December 09, 2010
— Ace Allah's confused about what this vote means. So am I.
The fact that the tax question isn't yet resolved is sort of good news, since some Republicans will vote for this amnesty once that issue is out of the way. I'm hoping to run out the clock and get the new real Senators in.
Posted by: Ace at
09:48 AM
| Comments (135)
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 09:50 AM (e4sSD)
We are toast unless we can repeal it past Obama.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 09:52 AM (e4sSD)
What the Republicans should be saying: How can the Democrats say they are concerned about deficits and unemployment when they're doing their damnedest to grant entitlements and benefits to illegal residents.
Posted by: lolsoothsayer has a yule log he wants you to see at December 09, 2010 09:52 AM (uFokq)
Don't worry, under the distraction of the Tax Cuts extension, they'll shove this one right up your ass to reside next to the D'ohbamacare bill. You'll soon have no room in your colon for actual shit........
Posted by: Sponge © at December 09, 2010 09:53 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: AmishDude at December 09, 2010 09:54 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: CAC at December 09, 2010 09:54 AM (lV4Fs)
If the Republicans had any spine their first order of business would be to pass legislation prohibiting the lame ducks from doing anything past the First Tuesday in November of an election until the new session starts.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 09, 2010 09:55 AM (pLTLS)
I think the newly elected are seated January 4th, or thereabouts.
Posted by: Sponge © at December 09, 2010 09:55 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 09, 2010 09:57 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: CAC at December 09, 2010 09:57 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: nevergiveup at December 09, 2010 09:58 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: CAC at December 09, 2010 09:58 AM (lV4Fs)
"The DREAM Act, along with a repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, was incorporated into the National Defense Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year 2011. On September 21, 2010, the Senate filibuster of the bill was maintained in a 56-43 vote; it would have taken 60 votes to stop the filibuster and continue the progress of the bill.
On September 22, 2010, Durbin introduced the bill once again along with Richard Lugar. Only two senators cosponsored the bill and it was defeated again. Less than a month later, on November 16, President Barack Obama and top Democrats pledged to introduce the Dream Act into the House by November 29th.
On December 8, 2010, the DREAM Act passed in the House of Representatives, 216-198. The Senate is expected to vote on the act at a later time, where it is expected to fail."
I'm not saying that it won't pass the Senate this time, but it's history indicates it can be held back.
Posted by: nickless© at December 09, 2010 09:59 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2010 09:59 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at December 09, 2010 09:59 AM (RkRxq)
Allah's confused about a lot of things and one of which should be solved by taking the test provided in the previous thread.
Posted by: Sponge © at December 09, 2010 09:59 AM (UK9cE)
I don't think they can do that. Once an amnesty passes, it's a done deal.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 09, 2010 10:00 AM (jVl+1)
The 3rd, IIRC.
There shouldn't even be "lame duck" sessions. After any Federal election, every Congresscritter should clear the Capitol and no Congressional business should be done (save for a national emergency) until the next Congress is seated.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 09, 2010 10:00 AM (9hSKh)
Well, remember last year when Mitch McConnell's top concern was getting that ObamaCare business over with so everyone could go home for Christmas?
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 09, 2010 10:02 AM (jVl+1)
Posted by: Dan at December 09, 2010 10:02 AM (1jzSs)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:04 AM (8vYJT)
if the Republicans had any spine their first order of business would be to pass legislation prohibiting the lame ducks from doing anything past the First Tuesday in November of an election until the new session starts.
They should at least be prohibited from hearing ethics cases!
Posted by: garrett at December 09, 2010 10:04 AM (rqvQ3)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 09, 2010 10:04 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 09, 2010 02:00 PM (jVl+1)
In this case it may be possible because they will have to go through college or the servcie first, unless they have some already lined up who have completed the requirements.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 10:05 AM (e4sSD)
pass legislation that seats the newly elected Congress in December.
It would take a constitutional amendment to change the start date of congressional terms. (They did it once before, in the '30s, moving the date back to January from March 4.)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at December 09, 2010 10:05 AM (jVl+1)
It's not voted down; it's just set aside (tabled) for now--a parliamentary move.
(I knew that stint as student counsel parliamentarian would eventually pay off.)
Posted by: rdbrewer at December 09, 2010 10:05 AM (6vpA7)
Posted by: Dan at December 09, 2010 10:05 AM (1jzSs)
It'd be easier to put in a Senate rule that 2/3rds of Senators are needed to force a vote during the lame duck session. So, 1/3rds can simply vote that the legislation must be tabled until the new Congress is seated.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 09, 2010 10:05 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 09, 2010 02:04 PM (QxSug)
FTFY
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 10:06 AM (e4sSD)
I just kinda discovered something semi-interesting. I was thinking how funny it would be if the losers in the Berkeley City Council were captured and tortured by Muslims.
Remember those American anti-American activists 'hiking' in Iraq/Iran who were captured and held for spying? Well guess for how many days the two remaining hostages have been held by Iran.
448 Days. That's 4 more days than the 1979-1980 hostages.
Yet it's not newsworthy for some odd reason.
Posted by: lolsoothsayer has a yule log he wants you to see at December 09, 2010 10:07 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: cali grump at December 09, 2010 10:07 AM (hL0k8)
That's exactly what socialism leads to. You can't give something, then, when it fails miserably and you can't fund it anymore, take it away. People will fight to the DEATH for their free shit.
Just look at Black Friday........them bitches go NUTZ and will STAB you for a low price on a PS3.......You make it free? Insanity ensues.
Posted by: Sponge © at December 09, 2010 10:07 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: t-bird at December 09, 2010 10:07 AM (FcR7P)
Seems to me they'd have to hide in the closets, wait for the Repubs to leave town, and then run out to the floor and convene some secret session. But I'm no expert.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:08 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: Dan at December 09, 2010 02:02 PM (1jzSs)
You know what it's really about: whether or not you are mean to Hispanics. That's it. That's the way they frame this and DADT and any other legislation.
Hispanics aren't in large numbers all that crazy about amnesty, but they perceive people who are anti-amnesty as being anti-Hispanic.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 09, 2010 10:08 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: joeindc44 at December 09, 2010 10:09 AM (QxSug)
Posted by: Dan at December 09, 2010 02:05 PM
No, silly, you feed el crocodil so he'll be nice to you, and then when he's all huge and strong and hungry again and you're the only one left, you, um, don't get eaten. See?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:11 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: Rocks at December 09, 2010 10:11 AM (Q1lie)
2010 - Democrats - Fuck you ....we will do as we please.
November 2010 - The People - No.... fuck you .... you're outta there......
December 2010- Democrats - **entending a high held middle finger ** Bwahahahahahahahaa....... Fuck YOU back atcha.......
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2010 10:11 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: Democrat at December 09, 2010 10:12 AM (rqvQ3)
Posted by: Tightie Rightie at December 09, 2010 10:12 AM (STILJ)
Oh cool! Retroactive!
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:13 AM (8vYJT)
I figure that the Democratic House Caucus is now almost purged of any moderates or anyone facing any kind of real challenge from the right.
Guys like Ben Chandler (KY-6) and Heath Shuler must be shitting bricks.
Posted by: lolsoothsayer has a yule log he wants you to see at December 09, 2010 10:13 AM (uFokq)
DREAM and anything that resembles DREAM in terms of amnesty are proof positive pieces of legislation that demonstrably show that there are no Democrats anymore. They've been hijacked by the nutterbutter regressives that seek only to destroy this country.
Look at how AZ SB 1070 polled. Nearly 3/4 of Americans supported even the most controversial provisions yet these assholes think it's their life mission to see to it that little Pinto Bean lives the 'American dream' on the taxpayers dime.
It's not being tone-deaf. It's about being a bunch of miserable anti-American raging psychotics.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 09, 2010 10:14 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:15 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: dagny at December 09, 2010 10:15 AM (Je6fj)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 09, 2010 10:15 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 09, 2010 10:16 AM (eOXTH)
We want Pelosi/Rangel/Waters/Weiner/Frank to be the face of the party.
Hu-Huh.
You said, "Weiner"...
Posted by: Butt-Head at December 09, 2010 10:16 AM (rqvQ3)
No... not psychotic. There's a method to their madness.
How the hell as dedicated leftists do you overcome an electorate that is center right???
Manufacture more voting leftists.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2010 10:17 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: Tightie Rightie at December 09, 2010 10:18 AM (STILJ)
-- impeached federal judge and demoncrat representative Alcee Hastings
Thanks for quoting that fuckbag. Now I've got to go shit this marvelous lunch I just ate........bastard.
Posted by: Sponge © at December 09, 2010 10:20 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: dagny at December 09, 2010 10:20 AM (Je6fj)
Posted by: CAC at December 09, 2010 10:21 AM (lV4Fs)
Ace, some very serious shit going on in the senate on the Dream Act.
More analysis needs to be provided on the political machinations going on here. If this sucker doesn't get filibustered the dream will be.
Consider the fact a massive budget was passed in the house yesterday and it includes the bush tax stuff. And the same budget bill is now in the senate.
Once a budget is passed than "reconcilliation" can be invoked blocking a filibuster.
I don't feel good about this at all.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 10:21 AM (LwLqV)
This is a much bigger fuckover than ObamaScare, and that was the biggest fuckover most of us could imagine. DREAM Act means Demorats in the executive branch for whatever future this country has left. Ah well.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 09, 2010 10:23 AM (FJQtI)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 09, 2010 10:23 AM (b75eT)
impeached federal judge and demoncrat representative Alcee Hastings
...and Congressional Black Caucus member. We will not be marginalized!
Posted by: Congressional Black Caucus at December 09, 2010 10:23 AM (rqvQ3)
A Democrat Party purged of any moderate members is exactly what we want. We want Pelosi/Rangel/Waters/Weiner/Frank to be the face of the party. Weiner and Frank in the same sentance. HUM
Posted by: Buffalobob at December 09, 2010 10:24 AM (GwH6h)
Reconciliation of what? Blocking a filibuster of all subsequent legislation?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:24 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: dagny at December 09, 2010 10:25 AM (Je6fj)
Folks, don't be fooled by the dems. I can't remember how many people told me that Obamacare would never, ever pass.
When ominbus bills are wound up with all kinds of stuff including things such as the SOS tax cuts, the votes are there.
Then the Dream Act will be introduced with a rule limiting debate and preventing a filibuster.
Just wait my fellow morons. These dem bastards have a trick up their sleeves.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 10:25 AM (LwLqV)
Posted by: dagny at December 09, 2010 10:25 AM (Je6fj)
How the hell as dedicated leftists do you overcome an electorate that is center right???
Manufacture more voting leftists.
Indeed. And this genie will never be put back into the bottle. Remember that these guys will gladly put our way of life on the chopping block for even the promise of more political power. Passing Amnesty, or even Amnesty-light, is the culmination of at least 50 years of effort undertaken by the Dems to change the political landscape by co-opting minority groups and making them near-slaves politically to the Democrat party.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 09, 2010 10:26 AM (9hSKh)
Do we have to melt the phones and faxes in D.C. again?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:26 AM (8vYJT)
How in fuck do they do this?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:28 AM (8vYJT)
Do we have to melt the phones and faxes in D.C. again?
It didn't do any good then. They do what ever the hell they want and what they want is power.
Posted by: jewells45 at December 09, 2010 10:29 AM (l/N7H)
How in fuck do they do this?
journolist hit the nail on the head. The dont need a new rule. They'll use budget reconciliation.
Posted by: fixerupper at December 09, 2010 10:30 AM (J5Hcw)
Posted by: dagny at December 09, 2010 10:30 AM (Je6fj)
Do eet for thee cheeldren!
Posted by: road median based produce salesman at December 09, 2010 10:32 AM (rqvQ3)
We can, but that would do us no good. Since the election is over, the lib-tards have literally nothing else to lose. A DREAM Act victory will forever change the political landscape by adding potentially 10-20 million more Dem voters. Political corpses can't feel any more pain.
/In the end, there will be only chaos.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 09, 2010 10:33 AM (9hSKh)
I am not saying I'm right on the Dream Act machinations but I really have a pit in my stomach just like last year with the Obamacare bull shit.
I'm calling into my contacts in D.C. right now and for those who have time, I would encourange you to do the same because something is smelling rotten in the fricking state of DCmark right now.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 10:35 AM (LwLqV)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at December 09, 2010 10:37 AM (b75eT)
Do we have to melt the phones and faxes in D.C. again?
There is no hope of repealing Odeathcare while O-America hating- dumbo is there. He has to sign a repeal bill.
And, yes, melt the phones.
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 10:38 AM (HqFeB)
Posted by: Flammenwerfer at December 09, 2010 10:42 AM (FIDMq)
That I'm aware of. I was referring to 2013. But the DREAM Act would nullify all conservative votes going forward.
Or, let me do some math here. The Act passes, the illegals must serve two years in the military or go to college for two years. That wouldn't be enough time for them to vote in 2012, I don't think.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:43 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 10:44 AM (HqFeB)
Unless they retroactively count "time served" as part of the 2 year requirement. If so, there will be plenty of illegals ready to negate our votes by 2012. ACORN and other such groups will make sure of that.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 09, 2010 10:46 AM (9hSKh)
do you sometimes get the feeling that the Dems envy the euro-bureaucrats in Brussels? The eurocrats issue the rules and the european parliments just vote to approve them?
do you sometimes get the feeling that the Dems would like to bankrupt the country so they can tell us that our only salvation is to cede some of our sovreignty to a more international sort of gov't?
do you sometimes think that the Dems aren't worried about feeding everyone else to the crocodile because the croc probably knows that most Dems are full of crap and therefore aren't really worth eating?
oh, and go read what Goldstein wrote at Protein Wisdom about Card Check through the side door: real modern fascism, labor & mgmt & gov't working hand in hand and the rest of us get f---ed.
Posted by: mallfly at December 09, 2010 10:47 AM (bJm7W)
And, depending on that choice, their voter affiliation would be determined. Since so many of them are truly illiterate, how many could pass college courses? oh, nevermind,....(thinks of collegiate athletes... most of them couldn't put a sentence together, even with a program...)
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 10:48 AM (HqFeB)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 02:43 PM (8vYJT)
Umm, I see lawsuits and disenfranchised citizens being in the headlines - their votes will count.
Posted by: Flammenwerfer at December 09, 2010 10:49 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Megaton McCain at December 09, 2010 10:49 AM (FLRN3)
This is the real reason The One caved on tax cuts.
Some Republicans who want this have made tax cuts a precondition.
For the Democrats, the DREAM act is infinitely more important than tax cuts.
Tax cuts can be repealed.
Posted by: RayJ at December 09, 2010 10:50 AM (2oRAd)
The irony of that precedential wannabe's campaign rant about 2 America's still boggles the mind. Where in hell do they dig up this trash to elevate to the nation's highest office? I know they out-sourced last presidential cycle; but, how can Americans be so effing IGNORANT????
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 10:54 AM (HqFeB)
Yeah, I mentioned retroactivity above. Gee, I wonder if any Repubs have looked for something like that in the Act?
And, depending on that choice, their voter affiliation would be determined. Since so many of them are truly illiterate, how many could pass college courses? oh, nevermind,....(thinks of collegiate athletes... most of them couldn't put a sentence together, even with a program...)
As it is, the military turns away huge numbers of applicants based on educational and physical shortcomings. Illegals would fail in even more massive numbers (unless they get waivers for those requirements, and of course I wouldn't count that out), forcing them into the college option, and I guarantee there will be special "Amnesty" programs consisting of self-esteem classes and leftist Hispanic Studies crap that will satisfy the educational requirement. Attendance optional, show us your tats or colors for extra credit.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:55 AM (8vYJT)
From a parliamentary procedure perspective....
"Tableing" is a good thing to do to stuff that you hate, and a lousyt thing to have done to something you like.
It takes a simple majority vote to "table" something.
It takes a 2/3 majority to get it off the table (according to Robert's Rules....Senate Rules may vary slightly).
So, essentially, it functionally takes a cloture style vote to get this turd back off the "table" for discussion. Then it will take an additional cloture vote to bring it to a vote....
And, thus, it dies with this Congress.
It is as dead as this past Thanksgiving's turkey!
Posted by: Paul Bunyan at December 09, 2010 10:55 AM (nd0uY)
I'm amazed that anyone who wants tax cuts would also want this.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:56 AM (8vYJT)
If McNasty Thumbintheye votes against it Grahamnasty will vote against it as well.
However it will only take two if the do it during lame duck and ALL the Dems vote for it.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 10:56 AM (e4sSD)
Keep in mind that a lot of the RINOs who supported amnesty originally are the same ones who are responsible for the "tax cuts" to be temporary anyway.
Posted by: Vic at December 09, 2010 10:57 AM (e4sSD)
You're giving me hope. But then, why did they table it? Because they know they don't have the votes and they want to be able to claim they tried their best?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 10:58 AM (8vYJT)
And, thus, it dies with this Congress.
Except there's reportedly four different versions of the bill. And they're going to vote on the House "version" next week. Here come the buyoffs... there goes the Republic. Wheeeeeeeeeee...
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 09, 2010 11:01 AM (FJQtI)
You're giving me hope. But then, why did they table it? Because they know they don't have the votes and they want to be able to claim they tried their best?
So they don't have to be on record for a substantive vote, later.
And, I agree, tabling it is a good move to let it flounder until some later time when the RINOS have to compromise over something else.. like Odeathcare changes.
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 11:02 AM (HqFeB)
Pick your favorite Senator and give 'em a call. No unanimous consent until 2011. Not for someone's birthday, or renaming a post office, or reading yesterday's minutes, or ANYTHING.
Posted by: cthulhu at December 09, 2010 11:04 AM (kaalw)
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 11:04 AM (HqFeB)
They evidently have quite a bit of faith in RINOs caving in the 112th Congress. So fuck it. In 2013 we nuke ALL this administration's leftist legislation out of orbit, just to make sure.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 11:05 AM (8vYJT)
And, thus, it dies with this Congress.
It is as dead as this past Thanksgiving's turkey!
Posted by: Paul Bunyan at December 09, 2010 02:55 PM (nd0uY)
Yeah, I remember people saying that about deathcare. It isn't dead until strangled, shot, and it's head cut off, then bombed into oblivion by TNT.
Never trust the fuckheads in DC to do the right thing.
Posted by: Steph at December 09, 2010 11:05 AM (kOSds)
And if that doesn't work I'll bog everything down by reading the entire text of the bill! Just watch!
Posted by: Tom Coburn at December 09, 2010 11:06 AM (jVl+1)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 09, 2010 02:46 PM (9hSKh)
The GOP critters who are against this have said that fake GED websites are proliferating all over the web at the news. There doesn't even have to be proof of a college course load. What illegal is going to do two years in the service when they could pretend to be going to college? The fraud will be rampant, and you can count on the socialists to speed up the process and be ever so helpful.
Posted by: RushBabe at December 09, 2010 11:07 AM (a3Z62)
Reid's Hispanic spokesperson said that they will be taking up the House's version of the dream act during THIS session.
The Dream Act that was tabled isn't the house version and was a test vote.
The Dream Act ain't dead folks.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 11:09 AM (LwLqV)
Posted by: Tom Coburn at December 09, 2010 03:06 PM (jVl+1)
Yep, it's not as effective as having an actual majority -- but it cuts down the mischief quite a bit. You wouldn't necessarily kill the DREAM act, or card check, or a 12-month continuing resolution in lieu of a budget, or any other stupid nonsense.....but it'd focus them on just one.
Posted by: cthulhu at December 09, 2010 11:11 AM (kaalw)
Educational hoaxes are popular and easy. I knew people who used fake Mandarin study as a means to work illegally in Taiwan -- just pay for the courses and never show up. The schools that offered the hoax were well known.
Then we arrive in the States, where ICE is regularly several years behind in checking up on foreign students. A guy who ran a language institute told me ICE used to show up to check on students' attendance/residence 2-3 years after they'd signed up for a six-week course.
I can't wait for the cries of RAYYY-cism when employers or AGs go to investigate those GEDs.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 11:12 AM (8vYJT)
Posted by: mallfly at December 09, 2010 11:14 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian
We have some news. Their ballots? Already printed, completed and serving time in the trunk.
Posted by: Don't care who does the votin, so long as I get to do the registering at December 09, 2010 11:14 AM (R2fpr)
Reid's Hispanic spokesperson said that they will be taking up the House's version of the dream act during THIS session.
The Dream Act that was tabled isn't the house version and was a test vote.
Oh, lovely. What's in the House version? Retroactivity?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 11:15 AM (8vYJT)
I just called Richard Burr's office and told them that he better do whatever it takes...strong-arming, intimidation, blackmail, if he has to, to make sure this damn bill does not pass. Told them I was already pissed as hell about his stupid co-sponsorship of the dumbass farm bill, and that they better hope I don't live another 6 years, if this bill goes through, because I will do what it takes to boot his ass out of office, and I don't forget shit easily. I was a little more diplomatic than that, but the strong-arming, intimidation & blackmail part I said. I said the other, too, but at least I didn't cuss even though I wanted to tell him what a complete shithead I think he is
I wasn't happy about putting his ass back in office this go around, because of some of the other crap he has voted on, but I did it anyway, against my better judgement, to be sure we had an 'R' in that seat. Told them that, too.
I'm serious. I think I'm more pissed, now, than I was before the election. Those bastards better come through, and kill this fucking bill dead.
Posted by: Steph at December 09, 2010 11:18 AM (kOSds)
Posted by: Flapjackmaka at December 09, 2010 11:22 AM (c5RQr)
My fear is the Dems will combine Reid's Senate version of the Dream Act with the Budget bill that passed the House yesterday afternoon.
Now that we have a budget passed in the house it moves on to the senate.
Reid forced a calculated vote on the Dream Act to allow cover for members voting against it as a stand alone bill.
If the Dream Act is combined with the Budget then the Bush Tax Rates, Reduction in SOS Taxes and Unemployment extension stuff will also become automatically combined into one big bill.
Then the Dems who may have voted No on the earlier Senate Dream Act will have cover to vote yes on a bill that includes it because it will contain the tax cuts for the middle class, unemployment extensions and payroll tax reductions.
And as far as filibusters are concerned an omibus budget bill inclusive of the dream act, the Reconcilliation Rule will be allowed. Effectively requiring only 51 senators to stop a filibuster.
We are being played.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 11:26 AM (LwLqV)
Is there any way to stop that? Or is that what the majority can do?
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 11:28 AM (8vYJT)
Melt the phones. Demand the demDream Act and Tax bill remain stand alone bills. Remind the guys up for re election, WE WILL REMEMBER. Taking names and retiring stupid fuckwits is a new American pasttime.
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 11:30 AM (HqFeB)
Posted by: LurkerinaNightmare at December 09, 2010 11:31 AM (HqFeB)
Oh, and for all of you Mike Castle supporters out there?
Guess who just voted for the Dream Act in the House? Yep, Mike Castle - he was one of 8 Republicans who voted for it.
So the shoulda woulda coulda from the Great State of Delaware that would have been a more "prudent" candidate of choice for U.S. Senate vs. Christine O'Donnell voted in the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday in favor of the Dream Act.
Nice.
Posted by: journolist at December 09, 2010 11:33 AM (LwLqV)
Oh, and for all of you Mike Castle supporters out there?
Guess who just voted for the Dream Act in the House? Yep, Mike Castle - he was one of 8 Republicans who voted for it.
So the shoulda woulda coulda from the Great State of Delaware that would have been a more "prudent" candidate of choice for U.S. Senate vs. Christine O'Donnell voted in the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday in favor of the Dream Act.
Nice.
Posted by: journolist
I hate my state. And I was one of the idiots saying that Castle was the guy who was going to win it all. Consider all of my comments with that fact in mind
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 09, 2010 11:38 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 09, 2010 03:38 PM (R2fpr)
I hate your state, too. In fact, fuck your state with a sideways Oklahoma.
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent at December 09, 2010 11:46 AM (FJQtI)
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 09, 2010 03:38 PM (R2fpr)
I hate your state, too. In fact, fuck your state with a sideways Oklahoma.
Posted by: The Mega Indepedent
I would ask for refugee status, but the test scares me.
Posted by: Blue Hen at December 09, 2010 11:49 AM (R2fpr)
I thought the rule in the Senate was that "reconciliation" can only be used once per year. Meaning they could not use it again until 2011 and the next congress.
Posted by: turtle at December 09, 2010 12:09 PM (lHn6+)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 12:14 PM (1ReYi)
Posted by: Geronimo at December 09, 2010 12:25 PM (sA76j)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 12:28 PM (1ReYi)
I'm not LOLing. My sister just called Boxer and screamed into the phone. Feinstein's office was busy. I'm calling now.
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 12:39 PM (1ReYi)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 02:55 PM
******************
Not to worry, the Dims have taken care of that. The DREAM Act gives unlimited power to the Secretary of Homeland Security to grant illegal alien amnesty applicants "hardship" and "family unity" waivers if the illegals claim they can't comply with the Act's requirements.
So any illegal who is too stupid to manage to stay enrolled in a community college (for 2 years) or a trade school (for one year) -- which is all the Act requires; no need to actually graduate, or to get satisfactory grades, all the illegal has to do is be enrolled (at U.S. taxpayer expense) and they qualify for amnesty-- can apply for a "hardship" or a "family unity" exemption, and JaNap can wave her magic wand and presto, the illegal gets amnesty, even though he/she has never stepped foot in a school, won't join the military, has a criminal record, doesn't have a job, etc.
But hey, don't worry! Giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens (and unlimited chain migration rights to many more millions of their family members) is going to reduce the U.S. deficit by bilions of dollars. The CBO says so! And we know they'd never lie to us!
Posted by: AZC at December 09, 2010 01:09 PM (P/M3M)
Posted by: mallfly at December 09, 2010 01:16 PM (bJm7W)
Yeah, I already found it all (posted above and sent hysterical e-mails to Rush, Powerline, my Senators, etc.)
Posted by: arhooley, conflicted Californian at December 09, 2010 01:37 PM (1ReYi)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2388 seconds, 263 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








I don't get it.
Posted by: lolsoothsayer has a yule log he wants you to see at December 09, 2010 09:49 AM (uFokq)