Ace of Spades HQ

October 19, 2010

Shots Fired At Pentagon?
— Ace

Shots were fired at the Pentagon early Tuesday, authorities said, striking a window of the building.
Pentagon police spokesman Chris Layman said it's not known who fired the shots. Pentagon police officers heard at least five shots around 4:50 a.m., Layman added.
According to another Pentagon Force Protection Agency spokesman, Terry Sutherland, two bullets hit the Pentagon on the south side of the building -- one striking a window and the other hitting the building itself. This is an unoccupied part of the building that is being renovated.

Most of the time these things aren't terrorism. But, on the other hand, who thinks it's a good idea to shoot at the Pentagon? You would think a conventional criminal, or some guy obsessed with a girl that let him down, would realize there are probably softer targets than the headquarters of the United States Armed Forces.

If it is a terrorist, he's one of those Lone Wolf types, and a disorganized personality type (thank God). Because he's trying to murder a building.

Posted by: Ace at 07:16 AM | Comments (95)
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.

1 MFM: Probably a disgruntled Tea Partier.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:17 AM (UOM48)

2 You would think a conventional criminal, or some guy obsessed with a girl that let him down, would realize there are probably softer targets than the headquarters of the United States Armed Forces.

Or the location was incidental- or, perhaps "peripheral" is a better term: that is, assuming this isn't a case of someone "shooting at" the Pentagon, then who/whatever he/she was shooting at just happened to be in the same location as the Pentagon. The shot-out window could have just been an accident.

Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 07:19 AM (8y9MW)

3 It's about time that building got what's coming to it.

Posted by: Code Stink at October 19, 2010 07:20 AM (Y81Xa)

4 1 MFM: Probably a disgruntled Tea Partier.

Dang, beat me to it, Mrs. D'oh.

Or some follower of Glenn Beck.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 19, 2010 07:20 AM (9hSKh)

5 that is, assuming this isn't a case of someone "shooting at" the Pentagon, then who/whatever he/she was shooting at just happened to be in the same location as the Pentagon.

That's what I was thinking too - the Pentagon happened to get in the way.

Posted by: alexthechick at October 19, 2010 07:21 AM (bQ5xy)

6 I will kill the building the next time, Infidel! No one can stop a holy one fulfilling Allah's will. Death to all masonry! Death to ceiling tiles, death to gutters! Submit!

Posted by: Achmed the Nearly Dead at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (LdYLm)

7 False Flag? October Surprise 2010?

Posted by: Flounder at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (Kkt/i)

8 After 9\11, wouldn't it be more secure? Just thinking out loud...

Posted by: Rod at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (ORbz7)

9 The Pentagon behaved stupidly. Now let me eat my damned waffle in peace, wingnuts.

Posted by: Angry Barry, about to blow at October 19, 2010 07:22 AM (UOM48)

10 Odd. How much damage did he/she think he/she would do firing two shots at a heavily-fortified building early in the morning? The place has got to have bullet-proof glass by now.

Posted by: Benson at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (qzcNU)

11 Much like James Lee and the Museum Shooter - this shooter will end up being a lunatic liberal.

Posted by: Naqamel at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (UMwMT)

12 That's what I was thinking too - the Pentagon happened to get in the way. Posted by: alexthechick at October 19, 2010 11:21 AM (bQ5xy) I think that's the simplest explanation. A random criminal act with the Pentagon serving as the backstop.

Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (02uN6)

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 19, 2010 07:23 AM (LdYLm)

14 So, what's the Pentagon's response?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:24 AM (UOM48)

15 Maybe Obomao needs his 9\11.

Posted by: Rod at October 19, 2010 07:25 AM (ORbz7)

16 So, what's the Pentagon's response? Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 11:24 AM (UOM4

Present Rules of Engagement prevent any return fire under any circumstances

Posted by: nevergiveup at October 19, 2010 07:25 AM (0GFWk)

17

Just some nutcase lefty (birm) trying to make a 'statement'.

Posted by: Dang Straights at October 19, 2010 07:25 AM (fx8sm)

18 nevergiveup, the Pentagon earned a Courageous Restraint award!

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (UOM48)

19 I've heard of "suicide by cop," but "suicide by open assault on American military HQ" seems like... well, overkill.

Posted by: MWR at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (4df7R)

20
I think that's the simplest explanation. A random criminal act with the Pentagon serving as the backstop.

There's not really anything near the Pentagon, it's not like Johns Hopkins and down in the 'hood. Rather isolated by freeway and such.

Posted by: Dang Straights at October 19, 2010 07:26 AM (fx8sm)

21 O/T: Anyone see the pic on Drudge with Michelle O and Jill Biden on stage with the horse?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:27 AM (UOM48)

22 Shots Fired At Pentagon?

oh I see. Not shots fired at (in vicinity of) the Pentagon. But actually fired at the Pentagon.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 19, 2010 07:28 AM (0q2P7)

23 Just read the article and it mentions a similar incident at the Marine Corps Museum in Quantico. Both of these installations are beside major highways (I-395 and I-95). I think both were a case of a random large building stopping bullets from a road-rage shooting.

Posted by: Nighthawk at October 19, 2010 07:28 AM (02uN6)

Since singer Susan Boyle (who professes being a virgin) has been on TV, there's been a marked drop in suicide bombings. Apparently many of the terrorists didn't realize what a virgin looked like and are taking up sniping?

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 19, 2010 07:28 AM (LdYLm)

25 Maybe he just missed his flight?

Posted by: nickless at October 19, 2010 07:29 AM (MMC8r)

26 This follows, by a day or two, shots fired at the Marine Corps museum in nearby Quantico http://tinyurl.com/23hq2fo

Posted by: Chris at October 19, 2010 07:29 AM (gHcba)

27 #21

Yeah. It's a shame because I actually liked SJP. Now I'm all for the horse jokes.

Posted by: Benson at October 19, 2010 07:29 AM (qzcNU)

28 - If it is a terrorist, he's one of those Lone Wolf types, and a disorganized personality type (thank God). Because he's trying to murder a building.
Or, perhaps, someone probing to see what different types of provocation attract which kind of responses?

Posted by: TimInVirginia at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (uBNLO)

29 Interstate 395 runs very close to the south side of the building. It could easily have come from there.

Posted by: harrison at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (1GXLU)

30 Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 19, 2010 11:28 AM (LdYLm)

Is it just me, or did the temperature in this thread just drop significantly?

Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (8y9MW)

31 Much like James Lee and the Museum Shooter - this shooter will end up being a lunatic liberal. FNC was saying that there was a similar shooting at the USMC Museum this weekend. So yeah, I'm thinking Code Pinko.

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (9Lm5R)

32 A disgruntled Reservist/Guardsman who woke up on 1 October (start of FY11) to find that the DOD neglected to fund continuing tours? A LOT of guys got fucked over with zero notice....

Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (3iMgs)

33 You would think a conventional criminal, or some guy obsessed with a girl that let him down, would realize there are probably softer targets than the headquarters of the United States Armed Forces.

Actually the Pentagon is a soft target protected by rent-a-cops. This was most likely a "driveby" and the perp will never be caught unless they have it on video.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 07:31 AM (/jbAw)

34 When I will accept Muslims as valid choice in religion belief (anyone giving odds when this will happen):

1. When freedom of religion and the right for open assemblies of non-Muslim religious gatherings can be commonplace in the Islamic world.

2. When Muslim terrorists stop bombing churches in Iraq and stop harassing Iraqi Christians seeking the free exercise of their faith (particularly women).

3. When the governments of predominantly Islamic nations cease their policies of persecution of non-Muslim faiths (most notably IranÂ’s campaigns against its BahaÂ’i population and the state-sanctioned violence against Coptic Christians in Egypt).

4. When people in predominantly Muslim countries have the right to change their religions without the risk of being arrested, tried and executed for crimes against the nation.

5. When the governments of predominantly Muslim country outlaw school texts that slander Judaism and Christianity.

6. When Muslims stop killing each other under the pretext of Koranic principles (Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan).

Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 19, 2010 07:32 AM (LdYLm)

35 At about 10:00 the northbound HOV lane in front of the Pentagon was closed and about 20 state troopers were walking in a line like they were looking for shell casings or something.

Posted by: buzz at October 19, 2010 07:32 AM (i27M5)

36 Why the shooting? Easy. The Pentagon doesn't broadcast enough green programming and shows on recycling.

Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 07:34 AM (AZGON)

37 29 That would have to be a rifle. It's not that close. Some tool from PG county probably but could be some love sick pentagon wonk. However, the lameness and ineffectiveness conotes a muslim.

Posted by: dagny at October 19, 2010 07:34 AM (N1fth)

38 nevergiveup, the Pentagon earned a Courageous Restraint award!

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 11:26 AM (UOM4

Yeah, you probably couldn't find a safer target to shoot at - even a random gas station might have a security cop or attendant that might pop off a few in return.

Typical moonbat 'courage'

Ever wonder why there's no symbolic shooting of blank rounds at the local rifle range by anti-gun leftists?

Posted by: Oldcat at October 19, 2010 07:35 AM (CN+Qv)

O/T: Anyone see the pic on Drudge with Michelle O and Jill Biden on stage with the horse?

LOL- dayum!!! I haven't seen a pic of Moochelle in awhile. Her ass is huge!!!

Posted by: jewells at October 19, 2010 07:36 AM (l/N7H)

40 Why the shooting? Easy. The Pentagon doesn't broadcast enough green programming and shows on recycling.

Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 11:34 AM (AZGON)

Have you seen their channel? Almost everyone is dressed in green...ok olive drab.

Posted by: Oldcat at October 19, 2010 07:36 AM (CN+Qv)

41 Hey, c'mon. Don't even look at me.

Posted by: Todd Seavey at October 19, 2010 07:36 AM (AZGON)

42 P.S. I don't think you could accidentally hit the Pentagon while shooting at something else. Nothing but parking lots and open spaces for at least 1000 yards in every direction.

Posted by: buzz at October 19, 2010 07:36 AM (i27M5)

I heard on the radio here that the shots were in the parking lot.

So hard to say, really, but I suspect that they weren't aimed at the Pentagon.

Posted by: blaster at October 19, 2010 07:38 AM (Ov86C)

44 Well, at least the Pentagon isn't dealing with the French... over at telegraph.co.uk French riot police clash with students as petrol stations run dry French riot police and students fired tear gas and petrol bombs at each other while truckers blocked roads and almost 3,000 petrol stations ran dry, as nationwide protests intensified.

Posted by: George Orwell at October 19, 2010 07:38 AM (AZGON)

Probably a white guy in a white van. Er, I mean two black guys in a black car.

Maybe a tea partier angry about the health care bill? Or, ah, a Muslim immigrant from Pakistan trying to build a homemade fuel-air explosive.

Perhaps a NASCAR-looking white guy who hates black people? Drat. I mean a giant Arab-Israeli.

It used to be the case that speculation was left to the amateurs. Now it's policy.

Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2010 07:39 AM (sOtz/)

46 I don't think you could accidentally hit the Pentagon while shooting at something else.

You underestimate people's inability to aim.

Posted by: alexthechick at October 19, 2010 07:40 AM (bQ5xy)

47 Maybe a tea partier angry about the health care bill? I'll go with that one. That, and the fact that the Pentagon hasn't permitted a mosque to be built where the airplane hit.

Posted by: Mayor Bloomberg at October 19, 2010 07:41 AM (AZGON)

48 We support the murder of American troops' buildings.

Posted by: medea benjamin at October 19, 2010 07:42 AM (TgXns)

49 I vote for gang bangers. They give more points for style than accuracy. Look good and cool while banging away at the enemy, even though you miss the target and kill some kid in bed two blocks over.

Posted by: maddogg at October 19, 2010 07:44 AM (OlN4e)

50 Posted by: buzz at October 19, 2010 11:36 AM (i27M5)

Doesn't really negate the theory of Pentagon-as-backstop. It just means that the shooting took place in a parking-lot and the shooter fled (as hard as it should be to get into the Pentagon parking lots, I don't imagine it's that difficult to leave).

My other theory is "Shooting to gauge reaction times in preparation for more significant attack," but I don't really buy that one, either.

Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 07:45 AM (8y9MW)

51 Where's Bill Ayers?

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 19, 2010 07:45 AM (9Cooa)

52 A political set up, like the "shot" fired outside the TX Capitol, to further an agenda.

Posted by: maverick muse at October 19, 2010 07:46 AM (H+LJc)

53 That would have to be a rifle. It's not that close.

Wouldn't have to be all that close given you are shooting at the world's largest office building, even with a handgun. You don't need specifically designated targets to hit it, just aim high enough to allow for the drop in travel time. And just because only two shots hit the building, who says that only two shots were fired?

Handguns may only have the effective range and accuracy of a thrown baseball (old rule of thumb), but baseballs can travel a long way...

Posted by: Drumwaster at October 19, 2010 07:46 AM (dWFSK)

54 That, and the fact that the Pentagon hasn't permitted a mosque to be built where the airplane hit.

Obama's latest threat to prosecute any who protest the GZ mosque made morning news.

Posted by: maverick muse at October 19, 2010 07:47 AM (H+LJc)

55 Is Dr. Amy Bishop free and marauding around the country again?

Posted by: kefka at October 19, 2010 07:48 AM (ytpAl)

56 he's trying to murder a building.

Bush did it first.

Posted by: Painfull Stool at October 19, 2010 07:50 AM (F/4zf)

57 Handguns may only have the effective range and accuracy of a thrown baseball (old rule of thumb), but baseballs can travel a long way...

Yeah, but a half-mile? If the ranges I've heard from the building to that highway are accurate (1000+ yards) we're actually talking even more than a half-mile (56.82%+ according to Wolfram Alpha). I'm buying the "in the parking lot" angle.

Posted by: AllenG at October 19, 2010 07:50 AM (8y9MW)

It used to be the case that speculation was left to the amateurs. Now it's policy. Posted by: Beagle

That's good.

Such policy speculation inevitably leaves a one-size-fits-all answer.

Posted by: maverick muse at October 19, 2010 07:50 AM (H+LJc)

Damn Wingers!!11!!!

Posted by: dananjcon at October 19, 2010 07:51 AM (pr+up)

60 Anyone see Wild Bill Ayers recently?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 19, 2010 07:51 AM (UOM48)

61 Probably trying to turn it into a hexagon.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 19, 2010 07:52 AM (XrvQ5)

62 Maybe it was done to see the reaction of the police force. Just an idea.

Posted by: Lou at October 19, 2010 07:52 AM (Cblyc)

63 I don't own any handguns chambered for rifle cartridges, at least not any that could hit the Pentagon from Texas and I've been here in Texas all morning. I swear.

Posted by: John Galt at October 19, 2010 07:56 AM (F/4zf)

64 The parking lots are essentially secured, nobody was cracking off rounds from the parking lot without a full response. The Pentagon has its own civilian police force, not just rent-a-cops; they have arrest and shoot-you authority. The windows are tough. I will go with a 1) a idiot of some kind and a driver with a modest rifle on the highway, or 2) couple of gangbangers shooting at each other and the building catching a couple of stray rounds (this includes pistols to AKs). Given the USMC Museum being hit. I go with option 1. Sooner or later they may hit someone.

Posted by: Jean at October 19, 2010 07:56 AM (uA+vD)

65 Damn Tea Partiers likely (snark)! Can't trust em. Look at all the bodies littered across this country already. It's about time to round them up.

Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 19, 2010 07:57 AM (71LDo)

66 More likely it was some one firing at a competing drug dealer and got the trajectory wrong. This may be news to the MFM, but bullets can travel a long way.

Posted by: Jack at October 19, 2010 07:58 AM (kCT7A)

67 From your link: "The windows, which are bullet-proof, did not shatter."

wow, bullet proof windows. didn't even know they made bullet proof windows..

Posted by: curious at October 19, 2010 07:59 AM (p302b)

68 According to Google Earth, the distance between the highway and the south (okay SSW) face of the Pentagon is only about 300 yards (about 1/6 of a mile, at a guess, but it is about 8 seconds of latitude)

Posted by: Drumwaster at October 19, 2010 08:02 AM (dWFSK)

69 It really is an ugly building. Guerrilla architects?

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 19, 2010 08:04 AM (mHQ7T)

70 They weren't real bullets. They were rockets disguised as bullets. The real bullets were shot down by the USAF over Nebraska. This was a false flag operation run by Dick Cheney and his secret government to create the justification to invade Krygzijistan, in order to enrich Halliburton!

WAKE UP, PEOPLE!!! IT'S SO OBVIOUS!!!

Posted by: Alex Jones at October 19, 2010 08:07 AM (EW49d)

71 Isn't the pentagon technically in Virginia. So that means there were two shootings at Military institutions in Virginia?

Posted by: curious at October 19, 2010 08:07 AM (p302b)

15 Obamao needs a Murrah, not a 9/11

As for not aiming at the Place Where Good Ideas Go to Die, I always remind people of the numnut in Nebraska who fired off his rifle to celebrate a 'Huskers national championship and hit a pregnant lady a few miles away. (it would be funny if she hadn't lost the kid).

Remember, once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, so when they find a third bullet we can talk about enemy action...

Posted by: Stephen at October 19, 2010 08:08 AM (wkR3c)

73 Wouldn't it be great is the Pentagon responded with a M198 Howitzer?

I bet THAT would put a stop to the random registered Democrat jackass popping of a few rounds at the building.

Posted by: Jesse James at October 19, 2010 08:22 AM (CHrmZ)

74 Why in the world would you shoot at a building? That is (pardon the expression) crazy.

Who was in/around the building at the time? Was anyone outside? What was going on around the building?

This supposedly happened at 5am. I'm guessing that something was going on outside, and the building just happened to catch the bullets.

Strangely enough, I do not think this was terrorism. However, if suddenly the FBI says it was DEFINITELY not terrorism, we'll know it was terrorism.

Posted by: shibumi at October 19, 2010 08:25 AM (OKZrE)

AAH - They got me.

Everything - getting - dark - bright - light - in - the - distance - coming - toward - me - good - bye - cruel - world . . .

Posted by: The Pentagon at October 19, 2010 08:33 AM (kbH+o)

76 the perp will never be caught unless they have it on video.

Figure the fucking odds on that. A whole freaking airplane hit it, and at most there were two frames (not counting whatever the Gas station camera caught).

We ain't Great Britain. Yet.

Posted by: Wind Rider at October 19, 2010 08:44 AM (S0YhE)

77 Maximum range for a 9mm handgun bullet fired at a 45 degree angle is 2500 yards.

People get killed all the time by bullets fired in the air in celebration by idiots ... cops in LA hide in their vehicles under freeway overpasses around midnight New Year's Eve for good reason.

Please don't make noises about maximum ranges at a building sized target unless you actually have a clue.

Posted by: Kristopher at October 19, 2010 08:47 AM (aAof6)

21, 27 How many times do I have to say this? (sigh)

Horses are far better looking than SJP! (or Michelle Obama for that matter)

Posted by: unknown jane's horse, getting fed up being told he looks like SJP at October 19, 2010 08:47 AM (5/yRG)

it must be a lone wack job because the bad guys would never just shoot at a building to watch the reaction of the security forces ... how fast and from where they deploy from would never be useful information to a hit squad that wanted to do a Mombai style attack on the Pentagon ...

Posted by: Jeff at October 19, 2010 09:00 AM (A3tpD)

80 Hey ya general, I don't know anything about any shooting at your place but how'd ya like to buy some bullet proof glass?

Posted by: guy with a new glass shop at October 19, 2010 09:03 AM (eBRdM)

For some odd reason I kinda doubt any "peaceniks" are going to stage a Mumbai type shoot em up at the Pentagon. Some other government building, maybe, but even then that's a stretch.

If it's a "peace-ers" job, then it's false flag.

Posted by: unknown jane's horse, getting fed up being told he looks like SJP at October 19, 2010 09:14 AM (5/yRG)

82 Gang Bangers? Ya know why they always hold the gun with the grip in the horizontal?

It came that way in the box.

Posted by: Pelayo at October 19, 2010 09:25 AM (V9Q+f)

83 There may be softer targets than the Pentagon, but if it were that hard it wouldn't have gotten hit at all.

Posted by: Common Sense Guy at October 19, 2010 09:36 AM (bN5ZU)

84 Guess some Lefty decided it was time to go to the fourth box.

Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at October 19, 2010 09:42 AM (xy9wk)

85 Oblig: "Nice army base you got here. Be a shame if anything happened to it."

Posted by: moviegique at October 19, 2010 09:57 AM (ey5wt)

86 OMG Why didn't the early warning detectors get it? why didn't the cameras see him? why wasn't he stopped? CONSPIRACYYYYYYY Maybe after this happened the 9/11 truthers could just see, it wasn't an inside job we just have stupid people sitting at the monitors seeing whats going on.

Posted by: Rbastid at October 19, 2010 10:43 AM (LLq30)

87 Infidel Dogs - we always come back to finish botched job. Try bomb World Trade Center then come back with planes. Dive plane into Pentagon now come back with rifle. Next we stab building in buttocks with penknife. Death to racist Amerikkka and her non green economy.

Posted by: Osama Bin Ladin at October 19, 2010 11:29 AM (ylhEn)

88 could have been someone who knew about that today the Pentagon was going to order all recruiters to start enlisting THE GAYS. Here in NYC the Maribes seem to be getting the most who wish to be early enlistees. Must be those uniforms.

Posted by: archie bunker at October 19, 2010 12:31 PM (0YS61)

89 If you read the comments on the news story at the link, the stupidity is nearly overpowering. Lots of airily superior jests about "rednecks" -- because of course lefties never, ever, ever commit acts of violence.

Posted by: Trimegistus at October 19, 2010 12:56 PM (cKh7r)

90 Ballistics is complicated, things like "maximum range" and "couldn't be a handgun" are not really very useful.

40% hit ratio on a building? Pretty sad.

It could really have been a vehicle-to-vehicle shooting on the freeway, a couple of very unlucky shots.

My only real concern is that it was someone on foot or in a vehicle who had studied security, got close and got away, as a "damp run" to test whether it was possible, or worse, a nutjob who did the same thing.

Certainly does not inspire great confidence in the security.

Posted by: Merovign, Strong on His Mountain at October 19, 2010 02:41 PM (bxiXv)

Too much coincidence that the Pentagon and Marine Museum were both shot within a couple days. If you keep heading north on I-95 from Quantico you drive right past the Pentagon about 40 minutes later.

I-395 is only a few hundred yards from the south face of the Pentagon. Somebody could easily fire out of the passenger window of a passing car on the freeway and hit the building.

However, the Marine Museum is screened from I-95 by a strip of trees at least fifty yards deep. I don't think you could hit it from the freeway. You'd have to drive into its parking lot to hit it or creep through the woods to get a clear shot.

It's probably idiots at work. When I worked in an office building next to the freeway in Fort Worth, there was a bullet hole in one of the windows one morning. I'll bet plenty of buildings next to the freeway in DC get shot and it never makes the papers.

Posted by: Tantor at October 19, 2010 06:21 PM (Ek/Oc)

92 And where was Bill Ayers when this happenned?

Posted by: Tantor at October 19, 2010 06:23 PM (Ek/Oc)

93 It's ok folks don't worry 'bout the shootin we can "absorb" this....

Posted by: 0bozo the incompetent at October 19, 2010 09:13 PM (BnRg6)

94 You would think a conventional criminal, or some guy obsessed with a girl that let him down, would realize there are probably softer targets than the headquarters of the United States Armed Forces

Meh.

I'm a chick so I'm pretty sure that I'd get a lot more understanding from the Pentagon than from my local Circle-K, if I ever decided to go all shoot 'em up like Major Nidal did.

Diversity.

Posted by: Deety at October 20, 2010 12:49 AM (Jb3+B)

95 I like how no one was hurt because "it was being renovated at the time". See! Government dollars saving lives AND creating jobs!!! OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA

Posted by: moses_mcbride at October 20, 2010 02:09 PM (9h/0Z)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.

110kb generated in CPU 0.1549, elapsed 0.3617 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3229 seconds, 223 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.