January 09, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Seems a little early in the day for an open thread, so here's a link dump on the Massachusetts special election.
The number one place to get timely and accurate information on the race is William Jacobson's Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. He's been all over this story from the beginning and is at Brown HQ today. Keep scrolling.
From Ed at Hot Air: "Yesterday, Democrats got so rattled that they began speaking openly of keeping Brown out of the Senate for as long as they could once he wins."
Politico is discussing ways ObamaCare could still pass if Brown wins in ten days. Snowe's name appears.
And here's a news story on the debate between Brown, Coakley, and third-party candidate Joseph Kennedy.
I'm out for a while, so tawk amongst yaselves.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
08:36 AM
| Comments (162)
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: t-bird at January 09, 2010 08:45 AM (jhkYX)
Posted by: Obama/Biden 2012 at January 09, 2010 08:46 AM (GaTkJ)
Gabe is gone so we got this thread all to our moron selves!
How about some top headlines comments?
Or who thinks the Cowboys are gonna kick philthydelphia's sorry ass twice in two weeks?
C'mon -- we need some moron creativity.
Posted by: Tinian at January 09, 2010 08:47 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: t-bird at January 09, 2010 08:48 AM (jhkYX)
And, other than that, I've nothing witty or awesome to add, so I'll let you brilliant morons carry the rest of the conversation. . . ^__^
Posted by: zmalfoy at January 09, 2010 08:49 AM (Vu1tf)
Posted by: Terry at January 09, 2010 08:50 AM (ddL+W)
So if the do by some fluke lose, the MA Democraps plan on ignoring the election as long as they can until they can get the nationilization of healthcare done.
You know they have a hisotry for that. In 1866 they ignored southern elections, through out the southern representatives, appointed new ones at the point of a bayonet, and passed the 14th amendment.
Except the MA folks at that time were called the "radical Republicans".
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 08:53 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 09, 2010 08:54 AM (QEeuq)
What this is telling me is that the Senate version is dead. I thought they would try to ram the Senate version through the House because getting 60 again is dicey. I think Nelson wants any excuse to kill this thing now. Landrieu and Lincoln can't be loving this.
Even libs who would vote for it would rather go back to their states and say that those Wascally Wepublicans foiled us again.
The corruption and cynical way they rammed this through increased the hatred for Democrats we're seeing in the polls (Obama's at -17 on the intensity index and +3 on the abyss index) will grow into white-hot rage, especially as the taxes, etc. come into being.
Also, Coakley's internal polls must be HORRIBLE for them to even be voicing this.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 08:54 AM (Vo2Ef)
Funny thing, a few years before that they almost left the union over states rights.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 09, 2010 08:56 AM (QEeuq)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at January 09, 2010 08:56 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 08:57 AM (LKkE8)
I looked in the link to see if this doofus's party was the commies, chicken-fuckers, or complete dumbasses, but all it said was "independent" Like any member of that disgusting family has ever been a stranger to complete corruption.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 08:58 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at January 09, 2010 08:59 AM (ijjAe)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 08:59 AM (LKkE8)
Posted by: mystry at January 09, 2010 09:01 AM (kmgIE)
Still a rat bastard commie though.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 09, 2010 09:01 AM (QEeuq)
Posted by: Blue Falcon in Boston at January 09, 2010 09:01 AM (ijjAe)
"Yesterday, Democrats got so rattled that they began speaking openly of keeping Brown out of the Senate for as long as they could once he wins."
What? No trunk load of mysterious uncounted ACORN ballots arriving in the middle of the night ?
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:02 AM (t72+4)
Funny thing, a few years before that they almost left the union over states rights.
If you are speaking of the Hartford Convention what they were against was the war of 1812. I'm not sure I would call that a "State's Rights" issue.
BTW, "States Rights" is a poisoned term. I prefer federal limitations as defined in the Consitution.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 09:03 AM (QrA9E)
VIDEO: Scott Brown Interview Last Night With Sean Hannity
+ Poll that shows Brown within 9 points
Posted by: hotairpundit at January 09, 2010 09:05 AM (D2axM)
#22 Is this not good? Anything to siphon away the votes from the Dem's is good. Most Union/Blue Collar people have no ides that the real Kennedy finally went to hell, and is dead.
Posted by: mystry at January 09, 2010 09:06 AM (kmgIE)
What? No trunk load of mysterious uncounted ACORN ballots arriving in the middle of the night ?
That comes before the delays.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 09:06 AM (QrA9E)
Ouch; I sit corrected. It's so hard to imagine a high exposure race in Massaholeits that isn't stained by the presence of one of "those" Kennedys. What do you think is the % of voters that will choose him just because of that mistake? It's gotta help Brown I would think.
btw, why do I not get the formatting options for my posts? Is it the shitty software or my shitty computer?
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 09:06 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 09, 2010 09:07 AM (QEeuq)
If you're worried that he'll unduly influence the party, don't. The Dems will be able to find a better candidate to run against him in 2012.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 09:08 AM (Vo2Ef)
With any luck, that will split the vote between him and Croakley..
Leaving Brown in the race with a good margin.
That would give them an excuse to change the law again and require a run-off.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 09:10 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 09, 2010 09:10 AM (S2NsL)
Depends on what formatting you want to do, I guess.
I see these options, bold, italics, underline, strike, superscript, subscript, color, fill in color, one for hyperlinks, an omega sign, backward, forward, and view/edit source.
Posted by: Deathknyte at January 09, 2010 09:11 AM (QEeuq)
Posted by: Vashta.Nerada at January 09, 2010 09:12 AM (4Tr6l)
Posted by: TC at January 09, 2010 09:15 AM (QXKjZ)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 09:16 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Methos at January 09, 2010 09:17 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 09:18 AM (pZEar)
They will go to any lengths to control your life.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 09, 2010 09:21 AM (DIYmd)
Wasn't there a lot of inbreeding in the Kennedy clan?
That would account for the narrow set eyes, mule teeth and a complete inability to steer anything be it a car, boat or plane.
Posted by: ErikW at January 09, 2010 09:22 AM (F4urd)
Or did Democrats just think their voter fraud wing wouldn't be needed in Massachusetts.
Do Democrats know how to do anything but lie, cheat and steal?
Posted by: bill-tb at January 09, 2010 09:22 AM (y+QfZ)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 09:24 AM (Vo2Ef)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 09, 2010 09:25 AM (6Hbvd)
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 09:27 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 09, 2010 09:30 AM (/x0jk)
"Not long after the Ayatollah Khomeini announced his fatwa against Salman Rushdie, the British novelist suddenly turned up on a Muslim radio station in West London late one night and told his interviewer he'd converted to Islam. Marvelous religion, couldn't be happier, Allahu Akbar and all that.
"And the Ayatollah said hey, that's terrific news, glad to hear it. But we're still gonna kill you."
-----------
I never knew that.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 09:32 AM (Vo2Ef)
"Not long after the Ayatollah Khomeini announced his fatwa against Salman Rushdie, the British novelist suddenly turned up on a Muslim radio station in West London late one night and told his interviewer he'd converted to Islam. Marvelous religion, couldn't be happier, Allahu Akbar and all that.
"And the Ayatollah said hey, that's terrific news, glad to hear it. But we're still gonna kill you."
-----------
I never knew that.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 01:32 PM (Vo2Ef)
Fatwa aside, Rushdie is still a stark raving liberal moonbat loon and evidently a wussy.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:33 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 09:34 AM (LKkE8)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 09, 2010 09:35 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 09:35 AM (Vo2Ef)
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 09:36 AM (Rx5UA)
Brown should have made me his campaign strategist. I would have papered the nation with this:http://tinyurl.com/nervam
Posted by: di butler/murderous bitch at January 09, 2010 09:37 AM (S3xX1)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 09, 2010 09:37 AM (DIYmd)
Discuss.
Posted by: logprof at January 09, 2010 09:37 AM (gJL6J)
After the MA election we can continue crushing the Crists and Mark Kirks (I can dream) of the party.
Posted by: Methos at January 09, 2010 09:38 AM (Xsi7M)
Why are the damn hyperlinks no longer working???
Posted by: di butler/murderous bitch at January 09, 2010 09:38 AM (S3xX1)
Oh, I didn't say it surprises me, Blazer. I think it's par for the course for the pompous-ass self-righteous lefty twit. I just said I didn't know it.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 09, 2010 01:35 PM (Vo2Ef)
I believe I read somewhere once that Rushdie was already a muslim but had gone agnostic during after his college years. If so he didnt really convert as much as just started following again.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:39 AM (t72+4)
I don't know, but maybe they should have searched this guy BEFORE they let him in a room with all those high-value CIA specialists.
Posted by: TakaoDeTrache at January 09, 2010 09:40 AM (p28Ei)
It seems that Chrisoph has inadvertently given you an outstanding nom de cyberplume. Who said he's completely useless?
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 09:40 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: Methos at January 09, 2010 09:41 AM (Xsi7M)
Posted by: zmalfoy at January 09, 2010 12:49 PM (Vu1tf)
Give me your lunch money.
Or not. Jump in. Bacon links are always appropriate. As the new guy, you have to provide the beer, though.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 09:43 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: ford at January 09, 2010 09:43 AM (Ki7fm)
Brown should have made me his campaign strategist. I would have papered the nation with this:http://tinyurl.com/nervam
Posted by: di butler/murderous bitch at January 09, 2010 01:37 PM (S3xX1)
With the 52 percenters, thats worth a lot of votes.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:44 AM (t72+4)
The guy also said bankruptcy is an option in some cases.
He said raising the deductible on some insurance policies would also lower your bills but then most loses would not be covered. A friend had a small scratch on her rental car. They insisted she put in a claim. Yesterday her car insurance was cancelled and she had to scramble to replace it. So maybe it doesn't matter if the deductible is high, but it must matter if you even have a small claim.
Friends have also reported having their lights and water turned off after being late only two weeks with the bill. And apparently iphones are turned off almost immediately when the bill isn't paid and then you have to pay a reconnection fee to get your phone back. The person with the water and light company issues said they waited twenty four hours after he paid them in cash to turn his lights back on and he said that he found out that is legal. In some circumstances 24 hours becomes a long time, especially if you have electric heat like he does.
Also, heat has been turned off and they have 24 hours too. With the "artic blast" that is very scary, particularly for the elderly and people with small children.
Posted by: curious at January 09, 2010 09:45 AM (p302b)
It seems that Chrisoph has inadvertently given you an outstanding nom de cyberplume. Who said he's completely useless?
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 01:40 PM (VGeGl)
O.k., what did I miss ?
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:45 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 01:39 PM (t72+4)
--Well, isn;t "pretending" to avoid getting killed central to taqqiya?
Posted by: logprof at January 09, 2010 09:45 AM (gJL6J)
Speaking of the Harford Convention and treasonous MA politicians, how many school children in MA are currently taught of how the then Gov of senator from MA sent a secret mission to England the USSR to strike a separate peace deal with the British Communists during the war of 1812 Cold War?
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Posted by: Tinian at January 09, 2010 09:46 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: Barbarian at January 09, 2010 01:45 PM (EL+OC)
How old is your Firefox?
Posted by: Roman Polanski at January 09, 2010 09:47 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 09:48 AM (Rx5UA)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 01:45 PM (t72+4)
A couple nights ago Christoph got sand in his vag over a statement di made regarding the palis and called her a "murderous bitch". di, having a real life, went away and did real life things while an online scrum ensued; when she returned and witnessed the carnage she issued a challenge to Christoph on the by-then-dead-thread. By adding the characterization to her moniker, I'd call her the winner by TKO.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 09:50 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 01:48 PM (Rx5UA)
You need to go to University of Illinois at Chicago.
Posted by: Bill Ayers at January 09, 2010 09:51 AM (Vo2Ef)
--Well, isn;t "pretending" to avoid getting killed central to taqqiya?
Posted by: logprof at January 09, 2010 01:45 PM (gJL6J)
He's been under 24 hr surveillance/security provided by the British since he wrote The Satanic Verses. I also believe that I had heard that he had taken up hanging out with Yusef Islam aka Cat Stephens over the last few years so maybe that has something to do with his taking up Islam again.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:51 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 01:45 PM (t72+4)
The post-season.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 01:48 PM (I30wK)
Well played sir. *golf clap*
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:52 AM (t72+4)
The person with the water and light company issues said they waited twenty four hours after he paid them in cash to turn his lights back on and he said that he found out that is legal.
Electricity cut-off varies from State to State because it is normally covered by State law. In my State the utility can not cut off your electricity until you miss the 3rd payment.
Usually they will work with you before cut off if you make some kind of effort as well.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 09:53 AM (QrA9E)
@75
Another thing I've read is that you shouldn't always pay your credit card on time. Let it kind of drift for a couple of months, just paying the minimum.
WTF? I pride myself on Always paying the balance when it is due.
But somehow, somewhere, that screws up my credit score, according to the experts.
Anyone care to explain that to me?
Posted by: HH at January 09, 2010 09:53 AM (1kwr2)
Greatness from any MA republican is a stretch. I'd settle for dimbulbish level of benign inertness.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 09:54 AM (2euWc)
A couple nights ago Christoph got
sand in his vag over a statement di made regarding the palis and called
her a "murderous bitch". di, having a real life, went away and did
real life things while an online scrum ensued; when she returned and
witnessed the carnage she issued a challenge to Christoph on the
by-then-dead-thread. By adding the characterization to her moniker,
I'd call her the winner by TKO.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 01:50 PM (VGeGl)
Christoph is probably still smarting from getting his ass handed to him last week by Jeff Goldstein and Patterico
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:55 AM (t72+4)
Hey. How far is it between Beckley and Richmond? I'll be in that hood last weekend of March.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 09:56 AM (I30wK)
No, this anecdote goes way back. Later in Steyn's article, he notes that Rushdie was on record being embarassed by this thing..
Posted by: Bill Ayers at January 09, 2010 09:57 AM (Vo2Ef)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 09, 2010 09:58 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 09:58 AM (Rx5UA)
Another thing I've read is that you shouldn't always pay your credit card on time. Let it kind of drift for a couple of months, just paying the minimum.
WTF? I pride myself on Always paying the balance when it is due.
But somehow, somewhere, that screws up my credit score, according to the experts.
Anyone care to explain that to me?
Posted by: HH at January 09, 2010 01:53 PM (1kwr2)
We've always prided ourselves on our credit status and paying our credit cards on time along with our other bills and we have always canceled cards and other things after we payed them off to stave off assuaging any debt.
Guess who can't get any credit or loans right now? That would be us.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 09:58 AM (t72+4)
A lot of my friends are saying that you have to really pay your bills on time since they start calling right away. On friend mails in her bills and was told outright that she should pay on the computer. Been having fascinating discussions with friends who play the market who are really interested in this type of information as it may be an indication of trouble with the company. If they were really easy going about late bills and then all of a sudden they are nuts then maybe they are having problems and really do need the money. That would casue certain reactions in my market playing friends.
Posted by: curious at January 09, 2010 09:59 AM (p302b)
Hey. How far is it between Beckley and Richmond? I'll be in that hood last weekend of March.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 01:56 PM (I30wK)
About three hundred miles as the crow flies.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 10:01 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: HH at January 09, 2010 10:01 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 10:02 AM (LKkE8)
(Goes to Youtube)
Posted by: FORGER - Racist Czar at January 09, 2010 10:02 AM (o4Xi+)
I harass health insurance companies on behalf of hospitals. It's like try to screw a mouse's ear to get money out of them now. They are massively cash crunched.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:03 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 02:01 PM (t72+4)
And crow's don't fly in sedans through that terrain. No shit? That far?
I was hoping to make you buy me lunch.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:05 AM (I30wK)
I was hoping to make you buy me lunch.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 02:05 PM (I30wK)
You'll have to settle for some not so kind words and empty condolences when the Bengirls fail to make the Superbowl. : )
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 10:07 AM (t72+4)
Posted by: curious at January 09, 2010 10:08 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 02:07 PM (t72+4)
My brother-in-law is a Stillers fan and lives 6 miles away. I'm used to it. I would like to catch up with you and make fun of you face to face sometime. If you're going to be in Dayton/Cincy let me know.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:10 AM (I30wK)
The Politico:
"Harry Reid is apologizing this morning for casting candidate Barack Obama's light skin and lack of 'Negro dialect' as selling points in his run for president.
"According to the new book 'Game Change,' Reid 'was wowed by Obama's oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama -- a 'light-skinned' African American 'with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,' as he said privately."
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 10:10 AM (VGeGl)
And, let's be honest, if Scott Brown turns out to be Specter-grade awful, his term will end very soon and then MA can go back to electing typical liberal moonbats.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:10 AM (Gk/wA)
Obviously a graduate of the Pete Stark school of economics.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 10:10 AM (2euWc)
My brother-in-law is a Stillers
fan and lives 6 miles away. I'm used to it. I would like to catch up
with you and make fun of you face to face sometime. If you're going to
be in Dayton/Cincy let me know.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 02:10 PM (I30wK)
I have family that lives in the Shadyside area. If I get up that way, I'll give you a holler.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 10:12 AM (t72+4)
Curious, I have never heard of ANY electric company in any State that I have ever lived in who cut off service on a bill that was 7 days overdue.
PS: I have lived in a lot of different States.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 10:12 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 02:12 PM (t72+4)
Word. I'll take you to Waffle House and the local strip joint.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:14 AM (I30wK)
And, let's be honest, if Scott Brown turns out to be Specter-grade awful, his term will end very soon and then MA can go back to electing typical liberal moonbats.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 02:10 PM (Gk/wA)
I'm not really a social con anyway, I'm more of a small government foreign policy type so I can forgive some of the purity flaws. Scott Brown getting elected in Massachusetts would be big.
Posted by: Blazer at January 09, 2010 10:14 AM (t72+4)
Gabe gets drunk and we don't get any NFL Cheerleaders?
This place is going to hell, and you cocksuckers don't give a shit.
We going to lose the "cocksucker" contest and no one cares.
Pussys! Even our trolls suck, shame, shame!
Posted by: Kemp at January 09, 2010 10:15 AM (2+9Yx)
#99-No,but it keeps you in the playing field.After your screw ups are forgiven and your credit limit is raised your score will be raised.Ths is what a fella in the local lounge told me after he asked me to buy him a drink.
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 10:15 AM (Rx5UA)
Hey, Herr, Blazer's not the only Richmond Moron. If you comment on C4P, there's a restaurant cook that would hook you up with some tasty fare, too.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 10:17 AM (LKkE8)
7 Do east coast morons not get internet access until the afternoon or something? Are their Mom's using the computer for online bookclub?
Terry, I think it's an Ewok thing and the phase of the moon or something.
Mostly it valu rite on Friday night, none of these morons know who their moms are.
Posted by: Kemp at January 09, 2010 10:17 AM (2+9Yx)
I agree vic, we all said the same thing to him but he showed one of my friends that his bills were paid and it was only 7 days overdue. I think what I'm pointing out is that if this can happen to him, whatever the reason, then maybe more companies will do stuff like this. He complained to his state commission that regulates them and now has a case number. We will see where this goes. Really, he's an attorney so I think he is going to pursue this to the nth degree cause he can.
Posted by: curious at January 09, 2010 10:19 AM (p302b)
As far as I'm concerned, you get a good credit score by mismanaging your finances. Companies basically want you owing indefinitely, and paying as many penalties as possible so as to maximize profits on you. Your credit rating is a reflection of this. This leads to very destructive behavior that keeps you in debt to these companies. While I'm a firm believer that you should pay back what you owe, and get irritated at all the fraud perpetrated by consumers (Hey, if you're borrowing money you have no intentention of paying back, you're perpetrating fraud. Ask Congress about that) I don't hold the credit card companies blameless, as they're encouraging the kind of behavior that leads to the fraud.
Of course, I despise the idea of owing money, and bust my ass to pay stuff off as quickly as possible (currently debt free; paid off a 5 year car loan in 4 months). If you owe money, you have a master. If I wanted to be a slave, I'd head for Africa.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 10:19 AM (pZEar)
Curious, I have never heard of ANY electric company in any State that I have ever lived in who cut off service on a bill that was 7 days overdue.
PS: I have lived in a lot of different States.
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 02:12 PM (QrA9E)
Yeah that sounds like dogshit to me; unless it was 7 days after a final notice.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 10:20 AM (VGeGl)
Hey, Herr, Blazer's not the only Richmond Moron. If you comment on C4P, there's a restaurant cook that would hook you up with some tasty fare, too.
Posted by: RushBabe at January 09, 2010 02:17 PM (LKkE
Sweet. I'd like to get over to DC and see a buddy of mine and make a trip of the whole thing. Haven't had a chance.
New thread up.
Posted by: Arnold Jackson at January 09, 2010 10:20 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: sexypig at January 09, 2010 10:20 AM (0t7L8)
"This place is going to hell, and you cocksuckers don't give a shit.
We going to lose the "cocksucker" contest and no one cares."
We cannot allow a Cocksucker gap!!!
Posted by: Gen. Buck Turgidson at January 09, 2010 10:21 AM (o4Xi+)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:22 AM (I30wK)
Oh, and apologies for the snotty attitude on credit debt. It's a hot button of mine. And a pet peeve. And it seriously pisses me off.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 10:22 AM (pZEar)
Another thing I've read is that you shouldn't always pay your credit card on time. Let it kind of drift for a couple of months, just paying the minimum.
WTF? I pride myself on Always paying the balance when it is due.
This is nonsense. 30% of your FICO score is your ratio of credit card balance to credit limit. A lower ratio is better. So if your ratio goes up because you only pay the minimum, then your FICO score goes down.Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:24 AM (Gk/wA)
A couple nights ago Christoph got
sand in his vag over a statement di made regarding the palis and called
her a "murderous bitch". di, having a real life, went away and did
real life things while an online scrum ensued; when she returned and
witnessed the carnage she issued a challenge to Christoph on the
by-then-dead-thread. By adding the characterization to her moniker,
I'd call her the winner by TKO.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 01:50 PM (VGeGl)
--That rocks. I saw that addition to her name on the ONT the last couple of nights, but decided to say nothing and not cross someone with that nckname!
Posted by: logprof at January 09, 2010 10:25 AM (gJL6J)
Particularly during winter. Even then, some will install a special meter with a user resettable mini-breaker in it that will trip when more than 5 or 10 amps are pulled. This allows for running basic lights and a furnace.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 10:26 AM (2euWc)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:27 AM (Gk/wA)
So Scott Brown is a bad actor who is a fan of gerbils?
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 09, 2010 10:27 AM (S2NsL)
Yesterday, Democrats got so rattled that they began speaking openly of keeping Brown out of the Senate for as long as they could once he wins.
Good lord, I don't know how anyone of good concience could be a Democrat.
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at January 09, 2010 10:28 AM (eNxMU)
Posted by: smudge at January 09, 2010 10:29 AM (Rx5UA)
Comrade, you are a bad, bad consumer! How are you supposed to fuel the recovery with this sort of counter-revolutionary anti-patriotic attitude?
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 10:29 AM (2euWc)
Cutting off power? I think all states have a minimum 30 day grace period. I know NC does. I think it's 60 days.
Contact your state utilities commission or google the rules. The only utilities that get away with this shit sometimes are the co-ops, supposedly the consumers friend, but usually a bunch of assholes that resell electricity at a mark up and don't pay federal income taxes.
Posted by: Kemp at January 09, 2010 10:30 AM (2+9Yx)
Re: Cautiously...
Of course, at this point in the game and when my Dec./Jan. heat bill comes due, lord knows I may sing a different tune.
(Laughs)
Posted by: HH at January 09, 2010 10:30 AM (1kwr2)
Thanks, chemjeff. I was actually debt free for years before, but due to a couple of years of unemployment in the last decade, I had to borrow for a car. Dumbest thing about it: the bank required me to take out a minimum 8k loan, in spite of me only needing 2k. Hence, the short payoff time.
And I don't think the credit debt thing is some grand conspiracy either. Just an artifact of bad behavior on the part of both parties involved.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 10:32 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 10:33 AM (VGeGl)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 02:29 PM (2euWc)
I'm afraid you're closer to the truth than you mean to be. Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex. Maybe Goldman Sachs was smaller in the 50s.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:34 AM (I30wK)
I would bet that Warren Buffet's FICO score is terrible. His house has been paid off for years, I doubt he has much in the way of credit cards, and his car is probably paid off too.
FICO simply ignores too much to be meaningful. Credit reports don't show brokerage accounts, real estate holdings, rental income, etc.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 10:35 AM (2euWc)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 09, 2010 02:35 PM (2euWc)
The problem is in debt brokerage. If your bank is going to hold the paper, no big deal if they know you. That's why car loans are easy. Mortgages are sold into the market, which means they have to meet certain "standards". That's why you get a 1 page form to borrow 30 grand for a car and you get a full rectal to borrow 30 grand for a house.
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at January 09, 2010 10:40 AM (I30wK)
Posted by: di butler/murderous bitch at January 09, 2010 10:50 AM (S3xX1)
All this kind of begs the question. Those of us who pride ourselves in paying off immediate debts, andf then have a lower credit rating than someone who struggles, or doesn't care, about making payments on time?
What kind of crap is that?
Posted by: HH at January 09, 2010 10:50 AM (1kwr2)
Posted by: Vic at January 09, 2010 10:54 AM (QrA9E)
Then the car loan people are idiots. Sounds like what they did is only look at your FICO score. If you haven't had any open lines of credit for a while, such that all of the closed accounts have drifted off of your credit report, then you get an automatic zero for the 15% of your FICO score which deals with length of credit history (no credit history = no score), and for the 10% of your FICO score whilch deals with types of credit used (no credit = no score). Apparently what they are looking for are all those "credit-worthy" people who have 2 car loans, a mortgage, a HELOC, 8 credit cards and $50K in student loans.
Consider it a blessing in disguise - save up more money and pay cash for a car.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:54 AM (Gk/wA)
I would bet that Warren Buffet's FICO score is zero. Ironic isn't it - because he has no credit score he'd have to put up a deposit in order to get a cell phone, even though he could afford to BUY THE WHOLE GODDAMN COMPANY.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:57 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 10:58 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: di butler/murderous bitch at January 09, 2010 02:50 PM (S3xX1)
You've heard the phrase "take lemons and make lemonade"? You took dumbfuckery and made bloody marys.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 09, 2010 11:02 AM (VGeGl)
Apparently what they are looking for are all those "credit-worthy" people who have 2 car loans, a mortgage, a HELOC, 8 credit cards and $50K in student loans.
These people you describe have a history with raw data that can be fed into the models. As bad as that might be, using what is spit-out of the models to represent a risk that is either acceptable or unacceptable satisfies due diligence without bringing human judgment into the picture.
As you have described, anyone with a clean record is invisible, and the loan officer will need to apply some human judgment as due diligence.
Once a bank allows its loan officers to apply human judgment, they open themselves to accusations of bias and discrimination.
At least half of everything that is wrong in this country is attributable to civil rights overreach.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 11:03 AM (Ce+tv)
I'd call her the winner by TKO.
Yeah, but me and a few others did all the heavy lifting.
Typical women taking all the credit...
Posted by: also known by many names at January 09, 2010 11:07 AM (jVldi)
So long as you are not spending money you cannot immediately repay, it's no worse than conducting your business in cash, and it's better in a lot of ways:
1. No ATM fees
2. No checks to mess with
3. Cash-back or other rewards programs
4. Consumer protection features such as automatic extended return periods or chargebacks against unscrupulous merchants
5. Consolidated statements of all your purchasing activity (online access available through most banks)
And, you are generating the raw data trail needed to satisfy the FICO black box.
I bank with USAA, and they outshine even AmEx for customer service.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 11:10 AM (Ce+tv)
There's always human judgment. Who decides how the different proportions of credit details are weighted in the FICO score? I understand the idea is to minimized biased human judgment. But the problem is the overreliance on the FICO score and other similar brain-dead statistical calculations. If I want manual underwriting for my loan, why should that be such a big deal?
Frankly I blame it on laziness of the lenders. They don't want to do credit checking the correct way, they only want to compare one number to some guideline.
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 11:16 AM (Gk/wA)
BTW. I'm not denying that systemic and systematic racial discrimination ever existed. It may still exist for all I know. The overreach I'm talking about is the idea that reverse discrimination is an acceptable countermeasure.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 11:22 AM (Ce+tv)
Frankly I blame it on laziness of the lenders. They don't want to do credit checking the correct way, they only want to compare one number to some guideline.
Can you think of another way to do it without inviting a righteous mau-mauing from the community agitators?
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 11:26 AM (Ce+tv)
Use the same idea as college admissions. For college, admissions people use a combination of numeric measures (e.g., SAT, ACT scores) and non-numeric measures (e.g., essays, extracurricular activities). In the case of lending, it would be both looking at things like FICO scores, but also manual underwriting, such as actually reading one's credit report. You can set non-numeric standards for lending that aren't biased, such as with college admissions, requiring applicants to have participated in extracurricular activities.
But let's not kid ourselves, there's always going to be human judgment involved, and with that the potential for bias. At some point, we just have to say "the system we have established is good enough, so let's go with that."
Posted by: chemjeff at January 09, 2010 11:34 AM (Gk/wA)
Frankly, lenders are wasting their time with racially neutral lending policies. If the policies result in unbalanced race ratios, they'll have to change those policies regardless of the fact that there's no input for an applicant's race. Equal results is the rule, not equal opportunity.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 11:38 AM (pZEar)
Back in the mid 90's I had three credit cards with a couple of thou on each and no job to pay them. So I ignored them for many, many months. I finally got a job and continued to ignore them as I saved the money to pay them a most of the way off all at once. So I called the first credit card company and told them I wanted to pay like $2,000 of the $2,400 I owe and cancel my card -- and the lady at the other end of the line says "Why do you want to do that? We'll accept $1,000 as the final payment and cancel your account". I was shocked but I immediately understood this lady was helping me out. She was also helping out her employer, of course, who was more than happy to end their relationship with me after the thousands they had already with a 23.5% APR. So I called the other two credit card companies, offered them about 50 cents on the dollar to cancel my accounts and they both agreed.
I thought I'd never get credit again.
Next, a few years later, I had a similar problem with being unable to pay off some graduate student loans. They went into default, collection and eventually garnishment. Just before something really drastic happened (being sent to debtors prison?) I arranged a payment schedule and kept with it. Within a year I had credit card offers out the wazoo. Some were pretty crummy with a high monthly fee, high APR and low credit limit, but since I needed to rebuild my credit I got four new credit cards.
Amazingly, from one of the new credit card companies I found out that I had a credit rating of 750. And that was after I'd defaulted twice on student loans (undergrad and grad), canceled three cards at about 50 cents on the dollar (roughly $3,000 less than what I owed) and let a bill for $90 in medical tests go into collection. So I guess lots of people are even shittier credit risks than me.
I wanted to get the monthly fee on my most expensive card ($14/month, $168/yr with a credit limit of $300) reduced by threatening to have it canceled but they said it was a no-go.They were the first to offer me new credit. The woman I talked to there advised me that I could raise my credit score by never paying more than 33% of the balance for at least one year. I tried it and it didn't work. I guess this credit card company specialized in offering credit to risky lenders by charging a high monthly fee and offering a low credit limit. I always paid on time and never got near my limit but hey canceled my account in less than two years. Maybe they had a flawed business model.
What I've learned from all of this is that credit card companies want to make money on interest. That's why, after making lots of money on me, they were agreeable to canceling my accounts at 50 cents on the dollar. They want you to owe them thousands and keep those payments regular as the interest grows and grows. That's the key to getting a good credit rating. To my way of thinking a good credit rating just means "here's a sucker we can make lots of free money off of".
I now pay my credit card accounts in full every month and I doubt it'll ever help my credit score, but at least if I keep it up I'll never experience that ugly feeling of sitting behind the 8 ball again. Besides -- I like paying at the pump. And if things ever turn really south again I have thousands at my fingertips that I may only have to eventually repay with my credit rating.
Which leads to the declaring bankruptcy discussion. I've never been there an done that, but if you really have to do it, do it. It's a pretty drastic step but it's better than losing everything.
Posted by: Tinian at January 09, 2010 11:51 AM (7+pP9)
No offense, but what you are describing is a more complex version of the same thing.
No matter what you examine to determine creditworthiness, the end result is either lend or don't lend.
The fatal flaw in what you propose is this: "You can set non-numeric standards for lending that aren't biased, such as with college admissions, requiring applicants to have participated in extracurricular activities."
Under the ridiculous legal theory of disparate impact, the lender would bear the burden to prove that any non-numeric standard isn't biased if the pass/fail numbers are worse for any protected class.
Flip this on its head, and picture a lending institution with a bigoted loan officer who hates a particular flavor of people and gets his rocks off by denying loans.
The system we have is good enough. There are many ways to succeed at the game so long as you understand how. You can build an excellent FICO score without going into real debt.
Anyone who wishes to run his life on a hardline "neither a borrower nor lender be" basis needs to understand that it takes years to lay-down a trail in case he changes his mind.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 11:55 AM (Ce+tv)
Frankly, lenders are wasting their time with racially neutral lending policies. If the policies result in unbalanced race ratios, they'll have to change those policies regardless of the fact that there's no input for an applicant's race. Equal results is the rule, not equal opportunity.
If FICO scores could be challenged in the courts because of adverse impact, they would have been.
Instead, the community agitators mau-mau banks, threaten boycotts, and block mergers and sales under provisions of the CRA.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 12:04 PM (Ce+tv)
@163 MikeO
If FICO scores could be challenged in the courts because of adverse impact, they would have been.
Instead, the community agitators mau-mau banks, threaten boycotts, and block mergers and sales under provisions of the CRA.
You say that like you're saying something different from what I said. The results weren't the same, and the lenders changed their policies. That the courts weren't forcing them to is immaterial.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 09, 2010 12:12 PM (pZEar)
You are absolutely right.
This is interesting because you've exposed me to my own bias about the courts. Even though I say they're full of shit, I still unconsciously lend them unwarrented prestige in my head.
Thanks for the wake-up call.
Posted by: MikeO at January 09, 2010 12:19 PM (Ce+tv)
Posted by: fluffy, Masshole at January 09, 2010 12:59 PM (4Kl5M)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CK-HPkz-kK4
After watching that debate, I wouldn't bother to vote at all. Brown is a sate senator who is bragging about his part in writing the law that gave Massachusetts mandatory health insurance. In part 2 of the debate he says he believes that health insurance is a right that everyone is entitled to, and he's proud to have worked with Ted Kennedy in getting Massachusetts the health care system we have now.
The only person in that debate who makes any sense is Kennedy. He's a Libertarian running as an Independent and is no relation to the Kennedy family.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at January 10, 2010 06:06 AM (YjQWV)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6I74aZSA_0
Kennedy is a Ron Paul nut job.
Posted by: Jaynie59 at January 10, 2010 06:21 AM (YjQWV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3279 seconds, 290 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








How will Massachusetts carry on without yet another slobbering Democrat monster elected to the Senate? Oh, the humanity.
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at January 09, 2010 08:41 AM (tm15w)