April 09, 2010
— Ace Olbermann, who has parlayed weak ratings into big salaries and lots of power at MSNBC, attempts to build on his lack of success by posting even weaker ratings. I guess now they'll make him chief operations officer.
Meanwhile, Olbermann's felater Phil Griffin, president of MSNBC, writes in a email written to one of Shuster's fans, objecting to the suspension:
From: Griffin, Phil (NBC Universal)Sent: Wed 4/07/10 11:16 PM
Sorry, but this is a business and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc.
Thanks for your note,
Phil
That to me seems to say he's all done. He didn't just call it a lapse.
Regarding Shuster, I would have thought that after his gonzo-nasty-liberal act at MSNBC no other real news company could hire him. His only other employment opportunities, I thought, would be at Salon or Media Matters or other nasty-liberal outfits.
And yet he was taping a pilot for CNN.
Let me express my extreme doubt that if anyone with right-leaning sympathies had vented them in the manner Shuster did, he couldn't get hired as a straight reporter anywhere -- including Fox.
Posted by: Ace at
10:44 AM
| Comments (261)
Post contains 225 words, total size 2 kb.
Sorry, but this is a business and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc.
Sounds like everybody else at MSNBC. So why the problem?
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 10:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: joncelli at April 09, 2010 10:48 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:48 AM (AZGON)
From: Griffin, Phil (NBC Universal)
Sent: Wed 4/07/10 11:16 PM
Sorry, but this is a business brothel and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional in his prostituting and that is not fair to the 500 other people whores who work at msnbc.
Thanks for your note,
Phil
FIFY, Phil
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 10:49 AM (t72+4)
Sent: Wed 4/07/10 11:16 PM
Sorry, but this is a business and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc, or to the eight people who watch it.
Thanks for your note,
Phil
Fixed
Posted by: Cicero at April 09, 2010 10:49 AM (QKKT0)
MSNBC has 500 employees? 500? To produce television that absolutely no one watches? Government work really is bloated and inefficient.
And yet he was taping a pilot for CNN.
Was it a Celebrity Jeopardy tryout? I hear that's what substitutes for the interview over there now.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 10:49 AM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:50 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 09, 2010 10:51 AM (TFnqE)
Posted by: MSNBC at April 09, 2010 10:51 AM (JrRME)
Posted by: Huh? at April 09, 2010 10:51 AM (6SGWt)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 09, 2010 10:51 AM (I1/U/)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:51 AM (AZGON)
Sorry, but this is a business and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc, or to the eight people who watch it.
And five of those eight are related to the fucker.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 09, 2010 10:52 AM (tm/sN)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 09, 2010 10:53 AM (P33XN)
If Phil fires him, can we consider that David had his antics stuffed right up his old "Shuster?"
Posted by: conscious and shocked at these developments at April 09, 2010 10:53 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 10:54 AM (OlN4e)
That's like lying about everything else, only better ! MS lie NBC. Come for the all-White-libtard crew, stay for the Total Bullshit
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at April 09, 2010 10:54 AM (JrRME)
I hope comcast does a thorough house cleaning.
I am sick of being told by hollywood and the media that they do what they do because of money not ideology. Yet anti films flop and family freindly films make a fortune(i am looking in your direction PIXAR).
More importantly in the arena of news, Fox is beating every cable news network combine and multiplied by two. CNN loses 50% of its audience from 2009(which i am sure has nothing to do with Lou Dobbs leaving) and how do they plan on winning back ratings? Why a TV show with David Shushter and some yutz from NPR of course.
If I owned Comcast, I would revamp MSNBC and turn it into a right leaning channel. what happened to the old saying, "if you can't beat them, join them."?
Back in 2002, I used to watch Fox and MSNBC, because MSNBC was a lot more middle of the road. Then during the Bush administration it veered hard left, probably to capitalize off the disenfranchised lefties. Ok fine, good business sense. But now that Bush is gone, don't you think you should do the same thing in the other direction? Veer to the right to get the disenfrancshised righties and centrists.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 10:55 AM (AZGON)
Decoded.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 10:58 AM (iBzKc)
According to the Senator, constituents should balance Fox with CNN, because it's unhealthy to get the news from one source. He, himself, reads two newspapers, the New York Times and the Washington Post, because listening to both sides puts things in context, and knowing different views "makes you a better person."
Coburn is a comforting reminder that except for a small few in their ranks, the GOP is still stuck on stupid.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 10:59 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 10:59 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: David Shuster, maitre d' at April 09, 2010 11:01 AM (GwPRU)
This weakling is part of the problem. Anyone who doesn't recognize that Pelosi and her gang of power-mad, anti-American bandits are evil and not just "misguided" is part of the problem.
Get in the fight you pansy jackass or get out of the way.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:01 AM (gQ+XA)
Yeah, 'cause Coburn's voting record is right in line with the Democrats', huh.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:01 AM (iBzKc)
25% are in advertising sales
10% are administrative (payroll, HR etc.)
5% are editorial staff, technical crew and on-air talent
10% are executive management
60% are janitorial and facilities maintenance (heavily weighted to minorities to pick up the diversity dollars).
I'm counting with that ObamaCare math, hence the extra 10%.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 11:01 AM (VY5KX)
Posted by: rdbrewer at April 09, 2010 11:02 AM (TFnqE)
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 11:03 AM (wuv1c)
His only other employment opportunities, I thought, would be at Salon or Media Matters or other nasty-liberal outfits.
He can go to Mediaite, that non-partisan straight-shooting no-favorites media watch site run by the ex-MSNBC general manager Dan Abrams. Did I remember to say they were non-partisan? Good!
Posted by: Sort-of-Mad Max at April 09, 2010 11:04 AM (ERJIu)
Yeah, 'cause Coburn's voting record is right in line with the Democrats', huh.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:01 PM (iBzKc)
His voting record aside he shouldnt be calling out not placating to the very media that would love to see his party driven from the earth.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:05 AM (t72+4)
and knowing different views "makes you a better person.
Um, no Senator. Having your head screwed on straight and having a firm grip on reality makes you better able to evaluate "different views". Endless blathering under the guise of discussion is what got us into the mess that's in Washington today.
This is shit. That is Shinola. Do try not to confuse the two.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 11:05 AM (i3AsK)
His voting record aside he should be calling out not placating to the very media that would love to see his party driven from the earth.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 03:05 PM (t72+4)
Crap, FIFme.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:06 AM (t72+4)
Government is like a newspaper. Nobody understands how they grow trees with words on them and then make newspapers from those trees; the important thing is to believe everything you read in the newspaper and never question it.
Posted by: Wise Words From Nancy Pelosi at April 09, 2010 11:06 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: somegai at April 09, 2010 11:07 AM (tcMQZ)
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 11:08 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 11:08 AM (VY5KX)
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 11:09 AM (OlN4e)
I, myself, read both Kos and Huffington Post to get both sides of all issues.
Posted by: somegai at April 09, 2010 03:07 PM (tcMQZ)
I myself only use one piece of toilet paper when I go to the bathroom, because I want to use both sides of the tissue.
Posted by: Cheryl Crow at April 09, 2010 11:10 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Ronster at April 09, 2010 11:10 AM (Xu6d3)
Na, Na, Na, Na...Na, Na, Na, Na...Hey, Hey, Hey, (Oh, hell yeah!), Goodbye Shuster!
Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya'
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (9hSKh)
You know, like Schuster, who can't even spell his own name right, you seem to have an issue with spelling too.
How would like to live in Atlanta?
Posted by: CNN at April 09, 2010 11:11 AM (H6Jyg)
Coburn displaying or not displaying the requisite amount of outrage that apparently some deem appropriate in discerning his "conservative" credentials will not change the nature of the major media. It will not lessen the degree to which they want his party eradicated. Personally, I couldn't care less about his statements on the matter -- actions (i.e., his Senate votes) are the determining factor in what public policies are advanced.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:12 AM (iBzKc)
Posted by: vermontaigne at April 09, 2010 11:13 AM (BPs+6)
/someguy...?
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 09, 2010 11:14 AM (NurK6)
But auditioning for a competitor? That makes him a slimeball of sorts
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 11:14 AM (sYxEE)
Unlike all of the members of the Democrat party whom they carry the water for.
I guess claiming to graduate from an Ivy League Kollege when in fact you didn't is ethical.
And how bad does it have to be that you would jump from a low rated cable news channel to the lowest rated cable news channel?
Posted by: Just A Grunt at April 09, 2010 11:14 AM (pOC9r)
Posted by: JorgXMcKie at April 09, 2010 11:14 AM (290l2)
ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc.
Using their anchor lineup as an indicator, I'll bet not one of those 500 employees is a minority.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:15 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Senator Tom Coburn (R)-OK at April 09, 2010 11:16 AM (3wpRl)
We want Schuster for his Jeopardy skills.
Posted by: CNN at April 09, 2010 03:07 PM (H6Jyg)
No fair! Asking Wolf a Bible question is like asking Rosie O'Donnell, well, any question.
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 09, 2010 11:16 AM (xxgag)
It's been a while since Jack Cafferty said anything outrageous
Jackie's been keeping it real since his third liver transplant.
Jorge X. McKie...I know you from the Amazon.com discussion board from years ago, if you're the same person.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 09, 2010 11:18 AM (P33XN)
CNN hired Rick Sanchez. Why wouldn't they hire David Shuster?
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 03:18 PM (uFokq)
I had to hire Rick after he did the "Dirty Sanchez" on me.
Posted by: Phil Griffin at April 09, 2010 11:20 AM (YVZlY)
Jesus, if Someguy heard Coburn was advocating reading the other side, he might explode like Rumplestiltskin.
You're punching down, dude. Never punch down.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 09, 2010 11:20 AM (P33XN)
If you don't recognize the nature of your enemy, you simply aren't qualified to fight him. Nancy Pelosi is less popular than skin cancer -- primarily because she's an unbelievably arrogant, haughty bitch who mocks citizens and journalists while carting her family around in government jets on our dime -- and Coburn feels the need to defend the scrunt as a "nice person"?
No, dumbass, she's not a nice person. She's an autocratic mandarin with a god complex and a sneering contempt for the people she deems to rule. You're apparently one of the few people outside of her spore brood that doesn't agree. Either she is destroyed or the republic that you're oath-bound to protect is destroyed.
So, no, it's not enough for him to just vote the right way. That's the minimum threshold for being an acceptable Republican. This guy is also the head of the NRSC -- he's constantly asking for my money on the basis that it will be put to good use to annihilate Democrats and their Leninist lunacy. His job is to throw red meat if for no other reason than to fill the coffers and he can't even do that on the most base cynical level?
Coburn's a fool. Screw him.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:21 AM (gQ+XA)
And just how do you think it makes the Phil's of the world feel? Eh?
Posted by: Phil Spector at April 09, 2010 11:21 AM (H6Jyg)
But she's almost as bright as a sack of broken CFLs during a rolling blackout. Almost.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 11:22 AM (mR7mk)
Coburn displaying or not displaying the requisite amount of outrage that apparently some deem appropriate in discerning his "conservative" credentials will not change the nature of the major media. It will not lessen the degree to which they want his party eradicated. Personally, I couldn't care less about his statements on the matter -- actions (i.e., his Senate votes) are the determining factor in what public policies are advanced.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:12 PM (iBzKc)
Coburn displaying or not displaying the requisite amount of outrage that apparently some deem appropriate in discerning his "conservative" credentials will not change the nature of the major media. It will not lessen the degree to which they want his party eradicated. Personally, I couldn't care less about his statements on the matter -- actions (i.e., his Senate votes) are the determining factor in what public policies are advanced.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:12 PM (iBzKc)
When was the last time you heard Obama, Pelosi or Reid say "If you want to gain both sides of the perspective watch both CNN and Fox News, because listening to both sides puts things in context and knowing different views "makes you a better person." ?
You're right, the media wont change and like all industries that refuse to change they'll go the way of the dinosaur eventually, just give it time.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:22 AM (t72+4)
Yes, by all means let's discard as an idiot a Republican Senator who has a lifetime ACU rating of 98% simply because he says something with which we don't agree, overlooking all the things he might have said in the past which we thought were spot-on.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:23 AM (iBzKc)
And just how do you think it makes the Phil's of the world feel? Eh?
Posted by: Phil Spector at April 09, 2010 03:21 PM (H6Jyg)
Word!
Posted by: Phil Herrup at April 09, 2010 11:24 AM (YVZlY)
Or, you know, just report the news. Fox is successful at what it does, but it doesn't necessarily cover the news. It veers into tabloid style spew-o-matic every few days. See balloon boy, latest dead white girl, Michael F'in Jackson, etc.
How about just find interesting stories, knowledgeable guests, and avoid injecting bias whether through editorial control or writing? Crazee, I know.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 09, 2010 11:24 AM (o8Qz0)
By the way Phil, I'm still interested in a position with MSNBC. You have my resume and super secret cell phone number which is 310-555-CHAS
I can bring my super skills in finding racists, mocking religion, bicycling. My skills in coding can be an asset once my plan to make MSNBC pay-per-view with registration is implemented. My moderation software can block the bad crazy viewers from soiling the name of rational and reasonable people who watch.
As a bonus, your viewers will get my perspective on comic books and nightly screen shots of my awesome photography
Posted by: Charles Comic Bookstore Johnson at April 09, 2010 11:25 AM (sYxEE)
Forget what he said and move on.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 11:26 AM (CJOrs)
Well, Sanchez is good with numbers.
Posted by: CNN at April 09, 2010 11:27 AM (H6Jyg)
Posted by: DBag at April 09, 2010 11:27 AM (KEgrx)
Jesus, if Someguy heard Coburn was advocating reading the other side, he might explode like Rumplestiltskin.
That's it! I've had it with this kind of ignorant ranting. Rumplestiltskin did not explode. He stamped his foot so hard he drove himself into the ground. Get your facts right, Tea-Partier.
You're right, the media wont change and like all industries that refuse to change they'll go the way of the dinosaur eventually, just give it time.
So they are willing to continue giving you their order of battle, and refusing to look at yours? I don't see the problem.
Posted by: pep at April 09, 2010 11:27 AM (YXmuI)
Yes, by all means let's discard as an idiot a Republican Senator who has a lifetime ACU rating of 98% simply because he says something with which we don't agree, overlooking all the things he might have said in the past which we thought were spot-on.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:23 PM (iBzKc)
We're not talking about discarding him, we're just saying stfu, Tom, quit helping the enemy.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:28 AM (t72+4)
I continue to hold out hope that Page Three girls will show up on Fox, what with Murdoch owning it and all.
Posted by: alexthechick at April 09, 2010 11:28 AM (8WZWv)
The market for people interested in knowledge and in-depth video coverage of non-sensational subjects (as opposed to reading or listening) is pretty small...but probably bigger than MSNBC's current share.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 11:29 AM (mR7mk)
Oh, and I watch MSNBC because I really want to do Contessa Brewer
Posted by: Tom Coburn, aspiring "maverick" at April 09, 2010 11:30 AM (sYxEE)
I'm not saying I don't want him re-elected. I'm saying he's completely unqualified to lead a fight against the Democrats. He doesn't have the temperament, and he doesn't recognize the nature of the enemy. Having him as the head of the NRSC is only mildly less idiotic than having a squishy self-obsessed diva like Michael Steele running the RNC.
He can keep his job and continue doing the right thing when it comes time for a vote. But take the microphone away from the dolt's face, because he's helping to ensure that those ACU-approved votes will continue to mean absolutely nothing. He voted the right way on Obamacare, too. BFD.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:30 AM (gQ+XA)
Am I party puritan? Is it asking too much to expect our party-leaders to support our agenda?
Too often I read, "You go into battle with the army you have, not the army you want," when the subject of purity comes up. To which I reply: All I want is to go into a battle with an army that doesn't help the other side win.
That's my Purity Test. Is that unreasonable?
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 11:30 AM (uFokq)
Forget what he said and move on.
Well, apparently to some people Coburn's conservative credentials can only be determined by him displaying a degree of verbal outrage sanctioned by those who would prefer he that refer to Pelosi with the kinds of descriptors we use here at AoSHQ, his actual stances and votes be damned.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:31 AM (iBzKc)
Maybe in the Wall Street Journal?
Posted by: CUS at April 09, 2010 11:31 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:23 PM (iBzKc)
Perhaps I am harsh and hasty, but I have no tolerance for playing nice with socialists these days, and anyone who thinks the NYT and W. Post is balanced reading is somewhat out of touch, IMHO.
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 11:32 AM (OlN4e)
Is this what people mean by "hit and run media"????
*cue Darth Vader voice*
This. Is CNN
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 09, 2010 11:32 AM (VY5KX)
Maybe if we let him know he's going to face a shitstorm from the base, he won't be tempted to "grow" in office like Lindsey Grahamnesty or John McCain
Remember, back in the early 80s McCain was a hardcore conservative. Then he "grew" in office
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 11:33 AM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 09, 2010 11:33 AM (P33XN)
Posted by: rawmuse at April 09, 2010 11:33 AM (OQ3LO)
No doubt Coburn has been a valuable asset to our side. He's a good man. But he fucked up really big. He rebuked us and took sides against us. That's a slap in the face. Coburn owes all of us an apology.
Never take sides against the family.
~Don Vito Corleone
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 11:35 AM (uFokq)
I guess I'm just not seeing how his comments are helpful to the other side. It's not like Democrats and liberals are going to hear Coburn's statements and all-of-a-sudden consider him an ally. He's like the #3 or so conservative lifetime voting record in the Senate.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:35 AM (iBzKc)
Posted by: Rasmussen guesses at April 09, 2010 11:36 AM (rVJH4)
If they want my ass over there, they better get Page Three, Four and Five.
Posted by: Contessa Brewer at April 09, 2010 11:36 AM (H6Jyg)
It's one of the tenets of liberalism -- rewarding failure.
Posted by: rockhead at April 09, 2010 11:36 AM (RykTt)
Well, apparently to some people Coburn's conservative credentials can only be determined by him displaying a degree of verbal outrage sanctioned by those who would prefer he that refer to Pelosi with the kinds of descriptors we use here at AoSHQ, his actual stances and votes be damned.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:31 PM (iBzKc)
No one is calling for Coburn's head here.
However, directing the impressionable undecideds you hope to win over and vote for your party to go read the NYT and WAPO, two rags that are working 24-7 to destroy your party is not a winning strategy. Thats pretty much what I was getting at here.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:37 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: someguytotherescue at April 09, 2010 11:37 AM (sYxEE)
Again, it's not enough to vote the right way when you're in a leadership position. He purports to replace the Democrats by fielding, endorsing, and funding candidates by appealing to angry conservatives with wallets; i.e. the Republican base.
If he's going to publicly and reflexively come to the defense of one of the most vile and polarizing creatures that the other side has ever produced -- a woman who cackled like a banshee in the face of passing the most destructive bill in American history without so much as a single bipartisan vote and in the face of overwhelming public opposition, a woman that repeatedly said that you, Doctor Coburn, were nothing more than a shill for special interests who want to let granny die -- why am I going to trust him with my money to do his job effectively?
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:38 AM (gQ+XA)
Of course those ACU-approved votes mean something -- they are an indicator that he's a reliable conservative vote, regardless of any "controversial" statements. Which is exactly what I want in the Senate.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:38 AM (iBzKc)
Posted by: conscious and trying not to step in it at April 09, 2010 11:38 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Kemp at April 09, 2010 11:39 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: someguy at April 09, 2010 11:40 AM (tcMQZ)
Coburn's words were disrespectful, disloyal, and demoralizing. It would be one thing if the defense was warranted, but we did nothing wrong to deserve that slap in the face.
It says a lot about Coburn's grasp of reality and his true feelings for the base.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 11:40 AM (uFokq)
This is just ridiculous. Coburn's the guy who promised to tie up the Senate version of ObamaCare by reading every single word of the bill (before McConnell shut him down on it). Coburn's the guy who's promised to expose and try to kill the plum appointments that any and all House Democrats who voted for ObamaCare were promised as a quid pro quo.
Then he makes one stupid statement and all of a sudden he's persona non grata in the party. If this guy doesn't have the temperament to fight the fight in the Senate then who the fuck do you think does? 'Cause like I said, count him out and we've got DeMint, probably Vitter, and THAT'S ABOUT IT. (Until one or both of them makes a dumb remark and THEY become unacceptable, of course.)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 11:40 AM (CJOrs)
Why does Coburn suddenly feel the need to play nanny to conservatives and that we need his advice on where to get our news and how to stay balanced?
STFU and do your job.
Posted by: exceller at April 09, 2010 11:41 AM (jx2Td)
Posted by: someshuster at April 09, 2010 11:43 AM (5npD/)
As for the Coburn thing, he is a decent guy, but why take a big wet dump on your base after they have done so much for you. It wasn't the house republicans or senate that almost stopped obamacare. it was the right, the tea parties, the constant press
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 11:43 AM (wuv1c)
Yes, that's a defensible position. I just don't think kneejerk "Coburn's an idiot!" reactions to his statements are rational in the face of his Senate stances. The guy's a valuable conservative vote, and I don't see where referring to him as an imbecile is productive. I understand it satisfies some people's emotional outrage, but otherwise I find it histrionic.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:44 AM (iBzKc)
Why does Coburn suddenly feel the need to play nanny to conservatives and that we need his advice on where to get our news and how to stay balanced?
Coburn's comments were just the inside of the beltway talking. It does shit to people after a period of time.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:44 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Tom Coburn, aspiring "maverick" at April 09, 2010 11:44 AM (sYxEE)
Sent: Wed 4/07/10 11:16 PM
Sorry, but this is a business and I need team players. He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc.
Thanks for your note,
Phil
Phil you have to understand. Most people, if their current employment contract is coming to an end, don't see cultivating new business opportunities and options as being unethical, immoral, or unprofessional.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 11:44 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 03:43 PM (OlN4e)
BUNK!
Posted by: conscious and heading out for a moment at April 09, 2010 11:45 AM (YVZlY)
Then he makes one stupid statement and all of a sudden he's persona non grata in the party.
-------------------
My point exactly.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:46 AM (iBzKc)
Does Coburn remember who defended him when Obama compared equated him to an abortion-clinic murderer?
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 11:46 AM (uFokq)
And if Coburn and Steele and the rest of the Stupid Party's leadership shit the bed on a once-in-a-lifetime realignment opportunity, he and the permanent minority Republicans in the Senate can all hone their ACU scores to a perfect 100 and it won't mean a damn.
No one here is saying that Coburn should be primaried or anything crazy like that. But he's not just a guy who gets to cast a vote. Jim DeMint can afford to make a stupid statement once in a while because Jim DeMint isn't flooding my email box with gimme gimme gimme solicitations.
You want my money? Say the things I want to hear or shut up. Tell me to read Demunist propaganda rags like the WAPO and the Times? Tut tut my criticisms about someone who is sneering in my face that she twisted the arms and issued the bribes necessary to condemn my children to growing up in a euro-trash shithole? Get bent.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:47 AM (gQ+XA)
Does Coburn remember who defended him when Obama compared equated him to an abortion-clinic murderer?
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 03:46 PM (uFokq)
Yeah, it was Nancy Pelosi. Wait, what?
Posted by: conscious and checking my facts at April 09, 2010 11:48 AM (YVZlY)
Never did think Janine Turner was all that attractive, but after reading that piece, suddenly I find her all kinds of irresistibly hawt. Yum.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:49 AM (iBzKc)
Yes, that's a defensible position. I just don't think kneejerk "Coburn's an idiot!" reactions to his statements are rational in the face of his Senate stances. The guy's a valuable conservative vote, and I don't see where referring to him as an imbecile is productive. I understand it satisfies some people's emotional outrage, but otherwise I find it histrionic.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:44 PM (iBzKc)
Okay, Coburn's not an idiot and his time in the Senate has been well spent, but his comments were certainly idiotic and not very helpful at all.
This is not the time to be playing extra sugary nice when we almost have the enemy on the run.
And yes, liberal Democrats are our enemy.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:49 AM (t72+4)
See, if I told you all that Nancy is a really nice lady and I read the NY Times and Washington Post, they all promised not to say for 24 hours that Republicans hate black people and want to kill children by denying health care
Nancy talked about refrigerators instead. See, she's a woman of her word
Posted by: Tom Coburn, aspiring at April 09, 2010 11:51 AM (sYxEE)
Ah hell, I'll give DeMint the benefit of the doubt. For now. After we take over the Senate this fall by virtue of the numbers of all these people we need to be getting rid of, we need to start pushing for DeMint to be elected Majority Leader, Majority Whip, Assistant Majority Leader, Assistant Majority Whip, Conference Chair, Conference Vice Chair, Policy Committee Chair, and maybe even President Pro Tempore, just to be on the safe side. Nobody else can be trusted to fight the Democrats the way they need to be fought.
What the fuck is this, Free Republic?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 11:51 AM (CJOrs)
It's funny. No matter how many times the Democrats call Republicans thieves, liars, warmongers, and in the pockets of Big Whatever, the Republicans still consider the Democrats their colleagues and friends.
Don't the Republicans hear all the nasty shit the Democrats say about them on a daily basis? Racists. Homophones. Bigots. Liars. Crooks. Corrupt. Stupid. Inept. Every nasty name in the book.
And only half the time they're right.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 11:52 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: conscious and checking my facts at April 09, 2010 11:52 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:46 PM (iBzKc)
And your point is fucking idiotic, which is my point.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 11:52 AM (CJOrs)
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 03:44 PM (t72+4)
Yeah, pretty quick the so called "good Republicans" are talking about "right wing extrimists" and doing commercials about global warming with Nancy Pelosi. Thats what the beltway does to good Rrpublicans. It seems Coburn is showing the first signs of creeping RINOism.
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 11:53 AM (OlN4e)
I liked the original Wicker Man, too. The one with the crazy naked chick.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:54 AM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:46 PM (iBzKc)
And your point is fucking idiotic, which is my point.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 03:52 PM (CJOrs)
Sorry. Replied to the wrong person.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 11:54 AM (CJOrs)
He's pacing himself. Or the economic burden is starting to hit his pocketbook, too. Hope-N-Change is inducing a bit of that, and liberals start to get upset when the policies they advocate actually start affecting them directly.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 09, 2010 11:55 AM (swuwV)
Posted by: YRM at April 09, 2010 11:55 AM (38UQ3)
Then you misunderstand my position, because I'm agreeing with your stance.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:55 AM (iBzKc)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 11:55 AM (0q2P7)
What the fuck is this, Free Republic?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 09, 2010 03:51 PM (CJOrs)
You're missing the point. Coburn is but one vote in the Senate. He should be directing all of his time and energies at attacking the opposition and getting as many GOP members into the Senate and House as possible this November instead of sticking his head up Nancy's dress trying to smell her farts.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 11:56 AM (t72+4)
The only good thing about the remake is when Nic Cage punches that chick in the face while in the bear costume. That and BEES! NOT THE BEES!
Posted by: alexthechick at April 09, 2010 11:56 AM (8WZWv)
And your point is fucking idiotic, which is my point.
Sorry. Replied to the wrong person.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead StatesDecaf.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at April 09, 2010 11:56 AM (o8Qz0)
121 Speaking of conservative babes....
Stunning! No question.
But "...SUV I drive to work on my ranch"?
Kitten ranch? I'm sorry but that is not the face of an outdoor girl. Either that or sunscreen and wrinkle cream have come a long (understatement) way.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 09, 2010 11:56 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 11:57 AM (fwSHf)
Janine Turner ages excruciatingly well... A fine wine, that lady...
Posted by: someshuster at April 09, 2010 11:58 AM (5npD/)
I was kind of partial to watching Nick Cage burn from the inside of a giant wooden doll.
Couldn't suspend the disbelief, though. Who doesn't take off his watch when he's burning to death? I mean, it's just common sense.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 11:58 AM (gQ+XA)
A woman who compares those who dissent against her statist agenda as nazis, racists, and terrorists is NOT, I repeat, NOT A NICE LADY
That is all
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 11:59 AM (sYxEE)
Reagan would have drinks with that Democrat bastard Tip O'Neil. I question his judgment.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 11:59 AM (iBzKc)
...not moral...?
Eh... I'm not so sure that word means what he thinks it does.
Making a pilot for CNN is immoral.
We've been saying that for a while, but I didn't expect MSNBC to agree.
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 09, 2010 12:00 PM (XdlcF)
It looks like we've got more brave volunteers to face the mighty wicker horde.
Hold the line, gents!
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 12:00 PM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: brian at April 09, 2010 12:01 PM (y05cf)
Yeah, pretty quick the so called "good Republicans" are talking about "right wing extrimists" and doing commercials about global warming with Nancy Pelosi. Thats what the beltway does to good Rrpublicans. It seems Coburn is showing the first signs of creeping RINOism.
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 03:53 PM (OlN4e)
I'm not calling Coburn a RINO and I'm certain we wont ever have to worry about that. His Senate record is impeccable, just saying now is not the time to start getting diarrhea of the mouth when one if not both houses are ripe for the taking.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 12:02 PM (t72+4)
They won't. But they will use his words against us in the media. I mean, they always will, but can't we at least make them WORK for it by having to do some fancy editing?
Why hand them the rope they will use to hang us? Why make it so easy for them to have a not-made-up quote that they can use to say "see, even the Conservative Republican Leadership thinks the Tea Party is over the top
+1
I like Coburn, but why say this? What are you hoping to accomplish? I know it is unfair that the media turns shit like this into something bigger than it is, but he is a smart man, he knows how the game works. He should know this will be used against us.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 12:03 PM (wuv1c)
I think people who dismiss what Coburn did are just as bad as those who call him a RINO in the making.
+1000
Coburn is a conservative, but people should acknowledge this is a lapse in judgement at the very least.
Posted by: Ben at April 09, 2010 12:04 PM (wuv1c)
Ronald Reagan, Sarah Palin, and Rush Limbaugh. What do these three people have in common? They never once scolded the base for the benefit of a Democrat.
Im sick & tired of these Republicans who feel the need to have these phony sister-souljah moments with us. We're the good guys. We didn't do anything wrong. We don't deserve contempt.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 12:04 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:59 PM (iBzKc)
Fuckin Rino! goddamit
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 12:04 PM (fwSHf)
Oh can it. Were not talking about purging him. Just trying to get him to realize; a lot of good people put their heart and soul into opposing Obamacare in a non-violent manner, and they were derided, insulted, marginalized, made to feel voiceless powerless, and ultimately degraded by the speaker. And that makes her, not a nice person, to treat common citizens with such disdain, even if they are political opponents.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:04 PM (0q2P7)
Yeah, remember when Tip O'Neil called the mass of Americans on whom the Republicans' near-term political fortunes rest almost entirely a bunch of racist Nazis hired by evil vampires from the Global Insurance Syndicate? And then Reagan started calling him "my bestest buddy Tip O'Neil" in every one of his speeches? And then Reagan started sending out a non-stop stream of correspondence begging those same racist Nazi vampire stooges for their money to help defeat the agenda of his bestest buddy Tip O'Neil?
Yeah, me neither.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 12:04 PM (gQ+XA)
155 We're purging Tom Coburn now? Kewl!
Tom Coburn deservse a kick in the nads. What he said condescended to a lot of people and was factually wrong. If he wants to propound the virtues of sucking up to people who wouldn't spit on a conservative if they were on fire and have said as much, he shouldn't insult the people who elected him by "teaching" them about the goodness of madam pelosi and what poor form it is to hold her in the contempt she deserves.
The jackass deserves a timeout.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 09, 2010 12:06 PM (RkRxq)
Diversity in journalism!
Posted by: George Orwell at April 09, 2010 02:55 PM (AZGON)
With those two papers, he takes in the gamut of opinion from A to B!
Posted by: Dorothy Parker at April 09, 2010 12:07 PM (7AOgy)
Reagan would have drinks with that Democrat bastard Tip O'Neil. I question his judgment.
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 03:59 PM (iBzKc)
The difference is, most of the Democrats running the show now are full blown far-left marxists , not the Zell Miller and Charlie Wilson moderate types we had back then.
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 12:07 PM (t72+4)
But as a member in good standing of the Democratic party, I thought that alone made the likes of O'Neil our outright "enemy," no matter their lack of extreme rhetoric...
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 12:07 PM (iBzKc)
But, he is right about 95% of the time. Want an elected official to agree with you 100% of the time, probably ought to get yourself elected.
Posted by: Mallamutt at April 09, 2010 04:01 PM (V9SYy)
I don't agree with myself half the time. That whole Romneycare thing, sheesh, what could I have been thinking?
Posted by: Mitt Romney at April 09, 2010 12:08 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 09, 2010 04:06 PM (i3AsK)
In a blonde page boy cut, yet! Retro '60s fantasy material, for sure.
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:08 PM (7AOgy)
Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me that the chickens were complaining.
David Shuster
Posted by: Mr. Barky at April 09, 2010 12:10 PM (qwK3S)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 12:10 PM (iBzKc)
Posted by: brian at April 09, 2010 04:01 PM (y05cf)
I think it's perfectly acceptable to say nice things about Democrats. For example, the other day someone said to me, "Nancy Pelosi isn't fit to eat with the pigs," and I stood up for her and said, "She most certainly is!"
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:11 PM (7AOgy)
Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me that you expected me to be moral, ethical and professional.
David Shuster
Posted by: Mr. Barky at April 09, 2010 12:11 PM (qwK3S)
Not true, if he said it about Joe Liebermann or. . . or. . .hmmmm. or some other Democrat yet to be named that does not call political opposition racist Nazi's, I wouldn't be upset.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:11 PM (0q2P7)
Well you guys can either chill out or not, i don't care. Politicians say political things sometimes, go figure. I would have rather he called her granny mcbotox and said she was the new Monica Lewinski in the whitehouse but he has other people to think about other than me and I don't think about him that much either.
He's on our team and I think that's a good thing.
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 12:12 PM (fwSHf)
From the article;
Just this week, a Tudor mansion in Bel-Air belonging to film star Nicolas Cage was in foreclosure auction and reverted to the lender.
Gee, and I thought "Knowing" was going to revive his career....
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 12:12 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: exceller at April 09, 2010 12:14 PM (jx2Td)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 09, 2010 03:45 PM (pLTLS)
I assume you're speaking strictly for yourself.
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:14 PM (7AOgy)
Nicholas Edward Cage! Puncher of women and wearer of pedobear suits!
Posted by: Dionne&Brainless at April 09, 2010 12:15 PM (J0rOD)
173 Reagan would have drinks with that Democrat bastard Tip O'Neil. I question his judgment.
Keep your friends close.....and your enemies closer.
Posted by: Rasmussen guesses at April 09, 2010 12:15 PM (rVJH4)
Posted by: American Federation of Fellators at April 09, 2010 12:16 PM (w9bVp)
EXACTLY!! This is the kind of stuff that Frum and Brooks lap up like camembert on Meghan McCain's tit. SEE! Those TEABAGGERS go too far even for a rock solid conservative like Coburn
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 12:18 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 03:57 PM (fwSHf)
Yes, Reagan worked with Democrats who were willing to work with him. The difference is that Nancy Pelosi hasn't been willing to work with Republicans -- in fact, she's used all the tools at her disposal to exclude Republicans from all significant decisions taken by the House. So the Reagan example is not germane to any discussion of Pelosi as a Speaker or as a human being.
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:19 PM (7AOgy)
Be a nice idea if they hadn't spent the last few years completely destroying the brand name. Be like Yugo coming back as a maker of luxury cars; nobody's going to buy that one.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 09, 2010 12:19 PM (YJl4U)
"I read Daily Kos and Little Green Footballs for balance. Quit relying on just Ace of Spades for your news."
Posted by: Senator Tom Coburn (R)-OK at April 09, 2010 12:19 PM (3wpRl)
This guy should be helping us make her utter despise of the common citizen a political campaign to strip her speakership in November. Not painting smilies on her formless mass colloquially referred to as her face.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:20 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Queen Olberfrau at April 09, 2010 04:18 PM (BiCQw)
That's like the last rat to jump declaring himself the Captain of the Titanic, for its last fifteen seconds above water.
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:20 PM (7AOgy)
At least get our name speeled correctly.
Sincerely,
Phil Griffin, Local President
Posted by: American Federation of Fellators at April 09, 2010 04:16 PM (w9bVp)
this ratio
of fellatio
to jerking
is working
Posted by: e! e! cumming! at April 09, 2010 12:22 PM (7AOgy)
Politicians say political things sometimes, go figure.
It's not the f--king same. This isn't standard political stuff any more. As your boy has said, this is about fundamentally changing this country.
What Coburn said, at least to me, says that he does not understand where this country is or where it is headed - that where it is is circling the toilet and where it is headed is down the damn drain. We've had way too much of the Lindsey Graham approach to conservative politics lately. It needs to be a gloves off fight. Hell, the damn dems have dispensed with politeness for years. The gentlemenly republicans look like sickening fools.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 09, 2010 12:23 PM (RkRxq)
If he says anything nice about the Dem leadership again, however, his name becomes fucking "Tweety."
Posted by: grognard at April 09, 2010 12:24 PM (v0kvW)
She's mostly plastic and botulism. I'd rather have a salad next to my pork chop.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 12:25 PM (mR7mk)
I just want Republicans to ask themselves two questions before they say stuff like Coburn said or when they apologize for the trivial faux offenses.
1. What do I gain by saying this/apologizing?
2. What do I lose by saying this/apologizing?
What did Coburn gain by sticking up for Pelosi? Nothing.
What did he lose? A lot of goodwill he has accrued over the years with the conservative base.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 12:25 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 09, 2010 12:28 PM (P9FdQ)
He's on our team and I think that's a good thing.
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 04:12 PM (fwSHf)
Couldn't he at least have said, "I find her to be personally nice even though I oppose her with every fiber of my being on every political issue"? Clarity is always helpful, and omitting that last bit opened him up to the charge of squishiness.
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:29 PM (7AOgy)
If it weren't for my hero Inhofe, I'd have to say "dumbass fucking Okie from Muskogee".
Totally unforced error - that makes it even more idiotic.
Posted by: TexasJew at April 09, 2010 12:30 PM (P9FdQ)
the answer to #3 would always be 'no.'
Pelosi and the Democrats ran an entire campaign in 2006 centered on the Republican party being corrupt. They also said some really ugly things (while using the dead bodies of our fallen heroes) about the Republicans during the Iraq invasion and occupation. Really ugly.
But Republicans like Tom Coburn have short memories, it seems.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 12:31 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 09, 2010 04:25 PM (mR7mk)
No one should ever make any allusion to eating Nancy Pelosi, not even in jest. Some things are just beyond the pale of human decency - and no one has a strong enough stomach for that imagery.
BTW, did you watch the Muppet clips?
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 12:31 PM (7AOgy)
How about, "she's not a bad person, for a traitorous lying old shitbag."
Posted by: TexasJew at April 09, 2010 12:32 PM (P9FdQ)
Or "I find her to be personally nice, but her demonizing and marginalizing of the Tea Party movement as some sort of racist or fascist movement has been WAY out of line"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:32 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Michael Steele at April 09, 2010 12:33 PM (QKKT0)
I guess he could have said, "I'd hit it!"
Posted by: conscious and checking my facts at April 09, 2010 12:33 PM (YVZlY)
How fast can you build these wooden warriors? Do you have a factory in Flint somewhere?
Nancy Pelosi slanders millions of Americans who oppose her Stalinist designs with the worst slurs in the language. Tom Coburn makes an asinine and wholly unnecessary public defense of Nancy Pelosi. Then Tom Coburn sends me six dozen emails every week asking for my money to help defeat Nancy Pelosi's agenda.
People like me tend to get pissed when the same twit who just played white knight to the malevolent hag that placed me as a shower operator at Auschwitz keeps asking me for money. It's bad for business. It's recklessly incompetent. And, yes, it does hurt our efforts to try and salvage what's left of this country by getting people like Reid and Pelosi the hell out of Washington.
What exactly, do you find faulty with this response? I know there's plenty wrong with the invented, imaginary arguments you guys have been knocking down all thread (and I encourage you to keep up the good work -- whoever that guy is arguing that Coburn has to go deserves a good lashing), but were we not also right to be angered when self-styled conservative lodestar Newt Gingrich sat down with Pelosi to talk about their agreement on a rollback to the stoneage to fight the invisible killer CO2?
And another thing. Coburn does deserve major props for his pronouncements to hold appointments that were obviously purchased in exchange for Obamacare votes. He recognizes that this kind of horse trading is -- dare I say it -- evil. But who the hell does he think was making those promises and soliciting those bribes? Ed Markey?
The Republicans need an easily-digested, clear-cut message for November, and one of the readiest they have at their disposal is to paint all Democrats as allies of Nancy Pelosi. Most people despise this viper and see her as emblematic of a party gone mad with power. The ads write themselves. Or at least they would if the man entrusted with the responsibility for making the machine work wasn't busy painting her as a grandmother just doing it for the children.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 12:33 PM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: David Shuster at April 09, 2010 12:35 PM (M5t+h)
Honk if you've been called a racist by a rich white celebrity, politician, or newsperson
Posted by: kbdabear at April 09, 2010 12:36 PM (sYxEE)
Couldn't he at least have said, "I
find her to be personally nice even though I oppose her with
every fiber of my being on every political issue she casts no reflection in a mirror IYKWIMAITTYD"?
Posted by: stuiec at April 09, 2010 04:29 PM (7AOgy)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 09, 2010 12:36 PM (xxgag)
Honk if you've been called a racist by a rich white celebrity, politician, or newsperson...today.
Posted by: Fred Jones, Scooby Gangmember at April 09, 2010 12:37 PM (uFokq)
Nobody here is saying (I don't think) that he needs to be rode out of town on a rail. What most conservatives want (again I think) is that the people we elect turn a corner. That they despense for as long as it takes, with being politicians and to start being statesmen - just for a while. Until they exorcise this socialist nightmare that the leftists have visited upon this country.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 09, 2010 12:37 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 04:33 PM (gQ+XA)
That was perfect!
Posted by: conscious and agreeing with VJay at April 09, 2010 12:38 PM (YVZlY)
Soda.... nose.... pain....
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:38 PM (0q2P7)
Nick, in light of your recent financial windfall, we may be able to rework your mortgage. Please contact me
Posted by: Barney Frank, Fannie Mae at April 09, 2010 12:39 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 12:40 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at April 09, 2010 12:41 PM (NurK6)
Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at April 09, 2010 12:41 PM (w9bVp)
Nobody here is saying (I don't think) that he needs to be rode out of town on a rail.
I guess I really don't understand what the point of the conversation is then.
Posted by: robtr at April 09, 2010 12:42 PM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Cicero at April 09, 2010 12:42 PM (QKKT0)
Halftime Report:
Andy: VJay, you said earlier that: "Tom Coburn sends me six dozen emails every week asking for my money to help defeat Nancy Pelosi's agenda."
Does he actually send you 72 emails a week?
VJay: Well, maybe not 72.
Andy: I thought so. Greg, back to you.
Posted by: Andy Levy at April 09, 2010 12:44 PM (YVZlY)
People like me tend to get pissed when the same twit who just played white knight to the malevolent hag that placed me as a shower operator at Auschwitz keeps asking me for money.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 04:33 PM (gQ+XA)
Excellent sir ! Bravo, Bravo !
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 12:44 PM (t72+4)
Nobody here is saying (I don't think) that he needs to be rode out of town on a rail.
I guess I really don't understand what the point of the conversation
is then.
I see, it's you find it hard to understand why people might be upset and want to voice their opinion publicly, and encourage the party to take Coburn aside, smack him across the face and ask him what the f*** he was thinking. And tell him not to do it again.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 09, 2010 12:47 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Blazer
Blazer, that was poetry. It brought tears to my eyes.
Posted by: mpfs at April 09, 2010 12:48 PM (iYbLN)
I guess I really don't understand what the point of the conversation is then.
The point is that he is speaking like a self-important condescending political relativist and that he should stop doing that.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 09, 2010 12:54 PM (RkRxq)
Gives me more time to dance on camera too!
Posted by: C*ntessa Brewer at April 09, 2010 01:07 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: C*ntessa Brewer at April 09, 2010 05:07 PM
Sweet fancy Moses!
Posted by: George Costanza at April 09, 2010 01:08 PM (sYxEE)
@ 229 How fast can you build these wooden warriors?
-------------------------
"And yes, liberal Democrats are our enemy."
Posted by: Blazer at April 09, 2010 03:49 PM (t72+4)
Posted by: Vile Roman at April 09, 2010 01:15 PM (iBzKc)
239 I shall heretofore hereafter temper my anger over certain dumbassed things Coburn may say, as long as he votes right. But I can't help but wonder how long that will be, with him thinking Pelosi is such a sweetheart and all.
Please pardon the lousy grammar.
Posted by: maddogg at April 09, 2010 01:23 PM (OlN4e)
Ah, I see. Liberal Democrats are our enemies in the present tense and per the modern, commonly understood nature of the term "liberal", so a guy who was considered a liberal Democrat roughly three decades ago must be interchangeable with Nancy Pelosi. Po-tay-to, po-tah-to.
I know there's a Latin phrase to describe the logical fallacy in which you're engaging, but you're the Roman, so you tell me.
It's almost like some of you guys don't want to recognize that we're on the same team here. But I guess you're now a filthy freeper if you dare to criticize the jackass antics of a public official without also calling for his pay-per-view beheading.
See, that's how you build a strawman. Tall and stout with a bit of an aggrieved martyr complex built in. You could burn Nick Cage in that baby.
Posted by: VJay at April 09, 2010 01:33 PM (gQ+XA)
Posted by: Rodney at April 09, 2010 01:50 PM (XRIh6)
Posted by: dustydog at April 09, 2010 02:46 PM (j8aSQ)
thank you ...
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ßæßÊÃá ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 09, 2010 10:02 PM (WFYoY)
On a "news" channel? Is that like "honor among thieves"?
Posted by: mikey at April 10, 2010 02:53 AM (xfRfG)
He was not moral, ethical or professional ...
But ... but ... but ... I thought that was a prerequisite for working there?!
Posted by: Gray Wolf at April 10, 2010 06:28 AM (srBjT)
Posted by: how to get rid of genital warts at September 17, 2010 03:48 AM (BOhFR)
Posted by: california car clocks at September 19, 2010 05:13 AM (B78t1)
Posted by: florists yellow pages at September 22, 2010 06:06 AM (oT80h)
Posted by: Shure at September 24, 2010 04:57 AM (pFbZS)
Posted by: benches seating listings at September 24, 2010 05:10 AM (nHuVv)
Posted by: art insurance directory at September 26, 2010 05:45 AM (YNlkX)
Posted by: Texas Family and General Practice at September 27, 2010 04:47 AM (R3ma1)
Posted by: jamie oliver recipes at September 27, 2010 07:46 AM (Q2pBm)
Posted by: Massachusetts Family and General Practice at September 29, 2010 06:23 AM (TcDlK)
point of pandora charms. This is a nice article for sure. Excellent point here. I wish there
are more and more New pandora beads articles like that. I totally agree with you on the
point of pandora jewellery. This is a nice article for sure. Thank you so much for sharing
some great ideas of pandora jewellery with us, they are helpful.
Posted by: pandora at October 24, 2010 10:15 PM (t7UbJ)
Posted by: shoes outlet at October 31, 2010 06:48 PM (Ulqwn)
Posted by: thomas sabo uk at February 22, 2011 04:35 PM (yiedj)
Posted by: thomas sabo uk at February 22, 2011 08:31 PM (eVzw+)
Posted by: thomas sabo skull at February 23, 2011 11:00 PM (yiedj)
Posted by: thomas sabo skull at February 23, 2011 11:02 PM (yiedj)
Do you crazy for NBA games? Have you hold your breath for the exciting moment? Are you one of NBA super fans? If the answer is YES, COME ON,GUYS!
All kinds of NBA jerseys are designed as authentic styles with High quality,Competitive price, Fast Delivery and Intimate Customer Service . Choose your favorite jerseys to support your team. Enjoy your free style!
They are all in stock!Welcome to buy!
Posted by: sunny at April 08, 2011 01:09 AM (wakeg)
Posted by: Coach Diaper at June 28, 2011 01:10 AM (GYGno)
Posted by: Insanity Workout at July 13, 2011 11:43 PM (Cfkqe)
<a href="http://www.fingersinthenose.net">Five Fingers Sale</a>
<a href="http://www.fingersinthenose.net">Vibram Five Fingers Shoes</a>
<a href="http://www.fingersinthenose.net">Five Fingers Shoes Sale</a>
Posted by: Cheap Five Fingers at July 14, 2011 02:19 AM (Cfkqe)
Posted by: Cheap Five Fingers at July 14, 2011 02:19 AM (Cfkqe)
Posted by: Cheap Five Fingers at July 14, 2011 02:21 AM (Cfkqe)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2413 seconds, 389 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








He was not moral, ethical or professional and that is not fair to the 500 people who work at msnbc.
Nor would it be fair to the 500 people who watch pmsnbc.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 09, 2010 10:48 AM (1Jaio)