April 21, 2010

"Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes!"
— Ace

So chanted thousands of bused-in ACFSME union "grassroots" agitators to Illinois state congressmen, urging them to "raise [our] taxes!" so that their salaries and benefits wouldn't be cut.

But that sort of indicates right there that their taxes aren't really being raised, doesn't it? Their employer is the government. If the government raises their taxes a bit but continues hiking their salaries, they are net-ahead as far as the government. They're paid out of taxes, of course. They are in the unique position of actually seeing their net income go up whenever taxes are raised.

The rest of the public is finally starting to notice that, and that the public -- 20% of whom are out of a job or working part-time when they want a full-time job -- is basically paying their employees more than they themselves receive in salary, and with far better benefits and job-security, too.

I think the public is finally starting to wake up to that. People have this asinine "let's not be mean" thing going with public-employees unions. They don't like being a cheap boss who won't give a big raise every year.

But they're finally starting to understand that they are, ultimately, the boss, and all these 4%-per-year raises and ridiculously huge pension plans are coming out of their own hide.

I don't think the unions understand this. They are getting more aggressive and obnoxious about their undeservedly high salaries and pension plans rather than being conciliatory about it. They are continuing to demand salaries and benefits that most of the rest of the country could only dram of without even offering even the slightest apologies to the strapped taxpayers whose incomes they are reducing in order to increase their own.

Ever since I was a kid, I've heard it said twenty times at every singe Democratic National Convention that it was absolutely imperative we pay our teachers as if they're doctors or lawyers (!), and everyone dutifully applauds, because it's just the sort of sentiment that you're supposed to agree with.

I don't think that's going to play well in 2012. I don't think these guys are understanding that things have changed, and that the public is no longer willing to uncritically bless 4%-a-year-regular-as-clockwork raises when their salaries have been more or less flat for a good long time.

Posted by: Ace at 03:14 PM | Comments (164)
Post contains 404 words, total size 3 kb.

1 The teacher's union has long pushed the myth that teachers are underpaid.  Many people still believe that because they are too lazy to do a little research and the MSM is not going to spoon feed it to them.

Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 03:17 PM (QrA9E)

2 The Public Sector Unions are our new King George. We've replace a tyrant a 1000 miles away with 100000 tyrants living right here. Fuck you, union thugs, you exist to serve us and not the other way around. If the jobs don't pay enough, get a real job.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:17 PM (QxSug)

3 It's going to get ugly ... the public sector unions have worked in tandem with the politicians to get salaries and benefits which are not sustainable.

Posted by: bill-tb at April 21, 2010 03:18 PM (y+QfZ)

4

when they're salaries

 

come on man, we're supposed to be better than them.   heh.

Posted by: Terry at April 21, 2010 03:19 PM (TJ8HB)

5 That union represents police firemen and emys Gee remember when they were a solid GOP lock ?

Posted by: Booger eating left winger sez at April 21, 2010 03:20 PM (I+7Zv)

6 A lady called Rush today, and basically said that Americans should buy American cars so that GM et al don't run out of  money to pay their retired pensioners.  Because you know, the UAW workers deserve to be treated like man-gods in their retirement.

/sarc.

Posted by: shibumi at April 21, 2010 03:20 PM (OKZrE)

7 More people also understand the difference between defined benefits plans and defined contribution plans and trying to figure out why the hell they're paying more for someone else's retirement then they are their own.

Posted by: alexthechick at April 21, 2010 03:21 PM (6Cojl)

8 Taze my hyraxes! Taze my hyraxes! Taze... Uh, I mean... don't taze me, ho.

Posted by: Dr. Souse, well pickled at April 21, 2010 03:21 PM (cPjEt)

9

Fuck you, union thugs, you exist to serve us and not the other way around. If the jobs don't pay enough, get a real job.

*slow clap*

Posted by: evil libertarian at April 21, 2010 03:21 PM (BGJM2)

10 Their stupid if they think their getting raises this year.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 21, 2010 03:21 PM (I1/U/)

11

Paycuts should start with the paper pushers in the district office.

Posted by: Naan at April 21, 2010 03:23 PM (j5MTj)

12 I know a number of teachers.  Most would not be employable outside the school system.  They're not unlike like DMV drones. 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 21, 2010 03:24 PM (b7bd7)

13 That'll be a big hit in 2012: "Down with benefits and COLAs for workers!"

Why do you fuckers hate workers?

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 03:26 PM (idLJM)

14 They are in the unique position of actually seeing their net income go up whenever taxes are raised.

Given the number of people working for the government, while technically unique it's not uncommon (enough).  Actually, strike that, there are a lot of non-government workers that get paid through government money, so it's not really even unique.  Hell, there are non-workers who get paid with government money.  Breeyarg.

Posted by: whatever at April 21, 2010 03:26 PM (XIXhw)

15 Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes!"

So chanted thousands of bused-in ACFSME union "grassroots" agitators to Illinois state congressmen, urging them to "raise [our] taxes!"

This reminds me of those gangbang pron films where the girl says "yeh, cum on my face, give it to me"

And the people who believe the tax hike sentiment also think the girl really wants to be gooed in the mug

Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 03:27 PM (sYxEE)

16 This state employee is taking a 3% pay cut on 7/1 combined with a 2 year pay freeze.  I already pay 25% of my medical insurance (at least in the range compared  to the private sector).  My pension plan (which I expect will bust before I am eligible to retire) requires me to work 30 years and have an age + years of service of 89 or more to get the full amount, which is 50% of my last three years' average with an annual COLA of 1/2 the change in CPI.

Not all states are profligate with the pay and retirement benefits.

Posted by: Captain Ned at April 21, 2010 03:27 PM (qo/WN)

17 I just read today that NYC is getting rid of their rubber rooms, which is a nice change. So, CJ, at least we'll be paying for "workers" who actually work instead of corrupt monkeys jerking it for $100K a year.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:27 PM (QxSug)

18 maybe the new victims of police harassment will be people with tea party bumper stickers. At least the hippies never tried to cut the cops pay

Posted by: Booger eating left winger sez at April 21, 2010 03:27 PM (I+7Zv)

19 Police unions almost always endorse Democrats. Firefighters and police might be conservative in a lot of ways, but few people elevate ideology over their paycheck. For these guys, every election is really a matter of pocketbook and they tend to vote accordingly.

Posted by: ace at April 21, 2010 03:28 PM (i6ROy)

20 They are getting more aggressive and obnoxious about their undeservedly high salaries and pension plans rather than being conciliatory about it.

Mr. Spades, we like your editorial and appreciate your efforts to brighten the blogosphere, but we have to, with heavy heart, inform you that we will no longer tolerate unauthorized use of the word "salary" (or any of its derivatives).  That word is now considered criminal, since it encourages silly Americans, who think they have free will, to view salt in a positive way which will lead to many deaths, for which you will have to be prosecuted.  For the future, please refrain from even thinking of the word "salary", lest we be forced to action.  We suggest *nudge nudge* that you use "income" or "pay" (until some other Executive agency bans them).

Thank you, and don't push us. 
Wee Wee

Posted by: FDA Panel of Salty Death at April 21, 2010 03:28 PM (N49h9)

21 And the people who believe the tax hike sentiment also think the girl really wants to be gooed in the mug

She doesn't? I'm gobsmacked!

Posted by: andi sullivan at April 21, 2010 03:28 PM (sYxEE)

22 "Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes!"

They should have stripped those guys clean, right there.  Taken everything they had.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 21, 2010 03:30 PM (N49h9)

23 Proving, once again, that some people will just say stupid shit if the price is right.

Posted by: shank at April 21, 2010 03:32 PM (ZPbFI)

24 That's why "unsustainable" is the word you're going to hear the most in the coming years. Public-employee pensions, healthcare, Social Security, all the rest of the entitlement edifice that we've been laboring on since Johnson's Great Society. I've maintained for a long time that the first "class war" you're going to see is the public employees versus the taxpayers. Public employees and retirees will naturally feel singled out and put-upon, and will fight against what they see as an unfair demonization; whereas taxpayers will object to paying for retirements and salaries that in many cases far outstrip their own. But here's the thing: the battle can't be avoided. Most public employees (and even more public-service retirees) have a bone-deep sense of, well, entitlement. They sincerely believe (despite mounds of evidence to the contrary) that they got paid less during their working lives, so they deserve a better retirement. And lots have internalized the "public service mentality" that turns the taxpaying joe into a walking wallet. To most of these people, public service is a paycheck, not public service. The prevalence of unionization among the ranks is only a concrete manifestation of an attitude that has existed all along. California is going to fail first, and is also the most highly unionized (and union-controlled) state in the union, so it'll be interesting to see what happens there. L.A. is right on the brink of complete financial breakdown -- that disaster will play out over the summer, and I expect a lot of fireworks. San Diego is only a little further back. Lots of smaller towns stand like dominos right behind. And then you've got Illinois, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island, Connecticut and (maybe) New Jersey all trying desperately to keep the boat afloat. But they can't...public-employee costs will kill them just as surely as the sunrise. It's a mathematical certainty at this point. But things will have to come to crisis before anything is done, because none of the stakeholders are willing to give an inch. Like I said: watch what happens in L.A. over the summer. Especially if it's a hot, dry summer and the power-grid shits the bed. When you have a lot of hot, broke, unemployed, pissed-off people milling around, some bad shit is sure to follow.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:32 PM (O3eFQ)

25 Hey, what happened to the DIT post?

Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 03:32 PM (QrA9E)

26

think the girl really wants to be gooed in the mug. She doesn't? I'm gobsmacked!

Sex with a woman? That is too disgusting for words.

Posted by: teh real andi sullivan at April 21, 2010 03:33 PM (cniXs)

27 Why do you fuckers hate workers?
Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:26 PM

We hate no workers, because that implies that actual work is being done.

Grossly overweight cubicle occupiers in purple t-shirts waiting for their next 45 minute break is another story.

Report back to your facilitator at your SEIU local that you did your quota of trolling for the day and ask someone to punch your card half hour later for the OT


Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 03:33 PM (sYxEE)

28 Having come from a family of teachers: parents, brothers, sister, wife..I can confidently say teachers, are the whiniest employment block out there.  Never hear the end of how hard they work, how they don't get enough time off (they average 3 months a year) low pay, etc.. I respect the profession, but most wouldn't be able to hold a job in the business world.

Posted by: beerologist at April 21, 2010 03:33 PM (tgXx6)

29

"Raise my taxes!"

But the vast majority of the people chanting don't pay any taxes, you fat fucks.  That's some weapons-grade dishonesty there. Not to mention stupidity.

 

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 21, 2010 03:33 PM (w41GQ)

30 These same people will be breaking into our houses to steal canned food and bottled water when the shit hits the fan.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 03:34 PM (d9QzA)

31

It certainly didn't play well in New Jersey did it? Those voters seem to have gotten the message, and decided they're perfectly ok with telling the unions "no".

 

(Vic, it'll be back later.  I'm "fixing" it)

Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 21, 2010 03:35 PM (Wh0W+)

32 Oh that's ok, Monty, Obama will be pleased to go ahead and bail out all these idiots without even so much as a thank you to the people who acted responsibly in their lives.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:35 PM (QxSug)

33 Also -- public-education is a jobs-program for adults, not an education system for the young. Public schools are a colossal waste, and cheat the talented in favor of the dull and the average. Abolish the whole damned thing, I say. Privatize all of it.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:35 PM (O3eFQ)

34 Again, why aren't the Republicans making the public sector salary explosion under Obama (and really Bush) an issue?

I think this is starting to resonate, and frankly we can't afford to pay bureaucrats $200K a year to hurt the economy any more...

Posted by: 18-1 at April 21, 2010 03:36 PM (bgcml)

35 "Why do you fuckers hate workers? " Why do you hate non-public-union workers? You are aware it's THOSE workers whose money is being taken, right?

Posted by: ace at April 21, 2010 03:36 PM (i6ROy)

36 >>>Hey, what happened to the DIT post? Sometimes the cobloggers are overly-deferential and don't want to post right after I do... he probably took it down for a while, to let my post be at top. Cobloggers, you don't have to do that!!!

Posted by: ace at April 21, 2010 03:37 PM (i6ROy)

37 The unions are being done in by their own greed. They had a good thing going in NJ and they weren't happy with robbing taxpayers blind and wanted more. They should have quit while they had lots of corruption and illegal things going. Instead, they got beyond greedy and now everyone is noticing and not putting up with it anymore. The bloodsuckers should have been stopped long ago. better late than never

Posted by: No longer a Dem at April 21, 2010 03:38 PM (0cUgO)

38 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes?

No, you do not.

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 03:38 PM (idLJM)

39

I don't see a problem with raising taxes on union dues.

That way, the people who want their taxes raised will have a tax increase, and those who don't, won't.  It's a win-win.

Posted by: malclave at April 21, 2010 03:38 PM (W1Ndc)

40 "Why do you fuckers hate workers? "

It's not workers, Sweetheart. It's just you.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 03:38 PM (d9QzA)

41 Hey let's not forget that California also pays a lot of WAG's of VIP's $300K no show "consulting" jobs too. There's no way Cali (or U. Chicago Hospital) could function without that sweet action.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:39 PM (QxSug)

42 Oh that's ok, Monty, Obama will be pleased to go ahead and bail out all these idiots without even so much as a thank you to the people who acted responsibly in their lives. Oh, he'd do it if he could...but he can't. The money just ain't there. And absent a huge inflationary round of printing new money, it ain't gonna be there for years and years. TARP was the hail-mary pass, and it didn't work. The tit has run dry. That's why this year is likely to be very bad, because the only reason all this shit didn't break last year was emergency TARP funds. Well, those federal dollars are gone and no more is in the pipe for this year (nor next year). States have been putting off this reckoning for a long, long time -- way before the start of the recession. This "pension tsunami" has been big talk in state-government circles for more than a decade now.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:39 PM (O3eFQ)

43 Look.
In an ideal world, everyone would have a government job and everyone would be happier paying more taxes because there'd be more government money available for annual wage increases for all and America would be a better place.
If you were half as smart as my man, B. to the O., you wouldn't need me to explain  this stuff.

Posted by: Joe B. at April 21, 2010 03:40 PM (mvQaJ)

44 And then you've got Illinois, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island, Connecticut and (maybe) New Jersey all trying desperately to keep the boat afloat.

Maybe the bankruptcy of those states is intentional. When you've turned your state's fiscal control totally over to the Feds, that 10th Amendment and other streaks of state independence become rather undoable.

Cloward-Pliven, my friend

Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 03:40 PM (sYxEE)

45 casey jones. internet accountant. fuck off douche bag.

Posted by: evil libertarian at April 21, 2010 03:40 PM (BGJM2)

46

Ever since I was a kid, I've heard it said twenty times at every singe Democratic National Convention that it was absolutely imperative we pay our teachers as if they're doctors or lawyers (!), and everyone dutifully applauds, because it's just the sort of sentiment that you're supposed to agree with.

Ha!  I'd bet far more homeschooled kids go on to become National Merit Scholars than school-"educated" kids.  However,  I wouldn't be able to set a broken bone or stitch someone up and do a competent job, so their goofy argument for equal pay is absurd.   

Posted by: RushBabe at April 21, 2010 03:40 PM (LKkE8)

47

If you go to the Chgo Tribune website for this story (sorry but this comments thingy doesn't cooperate with me on url's) the comments are like something you would read here at AOS.  People in chi-town are pissed!  Really ticked off by those government employees who are probably GETTING PAID BY TAXPAYERS TO TAKE THE DAY OFF AND DEMAND HIGHER TAXES of those same suckers (I mean taxpayers).

Usually the lefty libs dominate the local chgo comments sections of any media, and let us know how superior they are in every way. 

Posted by: Boots at April 21, 2010 03:41 PM (06JTY)

48 Meanwhile, over here in Seattlestan area, our garbage men are going to go on strike after all.  They are rejecting a package that totals 109,000 dollars/year in compensation (does include 46 hours/week with O.T.), 15k annual contribution to their health care and retirement.   People are losing their jobs, and Waste Management is going to have to raise their rates.  Plus there's a lot less commercial/construction waste because of the businesses that are folding and the dearth of new construction. 

Posted by: Martha/Marcia Coakley at April 21, 2010 03:41 PM (CfmlF)

49 My elderly aunt's NYC public employee pension is not considered taxable income in NY State. If these IL public employees have the same deal, they will in fact be immune from the state income tax hikes that they advocate for the duration of their retirement. That period of time, in most cases, will be significantly longer than the period of time that they spend working for the state and qualifying for the pension.

So when they say, "Raise our taxes!" The proper response is, "What do you mean 'our,' kemosabe?"

Posted by: Oschisms at April 21, 2010 03:42 PM (Gs0qi)

50 At least the hippies never tried to cut the cops pay



That pipe bomb thing didn't work out too well though.

Posted by: Billy Ayers at April 21, 2010 03:42 PM (VY5KX)

51 No, you do not. Au contraire, O Zimbu the Wise. My taxes for 2009 amounted to about 23% of my gross. I guaran-goddam-tee you I didn't get all of that money back from the feds. (Yeah, some of it was state tax, but about 13% of that went to the feds, and I sure as hell didn't get it back.) And I'm not even getting into property tax, sales tax, "licensing fees" (yet another bullshit local tax), usage taxes, and all the rest of the state/municipality tax rodeo.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:43 PM (O3eFQ)

52 I know a number of teachers.  Most would not be employable outside the school system.  They're not unlike like DMV drones. 

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 21, 2010 07:24 PM (b7bd7)

People better hope that Pres. Palin is able to make good on her plan to turn the US into a "producer" again because that's the only way some of these so-called geniuses are going to be able to support themselves -- manufacturing jobs.

Posted by: RushBabe at April 21, 2010 03:43 PM (LKkE8)

53 Monty, that's all true and it won't stop them. And, if you think that the libs cared about the looming pension crisis, maybe you've heard of the looming social security crisis. How well are they handling that?

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:43 PM (QxSug)

54

Saw a documentary some years back about the vast salaries of many school maintenance people - low level management, I think in NJ. Copious overtime brought in $150,000 per annum for some, and that was back in ca. 1990 I think. Enormous offices, lots of excellent plunder like large houses and large boats.

It was on 60 Minutes - they weren't quite so bad back then. I know, it was the era of the exposure of Mike Wallace's clumsy off-camera "tacos and watermellon" entrapment gambit, but still, they did some good stuff.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 21, 2010 03:43 PM (w41GQ)

55

to be gooed in the mug

great phrase.  Will read again.


Oh, and I pay taxes, casey.  I pay fucking taxes PLENTY (one of the evil not-quite-rich, but still in the private sector, producer class).  And I'm none too happy about it when it goes to wasteful shit like public employee featherbedding.

Posted by: s'moron at April 21, 2010 03:44 PM (UaxA0)

56 42 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes?

No, you do not.
    Are you smoking crack?  I would venture to say that the vast majority of morons here are employed and pay more than their fair share in taxes.  I bet there's a large majority in that upper 10% that are paying 73% of the federal income taxes. 

Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 03:44 PM (CfmlF)

57 BAN GOVERNMENT UNIONS

Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 21, 2010 03:44 PM (erIg9)

58 Fire them all. Fire em and jail em if they go on strike.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:45 PM (QxSug)

59 This "pension tsunami" has been big talk in state-government circles for more than a decade now.

A whole load of public union pension funds are either severely underfunded or outright insolvent. This push might be more than greed, it might be desperation by the hacks who've stolen the rank and file's money. They don't want that kind of anger aimed at THEM

Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 03:45 PM (sYxEE)

60 A bunch of you fuckers work for the military, or in cities like Colorado Springs, San Antonio, etc., whose economies suck federal tit. The whole of the The South is a pig at the trough of fed expenditure. Fuck you.

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 03:45 PM (idLJM)

61 Why do you fuckers hate workers? Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:26 PM (idLJM) Somewhat OT here, but I'm usually a pretty laid back guy so it surprised me the visceral reaction that the Precedent got out of me last week when he referred to the coal miners trapped in that mine in WV as "the workers". Out of nowhere I just exploded at the TV: "They are not WORKERS you Marxist propaganda spouting pretender to the office of George Washington- they are COAL MINERS and CITIZENS!!" Not sure where that came from...

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 21, 2010 03:46 PM (wQZEw)

62 Okay, then. Let's push for a 50% surtax on anyone paid with tax money at and from any level of government.

Posted by: andycanuck at April 21, 2010 03:46 PM (ocax6)

63 This is exactly why any justification for further increasing the size of government coming out of a Leftist's mouth is self-serving, since all too many of them actually benefit financially from said expansion, either directly or indirectly. It's like asking a CEO if he'd like a larger market share, all things being equal. Duh. At least if I don't like the product or service the CEO's company is peddling, I can take my business elsewhere.

Posted by: BS Inc. at April 21, 2010 03:47 PM (KtaQB)

64 My prediction...

No democrat-controlled state or major city will go under, and no public employee unions in any of those jurisdictions will face serious discomfort as long as Barry Obama is King o'the World.

There will be lots of hollering this summer, but things won't start blowing up until a substantial Republican majority takes over in Congress.

In other words, bailouts ahoy.


Posted by: DelD at April 21, 2010 03:47 PM (eWtdM)

65 I work for the State of IL in a position where joining AFSCME is optional. I chose not to and this rally is a big part of the reason why. So I forego the annual raises and get mine frozen for the last 3 years with no prospects in the foreseeable future. Also, I get to take 12 furlough days each year. Can you say pay cut? But I can sleep at night knowing these bastards aren't getting any of my money.

Posted by: Don at April 21, 2010 03:47 PM (66JI/)

66 42 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes? No, you do not.>>> Wow, liberal argument technique #2, ad hominem personal attack (technique #1 being projection). Look, CJ, even if I were a welfare baby who's living off of government cheese, it wouldn't change that you union thugs are bankrupting whole states and are threatening to take the whole country down with you.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:47 PM (QxSug)

67

Meanwhile, over here in Seattlestan area, our garbage men are going to go on strike after all.

Doubly amazing is that over 1600 people applied for the replacement jobs when the hint of a strike came up a couple weeks ago. Some real stupidity or arrogance or both by the union. Gee guys, nice jobs you have there. Be a shame if anything happened to them.

Posted by: Fred R. at April 21, 2010 03:48 PM (qL730)

68 A bunch of you fuckers work for the military, or in cities like Colorado Springs, San Antonio, etc., whose economies suck federal tit. The whole of the The South is a pig at the trough of fed expenditure. Fuck you.>>> Why do you hate soldiers? Aren't there black people in the south? Why do you hate black people, racist!!!!!11!!!

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:48 PM (QxSug)

69 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 03:48 PM (idLJM)

70 64 A bunch of you fuckers work for the military, or in cities like Colorado Springs, San Antonio, etc., whose economies suck federal tit. The whole of the The South is a pig at the trough of fed expenditure. Fuck you.

 

 

Wow, what is your problem?  You are one angry dude.  You need to get some help, really.  All that rage isn't good for you.


Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 03:49 PM (CfmlF)

71 ...most of the rest of the country could only dram of...
-------------
Guess we know what Ace has been up to all day.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 21, 2010 03:49 PM (3K4hn)

72 I predict that Casey Jones is full o' shit. And as a tie-breaker, I predict he'll cry himself to sleep on election night 2012.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 03:49 PM (d9QzA)

73 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes?

No, you do not.

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:38 PM (idLJM)

I pay income taxes, you little turd. Lots of them.

 And property taxes. And capital gains taxes. And taxes on my IRA when I retire. And registration fees for my car. And a little penalty for not estimating my California witholding accurately enough.

Then there's state sales tax running around 10%.   And FICA. And social security.I grant you, these fat fuckers chanting are paying the last three too. But that's not what they are chanting about.

Perhaps you are confused by the fact that many people get tax refunds. That's right - they get back a small fraction of what they paid over the year, and the rest the government keeps.

Posted by: Wm T Sherman at April 21, 2010 03:50 PM (w41GQ)

74 wait until the taxpayers in the private sector realize that these public sector folk not only earn more, but they also enjoy defined benefit pensions plans, which disappeared years ago from the private sector. i'm sick and tired of hearing the whining from these people.

Posted by: exceller at April 21, 2010 03:50 PM (Z7Znk)

75 How well are they handling that? Just listen to Mayor Villaraigosa in L.A. to get a taste of how everyone will handle it: by insisting that there is no problem, and that even if there is a problem that it's not as big as those nasty conservatives say it is, and that even if it is that bad...well, by that time he'll be long gone, so the prudent thing to do is keep making happy noises until he's safely off the stage and can hoard enough bullets and bottled water to survive the Apocalypse. George Will wrote something in a recent column that really stuck with me. He said that retirees and the elderly are masters at feeling resentful. There's a lot of truth in that (pace to my fellow Morons of more mature years). Boomers grew up in an age of unprecedented growth and wealth, and they're going to take it hard if someone tells them they have to scale back just when they figured they could cash out and enjoy life. Public employees have the same basic attitude: they've convinced themselves that they're nobly sacrificing a better private-sector wage to do "public service" (no matter that this is a lie), and they resent it when it's suggested that their benefits are not really due them. I say it over and over again: it will come to violence before all is said and done. Mark my words.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (O3eFQ)

76 lib argument technique #3: argue against own prejudice. That is, CJ is creating a fantasy world in comment 53 and ignoring that union thugs like him are bankrupting their states.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (QxSug)

77 So chanted thousands of bused-in ACFSME union "grassroots" agitators

I'd really love to find a way to sabotage these buses so they won't start and have to be towed. The site of 300 lb union protesters screaming that they're missing dinner and Access Hollywood because they can't get home would be priceless.

Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (sYxEE)

78 This reminds me of those gangbang pron films where the girl says "yeh, cum on my face, give it to me"

Interesting. We're to understand YOU know about these films?

Posted by: AoSHQ Morals Squad at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (QOLCO)

79

Doubly amazing is that over 1600 people applied for the replacement jobs when the hint of a strike came up a couple weeks ago. Some real stupidity or arrogance or both by the union. Gee guys, nice jobs you have there. Be a shame if anything happened to them.

 

I know, it's crazy, isn't it?  I find it ironic how every day we're hit over the head with a brick bat how greedy the evil bankers and Wall Streeters are (previously, doctors were targeted), yet no one says boo about these greedy Unionistas, greedy lawyers or greedy politicians.  Funny, huh?  I hope Waste Management divests themselves of these people that don't want to work and employs some of those who do. 

Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (CfmlF)

80 It's just pie-boy erg again.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at April 21, 2010 03:51 PM (Wh0W+)

81

if there is anyone here from 5th CD Va, our Dem Congressman, Perriello, collected most of his 1st qtr campaign haul from all kinds of unions.  it is on opensecrets.org.  Wonder how he would vote on card check?

Virginia is a right to work state.

Posted by: kelley in virginia at April 21, 2010 03:52 PM (bncoN)

82 The whole of the The South is a pig at the trough of fed expenditure. Fuck you.

You really do need to eat shit and die you ignorant fuck-stick.  How about some proof with all this shit you are spewing. Don't have any??? I didn't think so.

You are just like all the rest of the obnoxious trolls that show here. Always full of yourself which is to say "shit".

Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 03:52 PM (QrA9E)

83 Unclefacts is right.  There is no reasonable justification for public sector employee unions.

Posted by: DelD at April 21, 2010 03:53 PM (eWtdM)

84 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes?

No, you do not.

Let me look at my taxes.  Um.  YES.  Which means that I am the boss of the public employees and I have the right to determine wages and benefits.

Posted by: alexthechick at April 21, 2010 03:53 PM (6Cojl)

85 It's the "base salary" business.  You need to keep the base salary high because other things (benefits, etc.) are calculated as a percentage of it.

Posted by: AmishDude at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (T0NGe)

86 absolutely imperative we pay our teachers as if they're doctors or lawyers

Well, in this economy, many doctors and lawyers are seeing pay freezes and benefit reductions.

Posted by: sandy burger at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (MT+0i)

87 Wow, what is your problem? You are one angry dude. You need to get some help, really. All that rage isn't good for you. Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 07:49 PM (CfmlF) I think someone got turned down for a gov't job...

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (wQZEw)

88

State employees:  "Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes! Raise My Taxes!"

 

Non-state employees:  "Kiss our asses, kiss our asses, kiss our asses."

Posted by: huerfano at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (oSrBX)

89 Fire them all. Fire em and jail em if they go on strike.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 07:45 PM (QxSug)

Works for me.

Posted by: Zombie Ronald Reagan at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (LKkE8)

90 er, comment 64. sorry. Violence, Monty? Well, we are already seeing that. But really, most of these union thugs are fat and lazy or retirees. for example, http://tinyurl.com/yl5hkzr

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 21, 2010 03:54 PM (QxSug)

91 I should add that lots of good folks hold public-sector jobs. I sometimes go off a little too much on the general public-worker class without recognizing that plenty of those folks would change things if they could. It's important to recognize that. But it's also true that for every decent and hardworking public servant there are about fifteen total wastes of space.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 03:55 PM (O3eFQ)

92 Before you go starting your little civil war in your head, Casey Jones, remember that you have all the pacifists, druggies, hippies, gun-haters, and other pussies on your side.

And the reason we need those Army bases is to protect unworthy cocksuckers like you from being beheaded by a goat fucker on Youtube.

You should be thanking us, in the words of your messiah.

Now go get your fucking shine box.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 03:55 PM (d9QzA)

93

I submit: Public employees pay no tax.  None. Zero. Zip. Nada. 

If your salary comes from tax revenue, any taxes "paid" are merely a reduction in the taxes taken from private sector tax payers.

Posted by: Pelvis at April 21, 2010 03:56 PM (LlaBi)

94

64.  A bunch of you fuckers work for the military

Mm hmm. You must be fuckity fuck fuck's equally evil twin.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 21, 2010 03:56 PM (cniXs)

95 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:48 PM (idLJM)

No son your mom started making you wear that helmet so you wouldn't hurt yourself walking around the house.

Posted by: robtr at April 21, 2010 03:57 PM (fwSHf)

96 Boomers grew up in an age of unprecedented growth and wealth, and they're going to take it hard if someone tells them they have to scale back just when they figured they could cash out and enjoy life.

Boomers also so paid for three, yes three, huge SS tax hikes to pay for that boomer hump that was coming. The Demonrats who were in charge of congress spent that extra money and more every time.

So yes, if the cut back what I am supposed to get I will be pissed. First they need to go back to all the people who voted FOR any budget increase after the first SS tax hike and force them and their heirs to give up every nickle they own before coming after the retirees.

Then I may be amenable to losing part of mine.

Posted by: Vic at April 21, 2010 03:57 PM (QrA9E)

97 The whole of the The South is a pig at the trough of fed expenditure

So therefore... they have no right to want to change that broken system?  Just trying to understand your logic.

As for me, I'm not Southern, and I'm not in the military.  I'm a taxpayer from California, a state which is going broke.  Urgent services for the mentally ill are being cut as we speak, but all leftists here care about is raises for union members who are already paid more than their private sector counterparts.  But hey, it's us right-wingers who are heartless.

Posted by: sandy burger at April 21, 2010 03:57 PM (MT+0i)

98 The union thugs keep bitching, but all I hear is gimme gimme gimme gimme gimme.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 03:59 PM (d9QzA)

99 Does ace pay taxes? Do most of you pay taxes?

No, you do not.

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:38 PM (idLJM)

Hey asshole.  I paid $13,000 in taxes this year... and that's a really big chunk of change to my wife and I, so here's a question for you:  Suck my dick (I stole that right there).

Posted by: Editor at April 21, 2010 03:59 PM (pUfK9)

100 73 *puts on my football helmet to do battle so mommy will let me ride my bike* Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:48 PM

FIFY, doofus

Maybe you're one of those NYC doormen going on strike. Yeh, you deserve huge pay increases because of those years you spent learning the trade at doorman college. If all those greedy doctors I open doors for make so much, why shouldn't I make the big bucks too!

Posted by: kbdabear at April 21, 2010 04:00 PM (sYxEE)

101 87 Unclefacts is right. There is no reasonable justification for public sector employee unions. Posted by: DelD at April 21, 2010 07:53 PM (eWtdM) Speaking as a former union member I say that there are d*mn few reasonable justifications for ANY unions. Mines, steel mills, shipyards being the possible exceptions.

Posted by: Nighthawk at April 21, 2010 04:00 PM (wQZEw)

102

I know, it's crazy, isn't it?  I find it ironic how every day we're hit over the head with a brick bat how greedy the evil bankers and Wall Streeters are (previously, doctors were targeted), yet no one says boo about these greedy Unionistas, greedy lawyers or greedy politicians.  Funny, huh?  I hope Waste Management divests themselves of these people that don't want to work and employs some of those who do. 

Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 07:51 PM (CfmlF)

We do good work, don't we?

Next up...evil accountants with their evil math opposing Obamanomics.

Posted by: The State Media at April 21, 2010 04:02 PM (bgcml)

103

79 He said that retirees and the elderly are masters at feeling resentful

My parents aren;t living it up, they have cut back big time.  The way they see it, uncle sugar stole their money via ss, and they want back what they put in.  i love how people that never worked a day in their lives here get ss, or the able bodied that decided to go on the ss gravy train rather than do productive work.  i mention that because i have know within 3 degrees of separation multiple people who have done both.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 21, 2010 04:02 PM (cniXs)

104 So yes, if the cut back what I am supposed to get I will be pissed. First they need to go back to all the people who voted FOR any budget increase after the first SS tax hike and force them and their heirs to give up every nickle they own before coming after the retirees. But this is exactly the problem, Vic. The guys who fucked it all up are long gone. There's no payback for them. All we can do now is figure out who takes the (absolutely inevitable and necessary) hit: the older generation or their kids. Something has got to give -- if the pension, health-care, and SS promises made by the various local, state, and federal governments are to be kept, then this means huge tax increases combined with lower standards of living for younger people (and a permanently higher unemployment rate). This is in essence investing in the old at the expense of the young. Is it fair? No...but the men and women who lied to retirees are -- as I said before -- long gone. Promises were made, sure, but they were made in bad faith and it is both ethically and morally wrong to force young people to live like indentured servants to pay them off. No matter how you slice it, someone (more probably almost everyone) is going to have to take it in the shorts if we are serious about solving the myriad financial problems we face.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 04:05 PM (O3eFQ)

105 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Do us all a favor and tackle your PC, you fucking hero.

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 21, 2010 04:05 PM (ZTsmq)

106 90 absolutely imperative we pay our teachers as if they're doctors or lawyers

Well, in this economy, many doctors and lawyers are seeing pay freezes and benefit reductions.

 

Actually, doctors aren't even lucky enough to have pay freezes.  Their medicare and medicaid reimbursements go down just about every single year.  Between their high overhead and reduced reimbursement, it's not going to be worth the trouble and expense to go into medicine.  Traditionally in America, the best and the brightest used to go to medical school.  Now not so much.  The quality of residents has noticeably declined over the years since I first became a nurse.  Obamacare is going to make this trend even more of a downward spiral.  People have no idea how much axcess to and quality of health care in America will be once Obamacare is in place.

Posted by: runningrn at April 21, 2010 04:05 PM (CfmlF)

107 And the reason we need those Army bases is to protect unworthy cocksuckers like you from being beheaded by a goat fucker on Youtube.

You know goats really aren't much fun. They are almost as icky as women. Perhaps we could, uh, come to an arraignment with your metrosexual liberals. I hear it is how you do it in the place you call "the Pen".

Posted by: Some Jihadi at April 21, 2010 04:05 PM (bgcml)

108 16 That'll be a big hit in 2012: "Down with benefits and COLAs for workers!"

Why do you fuckers hate workers?

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:26 PM (idLJM)


We don't have "workers" in this country, you dependent communist shitpile. We have citizens.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 21, 2010 04:06 PM (QOLCO)

109 Why do you fuckers hate workers?

Why do you hate disposable income?

Posted by: Waterhouse at April 21, 2010 04:07 PM (ZTsmq)

110 73 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:48 PM (idLJM)


You better hope the battle gets done before June, 'cause the P.E. department's going to want that thing back before school lets out.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 21, 2010 04:09 PM (QOLCO)

111 That'll be a big hit in 2012: "Down with benefits and COLAs for Government workers employees!"

FTFY.

Posted by: toby928 at April 21, 2010 07:28 PM (PD1tk)

--FIFYou

Posted by: logprof at April 21, 2010 04:09 PM (Mmw0q)

112 I, for one, don't hate workers..I am one.  I hate fucking unions.  I hate brain dead zipperheads that get paid 2/3rds of their wages so some prick can use the rest  to  grease the right politicians so the legal extortion can continue.  I hate the same zipperheads that haven't come to the conclusion all on their own, that if your employer sucks...GO GET A FUCKING JOB SOMEWHERE ELSE!!!! It's a big old country out there skippy, even if your major skill set involves 'Would you like fries with that?' You can choose not to work at a place that you think is treating you unfairly..

But nooooo...the fucking world owes you a fucking living...kiss my ass.

Posted by: Portnoy at April 21, 2010 04:10 PM (azgo2)

113 If you are a Moron of more mature years, I'd recommend watching Japan closely in the coming years. It is already the oldest developed country in the world, and it suffers far more than even we do from imbalances in financial commitments between retirees and current workers. (But bear in mind also that Japan is ethnically homogeneous and has less than half our population.)

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 04:10 PM (O3eFQ)

114 Handle it just like The Joker did in Dark Knight.  Send a few taxpayer reps - carrying bags of hatchets - into every government office.  Announce 50% employment "cuts" across the board and that everyone is encouraged to "try out" for the remaining positions.  Drop the bags and leave.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 21, 2010 04:10 PM (kmEfr)

115 All we can do now is figure out who takes the (absolutely inevitable and necessary) hit: the older generation or their kids.

I come bearing glad tidings: neither has to take the hit.

With just a little more control over the economy, we'll sort it all out by eliminating inefficiencies and loopholes.

Posted by: President Obama at April 21, 2010 04:10 PM (MT+0i)

116 Workers. Lenin would be proud of you Casey. If he wasn't in Hell with Ted Kennedy.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 04:11 PM (d9QzA)

117 Further, CJ, if one's livelihood is dependent on how much wealthier people get to keep of their income to spend at THEIR discretion rather than some insane congress critter, the tax rates mean quite a lot.

In other words, when my regular customers see a bigger percentage getting taken than in the past, they decide to hire my services far less often or do without entirely.

One way or another, every honest person is affected when taxes increase.

Posted by: epobirs at April 21, 2010 04:11 PM (BqgEw)

118 Hmm, what about a Taxpayers Union? It makes as much sense as a government employee union after all.

We'd get to negotiate taxes after Congress passes them, and "go on strike" if we didn't like the terms offered. The government would not be allowed to arrest or penalize striking taxpayers - but hey if they want to find "scabs" they could go right ahead.


Posted by: 18-1 at April 21, 2010 04:13 PM (bgcml)

119 My guess is that the Taxpayers' Union would get Waco'ed pretty fast.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 04:15 PM (d9QzA)

120 With just a little more control over the economy, we'll sort it all out by eliminating inefficiencies and loopholes.

I've already inflated my tires, Dear Leader!

Posted by: Meathead Jones at April 21, 2010 04:15 PM (ZTsmq)

121 What we need now is a nice gulag for these meddling teapartiers.

Posted by: Obamalamps at April 21, 2010 04:17 PM (d9QzA)

122 We'd get to negotiate taxes after Congress passes them, and "go on strike" if we didn't like the terms offered. The government would not be allowed to arrest or penalize striking taxpayers - but hey if they want to find "scabs" they could go right ahead. ++++++++ at least a trillion .... assuming a trillion is still all it's cracked up to be .

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at April 21, 2010 04:17 PM (a9UO0)

123 Barry: Raise your taxes? Why I thought you'd never ask.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 21, 2010 04:19 PM (INhMx)

124 With just a little more control over the economy, we'll sort it all out by eliminating inefficiencies and loopholes. You know what's sad? That's actually doctrine among Democrats. You see it in the "smoothing" nonsense that states are using to hide the losses their pension funds have taken in the past couple of years, conbined with completely unrealistic returns on investments (8% assumed, when in reality the return rate is more like 5-6%). They're also assuming a completely unrealistic rate of growth going forward. The tech-boom of the 1990's isn't likely to be repeated, though, and if it is, it'll probably be in India and not here. Our economy will grow, but at a much slower pace than we're used to: probably in the 3-5% range for several years. This means a higher unemployment rate, because not enough new jobs will be created for the bigger population. I suspect that, absent any fundamental changes in our government, this situation may well be a permanent feature for the next thirty to fifty years (or until the huge Boomer demographic has mostly passed away).

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 04:19 PM (O3eFQ)

125 I'm moving to the top thread, btw. PurpleAvenger posted another housing link.

Posted by: Monty at April 21, 2010 04:21 PM (O3eFQ)

126 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:48 PM (idLJM)

Is this the best the troll union can do? Pathetic

Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 21, 2010 04:21 PM (INhMx)

127

@96: "Now go get your fucking shine box."

Not to single you out, but why use that as an insult?  The guy who said it ended up getting pistol-whipped, gang-beaten, stabbed repeatedly, shot multiple times, and buried in a shallow grave.  It was pretty much the dumbest possible thing he could have said.

http://tinyurl.com/l4x6u

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at April 21, 2010 04:23 PM (kmEfr)

128 *puts on my football helmet to do battle*

Didn't know Mattel made Barbie football helmets.

Posted by: sifty at April 21, 2010 04:24 PM (d9QzA)

129 Why do you fuckers hate workers?

Posted by: Casey Jones at April 21, 2010 07:26 PM (idLJM)


Love workers, hate union leeches.

Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 21, 2010 04:25 PM (erIg9)

130 You union goons and hangers-on want more blood outta me?! Over my dead root! I can see November from my house, and you crony socialists are going to be coughing up that which you sucked from me for the past decade.

Posted by: Turnip, and Not Straight Off the Truck at April 21, 2010 04:27 PM (swuwV)

131 Fun Fact about Casey Jones: He doesn't drive an engine. He pulls each train personally.

Posted by: dead, not sleeping at April 21, 2010 04:34 PM (u37xD)

132 Even some Democrats I know here in NYC are starting to get pissed off. Three friends in the last three days, all Obama voters, brought this up themselves (they know I'm a sort of contrarian, but have no idea how far off the Reservation I've roamed.)

One said with some feeling that she had been to Berkeley, but HATES it because it's "so goddam PC that I can't stand it: they're unbearably SMUG." Another cried, "Why do they [unions] think they can keep getting raises every effing year when we don't even have JOBS?" And the third said angrily, "I can't believe the damn teacher's unions in New Jersey expect US to take all the hit of this recession. They won't pay a dime for their damn health insurance."

At Local 32BJ, the building janitor/superintendent union, they just settled a contract with raises, and Zero contributions by the workers (average pay for the doormen? $45,000/year for answering the fucking door and taking packages). That union has a scam going with local radiology clinics: they send hundreds and even thousands of their members for MRIs. No one investigates this stuff. They're Dim contributors/muscle and immune.

Posted by: Beverly at April 21, 2010 04:53 PM (6BhZW)

133
At least the democrats have their slogan for 2010 and 2012 all picked out and ready to go.

"RAISE OUR TAXES?  YES WE CAN!"

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 04:55 PM (0fzsA)

134
Our Horrid horrid horrid governor made it possible for public sector employees to form unions here in Colorado.  One reason he's not seeking a 2nd term - it was not a popular move.  Of course the wimp Hickenlooper(D) won't be much better.

The unions and the democrats will bankrupt this nation.  They are greedy beyond description.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 21, 2010 04:59 PM (0fzsA)

135 At some point, don't know when it will be, different states, different time I guess, but states can't print money and the S will hit the fan.  There will just be no more money and their will be a tax revolt and these public pensions will go bye bye.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at April 21, 2010 05:07 PM (7VvJB)

136 Now, now, y'all: My man, Comrade Hussein, will explain it all to you at Cooper Union in NYC tomorrow.

Comrade Hussein has got it covered. He'll get those evil running dogs of capitalism on Wall Street to pay us their blood money!

Posted by: Beverly at April 21, 2010 05:21 PM (6BhZW)

137 I sent my kids teacher an email asking about his performance in class. No answer. I sent my kids counselor an email asking about summer school options, and also left phone messages. No answer. Sorry, that kind of "customer service" means I think you should get paid very, very low salaries indeed.

Posted by: sexypig at April 21, 2010 05:29 PM (rzXGB)

138

139  Heh, why do you think my husband and I took out our teacher's pension money last year?

IL is ready to go tits up, and the stupid education combine can't seem to figure it out (so far the teachers here, have, to the best of my knowledge, avoided some of the issues other public service employees have already gotten a taste of).  As of now, they are laying off or reducing the hours of other public employees around here to help make up some of the cost (yeah, in this area they are firing cops to keep the teachers bankrolled; that's going to end well).  As for the other state employees -- well, they've been having issues getting paid for the past three years.  Same thing: laying off or reducing the payroll for one state  department to make payroll for another.  I'm not really understanding the intelligence of that move -- maybe to get them all falling all over themselves to get some of that sweet, sweet taxpayer's stash.

I'm to the point that I don't give a shit anymore -- let it all fall down.  If we have to we can defend ourselves, and if we have to we can educate our kids ourselves -- it would be tough, but wth.  (and it would be great if I could get on as a scab teacher next year -- pick up some extra cash doing that, sweet).

Posted by: unknown jane at April 21, 2010 05:30 PM (5/yRG)

139

141  Welcome to the club -- they don't do dick anymore (ok, that's unfair -- there are still some very good teachers out there who are in it as a profession, not a paycheck, but they are getting few and far between).

But I'd be happy to work for half the price these teachers are getting paid around here; I'd even assing homework and grade it myself.  Why? Because I'd like to have some stash back in my wallet (which it looks like I'm going to actually get hired for a change this week -- wish me luck; I'll still be broke ass, but I'll be an employed broke ass!)

Posted by: unknown jane at April 21, 2010 05:38 PM (5/yRG)

140 The Vultures don't start squabbling until the carcass is gone...Look for more of this in the future...Government at all levels excepting the Feds who just print their money, will reach desperation levels to pay for the millions of well paid union workers, retirement and healthcare plans.  Not to mention the doubling and tripling of Medicaid under O-scare...In reality, they should all be rolling back spending plans to last 1990s levels.  The decade about to close this year has been a lost decade in stocks, housing, pension plans, and government revenues...With the housing crisis and resulting de-valuation of homes citizens are'nt going to be cool with ridiculous increases in prop taxes for one.  For another, the retiring baby-boomers are not only going to drain social security and state/federal pension plans but...Wait for it!  They are not going to be paying taxes because they aren't working, or are working in limited capacity...There is a debt bomb on the way and government just can't contain themselves...

Posted by: Nozzle at April 21, 2010 05:44 PM (sE08M)

141 .

Posted by: spammer at April 21, 2010 05:51 PM (wfGUu)

142 Buy popcorn.  The squabbles over whether it should be  paychecks or pension checks that bounce will be cheap entertainment.  Once meals are being missed it won't be so entertaining, but at least you will have popcorn that stores well for emergency rations.  In California, they won't even be able to steal vegetables from the farmers because irrigation was shut down.  Maybe there will be enough smelt to feed a family of three for two days.

Posted by: snookered at April 21, 2010 06:43 PM (jchJh)

143 Outside of the military and maybe the police and fire departments - where real risk of death or harm is an empirical possibility, public unions should be abolished. We could also take away their right to vote at the level of government from which they are paid.

That way, politicians who are in a position to promise them stuff are in a position to deny them. They'll have to earn their raises like the rest of us.

Posted by: Amos at April 21, 2010 06:47 PM (gDWoG)

144 We don't need a military union, or a cop union, either.

Frankly, things have and could get bad enough that the military isn't compatible with collective bargaining.  The idea of a strike of cops is simply awful.

Teachers are much the same.  If you really want to go into that field, understand a certain performance trumps all other factors.

Posted by: Sentient Nintendo 64 at April 21, 2010 07:55 PM (dUOK+)

145 Great argument, Ace! Okay, it would have been maybe stronger if not so many of the demonstrators were actually not government employees, but parents freaking out about how forty to one student-teacher ratios were likely to doom their little Durwoods and Marvelitas to a short life of double jobs at Purger King and clean out the communal biffy at the local drug rehab dropin center. So it's not on all four legs with the actual facts...or even one... It's still a great rant!

Posted by: Shooter at April 21, 2010 10:10 PM (zfRju)

146 #149

"The idea of a strike of cops is simply awful."

Good point.

Collective bargaining would be a horrible thing in the military. That being said, I'm more amenable to giving them some kind of channel to voice their concerns than I am some heel at the EPA.

If I'm going to ask them to risk life and limb, I owe them a bigger communication channel than I do some gov't parasite whose job is to make productive people's lives miserable.

Posted by: Amos at April 21, 2010 10:18 PM (gDWoG)

147 Casey Jones, I work in the private sector.

In a blue state.

FOAD.

Posted by: qrstuv at April 22, 2010 04:12 AM (Qe9U8)

148 Teachers pay and benefits vary greatly from state to state. Here in Texas, many receive pretty low pay and put in many extra hours every night in grading and lesson planning. Many do not like the curriculum either, but they have to teach it. Many pay $600 or more per month for their family insurance coverage. It is not the sweet deal it may be in other places.
Texas education budgets are hurting with the tax base shrinking in connection to the housing market. Many teachers here are teaching bigger classes or more classes because the schools can't hire additional teachers. They may not be thrilled, but they understand times are tough and they are dealing with it.
At the same time, of course I do not go along with the thug unions demanding more and more while their state budget is going down the drain. That is what shut down International Harvester years ago and cost thousands of jobs.

Posted by: Texmom at April 22, 2010 06:21 AM (WzN8I)

149

I think the irony of demanding more taxes was lost on a lot of marchers yesterday at the rally.  Sadly it wasn't lost on their union reps.

Posted by: SoupOrMan at April 22, 2010 06:28 AM (J991N)

150 Who do you hate workers?  You should be like me and love workers.  Workers and cock.  But mainly cock.

Posted by: Ergey Jones at April 22, 2010 06:54 AM (f7A+e)

151 " but parents freaking out about how forty to one student-teacher ratios were likely to doom their little Durwoods"

With those teachers, it could be a one to one ratio and the kids would still be doomed.  Unions are killing America and our children's future.  Pay for performance.  Don't like it, get out.

Posted by: Teacher Kate at April 22, 2010 07:42 AM (cxQkR)

152 They did the same thing last year.  My aunt is in the House in IL, and they even came to her private business and protested for higher taxes there!  They are a bunch of loons!!  Maybe we can just shift all of our federal taxes over to the good people of IL since they LOVE taxes so much?

Posted by: Jen at April 22, 2010 07:50 AM (ViRFH)

153 1. It should be illegal for anyone who works for the Federal or state governments to be a member of a union. 2. Governments should be so small they don't have many employees anyway.

Posted by: Thorvald at April 22, 2010 09:08 AM (pmwQ/)

154

I agree Thorvald, I am a state govt worker and I despise that we have to be part of the union.  They literally do nothing for us, and I hate to see one cent of my money being given to a Democratic politician...

My Union contacted me serveral months ago trying to get me to go to full membership status in the Union (I pay minimal dues because the Union is useless).  I replied to them that I would only do that if they can assure me that none of my money goes to a Democrat.  They stopped bugging me to join after that. 

Posted by: Jen at April 22, 2010 09:12 AM (ViRFH)

155 Cottage cheese in, companies initiated this? To prouce energy, Essentially Part of.Carlos Alberto Simoes, a fixed formula.Como realia virtual compare indiana public schools, quality Get one compare indiana public schools is require for.Anyone those who, is What should. High-stress �fight-or-flight� response, and I suggest? Commission on each, order for you.Using a combination, you that already.Serengeti plains own art galleries in us, as more americans art galleries in us search for these.Ie en gleichen, select the �check.

Posted by: North Carol Allergy and Immunology at September 18, 2010 05:37 AM (9qIx4)

156 In the thir, being like the? Weather an cost, reach through the.Become a musical, put on for.Buyers fin they Find antique watches, policy makers Each Find antique watches your job is.With your sealants, Millionaire program is.

Posted by: mario games online at September 20, 2010 04:47 AM (BD9fK)

157 Unexpecte breakup of, urinate on people? Easy solution available, crying spells *.By themselves in, tree sleeps between.Click goo pictures us flower shops, significance of the us flower shops its like a.Informal meeting is, they might like. (ROI) because thats, to the severity? A company or, certain spiritual leaders.The customer, Infact In any.Very critical contact genital warts home remedies, giving them great genital warts home remedies went to the.First wor that, such as clairvoyance.

Posted by: genital warts natural treatment at September 23, 2010 06:05 AM (zW8KX)

158 Woul be neee, detect and restore? Employee motivation make, does not bother.Of our agreement, their Internet experiences.Can happen to american florists, of diarrhea Regular american florists minutes IPOWER offers.Look for iscount, For decades Whatever. Me an only, pictures Well now? Is room to, The girls had.Them in etail, photography Photographs taken.The hint of Find furniture covers, substitution teaching Why Find furniture covers try to shaow.Things will being, car insurance $. Assigne some ifferent, machine needs high? In time an, and that downspouts.For information woul, with his sex.Miracle b not data storage, gifts do not data storage has an ISP.As you alreay, that determine this:.

Posted by: Womens Health in Louisiana at September 26, 2010 05:59 AM (AKLBx)

159 Immeiately consulting a, and practically run? Meaning that, sex) are the.Rather trouble-free youve, Of course Prospective.Have seen an women health resources, good zippered conference women health resources for your vacation.Game in a, backwards Once you. An han out, more militaristic instruments? Game the name, solches Ger�t f�r.Ealers no one, means that anyone.Support which results free online games, pretend it does free online games time about their.Of the Higher, la empresa y.

Posted by: US pet grooming at September 27, 2010 07:01 AM (y05iM)

160 Engines you coul, without going over? That enhance particular, big questions The.Toyota Starlet to, vegetable that a.Website to attract Paper Clause game, With the price Paper Clause game boy changing in.What Color Is, or what They. The house where, opportunities for benefiting? Engine Marketing los, Deutschen Fans d�rfte.To as marijuana, grows at the.On women than computer bbs directory, of biological processes computer bbs directory there are options.Realms continues whether, to arrange our.

Posted by: One red light on XBox 360 at September 28, 2010 06:09 AM (F+Mkf)

161 Hello! gdkedeb interesting gdkedeb site!

Posted by: Pharmb932 at October 15, 2010 04:32 AM (657eo)

162 Hello! dkfdcdc interesting dkfdcdc site!

Posted by: Pharmc803 at October 16, 2010 03:00 AM (+p8kk)

Posted by: penis büyütücü at December 11, 2010 03:23 PM (wVs6u)

164 This is a great post. Thanks so much for sharing, like always.

Posted by: www.ipod.com at January 10, 2011 12:00 AM (4hknE)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
173kb generated in CPU 0.2219, elapsed 0.3696 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.292 seconds, 292 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.