April 17, 2014
— Ace There's a famous scene in Annie Hall when a blowhard idiot pontificates about Fellini and Marshall McLuhan. Woody Allen (or "Alvie Singer") becomes increasingly annoyed by the boor, until he at last pulls the actual Marshall McLuhan out from behind an obstruction.
Marshall McLuhan then tells the guy he's an idiot, and that he "know[s] nothing of my work."
Why am I telling about you this? It's on YouTube:
Then Woody Allen turns to the camera and says, "Boy, if life were only [really] like this."
Well, sometimes life really does work like this.
Sometimes an egregious blowhard really does get pulled aside by the man whose work he is (wrongly) pontificating about and get told that he knows nothing of his work.
It just happened to Paul Krugman.
Krugman's been commenting on the work of Dan Kahan. Kahan's a professor of law at Yale who writes a lot about "cultural cognition," which is just the idea that individual people will tend to think, reason, and decide according to the patterns instilled in them by the cultural cohort within which they reside.
In other words, partisans tend to parrot like-minded partisans.
Although I'm sure it goes beyond actual political partisanship, to general social and philosophical outlook.
So Lesser Krugman, Ezra Klein, had written about this (himself getting big parts of it wrong, naturally), and then Paul Krugman wrote about Klein writing about it, and Krugman's main complaint with Ezra Klein was that he hadn't been partisan enough in his analysis.
Whereas Kahan describes cultural cognition as affecting, of course, both the left and right, Krugman insisted that No, it almost entirely affects the right, Becuz Theyre Dumb.
By the way, Klein was already pretty partisan about this, briefly acknowledging the phenomenon on the left, before turning with considerably more brio to talk about how dumb the right is.
But Krugman said, basically, Nah, you shouldn't have even conceded that much. Look we're just better. Period.
And do you know what happened next?
Magic happened next.
Kahan himself considered Krugman's "empirical proof" that the left was less subject to the effects of cultural cognition (group think), and... laughed out loud.
He really says that. Well, he says "guffawed."
Okay, I've finally caught my breath after laughing myself into state of hyperventilation as a result of reading Krugman's latest proof (this is actually a replication of an earlier empirical study on his part) that ideologically motivated reasoning is in fact perfectly symmetric with respect to right-left ideology.Rather than just guffawing appreciatively, it's worth taking a moment to call attention to just how exquisitely self-refuting his "reasoning" is!
There's the great line, of course, about how his "lived experience" (see? I told you, he's doing empirical work!) confirms that motivated cognition "is not, in fact, symmetric between liberals and conservatives."
But what comes next is an even more subtle -- and thus an even more spectacular! -- illustration of what it looks like when one's reason is deformed by tribalism:
Yes, liberals are sometimes subject to bouts of wishful thinking. But can anyone point to a liberal equivalent of conservative denial of climate change, or the “unskewing” mania late in the 2012 campaign, or the frantic efforts to deny that Obamacare is in fact covering a lot of previously uninsured Americans?Uh, no, PK. I mean seriously, no.
You know nothing of my work, Krugman.
I won't detail Kahan's refutation of Krugman's re-writing of his work. You can read his own words for that.
But his main point is that Krugman misses the point entirely. Krugman asserts, at the outset, that progressive beliefs must be correct, and therefore, anyone holding those beliefs must be better at reasoning.
Not so, Kahan replies -- you've missed the whole point of my work. Entirely. You can measure reasoning, but you'd measure reasoning by actually measuring reasoning, that is, taking the partisans of both sides and seeing how they react when presented with a provably true but ideologically discomfiting piece of evidence.
Instead, Krugman just assumes Progs R Smarterer because, you know, Progs R Smarterer.
That Krugman is too thick to see that one can't infer anything about the quality of partisans' reasoning from the truth or falsity of their beliefs is ... another element of Krugman's proof that ideological reasoning is symmetric across right and left!
In other words, Paul Krugman, posing as a Champion of Empiricism and purely-rational thought, himself discards the need for actual empirical evidence on a key point because it gels with the conclusion he already had in mind -- and thereby proves he's more infected tribal thinking than anyone else who's entered the discussion.
Thus directly self-refuting himself, and disproving the very claim he seeks to "prove."
For in fact, that "the other side" is closed-minded is one of the positions that partisans are unreasoningly committed to.
And this close-mindedness more and more frequently takes this form:
1. You are a racist, moronic, barely-human monster.
2. For evidence of such, see point 1.
3. The fact that you won't accept this proof proves that you are close-minded and hostile to "new ideas."
4. Which in turn proves -- as if it needed further proof! -- that you're a racist, moronic, barely-human monster.
If you want to read more of Kahan's theorizing on "motivated reasoning" (that is, what we usually call "reasoning backwards," figuring out the evidence and logic backwards from the conclusion you've begun with, you can read this.
More quotes at Volokh.
Thanks to @rdbrewer4 for this.
Why, this Paul Krugman is worth every penny of the $25,000 per month CUNY is paying him to serve as a Paris-Hilton-like brand ambassador for their studies in income inequality.
Who better to declaim about income inequality than a guy making $25,000 per month as a show-up-to-a-few-of-our-parties-and-collect-a-check side-gig?
Posted by: Ace at
11:02 AM
| Comments (207)
Post contains 989 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 17, 2014 11:06 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Paul K at April 17, 2014 11:08 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at April 17, 2014 11:08 AM (rt3TY)
I think "laughing myself into state of hyperventilation" probably included some laughing out loud.
I'm only commenting because this is a comments section. The post itself is such a self-contained jewel that it defies further explication.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 17, 2014 11:09 AM (JtwS4)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 17, 2014 11:09 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:10 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at April 17, 2014 11:10 AM (4CVLy)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 17, 2014 11:10 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 17, 2014 11:11 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at April 17, 2014 11:11 AM (cyxit)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 17, 2014 11:12 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:12 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: brak at April 17, 2014 11:12 AM (M2qTM)
Posted by: mrp at April 17, 2014 11:13 AM (JBggj)
Posted by: Phil Collins at April 17, 2014 11:13 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Waterhouse at April 17, 2014 11:14 AM (fOLwM)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 17, 2014 11:14 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 11:14 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: joncelli at April 17, 2014 11:14 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 17, 2014 11:15 AM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 17, 2014 11:15 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Mooch at April 17, 2014 11:15 AM (7pOq5)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone wearing tinfoil at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (43C0x)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 17, 2014 03:12 PM (DmNpO)
Fixed for accuracy.
Posted by: Insomniac at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: Lauren at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (hFL/3)
As Woody Allen movies go, it isn't bad.
[read what I wrote carefully....]
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 17, 2014 11:16 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 17, 2014 11:17 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: tu3031 at April 17, 2014 11:17 AM (yv+63)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 17, 2014 11:17 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (CMkNk)
I laughed. but then I realized that at least Paris has rarely been caught trying to be more intelligent than she really is. She is quite comfortable in her own skin and stays true to her craft (being a skanky, privileged skank). Paul, on the other hand, pretends (maybe DEMANDS) to be an intellectual of the highest order, although he too is just a skanky, privileged skank.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (ndlFj)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (8ZskC)
Shep just reported something about a kid asking Putin whether Obama would save him if he were drowning. Puting responded that he would because "President Obama is a decent and brave man."
Yeah.
Okay.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 17, 2014 03:12 PM (DmNpO)
Putin is pretty sharp. The kid's question was obviously a setup to get Vlad to say something racist. I'm not gonna say what it was, but I denounce myself for thinking it.
Posted by: mugiwara at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: Jaws at April 17, 2014 11:18 AM (eKZp1)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:19 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 17, 2014 11:19 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 17, 2014 11:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:19 AM (CMkNk)
Paul KrugmanÂ’s 'Big' New Salary DoesnÂ’t Make Him a Hypocrite, It doesnÂ’t even make him that rich!
MARC TRACY
The New Republic
http://tinyurl.com/nnerrvh
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: "Papah" Woody Allen at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (x60m8)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: BS Inc at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (lvxsr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: tasker at April 17, 2014 11:20 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: joncelli at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (RD7QR)
Or, "criminals and communists," if you're a lefty.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:21 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:22 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 17, 2014 11:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: willow at April 17, 2014 11:22 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Joe at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (7pOq5)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: spongeworthy at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (8Pg2o)
Posted by: BS Inc at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (pm/oS)
Posted by: Zombie Pauline Kael at April 17, 2014 11:23 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: tasker at April 17, 2014 11:24 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:24 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 17, 2014 11:24 AM (Z7PrM)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 17, 2014 11:25 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 17, 2014 11:25 AM (2hTlI)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 17, 2014 11:25 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 03:18 PM (P1WNR)
Being on time is racist
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 17, 2014 11:27 AM (1Jaio)
My guess is that asshole stole all of the ideas that ade him such a wonderful dude.
He is so goddamn dishonest, it must be.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Christies at April 17, 2014 11:28 AM (xggaJ)
Posted by: Butters 'Stotch at April 17, 2014 11:28 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: AMDG at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (eFytx)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: TheQuietMan
............
Noticing he's late is racist! We all know what that is a dog whistle for...
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (Z7PrM)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: Roy at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Snow! AHHHHHHHH! at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (hLRSq)
There is a famous scene, in Annie Hall?
You mean... there are enough people who saw it, to make a scene famous?
Or... perhaps famous amongst your social group???
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 03:14 PM (84gbM)
++++
From Wikipedia:
Annie Hall was screened at the Los Angeles Film Festival in March 1977, before its official release on 20 April 1977. The film received widespread critical acclaim, and along with winning the Academy Award for Best Picture, it received Oscars in three other categories: two for Allen (Best Director and, with Brickman, Best Original Screenplay), and Keaton for Best Actress. The film additionally won four BAFTA awards and a Golden Globe, the latter being awarded to Keaton. Its North American box office receipts of $38,251,425 are fourth-best in the director's oeuvre when not adjusted for inflation. Often listed among the greatest film comedies, it ranks 31st on AFI's list of the top feature films in American cinema, fourth on their list of top comedy films and number 28 on Bravo's "100 Funniest Movies." Film critic Roger Ebert called it "just about everyone's favorite Woody Allen movie".
Whatever you may think about Woody Allen and/or his films, there is little doubt that his films have been widely seen.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at April 17, 2014 11:29 AM (IN7k+)
Paul Simon.
The real question is which of the three farts don't smell?
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 03:29 PM (oDCMR)
Which of these three doesn't fart into a cognac glass and then inhale the fumes deeply?
Posted by: Insomniac at April 17, 2014 11:30 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 17, 2014 11:30 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 17, 2014 11:30 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: Shorty Johnson at April 17, 2014 11:31 AM (xWW96)
And . . . the guy does the same thing: Libruls R Being Much Full of Science Believing in the Global Warmings. Cons are teh dumbs.
I mean, totally missing the "hey, maybe there are real scientific reasons conservatives could have for NOT believing in global warming."
No, he just raffs at the dumb conservatives for believing a fake science paper.
Even though the fake science paper is exactly what most of us keep saying about the scam: "We'll believe it's a crisis when you fucking lying bastards start acting like it's a crisis."
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 17, 2014 11:31 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: End Times at April 17, 2014 11:32 AM (thLL8)
Specifically, who is shorter, Paul Krugman or Mike Bloomberg? Paul Simon.
Any reason for lumping Paul Simon in with these idiots? Assuming musician. The late floppy eared bastard from Illinois Paul Simon wasn't short.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 17, 2014 11:33 AM (JtwS4)
Posted by: Roy at April 17, 2014 11:33 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:33 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:34 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 17, 2014 11:34 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 03:33 PM (zOTsN)
He have a lot in common wit my dick.
Posted by: Shorty Johnson at April 17, 2014 11:34 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 17, 2014 11:34 AM (Qh0T+)
Posted by: Butters 'Stotch at April 17, 2014 11:35 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Lauren at April 17, 2014 11:35 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: End Times at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: joncelli at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (RD7QR)
Media Matters for America is apparently resisting an effort by Service Employees International Union Local 500 to unionize its staff.
Posted by: If It Walks Like A Terrier at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (e8kgV)
Again, I'll concede to Krugman's point that we on the Right are not as smart as the Left if he could convince the rest of his tribe to allow the peaceful physical split of the US into two sovereign nations. This would release them from the burden of having to put up with us.
But you know what, they would never agree to this in a million years because they know they would collapse into chaos and misery just like every other socialist based country / government whereas the majority of the people on the Right would welcome the split.
Posted by: polynikes at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: HR at April 17, 2014 11:36 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: ManWithNoParty at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (ojnk6)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (2hTlI)
Of course there's kids on South State Street who are as good or better than he is at conning people.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (JS0vr)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:37 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Naes1984 at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (LiHKo)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (oFCZn)
Not our fault this time. We don't want him, either.
Posted by: Zklpxk at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at April 17, 2014 11:38 AM (APuJ7)
Posted by: polynikes at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (P1WNR)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: CNN at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Dr Spank at April 17, 2014 03:37 PM (P1WNR)
Speakin' 'o' dat, can CNN locate my dick? Jus haddit a while back.....
Posted by: Shorty Johnson at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 11:39 AM (84gbM)
Kahan's a professor of law at Yale who writes a lot about "cultural cognition," which is just the idea that individual people will tend to think, reason, and decide according to the patterns instilled in them by the cultural cohort within which they reside.
We have a good old time in Hordeistan mocking the left. And if we read comments on their sites we think they're idiots. A guy at lunch today said "have you ever seen that Rachel Maddow show? I can't stand her". Well, no, and we can't either. But she has fans and rabid adherents who are sure that we're the idiots.
I don't know what can be done about it, but we have become two Americas who not only have fundamental differences in outlook, but who don't talk or listen to each other anymore.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 17, 2014 11:40 AM (JtwS4)
Posted by: CNN at April 17, 2014 11:40 AM (32Ze2)
Over and over and over again he has praised the actions of a Democrat President while having condemned those same acts under a Republican.
The guy is a fucking fraud from top to bottom.
The most interesting study would be: Which Nobel Prize winner has parlayed their award into the most subsequent money without ever doing any further significant work in that field?
After the JEF, I would say the Krugs has 2nd place far and away.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 17, 2014 11:40 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (2hTlI)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Zombie Kurt Vonnegut at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (TIIx5)
Well, well, well, dems cheating shocker:
A wealthy hotel executive and Democratic fundraiser who supported Hilary Clinton for president pleaded guilty Thursday to charges he secretly funneled more than $180,000 in illegal campaign contributions to three unnamed candidates and coached someone to lie about it.
An informant caught Sant Singh Chatwal on tape in 2010 explaining that he believed his illegal fundraising bought him access to people in power.
PS - that is AP report that spelled Hillary wrong.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: Shorty Johnson at April 17, 2014 11:41 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Sandy Fluke at April 17, 2014 11:42 AM (3rrMW)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 17, 2014 11:42 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:42 AM (oDCMR)
I had an epiphany last night. I realized the primary reason liberal politicians are so enamored with public transit and trains. It isn't about shepherding people into easily managed parcels of real estate.
It is about the kickbacks they receive from the developers. They don't even believe the lies they spew, they just want some cash.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 17, 2014 11:42 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: joncelli at April 17, 2014 11:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Lauren at April 17, 2014 11:43 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:43 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 17, 2014 11:43 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 17, 2014 11:43 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Lauren at April 17, 2014 11:44 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: thunderb also dickless rapper at April 17, 2014 11:44 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 17, 2014 11:44 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (8D0/R)
Posted by: joncelli at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: tasker at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (aDwsi)
Good news: I got a $1240/yr raise.
Bad news: That only works out to a net increase of $32 a paycheck.
Gee, thanks Obama!
Posted by: Country Singer at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (L8r/r)
Posted by: Person of Interest at April 17, 2014 11:45 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Reg at April 17, 2014 11:46 AM (thLL8)
It's not just that they do it. It's that they all do it. And they all do it because they HAVE to do it to cope with the subconscious reality that they couldn't survive without being parasites.
My apologies to Mel Brooks.
Posted by: grognard at April 17, 2014 11:46 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 17, 2014 11:46 AM (659DL)
Posted by: HR at April 17, 2014 11:46 AM (ZKzrr)
When I explain this to Libs... even Libs with a scientific background.... they tell me... well... its complicated and the scientists say its happening .... so....
For the Left? Credentialism Trumps Understanding or Fact.
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 17, 2014 03:39 PM (84gbM)
=============
There is study after study after study that shows that increased CO2 leads to bigger plants, that grow faster, that use less water and produce larger fruit.
But you never, ever, ever hear there is a huge benefit to global warming--one that would dwarf any negatives they keep lying about.
That's without counting the millions of acres that will become available for farming in the northern areas if the world would actually warm up.
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 17, 2014 11:46 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:47 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 17, 2014 11:48 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Behind Enemy Lines at April 17, 2014 11:49 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: Sharkman at April 17, 2014 11:49 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 17, 2014 11:51 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 17, 2014 11:51 AM (aDwsi)
Two good longer-form posts back to back makes for a good afternoon.
Posted by: StPatrick_TN at April 17, 2014 11:52 AM (dF04M)
I commiserate with them and then suggest that we really should have a basic voting test. Perhaps some very simple algebra or logic problems, or at least 6th grade math. Perhaps some kind of IQ test. That would take care of the stupid wingnuts, right?
---
The democrats. The only party to publicly proclaim that their own base is too stupid to vote correctly.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at April 17, 2014 11:53 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 17, 2014 11:53 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 17, 2014 11:55 AM (IXrOn)
Robert Reich
---
Little known facts,
his real first name is Tyrion
You should never play 'got you nose' with him
yeah, he has to pay for it
Posted by: Lord Varys at April 17, 2014 11:55 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Enron Corp. at April 17, 2014 11:56 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Kevin in ABQ at April 17, 2014 11:56 AM (XrGnJ)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at April 17, 2014 11:57 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Aviator at April 17, 2014 11:58 AM (3rrMW)
Posted by: Pigilito at April 17, 2014 11:58 AM (AW99N)
Posted by: StPatrick_TN at April 17, 2014 03:52 PM (dF04M)
True, but "Actually working for a living? How does that fucking work?"
How the Hell am I supposed to get anything done here?
Posted by: Sharkman at April 17, 2014 11:59 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: Nip Sip at April 17, 2014 11:59 AM (0FSuD)
Being laughed at will hurt them more than anything other than actual violence (which I do not condone).
Nothing would deflate President Narcissus faster and more completely than a very loud, very public rhetorical whuppin'
Posted by: acethepug at April 17, 2014 12:05 PM (Ue2Yo)
Posted by: Paul "Fredo" Krugman at April 17, 2014 12:08 PM (++HCY)
Posted by: Sharkman at April 17, 2014 12:08 PM (TM1p8)
If they aren't confident enough to stand behind their products without this legal bullshit, then I'm not confident enough to trust their products.
Fuck. Them.
Posted by: grognard at April 17, 2014 12:11 PM (/29Nl)
Posted by: dan-O at April 17, 2014 12:36 PM (D0bIN)
He writes that the agent told him that they have snipers around the stadium. Mass recalls the agent saying, "Like I said, do whatever it is you normally do. Nobody will bother you. But approach the president, and we go for the kill shot. Are we clear?" The agent repeated the line twice, Mass writes.
Posted by: If It Walks Like A Baseball at April 17, 2014 12:52 PM (e8kgV)
Liberals do not believe that there are such things as "opinions." There are facts and there are falsehoods, and all their world-views are based on their "facts."
So to argue against Liberalism is to argue against "facts." And who can argue against "facts"? Only benighted fools. And who argues with fools?
That's why Liberals become so enraged when people disagree with them--according to the Liberal, the opposer is either lying or stupid.
That's also why Liberals see absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever to using power to crush conservative opinions. After all, they "reason," if you found out your child's math teacher was teaching 2 + 2= 5, you would fight so he could no longer teach such lies, right? That's exactly what Liberals believe they are doing, and why they fight so hard against any ideas that aren't "Liberal."
Liberalism is a form of mental disease. They themselves prove this every single day.
Posted by: Null at April 17, 2014 01:11 PM (xjpRj)
Is there any particular reason the SCOAMF is perpetually late for his own press conferences? It's not as if he's got something better to do. He doesn't have to worry about rush hour traffic does he?
I sure this isn't like that Viagra commercial where the couple slip in late at the opera. Blech!
Posted by: Northernlurker at April 17, 2014 01:17 PM (Xmw9g)
Posted by: peej at April 17, 2014 02:12 PM (/2UVF)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3109 seconds, 335 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: NCKate at April 17, 2014 11:03 AM (BD6t/)