May 26, 2010
— Ace Lots of fun numbers here-- like mere interest on the debt is $6,165 per citizen.
But remember, Teabaggerz, Obama gave you a "tax cut."
Posted by: Ace at
08:34 AM
| Comments (76)
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Black guy in diner @ end of Space Balls at May 26, 2010 08:36 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: Barack The Benovelent at May 26, 2010 08:39 AM (CH909)
Posted by: Editor at May 26, 2010 08:40 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: t-bird at May 26, 2010 08:40 AM (FcR7P)
Federal pensions are listed as one of the largest budget items, nearly equal to interest on the debt. Houston, we have a problem.
Posted by: Atomic Roach at May 26, 2010 08:40 AM (Oxen1)
Go through them and you simply can't conclude we're in anything but deep shit.
Posted by: Derak at May 26, 2010 08:40 AM (Zr2Q4)
I especially like the debt to GDP ratio. Fun times. And by fun times I really mean here comes the economic collapse of this country, and when that happens the rest of the world falls right after.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at May 26, 2010 08:42 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: runningrn at May 26, 2010 08:44 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: robtr at May 26, 2010 08:44 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: John ryan's a special child, God bless him! at May 26, 2010 08:45 AM (2PTT7)
Posted by: Thom Hartmann at May 26, 2010 08:45 AM (RykTt)
Posted by: runningrn at May 26, 2010 08:45 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at May 26, 2010 08:47 AM (mHQ7T)
I didn't vote for Wilson.
Oh, you mean some little thing that wouldn't matter, because it's been too late for too long. Yeah, we could have done one of those. Still can!
Posted by: oblig. at May 26, 2010 08:47 AM (x7Ao8)
The debt problem is not unique to Obama.
Sure he put the pedal to the metal but we've been drowning in debt for decades.
I fear we're so far gone that only a full collapse to the point of us all (globally) starting over from an agrarian society might be the only hope.
Posted by: Scott J. at May 26, 2010 08:49 AM (NY7mQ)
Posted by: Larry Kudlow at May 26, 2010 08:49 AM (fwSHf)
Since no politician has the cajones to do both, no one is serious about the debt.
Posted by: seattle slough at May 26, 2010 08:49 AM (JRGA6)
Posted by: Will Folks at May 26, 2010 08:49 AM (IhQuA)
Don't forget that more people are getting money from The Vapid One's© stash than they are from a real job.
Income redistribution has been achieved. Everybody's pay is down, just like they planned. The economically illiterate imbeciles that infest Washington need to be exterminated. We had a perfectly good economy until we started voting in the worshippers of Marx, Mao, Engels, and Alinsky.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at May 26, 2010 08:50 AM (i3AsK)
O/T: Slate defends Joe McGinniss' creepy stalking of Palin (surprise surprise)
Posted by: Will Folks at May 26, 2010 08:50 AM (pTyL2)
You have to factor in that this is calculated using the lowest interest rates the US has seen in over a half century - kept artificially low by the Fed buying up our own debt (i.e. printing money). The Fed's balance sheet was just given the okay to expand by over 2 trillion (more printing enabled). And, on top of that, the US' debt is frightfully concentrated on short-term debt, meaning that we are that much more vulnerable to interest rate changes.
Rising interest rates are the most serious threat and there isn't really much of anything we can do about it. If interest rates go to 10% (the prime rate got up to 21.5% in 1980) ... whoa, boy!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 26, 2010 08:51 AM (Qp4DT)
As always SS, you're at best half right.
We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 26, 2010 08:51 AM (9hSKh)
That includes babies and old ladies.
And it's only the annual interest.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at May 26, 2010 08:52 AM (0q2P7)
Since no politician has the cajones to do both, no one is serious about the debt.
Posted by: seattle slough at May 26, 2010 12:49 PM (JRGA6)
You should maybe check out Paul Ryans website. He lays out exactly how to do it and he is running for re election.
Posted by: robtr at May 26, 2010 08:52 AM (fwSHf)
Yes, I see a light at the end of the tunnel.
Posted by: Barbarian at May 26, 2010 08:53 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Will "The Caring Stud" Folks at May 26, 2010 08:54 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Barack The Wise, First Emperor of Multicultura at May 26, 2010 08:55 AM (2PTT7)
13 trillion in pennies would PLUG THE HOLE, people.*
It's all in the plan.
*They would also weigh 3.25 trillion kilograms. This could cause a slight wobble in the earth's axis. Also, Guam would capsize.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 26, 2010 08:56 AM (B+qrE)
29, we really need to get that douche's address and make his life a living hell.
Subscribe him to tons of junk mail, book of the month club, Columbia House music, etc.
Posted by: Scott J. at May 26, 2010 08:57 AM (NY7mQ)
Posted by: Mr pink at May 26, 2010 08:57 AM (ZafcV)
Uhhh, my plan is to refinance this debt at a lower interest rate. This should save or create trillions of dollars, which is essential for creating a sustainable green economy with good paying green jobs.
This, combined with the savings from Health Care Reform should take care of our budgetary difficulties.
Posted by: Barack Obama the Financial Planner at May 26, 2010 08:57 AM (OCfDT)
First, it'd be an immediate $117K bonus for all the taxpayers in the US. Second, it would make subsequent deficit spending all but impossible: "Yeah, we repudiated it last year, but we really, really, really intend to pay back what we borrow this year...."
Third, it would completely torpedo China's growing hegemony in the far east -- they've been aggressively mercantilist and have amassed a huge pile of Treasuries, which will cause some consternation when they become worthless.
Posted by: cthulhu at May 26, 2010 08:58 AM (fYgoq)
I'd appreciate your "hole-plugging" a little more if I didn't have to put up with the damn smell!
And try using some joint-compound next time afterwords!
Posted by: Wall Studded With Holes in Folk's Apartment at May 26, 2010 08:58 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: t-bird at May 26, 2010 08:59 AM (FcR7P)
Repudiate the debt.
The Grapes of Wrath Part II: The Joads Go Cannibal and Shit
Yes, it would be even worse than that.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at May 26, 2010 09:01 AM (B+qrE)
Arizona Gets Border Soldiers; None for Texas
Arizona got a response. Texas is still waiting for an answer.
After repeated requests for help, President Barack Obama has agreed to send 1,200 National Guard troops to Arizona's border with Mexico. But so far, the president hasn't responded to Texas' request for assistance.
Gov. Rick Perry has sent letters to Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano requesting National Guard troops for the Texas-Mexico border.
Almost a year and a half after the first letter was sent, Perry hasn't received an answer.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 26, 2010 09:01 AM (9hSKh)
Remember when George Bush expanded Medicare? *sigh*
We're fucked. And you can blame not only corrupt politicians, but the economic illiteracy of our fellow citizens.
Posted by: Warden at May 26, 2010 09:01 AM (fE6tn)
Posted by: Obama at May 26, 2010 09:02 AM (ZafcV)
Posted by: Barack Obama at May 26, 2010 09:02 AM (SZy+Y)
Posted by: Obama at May 26, 2010 09:06 AM (ZafcV)
Just out of curiosity, what would actually happen if we did repudiate the debt?
OK, no more debt payments. No more borrowing. So, either Social Security recipients get their benefits slashed, or taxes go through the roof, or we inflate our money supply to pay this.
What else am I missing?
Posted by: Barack Obama the Financial Planner at May 26, 2010 09:07 AM (OCfDT)
That's a true reset button, Cthulhu. There would be a bit of chaos in the interim though.
The Chinese would be mightily pissed though. They may feel a bit froggy and try something completely stupid, say a Taiwanese invasion. They're probably going to have to try something like that in the near future anyway absent economic woes because of their child sex imbalance.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at May 26, 2010 09:09 AM (9hSKh)
Pi is 3.14.
If you hold up to a mirror a piece of paper with 3.14 written on it, it spells PIE.
Well, actually it spells PI.E but it still spells pie.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 26, 2010 09:10 AM (xxgag)
yeah, sigh . . . no surprise there
plus, idiot-in-chief hates texas and it's getting harder & harder for him to disguise that
Posted by: texasmamma at May 26, 2010 09:11 AM (4L69q)
Posted by: Vindictive bastard at May 26, 2010 09:14 AM (zgYXg)
Just out of curiosity, what would actually happen if we did repudiate the debt?
OK, no more debt payments. No more borrowing. So, either Social Security recipients get their benefits slashed, or taxes go through the roof, or we inflate our money supply to pay this.
What else am I missing?
Posted by: Barack Obama the Financial Planner at May 26, 2010 01:07 PM (OCfDT)
Around 60% of our debt is held by American Citizens and businesses. You would be talking about total global collapse.
Posted by: robtr at May 26, 2010 09:16 AM (fwSHf)
Just out of curiosity, what would actually happen if we did repudiate the debt?
OK, no more debt payments. No more borrowing. So, either Social Security recipients get their benefits slashed, or taxes go through the roof, or we inflate our money supply to pay this.
What else am I missing?
Posted by: Barack Obama the Financial Planner at May 26, 2010 01:07 PM
(OCfDT)
We'd piss off and impoverish a lot of bondholders including an enormous number of individual citizens and business, a bunch of pension funds and banks, a bunch of foreign investors. It would eliminate our ability to borrow in the future. The Chinese and others might get so pissed that they would invade Hawaii or California. We would lose all of our allies since they buy bonds too. We would become a pariah. Ripple effects would include very person on Earth. The Four Horsemen would ride. Unclear whether Jesus would come back.
Think of it as throwing a lit stick of dynamite into the world's largest gasoline storage facility.
Even the USSR did not repudiate the debt that the Czars had run up. Just not a good idea.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 26, 2010 09:17 AM (xxgag)
Just out of curiosity, what would actually happen if we did repudiate the debt?
OK, no more debt payments. No more borrowing.Well, for one, defaulting would save the dollar (as opposed to monetizing the debt and destroying our currency - which is far worse than anything anyone can imagine). There would still be borrowing, just not from some nations. There would be domestic borrowing and from within some other nations. At the current time, as the dollar is still the single trade and reserve currency (the Euro is worse than a joke), many nations would not even have the luxury of cutting the US off from anything. That would being their trade to a halt and kill them.
However, with default, all of this crazy social spending by the federal government, and states, would have to come to a screeching halt. This is problematic, since our federal courts like to force these expenditures on everyone without any regard for whether they have the power to do so (they don't) or whether we have the money (we don't).
The fact is that default is about the only reasonable way to handle our debt, certainly while the dollar is still the world's currency, but we don't have the political will to do so. And, the federal government is moving in the opposite direction, anyway, just piling more and more expenditures and future obligations on. They are going for a real nuclear explosion of monetary systems the world around.
Also, after the US were to default on our debt, there would likely be a race among nations with brains to grab control of the gulf oil fields, as that is where the most important world value is. Such a move would also have the more important effect of neutering the arab/persian/muslim world, which is why it should have been done after 9/11.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 26, 2010 09:17 AM (Qp4DT)
Since no politician has the cajones to do both, no one is serious about the debt.
Posted by: seattle slough
1. no, here is your opinion.
2. Debt can be alleviated by encouraging economic activity and thus taxable revenues (classifying CO2 as a pollutant does NOT qualify)It isn't surprising that you'd miss that.
3. Debt can be reduced by encouraging relations and trade with countries that are friendly (not sitting on the treaty with Columbia is one example).
try again dog food.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 26, 2010 09:19 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: hachie1 at May 26, 2010 09:21 AM (FXtu9)
2. Debt can be alleviated by encouraging economic activity and thus taxable revenues (classifying CO2 as a pollutant does NOT qualify)It isn't surprising that you'd miss that.
3. Debt can be reduced by encouraging relations and trade with countries that are friendly (not sitting on the treaty with Columbia is one example).
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 26, 2010 01:19 PM (R2fpr)
That is true. In fact, the only solution to the US' debt burden is growth. Unfortunately, The Precedent is totally, 100%, unbelievably anti-growth and has done everything in his power to kill growth, so the possibility of outgrowing the debt is unreasonable and not to be considered. It just cannot happen while The Precedent is occupying the White House and the stagnation is almost assured with dems controlling any of Capitol Hill.
So, you must approach this debt problem understanding that we will not be allowed to grow out of it, and then consider what other possibilities there are.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at May 26, 2010 09:22 AM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 26, 2010 09:30 AM (1Jaio)
Rowf? Bleeeachhhh!
Posted by: Barky ain't eatin' that sh*t
Story from my batchelor days: When I struck out in my first place, I sought ways to economize. That included buying cheap food that would keep in my hip batchelor pad. One attempt was a generic 'potted meat product'. School cafeteria and Marine Corps experience were defeated by this however. I offered some to my cat, a large ginger tom, who didn't care much for people food. He refused it. The true test came when I offered it to my Labrador retriever, and he blanched. This dog was known to hork down food without seeing it, much less tasting it. I did not repeat this experiment.
Posted by: Blue Hen at May 26, 2010 09:35 AM (R2fpr)
ace,
the proper spelling is TBAGGRZ.
thank you.
(and debt repudiation WILL happen, it's a question of when. Is Taiwan worth the --what is it $895 Billion or so?-- that China holds? Our debt is spread so far around, repudiation will collase the entire world economy, probably for a decade or three.)
China, Mainland 895.2
Japan 784.9
United Kingdom 2/ 279.0
Oil Exporters 3/ 229.5
Brazil 164.4
Hong Kong 150.9
Carib Bnkng Ctrs 4/ 148.3
Taiwan 124.8
Russia 120.1
That's only 1.7 trillion.
Posted by: s'moron at May 26, 2010 09:35 AM (UaxA0)
It's such a fucking joke, though. We know that any tax increase goes to increased spending. It will never be used to pay down the debt. Of course, the main problem is that a tax increase would harm the economy and reduce revenues, but even if it didn't, whatever it brings in becomes more pork and graft.
What we actually need is a fundamental change in our federal government's spending. Virtually all of this mess can be handled by states. Some states will do a great job replacing the fed, some will do a bad job. That's on the voters to kick our their local democrats. We need a transition period and a drastic reduction in federal spending. We need to admit the baby boomers didn't pay for social security and shouldn't receive benefits except in extreme situations... they let their congress spend their social security on regular pork and bloat... it was generational theft. They didn't want to pay taxes on massive spending, so they pretended it was OK to give their social security payments over.
We need to reduce our social entitlements and liabilities by as much as possible.
Posted by: Lex Luthor, Ruler of Australia at May 26, 2010 09:37 AM (dUOK+)
cthulhu mentioned repudiating the debt. Intriguing as that is, that doesn't address the onehundred trillion or so in unfunded liabilities.
So, I guess another question is this: If we do repudiate the national debt, what happens to those unfunded liabilities?
Oh, and there is no way in hell China could invade California or Hawaii. They don't have the navy or ships required to transport and supply logistically all the troops needed. Whoever said that was a possible consequence of repudiating the debt is mistaken on that account.
The global financial market might crash and burn as a result, but you won't see the red chinese flag flying over Los Angeles. Hollywood excepted...
Posted by: Ed at May 26, 2010 09:37 AM (OCfDT)
That is a long shot but remember, we would piss off the Mexicans (and Canadians too for that matter). In WWI, the Krauts tried to make a deal with Mexico that if we entered the war, they would invade us with Kraut help. Their foreign minister, a guy named Zimmermann, put it all down in a nice little telegraph to Mexico that the Brits intercepted and shared with us. When confronted, Zimmermann did not deny it. I could see a China - Mexico alliance.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 26, 2010 09:45 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: hachie1 at May 26, 2010 09:46 AM (FXtu9)
Posted by: Professor Filton Miedman at May 26, 2010 09:48 AM (zfRju)
I'm sure you think you're just terribly amusing, however in reality you come off as an innumerate numbskull.
Posted by: Waterhouse at May 26, 2010 10:27 AM (u+34p)
By contrast, every day we delay means another $83,000 worthless teacher gets that much more of a claim on the efforts of productive members of society. Every day we delay means more looting. Every day we delay further distorts the economy into uselessness.
Besides, why wouldn't I be in favor of a little Chaos....?
Posted by: cthulhu at May 26, 2010 10:58 AM (fYgoq)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2381 seconds, 204 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Horatius at May 26, 2010 08:35 AM (q3nrL)