January 24, 2010
— Slublog

Yes, it's Dick Morris, but given the arrogance the Dems have already shown on this, did you really think they'd do anything differently?
President Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate leader Harry Reid have all agreed to the basic framework of the plan.Time to call your Congressfolks.Their plan is clever but can be stopped if opponents of radical healthcare reform act quickly and focus on a core group of 23 Democratic Congressman. If just a few of these 23 Democrats are "flipped" and decide to oppose the bill, the whole Obama-Pelosi-Reid stratagem falls apart.
Here's what I learned top Democrats are planning to implement.
Senate Democrats will go to the House with a two-part deal.
First, the House will pass the Senate's Obamacare bill that passed the Senate in December. The House leadership will vote on the Senate bill, and Pelosi will allow no amendments or modifications to the Senate bill.
How will Pelosi's deal fly with rambunctious liberal members of her majority that don't like the Senate bill, especially its failure to include a public option, put heavy fines on those who don't get insurance and offering no income tax surcharge on the "rich"?
That's where the second part of the Pelosi-deal comes in.
Behind closed doors Reid and Pelosi have agreed in principle that changes to the Senate bill will be made to satisfy liberal House members -- but only after the Senate bill is passed and signed into law by Obama.
Nah, I didn't believe him either. (h/t: Allahpundit)
Yup. You've already lost the trust of a majority of the American people. Do this, and it's game over for the Dems, Bambi.
Posted by: Slublog at
05:03 PM
| Comments (155)
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: kefka at January 24, 2010 05:06 PM (n1uMU)
Posted by: jcjimi at January 24, 2010 05:07 PM (XSikc)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 24, 2010 05:08 PM (SB0V2)
Posted by: antisocialist at January 24, 2010 05:08 PM (Rwudm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 24, 2010 05:09 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: Cicero at January 24, 2010 05:10 PM (SCFiZ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 24, 2010 05:10 PM (QECjC)
That seems to be the thinking for Pelosi and Reid.
When the hell is Pelosi up for re-election?
Posted by: wherestherum at January 24, 2010 05:11 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: brian at January 24, 2010 05:11 PM (g//nK)
DO IT BARRY!
Posted by: GarandFan at January 24, 2010 05:13 PM (ZQBnQ)
Posted by: Salem at January 24, 2010 05:13 PM (86rbG)
Let us force this on you, you'll end up loving it, you'll see ! We know whats best for you proles now shut up and keep paying your taxes !
Posted by: Nazi Pelosi at January 24, 2010 05:13 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: antisocialist at January 24, 2010 05:13 PM (Rwudm)
Posted by: kefka at January 24, 2010 05:15 PM (n1uMU)
That plan has way to many moving pieces, it assumes that Pelosi can keep all the Stupak abortion votes, liberals, replace 3 yes votes from last time and rests entirely on a promise Reid is in no position to offer (letter or not).
It's too clever by waaaaayyyyy more than half.
I don't doubt they are talking about it but it ain't happening.
Posted by: DrewM. at January 24, 2010 05:15 PM (UAnTc)
Because the Newsmax article does not list the 23 congress creatures, I went to his site...
Now is the time to finish off the prospects of Obamacare with the Democrats reeling from the defeat in Massachusetts.
We must not trust them. The apparent reluctance of the House Democrats to pass the Senate version will evaporate once Obama puts his weight behind the bill and Pelosi starts to twist arms. Moderate Democrats cannot be counted upon.
So we need to target Democrats in swing districts who voted for the health care legislation in its first go-round in the House and convince them of the error of their ways. As the Republican floor leader in the 60s Senator Everett Dirksen once said “when they feel the heat, they see the light.”
Here is a list of twenty-three Democrats who voted for Obamacare and who are vulnerable in 2010. Its time to turn up the heat on them:
Harry Mitchell = Arizona 5
Gabrielle Giffords = Arizona 8
Alan Grayson = Fla 8
Mark Schauer = Mich 7
Carol Shea-Porter = NH 1
Mike Arcuri = NY 24
Mary Jo Kilroy = Ohio 15
Kathy Dahlkemper = Pa 3
Christopher Carney = Pa 10
Tom Perriello = Va 5
Ann Kirkpatrick = Arizona 1
Baron Hill = Indiana 9
Dina Titus = Nevada 3
John Hall = NY 19
Stephen Driehaus = Ohio 1
Paul Kanjorsky = Pa 11
Dan Maffei = NY 25
Allan Mollohan = W Va
Nick Rahall = W Va
Steve Kagen = Wisc
Marion Berry = Arkansas
John Spratt = Georgia
Zack Space = Ohio 18
Posted by: Deety at January 24, 2010 05:16 PM (aVzyR)
Posted by: antisocialist at January 24, 2010 05:16 PM (Rwudm)
Nancy, quit fuckin' around and pass it if you want, ya coward! If you liked Massachusetts, you'll love what you're bringing on yourselves.
We know there's no chance of voting Nancy out, but let's leave her sitting there with her 5 or 6 best buddies. the rest of 'em, GTFO!
Posted by: theothertrav at January 24, 2010 05:17 PM (00/a9)
I know. She's from my state. I can dream, can't I?
Posted by: wherestherum at January 24, 2010 05:17 PM (gofDd)
Posted by: toby928 at January 24, 2010 05:18 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at January 24, 2010 05:18 PM (CCcDq)
Posted by: Cicero at January 24, 2010 05:19 PM (SCFiZ)
Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 24, 2010 05:20 PM (MCHyX)
"This plan, of course, is a total subversion of the legislative process.
Typically, the Senate and House pass their own unique legislation and then both bills go to a conference committee. In conference the leadership of both Democrat-dominated houses wheel and deal and iron out differences.
The final compromise bill is then sent back to the full Senate and full House for a vote and has to pass both to go to the President. "
...
So, once again, the dems HOPE to lie to the American people, & do so behind closed doors. Where's C-SPAN?
Posted by: Pre Paid Sex Monster at January 24, 2010 05:20 PM (0fzsA)
Posted by: antisocialist at January 24, 2010 05:20 PM (Rwudm)
Obviously they plan to pass Anmesty to provide the Democrats with another 20million voters. It doesnt matter how unpopular they are now, because by 2012, the USA will have 20million more hispanic Democrat voters who will ensure Democrat majorities for ever.
Goodbye America
Posted by: GK at January 24, 2010 05:22 PM (nf2eg)
If the dems manage to ram it down our throats - the Republicans can and will use it to defeat every Democrat who takes part in this deception. Even those dems who helped out in the beginning will be on the voter chopping block.
Posted by: Pre Paid Sex Monster at January 24, 2010 05:24 PM (0fzsA)
Spending the next decade like the last decade baby-stepping 'independent-moderate' voters such as the Jill Dorson and her Regret Gang is not going to cut the crap.
At some point the babies must learn how to walk like an adult
Enough with the baby-steps; Moderate-Independents must grow up if they want to survive the vicious Left.
Posted by: syn at January 24, 2010 05:24 PM (IlCz1)
And how are these geniuses going to
1. pay for it, and
2. keep the docs from retiring in droves
How, indeed?
Posted by: Cloward-Piven at January 24, 2010 05:24 PM (YRjsF)
They have to pass it in the house. Stupak stood by his pledge. His faction, Cao and blue dogs have to agree to vote. It seems to me it's more to flip than they can get. Plus, they have to TRUST Pelosi.
If that works.
They have to walk it through the Senate process with the hopes of gaining the publics support in the process.
This is a fight to the end from a very desperate position.
Posted by: mghorning at January 24, 2010 05:26 PM (Q4Edg)
Posted by: weewilly at January 24, 2010 05:26 PM (iBHcm)
Don't trust the dems now to back out. They are desparate people and their backs are to the wall...some sort of bloodbath is coming.
Posted by: ishabibble at January 24, 2010 05:27 PM (GrvvI)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 24, 2010 05:27 PM (OkT2m)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 24, 2010 05:27 PM (TtXKB)
Posted by: tdpwells at January 24, 2010 05:27 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: Obama at January 24, 2010 05:28 PM (GfYt/)
Posted by: David at January 24, 2010 05:29 PM (6Z3qq)
Posted by: tdpwells at January 24, 2010 05:29 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: Tipsy McStagger, somewhere down in Texas at January 24, 2010 05:31 PM (vyFwl)
The House Democrats will be buying a pig in a poke after Obama goes down in 2012.
Posted by: toby928 at January 24, 2010 05:31 PM (PD1tk)
They aren't. As I said in a previous thread, this is for the consumption of the holdouts in the Fuhrerbunker. As they always describe it in military histories, the Pelosi-Fuhrer is moving phantom divisions around to counterattack the Russians. She will be just as effective as he was.
Posted by: Kevin Jennings at January 24, 2010 05:31 PM (0K3p3)
2. keep the docs from retiring in droves
They're not retiring in droves. They are moving to Haiti where they are getting thirty thousand a foot. Dead or alive.
Posted by: mghorning at January 24, 2010 05:31 PM (Q4Edg)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 24, 2010 05:32 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: JohnBigBootie at January 24, 2010 05:33 PM (PxSHp)
Posted by: Darth Nihilus69 at January 24, 2010 05:34 PM (GfYt/)
Okay where are the dems that wanna keep their jobs?? Where's their sense of selfishness all of a sudden? I find it hard to believe they're all willing to sacrifice themselves at Pelosi's altar.
Posted by: tdpwells at January 24, 2010 09:27 PM (Ei3oZ)
These are the same tone-deaf Dems who believe what Howard Dean and just about every liberal publication in the country is telling everyone right now. That they are losing massive public support by not ramming all their socialist wet dreams down everyones throats and that Scott Brown, Bob McDonnel and Chris Christie were elected because of failure to get them all passed.
They live in an alternate reality.
Posted by: Blazer at January 24, 2010 05:35 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Twinks at January 24, 2010 05:36 PM (LeFbD)
I figure Reid will use the nuclear option for the public option. These nitwits really believe universal health care as a right is a human rights issue. Next it will be income,housing, food, and transportation.
Thankfully their Soviet thing will be checked by Adam Smith's invisible hand...meanwhile we all suffer.
Posted by: torabora at January 24, 2010 05:36 PM (CH5ak)
Obviously they plan to pass Anmesty to provide the Democrats with another 20million voters. It doesnt matter how unpopular they are now, because by 2012, the USA will have 20million more hispanic Democrat voters who will ensure Democrat majorities for ever.
Goodbye America
Yes, the election of Scott Brown proved that we're doomed and powerless and doomed and dead and doomed and it's time for us to surrender, because there's no hope, and we're doomed, and the Democrats are unstoppable and we're doomed.
Posted by: Eye-rish at January 24, 2010 05:39 PM (cVJwC)
Yes, and it ranks behind only keeping their seats. Guess which one will win. There just aren't that many truly lunatic districts in the country. Ask Martha Coakley.
Posted by: pep at January 24, 2010 05:39 PM (0K3p3)
Unless the House decides it can live with just the Senate bill, Obamacare is dead. Take it to the bank. The best Democrtats can hope for is to pass some of the provisions they wanted like a Medicare expansion.
Posted by: Griff at January 24, 2010 05:41 PM (MKyfs)
Posted by: Darth Nihilus69 at January 24, 2010 05:42 PM (GfYt/)
Posted by: Ayn Rand at January 24, 2010 05:42 PM (CH5ak)
Posted by: DrewM. at January 24, 2010 09:15 PM (UAnTc)
Sounds like a bright idea from some mid-level staffer trying to help out his boss by providing a way to save this thing.
I don't know who leaked it to Morris, but Morris is one who would try to stir the pot here, most others would have ignored this thing as crazy.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 24, 2010 05:43 PM (Vo2Ef)
These nitwits really believe universal health care as a right is a human rights issue.
Its not so much as they believe its a right so much as they know its a good tool to wreck our country and economy with, grow the government exponentially larger, control peoples lives even more and relegate us to back-bencher status. These are not our mother and fathers or even our grandparents Democrats. These are the real Commies we were being warned about for decades.
Posted by: Blazer at January 24, 2010 05:45 PM (t72+4)
27 Harry Reid is throwing all of his political capital behind this. And $1, for a package with a total value of $1.
"If I had a dollar for every brain Harry Reid doesn't have, I would have one dollar."
Posted by: Squidward at January 24, 2010 05:46 PM (lQRmV)
Posted by: John Galt at January 24, 2010 05:47 PM (Ylv1H)
Let me be perfectly clear---the American people want this bill to pass. We just weren't getting our message out good enough and my enablers advise me to host more townhalls, grant more interviews and tap the networks to run more healthcare infomercials I intend to hit the road and canvass the country to listen to the people tell me that this is what they want.
God bless America
Posted by: President Barack H. Obama at January 24, 2010 05:48 PM (j4xgZ)
After Tuesday, this is insanity. She does not have the votes to win.
However...
She might toss it out there, just so she can have the Republicans on record as voting against it. She's hoping that she can have something to run on in the fall.
"We tried, but the Republicans said, 'no'"
The trouble is, this strategy welds this monstrosity to whomever votes for it.
(I'd like to see anyone get re-elected with this turd around their neck...)
Posted by: Warthog at January 24, 2010 05:50 PM (uz2hS)
Obviously they plan to pass Anmesty to provide the Democrats with another 20million voters. It doesnt matter how unpopular they are now, because by 2012, the USA will have 20million more hispanic Democrat voters who will ensure Democrat majorities for ever.
Goodbye America
Posted by: GK at January 24, 2010 09:22 PM (nf2eg)
Uh, filibuster....hello?
Posted by: Ellie Light at January 24, 2010 05:53 PM (wgLRl)
Of course, if it makes it to O and he signs it, the earthquake from MA will be a tsunami across the US.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 24, 2010 05:54 PM (DIYmd)
There's no more major national holidays until Memorial Day, at the end of May. So they can't vote on anything major until then...
Posted by: lauraw at January 24, 2010 05:54 PM (DbybK)
#22 Commiefornia is blue ONLY in the coastal counties...This blue thing has to do with crowded conditions in highly urbanized areas. The more rural...the more red.
Those of us in the red North would love to separate from the rest but they will not let go of the water they take from here....note Ahnuld is trying to steal even more water from the North for his swimming pool with $11 billion $$ bond issue while he is begging B+rry for bailout bucks. Screw RINO's...open season, no limit.
Posted by: Ayn Rand at January 24, 2010 05:54 PM (CH5ak)
Posted by: mghorning at January 24, 2010 05:55 PM (Q4Edg)
If you saw Beck's special on commie nutjobs, he made a clear point of saying that any country that switched into socialist gear had national health care as job #1.
Now, if you think November is going to be a bloodbath, check out the money quote from the Right Blogger conference held in Texas this past weekend:
The message heard over and over from just about all the panelists, was that the Right could beat the Left on-line and that our side clearly had the momentum. There was a genuine Tea Party atmosphere. There was euphoria over Scott Brown's recent win. Money bombs for Right candidates for office were also mentioned frequently. There was a definite emphasis on unity on the Right, and steering clear from divisive issues.
We've come a long way, baby.
From Libertarian Republican dot com.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 24, 2010 05:56 PM (LKkE8)
#73 We don't call him McAmnesty for nothing.
Posted by: torabora at January 24, 2010 05:57 PM (CH5ak)
Posted by: toby928 at January 24, 2010 05:57 PM (PD1tk)
Ah yes, the vaunted "transparency".
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 24, 2010 05:59 PM (3gX2w)
Palosi will be reelected as a congressman. The Speakership is a different story.
The House has to vote on a bill out of committee and the majority wins. There is NO way that bill will pass in the house. Therefore the bill is dead.
However, whatever the reason for all this do-or-die BS its a reelection killer no matter what is done. Its too late to shut up. They are doomed.
Speaking of doomed...send money to JD in AZ to beat the fucking clown McNasty.
Posted by: Serfer62 at January 24, 2010 05:59 PM (HLCnI)
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:00 PM (CfmlF)
Post #21 -
Correction:
John Spratt - SOUTH CAROLINA - I have called him before. He won't say what he's going to do until he votes. A big, fat 'screw you' to people in his district. This old fart needs to go, and I hope my vote puts him out.
Posted by: KR1 at January 24, 2010 06:01 PM (JVAYv)
Victor Davis Hanson wrote about Obama's problem with the truth.
It's another reason why, coupled with this week's fraudulent "Elie Light" propaganda and bizarre claims about banks and now this BS about waiting on healthcare: the man is a contemptible liar.
Read the entire essay. It's a good recap and analysis of Obama's total lack of veracity.
Posted by: K~Bob at January 24, 2010 06:03 PM (9b6FB)
The longer people are unemployed and hurting, the less likely people will be to suffer the fools who bring 'healthcare' 'reform'. People want jobs, they want the economy to recover, they want the burden of taxes they pay to go down, they want the threat of foreclosure on their home to go away.
They don't want a monument to the greatness of government which will 1) cost over a trillion dollars and 2) result in their own personal healthcare being rationed.
Posted by: Boots at January 24, 2010 06:04 PM (06JTY)
Posted by: Powdered Milk Man at January 24, 2010 06:04 PM (iJrbB)
Posted by: Methos at January 24, 2010 06:04 PM (Xsi7M)
Rep. Grayson was on Chris Matthews's show spouting this same talking point. He promised Chris that there will be a bill passed in 30 days or less via Reconciliation. Matthews lambasted him, accused him of spewing "netroots talking points" and basically told him this was impossible. The vid was jaw-dropping--blue on blue violence, a thing of bu-tay! Grayson came across smarmy, arrogant and generally as a giant smug douchebag.
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 10:00 PM (CfmlF)
Chris has been acting strange as of late. He's starting to take a few liberals to task and ask some tough questions If he keeps this up him and Keefums are gonna end up in a cat-fight in an MSNBC restroom.
Posted by: Blazer at January 24, 2010 06:05 PM (t72+4)
I see Rep. Marion Berry, (D., Ark) is on that list of vulnerable seats. Heh! This from WaPo:
Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry is expected to announce his retirement tomorrow morning, according to three sources briefed on the decision.
Berry will become the sixth Democrat in a competitive seat to leave in the last two months but the first to announce his retirement since the party's special election loss in Massachusetts last Tuesday.
"The message coming out of the Massachusetts special election is clear: No Democrat is safe," said National Republican Congressional Committee communications director Ken Spain.
Berry, first elected in 1996, had been noncommittal about his re-election bid for months although, privately, his allies insisted he was planning to run for re-election.
While Berry had rarely been challenged in the 1st district over the past decade or so, the seat has a clear Republican tilt as Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) won it with 59 percent in 2008.
Arkansas will be a huge focus of Republican efforts in the fall with Berry and Rep. Vic Snyder (D) retiring and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) in deep trouble as she seek re-election.
Arkansas Rep. Marion Berry is expected to announce his retirement tomorrow morning, according to three sources briefed on the decision.
Berry will become the sixth Democrat in a competitive seat to leave in the last two months but the first to announce his retirement since the party's special election loss in Massachusetts last Tuesday.
"The message coming out of the Massachusetts special election is clear: No Democrat is safe," said National Republican Congressional Committee communications director Ken Spain.
Berry, first elected in 1996, had been noncommittal about his re-election bid for months although, privately, his allies insisted he was planning to run for re-election.
While Berry had rarely been challenged in the 1st district over the past decade or so, the seat has a clear Republican tilt as Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) won it with 59 percent in 2008.
Arkansas will be a huge focus of Republican efforts in the fall with Berry and Rep. Vic Snyder (D) retiring and Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) in deep trouble as she seek re-election.
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:06 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: mghorning at January 24, 2010 06:07 PM (Q4Edg)
Chris has been acting strange as of late. He's starting to take a few liberals to task and ask some tough questions If he keeps this up him and Keefums are gonna end up in a cat-fight in an MSNBC restroom.
3 words: Pay Per View!
(can you imagine the bitch slapping, hair pulling, and bra snapping that would ensue?)
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:08 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: GarandFan at January 24, 2010 06:08 PM (ZQBnQ)
To start - only three votes are needed. Wexler is gone & can't be replaced until Apr. Stupak & Chao will probably vote against the watered down abortion provisions in the Senate bill.
Now you're working against the Dims, Peplosi sheltered and let vote NO last time. Count some of these, given the "mood", as NO again. There's work to do, but it's not insurmountable.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at January 24, 2010 06:08 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: JohnBigBootie at January 24, 2010 09:33 PM (PxSHp)
Shut up, John Bigbootie, you coward! You're da weakest individual
I ever know!
(here, hold this overthruster...)
Posted by: Dr. Emilio Lizardo at January 24, 2010 06:08 PM (DMzAl)
3 words: Pay Per View!
(can you imagine the bitch slapping, hair pulling, and bra snapping that would ensue?)
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 10:08 PM (CfmlF)
It would be epic and worth every penny to see.
Posted by: Blazer at January 24, 2010 06:09 PM (t72+4)
The longer people are unemployed and hurting, the less likely people will be to suffer the fools who bring 'healthcare' 'reform'. People want jobs, they want the economy to recover, they want the burden of taxes they pay to go down, they want the threat of foreclosure on their home to go away.
People are truly suffering out there. I would love it if someone in the media would do an expose of the high falutin' life-style of Barry and Mo. We are talking about a man who's policies are causing immeasurable pain out there and he and his wife are living high off the gubamint hog (the 8.9 million dollar estate that they stayed at during Christmas costs $4000/night to rent, Michelle's prominently photographed in all kinds of designer outfits--last week's Photo of the Day on WhiteHouse.gov featured her in a $2,763 designer coat. Someone analyzed five recent photos of her. The average cost of a pair of her shoes was 700.00 (5 different pairs). If people knew how much money the Obamas spent on themselves let alone what they are trying to spend on expanding government, people would be incensed. Especially since they try to spin themselves as these ordinary Joes who can feel your pain and are always talking about how we all need to sacrifice.
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:14 PM (CfmlF)
It would be epic and worth every penny to see.
Ball/boob dippingly good, clean fun. My money's on Chris, btw!
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:15 PM (CfmlF)
If Morris is right, (a stretch, I grant you) it's the House that we need to concentrate on.
They only made it by three votes the last time, but how many of those were Liberals who will be placated by that signed letter? Are there enough nervous Blue Dogs who care about being re-elected and Pro-Lifers to stop it?
Posted by: Saucy Jack at January 24, 2010 06:16 PM (GXLjK)
Posted by: mrfixit at January 24, 2010 06:16 PM (Bsm1s)
The problem is that there are so many boards and panels and administrators in this mess that, should they pass this, against the will of so many, they will not care about being reelected. If the voters, in their wrath, turn them out, they will just get jobs as administrators or chairing the panel that says Peter cannot have the expensive drugs that keep him alive.
Someone tell me that a Democrat Pol wouldn't just love to have the power of life and death. Tell me that. then let me tell you you're full of bovine exrement.
Posted by: Peter at January 24, 2010 06:19 PM (GkYyh)
Posted by: mrfixit at January 24, 2010 10:15 PM (Bsm1s)
You missed...
(by thaaat much...)
Posted by: Warthog at January 24, 2010 06:20 PM (DMzAl)
I really think plenty of dems who may have supported the health care monstrosity earlier now are really happy that they can get out of passing it, since their electorate will hold passage against them. If they just voted for it, the voters may forget by fall.
I would not be surprised to see it come up, and be blocked by a filibuster. From the dem's perspective, it's ideal -- it doesn't pass, so the issue stays alive, they don't get blamed for this horrible bill, and they can bash the nasty repubs for blocking it.
Posted by: Sam_R at January 24, 2010 06:21 PM (4SC3+)
Posted by: K~Bob at January 24, 2010 10:03 PM (9b6FB)
Thanks for the VDH link. Great article! Basically, Obama lies because he is inherently an inveterate, unrepentant, serial liar. It's seared into his character and who he is. Heh! So yeah, it's not his fault. He's a victim of himself.
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:21 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Freddie and Jason at January 24, 2010 06:25 PM (HAdov)
Posted by: mrfixit at January 24, 2010 10:16 PM (Bsm1s)
Can you imagine the outrage that would have occurred if the Bushes would have been traveling like the Bamster and taking luxe vacations? Or if Laura would have been wearing the haute couture outfits Michelle is constantly being photographed in? There would have been unhinged, scalding rage. (And that was during a good economy, but the meme would have been "we are a country involved in 2 wars, this spending is unconscienable and the president should be staying in D.C. to take care of all the issues at hand.") In fact, I recall lefty outrage over the audacity of his daughter getting married and having a "fancy wedding."
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:26 PM (CfmlF)
Hmmm....From Hotair:
“Stuart Rothenberg, a political analyst who follows Congressional races, said a report he will release Monday will count 58 Democratic House seats in play, up from 47 in December. The number of Republican seats in play has remained steady at 14 over the same period, he said. At the same time, Democrats expect more of their incumbents to retire, which could put additional seats at risk.”
Posted by: runningrn at January 24, 2010 06:31 PM (CfmlF)
Posted by: curious at January 24, 2010 06:32 PM (p302b)
http://tinyurl.com/yet4q5z
Please forgive me if this breaks all known rules, regulations, decrees, fatwas, etc., regarding posting. I'm just a moron, you know.
Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at January 24, 2010 06:33 PM (ltfED)
Question 1: can Nancy keep 218 fooled enough to cram it down?
Question 2: which way will the declared Dem 'retirees' break? will they vote party or country when they don't have to worry about re-election
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at January 24, 2010 06:34 PM (1AnxB)
Not that ANY of this is relevant to THIS topic, bye.
Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at January 24, 2010 06:35 PM (ltfED)
Posted by: curious at January 24, 2010 06:35 PM (p302b)
"Can you imagine the outrage"
Like the outrage when Nancy Reagan wore nice expensive outfits and we had this new phenomenom called homelessness? They had telethons on HBO and everything. Yet, there was Nancy, dressed nicely. I'm assuming that homeless problem is solved now since we don't hear about it anymore.
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 24, 2010 06:36 PM (MNxpu)
Mass-hypnosis. Leading and pacing. Subverting the thought process. Dig it.
Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at January 24, 2010 06:37 PM (ltfED)
Posted by: curious at January 24, 2010 06:37 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at January 24, 2010 06:40 PM (hhvRp)
I'm thinking: illegal at best.
Somebody call our Constitution-defenders back from the M.E., and quickly, if this happens.
Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at January 24, 2010 06:40 PM (ltfED)
I'm thinking: illegal at best.
Somebody call our Constitution-defenders back from the M.E., and quickly, if this happens.
Posted by: Taqiyyotomist at January 24, 2010 10:40 PM (ltfED)"
So then, how do we trust that any bill we have read is the same bill we read being signed and passed if a bill can be "adjusted" after it is signed. Wouldn't that be a sort of major league scandal?
Posted by: curious at January 24, 2010 06:42 PM (p302b)
Yep, that's it, get all of your graft and corruption in before the repubs take Congress and then claim you care about the national deficit. PATHETIC.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 24, 2010 06:45 PM (DIYmd)
Illinois actually has something like that in the state constitution about "fixing" bills (meant for typos and small stuff) and of course Blago went for white-out and rewrite.
Posted by: Steck at January 24, 2010 06:46 PM (mdpsT)
"did i read that right"
I assume, after it's passed and signed, they'll pass a budget reconciliation bill. That's what will address the changes.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at January 24, 2010 06:46 PM (ucq49)
Yeah, no Constitutionality problems there.
Posted by: Methos at January 24, 2010 06:51 PM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at January 24, 2010 06:51 PM (ucq49)
Money bomb them now and send a message to the Republicans as well.
Marco Rubio for senate in Florida
Doug Hoffman in New York 23rd.
Davis Harmer in Calif. 11th.
Patrick Hughes in Illinois. URGENT
These are all conservatives running in primaries against machines.
Posted by: mghorning at January 24, 2010 06:54 PM (IoDh3)
Oh piffle. Ogabe just said anyone could buy a truck. That means everyone has lots'a jack.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 24, 2010 06:59 PM (3gX2w)
Posted by: curious at January 24, 2010 07:01 PM (p302b)
Absolutely. I haven't seen any polls, but given the behavior of the Kirkies, there's apparently good reason to believe we can salvage the IL Senate seat. They aren't even pretending to have anything to run on beyond the John Kerry 'electability' argument. Which is nonsense as the Right-side voters (who mainly don't call themselves Republican because the state organization is such an embarrassment) won't vote for him, and several people I talked to today would vote for any Dem in the fall instead of him.
Posted by: Methos at January 24, 2010 07:02 PM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: Jean at January 24, 2010 07:06 PM (CPefM)
I'll bet Harry Reid uses replica watches, that bastard!
(and don't get me started about Nancy Pelosi's MBT shoes...)
Posted by: Warthog at January 24, 2010 08:00 PM (DMzAl)
Posted by: obamacare at January 24, 2010 08:12 PM (p302b)
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 24, 2010 08:15 PM (s2TC6)
"Comrades! The insurrection of five kulak [peasant] districts should be pitilessly suppressed. The interests of the whole revolution require this because 'the last decisive battle' with the kulaks is now under way everywhere. An example must be demonstrated.
1. Hang (and make sure that the hanging takes place in full view of the people) no fewer than one hundred known landlords, rich men, bloodsuckers.2. Publish their names.3. Seize all their grain from them.4. Designate hostages in accordance with yesterday's telegram.Do it in such a fashion that for hundreds of kilometres around the people might see, tremble, know, shout: "they are strangling, and will strangle to death, the bloodsucking kulaks". Telegraph receipt and implementation. Yours, Lenin. PS: Find some truly hard people."Posted by: Beverly at January 24, 2010 08:27 PM (rP1/u)
Posted by: torabora at January 24, 2010 09:36 PM (CH5ak)
Well well well. First they take a bipartisen bill dealing with funding of some stuff that passed the house with overwhelming support. Deleted everything in it and added healthscam to it so they can calim the bill "originated" in the HOuse for the purposes of satisfying the Consitution.
Then the get the house to pass the bill a second time without going to committee. The sign the bill into law. An honest court would throw the bullshit flag on the obvious lie of the bill "orignating in the House" and stike the entire thing as unconsituional and fraudulent.
But needless to that piece of an abortion, they plan on coming back with all the more liberal crap the House wants such as the so-called "public option" and then pass that under reconciliation.
Now if I was in the House I would never believe that knowing how easy it is to tie up a bill in reconcilliation.
Most of the Dems in the House want no part of this crap until after the elections in which they are praying that they can hold on. I would score the potential for succedss on this ploy as very small. On top of that, it demonstrates the utter contempt that Obama and the Dem leadership have for the average voter.
The "purple" districts are already gone for the Dems. If Obama, Reid, and Pelosi keep this up going in to the elections half of the blue districts will be gone as well. There very well could be a 100 seat turnover in the House as the Fox consultant said yesterday.
Posted by: Vic at January 24, 2010 10:25 PM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Ellie Light at January 24, 2010 10:53 PM (gJL6J)
Don't ever doubt that it will pass. The nuts on the left - Odummer's base - are demanding it. And, he has to have something to say when he gives his State of the Union on Wednesday. Besides, he believes that it is what "the people" - you know, we people that cannot think for ourselves - really want this only we don't know it because Marxists always believe that those in charge always know what's best for everyone.
Also, if you read the financial news regarding the status of the federal cash flow, there is none...and we can't have those living off the government - another large part of the base supporters - not having their (really our) money. Those natives would then become restless.
Remember that the "fees" (really taxes) are to be collected immediately even though the benefits, if there are any, are not be realized for three years.
On top of that, China has made it perfectly known that they will not continue to purchase any more debt and the rest of the "foreign investors" are not real happy with the return on the treasury bonds. Check out how much they have gone down in the last two days - along with the stock market.
Listen to what every one Odopey's people said on the "Sunday shows" today. Health care is still item one. He wants it passed so that he will be able to "move on" to jobs for his wonderful speech on Wednesday.
Don't every underestimate "taking advantage of a crisis" per Saul Alinksy. The crisis in this case was the election last Tuesday.
We peasants had better start getting with the program! If you think Obamunist is going to change his direction, think again!
Posted by: Never Ends at January 24, 2010 11:13 PM (YuFEe)
Posted by: L382guy at January 25, 2010 12:35 AM (YIWgc)
Don't discount this story because it came from Dick Morris. It is all over the net from several sources. So it is a story that Obama and Pelosi want out there.
Whether or not they really are going to do it is a different story. The obviously want to do it but whether or not they can is debatable.
Posted by: Vic at January 25, 2010 03:08 AM (QrA9E)
Berry is announcing today that he is retiring (trailing in the polls helps that out), so there's no leverage there.
On a side note, we now have two or of three Dem reps leaving the House this year. The third one (Ross) is a Blue-Dog, so he isn't quite as bad as the other two.
Posted by: Steve L. at January 25, 2010 04:30 AM (Gkhxf)
Democrats are like serial rapists.
We've told them repeatedly that WE DON'T WANT WHAT THEY'RE OFFERING.
They insist that we DO want it, that we KNOW we want it, that we really should be grateful for all their attention because we're really not that attractive of a nation anyway, and that we ought to just sit back and try to enjoy it, because we're going to get it whether we want it or not.
You know, kind of like what Bill Clinton told Juanita Broadrick as he raped her.
Hey, America! "Put some ice on it."
Posted by: Sam Adams at January 25, 2010 07:36 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: TrueNorth at January 25, 2010 08:35 AM (R/A2z)
Posted by: Texmom at January 25, 2010 09:42 AM (WzN8I)
You know what drives me crazy about the WH talking points regarding Obamacare? Blaming the insurance companies for rising premiums!!!
I might be wrong, but I believe in most States, premiums are controlled by an Insurance Commissioner. Insurance companies do not arbitrarily raise rates. They have to be approved by the respective States. And companies have to jump through a lot of hoops to get that rise in premiums. After spending months and hours and hours of time, it is not unusual for a State to turn down the rise in rates.
So, how is this the fault of the insurance companies? I would think it is the fault of State who allows the rise in rates. The insurance companies only request what they feel is required for them. Keeps a lot of actuaries in business, I will tell you that!
Posted by: The Original at January 25, 2010 09:50 AM (clDFl)
Does anyone think that this convoluted process is actually going to pull anything off? Does anyone think that the will to power of Nancy Pelosi is going to pull this out when members of her caucus are retiring so as not to face certain defeat? When those who are remaining are looking at some way of holding onto their seats?
When Barbara Boxer is looking at a serious challenge? When Beau Biden isn't going to try for Joe's old senate seat and will hunker down in the office he now holds?
I see this as a desperation move by the Dems, right into the face of reality.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at January 25, 2010 11:50 AM (O9Cc8)
BUT, BUT, BUT....
I was told that electing Scott Brown would irrevocably, undeniably stop ObamaCare.
When I suggested that maybe voting for yet another "Big Government" Republican might not be the best thing, or that it was continuing RINO business as usual, I was called a "Concern Troll" (whatever that is) and was BLAMED a priori for the passage of ObamaCare even tho I don't even live in Massachusetts.
How is this possible? I thought all our problems were over with the election of Scott Brown pseudo-conservative messiah.
Posted by: Uriel at January 25, 2010 11:58 AM (W0F3B)
And, now I find out that you guys knew about this Reconciliation possibility all along, and even expected it?
How could you possibly know such a thing before the election of Scott Brown, if the election of Scott Brown is the only thing that could cause the Dems to consider Reconciliation?
How did so many of you know what "Reconciliation" was or how the Dems might possibly want to use it? Especially if the election of Scott Brown is the only thing that would cause the Dems to consider it?
Posted by: Uriel at January 25, 2010 12:02 PM (W0F3B)
#32 GK:
I doubt that amnesty can be passed in the middle of a recession. Just. Not. Possible. The Democrats would be dynamiting their coalition even worse than they did with health care.
Example: You want to see p.o.'d unions? Try this.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at January 25, 2010 12:03 PM (O9Cc8)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3095 seconds, 283 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: eman at January 24, 2010 05:06 PM (MA/9d)