April 21, 2010
— Jack M. So, I'm listening to the EIB network right now (yeah, it's kinda a live blog) and a caller who used to work for Google called in to discuss how Google's search feature bills advertisers. Apparently, Google auctions off ad space and the highest bidder gets to have the ad of their choice come back as the number one result.
Why is this interesting? Because, according to the caller, people who sponsor, say a political campaign's efforts to fundraise off of the Goldman Sachs controversy, pay upwards of 50 (fifty) cents a click when people hit the resulting "sponsored ad" subject only to a daily budget agreed upon in advance.
Once the budget is reached for the day, said ad disappears.
This made me curious, so I entered the search terms "goldman sec" into google, and sure enough, a "sponsored ad" popped up at the very beginning leading me to a certain regime's online political efforts.
So I clicked the link.
Now, theoretically speaking, if I had done this 9 or 10 more times, I would have run upwards of a $5.00 charge towards the regime's daily amount. Meaning that i would have helped to stimulate the economy by divesting the regime of $5.00 they would not otherwise have spent. If, of course I had done that.
A few minutes later, I clicked on those search terms again. Whatever I was doing in those intervening minutes is none of your business. I may have been clicking madly on a certain link, and I may not have been. I'm not telling.
This time, however, the ad was gone.
Meaning that the "daily expenditure limit" for the ad had already been reached. Within 3 minutes of Limbaugh's mentioning it, the ad's "buy" for the day was over.
I wonder if the regime will send Mr. Limbaugh a gift for exposing their ad to a much wider audience than it would have otherwise achieved?
After all, you would think they would thank him. That's what you would think.
Now I'm not necessarily advocating that anyone go online over the next several days and continue to search out this link and click on it. I mean, it would be an awful thing if the regime were to lose a ton of money while gaining little to show for it. It would be a waste is what it would be.
But if you should be a little curious about the whole "Goldman SEC" thing, it is your civic duty to be informed.
Posted by: Jack M. at
09:47 AM
| Comments (188)
Post contains 430 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: lorien1973 at April 21, 2010 09:53 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: DarkLordOfTheIntarWebs at April 21, 2010 09:53 AM (Xu5Z7)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 09:54 AM (Ncr1R)
Posted by: Happy Gene at April 21, 2010 09:55 AM (i/J4I)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 21, 2010 09:57 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 09:58 AM (mR7mk)
Alliteration aside, it's an interesting internet intellectual inquiry, yes?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 21, 2010 09:58 AM (VY5KX)
Also, that reminds me to click on Ace's ads like I'm a rat going for the cocaine. I do so love when Disney ads come up on the rotation here. It's such a lovely combination of wholesome family goodness and rampant profanity.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 21, 2010 10:00 AM (8WZWv)
Now if everyone here searched and clicked the ad we could deplete their daily budget real fast.
Posted by: iam7545 at April 21, 2010 10:00 AM (/nm9d)
there are a lot of lefty groups that want our clicks
http://tinyurl.com/2b5nmlc
Posted by: nine coconuts at April 21, 2010 10:02 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Zombie Everett Dirkson at April 21, 2010 10:02 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: Alan Smithee at April 21, 2010 10:03 AM (F7GbV)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:03 AM (Ncr1R)
Posted by: izoneguy at April 21, 2010 10:03 AM (CLIVI)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at April 21, 2010 10:03 AM (JrRME)
Posted by: Paulie "the surfer" Corbone at April 21, 2010 10:04 AM (RD7QR)
That's only adsense, not adwords - and even with adsense, it's just within a short period of time. The same user (as long as it's not super rapid clicks) can hit the same account multiple times. Google doesn't specify the exact time frame of course, but it's less than 10 minutes.
IE clicking. hitting back. clicking - may not bill the account twice. but clicking. visiting your pron for a few minutes. clicking - will definitely bill it twice.
Second, for sponsored ads they have a formula that allows the ad to show or not show at different times.
Depends on the competition and your bid. The higher bid, you'll more likely appear more often, and where you want to appear. Lower bids will bounce around more, but higher bids (top 3 slots) will not go away until the budget is exceeded.
Posted by: lorien1973 at April 21, 2010 10:04 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: Lycos, Hotbot and Webcrawler at April 21, 2010 10:04 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:05 AM (Ncr1R)
Btw, I stopped using the big "G" months ago. For now, I Bing.
Posted by: Twinks at April 21, 2010 10:05 AM (VYKgG)
That's not a sponsored link. A sponsored link appears in a box across the top or down the right side.
What you saw was the result of an organic search. Someone had to optimize their listing in order for it to appear. That, combined with Google's software which looks for the best fit for the search request, is the reason for why it appeared first.
You can click all you want. No one gets charged.
Posted by: PAguy at April 21, 2010 10:05 AM (3TFhP)
Adwords is per click, not impression. They dumped impressions years ago. You have to interact with the ad (click) to both be informed and to bill the advertiser.
Posted by: lorien1973 at April 21, 2010 10:06 AM (IhQuA)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 10:06 AM (QxSug)
Bottom line, they are very proactive in looking for ways that people are trying to manipulate them, and they take steps to counter that activity.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 21, 2010 10:07 AM (DsU01)
Right click on link, open link in new tab, close tab without opening.
Posted by: davidt at April 21, 2010 10:07 AM (aag4W)
Posted by: JDFALCON IN VEGAS at April 21, 2010 10:07 AM (jHBnk)
At least Google has the good sense to appreciate their Chinese clients.
Posted by: Thomas Friedman, owner of a mansion and admirer of dictators at April 21, 2010 10:07 AM (AZGON)
The carbon footprint of server farms is pretty awesome, too. *grin*
Then there's this: running two searches is equal to the 14g of carbon dioxide produced when boiling a kettle with enough water for one cup of tea.
It may be a happy Lenin's Birfday this year after all. *click click click*
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 10:08 AM (mR7mk)
I admire you and my dreams are to be like you.
Here you are, out of the goodness of your heart, clicking on the ad, stimulating the economy.
Me on the other hand, shallow as I am, click the ad to burn up their damn budget.
Shit! I've got to learn to control my anger! Those voices!!!!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 21, 2010 10:08 AM (r1h5M)
Protect yourself.
Posted by: oh, Hi Mark at April 21, 2010 10:10 AM (jPEaq)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:10 AM (Ncr1R)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at April 21, 2010 10:11 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 21, 2010 10:12 AM (7VvJB)
"My name is Thomas J. Friedman, millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht."
Posted by: Thomas Friedman, owner of a mansion and admirer of dictators at April 21, 2010 02:07 PM (AZGON)
Again!
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 21, 2010 10:12 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Goldman Sachs SEC at April 21, 2010 10:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Grover Fucking Cleveland at April 21, 2010 10:16 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 10:17 AM (fwSHf)
If it was any good, no one would be selling so clearly GS knew is was crap.
These "market" type transactions have got to stop.
Posted by: nine coconuts at April 21, 2010 10:18 AM (DHNp4)
The first thing that shows up is Feministing. No one wants to see that shit.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 10:18 AM (mR7mk)
crap
i did this and accidently hit the "x" key which is located next to the "c" key.
so i typed in Goldman Sex and hit enter by accident on my work computer.
that's fantastic.
Damn you JackM
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:19 AM (wuv1c)
Jack M.
I wondered why people were getting upset about it! If it indeed appeared in a yellow box, then it was a sponsored link.
Looks like Google took it down. That's my guess.
Posted by: PAguy at April 21, 2010 10:19 AM (3TFhP)
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:20 AM (wuv1c)
-----------
Word. And I even had a blimp.
Posted by: Altavista at April 21, 2010 10:20 AM (3K4hn)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 21, 2010 10:20 AM (AZGON)
I've been pulling this nasty trick for years.
Posted by: Warden at April 21, 2010 10:21 AM (TIGTh)
-----------
Of course. Everyone knows Microsoft is less evil.
Posted by: Anachronda at April 21, 2010 10:21 AM (3K4hn)
Posted by: alexthechick at April 21, 2010 10:21 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 21, 2010 10:21 AM (uKraB)
It seems like you're suggesting that we click on certain ads with no intention of supporting the advertisers, JackM. It appears like you want people to do this merely to deplete the resources of our political foes.
It comes as no surprise that you would suggest the use of violence against those with whom you disagree.
I'll have no part of your violent, seditious ways, JackM.
Nosireebob.
Posted by: Eyjafjallajötroll at April 21, 2010 10:22 AM (cQyWA)
Head on over on over and click a while
Posted by: Bigzy at April 21, 2010 10:22 AM (LRduy)
The cost is chump change to these guys.
The scary thing is the White House putting their crap first in line when people are looking for info.
Posted by: ReallyOldGuy at April 21, 2010 10:23 AM (kNiZP)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:23 AM (Ncr1R)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 10:24 AM (mR7mk)
so i tried "asbestos exposure" and found a lot of scum bag lawyers that want our clicks (sorry gabe,)
http://tinyurl.com/2euh8g9
Posted by: nine coconuts at April 21, 2010 10:25 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: Bust of Churchill at April 21, 2010 02:23 PM (8/DeP)
FIFY.
Posted by: conscious, but randomly incoherent at April 21, 2010 10:25 AM (YVZlY)
I call bullshit on Ben. Bullshit Ben. You were looking for Nude Tim Geithner pics.
You need to go to TINY URL for that.
Posted by: paulie esther at April 21, 2010 10:25 AM (Vqruj)
I mean that the shit we do, don't you tea-bagging SOB's start doing it to us.
Next thing you know you assholes will start jamming the phone lines of our offices with stupid calls.
Posted by: Axelrod, the man at April 21, 2010 10:26 AM (vSiVD)
9 I googled "gilded sasquatch" but I didn't see any links to FLOTUS. The White House is dropping the ball.
Posted by: George Orwell at April 21, 2010 01:57 PM (AZGON)
+1,000,000,000,000
(in honor of our debt)
and thread winner, right out of the gate.
Posted by: s'moron at April 21, 2010 10:26 AM (UaxA0)
Just try it. Line's busy.
Posted by: Mary Landrieu at April 21, 2010 10:27 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:27 AM (Ncr1R)
Am I the only one who thinks that Bing's best ads are everything that Google does?
Just once I wish I was Bing.
Posted by: Tommy D. at April 21, 2010 10:27 AM (cQyWA)
Posted by: Grant Wood at April 21, 2010 10:31 AM (u8gk2)
Goldman Sachs & Co Address: 85 Broad St Fl Grnd
New York, NY 10004-2456 Phone Numbers: 1-212-902-1000
1-404-846-7200
2129021000
Posted by: Kemp at April 21, 2010 10:32 AM (vSiVD)
Ben Roethlisberger should thank Commissioner Goodell.
he shouldn't be suspended. He wasn't convicted of a crime, he wasn't charged with a crime, he is only guilty of screwing f'ed up women.
I can't believe they suspended him for 6 games.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: flag@whitehouse.gov at April 21, 2010 10:32 AM (u8gk2)
Posted by: conscious, but randomly incoherent at April 21, 2010 10:33 AM (YVZlY)
he is only guilty of screwing underage drinking f'ed up women to whom he had fed alcohol all night.
FIFY
Posted by: s'moron at April 21, 2010 10:33 AM (UaxA0)
"While President Obama assails the culture of greed and recklessness practiced by the men of Goldman Sachs, his administration is infested with them. The White House can no more disown Government Sachs than Da Boss-in-chief can disown Chicago politics.
Obama is headed to Wall Street on Thursday to demand “financial regulatory reform” — just as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed civil suit against Goldman Sachs for mortgage-related fraud. Question the timing? Darn tootin’. There are no coincidences in the perpetually orchestrated Age of O. Everyone from disgraced former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer to analysts at the Brookings Institution and Barclays Capital to the GOP leadership and Rush Limbaugh has noted the reeking political opportunism in the air.
As the New York Post reported Tuesday, the Democratic National Committee immediately bought sponsored Internet ads on Google that direct web surfers who type in “Goldman Sachs SEC” to Obama’s fundraising site. “It’s time to hold the big banks accountable,” the money-grubbing DNC message bellows. But just like his crony capitalist predecessor George W. Bush, Obama has relied on Goldman Sachs and Wall Street power brokers to engineer massive government interventions to “rescue” failing businesses with the tax dollars of ordinary Americans.
While irony-challenged Democratic candidates like mob-linked banker Alexi Giannoulias in Illinois (who hopes to fill ObamaÂ’s old Senate seat) call on Republicans to return their fat-cat Goldman Sachs donations, the Democrats are silent on the $994,795 in Goldman Sachs campaign cash that Obama bagged. The class-warfare Dems are also mum on all the presidentÂ’s Goldman Sachs men sitting in the catbirdÂ’s seat:
...
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 10:33 AM (0fzsA)
goldman sachs obama
the above search will get you a highlighted ad to Obama's website.
clicked it 50 times, cost them 25 bucks
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:34 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Adjoran at April 21, 2010 10:34 AM (3hg5M)
I must object to this. I'm the one who works in the evvvvviiiiillll personal injury field.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 21, 2010 10:34 AM (8WZWv)
Goldman Sachs runs the administration.
"...,.– Goldman Sachs partner Gary Gensler is Obama’s Commodity Futures Trading Commission head. He was confirmed despite heated congressional grilling over his role, as Reuters described it, “as a high-level Treasury official in a 2000 law that exempted the $58 trillion credit default swap market from oversight. The financial instruments have been blamed for amplifying global financial turmoil.” Gensler said he was sorry — hey, it worked for tax cheat Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner — and was quickly installed to guard the henhouse.
– Goldman Sachs kept White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel on a $3,000 monthly retainer while he worked as Clinton’s chief fundraiser, as first reported by Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney. The financial titans threw in another $50,000 to become the Clinton primary campaign’s top funder. Emanuel received nearly $80,000 in cash from Goldman Sachs during his four terms in Congress — investments that have reaped untold rewards, as Emanuel assumed a leading role championing the trillion-dollar TARP banking bailout law."
-MM
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 10:36 AM (0fzsA)
Sweet Mother...
– Former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson serves under Geithner as his top deputy and overseer of TARP bailout — $10 billion of which went to Goldman Sachs. Left-leaning government watchdog Melanie Sloan of the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington responded: “It makes it appear that they are saying one thing and doing another.” Paul Blumenthal of the Sunlight Foundation noted that, while at Goldman Sachs, Patterson lobbied against executive pay limits that Obama had crusaded for as senator (before, that is, his administration carved out exemptions for AIG). While Patterson agreed to recuse himself on any Goldman Sachs-related issues or related policy concerns, Blumenthal wrote, it “still creates a serious conflict for Geithner, as Treasury is being partly managed by a former Goldman lobbyist. Geithner is also placed in a tough position considering that his chief of staff is limited in the areas in which he can work (supposedly).”
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 10:37 AM (0fzsA)
he is only guilty of screwing underage drinking f'ed up women to whom he had fed alcohol all night.
FIFY
not a big fan of free will or personal responsibility. The girl took those shots voluntarily. Just because i offer kids candy from my van doesn't mean they HAVE to take it.
Also, if you read the read the police reports, the girl was drinking prior to the event, she was 20, so she was drinking illegally, it is the bars responsibility to not sell alcohol to minors. And she was wearing a name tag that said "DTF", which for those of you that are older means "Down to Fornicate" but a different F word.
Read the police report, it is all their. This was a drunk college girl party skank, who regretted doing something. Not the first time it has happened.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:37 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 10:37 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: John McCain at April 21, 2010 10:37 AM (u8gk2)
Posted by: kansas at April 21, 2010 10:38 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 21, 2010 10:38 AM (uKraB)
Hate to burst your bubble, but I know from a friend that pays for Google advertising, that per-click reimbursement is based on individual IP addresses per day.
In other words, you click once, the advertiser pays $0.25.
Click 100 times. . .the advertiser pays $0.25.
The clicks are logged, so if you're clicking on a link 1000 times, the advertiser can access that record. (Note that there is nothing illegal about clicking on a Google link 10,000 times if you like).
If you want to cost the advertiser more, you have to do your clicks from different IP addresses and/or spread them over multiple days.
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 10:40 AM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 21, 2010 10:40 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: kjl291 at April 21, 2010 10:41 AM (rlmtU)
Ben, (c'mon really? that's your nic?)
An NFL Quarterback should have MUCH better judgment than to fuck a stumbling drunk coed.
It reflects poorly on the league, and Goodall was in his rights to suspend Rothl.
Is 6 games too much? Maybe, but that's a judgment call, too. But to say he shouldn't have suspended Rothl. is just plain wrong.
Posted by: s'moron at April 21, 2010 10:41 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: Jack M. at April 21, 2010 10:43 AM (Ncr1R)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 21, 2010 10:44 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: JWF at April 21, 2010 10:44 AM (1l37M)
Fun stuff:
http://tinyurl.com/y83ecpw
Nobody suspects the gay inquisition.
(H/T WeaselZippers)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 21, 2010 02:38 PM (uKraB)
Wait until the transvestites hear about this. Nobody even told them that the other perverts were going to be playing with their balls.
Posted by: Attorney General at April 21, 2010 10:45 AM (xxgag)
Didn't Google get into a fight with some advertisers over the click abuse by the company's competitors? I seem to remember something about it and Google quickly giving credit for the fraud.
Posted by: Kemp at April 21, 2010 10:45 AM (vSiVD)
Ah, poor dirtbag Ben (not you, AoSHQ Ben, the shitstain Stealers Ben!)
Actions >>>> reactions and all that jazz.
Six games seems just about right to me for a guy that has been in this precarious situation before.
/no sympathy.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 10:47 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 21, 2010 10:50 AM (uKraB)
Stalinesque purge at MSOBC : Donny Deutch taken off for upsetting Keefums!
Chris Matthews unavailable for comment
Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 10:51 AM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 10:51 AM (OlnxK)
Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 10:52 AM (fwSHf)
That's exactly the point--this is the second "drunk party girl skank" accusing Benburger of sexual assault in less than a year. If he'd just paid a sober professional there'd be no "NFL players are rapists brutes" international publicity. Are they just supposed to let him stumble around stickin' his dick in "drunk party girl skanks" and making all the players who don't look like dicks until one night a woman shows up in an ER with injuries? (And then sues the league because everyone knew he had a problem and no one came to him like a fucking man and told him to stop fucking "drunk party girl skanks"...) Or until he ends up like Steve McNair?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 10:54 AM (mR7mk)
You're right that a "heavy clicking" campaign by a group of people (eg Rush's audience) *should* cause the advertiser to have to pay for all the clicks up to whatever their daily maximum budget is (assuming they have one).
*BUT* in the event of that sort of coordinated "attack" the advertiser might well complain to Google about it, and perhaps get a partial or even total refund.
Remember, Google wants this ad revenue. If anyone can just come and spam-attack advertisers with coordinated clicking, that would make advertisers unwilling to list ads on Google, thereby destroying Google's business model.
So its in Google's interest to make sure that its clients are satisfied and don't have to pay for click-attacks like this.
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 10:54 AM (6Q9g2)
Kemp, here i think it is page 15 of the police report.
the girls had been bar hopping that night, so they were already drunk.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:54 AM (wuv1c)
Is this not considered "click fraud"? I think it may be.
More troubling is the fact that they even had the ad placed at all. I have never felt so manipulated in my life as I have this past year. This administration is beyond belief.
Posted by: Texmom at April 21, 2010 10:55 AM (WzN8I)
Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 02:52 PM (fwSHf)
That must be a hold over from the Clinton years
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 21, 2010 10:56 AM (1Jaio)
Her form is better than JugEars. Must be the sculpted arms.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 21, 2010 10:56 AM (VY5KX)
Try "Worf Grows a Garden."
Posted by: Filly at April 21, 2010 10:56 AM (onwJ3)
Gibbs is the biggest liar press secretary to ever take in air:
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs denied President Obama took any PAC money from Goldman Sachs, therefore he will not return any of it.
GIBBS: "Anybody that contributed to the campaign at any point knew where the President stood on Wall Street."
How is that an answer?
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 10:59 AM (0fzsA)
Ah, poor dirtbag Ben (not you, AoSHQ Ben, the shitstain Stealers Ben!)
Actions >>>> reactions and all that jazz.
Six games seems just about right to me for a guy that has been in this precarious situation before.
/no sympathy.
Read the story of the girl from Nevada making the accusation, in civil court no less. She is insane. She made up an imaginary boyfriend in the military.
I will agree, he shouldn't be boning drunk skanks, that never helped anyone, but the NFL shouldn't be the morality police, nor do they have the moral authority to do so since Ray Lewis who was in fact charged with a double homicide is still playing in the league.
I get that the NFL can do what it wants, but Ben is guilty of nothing more than stupidy. He wasn't charged or convicted. He's only guilty in public opinion, which thank god can't put people behind bars.
i am not saying you should have sympathy for him, i'm just sayin i can't believe they are suspending him for 6 games, when the league is filled with admitted and convicted wife, drug users, dealer, etc and they aren't suspended.
Here in pittsburgh, James Harrison, the line backer admitted to beating his wife and he wasn't suspended. Santonio Homes before he was suspended had also admitted to beating his girlfiriend and had been caught smoking weed by the police.
it's just hypocritical thats all
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 10:59 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 21, 2010 11:01 AM (NurK6)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:02 AM (6Njk9)
Gibbs is lying again.
And in other news, water is still wet.
Posted by: Damn Skippy at April 21, 2010 11:03 AM (VDgKF)
Washington Post reporting that the Geico guy who dissed FreedomWorks got fired.
to steal a line from NRO
I guess Geico realized the voice over job was so easy a caveman can do it.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:03 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: moviegique at April 21, 2010 11:04 AM (ey5wt)
Washington Post reporting that the Geico guy who dissed FreedomWorks got fired.
This is news to me. Dammit, why aren't these stories posted on AoS? I get most of my news from this site. For fuck's sake, nobody gives a shit about 6 homosexual protesters in Washington D.C.
Posted by: Atom Ant at April 21, 2010 11:06 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:06 AM (OlnxK)
Ben
Thanks, why the fuck didn't his body guards stop this shit? What is he paying them for?
stop what shit? He probably hired them to keep people away from him, not to stop him from boning skanks.
Let's be honest her people. Wealthy famous men like screwing women. Many women(not AoSHQ women of course) like having sex with rich famous men.
This girl probably had sex with Roethlisberger, then regretted it when she realized that's all it was going to be, sex, and not relationship or anything else.
Even college bar skanks have remorse i guess.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:07 AM (wuv1c)
Washington Post reporting that the Geico guy who dissed FreedomWorks got fired.
to steal a line from NRO
I guess Geico realized the voice over job was so easy a caveman can do it.
The Geico lizard left ranting insulting messages on Freedomworks voice mail
It wasn't his fault, Flo from Progressive made him do it
Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 11:08 AM (sYxEE)
129 Morals clauses. They are there for a reason.
How many times does this adult fuck up have to find himself at the "wrong place, at the wrong time" with some "psycho girl" that's looking to take advantage of the situation.
He needs to be accountable for his poor choices criminal in nature or not.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 11:08 AM (pLTLS)
How many times does this adult fuck up have to find himself at the "wrong place, at the wrong time" with some "psycho girl" that's looking to take advantage of the situation.
He needs to be accountable for his poor choices criminal in nature or not.
I would agree 100% if the NFL was consistent, but the aren't. If every NFL were actually held to that standard, every team would have 4-5 plays under suspension right now.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:09 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Valiant at April 21, 2010 11:09 AM (UKSRV)
to steal a line from NRO
I guess Geico realized the voice over job was so easy a caveman can do it.
The Geico lizard left ranting insulting messages on Freedomworks voice mail
It wasn't his fault, Flo from Progressive made him do it
who knew that even the voiceover industry in hollywood was far lefty. He says he was motivated to make the call because of the racial slurs at the healthcare bill signing. It looks to me like the MSM has incited more violence agaisnt people using lies than the tea partiers have.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:11 AM (wuv1c)
Back when Kobie Bryant was charged with rape I did some research on these kinds of things.
The overall statistics for the charge of rape are really bad. 60% of all the rape charges are false. When you add in celebrity/wealth status to the male the percentage goes through the roof.
Suspension in this case is BS.
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 11:11 AM (QrA9E)
I would agree 100% if the NFL was consistent, but the aren't. If every NFL were actually held to that standard, every team would have 4-5 plays under suspension right now
And I might agree with that if he weren't the most high profile player on the team. He can't reap with benefits of being the focal point of the team without taking the consequences for that privilege.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 11:13 AM (pLTLS)
Re rape charges/suspension
Back when Kobie Bryant was charged with rape I did some research on these kinds of things.
The overall statistics for the charge of rape are really bad. 60% of all the rape charges are false. When you add in celebrity/wealth status to the male the percentage goes through the roof.
Suspension in this case is BS.
I will be honest, I knew a lot of girls in college who put themselves in these situations.
I am not playing the "she wore a short skirt and deserved it" card, but I will say that if you get black out drunk at a party and flirt very heavily with a guy and something sexual happens, then maybem, just maybe you share a certain degree of responsibility.
My guess is that this girl had sex with Roethlisberger, then regretted and made up a rape story. Like the Duke Rape case. The girl was a hooker, had sex with a bunch or guys, then was mocked by them and decided to get even by making up a rape story.
Rapes happen, and the men who commit them, especially the serial offenders should be punished to the full extent of the law, but lets not pretend that all people who cry "rape" are telling the truth.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:16 AM (wuv1c)
Clicking on an ad link to see where it goes, isn't "click fraud", even if every single member from Rush's audience does it.
Its fine to click on any ad you like, even if you have no intent of ever buying the product. Did you sign an agreement with the advertiser or Google that you would only click on links that you read or had commercial interest in? Non-followthrough clicks are part of the risk that advertisers take in running internet ads (or indeed that any advertiser takes in advertising ANY product).
It might be "click fraud" if I were to run an application that automatically generated several hundred new IP addresses per day (or spammed IP addresses) each generating a click, with the express intent of damaging the advertiser. But that's sort of a different thing, isn't it?
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 11:17 AM (PwGfd)
the Donny Douche story above...
if you want to know how far removed MSNBC is from reality...
the sad thing is that they are being so loyal to a man who isn't loyal. Keith Olbermann will burn MSNBC the first time he is offered more money or a better job elsewhere. This man has a history of burned bridges everywhere he has worked.
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:17 AM (wuv1c)
From what I have seen on this story she was in it for the money from the get-go. She probably wasn't even drunk.
Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 11:17 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:19 AM (6Njk9)
Ben, you're not distinguishing between the criminal charges, which were dropped and the perception issue that governs his contract with the league.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 11:19 AM (pLTLS)
I was looking at the actual report, which you have dismissed out of hand. *shrug*
But anyway, you have convinced me. White quarterbacks with Super Bowl rings should be able to drunkenly flash their dicks at "drunk party skanks" in semi-public places, and their employer shouldn't be able to say or do a damn thing.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 21, 2010 11:20 AM (mR7mk)
Still buying the "something happened in that house that night" meme?
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 21, 2010 11:20 AM (NurK6)
Ben Roethlisberger signed his contract. He is a fucking dirt ball. NFL contracts have good citizen/morality clauses.
Fucking drunken 20 year olds in Night Club bathrooms is bad publicity for the League.
If you cannot understand why Roethlisberger is being hammered. You may be retarded.
Posted by: paulie esther at April 21, 2010 11:24 AM (Vqruj)
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 03:17 PM (PwGfd)
Click fraud is when a search company or an ad company causes the ads to be clicked to generate revenue for themselves. Such as if their employees did it or wrote a program to do it.
An individual can click on anything they want as many times as they want for whatever reason they want.
Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 11:25 AM (fwSHf)
Heather - he didn't have sex with her, the only credible evidence in the police report is he talked to her in a hallway (not the bathroom). Your on this site, you know the media are idiots - why do believe them in this case?
I was looking at the actual report, which you have dismissed out of hand. *shrug*
But anyway, you have convinced me. White quarterbacks with Super Bowl rings should be able to drunkenly flash their dicks at "drunk party skanks" in semi-public places, and their employer shouldn't be able to say or do a damn thing.
why do you have to make this a race thing?(heh)
I don't think the Steelers suspended him, the NFL did. If it was the Steelers, then that is fine, it is their prerogative, but the NFL suspended him for bad moral judgement, when their league is filled with wife beaters, real rapists, drug additct, etc that aren't being suspended.
She had .20 blood Alcohol level, she wore a name tag saying she was "down to fornicate", she went into a dark hallway with a man. She clearly was all class.
Also as a moron, i reserve the right to flash my weiner at whoever i damn well please.
you just wait til ace acutally puts together the AoSHQ Las Vegas Junket
Posted by: Ben at April 21, 2010 11:27 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:29 AM (tJF9l)
Ben try to focus. I know it's difficult but the subject is BEN ROETHLISBERGER and his CONTRACT with the NFL.
Her blood alcohol level and any other players misdeads are not the issue.
Thanking you in advance for your cooperation.
Posted by: paulie esther at April 21, 2010 11:34 AM (Vqruj)
Depending on the series in question, approximately 1/3 of rape allegations are demonstrably false. In some series the proportion is quite a bit higher.
I've recently heard from a physician who was in charge of a particular Bible belt state's sexual crimes unit (his job was to conduct physical exams and document findings) that when he got the "victim" in a room privately, away from their friends and family, and asked them to come clean, roughly half the time, the victim would admit that the sex was consentual, and the rape charge was made because of embarrassment or for other reasons.
I know of a case where a 19 year old had sex with a 16 year old, who later claimed "rape". He said the act was completely consentual. She said force was involved. Charges were eventually dropped after eyewitnesses came forward describing the two holding hands and walking in public at a local mall two hours after the alleged "rape" occurred. (Is that something you do with someone who rapes you?).
So yeah, not only do false rape charges happen, they're depressingly common. Fortunately, much of the time false allegations don't lead to criminal charges, but often then do.
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 11:35 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:36 AM (h0rZ/)
With health insurance, the demon was Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of California, which Obama accused of raising premiums by “anywhere from 35 to 39 percent.” Why didn’t some curious reporter interview a single person who actually paid 39 percent more, or quote from a letter announcing such an increase? Because it didn’t happen. Insurance premiums are regulated by the states, and California wouldn’t approve such a boost. Yet the media’s uncritical outrage over that 39 percent rumor helped to enact an intrusive, redistributive health-care bill that has nothing to do with health-insurance premiums (which remain regulated by the states).
Today, the new demon du jour is Goldman Sachs, a handy scapegoat to promote hasty financial rejiggering schemes. The SECÂ’s suspiciously times civil suit against Goldman looks as flimsy as last monthÂ’s health-insurance story. It also looks unlikely to win in court.
“This is a non-scandal. The securities in question, so-called synthetic collateralized debt obligations, cannot exist unless somebody is betting that they will lose value.” In such a zero-sum contest, the big investors who went long knew perfectly well that other investors had to be taking the other side of the bet. Goldman lost $90 billion by betting this CDO would go up; John Paulson went short.
Columnists have moralized about the unfairness of the short investor (Paulson) negotiating the terms of this deal with a long investor, ACA Management, which had the last word. This too, notes Mallaby, “is another non-scandal. An investor who wants to bet against a bundle of mortgages is entitled to suggest what should go into the bundle. The buyer is equally entitled to make counter-suggestions. As the SEC’s complaint states clearly, the lead buyer in this deal, a boutique called ACA that specialized in mortgage securities, did precisely that.”
Like the earlier fuming about Anthem California, this new SEC publicity stunt is likewise irrelevant to the pending legislation. Congress hopes to get standardized derivatives traded on an exchange. But synthetic CDOs dealing with customized bundles of securities could not possibly be traded on an exchange and would therefore be untouched by reform.
Losses sustained by a few financial speculators on one exotic derivative had nothing to do with the start of a global recession in December 2007 or the related financial crisis of September 2008. The core of the latter crisis was mortgage-backed securities per se, yet Goldman was only the twelfth-largest private MBS issuer in 2007. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were and are the biggest risk, so any reform that excludes them is a fraud.
The SECÂ’s dubious civil suit against Goldman is a wasteful diversion at best. It has nothing to do with the Obama administrationÂ’s suicidal impulse to impose new regulations and taxes on banks to encourage them to lend more.
http://tinyurl.com/2avkdd7
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 11:36 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 11:39 AM (PjevJ)
Jean, you're saying the media made this grown man hop in bed with some desirable skanks that were after a bit of fame and money?
Wow. They're even more vile than I initially suspected!
Poor Ben. It's just *never* his faults these women "find him" is it?
Please consider this my "no" for the pity party for this piece of pig filth.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 11:47 AM (pLTLS)
"miserable failure" is #1. Seems the Obamabots are stuck in some sort of "it's Bush's fault" infinite loop. They need to be rebooted. Rush really does occupy the empty space between their ears.
Posted by: rockhead at April 21, 2010 12:07 PM (RykTt)
Posted by: redc1c4 at April 21, 2010 12:12 PM (d1FhN)
On paper it had nothing to do with rape allegations. The specific reason the NFL cited for suspending him was for "purchasing or facilitating the purchase of alcohol" for minors.
--
“As the District Attorney concluded, the extensive investigatory record shows that you contributed to the irresponsible consumption of alcohol by purchasing (or facilitating the purchase of) alcoholic beverages for underage college students, at least some of whom were likely already intoxicated. There is no question that the excessive consumption of alcohol that evening put the students and yourself at risk.
--
Reading between the lines, Roethlisberger didn't even prospectively buy these girls drinks. . .he just paid the bill for drinks they already bought. Hard to see how he was contributing to irresponsible consumption by paying for drinks that were already consumed!
IMO, the NFL has every right to ding him just for being involved in what evolved into a scandal, but all things considered this is fairly weak stuff considering that all of the serious charges were dropped and considering the level of hooliganism otherwise tolerated in the NFL. He's being zapped here more for PR reasons than for what he did.
If Roethlisberger had gotten into a drunken barfight and sent a few people to the hospital (arguably worse than paying the bill for a few drunk chicks), the NFL would probably have ignored this entirely.
Posted by: looking closely at April 21, 2010 12:16 PM (6Q9g2)
Posted by: ambah at April 21, 2010 12:19 PM (tPKi8)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 12:21 PM (6Njk9)
Meh, to hell with Ben (Rothl) and to hell with the skank -- sound like they both deserve each other. Frak them both (figuratively).
I really don't think a woman should be allowed to think they can get falling down drunk, act like a dirty whore, make come ons to men and then think that somehow have absolutely no consequences from that (and definitely not cry "victim").
By the same token I don't think men should get a free pass to get drunk and act like filthy pigs either -- double ditto if they think their "star" status excludes them from consequences.
No sympathy for stupid -- either side.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 21, 2010 12:28 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur
at April 21, 2010 01:58 PM (VY5KX)
--Actually, that's assonance (vowel repetition), not alliteration (consonant repetition)
Posted by: Diction Police at April 21, 2010 12:44 PM (Mmw0q)
Posted by: karenm at April 21, 2010 12:46 PM (2y90e)
There does seem to be some hypocrisy/double standard/inconsistency in how thes NFL treats certain players as opposed to others.
But, Ben, nothing for nothing, but it also seems like you're spending way, way too much time and energy defending someone who (1) did something that violated NFL policy - regardless of whoever else in the NFL may have done whatever they did whenver, (2) has been involved in similar situations before, (3) ought to know better due to his privileged position as an NFL QB (you live the good life, fine, but if you screw up like this you really shouldn't expect a lot of sympathy or much of a long leash), and (4) appears to be a dirtball at best from all accounts.
I'm all for equal treatment, but this guy does not seem to me to be someone who merits much carrying the flag for.
Posted by: RM at April 21, 2010 12:53 PM (1kwr2)
Ah, yes it's the media that's given me the perception that he's a scumbag. Poor Ben is the victim of overzealous media hacks.
They drive all his poor choices in life. From crashing his motorcycle without wearing a helmet to finding slut pupppies that throw down the rape card on cue.
Poor, poor Ben. He just can't catch himself a break.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 21, 2010 12:59 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 01:02 PM (6Njk9)
Posted by: DefendUSA at April 21, 2010 01:03 PM (yIwYC)
Posted by: sig at April 21, 2010 01:04 PM (2i+Vz)
Posted by: Kemp at April 21, 2010 01:06 PM (2+9Yx)
I think that's the point of my story. Rush's audience (whoever that might include) clicked on the link so frequently in a 3 minute period that the ad budget was entirely depleted for today.
Whether only one click per person counted, or whether multiple clicks did, the audience had the cumulative effect of, umm, moving the ad out of rotation, as it were
Jack - got that - I bet they took it down once it was all over the intertubes, radio and FOX
Posted by: iam7545 at April 21, 2010 01:27 PM (/nm9d)
It fit their narrative of events and facts be damned that's the story America was going to get. If it had been about a conservative politician, your and everyone on this site would have been skeptical and waited 48hrs before commenting.
In this case, no evidence to support an indictment. A DA could get a ham sandwich indicted -- and but he couldn't do it. The media created a firestorm based on some of her drunk girlfriend's calls to TMZ and a guy gets a $4M hit because he bought some rounds.
Posted by: Jean at April 21, 2010 02:50 PM (CPefM)
Posted by: snookered at April 21, 2010 07:05 PM (jchJh)
Posted by: the slob at April 21, 2010 08:31 PM (i1+rx)
hold down the Ctrl (control) button and just keep clicking the link.... I think a new blog game might be in the offing..... see how much Ad Money you can run up.... need a name for this new game of discovery....
Posted by: J2 at April 22, 2010 12:47 AM (DCdSz)
Posted by: penis büyütücü at December 11, 2010 03:11 PM (wVs6u)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3139 seconds, 316 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Polly Carboner at April 21, 2010 09:49 AM (VDgKF)