July 29, 2010
— Ace Ten percent here, ten percent there, and pretty soon you're talking about a real mandate.
Support for the building of a fence along the Mexican border has reached a new high, and voters are more confident than ever that illegal immigration can be stopped.A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 68% of U.S. voters now believe the United States should continue to build a fence on the Mexican border. ThatÂ’s up nine points from March when the Obama administration halted funding for the fence and the highest level of support ever.
Just 21% oppose the continued building of the border fence.Support for the fence is strong across all demographic groups. But while 76% of Mainstream voters think the United States should continue to build the fence, 67% of the Political Class are opposed to it.
I always enjoy how twits speak of the symbolism of a thing.
That's why the "Political Class" -- the Gee Aren't I Terribly Enlightened? crowd -- opposes this. They talk about that a lot -- the symbolism of the thing.
How about discussing the reality of it? It's a fence. Its real purpose -- in real-world, real-time reality -- is to halt people from crossing a border. A real border, mind you, although on that point I concede a border is a more abstract concept than, say, a shoe.
It doesn't symbolically represent a division between the countries. It actually is a division between the countries.
And what is wrong with that?
I'm noting this because a few weeks ago I saw a guy at the riots in Toronto who complained that the police barricades were a symbol representing a division between the protesters and the G-20 representatives.
And I thought, "Gee, no, actually it's not a symbol of a division; it really is, in fact, a physical division." Because, see, you're rioting. (And not symbolically in riot, either.) You can tell it's a real-world division because now you can't get to the G-20 conference center and throw rock-metaphors through the window-symbols.
I think there is a type of person -- well-represented in the "Political Class" and in progressive politics -- that has learned, from college, that the Abstract is everything, that Real Smart People are always focused on the Abstract, on metaphors, on symbols.
And they seem to disregard the concrete, the real, almost as a dirty thing, something of concern to the plebians, who cannot of course grasp the subtleties of high representational thinking like they can. You know, with their "symbolic" barricades and all.
They spoke of the Gaza Wall the same way -- that it symbolized the separation of the peoples. When it fact it did rather more than that. It actually separated them. Because one of those peoples was murdering and butchering the other. (And, again, I stress: They did so in a non-metaphoric manner.)
I don't think this is an important point in terms of a slogan or a manifesto or that sort of thing. I don't think you can build a politics around the Concrete. (What would that bumper sticker look like?)
It's just an observation of a type of intellectually-insecure individual who parrots the pattern of thinking of his professors (who once represented intellectual authority to them -- Symbolically, of course) and elevates, always, the Abstract above the Real.
I just tend to distrust this sort of divorced-from-tangible-reality worship of the abstract. Obviously -- duh -- abstract thinking is important. It is, in certain ways, I suppose, a higher form of thinking than thinking of the concrete.
But not when it is shorn of all rootings to the actual world.
This is how evil happens. You can abstract any evil you choose into some esoteric "greater good."
Posted by: Ace at
11:37 AM
| Comments (274)
Post contains 640 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 11:40 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 29, 2010 11:41 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Three Time Nobel Nominee Yukio Mishima at July 29, 2010 11:41 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 11:41 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: The MFM at July 29, 2010 11:41 AM (LhoRf)
Yes a big F*ing fence. It clearly says, "If you want past, use the F*ing gate!" to the political class, the technical term would be "Port of Entry"
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 11:42 AM (0q2P7)
what
way
does the author's use of
prison
symbolise
the protagonist's struggle?
And how does this relate -
- to our discussion of the uses of irony?
Posted by: English Teacher at July 29, 2010 11:42 AM (yUybe)
Posted by: Little Boy and Fat Man at July 29, 2010 11:42 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Ace at July 29, 2010 11:43 AM (KUUXH)
Posted by: AmishDude, pure mathematician at July 29, 2010 11:43 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Ace at July 29, 2010 11:44 AM (KUUXH)
Posted by: The MFM at July 29, 2010 11:44 AM (LhoRf)
Posted by: huerfano at July 29, 2010 11:45 AM (NmcJ6)
75% can support a controversial conservative measure.
However, with only 10% support, "common sense" liberal measures enjoy "broad" support.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 11:45 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Ace at July 29, 2010 03:43 PM (KUUXH)
THIS!
Posted by: Al Gore
Megadittos
Posted by: Mel Gibson at July 29, 2010 11:45 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: I'm making that golfing joke again at July 29, 2010 11:46 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 11:46 AM (OlN4e)
http://tinyurl.com/hgm5
Posted by: Alan Sokol at July 29, 2010 11:46 AM (5aa4z)
Posted by: The MFM at July 29, 2010 11:46 AM (LhoRf)
Posted by: President Ogaffe at July 29, 2010 11:46 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Randy at July 29, 2010 11:47 AM (zQKSr)
Posted by: Hedgehog at July 29, 2010 11:47 AM (oQIfB)
"So heavenly minded that they're no earthly good" ... Oliver Wendall Holmes
Posted by: bill at July 29, 2010 11:47 AM (0C9Hn)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 11:47 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: I'm making that BJ joke again at July 29, 2010 11:48 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: The Oligarchy at July 29, 2010 11:49 AM (kcqZS)
bat chain puller, I already got that, so suck on it!
'Tis an honor to be personally smacked down by Ace.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at July 29, 2010 11:49 AM (SCcgT)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 11:50 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: bill at July 29, 2010 11:50 AM (0C9Hn)
Posted by: The Council in that one town in Nebraska at July 29, 2010 11:51 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: Shephard Smith at July 29, 2010 11:52 AM (LhoRf)
My big gut is a symbol of me being overweight.
Posted by: Iota Cracker Jones at July 29, 2010 11:52 AM (1DVez)
Posted by: Ben at July 29, 2010 11:52 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: The Massachusetts General Assembly, 2006 at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (e8YaH)
I got my bigot groove back!
The biggest shame in all of this, imo -
The fact that we can now identify that a political class even exists in this country.
Is it supposed to be like that?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (RkRxq)
So low I can't get under it
So wide I can't get round it
-- OH, ROCK MY SOUL
by Peter Yarrow (of Peter, Paul & Mary fame)
libtards' pantaloons rapidly filling with libturds
Posted by: Tunes for Campers at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (FcKXR)
Posted by: Spencer Ackerman at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (VmtE9)
Posted by: Portnoy at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (mT7uC)
Fuck this country and the 30% of commie clusterfuckbags that destroyed it.
Posted by: The Man with the Non Creased Pants at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (gLNLT)
Posted by: Corona at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (woZIc)
The fact that we can now identify that a political class even exists in this country.
Is it supposed to be like that?
Yes. In France.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (T0NGe)
Nothing says get off my lawn like a 6 barrel auto rotating 20mm Vulcan Cannon. (Wow it shoots so fast it sounds like a big diesel running)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 11:53 AM (0q2P7)
Shep Smith is an android butt pirate.
Posted by: Dr. Varno at July 29, 2010 03:51 PM (3fiIy)
FIFY.
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent - stating the obvious at July 29, 2010 11:54 AM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Ben at July 29, 2010 03:52 PM (wuv1c)
I'm convinced!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 11:54 AM (RkRxq)
Is it supposed to be like that?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 03:53 PM (RkRxq)
Is it supposed to be like what?
Posted by: Bob Schieffer at July 29, 2010 11:54 AM (fDRif)
Yeah, the old symbolism thing. Reminds me of the economist joke, which ends:
"Well of course it works in real life, the question is, will it work in theory?"
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at July 29, 2010 11:55 AM (QQ9sc)
Posted by: An actual member of DHS at July 29, 2010 11:56 AM (e8YaH)
So low I can't get under it
So wide I can't get round it
-- OH, ROCK MY SOUL
by Peter Yarrow, pedophile and John Kerry's bud (of Peter, Paul & Mary fame)
FTFY
Posted by: MikeO at July 29, 2010 11:56 AM (lBmZl)
Is it supposed to be like what?
Posted by: Bob Schieffer at July 29, 2010 03:54 PM (fDRif)
Time for your nap Bob. There's a good boy.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 11:56 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at July 29, 2010 11:56 AM (gh1bX)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 11:57 AM (OlN4e)
My favorite economist joke:
An economist walks down the street with his buddy. Buddy says, "Hey! There's a twenty dollar bill lying on the sidewalk!"
Economist replies, "That's impossible. If there were, someone would have already picked it up."
Posted by: Truman North at July 29, 2010 11:57 AM (e8YaH)
Yup, and then these same people feel completely justified afterwords. Commies kill upwards of 100 million people trying to shoe-horn a particular gov't model on people? "Have to break some eggs to make an omlette" or "They meant well".
Add some projection and cognitive dissonance and ta-da, the modern liberal!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at July 29, 2010 11:57 AM (9hSKh)
Yeah I'm not following that logic.
Obama could use the same argument for the imaginary fence he's using now.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 11:58 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 11:59 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Ben at July 29, 2010 03:52 PM (wuv1c)
Be careful or you'll provoke 'em into comments like You care to posit a counterfactual to that?
Posted by: Libtard, waay smarter than you at July 29, 2010 11:59 AM (FcKXR)
You can abstract any evil you choose into some esoteric "greater good."
So you've read my new script! What do you think, too wordy?
Posted by: Oliver Stone at July 29, 2010 11:59 AM (fDRif)
They don't do that anymore, they simply alter their perception of reality to suit their desired philosophy. No fuss no muss, and you're always right in your world.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 11:59 AM (0q2P7)
IIRC, the PoMoTards decided the paper was correct even though it was meant as a joke. That's the problem with eliminating reality as a frame of reference.
Posted by: Ian S. at July 29, 2010 12:00 PM (p05LM)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 12:00 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: In before the troll at July 29, 2010 12:00 PM (P9+0W)
Living in a gated community can separate a person from reality.
If you build a gated community, then you don't have to worry about building a fence
Posted by: East Coast Intelligencia at July 29, 2010 12:01 PM (e8YaH)
"It is, in certain ways, I suppose, a higher form of thinking than thinking of the concrete."
Nooooo....no, no, no! Some ivory tower academic twit considering the finer points of hetronomative symbology is not thinking on a higher plane than an engineer designing a bridge, or for that matter a mechanic figuring out why a car is missing on one cylinder.
He's not fuckin' better than they are! He only thinks he is. Hell Ace, the work you do on this blog represents a far greater intellectual challenge than most professors in the humanities are capable of dealing with.
Posted by: gebrauchshund at July 29, 2010 12:01 PM (ADeN1)
Sigh.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller, uber pedant at July 29, 2010 03:41 PM (SCcgT)
Overblown.
Posted by: Rocks at July 29, 2010 12:02 PM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Maverick McMaverick at July 29, 2010 12:02 PM (swuwV)
I'm noting this because a few weeks ago I saw a guy at the riots in Toronto who complained that the police barricades were a symbol representing a division between the protesters and the G-20 representatives.
God..don't ya just wanna tear those wanna be fucktard's head off!
Posted by: dananjcon at July 29, 2010 12:02 PM (pr+up)
Posted by: Typical Libtard at July 29, 2010 12:03 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 03:59 PM (0GFWk)
Nothing is more expensive than "cheap labor". California spends over 21 BILLION a year on welfare, education and incarceration of illegal aliens and their children each and every year.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 29, 2010 12:03 PM (oIp16)
What would a 60' poured-concrete wall with machine gun towers and interlocking fields of fire say?
Posted by: Keith Arnold at July 29, 2010 12:03 PM (jhHL/)
Posted by: A Mobster at July 29, 2010 12:03 PM (e8YaH)
He's not fuckin' better than they are! He only thinks he is. Hell Ace, the work you do on this blog represents a far greater intellectual challenge than most professors in the humanities are capable of dealing with.
Thats true, and Ace can (and does) tell us to go fuck ourselves. Ya can't do that in the University!
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 12:03 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Truman North at July 29, 2010 03:58 PM (e8YaH)
True, but it's not a problem because they're all written by the invisible hand.
Posted by: AmishDude at July 29, 2010 12:04 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 12:04 PM (0GFWk)
Posted by: A fag hag at July 29, 2010 12:04 PM (e8YaH)
63 If the East Coast bordered Mexico instead of the Atlantic, we'd have the damn fence.
EAST SIIIIIIIDE!
Posted by: New Yawk Rapper at July 29, 2010 12:05 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 12:05 PM (WZFkG)
Lucianne@
FranceÂ’s President Sarkozy promised a crackdown against delinquency last week. Now he has ordered the dismantling of some 300 illegal camps of travellers and Roma across France, with the immediate deportation of anyone found without papers
omg, they are asking f or papers!
Posted by: willow at July 29, 2010 12:06 PM (SbsTp)
Posted by: Brad at July 29, 2010 12:06 PM (2GsJg)
Posted by: Downsized Upscale at July 29, 2010 03:59 PM (IhHdM)
I live behind two gates, one with a guard, and the other that requires a key code. This state could meltdown totally and we would not know it until the power went off. I like it.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 29, 2010 12:07 PM (oIp16)
Also, it symbolizes my impending heart attack.
Posted by: Michael Moore at July 29, 2010 12:07 PM (QoR4a)
Posted by: Steve L. at July 29, 2010 12:07 PM (Gkhxf)
Heh. Ace brings the funny. Too bad it symbolizes his inherent racism, but it's still ha-ha funny.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at July 29, 2010 12:07 PM (swuwV)
And I thought, "Gee, no, actually it's not a symbol of a division; it really is, in fact, a physical division." Because, see, you're rioting. (And not symbolically in riot, either.) You can tell it's a real-world division because now you can't get to the G-20 conference center and throw rock-metaphors through the window-symbols.
You're such a simple man. You just don't understand the nuance.
Posted by: New York Times at July 29, 2010 12:08 PM (1DVez)
Posted by: Keith Arnold at July 29, 2010 04:03 PM (jhHL/)
Go Ahead, Make My Day?
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent - stating the obvious at July 29, 2010 12:09 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 12:09 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at July 29, 2010 12:10 PM (ndlFj)
Posted by: Ace's new novel at July 29, 2010 12:10 PM (o7kZZ)
Posted by: nevergiveup at July 29, 2010 04:04 PM (0GFWk)
Oh I know.
I was just posting out that little factoid for the benefit of others that don't seem to know why we are all so aflutter out here in the West about that issue.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 29, 2010 12:10 PM (oIp16)
Posted by: Truman North at July 29, 2010 03:58 PM (e8YaH)
A prisoner was walking around the recreation yard, trying to figure how to break out. He walked up to a new prisoner and got to talking to him.
"So what did you do on the outside?", he asked the new guy.
"I was an economist", said the new prisoner.
"Wow. You must be a pretty smart guy. Maybe you can figure out how to break out of this place."
So the economist says, "Easy. Assume you had a pick axe....."
Posted by: Alan Sokol at July 29, 2010 12:10 PM (5aa4z)
ED-209 ready and operational! Drop your weapon! You have 10 seconds to comply!
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 29, 2010 12:11 PM (0q2P7)
OK, speaking of Mikey Moore, when that big ole vapor lock comes, who is going to pump fat boy's chest and who is gonna give mouth to mouth?
I'd pump his chest with a sledgehammer and give him mouth-to-mouth with the tailpipe of my truck.
I mean, if no one else volunteers.
Posted by: ErikW at July 29, 2010 12:11 PM (fDRif)
Posted by: dananjcon at July 29, 2010 12:11 PM (pr+up)
"Metaphor" is a thing bastardized by the left. It's not a bad thing - just bastardized to the point of inciting ill feelings.
OTOH, I can't help but think of the Ultimate Metaphor: God... which incites ill feelings of the left.
Plus ca change, plus cÂ’est la meme chose... but interesting to think about.
Posted by: dum blond at July 29, 2010 12:11 PM (gbCNS)
92 I want a giant border wall that makes the Berlin wall shit itself. Multiple fences some chain link some concrete, spotting towers, concertina, dog runs, snipers, mobile patrol, land mines, etc.
Flaming pits of fire, bitches!
Posted by: Samuel L. Jackson at July 29, 2010 12:11 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Ace's new novel at July 29, 2010 04:10 PM (o7kZZ)
HE STEAL SUZY-Q METAPHOR AND FUNYUN SYMBOL!
Posted by: Old Korean Lady, Postmodernist at July 29, 2010 12:12 PM (5aa4z)
HowÂ’s this for amateur sociology:
I don’t believe this whole “illegal” thing would be nearly as bad as it didn’t attract the political vultures to it.
Most Americans I donÂ’t believe can truly abide with things like free services, tuition assistance and educational benefits not available to citizens, sanctuary cities, non-enforcement of laws because of status, and other advantages that a probably very small minority of Americans are able to ascribe to illegals to the (perceived, at least) disadvantage to citizens.
If politicians were to come up with a fair model under which illegals were to attain a legal status without politicians being able to use it as a f—king tool to get elected every few years, I believe that most Americans would welcome it. (And I don’t mean amnesty – they should go to the back of the line, imo of those who are waiting to get in legally.)
But our politicians play this against us every few years and it is to their advantage evidently to let it languish, or to come up with remedies that piss off one side and play them against the other.
But, as in previous comments IÂ’ve made, I could just as easily be full of shit.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 12:13 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Average mongrel moron at July 29, 2010 12:13 PM (o7kZZ)
Posted by: Det. Riggs at July 29, 2010 12:14 PM (2cfUo)
Posted by: Jean at July 29, 2010 12:14 PM (bXHdf)
Posted by: Ace's new novel at July 29, 2010 04:10 PM (o7kZZ)
added a word
Posted by: conscious, but incoherent - stating the obvious at July 29, 2010 12:14 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (WZFkG)
Comrade Zero has done what he promised. He brought the country together.
Against the Zero Administration.
Posted by: Cicero at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (QKKT0)
Oh, yeah? Well your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
Posted by: Maya Angelou at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (swuwV)
114 But if they build the fence, could they at least leave some large holes for Salma Hayek to stick her big tits through?
Hey! No gringos get to touch my enchiladas!
Posted by: Salma Hayek at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (zgZzy)
Oh, yeah? Well your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
Did somebody say hamster?
Posted by: Richard Gere at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (zgZzy)
"Wow. You must be a pretty smart guy. Maybe you can figure out how to break out of this place."
So the economist says, "Easy. Assume you had a pick axe....."The mathematician says, "Define yourself to be outside of the fence."
Posted by: AmishDude at July 29, 2010 12:15 PM (T0NGe)
That's because it's a symbol:
__
| |
____| |___
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at July 29, 2010 12:16 PM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Jean at July 29, 2010 12:17 PM (1vx4q)
Posted by: rdbrewer at July 29, 2010 12:17 PM (1DVez)
So what will this group of AMNESTY seekers do when they become the ones on the bubble for the next group. Slave wages for all.
Isn't it weird how congressional clunkers won't keep their word about anything?
Posted by: bill-tb at July 29, 2010 12:17 PM (y+QfZ)
Posted by: Lincolntf at July 29, 2010 12:18 PM (+O8yf)
But while 76% of Mainstream voters think the United States should continue to build the fence, 67% of the Political Class are opposed to it.
Uh, but then only 68% want the fence? Either they pretty much ONLY polled the "political class"... or their as math challenged as Tim Geitner.
And the major question, why are we asking the servents, what the Boss's want? Why are they even ASKING the Political class these questions?
Posted by: Romeo13 at July 29, 2010 12:18 PM (H+oXM)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 12:18 PM (OlN4e)
Posted by: AmishDude at July 29, 2010 04:15 PM (T0NGe)
Sorry to interrupt all your smart witty posts, but with that hash, you really needed to be on last night's pussy-licking thread on the ONT.
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 12:18 PM (o7kZZ)
60' poured-concrete wall with machine gun towers and interlocking fields of fire.
I beat that in New York, I'll beat that in Nogales.
Posted by: Mexican Snake Pilssken at July 29, 2010 12:18 PM (zgZzy)
More dues!!
Posted by: Border Patrolman's Local 787 at July 29, 2010 12:19 PM (5aa4z)
__
| |
____| |___
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at July 29, 2010 04:16 PM (5aa4z)
Oh.
Pretend I never brought it up.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 12:19 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: ???????? at July 29, 2010 12:19 PM (p302b)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 04:18 PM (OlN4e)
But her chi-chis are in Mexico..
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 12:19 PM (o7kZZ)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at July 29, 2010 12:20 PM (tzcjs)
The Mandate Without Mentm
The Republicans might win the House, this November, on a mandate of repeal, security, a spending cuts...
but will they have the courage to prosecute such change?
Posted by: Time at July 29, 2010 12:20 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at July 29, 2010 12:20 PM (HQSQk)
Posted by: maddogg at July 29, 2010 04:18 PM (OlN4e)
And I, for one, am better off because of it.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 12:20 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: that guy that whispers en fuego because he's afraid of being deported at July 29, 2010 12:21 PM (8/oOq)
Oh.
Pretend I never brought it up.
We need a preview function just to prevent Chronic ASCII Fail.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at July 29, 2010 12:21 PM (5aa4z)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at July 29, 2010 04:20 PM (tzcjs)
I dunno,. but if our country goes down the shitter any more, the Canadians (whose banks are sound) may want to build one.
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 12:22 PM (o7kZZ)
In Soviet America, pussy licks you!
Posted by: YakovSmirnoffDude at July 29, 2010 12:22 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at July 29, 2010 04:20 PM (tzcjs)"
Don't think they would care. As long as someone else is paying for it, they would probably think it's fine.
Posted by: ???????? at July 29, 2010 12:22 PM (p302b)
Ace, glad to see you've finally figured out how it all works, in re the higher abilities of the enlightened.
Of course, your conclusions are probably all wrong, as you would be aware (and the enlightened already KNOW) if you had the least capacity to COMPREHEND anything at all, let alone understand it, or get it...
Posted by: Barbarausa at July 29, 2010 12:23 PM (gRgC6)
Posted by: Janeto Napolitano at July 29, 2010 12:23 PM (zgZzy)
Back to you , Katie.
Posted by: MFM at July 29, 2010 04:21 PM (EW49d)
Katie, dammit, are you drunk again?
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 12:24 PM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at July 29, 2010 12:24 PM (tzcjs)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 29, 2010 12:26 PM (zgZzy)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Toonces Obama at July 29, 2010 12:27 PM (554T5)
Posted by: awkward davies at July 29, 2010 12:27 PM (RNW0d)
He will not go behind his father's saying,
And he likes having thought of it so well
He says again, 'Good fences make good neighbors.'"
Posted by: ???????? at July 29, 2010 12:27 PM (p302b)
So not true. And I have the semester transcripts to prove it. The Humanities and Plant Systematics were the worst.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at July 29, 2010 12:27 PM (swuwV)
It's a vicious cycle:
More illegals, less cracka babies, less cracka babies, less work for black panthers.
Ya just can't win!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 29, 2010 12:28 PM (RkRxq)
157 I don't give a rat's ass if the support goes up to 108%. What you teabagging cons fail to realize time and again is that this is all about ME. So, to borrow an endearment from my VP...bite me.
Don't forget Mr. President . . . you won!
Posted by: Bobby Gibbsy at July 29, 2010 12:28 PM (zgZzy)
like that dam in China? I heard that is very cool to see.
Posted by: ???????? at July 29, 2010 12:28 PM (p302b)
Posted by: Neo at July 29, 2010 12:30 PM (tE8FB)
Posted by: Steve L."
What?
You make absolutely no sense, here.
Posted by: Dianna at July 29, 2010 12:30 PM (qrFCz)
I'm betting it would get a controversial 39%
Posted by: toby928 at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (8/oOq)
Oh...yes. Thanks, Bibbsy...er...Gibbsy. Got distracted. Tough putt for quad bogey coming up here.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Toonces Obama at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (554T5)
Posted by: Neo at July 29, 2010 04:30 PM (tE8FB)
Then mandatory chimichangas on all school menus.
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (o7kZZ)
Posted by: Corporate Obama shill at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (e8YaH)
Come to think of it, that was positively Alanis Morissette level of "irony" disguised as utter incoherence.
I hope you were joking.
Posted by: Dianna at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (qrFCz)
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at July 29, 2010 12:31 PM (zgZzy)
Hey ... this is good stuff !!
Posted by: Neo at July 29, 2010 12:32 PM (tE8FB)
Posted by: dum blond at July 29, 2010 12:32 PM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Tom at July 29, 2010 12:34 PM (ASjv/)
Posted by: dum blond at July 29, 2010 04:32 PM (gbCNS)
Because it's blocking their view of you sunbathing nude.
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 12:35 PM (o7kZZ)
Rhetorically, of course.
Posted by: Spencer Ackerman (J-lister) at July 29, 2010 12:36 PM (swuwV)
175 The privacy fence in my backyard is both practical and metaphoric of my desire to block out my damn next-door neighbors. Why else are they offended by it? More importantly, why should I care?
We're offended because we can't get a good look at your boobies now!!!
Posted by: Dum Blond's Neighbors at July 29, 2010 12:36 PM (zgZzy)
A couple of weeks of remorse and self-loathing in Newseek and Time, and some ugly political cartoons with themes pandering to white guilt. Then the issue will be put on the back burner as journalists lose interest and chase the next shiny thing.
I can live with that.
Posted by: fapo at July 29, 2010 12:37 PM (e1eKc)
Posted by: Corporate Obama shill at July 29, 2010 12:37 PM (e8YaH)
Posted by: Hedgehog
Sounds like it's time for a naming contest!
early entries:
Operation 'reunion'
Operation 'round trip'
Operation 'how did I wind up back here?'
Operation 'signing a lease was pointless'
Operation 'refused by addressee'
Operation ' Oh no you don't'
Posted by: Blue Hen at July 29, 2010 12:38 PM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Jean at July 29, 2010 12:42 PM (xMgdu)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 12:45 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 12:47 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 04:45 PM (WZFkG)
I like:
Operation "Sovereignty"
That would really makes the lefts' heads explode. Although, that won't change them, as they don't use their heads, anyway. But, it does slow them down a bit.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 29, 2010 12:49 PM (Qp4DT)
Posted by: Vic at July 29, 2010 12:50 PM (/jbAw)
FTFY
Posted by: toby928 at July 29, 2010 12:51 PM (8/oOq)
168 Has there been any polling on the use of a mine field, mixed high-density, Sprengmine 44's, Shumine 42's, Pot mines, A200's, the little wooden bastards that the mine detectors don't pick up?
+69
Posted by: dudeinsantacruz at July 29, 2010 12:51 PM (SfDpg)
Anyone knowingly employing an illegal should be tried, and executed. Their assets siezed. And their family sold into slavery.
Some people think I'm a bit extreme. Fuck 'em.
Posted by: Rat Patrol at July 29, 2010 12:52 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 12:52 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 04:52 PM (WZFkG)
Works for me.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 29, 2010 12:53 PM (Qp4DT)
There are 2 problems here. One is Mexico, who just dumps its' poor on the U.S any way they can. And we don't hold that government accountable.
The other is the U.S. It would seem, by the actions and the laws that have NOT been passed by this country, that there is a very large group of interests who want illegals in this country.
It's a tough fight.
Posted by: HH at July 29, 2010 12:56 PM (6oDXl)
Pete Stark informed a group of constituents that the "restaurant lobby" (?! WTF?) didn't want enforcement.
Posted by: Dianna at July 29, 2010 01:01 PM (qrFCz)
Concrete and fence posts were outlawed per Obamacare page 3,001 paragraph 86. Ya know 'it had to be passed for us to see what was in it'
Posted by: Journolist at July 29, 2010 01:04 PM (8EEyy)
Excellent post. Let me add two more things to your analysis.
1. It is also a cultural issue. Support for the border fence is culturally identified with the gun-totin' Minuteman rubes. The good people of the Political Class can't be seen to be associated with them even in the slightest.
2. The political class inherently don't believe in American exceptionalism. Therefore they think America is always perilously close to full-blown Nazi Fascism. In fact, you could say they believe in American Anti-Exceptionalism: we're always on the verge of disaster because we're a nation full of idiots and retards (according to them), unlike the educated Europhiles represented by the political class. So building a wall, because it could, very hypothetically, lead to concentration camps and atrocities against brown people, and because the Political Class has no faith in Americans to restrain themselves from going down that path, they will resist even the vaguest of vague hints of going there.
Posted by: chemjeff at July 29, 2010 01:06 PM (Pm5H8)
Posted by: Rangel/Greene 2012 at July 29, 2010 01:09 PM (sYrWB)
In other words, Idocracy......I will be suing the deputy for copyright infringement as soon as you tell me his name.
Posted by: Mike Judge at July 29, 2010 01:16 PM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Mike Judge at July 29, 2010 01:17 PM (UK9cE)
When Mexican-national illegally-resident rapists, murderers, drug smugglers, coyotes, and pedophiles get deported, we should air-drop them into this yard.
I'm not sure if it would be more effective to give them parachutes so they can start casing the place, or to just let 'em fall.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 01:20 PM (jV+np)
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 01:25 PM (I+7Zv)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 01:25 PM (jV+np)
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 01:27 PM (I+7Zv)
Gated communities should not be only for the top 1% of Americans. Let's put a gate around all 57 States.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at July 29, 2010 01:28 PM (kZT4X)
They have been dumbing down the schools for 40 years for the same reason, and look who's running the country (into the ground).
Posted by: real joe at July 29, 2010 01:31 PM (IpIBJ)
Posted by: Jan Brewer at July 29, 2010 01:36 PM (pELFl)
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Squad, And Summoner Of Meteors. at July 29, 2010 01:39 PM (eCAn3)
I mean does anyone think that the stupid thing works ?
Morons
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 05:25 PM (I+7Zv)
Bet you think Lindsey Graham is just fuckin' dreamy don't ya.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Squad, And Summoner Of Meteors. at July 29, 2010 01:40 PM (eCAn3)
Yeah. So what's it to you?
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 01:46 PM (pELFl)
hasn't most of the fence already been built and been determined not to be an effective way of stopping illegal border crossing ?
No.
It is essentially complete from the Pacific to NM which is where most of the illegals used to and still do cross.
No.
I mean does anyone think that the stupid thing works ?
Well, if it were built, then we could discuss it.
Posted by: HH at July 29, 2010 01:46 PM (6oDXl)
To put it nicely, Denny, you don't have a clue. I've been reading your ditzy comments - screwy assumptions, even screwier conjectures and wild 'n irresponsible accusations which aren't supported by the facts. I'm sure that you don't mean to be, but you're so ditzy that you're funny.. So please, keep 'em coming,
(Pssst, Ace? Is that you?)
Posted by: Greene/Rangel 2012 at July 29, 2010 01:47 PM (sYrWB)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 01:48 PM (jV+np)
LOL, those elements have to decay for a minimum of 5 years before they can be shipped. However it would be tough to stack them unshielded onto a fence.
The last time I saw someone try to measure one it was by lowering a high level film badge next to one in the SFP under 12 ft of water. They estimated 106 Rem/hr.
That is what we called instant molecular death.
Posted by: Vic at July 29, 2010 01:49 PM (/jbAw)
But....but....the Dems keep saying if the wall is 30ft. high
the hordes at the gate will make 31ft. ladders! I guess
we just have to give up......now, land mines might just
do the trick.
Posted by: grizzlybare at July 29, 2010 01:49 PM (PtLfz)
Posted by: SantaRosaStan, increasingly discouraged at July 29, 2010 01:50 PM (JrRME)
American Border Patrol
Posted by: sig at July 29, 2010 01:50 PM (2i+Vz)
Posted by: tangonine at July 29, 2010 01:57 PM (C8Pcc)
Posted by: Vic at July 29, 2010 05:49 PM (/jbAw)
I'm not seeing a downside here Vic
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Squad, And Summoner Of Meteors. at July 29, 2010 01:58 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: bigred at July 29, 2010 01:58 PM (uh7Ap)
B.O., Adult Child of an Alcoholic
tinyurl.com/35tmm7q
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at July 29, 2010 02:03 PM (w9BEi)
bigred--lol, so true.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 02:04 PM (jV+np)
bigred--lol, so true.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 06:04 PM (jV+np)
Heather you've forgotten the first rule of any nefarious plot: Leave No Witnesses.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Squad, And Summoner Of Meteors. at July 29, 2010 02:06 PM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Hi Denny!!! at July 29, 2010 02:09 PM (sYrWB)
Posted by: CoolCzech at July 29, 2010 02:09 PM (tJjm/)
I mean does anyone think that the stupid thing works ?
Morons
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 05:25 PM (I+7Zv)
Dickless twat.
Come down here and try to climb over the full-size 18' version (which has only been implemented in sections, due to the traitors in Congress and that bizarre fecal pellet in the White House). It is sheer vertical metal and has motion detectors.
Posted by: TexasJew at July 29, 2010 02:16 PM (o7kZZ)
Mine the frontier - with cluster bombs.
Ummm, No.
Now the drug boys, that's a whole different story.
Ambush...
Posted by: HH at July 29, 2010 02:21 PM (6oDXl)
Posted by: The Yeti at July 29, 2010 02:24 PM (tJjm/)
A fence
may not absolutely prevent your neighbor's dog from shitting on your lawn,
but it sure helps.
(and a paintball marker with electric feed hopper, fully loaded, can get the little doggie's attitude right, and real fast)
Posted by: Arbalest at July 29, 2010 02:35 PM (gma26)
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 02:45 PM (I+7Zv)
1. As shown above, the fence "from the Pacific to the NM border" is incomplete. Actually, it has many holes in it, and does not exist in other places. I think you know this, you just want to evade the truth.
2. "And also 50% of all illegals that are now in the country came on legal visas."
No. Obviously untrue. You know this, as well
3. "Of course once your neighbors dog is in, it then makes it harder for him to leave."
If you've ever had a "doggie problem", then you know that if you deal with it quickly, the doggie leaves even faster. They're good at remembering how they got in.
Posted by: Arbalest at July 29, 2010 02:51 PM (gma26)
Come down here and try to climb over the full-size 18' version (which has only been implemented in sections, due to the traitors in Congress and that bizarre fecal pellet in the White House). It is sheer vertical metal and has motion detectors. -TJ
I'll bet the UN wouldn't approve if we did build the fence like that all along the border.. Probably something like obscuring some historic view, or mopery with intent to creep.
Posted by: Reader C.J. Burch says... at July 29, 2010 02:53 PM (sJTmU)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at July 29, 2010 03:04 PM (w41GQ)
Posted by: GarandFan at July 29, 2010 03:15 PM (XaWFq)
@54: "Nothing says get off my lawn like a 6 barrel auto rotating 20mm Vulcan Cannon."
I prefer the retro look. Either the quad-40mm mount, or the German Flakvierling.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at July 29, 2010 03:15 PM (ySNz/)
"You can't deport 12 million people. That would be impossible!"
Really? How many could we deport? How many should we deport? None, you say? Eisenhower deported nearly 100,000 in less than a year, while causing the self-deportation of over a million.
Posted by: Cooter at July 29, 2010 03:16 PM (k2Bjx)
Posted by: War Monger at July 29, 2010 03:20 PM (uXuLF)
Posted by: Anderson Cooper at July 29, 2010 03:23 PM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at July 29, 2010 03:24 PM (tJjm/)
@192: "Anyone knowingly employing an illegal should be tried, and executed. Their assets siezed. And their family sold into slavery."
Naw, naw. We're cool with that.
Posted by: The Romans at July 29, 2010 03:26 PM (ySNz/)
Posted by: Call me Lennie at July 29, 2010 03:28 PM (mClC0)
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 06:45 PM (I+7Zv)
must be a bitch having to live with stupidity of this magnitude.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Squad, And Summoner Of Meteors. at July 29, 2010 03:31 PM (eCAn3)
Trotsky would tell you all about it if only Stalin had not located him down in Mexico with that little Mexican artist and her husband, whatshername again?
Reality beats abstract every time they meet up.
Posted by: Boots at July 29, 2010 03:32 PM (06JTY)
Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the issuance of Notices to Appear (NTA), and adopting significant process improvements.”
Posted by: Neo at July 29, 2010 03:32 PM (tE8FB)
The U.S. doesn't check your ID as you leave.
Not to mention you don't have to cross the Mexican border on foot to return to Ireland, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Thailand, etc--you can take a plane, maybe not directly there, but certainly with minimal unnecessary stops.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 29, 2010 03:39 PM (jV+np)
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 06:45 PM (I+7Zv)
I just walked in FROM the Mexican border about 5 minuets ago, and I must say, from first hand experience, that you are profoundly retarded.
There ARE NO CONTROLS on going into Mexico from the USA. You have two very bored InfanterÃa de Marina (Mexican Marines) standing in front of a card table waving EVERYONE through with no documentation what-so-ever. This is at the San Ysidro border crossing. Disneyland has better security than Mexico does at the US border.
Next time, know of what you are speaking before you talk nonsense.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at July 29, 2010 03:48 PM (oIp16)
Of course, once your neighbors dog is in
Dude, are you comparing Mexicans to dogs?
You are a bad, bad liberal.
Posted by: Who Knows at July 29, 2010 03:50 PM (aE/nJ)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 04:04 PM (WZFkG)
Sometimes a door is just a door.
Sometimes a fence is just a fence.
Posted by: Steve S at July 29, 2010 04:11 PM (IfigT)
- Dems won't vote for anything not including immediate amnesty (a very firm position I suspect).
- Public is opposed to immediate (gr)amnesty.
- Public is (now?) in support of a fence while the political class (whom is despised) is not.
SO: How to use to advantage? Any ideas?
Seems possible it could be used as a "wedge issue" for Nov. 2010, coupled with the AZ suit. I am imagining the Repubs actually BRINGING A PLAN TO THE PUBLIC. One the libs won't accept which is easier than pie - push it hard - be viewed in favor of a real "immigration reform" - take the word back _ (hint: it can even be more left then it would/will be - added bonus: the far right would be against and this would make media's job harder - it won't happen in next 2 years anyway (if get House - otherwise screwed regardless)).
a little far-fetched I know, but I wonder if GOP could use the center-position(s), for the Fall, while these nutballs are leaning so far left, and the public is moving away - the field is wide open in that sense.
If they say, "look, we are all for immigration reform, AND HERE IS OUR PLAN, it is the Dems who are trying to rigg the system (for votes). We simply feel that the path-to-citizenship should be a path and not a jump". This would also counter the party-of-NO theme, not that it's all bad, but it's bad to be pegged to one, and countering themes is a tactic to keep media off-balance. The left is, among other things, the party-of-Obstinant.
PS: silly ques: Can AZ pass a new law tommorrow and keep the DOJ and WH busy filing suits until Nov?
Posted by: hey it's bold at July 29, 2010 04:14 PM (vQoSF)
Posted by: Rich at July 29, 2010 04:44 PM (JzDsB)
Posted by: Ken Hahn at July 29, 2010 04:48 PM (WRkLQ)
-- begin post --
1) Have to be able to prevent gross flow of physical bodies across border, FIRST*. Choose your tech-of-choice. Initially it will need super-charged resources/patrols, which would be unnecessary once the solution has settled, (ideally - the guest-worker program and complying employers would do the trick (oh, but there is entitlements... k neglect for now), and a simple fence properly placed would remove the tail.
Next, a solution could have 2 things:
- guest-worker program
I don't know what there is now but this would not be your standard work-visa, with requirements A. We need this program because we don't want to cut-off the cheap labor supply, is that right? and the citizenship part should be necessarily a longer part, part of the,
- path-way to citizenship (for the future guest-workers + "special case" for those who broke the law)
There already is a normal one, and we are doing a "special case" for our valued resident neighbors, right? so this could be an auxillary path which could not be as strict as say the work/student/visa process, as we are primarly trying to avoid "uprooting" people.
2) First things first. Guest worker program. Once this is announced their will be an extreme increase in "migrants" (but does it matter?). background check etc. maybe fingerprints whatever...
* this is why there must be block first. It doesn't matter what the details of the amnesty process are: we will not be able to validate any work history as that would require self-incrimination by the employer (unless you want to grant them amnesty to, but again, the announcement, paperwork...) and we aren't looking at tax records (sorry if they also committed identity theft but they don't get that money back) or received handouts. Point is we will be having a blue-light special from the announcement untill the "special case" forms stop being handed out (eventually just an initial guest-worker program form). There may be another way to distinguish between those who have legitamate roots here and those who don't, but it escapes me.
Maybe they could be given the choice of paying into FICA/etc. or not. Those who do not want to become citizens would get to keep their money (oooh.. jealous - though mexico may grab it). If they choose to pay then those years should count if they eventually become citizens.
3) once we have all the guest workers including the millions of "special cases", we then stop handing out the forms and place those into the "pathway-to-citizenship" file in the immigration department, which will be at THE END OF LINE in the other immigration forms. They can still work with the guest-worker thing until interview or whatever - however, in the evalution, they will be allowed special (one time?) requirements that will take into account their whatever status. If they fail their guest-worker thing is cancelled and we send I nice letter asking them to leave.
No citizenship shall be awarded from this legislation for 1 full federal election cycle + 1 day. They will be guest-workers with application to pathway-to-citizenship until then.
After all the "special cases" are handled, their could still be a separate set of requirements for people applying for citizenship from the guest-worker program (after whatever years), but this would be uniform and not prejudicing any race or nationality or "US residency" prior 201X. In the end, there would be the final guest-worker forms at the embassies/border (fee paid at counter - but no job needed, or guaranteed), which would be quick, plus, a fence to boot (to deter the greediest employers, as the wages will necessarily rise for this new class).
At that point, as far as babies, if they are born here and go to school here, well, let's make them Americans.
-- end post --
pls, forgive my impudence.
Posted by: h.i.b. at July 29, 2010 04:49 PM (vQoSF)
"or nationality"
should be striked out: "
duh.
Posted by: hib at July 29, 2010 05:02 PM (vQoSF)
Morons
Posted by: denny crane at July 29, 2010 05:25 PM (I+7Zv)
Shorter denny crane: "FENCES: HOW DO THEY WORK?"
Gee, I have most of a telephone here, but for some inexplicable reason, it don't work. It is a mystery to us all.
Also, do you just forget where you're posting? "Morons" isn't an insult here, it's just the name of the group.
Do you stand outside the fence at dairy farms and shout "herd!" at them? I could so see that. Well, until the guys in the "rescue" van arrive.
Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at July 29, 2010 05:09 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 05:16 PM (WZFkG)
Posted by: oh gosh at July 29, 2010 05:18 PM (vQoSF)
Posted by: Splunge at July 29, 2010 05:28 PM (9uwvY)
Posted by: ChicagoJedi at July 29, 2010 09:17 PM (WZFkG)
yes, but we will have to wait untill 2013 for any entitlement reform no? So ques is how to get a fence before then... frankly, I don't think BO would allow a fence even with blanket amnesty..... so, then, the question is whats the best way to play the issue until he is gone. plus, the political (lobby) reality is that at minimum the solution will have to include ability to obtain special visa whatever outside the US; whatever that is called doesn't matter.
Posted by: og at July 29, 2010 05:37 PM (vQoSF)
Posted by: Brad at July 29, 2010 04:06 PM (2GsJg)
Posted by: Dave J. at July 29, 2010 06:47 PM (DCQ0q)
Posted by: omg hehe at July 29, 2010 08:44 PM (vQoSF)
Posted by: yixing teapots at July 30, 2010 12:23 AM (6ZwMD)
many fendi products for discount
high quality of fendi bags for cheap
Posted by: fendi handbags at July 30, 2010 06:42 PM (AvlwO)
Posted by: Janie Smith at August 09, 2010 01:22 AM (qh3I0)
Posted by: Family and General Practice in New Jersey at September 23, 2010 05:01 AM (y1wOX)
Posted by: used furniture at September 24, 2010 04:35 AM (tXU52)
Posted by: Facts about XBox 360 at September 25, 2010 04:41 AM (A89l8)
Posted by: florists yellow pages at September 26, 2010 05:22 AM (kiRPg)
Posted by: computers used at September 27, 2010 05:54 AM (p1a5x)
Posted by: accountants directory at September 28, 2010 06:30 AM (PI2Kh)
Posted by: computer consultants at September 29, 2010 06:53 AM (aZCSU)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4003 seconds, 402 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Opposition of Obamacare down 6% since April 1 or thereabouts.
Keep flooding the zone, my man.
Posted by: Truman "Alinsky" North at July 29, 2010 11:38 AM (e8YaH)