February 16, 2010

Surprising No One: Liberal Media Completely Embargoes Phil Jones Admissions
— Ace

With three exceptions -- FoxNews and the Washington Times (of course) and this brief single mention on CNN:

JOHN ROBERTS, CNN ANCHOR: There's also something else that's out there. Phil Jones from the University of East Anglia, the climate research unit, the guy that was at the center of this recent e-mail controversy late last year, has said in an interview with the BBC that he has not seen any, quote, "statistically significant warming since 1995," though he says he still believes that the earth's temperature has warmed. And he also said that he might be missing some of the data that is responsible for his climate models.

Of course, skeptics are jumping all over this, saying the whole thing is a farce. Global warming doesn't exist.

What do you think of the Professor Jones situation, the lack of statistically significant warming, and the fact that he may have misplaced some of the records?

JOHN CHRISTY, PROFESSOR, ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, UNIV. OF ALABAMA- HUNTSVILLE: Well, I think what Phil Jones is saying is that Mother Nature is perfectly capable of making the temperature rise and fall through the past several hundred years. And in terms of the data problems, well, we do have to be careful when we're talking about public policy, that means trillions of dollars, and we haven't had that very hard and critical situation where you take care of data and make it publicly available to everyone. And that needs to be done now.

We have a childish, petulant, insecure, unprofessional media. It has to be noted again that the British media is covering this story well -- even left-wing outfits like the Guardian and the statist-establishment-left BBC.

My respect for the BBC and the Guardian has increased quite a bit. This story is obviously against their political agenda, but they covered it anyway, because it's, you know, news.

Compare to the American Media, which is principally now in the business of blocking the reportage of news.

Posted by: Ace at 08:21 AM | Comments (85)
Post contains 349 words, total size 2 kb.

1

Lamestream media at work!

 

Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 16, 2010 08:23 AM (ujg0T)

2 First! Yea!

Posted by: Curmudgeon at February 16, 2010 08:23 AM (ujg0T)

3 Surprising No One: Liberal Media Completely Embargoes Phil Jones Admissions

And that's pretty much the biggest news yet with regard to global warming.

Posted by: rdbrewer at February 16, 2010 08:25 AM (YeHnw)

4 "[H]e has not seen any, quote, 'statistically significant warming since 1995,' though he says he still believes that the earth's temperature has warmed"

Climate science in a nutshell.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 16, 2010 08:27 AM (xxgag)

5 Come on now... We still need to do something to make the rain stop, or start... or warm.. or cold.. either way PAY YOUR DUES! The Government regulations will fix it.

Posted by: ObamaSock at February 16, 2010 08:27 AM (V8B//)

6 And that's pretty much the biggest news yet with regard to global warming. That and the fact that we're entering Dalton Minimum II: Little Ice Age Boogaloo.

Posted by: joncelli at February 16, 2010 08:27 AM (RD7QR)

7 Paging Al Gore... Paging Al Gore

Posted by: Mjim at February 16, 2010 08:29 AM (V8B//)

8

The interviewee is a professor at Alabama Huntsville.

He's fortunate to be walking on this side of the grass.

I haven't seen a Huntsville interview since Von Braun.

A little mass murder once in awhile really keeps your campus on the map.

Posted by: comatus at February 16, 2010 08:29 AM (/VEEI)

9 Phil Jones has a temperature!

Posted by: Al Gore at February 16, 2010 08:30 AM (H6Jyg)

10

But I think they have found a suitable walk-back spin that you can expect to see trial-ballooned soon:  climate scientists we fooled by mother nature and old, unreliable data.  Watch for it.

The lack of an "escape clause" for the MSM and the Democrats (birm) has prevented the exposure of these stories, but I predict they will start coming pretty quick once the "nuances" of the "fooled by Mother Nature" narrative are fine-tuned.

I told my children I would pay for their higher education in any field they chose - except journalism.  And I told them if they go that way, they could pick a new Dad too, because I would never speak to them again.

Posted by: sherlock at February 16, 2010 08:30 AM (FsbnY)

11 Time to bring in Captain America: http://tinyurl.com/yj5yzaf

Posted by: Justin Camp at February 16, 2010 08:30 AM (nF4Jh)

12 These fucking bastards in the MSM, Phil Jones, Mann, and every pol who wants to tax us to death. They should be taken out and shot.

Posted by: Jack at February 16, 2010 08:31 AM (bvDV5)

13 Doesn't really raise my respect of the BBC.  Just further lowers my... well, I don't have any respect for them really... opinion of the LSM.  Pretty much any news I get from them has to be verified by at least 2 other credible sources before I assume it's accurate.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 16, 2010 08:31 AM (pZEar)

14

Boy, the old home state of Alabama sure is getting a lot of press of late.

For all the wrong reasons, naturally, but still...

Posted by: The Werewolf of London at February 16, 2010 08:31 AM (i3AsK)

15 Any update on Trump wanting Al Gores Peace Prize revoked?

Posted by: Mjim at February 16, 2010 08:32 AM (V8B//)

16 How, exactly, does this help my chubby daughters?

Posted by: First Wookie, Fattty Foods Czar at February 16, 2010 08:32 AM (UOM48)

17 he has not seen any, quote, "statistically significant warming since 1995," though he says he still believes that the earth's temperature has warmed. And he also said that he might be missing some of the data that is responsible for his climate models.

Of course, skeptics are jumping all over this, saying the whole thing is a farce. Global warming doesn't exist.

I think the issue is that Global Warming has to be extraordinary. If the warming we had from the 80s to the 90s was no different then past warming trends, then Global Warming did occur, but AGW is a bunch of hooey.

Overall, it is looking more and more like the AGW boosters knowingly spent the last 5 or 10 years trying to hide the decline....so to speak.

Posted by: 18-1 at February 16, 2010 08:32 AM (7BU4a)

18

Compare to the American Media, which is principally now in the business of blocking the reportage of news blowing Obama on a daily basis.

Posted by Ace at 12:21 PM New Comments Thingy

FIFYA

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 16, 2010 08:33 AM (erIg9)

19

Compare to the American Media

I don't think they deserve to be called "media".

But "lying, truth-burying assholes" is a bit of a mouthful.

 

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 08:33 AM (Be4xl)

20

What is Jones trying to do? Hurt Charlie Johnson? He has invested the full thimblefull of his credibility in Global Warming. How unfair. Now Charlie will have to put his widdle hands over his ears while hollering Nanananana, lest he realize he has been a massive, galactic dickhead.

Posted by: maddogg at February 16, 2010 08:33 AM (OlN4e)

21
Doesn't really raise my respect of the BBC.  Just further lowers my... well, I don't have any respect for them really... opinion of the LSM.  Pretty much any news I get from them has to be verified by at least 2 other credible sources before I assume it's accurate.

We TOTALLY agree.......



Posted by: Dan Rather & Mary Mapes at February 16, 2010 08:33 AM (J5Hcw)

22 Look, I think you are all being much to hard on Phil Jones.  Being a climate scientist is hard work, it's not like you can just wish the data into proving the warming we know exists.  I hope you will all think about that before causing the good man any more trouble.

Posted by: Ellie Light of the Arctic Circle at February 16, 2010 08:33 AM (Xsi7M)

23 Any update on Trump wanting Al Gores Peace Prize revoked?

Any update on what Barry's doing with his Nobel money?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 16, 2010 08:34 AM (UOM48)

24 Propagandists.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 08:35 AM (Be4xl)

25

What is Jones trying to do?

Posted by: maddogg at February 16, 2010 12:33 PM (OlN4e)

Not go to jail for fraud?

Posted by: 18-1 at February 16, 2010 08:35 AM (7BU4a)

26 #6 Posted by: joncelli at February 16, 2010 12:27 PM (RD7QR) "That and the fact that we're entering Dalton Minimum II: Little Ice Age Boogaloo." Ice Ages are caused by manmade global warming, you denier.

Posted by: Settled Science Guy at February 16, 2010 08:35 AM (Q41Zh)

27 Carhles doesn't have to realize he's a galactic dickhead, that's what we're here for.

I'm more than happy to point this out to the world.

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 16, 2010 08:35 AM (erIg9)

28

But "lying, truth-burying assholes" is a bit of a mouthful.

 

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 12:33 PM (Be4xl)

Presstitutes rolls off the tongue.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 16, 2010 08:35 AM (xxgag)

29

Presstitutes rolls off the tongue.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 16, 2010 12:35 PM (xxgag)


so does Lying Cocksuckers

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 16, 2010 08:36 AM (erIg9)

30
Any update on what Barry's doing with his Nobel money?

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 16, 2010 12:34 PM (UOM4

Oh, I was going to get a few more mirrors for the white house. Oh, and maybe some large screen digital picture frames. Who wants to see a bunch of dead white guys when you could be looking at me?

Posted by: Barack Obama at February 16, 2010 08:36 AM (7BU4a)

31

I believe that the American Meida is wholeheartedly correct in not covering the corporatist and big oil funded denialist lies and slander. The British Media, however, should be banned from the internet and airwaves for being a mouthpiece of Christianist Creationists and Willful Gaia Molesters.

 

Anybody want a kindle? 

Posted by: Charles Johnson's Science Mentor at February 16, 2010 08:37 AM (wnU1W)

32 Well, I think what Phil Jones is saying is that Mother Nature is perfectly capable of making the temperature rise and fall through the past several hundred years.

You mean like all of us stupid bagging mouthbreathers said?  No!  The hell you say!

You know, when I lose evidence in a case, the other side is entitled to a jury instruction that says the jury is completely free to presume that lost evidence would be against my position.  I think it's fair to assume the same here.

Posted by: alexthechick at February 16, 2010 08:37 AM (8WZWv)

33 oh, and it appears as though Hurricane Data may be a bit dodgy as well.

Posted by: eddiebear at February 16, 2010 08:40 AM (wnU1W)

34 Chuck is mighty high on Science. Too damn bad he can't recognize it when it's biting him on his fat ass.

Posted by: maddogg at February 16, 2010 08:41 AM (OlN4e)

35 We're going to live!

Posted by: A Polar Bear at February 16, 2010 08:42 AM (Z+qzA)

36

"Look, I think you are all being much to hard on Phil Jones."

I totally agree.  Push him too far and he may go Full Bishop on some collegues.

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 16, 2010 08:44 AM (ucq49)

37

Overall, it is looking more and more like the AGW boosters knowingly spent the last 5 or 10 years trying to hide the decline....so to speak.

Longer than that. I remember watching a show from the 1990s about how temperatures were being measured in cities that had built up, etc.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 08:45 AM (Be4xl)

38 35: he said he read a book or something and "bothered to educate himself". Yeah. He probably read a comic book and took that as Gospel for his new faith

Posted by: eddiebear at February 16, 2010 08:45 AM (wnU1W)

39

I totally agree.  Push him too far and he may go Full Bishop on some collegues.

Like the earthquakes and tsunamis, that too would be taken as more proof of Global Warming.

Posted by: maddogg at February 16, 2010 08:46 AM (OlN4e)

40

oh, and it appears as though Hurricane Data may be a bit dodgy as well.

Perhaps it would be easier to point out which, if any, portions are correct.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 08:47 AM (Be4xl)

41 I don't care anymore. Screw all of you. You'll have to pry my cold, dead ass out of this chair. 

Posted by: Rajendra K. Pachauri, IPCC Chair at February 16, 2010 08:47 AM (SCcgT)

42 I can haz ManBerPeeg?

Posted by: loljones at February 16, 2010 08:49 AM (7DB+a)

43 In Britain, both Labour and Conservative politicians swallowed AGW pretty much whole hog and each party tried to one-up the other as being greener than thou.  So the British media in the end wasn't really favoring one party over the other by exposing the charade.  But in the US, the popular media-driven perception is of enlightened Democrat progressives versus foot-dragging Republican Gaia-rapers, so any walkback on AGW is seen to hurt the Dems much more than the Reps.

Posted by: Skookumchuk at February 16, 2010 08:49 AM (btzPD)

44 You teabaggers are sooo unsophisticated. Your little facts can't affect the TRUTH! AGW is REAL, and is caused by racist clouds!

Posted by: janeane garawfulo at February 16, 2010 08:50 AM (FAU2w)

45

Scandinavia-gate

"Yet again,  we have a situation where the data doesnÂ’t match the full-gloss coloured graphs produced by the PR agency for global warming called the IPCC."

Posted by: conscious, but incredibly incoherent at the moment at February 16, 2010 08:51 AM (Vu6sl)

46 I have actually toyed with the idea of getting a subscription to the Guardian at some point. Not because I am simpatico with their 'tendencies' but because they do COVER THE NEWS. As you say, even when the news is not to their liking they tend to cover it nonetheless. And when they do cover it, they most often just present the facts without a wheelbarrow of spin. That deserves respect and support. Frankly if somehow the Guardian could replace the NYT everyone(except Times propaganists) would be the better for it.

Posted by: Dougf at February 16, 2010 08:51 AM (8JckG)

47 41: true. That would leave a blank sheet of paper then

Posted by: eddiebear at February 16, 2010 08:51 AM (wnU1W)

48 Ace, you are spot on. Keep up the pressure. The left created this monstrosity. The left will fall with it as well, the fucking traitorous fucking liars!! 

Posted by: Threadjacker at February 16, 2010 08:53 AM (C39a6)

49 Well, if I read that the writers of this crap were sweating more than usual, I'd believe that.

Posted by: Mama AJ at February 16, 2010 08:54 AM (Be4xl)

50 Do players like the NYT, the WaPo, the LAT, and the Boston Globe understand that virtually no one under thirty pays them the slightest attention? Do they get it, yet, that if we see a headline on the Grey Lady, our first instinct is to peel back the lede and search for the real story elsewhere?

Posted by: George Orwell at February 16, 2010 08:57 AM (AZGON)

51

The Big Lie that couldn't.

Torches.Pitchforks.Anger

Posted by: Threadjacker at February 16, 2010 08:57 AM (C39a6)

52

I told my children I would pay for their higher education in any field they chose - except journalism.

That's harsh, sherlock.

Ideally, journalism as a field of study provides a great education requiring genuine knowledge across a broad array of subjects. The reality is that the journalists themselves are lazy. The people who practice this craft are oftentimes the ones who cut corners on the curriculum as students and rely on press releases to have their job done for them as "professionals." The model jourmalist is sharp, curious, a quick study on everything, analytical, clear of thought, unintimidated by all levels of power and beyond reproach in terms of integrity. It would be fine if some journalists merely lacked some of these qualities. Sadly, too many have the exact opposite of all of them.

I'd like to talk you out of your deal with your children regarding the study of journalism. Failing that, I'd like to convince you to extend your exception to also include education.

Posted by: FireHorse at February 16, 2010 08:58 AM (cQyWA)

53 Goddammit,how is it that the English press makes the MSM look like pussies. These LSM outfits better understand that they are going the be the first to be hanging from lightpoles.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at February 16, 2010 08:58 AM (nxUYP)

54

"I'd like to convince you to extend your exception to also include education."

I'd like to nominate Continuing Education/Studies

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 16, 2010 09:01 AM (ucq49)

55 Al Gore surfaces!  Worse than we thought.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 16, 2010 09:02 AM (xxgag)

56

Still waiting for an apology from Kathleen Parker for calling all climate realists "the same" as holocaust deniers.

I talked to my mom (liberal) about this yeasterday. She said I just get my info from the intertubes because she has not seen it on ABC News.

Unless and until the LSM reports this it is not true to a huge anount of people in this country. Sad but true. Alternative media is great but limited.

Posted by: fugazi at February 16, 2010 09:02 AM (4bvZp)

57 As I asked yesterday, does anyone want to bet against me that, sometime in March, we'll be reading somewhere that this February was actually the warmest February on record? Personally, I think that too many people have gone too far down this road to even think of turning back, and if they have to torture the data into confessing to a lie, they'll do it without a thought. Certainly, "Chuckles" won't give up on this crap until the next ice age, and even then he'll blame it on global warming.

Posted by: Bitsko at February 16, 2010 09:03 AM (8/KZN)

58 Even the public has given up on the MSM News now. As I said in the previous thread, they have spent their wad.

Posted by: Vic at February 16, 2010 09:07 AM (QrA9E)

59 Oh God.. Al Gore is still fuckin' that chicken

Posted by: Mjim at February 16, 2010 09:10 AM (V8B//)

60 MiniTrue: Comrades, you only need to know what we tell you.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 16, 2010 09:13 AM (1Jaio)

61 This doesnÂ’t quite fall into the weather as climate Â… Following a cold snap in the Northeast, Lake ErieÂ’s surface is virtually frozen over for the first time in about 14 years. The ice ranges in thickness between paper thin along the northern shore and several inches along the southern shore, where many people are ice skating. GoErie.com reports that the lake hasnÂ’t completely frozen since the winter of 1995-1996. Although the ice cover is considered complete, prevailing winds have created some cracks in the ice. There are also reportedly ice chunks floating off the coast of Dunkirk, N.Y., which is one of the deepest parts of the lake and would naturally be one of the last places to freeze.

Posted by: Neo at February 16, 2010 09:14 AM (tE8FB)

62 The American media is committing malpractice in its conduct of journalism. There needs to be a certification process....licensing, if you will, before allowing anyone to practice journalism. And the primary criterion should be to keep your fucking opinion to yourself. If you cannot do that then find another line of work. Like PR hack for the Democratic Party. Which is what our current media, with the exception of Fox, the WSJ and a handful of others, is.

Posted by: LGoPs at February 16, 2010 09:15 AM (v/rEn)

63 True, the Legacy Media hasn't touched it and probably never will.  But at least I can listen to my dip sis in law choke on it when I say the data sucks....and when she makes a snarky comment about Fox, I can honestly say that I learned it from the sainted Auntie Beeb instead. 

Posted by: bigpinkfluffybunny at February 16, 2010 09:16 AM (KWhJd)

64

Ace, I ban you from the Internet for your denialism of Global Warming and for the racism inherent in your denialism of Global Warming. And I mean from the entire Internet, no more Ewok porn for you. Ever.

Kilgore is out back cutting your wires as I write this. Al Gore, the inventor of the Internet and the architect of the Carbon Exchange that will save the non-racist environmentally sound world from your ilk told me I could.  

Posted by: Charles Johnson at February 16, 2010 09:16 AM (GgXZc)

65 Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man, and tell me to stop fucking with the data?

Posted by: Tweak at February 16, 2010 09:17 AM (iV4X6)

66 And by the way. y'all, HAPPY MARDI GRAS!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: SGT Dan at February 16, 2010 09:17 AM (GgXZc)

67 I'll bet the LAT will be the first big liberal press to break the embargo.

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 16, 2010 09:17 AM (ucq49)

Posted by: maddogg at February 16, 2010 09:18 AM (OlN4e)

69 Also in the controversy from the emails going under-reported? Jones et al. conspiracy to exclude critics, aka scientists, venue and voice. The bad science is just a tip of the iceberg. Their collusion to block out challenge and essentially make critics unemployable in the field was much worse.

These IPCC/AGW Hysterics/East Anglia academics are frauds. That is all they are. They cannot and should not be rehabilitated. Going back to them to get their adjusted opinion based on new evidence or soul-searching, career-saving walkbacks? An endeavor they do not deserve and one that should not be trusted anyway.

Strike "scientist" from their titles. They are not. They really should be facing academic isolation and banishment if not actual confinement/prison for fraud.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 16, 2010 09:22 AM (swuwV)

70 How, exactly, does this help my chubby daughters?

Posted by: First Wookie, Fatty Foods Czar at February 16, 2010 12:32 PM (UOM4

The cooler the planet, the lower the crop yields.  Less food, fewer fat people.  Rejoice, Chewwie!

Posted by: FUBAR at February 16, 2010 09:25 AM (1fanL)

71

Mama AJ,

Yeah, I remember watching a newscast a long ways back - could have been in the 80's - about how New York City could have a climate comparable to that of Miami by the turn of the century or thereabouts.

Saw Perky Katie the other night do a little shtick on this with some goofy music, talking about how there were some issues with the data that were giving "skeptics" some "ammunition". The whole tone seemed to be that there were a few technical glitches that were giving the flat earth society members an excuse to distort the truth that we all know.

 

Posted by: RM at February 16, 2010 09:29 AM (GkYyh)

72 She said I just get my info from the intertubes because she has not seen it on ABC News.

Buy her a subscription to the British press.  Surely she will trust the Red Guardian.

Posted by: toby928 at February 16, 2010 09:30 AM (PD1tk)

73 Fugazi, (#57) I know all too well what you mean. I used to do some work with a pro-Israel media advocacy/watchdog group that refused to acknowledge any journalist or outlet that wasn't in good standing with the left-wing cabal. It was their feeling that only sources like the New York Times, Washington Post, NPR, CBS, NBC, ABC, and CNN had any standing among their target audience. So if Fox News (or any outfit with a perceived conservative/right slant) reported a story that treated Israel in a positive light, we couldn't use it, period. And since my group's hallowed liberal/left biased sources were adept at simply ignoring stories that didn't fit a pro-Palestinian agenda, we were hard pressed to find anything to counter the daily lies and propaganda that were being aimed at Israel from Hamas and Hezbollah.

For all the talk of how talk radio and the internet have leveled the playing field, the truth is...not so much. The same dynamic shows up in trying to get people to look at the other side of the global warming debate. The second you say your information comes from Fox, The Wall Street Journal, or National Review Online, the majority of people tend to dismiss it out of hand, no matter how well sourced or researched that information might be. So as long as the NYT and company choose to keep burying inconvenient truthiness, I'm afraid the current leadership in Washington will keep cramming this stuff down our collective throats. Wish I knew how to change the dynamic, but I don't.

Posted by: Bitsko at February 16, 2010 09:31 AM (8/KZN)

74 I remember watching a newscast a long ways back - could have been in the 80's - about how New York City could have a climate comparable to that of Miami by the turn of the century or thereabouts. 

Posted by: RM at February 16, 2010 01:29 PM (GkYyh)

And they were right.  It snowed in NYC and it snowed in Florida.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 16, 2010 09:38 AM (xxgag)

75

At East Anglia, the dog ate their homework.

Remember that the BBC has 12 billion$ of their pension funds in the Gorebull Worming industry. Gangrene job development, Carbon credit exchange industry, Gangrene energy industry, and of course the Worming propaganda industry. They are going to change their spin very soon.

Posted by: chicocano at February 16, 2010 09:48 AM (6p3E9)

76

Looks like Gore might me right.  Oh wait.

Associated Press story published in the Washington Post, November 2, 1922.  Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt.

The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway.

Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.

Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds

Posted by: kansas at February 16, 2010 10:04 AM (sPCho)

77

I'd like to talk you out of your deal with your children regarding the study of journalism. Failing that, I'd like to convince you to extend your exception to also include education. - Firehorse

I meant it just the same way I once upon a time warned them not to get into cars with strangers, and for pretty much the same sordid reasons.  Except now that they are infinitely wise, I have to threaten them.  It's working so far - both becoming Doctors.

Oh, wait....

Posted by: sherlock at February 16, 2010 10:26 AM (jdXw+)

78 The American media has been so silent about this, there can be only one explanation. JOHN EDWARDS FUCKED GLOBAL WARMING!

Posted by: Guvnah at February 16, 2010 10:43 AM (Rg8DN)

79 Do the American MSM not realize that they are no longer people's only source of news?

Are they not aware that people can learn this news from elsewhere, then wonder why they did not hear it from the trusty MSM?

It's almost as if they've given up on reporting news, and now see themselves as groupthinking massage outlets, providing only what will soothe and relax the partisans who tune in.

Posted by: Erwin at February 16, 2010 11:20 AM (cjADH)

80

recent e-mail controversy

What recent e-mail controversy?

Posted by: constant cnn viewer at February 16, 2010 11:49 AM (2qU2d)

81

recent e-mail controversy

What recent e-mail controversy?

There was a recent e-mail controversy?

Posted by: NYT subscription holder at February 16, 2010 11:50 AM (2qU2d)

82

recent e-mail controversy

What recent e-mail controversy?

There was a recent e-mail controversy?

You mean to say Global Warming hasn't melted the Internet yet?

Posted by: MSNBC Viewers (both) at February 16, 2010 01:19 PM (ZrS0c)

83 "Compare to the American Media, which is principally now in the business of blocking the reportage of news."

It's not "news" until the media elite say it's "news".  And right now you have a lot of media elites with EGO involved.  So they'll continue to screech that the sky is falling.

Posted by: GarandFan at February 16, 2010 01:22 PM (6mwMs)

84 "We have a childish, petulant, insecure, unprofessional media. It has to be noted again that the British media is covering this story well -- even left-wing outfits like the Guardian and the statist-establishment-left BBC."
____________________
Let's war against diabetes

Posted by: NTDiabetes at December 08, 2010 11:09 PM (0Pczw)

85 Especially sought next models include the 1987 <a href="http://www.buygreatshoes.org/" rel="dofollow">uggaustralia</a> 1990 (Air Max III), 1991 (Air Max 91), 1993, 1995, 1997, and to an extent, 2003. The 1993 model was the first to have the in toto visible heel stand cipher that was apparent grease the back as really as on the sides, again the 1995 model <a href="http://www.buygreatshoes.org/" rel="dofollow">air force one</a> was the first to facet outward forefoot position. The 1997 model was the first to include a hefty roll Air happening. The Beatles' measure ""Revolution"" was used in a television commercial to hang in the shoe. It was the prime and especial point that a song performed by the <a href="http://www.buygreatshoes.org/" rel="dofollow">sunglasses hut</a> Beatles was used in a TV ad.

Posted by: sunglasses hut at July 08, 2011 06:29 PM (GlxmD)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
118kb generated in CPU 0.2743, elapsed 0.3545 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3274 seconds, 213 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.