October 07, 2010
— DrewM Well, they passed the bill and now they are finding out whatÂ’s in itÂ…the death of the American health care system.
As Obama administration officials put into place the first major wave of changes under the health care legislation, they have tried to defuse stiffening resistance — from companies like McDonald’s and some insurers — by granting dozens of waivers to maintain even minimal coverage far below the new law’s standards.…To date, the administration has given about 30 insurers, employers and union plans, responsible for covering about one million people, one-year waivers on the new rules that phase out annual limits on coverage for limited-benefit plans, also known as “mini-meds.” Applicants said their premiums would increase significantly, in some cases doubling or more.
These early exemptions offer the first signs of how the administration may tackle an even more difficult hurdle: the resistance from insurers and others against proposed regulations that will determine how much insurers spend on consumersÂ’ health care versus administrative overhead, a major cornerstone of the law.
Several leading insurers, including WellPoint, Aetna and Cigna, have also objected to new rules requiring them to cover even those children who are seriously ill, warning that they will stop selling new policies in some states because the rules do not protect them from having to cover too many sick children.
“The hardest part of health reform is always going to be the transition,” said Peter T. Harbage, a former state health official who is a policy consultant in Sacramento. He predicts more insurers and employers will lean on the government to delay or weaken the new regulations. “I think this pressure just increases until we get to 2014,” he said, referring to the year that the law will fully go into effect.
Yes, things are bad now because of the law but as soon as we have even more government intervention in the market place, why then things will just be awesome.
I love how the reporter calls a logical economic response to government action “stiffening resistance”. These companies aren’t resisting anything; they are simply making choices based on a new reality. Don’t get all snippy with them just because they refuse to go bankrupt in order to pretend that all the Democratic promises which were disconnected from any known reality were true.
ItÂ’s not bad enough that the government is mucking around in peopleÂ’s health care decisions; now big government is going to be in the business of handing out special dispensations for the chosen few. If you like your coverage, you can keep itÂ…if we deign to give you a waiver. I wonder what groups will be looked upon favorably by this gangster administration and which will be told to go to hell. IÂ’m sure itÂ’ll all be very fair and equitable.
This was always the scary shadow in the background of the health care debate. This law and itÂ’s tangle of bureaucratic regulations would screw things up so badly and make things worse that the next step would be even greater involvement by government to clean up the mess the previous round of laws made. Eventually, the out of control costs, the shrinking number of players in the private insurance market and the increase in people without coverage would lead to calls for nationalized health care.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:30 AM
| Comments (134)
Post contains 563 words, total size 4 kb.
Still trying to figure out how "waivers" work under the "equal protection" clause.
But then with Obama care having exemptions for certain religions, I can't see how it flys under either equal protection, or Sep of Church State either.... but ACLU? Crickets... they are too busy worrying about a Christian Flag flying over a cemetary...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 07, 2010 08:32 AM (AdK6a)
Good grief! They aren't resisting the legislation! They are reacting rationally to the legislation! And it's having some very bad consequences.
Posted by: InCali at October 07, 2010 08:33 AM (bZftd)
“I think this pressure just increases until we get to 2014,” he said, referring to the year that the law will fully go into effect.
...and then the costs kick in!!
Posted by: geoff at October 07, 2010 08:34 AM (QrzlF)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 07, 2010 08:34 AM (bvfVF)
And if you can afford the increase in premium that we promised you would never happen if we passed the legislation we're exempting your employer from. It's like Obama-Pelosi-Reid didn't do anything, only worse!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 08:35 AM (Vz9lf)
There will probably be some positive correlation between contributions to Dem and "progressive" causes and probability of getting one of these waivers.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 07, 2010 08:36 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: InCali at October 07, 2010 08:36 AM (bZftd)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 07, 2010 08:36 AM (w+RW6)
Wait until the 1099-K bomb hits businesses. Specifically small businesses who can't afford to hire a $40,000.00/year worker just to work on 1099 forms and be nothing more than a cost center.
It's going to be insane. I think the republicans will get rid of it if they win both houses, but if they don't, get ready to see a boatload of small business bankruptcies or simply decididing it isn't worth it and folding up shop.
Posted by: Ben at October 07, 2010 08:36 AM (wuv1c)
McDonald's only got the waiver as cover for the Union Plans they needed to placate.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at October 07, 2010 08:37 AM (tf9Ne)
The entire bill was a lie that we all saw thru, this was all predicted.
OBAMA EVEN SAID SO HIMSELF ON YOUTUBE, HE WANTED TO DESTROY EMPLOYER PROVIDED HEALTHCARE.
My HC is going up 13% cause of this faggot, no waiver for me. This bill was designed to do this shit.
my company applied for a rate increase, three months after i finally got insurance.
I can only imagine every american is getting a rate increase.
Posted by: Ben at October 07, 2010 08:37 AM (wuv1c)
Exemptions only last a year. Then what? There isn't an election in 2011.
So we have a health care system that's "broken" and the only way to cover everyone with "affordable quality" health insurance, we need to enact Obamacare. But in order for people to have coverage they have to be exempted from Obamacare. The dumbass Republicans should be beating this point to death.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:39 AM (8GYOu)
And so it starts to unravel.
I'm sure every other corporate CEO in America will see this news and say, "Hmm. Wish we'd gotten in on that waiver deal. Sugar, get me legal on the horn. Pronto!"
Death of a thousand cuts - Begin!
Posted by: Dang at October 07, 2010 08:39 AM (TXKVh)
Posted by: Tommat at October 07, 2010 08:40 AM (UyEtI)
On the 1099 issue.
These are multiple page PAPER forms... which means someone in the IRS will have to input the data, into a useable database...
That got to be 10's of thousands of jobs... and the cost of the infrastructure...
Then there must be some form of enforcment arm.
Then there must be some group to check validity, and fix errors.
And of course, my bet? Unionized Jobs?
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 07, 2010 08:40 AM (AdK6a)
Still trying to figure out how "waivers" work under the "equal protection" clause.
But then with Obama care having exemptions for certain religions, I can't see how it flys under either equal protection, or Sep of Church State either.... but ACLU? Crickets... they are too busy worrying about a Christian Flag flying over a cemetary...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 07, 2010 12:32 PM (AdK6a)
Well everyone could get a waiver, so its equal for all. Of course, if you are powerful, or give money to the Dems, or are close friends of Obama, its just a coincidence that you get your waiver and certain others don't.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 07, 2010 08:40 AM (z1N6a)
Posted by: maddogg at October 07, 2010 08:41 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:41 AM (omcBI)
Posted by: Ronald McDonald at October 07, 2010 08:41 AM (zgZzy)
Meanwhile, back at The Obama White House...
"Say, We should just give these waivers away! How much you think these waivers are worth? Sugar, get Rahm on the horn. Pronto!"
Posted by: Dang at October 07, 2010 08:42 AM (TXKVh)
Exemptions only last a year. Then what? There isn't an election in 2011.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 12:39 PM (8GYOu)
The exempt-ees need to pony up more protection money, that's what. Or favors.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 07, 2010 08:42 AM (z1N6a)
O/T but here's some good news from The Orlando Sentinnel:
Rubio has pushed his lead to 15 percentage points, attracting 42 percent of voters, compared to 27 percent for Crist, who's running as an independent, and 21 percent for Meek, the poll showed. Ten percent of voters remain undecided.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:42 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Barry Obasketball at October 07, 2010 08:43 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: bonifaceballers at October 07, 2010 08:43 AM (bPbwB)
I can only imagine every american is getting a rate increase.
Yep. Ours just did. We use a broker that sells every kind of plan from everyone imaginable and he said every plan he sells is going up because of this bullshit law.
Posted by: Roadking at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (HLMRE)
Meanwhile, back at The Obama White House...
"Say, We shouldn't just give these waivers away! How much you think these waivers are worth? Sugar, get Rahm on the horn. Pronto!"
(Fixed my typo)
Posted by: Dang at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (TXKVh)
I think there's a reason why The Vapid One™ likes to pick winners and losers and it has to do with his childhood.
Of course, anyone who seeks power over someone else will try to do this, but this is more specific since we know just a bit more about the way he was "raised".
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, the psychiatrist, is "In" at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Doc at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (MYT77)
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 08:44 AM (g4J4S)
These are multiple page PAPER forms... which means someone in the IRS will have to input the data, into a useable database...
That got to be 10's of thousands of jobs... and the cost of the infrastructure...
Then there must be some form of enforcment arm.
Then there must be some group to check validity, and fix errors.
And of course, my bet? Unionized Jobs?
Funny that! Did you know that the NHS in UK is the third largest employer in the world (after the Chinese Red Army and some railroad system in India). So Obama is forcing companies/insurance companies to have 80% of the premium costs go to the actual providing of healthcare. When the Gubamint takes over, they certainly won't have that same onerous standard--got to pay all those paper pushers, regulators and enforcers. I hate these hypocritical asshats.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:45 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi at October 07, 2010 08:46 AM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Average Joe at October 07, 2010 08:46 AM (bN5ZU)
The fact that it fails so spectacularly when introduced to reality is no surprise.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at October 07, 2010 08:47 AM (tf9Ne)
Still trying to figure out how "waivers" work under the "equal protection" clause.
Exactly - I can hear it now: "Would your company like to donate 5 or 10 million to the DNC to be on our sweet, sweet waivers list? I would strongly recommend the 10 million."
Posted by: Roadking at October 07, 2010 08:47 AM (HLMRE)
If we end up with nationalized health care wealthy and upper-middle class Americans will be shopping for cash on the barrelhead offshore medical care throughout the entire world.
Costa Rica and India are ramping up for "medical tourism" even as we speak.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:47 AM (8GYOu)
The CEO isn't going to call legal, he is going to call a DC lobbyist (well maybe Legal knows the lobbyist) or his senator. This is how the democrats are going to make money on this. Acme Inc. wants a waiver, you gotta hire the right lobbyist who will grease the right palms. It's about $$ for the democrats.
Posted by: Penfold at October 07, 2010 08:48 AM (1PeEC)
Leftard ideology is driven by the two prongedreasoning of jealousy and stupidity.
Liberal methodology: Half the neighborhood has milk to drink, unfortunately, the other half only has water to drink.
Solution: piss in the milk, then divide it evenly to obtain "social justice".
Posted by: maddogg at October 07, 2010 08:49 AM (OlN4e)
The fact that it fails so spectacularly when introduced to reality is no surprise.
Obama and the Democrats are incredibly venal. Obamacare is going exactly as planned. The only surprise is they didn't expect to see anything negative kick in just yet--remember they live in a static world not based in reality. So that's been a little jolt. So now they're scrambling to shore up the house of cards that they built. I don't see this ending well for America.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:49 AM (8GYOu)
You whiny clinger biotches would complain if you were hanged with a new rope!
Posted by: Preznit McJugEars at October 07, 2010 08:50 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Black Market at October 07, 2010 08:50 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 07, 2010 08:50 AM (w+RW6)
On the 1099 issue.
These are multiple page PAPER forms... which means someone in the IRS will have to input the data, into a useable database...
That got to be 10's of thousands of jobs... and the cost of the infrastructure...
Then there must be some form of enforcment arm.
Then there must be some group to check validity, and fix errors.
And of course, my bet? Unionized Jobs?
Or we will see more and more small businesses going the Greece route with more and more cash only jobs and just enough reporting to keep the auditors off your scent. Oh, and lots and lots of bribes to government officials.
Tax collection only works when it's easier and cheaper to comply.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at October 07, 2010 08:50 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 07, 2010 08:51 AM (x5wwo)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 07, 2010 08:51 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 07, 2010 08:51 AM (QxSug)
Leftists ASSUME they will be in charge forever and ever. They never think ahead. Will these waivers be recinded and others granted based upon politics?
Doesn't this make the entire program illegal and the current cases dead wins?
Posted by: baseballguy at October 07, 2010 08:51 AM (3x2gQ)
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 12:44 PM (g4J4S)
I would suggest calling it corporatism. This is the same economic model the national socialists in Europe adopted before WWII.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 07, 2010 08:52 AM (7BU4a)
If you wanna see some fucked up lies go on youtube and watch this fuck say not only will premiums go DOWN, but that businesses will have less expenses and be able to give you a raise. And the dumb fucks in the crowd cheer. Its the vid where he says premiums will go down 3000 %.
I think it was The Governor's Association ad that juxtaposed that clip with the one where Obama says "We never said that you could cover more people and it would cost less money."
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:52 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Preznit McJugEars at October 07, 2010 08:53 AM (g4J4S)
Which would be fine, except these medical tourists are a new reservoir for all kinds of exciting microbes to spread across the globe:
New Superbugs Spreading From India
An international team of scientists have found a superbug that is resistant to almost all antibiotics and are warning that it is widespread in India and could soon appear worldwide. The superbug has been diagnosed in 37 people so far who came back to the UK after having the surgery in India or Pakistan. This superbug is so closely connected to the Indian subcontinent that it has been called New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1). Scientists say there are actually no drugs to treat it.
Posted by: President Barracky Pissypants at October 07, 2010 08:53 AM (9hSKh)
Can we add the hundreds of thousands of people who used to work for dead insurance companies to the list of people Barry has personally put out of work?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 08:53 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 07, 2010 12:51 PM (02uN6)
Uh, it is great. For the little people.
Now, where is my waygu? I've been waiting like 5 minutes here people.
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 07, 2010 08:53 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Penfold at October 07, 2010 08:53 AM (1PeEC)
3,000% sweetie!
Posted by: Barack Obama at October 07, 2010 08:54 AM (7BU4a)
I'd just like to know why, if Obamacare was supposed to be such a great thing, is everybody so willing to sell their mother to get out of it?
And why only like 3 Democrats up for re-election are even mentioning it postively in their ads--the majority of Dems are running away from it and touting their vote against it.
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:54 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:54 AM (LpqRt)
I heard the IRS supported the change re: 1099 reporting requirement on $600 or more received - they don't have enough staff to handle it and it would be prohibitively expensive for them to hire the amount of people to do so. Does anyone know if Congress changed it?
Ha! Ha! Ha! Congress fix something that they broke? That's too funny!
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 08:55 AM (8GYOu)
Best thing that could happen to us. We could go back to treating health services as something to be provided for money instead of a right to be supplied by society. Markets, and shit like that.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 08:55 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 07, 2010 08:57 AM (QxSug)
Yeah, good luck with that.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 07, 2010 08:57 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 08:57 AM (bJevO)
Can we add the hundreds of thousands of people who used to work for dead insurance companies to the list of people Barry has personally put out of work?
Suck it sistah! I won! Big Insurance was an evil that needed to be taken out. All those greedy, money grubbing criminals stealing from minorities and women. The world's a better place without those jackals.
Posted by: Precedent O'Prompter at October 07, 2010 08:58 AM (8GYOu)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, the psychiatrist, is at October 07, 2010 08:59 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 07, 2010 08:59 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: 18-1 at October 07, 2010 08:59 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Penfold
The vote to remove the requirement failed.
No agency would ever refuse an expansion of their bureaucratic empire. Parkinson's Law plus the nature of bureaucracy equals an imperative for non-stop growth.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at October 07, 2010 09:00 AM (23kaI)
Posted by: scooter at October 07, 2010 09:00 AM (aamim)
I considered it, but "corporatism", while a popular name for it, does not describe what actually happens. Any governmental involvement in the business world is socialist in nature, and is anti-business and anti-corporation in nature. Also, note that I said incipient fascism; I believe that to be a more honest term for what "crony capitalism"/corporatism attempts to describe.
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 09:00 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: journolist at October 07, 2010 09:00 AM (O/NP5)
Ha! Ha! Ha! Congress fix something that they broke? That's too funny!
Posted by: runningrn at October 07, 2010 12:55 PM (8GYOu)
Hey, we'll get on it right after we pass a budget. Well, if we pass a budget.
Posted by: Nancy pelosi at October 07, 2010 09:01 AM (7BU4a)
An international team of scientists have found a superbug that is resistant to almost all antibiotics and are warning that it is widespread in India and could soon appear worldwide. The superbug has been diagnosed in 37 people so far who came back to the UK after having the surgery in India or Pakistan. This superbug is so closely connected to the Indian subcontinent that it has been called New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1). Scientists say there are actually no drugs to treat it.
I would have to be pretty darn desparate to go have surgery in a third world country. One of my former co-workers was going to go have gender reassignment surgery in Thailand. I was like "Dude! Why would you go there to have something like that or any surgery for that matter done?" His answer was that it's a lot cheaper there. I told him if he gets some funky infection, it may be a lot more costly and not just in money.
Posted by: Precedent O'Prompter at October 07, 2010 09:01 AM (8GYOu)
Wonder what factors Sebelius is using to decide whether and how to exercise her discretion to grant a waiver or not?
The mind races ... whether the employer is located in a particularly contested Congressional District? The political donations of the executives?
Follow the denied waiver requests. THAT is where the story will be.
Posted by: B.O.S. Tweed at October 07, 2010 09:01 AM (u+8qs)
Guy I know is a heart surgeon. He and his wife were on vacation in Mexico when she got chest pains. They went to the local hospital and determined she needed a bypass pretty quick. So the mexican doc comes in and says "we'll have her stable to travel by tomorrow". Heart surgeon says "Why? This isn't a tough procedure". "Americans always want to go home for this type of thing".
So he had the doc do it in Mexico. 5 days in the hospital, and he charged the $3500 bill on his Visa. He estimated that was half what the price would've been AFTER his insurance paid if it had been done here. Said the treatment was great.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:02 AM (5aa4z)
Buhahahaha! This morning, I parked right next to a car with a "Health Care is a Right" and "I can't live without national health insurance" bumperstickers, (car had Ohio tags btw).
This is the mentality of the people we are up against. Healthcare is a new "right", paid for by us.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 07, 2010 09:02 AM (9hSKh)
Even Hawaii is getting in on the red wave...
Ah, from sea to shining sea--that's what I like to see!
Posted by: Precedent O'Prompter at October 07, 2010 09:03 AM (8GYOu)
Yes, I suppose that is true. Your average public school educated person hears "corporatism" and he doesn't think an unholy alliance between the unions, big business, and the government with the latter holding the real power - he thinks corporations running things.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 07, 2010 09:03 AM (7BU4a)
Driving McDonalds out of business would probably yield a great deal of health care savings al by itself!
Posted by: the peanut gallery at October 07, 2010 09:05 AM (NurK6)
Franklin or Cuyahoga county plates?
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:05 AM (5aa4z)
When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first thing to be bought and sold will be legislators.
Posted by: P.J. O'Rourke at October 07, 2010 09:05 AM (xxgag)
This is the mentality of the people we are up against. Healthcare is a new "right", paid for by us.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 09:06 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Raycon's and john Ryan's idiot child at October 07, 2010 09:06 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: Penfold at October 07, 2010 09:07 AM (1PeEC)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 12:54 PM (LpqRt)
< This is a brilliant idea. Absolutely brilliant and I'm entirely serious here. I would say that it shouldn't necessarily be limited to tourists but could be purchased by U.S. citizens as well. The policies could be underwritten by off-shore insurers domiciled in Bermuda or there could be captive or pools of off-shore insurance in place. Hmmm. me like this a lot.
Posted by: journolist at October 07, 2010 09:07 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 09:07 AM (9e8Ti)
Oops.
To finish, new next door neighbor has a "Healthcare is a moral issue" bumpersticker on her Hyundai SUV. She's a dental hygenist.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 09:08 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Raycon's and john Ryan's idiot child at October 07, 2010 09:09 AM (ERJIu)
Exactly. It's all semantics, really, but semantics (and more so, pragmatics) matter.
Posted by: jwpaine at October 07, 2010 09:09 AM (g4J4S)
Purchase oil tanker 20 miles offshore. Purchase large boat. Place doctors on tanker, patients on boat. Some assembly and a credit card machine required
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:09 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Penfold at October 07, 2010 09:09 AM (1PeEC)
Oops.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 01:08 PM (3jxR/)
I was pondering whether to point at you and laugh. Now I know, but it's too late to do anything about it.
Tease.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:10 AM (5aa4z)
It is interesting that their is no discussion of the implications of this new right...
Compare it to free speech, for example.
I have the right to say what I want (with a few minimal restrictions). I don't have the "right" to demand resources from others though to give my speech a wider reach. I have to use my own resources or persuade others.
Health Care though is a service. If you have a right to it, you have a right to demand that other people give you things, for free. And the state will imprison them if they refuse. But the people claiming it is a right also seem to recognize it can't be a very broad right. In the words of the president, if your treatment would be expensive you should take some pain pills and die instead.
So this is actually bad on two fronts. This made up right is impigning on the very real rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of property. But further, this is introducing the notion that the government can curtail rights merely because it is convient. If Obama can deny you an expensive treatment even though you have a right to health care because society can't afford it, he can also stop you from saying things that he deems society can't afford to have said.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 07, 2010 09:10 AM (7BU4a)
She then is morally obligated to help me with this bit of pork chop I'm having a problem with.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:11 AM (5aa4z)
Driving McDonalds out of business would probably yield a great deal of health care savings al by itself!
Dude McDonalds was not going to go out of business, they where going to drop all of those covered and give the plan a big fat black eye (racist?) so they gave them the waiver.
But I bet michelle loves the way your thinking!
Posted by: Roadking at October 07, 2010 09:11 AM (HLMRE)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 09:12 AM (9e8Ti)
Posted by: Raycon's and john Ryan's idiot child at October 07, 2010 09:12 AM (ERJIu)
I was pondering whether to point at you and laugh. Now I know, but it's too late to do anything about it.
The sad part is, I haven't even started drinking yet.
But the day is yet young...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 09:13 AM (3jxR/)
http://tinyurl.com/35bszvh
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:14 AM (5aa4z)
But the day is yet young...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 01:13 PM (3jxR/)
Damn shame I'm not.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at October 07, 2010 09:15 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Sinner at October 07, 2010 09:16 AM (U/yZ+)
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights
The only thing is you have to be part of the Cristian Science church to get treatment.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at October 07, 2010 09:17 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Jean at October 07, 2010 01:12 PM (9e8Ti)
< Got it. This could be a catastrophic indemnity policy with a high deductible. it could be set up as a captive with members who essentially own the captive. Captives are usually set up with homogenous pools of risk, thus, we could even open it up to those 10% of morons who are homogenously inclined.
Posted by: journolist at October 07, 2010 09:18 AM (O/NP5)
Damn shame I'm not.
I know the feeling. But, on the bright side, when I finally croak, BackwardsGirl can use my liver as a doorstop.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 07, 2010 09:18 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: Bugler at October 07, 2010 09:26 AM (VXBR1)
Or tulip bulbs? Or baby teeth? Or unicorn eyelashes?
Posted by: T. Fairy at October 07, 2010 09:27 AM (u+8qs)
Posted by: journolist at October 07, 2010 01:18 PM (O/NP5)
The key to making this work financialy, would be to do it in a place like Cuba, or some small Island that runs its own laws... so you could make it a "at your own risk" type of surgery, getting rid of Malpractice insurance.
With the insurance saving, and lack of overhead, you could probably get really good Doctors to work there.... thus using reputation to overcome the problem of people being scared away by a lack of insurance.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 07, 2010 09:27 AM (AdK6a)
Posted by: cali grump at October 07, 2010 09:34 AM (hL0k8)
Can Obamacare waivers be traded? You know, like carbon credits?
It's our comeback, baby! Tanned, rested, and ready!
Posted by: Enron at October 07, 2010 09:40 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: joeindc44 at October 07, 2010 09:41 AM (QxSug)
Mission accomplished. Recommence the nudging.
Posted by: Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge Czar at October 07, 2010 09:43 AM (swuwV)
They don't want voters to lose their healthcare before the election, as they may blame Democrats for it.
Posted by: Kristopher at October 07, 2010 09:45 AM (aAof6)
OT - Night Two of CNN's Spitz & Hound ratings are in. They got just about the same number of Total Viewers as Shep Smith @ 7pm.
Wait, did I say same number of Total Viewers? Silly me.
They got roughly the same number of Total Viewers as Shep Smith gets of the 25-54 Demographic. My bad.
05 October 2010 8:00pm Cable News Ratings, Age 25-54 Demo:
O'Reilly - 896K
Olbermann - 366K
Nancy Grage - 189K
Parker/Spitzer - 125K
05 October 2010 8:00pm Cable News Ratings, Total Viewers:
O'Reilly - 3,549K
Olbermann - 1,179K
Nancy Grage - 639K
Parker/Spitzer - 513K
By the way, Sheppie got 531K of the Demo and just over 2M total viewers.
Glenn Beck got 533K of the Demo and 2.217M total. There are a LOT OF DVR's that start whirring at 5ET / 2 PT...
Posted by: CCX at October 07, 2010 09:59 AM (V40IZ)
Posted by: reason at October 07, 2010 10:01 AM (V40IZ)
You say that like it's a problem, not a feature. This is what the bastards wanted all along, to turn the health care system into fucking wreckage so they could remake it in their own image.
Posted by: Ronsonic at October 07, 2010 10:05 AM (VTm+A)
Missing from the NYT article:
The biggest single waiver, for 351,000 people, was for the United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund, a New York union providing coverage for city teachers.
Gee, I wonder why this was neglected?
Posted by: rockhead at October 07, 2010 10:21 AM (RykTt)
Posted by: chuck in st paul at October 07, 2010 10:28 AM (adr25)
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 07, 2010 10:30 AM (2g2ex)
Karl Marx also said that there would be a period of unrest as countries move from a capitalist to a communist economy.
Oi.
Posted by: Splshdown at October 07, 2010 11:25 AM (5GYlT)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2059 seconds, 262 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: nevergiveup at October 07, 2010 08:32 AM (0GFWk)