February 02, 2010
— Dave in Texas This past year, not to put too fine a point on it.
Some of it was ground gained by Headline News and CNN, and they all still suck wind behind O'Reilly (not a fan but whatever), whose show was the only cable news program to grow it's audience in the same time period (55%, even with boycott threats and all).
After a while shrill gets pretty tiresome (not to me, I actually find him entertaining again). I mean, how do you top shrieky hysteria and all those stern angry lectures night after night? By playing hard left the only game he has is to hold on to what he's got, and he's doing a piss-poor job of it if he loses almost half of em in the first year of Obama's administration.
With these shifting political fortunes, you run the risk of becoming the fan-boy of failure.
Which I'm guessing leads to more bitterness and contempt, not less but what the hell do I know?
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
08:16 AM
| Comments (55)
Post contains 179 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 02, 2010 09:47 AM (xxgag)
He is currently in the throes of a full-tilt meltdown. I'm with Dave; it is enjoyable to watch!
Posted by: Alamo at February 02, 2010 09:49 AM (Mqupr)
One of my frequent opponents in court told me that the only way she makes it through the day is by knowing that she can watch Olberman when she gets home.
Is her home in Bellevue?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 02, 2010 09:51 AM (U2ntX)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 02, 2010 01:47 PM (xxgag)
What sad little life she must have.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 02, 2010 09:55 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Cicero at February 02, 2010 09:56 AM (QKKT0)
7 One of my frequent opponents in court told me that the only way she makes it through the day is by knowing that she can watch Olberman when she gets home.
S
Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2010 09:56 AM (CfmlF)
I'll wager that if you of "your frequent opponents" is dim-witted enough to have her anxiety assuaged by K.O. you hand her frequent and thorough ass whippings in court.
Posted by: Alamo at February 02, 2010 09:58 AM (Mqupr)
7 One of my frequent opponents in court told me that the only way she makes it through the day is by knowing that she can watch Olberman when she gets home.
Holy Cow! That "S" just posted itself! Yikes, my laptop is possessed! Anyways, that sounds like my moonbat cousin. He thinks that Rachel Maddow and Keith Ohlbermann are the best "news shows" because they "do so much research, and everything is so well sourced." No lie. Crazy, huh!
Posted by: runningrn at February 02, 2010 09:58 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: volfan at February 02, 2010 10:01 AM (Lq6p6)
My wife watched Olberman for the first time on the night Scott Brown was elected. I had switched it over from Fox after Coakley had conceded in order to dip my balls in the delicious liberal tears.
She was amazed on a number of levels, but not in a good way.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at February 02, 2010 10:02 AM (E0EDC)
Seems to me that GE has already decided he is gone, and is seeding this story to get the ball rolling. Otherwise why write an article about someone that literally noone is watching?
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, though.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 02, 2010 10:12 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: callade at February 02, 2010 10:17 AM (wDZxl)
Posted by: toby928 at February 02, 2010 10:18 AM (PD1tk)
ABC,CBS, MSNBC all poll in the mid to low 30's while Fox covers 49%.
My theory is that for all three broadcast networks, it's the same 30+% uber liberal nutroots, while Fox is only scoring 49% out of the other 65% that are smarter than to buy into the liberal spin of the broadcast media. The 16% Fox hasn't gotten yet, generally either get their information from the Internet or the Weather Channel.
But when ABC/CBS/MSNBC claim 33/34/36%, I'm claiming it's the same people for all three, and these people look around and think "I agree with 3 out of 4 networks so I'm mainstream and Fox is radical." The truth is closer to the 50% that watch Fox, think they're somewhat moderate or center right, and realize that all 3 other networks are Uber-Left. No matter how Conservative you think Hannity or Beck or O'Reilly is, the average Fox VIEWER polls center right. Not nearly as far right as those broadcasters.
Meanwhile CNN maintains it's schizophrenia. It want's to join the other three liberal broadcast networks, but realizes it would be competing in the most over sold market out there. Air America's recent demise indicates that might be a financially wise decision for them. Air America was a failure because when all is said and done....it was redundant competition with 3 other networks.
Posted by: Just a Cynic.... at February 02, 2010 10:35 AM (v4UYp)
Of course, in a sane world, perennial low performer Dan Rather would have been canned by CBS in 1983 after 3 years of occupying third place in the ratings instead of letting him occupy third place in the ratings for over 20 years.
Posted by: OregonMuse at February 02, 2010 10:38 AM (hoowK)
Don't forget us.
Posted by: NPR at February 02, 2010 10:41 AM (hoowK)
Posted by: Chicken with sore butt in Keefums bathtub at February 02, 2010 10:43 AM (QuP9W)
In general, on the daily "Scoreboard" threads covering the ratings disparity between FNC and CNN/HLN/MSNBC, the usual wound-licking comments from the FNC-haters is:
1) FNC's outrageous ratings only further prove that America is chock-full of idiot simpletons who want to be lied to.
2) Just because Beck pulled in 3.9M viewers last night doesn't mean that ALL of them like him! Heck, most of them are probably liberals who enjoy the spectacle!
3) The main reason FNC ranks so highly is because every airport / waiting room / hotel lobby television is perpetually tuned to them (with the occassional addition of an anecdote where they belligerently complained to a hapless receptionist, or a conspiracy-theory that Roger Ailes distributes universal remote-controls to his myriad followers, who then descend upon the public arena, changing televisions!).
4) Defiance...so what they aren't doing well? The truth is never popular!
It's fun to read.
Posted by: reason at February 02, 2010 10:46 AM (F26eZ)
I'll be in the bathtub.
Posted by: Keith Olbermann at February 02, 2010 10:46 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: reason at February 02, 2010 10:47 AM (F26eZ)
"Keith is our tentpole."
"Ratings for Olbermann's Countdown have been soft recently"
As Ana Marie Cox would scream.... "penis!!!"
Posted by: kbdabear at February 02, 2010 10:48 AM (sYxEE)
Of course the reason every airport/waiting room is turned to FOX is because they are so highly ranked.
Posted by: CUS at February 02, 2010 10:48 AM (wOGfT)
KO's chicken: Stick a fork beer can in him. He's done.
Posted by: reason at February 02, 2010 10:49 AM (F26eZ)
26 Air America was a failure because when all is said and done....it was redundant competition with 3 other networks.
Don't forget us.
You have my sincere apologies. That was QUITE obvious and I ommited you.
How thoughtless of me.
Posted by: Just a Cynic.... at February 02, 2010 10:50 AM (v4UYp)
OH! I almost forgot...the most recent Progressive explanation for why FNC spanks the other networks so soundly: people only watch FNC because of the FoxBabes.
OK. Maybe they're on to something there...
Posted by: reason at February 02, 2010 10:58 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: Richard Mcenroe at February 02, 2010 10:59 AM (PcgQ7)
Posted by: Richard Mcenroe at February 02, 2010 11:01 AM (PcgQ7)
you run the risk of becoming the fan-boy of failure.
Buy a 'Wait Til Next Year' souvenir T-Shirt!
Posted by: Chicago Cubs at February 02, 2010 11:04 AM (ERJIu)
Posted by: joeindc44 at February 02, 2010 11:05 AM (QxSug)
Contrast that with O'Reilly at 3.7MM, Beck at almost 2.7MM and Hannity at 2.6MM. Better yet, contrast that with Red Eye, which shows in the middle of the freaking night, and still gets almost 400K.
So either FOX is making megabank on their talkers, or MSNBC is losing its shirt on theirs. If Comcast blows the thing up, we'll know which one it was.
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at February 02, 2010 11:12 AM (1bLKF)
What neither Keith O or MSNBC doesn't understand is, it's not just about the ratings, there is going to be actual consequences for their behavior over the last few years. I feel sorry his family, because his name is MUD!
I suspect we will never see him on MSNBC or Sports Casting again after Obama loses in 2012 or soon there after.
It's probably going to get real ugly over the next few years, becuase they know their chicken is cooked, and they are going to make one last big push to manipulate the population.
Posted by: Jimi at February 02, 2010 11:31 AM (fqxV7)
January 29, 2010 | 1:24 pm
"CBS News employees are bracing for a significant round of layoffs that will hit the news division next week, according to multiple sources. The budget tightening is expected to affect every newscast, including “60 Minutes,” the network’s crown jewel, although that show will likely suffer minimal losses.
People familiar with discussions about the cuts inside the news division have heard that the total number who could lose their jobs could reach as high as 100, or 7% of the approximately 1,400-person staff. A news executive disputed that, saying the final figure would be considerably lower."
Obama continues to save the important jobs. Is there nothing he can't do?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/
entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/01/
cbs-news-braces-for-round-of-layoffs-next-week.html
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 02, 2010 11:31 AM (LJSfA)
Posted by: PlymouthMom at February 02, 2010 11:34 AM (O/5X6)
Yeah, douche bags pretty much have gone the way of lobotomies and blood-letting.
I look forward to the day "Smoking Gun" has Keefy's greasy, unshaven mug-shot up for his arrest in a gay men's bathroom sting.
Posted by: Drillanwr at February 02, 2010 11:34 AM (GkYyh)
Quite investing and buying GE products People. Pass the Word!
We have already caught GE making sweetheart deals with the Obama Administration in the BullShit "Green Technology" realm, so if we can minimize the legislation that gets passed, and quit investing and buying their products, hopefully someday the Corporation will be brought to it's knees.
I hate to have to play it that way, because many people lively-hoods are at stake, but we can't have one of America most powerfull corporation playing footsie with the Commies all in the name of Profit and Power!
There are other great companies out there to invest and buy from!
Posted by: Jimi at February 02, 2010 11:40 AM (fqxV7)
Posted by: Steve L. at February 02, 2010 11:58 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: Silicon Valley Jim at February 02, 2010 12:19 PM (Iw3XI)
But the funniest stuff is when a blogger writes a diary with a title like "Olbermann PWNS {insert your Republican name here}!!!!!!!"
And then they go on and on how now the nation can finally see the truth in the news, not like the stuff Beck or Hannity puts out.. blah blah blah..
No one bothers to tell them Olbermann's viewership amounts to the equivalence of 2 cub scout packs and the poor people forced to watch him while stuck at bars in airports... oh yeah.. and the other daily kooks who can't decide who is awesomer.. Keith or Rachel Maddow... *barf*
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 02, 2010 12:40 PM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Silicon Valley Jim
Well now, you're onto something here. I believe Robert Gibbs should be replaced by Olbermann as WH Press Sec.
Posted by: Drillanwr at February 02, 2010 12:51 PM (GkYyh)
Which I'm guessing leads to more bitterness and contempt, not less but what the hell do I know?
Still pissed off about the Cowboys, aren't ya?
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 02, 2010 01:48 PM (1hM1d)
My wife watched Olberman for the first time ... I had switched it over from Fox after Coakley had conceded in order to dip my balls in the delicious liberal tears. She was amazed on a number of levels, but not in a good way.
You shouldn't have let her watch you dip you balls like that. Women are frequently amazed, but not in a good way. Women tend to Not. Get. It.
Oh, wait...
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at February 02, 2010 01:54 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Nozzle at February 02, 2010 02:31 PM (lxg2b)
Arbitron, you, SIR, are now officially The World's WORST Person ... er ... thing.
I herebye denounce you. Have you no shame? At long last, SIR?
Posted by: Warden at February 02, 2010 02:51 PM (QoR4a)
Posted by: East Bay Jay at February 02, 2010 08:23 PM (oNeKI)
Posted by: Halfsek at February 03, 2010 03:06 PM (62hQJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2425 seconds, 183 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: sv at February 02, 2010 09:41 AM (6OCIz)