February 26, 2010
— DrewM Looks like NY's accidental Governor is going to drop his election bid, which he officially announced only last week.
Gov. David Paterson has told Democratic leaders that he won't seek election to a full term amid a roiling scandal over whether he and his troopers intimidated a woman who'd reported domestic violence against one of his top aides, The Post has learned.Paterson communicated his intentions to top advisers and supporters, saying he'll make an announcement today, multiple sources said -- confirming a Post report.
Paterson, who took over the state's top spot when Eliot Spitzer resigned after it was disclosed that he had sex with a prostitute, is expected to say he won't resign.
Just last night Paterson said he intended to continue his campaign, which he launched this past weekend. But he also said he would talk to fellow Democrats about his future.
I guess they told him what everyone already knew...he was dead man walking before the recent scandal hit and that being caught up in allegations of intimidating a possible victim of domestic abuse wasn't exactly going to help.
My guess is he will still wind up having to resign before all is said and done.
What's this mean for Republicans? Not much in terms of the Governor's race. Andrew Cuomo, who will be investigating Paterson now, will still win the Democratic primary and Rick Lazio will still get steamrolled by him.
It might help on the margins in some suburban state Senate districts that were formally held by Republicans but lately have been going to the Democrats. Retaking the state Senate in '10 and holding it in '12 will be very important as NY goes through its redistricting process, especially since NY is likely to lose at least one House seat.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:33 AM
| Comments (109)
Post contains 308 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Mjim at February 26, 2010 06:37 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 26, 2010 06:38 AM (pLTLS)
Cuomo will win NYC, but an upstate and NYC Suburb strategy can bear fruit.
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 26, 2010 06:38 AM (bN5ZU)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at February 26, 2010 06:39 AM (8WOM0)
No there's not!
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at February 26, 2010 06:41 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 26, 2010 06:42 AM (mR7mk)
So how long ago was the Democratic machine pushing this guy to drop out?
And he refused to drop out.
Then shit hits the fan.
Makes a feller wonder. Don't it?
WELCOME TO CHICAGO!
Posted by: Dang at February 26, 2010 06:42 AM (UA4gE)
To be one of those, doesn't one have to at least "score" once in a while?
/If that's the case, then maybe it's an optional part of the AoS lifestyle?
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 26, 2010 06:44 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: Ben at February 26, 2010 06:44 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jane D'oh, cold and cranky at February 26, 2010 06:44 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at February 26, 2010 06:45 AM (Q41Zh)
On a serious note, can't the NY Republican party scrape up anybody better than Rick Lazio? I mean seriously, the guy who let himself be sand bagged by Hillary Clinton? They gotta be able to do better than that...
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 26, 2010 06:46 AM (OtQXp)
Why isn't this RACIST?
Cause Joos run the Times and EVERYONE knows a Joo can not be a RACIST.
It's in the Koran, or something, snark.
Posted by: Kemp at February 26, 2010 06:48 AM (qvT/A)
Posted by: nickless at February 26, 2010 06:50 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Ben at February 26, 2010 06:50 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Kemp at February 26, 2010 06:51 AM (qvT/A)
Posted by: Nicky Sarkozy at February 26, 2010 06:52 AM (BFqyO)
Dede Scozzafava's available. *heh*
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 26, 2010 06:53 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 26, 2010 10:42 AM (mR7mk)
That's skirt-chasing cooch-hound, if you please. Harrumph!
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2010 06:54 AM (ypGDY)
Posted by: Barry "Knuckles" Sotero at February 26, 2010 06:54 AM (tafgh)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 06:55 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 26, 2010 06:56 AM (tafgh)
26 The Koreans are not Joos! Idiot.
Tell that to my dad, asshole.
Posted by: Longwang Goldberg
Sorry, Mr. Goldberg. I couldn't see the hat with all that crazy-ass hair.
Posted by: Dang at February 26, 2010 06:57 AM (UA4gE)
Dede Scozzafava's available. *heh*
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 26, 2010 10:53 AM (mR7mk)
*FACEPALM*
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 26, 2010 06:57 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Dude at February 26, 2010 06:57 AM (4C8y0)
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 26, 2010 10:38 AM (bN5ZU)
Please find a strategy that can defeat that worthless cocksucker; even my lib friends hate him.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2010 06:58 AM (ypGDY)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 06:58 AM (p302b)
Posted by: HeatherRadish
at February 26, 2010 10:42 AM (mR7mk)
Only for the single morons. I'm informed that for us married types it is *not* part of the lifestyle.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at February 26, 2010 06:58 AM (tafgh)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:00 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Countrysquire at February 26, 2010 07:06 AM (xPe5J)
22 in related news, the new season of SNL will have an excuse to run only Patterson sketches and neglect any obama ones
Is there life west of the Hudson? Stay tuned.....details at 11:00.
SNL is so fucking parochial anyway. Like any of the rest of us out here in flyover land give a fuck about their 'inside baseball' skits.
Posted by: pendejo grande at February 26, 2010 07:07 AM (ZZf1e)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 11:00 AM (p302b)
Found this on Cuomo's time at HUD:
Apparently he helped inflate the housing bubble, among other things...
Posted by: Nighthawk at February 26, 2010 07:11 AM (OtQXp)
The thing is, this is just the result of the democrat machine no longer covering for the guy. I'd think it was a setup, but if the dems were able to pull setups like that, they'd do it to republicans as well. Which leads to a question: Just how much dirt is the dem machine sitting on? Considering the amount of corruption in government, it's horrifying to think that's just the less serious stuff they don't bother trying to cover up.
Throw Washington DC into the Sun, and then nuke the Sun from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 26, 2010 07:13 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Countrysquire at February 26, 2010 11:06 AM (xPe5J)
She's just trying to sell a record. It was about Beatty, everyone knew it was about Beatty. It was never any damn secret. Pretty sad way ti milk a career.
Posted by: Rocks at February 26, 2010 07:14 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at February 26, 2010 07:16 AM (kEBiX)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at February 26, 2010 07:17 AM (kEBiX)
She's just trying to sell a
record. It was about Beatty, everyone knew it was about Beatty. It was
never any damn secret. Pretty sad way ti milk a career.
Posted by: Rocks at February 26, 2010 11:14 AM (Q1lie)
She says it was about David Geffen, head of Elektra records at the time.
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at February 26, 2010 07:17 AM (VuLos)
She says it was about David Geffen, head of Elektra records at the time.
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at February 26, 2010 11:17 AM (VuLos)
Did that turn him into Teh Ghey? And yes, what a pathetic way to get your name in the headlines.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2010 07:21 AM (ypGDY)
That'll clear up that pesky global warming, too.
Cuomo represents another dynasty.
His daughters have the sacred Kennedy DNA. Schumer better look out.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 26, 2010 07:23 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: John McClane at February 26, 2010 07:25 AM (TJoID)
Looks like a dem/lib power struggle and BO is on the side of Cuomo and not the spitzer faction. So guess the kennedy thing makes sense, he joined the kennedy dynasty by default. Remember Patterson refused to appoint caroline.
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:26 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:27 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:28 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Mjim at February 26, 2010 11:24 AM (V8B//)
Oh good God...did you read some of the comments there? Moonbat central.
Posted by: Tami at February 26, 2010 07:29 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:29 AM (p302b)
She says it was about David Geffen, head of Elektra records at the time.
Posted by: Dwight Schrute at February 26, 2010 11:17 AM (VuLos)
Yes, and she is pushing a record. It's total BS.
Posted by: Rocks at February 26, 2010 07:30 AM (Q1lie)
No, I didn't even bother... but i just went back and took a look.
No kidding! They are praising the One for being so classy...
Posted by: Mjim at February 26, 2010 07:32 AM (V8B//)
I hate to say something positive about JugEars, but it really is a moderately classy move....which tells me that it wasn't Bambi's idea and he most likely made the call while pouting like a toddler in the Oval Office.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 26, 2010 07:39 AM (I/MqP)
I agree, it was the right thing to do. But it comes off as superficial at best.
Posted by: Mjim at February 26, 2010 07:44 AM (V8B//)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:53 AM (p302b)
Obama givs Cheney a phone call.
Posted by: Mjim at February 26, 2010 11:52 AM (V8B//)"
If the phone call came after his meeting with GWB then it was to find out what happened in that meeting.
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:54 AM (p302b)
Obama givs Cheney a phone call.
I don't mean to nitpick but that's not really class. It's protocol.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 26, 2010 07:55 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 07:55 AM (p302b)
Posted by: O'Shea at February 26, 2010 07:56 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: AHFF Geoff at February 26, 2010 07:57 AM (5r0Tz)
Tell me about it.
Posted by: Hillary! Clinton at February 26, 2010 07:58 AM (WjerO)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at February 26, 2010 11:17 AM (kEBiX)
Me likee.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 26, 2010 07:58 AM (xxgag)
You morons truly are not deserving of your man cards.
How in the world have you not referenced "The Manhattan Madam"?
None of you are worthy.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at February 26, 2010 07:59 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: AHFF Geoff at February 26, 2010 11:57 AM (5r0Tz)
Does this appointment need senate approval or is he just in?
Posted by: Tami at February 26, 2010 08:01 AM (VuLos)
yeah, he called Cheney AFTER GWB flew here to see him. He realized that he looked like shit and tried to make up for it. He forgot the protocol. And since we know about it, I doubt Cheney told the press, then Obama announced that he had called Cheney.
Sorry no class there.
Posted by: dagny at February 26, 2010 08:02 AM (HaCrJ)
Posted by: dagny at February 26, 2010 08:03 AM (HaCrJ)
Posted by: Sharkman at February 26, 2010 08:04 AM (Zj8fM)
Posted by: Paladin at February 26, 2010 08:06 AM (H7yeS)
Now listen you hoarder of souls! I was trying to watch some Skinemax pron and flip through these posts...
Wow. She looks well-fed and maintained IYKWIMAITYD. Still, I cannot deny my Skinemax wymens. Thanks lacey, I mean, hoarder of souls!
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 26, 2010 08:06 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:07 AM (p302b)
yeah, he called Cheney AFTER GWB flew here to see him. He realized that he looked like shit and tried to make up for it. He forgot the protocol. And since we know about it, I doubt Cheney told the press, then Obama announced that he had called Cheney.
Sorry no class there.
Posted by: dagny at February 26, 2010 12:02 PM (HaCrJ)"
this is too funny since they appear to be the most paranoid administration ever.
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:09 AM (p302b)
Posted by: NY Besty Rose at February 26, 2010 08:17 AM (XJ3kL)
Just how much dirt is the dem machine sitting on? Considering the amount of corruption in government, it's horrifying to think that's just the less serious stuff they don't bother trying to cover up.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 26, 2010 11:13 AM (pZEar)Is there a democrat-gate in the offing ? When they fall, it will be quick, just like climate-gate.
Posted by: CyclopsJack at February 26, 2010 08:18 AM (a4o2p)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:23 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:24 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:30 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 08:31 AM (p302b)
Rangel said Friday that the ethics report "exonerates" him because it says there is no evidence that he knew the trips were sponsored by corporations. The report said his staff knew who paid for the trips.
In other words, Why don't you just mind your damn business? Nothing to see here.
Posted by: madtechie at February 26, 2010 08:40 AM (5vrLJ)
Posted by: John at February 26, 2010 08:47 AM (6FYZ6)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 26, 2010 08:48 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: curious at February 26, 2010 09:07 AM (p302b)
Since Cheney can't make it to today's Bush Admin reunion, it might have been a note-taking session and maybe Cheney gave Bush a coffeecake for the gathering.
Posted by: The other 49 states with like 99% of the population at February 26, 2010 09:19 AM (soatC)
Posted by: arhooley at February 26, 2010 09:19 AM (soatC)
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama (or Barry as whispered) at February 26, 2010 09:21 AM (CfmlF)
Correction: August 28, 2009
A picture caption on Thursday with the continuation of the obituary of Senator Edward M. Kennedy misidentified two of his sisters and omitted a third in some editions. Shown in the picture, of the Kennedy clan in 1934, were front row, from left: Patricia, Rose, Joe (holding 2-year-old Edward), Rosemary, Eunice and Kathleen. (In some editions, EuniceÂ’s name was omitted, and in some editions Rosemary and Kathleen were reversed.)
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: January 3, 2010
An article last Sunday about the death of Edward M. Kennedy in August misstated the length of his tenure in the Senate. He served 47 years, not 46 years. (The error appeared in Mr. Kennedy’s obituary and another article, about memories of the Senator, on Aug. 27, and also in an editorial that day. The error was repeated in an article on Aug. 28 about how the Senate had changed during the time he served.) The article also referred incorrectly to the assassination of his brother President John F. Kennedy. The president was assassinated in 1963, the year after Edward Kennedy was elected to the Senate — not the same year.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: January 10, 2010
An article on Dec. 27 about the death of Edward M. Kennedy in August referred incorrectly to the assassination of his brother President John F. Kennedy, and a correction in this space last Sunday erroneously corrected the length of his tenure in the Senate. The president was assassinated in 1963, the year after Edward Kennedy was elected to the Senate — not the same year. And as the article correctly reported, Senator Kennedy served 46 years — not 47 as the correction said. (The correction also erred in stating that the length of tenure was incorrect in Mr. Kennedy’s obituary, in two other articles on Aug. 27 and Aug. 28 and in an editorial on Aug. 28. All four correctly reported the tenure as 46 years.)
Posted by: arhooley at February 26, 2010 09:34 AM (soatC)
Rivlin was the first chief of the Congressional Budget Office and was appointed by Jimmy Carter. She was vociferously opposed to Reagan's tax cuts. She is an avowed Keynesian.
She believes in large public debt. She believes in higher tax rates.
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at February 26, 2010 09:56 AM (m0gY5)
The problem is that with a good candidate the GOP WOULD have a shot here, but it's indicative of how badly run the state party in NY is.
Posted by: LikeATimeBomb at February 26, 2010 10:53 AM (mXYsC)
The problem is that with a good candidate the GOP WOULD have a shot here, but it's indicative of how badly run the state party in NY is.
The NY-23 race is a good indicator of how bad the party in NY is ran.
Posted by: Vic at February 26, 2010 10:55 AM (QrA9E)
Moreover, the NY GOP may suck, but in 2010, that doesn't condemn Lazio. Social media, talk radio, InterWeb (generally), and even Tea Party people reduce NY GOP's importance.
The big "?" here is can New Yorkers be awoken from the political coma that causes them to vote "D" no matter what. I think it's possible, but it's not that clear to me.
Posted by: ParisParamus at February 26, 2010 11:51 AM (GgR+e)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2616 seconds, 237 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 26, 2010 06:36 AM (otlXg)