March 26, 2010
— Dave in Texas Hugo's got his own "fairness doctrine".
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- The owner of Venezuela's only remaining TV channel that takes a critical line against President Hugo Chavez was arrested Thursday, raising concerns the government is carrying out a widening crackdown aimed at silencing opponents.Guillermo Zuloaga, owner of Globovision, was arrested on a warrant for remarks that were deemed "offensive" to the president, Attorney General Luisa Ortega said...
The Attorney General's Office said in a statement that prosecutors are investigating Zuloaga for allegedly violating a law prohibiting Venezuelans from spreading "false information through any medium," including newspapers, radio, television, e-mails or leaflets, "that cause public panic."
Full-blown socialism has a tendency to hand the advantage to the despot regardless of the will of the people (go figure), including control of the media. Make it a crime .
Which is why I fully expect this to happen here can't imagine this ever happening here.
They will use the word "fairness", which will confuse you because you thought you knew what that word meant.
"We're gonna be socialists, let's be socialists all across the board."
Ed Schultz link courtesy The Radio Equalizer via The Hostages
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
06:38 AM
| Comments (139)
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: dagny at March 26, 2010 07:07 AM (X2ScS)
Posted by: Fair-Minded Socialists at March 26, 2010 07:08 AM (RD7QR)
I'm suprised the guy lasted as long as he did -- Hugo's getting soft.
And Ed Schiesse can go orally pleasure a syphillitic yak.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 07:08 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Olliander at March 26, 2010 07:09 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: conscious, but mildly incoherent at March 26, 2010 07:09 AM (Vu6sl)
In other news: Upon hearing the joyful news that all freedom of speech in Venezuela is dead, Sean Penn was found masturbating in public, to a photo of his dear leader, the king of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 07:10 AM (0fzsA)
I'm suprised the guy lasted as long as he did -- Hugo's getting soft.
And Ed Schiesse can go orally pleasure a syphillitic yak.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 26, 2010 11:08 AM (5/yRG)
I can help Hugo with his little problem!
Posted by: Andee Sullyvan at March 26, 2010 07:10 AM (Vu6sl)
Obama IMHO is taunting the Right to cause violence. Then, anything goes. It will be for "security" purposes that we have new restrictions on our freedoms.
Posted by: PJ at March 26, 2010 07:10 AM (pizFh)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 26, 2010 07:11 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Randomly chosen syphilitic yak at March 26, 2010 07:11 AM (RD7QR)
9 Chubby and stupid. Remember the science test?
That's anti-fat hate speech but it is one of the hate speeches that isn't covered in order to end fattiness and save the environment.
Hate speech will only be that speech that is critical of this admin.
Posted by: dagny at March 26, 2010 07:11 AM (X2ScS)
I'm sure that Hugo was just worried that this guy's comments would cause "hate" amongst the public, inspiring them to become so angry that they would throw rocks through office windows even though the offices are located on the 30th floor.
Yup.. it's a darn good thing Hugo had a security force at his beck and call that is answerable to no one else that he could dispatch to arrest and jail this evil hate monger. Wonder if his armed goons were provided for in a health care bill too?
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 07:11 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2010 07:12 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 07:12 AM (mR7mk)
#10
"The chief proponent of this thinking – which amounts to an unprecedented government intrusion into our own country’s media -- is Professor Robert McChesney, founder of the Orwellian-named Free Press, one of the most influential organizations in the growing “media reform” movement on the far-left.
Free Press’ curious stance on media reform can best be summed up by McChesney who suggests that, “Any serious effort to reform the media system would have to necessarily be part of a revolutionary program to overthrow the capitalist system itself.""
Leftists must over-throw freedom to make life pure.
hmmm -what other historical figure did that?
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 07:14 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 26, 2010 07:15 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 07:15 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Sparky at March 26, 2010 07:16 AM (r0u40)
Don't forget the FCC getting involved with broadband. The FCC's original mandate supposedly was based on the airwaves being "owned by the people" therefore the government had the authority to regulate it.
Now they think they can regulate internet access. Keep in mind that the real original mandate for the FCC was to shutdown a popular opponent of FDR.
They did shut him down and got away with it. The "people" stood idly by.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 07:17 AM (QrA9E)
The left are so upset about talk radio. Never mind that the democrat/left own all the major news outlets like:
NBC
CBS
ABC
MSNBC
Time
Newsweek
The NY Times
The LA Times
etc...
btw- don't buy anything made by General Electric.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 07:19 AM (0fzsA)
don't buy anything made by General Electric.
Almost impossible. You know how big they are in turbines of all kinds?
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 07:20 AM (fx8sm)
btw- don't buy anything made by General Electric.
Way ahead of Ya. Drove 20 miles last year to avoid buying a GE hot water heater. Screw GE.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 07:21 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: PaleRider at March 26, 2010 07:21 AM (vBKqN)
People should be reminded of this fact...
I assume you also got Scott Brown's e-mail about his next possible opponent: Rachel Maddow. (I kid you not.)
(One wonders how MSNBC will replace such talents.)
Posted by: arhooley at March 26, 2010 07:22 AM (M/+ha)
Almost impossible. You know how big they are in turbines of all kinds?
Well, sure, but they also make household appliances.
I've noticed GE are advertising that they once sponsored Ronald Reagan. See!
When leftists have to trick and fool people to get you to buy something, I use my freedom of choice and just. say. no.
Of course that freedom of choice is diminishing as leftists gain power.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 07:22 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 26, 2010 07:22 AM (guQML)
He said the people year after year said "Oh they'll never do THAT!" to freedom after freedom. It can (has) happened here.
Posted by: AE at March 26, 2010 07:23 AM (kSfPT)
Posted by: General Electric at March 26, 2010 07:23 AM (4Kl5M)
First good news I've heard all month.
Posted by: the chicken at March 26, 2010 07:23 AM (M/+ha)
Almost impossible. You know how big they are in turbines of all kinds?
Buy /Rolls-Royce. Or Pratt & Whitney.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 07:23 AM (OlN4e)
Crisis Event: South Korean Ship Sinking In Yellow Sea Stratfor Today » March 26, 2010 | 1506 GMT
Applying STRATFOR analysis to breaking news
According to South KoreaÂ’s Yonhap News Agency, a 1,500-ton naval vessel
with a crew of 104 sank off of the island of Baengnyeong in the Yellow
Sea on March 26. Based on size and crew displacement it is likely
either an Ulsan-class guided missile frigate or a Po Hang-class
corvette. The incident took place between 9 and 10 a.m. local time. The
cause is unknown, but the BBC has reported that a torpedo was involved.
Seoul has said there was an explosion at the stern, and it is
investigating whether a torpedo attack from North Korea was the cause,
according to YTN TV. The contested waters between North and South Korea
do see the occasional naval clashes, but the loss of a surface
combatant on this scale would be extremely significant.
Posted by: Alexander at March 26, 2010 07:24 AM (2OAwL)
Posted by: Randomly chosen syphilitic yak at March 26, 2010 07:24 AM (RD7QR)
OT but serious news: S.Korean ship sinking, North attack suspected-media
SEOUL, March 26 (Reuters) - A South Korean naval vessel with more than 100 aboard was sinking on Friday in waters near North Korea and Seoul was investigating whether it was hit in a torpedo attack by the North, South Korean media said.
Broadcaster SBS said many South Korean sailors on the stricken vessel were feared dead.
South Korea's YTN TV network said the government was investigating whether the sinking was due to a torpedo attack by the North, and Yonhap news agency said the Seoul government had convened an emergency meeting of security-related ministers.
Yonhap also reported a South Korean navy ship firing towards an unidentified vessel to the north.
Posted by: Andee Sullyvan at March 26, 2010 07:24 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 26, 2010 07:24 AM (RkRxq)
Get one made by A. O. Smith. They have a factory in McBee, SC. Rednecks got to make a living too.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 07:25 AM (QrA9E)
Buy /Rolls-Royce. Or Pratt & Whitney.
Think power generation. If any new nuke plants are actually built, you can bet Wee Wee will make sure they're using GE generators.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 07:25 AM (fx8sm)
I think Ed Shultz should cut back to two fifths of Jack Black a day. You could get a tan standing too close to that face.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at March 26, 2010 07:26 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: mokimoki at March 26, 2010 07:26 AM (IrV7s)
Posted by: joncelli at March 26, 2010 07:27 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: John Galt at March 26, 2010 07:27 AM (F/4zf)
Get one made by A. O. Smith. They have a factory in McBee, SC. Rednecks got to make a living too.
Heh. Yes, we do.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 07:27 AM (OlN4e)
Eco-wackos are going to tie new plants up in court until well after Anybody's inauguration.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 26, 2010 07:27 AM (mR7mk)
Way ahead of Ya. Drove 20 miles last year to avoid buying a GE hot water heater. Screw GE.
Exercising your right to free speech.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 26, 2010 07:28 AM (0fzsA)
North Korea may have sunk a South Korean ship...
We need to drop Sheriff Joe behind the lines of the NORKs, let him reenact D-Day.
Posted by: Dang Straights at March 26, 2010 07:28 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Gaff at March 26, 2010 07:29 AM (jDWYv)
Not to worry anyway, none of the GE BWR plants are being planned or built (as far as I know). The two in GA and the ones elsewhere that are planned or Westinghouse PWRs.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 07:30 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: joncelli at March 26, 2010 07:31 AM (RD7QR)
If it's illegal to spread false information by "any medium" here, Obama will be taken away and never heard from again.
But he does get to keep his doctor.
Posted by: gus at March 26, 2010 07:33 AM (Vqruj)
Unless you get them all in one batch, the last one's always the toughest.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (ZJ/un)
We need to drop Sheriff Joe behind the lines of the NORKs, let him reenact D-Day.
The landing in Korea was at Veracruz. Everyone knows that.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (B+qrE)
Obama issues press release regarding S. Korean Naval incident:
Today, North Korea sank a South Korean Navy ship. This kind of action by North Korea is very unhelpful in our attempt to get them back to the negotiating table. I am asking them to avoid actions like this in the future.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (euuyg)
I have an economic question for the morons.
Do you own stocks in a non 401k or retirement account? If so do you plan on cashing out before Jan 1 2011 when all the higher tax rates go into affect?
i'm temped to pull as much money out of the private sector, and therefore out of the reach of the public sector, as i can.
Posted by: Ben at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Mal at March 26, 2010 11:30 AM (Z+qzA)
ANY communist dictator knows how to get what he wants from Obama: just phone the White House and TELL him.
It will be delivered in short order and all dissenting opinion branded as "RACIST!"
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 07:34 AM (ujg0T)
I'm not too familiar with Ed Schultz, but didn't he used to be a moderate/conservative democrat when he started on the radio?
Posted by: Ben at March 26, 2010 07:35 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: S Penn at March 26, 2010 07:36 AM (sGvp+)
Posted by: joncelli at March 26, 2010 07:36 AM (RD7QR)
OT
My Russkie engineer (legal naturalized citizen) has been very distressed since Zero was elected. He got more distressed when Healthscam passed. He came in this morning and asked me to help him pick out a shotgun and pistol. He came here to get away from communism.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 07:37 AM (OlN4e)
We need to drop Sheriff Joe behind the lines of the NORKs, let him reenact D-Day.
Anyone else get a mental image of John Belushi with his face blacked trying to be stealthy and sneaking into the Dean's office in animal house? Lol
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 07:37 AM (e8T35)
Lil Kim knows how to get goodies out of Obama.
The squeaky wheel get the grease free money along with a slap on the hand.
I pretty sure Barry will be sending a delegation very soon for lessons on how to crush the opposition like a grape negotiations.
Posted by: madtechie at March 26, 2010 07:37 AM (B+bWF)
Posted by: evil libertarian at March 26, 2010 07:37 AM (DkJhM)
are you getting this, Fox News Channel?
Posted by: White House Office of Communications at March 26, 2010 07:38 AM (JL3qV)
Posted by: Bugler at March 26, 2010 07:38 AM (YCVBL)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 26, 2010 07:40 AM (7VvJB)
Because free speech is such a precious resource that it must be rationed.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at March 26, 2010 07:40 AM (pZEar)
77 Imagine a boot MADE AT A GOVERMENT FACTORY AT 'FAIR' WAGES stamping on a human face forever.
-your future.
Sorry. Needed to correct.
Posted by: madtechie at March 26, 2010 07:40 AM (B+bWF)
Posted by: Pyrocles at March 26, 2010 07:41 AM (xzSvW)
My Russkie engineer (legal naturalized citizen) has been very distressed since Zero was elected. He got more distressed when Healthscam passed. He came in this morning and asked me to help him pick out a shotgun and pistol. He came here to get away from communism.
If he's not to familiar with weapons I'd recommend something in a 12-14 gauge pump for the shotgun, probably a 14 unless he's fired one before. Plenty of stopping power, but a lot less recoil and a lot easier to use for the novice. Also much better for home defense purposes since even with buckshot it won't penetrate most interior walls so a stray round probably won't end up killing somebody you give a rat's butt about.
For a pistol Smith and Wesson revolvers, something in a .38 would probably be a good choice. Again revolvers being much easier to store and use overall for a novice.
If he's somewhat familiar with firearms then my personal choice in shotguns is mossberg, and for pistols I prefer something in the 9mm category with high ammo capacity. Glock and Beretta both being nice, reliable and accurate in my experience.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 07:42 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent at March 26, 2010 07:42 AM (Vu6sl)
My Russkie engineer (legal naturalized citizen) has been very distressed since Zero was elected. He got more distressed when Healthscam passed. He came in this morning and asked me to help him pick out a shotgun and pistol. He came here to get away from communism.
maddogg: Where do you live? Here in the Sacramento area, which for some reason became a magnet for Slavic immigrants (kind of refreshing to see non-English signs in Russian rather than just Spanish, in an odd way), I hear the same sentiments all the time.
They also see the Gay Putsch of CA state politics as an attempt to destroy their freedom of religion. The Slavs here tend to be quite religious as well.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 07:43 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at March 26, 2010 07:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: GarandFan at March 26, 2010 07:48 AM (6mwMs)
Posted by: AP at March 26, 2010 07:55 AM (YmPwQ)
Maybe this is why Obama/Pelosi/Reid et al don't seem the slightest bit worried about the November 2010 elections.
Perhaps FAIRNESS is coming sooner than we think, and they know it.
Posted by: Boots at March 26, 2010 07:57 AM (06JTY)
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 08:01 AM (ujg0T)
Posted by: evil libertarian at March 26, 2010 08:04 AM (DkJhM)
Ed Schultz just said "it's time for Congress to even out the audience". That goes way beyond even forcing equal time on air for every point of view and opinion, regardless of the demand of the consumers. Just think about that...even out the audience.
I consider the ramifications of this statement to be even worse than Ed Schultz allowing his spittle to come into contact with my face.
Posted by: MostlyRight at March 26, 2010 08:11 AM (0aCXd)
Ed Schultz just said "it's time for Congress to even out the audience".
Funny, I just said "it's time to even out Ed Schultz".
Dunno what that means, but it sounds eliminationist.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at March 26, 2010 08:21 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at March 26, 2010 08:30 AM (kiQZz)
Posted by: dananjcon at March 26, 2010 08:33 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Optimizer at March 26, 2010 08:37 AM (JC+x3)
Posted by: Johnny Beigler at March 26, 2010 08:40 AM (RYmQ5)
For a pistol Smith and Wesson revolvers, something in a .38 would probably be a good choice. Again revolvers being much easier to store and use overall for a novice.
I shall soon be purchasing a 4" Ruger GP-100 .357.
A good gun by all accounts, with effectively no difference with the S&W as a close range weapon except it is about $100 cheaper at $450. By many accounts possibly the toughest and most reliable .357 revolver ever made.
Posted by: Carl Sagan at March 26, 2010 08:46 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Sean Penn at March 26, 2010 08:54 AM (mka2b)
for pistols I prefer something in the 9mm category with high ammo capacity. Glock and Beretta both being nice
They are.
But IMO, 9mm is too small. If I shoot you, you should die from it.
If you don't die, you should at least get knocked on your ass anyway.
As I see it, you do not need more rounds - you need better aim. If you can't drop 1-2 targets with 6 .357 rounds you have a bigger problem that more ammo won't really fix.
If you're engauging more then 3 targets, you're in a damn battle space and you need a damn submachine gun. 22-rounds of semi-auto 9mm isn't gonna cut it either.
Also I'll say for a beginner, I think a glock is harder to shoot then a revolver.
Revolvers are generally heavier and so have less recoil and are more accurate then pistols.
Glocks are featherweight guns. I've held plastic squirt guns that were heavier then a Glock .45.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 08:56 AM (IsLT6)
A good gun by all accounts, with effectively no difference with the S&W as a close range weapon except it is about $100 cheaper at $450. By many accounts possibly the toughest and most reliable .357 revolver ever made.
It is a nice gun, but I shy away from recommending .357 to most beginners. Great stopping power but high recoil can be pretty intimidating to first time shooters.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 09:01 AM (e8T35)
Not so if done properly. My wife had never shot a pistol before. I started her out on a S&W Model 19 with hot loaded .357 rounds. She was doing fine with it before using up half a box of shells. (5" group at about 20 feet).
A .357 doesn't really kick that much but it is damn loud so make sure they know to use hearing protection when practicing.
A .357 is a good weapon for all around carry but for concealed I prefer the .45 in the Colt model 1911A1 cut down version. Now that one is NOT for a beginner.
Best home defense is still the good old 12 gauge shotgun using 6 shot.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:10 AM (QrA9E)
True... but on a medium or large frame revolver, honestly, I do not notice any difference between (say, 120gr) .357 and .38.
More flash, more bang, but not really any difference in punch - which is VERY slight anyway compared to like a Glock.
For certain .38's or low grain .357's out out a heavy .357 revolver have less kickback then .9mm or .38 coming out of a lot of pistols.
Plus if you please you can shoot .38's out of it until you're not a beginner anymore.
And then, graduate to what is probably the most effective and versatile handgun round without having to get another gun.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:13 AM (IsLT6)
Sean Penn must be so proud of all the fellatio he gives Hugo.
Posted by: Bruce the Robert at March 26, 2010 09:14 AM (3ZwGl)
But IMO, 9mm is too small. If I shoot you, you should die from it.
If you don't die, you should at least get knocked on your ass anyway.
As I see it, you do not need more rounds - you need better aim. If you can't drop 1-2 targets with 6 .357 rounds you have a bigger problem that more ammo won't really fix.
I'll stick with my trusty 9mm. Granted, won't penetrate most bullet proof vests. Don't much care. At pistol ranges two or three rounds center mass will put your target down even if they don't penetrate, and I can normally squeeze off 2 to 3 in the same time it takes me to bring something higher calibre back on target from barrel climb. Getting hit with 9mm at those ranges will feel a lot like getting hit by a car or being worked over by baseball bats even if they don't go through the vest itself. Either way your taret is down, no longer returning fire and if necessary you can always follow up later with a headshot at a motionless, helpless target.
.357 is a nice round, good stopping power, but the high recoil means follow up is a bit slower even for an experienced shooter. Also I prefer weapons that don't have as much "carry", meaning they don't penetrate interior walls quite as easily and cut down on the stray round problem. If I do miss I'd rather have that round run out of energy quick rather than run the risk of hitting something I really didn't want hit.
Also I prefer something with a higher ammo capacity from my military days. If it hits the fan I'd rather not have to stop and worry about reloading until I'm fairly certain I'm under a decent amount of cover. Not as likely that this would be a consideration now, but if nothing else I like knowing I have a few extra rounds in case my target has taken cover and I need to keep his sorry ass occupied until I can move to a better position.
I also generally recommend revolvers for new shooters, pretty much zero chance of a feed problem, and the weight does provide a nice stable platform. Much easier to use, maintain and store for a novice shooter than an automatic.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 09:16 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 26, 2010 09:21 AM (GgR+e)
True... but on a medium or large frame revolver, honestly, I do not notice any difference between (say, 120gr) .357 and .38.
Hmm.. hadn't considered that... my experience with .357 was 158 grain wad cutters, suppose if you were to use a more standard 120 grain load in a good sized revolver that would cut down recoil considerably.
The noise factor would probably still be a consideration for most novices, at least until they got enough practice to realize that it makes a really loud bang, but on the upside considering most of the folks you'd likely be shooting at would be novices as well might be a bit of an advantage.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 26, 2010 09:24 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: mesablue at March 26, 2010 09:25 AM (jc7YC)
The .45ACP Glock hops on me. It's not bad, nothing I'm not perfectly fine with shooting 100 rounds out of, but it goes up a good couple inches with a shot and I have to bring it back down.
Not so with a hefty 50 ounce revolver. It pretty much just makes noise but stays put.
The .45ACP Glock is probably the most kickback I've ever experienced on a handgun. But I would not put it past my mother to fire it.
(Now, I've seen fired but never happened to fire the .454 casull and .50 AE type handguns and that's a whole different story. I saw a guy firing a .50 S&W revolver last Saturday. You feel the pressure wave 3 booths over. It's like *pop*pop*pop*pop*pop*BAWWWOOOOM* and then the whole range goes silent for a minute except for the guy shouting 'HAHAHA OH YEAH!").
But on the Glock, honestly I think the 9 or 10 rounds of ammunition that go in weigh more then the empty gun does. So it just hops around on you and is hard to hold still for me.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:27 AM (IsLT6)
The velocity of the rounds depends on barrel length and the rate of burn of the powder used.
A .357 with a 6" barrel using slower burning pistol powder will develop much higher velocity than a 9mm in an auto. However, if you use a cut down 2" barrel you have to go to a faster burning powder and there is some difference in velocity but not much.
That is if you load your own. Factory shells usually compromise in both directions.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:28 AM (QrA9E)
*pop*pop*pop*pop*pop*BAWWWOOOOM* and then the whole range goes silent for a minute except for the guy shouting 'HAHAHA OH YEAH!").
And then, 30 seconds later, "You wanna fire it? My hand hurts."
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:30 AM (IsLT6)
The velocity of the rounds depends on barrel length and the rate of burn of the powder used.
They were factory rounds.
So you're saying that the noise and flash increased, but not the kickback, I was using too slow burning a powder and it was escaping the gun?
It was a 6" barrel I was firing. But the ammo was el-cheapo stuff.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:33 AM (IsLT6)
Outside of a civil war (which is what the Administration is trying to orchestrate, btw), the most effective way to deal with these anti-American domestic enemies like Schultz is to capture the Senate and House and then start impeaching socialist enemy judges. Then we can reverse the '50's ruling about "Teaching Communism does not equal Advocation of Violent Overthrow since, ya know, they're just Teaching about Advocation." Socialism, international (communism), national (naziism/fascism), or petit are all incompatible with our Constitutional Republic and are based on the requirement that the Constitution and our culture be destroyed. Same as with monarchists - they're not able to be Americans if they adhere to such vile political cults. By definition they are all guilty of sedition at the least.
Instead of pretending they aren't seditious traitors; strip every fucking one of those enemy lickspittles like Schultz of their hated American Citizenship, sieze all their assets, and deport them AND their families to North Korea, Venezuela, or Cuba. If they have children under the age of 12, have them taken away to prevent the innocent kids from being abused by socialist/communist indoctrination.
But seriously, I can see no way that the like of them and real Americans can anymore co-exist. They are an absolute and imminent threat to liberty. They must be ejected from our Republic for it to survive.
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at March 26, 2010 09:35 AM (O6c08)
A .357 is a good weapon for all around carry but for concealed I prefer the .45 in the Colt model 1911A1 cut down version. Now that one is NOT for a beginner.
And there you have it too - There is no carry at all in my state.
My penchant for bigass revolvers is not totally seperate from the fact that concealed carry usage is not even an afterthought for me.
Trying to shove a 6" large frame .357 S&W revolver into my pants would be awkward.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:38 AM (IsLT6)
Plus, as was said, it eliminates the problem of shooting some one(thing) you don't wish to. I'd select that over my beloved M-1911 just about every time.
Posted by: irongrampa at March 26, 2010 09:41 AM (ud5dN)
Posted by: huerfano at March 26, 2010 09:41 AM (gLSaO)
@ 85 Stuck
A 14 Guage? How many of those do you have? I have fired many many rounds through a Remington 870. No malfunctions. I would stake my life on that shotgun.And Revolver is best choice, with Tarus being a good value, probably in .357. But I have Rugers among others. S&W, like Colt is mighty pricey
@87 Curmudgeon
He came in through Seattle, and his Dad still lives there. But he is now an Arkie. Says the Grey Squirrel is most dangerous animal in Arkansas. Heh, one whipped his ass in his own attic...
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 09:43 AM (OlN4e)
What I understood from your post was that you didn't feel like you were getting any increase in "punch" from the .357. I used to prefer Speer bullets in either the 125 gr or 140 gr semi-jacketed hollow point. I used a slow burning Hercules pistol powder and got high velocity with the 125 gr bullets.
A faster burning powder is needed for the short barrels such as a 2" snub nose or in the typical automatic which only has a 2" floating barrel. I forget the name now but I used a ball type powder than burned very fast.
If you were firing a commercial round in a 6" barrel revolver you should have got all the burn you can get from that round. Normally they gear theirs up as a compromise faster than the slow but slower than the fastest.
In any cased you should get a lot more punch from a 6" barrel .357 than you get from a 9mm glock. I will call once exception to that because someone mentioned 158 gr wadcutters up earlier.
A non-jacked soft lead wad-cutter will not give you much punch at all. They have to severely low loaded to prevent lead fouling in the barrel. A friend of mine worked in printing company that his father owned and he used to cast bullets from lino-type which is harder than normal soft lead. He could fire one cylinder of lino-type bullets and the barrel would lead so bad the groups would expand to 12 or 14 inches at short distances.
The next time you are in a sporting goods store see if they have any reloading manual and check out the relative velocities of the more common rounds and loads. It will probably surprise you.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:47 AM (QrA9E)
I carried my Model 19 in a holster on my hip unconcealed in GA. (w/ a permit)
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:50 AM (QrA9E)
Vic
I managed to get 850 fps out of a 2 1/2" snubbie in .44 special using Power Pistol. Thats pretty good punch from a shubbie with 200 grain bullets. Yes, I used a crony.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 09:51 AM (OlN4e)
In the .357 revolvers I've been looking at, the Taurus and the S&W are basically the same price (I'd go with S&W with no price difference) and the Colt is fricken a good bit more.
The Ruger revolvers (as I am told and have seen) run about $100 less then equivalent S&W and Taurus guns, and the Colts maybe $200-300 more.
Ruger GP-100 runs about $450, a S&W and a 7-shot Taurus about $550 and Colt like, I dunno, a Python is $1200 or something. That was the first thing I looked at and immediately ruled out on grounds of price.
Rossi (made by Taurus) is as cheap as the GP-100 or maybe cheaper but I'm skeptical of those guns. And they all seem much lighter in weight.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 09:53 AM (IsLT6)
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (QrA9E)
Vic
BTW, I shoot cast lead bullets with no lead fouling. I use Liquid Alox from Lee dusted with mika powder dry lube to take away the stickiness.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 09:54 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:57 AM (QrA9E)
126 850 fps is about what you get from a 200 gr .45 IIANM. That will definitely put someone on the ground whether they are wearing body armor or not.
Yes, and in a lightweight CC revolver, most umpleasant to shoot. But lethal.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 09:57 AM (OlN4e)
That buddy of mine used some kind of lube as well but still had a lot of fouling. He was also trying for high velocity in a .357 with the cast bullets.
I am assuming you are talking about the 850 fps .44.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 09:58 AM (QrA9E)
I am assuming you are talking about the 850 fps .44.
Yes, My son had the revolver, and tried cast bullets in it with quite a bit of fouling. He sold me the pistol cheap, and I made some mods, and used the Liquid Alox bullet lube. No fouling, none. I love the hateful little thing.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 10:01 AM (OlN4e)
That's good.
I have also heard that if you load 3 lead rounds and then followed by a jacketed round that it will clean the fouling out.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 10:09 AM (QrA9E)
I have also heard that if you load 3 lead rounds and then followed by a jacketed round that it will clean the fouling out.
I couldn't say, never having tried it. I just use the lube. And your buddy should buy Richard Lee's book on reloading. He has several chapters devoted to working up the correct alloys for cast bullets. And with gas checks, he says 2500 fps can be attained without fouling. I haven't advanced to rifle bullets as yet, but you can work up your own alloys, or Midwest USA has many casting alloys ready for the melting pot. Along with molds, gas checks, and everything else you need. Lee bullet molds are great and cost less than all others.
Posted by: maddogg at March 26, 2010 10:22 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Brian & Dianne at March 26, 2010 10:31 AM (ITzbJ)
LOL, I haven't seen him in a long time. All that was going on in another State over 30 years ago. He may have found some new stuff by now.
I used to have a Hornady Book, a Speer Book, and a book that came with the press. I liked the Speer stuff the best because they had an "accuracy" load for each bullet design.
I got out of the reloading business a long time ago because it got so expensive for the components and where I live now there are not many good places to go shoot anyway.
Posted by: Vic at March 26, 2010 10:45 AM (QrA9E)
Who cares? The only decent Venezuelan products are their luscious women.
Reason enough to do a Noriega job on Chavez, right now.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 26, 2010 12:43 PM (ujg0T)
Posted by: pst314 at March 26, 2010 02:40 PM (OA547)
Those aren't "progressives", those are hardcore Stalinist communists. The typical mush brained do-gooder progressive would not support such things.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at March 26, 2010 04:06 PM (FpwsP)
But on the Glock, honestly I think the 9 or 10 rounds of ammunition that go in weigh more then the empty gun does. So it just hops around on you and is hard to hold still for me.
Posted by: Entropy at March 26, 2010 01:27 PM (IsLT6)
I'm honestly trying to understand how those words put together mean something.
Sarcasm aside, a Glock .45 recoils about like a .22. I've never even seen anyone have a problem with one. Eees confusing.
And to the prior statements about a 14-gauge shotgun, I think there's a little confusion about the characteristics of a survival gun. For example, if you need to call up a historical society to get ammunition, it's probably not a good choice. You can get loads for 12-gauge at any power level you like.
And the guns don't cost $20 grand because they were handmade by Priests of Vulcan, either.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at March 26, 2010 11:53 PM (bxiXv)
In the right hands, a .22 will suffice for home defense. Anything more powerful will do more damage to your home than it will do to a burglar.
Personally, I prefer a baseball bat. Dianne prefers a cast iron skillet. Although a burglar in our home would be more likely to break his neck tripping over our sons' toys than to sustain a lump on his head in this house.
Posted by: Brian & Dianne at March 27, 2010 01:30 AM (ITzbJ)
The foreigner spoke a lot. But I didn't know which vocabulary he spoke. it absolutely was not Chinese, nor Japanese. Was he speaking Spanish?" Could you talk Chinese? Which vocabulary do you talk just now?" I asked. most ideal after silence for just about any while, the foreigner answered possessing only a little disappointment. "I'm an Englishman. I spoke chinese language program with you just now." Oh, my god, the tears arrived out even although i experienced been laughing. "You'd much better talk English." He started out to talk and talked a lot. thinking about that his chinese language program was truly poor, I attempted speaking with him in English.
After numerous words, he asked, "Are you speaking Latin? I couldn't catch any term which you said. I can completely grasp a complete great offer should you talk Chinese." Oh, my goodness. "Is my English truly poor? No, I don't think so. possibly he is definitely an Englishman who can not completely grasp traditional American English." I mentioned to myself.
Thank the merchants
Posted by: credit at June 19, 2011 08:15 AM (M4LS/)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2017 seconds, 267 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Sean f'in Penn at March 26, 2010 07:05 AM (4Kl5M)