February 11, 2010
— Ace Glen Beck takes her out.
This is a worry for me about out-of-nowhere Tea Party candidates.
GOP candidates tend to have histories and are vetted. Now, those histories have baggage -- yes, they do tend to be more establishment, more insidery, etc.
On the other hand, we know more about them, as a general rule.
The Tea Party is not just comprised of strong small-government conservatives. A lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives at never having been in "real politics," always shut out of real politics by the, erm, exoticness of their views.
These people, I think, want to hijack what is mostly a conservative movement and harness it to their own weird ends. The remaining Paulites. The few remaining Perotists. LaRouchies -- remember them? They were the ones with the Hitler signs. And a bunch of doctrinaire libertarian types, the ones, I mean, who don't want to talk about real issues before us but always want to engage in nothing but college bullshit sessions about the ideal state. Crank libertarians, I mean. The kind that just want to argue about the gold standard and lighthouses and nothing else all day.
I don't think they'll be successful in doing that. They will attempt to claim leadership of the movement -- they'll just assert they are leaders, and expect people to follow. But the movement will say "Screw you, weirdo, who asked you to lead?"
But I do think some of them may slip by, flying that Tea Party flag, which is a respectable outside-party flag, and hiding their real flag.
Which, in Medina's case, is the flag of 9/11 Trutherism.
We caught her, thank goodness.
But we have to be on guard for this. There are a whole pack of opportunistic weirdos who cannot fly their own flag without being laughed off the ballot, so they'll instead fly the Tea Party flag.
"Tea Baggage:" Coined by Dang in the thread.
Posted by: Ace at
10:25 AM
| Comments (292)
Post contains 359 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:27 AM (m4Ulb)
Posted by: brak at February 11, 2010 10:28 AM (W5NBA)
Posted by: self parody at February 11, 2010 10:29 AM (pUctD)
Perry - Merck-funded campaign for mandatory HPV
Kay - TARP, pro-illegals, yada yada yada
new chick - troofer
I give up. Is Kinky Friedman running again?
Posted by: Tex at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (DhStW)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (m4Ulb)
This is the problem when there is no real, national party who can verify and screen these people. We have even Democrats trying to co-opt the Tea Party in an attempt to get elected.
Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (1gwjW)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:31 AM (m4Ulb)
You say this like it is a bad thing or something.
You must be working for the Booosh.
Posted by: Most Leftists at February 11, 2010 10:31 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Jewells at February 11, 2010 10:33 AM (l/N7H)
Jim, here is my report from on the ground:
Medina is a Ron Pauler. She worked on PaulÂ’s last campaign and has adopted the tactics the the Paulians did when Paul threw his hat in the presidential ring.
When polls are taken (Perry, Hutchison, Medina) her supporters (former Paulians) crash the polls by calling in time after time after time, just as they did during the presidential campaign.
She claims to have the Tx. Tea Party groups behind her, but she doesnÂ’t.
Yeah, we knew she was a Truffer. But she had done her best to keep that little fact under wraps because she knows it wonÂ’t play well in Texas.
Good to see she lost it with Beck. Her campaign is probably now on life support, along with KBH.
Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (1gwjW)
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (nYKDd)
Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (1gwjW)
I really don't think some party purity test is the way to go buddy.
Posted by: Dede Scozzafava at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Dennis Kucinich from under a tin foil hat at February 11, 2010 10:35 AM (wWwJR)
It is true. Medina is often on that tinfoil hat wearing asshat Alex Jones's show. Even Ru Paul's dad Ron Paul rejects trutherism.
Yeah, right. He also makes appearances on the Alex Jones show. And he's "just asking questions" about 9/11. But not a truther, nosiree. He just wants to know what really happened.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (plsiE)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (jlvw3)
One down, millions to go...
Posted by: Joy to the whirled at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (WVBjj)
Posted by: Iblis at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (9221z)
Posted by: Dave at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (Xm1aB)
I guess those people who said Sarah Palin should endorse her over Perry were wrong huh.
Posted by: Dan at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (KZraB)
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (e+wCK)
Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 02:34 PM (nYKDd)
Well it is interesting. The fact that we conservatives have no problem going after each other is why our ideas tend to be much stronger and our candidates *somewhat* less likely to be crooks and scumbags.
But it indeed makes us weaker as a political force. The only thing the left ever argues about is tactics. Once the collective decides on an idea that's it...
Posted by: 18-1 at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: GuyfromNH at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (GWXuo)
From now on, being in the TEA party will = truther and birther and racist (instead of just the latter two).
What's hilarious is that most democrats entertain some of these retarded suspicions.
But the TEA party should be about taking the GOP over from the ground up. Instead of working for an actual campaign, run for precinct chair locally. Fix the GOP.
Rick Perry has been a great governor, and the rest of the country would be real lucky to have him, but Texas is going to keep him around.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (dUOK+)
Posted by: Tumescent Pubescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:31 PM (m4Ulb)
Ah, you're back to stink up another thread!
Posted by: Dick Cheney's Warcock at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: evil libertarian at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (RnbbT)
Hmmmm, could someone help me out here? I'm interested in implementing IP unified communications over extremely reliable, scalable and cost effective IP-PBX platforms.
Any idea who my first choice should be, say... if I was looking the Colorado area perhaps?
Posted by: Either a distributed enterprise client or government entity at February 11, 2010 10:39 AM (tWf3S)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (m4Ulb)
Nice try, limpdick. There are moonbats on both sides. The difference is, our side doesn't elect them cough McKinney coughcough Waters coughhackcough Kucinich cough Pelosi coughcough Stark cough ahem.
Fucking amateur. Can we request a troll upgrade? This one has NO fucking skills.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:39 AM (xGIqT)
And a lot of those claiming to be TEA party leaders seem to be Paulians. A lot of those claiming to be candidates for the TEA party tend to be Paulians.
they are STEALING a really wholesome and intelligent movement for limited government because it's the easy path to a little more success at the polls.
This is why the TEA party should be co-opted by Bachman, Palin, and the GOP. It's not ideal, but it protects the message from the Ron Paul thieves.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:41 AM (dUOK+)
Ron Paul attracts Nazi scum like Don Black, and if they aren't Nazi they are complete crazies. Normal people don't like Ron Paul. That's like an axiom.
Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (uSbo6)
Posted by: red speck at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (/vfpn)
"Fucking amateur. Can we request a troll upgrade? This one has NO fucking skills."
Nor any skill at argumentation, which is more to the point.
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (e+wCK)
We ostracize her.
The democrats put their psycho in charge of a powerful committee.
Of course there are idiots and psychos on both sides, but the party that thinks government should be smaller and less intrusive deals with these crazies so much better.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:43 AM (dUOK+)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:45 AM (m4Ulb)
Posted by: The Truthers at February 11, 2010 10:46 AM (YMZjg)
I hope the tea party never has a "leader" or is co-opted. That is not why most of these previously non-political people got involved in the movement.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (2sJK0)
I have great skillz at argumentation, knucklehead. All I need to do is call you a knucklehead, or claim that you have "no ideas" to win the argument, knucklehead.
All you haterz have no ideas, knuckleheads. I gtg - Palin Steele invited me over to play with his "gf".
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (otlXg)
"Hilarious. Your White Party fights for bankers, insurers, and no jobs.
Fight the Power, knuckleheads!
Have you been listening to Obama recently? Lotsa love for bankers and such-like on display.
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (e+wCK)
Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (nYKDd)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (m4Ulb)
Party has lots of ideas, eggy. They just don't happen to include the rampant increase in the size of government, the debt, welfare, entitlements and general stupidity yours does.
Now go get your fucking shinebox
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (erIg9)
Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (9B5OK)
What the hell...
"I'm certainly not into mind control or thought policing people," Medina said.
I guess that means there are some people who ARE into mind control? Lizard people, maybe?
Looks like I'll be holding my nose and voting for Perry. Shit.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (fx8sm)
Looks like Sarah Palin made the right choice in this particular race.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (wgLRl)
I never got why they bolded "love" in their rEVOLution signs. Seems they are very hateful.
Ron Paul's best defense to his publishing antisemitic columns in the Ron Paul newsletter was that he is an idiot who can't control his products or disavow them for decades.
There is an element of psycho that wants to legalize drugs, get out of Iraq, and eliminate all taxation. They know the TEA movement is powerful and are insane enough to think it is all about them.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (dUOK+)
FITY, dickhead.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (otlXg)
Posted by: Truman North at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (e8YaH)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (jlvw3)
#41 Nor any skill at argumentation, which is more to the point.
I have great skillz at argumentation, knucklehead. All I need to do is call you a knucklehead, or claim that you have "no ideas" to win the argument, knucklehead.
All you haterz have no ideas, knuckleheads. I gtg - Palin Steele invited me over to play with his "gf".
Assuming that this isn't a sock-puppet, I suggest that you look up the term "ad homimen." It is a logical fallacy. That is bad, in case you don't know what "fallacy" means.
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (e+wCK)
I guess that means there are some people who ARE into mind control?
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 02:48 PM (fx8sm)
I don't mean to defend that Medina person, but yes - there are folks who are desperate to send out thought police to persecute us. They're called Liberals. If they could put drugs in the water to control out minds they'd do it in a heart beat.
Posted by: Reactionary at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (xUM1Q)
Have you been listening to Obama recently? Lotsa love for bankers and such-like on display.
Why shouldn't I have love for Wall Street? Those dumbfucks donated lots of money and voted for me last time. They know I'm only kicking them around for show. They'll be back on my side when it counts, in three years. Won't you, boys?
Posted by: Barry Obama at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (lLqRQ)
Posted by: TexBob at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (2jp4I)
He is the Last True Conservative and the Only Man Who Can Save America...
...fuckit, I can't keep up the requisite levels of fake crazy to pull that off.
These Truther-Lites like Medina and Teh Ron piss me off with their half-assed "I don't know the real answer, I think there are questions that need to be answered."
Beck nailed it - you either believe the gov't murdered 3000 of its citizens, or you don't. It's like trying to take the middle ground on Jesus Christ - "Well, he was a great man who did lots of good things, but he was just a man."
No, sorry. He was going around claiming He was the Son of GOD who was magically implanted in His mother's womb. He was either who He said He was, or He was a stark, raving lunatic. There is no third choice.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (xGIqT)
Assuming that this isn't a sock-puppet, I suggest that you look up the term "ad homimen." It is a logical fallacy. That is bad, in case you don't know what "fallacy" means.
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 02:50 PM (e+wCK)
you're going to make him/her/it think you mean fellatio
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (erIg9)
He's better than our 80% friend, though I have been mad at him over the years at times.
Palin did get this right and she should get some credit for it. I know a lot of people are pissed about the Mccain endorsement, but at least one of the guys running against him (to his right) is also a total psycho. Mccain isn't perfect, and barely our 80% friend and I will laugh if he's voted out, but he's not psycho. He loves America and is very capable on the hill when we're in the minority (which we will be for a while).
Mccain is a tougher sell, but at least on Perry a lot of the people bashing Palin for her support have egg on their faces now.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (dUOK+)
Your White Party fights for bankers, insurers, and no jobs.
Except for the jobs of the bankers and the insurers. We're evil that way, too.
Psst--ask Toonces how he voted on TARP.
Idiot.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (B+qrE)
Give her a lovely parting gift and kick her ass to the curb.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 10:52 AM (9B5OK)
Posted by: Prepubescent Ergie at February 11, 2010 10:52 AM (VDgKF)
Posted by: Dr. Varno at February 11, 2010 10:53 AM (0QJjg)
The Tea PARTY folks should start their own party and quit trying to hijack the Republican PARTY.
Now, if they want to be part of the Republican party.. take part in rebuilding the Republican brand.. then come on in!
Smaller government and lower taxes should have always been the first items on the list of what Republicans strive for in government.
I'm getting a little tired of the loud angry squeaking wheel getting all the grease... and the presss.. and now having every Republican become associated with the nutjobs.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 10:54 AM (f9c2L)
Hahahaaaa! DU is remarkably quiet about this one, you would think they would be happy about seeing an alleged 'TeaBagger' getting run out of politics. Wonder why they aren't gloating. Any ideas, erg? C'mon, you know The Truth about 9/11, right?
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (fx8sm)
too late.
It was an easy question and if you need to take a poll to answer it you are not good enough for us Texans. Go fuck yourself. you make Kinky look plain you nut.
any TEA candidates that can't pass the Palin test are going to have to way out of their way to prove themselves.
Medina has caused some actual damage to the movement. She knows it. she's selfish.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (dUOK+)
I think there is room in the Tea Party for a widely varied set of reasons to be part of the movement. I'd call them the poles that hold the movement up. Some of those poles may be out on the edge.
But one pole that should be rejected by all Tea Party groups in every state is the Truthers. It may smack of a purity test, well so be it. Birthers are a close second. There is no reason that every major and minor tea Party organizer can't sign a petition/letter/statement that proclaims that Truthers and Birthers are not welcome. I would also expect any candidate looking for Tea Party support to sign the same document.
Posted by: Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (1QKZf)
Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (nYKDd)
ACE
will you post the article that was in the wall street journal editorial section.
I think it was titled "I am the President most trusted Advisor" It was wrtten as a satire in the guise of "SOTUS" or Straw Man of the United States of America.
It was written by Noam something or other. It was pretty funny.
Posted by: Ben at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (m4Ulb)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (2sJK0)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (jlvw3)
If you're not a Truther or a mental patient, there is no "long-form" answer to that question.
Two letters. Next question.
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (ySQoK)
most TEA folks are trying to fix the GOP (and some the democrats, which is hilarious).
Telling them to run on their own ticket is fucking retarded.
They need to take their time and run for precinct chair, moving up the line, and getting the GOP completely overhauled. That's what Palin is up to. And it's not just her and it's not her idea, but she's the figurehead right now.
Running a separate ticket is just letting the socialists win.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (dUOK+)
Palin=1
Armchair Quarterbacks=0
Maybe some people should take her more seriously.
Posted by: Alex at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (d8/2I)
Oh... Ace. Come on, we all know the Tea Party is comprised solely of racist denialist right-wing nazi homophobe truther birther christian doctor-murderers and anti-science nutjobs - it's a Wikipedia Trufact! It's nothing but sheer ignorance to claim otherwise. The science is SETTLED. BTW, did you know the term "teabagger" was started by the tea partiers themselves? It's a Trufact!
Posted by: Lars Jensen at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (OxK0d)
21
It is true. Medina is often on that tinfoil hat wearing asshat Alex Jones's show. Even Ru Paul's dad Ron Paul rejects trutherism.
Yeah, right. He also makes appearances on the Alex Jones show. And
he's "just asking questions" about 9/11. But not a truther, nosiree.
He just wants to know what really happened.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 02:36 PM (plsiE)
You are right. Though when Ron Paul was cornered in an interview he denied being a trutherist. Alx Jones and Ron Paul are in complete agreement on their antisemitism. Paul seems to be rooting for the enemy, and is the best Congressman an Islamo-Fascist could hope for.
Watch this from the creators of Hide the Decline. Baba O'reilly on the banjo.
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (jlvw3)
Not very many single things in my book make you ineligible to hold office, but being a truther is one of them.
That's what is so sad about Ron Paul. I love the guy's voting record, but cannot abide with the truther crap.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (/subp)
Posted by: Prepubescent Ergie at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (VDgKF)
Posted by: Molon Labe at February 11, 2010 10:59 AM (kYpqT)
Posted by: Noah at February 11, 2010 11:00 AM (mhD2v)
Heh.
I have a little test for people. I ask them "Is Communism evil" if the answer doesn't start with "of course" or "yes", you have a good idea what you are dealing with. Usually they start with 'Well," and then I just stop them. That's all I need to know.
Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (9B5OK)
Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (nYKDd)
Posted by: Noah at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (mhD2v)
"It is a sock."
I thought it might be, but the target was too inviting to miss. It helps me hone my snark skills, though.
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (e+wCK)
Conservatives don't get entitlements, what we want to do is fire most federal and state employees.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (2sJK0)
Posted by: big_pale at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (mzPP4)
We thank you.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (wgLRl)
If you really had concerns about 9/11, you would have looked into it. I watched loose change, and yeah, there were a couple of parts that make you suspicious. But if you really are suspicious of something like that, naturally you will look for explanations.
And the explanations (beyond the simple dishonesty of Loose Change et al) are very well publicized and easy to find, easy to read, and completely answer the questions.
If someone couldn't find the time to look into that in nine years, and thinks there's still an open question, they obviously are paranoid nuts, unfair about truth, or idiots. Or really, all 3.
Medina had a chance, in 2001, to look into this. in 2010, she has run out of time.
That she would need to "rebut" her "fuck up" comments says it all. And it says everything you will ever need to know about her close circle of advisers. Medina didn't realize this was totally toxic. A simple "Absolutely not" was required, and she didn't know that?!?
Let's have out with whoever else was part of this candidate's circle, and ask them what they think of 9/11.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:03 AM (dUOK+)
She answered. Stop defending a fucking Truther.
Agree totally with Ace. There is no acceptable answer to the question posed by Beck than "No." End. No further, no qualifications.
Clear?
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 11:03 AM (B+qrE)
Better to weed them out now than to have this pop up in the general.
No shit. The party of Cynthia Mckinney and Van Jones wouldn't think twice about bashing their opponent over the head with the "9/11 TRUTHER!!!!" label.
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 11:04 AM (fx8sm)
Anyone caught with a weird, lunatic, or hateful thought always wants to change the topic from the belief itself to a dry and pointless discussion of whether or not they have the right to hold that belief.
It's the go-to tactic for these freaks.
No one says you don't have the right to be a lunatic hateful anti-american conspiracy theorist.
But we also can determine that makes you ineligible for a governorship."
Hey now, don't compare us to Truthers.
Posted by: racists at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (l71WL)
"Jeff who really knows what Jesus said about himself ? No one even is sure of what YEAR he was born let alone what day."
In which case one can't reasonably call him a great man, either, since nothing is known for certain. All you are doing is cherry-picking the parts you agree with...
Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (e+wCK)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (jlvw3)
Yes, every time someone betrays their country by claiming there are reasonable questions about 9/11, it's only reasonable to throw them out on their ass.
This isn't a mis-speak. She was given a chance to clarify after her first disaster comment. There are some things that you can't excuse by "mis-speak".
This person wanted to govern 24 million people.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (dUOK+)
Tea Baggage
I just coined that. I'm afraid this is going to be par for a lot of the associations with the Tea Party. Every third party gathers the nuts. If the Tea Party folks start heading the direction of becoming a third party, it's doomed.
Posted by: Dang at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (UA4gE)
I disagree, and I would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for the meddlesome bloggers.
Posted by: Dede Scozzasomething at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (2sJK0)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (wgLRl)
you're right.
Medina is not REALLY part of the TEA party. She wasn't trying to fix the GOP's spending retardation. She's a nut.
Sadly, I think some people will come to associate this Ron Paul style crap, like that Houston n-word freak, with the TEA movement. Some people actually get their news from the big 3 and newspapers.
I hope your confidence is more realistic than my pessimism.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (dUOK+)
Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (jlvw3)
Another disappointment for Ace. Red State, Instapundit, and Michell Malkin all get to be Top 25 conservative writers but Ace get passed over. Well, they had David Brooks in the list, too, so you know someone was smoking dope.
RECOUNT!
http://tinyurl.com/yeqfj59
Posted by: Kemp at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Paultard at February 11, 2010 11:09 AM (4iIhs)
Posted by: Paultard at February 11, 2010 11:09 AM (4iIhs)
Just be thankful for the douche proof firewall.
Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (NLZLH)
Posted by: The DNC at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (T0NGe)
mis-speaks
I HATE that term because it is bullshit to its core. SHE DID NOT MIS-SPEAK. She did not say the Yankees play in Fenway or Brussels is in France.
She was presented a simple yes or no question and used 65 words to answer.
"Mis-speak". Meh.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (B+qrE)
<i>Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future...</i>
Happens to me all the time. Like that fundraiser that I said wasn't a fundraiser. Yep, gotta watch those mis-speaks.
Posted by: Algore at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (VDgKF)
Oh, yeah, baby, preach it. Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.
Posted by: JBean at February 11, 2010 11:12 AM (9rK3x)
Usually I find Glenn Beck nuttier than a Planter's sample pack, but at least he did good work on this one...
Now if he'd only lighten up on his obsession with Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt....
Why is that? Because he's funny? He's drawing parallels with Wilson and Roosevelt and today's "progressives". Read some history and you'll see that he's right. We are still paying for Wilson.
Now, who's the "real base" ace? Pray tell.
ME
Posted by: dagny at February 11, 2010 11:12 AM (V4YZy)
See, I have a hard time taking them seriously because all I can think is "really, you're still around, really?"
I read Medina's cya statement and wow does someone need to teach her the first rule of holes.
I'm not an enormous Beck fan but go him for bringing this up. Hey, look, he just showed more interest in delving into the beliefs of someone on "his" side than basically all of the rest of the press put together. I may have to start tivoing his show.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 11, 2010 11:13 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: Jewells at February 11, 2010 11:13 AM (l/N7H)
Oh, yeah, baby, preach it. Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.
Posted by: JBean at February 11, 2010 03:12 PM (9rK3x)
Birthers are not Truthers. Stop the stupid mantra.
People who foolishly believe person X wasn't born in location Y are not the same as people who dig Al-Qaeda and believe US goverment murdered 3000 people for oil. Fuck, just stop it.
Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 11:15 AM (uSbo6)
Posted by: dagny at February 11, 2010 11:15 AM (V4YZy)
I'm sure MSNBC will cover this responsibly. Get ready for Tea Party = 9/11 Truther meme.
Posted by: Ben at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (wuv1c)
But I kinda think we (and I am the TEA party) should just take over the GOP.
If you're whining about the GOP, like me, have you tried to support precinct chairs who are TEA partiers and want to reform the party? If there isn't such a person, are you going to run? Even if you are butt ugly and stupid.
I tried to post a link, but am unable to do so. Just Google "Tea Party Precinct Project"
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (dUOK+)
This new chick seems pretty interesting. Is she hawt?
Posted by: Charlie Sheen at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (7h7Un)
I live in his district -- it may happen, to a tea party candidate. Unfortunately, there are a few of them splitting up the vote.
Hopefully, people here are getting more sick of the bad attention from Ron Paul than the feeling of independence they got from voting for a wackjob who is a one issue candidate.
As far as Medina goes, anyone in Texas who did not know that she is a Paulbot didn't take a very close look. She is a sound clip candidate with only three or four things listed on her policy page. Cut taxes,. constitutionalist, blah blah blah.
I LOVED hearing her on Beck today. I was thinking, "this isn't very smart of her, I wonder how she'll fuck up."
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (jc7YC)
Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.
That's what THEY want you to think!
Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (AO4qz)
She was presented a simple yes or no question and used 65 words to answer.
She verbally soiled herself.
Even if she believes there is information withheld about 9/11 -- and I would agree with that, but the info deals with national security, not a cover-up -- she should easily be able to say automatically, "No, the US government was not involved."
How on Earth did she get as far as she did? Is Beck the first one to really ask her about this? Where are the tea partiers who fronted her?
Posted by: barbelle at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (qF8q3)
Well, Jesus for one, and maybe 12 other guys too. And some chick with long hair.
Posted by: C. Lars Jesuson at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (OxK0d)
By the way, I don't deny that gravity exists. I just think that there are a lot of interesting questions.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (xxgag)
I continue to believe that any National Tea Party should be a small voluntary affair which provides support and coordination, perhaps some advocacy. The State parties should be in the drivers seat. State parties will have enough local knowledge to keep the kooks out and also explain the necessary compromises (i.e. this person is as good as you are going to get in this race.)
Posted by: FR at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (AIyLg)
Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (vVM8h)
What are you talking about?
No one claimed the truthers and birthers are equally fucked up.
One's just paranoid about a really mysterious and dishonest politician, and the other is forgiving Al Qaida of murder.
Of course they aren't on the same level. Both are positions that are untenable and ridiculously foolsih tactics.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (dUOK+)
Posted by: Chris R
Can I watch if I hold your coat?
Posted by: Iskandar at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (/o58C)
Posted by: Houdini's Cadaver at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (nz654)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (2sJK0)
She claims to have the Tx. Tea Party groups behind her, but she doesnÂ’t.
She is a Paul-Bot and not actually part of the Tea Party movement. I guess the people in Texas are really screwed. It sounds like sticking with Perry is their best shot for now.
Posted by: Vic at February 11, 2010 11:21 AM (QrA9E)
No one really knew much about her, they just knew what they didn't like about everyone else. She's been saying all the right things to catch the conservatives and people who didn't know her background were willing to give her the benefit of the doubt -- until now.
She's done.
I've been telling everyone I know that she's a Paulbot and I am constantly met with surprise. Guess I don't have to do that any more.
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:23 AM (jc7YC)
Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future (and it will happen and it won't have as 'happy' an ending as this time since she does appear to be a loon), burn him/her at the stake, forthwith--it's the only reasonable thing to do.
Right. One time someone asked me how I felt about diddling little kids, and I just sorta launched into this hypothetical about how I hadn't really explored the idea completely, but I couldn't really rule it out and if anyone I knew supported diddling little kids, well, I don't have time to be the thought police.
And then, somehow, everyone thought maybe I was sympathetic toward the idea. All because of a few poorly chosen words.
Posted by: Warden at February 11, 2010 11:25 AM (TIGTh)
Posted by: Vic at February 11, 2010 03:21 PM (QrA9E)"
I was thinking about voting for Rick Perry in the primary, but after this morning, I have no doubts. I'm definitely voting Perry!
Glenn Beck just did us Texans a public service.
Posted by: newton at February 11, 2010 11:26 AM (q5ZJk)
Do you think she's the type to walk away when her numbers go south or is she gonna be haunting the campaign with phony-baloney 'Tea Party" signs and sound bites?
Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:26 AM (vVM8h)
Posted by: Ronsonic at February 11, 2010 11:27 AM (XiQgY)
Posted by: Fresh Air at February 11, 2010 11:27 AM (1yI48)
I haven't been able to listen to this, as I'm at work, but I'll assume folks are accurate about what the question was and what she said.
Well... shit. Shit shit shit. Um....
I agree. "No" is the answer I was looking for. If you want to equivocate, a non-nutty equivocation is that the federal government had no intent to allow 9/11, but was lax in preventing it. And that's pretty weak, considering how loose people were with security prior to 9/11, and how much political capital has been expended AFTER 9/11 to do the half-assed job of prevention that we're currently doing. The only real answer to the question is "No."
So... I guess I'll be voting third party or just abstaining on the governor's race. Least ways, I'm not voting for Perry or Hutchison, and I'm damn sure not voting for the democrat, whoever it is.
I wonder the MSM was holding this bit of nuttiness to spring on us right before the election, should she have won the primary. Or maybe they didn't see it as being anything out of the ordinary? Nah, probably the first one.
Well, good catch, Glenn. That's a real pisser, though.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (pZEar)
Anyone who associates Rick Perry's governership with 'screwed' doesn't understand how fucking awesome Texas is right now compared to the rest of the country.
Do I credit Rick Perry? Well, a lot of the administrative stuff is run well enough. But I know it's just the great people here. Still, I am not changing from a proven effective leader right now, even if I think Rick is a pretty boy who has messed up a few times
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (dUOK+)
I have no problem with tea partiers trying to remake the Republican party. But, do so from within.
Tea Party protests are fine.. but don't associate them with the GOP. Because, as Ace correctly points out, all the nutjobs like the Larouchies with their Hitler/Obama signs come out and join the party. Who needs that shit?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (f9c2L)
Period.
His nuts are everywhere and on everything and that means nothing.
We want to get RID of pork earmarking scum like Paul. And while it's not really balls on relevant, every true TEA partier supports the war on terror.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:29 AM (dUOK+)
But, I'm guessing she'll stick around. She came from nowhere is going back to nowhere and will probably try to turn this into an us versus them thing like Paul has always done.
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (jc7YC)
What are you talking about?
No one claimed the truthers and birthers are equally fucked up.
One's just paranoid about a really mysterious and dishonest politician, and the other is forgiving Al Qaida of murder.
Of course they aren't on the same level. Both are positions that are untenable and ridiculously foolsih tactics.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 03:18 PM (dUOK+)
1. Plenty of people claim this equivalence. Here and at Hotair.
2. One position is damning while the other is somewhat forgiveable. Even in politics. I wouldn't mind having a Birther rep. There is no harm as long he's not obsessive about it. I would mind having a 9.11 Truther as a rep.
There are mentally ill people who become great painters and there are mentally ill people who become serial killers. Are they the same?
Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (uSbo6)
I guess I see what you're saying. I think it's going to be hard to keep the nuts away, and I agree the TEA party needs to fix the GOP from within.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (dUOK+)
But I think the dude you responded to initially did not do that. He simply said both are untenable for the movement. Just as cancer and a cold are both things you should try not to have.
Truthers are 100000 times worse than Birthers. Most people know that.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:32 AM (dUOK+)
Pics or it didn't happen. Newsletter?
Posted by: Pedobear at February 11, 2010 11:32 AM (OxK0d)
Thanks. Hopefully people will be able to separate her from the TP's no matter what she says/does.
Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:33 AM (vVM8h)
8: "I give up. Is Kinky Friedman running again?"
He was - as a liberal Democrat - but quickly dropped out. He isn't the independent, free-thinker that he built his image around.
16: "Good to see she lost it with Beck. Her campaign is probably now on life support, along with KBH."
Let's not give Medina more credit than she deserved. She was never going to get out of the the Republican primary with more than about 10-15% (supposedly) of the party vote and she won't pull more than KBH - whose campaign is also on life support along with Medina. Whatever everyone around the country heard about Medina's prospects was not accurate. Perry will easily win re-election. He's still pretty popular here.
Posted by: slug at February 11, 2010 11:34 AM (n8Nln)
I'm just trying to see that we defend against the bad rap the GOP faithful have got in the press for so long now.. we're all racists, conspiracy theorists, etc. etc..
and if we start associating with exactly that type of people, and allow them to become prominent in the party, then those associations will stick.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 11:34 AM (f9c2L)
What about the Ron Paulians who have infiltrated the movement? If there are enough of them, it would be better to let them crash and burn via the Third Party route.
The GOP already has enough problems.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:35 AM (wgLRl)
All the Troofers need to be rounded up and locked in a cell with Rosie O'Donnell.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 11, 2010 11:36 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: mikeyslaw at February 11, 2010 11:38 AM (QMGr1)
Posted by: torabora at February 11, 2010 11:38 AM (yQHa6)
Posted by: Barbarian at February 11, 2010 11:39 AM (EL+OC)
And to think, there was actually going to be room in this week's paycheck to put some coin in her tip-jar and buy a couple of bumper-stickers...
I'm bummed. She'll try and tap-dance around this, and I'm sure will play the "inconsequential to TX politics" angle, but...damn.
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 11:39 AM (5npD/)
It's actually quite awesome when these nuts actually admit that they have "questions" about the government's involvement in 9/11. It makes it much easier to know whom to avoid at all costs.
A co-worker of mine who I was somewhat friendly with (casual acquaintance) started off on a Truther rant one day during a break at a conference we were attending. He was absolutely shocked when I called him a f**king idiot and told him to stay the hell away from me.
From what I've gathered, he's shot his mouth off on multiple occasions to other co-workers (big Ron Paul guy).
He used to be a quirky, but well-respected employee. Now, it's pretty sad watching this guy speak up about anything. Nobody takes him seriously, no matter what topic we're discussing.
Posted by: stickety at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (8Ev54)
Now, would you have thought you would have found anti Sarah Palin stuff on this kind of a site talking about another website going away? This is a scary site and scary stuff but, how many people have seen this stuff? I mean here is this stuff out there and Sarah Palin may not even know it is there. Yes, I know that is the way the internet is but, seriously, this is frightening stuff. I went back and told them all the site was crazy and they said "well we only discuss our dreams and our numbers, so it is ok" but really it is scary.
Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (p302b)
hold up, since when is the tea parties for the rnc? you know what, screw the republican party too. those assclowns are just as bad as the liberals
it was form by all types of people including democrats for conservative causes.
oh, i heard the interview in the car, i was like wow!!
Posted by: navycopjoe at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (DjnFS)
Rodeo clowns serve a very important purpose which makes their ha-ha just a bonus.
Posted by: agnostica at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 11:42 AM (p302b)
Property taxes suck but, she can throw her ass off a cliff if she thinks there's any doubt as to how 9/11 went down.
Posted by: jimmuy at February 11, 2010 11:42 AM (/rb2j)
Beck can be annoying, but he is good at ferreting out the truth about dangerous individuals.
A dear friend of mine is an Alex Jones acolyte. He told me about this Debra Medina, conveniently leaving out the troofer part. That was a really good audio clip.
I hope Medina really is headed back to four percent with a bullet. (not literally)
Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 11:45 AM (+FkcS)
Posted by: agnostica at February 11, 2010 11:46 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: John Galt at February 11, 2010 11:50 AM (Ylv1H)
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at February 11, 2010 11:51 AM (g9neE)
As well they should be. There's a lot to the democratic party that would be a lot better if they were simply fiscally sound. Get rid of the pork and graft and our nation probably could sustain some of their stupid programs a lot better.
We all benefit if patriotic Americans on left and right agree to be fiscally sustainable and take over their political parties, GOP and Democratic.
Of course, most will try to fix the GOP, but whenever I see a democrat at a TEA party I shake their patriotic hand.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:51 AM (dUOK+)
"So... I guess I'll be voting third party or just abstaining on the governor's race. Least ways, I'm not voting for Perry or Hutchison, and I'm damn sure not voting for the democrat, whoever it is."
JOO KNO JOO WANT ME!
Posted by: Farouk Shami at February 11, 2010 11:52 AM (5npD/)
There's an update on Hot Air where Medina first backtracks her troofer self, but then in the end compulsively goes back to her point that the government should be accountable when the populace has questions.
175 - I know the type. When my friend starts on his troofer rant, there's nothing to do but shut up. You can't argue with them. But you can keep them out of office.
Medina's next move: Go back on Jones' show, complaining how Glenn Beck is a Bilderberger, as are all the readers of Hot Air and Ace of Spades.
Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 11:52 AM (+FkcS)
hmmm, this is probably why Sarah avoided supporting Medina, and its a good thing too.
I can just see the headlines to bash Palin if she has supported Medina.
I have to admit Palin seems to be pretty good at getting all the inside information.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at February 11, 2010 11:53 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (jc7YC)
You say you want change. But you draw very tight permissible limits. What's preferable: a Medina with "some questions" about 9/11, or a guy who insists on shooting up virgins with HPV? This place seems more like a GOP echo chamber every day. "Gold standard", yeah that's a wacko Democrat idea (ca. 1932)
I'm disgusted with the lot of you.
Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at February 11, 2010 03:51 PM (g9neE)
I think he only wants to shoot up female virgins with HPV, so you're probably safe.
Posted by: The Drizzle at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (mV/4V)
Crazy doesn't necessarily mean dumb as a doornail. Some truthers (while as previously mentioned....er, crazy) are politically astute enough to recognize the ascendancy in influence of the tea party movement, and seek to hitch their wagon to it. Unlike with the kook left, carrying Chimpy McBushhitler signs, the media are going to fix their laser sights on every fringe lunatic that associates itself with any group that falls on the right side of the ideological spectrum.
Posted by: Reggie1971 at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (xIqkW)
Did Palin know about Medina's Truther-ness? This could be just dumb luck for Palin.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 11:57 AM (otlXg)
Thank you Ace. Tea Baggage, indeed.
Anyone who associates with Alex Jones is, well, a dang chicken fucking dim-bulb.
9/11 Trutherism in an unforgivable offense.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 11, 2010 11:58 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Generic at February 11, 2010 11:58 AM (mycY7)
I don't think Sarah Palin had inside-info on this. If she had it, then Perry would've had it, and if Perry had it, he would have used it...
I'm still under the impression that Palin endorses Perry to pay back political favors amongst the various Republican governors, and she got lucky by not going out on a limb for Medina.
I don't even think that Beck had any inside-info on this. He just asked a question, giving her a chance to squelch the one rumor that would most likely hold her back from being a serious contender.
And instead of using the hacksaw to cut off the handcuffs, she wound up slitting her own wrists.
Ugh.
I can't get home and take her support group off of my Facebook quickly enough.
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:01 PM (5npD/)
That was reason enough for most people to stay away from her.
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 12:03 PM (jc7YC)
He's trailing a 9/11 truther in the race for governor?
Posted by: wtfci at February 11, 2010 12:03 PM (+zo63)
I doubt she actually knew much about Medina besides that she's a Ron Paul nut. That's really all you need to know. Ron Paul = traitor. I know, that's extreme and a lot of his supporters probably don't understand this. Sorry y'all, Texas says go fuck yourself. You are free to whine and run and lose forever, though. Enjoy that. Hopefully Earmark Pork Paul is thrown out. He gets so much money from the crooks who bribe him that I don't know it's possible, and the field against him splits the vote, but we'll try hard. Can't always kick the crooks out.
as to the idiot who asks which is worse, the HPV bullshit or being a truther, that's a very easy question that obviously favors Perry 100:0
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:04 PM (dUOK+)
By the way, I'm sure Medina will be getting a paper grocery sack filled with the collected feces of the entire KLIF morning crew, set ablaze, on the front steps of her campaign office.
Jeff Bolton! Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me she was a Truther?
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:04 PM (5npD/)
You might think I;m kidding, but I'm not.
The first time I read Sarah PalinÂ’s energy I saw her abusing her children, and immediately took a dislike to her because I have issues with child abusers. Then I started to see a really dark side where this energy goes out and works through other people. IÂ’m still trying to understand it, and itÂ’s really interesting to see how people come to her defense.
I had this college professor that had very similar energy to PalinÂ’s, and people really seemed to like this guy, but I heard quiet rumors about how students that argued with him turned up dead, so stupid me, I just had to see what it was all about, and I argued in class with this professor. Of course my psychic radar was going on full blast after the argument, and as I was driving home I saw this strange energy behind this parked car I was driving towards, and I covered my break and slowed down, and then a child darted right in front of my truck. If my radar hadnÂ’t been out like that that child would have been killed, and my life would have been ruined. A few days later there was a baseball game with the people in that college department and I ended up getting hit in the head with a baseball, and getting some large scrapes and burses. I checked the energy after each injury and found that professor not only looking at me, but his intent directly involved in the things happening to me, even though he wasnÂ’t playing in the game. After that I dropped out of the Fine Arts program, which put me in direct contact with him, and never upset the guy again.
Palin scares the shit out of me and I would like to understand why, but IÂ’m not sure it is worth tempting that energy that surrounds her.
From the link at 176. Sweet fancy Moses that is industrial strength lunacy right there.
Posted by: Rocks at February 11, 2010 12:05 PM (Q1lie)
There's some of that. Building a coalition takes more than a nice jingle and a few facebook posts. You do have to cut deals and work with people.
Perry has been outspoken on Obama's power grabs and I think he's one of the good guys, but of course there's a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes.
Power players can survive today if they support fiscally sustainable government.
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:07 PM (dUOK+)
Palin was right in her speech that the movement doesn't and shouldn't have "leaders".
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at February 11, 2010 12:07 PM (IoUF1)
Posted by: TexBob at February 11, 2010 12:09 PM (2jp4I)
Thank you for bringing us that little gem, Rocks, so that the rest of us don't have to go there.
Make sure you wash thoroughly...
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:09 PM (5npD/)
And of course it takes some wheeling and dealing and hard work with democrats and republicans to get government work done and be sustainable with money.
Palin has overtly noted that she and every other politician will disappoint most folks in some shape or form.
Bottom line: are you spending more than revenue or not?
Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (dUOK+)
Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (946fl)
By the way, I'm sure Medina will be getting a paper grocery sack filled with the collected feces of the entire KLIF morning crew, set ablaze, on the front steps of her campaign office.
Jeff Bolton! Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me she was a Truther?
LOL! You're not kidding. This seriously stinks for them. Imagine having to endorse Perry or Hutchison after all the crap being slung...
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (pZEar)
Posted by: cloud of honesty at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (/9uzv)
Sorry you lost your job flying rubber dog shit from Hong Kong.
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 12:13 PM (otlXg)
WoooooOOOOOoooooOOOOO!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 12:15 PM (f9c2L)
I feel so stupid!
[/sarc]
fucking new age retards who don't have a fucking clue how the universe works
Christ on a pony.
Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:16 PM (946fl)
Posted by: Paul Revere at February 11, 2010 12:18 PM (epgqp)
Perry has never trailed Medina, not even in her wildest dreams.
Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:18 PM (946fl)
Oh, it's honest cloud!
Hi, honest cloud! Or should I just call you John?
Is your dad still practicing law? Nice place he's got there on Marco Island.
Posted by: Warden at February 11, 2010 12:21 PM (QoR4a)
I love this game... It never gets old!
"ACORN is comprised of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."
"The Progressive Movement is comprised of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."
"Barney Frank's anus is chock-full of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:25 PM (+hPIb)
Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 12:25 PM (Jpn2p)
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 12:28 PM (jc7YC)
Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (AO4qz)
I just checked the reader comments under the Dallas newspaper story and Medina's retraction.
It's 50-50, with half of the comments attacking Beck for exposing Medina.
Texas - wtf?
Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (+FkcS)
It's scary though, that there are people like this who exist and believe as they do and since it is a free country they are entitled to that belief but, until the other day, I had no idea these nuts doesn't cover it, existed. I mean i knew about the truthers and the birthers and some of the others mentioned but I didn't know about this group. And the website they mourned is back and it is worse than this one. At first my friends and I had a couple of good laughs but then you start thinking about people actually reading and believing this stuff and it give you a stomach ache and a head ache.
Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (p302b)
Thank goodness - I was afraid KBH would win the nomination if Medina pulled votes away from Perry!
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at February 11, 2010 12:31 PM (NxLEp)
The Democrats. The Democrats just recently started to trail Medina. She's always been last in the Republican lineup, but she just recently got her leg up over Bill White, or whatever his name is.
(and man, was that White / Shami debate last week a snoozer...basically an hour or White spouting the standard Democratic stance, and Shami following up with a "me, too." And really, nothing is creepier than listening to Farouk Shami talk about how "a lady is a human being and all human beings have rights and that lady has a right as a human being to choose what is best for her life as a human being." Gave me the jibblies.)
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:31 PM (+hPIb)
176 -- Oh, that sort of industrial strength crazy has been around for quite a while now and is pretty prevalent on a lot of sites.
For instance: did you know that Barbaro (yep, the dead racehorse) is an enlightened being and messenger from God? And he even manifests in photos as spiritual "orbs" (aka. dust particles on your camera lens, but that's only the explanation from people who don't "see" because we're souless or something). And Barbaro (according to his devotees) went overwhelmingly for teh o-ster in '08. Barbaro not only sends them messages about who to vote for, but also comes to these people and tells them to spend a hell of a lot of money on "rescuing" animals (what we lesser beings usually call hoarding) and giving to the humane society (spit) and peta (double spit).
I shit you not -- some of them have left their families in order to "follow Barbaro"...and there are a lot of them (more than a hundred at least that I know of) -- and they vote...and they stalk uppity unbelievers who dare to question them (or their idols) too. How scary is that?
Let's face it: the world is going to continue to go down the drainpipe for as long as batshit crazy people are given much of a forum to spread their batshit craziness.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 12:37 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: osbourne cox at February 11, 2010 12:40 PM (Vc/xe)
Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 12:42 PM (Jpn2p)
I follow horse racing so this was doubly funny to me. but, stuff like this is scary. I mean at least they could have chosen to follow the greatest race horse of all time, Secretariat.
Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 12:42 PM (p302b)
Bill Clinton in Hosprital in NY
Former President Bill Clinton Rushed to N.Y. Hospital Clinton Had Quadruple Heart Bypass Surgery in 2004Clinton, 63, was transported to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan for a condition related to his heart.
ABC News' chief political correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported that sources said he was taken to the hospital "likely for a stent procedure
Posted by: willow at February 11, 2010 12:47 PM (7FgWm)
Well, we are the home of Ron Paul and Alex Jones.
But, seriously, don't hold that against us!
Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 01:00 PM (946fl)
I've had one of those. Angiogram thingy into the femoral artery up into the artery near the heart. Not a biggie. He should be out in a day or two.
Posted by: OregonMuse at February 11, 2010 01:00 PM (JkUVD)
osbourne - right here. I was one of them.
Either Palin had this ace up her sleeve, or she got really lucky.
Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 01:02 PM (+hPIb)
Posted by: DBOOTS, Rainbow Czar at February 11, 2010 01:04 PM (+hPIb)
176 -- Oh, that sort of industrial strength crazy has been around for quite a while now and is pretty prevalent on a lot of sites.
For instance: did you know that Barbaro (yep, the dead racehorse) is an enlightened being and messenger from God?
Please tell me that you made that up.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 01:05 PM (plsiE)
231 -- I've got good friends in the racing industry (and possibly a couple of job prospects) and trust me, the Barbaro fans are a fairly sizeable group that are not only batshit crazy, they're also politically active (and for the most part don't know $%ck about horses or racing).
Don't get me wrong, the horse was a decent racer and it was sad what happened to him, but these people just take the cake (and they are for the most part, not pro-horse owning in the traditional sense). It had a lot to do with a guru type who started a blog about the horse; the rest is history.
And they are certifiable: they'll stalk your ass if they think you are a danger to their cult (threaten your kids, animals, and property too).
Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 01:06 PM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Gramercy Infidel at February 11, 2010 01:16 PM (5jnES)
I didn't interpret what she said, as meaning she's a Truther. BUT, I did interpret it as not wanting to pissing off/giving cover to the Truthers among her supporters. She must have quite a few, if that's the case. Whether she's a Truther, or just wants to enable them, the end result, for me, is the same.
She's lost my vote, and I've emailed my various networks (in TX) regarding this. Her previous association w/ Ron Paul (who I loathe) wasn't enough to turn me off. This however, drive the spike thru her heart.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 11, 2010 01:18 PM (ucq49)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 01:33 PM (l71WL)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 05:33 PM (l71WL)
So, you too think Hitler was a nice guy who was tricked by the World Jewry into WWII?
And we're supposed to adore you for your smartipantiness to shut up about it?
Posted by: Robert Gibbs at February 11, 2010 01:46 PM (Q+1PV)
Posted by: Ruth H at February 11, 2010 01:49 PM (KLwh4)
That's exactly the issue that I can tolerate Pat Buchanan believing in, since I agree with him on virtually everything else, as long as he doesn't embarrass me by talking about it or acting on it.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 02:02 PM (l71WL)
Posted by: Filly at February 11, 2010 02:03 PM (FDfio)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 02:06 PM (Pc9mH)
"So, you too think Hitler was a nice guy who was tricked by the World Jewry into WWII?"
That's exactly the issue that I can tolerate Pat Buchanan believing in, since I agree with him on virtually everything else, as long as he doesn't embarrass me by talking about it or acting on it.
Such a surprise that our resident neo-Nazi is a Pat Buchanan fan.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 02:11 PM (plsiE)
Apparently, Medina is avoiding the media because she is "very busy with appearances."
Busy watching her campaign implode, more likely.
She should be on every news station doing damage control -- instead she's hiding.
Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 02:32 PM (jc7YC)
Posted by: rabidfox at February 11, 2010 03:27 PM (4KPcZ)
Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 03:29 PM (5/yRG)
They sure did get out and rock the vote for bammy though -- they'll do just about anything for Barbaro.
**in fairness, I don't think the real Barbaro gave two plops about politics, and since he was a fairly classy horse I would like to think if he did, he wouldn't have shilled for teh owe.
Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 03:31 PM (5/yRG)
Beck is a fraud. He's in bed with Rick Perry and this just proves Governor Rick is running scared!!!
Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 04:25 PM (C1Trn)
Brit Hume Carl Cameron on 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo
Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 04:26 PM (C1Trn)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 04:36 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:47 PM (X1fsj)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 04:49 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:53 PM (X1fsj)
Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:54 PM (X1fsj)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:06 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:06 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 05:14 PM (AO4qz)
Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 05:15 PM (C1Trn)
I saw this post at Patterico and thought it made a great point.
I wouldnÂ’t have much confidence in an elected (or appointed) official who was a Truther. But I just started wondering what the difference is between someone who holds such out-of-the-mainstream, contrary-to-the-evidence beliefs and one who holds beliefs that can be similarly categorized, except that they are religious in nature.
In other words, if I consider Medina a weirdo whoÂ’s unworthy of the public trust, and thatÂ’s acceptable, why is not not acceptable to consider as a weirdo whoÂ’s unworthy of the public trust someone who, oh, letÂ’s just say, believes Jesus walked the American southwest?
-Diffus
Posted by: Trogdor at February 11, 2010 05:16 PM (k6ceA)
First off, she didn't ask any questions about it. She answered a question, and expressed her distrust. It's not rational to let emotions fly off the handle whenever the words "911" are spoken. The government is not sacred. It is mostly full of a bunch of bumbling idiots. Rudy Guiliani knows all too well that the masses react this way when they hear the magic words. That's why he uses it to his advantage to limit his vocabulary to "September 11th".
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:26 PM (/bomj)
http://tinyurl.com/y9ljgf8
Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 05:37 PM (AO4qz)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:49 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:54 PM (/bomj)
Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 08:00 PM (Jpn2p)
Posted by: brak
Self-described is the word.
Big "L" Libertarians are too nice to loons. They won't kick out loons who claim to support Non-Aggression, so loons have learned that as long as they give lip service to such, they can rant about damned near any conspiracy crap and get away with it.
At least Republicans aren't shy about giving joo-haters and conspiracy loons the boot, no matter how much they claim to support the platform.
Posted by: Kristopher at February 11, 2010 10:14 PM (kCEOg)
And now the morning guy on KLIF took the same tack as the afternoon guy. "Beck set Medina up, is in a secret cabal with Perry and Palin, it was an unfair question to ask of Medina, it was sexist , Beck was too quick to label her a truther, etc."
This is quite disturbing. Medina clearly danced around her first response the question of whether she was a truther, and Beck threw her a lifeline by clarifying and specifying his question, "Do you think the Federal government was complicit in bringing down the towers?" And she still couldn't bring herself to say no. This wasn't a simple "Oops, that was a bad answer, let me try again," or "I thought you were referring to whether the government did everything it could to prevent 9/11." She doubled down on her response that there were "unanswered questions" and "missing evidence" to arrive at a reasonable conclusion about whether the government was complicit in bringing down the towers.
Now, if you want to make the case that's a valid response for a Republican candidate, that's one thing. But to suggest this was a Gotcha question that was unfair or too difficult for a yes/no answer is nonsense.
Crap, I'm disappointed. And no, neither Perry nor Hutchison has my vote now. I'll do a write in for "Hypothetical Conservative Candidate" before I vote for either of those political vermin.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 12, 2010 04:53 AM (pZEar)
By all means, "conservatives," let's go out of our way to twist the words of a candidate who is dedicated to upholding the United States Constitution so that she doesn't interfere with the "fight" between two establishment Republicans. This isn't Massachusetts. Texas is a state where a true Conservative can win, but let's make sure we elect a Democrat Lite candidate instead.
Medina is not a truther. She didn't answer the question well, but Beck demonstrated his clear intent. Isn't it ironic that the CEO of Conspiracies-R-Us wants to smear a true limited government candidate at a conspiracy nut? At times Beck is no better than Big Dumb Ed Schultz.
But, let's say Medina is a "truther." You have two Big Government "non-truthers" who have been a part of the problem vs. a "truther" who recognizes the legitimate function of government. Personally, I would vote for the conspiracy nut over the two who I know will be lying as they take an oath to uphold the Constitution.
Posted by: edgycater at February 12, 2010 07:20 AM (+Rp97)
Ace, shame on you. Where is your explication regarding the Perry kickback PAC corruption that is what our Texas governor's race is attempting to rescind.
What a lame easy reader piece you wrote. By all means, take Glenn Beck's word at face value--as if he's never dead wrong and he's always totally reliable.
Debra Medina is not a truther, and trutherism has absolutely NOTHING to do with her conservative Tea Party GOP campaign and platform in the Texas governor's race. Medina's initial response to Beck's initial question was that she was not a truther, and despite her clear and detailed responses to Beck, it was clear that Beck had it in mind to paint her as a "truther" from the onset.
At one point, Beck probed, saying, "is that a yes?" that she believes in some U.S. involvement in the attacks.
As a matter of fact, within the intelligence community and Bush's "bipartisan" administration that retained many officials from the Clinton administration in his Cabinet, the obvious disconnect was intentional (designing 9/11 is NOT the issue, enabling it to occur IS the issue) and sabotaged our national security. Furthermore, the Bush/Cheny "solution" has become the nightmare of abusive federal powers; the "solution" that created the Department of Homeland Security only took one transfer of administrations to completely mutate into the very Big Brother's Nanny that the Constitution never permitted.
The Other McCain took issue with the Tea Party Convention, as others who actually BUILT the Tea Party have also noted.
What forced the failure of Newt's Contract With America that convinced conservatives to support new candidates? THE RNC GOP ESTABLISHMENT ASSASSINATED THOSE YOUNG CONSERVATIVES NEWLY ELECTED.
Deja vu. The GOP usurpers promise the Tea Party conservative movement that the career politician network establishment is the ONLY acceptable and trustworthy means to police themselves and convert themselves into good Tea Party people.
Glenn Beck has claimed to be a Libertarian. So does Sean Hannity. Totally believable if you trust corrupt career politicians.
Sarah Palin has endorsed Rep. Ron Paul the official Libertarian Republican. So whatever problem critics have with Medina's distrust of government propaganda, they have with Sarah Palin on the same grounds that Beck claims is Trutherism.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:36 PM (H+LJc)
What a weasel.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:39 PM (H+LJc)
Who the hell are you to call a conservative woman that word?!
You're a loser with mommy issues.
Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:43 PM (H+LJc)
Posted by: Judge Napalitano at February 12, 2010 08:35 PM (d7Px0)
Gov. Goodhair is looking better and better. Dunno about KBH...There's allot to be said about not changing horses in the middle of an Apocalypse.
Posted by: LaFemmeGordita at February 13, 2010 07:01 AM (k4Eh2)
If not PARMIGIANI Watch,Wholesale ED HardyWholesale ED Hardy you will lose your hard earned money. It is only buying from reliable sources will get you the right replcia Swiss watch. Surely you want to be more stylish with your new watch. InED Hardy Women Clothing
Posted by: ED-hardy at March 29, 2010 01:06 AM (mpih4)
Posted by: puma shoes at August 02, 2010 01:09 AM (y2XSP)
Posted by: camel lover at August 13, 2010 12:21 AM (6ajE3)
Posted by: camel cig at August 19, 2010 01:07 AM (dORov)
Posted by: Watchfordream at August 26, 2010 09:52 PM (Wtbbj)
<a href="http://www.zistyle.com/" title="zistyle">zistyle</a> is very good.
<a href="http://www.hotuggs.org/" title="hotuggs">hotuggs</a> is very good.
<a href="http://www.newstation.org/">Enthusiast</a> is very good.
Posted by: nsrgf at September 26, 2010 10:46 PM (Kkvi2)
Posted by: ask siirleri at November 19, 2010 10:21 PM (UX7zh)
Posted by: mmm at November 26, 2010 08:07 PM (OExcC)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2507 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








oh boy
Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 11, 2010 10:27 AM (jVldi)