October 27, 2010
— Ace I took a pass on the Sink cheating story, because of the meh factor. Okay, some woman handed her a phone; she read it. Is that the most horrible thing? Certainly it doesn't rise to the level of, say, Joe Miller Freeping an unofficial, meaningless online poll at work by voting four times. That obviously evidences a gross defect of character.
But Sink cheating a little? Meh.
But... on the other hand... if you look the American people in the eye and just lie to them (at Hot Air)...
John King of CNN (link at Hot Air) analyzed the audio and the make-up artist clearly said "This is a message from the staff," which doesn't sound anything like "from your daughter."
Sink's next line, of course, will be that she didn't hear what the make-up artist said, she was too busy thinkin' about governin' and stuff, and anyway, this is all just a distraction from what the people of Florida need, and what the people of Florida need is a dishonest air-head who needs her staff to tell her things like "When he says something bad about you, you say it's not true."
Posted by: Ace at
07:54 AM
| Comments (53)
Post contains 215 words, total size 2 kb.
Also stolen from the net:
Former President Bill Clinton’s ‘get out the vote’ rally for Democrats at a downtown Chicago hotel was the most unenthusiastic WLS veteran political reporter Bill Cameron has ever witnessed.
Clinton was an hour late for the Tuesday afternoon rally at the Palmer House and droned on for another hour, sending dozens of the few hundred Democrats in attendance for the exits.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 27, 2010 08:00 AM (ruu60)
Every single one of these Democrats is lying: Don't believe what I've done, believe what I'm telling you now.
Dear Independents: They think you're stupid.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 27, 2010 08:01 AM (3wPsb)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:01 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:02 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: joncelli at October 27, 2010 08:03 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:03 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 12:02 PM (0Pl0
Why is this concerning? Wasn't Machine supposed to win this race by 20% or sumptin'? If the polls are showing it this close he's in deep, deep, deep trouble.
Posted by: Editor at October 27, 2010 08:04 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:05 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 27, 2010 08:06 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 27, 2010 08:07 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:08 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: The Chewbacca Defense at October 27, 2010 08:12 AM (GGEUV)
Posted by: Jo-jo the Dog-Faced Boy at October 27, 2010 08:13 AM (bN5ZU)
She just lost. It had been kinda close before now, but she just made a mistake that everyone will remember for the next week.
Not that Scott is all that trustworthy either, but he knows that folks will be watching him and all the newly elected pols like bloodthirsty hawks, and all they need to do is fuck up one time and there will be wrath unleashed.
Things have changed.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at October 27, 2010 08:14 AM (3jxR/)
During the last hour, @nprnews has tweeted two stories that continue their pattern of left leaning news "reporting":
How The Rest Of The World Views The Tea Party http://n.pr/a22XeE
Joe Miller's On-The-Job Political Chicanery Detailed http://n.pr/cdSx5I
Posted by: TheRedDianthus at October 27, 2010 08:14 AM (ErOeR)
This turd looks like she'd be intellectually challenged by a parent teacher conference.
Posted by: ontherocks at October 27, 2010 08:15 AM (HBqDo)
But if the numbers can flip so much so quickly, it doesn't represent a trend.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 27, 2010 08:16 AM (3wPsb)
Posted by: Y-not at October 27, 2010 08:16 AM (UcOiF)
Posted by: MaxMBJ
Being from Delaware, I've been bracing or the worst. But this same group (Tea Party Express) accurately predicted her chances in the primary. And I noticed the state GOP go into overtime after that poll was announced, so they apparantly saw merit in it. And as we know, she did edge Castle.
This poll also would explain why Coons is on the attack and running away from Obama on the Bush tax cuts.
What I find curious is what they're doing differently from Reichmussen.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 27, 2010 08:16 AM (R2fpr)
"Then why did she fire somebody?"
Right, in fact she says, "I held the person who was responsible for the cheating accountable and he's no longer with my campaign."
Doesn't she feel the least bit she's responsible?
To me the firing is worse because it shows she throws little people to the wolves to cover her screw-ups. Haven't we had quite enough of that kind of leadership lately?
She knew the rules. She should have just said, "Ooops. I reacted quickly to a note being handed to me without thinking. My mistake, and I apologize." And the staff member could be reprimanded. But over-punishing an underling in an attempt to inoculate yourself stinks.
Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at October 27, 2010 08:19 AM (GGulh)
"You know Alex Sink is the great-granddaughter of CIRCUS FREAKS, don't you?"
If only she was a dwarf with flippers and a beard...
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 27, 2010 08:22 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Ted Kennedy's Gristle Encased Head at October 27, 2010 08:23 AM (+lsX1)
Half the rest of the world loved Obama; the other half hates us no matter what we do or who we have running our show. Fuck the rest of the world.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 27, 2010 08:27 AM (Vz9lf)
So...Sink was worried about her daughter in Europe, that might be in a Turkish prison. "But I totally ignored the message". Either she is a shitty mom, or she saw, and got, the true message. Which resulted in a staffer being fired?
Follow-up: "So if you didn't understand the message, you thought was from your daughter in Europe, when did you contact her to confirm she was OK?...and can you provide those phone records"?
Posted by: hutch1200 at October 27, 2010 08:32 AM (RRM77)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 08:35 AM (0Pl08)
Posted by: Jerry Brown at October 27, 2010 08:35 AM (bN5ZU)
A Web Of GOP Influence
http://tinyurl.com/233nzaa
Posted by: TheRedDianthus at October 27, 2010 08:35 AM (ErOeR)
Posted by: Jerry Brown at October 27, 2010 08:36 AM (bN5ZU)
One lesson I think to take from the campaign the Democrats ran in 2006/8 is run with every negative story you can find about the opposition party. It helps create the notion that they have a "culture of corruption".
And one of the benefits of being on the right is we have so much more real scandal to work with. But there is no reason to not throw everything we've got - from the Walpin firing on down...
Posted by: 18-1 at October 27, 2010 08:38 AM (7BU4a)
Now that is a debate I would like to participate in.
Posted by: Sen Stuart Smalley at October 27, 2010 08:39 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at October 27, 2010 08:42 AM (B4xb/)
It is frustrating that this will work in some cases, at least. If you don't like the Obama or Pelosi agenda, why would you vote for a Democrat? All of these "independent" and "moderate" Democrats rolled over for them over these last 2 years. And they will do it again until someone makes them pay a price.
Posted by: Sen Stuart Smalley at October 27, 2010 08:42 AM (7BU4a)
O'Donnell's inhouse polling puts her 6 down. Beautiful.
Internal polls are almost meaningless- they're as much for PR as anything else. They always show greater support for the candidate that sponsored them then independent polls.
Even if it was accurate (and it probably isn't), being down 6 points less than 6 days before the election isn't something to crow about.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 27, 2010 08:43 AM (plsiE)
FTFY
Posted by: 18-1 at October 27, 2010 08:43 AM (7BU4a)
They're like the spoiled kid of 35 living in Mommy's basement and bitterly resentful of the successful sibling living in his own nice house...
Posted by: Hatchet Five at October 27, 2010 08:46 AM (B4xb/)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 27, 2010 08:46 AM (3iDt4)
Even if it was accurate (and it probably isn't), being down 6 points less than 6 days before the election isn't something to crow about.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 27, 2010 12:43 PM (plsiE)
Yes and no. I would be amazed if C'OD pulled out a victory because all of the Democrat heavy guns are aimed at her. You are right about internal polls, and even a 6 point loss is still a loss.
However, if a below average candidate, who is viewed as "far right" in a far left state, and who is the primary lightning rod in this campaign is able to keep her loss fairly close it means that the Republicans truly have a mandate to pursue "very" conservative positions in non-crazy non-leftwing America...
Posted by: 18-1 at October 27, 2010 08:47 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: ace at October 27, 2010 08:49 AM (wACL4)
Posted by: ace at October 27, 2010 08:50 AM (wACL4)
Posted by: hutch1200 at October 27, 2010 08:57 AM (RRM77)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at October 27, 2010 09:01 AM (0Pl08)
7 O'Donnell's inhouse polling puts her 6 down. Beautiful.
"We're gonna win the game, I guarantee it." Broadway Joe, 3 days before Superbowl III. Superbowl III Final: Jets 16, Colts 7
And yes grasshopper, I am old enough to remember it. And yes, I will just shut up about it because I know that you know where this is going because I know that you know that in Â’69 all the sports writers and bookies, i.e. the smartest guys in the room, picked the Colts over the Jets with a huge spread.
Once I had an Irish girl
She was fat and lazy
Now I have this Yankee girl who damn near drives me crazy
OH!
Haul away and up she rises
Haul away and up she rises
Haul away and up she rises
Early in the morning
Posted by: VADM (Red) Cuthbert Collingwood, RN at October 27, 2010 09:18 AM (YZ0iV)
I'd like to think we're better than that.
Posted by: Leo Ladenson at October 27, 2010 09:19 AM (mAm+G)
O'Donnell's inhouse polling puts her 6 down. Beautiful.
Internal polls are almost meaningless- they're as much for PR as anything else. They always show greater support for the candidate that sponsored them then independent polls.
Even if it was accurate (and it probably isn't), being down 6 points less than 6 days before the election isn't something to crow about.
Posted by: Hollowpoint
I'm not crowing.
Being down six points in a blue state where your opponent has been bringing in the President, VP and a line of Senators and "press' (Rachel Maddow) is not meaningless. Add to that the collusion of the national AND local press.
And I noted that this same group managed to publish a poll during the primary that turned out to be very accurate after the fact, and which was taken very seriously by the state GOP beforehand.
If this poll is as viable as that prior poll, then this is far closer than anyone thought. Coons' current actions seem to resemble the state GOP; ramp up the attacks and even run away from the President.
You didn't listen to these polls or people from Delaware during the primary, and see how well that approach turned out. You want to ignore this again and rely on your attitide and snark? Feel free. She's still far behind. but unless these signs are dramatically different from what we've already witnessed, something weird is going on here. Again.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 27, 2010 09:21 AM (R2fpr)
This is beautiful; Sink keeps making up lies before she knows what CNN has on her. First she said her aid "tried" to communicate with her, apparently not knowing she was on tape reading the message. Then she tried claiming the make-up artist said she didn't know who the message was from, not knowing CNN had audio of what the make-up artist actually said.
I can see two possible TV ads her opponent can make out of this.
"If she'll lie like this when she's on tape, imagine what lies she'll tell you about what she does when she's out of your sight."
"Do Floridians really want a governor so stupid she'll make up lies not knowing she's on tape with audio even though she's in a TV studio?"
Posted by: Matt at October 27, 2010 10:55 AM (jFZY3)
Posted by: vince at October 27, 2010 11:35 AM (Gt5Md)
Posted by: Gold Jewellery at April 17, 2011 12:03 AM (9It5U)
Posted by: cheap clothes online at April 28, 2011 06:32 PM (eB2Vr)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2341 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 27, 2010 07:59 AM (UOM48)