July 08, 2010
— Ace Sam Besserman is a liberal teacher's worst nightmare: an eleven year old with a conservative agenda and an appreciation for free speech rights.
My name is Sam Besserman, I'm eleven years old, I live in Beverly Hills, California, and ever since I can remember I have been subjected to political bias in school. The first time I noticed the bias was actually in preschool, where the teacher was reading a book about the importance of mothers and the inferiority of fathers. I tried to tell the teacher that dads might be just as important. The teacher responded in a sing-song, "No, listen to me, I'm the teacher." Of course, the girls loved the book and most of the boys hated it, except for a few who liked it and also wanted to become mothers some day. I was three years old and royally pissed off.I had to listen to such feminist ideas every day, and at times, I actually bought into them. Months later, I still didn't know whether mothers were really more important than fathers. Once I even felt like going into the bathroom and trying to pull off my penis. It wasn't that I wanted to be a woman -- I had just lost my enthusiasm for my embattled gender.
The only male teacher I had might as well have been castrated. His voice was soft, his gestures were feminine, he didn't know how to run a class, and he had to rely on female assistant teachers to control the children. And, of course, the female teachers treated the girls ten times better than the boys and constantly reminded us of our alleged inferiority....
When I switched schools in 2nd grade, I suddenly found myself surrounded by bleeding-heart liberals. We were taught that minorities were victims and therefore good, and members of the majority were, by inference, bad. Similarly, we learned that America was the big, bad exploiter, and the countries my parents grew up believing were evil were not so bad after all. I asked my father about these issues practically every night, and he taught me the meaning of moral relativism. I thought he was being too kind, and I characterized it, instead, as moral inversion.
Moral inversion? This is not your typical 11 year old.
...Once, when I was reading to avoid listening to a yet another guest lecture about man-made global warming -- in which the lecturer told us we should all reduce our consumption of meat to one meal a week -- the teacher took away my book and said, "Listen, she's smart." But according to what we now know about the hockey stick graph, she wasn't that smart after all. My English teacher was no better. She made it completely obvious that she thought those who didn't like Barack Obama needed to see a doctor. She never had anything good to say about America and always exaggerated Native American achievements over those of European colonists. When I tried to express my conservative views, she would say that we didn't have time for that and we should move on. One day she gave us a lecture on stereotyping. I raised my hand and gave an example of a comedian I heard who stereotyped Texans, and she said, "Oh, well, Texas!" as if to make an exception. The principal, who happened to be in the room at the time, quickly told her, "Shhhh!"
...
After all these years, you'd think I'd have given up. My country is undermining itself in its schools. It's teaching boys that they can't even compete with girls. It's teaching those of us who have pride in our country that it is misplaced. It's teaching nonsense and claiming that it's science. But possibly, even more usefully, I think I have struck comedy gold.
When I read about this on Hot Air, didn't get the part about "comedy gold," because his recitation of the facts seemed matter-of-fact and serious.
But now he's giving us a bit of that comedy gold, as he impersonates and mocks his commie-symp teacher.
The great thing about this is that the teacher gets a lot of payback here and there's not a thing, I think, she can do about it.
Posted by: Ace at
08:54 AM
| Comments (156)
Post contains 716 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: Ben at July 08, 2010 08:56 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: joncelli at July 08, 2010 09:01 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: spook at July 08, 2010 09:03 AM (KETCq)
Also, I bet the kid gets mandatory out of school suspension for some type of violation of school rules regarding respect for teachers or impersonation or some such.
Posted by: alexthechick at July 08, 2010 09:04 AM (s5o7b)
Yeah. I wrote Corey Haim a letter when I was 11. I used really big words like "rad".
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at July 08, 2010 09:05 AM (HaYO4)
Maybe, maybe not. Have you seen that 14 yr old kid that was going around with the Tea Party Express giving speeches (his name escapes me)? I saw him several times on CSPAN speaking at think-tanks....including some pretty sophisticated question/answer sessions. He was more coherent and logical than a lot of 40-50 yr old adults. Awesome stuff.
Kids are capable of great things, with the proper education, discipline and supervision.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at July 08, 2010 09:06 AM (P9+0W)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at July 08, 2010 09:06 AM (JSghx)
If I was that kid's father and the teacher threatened his grades and did that kind of shit I would have one of those 20 million dollar jackpot payouts.
That would finance a move and a new career somewhere else.
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 09:06 AM (/jbAw)
I like the young man, Sam I am... Stick it to the brain dead zombie teachers whenever you can. McCarthy was right, you know.
Posted by: maddogg at July 08, 2010 09:07 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at July 08, 2010 09:07 AM (9Cooa)
Once I even felt like going into the bathroom and trying to pull off my penis.
Ahhhh...a moron-to-be
We actually call doing that something else...like "shaking hands with Mr. Happy"
Posted by: beedubya at July 08, 2010 09:07 AM (AnTyA)
That's a pretty effective video. Maybe we should all try our hand at political add making on the interwebs.
Plus:
Sexy Russian spy's twin brother located.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at July 08, 2010 09:07 AM (RkRxq)
LOL. Joke or not, that's some good stuff, there.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at July 08, 2010 09:08 AM (Qp4DT)
Moose and squirrel would be better chairmen than Steele.
Posted by: alexthechick at July 08, 2010 09:10 AM (s5o7b)
It's a bit precocious for an 11-year-old. Somebody's pulling our leg.
If a talented kid gets a decent education, he can do better than writing fart jokes. There are a few gems out there.
Posted by: HoundOfDoom at July 08, 2010 09:11 AM (tQ7IJ)
Ben, you didn't go to a Catholic grade school, did you? We had socialist nuns and I knew at age 11 they were editorializing and not teaching. Just like most of the moms I knew.
no i belive teachers are commies. I don't believe an 11 year old wrote that. That isn't the writing of a 4th or 5th grader. I have never met someone that young who uses proper punctuation for quotes, has a command of adverbs, or make such coherent arguement.
Read that paragraph over again and tell me you know an eleven year old who can write like that.
Posted by: Ben at July 08, 2010 09:11 AM (wuv1c)
Palin should replace Steele, ASAP.
she would be a great RNC head and it would get her out of the race in 2012. I love Sarah, but I don't think she can beat Obama. I believe Chris Matthews when he said the media would do everything they could to destroy her. And as much as i hate the media, they still do have influence with idiots who vote.
Paul Ryan 2012.
Posted by: Ben at July 08, 2010 09:14 AM (wuv1c)
I call official English teacher bullshit.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 09:15 AM (UR3ca)
Cmon. Homeslice said he once considered 'pulling off' his genitalia.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at July 08, 2010 09:15 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 09:16 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: t-bird at July 08, 2010 09:16 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: GulfCoastTider at July 08, 2010 09:16 AM (g23BR)
By eleven I was on my second or third reading of Tolkien, including the Hobbit and the trilogy. I may have even tried to read the Silmarillion by that age. I dunno if I could have written that well at that age, but I see no reason it's impossible for SOMEONE to be able.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at July 08, 2010 09:16 AM (ZJ/un)
Anyway, I don't remember having it anywhere near this bad in school. Thank goodness. For a period of time the whole school would sing the Canadian anthem (and other songs) every morning if I remember correctly. I remember a teacher who debunked nonsense and others who praised the positive aspects of western society. The same first teacher also talked about his travels in Africa and various dictators antics, probably to teach us that the world is a rough neighborhood.
I also remember a couple lessons in multiculturalism but it was more learning about various foods and dress around the world. And maybe there was a book about some Lebanese schoolchildren we read. I don't remember any multiculti nonsense, or, if it did happen, it didn't stick.
Posted by: fb at July 08, 2010 09:17 AM (G60Nl)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 09:19 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Alex at July 08, 2010 09:19 AM (ifK+p)
Myself, when I was 11.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 08, 2010 09:20 AM (M9BNu)
Posted by: maddogg at July 08, 2010 09:20 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 09:20 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 01:19 PM (0GFWk)
Sorry, kiddo, but I've read it twice.
Posted by: maddogg at July 08, 2010 09:21 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Breaking News at July 08, 2010 09:21 AM (+UnQ6)
Why? You want him to become an emotionally stunted, intellectually withered sports fan? Or worse -- an athlete?
Posted by: Rob Crawford at July 08, 2010 09:21 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: joncelli at July 08, 2010 01:01 PM (RD7QR)
Read that paragraph over again and tell me you know an eleven year old who can write like that.
Posted by: Ben at July 08, 2010 01:11 PM (wuv1c)
I wrote and spoke like that at 11. It is possible for kids to be well spoken at a young age. People who doubt this are just an obstacle to overcome.
Posted by: soulpile at July 08, 2010 09:22 AM (afWhQ)
Posted by: Alex at July 08, 2010 09:22 AM (ifK+p)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 08, 2010 09:22 AM (M9BNu)
I read it multiple times before the age of 18.
No, I didn't have a life.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at July 08, 2010 09:22 AM (ZJ/un)
"Re the source of this article. The detractors here are correct. Sorry, but my child attended school with Sam (we are moving out of state this year). Not to diminish any native intelligence, but to my knowledge, Sam has special needs and disciplinary problems and poor academic performance completely unrelated to his political assertions here."
Says he's being puppeted by his parents. Of course "Sam" comes in later to defend himself. I'm not saying that this kid isn't articulate and bright, as he acquitted himself well on Fox and Friends. And I've no doubt he thinks this way. But this is the Balloon Boy of conservative media, people.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 09:23 AM (UR3ca)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 09:23 AM (0GFWk)
Democrats benefit as we become a nation of pussies.
Left-wing democrat communists can suck my big. black. DICK.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at July 08, 2010 09:23 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Mastiff at July 08, 2010 09:24 AM (8dy/N)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 08, 2010 09:24 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 09:24 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Alex at July 08, 2010 09:24 AM (ifK+p)
Posted by: dagny at July 08, 2010 09:24 AM (2idRW)
Posted by: Barry, Highly Articulate and Intelligent at July 08, 2010 09:25 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: The Chap in the Deerstalker Cap at July 08, 2010 09:25 AM (qndXR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 09:25 AM (0GFWk)
"I asked my parents to take me out of the school and put me in our local public school, Beverly Vista Elementary. They agreed since spending money on a private school which didn't teach traditional American values seemed to be a waste of money. Unfortunately, the worst was yet to come."
Ah yes private school. That explains a bunch
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 09:27 AM (0q2P7)
Welcome to the club, Sam. Get ready to have your grades nosedive, be stuck in detention about 3 of 5 days of the week, and your car keyed by teachers in the high school parking lot when you're old enough to drive. But it's still worth it. Reality will always avenge you.
Posted by: societyis2blame at July 08, 2010 09:29 AM (V3HUX)
Posted by: KG at July 08, 2010 09:29 AM (S8TF5)
Posted by: Phinn at July 08, 2010 09:29 AM (cwpfa)
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 08, 2010 09:30 AM (eYgrz)
BTW you too can click through and learn relevant though not pertinent information that answers logical questions about the analysis.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 09:30 AM (0q2P7)
I was in seventh grade when I was 11. I went to math camp with 11 year olds who did calculus.
Man, kids really are being dumbed down these days if y'all are expecting 11 year olds to be in fourth grade still choking on writing complete sentences.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at July 08, 2010 09:33 AM (M9BNu)
Agree. I don't know if Sam's in the same boat, but I read adult books and spoke in perfect geek-english like this when I was in elementary school (Then I discovered beer and weed, of course). It's not par for the course, but certainly not unheard of. And he did go to a private school.
I wouldn't go making more than a one-day story out of him in that public school teacher bias isn't exactly the scoop of the century, but I won't rubbish the kid just because some anonymous commenter at AmThinker claims differently (and the "special needs" cherry on top seems a bit much, don't you think ?)
Posted by: societyis2blame at July 08, 2010 09:34 AM (V3HUX)
"Not to diminish any native intelligence, but to my knowledge, Sam has special needs and disciplinary problems and poor academic performance completely unrelated to his political assertions here."
Doesn't mean he's dumb or that he couldn't have written it. My wife used to teach at a charter school for highly gifted kids (IQ 135 got your kid wait-listed, 140+ was automatic admission) and it was common for them to get new students who bombed out or had disciplinary problems at regular public schools because they were bored out of their skulls. Not surprisingly, their performance and attitude completely changed when they were actually challenged at the charter school. Boy, did the local public school system hate that charter school.
I admit that I am skeptical that this kid wrote this, but I have seen kids who I think could do it.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at July 08, 2010 09:36 AM (JxMoP)
Putting this post up and then seemingly swallowing it, hook, line, and sinker, makes conservatives look like fools.
Posted by: blindside at July 08, 2010 09:37 AM (x7g7t)
Do we know that for true or is it something the teachers dreamed up to attack back with?
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 09:38 AM (/jbAw)
Yep.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at July 08, 2010 09:39 AM (ZJ/un)
Posted by: Brad at July 08, 2010 09:39 AM (2GsJg)
I'm not saying that this kid isn't articulate and bright, as he acquitted himself well on Fox and Friends.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 01:23 PM (UR3ca)
This may be true, but it may also just be Liberal damage control. They are by no means above smearing children, and writing somebody off as "special needs" is the easiest way to diminish his intellect in the eyes of others.
It's rare that an 11 year old would write that way - and who knows how much editing has been done. But I recall having a limited cognizance of political bias in classes by third grade - about 8 years old. By 5th/6th grade it was glaring.
Posted by: Reactionary at July 08, 2010 09:39 AM (xUM1Q)
Do we know that for true or is it something the teachers dreamed up to attack back with?
If the "special needs" was ADHD, then it was likely a label assigned by a teacher.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at July 08, 2010 09:39 AM (ZJ/un)
When I was 13. My 10 year old intends to start it when she finishes LOTR. And there's no reason to believe an 11 year old didn't write that.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at July 08, 2010 09:40 AM (5aa4z)
Anybody else get shown the movie with the exploding prarie dogs, and baby harp seal clubbing, among other things.
First time was in fourth grade, in about 1976. I cried.
Looking back, I was definately being manipulated/trained.
Posted by: Pelvis at July 08, 2010 09:40 AM (LlaBi)
Posted by: Jean at July 08, 2010 09:41 AM (I6dJM)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 08, 2010 09:42 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Cincinnatus at July 08, 2010 09:44 AM (TGmQa)
Posted by: Jean at July 08, 2010 01:41 PM (I6dJM)
That's embarrassing. I used to do the same thing with Khuzdul.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 08, 2010 09:44 AM (eYgrz)
Posted by: Jean at July 08, 2010 01:41 PM (I6dJM)
Geek.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at July 08, 2010 09:44 AM (5aa4z)
"Mark Pienkos." There ought to be a law that candidates have to have names revealing who they really are. To steal Romeo13's thunder, we could have Hypocracy Jones. Raven Lunatic Hatboxer. Korrupshawn Hastings.
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 08, 2010 09:44 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: your winnings, sir at July 08, 2010 09:45 AM (evdj2)
Posted by: Jean at July 08, 2010 01:41 PM (I6dJM)
That's embarrassing. I used to do the same thing with
Khuzdul.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 08, 2010 01:44 PM (eYgrz)
You ought to try sex. It's better than bacon.
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 08, 2010 09:45 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: joeindc44 at July 08, 2010 09:46 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Laura Castellano at July 08, 2010 09:47 AM (fuw6p)
That's what I think happened here-- kid wrote the basis with some heavy adult "editing."
I'm not at all disagreeing with this essay's point, or saying that kids can't write extremely well or notice political indoctrination at a very early age. It's not impossible that an 11 year old wrote this. I hope I'm wrong. But, I'm sorry, unless the kid sits down and cranks out something of a similar caliber for all the world to see without outside help, I'm not buying.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 09:49 AM (UR3ca)
You ought to try sex. It's better than bacon.
Posted by: WalrusRex at July 08, 2010 01:45 PM (xxgag)
Wow! Really! Better than bacon huh? Maybe I will give that a try.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 08, 2010 09:51 AM (eYgrz)
Like I said before, educational bias isn't something so news-worthy that this could rebound to our discredit. This isn't O'Keefe and Giles. I could be wrong, but I'm not going to feel like I have egg on my face if the kid didn't write that statement word-for-word.
Posted by: societyis2blame at July 08, 2010 09:52 AM (V3HUX)
Posted by: Jean at July 08, 2010 09:54 AM (y8mLK)
"A lot of those fancy words and terms pop up pretty regularly in conservative magazines/blogs. Don't be surprised if "put me some knowledge" is also in his vocabulary."
I heard that the F&F producers had to edit out Sam asking Brian if Patty Ann's elbows were just as sharp in real life as they looked on television...
Posted by: reason at July 08, 2010 09:58 AM (kZVsz)
"You ought to try sex. It's better than bacon."
Clearly, you are doing something wrong with your bacon.
Posted by: reason at July 08, 2010 10:00 AM (kZVsz)
He could have Asperger's syndrome (his "special needs" diagnosis), with a talent for writing. Some kids who are extremely intelligent would be a real nightmare for a liberal teacher who is used to having kids who don't question anything that they are being taught, they are just interested in parroting things back.
Kids with Asperger's can't always adjust socially, but they are BRILLIANT in other areas of their lives. The fact that the teacher couldn't tell that the father's paper wasn't the kids tells me one of two things - either the dad was writing all of his papers, or the kid really does write like this. Either one is plausible - the average person is more likely to believe that the dad wrote it because it just doesn't SOUND like what most 11-year-olds write.
Don't know what the truth is, but I'm willing to reserve judgment for now.....
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at July 08, 2010 10:01 AM (Nr9jl)
Posted by: logprof at July 08, 2010 10:03 AM (BP6Z1)
The great thing about this is that the teacher gets a lot of payback here and there's not a thing, I think, she can do about it.
Yeah? Just wait until I "look the other way" when Troy Benderman, the school bully gives him some "extra" attention.
Posted by: Sam Besserman's vindictive teacher at July 08, 2010 10:04 AM (OmoJ6)
Posted by: Schwalbe at July 08, 2010 10:06 AM (UU0OF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 01:19 PM (0GFWk)
Agreed. Those commenters who claim they have are lying.
Posted by: Ed at July 08, 2010 10:06 AM (OmoJ6)
Posted by: fb at July 08, 2010 10:06 AM (G60Nl)
I used to moderate for AT. AT is rife with trolls, extremely smart and deceptive ones in fact; thanks mostly to exposure on talk radio, and the MFM. The moderators try and filter those not participating in intellectually honest arguement. But some sneak through.
The first thing that would make me say wait a sec; is the fact this persons kid went to school with Sam, which means they are from Berkeley. Which is an immediate not to be trusted. But it gets even more subtle.
First of the person posts with a subject pseudonym instead of a handle. Red flag one.
Next.
Sorry, but my child attended school with Sam (we are moving out of state this year).
The important takeaway is the declaration of moving out of state. The person posting knows that they are claiming to live in Berkeley, and knows that immediately hurts their credibility in a conservative forum, so to build their con cred they state "we're moving out"
A real conservative, who was telling the truth, would not assume his/her credibility would be questioned and feel the need to defend it from the get go, they would typically wait for it to be questioned before providing their con-cred.
This boy is being done a grave injustice by his father for puppeting his own views thru his child (not unique to any group)
Note the attempt to maintain a "neutral" tone. A conservative of that belief would have noted that Libbies exploit their children much much more than conservatives, and would have said something like "we should not stoop to that level" rather than pretend to be a sideline observer of the whole debacle.
My ex-professional opinion is that, the content of the comment is "true" (true being very loosely used, rather, believed to be mostly true by the commenter) but the commenter is a liberal who is posting from their own bias.
One last item I just noticed.
"He will succeed if he stops looking for excuses for bad behaviour and performance."
Ever hear some "parent" say that about some other random parents kid, on a public forum, where they are the only one impeaching the kids performance? Or does that sound more like.......a teacher?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 10:07 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at July 08, 2010 01:19 PM (0GFWk)
I have; a couple of times. One of my favorites.
Posted by: baldilocks at July 08, 2010 10:11 AM (CPqLO)
Also note the British spelling.
Didn't the kid's video parody of his pro-Communism "Don'tcha know" teacher include a British accent?
Posted by: Phinn at July 08, 2010 10:13 AM (emFX5)
--Also interesting how "behaviour" was spelled.
Posted by: logprof at July 08, 2010 10:14 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: baldilocks at July 08, 2010 10:16 AM (CPqLO)
More like 10 1/2.
Posted by: Phinn at July 08, 2010 10:19 AM (emFX5)
Posted by: MissTammy at July 08, 2010 10:20 AM (G0eZh)
It's not a matter of just avoiding surface errors. It's the word choice, the syntax, the tone, and the sentence construction that make me highly suspicious.
Kid may or may not be a genius or savant. All I'm saying is... proceed with extreme caution before anointing him the next Buckley.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 10:20 AM (UR3ca)
Posted by: Peter at July 08, 2010 10:22 AM (cSlKk)
Posted by: the Butcher at July 08, 2010 10:24 AM (8g9qq)
How have we come to the point where this thread is about dissecting the kid's prose and not about the ideas expressed?
I'm hoping it's because we all agree and nobody's particularly surprised that this is happening.
Because regardless of the prose, it's a "shocking" and "unprecedented" indictment of Marxist America.
Posted by: Truman North at July 08, 2010 10:24 AM (e8YaH)
Early education was also very different at that time.
I'm hoping it's because we all agree and nobody's particularly surprised that this is happening.
This-- I don't think the topic of the essay is news to anybody.
Posted by: Filly at July 08, 2010 10:27 AM (UR3ca)
What am I supposed to do with all this myrhh then?
Posted by: Waterhouse at July 08, 2010 10:34 AM (SbVxv)
Posted by: gushka at July 08, 2010 10:35 AM (K7SqX)
@Filly (# 113). True, education was very different at the time. And Edwards was educated by his family (including siblings), who were all also highly educated. Plus, he was a genius. My point is only that it's not at all implausible for an 11-year-old to have been able to write this. Hell, I still remember when I was seven and asked my dad, "If God is eternal, then wouldn't that mean He'd have to wait forever before He created us?" and that's when I got introduced into the concepts of the relativity of time, and how time is not itself eternal and all that stuff. So yeah, 11-year-olds can do this, so long as they get taught outside of the public school system.
Posted by: Peter at July 08, 2010 10:36 AM (cSlKk)
Posted by: Sam Besserman Jun 29, 08:13 AM<p>
<p/>
First of all, I'd like to let everyone know I'm not a fabrication. I was just on Fox & Friends and everything I wrote is true. Some people questioned whether I could actually remember preschool. All I can say is that some people are different and can remember longer than others.
<p>
<p/>
It seems that NotSoFastFolks is my principal. He is someone who is obviously upset or, at the very least, embarrassed about what I wrote. As for “special needs,” last year my father asked the school to help make sure I was getting my homework done. It had nothing to do with my native intelligence. I just found that I was learning so much more from historical video games than from social studies, especially with a teacher who clearly had a bias against me. (Ironically, I thank video games for my vocabulary.)
<p>
<p/>
The principal has just been fired from the school and his unresponsiveness may have played a part in that. Why did he need to make inferences about my home life? Not only is my home life dramatic, crazy and fun, the points he is making are all irrelevant.
<p>
<p/>
My column reflects what happened at his so-called “school” and he tried to put the responsibility on me to stop my teacher from politicizing the class. My father asked him to speak to the class himself to tell everyone it was safe place to present their varying points of views, but he refused. My father did not co-write the piece and, for spelling errors, I used spell-check. (Of course it didn't have the word “misandrist” which I learned last year when I was looking for the equivalent word for misogynist to describe my 5th grade teacher.)
<p>
<p/>
I was encouraged to write the piece by a PR man who saw the video I did for Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney. I have also spoken at the Westside Los Angeles Dennis Prager Group and have just been invited to speak to another group. My worst grades were given to me by the most biased teacher. Coincidence? I think not.
<p>
<p/>
One last point --
<p>
<p/>
I had zero disciplinary problems in all of my schools. This is what liberals do when they can't argue! They make ad hominem attacks.
<p>
<p/>
It seems like my column struck a nerve with a lot of people and I hope that the discussion continues.
<p>
<p/>
Thank you for reading it.
Posted by: masher at July 08, 2010 10:37 AM (S2SMB)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 10:41 AM (0q2P7)
Look, I was a national merit scholar, 700+ on the pre'95 SAT verbal, loved english, writing, etc. I read some serious books in junior high including Ayn Rand, Bork's Tempting of America, etc. I'm not the smartest person who ever lived, but I was pretty smart. No eleven year old writes that well. I didn't write quite that well even in high school and got 5 and 5 on AP English Comp and Lit respectively.
The biggest give aways are the perfect punctuation and use of commas, the use of double hyphens to set off parenthetical expressions, and certain word choices like "European colonists" or "moral inversion" or "embattled gender." Come one guys, maybe he made the broad sketch of the ideas, but his parents significantly edited and added to whatever he said or wrote.
When believeing something requries believing in a sig sigma event, assume there's another explanation.
Posted by: Roach at July 08, 2010 10:43 AM (S5SBg)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at July 08, 2010 10:48 AM (1kwr2)
@Roach "When believeing something requries believing in a sig sigma event, assume there's another explanation."
Since your description of your intelligence would put you well into the 99th percentile, then that requires us to believe in a very *rare* event. Therefore, I assume there's another explanation than that you were really that smart. After all, it's much more likely you're lying about all of that (since even idiots can lie) than it is that you were actually in the 99th percentile. Therefore, we must draw hasty conclusions like you do and insist that you're a liar..... :-P
It would be one thing if the claim was that there were a LOT of these kids. But one or two is not out of the question. In fact, we should *expect* there to be *someone* capable of doing this.
Posted by: Peter at July 08, 2010 10:50 AM (cSlKk)
Sorry if some of you supersmart types are not as super smart as you thought.
The kid may in fact be a smarter, better person than you are.
Plus, I heard he has a huge penis.
Posted by: Pelvis at July 08, 2010 10:52 AM (LlaBi)
Posted by: Quint&Jessel, Sea of Azof, Bly, UK at July 08, 2010 10:53 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at July 08, 2010 10:58 AM (em31V)
An apellate court in Connetticut ruled Pratt and Whitney can't move its factory out of state.
If I was P&W I'd burn the factory to the ground.
Posted by: torabora at July 08, 2010 11:02 AM (mFAN+)
Hey, I was reading before I started kindergarten and was starting to read WAR & PEACE when I was in 6th grade; didn't finish it, but i tried! MOstly like to read my dads (USAF) accounts of WWII and strategy / technology books (did you know that the engines on a single XB-70 could generate enough power to provide all of Ireland with its electrical needs? Well, it could! In the 1960's.).
Not all kids today have the IQ of a wrung-out Spongebob Squarepants. Most of them, yes, but not all.
Posted by: Clutch at July 08, 2010 11:03 AM (X67eL)
"I bet people would pay money for video of the reunion, of people arguing with him, and proving he has no real grasp of economics."
Maybe we could get Pete Stark to drop him some knowledge. He's, like, scary-smart about economics.
Posted by: reason at July 08, 2010 11:03 AM (XiVKO)
Yes we could just apply Occum's Razor. That though in any instance is extremely lazy analysis. Their is a reason it remains a razor and not a theorem. It is because, when conducting analysis, no logical merit can be assigned to conclusions reached with the razor. It is a shortcut to better analysis-of-the-unkown tools like Bayesian Belief and should only be used when one hasn't the time to do the more throughough analysis. Apparently we here do, so we should, before reaching an opinion that impugns someone's, especially a possible future ally's, character.
In this case, would it be more logical to assume that this kid who apparently spent a bunch of time in private school would have the same dilapidated understanding of English that we had in public school at the same age? I think not. Logic would tell us all of his academic skills should be better than average, the only question is how much better.
Posted by: MFM at July 08, 2010 11:09 AM (0q2P7)
Directive 10-289.
Posted by: toby928 at July 08, 2010 11:17 AM (4WbTI)
Exactly.
Personally, I was exiled to the library starting at fourth grade. I was "unteachable" and was becoming a "discipline problem" because I was bored. I consumed books. My writing skills, however, lagged somewhat, probably due to my social isolation.
I've known kids like this. Unfortunatly, they usually burn-out early due to the social pressures.
Early OUTLAW! syndrome.
Posted by: Pawn at July 08, 2010 11:19 AM (emF0q)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 11:26 AM (0q2P7)
Oh and about that comment. An experienced writer would have known the reader would have no idea what the hell he was talking about and been more careful to explain the potential for parody and comedy of said teachers manner in the body. He knows it, thinks it's obvious (which it isn't), and proceeds to assume the reader has knowledge they more than likely don't. For those familiar with composition, a closing statement or conclusion, not readily derivable from the body text, is a pretty substantial error.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at July 08, 2010 11:34 AM (0q2P7)
BTW I also went to school with Austin Goolsbee and will see him@ our reunion in august. He was always a fatuous asswipe, even when he was 12. We can see by his work as Obama's economic strategest that he hasn't changed.
Posted by: gushka at July 08, 2010 02:35 PM (K7SqX)
I bet people would pay money for video of the reunion, of people arguing with him, and proving he has no real grasp of economics.
Posted by: buzzion at July 08, 2010 02:51 PM (oVQFe)
the hostess for this reunion is married to a Marine and she intends to seat Austin between MY marine and hers, just for fun. Yes we have discussed that we should sell tickets.Posted by: Gushka at July 08, 2010 11:37 AM (xVlYz)
It's hardly "six sigma" to have your normal gifted kid IQ, as I did and claim above, admittedly without proof. I didn't think it was really that impressive. I would assume a great many bloggers were that smart, as these are people that write and debate for fun--a pretty self-selecting population. Setting that aside, to write better than many journalists and college professors and bloggers and smart adults . . . at 11. Well, compared to the alternative--his parents helped--the latter is many times more believeable.
Posted by: Roach at July 08, 2010 11:44 AM (S5SBg)
Good Lord, I would sure love to see the arguments and justification in that ruling!
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 11:45 AM (/jbAw)
Your message has been rejected because long strings of unbroken text are very annoying. Use the space bar or tinyurl.com as appropriate.
I used HTML as appropriate. I'm glad it threw away my post when it gave me this message. Poor error handling on the part of the web developer. I guess you get what you pay for.
Posted by: teh dave at July 08, 2010 11:46 AM (+2Gjy)
E = mC2 to to the other students plus showing them how to work the energy readout on a slide rule.
The teacher then was not amused.
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 11:49 AM (/jbAw)
My 11 yo daughter and many of her friends write at this level, No shit. She reads a lot, sometimes several books a week, Twilight series, Harry Potter, etc. She Just read "Left for Dead" the other night which is the story of the sinking of the USS Indianapolis. Her mother always pushed the mechanics, I pushed the content by which I mean; I encouraged her to read above her level and to look up words if she didn't know them. In this way and by working together with my wife, she is turning out great. Her Twin brother, on the other hand, well lets just say, he competes with our 6 yo when it comes to reading and writing. But he shows sparks of genius so we still have hope that as long as we keep working with him, something will eventually click.
I can see his parents editing the writing a bit to help out but I would not be surprised if he wrote that himself.
Posted by: Moemo at July 08, 2010 11:50 AM (JDrQ3)
That is Pixy trying to fight the auto-spammers. That is why you see the spambots gloming on to people's posts now.
Posted by: Vic at July 08, 2010 11:51 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: masher at July 08, 2010 11:57 AM (S2SMB)
Posted by: AndrewGurn at July 08, 2010 12:09 PM (plOQz)
My recommendation would be to output the content of the post (minus the html) with the error message. You could copy and paste your post and try again. From the content of the error message it looks more like it gagged on an anchor. I would also guess that from the widespread use of tinyurl on this site. But I'm not sure.
Anyway I think it's certainly possible that a high IQ kid could write that way. But stats tells us that high IQ kids are not the norm. So I agree that it is possible and that skepticism is warranted. But that's not how I said it before.
Posted by: teh dave at July 08, 2010 12:12 PM (+2Gjy)
Pro: I was that smart as a kid, so why couldn't he be, too?
Con: I was an idiot as a kid, so clearly he must be, too.
So far we're at evens.
Posted by: Cameron at July 08, 2010 12:27 PM (N4vxZ)
Dude, I've tutored and taught kids that age. The only difference between Besserman and most other kids when it comes to "mature" sarcasm and wit is that Besserman actually enjoys a large enough vocabulary to express his more fully. He's not a genius - he's just a bit more precocious than most.
Posted by: Cameron at July 08, 2010 12:34 PM (N4vxZ)
Jeeze, people, even for us that's sad.
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at July 08, 2010 12:40 PM (oL8lS)
Posted by: Garbonzo the Garrulous at July 08, 2010 04:40 PM (oL8lS)
His point is not exactly news to anyone here.
Here's another hot tip... them Democrats seem kinda hostile to patriotism.
Posted by: Sharrukin at July 08, 2010 12:51 PM (eYgrz)
Full disclosure: I sure as hell wasn't precocious as a kid. At 11 all I cared about was trying to successfully load "Adventureland" onto Dad's Model I TRS-80.
Memorieeeees . . . through the swiss cheese of my miiiiiiiind . . !
Posted by: Cameron at July 08, 2010 01:02 PM (N4vxZ)
Posted by: Trimegistus at July 08, 2010 02:30 PM (YbH9Y)
I could read and write like this kid when I was 11 as well. Math, not so much.
This kids "behavioral" issues are no doubt due to the fact that he doesn't mimic his teacher's worldview.
In short, I'm saying this kid could absolutely be genuine.
Posted by: GGE, Hall of Fame Moron at July 08, 2010 04:52 PM (QY8Ui)
Its not the writing or the vocabulary or the general content. It's the mature sarcasm and wit that is far beyond what even the most intelligent eleven year old would have that raises my doubts.
My 11 year old wields sarcasm and wit like a rapier. A lot of that depends on the homelife they have, if they are exposed to this sort of intelligence from their parents it's no surprise they develop it early. Maybe you can't believe they are capable of it, but facts exist independently of your ability or willingness to believe in them.
Yes, there are kids who can do this. Don't judge them all by the Xbox zombies you see on the cartoons.
Posted by: GGE, Hall of Fame Moron at July 08, 2010 05:03 PM (QY8Ui)
Posted by: realwest at July 08, 2010 09:08 PM (2qFUO)
Posted by: meep at July 09, 2010 04:08 AM (UhB0V)
Posted by: meep at July 09, 2010 04:10 AM (UhB0V)
Posted by: Milesdei at July 09, 2010 06:03 AM (FS9ko)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1876 seconds, 284 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Ben at July 08, 2010 08:56 AM (wuv1c)