). We will have to watch how they vote on cloture. Dems like to vote FOR cloture on this kind of shit, then vote against the bill itself when the vote doesn't mean a damn thing. They can then tell their voters they voted against it when, in fact, they didn't.
At least this time McLame will vote against it so Grahamnasty will too. This will be a tight one on cloture, but like the "Tax Deal" if they get cloture it is a done deal.
So yes all you ACU haters, it will go down as a vote against amnesty even though they technically voted for it when they voted for cloture.
Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (e4sSD)
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 02:42 PM (cX9pO)
I think I'll continue breathing. To a Communist lackwit, this is "oxygen relief".
Posted by: Waterhouse at December 17, 2010 02:44 PM (XUuH5)
Yes, a hundred times to what HeatherRadish said.
Still, those are almost a statistical minority to the illegals from El Salvador, Guatemala and all the rest.
It's funny. It's easy to tell when the coyotes have gotten a large group through.
There are Americanized Mexicans. Then a large group of Indians, from who can tell where.
Very different groups of people. Act very differently. They have nothing in common with each other, even languages.
Posted by: Who Knows at December 17, 2010 02:46 PM (QLiYt)
Hell, if they didn't pull MooKow they are not going to pull any for any reason. That will never happen.
Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 02:48 PM (e4sSD)
Posted by: archie bunker at December 17, 2010 06:29 PM (0YS61)
Got a job, bucko? Thank the so-called rich, dipshit.
Posted by: Steph at December 17, 2010 02:51 PM (kOSds)
Sarah made #9, which I thought the libs always maintained she was a "tacky dresser".
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 02:53 PM (0g3ST)
That would be Tom Friedman.
Posted by: toby928™ at December 17, 2010 02:58 PM (S5YRY)
Those pushing for the Dream Act have been going at it 24/7 and are part of the progressive machine. The Catholic Bishops are supporting it and there are literally hundreds of thousands of students who have been working on this and huge numbers have descended upon D.C.
They are pushing the Maine sisters hard and are making this into a "moral" argument.
This needs to be shut-down.
I am very concerned about this apart from Senator Jeff Sessions from Alabama, the GOP has been off their game on this, afraid to broach the progressives' narrative.
Remember how everyone was saying how Obamacare didn't have a chance? I sure do and I kept saying wake up.
These dems don't play by the rules and are controlling the narrative.
The Dream Act rewards law breaking and will signal the U.S. is unwilling to enforce it's own laws by making exceptions through Federal Statute.
So, violating an exception ain't so bad now is it - hey, come on in, the water and is warm along with these jokers' laws.
This thing has a 50 50 shot of passing. Reid is rallying his folks right now. That's why it was tabled and is now being reintroduced.
Call the senators, burn up the phone lines.
Posted by: journolist at December 17, 2010 02:58 PM (LwLqV)
Funny thing happened here in Wis. We changed the Assembly, Senate, and Gov. from dem to repub. In the lame duck session the other night, them dems wanted to extend the state workers union contract by 4 years so incoming Gov. Walker could not change it. It passed the Assembly but tied in the senate where the dem leader voted with the pubs to make it a tie vote. The measure failed. Dem leader said the people voted for Walker and the pubs, so the contract should by rights be left to the new gov. Senate then adjourned and went home.
Oh, the dem leader was removed from his post immediately after the failed vote.
Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 03:00 PM (cX9pO)
What was up with the Condi Rice pic in the middle?
She actually looks rather good in it, and I hate those front panels with shiny bead-like attachments.
Except David Drier. He's going for the 1920s look there.
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at December 17, 2010 03:02 PM (0g3ST)
Posted by: Dan at December 17, 2010 03:28 PM (1jzSs)
I like some of what Pawlenty stands for, although I wouldn't vote for him in the primary, but this statement was stupid as hell. Doesn't quite have a fighter instinct, does he? Can we call him a quitter?
“Yes,” he answered when asked by the News Tribune editorial board this week whether, after the Republicans took control of the Minnesota Legislature in the Nov. 2 election, he wished he had run for another term.
“If I would have known then what I know now,” the Republican lamented, and “given what I’ve been through and hoped to accomplish, but that (the DFL-controlled Legislature) blocked. But you can’t predict the future. And of course, I made my decision after the 2008 election when President Obama and the Democrats swept everything. I looked at that and (decided against) having to go over there and ram heads with (DFL Sen. Larry) Pogemiller and (DFL Rep. Margaret Anderson) Kelliher and their like. (There was a) high probability of that. Hindsight is 20/20.”
Posted by: Steph at December 17, 2010 03:32 PM (kOSds)
The one good thing about this extension is the fact that it will force tax simplification to the forefront.
Obama is already talking about moving toward a flatter, simpler tax code. The GOP should call his bluff and pass a straight flat tax with a reasonable standard deduction.
Eliminate payroll taxes. Eliminate capital gains. Eliminate the estate tax. Lower the corporate tax to 10%.
Don't let a crisis go to waste.
Posted by: stickety at December 17, 2010 03:35 PM (ZzwJu)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 17, 2010 04:18 PM (O4KLB)
I don't care if every Repub but Brown, Collins and Snow vote against it. If it passes, I'm done. I'll be in the bunker playing HALO.
Posted by: Cooter at December 17, 2010 04:49 PM (6Lv8l)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at December 17, 2010 04:53 PM (btzPD)
Posted by: eman at December 17, 2010 05:15 PM (XXyJt)
The Dream act is once again - the worst congress in US history attemping to fuck the American people over... right until the end.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at December 17, 2010 06:22 PM (0fzsA)
Frankly, I'm starting to warm to the idea of dropping a nuke on California. It could hardly be worse than what we have now.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at December 17, 2010 07:08 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Cold Hearted, Cold Blooded, Armed and Pissed Off at December 17, 2010 07:51 PM (FN9EA)
To summarize Obama's first two years, he has used Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Bill Clinton and yes, even George Bush as crutches, unable to accomplish anything on his own merits or with his own managerial skills.
In fact, even world leaders agree that he has done more harm than good.
His cabinet consists entirely of sleazy, bumbling and incompetent fools like Holder, Clinton and himself. So why do we need that useless putz and anyone in his crappy administration?
It seems to me that we could get along just fine without a POTUS and his entire cabinet. For the first time in our country's history, the goverment would run smoother without them. What a bunch of habitual fuck-ups those imbecilic 52%ers elected. They sure elected their own kind.
Posted by: Brian at December 18, 2010 11:21 AM (sYrWB)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2273 seconds, 296 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








So they can't defund obibblecare next year?
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at December 17, 2010 12:59 PM (c5RQr)