December 27, 2010

Second First Look At Tim Pawlenty?
— Ace

At Hot Air's Green Room, Mitch Berg has an introduction to Pawlenty, for the many who have dismissed him as some sort of RINO. Quoting the Pioneer Press:

“This is a state that was on a spending binge for a long time with a liberal-leaning political culture that goes back decades or generations, and to try to change the direction of the state was a big undertaking. But I think we did that,” Pawlenty said during an extended interview Tuesday with a group of Capitol reporters.

Making that change was not easy, the Republican governor said. He had to call a predominantly Democratic Legislature into special sessions, issue a record number of vetoes in one year and use a government shutdown to force the changes.

“This will be known as the time Minnesota finally came to terms with its excesses and got itself on a more sustainable and responsible path,” he said.

That legacy, he asserted, is more significant than any new program or building he might have created.

And then Mitch Berg:

Poli-sci prof Steven Schier from Carlton College provides the key caveat that the U of M’s Jacobs didn’t, pointing out that Pawlenty “never had a fully cooperative Legislature”. That’s putting it lightly. When the DFL took complete control of the Legislature in 2006, DFL Senator Cy Thao famously remarked “When you people [Republicans] win, you get to keep your money; when we win, we take your money!”. Senate Majority Leader Larry Pogemiller said in 2008 “it’s silly to think that people can spend their money better than government can”.

It says a lot that prominent liberal politicians are permitted to say that in Minnesota. Even hardcore liberals like Nancy Pelosi shy away from saying "it's silly to think that people can spend their money better than the government can." She thinks that, certainly, but she avoids saying it, because that would hurt her caucus. And yet here's a Senate Majority Leader who says it.

So that's the battlefield he's on. That's the political culture he's confronting.

So when Salisbury quotes JacobsÂ…:

A governor must build coalitions to get things done, Jacobs said, but Pawlenty had a hard time finding “honorable compromise” with DFL legislators.

…one can forgive him for not adding “because the DFL had no interest in compromise, and were largely not honorable”.

But I will.

My real point is that Pawlenty’s legacy goes waaaay beyond simple, material things like programs and departments and government real estate. Tim Pawlenty did something that’s needed doing since long before I came to Minnesota. Because for all of my hard-core paleocon friends’ grousing about “impact fees” and “travelling with Will Steger”, it’s a simple fact that Pawlenty’s political leadership helped drive the Minnesota GOP to the right; it helped the GOP provide a real policy alternative to the DFL for the first time in recent memory.

Many may deem him to have governed not conservatively enough, but I always read that like this: If a guy governed as conservative as possible in a state's liberal culture, or even more conservatively than most believed possible, does that mean his Comfort Setting for his own personal politics is where he actually governed or further to the right of what he was permitted to do?

As an analogy: Many conservatives call Obama a socialist. (I agree.) But liberals point out that most of what he's done is not actually socialist per se (socialist light or socialist-tending, but not actually socialist).

That may be true, and yet I still say he's a socialist. Why? Because I know what his impulses are. I know where he'd take the country if he were allowed to, what he'd do if he didn't face so much push-back and hostile public opinion and panicking Democratic legislators and Republican delay and obstructionism.

I always laugh at liberals who make the claim that Obama isn't a socialist based on, say, the tax cut deal. Okay, people making that argument: If the Congress were dominated by liberals, and they'd won even more seats in 2010, do you imagine he'd be angling for the same deal? Or do you think he'd be looking to increase taxes not only above Bush levels but possibly above Clinton levels, too?

In other words: Can you imagine Obama putting his political capital on the line, defying Congress, and vetoing a bill that he considered too leftwing?

I can't. I don't think many can, either. I think his governing philosophy is as left as the road will allow.

At any rate, analogizing that to conservative-leaning governors in blue states: Doesn't this sort of thinking work in reverse, to their advantage, too? If we say Obama's a socialist based on what he would do if permitted, can't right-leaning governors, thwarted by tax-and-spend legislatures, be said to be strongly conservative, based on what they almost certainly would do if permitted?

I don't really think Pawlenty is going anywhere, but I think it's a bit of a shame that he's not even seriously considered at all. Like Duncan Hunter, he's one of those guys you really think should be seriously considered even though in your heart you know they won't be.

Posted by: Ace at 09:19 AM | Comments (92)
Post contains 872 words, total size 6 kb.

1 Y'know, right after reading this post, I looked out of my window and gazed upon the 6 inches of "global warming" on the ground.  What's TPaw's position on "Global Warming", Ace?

Posted by: mrp at December 27, 2010 09:22 AM (HjPtV)

2 He's got nice hair!

Posted by: John Edwards Hair Brush at December 27, 2010 09:24 AM (EL+OC)

3 Been living here in the frozen tundra since 2002. Thank God for Pawlenty or else taxes would be unreal here. He stood the line on most things, gave in on others. In other terms he Governed. And Effectively. It does suck that he raised cig taxes and even more troublingly banned smoking everywhere.

Posted by: Zakn at December 27, 2010 09:25 AM (zyaZ1)

4 Come to the light, Ace ....

Posted by: Pawlentyline at December 27, 2010 09:25 AM (vdfwz)

5 Yeah, Pawlenty's AGW stuff bothers me.  It's indicative of sloppy thinking, or political calculation.  Either or both gets in the way of my whole hearted support.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 09:26 AM (S5YRY)

6 Is this "candidate review day" or what? Barbour, Pence and Pawlenty...another look at Teh Fred coming next?

Frankly, I'm "none of the above" for these three. Until they run, and their records and beliefs are put out for all to see, there's not enough substance to justify supporting any damn one of them.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (Ulu3i)

7 His cave-in on the Franken-Coleman race indicates to me just how much backbone he'd have defending conservatism or any reductions in the growth of government.

Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (vdfwz)

8 T-Paw has never struck me as a RINO (of course I'm probably a RINO by your def). He's just more in the 'feh' category for me. He needs to be more vocal (read: less of a nice guy).

Posted by: laceyunderalls at December 27, 2010 09:27 AM (pLTLS)

9 This post helps one man......

Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at December 27, 2010 09:28 AM (1fB+3)

10 I could see Pawlenty end up being the consensus/compromise candidate though, after Mitt crashes and burns.

Posted by: toby928™ at December 27, 2010 09:29 AM (S5YRY)

11 In before the "See? This is all Mittens was doing too" crowd

Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 09:29 AM (fLHQe)

12

Get serious Gabe -- the MFM is gonna pick Romney the Commie for the GOP in 2012.

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 27, 2010 09:29 AM (7+pP9)

13 lacy...if he becomes more vocal he'll be labeled a bitch...oh wait that's only for women

Posted by: phoenixgirl at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (eOXTH)

14 Didn't he basically decide not to run for another term as governor because after the 2008 election he thought he would have no shot so didn't even want to put up a fight. 

Posted by: buzzion at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (oVQFe)

15 Hey fuckers, we are talking about Haley Barbour today. 

Get with the program.

Posted by: The MFM at December 27, 2010 09:30 AM (zdaIQ)

16 Even Al Gore has admitted that ethanol is good for nothing but buying votes, and Pawlenty apparently still hasn't gotten the memo.
His official site wants me to download a pdf of his "goals, vision, etc." so this is just from wiki:

"Minnesota has mandated a 10% mixture of gasoline and ethanol (gasohol) since 1997, while most cars are designed to handle 15% safely. Pawlenty signed into law in May 2005 a bill that will raise the minimum mandated mixture to 20% in 2013. Pawlenty has also lobbied the Governors' Ethanol Coalition to mandate higher ethanol use nationwide"


Posted by: Lincolntf at December 27, 2010 09:31 AM (T+5rr)

17 Governor Pawlenty; that's what gets my attention. That's where Presidents should come from. Thanks to Obama, McCain, Kennedy, Dole, Kerry, and Hillary for making this crystal clear.

Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:33 AM (kho+0)

18 Yawnplenty has a list of nanny state legislation behind him as long as a laser. Pass.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:35 AM (BHLuE)

19 Pawlenty is rated "conservtive" at the "On The Issues" site and on the statements he is a conservative on everything except he is a little squishy on gun control.

Don't know his actual record though. I could support him in a run.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:35 AM (M9Ie6)

20 If we say Obama's a socialist based on what he would do if permitted Using that criterium, he's a Marxist, not a socialist. The laws of economics and the rules of golf, however, continue to pound him up the ass.

Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:36 AM (kho+0)

21 From his state website

“Like most Minnesotans, Will (Steger)and I share a great respect for nature and the outdoors. By highlighting impacts of climate change right here in Minnesota, we hope to bring greater attention to this important issue,” Governor Pawlenty said.

Until he can recognize that AGW is a scam I will not vote for him in a primary. I would vote for him in the election though since he's better than Barry.

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 09:37 AM (tf9Ne)

22 Well Governor Dayton !!! will make you appreciate him more, sheesh

Posted by: justin cord at December 27, 2010 09:37 AM (c0+w5)

23

I wouldn't trust Minnesota voters with a pair of child's safety scissors.  They are that stupid, clueless and liberal.*  These are the dumbshits that elected Jesse Ventura, Paul Wellstone and Al.  Fucking.  Franken.

Even if gave a damn about Pawlenty, which I don't, he's a non-starter.  The guy will not even carry his own state in a general election.

 

 

*Triple-redundancy word score.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (lGFXF)

24 If No Labels sings the praises of Pasty Pawlenty, it'll be the sure sign that he'll dump conservative policy like an ugly prom date with a little heat from the MFM

Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (vdfwz)

25

Can somebody do a breakdown of which conservative dealbreaker each major/semi-major Republican candidate has in their closet?  I'll try, but I suck at this:

TPaw - Global Warming and ?

Mittens - Loves him some Mandates

Pence - ?

Barbour - ?

Sarah Palin - ?

Who else and what else?

 

Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (fLHQe)

26 I don't really think Pawlenty is going anywhere, but I think it's a bit of a shame that he's not even seriously considered at all.

I wouldn't bet on that. Pawlenty's biggest, really only, problem is lack of charisma. But that may prove to be a plus in the end. I would say that he is the goto guy should Palin cause an all out Civil war. Romney is dead in the water. If he wins the nomination that means the Conservatives have tuned out ala McCain in 2008. He, and the establishment,  thinks he can win enough Independents to overcome that in the general. He's wrong.

Posted by: Rocks at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (WxagK)

27 Minnesota -- home of Al Franken, "Poppin' Fresh" and Jesse Ventura, among others. And don't forget Teh Hube, free-spending socialist and loudmouth.

I'll pass on Pawlenty. In fact, I'll pass on Minnesota until the dumb shits up there get their minds right.

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 27, 2010 09:38 AM (Ulu3i)

28 Tim has a Manbearpig poster in his garage. Not a good sign. Don't call us, we'll call you. Next.

Posted by: eman at December 27, 2010 09:39 AM (XXyJt)

29 Many conservatives call Obama a socialist. (I agree.)

He is far more than a "socialist" if you go by Marx's definition of socialism.  He is a hard core communist. Look at all his czars, they are all acknowledged communists.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:39 AM (M9Ie6)

31 The GOP should seriously consider him. I'm awed by his tie clip and cufflinks

Posted by: David Brooks at December 27, 2010 09:40 AM (vdfwz)

32 fracking sock

Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 09:40 AM (fLHQe)

33

Posted by: Loyal Romney Supporter at December 27, 2010 01:38 PM (fLHQe)

Mittens - Loves him some Mandates / RomneyCare (still supports it)

Pence - (according to commentors here) Not a Governor

Barbour - RAAAAACIST! (the MFM says so)

Sarah Palin - Quitter!

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 09:40 AM (8y9MW)

34

***pulls pin and cooks it off for a couple of seconds before rolling it into the thread***

 

What about Christine O'Donnell?  She could run!

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at December 27, 2010 09:41 AM (lGFXF)

35 I'll pass on Minnesota until the dumb shits up there get their minds right.

Being a Minnesotan I should take this as an insult but since I agree with you I won't

Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (tf9Ne)

36 TPaw - Global Warming and ?

Is he on the AGW train? They didn't have that at "On the issues". Said there were no statements on environmental issues.

They did say this though under the energy topic:

Stop harmful EPA regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. (Mar 2010)

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (M9Ie6)

37 Google Pawlenty and you get a Powerline article about his not running for re-election because of the Liberal Leg. And it's very boring.

I'm not saying that as a negative, I'm saying that as the most boring thing ever. Palin may be too out there to truly unite the country, but if you google Palin, the Huffington Post "Sarah palin" section pops up, and if you google Romney, at least his web site pops up.

To sum: Pawlenty only has a political presence to political junkies, and that can't translate into Presidential ambition.

Posted by: William at December 27, 2010 09:42 AM (+zM6M)

38 >>At any rate, analogizing that to conservative-leaning governors in blue states: Doesn't this sort of thinking work in reverse, to their advantage, too? It should. But that requires a lot more thinking than just screaming RINO! I like Pawlenty but he is charismatically challenged. Not a good thing for a modern presidential candidate.

Posted by: JackStraw at December 27, 2010 09:43 AM (TMB3S)

39 8 His cave-in on the Franken-Coleman race indicates to me just how much backbone he'd have defending conservatism or any reductions in the growth of government.
Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 01:27 PM (vdfwz)

There really wasn't anything he could do about the Franken-Coleman fiasco, you can blame that on our corrupt ACORN-member Secratary of State Mark Ritchie.  I'm more concerned about his numerous junkets to the Arctic with Will Steger to prove "ZOMG teh polar bears is drowning because of global warming!!11!!!!11!", the statewide smoking ban, tax money for Target Field, increased ethanol mandates and subsidies, parole for a sex offender who went on to molest a bunch more kids, and more money for light rail boondoggles.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (IoUF1)

40 Have the dynamic duo, Mitch Daniels/Paul Ryan, been scratched off your top 10 list? 

Posted by: Brian at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (sYrWB)

41 Pawlenty Supports Mileage Tax

But as cars and trucks get better mileage, the gas tax isn’t keeping pace with the need for roads and road work. So another option is gaining traction in Minnesota — a high-tech mileage-based user fee.

“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.

Pawlenty said the state is now working on a pilot program to try it out, with an eye toward cars that arenÂ’t even on the road yet.


Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (BHLuE)

42 40 - I like Pawlenty but he is charismatically challenged. Not a good thing for a modern presidential candidate. ^yes. I know it sounds shallow but something about Pawlenty gives me the creeps when I see him on tv. I would like other comment said vote for him against Obama but that is all.

Posted by: gesc at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (8PtPP)

43 It's pretty easy to get off the Global Alarming bandwagon. He's in Minnesota. Freaking look outside! Even the highway to hell is freezing over. Change course, change course publicly.

Posted by: t-bird at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (kho+0)

44 Aside/until from his terrible defense of MassCare, that is why I had given Romney some leeway. Its f'n massachutsetts. Same with MN.

Posted by: A.G. at December 27, 2010 09:45 AM (ojVHV)

45 As a firm lifelong registered Republican who intends to vote Republican in 2012, I feel all warm and squishy about Pawlenty. He makes me feel all comfy

Posted by: David No Labels Frum at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (vdfwz)

46 Pawlenty endorsed McCain while he was pushing amnesty.  That's an automatic  disqualifier for me.   

Posted by: Jon at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (Xt7UU)

47 15 Didn't he basically decide not to run for another term as governor because after the 2008 election he thought he would have no shot so didn't even want to put up a fight.

Didn't his fatigue from fighting the hard-leftist Democrat Legislature also play a part in his decision not to seek a third term? 

/He regretted that decision IIRC.

Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at December 27, 2010 09:46 AM (9hSKh)

48

Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at December 27, 2010 01:40 PM (8y9MW)

I'm with ya, but I was hoping to just get each candidate and which ones are guilty of violating the strictly conservative dealbreakers (i.e. amnesty/immigration shenanigans, climate change crap, 2nd Ammendment bullshit, Healthcare, drunk on spending)...(and how the hell I left Schmuckabee off that list is beyond me)

The reason is because it's becoming increasingly clear to me that this arbitrary idea that someone should be a governor or have more experience as a governor is just that - arbitrary and needlessly self-limiting.  We've got a few major Republican "establishment" players who have plenty of "experience" and are complete fucksticks for candidates. 

I'm just not buying it anymore.

Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 09:49 AM (fLHQe)

49 2008:  Tim Pawlenty and  Janet Napolitano sing praises to Gaea

http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/14167711.html


Posted by: mrp at December 27, 2010 09:49 AM (HjPtV)

50

“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.

Pawlenty said the state is now working on a pilot program to try it out, with an eye toward cars that arenÂ’t even on the road yet.


Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 01:45 PM

Well, that seals the deal for me! A conservative that we in the educated center of the universe can accept with open arms

Posted by: Kathleen Parker, Client #10 at December 27, 2010 09:50 AM (vdfwz)

51 Wonkity, wonkity, blah, blah, blah.

Where's the red meant?!?

Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 27, 2010 09:50 AM (s3dMx)

52

Can somebody do a breakdown of which conservative dealbreaker each major/semi-major Republican candidate has in their closet?  I'll try, but I suck at this:

 

TPaw = Global Warming

Mittens= Romney Care

Pence = unknown

Barbour = Possible Race issues, would sink him

Sarah Palin = Not qualified(yeah, I said it. it wasn't okay that Obama isn't qualified and it shouldn't be for her either. And if someone compares her to reagan again I am going to go batshit crazy)

Huckabee = Bush III compassionate conservative and will pardon anyone who comes to jesus

Gingrich = didn't he divorce his wife who was dying of cancer? Oh and the Global Warming thing

Giuliuni = New York Republican doesn't sell south of the mason dixon or west of the mississippi

Ryan= perfect in my mind but doesn't want the job

Paul = the jews will stop him from winning, they always do with their matzos made of the blood of gentile children

Daniels = his truce(while it makes some sense in this election) came across as politically deaf consider who votes in republican primaries

 

who am i leaving out?

 

Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (wuv1c)

53

To sum: Pawlenty only has a political presence to political junkies, and that can't translate into Presidential ambition.

Posted by: William at December 27, 2010 01:42 PM (+zM6M)

And really only to the political junkies in his home state.  I doubt that if the Powerline fanboys didn't spend so much time talking about him there would be zero buzz about him as a presidential candidate.

Posted by: buzzion at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (oVQFe)

54 Meat, red f'ing meat.

Posted by: Leo Ladenson at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (s3dMx)

55 Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 01:35 PM (M9Ie6)

I haven't seen any indication that he's a squish on gun control.  I'm pretty sure it was him who signed concealed carry into law.  He's a squish on everything else, though.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 09:51 AM (IoUF1)

56 Semanko is one of those internet assholes that sling shit all over the place, then when they get called on it act all butt-hurt and then say shit like "I'm so sorry you feel that way, please have a wonderful day and God bless."

It ain't just Steele that needs to be run out of town, it's fucksticks like Semanko that need a seat on the rail as well.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 27, 2010 09:54 AM (eCAn3)

57 I'm not sure people get it. Ronald Reagan isn't the dream. He's the bare minimum at this point. 95% of the government needs to be eliminated. We have trillions in debt that requires immediate and major cuts in entitlements. The entire tax code must be rewritten and simplified. Constitutional amendments will need to be passed to restrain government. The public sector must be de-unionized. And so on. We don't have time for half-measures floated by lackluster politicians. Name one candidate who has the stones and ability to drive these issues through congress. Name one candidate who could survive the criticism. Name one candidate with the charisma and vision to lead people in supporting these programs. Hell, not even programs. A major power change in the structure of government. Who will face these countless battles and win?

Posted by: Chicago Jedi at December 27, 2010 09:54 AM (6ftzF)

58

Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 01:51 PM (wuv1c)

See my post @ 50

Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 09:54 AM (fLHQe)

59 and I put that in the wrong effin thread.


stupid interwebs.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Confuse A Cat, Ltd. at December 27, 2010 09:56 AM (eCAn3)

60 If we rejected every politician that didn't by into the Green pretendustry one way or another we wouldn't have any candidate, christ even Palin pissed away 100 million in Alaska from windmills to methane to geothermal.

Posted by: lowandslow at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (rplS1)

61
Pawlenty supports curfew legislation
Pawlenty touts farm bill
Pawlenty signs smoking ban

Ugh... make it stop. Please... make it stop.

Posted by: The Mega Independent at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (BHLuE)

62 In this day and age, government is little more than an administrative scheme for managing transfer payments. Executive experience in this environment is not compatible with small government principles because a major chunk of any executive's job description is fighting tooth and nail to grab the best and most he can from the next-higher-level's handouts teat for his constituents before other execs representing other constituents grab it first. We're fucked, and there is no way out of this mess that doesn't pass through civilizational collapse.

Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at December 27, 2010 09:58 AM (xJVlJ)

63

Burn the Witch,

I'm just not buying it. Saying "experience" is a disqualifer is a crazy as saying "inexperience" is a qualifier.

I understand that some stuff on these people's resume is junk, but I don't want a total novice. See emocratic Presidential Candidate 2008

Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 09:59 AM (wuv1c)

64 I haven't seen any indication that he's a squish on gun control.

It says he supported mandatory Statewide background checks and training in order to carry a gun.

Supported statewide standardized training and background checks for law-abiding citizen to carry firearms.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:00 AM (M9Ie6)

65 Right now anybody with a R by his name is better then this Piece of garbage we have now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Henry Gibson at December 27, 2010 10:00 AM (SZy+Y)

66 Until Pawlenty recants his idiotic global warming statements, I will not even entertain the idea that he is a serious conservative.

Next.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 27, 2010 10:01 AM (gDbxE)

67 “Like most Minnesotans, Will (Steger)and I share a great respect for nature and the outdoors. By highlighting impacts of climate change right here in Minnesota, we hope to bring greater attention to this important issue,” Governor Pawlenty said.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at December 27, 2010 01:37 PM (tf9Ne)

Apparently by "impacts of climate change", he means the five fucking feet of snow we have before December's even over.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:02 AM (IoUF1)

68

“We realize that in the future, cars aren’t going to be powered by fuel, probably,” said Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who signed into law $5 million for the current biennium to study the mileage tax.

We're not fuel?

Posted by: Unicorn farts at December 27, 2010 10:06 AM (RykTt)

69 OK, research shows that he initially supported the crap and tax scheme but has now flip-flopped. 

That is a big negative.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:06 AM (M9Ie6)

70 I always being climate change.

Posted by: December at December 27, 2010 10:06 AM (S5YRY)

71 Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 02:00 PM (M9Ie6)

Prior to that, CCW permits were at the discretion of the county sheriffs, who often denied them for no good reason.  Now anybody who passes the background check, takes the training course, and can hit a target at 5 yards can get a permit, so it's an improvement in my book.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:10 AM (IoUF1)

72 That is a big negative.

Yes, I'd say not being able to recognize a genuine shit sandwich at point blank range calls one's presidential timber into question.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 27, 2010 10:11 AM (gDbxE)

73 Ace KNOWS what evil lurks in the mind of Obama. He KNOWS

Posted by: drizzler's battlefield buddy at December 27, 2010 10:17 AM (0YS61)

74 Prior to that, CCW permits were at the discretion of the county sheriffs, who often denied them for no good reason.

OK he is OK on that issue then.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:18 AM (M9Ie6)

75 I think minimum to get in is executive experience. We got a bunch of Senators running last time. See how that turned out. So, no sitting or former legislator who has no former executive experience. I think also the Republican candidate needs to be genuinely Tea Party friendly - not a Johnny come-lately, or someone who has been negative on the Tea Party in the past. Doesn't need to be a card carrying member - just don't forget who they are and what they want. And as much as we hate politicians, it is politics after all. You can be the biggest rock star ever, if you can't put a campaign together, you can't win. So someone with demonstrated electoral success. That reduces the field a good bit right now. In my estimation that leaves Barbour and Pawlenty and Palin, and it is also my estimate that Palin isn't running. So you have Pawlenty and Barbour, and that's why Politico is going broadside on Barbour right now. Maybe Pawlenty is off of their radar, but if they think he's interested in running, they will be after him soon enough.

Posted by: blaster at December 27, 2010 10:22 AM (MrMxG)

76

I'm just not buying it. Saying "experience" is a disqualifer is a crazy as saying "inexperience" is a qualifier.

I understand that some stuff on these people's resume is junk, but I don't want a total novice. Seeemocratic Presidential Candidate 2008

Posted by: Ben at December 27, 2010 01:59 PM (wuv1c)

We got a so-called "novice" in 2008 who is a committed leftist.  We all like to talk about how incompetent he is, but has he advanced a leftist agenda?  Yeah?  Then he's not exactly incompetent is he?  And this despite his "inexperience".

I didn't mean to suggest that experience is a disqualifier, just that this idea that there is one type of experience track for the POTUS.   

Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 27, 2010 10:23 AM (fLHQe)

77 Another plus for T-Paw: he was reelected in 2006, of all years, in Minnesota, of all states. Basically, once you get to know him, you can't help but like what you hear, regardless of what side of the political spectrum you're on. He does that awesome thing that only a few politicians can do: governs as a conservative while managing to not seriously offend liberals.

Unfortunately, some conservatives have taken the lack of liberal offense as a sign that he's a RINO, and that could be the kiss of death in this climate. In my opinion, though, it's not a sign that he's a RINO -- it's a sign that he's really good at framing issues and messaging.

Posted by: sayyid412 at December 27, 2010 10:27 AM (z375o)

78 The Powerline guys were also the ones touting that conservative T-Rex, Norm Coleman, who was going to steamroll the unsuspecting George Galloway. 

Posted by: ed at December 27, 2010 10:28 AM (Urhve)

79 Yes, I'd say not being able to recognize a genuine shit sandwich at point blank range calls one's presidential timber into question.

Anyone who supported the AGW scam as legislated in the House bill can't be anything other than an idiot or a communist.

There is no in-between on that one.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 10:35 AM (M9Ie6)

80

Welcome to the Peoples Republic of Minnesota. Pawlenty, like many of the pols up here are sock puppets for Cenex and other Big Agra operations. Hmmmm, Big Agra.... ethanol subsidies.... hmmmm, AGW is 'fixed' by putting ethanol into gasoline... I'm sure there's a connection there somewhere.

In addition, the out-state farmers are now wholly addicted to government handouts and 'price supports'.

We're a state of junkies and enablers. I'm leaving. ha ha

Posted by: chuck in st paul at December 27, 2010 10:42 AM (EhYdw)

81 Unfortunately, some conservatives have taken the lack of liberal offense as a sign that he's a RINO, and that could be the kiss of death in this climate. In my opinion, though, it's not a sign that he's a RINO -- it's a sign that he's really good at framing issues and messaging.
Posted by: sayyid412 at December 27, 2010 02:27 PM (z375o)

It's more likely the fact that the Sierra Club and Big Ag have their hand two feet up his ass.

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at December 27, 2010 10:55 AM (IoUF1)

82 Minnescrota.  The state that brought you Senator Stewart Smalley.  'nuff said.

Posted by: tangonine at December 27, 2010 11:21 AM (x3YFz)

83 I read the House Cap and Trade bill in its entirety when it got passed.  It was up on line at a site for a few days before someone realized that it was probably better to hide it.

It had things like all new homes had to be inspected for energy efficiency and rated (with the goal of moving to inspecting ALL homes as they were sold),  a "cash for clunkers" appliance trade in program,  with incentives for dealers to sell the MOST energy eficient models (as rated by 10 university centers set up around the country), allowable light wattages with exceptions for work usage (like...oh...SURGERY) only granted by the Secretary of Energy,  etc. etc. etc.

If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab,  he is unfit to be president.  No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 11:24 AM (Fo83G)

84 85.

If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab,  he is unfit to be president.  No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 03:24 PM (Fo83G)

Idiot is the likely diagnosis.

Posted by: tangonine at December 27, 2010 11:29 AM (x3YFz)

85

If Pawlenty supported that boondoggle and power grab,  he is unfit to be president.  No softening of me on that opinion. He's either an idiot or a closet Marxist.

Over the past couple years he's backed away from the global warming stuff; recently he referred to Cap and Trade as a "disaster".

Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 27, 2010 11:35 AM (plsiE)

86 I know he isn't a southerner, but whenever I start thinking about T-Paw, I start thinking about Hee-Haw!

*shakes my head*

Posted by: Africanus at December 27, 2010 11:36 AM (ygqbC)

87 Posted by: Miss Marple at December 27, 2010 03:24 PM (Fo83G)

Not only that for "new" homes but any work that was of sufficient scope to require a building permit also required upgrade to CA Green standards. It would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars for that upgrade of older homes here.

Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 11:54 AM (M9Ie6)

88 Paw seems like a good man, but he got snookered on AGW. WTF?!? Until I see a great explanation of that, I couldn't support him.

Posted by: The Stupid Party at December 27, 2010 02:12 PM (BZEkR)

89 I don't really think Pawlenty is going anywhere, but I think it's a bit of a shame that he's not even seriously considered at all. Like Duncan Hunter, he's one of those guys you really think should be seriously considered even though in your heart you know they won't be. Oh please. The guy said the following about global warming: ---------- One of the biggest issues, global climate change, is what motivated the pair to join forces — warning of what they say will be grave consequences if individuals, businesses and governments don’t act to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. “It is an important issue — I think one of the most important of our time,” Pawlenty told the 400 researchers, resource managers and educators gathered in Duluth this week. Steger praised Pawlenty for having “the guts to take on bold initiatives” to reduce greenhouse gases and for his leadership on that issue in his capacity as chair of the National Governors Association. [ ... ] Pawlenty, who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the state 80 percent by the year 2050, expressed disappointment that more steps aren’t being taken on the national level, and he challenged individuals, communities, and states to show the way. “Maybe we can lead them [the federal government] or even shame them into action,” Pawlenty said. “It’ll become de facto national policy.” ---------- That right there should eliminate Tim "The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive." Pawlenty from ANY consideration. Period.

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 02:33 PM (NITzp)

90 Is he on the AGW train? They didn't have that at "On the issues". Said there were no statements on environmental issues. Posted by: Vic at December 27, 2010 01:42 PM Well then that site is fucking useless. He has been on the AGW train since 2006. So they are deliberately hiding his record. He has made plenty of statements on AGW and Cap and Trade, including this one: In April, Mr. Pawlenty delivered the remarks that probably best reveal his views on the environment. “It looks like we should have listened to President Carter,” he told the Minnesota Climate Change Advisory Group. “He called us to action, and we should have listened. . . . Climate change is real. Human behavior is partly and may be a lot responsible. Those who don’t think so are simply not right. We should not spend time on voices that say it’s not real.” Now, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not supporting or voting for anyone who thinks we should have listened to Jimmy fucking Carter. Seriously, read that statement and try and tell me that Pawlenty is a conservative. Give me a fucking break. There is no fucking way anyone should be supporting this asshole. Anyone that much of a dumbass to fall for AGW and say everyone else is wrong and should not be listened to... has NO business being a GOP leader, let alone President.

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 02:37 PM (NITzp)

91 His cave-in on the Franken-Coleman race indicates to me just how much backbone he'd have defending conservatism or any reductions in the growth of government. Posted by: kbdabear at December 27, 2010 01:27 PM Why would Pawlenty reduce the government when in 2006, his statement was... "The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive." If Obama said that, he'd be called a socialist. But when Pawlenty says it, ace classifies him a "conservative-leaning Republican in a Blue State"? WTF?! For crying out loud, the guy said we should have listened to Jimmy fucking Carter on energy policy and AGW. Yet people are still considering him a viable candidate for the GOP nomination?! Again, WTF?!

Posted by: Clyde Shelton at December 27, 2010 03:01 PM (NITzp)

92

Why would Pawlenty reduce the government when in 2006, his statement was...

"The era of small government is over . . . government has to be more proactive, more aggressive."

I looked into that, because it didn't sound like something he'd say.

Turns out it was from a Star Tribune article (which immediately makes it suspect) and the "The era of small government is over" line was a referring to a David Brooks article titled as such.

The Star Trib later issued a "clarification"; they have a habit of misquoting / selectively editing Republicans to suit their own needs.

Couldn't find the original Star Trib article; found a blog reference here.



 

Posted by: Hollowpoint at December 27, 2010 04:04 PM (plsiE)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
126kb generated in CPU 0.061, elapsed 0.2466 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2288 seconds, 220 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.