January 20, 2010
— Ace Is Scott Rasmussen still Hitler?
Posted by: Ace at
10:25 PM
| Comments (166)
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Drew in MO at January 20, 2010 10:34 PM (yNnOg)
Posted by: Man-chelle at January 20, 2010 10:34 PM (B9F0J)
Posted by: Penn State Marine at January 20, 2010 10:35 PM (nMDav)
Posted by: Judge Smails at January 20, 2010 10:35 PM (RQUn6)
Ace, if I told you once, I told you a hundred times.
No pondering in the bed, the sheets get stiff, and you know we cant keep buying you glasses.
Nite sweetie, Mama thinks you're the best blog on the interwebs.
Posted by: Ace's Mom at January 20, 2010 10:41 PM (siDUr)
Posted by: random at January 20, 2010 10:42 PM (mhbHz)
Posted by: Andi Sullivan at January 20, 2010 10:43 PM (6GjHP)
BTW, would you like a calendar? How about a picture of my bicycle seat?
Posted by: Cahrles Johnsun at January 20, 2010 10:46 PM (CoKwa)
Oh and Ace honey.
Stop putting those stickys with "Hit the Tip Jar", on your Mother's monitor.
I'll have to tell your fake intertube friends about the rubber sheet on the mattress.
Posted by: Ace's Mom at January 20, 2010 10:48 PM (siDUr)
Posted by: enoxo at January 20, 2010 10:53 PM (ITaab)
Posted by: arhooley at January 20, 2010 10:55 PM (6GjHP)
Oh Ace snuggums, are you dreaming about me?
Dream this while you're furiously pounding your tiny little organ.
Hannah F'n Giles.
Just because you don't read your own blog, doesn't mean I don't, Peckerwood.
Posted by: Tri Corner Hat Babe at January 20, 2010 10:57 PM (siDUr)
He is the devil until he stops that "somewhat approve" shit;
Just ask the most important question: "would you vote for Obama again if the 2008 race were held again today?"
That is the only relevant question, and the dumbass should ask it every day as a gauge. "Somewhat" approval means shit. I "somewhat approved" of Clinton signing the Pubbies' Welfare Reform, but I'd never vote for the cocksucker in a million years.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 20, 2010 10:57 PM (dcKUM)
In honour of Andrew Sullivan, we should call this kind of nutbag paranoia, Lesionnaire's Disease.
Posted by: Victoria at January 20, 2010 11:01 PM (3sdjL)
See, this is how I know most of you are guys. I look at that hideous coat in prison warden grey, and think Moschino was so five minutes ago.
Posted by: Victoria at January 20, 2010 11:03 PM (3sdjL)
Leave my daughters out of your malignant meanderings.
And who is going to clean up all this pudding at the Hotel?
Buy a decent suit boy, you looked like a freakin' Democrat lush last night.
Posted by: Scott Brown at January 20, 2010 11:03 PM (siDUr)
------------------
Let them eat cake. Don't cry for me, Argentina. For the first time in my adult lifetime . . .
Posted by: arhooley at January 20, 2010 11:05 PM (6GjHP)
Posted by: Al Czervik at January 20, 2010 11:06 PM (MmF0K)
Posted by: Scott in OC at January 20, 2010 11:09 PM (Du+1C)
Michelle Obama doesn't appear to be "sacrificing" anything in this recession...
Posted by: newser at January 20, 2010 11:10 PM (OBUuM)
You should be asking if Glenn Beck is Ama-dinna-jacket after today's jump the shark moment regarding fathers razing their daughters.
When my dad met my fiance all he said was "thank you. i'll be sure to send you payments every year you actually keep her" and this was at the dinner with mom, grandma, and the proprietors of the family restaurant where my family and I had dined for over 5 years every week. I had the waiters laughing, the owners of the restaurant, the dishwashers, my mom and grandmother, all in league with my dad...at my expense - or was it my father's????........hmmmmm.
(pause for an austin powers/dr. evil "thought" moment)
its 17 freakin years later and i'm still married to the same guy my dad actually thanked at my wedding for taking me off his hands.
do you think I should call child protective services or a lawyer and sue my parents for abuse for these verbal volleys? or should I take it as a sign that I was well loved and secure in that knowledge to the point my family could make these statements?
i don't know what crawled up beck's ass today regarding brown but i've changed my radio channel preset button from his station to another after today's shitstorm.
After the last year we've had to endure with Obama, I just can't take anyone who can't celebrate the moment and have a sense of humor.
beck is on his way to becoming a right wing olberman and that hurts me to say. he can turn it around but today beck was a total clod.
Posted by: kay at January 20, 2010 11:14 PM (TW1NB)
Ponder?
Come over to the Dark Side Ace, where all the pants have knife sharp creases, and the chronically under-educated will never assualt your tender sensibilities.
You'll be like the son I never had, and I'll dress you in frilly frocks and you can sit on my knee while I admire you shiny patent leather buckle shoes....
Oh my I'm flushed, ahhhhhhhh that's better.
Posted by: David Brooks at January 20, 2010 11:16 PM (siDUr)
I think she may have donated her corneas or something if she considers that coat attractive.
Posted by: arhooley at January 20, 2010 11:16 PM (6GjHP)
Posted by: Matthews of MSNBC at January 20, 2010 11:21 PM (+deq6)
Anyone with me on this?
Posted by: two words at January 20, 2010 11:24 PM (QxGmu)
Sleep that knits up the ravelled sleeve of.......
Oh screw it, like you read poetry you racist teabagger capitalist running dog.
Posted by: Mayan Angelouse at January 20, 2010 11:25 PM (siDUr)
Abercrombie and Fitch
girl who firmly follows the fashion trend,
It really brings me some fresh feelings with addtional insights into today's world.
Posted by: s at January 20, 2010 11:26 PM (vq2q4)
NFL JERSEYS
this is forever!
Posted by: s at January 20, 2010 11:27 PM (vq2q4)
Anyone with me on this?
Seeing how twisted the underlying Prog agenda is, it's a bit of a mindfuck. He's done enough good throwing lights on the cockroaches to get a pass for going reefer mad on Brown.
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at January 20, 2010 11:29 PM (qyKoF)
Is Scott Rasmussen still Hitler?
Congratulations Mr. Ace we have added you to our list of Domestic Terrorist Web Sites, and have forwarded a copy of this Post to the Department of Homeland Security.
Thank you in advance for your assistance in securing our next Federal Government Grant.
Yours,
Morris Dees
Posted by: Southern Poverty Law Center at January 20, 2010 11:32 PM (siDUr)
Posted by: enoxo at January 20, 2010 11:32 PM (ITaab)
Posted by: Hannah at January 20, 2010 11:44 PM (+Z5RN)
Am I the only one who thinks that Southers dude looks like he has demon ears?
Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at January 20, 2010 11:50 PM (dQdrY)
Was Obama trying to start the Funny Ear administration or what?
Posted by: arhooley at January 20, 2010 11:53 PM (6GjHP)
Posted by: vivi at January 21, 2010 03:22 AM (knNJg)
It's OK. Everybody at some point in their life shops a rummage sale.
Posted by: Bill H at January 20, 2010 11:54 PM (q8CmE)
Posted by: enoxo at January 21, 2010 12:00 AM (ITaab)
Posted by: The Drizzle at January 21, 2010 12:09 AM (F2Ul9)
Is Scott Rasmussen still Hitler? Will Scott Brown come see me?
FIFY
Posted by: rdb at January 21, 2010 12:17 AM (4Ve/l)
Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at January 21, 2010 12:36 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: dudeinsantacruz at January 21, 2010 12:42 AM (3wYSZ)
Posted by: dudeinsantacruz at January 21, 2010 01:54 AM (3wYSZ)
Posted by: Investigating Officer at January 21, 2010 02:00 AM (SwkdU)
Your dim-witted and short-sighted president just screwed up again.
He expects NATO to pick up the shortfall in troops for Afganistan, right?
Well, British parliament, just cut funding for the war in Afganistan by 110,000,000 pounds.
Euro-peons are not as enamored by Obama as your media tells you that they are.
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 02:34 AM (ITzbJ)
Let's see, so far, Obama has authorized 14,000 troops for Haiti, although 500 to 1,000 would have sufficed, and most of those troops don't even have a defined mission there yet.
But that silly twit in your White House is sending only 30,000 troops to Afganistan, instead of the 40,000 (minimum) which were requested by the Commanding Gemeral on the ground there.
Never mind that Haiti's hero, Hugo Chaqvez, hasn't done squat for the Communist regime or for the other people in Haiti, showing that that fat blowhard is all talk, no action, and all hat, no cattle - just bravado.
Hugo and Barack are two of a kind - empty suits and blowhards. What a mess.
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 02:51 AM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: franksalterego at January 21, 2010 02:54 AM (GKyIE)
Is John Zogby an opportunist idiot who makes wild predictions against the market in hopes he might get lucky and catch an outlier so he can claim on his website that he is in some way still relevant?
** After doing NO POLLING whatsoever on the MA race, Zogby came out at the 11th hour calling the race for Coakley by a point when every other poll that mattered said it was 5-10 points.
In the history of earth, has there ever been a pollster WRONG as often as John Zogby?
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 21, 2010 02:55 AM (kEBiX)
The problem was that Brown's margin of victory was so large, the cheating couldn't win it for Coakley. What is my evidence?
Witness the steadily increasing margin of victory for Coakley in Boston (the natural place for Dems to cheat since it is so liberal there, they could claim any margin of victory for the Democrat and still be considered a viable outcome). In Boston, Coakley started the night in a dead tie with Brown. As the night went on, the margin of victory steadily increased in Boston to eventually end at about 39%!
Those of you who follow statistics and elections know that the margin of victory in an area usually changes relatively little throughout the count. Statewide, Brown started ahead by about 5% and ended ahead by about 5%. A 39% leap screams that Boston was throwing in EXTRA VOTES for Coakley as the night progressed to try to make up for his lead elsewhere.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 21, 2010 03:02 AM (kEBiX)
The latest thing being talked about;
Democrats switching to Republican. Fox just had Parker Grifith from AL. This is something we should be careful of. The last time we had the commies abandoning a sinking ship we picked up a bunch of neocons who were primarily RINOs.
Looking at this guys voting record he seem to be fairly good (he voted againt the healthscam bill and against crap and tax). He hasn't been in office long enough to get a rating from ACU though.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 03:09 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Bonesaw at January 21, 2010 03:13 AM (ZgcbL)
I have the same concern. Scott Brown said repeatedly he wants to 'go back to the drawing board.'
I want the government to mind its own fucking business and stop meddling in the private sector. I am worried we have elected compromiser, not a conservative.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 03:16 AM (6wUpV)
We're not going to stop socialized medicine until we control at least one house of Congress. We need to win big in 2010.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 03:18 AM (6wUpV)
oh, and you know who was up here trying to ride Scott Brown's coattails?
the Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina, Andre Bauer.
He came up here and held a Brown sign by the road and helped out the campaign.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 03:20 AM (6wUpV)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at January 21, 2010 03:22 AM (8WOM0)
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 03:22 AM (ITzbJ)
My guess is that she is sacrificing paying for anything. Since she is so awesomely beautiful, these designers beg her to wear their clothes.
Posted by: Steve L. at January 21, 2010 03:23 AM (Gkhxf)
Over at the corner they are saying that the House liberals have gone to Pelosi and told her flat out that they will vote for the Senate bill as is.
That is the only way they could get the bill through. The so-called nuclear option simply will not work.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 03:23 AM (QrA9E)
Or who, when he is right 1 time out of 10, brags about it so much?
Posted by: Steve L. at January 21, 2010 03:27 AM (Gkhxf)
We're not going to stop our slide into socialism until we have people in Congress who think government is the problem, not the solution.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 03:28 AM (6wUpV)
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 03:33 AM (ITzbJ)
oh, and you know who was up here trying to ride Scott Brown's coattails?
the Lieutenant Governor of South Carolina, Andre Bauer.
Bauer is putting on an early full court press but it is still way to early to put much into it. In polling he is behind some of the other potential candidates but those polls really don't mean much right now. They are really nothing more than "name recognition" things.
In a few months the politicking will be fast and furious and the candidates will have to actually publish some positions on issues. And like everywhere else, SC the big issue is the economy.
Unemployment is traditionaly high here and currently it is really high.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 03:38 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 21, 2010 03:38 AM (E9fb9)
Brown has done a great job of shaking up the Obama program. He has shown himself to be a great campaigner, at least in this situation, but we have yet to see how he performs in the Senate. The greatest campaigner in recent times, maybe ever, has created problems we will be a long time getting rid of, so let's not go overboard on another great campaigner until we see what he's made of.
Posted by: Packy East at January 21, 2010 03:40 AM (CKW49)
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 03:41 AM (ITzbJ)
Yes, yes, yes! You go, dude!
Posted by: Tami at January 21, 2010 03:41 AM (VuLos)
71 I am worried we have elected compromiser, not a conservative.
The problem isn't with Scott Brown, it's with his electorate/constituents... He's in the unenviable position of having to keep a bunch of fickle Liberal/Progressives happy.
He only won by a 5% margin, and it wouldn't take much for them to turn around and bite him in the ass.
This is, after all, what turns most Republican/Conservatives into RINO's.. Principles can only take a politician so far.
Posted by: franksalterego at January 21, 2010 03:43 AM (GKyIE)
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 03:48 AM (ITzbJ)
The UNÂ’s top climate change body has issued an unprecedented apology over its flawed prediction that Himalayan glaciers were likely to disappear by 2035.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said yesterday that the
prediction in its landmark 2007 report was “poorly substantiated” and
resulted from a lapse in standards.
--------
Standards? You have standards?
Posted by: Tami at January 21, 2010 03:49 AM (VuLos)
Stossel is on F&F right now blasting T. Boone Nosepickens.
I'm sure Gretchen doesn't like that after fawning over him yesterday.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 03:50 AM (QrA9E)
The UNÂ’s top climate change body has issued an unprecedented apology over its flawed prediction that Himalayan glaciers were likely to disappear by 2035.
Yeah, they had that on Fox earlier. They included a statement that they meant 2050. Hahahahahaha
Wasn't there a report out a few days ago that said that ENTIRE thing about the snow melting on the Himilayas was a fraud and based on nothing more than an verified opnion over the phone and zero actual science?
I kept waiting to hear someone bring that up, but I forgot this is F&F and they support AGW.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 03:54 AM (QrA9E)
It emerged last week that the prediction was based not on a consensus among climate change experts but on a media interview with a single Indian glaciologist in 1999. That scientist, Syed Hasnain, has now told The Times that he never made such a specific forecast in his interview with the New Scientist magazine.
“I have not made any prediction on date as I am not an astrologer but I did say they were shrinking fast,” he said. “I have never written 2035 in any of my research papers or reports.” Professor Hasnain works for The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) in Delhi, which is headed by Rajendra Pachauri, head of the climate change panel.
Posted by: Tami at January 21, 2010 03:57 AM (VuLos)
Dem cheating, vote fraud. Nothing new here.
Fixed.
Posted by: the real joe at January 21, 2010 04:01 AM (WjerO)
Seriously, the American people need to hire Goldman Sachs to get them out of debt, plain and simple.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:06 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 21, 2010 04:09 AM (e910j)
Posted by: fluffy the bloviating masshole at January 21, 2010 04:10 AM (SwkdU)
'heck this thing prevents another depression, things look pretty good, we don't need this regulation, let's take the proverbial "handcuffs" off..."
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:12 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:14 AM (p302b)
Posted by: fluffy has a couple bucks at January 21, 2010 04:15 AM (SwkdU)
I thought Brown was crystal clear in his post-victory NBC interview that has little interest in national health care reform, since Mass already takes care of it on the state level. So, even in Mass, he's in the position that the super-Red-Staters are in: his Party, his constituents, AND the people who might one day elect him to a higher office all want national health care killed.
Now, health care is a unique issue for the Chowds. I have no idea how he's going to keep them happy on the other issues that made Ted Kennedy so popular. I hope he just keeps pressing the "JFK would've puked on Harry Reid" stuff -- very effective.
Posted by: Bender Bending Rodriguez at January 21, 2010 04:16 AM (1bLKF)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:17 AM (p302b)
I gotta believe that Republicans in Florida can come up with better candidates than Christ or Rubio.
I gotta believe that someone else is waiting in the wings to make an appearance in a few months.
Posted by: Guest at January 21, 2010 04:21 AM (ITzbJ)
Posted by: fluffy at January 21, 2010 04:22 AM (SwkdU)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:33 AM (p302b)
Yes, the push will be on today by Obama for a new Fascist attack on the banks. I had hoped for those bank CEOs to grow some balls during the grilling they got but I guess it was hopeless.
It is also hopeless to expect ANYONE in the news business, including Fox, to actually lay the blame for this financial mess where it is due, solely on the commiecrats. Cavuto did do a one hour special back in 2008 that detailed a lot of it but I guess he has been denutted since then. He never speaks of it anymore.
Obama will scream for yet more intrusive regulations on the banks and hope that the Republicans oppose him on it so he can have a new “populist” attack means for the commies to use during the 2010 elections.
If he really wanted to “fix” the banking industry he would remove 99% of the government from the banks and abolish CRA. That will never happen.
Also, from some of the comments from last night it appears that Axelrod is active again in preparation for the 2010 elections. We are infested with a couple of concern trolls.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 04:33 AM (QrA9E)
"Obama will scream for yet more intrusive regulations on the banks and hope that the Republicans oppose him on it so he can have a new “populist” attack means for the commies to use during the 2010 elections."
So his idea to gain "populist" cred is to continue demonizing banks and harming business in the midst of a recession and high unemployment? Didn't anyone ever tell him not to go full retard? This ain't Venezuala numbnuts.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 04:37 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:38 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:42 AM (p302b)
Batchelor had a guest on the other night.
I didn't wat the hearings. I have only seen highlights on the news and those highlights did not look like "softball" questions. In fact, to me they were the tyical Demoncrap accusations of everything from devilworship to baby killing.
Who is Batchelor and who was his guest?
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 04:44 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 04:49 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Mjim at January 21, 2010 04:50 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: Jean at January 21, 2010 04:51 AM (mtAmx)
Glenn is just trying to caution us to not go all in too quickly....that kind of thinking got America the WON.
Posted by: non_dhimmie at January 21, 2010 04:52 AM (zACGu)
Posted by: steevy at January 21, 2010 04:55 AM (kxc0T)
Which reminds me of a quetion I never got an answer to: Since when do Ferengis mate with Klingons?
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at January 21, 2010 05:00 AM (xqhoO)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 05:00 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:00 AM (OlN4e)
I like GB but he came off as a dick with the Scott Brown comments.
I veiwed that as one of his irratic side trips. When I turned it on yesterday he was in one of his "Repubs are just as Bad as the Dems" kicks which is what all of hits on Brown is about.
When he starts on that shit I turn it off. Which is what I did yesterday.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:00 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at January 21, 2010 05:02 AM (xqhoO)
Its almost as if they trotted this out in order to distract?
They don't have any cards to play however because they went
all in with the big O.
Posted by: Mjim at January 21, 2010 05:02 AM (V8B//)
123 And on a related note: With ears that huge, how can Obama be so completely tone deaf?
You should ask Newt 'bout that tone deaf problem.
Posted by: maddogg at January 21, 2010 05:03 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:03 AM (p302b)
Posted by: teej at January 21, 2010 05:04 AM (QdUKm)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 21, 2010 05:05 AM (y+Brm)
Posted by: steevy at January 21, 2010 05:07 AM (kxc0T)
Lisa Myers? Is that the blond twit who was in a canoe in 2" of water on the streets of New Orleans in 2005?
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:09 AM (ouySy)
Posted by: mrfixit at January 21, 2010 05:09 AM (Bsm1s)
In a report Glass Steagall as "archaic". Well heck, "archaic" is better than "nothing".
Bob Pisani just said that "most people think there will be something but it will be muted because of the MA election results".
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:10 AM (p302b)
Last night I wondered: I wonder what 'Mimi' Insane Clown Posse form the Drew Carey Show is doing right now?
fify
Posted by: mrfixit at January 21, 2010 05:11 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:13 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:15 AM (p302b)
who is her hook? how, after that, is she still working there?
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:17 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 05:17 AM (SqAkN)
Vic, this is his station link.
Thanks for the link. I had never heard of him before. I noted that he is on WBT out of Charlotte, NC from 09:00-13:00. Perhaps I will fire up my old Icom SW reciever and 150 ft long wire antenna and tune him him one afternoon.
I did go and read 5 of his columns. He is hard down on the Huck. I give him a plus for that. The problem is he down on the Tea Partiers, Palin and Cheney as well. It appears to me that he is part of the NE old style country club Republicans.
IOW, he is part of the RINO wing of the Party and doesn't really beleive in conservatism.
But that is based on just what he had to say about some other members of the Party.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:18 AM (QrA9E)
reminds me of a song I heard way back in the days of my mispent youth...
"drop kick me Jesus,
through the goalposts of life
not too far to the left
nor too far to the right..."
Posted by: mrfixit at January 21, 2010 05:19 AM (Bsm1s)
After Edward's brave admission that the two year old kid over there is in fact his son, I feel emboldened to admit something.
I have a rash on my Jimmy sack. I think it might be from a dipping too soon after grooming. And while it still itches, and burns a little, I do feel better having admitted this.
Posted by: Dang at January 21, 2010 05:19 AM (UA4gE)
Yup Curious. And now they're talking about writing new banking regs. Hey, here's a novel thought guys. Just reinstate Glass Steagall.
We don't need more rregulations. What we need is to get rid of most of the ones we currently have. That is what caused the problem to begin with.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:20 AM (QrA9E)
Health care reform:
1. Tort reform
2. Buy health insurance across state lines.
3. Insurance companies no longer exempt from anti trust laws, or make doctors exempt too.
4. Tax credits for those who can't afford insurance.
Posted by: kansas at January 21, 2010 05:22 AM (Wwi5M)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 05:22 AM (p302b)
I wonder when we will stop do post mortems on the 2008 Presidential election.....
I'm still waiting for a mea culpa from the Republicans in Congress for losing control in 2006.
Posted by: This is boner at January 21, 2010 05:24 AM (ouySy)
I respect you greatly, you are such an incredibly cerebral person, I think you would like Batchelor.
Thanks, like I said I'll give it a shot one of these afternoons. But I am a hard core conservative.
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 05:28 AM (QrA9E)
Btw, when did the last upchuck of verbiage from diderot's dog happen?
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 21, 2010 05:34 AM (VGeGl)
Ha, ha. Cheap NFL jerseys spambots better poetry than erg.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 21, 2010 05:37 AM (2qU2d)
"It's OK. Everybody at some point in their life shops a rummage sale."
Sarah Palin shops in consignment stores and resale shops, while Michelle Obama wears thousand-dollar designer originals: yet Sarah usually looks great, while Michelle often looks like a bag lady who's rummaged through a Park Avenue dumpster. I don't get it, yet there it is.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 21, 2010 05:51 AM (VrNoa)
Michelle Obama wears thousand-dollar designer originals: yet Sarah usually looks great, while Michelle often looks like a bag lady who's rummaged through a Park Avenue dumpster.
That's because fashion designers are only interested in doing something that hasn't been done before. But the reason it hasn't been done before is because it's fugly. Most folks understand it's fugly. The idiots buy it.
Posted by: Dang at January 21, 2010 06:08 AM (UA4gE)
Michelle Obama doesn't appear to be "sacrificing" anything in this recession...
Posted by: newserI thought it was a lefties job to be the fashion troll. Anyway, you have it all wrong, Michelle is just wearing a coat with some negro dialect.
Posted by: Moon Doggy at January 21, 2010 06:11 AM (P0pMu)
Posted by: torabora at January 21, 2010 06:42 AM (fkNZG)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 21, 2010 06:49 AM (hoowK)
Doesn't matter. I don't know how she does it, but no matter what Michelle Obama wears, she makes it look ugly.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 21, 2010 06:50 AM (hoowK)
Those of you who follow statistics and elections know that the margin of victory in an area usually changes relatively little throughout the count.T Statewide, Brown started ahead by about 5% and ended ahead by about 5%. A 39% leap screams that Boston was throwing in EXTRA VOTES for Coakley as the night progressed to try to make up for his lead elsewhere.
Bill,
Not necessarily so! I follow both, and while I am sure there was some cheating, the fact that the count jump so quickly could be a function of busy precincts not reporting until all voters have voted. The rule is if you're in line at closing you get to vote. That means 50-60 or more people could vote after polls officially close. Also a dems will put less voting machines in pro gop precincts to discourage voters by making long lines. The Black precincts, which go 90% democrat, are notorious for be lazy and late. That mostly explains the jump in the vote, Black precincts.
Posted by: Kemp at January 21, 2010 06:51 AM (2+9Yx)
We need to start referring to Progressives as "Regressives".
The point is there is nothing "progressive" at all about their agenda. It is just a rehash of what the Soviet Union tried in 1917. Socialism isn't new. Been there, done that, didn't like it ...
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 21, 2010 06:56 AM (kEBiX)
Not necessarily so! I follow both, and while I am sure there was some cheating, the fact that the count jump so quickly could be a function of busy precincts not reporting until all voters have voted. The rule is if you're in line at closing you get to vote. That means 50-60 or more people could vote after polls officially close. Also a dems will put less voting machines in pro gop precincts to discourage voters by making long lines. The Black precincts, which go 90% democrat, are notorious for be lazy and late. That mostly explains the jump in the vote, Black precincts.
Actually, if you watched the returns in Boston closely throughout the evening, you will see that every time new numbers were added, the gap increased a few percentage points. This would indicate that each new district reporting had significantly more votes for Coakley than the previous districts. Odd that. A small change may be expected, but a 39% increase? IMHO, no.
** Also, keep in mind that if your goal was to constantly pepper in new fake votes throughout the count so that no one district appeared to be supplying all the fakes, this is EXACTLY what the results would have looked like.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 21, 2010 07:02 AM (kEBiX)
Does this prove you drive and ugle car?
Posted by: Moon Doggy at January 21, 2010 07:08 AM (P0pMu)
Posted by: Moon Doggy at January 21, 2010 07:09 AM (P0pMu)
Posted by: John Charlson at January 21, 2010 07:16 AM (C3uAA)
Posted by: vivi at January 21, 2010 07:24 AM (knNJg)
Posted by: vivi at January 21, 2010 07:29 AM (knNJg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2917 seconds, 294 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Shooter McGavin at January 20, 2010 10:29 PM (cxGtL)