February 21, 2010
— Gabriel Malor The President's micro-bounce after the State of the Union is over. Just 22% "strongly support" Obama, the lowest that figure has ever been.
Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19. The Approval Index has been lower only on one day during Barack ObamaÂ’s thirteen months in office (see trends). The previous low came on December 22 as the Senate was preparing to approve its version of the proposed health care legislation. The current lows come as the President is once again focusing attention on the health care legislation.
The President is not going to take no for an answer. Tomorrow he will unveil (finally, finally) his own version of ObamaCare. He hopes that his own popularity will buoy this latest attempt to pass something—anything—that has "health", "choices", and "America" in the bill title.
I think he's going to be disappointed. First, most Americans have now had a chance to evaluate the healthcare system and the alternatives proposed by the Democrats. Maybe if he'd done this seven months ago—remember, back when the time for debate was through?—he could have rallied people.
But now we know too much. We've heard about the individual mandate and the public option. We're sick to death of pie-in-the-sky boasts about "bending the cost curve". Regurgitating the same old talking points they've been using since July isn't going to make Americans any more likely to support ObamaCare.
Second, the President doesn't actually have any popularity with which to buoy the bill. Americans keep telling Obama and the Democrats that they don't want more expensive healthcare, more taxes to pay for it, a single-payer Trojan horse, and fewer options for insurance. But those are the features of ObamaCare, no matter how often the President trots out his panicked "we must do something, quick!"
Third, Independents who formerly supported the President are asking why, if he could just propose his own bill, did he not do that seven months ago? It's just ridiculous that he could have shown some leadership at any time, but substituted a speech and five prime-time addresses instead. It's given the Independents a reason to be pissed at Obama without having to endorse Republican ideas about healthcare. It's the process story, stupid.
Finally, Democrats in Congress also have their noses out of joint. They put in the time last year, it failed. Now they'd like to get on with the election season, if you don't mind, Mr. Let Me Eat My Waffles. Instead, the President is still pushing his "signature policy effort" while Democrats watch their districts trend more and more Republican.
So my prediction is that they will take every single opportunity to decide that the President's proposal is just not cutting it. The ones who made stands against abortion funding will stick to their guns because it gives them the perfect stage on which to make hay for November. The same is true for those opposed to the public option and the excise tax.
Obama thinks he's taking control of this issue at Thursday's* healthcare summit. He's not.
*Corrected thanks to newrouter.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
07:34 AM
| Comments (127)
Post contains 538 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Kathleen Sebellius at February 21, 2010 07:37 AM (liBQN)
Posted by: Tami at February 21, 2010 07:39 AM (VuLos)
The Blue Dogs terrified of reelection LAST year will not vote in the House this year and explain that to their consituents.
So with them out, Cao out, Murtha dead and whats-his-face retired in Florida,
Pelosi is at 217 votes.
1 shy.
Try it, and make the loss of the House a certainty.
Republicans need to grow some balls at the "health care discussion" this week, shouting about jobs first, HC next. Make the argument entirely about a focus on jobs ONLY before we get back to healthcare.
They still steam ahead, they will lose probably 9 seats in the Senate and 50-60 in the House.
Posted by: theoneandonlyfinn at February 21, 2010 07:39 AM (9e+Bu)
*Cough*
Yo, proggies. It's the lies, false blame and spending, stupid.
"When the Democrats took control of Congress in 2007, the debt held by the public was 36.2% of GDP. It rose to 40.2% the next year. This year it will be about 63.6%, next year 68.6%, then 77% of GDP in 2020. And the Obama administration's budget estimates 218% in 2050."
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 21, 2010 07:41 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: gomm at February 21, 2010 07:43 AM (Ibk1S)
"Choices"?
I love choices.
Especially if it's a big fat bloody abortion.
Since no one has read the bill, bills, or "compromise" Kathleen Sebellius has probably worked her post-natal abortion law in there. What a charming woman?
Keith Olberman is a girl.
Posted by: dagny at February 21, 2010 07:43 AM (H72T4)
Posted by: beerologist at February 21, 2010 07:43 AM (tgXx6)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 07:45 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: GarandFan at February 21, 2010 07:46 AM (6mwMs)
Posted by: kansas at February 21, 2010 07:47 AM (sPCho)
Posted by: Barry O. at February 21, 2010 07:49 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: gomm at February 21, 2010 07:49 AM (Ibk1S)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 07:49 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: conscious and pissed off at February 21, 2010 07:49 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: conscious and pissed off at February 21, 2010 11:49 AM (Vu6sl)
I think the preliminary stages have already begun.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 21, 2010 07:52 AM (ypGDY)
OHbamas ego requires its passage.
.
The Kommiecrats strategy is that the next congress will also be evicted thereby regaining it in 2012.
.
The GOP will comply...
Posted by: Serfer62 at February 21, 2010 07:52 AM (HLCnI)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 07:53 AM (4tixt)
If it ties, it dies thanks to the election, and the House.
Just do the math.
it got, what? 220 votes last year?
Cao is out, Murtha's dead, Abercrombies out.
thats 217.
ONE Blue Dog needs to flip the script.
They were "safe" last year but still voted NO to stay in good standing with their constituents.
Does anyone really think these Blue Dogs that voted No last time are going to switch out of fear and ASSURE themselves political destruction in November?
Many of them are new and don't even qualify just yet for the Congressional goodies, they have to stay in at least for another term.
I refuse to believe it. 8 months is a lifetime in political cycles, but short-term attention spans of Americans go OUT the window in deep recessions. They're screwed.
Posted by: theoneandonlyfinn at February 21, 2010 07:56 AM (9e+Bu)
Posted by: Charlie Gibson at February 21, 2010 07:56 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: paleRider at February 21, 2010 07:56 AM (SG/om)
Oh, and I am with dangy, who is with Anne Coulter
Keith Olbermann is a girl.
Posted by: Mallamutt at February 21, 2010 11:54 AM (V9SYy)
I love how she lobbed that out there at the very end of her speech.
Posted by: conscious and wants to marry Anne Coulter at February 21, 2010 07:56 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: conscious and wants to marry Anne Coulter at February 21, 2010 11:56 AM (Vu6sl)
yeah, she's hot, but I would hate to have her caustic wit turned on me
Posted by: mrfixit at February 21, 2010 07:58 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: Buffalobob at February 21, 2010 07:59 AM (XjviO)
Posted by: The chicken at February 21, 2010 08:00 AM (Vo2Ef)
If we want to stop it, we need to make HC toxic issue like the NRA did with gun control.
Posted by: Gary B at February 21, 2010 08:00 AM (1gWfF)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 08:00 AM (4tixt)
Looking out of my window, I'm thinking that if there is one issue that we can all get behind is that global warming is a good thing and we want more of it.
Posted by: The chicken at February 21, 2010 08:00 AM (Vo2Ef)
What exactly do the Republicans propose to 'bend the curve downward', because I guar-an-tee that the 'system' will be running on empty in the near future. It's merely a question of math.You can say that his proposals don't address the problems, the problems being highlighted by the recent situation in California, which we are all familiar with, but what will address those issues ?
If the Insurance Industry is either in or is going to enter a 'death spiral' ,what is the solution ? How do people afford coverage if their employers don't provide it ? These are not JUST a cheap 'political issues'. They are REAL.
Politically it is all well and good to defeat Obama, and I am certainly fond of that idea, but What Then . Once the HCR either goes down in flames or gets rammed through and thus becomes pretty much toxic, then what happens. ?
I have seen nothing in Republican plans that would lead me to believe that they have addressed the FOUR issues raised by Obama. But I stand perfectly ready to be corrected and informed by those who have ideas on how the system can be sustained when everyone says that it cannot under the current trend-lines.
Posted by: Dougf at February 21, 2010 08:02 AM (8JckG)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 21, 2010 08:06 AM (Bsm1s)
I certainly don't think they can gain serious support for any bill on healthcare at this point. The American people, having seen what is in the house and senate bill, don't trust the congress or the administration on this.
Posted by: mghorning at February 21, 2010 08:07 AM (VA/5j)
Healthcare?
Don't look at me, foreign policy and jobs are my projects and may I say both are going swimmingly, (just a posthumous shout-out to my dead buddy Ted), and will be part of this administration's greatest accomplishments. Like I always say, that's two golds and a silver, (just a hint-more precious metals in your portfolios), with only two minutes left in this epoch.
Gotta go now and get those Sunnis and Sharias to kiss and make up. Man do those people love goats. What's up with that. We need DADT in the Iraqi forces stat. Oh well, back to the tables, err I mean the whetstone.
True story, 'cause money walks and bullshit stinks.
Posted by: Joe the lawyer Biden at February 21, 2010 08:07 AM (nK3yo)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 08:08 AM (4tixt)
SD: 41
TA: 45
TD: 54
Approval index -19 but the abyss index is only +4.
My theory is that Obama is solidifying his base because he doesn't know what else to do. His goal here is to have the bill fail and blame the Republicans. He has no intention of having it pass.
He's writing his third autobiography and he's writing it as a tragedy.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 21, 2010 08:09 AM (Vo2Ef)
Posted by: Barry "What me lie?" Obama at February 21, 2010 08:10 AM (Vu6sl)
He's writing having Bill Ayers write his third autobiography and he's writing it as a tragedy.
fify
Posted by: mrfixit at February 21, 2010 08:11 AM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: Antimatter at February 21, 2010 08:13 AM (gbCNS)
If tea partiers are "teabaggers" does that make global warmists "snowballers"?
Just a thought.
Posted by: AmishDude at February 21, 2010 08:16 AM (Vo2Ef)
If Barry, our light skinned president, would just explain it again without the negro dialect.. everyone would want it. And those democrats who wont vote for it.. they are fucking retards.
Posted by: Harry Reid at February 21, 2010 08:16 AM (7GgDy)
This bill will bring more light-skinned blacks with no Negro dialects out of the shadows, and up to the blackjack tables.
Posted by: Harry "Searchlight" Reid at February 21, 2010 08:16 AM (nK3yo)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 08:18 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: Death Panel's Czar at February 21, 2010 08:21 AM (nK3yo)
Posted by: grizzlybare at February 21, 2010 08:21 AM (V5kav)
In 2007 - the last federal deficit one can reasonably lay at the feet of the Republicans (so-called) - was something like $160B. In January of 2007, the trends for spending and revenue had the U.S. on track for a balanced budget by some time in late 2008.
This year the deficit is $1.6T.
Someone explain to me again why we should trust these people to do anything?
Posted by: goy at February 21, 2010 08:23 AM (+Gze8)
#54
Rasmussen, PPP, CNN, Pew, Democracy Corps are all in a racist conspiracy of racists throwing numbers of hate at a victim of racism.
Posted by: theoneandonlyfinn at February 21, 2010 08:28 AM (9e+Bu)
If the Insurance Industry is either in or is going to enter a 'death spiral' ,what is the solution ? How do people afford coverage if their employers don't provide it ? These are not JUST a cheap 'political issues'. They are REAL.
Well, people paid their doctors out of their own pockets long before health insurance was around. Think of the monstrous price of that insurance middle man.
Meanwhile... I have a pre-existing condition and buy my one super expensive choice in insurance out of my own pocket. Save me!
Posted by: Antimatter at February 21, 2010 08:30 AM (gbCNS)
It's hard to see how Obama and the democrats expect the Health Care Summit to work for them politically. They want to present their plan and pretend they're open to suggestions while preparing to ram it down our throats anyway. And they expect Obama's charisma to dominate the room.
But Obama and his Chicago advisors have nearly zero experience with a two-party system. They don't seem to understand that the other guys have a strategy, too.
Republicans will get a chance to publicize their own health care proposals, which have been embargoed by the mainstream media. They can play to the bleachers all they want, because Americans have already decided they don't want the democrats' version. It's an issue that is causing unprecedented damage to the Democrat Party, and further publicity will only cement public attitudes.
The GOP may end up wasting an opportunity, but it's hard to imagine a scenario that suddenly makes Obama Care and the democrats popular.
Posted by: lyle at February 21, 2010 08:32 AM (DyBUM)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 21, 2010 08:37 AM (9Lm5R)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 08:40 AM (4tixt)
No more than a suicide bomber would be turned away and go home because a mall cop told him he couldn't go in.
The Precedent is on his suicide run and he will not be stopped.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at February 21, 2010 08:49 AM (A46hP)
I think there will be some small number of Republicans who will cause Obama to drench himself in flop sweat. All they need is the truth. Ask him to explain things he is proposing that he does not know how to explain, or simply can't be explained because they are delusional - i.e., the elephant in the room: explain how a governmnent takeover of healthcare will save money and improve service. Politely point out the absolute contradiction between things he says now and things he said before. I mean hey, it's a summit - let's have some dialogue.
Besides the slide of the Democrats' popularity, there is a growing sense that the ability of the Republican party old guard to call the shots is also fading. The old R's have fossilized into the Washington establishment and are afraid of moving beyond their comfort zone. There are a few Young Turks, and there is blood in the water - seeping from both parties' leadership. These are ambitious men - how long can they be held back?
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at February 21, 2010 08:52 AM (w41GQ)
The "summit" is simply a grandstand play for Obama and his allies in the media to reinforce the narrative of the GOP as the "party of no", then the media will give Obama and the Demo-rats the cover to pass a bill via reconciliation.
Not very hard to see what they're doing.
The only question is whether the GOP PR machine can overcome the combined efforts of NBC/ABC/CBS/MSNBC/NYT/WaPo/etc to blame the GOP for the "failure of healthcare reform", when in fact the Dems overwhelmingly own the Congress & could pass anything they want if they could get their own members to vote for it.
Posted by: proudvastwingconspirator at February 21, 2010 08:58 AM (waiSQ)
The Government Motor's 2010 Obama.
This car runs on hot air, bull-shit and broken promises.
It has three wheels that speed the vehicle through tight left turns.
It comes complete with two teleprompters programmed to help the occupants talk their way
out of any violations.
The transparent canopy reveals the plastic smiles still on the
faces of all the happy owners.
Comes in S, M, L, XL and 2XL (pictured)
It wonÂ’t get you to work, but hey, there arenÂ’t any jobs anyway!
Posted by: YIKES! at February 21, 2010 09:00 AM (E5V01)
The GOP should just answer every single question about health care with the idea that Medicare must be reformed and the Dems need to go find this quick $500 BILLION and do it, now, without mucking aroud with other things that the federal governmetn has no power to muck around with.
If the GOP kept pushing this, forcing the Dems to acknowledge this outrageous claim that their health scare monstrosity is allegedly going to be funded by, the Dems will drop their health scare talk like a hot potato. There is nothing else to speak to the Dems about.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at February 21, 2010 09:03 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at February 21, 2010 09:04 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 21, 2010 09:12 AM (9IHmo)
Posted by: Mord at February 21, 2010 09:14 AM (tTj19)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 09:20 AM (4tixt)
Excellent post, I emailed this post to many many disgusted democrats who are now in the process of changing their registrations to Independent, they are counting down to November.
My first thought when I heard about this summit was, if the Messaih had his own plan, why the hell did he not post it online 1 year ago? (yes we all know the answer to that, but many Independents and centerist democrats who are fleeing the dem. party are now asking this, and basically dismissing this whole charade and are just disgusted)
and also, what the hell happened to that sharp pivot to Jobs???!??! are we now pivoting back to this job-killing DeathCare bill now? I feel like I'm watching the Messaih go back and forth between those teleprompters, getting a whiplash here.
The country is essentially leaderless and rudderless.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at February 21, 2010 09:24 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: evil midnight bomber what bombs at midnight at February 21, 2010 09:27 AM (hCQG5)
I'm too lazy to learn how to use Tiny URL, but perhaps someone ambitious could provide a link to the Animal House scene when the marching band is led into a blind alley. Seems like an apt visual analogy.
Posted by: pep at February 21, 2010 09:30 AM (0K3p3)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 21, 2010 09:30 AM (9IHmo)
Wanna bet the R's will do something exceedingly stupid on this?
hahahahhahahahahahahaha!
btw, holy shit, if I asked you guys one year ago if you thought Michael Steele would still be the RNC chairman, what would you say?
Posted by: This are lolcat at February 21, 2010 09:31 AM (K9ZHX)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 21, 2010 01:30 PM (9IHmo)
100% agree, just a few changes that all sides agree on, and the marxist can have his nice signing ceremony. But the freak actually wants this massive govt takeover. He has to be one of the densest ignorant people I have ever seen, all people will remember is that the dems abused power in the last 2 years and now in November they want people to vote to give them even more power? (I can just see the Tea Party ads for this)
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at February 21, 2010 09:33 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: eman at February 21, 2010 09:36 AM (4tixt)
Posted by: DngrMse at February 21, 2010 09:42 AM (rE7MP)
I think it's all part of the plan. Sacrifice the Dem majorities, the Republicans control house and Senate, then.... Obama runs on "can't have unchecked Republican power in '12."
Posted by: shibumi at February 21, 2010 09:48 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: MarkD at February 21, 2010 09:49 AM (0FVgz)
The only way the thing gets passed is if the Republicans go to the summit and act like they usually do. The less they open their mouths the better because they can't articulate a case for why our current system is better and why we need to do less, not more. It is an easy argument to make looking at the experience of other countries etc... but these are the largely the same guys who sat around and were happy to let the government grow ever larger as long as they could keep their seats. They have already conceded the moral high ground by agreeing that SOMETHING has to be done so now it is just a matter of how hard we get screwed. We are going to vote for them because they suck less, not because they understand or agree with our principles.
It's a bit like a nude beauty pageant between Jack Nicholson and Kathy Bates. You have to vote against whichever one is showing their ass the most at the time.
My bet is that the Dems are desperate enough that they try to ram it through using every dirty trick in the book while using the media as air cover. Their only hope is if it is done quickly enough so no one can dissect the lies it is built upon before it is too late. The press will say that Obama was Solomon like in his wisdom and has cracked the conundrum.
The Republicans need to make it known that if reconciliation is used then the Congress will be shut down as every single bill will be filibustered and every procedural trick in the book will be used to run out the clock until the next elections when reinforcements will arrive.
If the Republicans fail then we will need to scrap the party and start over from scratch with a new entity because they will have proven themselves too broken to be of use to us as a tool. We deserve better than being forced to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Posted by: Voluble at February 21, 2010 09:49 AM (nZNTl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 21, 2010 09:51 AM (9IHmo)
This is another power-grab, meant only to give them more toys to play with. They don't have to pay for what they break...we do.
Tell the Traitor-in-Chief that his plans will destroy America and he'll smile. That's what he wants. For him, holding the presidency is the best possible revenge on a society he loathes, even though it has given him undeserved benefits beyond measure.
Posted by: Ray-man at February 21, 2010 09:58 AM (hoRGo)
Posted by: theoneandonlyfinn
Perhaps they should remind everyone that J-O-B-S were supposed to be Belshazzar's top domestic agenda item. And that instead he's pursuing his ego stroking health care agenda.
Posted by: sandbagger at February 21, 2010 09:59 AM (bftAu)
Afternoon all. Obama doesn't have to control the issue after the meeting. He just has to provide political justification should he use the closure(?) route. He will introduce his health care package, a carefully crafted document with give and take from both house's democrats, the most controversial segments probably removed of significantly watered down (after all, this bill is the camels nose as it were) and maybe one of two republican suggestions (some toothless tort reform for example). The whole package will still be bad and the GOP will still vote against it as a bloc which will still give Obama and the Dems the cover (or so they think) to use closure and be able to explain this as an national health/fiscal emergency and was only done because the GOP is using this issue for political gain at the cost of peoples health (which the MSM will dutfully report).
I'm not saying this approach would work but if Obama shows that he combined the two plans, took out a few things that were particulalry onerous and incorporated a GOP idea or two then when the MSM gets behind this to show the President did his hardest to work out a deal and only used closure when no other way was possible (what with those evil GOPers still fighting against health care for poor peope) he may get away with it. By the by, depending on his approach he may not lose too many Dem on this vote. I think they can afford to lose 4 to a NO vote, although that kind of screws up his message a tad.
Just a thought.
Posted by: scr_north at February 21, 2010 10:11 AM (Ve5/5)
Yep, I think you got it about right. The phony summit sets up as an epic fail for Obama.
http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
Posted by: LibertyAtStake at February 21, 2010 10:21 AM (PmNi0)
What an idiot.
oh yeah...Jennifer Granholm, the moronic governor of the failed state of Michigan, is on FOX right now making wild claims about job creation due to the stimulus spending. 14% of michigan is unemployed, and Detroit is literally collapsing as all of its landmarks crumble into disrepair. She doesn't get it either. The people don't want this healthcare bill. She is convinced that it's "arrogant if we don't do anything." Well, I hope the good people of Michigan finally wake up and vote this moronic, insider politician, who has done NOTHING for the people of Michigan. Ms. Granholm, the people do not want it!
What is wrong with these Democrats? Why are they sooooooo arrogant in thier stupidity?
Posted by: mistress overdone at February 21, 2010 10:28 AM (2/oBD)
Obama & his advisors must have some sort of magical faith in "his personal poll numbers & popularity", which is why they press on with healthcare destruction in the face of strong public rejection of Obama's policies.
Does it not occur to teh One & his advisors that maybe people don't want to admit on the phone that they oppose teh One, AND his policies, but to avoid being labeled as a racist by some stranger doing a poll, that they claim to just love teh One but hate the policies??
Maybe the public hates on teh One just as much as the hated policies themselves. November can't get here fast enough.
Posted by: Boots at February 21, 2010 10:30 AM (06JTY)
Call me a dreamer... but my gauzy wish is that it will come to the forefront of political discussion about the constitutional limits of the federal government. You know... how none of the politicians in Washington can constitutionally do 95% of the shit that they're doing.
My gauzy dream is that the GOP will grow some balls and pound on the fact that feds have no right to be in our healthcare business. I suppose it might be a mix of ball deficit and power hunger.
Posted by: Antimatter at February 21, 2010 10:41 AM (gbCNS)
I'm pretty sure that dumbass scrunt is term-limited out after this term. Her ignorance quotient is astoundingly high even for Commiecrats. I think Fox has her on so that Chris Wallace can look relatively intelligent.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 21, 2010 10:47 AM (ypGDY)
Obama/Pelosi/Reid are confident that their media allies will hammer the GOP for whatever they do at the "summit". They also know that if they ram a bill down out throats, their media allies will find "average Americans" that will praise the bill, whatever it is, to put on the tube everyday in an effort to persuade those of us too stupid (in their opinion) to get how great this is for us.
In reality, 90+% of Americans have coverage, and 85+% are happy with the coverage they have. That means there is no reason to destroy the current system and replace it with a gov't run system with the efficiency of the Post Office, the customer-relationship skills of the DMV and the fiscal controls of Social Security.
Posted by: proudvastwingconspirator at February 21, 2010 10:48 AM (waiSQ)
Posted by: SFC MAC at February 21, 2010 11:06 AM (/9h7Q)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 21, 2010 11:06 AM (DTffv)
If he couldn't get his healthcare reform bill passed before the Scott Brown election with bicameral supermajorities, how does he expect to do this now?
Posted by: looking closely at February 21, 2010 11:14 AM (KNy97)
as a professor(no racial overtones- because i'm a progressive) of sooper smart stuff i hope that our chairman O will just issue a directive and ram healthcare that is free for me up the ass of the cowpayers... as WE progressives wish we had the freedom of china of that lover of liberty hugo ,WE progressives hope for our finger wagging girly man will do to america what pot pot did to cambodia...
when we progressives are not running around shooting people WE like to try and solve the problems that we created...WE CAN'T... so we pine away for obama and load our shotguns and wait for a faculty meeting...
WE promised people too much and there is no way to pay for it... and since WE can't be at fault for anything we choose to blame a minority...it's what we progressives always do... the other day as i was waiting for my double twist and cinn a proud black man received his order before me...well i stamped my feet and called mommy and the black man took offense... well i pepper srayed him and called the police and had him arrested...
WE progressives are better than everybody else and it would make our lives better if people would just deal with it...IT CAN'T BE OUR FAULT , WE'RE PROGRESSIVE GOD DAMMIT....
Posted by: professor von poopyants at February 21, 2010 11:23 AM (91IME)
Posted by: looking closely at February 21, 2010 03:14 PM (KNy97)
The Precedent doesn't care about getting health scare passed. he never cared about passing it, which is why he farmed it out to Reid and Pelosi. All the Indonesian Imbecile wants is to foment chaos and to drain our fundamental institutions of trust and integrity in the eyes of the citizenry, so that they can no longer function and our nation comes crashing down (he keeps his fingers crossed for this).
It was never about politics or the details of legislation for The Precedent (as he's too stupid to understand the issues, anyway) but just about breaking our government in his drive to exact revenge on the US and the West.
Of course, using idiotic leftist political theories as the basis of his agenda, he would be just as happy if the crap did pass and got enacted, as that would do direct harm to our nation, but he doesn't really care about passage, either way, as for his intentions, it's win-win.
Pass awful legislation that tears the Constitution to shreads. Win.
Fail to pass legislation during the greatest assault by the federal government on the citizenry, thereby harming the ability of the federal government to work, at all. Win.
Sowing chaos and destroying complex systems are just too easy. And if the dems try to turn on them, he just starts pulling the race card, trying to send this nation to the sorts of urban riots that so many are terrified of happening if the Constitutional eligibility of the Indonesian imbecile were to be rationally considered and ruled on.
And, while all this is happening, the insane spending, anti-growth policies, and arbitrary nature of federal government action serve to make us sitting ducks for the coming moentary catastrophe - the second leg of the credit crisis that we are now far too weak and poor to be able to buy time, as we did with the Fed blowing up its balance sheet and the federal government assuming tons of private liabilities and obligations to fend off the first hit for a little bit.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at February 21, 2010 11:25 AM (A46hP)
Voter: I'm hungry.
Granholm: Here. Eat this shit sandwich.
V: Whaaaa....?
G: Well, you've got to eat something.
Posted by: effinayright at February 21, 2010 11:29 AM (U/ul8)
For what its worth, Obama's simple popularity has actually been lower than it is now, though not by much. Reading Rasmussen's numbers, it looks like the declining "approval index" is mostly a function of bleed-off from the "strongly approve" group.
On reconciliation, that's a pipe dream. Again, to get that route to work, the Dems would need to get the House to approve the Senate version of the healthcare bill. Right now, after Scott Brown and with election season drawing ever-closer, they don't have the votes to do it.
More simply, Obama or no Obama, if the Dems could pass this thing through reconciliation, they would have done so already.
Posted by: looking closely at February 21, 2010 11:32 AM (KNy97)
Posted by: President Billy Ray Valentine at February 21, 2010 11:34 AM (xqhoO)
Is that actually going to happen? Probably not. He'd have to abandon all the unpopular talking points he previously insisted were critical to this reform. While Obama has certainly not been shy about saying one thing then reversing himself a short while later, in this case, he'd be reversing himself in a highly public way on a major public issue that was supposed to be his signature issue.
Obama would have to introduce something that would cause at least one or two Republicans Senate Republicans to defect preventing a filibuster. Meanwhile both the Congress AND the public are fatigued on this issue.
I don't see it happening, and I actually see very little potential upside to the President here for trying. If he were smart, he'd just say the Congress gave it the best shot they could, but the public isn't ready for this reform now in this bad economy, and it will be re-addressed later in his term (never to get re-addressed).
Posted by: looking closely at February 21, 2010 11:45 AM (KNy97)
Posted by: NotAMolly at February 21, 2010 11:48 AM (ADJFU)
Posted by: sexypig at February 21, 2010 12:22 PM (kre5q)
______________________________________________________-
Oh my, does that take me back, Professor!! Just LOVED your seminars!!!
Posted by: Rosie O'Donnell at February 21, 2010 12:36 PM (9YF/h)
I'm just afraid that Bam-Bam is going to do the same thing that he did at the Democratic Summit Meeting that was held a couple of weeks ago: show up, say a few pretty words, toss "his" bill on the table, and then turn around and leave, and let the "peasants" do all of the heavy lifting.
It's a good thing that Bambi wasn't in the US Senate any longer than he did; he doesn't understand what reconciliation REALLY entails. This process could conceivably take MONTHS, not the 60 days that Reid claims it will take. Most congresscritters want to be out of DC by the end of May, to start campaigning for November's elections.
There is no guarantee that what comes out of reconciliation is going to look anything like what goes in. There is also - and this is MUCH more important - no guarantee whatsoever that BO will sign what comes out of reconciliation, no matter what he may have promised people. His word is worth NOTHING - he will lie to suit his purposes. The Senate bill is much closer to what he really wants, and this whole reconciliation process could just be cover.
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if he lets this all go through, signs the Senate bill intact, and then says that the reconciled bill isn't what the American people really want and/or need, and refuses to sign it. Congress is crazy if they are willing to take the president at his word.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at February 21, 2010 12:48 PM (Vd3Vk)
Posted by: katya at February 21, 2010 12:57 PM (+yqYG)
1. Granholm appears to have sucked people's balls on the way in and now she's sucking Obama's balls on the way out, jockeying for a job. A little sexist maybe, but true.
2. When in the wide wide world of sports has Obama had time to
a.) read the 2700 pager?
b.) put something fabulous together to post last-minute?
50 bucks says the Smails kid doesn't post.
Posted by: alppuccino at February 21, 2010 01:06 PM (qZFr6)
It can happen.
Posted by: Ishmael at February 21, 2010 02:37 PM (J8yM/)
Interesting thoughts, especially how he actually doesn't know what a mess reconciliation can be. I think his delusions and ignorance still have him convinced that he's going to get something to sign, though. I wonder where his mind will be at the end of four years.
Posted by: arhooley at February 21, 2010 02:44 PM (J8yM/)
Posted by: ManeiNeko at February 21, 2010 04:30 PM (TiE76)
Posted by: CoolCzech at February 21, 2010 04:44 PM (9IHmo)
Socialists of the world unite!
Posted by: The Chicken at February 21, 2010 05:56 PM (Q79I1)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at February 21, 2010 06:27 PM (YiECU)
BO is BO, afterall.
Posted by: get real at February 21, 2010 10:58 PM (ucq49)
Stupid sock!
Posted by: poll critic
Posted by: get real at February 21, 2010 06:58 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: Meremortal at February 21, 2010 10:58 PM (LnEk1)
Posted by: Rewrite! at February 21, 2010 11:57 PM (d7Px0)
Posted by: Christy at April 23, 2010 10:13 AM (8sbY5)
Cheap CHI Flat Iron have the so many function, all of them are good for your hair . Our limited edition Hair Straighteners CHI don't last very long and can be hard to get a hold of after they have sold out.
Message from : http://www.chibuy.org/
Posted by: CHI Straighteners at May 11, 2010 11:48 PM (nrPSj)
I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post
military gear
r
Posted by: ADAM at June 01, 2010 02:13 AM (Nc2l1)
Blu-Ray Ripper
Posted by: emicsoft at June 01, 2010 11:00 PM (MYLuB)
Emicsoft Blu-Ray Ripper is a very practical tool specially designed to convert Blu-Ray DVD disc to other video/audio formats so that you could enjoy Blue ray movies on iPod, iPhone, PSP, PS3, Xbox, Wii, BlackBerry and mobile phones.
Posted by: emicsoft at June 08, 2010 12:54 AM (9MaiN)
Posted by: dvdipad at July 10, 2010 08:21 AM (02X3l)
ÃÑÃÔÉ ÇáÎáÃÃŒ - ÇáÎáÃÃŒ ÔÇÊ - ÇáÃÈ - ÔÇÊ ÇáÃÈ - ÃÑÃÔÉ ÇáÃÈ
Posted by: fofo at August 21, 2010 04:04 PM (okHHq)
Posted by: makayla at October 18, 2010 03:35 AM (U1g9S)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2403 seconds, 255 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Shooter McGavin at February 21, 2010 07:36 AM (cxGtL)