March 29, 2010
— Gabriel Malor I was a little worried that if ObamaCare passed, people would quickly adjust their thinking and tell themselves "it's not so bad, I guess I can live with it." But with a new story every day of some unanticipated evil lurking in the bill, people aren't ready to forgive and forget (yet):
One week after the House of Representatives passed the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats, 54% of the nation's likely voters still favor repealing the new law. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 42% oppose repeal.Those figures are virtually unchanged from last week. They include 44% who Strongly Favor repeal and 34% who Strongly Oppose it.
Only 17% of all voters believe the plan will achieve one of its primary goals and reduce the cost of health care. Most (55%) believe it will have the opposite affect and increase the cost of care.
Forty-nine percent (49%) believe the new law will reduce the quality of care. Sixty percent (60%) believe it will increase the federal budget deficit. Those numbers are consistent with expectations before the bill was passed.
The President says that if Republicans want to run against the bill, we should "bring it on." I agree. The House in November 2010. The Senate in November 2012. The 45th President of the United States should be ready to sign repeal legislation on January 21, 2013.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
07:38 AM
| Comments (74)
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
Right-o! I don't think Nancy's scheme of "passing the bill so that we know what's in it" is going to go over well when the many holes in the bill start swallowing more and more Americans. And they really messed up by uploading the taxes first.
I wish I could have "hope" that repeal is possible, but I lost that when I stabbed myself with the Blade of Olympus. But there's plenty of it floating around now, somebody can use it.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 29, 2010 07:43 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Alex at March 29, 2010 07:44 AM (Tr7vq)
He keeps so low because of stupid crap like this:
Axelrod advertising the new way: Try Our New Shit sandwich; you'll like it! (I may have changed that Fox headline slightly)
Posted by: Vic at March 29, 2010 07:44 AM (QrA9E)
I really want to believe that, but at this point I think the "gimme my free shit!" crowd outnumbers the rest of us. Especially with unemployment around 18% and rocketing up, in part due to this bill.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 29, 2010 07:44 AM (mR7mk)
and what if the next Preznidunt will be Barack H. Obama (D-underdocumented)?
Posted by: Garbiel Malodor at March 29, 2010 07:46 AM (dP6Ky)
Posted by: Alex at March 29, 2010 07:47 AM (Tr7vq)
#5 I really want to believe that, but at this point I think the "gimme my free shit!" crowd outnumbers the rest of us. Especially with unemployment around 18% and rocketing up, in part due to this bill.
You didn't get one of those blue orbs of "hope", I see. This re-alignment could very well be the case (and Steyn seems to think so too). We'll see in a few.
But if that's the case, buckle up, because in the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 29, 2010 07:47 AM (9hSKh)
Forget? Never!
Forgive? Never!
Fight for repeal of every program the Commie in Chief got through the commie Senate and House? Every fucking day until I'm dead or it's done.
Posted by: maddogg at March 29, 2010 07:47 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Don at March 29, 2010 07:48 AM (tTj19)
Kudos to any corporation who stands up to Nostrilitis and his Evil Band of Goblins for taking that accounting write off in response to this bill. If they go to the mattresses, then AT&T, Caterpillar, and Deere will all move up a notch in my book...to notch 1.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at March 29, 2010 07:48 AM (DPM1U)
Why wait until the 21st? Do it at the lectern immediately following the oath! The new Congress gets sworn in the first week of January so they can act quickly and repeal it just in time for the new president to sign the repeal into law. Although I suppose Obama could do a last minute veto....
I wonder what the latest veto in history was? Wonder if anyone ever vetoed anything in the waning days/hours/minutes of his presidency?
Posted by: dczombie at March 29, 2010 07:49 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at March 29, 2010 07:49 AM (I1/U/)
Posted by: Berkeley Resident at March 29, 2010 07:52 AM (90oki)
Repubs will get 35-40 House seats in Nov. Almost guaranteed.
Posted by: DarthNihilus69 at March 29, 2010 07:52 AM (t2WJv)
Indeed -- when the number of net tax benefit recipients exceeds the number of net tax payers, it becomes a pathological predicament that is difficult to reverse.
Posted by: Vile Roman at March 29, 2010 07:53 AM (g/3O9)
Posted by: Tiger Woods at March 29, 2010 11:40 AM (Ki7fm)
FIFY
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at March 29, 2010 07:54 AM (NtI5g)
Posted by: dan in michigan at March 29, 2010 07:55 AM (9jRMu)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 29, 2010 07:55 AM (RkRxq)
Only 17% of all voters believe the plan will achieve one of its primary goals and reduce the cost of health care. Most (55%) believe it will have the opposite affect and increase the cost of care.
so...what's the point?
Posted by: dudeinsantacruz at March 29, 2010 07:56 AM (NA7sd)
Indeed -- when the number of net tax benefit recipients exceeds the number of net tax payers, it becomes a pathological predicament that is difficult to reverse.
You want to bring the Government to it's knees? What if 25 million or so of us just refused to pay out taxes? What are they gonna do?
Time to stop witholding from your paycheck, if you still get one.
Posted by: maddogg at March 29, 2010 07:57 AM (OlN4e)
You want to bring the Government to it's knees? What if 25 million or so of us just refused to pay out taxes? What are they gonna do?
nominate us for high cabinate level positions? make us in charge of the ways and means commitee?
Posted by: dudeinsnatacruz at March 29, 2010 07:58 AM (NA7sd)
The hearings that Waxman (D-Nostrillia) have ordered to chastise those companies who dare to criticize The Vapid One's© glorious healthcare bill should be interesting. Hopefully, a few of these folks will show some cojones and speak truth to power about the negative effects of this monstrosity of a bill. They should highlight the added cost to business and the very real possibility of additional job losses as a direct result of DeathCare.
We're pricing ourselves out of the market. Actually, our government is pricing us out of the market. Will anyone at those hearings recommend a regulatory freeze or, better yet, a regulatory rollback to, say, 1980?
Yeah, I know, but a boy can dream...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 29, 2010 07:59 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 29, 2010 07:59 AM (+UMH8)
Holes swallowing Americans? Yeah, talk like that will get you a one way ticket to the hearings, pal.
Posted by: Henry The Enforcer Waxman at March 29, 2010 08:00 AM (H6Jyg)
should I buy T-bills and medium-term bonds now that interest rates are rising?
Guns and ammo are a safer investment.
Posted by: shibumi at March 29, 2010 08:04 AM (OKZrE)
Inauguration Day 2013 is the 21st.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at March 29, 2010 08:07 AM (Mi2wf)
The hearings that Waxman (D-Nostrillia) have ordered to chastise those companies who dare to criticize The Vapid One's© glorious healthcare bill should be interesting.
Their status as "Public Servants" is lost on them. They see themselves as our rulers and that they can do whatever the hell they want to anyone at any time and for any reason and that is a major problem.
Major problem.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 29, 2010 08:09 AM (RkRxq)
for 2013 inaguration day will also be MLK day...irony or poetic justice?
Posted by: dudeinsnatacruz at March 29, 2010 08:09 AM (NA7sd)
Posted by: ford at March 29, 2010 08:10 AM (Ki7fm)
Posted by: SlightlyAjar at March 29, 2010 08:10 AM (Ow8zp)
for 2013 inaguration day will also be MLK day...irony or poetic justice?
There certainly can be no mistaking that I have a dream for that day.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 29, 2010 08:11 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 29, 2010 08:11 AM (9Cooa)
34 The way I see it moving more of the JOBS out of the country will save all of these companies a bundle..
prepare for you plumber , electrician, carpenter,to drive in from Mexico. All calls will go through a call center some where else.
Think of the convenience! Replenish your stash and get your plumbing fixed with one call!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 29, 2010 08:12 AM (RkRxq)
"Obergruppenführer McPollster"
hey!
I thought we all agreed not to use our secret clubhouse names in public?
Posted by: Scott R. at March 29, 2010 08:13 AM (Ed9Xn)
Posted by: Jean at March 29, 2010 08:14 AM (pIKTP)
And now we have Aetna's CEO saying premiums will increase. He said Obama's promise of unrising premiums only applied to the insured (duh!)
I expect to see his ass hauled into Congress right behind AT&T and Catepillar.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 29, 2010 08:15 AM (pLTLS)
oh no no no!
We can go that far. We need to Repeal & Replace the bill...with something more moderate...and bipartisan.
I've got news for you: The Republicans will NOT win the House, this November. No way. Not gonna happen. Not with the assholes we have in Washington.
Posted by: This is Concerned at March 29, 2010 08:15 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 29, 2010 08:15 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 29, 2010 08:15 AM (0GFWk)
Obama and his pinko administration are treading on me.
I'm going to tell them politely that they should not do that.
Next time I will be more emphatic.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 29, 2010 08:19 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 29, 2010 08:20 AM (9hSKh)
Gabe, I think that the inauguration will still be on Jan. 20th even though that is a Sunday. I think that the 21st will be considered a paid holiday for federal workers in the DC metro area who would normally have inauguration day off but won't because it's on Sunday this time around. Here is the OPM statement but it's less than clear: http://tinyurl.com/y9rmppq
Posted by: dczombie at March 29, 2010 08:20 AM (nF4Jh)
Yeah, I know, but a boy can dream...
Posted by: BackwardsBoy
at March 29, 2010 11:59 AM (i3AsK)
So looking at what Obama and his allies have done so far, one can clearly see they have paid no heed to the norms of American politics. From openly looting the treasury to making the justice department just another policy arm of the DNC, this is a brave new world with virtually no rules.
The Republicans had better understand this and do it themselves. Why not put a rollback of Obama's agenda, AND almost everything since 1980, on the table?. Obama's created crises might make people as open to real change as opposed to more statism. Statism caused the current recession, and Obama's statist policies have turned it into a depression.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 29, 2010 08:21 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at March 29, 2010 08:22 AM (Mi2wf)
Seriously, this alone should be grounds for impeachment of Obama and prosecution of the Democrat congressional leadership.
Posted by: 18-1 at March 29, 2010 08:27 AM (7BU4a)
the chances of the repeal of Obamacare will be completely different that Social Security and Medicare experienced.
For both SS and Medicare the day after it was implemented every working American saw a new tax for both with the promise that they would ALL be given the benefits.
With Obamacare everyone with current coverage will see rising premiums and higher taxes and costs and almost none of them will see the benefits personally.
Pre-existing condition ? If you have coverage its not your problem.
Rising costs ? they'll get worse while your out of pocket expenses go up, where is the benefit ?
More people will have coverage ? If you are already covered how does this help you directly ?
In short there will be over 200 million Americans who will personally never see one thin dime of actual benefit from Obamacare, the campaign to repeal it writes itself.
Posted by: Jeff at March 29, 2010 08:27 AM (1QKZf)
Remember this: The Republicans will gain 20 seats in the House, 3 in the Senate, and then Michael Steele and the rest of the douchebags will pat themselves on the back for having a great midterm election season.
And we'll be saddled with the same loser-leadership for 2012.
Posted by: This is Concerned at March 29, 2010 08:27 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at March 29, 2010 12:20 PM (9hSKh)
Not until 2013, that is why the companies have to announce the hit now. After 2013 they can spread the wealth loss around to us.
Posted by: robtr at March 29, 2010 08:28 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Upscale Community Organizing Thought Criminal at March 29,
2010 12:23 PM (IhHdM)
Hey, would you like to be hauled in front of congress with the threat of imprisonment because you didn't toe the Obama line?
Posted by: The MSM at March 29, 2010 08:28 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: pat at March 29, 2010 08:28 AM (vZL64)
for 2013 inaguration day will also be MLK day...irony or poetic justice?
There certainly can be no mistaking that I have a dream for that day.
I could swear I heard a silent "boy" in there, you raaaaaacist.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 29, 2010 08:29 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: elliot m at March 29, 2010 08:29 AM (RB5UU)
Gabe: True on Eisenhower and Reagan, but those were the inaurations for their second terms so there was no transition of power. Since the constitution mandates that noon on Jan. 20 is the time when the new president takes office, it seems that if we have a new president rather than Obama starting a second term we would have the inauguration on the 20th but if Obama is being sworn in for a 2nd term it would be postponed until the 21st.
Either that, or there could be a private swearing on in the 20th for the new president and the public ceremony on the 21st?
Posted by: dczombie at March 29, 2010 08:30 AM (nF4Jh)
It already has. See AT&T.
Posted by: someone2 at March 29, 2010 08:31 AM (/hia0)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 29, 2010 08:31 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 29, 2010 08:33 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 29, 2010 08:35 AM (0GFWk)
The "gimme my free shit now" crowd will really be upset when they don't get anything for free. Some of them have already been laughed out of doctors' offices for looking for freebies.
Posted by: Luca Brasi at March 29, 2010 08:35 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 29, 2010 08:38 AM (9Cooa)
True. Plus, think of all the memorial pancake breakfasts that would spring up.
Mmmmmmm. Pancakes.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 29, 2010 08:40 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: MarkD at March 29, 2010 08:41 AM (YhZfg)
Posted by: Mr. Happy at March 29, 2010 09:09 AM (waaUg)
"Bring it on" was Dubya's thing, although he actually said "bring 'em on."
The More You Know...
Posted by: RJ at March 29, 2010 10:00 AM (ADbI4)
In order to repeal ObamaCare, the GOP will need 60 votes in the Senate (or else the Dems can filibuster). I doubt there will be 60 Republican seats in the Senate in January 2013, no matter how well the elections this November and in 2012 go. And I doubt a single Democrat Senator would vote to repeal this massive expansion of government.
Should the GOP run in 2010 on a platform of repeal? Sure. Will they actually be able to do it? Almost certainly not.
Posted by: RJ at March 29, 2010 10:06 AM (ADbI4)
There was an idiot on Fox this morning from "The Hill" who was saying Republicans should NOT run on a platform of repeal because they could not do it and it would cost them.
I laughed my ass off. Has Obama kept one single damn promise? Even the ones he could keep he has broken.
Posted by: Vic at March 29, 2010 10:20 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: fat burning exercises at November 16, 2010 06:50 PM (JIhhW)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1949 seconds, 202 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Tiger Woods at March 29, 2010 07:40 AM (Ki7fm)