January 19, 2010

Sad-Sack Dems Mull "Nuclear Option" of Budget Reconcilliation
— Ace

As the old saying goes: We must hang together or we will surely hang apart.

Democrats will in fact hang together, they've decided.

No matter how strong the signal from 60% of the public that We don't want this, they are determined to ram it down our throats to appease their 30% nutroots supporters -- and even those guys don't like this bill.

The Democrats are determined to do this, even if it takes the taint of an anti-democratic maneuver to do so.

Congressional Democrats have been discussing several options, since a Brown win would break the party's 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority at a critical time for health care reform. Durbin, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate, described a combination of tactics to get what his party wants out of health care reform.

First, he said the House could simply approve the Senate bill, sending it straight to President Obama's desk.

Then, Durbin said, the Senate could make changes to the bill by using the nuclear option, known formally as "reconciliation," a tactic that would allow Democrats to adjust parts of health care reform with just a 51-vote majority.


"We could go to something called 'reconciliation', which is in the weeds procedurally, but would allow us to modify that health care bill by a different process that doesn't require 60 votes, only a majority," Durbin said. "So that is one possibility there."

Though House Democrats have major misgivings about the Senate version, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer on Tuesday suggested they'd be willing to consider approving the Senate bill intact, if the alternative is no bill at all. A majority of Democrats in that chamber are opposed to many provisions in the Senate-passed bill, including the controversial tax on high-cost insurance plans which the unions are vehemently against.

Though Democrats, including Durbin, have previously insisted reconciliation would not be used, key aides have quietly pointed to a change in circumstances with the unexpectedly competitive race in Massachusetts.

But reconciliation is not easy under any circumstances. Any measure that is passed under the process requires 51 votes for passage, but that measure's authors must pass strict legislative tests to show the bill deals only with taxes and spending to bring the legislation in line with the budget -- a move that its creators made back in 1974 to keep extraneous provisions from being passed under this expedited process.

Reconciliation might allow for Democrats to modify the excise tax, but it would not appear to allow for changes to abortion and immigration language, among some of the hot-button issues.
Republicans have decried the use of reconciliation for such a massive re-ordering of the nation's economy. To be sure, Republicans were the first to use the tactic outside its intended purpose, and they have used it most often for tax relief, but they say health care reform is different.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., the primary point person in the Senate for reconciliation matters as the top Republican on the Budget Committee, has called this "Chicago-style politics" and has vowed to raise scores of objections, called "points of order." There are about 13 different ways Republicans can challenge Democrats, and nearly all of these will require votes.

This is nuts.

Posted by: Ace at 01:01 PM | Comments (77)
Post contains 552 words, total size 4 kb.

1 They're getting teste

Posted by: tachyonshuggy at January 19, 2010 01:01 PM (yUybe)

2 The ass is about to self-destruct? Awesome!

Posted by: Filthy Scandi snowbilly at January 19, 2010 01:02 PM (BxtwP)

3 This talk is all using today's political conditions (as they see them)... Tomorrow will be very different. They won't do _any_ of these things.

Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 01:03 PM (MCHyX)

4 I hope they go for it. The nuclear option will just blow-up in their faces.

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent (M) at January 19, 2010 01:03 PM (Vu6sl)

5 Really, how did we lose to these people?

Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 19, 2010 01:04 PM (ehLtp)

6

They keep saying that the House could vote on the Senate Bill but to my knowledge that Senate Bill they are talking about is the Baucus bill and it was NOT originated in the House.

 

Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 01:04 PM (QrA9E)

7 @1 - you bastage.  ROFLMAO.

Posted by: grognard at January 19, 2010 01:05 PM (v0kvW)

8 Make no mistake - these guys are getting dangerous. As in "state of emergency" dangerous. These tactics call into question what the Dems WONT do to enact their legislation. At this point it seems that they simply won't be stopped by election or otherwise. The day may come when they deem us "ungovernable" and hence in need of "correction". Dangerous times folks.

Posted by: volfan at January 19, 2010 01:05 PM (Lq6p6)

9 Suicide Squad Leader: We are the Senate Democrats' Judean People's Front crack suicide squad! Suicide squad, attack! [they all stab themselves] Suicide Squad Leader: That showed 'em, huh?

Posted by: Marcia "Information Minister" Croakley at January 19, 2010 01:06 PM (QJzQi)

10 One final banzai charge, before they all commit electoral seppuku.

Posted by: DelD at January 19, 2010 01:06 PM (eWtdM)

11 Balls of a feather hang together .

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at January 19, 2010 01:06 PM (a9UO0)

12 Exposing just how fanatical these people are is a reasonably good thing. Flushing the roaches so you know them to be what they are.

Posted by: Vet Missing Parts at January 19, 2010 01:06 PM (MCHyX)

13
The more the Democrats pull their shit, the more seats we pick up this year.

And the better chance we have in stopping Obama's radical agenda. We need control of Congress, or at least one house. Gaining a lot of seats doesn't necessarily stop Obama; we need control.

Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 01:06 PM (jVldi)

14 Really, how did we lose to these people?

Mass psychosis.

Posted by: Soap MacTavish at January 19, 2010 01:07 PM (554T5)

15 Hmm...you know, I'm not entirely sure, but I think Ace might be sending us some subtle hints that things are looking good up at Brown HQ.  Yes...yes, I think I may have just cracked the code...oh, Ace, you sly dog!

Posted by: chris at January 19, 2010 01:08 PM (SiJV8)

16 Hey guys, http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/ is liveblogging if anyone is interested.

Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 19, 2010 01:08 PM (kEBiX)

17 Allahu Ackbar!

Posted by: Hasan Reid at January 19, 2010 01:08 PM (qyKoF)

18 The more undemocratic it appears it will take to get this bill passed, the easier it will be to undo it down the road IF they actually do this.  As long as the GOP/Opponents are in the majority, they will be able to undo this undemocratic, un-American monster.

Posted by: CDR M at January 19, 2010 01:09 PM (F9LAD)

19 Like cocaine addicted monkeys, they can't help themselves.

Posted by: Robin at January 19, 2010 01:09 PM (6uXZa)

20 Wow, we're dipping taints now?

Meh, why not?  I think Scott Brown is going to ask Massachusettes Dems how his ass tastes later tonight.

Posted by: INCITEmarsh at January 19, 2010 01:09 PM (31oQh)

21 They are full of shit. Simple as that. Now back to watching the Chrissy show...

Posted by: Cheney's Power Mane at January 19, 2010 01:09 PM (qcgPU)

22 If they do it, they own it lock, stock and barrel. There's no foisting it on the Repubs, even though the media will spin it that way.

Posted by: wherestherum at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (gofDd)

23

Even I get physically ill watching the Dems try to make legislation.

Posted by: Jimmy Dean at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (QKKT0)

24 The democrats are nucking futs!

Posted by: Dickie Roberts at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (ehLtp)

25 These guys are just nutcases.

Posted by: joncelli at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (RD7QR)

26 Do it. The House will very interesting with 350 Republicans in it and  majority in the Senate.

Posted by: Stanley Corporation at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (OOgDc)

27 They did not hesitate a nanosecond to sacrifice the lives of our troops by savagely undermining a President in a time of war to sere their own political ends. What makes anyone think they would hesitate to do this if they calculate it will further their agenda. The ONLY possible thing that could keep them from moving forward is if enough of them decide it is too dangerous politically and that they do not want to committ political suicide. 

Posted by: RM at January 19, 2010 01:10 PM (1kwr2)

28 This is going to be a slow-motion clusterfuck.

The Republicans in the Senate will regularly withhold consent on bills between now and November in order to minimize the amount of "work" done by the body.

They'll also be objecting to every single line of the bill as it goes through the reconciliation process, which will take a lot of time.  Even if they miraculously get it through the process, none of what the Dems *really* want will actually end up in the final product.


On the Dems' side, a bunch of the Blue Dogs will start running for the hills and a bunch of the far-left Dennis Kucinich types will piss and moan about having to swallow the Senate bill instead of the one they passed a few months back.


If they do this, it will single-handedly tie up Congress for at least a few months at a time when Dems should be trying to distance themselves from this bill as much as they can.

Going forward with this is a suicide pact and I think that Barry, Harry, and Pelosi are about to start passing out the Kool-Ade.

Posted by: Andre The Giant at January 19, 2010 01:11 PM (YkEce)

29 It is difficult to really know what will happen, but I lean toward the view that this election will scare far to many centrists away from this for it to have any chance of working.

Posted by: doug at January 19, 2010 01:11 PM (Sa/HV)

30 The ONLY possible thing that could keep them from moving forward is if enough of them decide it is too dangerous politically and that they do not want to committ political suicide.

The reasoning seems to be that since it is political suicide, they might as well go out in a blaze of glory.

Posted by: wherestherum at January 19, 2010 01:11 PM (gofDd)

31

Beck is back into his "both" parties are bad BS. This is one of the things that bothers me about him.

 

Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 01:11 PM (QrA9E)

32 He says "he doesn't know who this Brown is".

Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 01:12 PM (QrA9E)

33 Excuse the sockpuppet above...  Just reminding people that Andre DOES have a posse.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 19, 2010 01:12 PM (YkEce)

34 There's just not enough chocolate pudding in Massachusetts for that post, Ace. You might have to scale it back a dollop.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at January 19, 2010 01:12 PM (hF8Tn)

35 The leadership can try all they want.  I would suggest they remember how that vote on the 'doctors' fix' went.

Posted by: Methos at January 19, 2010 01:13 PM (Xsi7M)

36 OK, I know this is off topic, but damn, the MacGruber red band movie trailer actually looks funny.
http://2azm.sl.pt

Posted by: CDR M at January 19, 2010 01:13 PM (F9LAD)

37
If the Democrats do this and Obama signs it, the Republicans better not applause Obama at the SOTU.

Republicans should walk out as soon as everyone sits down at the SOTU.

Or perhaps pull their pants down and moon Obama.

Posted by: This is...it doesn't matter, just read it at January 19, 2010 01:15 PM (jVldi)

38

Go Brown, and the Republicans (or somebody!) needs to start considering a plan to stop these dangerous, dangerous people if either the election is stolen or the Dems go with the nuclear option -- these people are giving signals that they would stop at nothing, including and up to a police state, to get what they want.  The more they lose, the more oppressive they will become -- that much is clear.  They need to be voted out asap!

And can there please be a coalition made up in IL to get rid of that awful bastard Durbin?  IL has suffered too many years of his office holding, enough!

Posted by: unknown jane at January 19, 2010 01:15 PM (5/yRG)

39 Ace you know as I know that the democrats are not trying to appease their base...health care is and has always been a strategic move in the pursuit of total control. Economic slavery is just a short step away from pure tyranny.

Posted by: evil libertarian at January 19, 2010 01:17 PM (d/hxi)

40
Beck just played a clip of Nancy Pelosi saying she doesn't care who wins tomorrow, healthcare will go through.  That crazy bitch needs an overdose of botox stat.

Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 19, 2010 01:17 PM (UOM48)

41 37
If the Democrats do this and Obama signs it, the Republicans better not applause Obama at the SOTU.

Republicans should walk out as soon as everyone sits down at the SOTU.

Or perhaps pull their pants down and moon Obama.

If the Dems do this, there's little chance of it being done for the SOTU unless it gets pushed back again.

The first day after the election is Wednesday, January 20, and the SOTU is currently scheduled for January 27.  There's no way they can get the bill through reconciliation within a week and I don't think they have the votes to "ping-pong" the Senate version through the House either.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 19, 2010 01:18 PM (YkEce)

42 I know that all of this crap both pisses off and scares alot of you, as well as it should. However, you need to be a little contrarian at this point and enjoy the show. The Dems are twisting in the wind right now and they are continuing to show the country who they truly are as they attempt to escape their predicament. All of these threats and crazy statements by leaders on the left hurt the WHOLE party down the road. Embrace it, don't fear it.

Posted by: Cheney's Power Mane at January 19, 2010 01:20 PM (qcgPU)

43 I think the Donks are at the point now that it's vital to just get something passed to avoid looking like a pack of completely incompetent assholes. They're all in -- Pelosi is in a safe seat, and Reid is probably doomed no matter what so they really have nothing to lose by ramrodding something through. And they're also liberal true-believers who desperately want to keep Obama's mystique intact for as long as possible; they know that the failure of Obama's signature intiative will probably doom him to lame-duck status barely a year into his first term. They've chained themselves to the mast on this one.

Posted by: Monty at January 19, 2010 01:22 PM (4Pleu)

44 Ace, I lol'ed.

Posted by: RarestRX at January 19, 2010 01:23 PM (rmNST)

45

"Really, how did we lose to these people?"

The media.  And I think this is the nail on the media's coffin too.  May they enjoy Satan's barbed cock.

Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 19, 2010 01:23 PM (U37Ux)

46 geeze, i wish that really were a Cheney. imagine picking any of their brains.

Posted by: willow at January 19, 2010 01:26 PM (7FgWm)

47 The Democratic leadership appears to have forgotten one part of the equation.  HOW MANY DEMOCRATS ARE WILLING TO PISS OFF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND COMMIT POLITICAL SUICIDE?

Posted by: GarandFan at January 19, 2010 01:27 PM (ZQBnQ)

48 Your nuts!

Posted by: Martha Coakley at January 19, 2010 01:28 PM (RykTt)

49 43 -- I'll laugh my ass off the day I see Pelosi jeered and pelted with rotten tomatoes (and going stale whitebait) on the steps of the Capitol.  I want that vile Durbin to suffer every bit of a campaign for reelection in IL -- I want him afraid to face his "constituents" here at home; perhaps pelt him with vitamins.

Posted by: unknown jane at January 19, 2010 01:28 PM (5/yRG)

50 Your You're nuts.  Oops.

Posted by: Martha Coakley at January 19, 2010 01:29 PM (RykTt)

51 Make no mistake - these guys are getting dangerous. As in "state of emergency" dangerous. These tactics call into question what the Dems WONT do to enact their legislation. Without postulating anything too conspiratorially bizarre (martial law!!11!!!11!), be prepared to see the Demotard Congress do some completely batshit parliamentary maneuvers to get Hellcare into law. They will do it, they will step over any line you imagined was legal, short of guns and a coup-d'état.

Posted by: George Orwell at January 19, 2010 01:30 PM (LMfg6)

52 But "reconciliation" is really one of the lower levels of the "Nuclear Option"

They could just vote to suspend the rules on cloture for the remainder of the day .. it would take 51 votes.

But this would be a "limited strike" "Nuclear Option" .. by far, further than anyone in the Senate really wants to go  .. it sets a bad precedent for the future and would most likely cost Reid his job as Majority Leader.

Posted by: Neo at January 19, 2010 01:31 PM (tE8FB)

53

how did we lose to the,. a perfect storm of media lies, bashing reps 24/7 for 7 + years, and this young generation of " properly educated kids" (think ayers group)

Oh and the i'm so cool for voing for this fresh faced  guy and not  the-old-white-dude

Posted by: willow at January 19, 2010 01:31 PM (7FgWm)

54   If the House does pass the Senate bill as is, the whole thing should get tossed by a court. All tax bills have to originate in the House. And this bill is full of new taxes.

Posted by: Waste93 at January 19, 2010 01:32 PM (RwLTZ)

55

Harwich students have exit poll. Great to see the kids involved

As in previous elections, government students at Harwich High School will conduct an exit poll today at the special election for the US Senate seat.

By 11am over 2,000 Harwich voters had cast ballots, and while the numbers from the H.H.S. exot pollers is still being crunched, Coakly has lost by over 10% if Harwich is typical of today's voting state-wide.

More at: www.capecodtoday.com/blogs/

 

Posted by: medulla oblongata at January 19, 2010 01:35 PM (uTmVS)

56 Isn't that kind of a circular firing squad they are planning? Ought to work out fine. What can go wrong?

Posted by: buck ofama at January 19, 2010 01:35 PM (b/O+P)

57

Here's my nuclear option for the Democrats: http://tinypic.com/r/wbfo91/6

 

Posted by: conscious, but incoherent (M) at January 19, 2010 01:35 PM (Vu6sl)

58 I think the Donks are at the point now that it's vital to just get something passed to avoid looking like a pack of completely incompetent assholes.

If only the American public saw this for what it is, but the American public elected the jug-eared numb-skull, so I'm not surprised they don't.

Posted by: rockhead at January 19, 2010 01:37 PM (RykTt)

59 There's a side-effect to reconcilliation: The provisions automatically sunset after 5 years. That would be pretty awesome: The taxes start now, the coverage starts in 2014, and then it all ends in 2016.

Posted by: Topper Harley at January 19, 2010 01:37 PM (xRDFS)

60

seriously why Would they do this? don't they realize people will be angrier than hell and they  will likely lose elections for a good time.

sure they'll always have that devoted 30% of soul wreckers but otherwise?

Posted by: willow at January 19, 2010 01:40 PM (7FgWm)

61 I think the exact quote is "We must hang together or surely we shall all hang separately," at least according to Stuff Jefferson Said, Vol. II

Posted by: Teste at January 19, 2010 01:41 PM (9SKbK)

62 More Here

Posted by: medulla oblongata at January 19, 2010 01:42 PM (uTmVS)

63

I don't think it's so much Left vs. Right - it's two ideologies - either healthcare is a right or it isn't. If it's a right (like Switzerland, Taiwan, Germany, Canada, UK, Japan, etc. have chosen) then the Government should take it over - only problem is that path has proven to be unsustainable - there will never be enough money to give EVERYONE top-quality health care for free (or greatly subsidized).

If healthcare is NOT a right then healthcare should be left up to the private market.

The current system of a mix of private and public (Medicare, Medicaid, WIC, etc.) isn't working well today - healthcare costs are out of control.

But making a bunch of deals with Big Phrma, doctors groups, lawyers (healthcare costs would immediately be reduced with caps and tort reforms), hospital groups, unions, special deals (bribes) for certain Senators, illegal aliens (they'll be included somehow) and endless other special interest groups is the worst possible way to proceed - yet that is what Obama, Pelosi and company are doing - and, big surprise, people are starting to rebel. Also amazing is that the taxes proposed by the Dems (which are likely to be found unconstitutional) kick in right away but benefits won't be provided for many years. All this being done while thousands upon thousands more Americans lose their jobs every month.

Obama, Pelosi and the rest of the Dems have to be the most out of touch and clueless "leaders" this country has ever had.

Posted by: markytom at January 19, 2010 01:49 PM (o0TRr)

64 Except for the whole we-may-get-obliterated-by-terrorists thing, I'm having a moment of happiness that they Won.

This Brown revolution would not have happened under President McCain, and it's going to be much deeper and harder and longer-lasting than any conservative wind that McCain would have blown.

Posted by: arhooley at January 19, 2010 01:51 PM (6GjHP)

65

@5: "Really, how did we lose to these people?"

Because the GOP sucks really, really badly at actually governing.  If the Dems were even minimally competent, the GOP would be done.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at January 19, 2010 01:51 PM (cZtT3)

66

Regarding Dick Durbin in Illinois politics, he is not from Chicago, he's from 'downstate' (anywhere except Chicago, even north of Chicago, can be considered downstate).  Although he is from southern Illinois.  Which makes the folks downstate think that he is somehow on THEIR side against Chicago. (Half the state population is the Chicago metro area, the other half is 'downstate'.)

Plus he is the most bland nothing little pudgy nobody you can imagine.  Talk about your banality of evil.  But that's how he wins, even when he calls our troops the equivalent of the Kyhmer Rouge in Laos, and says they are killers, he comes home and he's Mr. Milquetoast and never gets any negative publicity.  Ever.

Posted by: Boots at January 19, 2010 01:53 PM (06JTY)

67 66 You seddit, Cube.

Posted by: K~Bob at January 19, 2010 02:00 PM (9b6FB)

68 67 (anywhere except Chicago, even north of Chicago, can be considered downstate)

I like that term better than the one the media uses in Michigan. Here, if it's not in the Detroit Metro Area, it's "outstate." Makes it sound like they mean someplace not in the state.

Posted by: K~Bob at January 19, 2010 02:03 PM (9b6FB)

69 60There's a side-effect to reconcilliation: The provisions automatically sunset after 5 years. That would be pretty awesome: The taxes start now, the coverage starts in 2014, and then it all ends in 2016.

Posted by: Topper Harley at January 19, 2010 05:37 PM (xRDFS)


I'm not sure how to search for an authoritative link on that, Topper.  I've heard pundits say it a few times, so I'm sure it must be true.  But I'm betting there's some nasty chicanery that could be worked into the bill to make that difficult.  For example, didn't the Totalitarian Trio (Obama, Reid, Pelosi) try to make the bill un-repealable by requiring a supermajority?

Posted by: K~Bob at January 19, 2010 02:07 PM (9b6FB)

70

Actually it is called "the Byrd Rule" who got it passed to amend the "reconcilliation act".  It limits the uses of the process AND calls for all budget things that are passed using it to sunset after 10 years.

That is why the Bush tax cuts expire after 10 years.

Byrd called for this after Bill Clinton tried to pass the first healthscam using reconcilliation.

They can not use reconcilliation for this bill because ANY senator can raise objections to its use for the bill and it takes 60 votes to settle that call,

 

Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 02:16 PM (QrA9E)

71 If Brown wins, could Biden be the 60Th vote or can the VP only vote to break a tie?

Posted by: Ohio Dan at January 19, 2010 02:30 PM (rurh0)

72 He only gets to vote in the event of a tie.

Posted by: Vic at January 19, 2010 02:37 PM (QrA9E)

73 Nuclear option giveth and nuclear option taketh away.

How many federal agencies will be dismantled in the next ten years if they take this tack?

Posted by: JB at January 19, 2010 02:42 PM (1OoPr)

74

67, Trust me Boots, I know where he is from.  Since the bastard got into office my family has been trying to vote him out (they didn't vote to put him in in the first place).  My hatred for that piece of shit has only intensified over the years -- and yep, every dipshit yellow dog who can only seem to vote for a D rather than for a person votes for him down here, plus the unions (why, I'll never know -- there are hardly any union jobs left down here; there are hardly any jobs period) plus the campus lefties, plus the welfare n'erdowells. 

There are those who see him for what he is, and he could lose -- but he has Chicago behind him, plus a whole lot of stupid down here.  And every time he's up for election he always promises the downstate lots of goodies...you'd think the dumbasses would learn...but they don't -- they could live in Haiti-esque conditions and if that sonofabitch offered to get them 50 jobs in the downstate they'd have his signs all over their yard come election time.

I want to fight that -- and not by myself this time; I'd like a little backup and somebody at least somewhat decent to run against that traitorous ass.  I'm beginning to think that will never happen.

Posted by: unknown jane at January 19, 2010 03:00 PM (5/yRG)

75
they are determined to ram it down our throats

Wrong oriface. And they don't have the decency to use some lube.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at January 19, 2010 03:40 PM (1hM1d)

76 My bad -- I don't know why I was thinking 5 years when it was 10...

Posted by: Topper Harley at January 19, 2010 05:00 PM (xRDFS)

77 Follow your spirit, and upon this charge,
Cry "God for Harry, England, and Saint George!"

Unleash HELL!

Posted by: Beverly at January 19, 2010 07:27 PM (OcwRr)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
110kb generated in CPU 0.0839, elapsed 0.2399 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2152 seconds, 205 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.