January 10, 2010
— Ace Centerpiece of the segment? An interview with Palin-basher Steve Schmidt.
EdwardR. writes:
Palin simply did not have enough time to prepare for running for the VP slot. Up until the last moment, McCain wanted to pick Lieberman and Palin was his last second choice. She got by her debate on charisma alone.
If Palin had 3-4 months to seriously prepare, her interviews would have been SO much better and would have aced out the main argument against her, that she didnt have the intellect to be VP or POTUS.
I have always said that. I always ask the question, "Name me a vice presidential nominee who was not either a 1) sitting Senator (who knows federal issues because it's his day-to-day job or 2) someone who had just run for President (and lost) and therefore had gone through the Obama six-months-of-briefing-books process. Note that this process, too, allows a candidate to make a lot of mistakes early, when the cameras aren't rolling very much or at least no one's paying much attention. After several months of this errors are corrected, and the candidate seems like he knows what he's talking about.
Yeah -- but he didn't six months before.
I asked David Freddoso this question, and he actually had an answer: Dick Cheney. Fine, good answer, I have since modified the question. But obviously that still makes my basic point: Cheney was a fixture in DC for all of his life in one capacity or another.
There's a reason governors who haven't been running for president for a year are never nominated to be VP -- it's not their day-to-day job, and they have absolutely zero prep time to bone up on this stuff.
Strangely enough, while the media always covered for Obama's lapses, they never did let anyone know that Palin was the only pure governor (that is, no running for president) nominated for VP since, well, I don't know when.
Game Change: Palin disputes the account in the book:
Her spokeswoman, Meghan Stapleton, said in a statement: "The Governor's descriptions of these events are found in her book, 'Going Rogue.' Her descriptions are accurate. She was there. These reporters were not."The statement was provided to CBS's "60 Minutes,” which includes material about the former Alaska governor in a segment about “Game Change.” Correspondent Anderson Cooper interviewed Steve Schmidt, top strategist on the McCain-Palin campaign, who said a campaign aide preparing her for the debate with Joe Biden “told us the debate was going to be a debacle of historic and epic proportions.”
“She was not focused ... not engaged,” Schmidt told Cooper. “She was not really participating in the prep.” Schmidt confronted Palin and, he said, “She said, ‘You know, I think that's right.’”
Even if that is true, it's also true (I think) that Palin was feeling by this point she was being badly served by her preppers, who fed her a lot of talking points that weren't really he. Further, she beat Joe Biden in that debate, so.... I don't know. Assuming she wasn't fully into the prep-stuff, she was right: A less rehearsed, more natural performance served her well.
Posted by: Ace at
08:50 AM
| Comments (120)
Post contains 541 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: huerfano at January 10, 2010 08:53 AM (9szrE)
Posted by: Iskandar at January 10, 2010 08:56 AM (sKPtW)
...and probably just as credible.
Posted by: The Rogue Economist at January 10, 2010 08:56 AM (9WVTX)
Posted by: huerfano at January 10, 2010 08:59 AM (9szrE)
Posted by: paleRider at January 10, 2010 08:59 AM (bUWh3)
Posted by: robtr at January 10, 2010 09:00 AM (fwSHf)
Well, on the bright side, we'll finally be finished with the incessant MSM coverage - day and night - minute after interminable minute - of Reid's racismy racist comments (that we all know aren't really racist because he is like... a democrat! duh).
I thought it would never end.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 10, 2010 09:00 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 10, 2010 09:02 AM (GaTkJ)
No one questioned Sargent Shriver's qualifications to be VP, and he'd never even run for dogcatcher. He'd held no elective office, ever. The only real job he'd had was when his brother-in-law let him run the Peace Corps.
Of course, what qualifications does one need for a platform of Acid, Amnesty, and Abortion? Knowing all of Blue Cheer's lyrics?
Posted by: Velociman at January 10, 2010 09:03 AM (DXgYB)
Posted by: pep at January 10, 2010 09:05 AM (malh1)
Posted by: Kensington at January 10, 2010 09:07 AM (LIH4p)
This is supposed to be the "big get" from the book, I guess. The bias is just astounding. Given the Reid, Clinton and Edwards (especially Edwards) stuff in that book, they interview this little turd.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 10, 2010 09:08 AM (Vo2Ef)
I will just say it. If you do not support Sarah Palin THEN YOU ARE NOT A CONSERVATIVE. Yes I said it. (you can like other conservatives more, but you are not a conservative if you support Romney for example.)
I hear this crap from conservatives all the time. They whine about socialism, taxes, big government, on and on. They whine that they dont have a true conservative to vote for like in 2008 when our field in the primaries was filled with mostly big government freaks. Then they vote for Obama? Then they vote for Dole? Then they vote for Huckabee? Romney? They vote for every big government freak this country has to offer!
Now we have a real conservative who has proved it professionally and personally, and we have some conservatives nitpicking her every move. And I am not talking about frauds like Frum who of course will do that, I mean so called real conservatives who identify as such. Frum says he is moderate. I am taking aim at some of the identified true conservatives at the American Spectator, National Review, Krauthammer, and every other piece of trash out there like HotAir. They are ignorant about her record.
They will vote for Romney or Pawlenty, or Huckabee or some other freak and then they will bitch and moan when the debt skyrockets and their currency collapses bemoaning how the government keeps growing! Well, you dumbasses voted for it! ROMNEY SHOULD BE LAUGHED OFF THE STAGE IN A GOP PRIMARY! The fact that he polls high as a front runner should tell us that the conservative movement is in CRISIS! He signed and championed almost the exact same fucking law that Obama is ramming down our throats right now! And people say he is a conservative? Are you brain dead? Since when is big government entitlements that bankrupt a state conservative?
I am sick of these fraudulant conservatives with their stupidity and lies. You think the tea party folks are gonna volunteer and sleep in the snow below zero temps to work for Romney, a wall street financier who passed Obamacare in his own state? An entitlement that is now bankrupting them? WAKE UP!
IF THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT SARAH PALIN THEN THERE IS NO CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT AND IT DESERVES TO WHIMPER AND DIE.
It will exist in talk radio but not in the halls of power.
Are there other true conservatives? Of course, but none are running for president that I know of besides her who have any broad appeal at all.
I have alot more, but I am sure you get the idea and are annoyed with my rant at this point, which I understand
I hope at least some of you agree with me.
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 09:08 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2010 09:08 AM (VGeGl)
Thanks for that slanted opinion, Ace.
BTW, are you under a spam attack--the comments pages aren't loading very well under XP Pro and IE7.0?
Posted by: andycanuck at January 10, 2010 09:09 AM (2qU2d)
Don't worry about it. It's two years away. Plenty of time to take care of that.
*yawn*
Ooh, sleepy. I need a nap.
Posted by: Michael Steele at January 10, 2010 09:09 AM (LIH4p)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 10, 2010 01:02 PM (GaTkJ)
Uh-oh.
Posted by: That Chicken at January 10, 2010 09:10 AM (o4SzL)
Before that, Earl Warren of California in 1948. (lost)
On the Dem side, Charles Bryan of Nebraska in 1924. (lost)
Before that, Indiana's Thomas Marshall won with Wilson iu 1912 and 1916.
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at January 10, 2010 09:10 AM (xqhoO)
He hadn't received electroshock therapy.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 10, 2010 09:11 AM (Vo2Ef)
Posted by: I'm Rick James, BITCH! at January 10, 2010 09:13 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: curious at January 10, 2010 09:15 AM (p302b)
What else is on TV?
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 10, 2010 09:15 AM (OUqZe)
Posted by: the real joe at January 10, 2010 09:17 AM (SUYSs)
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 09:17 AM (KZraB)
For contrast, we certainly wouldn't want to waste our time on useless non-news like Obama's premptive amnesty for immigrants from terror sponsoring countries... nah... 'snothing.
via Omri
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 10, 2010 09:19 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at January 10, 2010 09:20 AM (xqhoO)
What's even worse is that their ratings suck so hard that they need the additional 300 viewers the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man's ugly little brother will bring on Sunday night.
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at January 10, 2010 09:21 AM (KWhJd)
Posted by: Gen. Sir Harry Flashman, VC at January 10, 2010 09:22 AM (9+fr4)
Ace nails it on the subject of Palin's preparation. Bottom line, she had been busy all of her life doing real stuff.
But Ace's observation also applies in a different way to the Moron in Chief.
All Obamy had done in his entire life is to practice to be a politician. He never held a job, never wrote a book (other than put his name on the cover), never had responsibilities of any sort.
He was prepped for 20 years by the people who chose him and groomed him.
And not just on the issues either. One of the key reasons that he got out of the box as easily as he did was that he was super-skilled in the polititcal art of lying, moreso even than the next greatest expert of all time, Bill Clinton. The art of lying isn't as easy as it seems. It goes against nature, and to operate at the highest level, it takes two skills. One is technical and the other is a personal attribute. The technical aspect is practice and knowledge. There are dozens, perhaps hundreds of techniques, and the more information you can master about the thing you are lying about, the easier it is to pull off whatever technique you are using. Obama was well drilled on the technical aspects. The personal aspect to total amorality. You can't be a good liar if you have normal human emotions and even the slightest bit of morality. Obama has neither. He has no moralitity whatsoever. His childhood stripped him of it. He is a form of pschopath. The perfect blank slate for his masters to imprint with their own insane, arrogant, evil lusts.
Posted by: proreason at January 10, 2010 09:23 AM (Rllt+)
Posted by: Tommy V at January 10, 2010 09:24 AM (gkc1e)
Well, thank God you're here to tell us how to be a conservative. We were just lost without instruction before you came along.
Dan, no, people that aren't fans of Sarah Palin can be conservatives. Likewise those who think Romney would be a fine leader can be as well. It's not up to you to decide who's a conservative and who isn't. Sorry, you're not the decider on the matter.
I realize you're trying to be helpful in your own way but it takes a certain amount of arrogance mixed with pointlessness to dictate the nomenclature of conservatives. I can think of a dozen ways that would actually help get conservatives elected rather than wasting time on pompous fiats like that.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 10, 2010 09:24 AM (sKPtW)
Posted by: curious at January 10, 2010 01:15 PM (p302b)
That's none of your business.
Posted by: Helen Thomas at January 10, 2010 09:28 AM (dRqic)
Posted by: ac at January 10, 2010 09:28 AM (A51gv)
Of course, what qualifications does one need for a platform of Acid, Amnesty, and Abortion? Knowing all of Blue Cheer's lyrics?
Posted by: Velocimanat January 10, 2010 01:03 PM (DXgYB)
He was also the producer for the classic Sargent Shriver's Bleeding Heatrs Club Band album.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at January 10, 2010 09:30 AM (tm15w)
"Going Rogue" meant wanting to win, and we couldn't have that.
Posted by: ian cormac at January 10, 2010 09:32 AM (My6A7)
I just finished Going Rogue. Good book; it's not exactly Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, but Palin comes across as likeable, and her descriptions of her family's history and what it was like to grow up in Alaska were quite interesting. And she writes well. Yes, I know, she had a lot of editorial help, but the words basically are hers, and they're well done.
As for 60 Minutes, I'm not surprised. Not surprised at all.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 10, 2010 09:32 AM (h9hW4)
Posted by: Jack at January 10, 2010 09:34 AM (bvDV5)
Posted by: ace at January 10, 2010 09:34 AM (5EsuI)
Schmidt wants to keep getting gigs working on political campaigns. Boy he did a lousy job on McCain/Palin's campaign.
Posted by: keyboard jockey at January 10, 2010 09:35 AM (YB60l)
Posted by: dorkafork at January 10, 2010 09:44 AM (WbRO8)
Posted by: curious at January 10, 2010 09:56 AM (p302b)
Jebus tap dancing Christ! Lieberman and Palin are not even the same species. We DID dodge a bullet by not electing that senile old coot.
Posted by: John Galt at January 10, 2010 09:57 AM (Ylv1H)
Posted by: Yehudit at January 10, 2010 09:59 AM (6UJVZ)
/yawn
It's time for a palate-cleanser.
Thanks to a link provided by conservativesforyouknowwho dot com, we can view a typical Going Rogue book-signing as an art form. LINK
Posted by: mrp at January 10, 2010 09:59 AM (HjPtV)
Palin whips Biden.
Steve Schmidt: She didn't prep the way my vast political knowledge said she should.
Okay, then.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 10, 2010 10:03 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: Bill Clinton at January 10, 2010 10:05 AM (XIUQZ)
Ace, you did not dispute that Romey is a big government freak. Look at his record. GREW GOVERNMENT. Supported Obamacare before there was Obamacare. Is this conservative? Do we believe in conservatism, or dont we?
If we don't then fine, this is america. Then we should not call ourselves conservatives. If being a conservative means you can believe ANYTHING then being conservatives means nothing.
After the primary, I supported McCain since he was our only shot, but in the coming primary process we have no excuse not to nominate a true conservative.
ISKANDAR, is romney a conservative? If you like him and want him to be POTUS, then glod bless you, but he is not a conservative. Conservtives dont grow government and bankupt their states with new entitlements. This is a fact, and my delivery does not change the facts.
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 10:11 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: JackStraw at January 10, 2010 10:17 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: Yehudit at January 10, 2010 01:59 PM (6UJVZ)
I'm not sure if she "didn't know" about it as much as was shocked by how ludicrous it was that she was expecting Gwen Ifill to start laughing about it; unfortunately Gwen was thinking about the next all-you-can-eat buffet joint she was going to send out of bidness and declined to correct the dumbest idiot from Scranton.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 10, 2010 10:22 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: toby928 at January 10, 2010 10:28 AM (PD1tk)
That fact is only apparent to you I guess. MA budget change over year prior:
2003 = - 4.7%
2004 = - 2.2%
2005 = 0.8%
2006 = 0.6%
2007 = 7.5%
Looks like aside from his final year that included the health care legislation, he cut spending.
"The state legislature, with Romney's support, also cut spending by $1.6 billion, including $700 million in reductions in state aid to cities and towns. The cuts also included a $140 million reduction in state funding for higher education, which led state-run colleges and universities to increase tuition by 63%. Romney sought additional cuts in his last year as Massachusetts governor by vetoing nearly 250 items in the state budget. All of those vetoes were overturned by the legislature."
Posted by: Iskandar at January 10, 2010 10:37 AM (sKPtW)
Iskandar, you know just like I do that the healthcare fiasco has destroyed their budget and it is not reflected in those numbers you posted. THE STRUCTURE was put in place and now they are reaping the whirlwind. Just like Obamacare, it looks good on paper in the first bit due to accounting tricks worthy of enron, but long term they are screwed.
How are those numbers looking now and in the future as they grow faster than GDP? I really hope for your sake your not a taxpayer in that state.
He will say hes not in charge now so he cant be blamed, well once put the structure in then that is what happens. It is a hallmark of the progressive movement. He should have known.
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 10:43 AM (KZraB)
Palin didn't well in her interviews (though given how much they were edited, who knows what they looked like uncut), but whether the debates counts as a tie, a very slight win (my view--given what the worries about her were at that point), or an actual win, it was very clearly not a debacle of historic proportions.
I know political analysts and aides have to be realistic in order to help the campaign, but maybe it would have helped Sarah Palin's self-confidence and helped her in her practicing if she was around people who didn't spend their time talking about her like this behind her back? Maybe?
Also, there are/were rumors re: Obama cheating on his wife. Maybe only rumors, but that's no better than the stuff they're publishing about Cindy Mcain's and Bill Clinton's private life. So far, in these leaks, they seem to offered dirt on a lot of major players in 2008--but not Obama. If they wanted to, they could. I'm interested to know if that's in there, if anything about Obama is in there. Yeah, It would shock me (they'd catch holy hell, if not a lawsuit--btw has Cindy commented on this?).
However, if they're going this far with everybody else, and if they're going to be consistent, then I would expect at least something on the guy. I don't know--maybe something about the press not reporting his smoking for two years? Did nobody really know about that? Yeah, it's dirty reporting, but that's stopping them from knocking everybody else; so what's in there?
Posted by: AD at January 10, 2010 10:46 AM (INZCg)
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 10:53 AM (KZraB)
Dan's one of those Palin "supporters" who thinks that it is his job to run down any and all potential GOP candidates for president other than Sarah.
If it turns out that Palin doesn't run in 2012 he will stay home and pout on election day, after spending much of the primary season badmouthing all of the GOP candidates as being "big government freaks, no different from the Democrats".
He will also urge all TRUE CONSERVATIVES to likewise stay home and ensure that B.O. gets reelected so that he can later say that Sarah was the only one who could have defeated B.O. evah!!!
Posted by: Deety at January 10, 2010 10:56 AM (aVzyR)
I like Sarah, I find it odd that the repubs have this "its their turn" mentality when it comes to picking candidates. I mean Bob Dole? John Mccain? I didn't vote for Dole, but I did vote for Mccain.
I really think the 2 party system itself is in jeapordary, and the US dollar crumbles some more, that will lead to the waning of the 2 party system.
Esssentially the whole system needs to be cleaned out, DC as well as Wall st. who has the balls to do this? B/c they will have the 2 parties going after them as well as the MSM going after them. Personally, I think we are reaching that point.
I have to admit, I used to love wathcing 60 minutes, would Tivo, now, cBS itself is channeled from my dish network.
I completely believed that Bush story that Dan Rather told in 2004, its wasn't until last year, I realise they lied. So, now anything they to say about Sarah, I really don't trust.
As for Steve schimt, again, does he know the more hit jobs he does on Sarah, who will hire him? didn't he just lose an election?
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at January 10, 2010 11:06 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 11:09 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: DanO at January 10, 2010 11:11 AM (RIxJG)
Deety, do not be silly. Obviouisly, I am talking about the PRIMARY PROCESS. Once that process is complete I will support the most conservative candidate, which means I will support the GOP nominee against Obama. I will vote for Romney, and donate the maximum to Romney ONCE HE IS OUR ONLY SHOT against Obama in the general. I will not sit home. I will also not be surprised at all when Romney grows government, albeit not as much as Obama did.
I am a conservative which means I support the more conservative candidates. Palin vs Romney, Palin is more conservative in every way. Romney Vs. Obama, Romney is more conservative in everyway. See, no big mystery here
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 11:14 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 11:14 AM (KZraB)
So was St. Elizabeth Edwards cured by the Jug-Eared Jesus?
Most people with late-stage terminal cancer, like our wonderful loved ones and relatives tend to, you know, die in quiet dignity. Not these political scumbags.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 10, 2010 11:20 AM (/sDrM)
Yeah, well I don't know one way or another what he thinks. Frankly, I don't care. The problem with the comment was that he thought it's his job to determine the authentic conservative candidate. He's certainly welcome to lobby for whomever he thinks is best but he's wasting his and our time with the soviet declarations. I shouldn't have even bothered with the Romney stats; I'm not that big of fan of him either but his record was more of a mixed one than one of an outright Statist.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 10, 2010 11:22 AM (sKPtW)
Being called the "top strategist on the McCain-Palin campaign" is like being called the captain of the Hindenburg.
Obama should have lost by 5-7 points. It took a worthless bloviating shithead like McCain and this clown to turn that number into a 4-point win.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 10, 2010 11:25 AM (/sDrM)
And wouldn't Palin the [Unprepared] Hick tying Biden the Policy Genius be the equivalent of a Palin win?
Posted by: andycanuck at January 10, 2010 11:27 AM (2qU2d)
lowandslow, Alaska has a uniqe state constitution that was put in place long before Sarah Palin was governor. It states that the people own the resources and are entitled to revenue from it. Following the constitution despite your own beliefs is the quintissential conservative action. Obama and his pals could learn something from this as I am sure you agree!
Also, what you call a windfall profit tax was anything but. In fact, it incentivized new production and expansion with lower taxes in certain areas while making sure the people were not getting ripped off DUE TO CORRUPTION among the GOP sadly.
Posted by: Dan at January 10, 2010 11:49 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: Kevin at January 10, 2010 12:13 PM (iagrR)
Posted by: Fresh Air at January 10, 2010 12:14 PM (dNuNZ)
Posted by: moi at January 10, 2010 12:22 PM (71WO5)
Posted by: dan-O at January 10, 2010 12:33 PM (pP0yk)
Posted by: Assman at January 10, 2010 12:42 PM (OCK4B)
Posted by: trentk269 at January 10, 2010 12:55 PM (hYr0p)
Palin herself says in her book that the initial prep wasn't going well for several reasons. After a change of staffers and location, prep went much better, and she did great in the debate. Other staffers agree with the account.
Posted by: stace at January 10, 2010 01:05 PM (g/wgk)
Posted by: moi at January 10, 2010 01:14 PM (71WO5)
Posted by: TheresaD at January 10, 2010 01:30 PM (iGCmo)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 10, 2010 02:06 PM (J+e7E)
Does anyone actually watch CBS news other than lefties needing justification of their opinions?
CBS is banned in my house after Rathergate - why not banning them from yours?
Posted by: FrankReality at January 10, 2010 02:51 PM (t5/IN)
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 10, 2010 06:06 PM (J+e7E)*
It trolls at HA too,and has been smacked down by Alaskans there as well.Probably one of Palins nutcase stalkers up there.
Posted by: TheTaR(and feather)Czar at January 10, 2010 03:08 PM (houxp)
Posted by: ian cormac at January 10, 2010 04:50 PM (My6A7)
Posted by: osbourne cox at January 10, 2010 05:35 PM (Vc/xe)
101 I'm not the one on a conservative website making excuses for a tax increase.
No, you are the socialist-lite Romneybot troll on a conservative website kneecapping his opponent and hoping we'll all forget that your guy invented the individual mandate and brought socialist healthcare to America. Take your goddam Romneycare and your big government "conservatism" back home to Mass. with you, moby.
Posted by: osbourne cox at January 10, 2010 05:56 PM (Vc/xe)
Posted by: VermillionSky at January 10, 2010 07:01 PM (6Z0fA)
Posted by: Elroy Jetson at January 10, 2010 09:34 PM (vMmv5)
Dewie Whetsell, Alaskan Fisherman. As posted in comments on GretaÂ’s article referencing the MOVEON ad about Sarah Palin.
The last 45 of my 66 years IÂ’ve spent in a commercial fishing town in Alaska I understand Alaska politics but never understood national politics well until this last year. HereÂ’s the breaking point:
Neither side of the Palin controversy gets it. ItÂ’s not about persona, style, rhetoric, itÂ’s about doing things. Even Palin supporters never mention the things that IÂ’m about to mention here.
1. Democrats forget when Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because as soon as Palin took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits The Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, “la la la la” (well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that has ever done anything similar.
2. Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new system of splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t let the door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed, and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being filthy rich. Of course, the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done anything similar.
3. The other thing she did when she walked into the governor’s office is she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known as “pork.” She went through the list, took 85% of them and placed them in the “when-hell-freezes-over” stack. She let locals know that if we need something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous governor’s jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook (remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning — I imagine — that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to hear the names of those other governors.
4. Now, even with her much-ridiculed “gosh and golly” mannerism, she also managed to put together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas pipeline built which will be the biggest private construction project in the history of North America No one else could do it although they tried. If that doesn’t impress you, then you’re trying too hard to be unimpressed while watching her do things like this while baking up a batch of brownies with her other hand.
5. For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldnÂ’t start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No governor for 30 years could make them get started. Then, she told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the way to the court house. Alaska won again.
6. President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for Alaska to be at 50% renewables by 2025. We are already at 25%. I can give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style and persona Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool. But thatÂ’s just a cover-up. IÂ’m still waiting to hear from liberals the names of other governors who can match what mine has done in two and a half years. I wonÂ’t be holding my breath.
By the way, she was content to return to AK after the national election and go to work, but the haters wouldnÂ’t let her. Now these adolescent screechers are obviously not scuba divers. And no one ever told them what happens when you continually jab and pester a barracuda. Without warning, it will spin around and tear your face off. Shoulda known better.
You have just read the truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along with the democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her. I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty, immoral people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter ex-presidentsÂ’ wives.
So “You go, Girl.” I only wish the men in Washington had your guts, determination, honesty, and morals.
Posted by: syn at January 11, 2010 03:02 AM (IlCz1)
Maybe John Edwards is right, there are two Americas, one lives life while the other lives in TV-Land.
Posted by: syn at January 11, 2010 03:06 AM (IlCz1)
Does it bother you that Mitt Romney is quick to raise his hand to Climate Change Fraud; are you all concerned he will do a Schwarzenegger-ie completely decimate the ecomony in order to serve his uber wealthy Collectivist social standing in the Statist's Billionarie's Club?
By the way, MODERATES voted for Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Chris Dodd, Barney Franks.
Given the track record MODERATES are not reliable voters who make wise choices.
Posted by: syn at January 11, 2010 03:20 AM (IlCz1)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 11, 2010 03:52 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: Assman at January 11, 2010 05:24 AM (OCK4B)
Posted by: Bob at January 11, 2010 06:14 AM (rC5jC)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 11, 2010 07:52 AM
Really? Syn post is nothing but bullshit. Palin didn't do one fucking thing to break up any "Old Bastards Club" or send anyone to jail, nothing, it's a fucking lie.
Nor did she make Alaskans stinking rich and make the oil companies fall meekly in line, 100% bullshit, revenues are dropping and big oil is slowly pulling out thanks to ACES, EXXON is not drilling one new well on state land this year, not a one.
Nor did she force EXXON to drill at Point Thompson, it's just the fucking opposite. EXXON was required to drill at Point Thompson in 2008 by leases they signed years before Palin was even around politics. It was Palin that tried to stop EXXON from drilling and revoke their leases by denying EXXON's permits and she only did a 180 when she was about to get her ass handed to her in court. It was EXXON that had to take her to court so they could drill, do you fucking get that?
I mean the bullshit you people will believe is astounding.
Posted by: lowandslow at January 11, 2010 06:34 AM (XbjSP)
So Palin's admin revoked their licenses so they could rebid them to producers who would drill.
Exxon took them to court. And Sarah's admin won 3 different cases in 2007.
So Exxon was finally forced to drill or lose the leases.
Why don't you stay away from Immoral Minority? Doesn't the very title of that blog tell you not to bother with it?
Posted by: hrh40 at January 11, 2010 06:58 AM (62LhM)
Posted by: hrh40 at January 11, 2010 10:58 AM (62LhM)
The voices in his head keep him from doing anything that makes sense. I can't figure out if he's Cahrsel Jhonsno or Steve Schmidt.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 11, 2010 07:11 AM (VGeGl)
You don't know what you're talking about. EXXON was required by the lease to submit a plan of development and start exploratory drilling by 2008 which they were willing to do. So Palin tried to revoke their leases so she could rebid them, that's the only part you got right. But you also seem to think there were companies lined up to bid on them, there wasn't. They weren't viable for most companies only EXXON had the resources to drill and make a reasonable profit, lease are gas leases and if you noticed gas isn't that profitable right now nor in 2008.
Palin was in the wrong when she tried to revoke the leases, in every way possible, legally and ethically. The state just can't change their mind they don't like the terms of a contract and renege on them. Christ if this was a Democrat that tried to pull that horseshit we would crucify them and rightly so. It doesn't make any difference if EXXON didn't want to do anymore then was necessary to fulfill their lease, it was their contractual right to do so. Then Palin tried to deny them permitting and reject their plans of development so they couldn't move ahead at Point Thompson and lose their leases. At every point in this process the courts ruled for EXXON because it was simple contract law that Palin couldn't seam to grasp. Only when it became obvious the court had no choice but to rule in EXXON's favor in the last decision by the court did Palin reverse her course and drop the litigation and approve EXXON's plans. In other words she harassed EXXON for two years and got nothing out of it, the results would have been exactly the same.
That's what happened.
Posted by: lowandslow at January 11, 2010 07:57 AM (XbjSP)
Official Position? During the NH debate Mitt's hand was the first to raise in support of Climate Change Fraud, Rudy debated with himself before finally giving into the fraud.
Mitt's official position was to immediately throw his hand up the ass of bullshit producing Climate Change Fraudsters faster than Rudy could decide just how far up he too should reach.
The only reason people want Mitt Romney is because he made money unfortunately these people have yet to realize that politicians from the fucking Collectivist Billionaires Club ALL end up governing like freaky Mommy-Nannies Statists.
See Bloomberg-Kennedy-Schwarzenneggers-and Bush.
Further; those 'fiscal conservatives' who bitch about big spender Bush cannot seriously consider Mitt 'MANDATE' Romney a viable alternative to the Democrat Party.
Posted by: syn at January 11, 2010 07:57 AM (IlCz1)
Posted by: syn at January 11, 2010 07:59 AM (IlCz1)
I can't believe another campaign would want him after he's proven that he can't keep his mouth shut after the fact.
Posted by: Troika37 at January 11, 2010 12:51 PM (CWiyN)
Posted by: Ginault Watches at January 24, 2011 07:01 PM (ilAMz)
Posted by: supra footwear at April 17, 2011 01:35 AM (mz6Q3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1954 seconds, 248 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: GarandFan at January 10, 2010 08:53 AM (ZQBnQ)