November 20, 2010
— Dave in Texas I don't understand why so many Americans are ignoring this show. It's educational.
Kathleen managed to get one out of three facts right, that'll surely keep their audience riveted. He was the first Secretary of the Treasury. Other than that, as commenter Vic notes, he was a British subject when he came to NY, which was at the time a British colony.
Alexander Hamilton just sent word through my Quija board that "James Madison did the heavy lifting on the Constitution, and also Aaron Burr is still a 'f'n whiny bitch'."
UPDATE: Hamilton adds "Oh. No offense"
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
06:15 AM
| Comments (132)
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 20, 2010 06:41 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at November 20, 2010 06:45 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Dave C at November 20, 2010 06:49 AM (poJjg)
is this from the Onion? I am seriosuly asking this because my wife doesn't believe me when I told her about this.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at November 20, 2010 06:51 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 06:51 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 06:51 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Aaron Burr at November 20, 2010 06:54 AM (1O93r)
His status would not have been anything at all comparable to an "illegal" alien, even if they had had immigration laws at the time.
That is besides the point that he really had little to do with "writing the constitution". He was a delegate from NY and more involved with financial matters.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 06:55 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: eman at November 20, 2010 06:56 AM (72SyE)
Posted by: Elliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 06:56 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer at November 20, 2010 06:58 AM (72SyE)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 20, 2010 06:59 AM (3jxR/)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 20, 2010 07:01 AM (LH6ir)
But where is the fact check on this? (Other than the obvious, Newsbusters, et al) The handful of people watching walk away with a very skewed version of what really happened. And the show, Scrunt/Cock Holster will never issue a correction in next week's show.
Posted by: Dave C at November 20, 2010 07:02 AM (poJjg)
But, over the coming days and months, this lie will be repeated by all sorts of lefty sites--citing to her as the authority (some of the time).
Anyone on our side who corrects a lie--any lie, no matter how outrageous--about the left needs punched in the junk.
Posted by: Jimmuy at November 20, 2010 07:03 AM (ImAna)
Posted by: elliot m at November 20, 2010 07:03 AM (pDWjd)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 07:05 AM (e4sSD)
Wouldn't you have thought that i f a lib wanted to assail illegal-immigrantion opponents, and use the Founders to do it, they'd cite this passage?
"He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands."
That's a much harder one, it seems to me, for originalists to argue around.
Maybe she hasn't read it yet.
Posted by: comatus at November 20, 2010 07:06 AM (hrwMe)
Posted by: comatus at November 20, 2010 11:06 AM (hrwMe)
The problem with that argument, comatus, is that it entirely ignores the fact that most opponents of ILLEGAL immigration have absolutely no problem with - and would be happy to see a large expansion of - LEGAL immigration.
Why this point escapes so many people, heaven only knows.
Posted by: kiltedscotsman5 at November 20, 2010 07:12 AM (2Zl49)
Then they can always say they are centrist type blogs because they use KP as a source too.
Posted by: Dave C at November 20, 2010 07:12 AM (poJjg)
John Jay also wrote some of the Federalist papers and he wasn't even a delegate.
As for Hamilton, working from memory here from a book I read several years ago that was a history of the writing and the meetings, Hamilton was not much more than just another delegate and there mainly because he was a personal friend of George Washington.
Madison was probably the most influential of the delegates after the initial start using the Va Plan which he wrote.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 07:13 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: libra at November 20, 2010 07:13 AM (kd8U8)
It's about the Narrative.
It's all about the Narrative.
Posted by: Dave C at November 20, 2010 07:14 AM (poJjg)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 07:16 AM (e4sSD)
Hey, what do you want for your $40? True love?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 20, 2010 07:17 AM (rgL27)
Posted by: buzzion at November 20, 2010 07:18 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: sexypig at November 20, 2010 07:19 AM (CR4VB)
Posted by: Pulitzer Prize winner, Kathleen Scrunt Parker at November 20, 2010 07:21 AM (UOM48)
She majored in Spanish Literature.
Obviously she did not take and US history at Winter Haven, FL high, another little rich town.
Think she knows Franco is still dead?
Posted by: Kemp at November 20, 2010 07:21 AM (JpFM9)
Posted by: nickless© at November 20, 2010 07:24 AM (MMC8r)
It appears as if she is holding some Spitz wad in her right cheek. She is trying not to spill it on air - a true professional.
Posted by: Hexenkessel at November 20, 2010 07:24 AM (7nyPv)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at November 20, 2010 07:26 AM (0IUXS)
Roman Polanski made a decent flick or two - let's legalize statutory rape, yes, Kathleen?
Phil Spector engineered some cool tunes - let's legalize murder, right, Kathleen, YOU COLOSSALLY STUPID FUCK?
Posted by: Waterhouse at November 20, 2010 07:26 AM (7MVa0)
Posted by: Hexenkessel at November 20, 2010 07:29 AM (7nyPv)
Typical street hustler.
They know enough to pull off their con, that's it. Posted by: eman at November 20, 2010 10:56 AM
Useful idiots are worth the money.
Posted by: CNN brass at November 20, 2010 07:30 AM (QgmBR)
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at November 20, 2010 07:31 AM (PWj+8)
Well, it wasn't rape rape.
Posted by: Whoopi Goldberg at November 20, 2010 07:32 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: GrumpyUnk at November 20, 2010 07:33 AM (NPZEl)
Posted by: Kemp
Top American Party Schools 2010-2011: Princeton Review Rankings
1. University of Georgia
2. Ohio University
3. Penn State
4. West Virginia University
5. University of Mississippi
6. University of Texas at Austin
7. University of Florida
8. University of California – Santa Barbara
9. University of Iowa
10. DePauw University
11. Florida State University
12. University of Wisconsin - Madison
Florida State: The Sorbonne of the Everglades.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 20, 2010 07:35 AM (rgL27)
Posted by: typical liberal dipshit at November 20, 2010 07:35 AM (awinc)
Before he got caught screwing hookers in his socks, the Steamroller wanted to give drivers licenses to illegal immigrants.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at November 20, 2010 07:35 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: buzzion at November 20, 2010 07:38 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at November 20, 2010 07:39 AM (3jxR/)
@25 scotsman, no, I get it; I'm wondering why they don't even mention one of the more problematic policy backgrounds, and go for the cheap shot instead. Mote, beam, etc.: imagine that network defending a Wall Streeter.
But, the complaint in the Declaration was that the Crown imposed too much control (by 1760 lights, treating the Indians too well also). There certainly has been a change in that viewpoint. I don't see it as a problem; a "nuanced thinker" ought to.
Posted by: comatus at November 20, 2010 07:41 AM (hrwMe)
He was the first Secretary of the Treasury
...and Tim Geithner will be the greatest Sec. of Treasury, ever.
Go Orunj!!!
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama - 'Hussein' means stupid. at November 20, 2010 07:42 AM (BMOds)
That is besides the point that he really had little to do with "writing the constitution". He was a delegate from NY and more involved with financial matters.
The Constitution proper, maybe...however he wrote over 2/3 of the Federalist Papers. They had a little something to do with the constitution.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama - 'Hussein' means stupid. at November 20, 2010 07:46 AM (BMOds)
Etymology, the study of the origins of words, is a fun dalliance. For instance, women like Kathy Parker are why the "C-word" was created. True story.
Posted by: ohio at November 20, 2010 07:46 AM (+UJsK)
Posted by: Dick Blumenthal at November 20, 2010 07:49 AM (FcR7P)
The Constitution proper, maybe...however he wrote over 2/3 of the Federalist Papers. They had a little something to do with the constitution.
Posted by: Barack Hussein Obama - 'Hussein' means stupid. at November 20, 2010 11:46 AM (BMOds)
Not really. The Federalist Papers were actually propaganda leaflets designed to alley fears in NY State of the Constitution. The ones written by Hamilton gave "his" interpretation of what the Constitution did and its limitations. They were written and slanted in a manner to influence the NY legislature to vote yes for ratification.
On top of that most of the fears regarding the constitution have been shown to be justified and the "protections" described in those papers have turned out to be illusory.
The anti-federalist papers have turned out to be right on the money.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 07:53 AM (e4sSD)
The only thing they are ever absolutely sure of is that they're right.
Posted by: Lincolntf at November 20, 2010 07:53 AM (Z6Mgb)
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 11:13 AM (e4sSD)
This is not accurate, at all. Hamilton had a much more integral role than you suggest.
Try reading 'Hamilton', by Ron Chernow.
iirc - Jay only wrote three or four of the Federalist Papers.
Posted by: garrett at November 20, 2010 07:53 AM (BMOds)
Try reading 'Hamilton', by Ron Chernow.
iirc - Jay only wrote three or four of the Federalist Papers.
Posted by: garrett at November 20, 2010 11:53 AM (BMOdsDifferent writers have different opinions.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 07:56 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 07:57 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: Moi at November 20, 2010 07:59 AM (Ez4Ql)
You gotta remember: liberal Sacred Text is that ALL European settlement of the Americas as "illegal" because it supposedly violated the laws of the natives. Which is dead wrong, because in fact the local Indians had no sense of property ownership, being enlightened 21st century feminist ecologists trapped in the wrong century and all (sarcasm).
Seriously: there were something like 13,000 Indians living in all Connecticut - a state of 3.2 million today. Most of CT was essentially a vast wild wasteland.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2010 08:00 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: JP at November 20, 2010 08:04 AM (+hVrU)
Well........
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 20, 2010 08:06 AM (rgL27)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:07 AM (JcRgg)
And of course it was nothing but an incredibly long catalog of disasters caused by the white man. One walked away thinking, "Well no WONDER the United States today is nothing but a third world squalid cesspool of poverty and despotism!" Until one realized that it's quite the opposite, for reasons the NGC didn't seem to keen on getting into.
Posted by: CoolCzech at November 20, 2010 08:08 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Minnie Rodent at November 20, 2010 08:08 AM (PZLW0)
Like I said, I don't recall them saying a whole lot about Hamilton other than he was there, he contributed, and he was a personal friend of George Washington. The book I read gave most of the credit to Madison. They credited Washington for keeping the meeting on track.
That is as far as individual credit was given. One of the major points I got out of the book was how much of the actual heavy lifting was done by committee with the full body simply refining the committee's work.
One other thing I got from the book was how very close we came to having no Constitution at all.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 08:11 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:12 AM (JcRgg)
Martha Washington's Vagina had wooden teeth. It was to keep the Red-Coats out.
Actually, it was pretty common back then.
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:14 AM (BMOds)
Posted by: Eliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 08:14 AM (tJjm/)
You will never find anything about history on TV that is even remotely accurate. The worst offender is the History Channel. On those rare occasions when the actually discuss history it is pure liberal propaganda.
I quit watching the history channel years ago.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 08:14 AM (e4sSD)
oh how low my San Diego State University brethren have fallen. Back in my day we'd have printed that list and used it for a rolling paper
Posted by: Frank G at November 20, 2010 08:15 AM (4X0aT)
Ben Frankilin holds the first U.S. Patent for a Fucking Machine. It's based on a 17th Century Apple Press.
Hand to God.
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:15 AM (BMOds)
Alexander Hamilton wrote in 1802: "The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family."
Hamilton further warned that "The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader."
The survival of the American republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon "the preservation of a national spirit and a national character." "To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty."
- Michelle Malkin 7/2/2010
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 20, 2010 08:16 AM (rgL27)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:16 AM (JcRgg)
Well........
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at November 20, 2010 12:06 PM (rgL27)
It must have been for banging her head against a wall wg
Posted by: buzzion at November 20, 2010 08:19 AM (oVQFe)
Joe Biden once told me that Alexander Hamilton is Jamie Lee Curtis' Great, Great, Grand Uncle.
I'm not sure if Sequential Hermaphroditism skips a generation or not, but it's possible that Hamilton had both sex organs.
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:20 AM (BMOds)
I quit watching the history channel years ago.
Posted by: Vic at November 20, 2010 12:14 PM (e4sSD)
Whoever picks the HC's pictures they flash to illustrate their narrative is a total idiot. Half the time they'll show paintings from the Middle Ages when discussing Mesopotamia, images of the wrong King, or show Charlemagne walking through a building clearly built in the 1700's, etc. They even showed the skyline of the wrong city once!
Woe to anyone that relies on their knowledge of History on the History Channel.Posted by: Eliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 08:21 AM (tJjm/)
Posted by: Pulitzer Prize winner, Kathleen Scrunt Parker at November 20, 2010 08:22 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:22 AM (JcRgg)
But if you go into any American street and ask people about this, they act as if the Founders had never even contemplated the possibility of gay marriage. The level of ignorance in America is just astounding. I think I'm going to concentrate on that topic for my next Putzer Award series of columns.
You are so right, Kathy. Can I call you Kathy?...
and what's most amazing is that after these raucous debates, the Founder's would often sleep in shared beds. Not saying they are gay. A lot of straight men experiment with that sort of thing.
Posted by: Eliot 'Sock-Garters' Spitzer at November 20, 2010 08:23 AM (BMOds)
Posted by: Pulitzer Prize winner, Kathleen Scrunt Parker at November 20, 2010 08:25 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: CNN at November 20, 2010 08:25 AM (72SyE)
Posted by: Eliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 08:27 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: eman at November 20, 2010 08:28 AM (72SyE)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at November 20, 2010 08:28 AM (mdxTy)
Hamilton's problem was he could not conceive of a public servant who would place self before dutiful obligation.
Posted by: garrett at November 20, 2010 08:29 AM (BMOds)
I bet that Parker gets to veto any potential conservative to appear on the show. I'm sure she knows who is actually smarter than her and would wipe the floor with her idiocy. Keeping them off is necessary to continuing the lie that she is the conservative voice on the show.
Posted by: buzzion at November 20, 2010 08:32 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: Kathy Parker at November 20, 2010 08:34 AM (BMOds)
Posted by: Elliott Spitz... - I mean Cliente Numero Nuevo at November 20, 2010 08:34 AM (502+o)
Having just exhausted Ron Chernow's tome on Alexander Hamilton, put to rest any notion that Madison was the primary author of the Constitution. Hamilton was instrumental in drafting quite a bit because at the time of the formulation, Madison was already drifting into more of the Republican camp which favored improving the Articles of Confederation by way of strengthening the legislature who would oversea an executive role as against the introduction of a strong Executive which was favored by Hamilton.
Upon adoption and the election of Washington with the selection of Hamilton to Treasury and Jefferson to State, Hamilton ran rough-shod over the Republicans and established the notion of the strong Executive branch managing operations based upon the legislative framework which is why Madison finally split into the Republican camp with Jefferson.
That and the Republicans headed up by Jefferson were in fact quite devoted to aristocratic/autocratic rule rule of fiefdoms (the states) and slave-owning pricks to boot.
The bastard Hamilton realistically noted that some people were in fact better than others and favored more of a responsible meritocracy that allowed the maximum number of people the greatest available freedom.
As such, history as probably told by a) the winners and b) ancestors of dolts like Parker, remembers Jefferson as a generous man of the people and Hamilton as the parsimonious stuck up prick.
Go figure.
Posted by: Shwing N. Richard Duh Turd at November 20, 2010 08:42 AM (77cMq)
I'm irked at her because of how she framed this as a republican vs innocent, virtuous illegal alien.
"This is kind of a classic though, isn't it, really? I mean, you've the college Republican versus the illegal immigrant, and it's kind of a classic clash, you know, that corresponds to this immigration debate we're having in this country. And clearly, when you put a human face on the illegal immigrant, it's a different story. I mean, nobody wants to punish this young 22-year-old."Thanks for that Cathlene.
I agree that nobody wants to punish this young 22-year-old. Which is why I think this guy should get Cathlene's gig.
I mean, everyone has to make sacrifices, right? Why not Cathleen?
Posted by: ed at November 20, 2010 08:44 AM (QLhy5)
Posted by: BuddyPC at November 20, 2010 08:45 AM (N/Bgb)
Posted by: Client Number Nine at November 20, 2010 08:46 AM (502+o)
Posted by: Dan at November 20, 2010 08:47 AM (1jzSs)
did she really claim Alexander Hamilton was an illegal immigrant?
srsly?
god she is dumb
Posted by: chemjeff at November 20, 2010 08:48 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Eliot Spitzer at November 20, 2010 08:49 AM (JcRgg)
Posted by: Wolf Blitzer at November 20, 2010 08:50 AM (72SyE)
Notice that it says promote the general welfare rather than provide the general welfare. Wonder how skanky mcskankleson can twist that, especially now that we have learned that Hamilton wrote it...
Please please please don't begin to even consider teaching us the "real" meaning of domestic tranquility ya stupid fucking cunt.
Posted by: Constitution at November 20, 2010 08:54 AM (Epj2t)
Posted by: Consequences of Columbus at November 20, 2010 09:14 AM (Epj2t)
Yep that's one of the libtard mantras. I'll admit that the North American Aborigines' land was taken, but they also gave tobacco; we're even.
Posted by: Pelayo at November 20, 2010 09:14 AM (V9Q+f)
Hamilton also invented the variable-pitch propeller, which allowed the Wright Brothers to achieve heavier-than-air flight. Being a bit light in the loafers helped them too.
True story - a really nice (and hot) girl broke up with me just because during a visit to the Wright museum, I asked the docent if it was true that the brothers were gay.
Posted by: sherlock at November 20, 2010 09:22 AM (thr9V)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 20, 2010 09:33 AM (V9Q+f)
Posted by: bigred at November 20, 2010 09:41 AM (cX9pO)
These people will say anything to justify getting their housekeepers and gardeners at slave wages, won't they?
Posted by: AmishDude at November 20, 2010 10:01 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Pulitzer Prize winner, Kathleen Scrunt Parker at November 20, 2010 12:22 PM (UOM4
My favorite response to those who tout the intellect of our president: "Yes. I can see why you would think he's smart."
Posted by: AmishDude at November 20, 2010 10:07 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: Pelayo at November 20, 2010 10:09 AM (V9Q+f)
Posted by: csufbomb at November 20, 2010 10:13 AM (I7qCs)
Alex Ham, along with John Jay and Madison, wrote the Federalist Papers
That's high school-level civics / American Govt. Dumb ignorant scrunt
Posted by: SantaRosaStan at November 20, 2010 10:28 AM (UqKQV)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at November 20, 2010 10:45 AM (fxACH)
Let's file her under "once was pretty good looking, but stupid".
Time has moved on as regards her good looks--but stupid is forever.
Posted by: Comanche Voter at November 20, 2010 10:47 AM (3ESDJ)
Regarding the subject of the clip, I am a card-holding member of the CSU Fresno student body, and I'm pissed off to the highest levels of pisstivity that this (person) is ASU President. I don't give a shit if he was brought here by his parents when he was a child, he's still here illegally, and needs to be deported.
Compose yourself please [DiT]
Posted by: Smokey Behr at November 20, 2010 10:58 AM (QyeW7)
Wouldn't you have thought that i f a lib wanted to assail illegal-immigrantion opponents, and use the Founders to do it, they'd cite this passage?
"He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands."
That's a much harder one, it seems to me, for originalists to argue around.
******************************
Not hard at all, given that the argument here (from the Declaration, btw) , was that George III, the sovereign, would not allow immigration sought by the colonies, and obstructed laws passed by the colonies and Parliament to encourage immigration.
That's hardly the situation today. And apparently things had changed when Hamilton wrote against immigration, 26 years later.
Posted by: effinayright at November 20, 2010 12:40 PM (1GJtL)
Posted by: Captain Hate at November 20, 2010 12:55 PM (ccPlf)
Posted by: Damian at November 20, 2010 01:08 PM (a0PWV)
Posted by: Kathleen Bobblehead at November 20, 2010 01:49 PM (swuwV)
Oh please. It isn't even anywhere near the Everglades. I rank higher academically AND as a party school.
You can't spell STFU without FSU.
Posted by: THE University of Florida at November 20, 2010 02:03 PM (DCQ0q)
If the dudes from south park are looking for fresh material - Eliot Spitzer and Kathleen Parker.
Yes. It writes itself.
Posted by: Living in a world I don't understand at November 21, 2010 06:14 AM (UYJ+m)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1809 seconds, 260 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: fozzy at November 20, 2010 06:38 AM (lPLCj)