March 30, 2010
— Ace Great idea. The Democrats put up several veterans in 2006 and won.
Including Eric Massa, for God's sakes. That shows you how powerful a biographical datum military service is.
And that's just looking at it in political terms. In less-crass terms, these guys deserve to lead the country. When they say "I'll fight for you," they're coming from a position of experience actually, genuinely fighting for you.
Why the Republican Party doesn't do more of this is a mystery to me, but my guess is that the party is Stuck on Stupid and wants to nominate people whose "turn" it's supposed to be. Even if the candidate in question is sort of minor elected official without any real qualifications for Congress, other than having run for minor office in the past.
That said, there are a lot of candidates worthy of our support.
Palin spotlights three, for the moment:
The first is Major Vaughn Ward, a fourth-generation Idaho native who grew up on his family’s farm in Shoshone and is running in Idaho’s 1st Congressional District. Coming from a family with a proud military tradition, Vaughn joined the Marine Corps after college and was finishing up his service when the September 11th attacks occurred. He put his life on hold and heeded his country’s call – serving first as a CIA Operations Officer and later volunteering with the Marine Corps for a combat tour in Iraq, during which he was awarded the Bronze Star with Combat V. After returning from Iraq, Vaughn went to work for the McCain/Palin campaign. I was grateful for his support then, and I’m happy to support him now because I know that he believes in the same commonsense conservative ideals that we cherish. Vaughn knows that real job growth comes from the private sector, not government. He believes in free market reforms, tax relief for families and small businesses, and a return to a constitutionally limited government that lives within its means. He’ll carry the conservative banner to Washington and will rein in the reckless growth of government to get it back on our side. And remember, a vote for Vaughn is a vote to remove the gavel from Nancy Pelosi’s grip....The second veteran is Captain Adam Kinzinger, a decorated special-operations pilot who flew combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Adam is running for Illinois’ 11th Congressional District against a freshman incumbent congresswoman who seemed to pull a bait and switch on voters to get elected. She sounded like a blue dog on the campaign trail, but didn’t vote like one in Washington. Instead, she voted in lockstep with the Pelosi agenda – on Obamacare, the stimulus, cap-and-tax – and the list goes on. She’s part of the reason for Congress’ 11% approval rating. Adam is a strong fiscal conservative with a proven track record as a reformer from his years serving on his local county board. Adam started out in local office, and, like many of us, believes in making government more accountable to the people. When you serve in local office, your constituents truly are your neighbors. Adam understands this, and I know that he will listen to his constituents and work for us, not against us, in Washington....
The third veteran is Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, a decorated war hero whoÂ’s served with distinction in combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many of you may have heard of Allen from a speech he gave last year that became a viral video on YouTube with over 2 million viewers. AllenÂ’s personal story is a testament to the commonsense conservative belief that our nationÂ’s greatness is rooted in freedom, because with freedom comes equal opportunity, and that, coupled with hard work, leads to success. Allen is a small government fiscal conservative running against a leftwing ideologue whoÂ’s marched to the beat of Nancy Pelosi on every issue from cap-and-tax to the stimulus, TARP, and, of course, Obamacare. ItÂ’s time to send Allen to Washington in his place.
The last link in each leads to the respective candidate's website, where you can donate. I've omitted the Facebook and Twitter links, but you can find them at Palin's post.
Another Vet: This one running for Gillibrand's own seat. Scott Murphy, who holds the seat now for the Democrats, posed as being anti-ObamaCare until Nancy Pelosi informed him he could no longer maintain that pretense, directing him to dutifully vote yes.
Chris Gibson, hero, and next Congressman from the 20th District of New York.
Posted by: Ace at
09:36 AM
| Comments (196)
Post contains 760 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Navin R Johnson at March 30, 2010 09:39 AM (HpT9p)
Posted by: alexthechick at March 30, 2010 09:40 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 09:40 AM (zzUK0)
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 09:40 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: Al at March 30, 2010 09:41 AM (0lyUI)
(Didn't lauraw make the original post recommending www.iraqvetsforcongress.com?)
Posted by: HeatherRadish, Doom and Gloom at March 30, 2010 09:41 AM (mR7mk)
Hey, where's our love??
Posted by: People that have actually met a payroll at March 30, 2010 09:43 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: rawmuse at March 30, 2010 09:43 AM (AMis9)
Aha. lauraw is actually Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 30, 2010 09:43 AM (7VvJB)
I second that.
Posted by: mpfs at March 30, 2010 09:43 AM (iYbLN)
The incumbents are just as worried as the progs that they are going to be replaced, especially when the Tea Party's get a head full of steam as Nov. nears IMO.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 09:44 AM (zzUK0)
for her ENFP Myers-Briggs personality and intelligence. Amongst other things, that means she has an incredibly powerful ability to see connections, and can see how doing X will affect Y. I'm not sure she should take Steele's job right now (because it would alienate certain people, fairly or unfairly), but WOW, she has the brain to do that better than anyone.
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 30, 2010 09:44 AM (TFs5o)
In the spirit of Scott Brown's victory and for being the 41st Republican in the Senate, I propose 41 in 2010.
40 seats in the House to remove Pelosi
+ Harry Reid's seat in the Senate
= 41
...in 2010.
We need something. Any thing. It's April and the Republicans haven't done shit to convince the people to vote for them. Being not-Democrats might be enough to win a handful of toss-up seats, but it isn't enough to win the House or make any progress in the Senate.
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 09:45 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 30, 2010 09:46 AM (TFs5o)
The moronettes have been all over Kinzinger for a couple months now.
I wish that I was all over him...
Posted by: Cheri at March 30, 2010 09:46 AM (G+Wff)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 30, 2010 09:47 AM (0GFWk)
The "narrative" of veteran leaders fighting for their country, leading others in doing the same, and then coming home to lead in the political sphere is one that is compelling, and for a change, honest. The RNC should just STFU and let Palin run with it. After she puts together a congress or two of leaders we can love and respect - and vice-versa! - she can modestly claim to have proven she knows how to build a winning team, unlike some other Politicians.
Then she will be seen as ready for the Big Show with no hesitiation whatsoever.
Oh, and along the way, she could see the MSM destroyed and driven before her, and hear the lamentations of their houseboys.
Posted by: sherlock at March 30, 2010 09:47 AM (cq3pU)
It's pretty boring reading the list of folks running for city council or county commissioner. "Worked at Wendy's" may be honorable, but it just doesn't have the impact of "Sgt. Major Davies served two tours in Iraq."
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 09:48 AM (9b6FB)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 30, 2010 09:48 AM (TFs5o)
You know what else is a mystery?
The Republican's strategy to win the House in 2010, that's what.
Offer everyone a free night out at their favorite bondage emporium?
Posted by: Barbarian at March 30, 2010 09:49 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: steevy at March 30, 2010 09:50 AM (F+A+X)
The moronettes have been all over Kinzinger for a couple months now.
(he needs to let his hair grow just a smidge --than he has my Full Moronette Seal of Approval®.)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at March 30, 2010 09:50 AM (pLTLS)
The moronettes have been all over Kinzinger for a couple months now.
I wish that I was all over him..
Or under him...I'm flexible.
Posted by: mpfs at March 30, 2010 09:50 AM (iYbLN)
Sure, I've seen a few republicans of note stand up, but the party itself, aka Steele and company, seem almost completely AWOL.
Be nice if they pulled their heads out of their asses, got out of the hot lesbian porn nightclubs for a bit and actually started articulating a message to the American people.
I'll even give them their first campaign slogan for any GOP'er running for Congress. "Give me your vote and I'll guarantee you the next time you reach for your wallet you won't see Congress's fingerprints all over it"
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at March 30, 2010 09:51 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: different troll from #15 at March 30, 2010 09:52 AM (BgD0W)
Queef would never leave his bathtub. I don't see a downside.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (mR7mk)
Well, ParisPrius, for starters every single GOP congressmen should be holding town hall meetings, raising awareness, and articulating conservatism.
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (zzUK0)
Compare "rendezvous with destiny" or "a time of choosing" to most of her phrases and you'll get the picture. I think she's got time to kick it up a notch (and I also remember some horrendous speeches by The Great Communicator), so this isn't me piling on like the Paulians and Pawlentians.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (9b6FB)
Posted by: buzz at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (kwhut)
Lt. Col. Allen West!
I know I might get some criticism, but I much prefer Sarah Palin as a kingmaker than a candidate.
Posted by: runningrn at March 30, 2010 09:54 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 30, 2010 09:55 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Not Andrew Sullivan but a real concerned conservative at March 30, 2010 09:55 AM (AZGON)
Actually, if you go to politics1.com and check out the candidates running across the country, there are shitloads of vets running across the country. In some districts there are several running for the nomination. Of course, these people won't get touted in the media like anti-war vets do.
The other interesting trend is all the M.D.'s who are running against Democrats. Gee, I wonder why? (Sarc!)
Posted by: runningrn at March 30, 2010 09:55 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Chairman of the Nonpartisan Anti-Chinese League at March 30, 2010 09:56 AM (xGIqT)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 30, 2010 09:56 AM (0GFWk)
You guys remember a few weeks when the momentum was on our side and their was chatter about gaining 50, 60, maybe even 70 seats in the House?
What happened with that momentum? It was squandered. The Republicans, as usual, killed their own momentum by either a form of political atrophy or by saying/doing something stupid.
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 09:57 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: George Orwell at March 30, 2010 09:58 AM (AZGON)
Be nice if they pulled their heads out of their asses, got out of the hot lesbian porn nightclubs for a bit and actually started articulating a message to the American people.
Now, that's just crazy talk! But seriously I agree with you - but the question is how do they get around the media's efforts to ignore them until there is some dirt to throw? Do you think the Dems never threw a party at a raunchy club before? Hell, they invented the idea of the waitress sandwhich! But do you ever hear about it in the national media? Nope.
The fact is that there is only one GOP politician who has the star power right now to burn right through the MSM's filters and connect directly with the average American - and that is Sarah Palin.
Posted by: sherlock at March 30, 2010 09:59 AM (cq3pU)
As been said around here before, I am not sure thats a bad thing.
but if you think they should, we must remember that anywhere but Fox, it will be 3 liberals against one conservative. Unfortunately, the net and commercials and ads will be the only way to give an uninterrupted message.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 30, 2010 10:00 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Bomber, future veteran at March 30, 2010 10:01 AM (qzoN5)
Posted by: Paladin at March 30, 2010 10:01 AM (XZu3c)
Remember that wonderful speech Gov Christie made?
Yeah, that was squandered. There are dozens of examples where the GOP just lets the fruit die on the vine.
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 10:02 AM (3njmu)
Well, we certainly have the Precedent for that now.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 30, 2010 10:02 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: Aristotle at March 30, 2010 10:02 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 30, 2010 10:03 AM (0GFWk)
There are all sorts of people who were in the military, but are not going to be of help us in public office. It guarantees nothing.
A few veterans who either were elected to office or ran for office:
George McClellan (D-Weinerville; ran for President, lost).
Ulysses Grant (President, one of the worst ever).
Ambrose Burnside (Governor).
Douglas MacArthur (ran for President, lost).
John McCain (Senator, ran for President, as squishy as they come).
Randy "Duke" Cunningham (Congressman, slobbering crook).
Eric Massa (Congressman, tickler, user, weirdo).
And somebody mentioned Colin Powell; hear him, hear him.
Veterans who worked out well generally were elected in eras when almost everyone had served in the military.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at March 30, 2010 10:03 AM (w41GQ)
Office-holders moving up have big-donor coattails, favors cached and owed, histories of playing ball, etc., and the GOP, like any entrenched institution, has only internal incentives. A "true conservative" (or Palinite or Paulite or libertarian) candidate win is a Party loss. It doesn't get them anything. Credibility with and support from us broke goons and toothless rubes isn't a Beltway asset.
Posted by: oblig. at March 30, 2010 10:03 AM (x7Ao8)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Chairman of the Nonpartisan Anti-Chinese League at March 30, 2010 10:03 AM (xGIqT)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:03 AM (zzUK0)
Veterans also know how to fight -- which might be a very useful thing. Plus, it's very hard for lefties to attack vets, at least to the public, without repercussions. Let's face it: how many people are friends and family with vets? Attack them for their war record and you paint yourself into a little corner with the majority of the people.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 30, 2010 10:04 AM (5/yRG)
Be careful what you wish for, Ace and Sarah Palin. You just might end up with Wesley 'Ashley Wilkes' Clarke.
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 10:05 AM (3njmu)
Poor judgment right there. Just say'n
Posted by: Barbarian at March 30, 2010 10:05 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 01:54 PM (zzUK0)
I'm glad to see this, but I know a hard-left Vietnam vet (and I know for a fact he served in Vietnam). It makes me wonder.
Besides, the shzt that the hippies were protesting loudly in the sixties is exactly what they are up to now in their 60's. Reid and company look just like LBJ's wrecking crew to me.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:05 AM (9b6FB)
But the question was what should the GOP be doing, implying some kind of centralized concerted effort. The GOP should be facilitating candidates' efforts, but they can't substitute for individual candidates and elected officials doing what they should. In other words, if the GOP (the RNC?) is doing what it should, it should be behind the scenes; so knowing what it is or isn't doing may not be obvious.
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 30, 2010 10:05 AM (TFs5o)
Did not expect them to boo him, but did not expect the reception he got. On the plus side, I assume that crowd skewed enlisted, therefor younger and more liberal. Most of our candidates are officers, who tend to be more conservative politically.
Posted by: Bomber at March 30, 2010 10:05 AM (qzoN5)
Brilliantly played, as it will certainly put the finishing touches on Mitt's flameout, eliminating a serious contender in '12.
Posted by: The Hammer at March 30, 2010 10:06 AM (YBTwf)
Posted by: Keith Overdone at March 30, 2010 10:06 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at March 30, 2010 10:07 AM (RZ8pf)
Posted by: ParisParamus at March 30, 2010 10:07 AM (TFs5o)
I guarantee that there were First Sergeants reading those troops the riot act to preserve decorum. As is proper.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 30, 2010 10:08 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: Ludicrous Speed at March 30, 2010 10:09 AM (zqzYV)
Posted by: Tammy Duckworth at March 30, 2010 10:10 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 30, 2010 10:10 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: Tammy Duckworth at March 30, 2010 10:11 AM (CfmlF)
The GOP isn't doing shit.
They should be fact-checking everything Obama says and does. They should be closely examining everything Democrats are doing.
For fuck's sake, the GOP (let alone Congressional Republicans) don't even want to raise awareness about Pelosi's trip to Italy or her personal travel expenses!
The GOP isn't even vetting Obama's cabinet; Glenn Beck is!
and the list goes on...
Posted by: This is I Hate F'n Chimps at March 30, 2010 10:11 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: catmman at March 30, 2010 10:12 AM (BCSpK)
Posted by: runningrn at March 30, 2010 10:13 AM (CfmlF)
There is a very low percentage of 'Nam Vets I meet at the VA that are for odumbass, but there are some that are nuts look at the one that stumped for hanoi john the traitor, hell he was in charge of the VA, dumbass.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:13 AM (zzUK0)
In fact, more people agree with her than they do David Brooks and George Will put together.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:14 AM (9b6FB)
I'm thinking simply considering veteran status is not enough to screen out the idiots.
Posted by: Sean Connery at March 30, 2010 10:14 AM (edJX0)
Posted by: Bomber at March 30, 2010 10:15 AM (qzoN5)
It can't get widespread traction. But I do agree, they need a consistent repeated message across the party. It looks like its going to be "Repeal and Replace". I hope they throw in National Debt, Spending and Unemployment.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 30, 2010 10:15 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: K~Bob
at March 30, 2010 02:14 PM (9b6FB)
I'd love to share a backseat with her.
Posted by: Ludicrous Speed at March 30, 2010 10:15 AM (zqzYV)
Generally speaking, running and supporting vets is a a good thing, but proper vetting still needs to be done.
The honorific 'vets' can be a negative.
Posted by: catmman at March 30, 2010 02:12 PM (BCSpK)
Will the vetting process include getting their opinion of tickle fights and "snorkeling?"
Posted by: Hedgehog at March 30, 2010 10:16 AM (oQIfB)
I won't run for public office but I would make a great security guy. Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 01:40 PM (zzUK0)
Damn, ya beat me to it. That's what I get for takin a smoke break.
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at March 30, 2010 10:17 AM (3IZGh)
"Why the Republican Party doesn't do more of this is a mystery to me, but my guess is that the party is Stuck on Stupid and wants to nominate people whose "turn" it's supposed to be."
Whooo! My ears are burnin', all of a sudden...
Posted by: Kay Bailey Hutchison at March 30, 2010 10:18 AM (XiVKO)
I'm thinking simply considering veteran status is not enough to screen out the idiots.
Posted by: Sean Connery at March 30, 2010 02:14 PM (edJX0)
Well, the game is afoot. I'll take anal bum cover for 7,000.
Posted by: Sockpuppet Sean Connery at March 30, 2010 10:18 AM (zqzYV)
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:19 AM (9b6FB)
Hey, Michael Steele! Call me!
Posted by: JohnJ at March 30, 2010 10:20 AM (FKG1q)
Posted by: MSM sneering at Sarah Palin While Crapping in Their Collective Pants at March 30, 2010 10:20 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: K~Bob
at March 30, 2010 02:19 PM (9b6FB)
The day is mine! I'll take Famous Titties for 400.
Posted by: Sockpuppet Sean Connery at March 30, 2010 10:20 AM (zqzYV)
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:21 AM (9b6FB)
We need to elect some conservative vets. I have a few friends who served in Viet Nam and are really liberal, including one who thinks The Vapid One™ is the bee's knees.
And yeah, the GOP is, once again, attempting to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. The ads have been writing themselves since November of '08, but what do we hear from Steele & Co.?
Bondage bars. NTTAWTT, but it'd be nice if they at least stayed on the topic of Dims ruining what was once a perfectly nice country.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at March 30, 2010 10:22 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: JohnJ at March 30, 2010 02:20 PM (FKG1q)
JohnJ, what do you look like? Do you have a full, beautiful head of hair? Are you ripped with washboard abs? Picture please!
Posted by: Informed, Issues Oriented Moronettes at March 30, 2010 10:22 AM (CfmlF)
Some on the left think the GOP is hopelessly racist and can't stand the idea of a black president. Much of the impetus behind Obama, and the ignoring of his terrible resume, was based on the idea that it would be valuable to send a message of rejection to republican racism.
Now, I realize this is misguided. The right just wants everyone treated based on content of individual character instead of freebies for various hyphen-Americans. The GOP is not racist and doesn't really give a shit what the President's skin color is (random nut exceptions aside).
But this is a lot like how I feel about Palin. The democrats hate a powerful, beautiful, happy mother. A normal nuclear family. A middle class woman with values who would never abort a child. Someone whose patriotism is very simple and proud and nice. The left has demonized her in various sickening ways, talking about faked pregnancies and making up Palin gaffes that were really Tina Fey and Matt Damon's daydreams.
I want to send a message that Palin is a great leader and an acceptable politician for America. That's part of why I overlook that her resume is lighter than a few others (better than Obama, but still, lighter than the ideal).
I think it's important that the tactics used against Palin are known to backfire, so that women who want to be conservatives are less likely to deal with the hatred Palin has seen. Also, she simply gets what's good about America. She will have the basic ability to do what's right but difficult, like W often had.
Posted by: throwaway handle at March 30, 2010 10:22 AM (dUOK+)
It's been a long time since I've seen a breakdown - almost a decade. But IIRC the officers are approx 80% center-right, whereas all others are 65% . I'd bet both groups have fallen 5-10% since then.
Best bet then would be an officer, but beware, needs to be one on the younger side. Maybe it's my imagination, but it seems the older some get, the squishier they get.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 30, 2010 10:22 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 02:21 PM (9b6FB)
Nor should ye be, laddie
Posted by: Ludicrous Speed at March 30, 2010 10:23 AM (zqzYV)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at March 30, 2010 10:23 AM (I/MqP)
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at March 30, 2010 10:24 AM (/cH23)
As ACE pointed out..I'm sick in tired of running the person whose "TURN" it is next. IE...Dole, MacLame etc..
Hell the '08 frontrunners were Edwards, Hitlery, and Barry Sotero. Barry can't produce a B-cert (no I'm not a birhter), high scool or college transcript. Hell, by his account he was a Virgin until he met Worf.
McCain had all the neccessary creds to be CiC. It meant shit. The people want a newcomer(?).
My slogan is:
"I don't know anybody, and I don't fucking OWE anybody"!
Posted by: hutch1200 at March 30, 2010 10:25 AM (giGwS)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 30, 2010 10:25 AM (mhD2v)
And anybody wearing stars is a politician. Any O6 who wants to wear stars is a politician.
Posted by: Bomber at March 30, 2010 10:26 AM (qzoN5)
Posted by: Dan at March 30, 2010 10:26 AM (1jzSs)
"The third veteran is Lieutenant Colonel Allen West, a decorated war hero whoÂ’s served with distinction in combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan."
. . . who was allowed to retire in lieu of getting court-martialed for pulling some stupid stunts on prisoners . . . after he'd NJP'd some of his own people for doing the same thing.
"Do as I say, not as I do" is not a conservative value.
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at March 30, 2010 10:27 AM (v3pYe)
" Will the vetting process include getting their opinion of tickle fights and "snorkeling?" "
That and who is trying to "recruit" 300 brothers to stand at Thermopylae to fight the Persians.
I bet Massa had ordered reproduction spears, capes and briefs for his staffers just waiting to go.
Posted by: Arbalest at March 30, 2010 10:29 AM (BjcIH)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:30 AM (zzUK0)
We need good principled conservatives, with good voting records. I don't care what letter behind his name
Posted by: jamie at March 30, 2010 10:30 AM (CTJDC)
Those three examples are honorable combat veterans, not PIOs.
Not a guarantee, but close enough to make it a rule.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 30, 2010 10:30 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: rawmuse at March 30, 2010 10:31 AM (AMis9)
Posted by: This is Wax Paper at March 30, 2010 10:32 AM (3njmu)
Several reasons:
1) as mentioned before, you'd get more Republicans than Democrats
2) You'd get more centrist Democrats.
3) And this is the big one: Up until now, the Tea Party has debated the merits of going independent vs. taking back the Republican party. Stop thinking small. Why take back ONE party when we can take back BOTH and kick the big government social spending lefties to the curb (or into the Green Party)
Why can't we have small government, leave-people-alone, Strong-national-defence, unapologetic-flag-waving, celebrate-American-exceptionallism as the base of the Democrats AND the Republicans? There's still plenty to argue about and differentiate between the two. Leave the fringe thinking to fringe parties.
Supporting more Vets for office is an important step in that.
Posted by: SL at March 30, 2010 10:34 AM (irk3g)
Posted by: This is Wax Paper at March 30, 2010 10:35 AM (3njmu)
Posted by: nevergiveup at March 30, 2010 10:35 AM (0GFWk)
Doubtful, but then I doubted Scott Brown could do it until 2 weeks before the election.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 30, 2010 10:36 AM (7VvJB)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 30, 2010 10:36 AM (5/yRG)
Ilario Pantano, former Marine, author of "Warlord"
Running for US Congress, N. Carolina. Worth considering.
Posted by: Glock and Load! at March 30, 2010 10:36 AM (dROPF)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 30, 2010 10:38 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Nicole at March 30, 2010 10:38 AM (CH1cF)
The problem is:
Vets we would like to see run
vs.
Vets that the GOP would actually recruit to run
Posted by: chemjeff at March 30, 2010 10:39 AM (JgygP)
Posted by: Vyceroy at March 30, 2010 10:40 AM (+bvV6)
My brother voted for O. He heard a clip of Palin in nevada where she said "lock and load" and it freaked him out. He thinks she is forming a militia to stage a coup.
My only response was " that's not a bad idea"
Posted by: TC at March 30, 2010 10:41 AM (4XzsU)
But the point is, volunteers for military service are self-selecting for most of the things we also seek in officeholders. It's a form of political shorthand for "is worth consideration."
"Rock musician" or "Actor" just doesn't carry the same weight.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:41 AM (9b6FB)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:41 AM (zzUK0)
Is = are
I blame Kinzinger and his very easy on the eyes looks...and a lack of coffee, but mostly Kinzinger.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 30, 2010 10:43 AM (5/yRG)
The primaries have not happened yet. Yes, the GOP should be putting together a national strategy, for all we know, they are.
. But we have to gird for the next fight, which appears to be Cap n Tax. Another bruising fight over what most of the country c onsiders a dead issue (global warming/climate change) will not be good for the Dems right now. Even a feckess GOP should be able to take back the House with minimal efffort if the Dems keep up their political jihad.
Posted by: Bob, the concern troll at March 30, 2010 10:45 AM (YmPwQ)
I can't stress it enough. This guy is a douchebag, a disgrace to the Marine Corp, and a pathetic piece of human debris. And those are just the things I can say in polite company.
The guys over at TAH (This Ain't Hell) have a long history on this guy and his arrests fro various anti war protests he ahs staged as well as his court martial while a Marine.
Posted by: Just A Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:46 AM (pOC9r)
Sock, begone!
I also disageree that Amnesty will be the Dem savior. They'd also have to spread the illegals all over the country, in districts that are close, and I don't see that as feasible.
Posted by: Bob, the concern troll at March 30, 2010 10:47 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 02:30 PM (zzUK0)
That may well be the single strangest thing I've seen on this blog.
Personally, I can only think of two ways West and Obama are similar and neither remotely have anything to do with leadership, honor or policy.
You may want to take a moment and reconsider that statement.
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 10:47 AM (9B5OK)
Posted by: TC at March 30, 2010 10:51 AM (4XzsU)
I didn't say I trust him, I'm just saying there's zero basis to compare him to Obama. There are a lot of stops on the continuum between 'trust' and 'kind of reminds me of Obama'.
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 10:53 AM (9B5OK)
We need a Constitutional Amendment to put a box around the "commerce" clause, and also limit the phrase "promote the general welfare."
We also need to repeal Obamacare.
Both things will require a supermajority. Not just "non-liberal" congressmen, but "originalist" congressmen.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 10:53 AM (9b6FB)
My brother voted for O. He heard a clip of Palin in nevada where she said "lock and load" and it freaked him out. He thinks she is forming a militia to stage a coup.
My only response was " that's not a bad idea"
Posted by: TC at March 30, 2010 02:41 PM (4XzsU)
Really..all the PMSM-Libtard hand-wringing over Palin is priceless she really does send them into a tizzy. And they should be nervous...they've aided and abetted in the willfull destruction of our country and we are ready to fight to get it back. All this talk about militias just makes me wonder where the hell are these people and can I subscribe to their newsletters!
Posted by: dananjcon at March 30, 2010 10:54 AM (pr+up)
141 McCain put her on the national stage. It would have looked bad if she supported his opposition. Even if she had stayed out of it, it would have looked bad. She has never run him down---just taken positions, on her own, that he wouldn't take. If he hadn't picked her, we may still not know who she is.
McCain makes me cringe and I blame his maverick stuff for the position we are in today. I would still support him against a lib though. Sarah can't really abandon him without looking like a bitch.
Posted by: dagny at March 30, 2010 10:56 AM (A75vQ)
I was talking about saying what you think they want to hear, like obama does in all of his speeches, my red flag went up when I heard his speech and researched him he was in trouble big time while in the service that's all, cool your jets.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 10:56 AM (zzUK0)
They'd also have to spread the illegals all over the country, in districts that are close, and I don't see that as feasible.
They only have to spread their name. The address can be a park bench or abandoned house.
Posted by: harleycowboy at March 30, 2010 11:03 AM (JKGfQ)
McCain makes me cringe and I blame his maverick stuff for the position we are in today. I would still support him against a lib though. Sarah can't really abandon him without looking like a bitch.
Posted by: dagny at March 30, 2010 02:56 PM (A75vQ)
The frauds who claim they "did support her, until she campaigned for McCain," are being intentionally stupid about this fact.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 11:04 AM (9b6FB)
And I'm just saying it's a strange leap you made.
There are few insults worse than suggesting someone kind of reminds you of Obama.
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 11:04 AM (9B5OK)
Listen to his speech and listen to one of obama's, really listen that's all I was saying.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 11:06 AM (zzUK0)
Sarah can't really abandon him without looking like a bitch.
Oh yes she can. After RINO Mcain's posturing she should drop him like a hot rock.
Posted by: harleycowboy at March 30, 2010 11:08 AM (JKGfQ)
Obama sounds more like a pseudo-intellectual to me than Allen West.
West sounds a helluva lot more like an AME preacher to me than Obama.
That's how I hear it.
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 11:10 AM (9b6FB)
but when I went back as a Platoon Sgt. in a Infantry Companyit was like herding cats to get them to act like soldiers (not all) no, we need this new breed of Vets to run for office it's a much different military than 'Nam. Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 02:41 PM (zzUK0)
Good times my Brother, good times. LOL
Posted by: Old Hippie Vet at March 30, 2010 11:10 AM (3IZGh)
amnesty plus radical redistricting would be sufficient to permit a huge amount of illegals made democrat voters to choose our president and House.
They want to go away from a strict count, and give minorities 'extra' census counts because they are somehow scared to answer the forms or something.
There's more to this than any particular step.
And people mad Palin for making a decision that is obviously not strictly political... those people don't get it. A) hayworth simply isn't worth abandoning Mccain over. He's a douche and a loser and a bit crazy. B) Mccain is a good friend of Palin's. He's an honorable man who does as he says. I don't like what he does, but he's honest about it. That means Palin's loyalty is justified despite their political differences. Honor matters, even in this case.
Palin's choosing to be loyal to her friend instead of strictly abandoning every RINO. I understand this at its core as Palin being a good person.
Posted by: throwaway handle at March 30, 2010 11:13 AM (dUOK+)
I listened to this speech when Laura posted it.
I hear a love of country, an appreciation of opportunity and not outcome, a respect for limitations of government and an appreciation of individual achievement.
I hear zero echoes of Obama in it.
Just curious but what exactly are you hearing?
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 11:13 AM (9B5OK)
And I'm just saying it's a strange leap you made.
There are few insults worse than suggesting someone kind of reminds you of Obama.
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 03:04 PM (9B5OK)
150 149 DrewM,Listen to his speech and listen to one of obama's, really listen that's all I was saying.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 03:06 PM (zzUK0)
Excuse me fellas...but aren't all pols populists? Its their stock-n-trade, Sarah was dishing quite a bit of red meat this weekend, it just so happens we prefer here meat to say Barbara Boxer's.
Posted by: dananjcon at March 30, 2010 11:14 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: K~Bob at March 30, 2010 11:14 AM (9b6FB)
I'm just saying that I want to see what Col.West does in the future before I support him, as for odumbass I despise him for the way he scammed America and I don't want to see anyone else do that just because of one sermon.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 11:21 AM (zzUK0)
Posted by: stace at March 30, 2010 11:25 AM (g/wgk)
Yeah well, you could say that about a lot of politicians.
Posted by: DrewM. at March 30, 2010 11:32 AM (9B5OK)
Yes I could, my vote is important and I'm not going to give it to anyone that has a pretty voice I want to have trust when I mark it, if more Americans would do that we wouldn't be where we are today!!
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at March 30, 2010 11:36 AM (zzUK0)
When they say "I'll fight for you," they're coming from a position of experience actually, genuinely fighting for you.
Let's be thoughtful about such broad statements. Just serving in the military does not make you a good bet: Kerry, Murtha, Heath Shuler has not shown me he fights for the consituants because he was a VET; Of the six veterans who served in Iraq and ran for Congress in 2006, only Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., was elected. What do we know about him?
Posted by: rightzilla at March 30, 2010 11:40 AM (rVJH4)
Posted by: Louis Tully at March 30, 2010 11:49 AM (jat5l)
@168...thanks.
@ ACE: Great idea. The Democrats put up several veterans in 2006 and won.
uh...1 of six won.....0.016 success. So the mantra of HE SERVED SO ELECT HIM is not really supported by that statement.
Posted by: rightzilla at March 30, 2010 11:54 AM (rVJH4)
Posted by: Mohammed at March 30, 2010 11:56 AM (4XzsU)
Posted by: Mohammed at March 30, 2010 03:56 PM (4XzsU)
Now this is an idea I can get behind.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 30, 2010 12:01 PM (1fanL)
Posted by: Rat Patrol at March 30, 2010 12:11 PM (dQdrY)
Vets are assumed by many to be republicans, so there is nothing special about that. But democrats who are veterans get attention because they are abnormal. They give the dems cover on national security issues. Of course, most of them are Vote Vets douchebags like Pat Murphy and Massa.
Posted by: Pat at March 30, 2010 12:17 PM (R0lVr)
I'd run. But Marcia Blackburn seems to want to keep her seat for now, and I don't want to move.
I figure in a vet-heavy district, the sins of my past won't be as big a deal.
Posted by: SGT Dan at March 30, 2010 12:23 PM (GgXZc)
It is too bad he is not in the county with Watkins Glen.
Posted by: hous bin pharteen at March 30, 2010 12:30 PM (pU4D7)
Republican Mark Rosen--West Point undergrad, Harvard grad--has Nita Lowey VERY worried in NY 18th. On the day of the "healthcare" vote, he stood outside her Westchester office and made a speech against the bill and in favor of personal responsibility/fiscal conservatism/liberty.
If Westchester could give Spano the boot, Lowey can (finally) get kicked to the curb, too. Fingers crossed/$$'s being sent to Rosen.
Posted by: Nik at March 30, 2010 12:47 PM (CdZ1a)
"Hell, I'd vote for him based just on that story."
You'd vote for a guy who NJP'd his troops for the exact same crap he pulled with those prisoners?
Damn.
Look, I've actually been there and done that in the USMC, and I had to deal with a CO who pulled some shenanigans like that. It's no fun, and it shows a severe weakness of character.
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at March 30, 2010 12:47 PM (sGtp+)
Conservative Republican NC-7 running against Blue Dog Democrat Mick McIntyre.
PantanoforCongress.com
Posted by: syn at March 30, 2010 01:03 PM (IlCz1)
Posted by: Annabelle at March 30, 2010 01:38 PM (4s/y5)
Adam West currently has a fund raiser going on "22 for 22" (22nd District). If you can cough up $22 it would help. I'm not even in FLA and I sent him
$35 earlier and will do $22 now. That's how impressed I am with him.
He showed up and spoke at the Daytona Beach Bike Week Freedom Rally last month and gave an awesome speech. The dude is the real deal.
On his FB page, somebody commented as follows (all typos and misspellings kept in): "SORRY COL.BBUT SINCE IAM PART OF TEA PARTY I JUST FOUND OUT IAM A RASCIST SO I DONT KNOW IF IAM ALLOWED TO SUPPORT A REALY GREAT CANIDIT SUCH AS YOUR SELF"
Commentor can't spell, but h/she sure made a helluva point.
Posted by: Home of Joe Biden at March 30, 2010 01:54 PM (YpNr0)
Conservative Republican NC-7 running against Blue Dog Democrat Mick McIntyre.
PantanoforCongress.com
Posted by: syn at March 30, 2010 05:03 PM (IlCz1)
I'll second that. That seat has been Dem for over 100 years, and they think they own it. McIntyre was one of the few lucky Dems allowed by Pelosi to vote NO on health care, and that was only because he finally had a credible and dangerous challenge to the seat this year.
Pantano is in the middle of a money bomb right now - until midnight tomorrow. Can some of you guys throw a few bucks his way?
Posted by: Redhead Infidel at March 30, 2010 02:33 PM (/O9DD)
Posted by: Pat at March 30, 2010 02:34 PM (R0lVr)
Roughly 1/3 of the troops are liberal or Kommiecrat. The rest, which by the way are mostly in combat forces, are Conservatives or Pubs...
Strars & Stripes did the poll, but while I was there in 04 it seemed much more Conservative.
Posted by: Serfer62 at March 30, 2010 02:41 PM (HLCnI)
Posted by: Redhead Infidel at March 30, 2010 02:51 PM (/O9DD)
But combat arms guys are overwhelmingly conservative.
Always be careful about people in a government bureaucracy. To be a true conservative, you have to value life without much government involvement. You have to realize that government is a problem, not a solution, to be kept out of as many things as possible. That can be hard if you just spent 30 years working for Uncle Sam, heroic as our troops are.
Posted by: throwaway handle at March 30, 2010 03:00 PM (dUOK+)
Posted by: SGT Dan at March 30, 2010 03:33 PM (L0IJJ)
Posted by: Horatius at March 30, 2010 04:28 PM (qVVR9)
Posted by: KathyTheEngineer at March 30, 2010 05:05 PM (ZgjR3)
Posted by: Dave J. at March 30, 2010 05:40 PM (DCQ0q)
Posted by: Analpoundit at March 31, 2010 02:31 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 31, 2010 02:51 AM (mHQ7T)
Nothing against service experience, but as Mencken observed about motherhood, "I would be more impressed with it if the requirements were higher."
Posted by: PersonFromPorlock at March 31, 2010 04:29 AM (BbTsC)
Posted by: puma running shoes at April 02, 2010 12:36 AM (ULaGr)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2856 seconds, 324 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Wesley Clark at March 30, 2010 09:38 AM (ucq49)