February 06, 2010
— DrewM Started a bit ago and it's on Fox now.
She's making fun of Sheriff Joe and Hope & Change. That's kind of fun.
Posted by: DrewM at
05:26 PM
| Comments (262)
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: sonnyspats at February 06, 2010 05:31 PM (68tQb)
She seems off. Stumbling a bit in places.
Having said that, I can't remember ever seeing a woman with such great hair. She's absolutely stunning.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 09:28 PM (P33XN)
She goes off on tangents now and then, but it's funny because it usually is multiple slams against the Administration.
And all without a teleprompter--no stuttering, no uhs and ums. Brilliant.
Posted by: enoxo at February 06, 2010 05:34 PM (hAXQ2)
Posted by: trainer at February 06, 2010 05:34 PM (yCWYQ)
Posted by: sonnyspats at February 06, 2010 05:35 PM (68tQb)
She's had some great lines.
Posted by: trainer at February 06, 2010 09:34 PM (yCWYQ)
Uh, it's been about 32-minutes.
Posted by: Editor at February 06, 2010 05:35 PM (YX6i/)
OMIGOD, she tends to ramble during a speech like a Real Person, instead of reading from the teleprompters without fail? Oh how terrible.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 06, 2010 05:36 PM (1gQUY)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 05:37 PM (M4JV6)
Posted by: trainer at February 06, 2010 05:38 PM (yCWYQ)
Posted by: garrett at February 06, 2010 05:38 PM (xCF2m)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 09:37 PM (M4JV6)
fify
Posted by: Teri Hatcher at February 06, 2010 05:39 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: DM! at February 06, 2010 05:39 PM (O0Qwy)
Posted by: Dick_Nixon at February 06, 2010 05:39 PM (Itnem)
Todd needs to drop to his knees every morning and thank the one most high for his good fortune in marrying a woman like Sarah.
I suddenly realized I support the idea of cloning. Let's clone a few million Sarah Palins. Kill feminism with one stroke.
Although she's stumbled a few times, it's definitely awesome she doesn't use a teleprompter. No tennis match head here. Sarah will look directly at you to tell you what she thinks.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 05:39 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: Teri Hatcher at February 06, 2010 05:40 PM (YX6i/)
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 05:41 PM (Ei3oZ)
I donated a dollar for every orgasm that occurred in the Kinzinger thread. I cannot afford to to that here!
You can donate to Kinzinger through www.redstate.com .
And you should because under Obama you will be taxed every time you put your hand between your legs.
Posted by: mghorning at February 06, 2010 05:43 PM (nfz/V)
And you should because under Obama you will be taxed every time you put your hand between your legs.
I could single handedly pay off the national debt if this is true.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 05:44 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 05:46 PM (P33XN)
Posted by: mystry at February 06, 2010 05:46 PM (kmgIE)
Posted by: logprof at February 06, 2010 05:47 PM (gJL6J)
Posted by: sonnyspats at February 06, 2010 09:44 PM (68tQb)
I swear for a second there she was starting to tear up herself.
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 05:47 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: Zombie-droid 37542 at February 06, 2010 05:47 PM (C39a6)
Posted by: SlaveDog at February 06, 2010 05:47 PM (W+E+o)
Posted by: steevy at February 06, 2010 05:47 PM (WPoqe)
Posted by: 48%er at February 06, 2010 05:48 PM (Nu1ow)
Bringing this forward from the afternoon thread....
416
409 No I just meant that she's looking down a lot--who cares, I say.
I agree. She's made a couple slips and lost her place once or twice, but I'd rather enjoy listening to the mesage than nit-pick about her presentation.
Definitely agree with the message being delivered. It's been too long since an American politician spoke this way.
Posted by: NC Ref at February 06, 2010 09:33 PM (OhdlH)
Posted by: NC Ref at February 06, 2010 05:49 PM (OhdlH)
Posted by: beerologist at February 06, 2010 05:49 PM (tgXx6)
Posted by: enoxo at February 06, 2010 05:50 PM (hAXQ2)
Huh. For almost an hour, I thought she was black.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 09:49 PM (P33XN)
Was she clean and articulate?
Posted by: Joe Soapy Biden at February 06, 2010 05:50 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 05:50 PM (M4JV6)
Posted by: eman at February 06, 2010 05:51 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: mystry at February 06, 2010 05:51 PM (kmgIE)
Posted by: joe biden at February 06, 2010 05:51 PM (nfz/V)
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 05:52 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: mystry at February 06, 2010 09:51 PM (kmgIE)
Come on man, that would be like making Mark McGuire play without his 'roids.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 06, 2010 05:52 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: Charles Johnson at February 06, 2010 05:53 PM (C39a6)
Let me tell ya, this Palin woman's got nuthin' on Fightin' Joe Biden!
Has she ever evaded sniper fire in Afghanistan?
Where was she during the Meow Meow Uprising of 1977?
Did she rally her troops on Bunker Green, crying, "Don't fire until you can see clear all the way to Russia!"?
How many super-secret missions has she led?
Posted by: Sheriff Joe Biden at February 06, 2010 05:53 PM (gJL6J)
Posted by: quite googleable at February 06, 2010 05:53 PM (EiH7n)
"Who cares what an irrelevant lamestream media has to say about you!"
God love ya, Sarah! I know I do.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 05:53 PM (M4JV6)
Please, please don't let her run. Or, if she does, let her lose in the primaries. And I saw this as someone who loved her in 2008.
She's been tainted. Maybe it's fair, maybe it's not . . . but it's true. Sarah Palin has become the love child of Dan Quayle and Jerry Springer. She will never be a series contender.
Posted by: S. Alito at February 06, 2010 05:53 PM (GiUTT)
Cadence. That's it. I've been trying to explain to my wife what bugs me about the way she speaks. I love what she says, just not the way she says it. It's almost like she's reciting sentences.
Posted by: TC at February 06, 2010 05:54 PM (1qoYm)
Come on man, that would be like making Mark McGuire play without his 'roids.
Posted by: 18-1 at February 06, 2010 09:52 PM (bgcml)
Been with my dad too much lately - my first thought wasn't to steroids but hemorrhoids.
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 05:55 PM (Ei3oZ)
Posted by: eman at February 06, 2010 05:57 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: Holger at February 06, 2010 05:58 PM (8NGHm)
what are you a homo? heh heh
Posted by: sonnyspats at February 06, 2010 09:54 PM (68tQb)
Watch it there, cupcake.Posted by: SlaveDog at February 06, 2010 05:59 PM (W+E+o)
Posted by: S. Alito at February 06, 2010 09:53 PM (GiUTT)
I don't think she is permanently tainted, but there will be significant linger effects from the State Media smear job into 2012. Probably the best thing for her is to help conservatives in the 2010 elections, and then focus on getting back into the political game.
Replace Steele? Found that Conservative Party that I am always suggesting?
Of course there is an argument to be made that as people slowly wake up to the fact that the media and Obama lied to them, they may be very open to the person who has been pointing this out from the beginning - and that would be Palin...
Posted by: 18-1 at February 06, 2010 06:00 PM (bgcml)
Posted by: eman at February 06, 2010 06:00 PM (4tixt)
Stupid Fox.
Just as the audience starts to cheer for Sarah when the phrase "President Pain" is uttered, they go back to Geraldo.
Blech.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 06:00 PM (M4JV6)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 06:01 PM (oeESr)
Posted by: joe biden at February 06, 2010 06:01 PM (nfz/V)
Stupid Fox.
Just as the audience starts to cheer for Sarah when the phrase "President Pain" is uttered, they go back to Geraldo.
Blech.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 10:00 PM (M4JV6)
CSPAN!!
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 06:01 PM (Ei3oZ)
Maybe she can get the act together for '16 or '20, but she's not ready to be POTUS now or in '12.
If all the droolers could look beyond the legs, they ought to realize that she needs more seasoning and experience.
Don't tell me the Chicago Jesus didn't/doesn't have the resume for the job either. He's screwed up monumentally. We don't need someone else who's busy finding her footing and is a somewhat more organized speaker/thinker.
Posted by: Chapeau du Tinfoil at February 06, 2010 06:01 PM (3Qk8d)
Asked about the "Palin Plan" she mentioned two things: Getting the government out of the way of the people (a total paraphrase there, but that's the gist of it), and in the war on terror, she quoted Reagan: "We win, they lose" (doing everything we can to win this war).
That got a standing applause.
Posted by: K~Bob at February 06, 2010 06:02 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: SlaveDog at February 06, 2010 06:03 PM (W+E+o)
I {heart} SP!
Posted by: TheresaD at February 06, 2010 06:04 PM (iGCmo)
Bad me.
We don't need someone else who is busy finding his/her footing in the nation's biggest job and needs to become a somewhat more organized speaker/thinker.
Posted by: Chapeau du Tinfoil at February 06, 2010 06:05 PM (3Qk8d)
She could be a Senator and you'd say, we'll she quit as a Gov. She could be Speaker of the House and you'd say she'd need to be a Senator.
You sound like someone that will never think she has enough experience, so try again please.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 06, 2010 06:05 PM (M4JV6)
...and as we saw in 2008, how you say something is more important to voters than what's being said.
Scares and sickens me, but that's how it is.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 06, 2010 06:05 PM (OkT2m)
I forgot Palin was white for about and hour.
Posted by: exceller at February 06, 2010 06:05 PM (Z7Znk)
Posted by: steevy at February 06, 2010 06:06 PM (WPoqe)
Sarah spoke about the founding fathers. If you missed it I would highly recommend linking to a vid of her complete speech. Palin was impressive!
Posted by: sonnyspats at February 06, 2010 06:06 PM (68tQb)
Posted by: joe biden at February 06, 2010 06:07 PM (nfz/V)
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 06:08 PM (Ei3oZ)
iirc, didn't B.Clinton get 200K or 250K for his speaking fees? I remember seeing on CNN how this proved he was teh best president evah! No mention of how evil he was for accepting filthy money to speak somewhere...
(of course those huge fees where just another way to pump slush money into the Dem system, eh?)
Posted by: 5Cats at February 06, 2010 06:08 PM (HBEhc)
Posted by: Hussein Obama at February 06, 2010 06:09 PM (C39a6)
Posted by: eman the Moderate at February 06, 2010 06:10 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: steevy at February 06, 2010 06:10 PM (WPoqe)
Posted by: Some NOW hag at February 06, 2010 06:12 PM (M4JV6)
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 06:15 PM (Ei3oZ)
I didn't see anybody named Underpants on the de donation thread for Kinzinger at www.redstate.com .
Just saying.
Posted by: joe biden at February 06, 2010 06:15 PM (nfz/V)
I love what she says, just not the way she says it.
The preference for style over substance is puzzling to me, but that's how we got where we are. MLKing said something about people not being judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I like the meaning of that even when it's applied to the way someone gives a speech.
Posted by: huerfano at February 06, 2010 06:17 PM (lLqRQ)
- You mean like the World "Series", genius?
"Maybe she can get the act together for '16 or '20, but she's not ready to be POTUS now or in '12."
- Well, I am sure you are an extraordinary successful individual and therefore I highly value your opinion. Thanks.
Posted by: Henry Von Douche at February 06, 2010 06:17 PM (4cFg/)
Posted by: polly at February 06, 2010 06:17 PM (/oEAz)
Scares and sickens me, but that's how it is.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 06, 2010 10:05 PM (OkT2m)
--Alas, I have to agree. Even though some of the 0bots from '08 will graduate and have to deal with the real world, there will still be a whole new crop o' stupids in college in 2012.
Posted by: logprof at February 06, 2010 06:18 PM (gJL6J)
I HATE this argument. Palin is not stupid, leave that meme to the left.
Palin is not stupid, agreed. She DOES, however, need to bone up on foreign and domestic policy minutia. And it's no shame to admit that; all politicians graduating to the national stage need to. She needs to do so to make her a more well-rounded candidate, and to avoid any embarrassing gaffes that you know the MSM is going to be salivating for. No more Couric moments. That's an unforced error that can easily be eliminated.
Posted by: Ombudsman at February 06, 2010 06:18 PM (y4B2y)
Now if by "a lot" you mean "every now and then" then sure.
If by "a lot" you mean "a lot," then no.
Posted by: K~Bob at February 06, 2010 06:20 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: gus at February 06, 2010 06:20 PM (MaqIC)
"God, family, military... completely predictable. She sounded like a hatemong-"
At which point we changed the channel.
Posted by: Filly at February 06, 2010 06:20 PM (FDfio)
great speech without a telepromter. Maybe Obama should take lessons
instead of a chin to the air a humble downward look works best
Posted by: unseen at February 06, 2010 06:21 PM (aVGmX)
Posted by: eman at February 06, 2010 06:22 PM (4tixt)
Posted by: gus at February 06, 2010 06:22 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: mystry at February 06, 2010 06:22 PM (kmgIE)
Sarah did just fine.
She may not dazzle the elites, but ordinary country loving folks get her message just fine.
Time will tell if she wants to run in 2012.
Until then the country will be getting an up close look at a "college lecturer", running the land they love, into a ditch.
God Bless America, God Bless Sarah.
Posted by: solitary knight at February 06, 2010 06:24 PM (pVXvT)
Did anyone else see her start to choke up when she mentioned Reagan and disabled children? I just hit rewind to see it again.
Love Palin.
Posted by: Kristi at February 06, 2010 06:24 PM (7GgDy)
Posted by: gus at February 06, 2010 06:24 PM (MaqIC)
Did she go to Columbia? No. So quit the hatin'
Did she go to Harvard? No. So stfu.
Only half black men who go into East Coast Ivy League elitist Universities are worthy of the TELEPROMPTER.
Posted by: gus at February 06, 2010 06:28 PM (MaqIC)
Posted by: mystry at February 06, 2010 06:28 PM (kmgIE)
Posted by: enoxo at February 06, 2010 06:29 PM (hAXQ2)
iirc, didn't B.Clinton get 200K or 250K for his speaking fees? I remember seeing on CNN how this proved he was teh best president evah! No mention of how evil he was for accepting filthy money to speak somewhere...
(of course those huge fees where just another way to pump slush money into the Dem system, eh?)
Posted by: 5Cats at February 06, 2010 10:08 PM (HBEhc)
As I recall he got millions from Uzbekistan for some reason. It is not really clear why, unless they thought Hillary was going to win the election, and it would have been a good way to bribe her.
Of course when Clinton left office, he sold pardons, so he is an old hand at bribery...
Posted by: 18-1 at February 06, 2010 06:30 PM (bgcml)
Did anyone else see her start to choke up when she mentioned Reagan and disabled children? I just hit rewind to see it again.
Love Palin.
Posted by: Kristi at February 06, 2010 10:24 PM (7GgDy)
I did! I thought it was just me - glad someone else picked up on that.
Posted by: tdpwells at February 06, 2010 06:31 PM (Ei3oZ)
She does exactly what she needs to do: articulate the philosophy, show the guts to follow through, and leave the details to the experts.
We have President Smartest Badass Ever To Hold Office, with the highest IQ (so high that no one knows how high it is), currently proving that a grounding in solid philosophy that has been historically proven to work is worth much more than all the IQ points the elitists can scrape together.
Posted by: K~Bob at February 06, 2010 06:33 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: Fresh Air at February 06, 2010 06:35 PM (1yI48)
Posted by: divad murf at February 06, 2010 06:40 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at February 06, 2010 06:40 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: exceller at February 06, 2010 06:41 PM (Z7Znk)
OK, "minutia" is the wrong term. I didn't mean to imply that she needs to be a policy wonk. My point is a candidate on the national stage for the first time needs to prove she has a grasp of the issues. That's just basic competence.
Don't get me wrong, I love Palin. But considering the fact that she was governor of Alaska and that she will get no breaks from the media, she needs to over-demonstrate basic competence in order to earn the confidence of the general electorate
Posted by: Ombudsman at February 06, 2010 06:42 PM (y4B2y)
Posted by: franksalterego
No, you're not.
It'd be a good fit for her.
Posted by: Iskandar at February 06, 2010 06:42 PM (/o58C)
We in the educated class know what it takes because we read lots of stuff.
Can someone help me find my car? I can't find it because someone took down the signs that I read
Posted by: David Brooks at February 06, 2010 06:45 PM (sYxEE)
Sarah fired a bazooka at Obama's cocoon. There will be
days of the MSM trying to parse this as a "hateful speech", of NO use to political discourse. They will
fail. She rocked HER group. That was her purpose.
And she did it without 5 lbs of pancake makeup or
or a size 20 pantsuit. She may not be presidential
fodder, but she has the Libs' knees going ...JELLO!
Orrin Hatch and Mitch McConnell should take her
course in inspiring the base.
Posted by: grizzlybare at February 06, 2010 06:46 PM (V5kav)
Posted by: Kathleen Parker at February 06, 2010 06:47 PM (sYxEE)
First Pawlenty is a goof. Second Sarah speaks the thoughts that are running through many American heads. Ourcountry cannot continue to be run like this without bearing out the consequences. It gives us the courage and the strength to battle against "business as usual corrupt government"
Posted by: cheri at February 06, 2010 06:49 PM (bLIcJ)
SHIT! You mean I missed her ass? Was she wearing that tight black skirt?
Posted by: Ombudsman at February 06, 2010 06:50 PM (y4B2y)
She's the real deal, alright. But I have to tell you, I missed the head on a swivel that signifies real intelligence!
s/off
Jug Ears has become the Milli Vanilli of the political world. If his teleprompter malfunctions, he's done. Just sayin'
Posted by: BIG ROB at February 06, 2010 06:51 PM (f6qHG)
As I recall, Reagan was dead to the world after Jimmah got elected. That didn't turn out too bad, as I recall.
Posted by: TheGhostWhoWalks at February 06, 2010 06:51 PM (nmg4C)
There was a wrinkle in her blouse.
David, that was a jacket and those are breasts. You know, like Barry's moobs, but larger.
Posted by: huerfano at February 06, 2010 06:52 PM (lLqRQ)
Posted by: Rodney at February 06, 2010 06:52 PM (c6mrx)
One of our lib relatives was giving my sis and me a ration of sh*t about the "birthers" and what idiots they were. We told him we must be "grade-ers" because we wanted to see what kind of grades Zero got in college.
Posted by: TheresaD at February 06, 2010 06:52 PM (iGCmo)
Nobody cried watching this. We did cry because the wagyu was a little stringy. When Giles returns with my trust fund check, I'm hiring a new chef.
Posted by: Christopher Buckley at February 06, 2010 06:52 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Fuming Moronette #33162 at February 06, 2010 06:53 PM (LKkE8)
Posted by: TheresaD at February 06, 2010 10:52 PM (iGCmo)
+100
Posted by: Moronette #33162 at February 06, 2010 06:56 PM (LKkE8)
Posted by: arhooley at February 06, 2010 06:57 PM (HJuHu)
NONTROVERSY!!!
That kind of bad craziness is why I bid adieu to the bad crazy racists on the right. Obama hasn't released his college transcripts because they're so overwhelming that the average mouth breather who doesn't read up on things like I do couldn't handle that kind of awesome.
Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at February 06, 2010 06:58 PM (sYxEE)
Excellent. I will steal this line. You will get no attribution or compensation. After all, Zero says we have to spread the wealth around, no?
Posted by: Ombudsman at February 06, 2010 06:59 PM (y4B2y)
Posted by: andi sullivan at February 06, 2010 07:02 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: huerfano at February 06, 2010 07:03 PM (lLqRQ)
Picture the Seinfeld episode when the pilot was on tv and the scene is Newman asleep on his chair with a bucket of wings on his lap.
Then picture Newman with blonde hair dressed all in black
Posted by: Meghan McCain at February 06, 2010 07:06 PM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Journalist at February 06, 2010 07:07 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: Kasper Hauser at February 06, 2010 07:08 PM (0GLoV)
Reagan also spent years on the peas and carrots circuit speaking for GE so his delivery was highly polished.
Posted by: Packy East at February 06, 2010 07:09 PM (CKW49)
* - There is no Hell because scientists said so. So if you're not a bad crazy creationist, substitute "Orange County" for "Hell"
Posted by: Cahrsel Jhonsno at February 06, 2010 07:12 PM (sYxEE)
Of course, unlike the rest of your mythical "better" spokespeople/candidates, she has the potential to be as great as any of the best.
On second thought, I remember Reagan sounding like a total doofus plenty of times. He was never as awesome as Reagan, either.
Posted by: K~Bob at February 06, 2010 07:12 PM (9b6FB)
she was clean and articulate.. I forgot she was white for an hour and I am so glad she didnt have a negro dialect. If I support her, I wont have to worry about my mortgage or putting gas in my car!!!!!! I wish someone would have asked her for a kitchen.. that would have been awesome.
Posted by: Kristi at February 06, 2010 07:14 PM (7GgDy)
Posted by: alaska trash at February 06, 2010 07:35 PM (E7nZ5)
Posted by: David Brooks at February 06, 2010 07:46 PM (BGpfF)
Reagan was also 70 something during his best speechifying. She's in her 40s and has no formal training. Makes a big, big difference.
And BTW, Dan Quayle gets a bad rap. He actually was a pretty smart and accomplished fella. Not the best pol, but not an idiot, either.
Posted by: di butler, qualified for Aussie porn at February 06, 2010 07:52 PM (S3xX1)
Conversely, I think Palin would have been permanently Quayled twenty years ago, but I'm not concerned about that now because we do have alternative media.
Posted by: Kensington at February 06, 2010 07:56 PM (BGpfF)
Posted by: prettypinkfluffypanties at February 06, 2010 07:57 PM (J9FP0)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 08:09 PM (oeESr)
I'm thinking no or you wouldn't have posted what you just did.
Posted by: Mary Beth at February 06, 2010 08:14 PM (JPEqm)
Posted by: Dan at February 06, 2010 08:16 PM (KZraB)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 08:23 PM (oeESr)
Posted by: Exasperated Moronette at February 06, 2010 08:26 PM (LKkE8)
The "Palin supporters blindly worship her" Straw Man is almost as irritating as Obama's reformulations.
If she's such a lightweight, you'd think there would be more substantive arguments against her than telling her supporters to stop liking her.
Posted by: Moron in a Leopard Snuggie at February 06, 2010 08:29 PM (FD3EH)
Posted by: K~Bob at February 06, 2010 08:34 PM (9b6FB)
Posted by: di butler, qualified for Aussie porn at February 06, 2010 08:36 PM (S3xX1)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 08:37 PM (oeESr)
Posted by: Rodney at February 06, 2010 08:48 PM (c6mrx)
Posted by: Strawman in a Leopard Snuggie at February 06, 2010 08:54 PM (FD3EH)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 08:56 PM (oeESr)
I want to bring back a term no longer in use, because of PC prissiness:
IDIOT SAVANT.
Look it up.
It explains Barak Hussein.
Posted by: effinayright at February 06, 2010 08:56 PM (lQRmV)
go to msn.com
On the news section they are having a vote on her speech.. please vote.. we are talking MSNBC poll her so ... not looking so good for her .. add a vote for Palin.. make the haters mad.
Posted by: Kristi at February 06, 2010 08:59 PM (7GgDy)
Look, folks, just because Barack Obama heads a cult, that doesn't mean that every group of enthusiastic supporters is also a cult.
Sarah Palin is not a cult leader, and her supporters are not a cult.
Stop being dumb about this.
Posted by: Kensington at February 06, 2010 09:01 PM (BGpfF)
Posted by: ian cormac at February 06, 2010 09:05 PM (cYl+u)
Posted by: scr_north at February 06, 2010 09:20 PM (Ve5/5)
Yeah.
When the mob decides you should die, perhaps you should back off.
Like your logic, mob-boy. Appreciate the faux concern.
You people make me sick. You think intimidation by your thugocracy makes you right. Unh huh. That's why the Tea Parties are succeeding.
We get that you want dissenting voices squashed. Clear. Very much so.
Ain't happenin', big guy. Last I checked, we got the guns. And don't think we aren't as serious as, oh. say....Saul.
Posted by: Derak at February 06, 2010 09:26 PM (ycYLZ)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 09:34 PM (oeESr)
Face it, when the other side decides it's time to "go loud" and fires on Fort Sumter, that frees us up to do a lot of cleaning up.
Posted by: SGT Dan at February 06, 2010 09:45 PM (604CD)
Hmmmmmm.
And you admitted to living in the Cincy area too...
And you like Chinese.
It's a start.
Posted by: CPT. Charles at February 06, 2010 09:48 PM (lYKj1)
Keep up this vapid 'argument' and it'll become obvious that Rahm was speaking about you.
Posted by: JorgXMcKie at February 06, 2010 10:00 PM (290l2)
Hey kids! Tonight's word is Worship.
Liberal reporters have been trolling the lines of folks who show up to see Palin for 18 mos. now, looking for quotes to smear her and her supporters. Invariably, they turn out to be ordinary, well-informed citizens who say they like Palin personally and agree with her common-sense positions.
Posted by: Strawman in a Leopard Snuggie at February 06, 2010 10:01 PM (FD3EH)
Posted by: Fresh Air at February 06, 2010 10:09 PM (1yI48)
Posted by: Fresh Air at February 06, 2010 10:12 PM (1yI48)
Please, please don't let her run. Or, if she does, let her lose in the primaries. And I saw this as someone who loved her in 2008.
She's been tainted. Maybe it's fair, maybe it's not . . . but it's true. Sarah Palin has become the love child of Dan Quayle and Jerry Springer. She will never be a series contender.
Posted by: S. Alito at February 06, 2010 09:53 PM (GiUTT)
fuck off and die you worthless concern troll
Posted by: Da Gubnah David P at February 06, 2010 10:14 PM (erIg9)
Picture the Seinfeld episode when the pilot was on tv and the scene is Newman asleep on his chair with a bucket of wings on his lap.
Then picture Newman with blonde hair dressed all in black
Posted by: Meghan McCain at February 06, 2010 11:06 PM (sYxEE)
I hear a stick of butter calling your name, Fatty McButterpants.
Posted by: Da Gubnah David P at February 06, 2010 10:20 PM (erIg9)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 06, 2010 10:40 PM (oeESr)
Ann Althouse explains it all for you. Sarah Palin was a blithering idiot until she became a devious genius.
"What I love about all this is the extreme contrast to the way Palin was mocked when she resigned as Governor of Alaska.
I, myself, did not think it was stupid, because I pictured her doing something like what she is actually doing, but I certainly remember the derision. Her political career was over. She was "toast."
A big difference between what I pictured and what she's doing is that she's staying in Alaska. I thought she needed to get out of Alaska (in order to run for President). It's innovative the way she's staying in Alaska.
As a blogger, operating from my remote outpost in Madison, Wisconsin, I love that she's working through Facebook and staying rooted in Wasila, Alaska. Fox News is building a TV studio in her house in Wasila. That's so not toast."
http://althouse.blogspot.com/
2010/02/sarah-palin-was-blithering-idiot-until.html
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 06, 2010 10:48 PM (LJSfA)
"Sarah Palin does not need to run for president. She can do greater good for the US and the world by mantaining the spotlight and speaking."
Maybe that's the plan, to someday replace Rushbo with Rougebabe. It's a heck of a lot easier and way better paying job then Pres.
Posted by: beanervt at February 07, 2010 01:17 AM (jwi2Z)
Hm. Put me down as a "realty-er," because I want to know why Tony Leavenworth Rezko bought Barry Oblowme A HOUSE. A fucking HOUSE for fuck's sake! How has this stayed under the LSM's carpet for ... what?, two years???
...
boring disclaimer:
Yeah he didn't exactly precisely "buy him a house," but:
a/ that's quicker to type, or say, than "did him a multi-hundred-thousand-dollar complicated favor in connection with a home purchase,"
and
b/ it makes it THEIR job to make that correction, which, even if they can, doesn't make the deal look any better, plus makes them look like they're splitting hairs.
Why aren't there a dillion skillion bumperstickers and t-shirts out there, asking this question? Not THIS question, but the one about the house? Have the birthers sucked all the question-asking oxygen out of the atmosphere, or what?
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 07, 2010 02:51 AM (ZO7ND)
Posted by: noce sacco at February 07, 2010 03:25 AM (Qc93O)
Word.
Posted by: toby928 at February 07, 2010 04:45 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Scott McClellan at February 07, 2010 05:05 AM (Sghlv)
hahahaha
Palin's finished cuz she is dumb -which is why the media followers her around and listens to her speak on all news channels
Palin's too polarizing- yes that's horrid, pointing out the misdeeds of those in power
Palin's doesn't know enough- as i remember she was aked to be VP, not president as yet. also she did run a state, and a part of a business etc.
Palin's supporters are just liek Obama worshippers! omgod a cult. yeah sure, they all buy coffee cups, undies, pictures, and t shirts, every Palin thing they can get their hands on, to be buried with , they spend all their hours trolling every conservative site Just like those Obama supporters!
Palin is a smart women that is being supported by a large group, why? because she speaks to what we know, that we need to start getting involved, organize , don't roll over for anyone, she speaks of our consitutional rights, she points out activities of those leading us and the danger .
o and that the media has ruined her, well yes they have done their best, let's see how things look in 2--6 years, she hasn't said she was going to run as yet, alot can happen in those years, Obama is already being seen for a less than great president, and She certainly Is gaining knowledge and information as she moves along the states, she didn't go hide away, she has been using the time to gather info learn , gain support for Conservative thinking, Maybe she won't ever run, why are we asking if she's ready to be Potus now? why don't we see how things look in 2 years and how she looks in two years, why this incessant whine; there is just NO way she can Be ready or overcome. we are Not a Group of giver uppers , lets wait and see what flows.
Posted by: willow at February 07, 2010 05:08 AM (7FgWm)
You know that she hits them high, she hits them low, she does a slam dunk over Mr. Waffles etc. (Tough when you're about 5" 4" and Mr. Waffles is 6' 2"--but she kin do it.) Mainly she can talk without a teleprompter--probably has some notes in hand or maybe even a written speech--she's not entirely winging it. But she's prepared--which is more than you can say for Mr. "I'll just read the Teleprompter with whatever crap my speech writers have put on it. Dang what's that word "corpseman"? I dunno--never heard of it before."
She also has a gift (well so does the Anointed One supposedly have a "gift') of a turn of phrase. "Death panel" was spot on and it made the Democrats wiggle and struggle for several months. Two little words that blew right up Harry and Nancy's skirts (yup, Harry wears a dress--as far as I'm concerned).
Let her keep on out there giving speeches and talking to people. She's doing her "homework". She may make it to 1600 Pennsylvania and the Oval Office--she may not. But it's going to be fun watching her try to get there. You go girl.
Posted by: Corncob Supporter at February 07, 2010 06:33 AM (ktYjH)
Last night a conservative, a true conservative said to me "she'll never be president cause she quit". I was a little horrified to hear that come out of the mouth of a conservative. But we discussed why that was said and we all agreed that she got financial security for her family out of this VP run and she also has the ear of the world. It is possible that women understand why she quit more than men. But, if she ever wants to run for the presidency she is going to have to tackle two mountains, the questions of "why she quit" and "the tina fey debacle". Maybe head on. Or maybe she will just continue on and see how it goes. I always supported her. Lately, she has been very effective as private citizen Sarah Palin. With no horse in the race she can and does say anything she wants to say without having to worry about whether or not she will be elected to any public office. She's in a great position to effect change. Most politicians must be so jealous, having the ability to say anything you want anytime without worrying about the politics of your holding an office or an appointment or a future office is something they would salivate over to attain. It's possible a lot of these politician types are uber jealous of Sarah and how she has maneuvered herself into a position of power. Sometimes I think if she had Rove on her side with McCotter next to her, they would be unbeatable. Who knows. The world changes at such a fast pace, you can't predict anything anymore as nothing seems to go the way you think it will go.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 06:51 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 07, 2010 07:07 AM (oeESr)
215 -- There are some very valid reasons why she should not run for president; the quitting bit is one of them. I understand why she quit. It was probably one of the most statesmanlike a politician has done in quite a while (it was costing the people of Alaska to defend her). Still, she is smeared now (however unfairly) as a "quitter" -- it would be an almost insurmountable handicap to overcome. The Rand Paul endorsement I don't really consider her best decision either and would come back to haunt her. It wouldn't only be a handicap during any election run; if she were to be elected she'd have the hounds nipping and yapping for the duration. This is unfair, but it is reality. In order for her to be successful as a president things would have to change quite a bit -- people are intrinsically petty and fickle.
I appreciate and admire much of what she does (I consider her the one of the ultimate feminist role models, a strong and intelligent woman who has a compass and yet doesn't deny her femininity) -- but she would be better off not running and much more effective in another position.
This speech...this is where she has her true power -- keep her capable of doing this; a president cannot.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 08:07 AM (5/yRG)
Actually, Reagan wasn't much of a conservative.
If you work out those credibility problems, people might read past your first paragraph.
Posted by: rdbrewer at February 07, 2010 08:21 AM (vJYaJ)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 07, 2010 08:23 AM (oeESr)
219 -- Well, in the strictest sense, no, Reagan was not a "pure" conservative, but what is missing from the above is the acknowledgement that a president (or a leader if you will) cannot be so pure as to be hard headed -- the only leaders who are that "pure" and/or stick to their ideological guns all the time tend to be fascist dictators, not leaders of free people.
Suffice it to say that Reagan was conservative enough and a clever leader who for the most part (I have my criticisms of him) worked to serve his people -- that's all you can really ask of a president/leader.
Hmmm, in that light it makes for an interesting comparison, then and now, doesn't it?
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 08:29 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 08:41 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 07, 2010 09:03 AM (oeESr)
Posted by: yambles at February 07, 2010 09:21 AM (rxaXW)
He's preaching to the choir, that's for sure. Posted by: toby928 at February 07, 2010 01:27 PM I do not think that phrase means what you think it means.
Posted by: OneEyedJack at February 07, 2010 09:38 AM (Poe30)
On a side note I'd like to see her packing heat for her next speech.
Posted by: yambles at February 07, 2010 09:46 AM (rxaXW)
I would like to win in 2010 and 2012. I think Palin can help with that tremendously -- she's a great speaker and will be a fabulous fundraiser. A lot of people adore her.
The flip side of that is that, thanks to the media's smear job against her, a lot of people think she's Caribou Barbie. That image, once in place, is very hard to undo.
The Republicans need to run a stellar candidate against Obama, even if his poll numbers continue to sink. We need someone who's going to be strong out of the gate, not someone who needs his/her image retooled first.
Posted by: Scout at February 07, 2010 09:53 AM (GiUTT)
Now wait a minute. A career politician is someone who has never held a job outside politics--Barack Obama and John Thune, a good conservative who some like for POTUS, are good examples. Sarah Palin is a working class lady who has worked the "slime line," waitressed and run her own fishing business. Yes she was also a small town mayor and a governor for less than one term. She now holds no political position. To call her a "career politicial" strips all meaning out of the term.
I give you credit though, for originality with that one. Most of her detractors think she hasn't spent enough time in government.
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:01 AM (Vc/xe)
This part here- ""What I object to is the deification of politicians, whatever their party or ideology."
As a looong time reader of ancient history I can understand that point. It does seem to be a repeating theme in history as far back as the ancient Egyptians, where pharaoh was "god" on earth, or to the roman emperors, or the popes and European kings during the dark ages, or the pre wwII Japanese with their "emperor god", to the German people with their Hitler, and on and on. In all cases these leaders were deified, and not much good came out of it.
The one shining moment in history was the creation of America, it really was a different way of doing things. I understand your "warnings", because even here there is a tendency to slip back into old ways. Ted kennedy is a perfect example, the fucking "people" created the kennedy dynasty and as a result the drunken pos was in the senate for a billion years when he should have been in frigging prison.
I always look at a leader and say to myself "what would they be like in a government other than ours". We know damn well obama is a wanabee marxist dictator, he has ALL....ALL the classic signs. You can interchange him with pumpkin head over in N Korea as easy as you can swap your left sock for your right sock.
I never got that feeling with Reagan or Bush, but then again the defining difference between conservatives and liberals has been where conservatives celebrate leaders who are good for the country because when the country is healthy we all benefit. Liberals celebrate leaders who are good for "them" and the country be damned. Obama's apology tour was a classic example, it was bad for the country but great for the left because it made THEM feel good. They are waaaaay more inclined to deify their fucked up leaders as gods than the right will ever be.
Posted by: Berserker at February 07, 2010 10:03 AM (gWHrG)
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:04 AM (Vc/xe)
Got it. She's better off as a private citizen. She should stay retired from politics, for her own greater political effectiveness. Yuh-huh.
Warren Bullshit @ 216 "Actually, Reagan wasn't much of a conservative. He was a social liberal who "
Yuh-huh. CLICK.
What else is on?
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 07, 2010 10:11 AM (ZO7ND)
I was called a concern troll above. (I didn't post under my usual name -- Scout, but S.Alito by accident, as that was what was in the name box -- I think that was from the SOTU night -- and I didn't remember to change it back to Scout before I posted).
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure why I've been down on Palin lately. Mr. Scout reminded me of how much I loved her when she first joined the McCain campaign. And I did -- she energized his entire campaign. But, I don't know . . . I just don't think she's the strongest candidate we can run.
Then again, I was all for Teh Fred getting the nomination in 2008, so maybe I don't have the best judgment in these matters.
Posted by: Scout at February 07, 2010 10:15 AM (GiUTT)
229 -- That is unfortunately what I take away from what has happened; she's been smeared perhaps irreparably by the media. That would be a huge handicap during a campaign, let alone if she managed to win (think BDS on a whole lot of steroids...she'd be lucky to get anything accomplished with the media yapping at her flanks constantly). She is however, the ideal king maker imho -- so let her do that.
Yes, she is more of the libertarian persuasion imho -- or at least fiscal conservative and a social libertarian conservative. Perhaps that is the thing I like most about her (plus being a true feminist -- it's been a long time since I have gotten to see a true feminist role model, more please). I think Warren is very incorrect as far as I have not seen her interject her religious beliefs very strongly at all in how she ran her governorship -- she has not been coy about expressing her personal beliefs, but as far as I know, she has always been very upfront informing her audience that her beliefs are hers personally.
As for her deification: well, I can see that being a problem. She is a strong personality, and these are desperate times. People are going to naturally be susceptible to cult of personality (hah, you don't have to go very far to see where that has happened already!). I'm not so sure she has been so guilty of fostering this as it has been foisted on her by some of her more rabid fans -- the verdict is out there. I think it would be wise for people to remember that she is merely human and is not perfect...and to not go projecting one's hopes and wishes on any other person, least of all a politician. It isn't healthy.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 10:15 AM (5/yRG)
Sgt.BS, USMC and Concerned Curious, however, not so much.
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 07, 2010 10:22 AM (ZO7ND)
I love how so many genius-level policy experts (translation: smartest narcissist in the room) love to recommend how much she needs to study more, go into detail, minutiae, be an expert like, well, ME! Ghod... oghodoghod, please someone notice how fzcking smart I am!
She does exactly what she needs to do: articulate the philosophy, show the guts to follow through, and leave the details to the experts.
We have President Smartest Badass Ever To Hold Office, with the highest IQ (so high that no one knows how high it is), currently proving that a grounding in solid philosophy that has been historically proven to work is worth much more than all the IQ points the elitists can scrape together.
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:25 AM (Vc/xe)
but you beg the question. Who IS? (and hey I like Fred, but come on, he had no energy) And if you're not trolling, why repeat the Caribou Barbie crap, which is the stock in trade of Palin trolls?
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:30 AM (Vc/xe)
I'll tell you why I called out 229 as a troll:
"Caribou Barbie," 'I used to support her, ' saying there is someone better but never naming the alternative and even "I'm not a concern troll." All of these are sure signs of the anti-Palin troll.
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:34 AM (Vc/xe)
Well thank you Dave, and no, I'm not a concern troll because there is no agenda in what I write here. This is merely a fun place to express my opinions, nothing more or less.
I think Sarah Palin is a powerful personality and has been up until this a very good and clever leader and a bit of a statesman. I appreciate that about her and find it a shame that she has been smeared. Unfortunately, it would have repercussions for any run for office she would make (at least as far as 2012 is concerned). It isn't fair, but life is not fair. Does she have a place in American politics? Most definitely yes! We most definitely need people like her reminding people of who we really are, rallying the people to take charge of their futures, and helping to put the breaks on the facist steamroller that has become our government. Is a campaign for the presidency the best place for her right now? I don't believe so -- things may change however; nobody knows what will happen between now and then. Still, a lot of things would have to change. I don't believe the best canidate to run against the precedent has been revealed yet. I hope the person who will be his opponent is a good and clever leader who can win -- we can't afford anything else.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 10:37 AM (5/yRG)
That argues for nominating someone the media likes. No thanks, been there, done that. I'm supporting someone that I like, not someone the media likes. This is the classic establishment GOP argument vs Palin that Frum and others have been making since Sept. 2008. Fail.
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:39 AM (Vc/xe)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 10:41 AM (5/yRG)
I was not calling her Caribou Barbie. My whole point is that there are a lot of fucking people out there who do. Someone even showed up at our annual Halloween Party dressed as "Caribou Barbie." And that's the sort of shit that sticks to a candidate.
Posted by: Scout at February 07, 2010 10:44 AM (GiUTT)
242 -- No, it does not mean "picking somebody the media likes"; it's merely the sad truth. Until the left has damaged itself irreparably, they will pull out all stops to destroy her...and people will listen to them. Now, things may change to the point that the people of this country will stop listening to such tripe, but until the time comes the smears and derangement will be in play -- to the detriment of Palin or anyone else like her.
This is where the opposition needs to work at undercutting the media -- the left needs to be undercut first. They need to be revealed for what they really are. It's starting; perhaps by 2011 the realities will be such that my concerns will no longer be valid. I won't be unhappy if that came to pass. I hope I can look back and say I was completely wrong here.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 10:47 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:47 AM (Vc/xe)
why the "concerned curious" label. To diminish my opinion. Which is quite valid since I am not a conservative, I am an independent and, as such, think as an independent. Btw, Stoop Davy Dave, go look up all my previuos posts as "muffy". While i was steadfastly defending Sarah Palin on her first day out with the wolves, andoid sullivan comes to mind, were you fighting alongside me?
I want Sarah Palin to be effective, period I want her to do whatever she wants to do, period. When she signals that she wants to run for president, i'll be right there but, until then, I respect the person that she is and do worry about the way we boil candidates down in this modern age of twitter and facebook. It almost seems to be that no candidate can make themselves heard in this environment where news is made of twitter not on the MSM and no longer on cable. Doesn't it worry anyone else that we voted a man into office, have watched him completely ignore any and all campaign and after election promises (which are on video and audio) and did exactly what he wants to do, regardless of what the American people think and using the excuse that he knows best? We need Sarah Palin to not make any promises. To tell the American people the truth. Since it appears that no one in DC cares to take up that little peccadillo. We also need her to make sure she doesn't sugar coat anything, And she doesn't promise anything she may not be able to deliver due to the DC climate.
Calling me a concern troll again, when I am clearly not, is just dumb.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 10:48 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 10:55 AM (Vc/xe)
I do think that you guys ought to discuss Bachman and Blackburn pulling out and saying it was cause of the money and where it may be going. Bachman is not an ally to lose. These people who are running these tea parties need to be on the same page and a united front with clearly deliniiated goals and a blance sheet that is transparent. Althought seems like the meaning of the word transparent is being corrupted by everyone.
See regular people are getting it, they are starting to pay attention. If, for one second they think the tea party movement is being corrupted in any way, is not really speaking for them, or is in danger of becoming like the democrat and republicans parties, they will pull back and that is exactly what the administration would love to see.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 10:55 AM (p302b)
246 -- Oh please, try not to overheat yourself. No, I'm not a "true blue conservative", whatever that is. I am a moderate for the most part, for want of any better way to describe myself. That does not mean that I'm "the enemy" -- I want very badly to get rid of the statists who would like to strip the Constitution and who don't care one whit for the people other than as a way to gain more power. So, you can either accept our differences of opinion...or you can keep spouting inflamatory rhetoric and attempt to drive people like myself away.
I think it's a perfectly valid thing to think about: is Sarah Palin better off and better for the cause of getting rid of some of the idiots we now have in D.C. (and making life difficult for their supporters) where she is at now, or as a canidate for president? Right now, she's better off where she is at -- and excuse me, oh great conservative Moe, but what part of "that may change" did you not read?
By the way, is that the general gist of what you were saying too Curious?
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 11:01 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 07, 2010 11:07 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at February 07, 2010 11:07 AM (oeESr)
Just a few corrections. Reagan was a fiscal and national security conservative. His social (domestic) conservatism involved less spending and less government. Fannie Mae was created in 1938 as part of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. In 1968, due to fiscal pressures created by the Vietnam War, Lyndon B. Johnson privatized Fannie Mae in order to remove it from the national budget. Reagan had nothing to do with Fannie Mae.
He didn't "talk nice" to bad guys like the Soviets or Libya.
As for the marines; I was in Iraq twice (Desert Storm and OIF) and in Bosnia. The Army has been there for awhile. You're late to that party.
As for a Great Leader, an exhumed Ronald Reagan would be a far better leader than the socialist assclown we're saddled with now.
Disclosure: SFC, US ARMY 1976-2006
Posted by: SFC MAC at February 07, 2010 11:08 AM (/9h7Q)
I think the media anointed John McCain as the candidate for the republicans and the conservatives and republicans allowed them to do this. He would not have even been in the running were it not for Sarah Palin. I watched how people on here systematically ate their own. Mitt was a mormon, rudy wore a dress on SNL. Huckabee, was too religious Fred Thompson was accused of all manner of maladies. Tom Tancredo was dissected as well. The republicans/conservatives helped set the stage for mr. no vote and watch me get rid of all opponents was able to be "a bolt out of the blue" and, with a little help from the MSM who after a while began to believe their own lies about the boosh administration and MeCain and Palin, were the enablers. I think you are right...a bolt out of the blue, able to replicate what BO and his army did, might be nice. Problem is the republicans and the conservatives are too honest and honorable...they can't keep secrets...it would never work.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 11:48 AM (p302b)
Then when you demonstrate the not only are you NOT barbie material but in fact are very engaging, articulate, and knowledgeable, you blow right through the artificial ceiling of audience beliefs.
Under-sell -- over-deliver. ALWAYS a winning technique.
If you saw Palin on FoxNews Sunday you know exactly what I mean. She handled Chris Wallace with ease, and grace, and a clear intellegence. And THAT'S not an easy thing to do. Ever.
I thought that a run in 2012 was an outlandish idea. Now ----- not so out there at all.
Not at all.
Posted by: Dougf at February 07, 2010 12:40 PM (Dn/ok)
haven't seen the Wallace interview yet, however, I did see the CNN take on the Wallace interview and they managed to say that Wallace did a fair interview but, as usual, Sarah was not up to the task. They showed a clip of her being challenged about her saying the prez was trying to tell us what to do. In the absence of being able to reference a clip of some sort she failed, in their eyes, to reference the speech about turning off your tv's. If you are only getting your news from CNN, you thought the interview was an epic fail. Ugh I hate the MSM.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 01:00 PM (p302b)
You idiot conservatives had better pay heed. Clearly you need to be told not to "worship" someone. I mean, hell, conservatives are mostly atheists, struggling in the dark, dangerous world, just looking for a personal deity they can send messages to on FaceBook, and follow on Twitter. Probably. Right?
You know I'm right. Hell, for an hour or so I almost forgot we were "worshiping" someone. Mmm Mmm Mmmmmmm!
And boy, we sure are lucky to have someone tell us Palin is damaged goods because, well, ...she's been smeared you see. Smeared like a bug on the great windscreen of life. (Or at least, the one provided to you for free by the MSM and beltway elites.) Yep, tainted forever. Dried on fast by the sun, so bad you'll wear the edge off two Alaska State quarters trying to chisel her off. Then you can drive safely into a smear-free future; far from those cretins in Alaska.
(Hell, they're so close to Russia, they're practically foreign agents Jews Israelis foreigners anyway.)
Yes, I'm concerned. Concerned! I'm so frikkin' concerned that I must tell you all how very concerned I am. And how you should be, too. You know how you get: you are so busy drooling and "dipping" that you forget, sometimes, to duct tape your precious few, still-functioning neurons into some semblance of a network, long enough to engage your failing sense of caution. So straighten up, pay attention, and say it with me:
Must.Be.Careful.Not.To.Trust.Palin.
That wasn't so hard, was it? I'm sure I lodged that into your biohazard of a brain. So slick you'd never notice. And now you know.
I'm sure you'll forget by this time tomorrow. But for now, you know.
Posted by: K~Bob at February 07, 2010 03:21 PM (9b6FB)
“I would be willing to if I believe that it’s right for the country,” Palin said when asked if she would run for president in 2012.
She qualified the statement, adding that she sees “many” other potential candidates who are “in as strong or stronger position than I am to take on the White House and if they’re in a better position than I in three years, I’ll support them.”
Still haven't seen the interview. Still haven't really watched the game because the hostess gets to heat everything up and get the meal out...but they are having a good time.
That was as far as I am concerned the perfect answer. The world is traveling at too fast a pace. You can barely predict what's going to happen in the next couple of hours, look at poor CT and the explosion where people were killed, no less the next couple of days or year or years. What she managed to get across was that her prime concern is the welfare of this country and of all Americans. Now that is a good thing.
Posted by: curious at February 07, 2010 03:40 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Paramus Snow Accumulations at February 07, 2010 04:11 PM (oT1aA)
Congrats, that is some of the lamest crap I've read here since David Frum was last linked.
Posted by: Moe Syzlak at February 07, 2010 06:20 PM (Vc/xe)
'All Presidents learn on the job and a great of what folks think a President needs to know in order to do a good job is in fact exactly what they should avoid like the Devil.'
"foreign and domestic policy minutia" is for followers, not leaders.
YESSSS! Eman gets it! I wish more people did.
The people who think Sarah needs to know every detail about every subject are obviously people who have never been in leadership positions themselves.
I have the good fortune to be acquainted with many excellent leaders in business, politics and the community, and have learned a lot by watching the way they operate. While intelligence (which Sarah has in spades) is needed in a good leader, sheer volume of facts is not. That is what advisers are for. What you want to look for in a leader is therefore the uncommonly good judgment about things that enables them to pick good people. And a leader must have a passionate enough gut-level commitment to the project that they will invest themselves wholeheartedly in it. There are many, many other attributes that make a good leader, but being a walking encyclopedia is not one of them.
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 07, 2010 08:06 PM (orMqj)
Will you do your absolute best to keep me and my kids safe from terrorist attack?
If it becomes necessary to conscript my kids for a war, will it be a just war, and will you have a sane, smart strategy that minimizes the odds of lives being wasted stupidly, and will you move heaven and earth to make sure we WIN the sucker?
Will you reduce the deficit so that my great-granchildren's great-granchildren are not still paying off the debt?
Will you repeal the death tax permanently so that all that my family has worked to build for two generations will not be flushed down the toilet?
Will you respect, revere, preserve and protect the United States Constitution?
Will you do everything possible to restore the liberties that have been stolen from me by the federal government in the past 40 years?
Will you appoint judges and justices who respect the Constitution and see their job as one of interpretation rather than legislation?
Will you work to protect babies from being murdered before birth, and will you work as untiringly and as passionately in that cause as Abraham Lincoln worked to abolish chattel slavery?
I'm endeavoring to raise my children with a sense of the sacredness of sex and marriage, the dignity of all human beings, and the instincts to recognize and desire truth, beauty and goodness. Are you going to make my task easier--or at least, not any more difficult than it already is?
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at February 07, 2010 09:10 PM (orMqj)
>>, go look up all my previuos posts as "muffy". <<
Wait, what? Muffy is you? Hmp.
Well, I've got no reason to doubt you, but then again, I've got no reason NOT to doubt you.
>> While i was steadfastly defending Sarah Palin on her first day out with the wolves, andoid sullivan comes to mind, were you fighting alongside me?<<
See, now, if I were juuuuust slightly less scrupulous, I could just as easily tell you to "go look up all my previous posts as 'JackStraw'," but other than bringing the real JackStraw (*) down on my ass, I don't see that working out well for me.
(* and no, I'm kidding, I'm not him, except in my dreams)
>>I want Sarah Palin to be effective, period <<
You want her to retire from seeking and holding elected offices, and have some rhetorical convolutions about how that would make her more effective. You quack, walk, swim, and fly like a duck, and expect me to think of you as a swan.
>>Doesn't it worry anyone else that we voted a man into office, have watched him completely ignore any and all campaign and after election promises (which are on video and audio) and did exactly what he wants to do, regardless of what the American people think and using the excuse that he knows best? <<
It worries me that you seem to think this digression does something to support your point about Sarah Palin.
Here's mine, just to be clear about it:"
I agree, with you and Scout and Unknown Jane, about how badly and unjustly she's been damaged by the sleazebag media; but I jolly well DISagree about what to do about it.
If Bill "Comeback Kid" Clinton could overcome his peccadilloes, shit!, if Richard Fucking Milhouse Nixon could overcome HIS peccadilloes, then Saracuda Palin can BY GOD damn well do the same thing! She's better and smarter and honester AND looks better in a tight skirt than either of those fools, and they both did the exact same thing that you are telling me that she could never do. So I think you're underestimating her, badly.
Worse, I think if your p.o.v. prevails, then David Brooks and all his crybaby ilk are winning, and to me, it's critical that they do NOT win. And truly, they ONLY win when and if SHE gives up. So she'd better not, because she's right and they're utterly utterly wrong.
To whatever extent your position overlaps theirs, you're wrong too.
>>Calling me a concern troll again, when I am clearly not, is just dumb. <<
You don't think I'm called "Stoop" by mistake, do you?
Posted by: Stoop Davy Dave at February 08, 2010 12:02 AM (ZO7ND)
I love the concern troll/media put downs on Sarah . . . because it reminds me of how they also thought Ronald Magnimus Reagan was too stupid to be president.
Reagan, against all advice from the smart guys removed the price controls on fuel and let the market work. Within months price of gas was down $.60. Reagan told the air traffic controllers that they wouldn't like the outcome of an illegal strike. Sent the lazy buzzards home. Reagan was told he was too naive and inexperienced to stand up to the smarties in the USSR. We know how that turned out.
Sarah's rejection by MSM and lefty concern trolls - as good as an endorsement to me.
And the fact that they unwittingly remind us of Reagan every single time they bash Palin: mmmmmm mmmmmm good!
Posted by: Jade Sea at February 08, 2010 04:35 AM (/aKkc)
Oh and Reagan spent years doing exactly what Palin is doing now: journaling, writing, speaking and debating. He was honing his thought process and sharpening the axe so to speak.
By the time he stepped up to be POTUS, he had a clear and unambiguous view of who he was and what he believed.
Palin is headed the same direction. Ideas matter. Character matters. Ability to communicate, explain, inspire and defend matters.
Not "worshipping her" you numbnuts, just pointing out what is in the works.
Posted by: Jade Sea at February 08, 2010 04:41 AM (/aKkc)
Sarah Palin called these scumbags out in one of best political barnburners in recent history. We saw the birth of a political star and the advent of an actual grassroots movement. The powers that be declared war on the heartland then.
I like this woman, and I trust her. Even if she is far from perfect, she is tough, courageous and highly effective. Sarah Palin gets things done. She loves this country, and it shows whenever she speaks. I am happy to watch her fortunes unfold and see her assume the mantle of leadership.
Actually, I'm content with the 2008 election outcome in that we can finally put to rest any notion that this country is anything but a land of opportunity. We have someone now who can potentially get the dangerous jackass in the Oval office ousted and move America in the right direction. This person will not be learning on the job, either; we are all witnessing their education.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 08, 2010 09:39 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at February 08, 2010 09:41 AM (mHQ7T)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2115 seconds, 390 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








She seems off. Stumbling a bit in places.
Having said that, I can't remember ever seeing a woman with such great hair. She's absolutely stunning.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 06, 2010 05:28 PM (P33XN)