January 13, 2010
— Ace But most of this is bluster. Same in any negotiation -- both parties have an incentive to claim they're willing to walk away from the table with no deal.
Congressional Democrats face “serious problems” in getting a healthcare reform bill to the president’s desk, according to a House panel chairman.“We’ve got to get a bill that’s more compatible to the House,” Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday. “Forget all the other questions. Two-hundred-eighteen [votes] is the most important issue we are dealing with… We have serious problems on both sides of the Capitol. Serious problems.”
Rangel’s comments come a day after Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said health reform is “hanging by a thread.”
Check this out:
Financing the roughly $900 billon cost of the bill stands as possibly the biggest obstacle to final action given how far apart the House and Senate are. Labor unions and their allies among House Democrats remain strongly opposed to the excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans. Obama met with labor leaders Monday and Pelosi sat down with some of the same leaders on Tuesday before gathering her leadership team and her caucus together to seek a way forward.Although the House bill eschewed the excise tax and liberals have decried it, the provisions in the Senate bill appeal to the centrist contingent of the Democratic caucus as an alternative to an income tax increase. Some health experts say the excise tax will lead to reduced spending on healthcare services.
"I definitely think thereÂ’s increasing support in the caucus for some kind of a tax on plans that executives and wealthy people have," said Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.). "This is one of the few cost-containment measures in the bill," he said, echoing the argument made by Obama and senior Senate Democrats. Polis last year successfully pushed for the surtax in the House bill to be lifted to the millionaire level.
Despite the dissatisfaction among many House Democrats with Obama's stance in favor of the excise tax, a solution could be emerging as the president attempts to work out a compromise with organized labor.
Raising the threshold, currently at $8,000 for individuals and $23,000 for families, could be a key component of a revised version of the policy. In addition, Democrats are looking at other modifications, such as exempting existing collective bargaining agreements negotiated by unions and other tweaks to prevent a revolt by labor groups and provide cover to pro-union House Democrats.
Ah. Union-negotiated health care plans would be exempted from the excise tax. How novel -- buying off a specific constituency. This is only the thirtieth time they've done this in the bill.
Let's just cut to the chase and make it official that only Republicans or conservative-leaning independents have to pay higher taxes or have their health-care rationed. Because that is what they are attempting, after all, with all these exclusions for protected allies.
Rangel says no bill until February, which isn't much comfort, as that's less than three weeks away.
Hopefully Brown will win and end this catastrophe.
It might be that Democrats actually want that to happen. At this point they might prefer to lose, so long as they can blame Republicans.
Posted by: Ace at
08:57 AM
| Comments (60)
Post contains 558 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: B+ Barry at January 13, 2010 09:02 AM (3PqHz)
Posted by: torabora at January 13, 2010 09:03 AM (EvboQ)
"I definitely think thereÂ’s increasing support in the caucus for some kind of a tax on plans that executives and wealthy people have," said Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.).
Or maybe members of Congress. But that's just crazy talk.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at January 13, 2010 09:04 AM (B+qrE)
Posted by: torabora at January 13, 2010 09:05 AM (EvboQ)
Posted by: dogfish at January 13, 2010 09:05 AM (GQwdV)
On the other hand, it does appear to be quite problematic for the dems. Stupak et al is rumored to not be on board for the Senate bill's abortion language, and he's got a solid 12 with him. Add the ones whose union backers are calling them and saying "get that cadillac plans thing out of that bill or we'll support your opponent in November".....
Still, I don't trust any of them.
Posted by: Intrepid at January 13, 2010 09:06 AM (92zkk)
Hopefully Brown will win and end this catastrophe.
It might be that Democrats actually want that to happen. At this point they might prefer to lose, so long as they can blame Republicans.
Why? What were they doing up until now, blaming themselves?
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 13, 2010 09:06 AM (pZEar)
"I definitely think thereÂ’s increasing support in the caucus for some kind of a tax on plans that executives and wealthy people have," said Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.).
That lie has already been debunked. The overwhelming majority of these so-called plans are by unions and government workers. The numbers are also not inflation adjusted.
Ah. Union-negotiated health care plans would be exempted from the excise tax. How novel -- buying off a specific constituency. This is only the thirtieth time they've done this in the bill.
Are you sure on this Ace? I downloaded both the House and Senate versions of the bill and could find no exemption in it for the Unions. It doesnÂ’t make sense that the unions would be fighting this if they were exempted.
Posted by: Vic at January 13, 2010 09:07 AM (QrA9E)
In any case this is all bluster for the cameras. Every time someone has predicted the death of this POS it has squeaked through via a few sellouts like Nelson.
Posted by: Vic at January 13, 2010 09:10 AM (QrA9E)
LINK
Posted by: mrp at January 13, 2010 09:17 AM (HjPtV)
Help me to follow this logic (surely I have this wrong!):
If Union Negotiated Health Care Benefits are exempted as a special interest group, and only Union and Government Workers would qualify for the tax then the tax is only for show in the first place. Because SEIU as a Union would also exempt MOST of the Government Workers wouldn't it?
Posted by: Just a cynic..... at January 13, 2010 09:18 AM (v4UYp)
I've been thinking along these lines for a few weeks. That Reid, Pelosi et al would be willing to throw Coakley under the bus to protect their own political skin come November.
Reid would do it to help get re-elected as Senator. Pelosi would do it to ensure Democratic control of the House and her leadership position; if she lost the House don't think for a moment that she would lose the position of Minority Leader.
Posted by: David in San Diego at January 13, 2010 09:19 AM (GF+6V)
Posted by: pendejo grande at January 13, 2010 09:21 AM (t1aMc)
Hopefully Brown will win and end this catastrophe.
Please please please please......
Speaking of which..... anybody see the video of the reporter from the Weekly Reporter that got roughed up by one of Coakleys entourage???
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2010 09:22 AM (J5Hcw)
errr typo....
Weekly Standard
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2010 09:24 AM (J5Hcw)
I don't give a Rangle's ass who they blame it on, just kill the damn thing. Then if they want to credit the GOP with saving the country from socialism, so be it!
Posted by: maddogg at January 13, 2010 09:25 AM (OlN4e)
As I said earlier, I could find NO exemption in either the House Bill or the Senate Bill for unions.
Of course the House Bill doesn't have a cadillac tax in it, it just added a surtax to anyone making over $1,000,000 a year.
Posted by: Vic at January 13, 2010 09:25 AM (QrA9E)
Yeah, you'd think. I can't remember all the states but there are a number of R Senators asking the AG for their states to investigate precisely that due to Nelson's deal.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 13, 2010 09:31 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: mystry at January 13, 2010 09:31 AM (kmgIE)
Posted by: Dell at January 13, 2010 09:37 AM (zlXS5)
Posted by: inspectorudy at January 13, 2010 09:38 AM (Vo1wX)
Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at January 13, 2010 09:42 AM (KWhJd)
Over at NRO's "Doctor Doctor" blog it says this:
Feingold: Cornhusker Kickback Will Be Stripped [Daniel Foster]
Sen. Russ Feingold (D., Wis.) has joined fellow Senate Democrats Sherrod Brown (D., Ohio) and Blanche Lincoln (D., Ark.) in telling constituents that Nebraska's sweetheart Medicaid deal will likely be stripped from health-care reform in conference negotiations.
Feingold told constituents in Wis., today that Nelson's provision will probably be stripped.
“Well, whether that provision was legal or illegal, it shouldn’t have been done,” Feingold said, referring to the lawsuit being brought by a number of state attorneys general. "I understand that Sen. Ben Nelson has already indicated he knows he’s probably not going to get it in the end. I think it’s going to get stripped from the bill."
Really? hmmmm.Posted by: pre-paid sex monster at January 13, 2010 09:49 AM (0fzsA)
As I said earlier, I could find NO exemption in either the House Bill or the Senate Bill for unions.
Posted by: Vic at January 13, 2010 01:25 PM (QrA9E)
Then Amish it is.
Me think an "Amish for Idiots" self help book would rake in big $$$, just saying...
Posted by: always right at January 13, 2010 09:52 AM (0AClR)
I thought there was supposed to be an exemption for police, firefighter & longshoremen's union plans from the Cadillac tax?
Section 6001 of the Senate bill provides for an "increase in the amount considered an "excessive coverage" for hazordous professions. The theory being that their insurance will cost more than normal professions.
They also increase the amount for "high cost states".
They do not define what the high risk professions are but neither do they totally exempt them from the tax.
Posted by: Vic at January 13, 2010 09:52 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Warden at January 13, 2010 09:56 AM (lEqfY)
Sen. Ben Nelson has already indicated he knows heÂ’s probably not going to get it in the end.
I really wish I could say the same.......
Posted by: The Chicken at January 13, 2010 09:59 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: Majority Leader Harry Reid at January 13, 2010 10:03 AM (6uiF7)
I don't know about the "can". They are going to blame Republicans, no matter what, and they'll demonize Republicans even if they pass this hulking, smelly, un-Constitutional POS. The Dems have the chutzpah to claim that they have been open throughout this process (of one short-term deadline which would preclude reading current legislation after another and one vote for "bills" that bare no resemblance to what is offered at the next step ...).
The left has no shame, no brain, and knows no limit to their depravity and prevarication.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at January 13, 2010 10:05 AM (A46hP)
They love the American people so much that they want to shove this down our throats no matter what. Tell any lie, break any promise, ignore public opinion, ignore the Constitution, pay any bribe, just shove, shove, shove.
Because they care.
By the way, will unemployed people be subject to arrest for not having insurance? That would get the prison guard unions on board.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at January 13, 2010 10:05 AM (w41GQ)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 13, 2010 10:07 AM (DIYmd)
Prison. Like in free room and board, free cable, three meals a day, lifting weights and laying around? Sounds pretty good.
Posted by: kansas at January 13, 2010 10:10 AM (mka2b)
38 At this point they might prefer to lose, so long as they can blame Republicans.
Hahahaha. The pubbies would be heralded as heroes!
Posted by: RushBabe at January 13, 2010 10:11 AM (LKkE8)
Let's just cut to the chase and make it official that only Republicans or conservative-leaning independents have to pay higher taxes or have their health-care rationed. Because that is what they are attempting, after all, with all these exclusions for protected allies.
A+
Posted by: willow at January 13, 2010 10:11 AM (7FgWm)
Posted by: rawmuse at January 13, 2010 10:25 AM (NhERI)
So unions will be exempt - but the rest of us will get hit even harder with taxes, increased costs, penalties and fees.
Seems fair.
Posted by: pre-paid sex monster at January 13, 2010 10:41 AM (0fzsA)
Rangle: Yes little Sheeple, go back to sleep... don't worry that we had a closed door meeting in the Whitehouse today about this...
Look, over there... American Idol...
and Connan is mad at NBC!
/Rangle waits for the news cycle to "spin"
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2010 10:51 AM (T6P6L)
I don't believe it for a second. I have every expectation that I'll wake up one morning to hear Rangle saying, "All your bodies are belong to us" - and really meaning it.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 13, 2010 10:54 AM (VrNoa)
"Unions to be Exempted from Cadillac Tax? [Daniel Foster]
Congress Daily is reporting that union lobbyists on Capitol Hill today scored a tentative deal that would exempt "collectively bargained healthcare plans" from the so-called Cadillac Tax on high-cost policies.
As the American Spectator's Philip Klein notes, this means that two Americans receiving identical health-care benefits could be taxed differently if one happened to be a member of a union and the other not.
01/13 2:42pm"http://corner.nationalreview.com/
Posted by: Not Union and Proud at January 13, 2010 10:56 AM (tSZY5)
30
*mimics motion for male self-satisfaction*
Yeah, yeah. I hear ya talkin.'
Posted by: Moron #259872I've changed my nic, this isn't me.
Way to steal somebody's bit, jacknut. Come up with something on your own.
Posted by: s'moron at January 13, 2010 10:59 AM (p1s9n)
Amish Jack, I looked into form 4029. To be eligible for this waiver, you have to be a member of a religious group that meets the following criteria:
"It is conscientiously opposed to accepting benefits of any private or public insurance that makes payments in the event of death, disability, old age, or retirement; makes payments for the cost of medical care; or provides services for medical care (including social security and Medicare benefits.
"It has provided a reasonable level of living for its dependent members.
"It has existed continuously since December 31, 1950."
So, you can't just opt out of Social Security or Obamacare: you have to drop out of the system, including private insurance - and you have to be a member of a religious group that will look after you and has been in existence for at least 60 years. And you're also not eligible if you or any family member has ever accepted a Social Security benefit.
By the way, it's not just Amish or Old-Order Mennonites who meet these criteria: Muslims do, too, since orthodox Muslims, like the Amish, reject insurance as a form of gambling. So, if you have no objection to becoming a Muslim, you're good to go. Otherwise, all your bodies are belong to Obama.
Posted by: Brown Line at January 13, 2010 11:03 AM (VrNoa)
THERE ARE TWO AMERICAS!
Job-killing/anti-competitive union/big juicy government America-- where thugs at the top pull congressional strings and all sorts of unfair dealings happen behind closed doors....
-and-
The rest of us who get the invoice - America.
Posted by: pre-paid sex monster at January 13, 2010 11:09 AM (0fzsA)
Charles Rangel. Light skinned, no hint of Colored dialect, thin lips, straight hair, doesn't pay his taxes.
Excellent candidate.
Posted by: gus at January 13, 2010 11:10 AM (Vqruj)
Mass. Update by William Kristol
IÂ’m told reliably:
1. Internal Democratic polls have the race close, with a small and fading Coakley (Dem) lead.
2. One Republican poll, and one poll for an independent group, now actually have Brown (Rep) up by a few points.
3. The Democrats are pouring everything in—one report is that the buy behind this DSCC ad against Brown is close to a million dollars.
Posted by: tims472 at January 13, 2010 11:16 AM (JWfo1)
Lenin was clear: 'from those according to their abilities, given to those who are politically connected'. Either that, or 'I am the walrus'. One of the two.
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at January 13, 2010 11:24 AM (4Tr6l)
Posted by: Jean at January 13, 2010 11:24 AM (QFzyw)
Posted by: Jean at January 13, 2010 11:26 AM (vb5IK)
Posted by: Brown Line at January 13, 2010 03:03 PM (VrNoa)
Sorry, nothing will induce me to point my ass skywards five times a day.
Posted by: always right at January 13, 2010 11:36 AM (0AClR)
Posted by: dustydog at January 13, 2010 11:36 AM (XHOAD)
Ah, you may want to rethink the whole "going Amish" thing: most of the Amish around here are getting regulated and fined to the point of not being able to turn a living -- USDA came in and shut a bunch of Amish home industries down...state regs on food safety, and then there's the animal ID tax -- lotta Amish can't afford to pay it, so they'll get their chickens and cows taken from them eventually, even their horses (guess they've still got bicycles and inline skates...).
The Amish are in the early stages of getting marginalized out of existence.
Posted by: unknown jane at January 13, 2010 12:03 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at January 13, 2010 12:04 PM (5/yRG)
Naturally! The Party of No. Ignore the fact of who has a majority in both houses. And don't look for them to go back to the drawing board to 'get it right' a second time. They've got it the way they want, they just can't sell it in an election year.
Posted by: GarandFan at January 13, 2010 12:57 PM (ZQBnQ)
Rangel lied: Health Care Negotiations Face "Serious Problems;" No Bill Until February
-
Its a lot easier to fugure out what they're going to do by what they say they're going to do.
"No bill until Feb"
Translation - bill 1st day of the new congress.
Posted by: Jimma at January 13, 2010 01:50 PM (8yIhu)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.242 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








So, how long do the MA Dims need to keep Brown from his seat now.
Gettin betta & betta
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at January 13, 2010 09:02 AM (ucq49)