December 27, 2010
— Ace At Hot Air's Green Room, Mitch Berg has an introduction to Pawlenty, for the many who have dismissed him as some sort of RINO. Quoting the Pioneer Press:
“This is a state that was on a spending binge for a long time with a liberal-leaning political culture that goes back decades or generations, and to try to change the direction of the state was a big undertaking. But I think we did that,” Pawlenty said during an extended interview Tuesday with a group of Capitol reporters.Making that change was not easy, the Republican governor said. He had to call a predominantly Democratic Legislature into special sessions, issue a record number of vetoes in one year and use a government shutdown to force the changes.
“This will be known as the time Minnesota finally came to terms with its excesses and got itself on a more sustainable and responsible path,” he said.
That legacy, he asserted, is more significant than any new program or building he might have created.
And then Mitch Berg:
Poli-sci prof Steven Schier from Carlton College provides the key caveat that the U of M’s Jacobs didn’t, pointing out that Pawlenty “never had a fully cooperative Legislature”. That’s putting it lightly. When the DFL took complete control of the Legislature in 2006, DFL Senator Cy Thao famously remarked “When you people [Republicans] win, you get to keep your money; when we win, we take your money!”. Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller said in 2008 “it’s silly to think that people can spend their money better than government can”.
It says a lot that prominent liberal politicians are permitted to say that in Minnesota. Even hardcore liberals like Nancy Pelosi shy away from saying "it's silly to think that people can spend their money better than the government can." She thinks that, certainly, but she avoids saying it, because that would hurt her caucus. And yet here's a Senate Majority Leader who says it.
So that's the battlefield he's on. That's the political culture he's confronting.
So when Salisbury quotes JacobsÂ…:
A governor must build coalitions to get things done, Jacobs said, but Pawlenty had a hard time finding “honorable compromise” with DFL legislators.…one can forgive him for not adding “because the DFL had no interest in compromise, and were largely not honorable”.
But I will.
My real point is that Pawlenty’s legacy goes waaaay beyond simple, material things like programs and departments and government real estate. Tim Pawlenty did something that’s needed doing since long before I came to Minnesota. Because for all of my hard-core paleocon friends’ grousing about “impact fees” and “travelling with Will Steger”, it’s a simple fact that Pawlenty’s political leadership helped drive the Minnesota GOP to the right; it helped the GOP provide a real policy alternative to the DFL for the first time in recent memory.
Many may deem him to have governed not conservatively enough, but I always read that like this: If a guy governed as conservative as possible in a state's liberal culture, or even more conservatively than most believed possible, does that mean his Comfort Setting for his own personal politics is where he actually governed or further to the right of what he was permitted to do?
As an analogy: Many conservatives call Obama a socialist. (I agree.) But liberals point out that most of what he's done is not actually socialist per se (socialist light or socialist-tending, but not actually socialist).
That may be true, and yet I still say he's a socialist. Why? Because I know what his impulses are. I know where he'd take the country if he were allowed to, what he'd do if he didn't face so much push-back and hostile public opinion and panicking Democratic legislators and Republican delay and obstructionism.
I always laugh at liberals who make the claim that Obama isn't a socialist based on, say, the tax cut deal. Okay, people making that argument: If the Congress were dominated by liberals, and they'd won even more seats in 2010, do you imagine he'd be angling for the same deal? Or do you think he'd be looking to increase taxes not only above Bush levels but possibly above Clinton levels, too?
In other words: Can you imagine Obama putting his political capital on the line, defying Congress, and vetoing a bill that he considered too leftwing?
I can't. I don't think many can, either. I think his governing philosophy is as left as the road will allow.
At any rate, analogizing that to conservative-leaning governors in blue states: Doesn't this sort of thinking work in reverse, to their advantage, too? If we say Obama's a socialist based on what he would do if permitted, can't right-leaning governors, thwarted by tax-and-spend legislatures, be said to be strongly conservative, based on what they almost certainly would do if permitted?
I don't really think Pawlenty is going anywhere, but I think it's a bit of a shame that he's not even seriously considered at all. Like Duncan Hunter, he's one of those guys you really think should be seriously considered even though in your heart you know they won't be.
Posted by: Ace at
09:19 AM
| Comments (92)
Post contains 872 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: Zakn at December 27, 2010 09:25 AM (zyaZ1)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 09:26 AM (S5YRY)
Frankly, I'm "none of the above" for these three. Until they run, and their records and beliefs are put out for all to see, there's not enough substance to justify supporting any damn one of them.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 09:29 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 09:29 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: buzzion at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (oVQFe)
His official site wants me to download a pdf of his "goals, vision, etc." so this is just from wiki:
"Minnesota has mandated a 10% mixture of gasoline and ethanol (gasohol) since 1997, while most cars are designed to handle 15% safely. Pawlenty signed into law in May 2005 a bill that will raise the minimum mandated mixture to 20% in 2013. Pawlenty has also lobbied the Governors' Ethanol Coalition to mandate higher ethanol use nationwide"
Posted by: Lincolntf at December 27, 2010 09:31 AM (T+5rr)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:33 AM (kho+0)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:35 AM (BHLuE)
Don't know his actual record though. I could support him in a run.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:36 AM (kho+0)
“Like most Minnesotans, Will (Steger)and I share a great respect for nature and the outdoors. By highlighting impacts of climate change right here in Minnesota, we hope to bring greater attention to this important issue,” Governor Pawlenty said.
Until he can recognize that AGW is a scam I will not vote for him in a primary. I would vote for him in the election though since he's better than Barry.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 09:37 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: justin cord at December 27, 2010 09:37 AM (c0+w5)
I wouldn't trust Minnesota voters with a pair of child's safety scissors. They are that stupid, clueless and liberal.* These are the dumbshits that elected Jesse Ventura, Paul Wellstone and Al. Fucking. Franken.
Even if gave a damn about Pawlenty, which I don't, he's a non-starter. The guy will not even carry his own state in a general election.
*Triple-redundancy word score.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (lGFXF)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (vdfwz)
Can somebody do a breakdown of which conservative dealbreaker each major/semi-major Republican candidate has in their closet? I'll try, but I suck at this:
TPaw - Global Warming and ?
Mittens - Loves him some Mandates
Pence - ?
Barbour - ?
Sarah Palin - ?
Who else and what else?
Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (fLHQe)
I wouldn't bet on that. Pawlenty's biggest, really only, problem is lack of charisma. But that may prove to be a plus in the end. I would say that he is the goto guy should Palin cause an all out Civil war. Romney is dead in the water. If he wins the nomination that means the Conservatives have tuned out ala McCain in 2008. He, and the establishment, thinks he can win enough Independents to overcome that in the general. He's wrong.
Posted by: Rocks at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (WxagK)
I'll pass on Pawlenty. In fact, I'll pass on Minnesota until the dumb shits up there get their minds right.
Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: eman at December 27, 2010 09:39 AM (XXyJt)
He is far more than a "socialist" if you go by Marx's definition of socialism. He is a hard core communist. Look at all his czars, they are all acknowledged communists.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:39 AM (M9Ie6)
President Obama, Secretary Solis and key White House staff met last week with a dozen leaders from several national labor unions to discuss ways to work together to strengthen the economy. The group talked about creating good jobs for the American people, and how the partnership with labor unions is essential to growing our economy and continuing our recovery. The president and the labor secretary also highlighted critical steps that the administration has taken and pledged to continue to work closely with organized labor in the coming months on important economic issues.
I'd vote for pretty much anyone over the current dumbfuck.
Posted by: Crossposted, for Great Justice at December 27, 2010 09:39 AM (S5YRY)
Posted by: David Brooks at December 27, 2010 09:40 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 01:38 PM (fLHQe)
Mittens - Loves him some Mandates / RomneyCare (still supports it)
Pence - (according to commentors here) Not a Governor
Barbour - RAAAAACIST! (the MFM says so)
Sarah Palin - Quitter!
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 09:40 AM (8y9MW)
***pulls pin and cooks it off for a couple of seconds before rolling it into the thread***
What about Christine O'Donnell? She could run!
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 27, 2010 09:41 AM (lGFXF)
Being a Minnesotan I should take this as an insult but since I agree with you I won't
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (tf9Ne)
Is he on the AGW train? They didn't have that at "On the issues". Said there were no statements on environmental issues.
They did say this though under the energy topic:
Stop harmful EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. (Mar 2010)
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (M9Ie6)
I'm not saying that as a negative, I'm saying that as the most boring thing ever. Palin may be too out there to truly unite the country, but if you google Palin, the Huffington Post "Sarah palin" section pops up, and if you google Romney, at least his web site pops up.
To sum: Pawlenty only has a political presence to political junkies, and that can't translate into Presidential ambition.
Posted by: William at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (+zM6M)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 27, 2010 09:43 AM (TMB3S)
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 01:27 PM (vdfwz)
There really wasn't anything he could do about the Franken-Coleman fiasco, you can blame that on our corrupt ACORN-member Secratary of State Mark Ritchie. I'm more concerned about his numerous junkets to the Arctic with Will Steger to prove "ZOMG teh polar bears is drowning because of global warming!!11!!!!11!", the statewide smoking ban, tax money for Target Field, increased ethanol mandates and subsidies, parole for a sex offender who went on to molest a bunch more kids, and more money for light rail boondoggles.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (sYrWB)
But as cars and trucks get better mileage, the gas tax isn’t keeping pace with the need for roads and road work. So another option is gaining traction in Minnesota — a high-tech mileage-based user fee.
“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.
Pawlenty said the state is now working on a pilot program to try it out, with an eye toward cars that arenÂ’t even on the road yet.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (BHLuE)
Posted by: gesc at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (8PtPP)
Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (kho+0)
Posted by: A.G. at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (ojVHV)
Posted by: David No Labels Frum at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (vdfwz)
Posted by: Jon at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (Xt7UU)
Didn't his fatigue from fighting the hard-leftist Democrat Legislature also play a part in his decision not to seek a third term?
/He regretted that decision IIRC.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 01:40 PM (8y9MW)
I'm with ya, but I was hoping to just get each candidate and which ones are guilty of violating the strictly conservative dealbreakers (i.e. amnesty/immigration shenanigans, climate change crap, 2nd Ammendment bullshit, Healthcare, drunk on spending)...(and how the hell I left Schmuckabee off that list is beyond me)
The reason is because it's becoming increasingly clear to me that this arbitrary idea that someone should be a governor or have more experience as a governor is just that - arbitrary and needlessly self-limiting. We've got a few major Republican "establishment" players who have plenty of "experience" and are complete fucksticks for candidates.
I'm just not buying it anymore.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 09:49 AM (fLHQe)
http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/14167711.html
Posted by: mrp at December 27, 2010 09:49 AM (HjPtV)
“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.
Pawlenty said the state is now working on a pilot program to try it out, with an eye toward cars that arenÂ’t even on the road yet.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 01:45 PM
Well, that seals the deal for me! A conservative that we in the educated center of the universe can accept with open arms
Posted by: Kathleen Parker, Client #10 at December 27, 2010 09:50 AM (vdfwz)
Can somebody do a breakdown of which conservative dealbreaker each major/semi-major Republican candidate has in their closet? I'll try, but I suck at this:
TPaw = Global Warming
Mittens= Romney Care
Pence = unknown
Barbour = Possible Race issues, would sink him
Sarah Palin = Not qualified(yeah, I said it. it wasn't okay that Obama isn't qualified and it shouldn't be for her either. And if someone compares her to reagan again I am going to go batshit crazy)
Huckabee = Bush III compassionate conservative and will pardon anyone who comes to jesus
Gingrich = didn't he divorce his wife who was dying of cancer? Oh and the Global Warming thing
Giuliuni = New York Republican doesn't sell south of the mason dixon or west of the mississippi
Ryan= perfect in my mind but doesn't want the job
Paul = the jews will stop him from winning, they always do with their matzos made of the blood of gentile children
Daniels = his truce(while it makes some sense in this election) came across as politically deaf consider who votes in republican primaries
who am i leaving out?
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (wuv1c)
To sum: Pawlenty only has a political presence to political junkies, and that can't translate into Presidential ambition.
Posted by: William at December 27, 2010 01:42 PM (+zM6M)
And really only to the political junkies in his home state. I doubt that if the Powerline fanboys didn't spend so much time talking about him there would be zero buzz about him as a presidential candidate.
Posted by: buzzion at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (oVQFe)
I haven't seen any indication that he's a squish on gun control. I'm pretty sure it was him who signed concealed carry into law. He's a squish on everything else, though.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (IoUF1)
It ain't just Steele that needs to be run out of town, it's fucksticks like Semanko that need a seat on the rail as well.
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 27, 2010 09:54 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Chicago Jedi at December 27, 2010 09:54 AM (6ftzF)
Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 27, 2010 09:56 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: lowandslow at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (rplS1)
Pawlenty supports curfew legislation
Pawlenty touts farm bill
Pawlenty signs smoking ban
Ugh... make it stop. Please... make it stop.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (BHLuE)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (xJVlJ)
Burn the Witch,
I'm just not buying it. Saying "experience" is a disqualifer is a crazy as saying "inexperience" is a qualifier.
I understand that some stuff on these people's resume is junk, but I don't want a total novice. See
emocratic Presidential Candidate 2008
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:59 AM (wuv1c)
It says he supported mandatory Statewide background checks and training in order to carry a gun.
Supported statewide standardized training and background checks for law-abiding citizen to carry firearms.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:00 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: Henry Gibson at December 27, 2010 10:00 AM (SZy+Y)
Next.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 27, 2010 10:01 AM (gDbxE)
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 01:37 PM (tf9Ne)
Apparently by "impacts of climate change", he means the five fucking feet of snow we have before December's even over.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:02 AM (IoUF1)
“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.
We're not fuel?
Posted by: Unicorn farts at December 27, 2010 10:06 AM (RykTt)
That is a big negative.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:06 AM (M9Ie6)
Prior to that, CCW permits were at the discretion of the county sheriffs, who often denied them for no good reason. Now anybody who passes the background check, takes the training course, and can hit a target at 5 yards can get a permit, so it's an improvement in my book.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:10 AM (IoUF1)
Yes, I'd say not being able to recognize a genuine shit sandwich at point blank range calls one's presidential timber into question.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 27, 2010 10:11 AM (gDbxE)
Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 27, 2010 10:17 AM (0YS61)
OK he is OK on that issue then.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:18 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: blaster at December 27, 2010 10:22 AM (MrMxG)
I'm just not buying it. Saying "experience" is a disqualifer is a crazy as saying "inexperience" is a qualifier.
I understand that some stuff on these people's resume is junk, but I don't want a total novice. Seeemocratic Presidential Candidate 2008
Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 01:59 PM (wuv1c)
We got a so-called "novice" in 2008 who is a committed leftist. We all like to talk about how incompetent he is, but has he advanced a leftist agenda? Yeah? Then he's not exactly incompetent is he? And this despite his "inexperience".
I didn't mean to suggest that experience is a disqualifier, just that this idea that there is one type of experience track for the POTUS.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 10:23 AM (fLHQe)
Unfortunately, some conservatives have taken the lack of liberal offense as a sign that he's a RINO, and that could be the kiss of death in this climate. In my opinion, though, it's not a sign that he's a RINO -- it's a sign that he's really good at framing issues and messaging.
Posted by: sayyid412 at December 27, 2010 10:27 AM (z375o)
Posted by: ed at December 27, 2010 10:28 AM (Urhve)
Anyone who supported the AGW scam as legislated in the House bill can't be anything other than an idiot or a communist.
There is no in-between on that one.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:35 AM (M9Ie6)
Welcome to the Peoples Republic of Minnesota. Pawlenty, like many of the pols up here are sock puppets for Cenex and other Big Agra operations. Hmmmm, Big Agra.... ethanol subsidies.... hmmmm, AGW is 'fixed' by putting ethanol into gasoline... I'm sure there's a connection there somewhere.
In addition, the out-state farmers are now wholly addicted to government handouts and 'price supports'.
We're a state of junkies and enablers. I'm leaving. ha ha
Posted by: chuck in st paul at December 27, 2010 10:42 AM (EhYdw)
Posted by: sayyid412 at December 27, 2010 02:27 PM (z375o)
It's more likely the fact that the Sierra Club and Big Ag have their hand two feet up his ass.
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:55 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: tangonine at December 27, 2010 11:21 AM (x3YFz)
It had things like all new homes had to be inspected for energy efficiency and rated (with the goal of moving to inspecting ALL homes as they were sold), a "cash for clunkers" appliance trade in program, with incentives for dealers to sell the MOST energy eficient models (as rated by 10 university centers set up around the country), allowable light wattages with exceptions for work usage (like...oh...SURGERY) only granted by the Secretary of Energy, etc. etc. etc.
If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab, he is unfit to be president. No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 11:24 AM (Fo83G)
If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab, he is unfit to be president. No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 03:24 PM (Fo83G)
Idiot is the likely diagnosis.
Posted by: tangonine at December 27, 2010 11:29 AM (x3YFz)
If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab, he is unfit to be president. No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.
Over the past couple years he's backed away from the global warming stuff; recently he referred to Cap and Trade as a "disaster".
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 27, 2010 11:35 AM (plsiE)
*shakes my head*
Posted by: Africanus at December 27, 2010 11:36 AM (ygqbC)
Not only that for "new" homes but any work that was of sufficient scope to require a building permit also required upgrade to CA Green standards. It would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars for that upgrade of older homes here.
Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 11:54 AM (M9Ie6)
Posted by: The Stupid Party at December 27, 2010 02:12 PM (BZEkR)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 02:33 PM (NITzp)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 02:37 PM (NITzp)
Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 03:01 PM (NITzp)
Why would Pawlenty reduce the government when in 2006, his statement was...
"The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive."
I looked into that, because it didn't sound like something he'd say.
Turns out it was from a Star Tribune article (which immediately makes it suspect) and the "The era of small government is over" line was a referring to a David Brooks article titled as such.
The Star Trib later issued a "clarification"; they have a habit of misquoting / selectively editing Republicans to suit their own needs.
Couldn't find the original Star Trib article; found a blog reference here.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 27, 2010 04:04 PM (plsiE)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2288 seconds, 220 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: mrp at December 27, 2010 09:22 AM (HjPtV)