April 12, 2010
— Purple Avenger Wow. 57/28
Its Game Over Charlie. Game. Fracking. Over. Party switch in 5...4...3...2...
Continuing recent trends, Ogabe's job approval has also sunk to a new low of 45% per the racist counter-revolutionary underground faux-pollster Gallup. I've been tipped that an assault team has been prep'ed and arrests are expected at the Gallup bunker any moment now.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at
06:10 AM
| Comments (312)
Post contains 66 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 12, 2010 06:13 AM (QXxYR)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 12, 2010 06:14 AM (QXxYR)
btw The news on Obama being at 45% in Gallup, yeah I said it over and over again last night on this blog and no one wanted to discuss it, I guess it's kind of become everyday news now that Obama has become an unpopular President in 1 & 1/2 year(s), it took Dubya 5 years, a 2nd term, and a natural disaster to become unpopular, Obama just had to be Obama
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:16 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: conscious and hearing that Obama sucks the big one at April 12, 2010 06:17 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Brainless AP hack at April 12, 2010 06:17 AM (QXxYR)
Posted by: Warden at April 12, 2010 06:17 AM (TIGTh)
Posted by: Gov. Crist at April 12, 2010 06:18 AM (qms0w)
Posted by: Ira at April 12, 2010 06:18 AM (bJm7W)
An assualt team consisting of Code Pink and various PETA supporters no doubt and most likely being lead by the Reverend Al Sharpton. The attack plan is simple, Sharpton distracts them by accusing them of racism, then the PETA wave of nude chicks who never shave anything swarm in, and as the poor Gallup folks are trying to deal with the nausea brought on by this assault on their visual senses Code Pink rushes in, assailing everyone with a combination of body odor and even more odoriferous leftist political propaganda.
Naturally the lame stream media will fail to report the chemical and biological warfare components of the assault and those who do survive will likely be carted off to re-education camps.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 06:18 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Brainless AP hack at April 12, 2010 06:19 AM (QXxYR)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at April 12, 2010 06:19 AM (KWhJd)
Who's there?
Orange.
Orange who?
Orange ya glad Crist is getting his ass handed to him after kissing up to Obama and selling his soul for a lousy buck?
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 06:20 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: runninrebel at April 12, 2010 06:20 AM (i3PJU)
Uhh, you folks do realize that that means that 45% of the American population still supports this marxist-tribalist-nihilist insanity, right?
Bueller?
Anyone?
I.e. we are only a few short years away from the point at which the GOP can never again win national elections:
Minority births expected to outnumber white births soon
March 10, 2010
usatoday.com
In the near future, we will simply be stalling for time in these elections [2010, 2012, maybe out to 2016] - long term, constitutional republicanism cannot withstand our impending demographic catastrophe - Barack Hussein Ogabe represents only the leading edge of this disaster.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 06:21 AM (l9HB0)
if they bring a knife to a fight, we bring hot chocolate and Hallmark greeting cards.
He meant hostile foreign nation-states, only. U.S. citizens get the SEIU enforcers.
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 12, 2010 06:21 AM (fx8sm)
Floridians are racist against orange people. Sad, really.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 12, 2010 06:21 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 12, 2010 06:23 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 06:23 AM (xPhKI)
Posted by: oso at April 12, 2010 06:26 AM (bPbwB)
Posted by: Math sez at April 12, 2010 06:27 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: conscious and quite sure Obama is a metrosexual at April 12, 2010 06:27 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 12, 2010 06:27 AM (QXxYR)
While polls are hardly definitive, I am delighted that Crist seems to be sinking into much-deserved oblivion; I, and apparently many of my fellow Floridians were outraged when right after the election, the first news was footage of Crist groveling before Obama in the hope of getting a little stimulus ripoff money. Reading/hearing Crist's comments, I half expected the clown to announce his conversion to the Democrat Party.
At least one senatorial candidate is getting punished for "reach-outism". Wish that South Carolina and Arizona had Rubio clones.
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at April 12, 2010 06:27 AM (PZLW0)
Posted by: Arlen Specter at April 12, 2010 06:28 AM (wOGfT)
Well actually no - the vast majority of people polled oppose his policies, but for some bizarre reason he's still popular "personally", which is all this poll really represents.
I think a large function of these numbers of course have to do with the fact that even people who oppose Obama "politically" want to avoid telling people (even pollsters) that they dislike him personally because of the false assumption their motivations for doing so might be deemed racial rather than political.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 06:29 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at April 12, 2010 10:19 AM (KWhJd)
Crist ends his term as Governor in January of next year, his approval rating is at about 48%-51%, he's barely popular and the primaries have beat up his approval rating which just 1 year ago was in the mid 60s, if he would have run for Governor he would have been elected easily again, but the AG who started the Obamacare suing, Bill McCullum, is running for Governor and leads the Dem candidate big, but yes come on back because Crist's term is nearly up.
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:29 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: eman at April 12, 2010 06:29 AM (qms0w)
That link shows that Obama has an approval rate of 48% and a disaproval rate of 45 %. Purple Avenger has been BLINDED by ODS. PA seek help immediately before attempting to drive
Posted by: Math sez at April 12, 2010 10:27 AM (mhD2v)
You're the one who needs new glasses. The lines cross.Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 06:29 AM (7+pP9)
Crist really is a defacto democrat already. His administration has been more liberal and moonbatty than any of the recent past Democrat governors, Bob Graham/Lawton Chiles, both of which were sort of traditional southern Democrats who showed at least some measure of common sense and restraint in spending.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 06:30 AM (xPhKI)
For anyone that can stomach it, Real Clear has an editorial from the Boston Globe on the civil duty of paying taxes. Money quote, "Citizens long for leaders who will remind us that what we do this week has nobility in it. And if we have to do more of it — pay higher taxes — so that teachers and librarians, and those they serve, are not humiliated but enriched, we will."
Really? We long for leaders who will remind us of the nobility of paying our taxes as they don't pay their own?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 12, 2010 06:31 AM (pLTLS)
um, read again, it's 45% approval and 48% disapproval
I think someone else should check themselves before they drive
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:31 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 12, 2010 06:33 AM (QXxYR)
Possibly. Even running as a squish republican, he'd probably be a shoe in for the Nelson seat, and be a big upgrade over the ultra-liberal Nelson.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 06:33 AM (xPhKI)
Posted by: Math sez at April 12, 2010 06:33 AM (mhD2v)
mindless dumb asses who support him because of party partisanship, the dems blasted Dubya over spending and support Obama when he does the same except 10 times as worst, the party has increasingly become one filled w/ dopes who would suck a dem's cock if they asked, a President is really screwed when he polls in the 30s because that means his base is turning on him as well, as happened w/ Dubya and Poppy Bush. But dems are partisan zombies and while Independents give this guy approvals in the late 30s to low 40s, they're giving this clown a 83% approval
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:36 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: eman at April 12, 2010 06:38 AM (qms0w)
Posted by: conscious and wondering if Crist answered the census as Orange-American at April 12, 2010 06:38 AM (YVZlY)
Planned Parenthood is failing in their mission. Good luck in the barrios, butchers--those anchor babies are worth thousands of dollars of annual welfare.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 12, 2010 06:38 AM (mR7mk)
Time for CBS to come out with a 90% approval rating poll.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 06:39 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: eman at April 12, 2010 06:42 AM (qms0w)
Obama has had a steady approval rate for at least 6 months according to Gallup of 48% It is also interesting that "bad" news concerning Obama is so readily accepted
Posted by: Math sez at April 12, 2010 10:33 AM (mhD2v)
Anything below 50% is very bad news. 45% after 15 months in office is catastrophic.Obama is a sure one-termer if he isn't impeached or forced to resign even earlier.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 06:45 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Math sez at April 12, 2010 10:33 AM (mhD2v)
and having an average approval of 48% is good? that's the average poll number for a President to lose re-election, that's because it's below 50%, half those polled, btw pollster.com takes every poll and averages them to one approval rating, Obama's approval?...47.1%, his disapproval?...48.4%! And that includes polls by dem pollsters and ABC/CBS/CNN polls that overpoll dems, it's obvious the guy has taken a big hit quick into his Presidency that's what happens when you spend this crazy and do the very things that pissed people off about Bush in his 2nd term. btw 68% approved of Obama when he first took office, that's 22% of people who didn't vote for him giving him a chance, republicans like me who said they approved of him to give him a shot, when Bush took office in 2001 clowns like you we're calling him an illegitimate President because of crazy theories he stole FL in 2000, also in 2004 when Bush ran for re-election the economy was good and he was popular but that didn't keep the left from beating him down to the point the 2004 election was as close as it was though w/ the same good economy Clinton won easily in 1996
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:46 AM (38UQ3)
Any tips on how I can keep the semen in my ass from leaking out? I am trying to get pregnant. I'll trade a Kindle and 3 calendars for anything that works.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at April 12, 2010 06:46 AM (90oki)
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 12, 2010 06:48 AM (nxUYP)
Tweet of the Day:
Establishing actual facts w/Obama is like establishing vaginal care 4 Code Pink: Rarely happens & when it does, never works.
Posted by: conscious and wondering if Crist answered the census as Orange-American at April 12, 2010 06:50 AM (YVZlY)
Any tips on how I can keep the semen in my ass from leaking out? I am trying to get pregnant. I'll trade a Kindle and 3 calendars for anything that works.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at April 12, 2010 10:46 AM (90oki)
Push it out Charles, push it out. Shhhhhhh. Men can't get pregnant, sorry. Just because your boyfriend told you he was going to breed you, doesn't mean you are going to get knocked up for real.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 12, 2010 06:51 AM (nxUYP)
Posted by: David Brooks at April 12, 2010 06:51 AM (6uiF7)
I blame Israel and Wall Street and racist Teabaggerz.
And Bush.
And Sarah Palin's nuclear knowledge.
And Rush Limbaugh.
And insurance companies.
And tonsil-grabbing doctors.
And, just for the hell of it...NASCAR.
This list with these guys is endless.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 06:51 AM (B+qrE)
Any tips on how I can keep the semen in my ass from leaking out? I am trying to get pregnant. I'll trade a Kindle and 3 calendars for anything that works.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at April 12, 2010 10:46 AM (90oki)
I recommend a fence post (one you featured as a photo on your ONT will be fine) wrapped tightly with barbed wire. Shove it in until it shows in your throat.
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 06:52 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at April 12, 2010 06:52 AM (KWhJd)
Posted by: Barrack Obama at April 12, 2010 06:53 AM (90oki)
As remarkable as it is, the fact that neither British Prime Minister Gordon Brown nor Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are attending President ObamaÂ’s nuclear security summit in Washington Monday and Tuesday is not altogether surprising.
Relations with both countries — Israel in particular — have grown strained under Obama. Combined with Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s recent defiance of the administration, questions are growing about the president’s ability to maintain important relationships.
“It is a curious state of affairs when relations with our major democratic allies are all wobbly at once,” said Michael Green, a former foreign policy adviser to President George W. Bush, who also listed Japan and South Korea as traditional allies whose relationships with the U.S. have frayed under Obama.
Posted by: conscious and wondering if Crist answered the census as Orange-American at April 12, 2010 06:53 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Lindsey Graham at April 12, 2010 06:54 AM (PLvLS)
interesting that "bad" news concerning Obama is so readily accepted
There's the tell. They really can't help themselves.
Posted by: Dang Straights at April 12, 2010 06:55 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 10:45 AM (7+pP9)
2 Presidents have come back from being this unpopular this quick...Clinton and Reagan. both of them came back because Carter's horrible recession finally ended and the economy boomed, and Clinton worked w/ Reps to govern as a moderate (what Obama promised?) and had the economy recover in time to help him, and even w/ that he had to comeback to win re-election w/ help from a govt. shutdown, passing welfare reform (which he vetoed twice before) and a horrible GOP candidate that I argue was worse then even McCain as a candidate, Obama has no policies that spell recovery and no willingness to work w/ reps, Hugh Hewitt has come up w/ the idea the guy has gotten use to the idea he'll be a 1 termer, a friend of mine who works for the DNC claims he still thinks he can be re-elected in a landslide and that everything will be all good 2012, either way I too see this guy as a 1 termer
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 06:56 AM (38UQ3)
Fox News: "We're so over that whole ratings and profits thang! Besides, we kind of like the cut of CNN's and MSNBC's jib."
Fox peddling opinion now as news: http://tinyurl.com/yeplwlt
via
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 12, 2010 06:56 AM (RkRxq)
I would like to reserve the right to give rambling, incoherent, self-referential 17 minute answers on all thread topics today.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 06:57 AM (B+qrE)
http://tinyurl.com/y5m4jsw
How did America ever survive without this guy?
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 06:57 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Barrack Obama at April 12, 2010 06:58 AM (90oki)
When he was with Rubio on Fox News Sunday, Crist came across as an arrogant little puke.
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 07:01 AM (dXpcc)
a top aide said he has taken "historic steps" to improve democracy in the United States during his time in office
I see that they have the same trouble with "historic" and "improve" as they did with "agnostic."
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:01 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 07:04 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at April 12, 2010 07:04 AM (90oki)
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:05 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 10:56 AM (38UQ3)
I posted this earlier:
AP survey: Recovery to remain sluggish into 2011
By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer
April 12, 2010
WASHINGTON – The pillars of Americans’ financial security — jobs and home values — will stay shaky well into 2011, according to an Associated Press survey of leading economists.
[Of course these are the same economists who seem to be perpetually surprised by every bit of new economic news.]
The findings of the new AP Economy Survey, released Monday, point to an economic recovery that will move slowly and fitfully this year and next. As a result, the Federal Reserve will be forced to keep interest rates near zero until at least the final quarter of this year, three-fourths of the economists saidÂ…
Among the first surveyÂ’s key findings:
• The unemployment rate will stay stubbornly high the next two years. It will inch down to 9.3 percent by the end of this year and to 8.4 percent by the end of 2011. The rate has been 9.7 percent since January. When the recession started in December 2007, unemployment was 5 percent.
• Home prices will remain almost flat for the next two years, even after plunging an average 30 percent nationally since their peak in 2006. The economists forecast no rise this year and a 2.3 percent gain next year.
• The economy will grow 3 percent this year, which is less than usual during the early phase of a recovery and the reason unemployment will stay high. It takes growth of 5 percent for a year to lower the jobless rate by 1 percentage point, economists say.
The economy began growing again last summer, 18 months after the recession startedÂ…
[Again, the AP insists on trotting out the lie that the recession started in December 2007, which is not true. It started in the final quarter of 2008.]
Economists think sales of previously occupied homes, the biggest chunk of the market, will tick up to 5.4 million this year and to 5.9 million in 2011. That would mark continued improvement from the low of 4.9 million in 2008 and be in line with sales in a healthy economy.
But there’s a catch. Sales are forecast to rise in part because of another anticipated wave of foreclosures. That will keep prices from rising — and consumers from spending freely. Surging home equity spurred spending during the housing boom of the last decade…
Economists say it may take until at least the middle of the decade for home values to begin rising normally again. The biggest asset for many Americans, homes have appreciated an average 4 percent a year since World War II, economists say.
--------
Unless the economy makes a quick U-turn and roars back to life Obama is a one term president.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 07:08 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: OberShtuppenFuhrer Obama at April 12, 2010 07:10 AM (3sB5l)
“We are going to pass comprehensive immigration reform,” Reid told the crowd. “We need to do this this year. We can’t let excuses like a Supreme Court nomination get in the way.”
Reid promised the legislation would include provisions to secure both the north and south borders, revisions to a guest worker program, and provisions to deal with illegal immigrants already in the country.
“There are no excuses. This is something America needs,” Reid said. “We’re going to do immigration reform just like we did health care reform.”
shove it down our throats?
Posted by: willow at April 12, 2010 07:12 AM (7FgWm)
StuckOnStupid: Well actually no - the vast majority of people polled oppose his policies, but for some bizarre reason he's still popular "personally", which is all this poll really represents.
I suppose you're free to tell yourself these lies - maybe you think you can find comfort in them - I suppose we all need to figure out some way to sleep at night, and if you have to lie to yourself to make the demons go away, then so be it.
But you are about to learn [in no uncertain terms] that constitutional republicanism CANNOT withstand the kinds of demographics we are now throwing at it - long term, without a [successful] secessionist movement to rid us of the burden of these demographics, Chavezian-Castroite Mugabeism will be the order of the day.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 07:13 AM (l9HB0)
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 12, 2010 07:13 AM (mka2b)
Crist is an opportunistic piece of shit. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 12, 2010 07:13 AM (nxUYP)
Posted by: President B. Obama at April 12, 2010 07:14 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: Emperor of Icecream at April 12, 2010 07:15 AM (epBek)
But you are about to learn [in no uncertain terms] that constitutional republicanism CANNOT withstand the kinds of demographics we are now throwing at it - long term, without a [successful] secessionist movement to rid us of the burden of these demographics, Chavezian-Castroite Mugabeism will be the order of the day.
OK--you have fun with that. I'm going to, you know...vote and contribute campaign money and stuff.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:17 AM (B+qrE)
@76:
Where's the FOX opinion in that news article?
Reporting on the opinions of others is not "peddling opinion". If it were, every comment on legislation from the mouth of Senators and Congressmen would be opinion.
Posted by: effinayright at April 12, 2010 07:17 AM (3sB5l)
Reid promised the legislation would include provisions to secure both the north and south borders,
I have been in favor of a wall against the evils of Gordon Lightfoot music for some time now. BLAME CANADA!!!!
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:19 AM (B+qrE)
Of course the fact that Obama has an "anti government" terrorist as a close personal friend is entirely irrelevant because his terrorist friend is a lefty bomber.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 07:20 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 11:15 AM (uFdnM)
at the risk of sounding like an asshole, if it bothers you so much, edit it for me
I'm in a hurry when I comment on blogs to get my point out quick and because I consider it a fun thing to do. I'm an aspiring Author who knows plenty about grammar and spelling but if I worry too much about that on a blog by the time i'm done making the comment look perfect i'll miss out on good points to reply to, I have a life to live and when I get my chance i'll stop by the open laptop and add a new comment, grammar is the last thing on my mind
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:22 AM (38UQ3)
Crist was a successful and popular Governor for most of his term and a positive face of the Republican party for non Republicans. Some of these comments remind me of how the libs talk about Palin and they have the excuse that she's on the other side from them.
He's a squish, polynikes. And that hug and jsutification for signing his soul away for Crapulus scraps (and that's what they were) just confirmed the worst.
Someone needs to ask him how he feels about that deal now that Obama is gutting NASA...and Florida with it. Saved or created indeed.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:23 AM (B+qrE)
I guess what I don't get is what is so "radical" about calling the Obama Administration socialist. Duh! They are socialists! They don't like to admit it of course, but that pretty much describes their agenda to a T.
So how can that in anyway be considered a "radical" school of thought?
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 07:23 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Christoph to the rescue at April 12, 2010 07:24 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 07:24 AM (uFdnM)
OK--you have fun with that. I'm going to, you know...vote and contribute campaign money and stuff.
And I am telling you that, long term, none of that stuff will make any difference.
Short term - 2010, 2012, maybe out towards 2016 - the GOP can still win national elections.
But long term, with white babies becoming a minority of all births in this country, "democracy" [ = demos kratia = "the rule of the mob"] necessitates that Chavezian-Castroite Mugabeism will be the order of the day.
Which is what this poll is telling you - that there is now a solid base of 45% of the people in this country who ACTIVELY DESIRE AND WELCOME this insanity.
Within the confines of demos kratia, we can only hold out against them for so long - eventually, if our way of life is to survive [and endure], then we will have to secede.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 07:26 AM (l9HB0)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 11:24 AM (uFdnM)
lol, I din't mean to sound like a prick, I was just explaining that I have no time to correct or care about my grammar when I comment on blogs I go to because i'm in more of a hurry then when i'm writing a story/manuscript.
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:27 AM (38UQ3)
Alright, enough already. Periods are bad. I get it.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 11:24 AM (uFdnM)
Dump your wife/GF and you won't have to put up with that monthly taste of hell.Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 07:28 AM (7+pP9)
Wonder why no one demands to see her footage of McVeigh waving a homemade sign outside his congressional representative's office.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 12, 2010 07:29 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 11:26 AM (l9HB0)
I disagree to a point, while I agree the coming minority birth boom (and i'm one before I get called a racist) will lead to a re-alignment that will help Dems in the near future, I also think that will be turn back to a Republican majority after the policies continue to fail. The fact is that 45% don't welcome insanity, they just don't care because it's someone w/ a (D) next to their name talking about. Again, Obama is doing the things they bash Bush over 10 times as worse and they're loving him for it, why? he's a dem, their a bunch of party hacks w/o common sense thinking, just a bunch of zombies
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:31 AM (38UQ3)
Personally, I think the additional charge for luggage is bullshit, but I can always choose to use another airline. Chucky wants government control of what the airlines can charge. Fuck him. Let the competition between the airlines work it out.
Washington (CNN) – Sen. Chuck Schumer vowed Monday to offer legislation that would prohibit airlines from charging passengers a fee to carry on luggage.
Spirit Airlines recently announced a carry on fee ranging from $30 to $45 per bag, becoming the first U.S carrier to charge for carry on luggage.
The New York Democrat said in an interview on CNN that the new fees "step over the line" and if the Treasury Department does not answer his plea to prevent the fees from being implemented he is certain that the legislation will go through the Senate and the House "like a hot knife through butter."
Posted by: conscious and saying Fuck Chuck at April 12, 2010 07:31 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: In before the troll at April 12, 2010 07:31 AM (VY5KX)
And they're the ones procreating. Analogous to Europe and their immigrants.
I expect the eco-whackos to destroy the American agriculture and trucking industries, causing urban food panics, long before we get to the anti-white Mugabe stage.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 12, 2010 07:32 AM (mR7mk)
Just a couple of thoughts here. Crist was a primary example of exactly what is wrong in government today, on the one hand he claims he's for smaller government and reduced spending but he's more than willing to take hand outs for his state and perpetuate this cycle of more and more kickbacks to state government from local government.
We need leaders that will stand on principle. Look at Governor Heinman from Nebraska for example, when Senator Ben Nelson sold us down the river with his Cornhusker Kickback, Heinman stood up and said this was not something we in Nebraska wanted. When Nelson tried his political blackmail and said if the Governor Heinman would go on the record opposing it he'd see it was taken out of the bill, Heinman stood his ground and said take it out.
That's the sort of principled leadership people want, not the Crist decrying it in speeches in front of one crowd and then accepting federal government "bribes" hand over fist with the other. People are, rightfully so, sick of that type of governance. I would also point out that whenever a republican politician is seen as "appealing to non-republicans" that this is just MSM doublespeak meaning he's a worthless RINO who will most likely enforce liberal policies and abandon conservative principles. No thanks.
So with luck Crist will join Stupak in the dust bin of history, along with a boatload of other weasel opportunists who have far to long dominated our political landscape. Good riddance to the lot.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 07:33 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Fritz at April 12, 2010 07:34 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: Fritz at April 12, 2010 11:34 AM (GwPRU)
and a halter top with no bra
Posted by: conscious and saying Fuck Chuck at April 12, 2010 07:35 AM (YVZlY)
The New York Democrat said in an interview on CNN that the new fees "step over the line" and if the Treasury Department does not answer his plea to prevent the fees from being implemented he is certain that the legislation will go through the Senate and the House "like a hot knife through butter."
Good grief.
Remember when those roving bands showed up at your door and forced you to fly Spirit Airlines against your will? hey Senator--waht happens if they just raise thier ticket prices 30 to 40 bucks?
I am also fairly certain that the Transportation Departement handles this sort of thing and not the Treasury Department.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:36 AM (B+qrE)
Of course the fact that Obama has an "anti government" terrorist as a close personal friend is entirely irrelevant because his terrorist friend is a lefty bomber.
Let's not forget that at least 7 people died as a result of Obama's friends Mr. & Mrs. Ayers bombing activities.....3 of the dead were their friends in Greenwich Village (odd way to treat your girlfriend Mr. Ayers) and 4 were innocent members of law enforcement murdered by Weather Underground bombs.
From wikipedia (yeah I know) "On February 16, 1970 a nail bomb placed on a window ledge of the Park Police substation in the Upper Haight neighborhood of San Francisco exploded at 10:45 p.m. The blast killed police Sergeant Brian McDonnell. Law enforcement suspected the Weather Underground but was unable to prove conclusively that the organization was involved. A second officer, Robert Fogarty was partially blinded by the bombÂ’s shrapnel......
...According to David Gilbert, who took part in the 1981 Brinks Robbery that killed three officers and was jailed for murder "[their] goal was to not hurt any people, and a lot of work went into that. But we wanted to pick targets that showed to the public who was responsible for what was really going on."
Sometimes I still can't believe this guy, with all his evil baggage, was elected president by 52% of the voters. I just can't believe it.
Posted by: Boots at April 12, 2010 07:37 AM (06JTY)
I have been in favor of a wall against the evils of Gordon Lightfoot music for some time now. BLAME CANADA!!!!
Speaking of those pale, shifty bastards, did you know Canada is the largest producer of natural uranium in the world? By applying mental gymnastics one could conclude that Canada is a terrorist-sponsoring nation and should be dealt with swiftly and harshly
And by swiftly and harshly, I mean the boycotting of all Tim Horton's and duty-free stores.
Posted by: ErikW at April 12, 2010 07:37 AM (/0Stw)
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 07:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:39 AM (B+qrE)
My understanding was the airline was trying to discourage people from bringing their huge-assed body-sized bags onto the plane and spending hours trying to stuff them into the overhead compartment while 50 other people with huge-assed bags stand behind them and cause a late pushback from the gate...instead of just checking them, getting on, and sitting down.
Chuckie, you know why people do this? Because there's a fee to check the bags. Because fuel prices skyrocketed in 2008. Because of your stupid Socialist Democrat eco-whacko anti-American no-drilling/no-new-refineries policies of the past 40 years.
*spit*
Posted by: HeatherRadish flies too much at April 12, 2010 07:39 AM (mR7mk)
And by swiftly and harshly, I mean the boycotting of all Tim Horton's and duty-free stores.
Don't forget the Ann Murray CD's.
Posted by: Barbarian at April 12, 2010 07:40 AM (EL+OC)
All problems? Yes, actually as you ponder that- debt, flat tax, lack of campaign reform, Obamacare, it becomes inescapable. These sociopaths don't want to fix easily fixed problems.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 07:41 AM (uFdnM)
Will Chuck concern himself with the Hispanics bringing on live chickens and illegal fruit in crates too?
Posted by: Barbarian at April 12, 2010 07:42 AM (EL+OC)
Typical liberal - wants to pass a law for a non-problem by pretending its populist. Big deal, they just raise the ticket price for everbody, once again, businesses hardest hit by dem policies. I have flown day trips plenty of times with just a briefcase.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 07:43 AM (7VvJB)
CNBC has the CEO on the other day. Essentially he said they have dramatically lowered their fares and, if you choose not to bring a carry on, then you have an even lower fare.. But, as usual, CNBC preferred to only hear the MSM version of this....
is the ceo a republican?
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 07:43 AM (p302b)
considering the horrible rep year that was 2008, the financial crisis, Palin's bad favorables, McCain's bad campaign and debate performances (except the 3rd one), and the Bush and War fatigue tied to Republicans while Obama was the darling of the country w/ favorables in the 70s, not to mention a discouraged GOP base that didn't turn out the vote, it's amazing he only got that much of the vote, i've said it before and i'll say it again, if the GOP had turn out we could have pulled off a victory
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:43 AM (38UQ3)
I didn't see that show, but I'm not surprised. I think Crist went into this with a sense of "inevitable entitlement" and got rocked fracking hard by what happened and still can't really believe its happening.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 07:44 AM (xPhKI)
Posted by: Chucky Shumer at April 12, 2010 07:45 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010
11:38 AM (p302b)
I love it, Beck has stepped in it a couple times trying to be Mr. independent going after people like Scott Brown over a joke, having Massa do a 1 hour interview, and claiming McCain would be a worse President then Obama, Ryan is showing balls by defending himself against Beck who sometimes get away unchecked
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:46 AM (38UQ3)
it's amazing he only got that much of the vote, i've said it before and i'll say it again, if the GOP had turn out we could have pulled off a victory
If Giuliani or Thompson had been the nominee...shoulda, coulda, woulda.
Man, those were two bad campaigns.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:47 AM (B+qrE)
Airlines: suddenly remove overhead carry-on racks to save weight and add paying cargo bay capacity.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 07:48 AM (xPhKI)
Also makes sense. I'd been wondering how bringing your huge-assed bag into the cabin instead of checking it saved any fuel...other than it only has a 3oz bottle of shampoo instead of a 4 oz.
Posted by: HeatherRadish flies too much at April 12, 2010 07:49 AM (mR7mk)
I loved when Ryan told him he doesn't watch the show.....
When Beck said that he was for a VAT, per some article I read at some site on the blog roll of Michelle Malkin's site....yes it was after happy hour....I began to wonder about Beck, yet again...
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 07:49 AM (p302b)
Now that the One has been exposed and is listing in the harbor, it's payback time. Palin is regrouping and maybe the GOP can find a real republican to run next time.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 07:50 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 07:51 AM (7VvJB)
Also makes sense. I'd been wondering how bringing your huge-assed bag into the cabin instead of checking it saved any fuel...other than it only has a 3oz bottle of shampoo instead of a 4 oz.
Posted by: HeatherRadish
flies too much at April 12, 2010 11:49 AM (mR7mk)
What drives me nuts are the people who have no concept about loading the overhead bins. They think it's there just for them and they can put all their mess up there and when you come along and put your little suitcase up there, they have a cow. They could load a plane with experienced travelers in very little time...it's the ones who have no clue that cause the delays...lol
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 07:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 12, 2010 07:53 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: Charlie Crist at April 12, 2010 11:13 AM (mka2b)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 07:54 AM (mHQ7T)
the only time I find myself defending Beck is when AP or CJ do some stupid attack on him, but yes Beck steps over the line sometimes, his ratings are great but they stopped being high enough to challenge Bill O' or Hannity after he took a shot at Palin, he pisses off the base sometimes and is caught being a hypocrite. Mark Levin (who I'm not a fan of but I like his war w/ Beck) said Beck was kissing Dubya's ass at a talk radio host meeting w/ Bush and then Beck talked about how horrible Bush is like Obama on his show, now Dubya surely was no conservative and made stupid mistakes (mostly in his bad 2nd term) but he is nowhere near as bad as Obama, hell Bush is starting to poll w/ Obama, the country is starting to want him back but that's another issue
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:54 AM (38UQ3)
Ok, again this is a misreading of the polls. There is no solid base of 45% that welcome Obama's destructive policies. Look, if your going to be a conservative you need to act like a conservative, and one of the things we conservatives do is set emotion aside and look at facts first to determine the best course of action.
Emotive arguments and overreaction are a hallmark of the whacko left, they have little to no place on the much more well reasoned and thoughtful right. Now, the polls you cite are very narrow and have to do more with Obama as a person, not his policies. Also you run into inherint problems relying on any poll data, because a lot has to do with your representative sample, what time of day you call, and how the questions are worded.
For example, if your representative sample is 80% registered democrat, guess what? Your going to get much different results than if your sample is closer to 50/50. Without this data one cannot possibly state that there is a 45% solid base of support based on a single poll, it's ludicrous.
Now, when people are asked if they think the country is headed in the right direction, on average only 31% will say yes, almost 61.4% say no. A much different result than the 45% "solid base" you infer from the poll above.
So for now I encourage you to work within our current political system, have a little faith and try to get good, conservative candidates in there. Remember also not to put so much stock in polls, while they are sometimes good indicators they are based on very small samples and usually poll groups of "likely" voters, which doesn't really tell you much since a lot of tea party folks would not fall into the "likely" voter category until now.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 07:54 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Thyicak stupid fucking leftard at April 12, 2010 07:55 AM (OlN4e)
The fact is that 45% don't welcome insanity, they just don't care because it's someone w/ a (D) next to their name talking about.
Except that what you are describing is precisely the very insanity itself.
Long term, consitutional republicanism CANNOT withstand these kinds of demographics - a voting public which is incapable of supporting itself, which exists only to consume and devour and destroy the sane [& productive] portion of the population.
When the leeches become 50% + epsilon, demos kratia ensures that the society is doomed.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 07:55 AM (l9HB0)
now Dubya surely was no conservative and made stupid mistakes
I give you....the Department of Homeland Security.
Until The Thingtm, the worst public policy decision in the history of the republic.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 07:57 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Thyicak stupid fucking leftard at April 12, 2010 11:55 AM (OlN4e)"
Probably that is what chuckie is thinking...."ah, the chance to make another Amtrak, Fannie and Freddie, AIG, GM, the power is too much for me"
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 07:57 AM (p302b)
Is that right? I thought Ryan praised TR and Wilson's progressive policies.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 07:57 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 11:50 AM (uFdnM)
I agree, McCain discouraged the base from voting, if Hillary would have been the nominee (and she should have been) she would have won like 60% of the vote and won in a landslide, but Obama who they thought would be the best pick to win ironically only got 52% of the vote on the night that the opposing party's President had an approval of 27%!
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 07:58 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 07:58 AM (p302b)
Because he cut a deal with the Democrats before he announced his run. Crist thought Obama campaigning for him in FL would help him win a Senate seat at a time when "the GOP needs to compromise or disappear." We dodged a bullet when Rubio came on the scene.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 07:59 AM (mHQ7T)
ROTFL.. yes, the grips are magnetic. And if your hands were metal that would mean something.
Hat tip to the MST3K reference.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 08:00 AM (e8T35)
How about charging the 300 lb chicken mcnugget spilling out of his seat next to me- a third more for the extra 100 lbs he is sporting? Now that would be sweet-
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:00 AM (uFdnM)
Is that right? I thought Ryan praised TR and Wilson's progressive policies.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 11:57 AM (Z+qzA)"
So did Beck who apparently "after hearing so much about how great Ryan was dug up some speech ryan made in Michigan that seemed to say exactly that" and this prompted Beck to fry Ryan and Ryan's office to call to defend him....leading to the interview that just occurred.
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:01 AM (p302b)
TR was a moderate/liberal Republican, Wilson was an outright communistic dictator no good a-hole
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:01 AM (38UQ3)
Pandering to the unions. I like being able to grab my carry on, get the fuck off the plane, go through customs and get in a cab in under an hour.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 08:02 AM (mHQ7T)
161 When I first started flying commercial, back in the late 60's/early 70's, there was a charge for overweight baggage. At least flying overseas. You were allowed so many pounds (35?) for free, and paid for the overage. Get you hands on an old copy of Europe on 5 dollars a day. That gave all kinds of tips for sneaking extra stuff onto the plane. Wearing 3 pairs of pants and two coats etc.
5 dollars a day? Hell, you'd have to pay me a hellova lot more per day than that. At least $200.00/day, plus perks like a horny Swedish bikini team captain for starters...
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 08:02 AM (OlN4e)
Be sure the application for permission to fly home to Texas for your mother's deathbed/funeral is completed in triplicate, and in six weeks they will get back to you with the ticket for your flight four months later, after College Students For Obama are all done flying off to San Padre for the spring break (financed with loan money they'll never have to completely pay back).
Posted by: HeatherRadish flies too much at April 12, 2010 08:02 AM (mR7mk)
300 lb chicken mcnugget
I think we're going to need more than two packets of sweet and sour sauce.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 12, 2010 08:03 AM (B+qrE)
Someone hasn't flown coach lately.....
Why not have fares based on weight of the passenger and their luggage and be done with it?
That's actually a good idea. Hence, it'll never stick. After the first fattie sues an airline for making them subject to public humiliation, or the "fairness" argument, weight-based fares will go the way of the dodo.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 12, 2010 08:03 AM (VY5KX)
Another guest said that Reid will retire. That you have to file by the 30 and his son is running for governor and he doesn't want to impact that race....
everyone laughed.
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at April 12, 2010 08:03 AM (uKraB)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:04 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 12:04 PM (uFdnM)
don't worry about it, i'm pretty sure my lack of grammar in my blog comments have bothered others as well
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:07 AM (38UQ3)
Gallup uses Adults, which is the most favorable group possible for Obama, rather than RV or LV
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 08:07 AM (xPhKI)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:08 AM (p302b)
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:08 AM (38UQ3)
Anyone see at HA, an article from the WSJ, about Obama meeting with the Kazahk "leader", and saying that America was still working on its democracy and that he was taking historic steps to improve it.
Was he talking about ACORN going under? I'm lost, i didn't realized we were still working on our democracy and that Obama had undertaken historic steps to improve it.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:08 AM (wuv1c)
It appears that we're going to a model where passenger traffic is treated like airfreight.
A friend of mine is a 767 pilot who calls passengers "self-loading cargo."
Posted by: Cicero at April 12, 2010 08:08 AM (QKKT0)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:10 AM (p302b)
Posted by: toby928
Re-read his speech again. It sounded like he was talking about the trust-busting and anti-patronage type legislation that TR and others had a hand in.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 12, 2010 08:10 AM (o8Qz0)
"Constitutional scholar" doesn't realize we're meant to be a republic. Or doesn't care. Six of one, half-dozen of the other.
Posted by: HeatherRadish flies too much at April 12, 2010 08:11 AM (mR7mk)
I've started getting the third hour of Beck on my afternoon drive home. He was really concerned about the use of the term Progressive by Ryan. (wooodrow willlson!1!!) I think Ryan just used the term as shorthand for the activist stuff he liked, rather than an endorsement of rule by the elite.
i agree, that progessivism should mean foward moving, but once words have a negative connotation to them, there should be no attempt to rehabilitate them.
For example, the Socialist Party of America doesn't call itself the National Socialist Party of America for a reason.
Personally I miss the word liberal, as i consider myself a classical liberal, but I have given up any hope on bringing that word back to its original meaning.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:11 AM (wuv1c)
I remember reading a very intelligent discussion on a thread here about why a democracy is a democracy and a democratic republic is a whole different thing altogether.
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:12 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:13 AM (p302b)
It'll last until Ace regains consciousness...another day or two maybe.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 12, 2010 08:13 AM (xPhKI)
Just in case no one misunderstands, that is Rush sarc.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 08:14 AM (7VvJB)
When he was with Rubio on Fox News Sunday, Crist came across as an arrogant little puke.
He was showing his true colors, Dagny
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at April 12, 2010 08:14 AM (pHH0Q)
Emotive arguments and overreaction are a hallmark of the whacko left, they have little to no place on the much more well reasoned and thoughtful right.
Except that you're the one who is being emotive and overreacting when you try to convince yourself that there is not a solid [and growing] plurality of the population which supports and welcomes this insanity - a plurality which will be an unassailable & permanent majority no later than about 2020.
We can hold out against them in the short term - maybe out towards 2016, a Palin/Bachman or Palin/Cheney ticket might still be able to win nationally [if only by the skin of its teeth] - but, long term, constitutional republicanism CANNOT withstand these kinds of demographics.
To keep the USA intact, as a constituional republic, we would need to repatriate every single one of the 30+ million Mexican Indian illegal aliens, repudiate Wong Kim Ark, strip their 30 to 45 million anchor babies of Wong Kim Ark citizenship, and end up re-locating 60 to 75 million Indians back to the badlands of Mexico, which is a positively Stalin-esque [or Mao-esque] undertaking that you would be contemplating.
Realistically, our best hope at this point is for the central tier of states [the South, the redder parts of the Midwest, the Rockies, Alaska, and possibly Alberta/Northwest/Yukon Canada] to secede and form a new union.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 08:15 AM (l9HB0)
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 11:54 AM (38UQ3)
Bush was and still is a conservative by any measure.
i didn't care much for bush. It is the reason i fear Huckabee. Its someone who is called a conservative but isn't really a conservative. Economic conservatism is the most important aspect of conservatism, bush was a 50/50 economic conservatism. He focused on stupid social issues that will never be solved. If you voted for Bush in 2004 honestly thinking he would add an amendment to the constitution banning gay marriage you are nuts. I understand politicians do things to win votes, but that will NEVER happen.
I liked bush's supreme court picks, his defense of this nation, his distrust of foreign nations. tax cuts, his integrity, and that's about it. The rest wasn't so great.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:16 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:17 AM (p302b)
That's something I haven't heard. Rush just said the polish plane was dumping fuel.
i can't be the first to say this, and i hate to sound like a conspiracist, but dear lord am i the only person who thinks the russians had a hand in this?
Imagine if you could wipe out 80% of a government and make it look like an accident? Especially considering the government thwarts russia's continued attempts to bring Poland back into the Russian sphere of control.
Anyone but me?
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:19 AM (wuv1c)
That's 90 percent of his job.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 08:19 AM (Z+qzA)
When he was with Rubio on Fox News Sunday, Crist came across as an arrogant little puke.
He was showing his true colors, Dagny
What i find most impressive about that Sunday show was that Rubio can openly talk about the need to reform social security (read:cuts to people under 55) in a state like Florida and not be destroyed in the polls. If a state like Florida elects Rubio, I think that tells you this country is ready for an honest discussion on the painful steps we will need to take to become solvent again.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:21 AM (wuv1c)
i can't be the first to say this, and i hate to sound like a conspiracist, but dear lord am i the only person who thinks the russians had a hand in this?
Heavy fog hides smoke trail from heat seeking missile. It's in KGB manual.
Posted by: Putin at April 12, 2010 08:21 AM (QKy+n)
I liked bush's supreme court picks, his defense of this nation, his distrust of foreign nations. tax cuts, his integrity, and that's about it.
That's 90 percent of his job.
Reckless spending(sorry if i sound like a leftist on this one, but dear lord he spent like crazy), Medicare Part D, No Child Left Behind, Attempted Immigration Reform, TARP, Naming Chris Cox to the SEC, reaching across the aisle for shit legislation, no there was a lot to his admin that i didn't like one bit. He was good on some stuff, terrible on other stuff.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:23 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:24 AM (uFdnM)
Anyone but me?
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 12:19 PM (wuv1c)
Something is very, very fishy there. An experienced pilot trying to land his plane in dense fog on a VFR only runway in the dead of night just does not set right with me.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at April 12, 2010 08:24 AM (cqZXM)
"Airlines: suddenly remove overhead carry-on racks to save weight and add paying cargo bay capacity."
I kinda like this...
Posted by: reason, who is tall and maintains Gold status anyway... at April 12, 2010 08:25 AM (5npD/)
Heavy fog hides smoke trail from heat seeking missile. It's in KGB manual.
i am not saying they shot is down, that would be too obvious, but the its a russian made plane(which does have a shitty safety record), landing at a russian airport, I would think they could just tamper with the mechanical parts and make it look like an accident.
It's just that russia had so much to gain from that plane going down, that i think the question should be asked. If upon review it turns out to be a total accident, I will be believe that, but the first thing i thought when i saw the story was that russia was somehow involved.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:26 AM (wuv1c)
Ben at April 12, 2010 12:19 PM (wuv1c)
Haven't heard about the fuel dumping but the rest is suspect. Who the hell sends all of the eggs in one basket? Oh wait......It was Poland wasn't it?
Posted by: harleycowboy at April 12, 2010 08:28 AM (JKGfQ)
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:28 AM (uFdnM)
Ben, the plane had just been sent to Russia to be completely overhauled and updated. One of the threads has a quote from the mechanic who worked on the plane saying it was as good as new.
And, the Russians have vlad investigating....doing a thorough investigation....
What I still don't understand is why all those important people didn't think twice about riding on the same plane together. and, initially they said "someone missed the flight" but never revisited that....man was that person lucky....
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:30 AM (p302b)
Put the immediate kabash on Kyoto........
Posted by: polynikes at April 12, 2010 12:28 PM (m2CN7)
Uh that was Clinton that refused to sign the treaty or even present it to Congress. Bush just pretty much ignored the whole thing.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at April 12, 2010 08:32 AM (BuYeH)
Ben, the plane had just been sent to Russia to be completely overhauled and updated. One of the threads has a quote from the mechanic who worked on the plane saying it was as good as new.
And, the Russians have vlad investigating....doing a thorough investigation....
What I still don't understand is why all those important people didn't think twice about riding on the same plane together. and, initially they said "someone missed the flight" but never revisited that....man was that person lucky....
i read that the polish government did it to save taxpayer money. dear lord i hope our politicians don't do the same.
also, if it turns out to be an accident, i will totally believe it. I'm just saying my gut feeling when i first heard the news went immediatly to thinking the russians had a hand in it.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:33 AM (p302b)
I disagree. NCLB, Medicare Part D and Tarp hardly seem conservative, in a Calvin Coolidge way.
that was my point, they weren't conservative.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:34 AM (wuv1c)
Ask Buddy Holly, Lynard Skynard, Marshall. My old man buried one on a wooded hillside. Tore both wings off. Walked away without a scratch. Said it was a perfect landing, not so much for the plane.
Posted by: Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:35 AM (uFdnM)
What are the odds Crist runs as an independent and spoils Rubio's chances?
I give us one chance in three.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:35 AM (wuv1c)
"also, if it turns out to be an accident, i will totally believe it. I'm just saying my gut feeling when i first heard the news went immediatly to thinking the russians had a hand in it.
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 12:32 PM (wuv1c)"
I think a lot of people would have that reaction which is sort of the "automatic reaction". If it turns out not to be an accident, wondering who might have benefited by this and by being able to pin it on the russians? I remember when I heard about the invitation and the apology I thought to myself "that doesn't sound right, what's up".
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:36 AM (p302b)
That's just it, Putin didn't really apologize.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 08:38 AM (Z+qzA)
I don't recall. When exactly was it that we claimed to be balanced moderate non-partisan squishy milquey toast?
What makes a good man go neutral? Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 08:38 AM (0q2P7)
So many on one plane was a stumper for me, too.
I mean, I can understand Pres & family...I'm sure all the Obamas can travel together if they want. But Pres & VP don't get to travel together, and I'm sure they keep a lot of the other various top-level officials off of the same flights / out of the same motorcade vehicles from one another...
Too much pressure from the enviroweenies in Poland for the government to reduce their carbon footprint and usage of fossil fuels?
Mistake to buy your governmental aircraft from a country that doesn't particularly like you?
Posted by: reason at April 12, 2010 08:39 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 08:40 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 12:40 PM (0q2P7)
Would that S.C. would get the message and give Lindsey effing Graham the boot.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 12, 2010 08:42 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Fritz at April 12, 2010 08:42 AM (GwPRU)
Posted by: reason at April 12, 2010 08:44 AM (5npD/)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 08:44 AM (dXpcc)
Hit the AoSHQ Tip Jar and buy ace an alarm clock...
He'll just blow it on Qualudes and Rhodesian Tranny Hookers
Posted by: Ben at April 12, 2010 08:46 AM (wuv1c)
Oh shit! Men everywhere are screwed. No longer will your female partner have to ask you the chilling question "what are you thinking?"
New technology unveiled by Intel uses brain scans to figure out what you're thinking. In tests, it was 90% accurate http://su.pr/6WfeM6
Posted by: conscious and saying that's not what I was thinking at April 12, 2010 08:47 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 08:49 AM (dXpcc)
Posted by: Women at April 12, 2010 08:50 AM (e8YaH)
New technology unveiled by Intel uses brain scans to figure out what you're thinking
If they haven't figured out that it's naked chicks, Barbecued Ribs, and Beer they're just not trying.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 08:50 AM (0q2P7)
There are only three things we ever think about anyways so how hard was it before this invention.
Posted by: Buzzsaw probably thinking what you think I am at April 12, 2010 08:51 AM (tf9Ne)
The KGB did bump off Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq is a contrived plane crash, so there's that.
Posted by: toby928 at April 12, 2010 12:27 PM (PD1tk)
ISI did that.I was reading about the crash (can't find the site) and the runway had a old Russian military ILS. The plane was equipped to read it but the system was different than civilian ILS systems -- the beam led to a spot before the runway threshold. Apparently the plane was also descending at 7m/s (which was way too fast) when it impacted. ILS beams can be distorted. As for the fuel dumping, that sounds mighty screwy.
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 08:52 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Tonya (I should have gold) Harding at April 12, 2010 08:52 AM (uFdnM)
Is there some point to your glooming?
The point is that you people are breaking out the champagne and caviar and cigars to celebrate an Obama approval rating of 45%, when, instead, you ought to be horrified.
Obama has proved to be every bit the Bill Ayers/Frank Marshall Davis/Rashid Khalidi Chavezian-Castroite Mugabe-ist radical that we were trying to warn people he would be [back in 2008], and yet 45% of the citizenry* in this country STILL supports him.
I.e. the Chavezian-Castroite Mugabeist "fringe" element in our society is only "5% + epsilon" away from acheiving a permanent majority at the ballot box, and once they achieve it [probably no later than about 2020], the republic ends, and it NEVER returns.
*Where "citizenry" is a polite euphemism for "blood-sucking leeches".
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 08:53 AM (l9HB0)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010
12:49 PM (dXpcc)
so your for child
molestation?
Posted by: Christoph to the rescue at April 12, 2010 12:50 PM (38UQ3)
Where did you get that?
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 12:53 PM
(p302b)
it was just me doing a sockpuppet of Christoph, mocking how he turned everything into an anti-religion thing
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:54 AM (38UQ3)
Nothing emotive about my stance at all, I simply look at more than one poll and see a much different result than you do, rather than basing an opinion on a single source that really doesn't support your conclusion. The 45% solid base of support you see in that poll is anything but solid and doesn't even truly indicate support. When you look at another poll with a much better, more targeted question, do you agree with where our country is headed, and you get a much different result, about 65% on average say no, they don't.
We can hold out against them in the short term - maybe out towards 2016, a Palin/Bachman or Palin/Cheney ticket might still be able to win nationally [if only by the skin of its teeth] - but, long term, constitutional republicanism CANNOT withstand these kinds of demographics.
Again I think it's simply far to early to make a statement like this one, and far too little data to support such a conclusion. While I agree that should we eventually get to the stage where an actual majority has an entiltlement mentality that this will eventually cause the collapse of the republic I agree.
However as recent events would indicate up till now only a small percentage of people in our nation are actually politically active, politically educated and politically involved. That is changing, and from the looks of things for the better. So personally I think it's pretty premature to talk about secession and other rather radical solutions until at the very least we get past the next few elections.
The populace is beginning to awake, the lame stream media is rapidly losing it's hold and credibility and things are beginning to change. I see no purpose served in proposing what you propose at this stage, it simply adds fuel ti the fire that the tea party/conservative movement is radical, which we simply are not. I see no purpose or advantage in fulfilling the MSM's idiotic narrative.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 08:55 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 08:55 AM (e8YaH)
his 1st approval was at 68%, he's had a 23 point drop in approval in15 Months, it takes time for the country to back away from a President, hell it took Dubya 2 terms to even get underwater in approval, Obama's done it quicker and chances are he's done in 2012
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:56 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: curious
at April 12, 2010 12:53 PM
(p302b)
it was just me doing a
sockpuppet of Christoph, mocking how he turned everything into an
anti-religion thing
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 12:54 PM (38UQ3)
ah, I was so thankful to have dagny be able to answer all my questions.
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 08:56 AM (p302b)
Quit smearing my name.
Posted by: Proud to Be the Lunatic Fringe at April 12, 2010 08:57 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by:
Is there some point to your glooming? If its inevitable, its inevitable.
Posted by: toby928
He who argues with a colon is an ass.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 12, 2010 08:58 AM (R2fpr)
Yeah I'm on stage seven there you need to catch up. I've just come to accept that a major conflict between the two philosophies of human existence is inevitable, and will almost certainly occur in my lifetime. The best that we can do is politically fight for and preserve as much freedom as we can until then.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 08:59 AM (0q2P7)
it was just me doing a sockpuppet
of Christoph, mocking how he turned everything into an anti-religion
thing
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 12:54 PM (38UQ3)
This means you're ok with slavery. Interesting.
Posted by: Christoph at April 12, 2010 08:59 AM (+gX1+)
lol, Steyn does go a little far with the doom and gloom stuff sometimes, I'm glad that while people celebrated the 2004 Bush victory though that he pointed out that in a good economy, a popular republican president still barely won re-election, but there's other factors to that as well
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 08:59 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 09:01 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: toby928 at April 12, 2010 12:56 PM (PD1tk)
Puritanism, the haunting feeling that someone somewhere is having a good time.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at April 12, 2010 09:02 AM (JSetw)
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (Z+qzA)
yep, he turned up on the ONT of all threads and spread his religion bashing and pissed people off, the next night he posted comment after comment bashing the pope and once again got the religion bashing going, Dave in Texas had enough and banned him for basically being an a-hole, it reminds me how Allah stopped posting comments here after he couldn't deal w/ the morons anymore taking him to task, he could just banhammer all the HA people instead...
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 09:03 AM (38UQ3)
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 09:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:03 AM (dXpcc)
This is what happens when you don't stand for anything. Crist tries to please all of the people all of the time.
You have to live in Florida to truly understand how shocking the fall of Crist has been. Charlie used to be a LOCK for any state-wide political office he chose to run for.
Unfortunately for Charlie, he ran smack into the mood of the nation: Do right or be gone!
Posted by: Snorty McBrearty at April 12, 2010 09:04 AM (Wjv9m)
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (Z+qzA)
Thanks be to God
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:04 AM (dXpcc)
Europeans have a fine and long tradition of allowing an elitist ruling class autocratic control of society. It is not particularly surprising to me that after an essentially short period of freedom, they lapsed back to their more familiar form. They get to choose their rulers now, and for them that is enough freedom I guess. I have more hope for America than that.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 09:05 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: That Guy at April 12, 2010 09:06 AM (eoYse)
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (e8YaH)
that reminds me, what the fuck is the UK thinking w/ Labor coming back to tie the Conservative party? just 1 year ago the Conservatives were up big and Brown has the worst polling in prime minister history for the UK, and polls have him as the most unpopular PM in history. Have you seen Brown in the parliamentary debates? he gets his ass handed to him time and time again. Yet the UK is seriously thinking about re-electing him? God save the Queen after all...
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 09:06 AM (38UQ3)
The point is that you people are breaking out the champagne and caviar and cigars to celebrate an Obama approval rating of 45%, when, instead, you ought to be horrified.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 12:53 PM (l9HB0)
You have to understand that there is a high floor for The Precedent's approval rating. He has 9% locked up in blacks, call it 7% locked up in Hispanic approval, and a good 20% of self-hating, nihilistic whites that would never, ever, ever abandon the affirmative action retard. That's 36% right there, and those are approvals etched in stone until the sun burns out. On top of that, there are a good number who dislike the Indonesian Imbecile but would never tell a pollster that, lest they be viewed as racists.
Given that, 45% is not too much above the brain-dead, America-hating 36% effective floor of support. It is truly sad that such an anti-American retard would have a floor of this level to his approval, but that's the society we have, these days.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 09:06 AM (N49h9)
Oh shit! Men everywhere are screwed. No longer will your female partner have to ask you the chilling question "what are you thinking?"
New technology unveiled by Intel uses brain scans to figure out what you're thinking. In tests, it was 90% accurate http://su.pr/6WfeM6
They're gonna be so disappointed!
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at April 12, 2010 09:06 AM (pHH0Q)
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 01:06 PM (38UQ3)
Check out the headlines at www.telegraph.co.uk The shaking of heads commences.
Posted by: ErikW at April 12, 2010 09:09 AM (8z8kE)
Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 09:09 AM (h0rZ/)
it was just me doing a sockpuppet of Christoph, mocking how he turned everything into an anti-religion thing
Posted by: YRM at April 12, 2010 12:54 PM (38UQ3)
This means you're ok with slavery. Interesting.
Posted by: Christoph
If this piece of garbage holds true, then paying property taxes to a school district that harbors abusive teachers qualifies as both support for molestation and slavery. And when that district uses more of our money to defend the abusers, and pay the associated costs of cleaning up the damage, the comaprison is carried along farther. And unluike the Church, coercive powers exist to force children into these abusive environments. And yet that comparison isn't made. Why is that? Because public school systems are 'sacred'?
Interesting.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 12, 2010 09:09 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: That Guy at April 12, 2010 09:10 AM (eoYse)
280
Yeah. I already know what they are thinking----boobs, dinner, my balls itch, where's the remote, repeat
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:11 AM (dXpcc)
Posted by: Banana flavored kitteh at April 12, 2010 09:11 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: jwpaine at April 12, 2010 09:11 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (Z+qzA)
Thanks be to God Allah
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 01:04 PM (dXpcc)
FIFme
Posted by: Barack "Fn' Hussein" Obama at April 12, 2010 09:12 AM (YVZlY)
What turned me against Crist was his insane insistence on using California's air quality rules in a state that clearly doesn't need anything else harming the economy. Our air quality is natually great, given our breezes. We don't have any basins or geographic features which tend to make air stagnate and concentrate pollutants. Or any super big cities. Crist's point-scoring is for the wrong side. We need to start rolling back the stifling environmental rules that are strangling our economy. Shit, our UE rate is 12.2%, the highest it's been in a couple of generations.
Sorry, Charlie. It's time to make way for the real Americans who want a return to our traditional values in Washington. You've removed yourself from that movement by kissing The Vapid One's© lightly tanned ass.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 12, 2010 09:13 AM (i3AsK)
What I can't understand is why 70% of Jews would support an anti-Semite like Obama.
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 09:13 AM (Z+qzA)
Remember when ACE met ICE-T & COCO on a flight? He posted about it. Brian Dennehy was the pilot.
true story, btw
well, semi-true
Posted by: Mr Peeblewing Plover at April 12, 2010 09:14 AM (uFokq)
I've just come to accept that a major conflict between the two philosophies of human existence is inevitable, and will almost certainly occur in my lifetime. The best that we can do is politically fight for and preserve as much freedom as we can until then.
Right - something like a Palin/Bachman victory in 2012 [and then again POSSIBLY in 2016, but very iffy demographically] would only allow us to tread water for a few more years.
Long term, there are not enough white babies being born in the USA for it to continue as a constitutional republic.
If you give the vote to 75 million Mexican Indians, with their 3.0+ total fertility rate [and they will get the vote, one way or another], then constitutional republicanism is doomed.
Heck, most of them don't even have the vote yet, but already the bad guys are only "5% + epsilon" away from achieving their paradise of milk and honey.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 09:15 AM (l9HB0)
Wait. Maybe it wasn't on a flight.
Maybe ACE met ICE-T at a movie theater in NYC. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Posted by: Mr Peeblewing Plover at April 12, 2010 09:16 AM (uFokq)
Oh shit! Men everywhere are screwed. No longer will your female partner have to ask you the chilling question "what are you thinking?"
New technology unveiled by Intel uses brain scans to figure out what you're thinking. In tests, it was 90% accurate http://su.pr/6WfeM6
90%? No problem. No matter what the machine says, it comes back SEX. Instant 90% accuracy.
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 09:17 AM (OlN4e)
True. Obama's approval rating (high) will never be consistent with approval of his policies (low). Although there seems to be a relatively high approval of the things that Obama promised. It's just that his promises don't really manifest themselves in the final policies or policy results. (e.g. Health Care and Stimulus). Or as some people like to say: He lies.
I'd also be willing to wager that his approval rating (high) will not be consistent with the number of people who vote for him in 2012 (low).
But that's just my opinion.
Posted by: SlaveDog at April 12, 2010 09:18 AM (H6Jyg)
What I can't understand is why 70% of Jews would support an anti-Semite like Obama.
Simple: we hate ourselves. Traditionally, we pick out the most anti-Semitic candidates to support. I can't explain it any more than I can explain Woody Allen.
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 09:19 AM (e8YaH)
I've been researching this and thinking about this for years. I've come up with a few theories none of which satisfy me.
1. Jews tend to think of themselves as the "underdog" and hence support the party that insists it is "for the underdog"
2. Jews have a 5000 year history of subjugation and allowing themselves to be enslaved and mistreated and for some reason find that a comfortable place.
3. Most american jews are of the reform movement which is essentially liberalism in opposition to their heritage which they find quaint and uneducated.
4. Who the hell knows?
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:19 AM (dXpcc)
You have to understand that there is a high floor for The Precedent's approval rating. He has 9% locked up in blacks, call it 7% locked up in Hispanic approval, and a good 20% of self-hating, nihilistic whites that would never, ever, ever abandon the affirmative action retard. That's 36% right there, and those are approvals etched in stone until the sun burns out. On top of that, there are a good number who dislike the Indonesian Imbecile but would never tell a pollster that, lest they be viewed as racists. Given that, 45% is not too much above the brain-dead, America-hating 36% effective floor of support. It is truly sad that such an anti-American retard would have a floor of this level to his approval, but that's the society we have, these days.
That's precisely what I understand, which is why I am trying to tell you people that you should be ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIED by these approval numbers.
Ten years max before we get either a [successful] secessionist movement or else the death of constitutional republicanism.
Prepare accordingly.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 09:20 AM (l9HB0)
Liberalism commandment 1
Ye shall have no other God before me.
Just ask Father Pfleger and Cardinal George.
Or the Diocese of Toledo which payed for Abortions.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 09:21 AM (0q2P7)
Miss Lindsey Graham isn't up for re-election until 2012..
..but wouldn't it be fucking awesome if he were to blow up like Crist did?
SC has a huge retired military community...can't they find someone to replace this bitch?
Posted by: beedubya at April 12, 2010 09:23 AM (AnTyA)
Ok, well long term this is a fight between competing political philosophies, not some sort of race war. Sorry, but I think you are way, way off base here, and I find it pretty odd that so far you've tried to present first an argument that radical, indeed possibly violent action is necessary and in the next we find this racial screed.
Your starting to sound a whole lot more like a liberal troll pretending to be a conservative and smear us with this kind of racist crap and a lot less like a real conservative with each posting. Most interesting.
No, I reject this wholeheartedly, as I think you'll find most conservatives do - this is a question of political ideology, not a question of race.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 09:24 AM (e8T35)
At least they will finally believe us when we say "nothing".
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 09:24 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Mal at April 12, 2010 01:13 PM (Z+qzA)
Liberal Jews are deathly embarrassed about Israel and its existence. They would very much prefer that the nation just disappear, as they are tired of having to defend themselves (in distancing themselves from Israel) at all of their liberal outings and parties.
The West generates many self-haters (due to our individualistic nature and use of guilt as the main control mechanism) but Judaism generates even higher percentages of self-haters (due to Jewish culture's even greater use of guilt). Jews - liberal Jews, in particular - also have a very, very weak spot in that they have a strong desire to "belong", which is in direct opposition to Biblical Judaism. They see Israel as standing in their way of "belonging", with respect to modern liberalism, much as they always looked at Judaism as standing in their way of belonging to normal society.
Some Jews have realized what they have done (not that Jews have the numbers to move any national elections - except in the one strange case where an obvious mistake in marking their ballots, by senior citizen Jews, gave the 2000 election to Bush - thank G-d) but many are still stuck in the liberal bubble, because they see The Precedent's aggressive hate of Israel as a feature.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 09:25 AM (N49h9)
Plenty of white babies born in Europe. How's that constitutional republic doing?
Posted by: jwpaine at April 12, 2010 09:25 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Tom in Korea at April 12, 2010 09:26 AM (+gX1+)
Posted by: Jean at April 12, 2010 09:26 AM (vb5IK)
I could have made a spinner, with a picture of naked boobies, a barbecue, and a beer, (and a blank spot) and been just as accurate.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 12, 2010 09:27 AM (0q2P7)
315 That's what I've come up with finally---Progressives, Babylonians, Romans, et al. same dif.
Everybody's Herod
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:29 AM (dXpcc)
You whiny little bitches want a new post? Get back to me when you reach 600 comments.
Posted by: Ace - ruling with an Iron Fist at April 12, 2010 09:29 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 12, 2010 09:29 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 09:30 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 09:32 AM (dXpcc)
Posted by: Filly at April 12, 2010 09:34 AM (onwJ3)
Okay, you run on political ideology and let them run on race. We'll see who wins.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 12, 2010 09:35 AM (NurK6)
Ten years max before we get either a [successful] secessionist movement or else the death of constitutional republicanism.
Prepare accordingly.
Posted by: at April 12, 2010 01:20 PM (l9HB0)
It seemed to me that eventual secession was inevitable on Nov 4th, 2008. That was a declaration of national suicide and I think that people can only delude themselves in thinking it was anything other. If a nation decides to kill itself, there is little that can stop it. The question came down to whether some states would secede before it all falls in, or whether they would all ride this into the wall.
Seeing how so many seem to have accepted the insane way that health scare was forced through (the most un-American piece of legislation pushed through in the most un-American process this hation has ever witnessed) I don't give this nation anything even close to ten years. Too many taboos have been broken. Too many rules have been run over. Too many traditions (that held this nation together) have been run roughshod.
Basically, this is the French Revolution come to America - traditions and religion will be destroyed for no good reason, but they will be destroyed - and that describes only the motivations of the idiot liberals. The Indonesian Imbecile is more on a mission of just exacting revenge on the US and the West, for the third world - as he's too stupid to have any actual political thoughts.
On the bright side, France is on their 5th Republic, already ... and they are only 4 or 5 new Republics away from getting it right and coming to the view that our Founders laid down before the French even started on their trek to build a reasonable nation.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 12, 2010 09:36 AM (N49h9)
I used to be good friends with an observant Jew, and we had many fraught arguments as to why the Hebrews went all-in for Democrats.
For the older generation, it begins and ends with FDR-worship. For the Boomers, it's a more complicated brew of culture (Jews tend to be upper-middle class and highly involved in the academic and financial worlds) and a theological disconnect from their religion (relatively few ethnic Jews describe themselves as "very observant" any more). Never mind the fact that the most virulent anti-semitic strains in American politics come from the Marxist left and not the John Birch right, and never mind the authoritarian leanings of the Democrat Party: "Jews are as party-loyal as Soviet commissars," one poster at Commentary magazine noted.
As far as I can tell, the American Jewish political calculus has little to do with Israel one way or another (except to the extent that jews are disproportionately academics and reflect the academic Left's dislike of Israel).
I don't think there's much to be done in terms of making the anti-statist, small-government message "more palatable" to Democratic constituencies. Frankly, people become Democrats not because they don't understand the competing political philosophies; they become Democrats because they like a statist/authoritarian state (until the inevitable happens and the state crashes, but that's a rant for later).
Posted by: Monty at April 12, 2010 09:38 AM (4Pleu)
Now that Ebert lost his face and his mind.. we can have ..
Sneakin' in at the Movies with Ice and Ace: "a motherfucker gotta be able to tell a woman where he takin her to".
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at April 12, 2010 09:39 AM (MFQJZ)
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (e8YaH)
Canada?
Posted by: RushBabe at April 12, 2010 09:39 AM (LKkE8)
Okay, you run on political ideology and let them run on race. We'll see who wins.
I have no problem with that at all. I'd rather judge a man by his character than the color of his skin.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 09:41 AM (e8T35)
Steyn comes from a land that has seen the doom and gloom overtake it.
Posted by: Truman North at April 12, 2010 01:01 PM (e8YaH)
Canada?
Naw, they issued Michael Buble. There's hope for them yet.
Posted by: Filly at April 12, 2010 09:44 AM (onwJ3)
Barring a SERIOUS fuckup by our guys in OH,KY,MO,AZ or FL,
we pick up a minimum of 7 seats, more likely 8 seats, and quite possibly 9 seats in the Senate. Every day California faces crisis, every day California faces the choice of laying off its own state workers, every day the Democrats in this state continue to lose their grip (how are you going to get your union activists to help get you reelected when you just fired them??).
North Dakota, Delaware, and Indiana are all but a lock; Arkansas, Nevada, and Pennsylvania are falling into place, and Illinois and Colorado are beginning to veer right. California can't make up its mind- a first for Boxer.
I don't mind Senators Castle, Kirk, Norton, Lowden, Toomey, Boozeman, Fiorinambellvore and whatever amoeba-with-an-R-next-to-it pops out of Indiana.
Posted by: conartcritic at April 12, 2010 10:02 AM (lV4Fs)
Yup.. much scarier than Salem's Lot any day.. being overrun by liberal asshat's is much scarier than vampires. At least the vampires don't try to give you a guilt complex and make you think it's your fault before draining the last ounce of your blood.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 10:04 AM (e8T35)
329 I've always wondered about that -- of all people I would have thought Jews (and Blacks) to be the most immune to the Democratic party, given its history. Of all people, it does baffle me why any Jew would worship FDR (and no, he was hardly instrumental in rescuing them from the gas chambers...that came as a consequence of defeating Germany, not out of any great desire to do so).
I have reconciled myself to the wise words of an old professor I had (and a survivor): "never think for one second that anyone cannot be fooled; never suppose for one second that anyone cannot be persuaded to buy into propaganda at the expense of historical truth; they will do it with a smile on their face".
Great guy and a lovely person -- one of the last "true professors" imho.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 10:16 AM (5/yRG)
Toomey said he is a nice guy BUT he could not win. How discouraging to hear...so I send Rubio a load cash.
I love the fact the GOP 30% 'highly educated Whites' candidate is getting his well-tanned asshole beaten by a fantastic Conservative American.
But The Stupid Party never learns from its often repeated mistakes; the GOP's 30% 'highly educated Whites' will suffocate the Conservative movement's voice by shoving their 30% 'highly educated Whites' candidate Mitt Romney because they think having smart government is better for their own personal selves than is limited government for all Americans
The GOP's 30% 'highly educated Whites' = Liberal's Useful Idiots.
Hey GOP no more Big Donor money from me you 'fracking highly educated up-tighty Whiteys' ...I'm going Rouge.
Ten years of your 'highly educated useful idiot' shit; I. Am . Done. With You.
By the way...Leave the Room GOP's 30% 'highly educated up-tighty Whites" and for your love of Obama please take George Will with you when you go.
Posted by: susan at April 12, 2010 02:01 PM (IlCz1)
Toomey said he is a nice guy BUT he could not win."
I first met Marco when he was a junior member of the Florida House (well before his speakership) and I was a staff attorney for the House Judiciary Committee. I was instantly impressed, and most politicians don't impress me in the slightest. He is the real deal. I thought then, and continue to think, that Marco will be President some day. We should be so fucking lucky.
Posted by: Dave J. at April 12, 2010 02:46 PM (DCQ0q)
purple avenger. show us yer frontbum luv!
Posted by: bigboy4U at April 12, 2010 03:22 PM (TA9hv)
What I don't get is how the hell the Rubio/Crist debate on Fox News Sunday, two weeks ago, failed to earn its own post. There was just me and one other poor schlub on here asking for a thread.
I hated it then and I hate it now, but despite the fact that Crist behaved desperately, launching an attack from the moment he opened his mouth, Rubio, in my eyes, didn't come off a whole lot better.
He seemed a bit like an entitled little shit. A fast-talker. A salesman...
There were times when he seemd to have an air about him as if the floor was entirely his and, at one point, after Wallace asked a question of Crist re Crist's aspirations for future office, Wallace was incredulous that Rubio interrupted to say that he would like to comment on the question.
He's not Crist, and that's a good thing, but he's no J.E.B. either.
Florida needs another Jeb.
Posted by: jmflynny at April 12, 2010 04:38 PM (uyljC)
Posted by: zirconia-blank at April 12, 2010 10:56 PM (mGDQn)
thank you dear ..
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 13, 2010 02:38 AM (WFYoY)
This is just a perception, mind you, but it appears that that Rubio has sense enough to realize that he doesn't need any help from Palin to get elected; another reason why I like that guy.
It also appears, however, that, to no avail, Palin is trying to get in on Rubio's campaign, presumably so that she can take credit for his election, and so that she can draw more attention to herself, another reason why she gets on my nerves .
A belated word of advice to an already very likeable Michelle Bachman: Palin needs you. You don't need her.
Posted by: Dianne & Brian at April 13, 2010 04:47 AM (ITzbJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4204 seconds, 440 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Tom in Korea at April 12, 2010 06:12 AM (+gX1+)