February 11, 2010

Tea Baggage: Texas Tea Party Gubernatorial Candidate Medina is a Truther
— Ace

Glen Beck takes her out.

This is a worry for me about out-of-nowhere Tea Party candidates.

GOP candidates tend to have histories and are vetted. Now, those histories have baggage -- yes, they do tend to be more establishment, more insidery, etc.

On the other hand, we know more about them, as a general rule.

The Tea Party is not just comprised of strong small-government conservatives. A lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives at never having been in "real politics," always shut out of real politics by the, erm, exoticness of their views.

These people, I think, want to hijack what is mostly a conservative movement and harness it to their own weird ends. The remaining Paulites. The few remaining Perotists. LaRouchies -- remember them? They were the ones with the Hitler signs. And a bunch of doctrinaire libertarian types, the ones, I mean, who don't want to talk about real issues before us but always want to engage in nothing but college bullshit sessions about the ideal state. Crank libertarians, I mean. The kind that just want to argue about the gold standard and lighthouses and nothing else all day.

I don't think they'll be successful in doing that. They will attempt to claim leadership of the movement -- they'll just assert they are leaders, and expect people to follow. But the movement will say "Screw you, weirdo, who asked you to lead?"

But I do think some of them may slip by, flying that Tea Party flag, which is a respectable outside-party flag, and hiding their real flag.

Which, in Medina's case, is the flag of 9/11 Trutherism.

We caught her, thank goodness.

But we have to be on guard for this. There are a whole pack of opportunistic weirdos who cannot fly their own flag without being laughed off the ballot, so they'll instead fly the Tea Party flag.

"Tea Baggage:" Coined by Dang in the thread.

Posted by: Ace at 10:25 AM | Comments (292)
Post contains 359 words, total size 3 kb.

1
oh boy

Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 11, 2010 10:27 AM (jVldi)

2 TEM and Outsourced telecom services can be expensive.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:27 AM (m4Ulb)

3
is she a joo-hater, too?

Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 11, 2010 10:28 AM (jVldi)

4 Good to know.  She was starting to get some traction in the race.  There's a disturbing amount of conspiracy theorists amongst self-described libertarians, so I can't say I'm surprised.

Posted by: brak at February 11, 2010 10:28 AM (W5NBA)

5 Thank you, Glenn!

Posted by: Dick at February 11, 2010 10:28 AM (vYMo9)

6 don't think the link is working, Acey.

Posted by: self parody at February 11, 2010 10:29 AM (pUctD)

7
oh look, it's eggmcmuffin

How's that Gitmo closing working out for you?

Posted by: This is Carlton, the doorman at February 11, 2010 10:29 AM (jVldi)

8 Great, now who the hell can a conservative Texan vote for?

Perry - Merck-funded campaign for mandatory HPV
Kay - TARP, pro-illegals, yada yada yada
new chick - troofer

I give up.  Is Kinky Friedman running again?

Posted by: Tex at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (DhStW)

9 Our value-added services are robust and comprehensive.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (m4Ulb)

10 There's a lot of people trying to co-opt the Tea Party by saying "I'm a Tea Partier!  I went to rallies!"

This is the problem when there is no real, national party who can verify and screen these people.  We have even Democrats trying to co-opt the Tea Party in an attempt to get elected.

Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (1gwjW)

11 Glen straightened that out.

Posted by: bill-tb at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (y+QfZ)

12 It is true. Medina is often on that tinfoil hat wearing asshat Alex Jones's  show. Even Ru Paul's dad Ron Paul rejects trutherism.

Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:30 AM (NLZLH)

13 Anyone need help with their telecom bill? I may post my work number soon, give me a call.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:31 AM (m4Ulb)

14 Which, in Medina's case, is the flag of 9/11 Trutherism.

You say this like it is a bad thing or something.

You must be working for the Booosh.

Posted by: Most Leftists at February 11, 2010 10:31 AM (7BU4a)

15 Apparently she has tried to backtrack but I think the damage is done.  People who say that these truther dolts have the right to engage in political discourse are woefully stupid.  That type of thinking has no place in honest political debate.  It belongs over there on that pile of dog shit I just scooped up.

Posted by: Jewells at February 11, 2010 10:33 AM (l/N7H)

16 Over at Gateway Pundit, a commentor from Texas said this:

Jim, here is my report from on the ground:

Medina is a Ron Pauler. She worked on PaulÂ’s last campaign and has adopted the tactics the the Paulians did when Paul threw his hat in the presidential ring.

When polls are taken (Perry, Hutchison, Medina) her supporters (former Paulians) crash the polls by calling in time after time after time, just as they did during the presidential campaign.

She claims to have the Tx. Tea Party groups behind her, but she doesnÂ’t.

Yeah, we knew she was a Truffer. But she had done her best to keep that little fact under wraps because she knows it wonÂ’t play well in Texas.

Good to see she lost it with Beck. Her campaign is probably now on life support, along with KBH.

Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (1gwjW)

17 Medina associates with anti-semitic Neo-Nazis like Alex Jones. Everyone is trying to co-opt the Tea Party movement. 

Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (NLZLH)

18 But we have to be on guard for this. I agree, but the feeding frenzy in the right-o-sphere over the O'Keefe affair proves that we are just as trigger-happy as the left (if not worse) at jumping to unproven conclusions based on scant, actual, evidence based on the word of the MSM. In other words, in the immortal words of Reagan: trust but verify (before heaping bodies on the bonfire).

Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (nYKDd)

19 This is the problem when there is no real, national party who can verify and screen these people.  We have even Democrats trying to co-opt the Tea Party in an attempt to get elected.

Posted by: enoxo at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (1gwjW)

I really don't think some party purity test is the way to go buddy.

Posted by: Dede Scozzafava at February 11, 2010 10:34 AM (7BU4a)

20 Damn, those Tea Partiers are sure crazy, huh?

Posted by: Dennis Kucinich from under a tin foil hat at February 11, 2010 10:35 AM (wWwJR)

21

It is true. Medina is often on that tinfoil hat wearing asshat Alex Jones's  show. Even Ru Paul's dad Ron Paul rejects trutherism.

Yeah, right.  He also makes appearances on the Alex Jones show.  And he's "just asking questions" about 9/11.  But not a truther, nosiree.  He just wants to know what really happened.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (plsiE)

22 I have the right to put up a website called "I hate N*ggers and Jews" but that doesn't mean it's a palatable thought. Anyone caught with a weird, lunatic, or hateful thought always wants to change the topic from the belief itself to a dry and pointless discussion of whether or not they have the right to hold that belief. It's the go-to tactic for these freaks. No one says you don't have the right to be a lunatic hateful anti-american conspiracy theorist. But we also can determine that makes you ineligible for a governorship.

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (jlvw3)

23 If she needs a presser to clarify her statements regarding a question that could have been easily answered with ONE word, then she is no doubt discredited and unable to lead the State of Texas.

One down, millions to go...

Posted by: Joy to the whirled at February 11, 2010 10:36 AM (WVBjj)

24 This is the whole reason you have primaries. To pick the corn outta the shit.

Posted by: Iblis at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (9221z)

25 Let the Freak Flag fly!

Posted by: dfbaskwill at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (usjNq)

26 She has issued a statement denying she's a truther.

Posted by: Dave at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (Xm1aB)

27 The Minnesotans 4 Global Warming are at it again.

Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (NLZLH)

28

I guess those people who said Sarah Palin should endorse her over Perry were wrong huh.

Posted by: Dan at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (KZraB)

29 When I went to my local Tea-party last April, one of the most visible groups was Iraq Veterans Against the War. Most of the other folks kind of quietly kept their distance and ignored them, but they were there. Not everyone in the tea-party is an actual friend.

Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:37 AM (e+wCK)

30 I agree, but the feeding frenzy in the right-o-sphere over the O'Keefe affair proves that we are just as trigger-happy as the left (if not worse) at jumping to unproven conclusions based on scant, actual, evidence based on the word of the MSM.

Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 02:34 PM (nYKDd)

Well it is interesting. The fact that we conservatives have no problem going after each other is why our ideas tend to be much stronger and our candidates *somewhat* less likely to be crooks and scumbags.

But it indeed makes us weaker as a political force. The only thing the left ever argues about is tactics. Once the collective decides on an idea that's it...

Posted by: 18-1 at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (7BU4a)

31 Usually I find Glenn Beck nuttier than a Planter's sample pack, but at least he did good work on this one... Now if he'd only lighten up on his obsession with Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt....

Posted by: GuyfromNH at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (GWXuo)

32 Watch the left go wild with this.

From now on, being in the TEA party will = truther and birther and racist (instead of just the latter two).

What's hilarious is that most democrats entertain some of these retarded suspicions.

But the TEA party should be about taking the GOP over from the ground up.  Instead of working for an actual campaign, run for precinct chair locally.  Fix the GOP.

Rick Perry has been a great governor, and the rest of the country would be real lucky to have him, but Texas is going to keep him around.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (dUOK+)

33 13  Now, who's the "real base" ace? Pray tell.

Posted by: Tumescent Pubescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:31 PM (m4Ulb)

Ah, you're back to stink up another thread!

Posted by: Dick Cheney's Warcock at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (Vu6sl)

34 I didn't catch the interview only a few seconds of the caller aftermath...the ron paul overload technique was in full effect these people were pissed at glenn. You got to be kidding me texas you don't have anyone but that douchebag fake perry to run?

Posted by: evil libertarian at February 11, 2010 10:38 AM (RnbbT)

35

Hmmmm, could someone help me out here?  I'm interested in implementing IP unified communications over extremely reliable, scalable and cost effective IP-PBX platforms.

Any idea who my first choice should be, say... if I was looking the Colorado area perhaps?

Posted by: Either a distributed enterprise client or government entity at February 11, 2010 10:39 AM (tWf3S)

36 It is a pleasure to watch your no-ideas party marketed by red state fuckups.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (m4Ulb)


Nice try, limpdick.  There are moonbats on both sides.  The difference is, our side doesn't elect them cough McKinney coughcough Waters coughhackcough Kucinich cough Pelosi coughcough Stark cough ahem.

Fucking amateur.  Can we request a troll upgrade?  This one has NO fucking skills.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:39 AM (xGIqT)

37 I see a lot of Ron "earmark pork" Paul supporters claim the TEA party was 100% Ron Paul's idea.

And a lot of those claiming to be TEA party leaders seem to be Paulians.  A lot of those claiming to be candidates for the TEA party tend to be Paulians.

they are STEALING a really wholesome and intelligent movement for limited government because it's the easy path to a little more success at the polls.

This is why the TEA party should be co-opted by Bachman, Palin, and the GOP.  It's not ideal, but it protects the message from the Ron Paul thieves.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:41 AM (dUOK+)

38 The second I heard she's a Ron Paul fan (about a week ago) - I thought "waaaacko".

Ron Paul attracts Nazi scum like Don Black, and if they aren't Nazi they are complete crazies. Normal people don't like Ron Paul. That's like an axiom.

Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (uSbo6)

39 Can't we just "out" the political weirdos the old-fashioned way? Have Obama appoint them czar of this or that on a Friday, and then some screed they wrote turns up over the weekend, and by Monday morning it's all over.

Posted by: red speck at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (/vfpn)

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (fx8sm)

41

"Fucking amateur.  Can we request a troll upgrade?  This one has NO fucking skills."

Nor any skill at argumentation, which is more to the point.

Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:42 AM (e+wCK)

42 So she's our John Conyers.

We ostracize her. 

The democrats put their psycho in charge of a powerful committee. 

Of course there are idiots and psychos on both sides, but the party that thinks government should be smaller and less intrusive deals with these crazies so much better.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:43 AM (dUOK+)

43

she's finished.

Posted by: exceller at February 11, 2010 10:43 AM (jx2Td)

44 Circle of Excellence, baby!

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:45 AM (m4Ulb)

45 Fire does not melt steel!  Google it!

Posted by: The Truthers at February 11, 2010 10:46 AM (YMZjg)

46 Yeah, she's toast.

I hope the tea party never has a "leader" or is co-opted.  That is not why most of these previously non-political people got involved in the movement.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (2sJK0)

47 #41  Nor any skill at argumentation, which is more to the point.

I have great skillz at argumentation, knucklehead.  All I need to do is call you a knucklehead, or claim that you have "no ideas" to win the argument, knucklehead.

All you haterz have no ideas, knuckleheads.  I gtg - Palin Steele invited me over to play with his "gf".

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (otlXg)

48

"Hilarious. Your White Party fights for bankers, insurers, and no jobs.

Fight the Power, knuckleheads!

 

Have you been listening to Obama recently? Lotsa love for bankers and such-like on display.

Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (e+wCK)

49 Well it is interesting. The fact that we conservatives have no problem going after each other is why our ideas tend to be much stronger and our candidates *somewhat* less likely to be crooks and scumbags. But it indeed makes us weaker as a political force. The only thing the left ever argues about is tactics. Once the collective decides on an idea that's it... Posted by: 18-1 at February 11, 2010 02:38 PM (7BU4a) I'd just like to see us be a little less eager to stone someone to death before that person has even had a chance to rebut or defend against the allegations. (And I am not defending this woman beyond that she at least deserves a few hours to actually reply to the allegations--if she, ultimately, is a Truther, she should be cast into the 9th circle of Hell w/ Paulians, Paleos, etc.)

Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (nYKDd)

50 10 It is a pleasure to watch your no-ideas party marketed by red state fuckups.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 02:30 PM (m4Ulb)


Party has lots of ideas, eggy. They just don't happen to include the rampant increase in the size of government, the debt, welfare, entitlements and general stupidity yours does.

Now go get your fucking shinebox

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (erIg9)

51 Hey erg...can you reccomend a good ShoreTel Certified Partner?

Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 10:47 AM (9B5OK)

52
What the hell...

"I'm certainly not into mind control or thought policing people," Medina said.

I guess that means there are some people who ARE into mind control?  Lizard people, maybe? 

Looks like I'll be holding my nose and voting for Perry.  Shit.

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (fx8sm)

53 She can go die in a fire, then.

Looks like Sarah Palin made the right choice in this particular race.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (wgLRl)

54 That TEA party "founder" in Houston who mispelled the N word on his signs?  Huge Ron Paul supporter.

I never got why they bolded "love" in their rEVOLution signs.  Seems they are very hateful.

Ron Paul's best defense to his publishing antisemitic columns in the Ron Paul newsletter was that he is an idiot who can't control his products or disavow them for decades.

There is an element of psycho that wants to legalize drugs, get out of Iraq, and eliminate all taxation.  They know the TEA movement is powerful and are insane enough to think it is all about them.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:48 AM (dUOK+)

55 44 Hilarious. Your  My White Red Party fights for bankers, insurers, and those who won't get no jobs.

FITY, dickhead.

Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (otlXg)

56 Your White Party fights for bankers, insurers, and no jobs.

So Obama joined the White Party?

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (2sJK0)

57 I am crestfallen that it is true.  But I am relieved it was caught now.

Posted by: Truman North at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (e8YaH)

58 >>> (And I am not defending this woman beyond that she at least deserves a few hours to actually reply to the allegations--if she, ultimately, is a Truther, she should be cast into the 9th circle of Hell w/ Paulians, Paleos, etc.) dude -- she had the chance to respond to a simple question posed to her by Glen Beck. She chose to evade. If you're asked "Do you believe the government played a role in bringing down the WTC?" and you answer "I don't have all the facts, but good questions have been raised" (as she did), then guess what? You've had all the time you need for a "response."

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:49 AM (jlvw3)

59

#41  Nor any skill at argumentation, which is more to the point.

I have great skillz at argumentation, knucklehead.  All I need to do is call you a knucklehead, or claim that you have "no ideas" to win the argument, knucklehead.

All you haterz have no ideas, knuckleheads.  I gtg - Palin Steele invited me over to play with his "gf".

Assuming that this isn't a sock-puppet, I suggest that you look up the term "ad homimen." It is a logical fallacy. That is bad, in case you don't know what "fallacy" means.


Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (e+wCK)

60 "I'm certainly not into mind control or thought policing people," Medina said.

I guess that means there are some people who ARE into mind control? 

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 02:48 PM (fx8sm)

I don't mean to defend that Medina person, but yes - there are folks who are desperate to send out thought police to persecute us.  They're called Liberals.  If they could put drugs in the water to control out minds they'd do it in a heart beat.

Posted by: Reactionary at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (xUM1Q)

61

Have you been listening to Obama recently? Lotsa love for bankers and such-like on display.

Why shouldn't I have love for Wall Street?  Those dumbfucks donated lots of money and voted for me last time.  They know I'm only kicking them around for show.  They'll be back on my side when it counts, in three years.  Won't you, boys?

Posted by: Barry Obama at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (lLqRQ)

62 I figured her for a Ronilian, so this is just the microwave going "ding, ding, ding" It's done. She did not sound too bright in the interview in the first place

Posted by: TexBob at February 11, 2010 10:50 AM (2jp4I)

63 Ron Paul attracts Nazi scum like Don Black, and if they aren't Nazi they are complete crazies. Normal people don't like Ron Paul. That's like an axiom.

He is the Last True Conservative and the Only Man Who Can Save America...

...fuckit, I can't keep up the requisite levels of fake crazy to pull that off.

These Truther-Lites like Medina and Teh Ron piss me off with their half-assed "I don't know the real answer, I think there are questions that need to be answered."

Beck nailed it - you either believe the gov't murdered 3000 of its citizens, or you don't.  It's like trying to take the middle ground on Jesus Christ - "Well, he was a great man who did lots of good things, but he was just a man."

No, sorry.  He was going around claiming He was the Son of GOD who was magically implanted in His mother's womb.  He was either who He said He was, or He was a stark, raving lunatic.  There is no third choice. 

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (xGIqT)

64

Assuming that this isn't a sock-puppet, I suggest that you look up the term "ad homimen." It is a logical fallacy. That is bad, in case you don't know what "fallacy" means.


Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 02:50 PM (e+wCK)


you're going to make him/her/it think you mean fellatio

Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (erIg9)

65 A lot of people bash Palin for her supposed opposition of the TEA candidate, but Rick Perry is very much part of the TEA party.

He's better than our 80% friend, though I have been mad at him over the years at times.

Palin did get this right and she should get some credit for it.  I know a lot of people are pissed about the Mccain endorsement, but at least one of the guys running against him (to his right) is also a total psycho.  Mccain isn't perfect, and barely our 80% friend and I will laugh if he's voted out, but he's not psycho.  He loves America and is very capable on the hill when we're in the minority (which we will be for a while). 

Mccain is a tougher sell, but at least on Perry a lot of the people bashing Palin for her support have egg on their faces now.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (dUOK+)

66

Your White Party fights for bankers, insurers, and no jobs.

Except for the jobs of the bankers and the insurers.  We're evil that way, too.

Psst--ask Toonces how he voted on TARP.

Idiot.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 10:51 AM (B+qrE)

67 As for this nut job...thanks for playing.

Give her a lovely parting gift and kick her ass to the curb.

Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 10:52 AM (9B5OK)

68 Hey guys I'll be right back, I'm kinda busy felching Karl Marx's corpse right now.  Hey, does that make me a "corpsman?"

Posted by: Prepubescent Ergie at February 11, 2010 10:52 AM (VDgKF)

69 Is the troll tryn' to go all gangsta on us?

Posted by: Dr. Varno at February 11, 2010 10:53 AM (0QJjg)

70 The kind that just want to argue about the gold standard and lighthouses

Que?

Posted by: Waterhouse at February 11, 2010 10:53 AM (ySQoK)

71 If you want to start a political PARTY and a political movement, do it.

The Tea PARTY folks should start their own party and quit trying to hijack the Republican PARTY.

Now, if they want to be part of the Republican party.. take part in rebuilding the Republican brand.. then come on in!

Smaller government and lower taxes should have always been the first items on the list of what Republicans strive for in government.

I'm getting a little tired of the loud angry squeaking wheel getting all the grease... and the presss.. and now having every Republican become associated with the nutjobs.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 10:54 AM (f9c2L)

72 Assuming that this isn't a sock-puppet,

It is a sock.

Posted by: Waterhouse at February 11, 2010 10:54 AM (ySQoK)

73
Hahahaaaa!  DU is remarkably quiet about this one, you would think they would be happy about seeing an alleged 'TeaBagger' getting run out of politics.  Wonder why they aren't gloating.  Any ideas, erg?  C'mon, you know The Truth about 9/11, right?

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (fx8sm)

74 Now Medina fans are telling us to WAIT!!! She'll have a press release disavowing trutherisms!!!!

too late.

It was an easy question and if you need to take a poll to answer it you are not good enough for us Texans.  Go fuck yourself.  you make Kinky look plain you nut.

any TEA candidates that can't pass the Palin test are going to have to way out of their way to prove themselves.

Medina has caused some actual damage to the movement.  She knows it.  she's selfish.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (dUOK+)

75

I think there is room in the Tea Party for a widely varied set of reasons to be part of the movement.  I'd call them the poles that hold the movement up.  Some of those poles may be out on the edge. 

But one pole that should be rejected by all Tea Party groups in every state is the Truthers.  It may smack of a purity test, well so be it.  Birthers are a close second.  There is no reason that every major and minor tea Party organizer can't sign a petition/letter/statement that proclaims that Truthers and Birthers are not welcome.  I would also expect any candidate looking for Tea Party support to sign the same document.

 

Posted by: Jeff at February 11, 2010 10:55 AM (1QKZf)

76 dude -- she had the chance to respond to a simple question posed to her by Glen Beck. She chose to evade. If you're asked "Do you believe the government played a role in bringing down the WTC?" and you answer "I don't have all the facts, but good questions have been raised" (as she did), then guess what? You've had all the time you need for a "response." Hey, people mis-speak and fuck up every day--especially when they're on the set of a hugely-rated show and aren't used to it. Besides, it isn't exactly the most congenial format for long-form, reasoned, debate to begin with, is it? Like I said: let her rebut it and, if she fails to convince, then bring out the howitzer but, as this has happened many times in the past where the actual 'guilty' party has turned out to be not so guilty (see: O'Keefe), we do a lot of collateral damage in the process that is very, very difficult ot undo. (Which is then, of course, hung around our throats like a millstone by the left for all eternity.)

Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (nYKDd)

77

ACE

will you post the article that was in the wall street journal editorial section.

I think it was titled "I am the President most trusted Advisor" It was wrtten as a satire in the guise of "SOTUS" or Straw Man of the United States of America.

It was written by Noam something or other. It was pretty funny.

Posted by: Ben at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (wuv1c)

78 Oh, and I am in no way a Network Consultant.

Posted by: Tumescent Republican at February 11, 2010 10:56 AM (m4Ulb)

79 Oh, the press will always give attention to the nutjobs supposedly on our side.  Thats just the way it is.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (2sJK0)

80 @27 The Minnesotans 4 Global Warming are at it again.

ROTFLOL. Excellent, love the banjo!

Posted by: Mike H at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (cvvNY)

81 there's an old libertarian saw about whether the private sector, if left to its own devices, would build lighthouses. lighthouses are used in economics as an example of the free-rider problem. Every ship needs the lighthouse -- but everyone would prefer that someone else went to the expense of building, maintaining, and staffing a lighthouse. The free-rider problem rears its head - if the government did not build them, would shipping companies build them themselves? (A: Probably.) Anyway, it's just my shorthand for a very theoretical question that is interesting enough, but a real poltician needs to get beyond purely theoretical discussions. my idea of a crank libertarian is a guy who has no interest in real politics but just wants to talk about theoretical puzzles like this.

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (jlvw3)

82 Hey, people mis-speak and fuck up every day

If you're not a Truther or a mental patient, there is no "long-form" answer to that question.

Two letters. Next question.

Posted by: Waterhouse at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (ySQoK)

83 Chi-Town Jerry,

most TEA folks are trying to fix the GOP (and some the democrats, which is hilarious).

Telling them to run on their own ticket is fucking retarded. 

They need to take their time and run for precinct chair, moving up the line, and getting the GOP completely overhauled.  That's what Palin is up to.  And it's not just her and it's not her idea, but she's the figurehead right now.

Running a separate ticket is just letting the socialists win.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 10:57 AM (dUOK+)

84 So Palin's non-endorsement of this nutso was brilliant AND she seemed to know more than we did.

Palin=1
Armchair Quarterbacks=0

Maybe some people should take her more seriously.

Posted by: Alex at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (d8/2I)

85 A lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives at never having been in "real politics," always shut out of real politics by the, erm, exoticness of their views.

Oh... Ace. Come on, we all know the Tea Party is comprised solely of racist denialist right-wing nazi homophobe truther birther christian doctor-murderers and anti-science nutjobs - it's a Wikipedia Trufact! It's nothing but sheer ignorance to claim otherwise. The science is SETTLED. BTW, did you know the term "teabagger" was started by the tea partiers themselves? It's a Trufact!

Posted by: Lars Jensen at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (OxK0d)

86
21

It is true. Medina is often on that tinfoil hat wearing asshat Alex Jones's  show. Even Ru Paul's dad Ron Paul rejects trutherism.

Yeah, right.  He also makes appearances on the Alex Jones show.  And he's "just asking questions" about 9/11.  But not a truther, nosiree.  He just wants to know what really happened.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 02:36 PM (plsiE)


You are right. Though when Ron Paul was cornered in an interview he denied being a trutherist. Alx Jones and Ron Paul are in complete agreement on their antisemitism. Paul seems to be rooting for the enemy, and is the best Congressman an Islamo-Fascist could hope for.

Watch this from the creators of Hide the Decline. Baba O'reilly  on the banjo.

Minnesotans 4 Global Warming.




Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (NLZLH)

87 >>>Like I said: let her rebut it and, if she fails to convince, then bring out the howitzer but, as this has happened many times in the past where the actual 'guilty' party has turned out to be not so guilty NO. Really, my real answer here, which I won't say, is decidedly stronger than "NO." She answered. Stop defending a fucking Truther.

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (jlvw3)

88 Meh, she's a truther.

Not very many single things in my book make you ineligible to hold office, but being a truther is one of them.

That's what is so sad about Ron Paul.  I love the guy's voting record, but cannot abide with the truther crap.

Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (/subp)

89 Fucking knuckleheads. Class war in reverse.

Fucking erg:  Classless idiot 24/7

Posted by: Captain Hate at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (ypGDY)

90 BTW, anyone got any frozen fruit?  My ass just feels so empty.

Posted by: Prepubescent Ergie at February 11, 2010 10:58 AM (VDgKF)

91 She sounds like a rather husky lass.

Posted by: Vivi at February 11, 2010 10:59 AM (hMAiu)

92 Hey, the system worked. She got outed as a troofer. The other nut cases will also.

Posted by: Molon Labe at February 11, 2010 10:59 AM (kYpqT)

93 Jeff who really knows what Jesus said about himself ? No one even is sure of what YEAR he was born let alone what day And what is with the "cough" "cough" thing ? Are you self checking for hemorrhoids ?

Posted by: Noah at February 11, 2010 11:00 AM (mhD2v)

94 If you're not a Truther or a mental patient, there is no "long-form" answer to that question.

Heh.

I have a little test for people. I ask them "Is Communism evil" if the answer doesn't start with "of course" or "yes", you have a good idea what you are dealing with. Usually they start with 'Well," and then I just stop them. That's all I need to know.

Posted by: DrewM. at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (9B5OK)

95 82 If you're not a Truther or a mental patient, there is no "long-form" answer to that question. Two letters. Next question. Posted by: Waterhouse at February 11, 2010 02:57 PM (ySQoK) Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future (and it will happen and it won't have as 'happy' an ending as this time since she does appear to be a loon), burn him/her at the stake, forthwith--it's the only reasonable thing to do.

Posted by: ECM at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (nYKDd)

96 Ace.

I am thinking you might want to post this.

Minnesotans 4 Global Warming.

Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (NLZLH)

97 And the only reason that the rightwing nit cases don't get elected is because Americans choose not to, bot because the HOP doesn't nominate them

Posted by: Noah at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (mhD2v)

98

"It is a sock."

I thought it might be, but the target was too inviting to miss. It helps me hone my snark skills, though.

Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 11:01 AM (e+wCK)

99 Please take away my entitlements

Conservatives don't get entitlements, what we want to do is fire most federal and state employees.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (2sJK0)

100 Better to weed them out now than to have this pop up in the general.

Posted by: big_pale at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (mzPP4)

101 Honest Clot clocks out.  Erg clocks in.  I like that we have trolls who take their work seriously by showing up at the appointed place at the appointed time.  Setting up and maintaining a duty rotation is very professional and indicates how highly you libtards regard this blog.

We thank you.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:02 AM (wgLRl)

102 It's been almost nine years.

If you really had concerns about 9/11, you would have looked into it.  I watched loose change, and yeah, there were a couple of parts that make you suspicious.  But if you really are suspicious of something like that, naturally you will look for explanations.

And the explanations (beyond the simple dishonesty of Loose Change et al) are very well publicized and easy to find, easy to read, and completely answer the questions.

If someone couldn't find the time to look into that in nine years, and thinks there's still an open question, they obviously are paranoid nuts, unfair about truth, or idiots.  Or really, all 3.

Medina had a chance, in 2001, to look into this.  in 2010, she has run out of time.

That she would need to "rebut" her "fuck up" comments says it all.  And it says everything you will ever need to know about her close circle of advisers.  Medina didn't realize this was totally toxic.  A simple "Absolutely not" was required, and she didn't know that?!?

Let's have out with whoever else was part of this candidate's circle, and ask them what they think of 9/11.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:03 AM (dUOK+)

103

She answered. Stop defending a fucking Truther.

Agree totally with Ace.  There is no acceptable answer to the question posed by Beck than "No."  End.  No further, no qualifications.

Clear?

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 11:03 AM (B+qrE)

104

Primaries are a beautiful thing.

Posted by: robtr at February 11, 2010 11:04 AM (fwSHf)

105
Better to weed them out now than to have this pop up in the general.

No shit.  The party of Cynthia Mckinney and Van Jones wouldn't think twice about bashing their opponent over the head with the "9/11 TRUTHER!!!!" label.

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 11:04 AM (fx8sm)

106 "I have the right to put up a website called "I hate N*ggers and Jews" but that doesn't mean it's a palatable thought.

Anyone caught with a weird, lunatic, or hateful thought always wants to change the topic from the belief itself to a dry and pointless discussion of whether or not they have the right to hold that belief.

It's the go-to tactic for these freaks.

No one says you don't have the right to be a lunatic hateful anti-american conspiracy theorist.

But we also can determine that makes you ineligible for a governorship."

Hey now, don't compare us to Truthers.

Posted by: racists at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (l71WL)

107

"Jeff who really knows what Jesus said about himself ? No one even is sure of what YEAR he was born let alone what day."

In which case one can't reasonably call him a great man, either, since nothing is known for certain. All you are doing is cherry-picking the parts you agree with...

Posted by: Grey Fox at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (e+wCK)

108 >>>Medina has caused some actual damage to the movement. She knows it. she's selfish. she's not part of the actual movement. It's just a flag of convenience for her. There are a lot of nutbag cranks who are "political" in much the same way Lee Harvey Oswald was "political." They are salivating at the idea of a *respectable* outsider third party they can join and coopt and claim to lead. We can't permit this, obviously. I mean, I guess I'm not a true Tea Partier since I think the movement must be coopted by the GOP (and the GOP must adopt its principles, of course) and I don't want a real third party and etc., but even if you are a Tea Partier first, you can't let these nutjobs attempt to capture your flag for their own bizarre ends.

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (jlvw3)

109 "Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future (and it will happen and it won't have as 'happy' an ending as this time since she does appear to be a loon), burn him/her at the stake, forthwith--it's the only reasonable thing to do. Posted by: ECM"

Yes, every time someone betrays their country by claiming there are reasonable questions about 9/11, it's only reasonable to throw them out on their ass.

This isn't a mis-speak.  She was given a chance to clarify after her first disaster comment.  There are some things that you can't excuse by "mis-speak".

This person wanted to govern 24 million people.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:05 AM (dUOK+)

110
Tea Baggage

I just coined that.  I'm afraid this is going to be par for a lot of the associations with the Tea Party.  Every third party gathers the nuts.  If the Tea Party folks start heading the direction of becoming a third party,  it's doomed.

Posted by: Dang at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (UA4gE)

111 Primaries are a beautiful thing.

I disagree, and I would have got away with it too, if it wasn't for the meddlesome bloggers.

Posted by: Dede Scozzasomething at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (2sJK0)

112 If only Ron Paul would lose his primary...

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (wgLRl)

113 Whoo doggies, Texas tea!

Posted by: Jed Clampett at February 11, 2010 11:06 AM (Q41Zh)

114 84

Good point.

Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (vVM8h)

115 ace,
you're right.

Medina is not REALLY part of the TEA party.  She wasn't trying to fix the GOP's spending retardation.  She's a nut.

Sadly, I think some people will come to associate this Ron Paul style crap, like that Houston n-word freak, with the TEA movement.  Some people actually get their news from the big 3 and newspapers.

I hope your confidence is more realistic than my pessimism.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (dUOK+)

116 >>>Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future (and it will happen and it won't have as 'happy' an ending as this time since she does appear to be a loon), burn him/her at the stake, forthwith--it's the only reasonable thing to do. FYNQ. She didn't "mis-speak." She said she had suspicions that the government brought down the WTC. Gee, funny, I can express myself pretty directly and clearly if asked about that. Didn't know there was so much "nuance" to this question.

Posted by: ace at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (jlvw3)

117 OT,

Another disappointment for Ace. Red State, Instapundit, and Michell Malkin all get to be Top 25 conservative writers but Ace get passed over. Well, they had David Brooks in the list, too, so you know someone was smoking dope.

RECOUNT!

http://tinyurl.com/yeqfj59

Posted by: Kemp at February 11, 2010 11:07 AM (2+9Yx)

118 Did someone mention Dr. Paul's name? I came running as soon as I heard it.

Posted by: Paultard at February 11, 2010 11:09 AM (4iIhs)

119 Notice I didn't call him "Professor Paul". THAT would be racists.

Posted by: Paultard at February 11, 2010 11:09 AM (4iIhs)

120 118 Did someone mention Dr. Paul's name? I came running as soon as I heard it.

Just be thankful for the douche proof firewall.

Posted by: Flavius Julius at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (NLZLH)

121 See?  This is why you have to vet candidates before you nominate them.

Posted by: The DNC at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (T0NGe)

122

mis-speaks

I HATE that term because it is bullshit to its core.  SHE DID NOT MIS-SPEAK.  She did not say the Yankees play in Fenway or Brussels is in France.

She was presented a simple yes or no question and used 65 words to answer.

"Mis-speak".  Meh.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (B+qrE)

123

<i>Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future...</i>

Happens to me all the time.  Like that fundraiser that I said wasn't a fundraiser.  Yep, gotta watch those mis-speaks.

Posted by: Algore at February 11, 2010 11:11 AM (VDgKF)

124 The Tea Party is not just comprised of strong small-government conservatives. A lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives at never having been in "real politics," always shut out of real politics by the, erm, exoticness of their views.

Oh, yeah, baby, preach it. Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.

Posted by: JBean at February 11, 2010 11:12 AM (9rK3x)

125

Usually I find Glenn Beck nuttier than a Planter's sample pack, but at least he did good work on this one...

Now if he'd only lighten up on his obsession with Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt....

Why is that? Because he's funny? He's drawing parallels with Wilson and Roosevelt and today's "progressives". Read some history and you'll see that he's right. We are still paying for Wilson.

Now, who's the "real base" ace? Pray tell.

ME

Posted by: dagny at February 11, 2010 11:12 AM (V4YZy)

126 LaRouchies -- remember them?

See, I have a hard time taking them seriously because all I can think is "really, you're still around, really?" 

I read Medina's cya statement and wow does someone need to teach her the first rule of holes.

I'm not an enormous Beck fan but go him for bringing this up.  Hey, look, he just showed more interest in delving into the beliefs of someone on "his" side than basically all of the rest of the press put together.  I may have to start tivoing his show.

Posted by: alexthechick at February 11, 2010 11:13 AM (8WZWv)

127 Not exactly a mis-speak but did anyone catch Bobby Jindal on Fox and Friends earlier this week?  Doocey asked him three times if he asked for or approved of the "Louisiana Purchase" and he evaded the question all three times.  Certainly gave me pause.

Posted by: Jewells at February 11, 2010 11:13 AM (l/N7H)

128 Sometimes you feel like a nut....
Sometimes you really are....

Posted by: Ron Paul at February 11, 2010 11:14 AM (Q1lie)

129
Oh, yeah, baby, preach it. Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.

Posted by: JBean at February 11, 2010 03:12 PM (9rK3x)

Birthers are not Truthers. Stop the stupid mantra.

People who foolishly believe person X wasn't born in location Y are not the same as people who dig Al-Qaeda and believe US goverment murdered 3000 people for oil. Fuck, just stop it.

Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 11:15 AM (uSbo6)

130 Well, at least she doens't want Obama to produce a birth certificate.

Posted by: dagny at February 11, 2010 11:15 AM (V4YZy)

131

I'm sure MSNBC will cover this responsibly. Get ready for Tea Party = 9/11 Truther meme.

Posted by: Ben at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (wuv1c)

132

Well, at least she doens't want Obama to produce a birth certificate

ahhahaha

Posted by: Ben at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (wuv1c)

133 Maybe the TEA party can simultaneously purge its nuts and run as its own party against the GOP and Dems and take over congress and the White House.

But I kinda think we (and I am the TEA party) should just take over the GOP.

If you're whining about the GOP, like me, have you tried to support precinct chairs who are TEA partiers and want to reform the party?  If there isn't such a person, are you going to run?  Even if you are butt ugly and stupid.

I tried to post a link, but am unable to do so.  Just Google "Tea Party Precinct Project"

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (dUOK+)

134

This new chick seems pretty interesting.  Is she hawt?

Posted by: Charlie Sheen at February 11, 2010 11:16 AM (7h7Un)

135 If only Ron Paul would lose his primary...

I live in his district -- it may happen, to a tea party candidate.  Unfortunately, there are a few of them splitting up the vote.

Hopefully, people here are getting more sick of the bad attention from Ron Paul than the feeling of independence they got from voting for a wackjob who is a one issue candidate.

 As far as Medina goes, anyone in Texas who did not know that she is a Paulbot didn't take a very close look.  She is a sound clip candidate with only three or four things listed on her policy page.  Cut taxes,. constitutionalist, blah blah blah.

I LOVED hearing her on Beck today.  I was thinking, "this isn't very smart of her, I wonder how she'll fuck up."

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (jc7YC)

136
Conspiracy theorists - be they truthers, birthers and/or Paulites -- need to be screened out.

That's what THEY want you to think!

Posted by: Dang Straights at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (fx8sm)

137 Truthers should be rounded up, taken to a dark, dank place and used as human targets for Army sniper training. My hatred for them runs deep. I am a 9/11 survivor. I have first hand knowledge which renders almost every 9/11 conspiracy theory as bullshit (explosives were installed the night before, there was a power outage the weekend before, etc). Their leaders surely know that they are full of shit. I have gotten physical with many of them I encounter on the street (including a near arrest on a Metro North train on 9/11/07 when I berated some college knowitall hippy wearing a "9/11 was an inside job" shirt) to the point that cops were called. Truthers deserve no quarter. If you see one being beaten by an outraged survivor, cross the street and pay it no mind.

Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (AO4qz)

138

She was presented a simple yes or no question and used 65 words to answer.

She verbally soiled herself.

Even if she believes there is information withheld about 9/11 -- and I would agree with that, but the info deals with national security, not a cover-up -- she should easily be able to say automatically, "No, the US government was not involved."

How on Earth did she get as far as she did?  Is Beck the first one to really ask her about this?  Where are the tea partiers who fronted her?

Posted by: barbelle at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (qF8q3)

139 ...who really knows what Jesus said about himself...

Well, Jesus for one, and maybe 12 other guys too. And some chick with long hair.

Posted by: C. Lars Jesuson at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (OxK0d)

140 That wasn't even the best part of Beck's show today.  It was hilarious when he was ragging on Megan McCain.

By the way, I don't deny that gravity exists.  I just think that there are a lot of interesting questions.

Posted by: WalrusRex at February 11, 2010 11:17 AM (xxgag)

141 Nut-balls like this do need to be drummed out & shouted down, but it should be done by the STATE Tea Parties- they are the ones who will know who the clowns are.

I continue to believe that any National Tea Party should be a small voluntary affair which provides support and coordination, perhaps some advocacy. The State parties should be in the drivers seat. State parties will have enough local knowledge to keep the kooks out and also explain the necessary compromises (i.e. this person is as good as you are going to get in this race.)

Posted by: FR at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (AIyLg)

142 Don't know how many of you guys went to  "Libertarian" Joe Kennedy's website during the Brown/Coakley race, but he had a huge "Tea Party Approved!!!" banner (something like that) at the top.  Ticked me off a little, but we all know where the Tea Party vote went. Weasels will keep trying to co-opt the label and we'll have to keep our ears and eyes open and pick them out. If the movement ends up with fewer kooks than the Dems, that's a win.

Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (vVM8h)

143 Juicer,

What are you talking about?

No one claimed the truthers and birthers are equally fucked up.

One's just paranoid about a really mysterious and dishonest politician, and the other is forgiving Al Qaida of murder.

Of course they aren't on the same level.  Both are positions that are untenable and ridiculously foolsih tactics.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:18 AM (dUOK+)

144 If you see one being beaten by an outraged survivor, cross the street and pay it no mind.
Posted by: Chris R

Can I watch if I hold your coat?

Posted by: Iskandar at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (/o58C)

145 OH if you would have seen the debate she attended on the DFW news station you would have already realized she's a nut.

Posted by: Houdini's Cadaver at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (nz654)

146 It will be interesting to see how the media treats the tea party this summer after attacking them for so long.  It seems some are starting to take it seriously especially after the Brown election.  Will they still try to discredit them and paint them as crazy knowing this will even motivate them more?  Not talking olby here.

Posted by: Guy Fawkes at February 11, 2010 11:19 AM (2sJK0)

147

Can I watch if I hold your coat?

And I'll bring the popcorn.

Posted by: barbelle at February 11, 2010 11:21 AM (qF8q3)

148

She claims to have the Tx. Tea Party groups behind her, but she doesnÂ’t.

She is a Paul-Bot and not actually part of the Tea Party movement.  I guess the people in Texas are really screwed. It sounds like sticking with Perry is their best shot for now.

Posted by: Vic at February 11, 2010 11:21 AM (QrA9E)

149 barbelle, people here were starting to get sick of all the mud that was being lobbed back and forth between Perry and Hutchison and the Tea Party movement is HUGE here.  As soon as she just said the words, her poll numbers went up.  She was just lucky in her timing.

No one really knew much about her, they just knew what they didn't like about everyone else.  She's been saying all the right things to catch the conservatives and people who didn't know her background were willing to give her the benefit of the doubt  -- until now.

She's done.

I've been telling everyone I know that she's a Paulbot and I am constantly met with surprise. Guess I don't have to do that any more.

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:23 AM (jc7YC)

150
Alright, you guys win: every time someone mis-speaks in the future (and it will happen and it won't have as 'happy' an ending as this time since she does appear to be a loon), burn him/her at the stake, forthwith--it's the only reasonable thing to do.

Right. One time someone asked me how I felt about diddling little kids, and I just sorta launched into this hypothetical about how I hadn't really explored the idea completely, but I couldn't really rule it out and if anyone I knew supported diddling little kids, well, I don't have time to be the thought police.

And then, somehow, everyone thought maybe I was sympathetic toward the idea. All because of a few poorly chosen words.

Posted by: Warden at February 11, 2010 11:25 AM (TIGTh)

151 Where's the birth certificate?

Posted by: torabora at February 11, 2010 11:26 AM (yQHa6)

152 "She is a Paul-Bot and not actually part of the Tea Party movement.  I guess the people in Texas are really screwed. It sounds like sticking with Perry is their best shot for now.

Posted by: Vic at February 11, 2010 03:21 PM (QrA9E)"

I was thinking about voting for Rick Perry in the primary, but after this morning, I have no doubts.  I'm definitely voting Perry!

Glenn Beck just did us Texans a public service.

Posted by: newton at February 11, 2010 11:26 AM (q5ZJk)

153 mesablue

Do you think she's the type to walk away when her numbers go south or is she gonna be haunting the campaign with phony-baloney 'Tea Party" signs and sound bites?

Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:26 AM (vVM8h)

154 "Crank libertarians, I mean. The kind that just want to argue about the gold standard and lighthouses and nothing else all day." Damn, Ace, you got some high class libertarians. The ones I know won't shut up about Pot and Porn.

Posted by: Ronsonic at February 11, 2010 11:27 AM (XiQgY)

155 The truth, unfortunately, is that a lot of Paulians were behind the early tea parties. They have done a very effective job organizing them and staying behind the scenes. I am happy to have them alongside if their aim is to get rid of the reckless Congress or Zero. If their aim, however, is to support Ron Paul for president in the guise of doing these other things, or to view them as "icing on the cake," then I want their asses out of the movement along with Medina's--who is probably a Paulian, too.

Posted by: Fresh Air at February 11, 2010 11:27 AM (1yI48)

156

I haven't been able to listen to this, as I'm at work, but I'll assume folks are accurate about what the question was and what she said.

Well... shit.  Shit shit shit.  Um....

I agree.  "No" is the answer I was looking for.  If you want to equivocate, a non-nutty equivocation is that the federal government had no intent to allow 9/11, but was lax in preventing it.  And that's pretty weak, considering how loose people were with security prior to 9/11, and how much political capital has been expended AFTER 9/11 to do the half-assed job of prevention that we're currently doing.  The only real answer to the question is "No."

So... I guess I'll be voting third party or just abstaining on the governor's race.  Least ways, I'm not voting for Perry or Hutchison, and I'm damn sure not voting for the democrat, whoever it is. 

I wonder the MSM was holding this bit of nuttiness to spring on us right before the election, should she have won the primary.  Or maybe they didn't see it as being anything out of the ordinary?  Nah, probably the first one. 

Well, good catch, Glenn.  That's a real pisser, though.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (pZEar)

157 Sticking with Rick Perry isn't the ideal of my dreams, vic, but Texans are far far far far from screwed.

Anyone who associates Rick Perry's governership with 'screwed' doesn't understand how fucking awesome Texas is right now compared to the rest of the country.

Do I credit Rick Perry?  Well, a lot of the administrative stuff is run well enough.  But I know it's just the great people here.  Still, I am not changing from a proven effective leader right now, even if I think Rick is a pretty boy who has messed up a few times

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (dUOK+)

158 Ducks,
I have no problem with tea partiers trying to remake the Republican party.  But, do so from within.

Tea Party protests are fine.. but don't associate them with the GOP.  Because, as Ace correctly points out, all the nutjobs like the Larouchies with their Hitler/Obama signs come out and join the party.  Who needs that shit?

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 11:28 AM (f9c2L)

159 Ron Paul doesn't get credit for the TEA party in Texas.

Period.

His nuts are everywhere and on everything and that means nothing.

We want to get RID of pork earmarking scum like Paul.  And while it's not really balls on relevant, every true TEA partier supports the war on terror.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:29 AM (dUOK+)

160 lincoln,  depends on the fallout from today. It was front page on the Houston Chronicle web site within an hour of the Glenn Beck show. 

But, I'm guessing she'll stick around.  She came from nowhere is going back to nowhere and will probably try to turn this into an us versus them thing like Paul has always done. 

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (jc7YC)

161 143 Juicer,

What are you talking about?

No one claimed the truthers and birthers are equally fucked up.

One's just paranoid about a really mysterious and dishonest politician, and the other is forgiving Al Qaida of murder.

Of course they aren't on the same level.  Both are positions that are untenable and ridiculously foolsih tactics.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 03:18 PM (dUOK+)

1. Plenty of people claim this equivalence. Here and at Hotair.

2. One position is damning while the other is somewhat forgiveable. Even in politics. I wouldn't mind having a Birther rep. There is no harm as long he's not obsessive about it. I would mind having a 9.11 Truther as a rep.

There are mentally ill people who become great painters and there are mentally ill people who become serial killers. Are they the same?

Posted by: Juicer at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (uSbo6)

162 "Chi-Town Jerry"

I guess I see what you're saying.  I think it's going to be hard to keep the nuts away, and I agree the  TEA party needs to fix the GOP from within. 

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (dUOK+)

163 #64 ...Uncle, beat me to it!

Posted by: torabora at February 11, 2010 11:32 AM (yQHa6)

164 Juicer, anyone claiming they are equivalent is a douchebag.

But I think the dude you responded to initially did not do that.  He simply said both are untenable for the movement.  Just as cancer and a cold are both things you should try not to have.

Truthers are 100000 times worse than Birthers.  Most people know that.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:32 AM (dUOK+)

165 I hadn't really explored the idea completely, but I couldn't really rule it out and if anyone I knew supported diddling little kids, well, I don't have time to be the thought police...

Pics or it didn't happen. Newsletter?

Posted by: Pedobear at February 11, 2010 11:32 AM (OxK0d)

166 160

Thanks. Hopefully people will be able to separate her from the TP's no matter what she says/does.

Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 11:33 AM (vVM8h)

167

8: "I give up.  Is Kinky Friedman running again?"

He was - as a liberal Democrat - but quickly dropped out.  He isn't the independent, free-thinker that he built his image around.

 

16: "Good to see she lost it with Beck. Her campaign is probably now on life support, along with KBH."

Let's not give Medina more credit than she deserved.  She was never going to get out of the the Republican primary with more than about 10-15% (supposedly) of the party vote and she won't pull more than KBH - whose campaign is also on life support along with Medina. Whatever everyone around the country heard about Medina's prospects was not accurate. Perry will easily win re-election.  He's still pretty popular here.

Posted by: slug at February 11, 2010 11:34 AM (n8Nln)

168 Good.. agreed!

I'm just trying to see that we defend against the bad rap the GOP faithful have got in the press for so long now.. we're all racists, conspiracy theorists, etc.  etc..

and if we start associating with exactly that type of people, and allow them to become prominent in the party, then those associations will stick.

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 11:34 AM (f9c2L)

169 A question for those who want the Tea-Party to change the GOP from within?

What about the Ron Paulians who have infiltrated the movement?  If there are enough of them, it would be better to let them crash and burn via the Third Party route.

The GOP already has enough problems.

Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 11, 2010 11:35 AM (wgLRl)

170 I've said it once and I'll say it again.  Beck is doing the work no one else seems to think important.  He's shining a spotlight on every cockroach in Barry's administration, and today's show proved he's pretty damned impartial when it comes to going after nutjobs wherever they lurk.

All the Troofers need to be rounded up and locked in a cell with Rosie O'Donnell.

Posted by: Jane D'oh at February 11, 2010 11:36 AM (UOM48)

171 My wife and I had a discussion the other night about who we were thinking about voting for in the Governor's race. Guess who I said I was considering? Guess who looks like a dumb fuck now.

Posted by: mikeyslaw at February 11, 2010 11:38 AM (QMGr1)

172 #121 DNC, someone actually veted The Kenyan? Who knew?

Posted by: torabora at February 11, 2010 11:38 AM (yQHa6)

173 It scares me that there are psychopaths out there like Medina and the Ronulans.

Posted by: Barbarian at February 11, 2010 11:39 AM (EL+OC)

174

And to think, there was actually going to be room in this week's paycheck to put some coin in her tip-jar and buy a couple of bumper-stickers...

I'm bummed.  She'll try and tap-dance around this, and I'm sure will play the "inconsequential to TX politics" angle, but...damn.

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 11:39 AM (5npD/)

175

It's actually quite awesome when these nuts actually admit that they have "questions" about the government's involvement in 9/11.   It makes it much easier to know whom to avoid at all costs.

A co-worker of mine who I was somewhat friendly with (casual acquaintance) started off on a Truther rant one day during a break at a conference we were attending.  He was absolutely shocked when I called him a f**king idiot and told him to stay the hell away from me. 

From what I've gathered, he's shot his mouth off on multiple occasions to other co-workers (big Ron Paul guy).

He used to be a quirky, but well-respected employee.  Now, it's pretty sad watching this guy speak up about anything.  Nobody takes him seriously, no matter what topic we're discussing. 

 

Posted by: stickety at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (8Ev54)

176 i posted about this the other day early in the morning.  My fashion blog/chat room gals were mourning the loss of some website they all go to to interpret their dreams and discuss astrology.  They had posted a new blog to go to since this old favorite was gone.   So, since they were carrying on so much I decided to check out the new blog to see what the gals are up to when they aren't on the fashion blog.  What I found was this. 
Now, would you have thought you would have found anti Sarah Palin stuff on this kind of a site talking about another website going away?  This is a scary site and scary stuff but, how many people have seen this stuff?   I mean here is this stuff out there and Sarah Palin may not even know it is there.   Yes, I know that is the way the internet is but, seriously, this is frightening stuff.  I went back and told them all the site was crazy and they said "well we only discuss our dreams and our numbers, so it is ok"  but really it is scary.

Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (p302b)

177

hold up, since when is the tea parties for the rnc?  you know what, screw the republican party too.  those assclowns are just as bad as the liberals

it was form by all types of people including democrats for conservative causes.

oh, i heard the interview in the car, i was like wow!!

Posted by: navycopjoe at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (DjnFS)

178

Rodeo clowns serve a very important purpose which makes their ha-ha just a bonus.

Posted by: agnostica at February 11, 2010 11:40 AM (gbCNS)

179 If you go to the link in #176, you have to scroll down, you can't miss the Sarah Palin picture, it's huge.

Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 11:42 AM (p302b)

180 That f'ing sucks. All I'd known about her prior was that she was campaigning to eliminate the property tax -- "If you have to pay property taxes, you are only renting the property from the government."

Property taxes suck but, she can throw her ass off a cliff if she thinks there's any doubt as to how 9/11 went down.

Posted by: jimmuy at February 11, 2010 11:42 AM (/rb2j)

181

Beck can be annoying, but he is good at ferreting out the truth about dangerous individuals.

A dear friend of mine is an Alex Jones acolyte. He told me about this Debra Medina, conveniently leaving out the troofer part. That was a really good audio clip.

I hope Medina really is headed back to four percent with a bullet. (not literally)

Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 11:45 AM (+FkcS)

182 Vetting, vetting, vetting. Being jaded by longtime politicians shouldn't be the issue when nonvetting can get you the likes of Van Jones.

Posted by: agnostica at February 11, 2010 11:46 AM (gbCNS)

183 My distaste for Perry and Hutchison is so great that Media may still get my vote.

Posted by: John Galt at February 11, 2010 11:50 AM (Ylv1H)

184 I'm going out on a limb here: You say you want change. But you draw very tight permissible limits. What's preferable: a Medina with "some questions" about 9/11, or a guy who insists on shooting up virgins with HPV? This place seems more like a GOP echo chamber every day. "Gold standard", yeah that's a wacko Democrat idea (ca. 1932) I'm disgusted with the lot of you.

Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at February 11, 2010 11:51 AM (g9neE)

185 A couple of folks point out that democrats are also interested in the TEA movement.

As well they should be.  There's a lot to the democratic party that would be a lot better if they were simply fiscally sound.  Get rid of the pork and graft and our nation probably could sustain some of their stupid programs a lot better.

We all benefit if patriotic Americans on left and right agree to be fiscally sustainable and take over their political parties, GOP and Democratic.

Of course, most will try to fix the GOP, but whenever I see a democrat at a TEA party I shake their patriotic hand.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 11:51 AM (dUOK+)

186

"So... I guess I'll be voting third party or just abstaining on the governor's race.  Least ways, I'm not voting for Perry or Hutchison, and I'm damn sure not voting for the democrat, whoever it is."

JOO KNO JOO WANT ME!

Posted by: Farouk Shami at February 11, 2010 11:52 AM (5npD/)

187

There's an update on Hot Air where Medina first backtracks her troofer self, but then in the end compulsively goes back to her point that the government should be accountable when the populace has questions.

175 - I know the type. When my friend starts on his troofer rant, there's nothing to do but shut up. You can't argue with them. But you can keep them out of office.

Medina's next move: Go back on Jones' show, complaining how Glenn Beck is a Bilderberger, as are all the readers of Hot Air and Ace of Spades.

Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 11:52 AM (+FkcS)

188

hmmm, this is probably why Sarah avoided supporting Medina, and its a good thing too.

I can just see the headlines to bash Palin if she has supported Medina.

I have to admit Palin seems to be pretty good at getting all the inside information.

 

Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-democrat at February 11, 2010 11:53 AM (ACkhT)

189 Jeffrey Quick -- concern troll or troofer?

Either way, I'm disgusted with you.

She's a nutjob. 

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (jc7YC)

190 Ace, you are ON the money!

Posted by: Sibyl West at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (XGiRE)

191   185 I'm going out on a limb here:
You say you want change. But you draw very tight permissible limits. What's preferable: a Medina with "some questions" about 9/11, or a guy who insists on shooting up virgins with HPV? This place seems more like a GOP echo chamber every day. "Gold standard", yeah that's a wacko Democrat idea (ca. 1932)

I'm disgusted with the lot of you.

Posted by: Jeffrey Quick at February 11, 2010 03:51 PM (g9neE)

I think he only wants to shoot up female virgins with HPV, so you're probably safe.

Posted by: The Drizzle at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (mV/4V)

192

Crazy doesn't necessarily mean dumb as a doornail.  Some truthers (while as previously mentioned....er, crazy) are politically astute enough to recognize the ascendancy in influence of the tea party movement, and seek to hitch their wagon to it.  Unlike with the kook left, carrying Chimpy McBushhitler signs, the media are going to fix their laser sights on every fringe lunatic that associates itself with any group that falls on the right side of the ideological spectrum.

 

 

Posted by: Reggie1971 at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (xIqkW)

193 #189  I have to admit Palin seems to be pretty good at getting all the inside information.

Did Palin know about Medina's Truther-ness?  This could be just dumb luck for Palin.

Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 11:57 AM (otlXg)

194
Thank you Ace.  Tea Baggage, indeed.
Anyone who associates with Alex Jones is, well, a dang chicken fucking dim-bulb.
9/11 Trutherism in an unforgivable offense.

Posted by: Lemon Kitten at February 11, 2010 11:58 AM (0fzsA)

195 I've been saying it to anyone who will listen. Medina is crazy and her agenda (what little she's explained) will destroy the state. I'd rather have Shami who can't even speak English over her. Plus she looks like Peggy Hill.

Posted by: Generic at February 11, 2010 11:58 AM (mycY7)

196

I don't think Sarah Palin had inside-info on this.  If she had it, then Perry would've had it, and if Perry had it, he would have used it...

I'm still under the impression that Palin endorses Perry to pay back political favors amongst the various Republican governors, and she got lucky by not going out on a limb for Medina.

I don't even think that Beck had any inside-info on this.  He just asked a question, giving her a chance to squelch the one rumor that would most likely hold her back from being a serious contender.

And instead of using the hacksaw to cut off the handcuffs, she wound up slitting her own wrists.

Ugh.

I can't get home and take her support group off of my Facebook quickly enough.

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:01 PM (5npD/)

197 Plus she looks like Peggy Hill.

So she's got Peggy's hair and Dale's politics? Quite a mix.

Posted by: lincolntf at February 11, 2010 12:03 PM (vVM8h)

198 She worked on Ron Paul's staff for chrissakes. 

That was reason enough for most people to stay away from her.

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 12:03 PM (jc7YC)

199 Isn't this pretty awful news for the Democratic candidate?

He's trailing a 9/11 truther in the race for governor?

Posted by: wtfci at February 11, 2010 12:03 PM (+zo63)

200 It wasn't dumb luck that Palin endorsed a known and capable governor.  Her basic argument was that Perry is doing a good job and we know he's not some kind of risk.

I doubt she actually knew much about Medina besides that she's a Ron Paul nut.  That's really all you need to know.  Ron Paul = traitor.  I know, that's extreme and a lot of his supporters probably don't understand this.  Sorry y'all, Texas says go fuck yourself.  You are free to whine and run and lose forever, though.  Enjoy that.  Hopefully Earmark Pork Paul is thrown out.  He gets so much money from the crooks who bribe him that I don't know it's possible, and the field against him splits the vote, but we'll try hard.  Can't always kick the crooks out.

as to the idiot who asks which is worse, the HPV bullshit or being a truther, that's a very easy question that obviously favors Perry 100:0

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:04 PM (dUOK+)

201

By the way, I'm sure Medina will be getting a paper grocery sack filled with the collected feces of the entire KLIF morning crew, set ablaze, on the front steps of her campaign office.

Jeff Bolton!  Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me she was a Truther?

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:04 PM (5npD/)

202 LunaBaby wrote: She more than makes me nervous, she scares the pee out of me. I think we should all pitch in and get an island if she ever becomes President.
You might think I;m kidding, but I'm not.

The first time I read Sarah PalinÂ’s energy I saw her abusing her children, and immediately took a dislike to her because I have issues with child abusers. Then I started to see a really dark side where this energy goes out and works through other people. IÂ’m still trying to understand it, and itÂ’s really interesting to see how people come to her defense.

I had this college professor that had very similar energy to PalinÂ’s, and people really seemed to like this guy, but I heard quiet rumors about how students that argued with him turned up dead, so stupid me, I just had to see what it was all about, and I argued in class with this professor. Of course my psychic radar was going on full blast after the argument, and as I was driving home I saw this strange energy behind this parked car I was driving towards, and I covered my break and slowed down, and then a child darted right in front of my truck. If my radar hadnÂ’t been out like that that child would have been killed, and my life would have been ruined. A few days later there was a baseball game with the people in that college department and I ended up getting hit in the head with a baseball, and getting some large scrapes and burses. I checked the energy after each injury and found that professor not only looking at me, but his intent directly involved in the things happening to me, even though he wasnÂ’t playing in the game. After that I dropped out of the Fine Arts program, which put me in direct contact with him, and never upset the guy again.

Palin scares the shit out of me and I would like to understand why, but IÂ’m not sure it is worth tempting that energy that surrounds her.


From the link at 176. Sweet fancy Moses that is industrial strength lunacy right there.

Posted by: Rocks at February 11, 2010 12:05 PM (Q1lie)

203

"He's trailing a 9/11 truther in the race for governor?"

Not anymore.

Posted by: the next Ras poll release at February 11, 2010 12:06 PM (5npD/)

204 "I'm still under the impression that Palin endorses Perry to pay back political favors amongst the various Republican governors, and she got lucky by not going out on a limb for Medina."

There's some of that. Building a coalition takes more than a nice jingle and a few facebook posts.  You do have to cut deals and work with people.

Perry has been outspoken on Obama's power grabs and I think he's one of the good guys, but of course there's a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes.

Power players can survive today if they support fiscally sustainable government.

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:07 PM (dUOK+)

205 I have a problem with this whole notion of "Tea Party candidates".  Who decides this?  They don't have primaries.  They aren't even on the same page about everything.  It's an opposition movement , and the only thing the Tea Partiers have in common is opposition to the agenda ObaMao, Pelosi, and Dingy Harry.  They have no means to select candidates.

Palin was right in her speech that the movement doesn't and shouldn't have "leaders".

Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at February 11, 2010 12:07 PM (IoUF1)

206 Truthers are just fucking nuts. Birthers, on the other hand, are just too late to the game. The media was complicit in squashing and spiking any stories about The Won's past. Why would Barry spend millions to hide his past? I still want to see his transcripts and his passport record when he visited his muslim holyland of Pakistan.

Posted by: TexBob at February 11, 2010 12:09 PM (2jp4I)

207

Thank you for bringing us that little gem, Rocks, so that the rest of us don't have to go there.

Make sure you wash thoroughly...

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:09 PM (5npD/)

208 Texas under Perry has a billions dollar surplus.  That's really what the TEA party is all about.

And of course it takes some wheeling and dealing and hard work with democrats and republicans to get government work done and be sustainable with money.

Palin has overtly noted that she and every other politician will disappoint most folks in some shape or form.

Bottom line: are you spending more than revenue or not?

Posted by: ducks Under Oklahoma ASCEND at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (dUOK+)

209 Hope this does Medina in. She was well on her way of splitting Perry's votes and giving KBH the nomination.

Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (946fl)

210

By the way, I'm sure Medina will be getting a paper grocery sack filled with the collected feces of the entire KLIF morning crew, set ablaze, on the front steps of her campaign office.

Jeff Bolton!  Why didn't you come to me like a fucking man and tell me she was a Truther?

LOL!  You're not kidding.  This seriously stinks for them.  Imagine having to endorse Perry or Hutchison after all the crap being slung...

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (pZEar)

211 My report card says "high functioning retard." I wonder what that means?

Posted by: cloud of honesty at February 11, 2010 12:10 PM (/9uzv)

212 #212  That whole sentence is a lot more applicable to the Democrat party.

Sorry you lost your job flying rubber dog shit from Hong Kong.

Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at February 11, 2010 12:13 PM (otlXg)

213 Ya think the knock in the head with the baseball has anything to do with it?

WoooooOOOOOoooooOOOOO!

Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at February 11, 2010 12:15 PM (f9c2L)

214 Oh noes!  Palin has a bad aura????????????

I feel so stupid!


[/sarc]


fucking new age retards who don't have a fucking clue how the universe works

Christ on a pony.

Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:16 PM (946fl)

215 So she's a lock for the Ron Paul voting bloc.

Posted by: Paul Revere at February 11, 2010 12:18 PM (epgqp)

216 One of the last polls I looked at had Perry trailing Hutchinson by the same percentage that Medina was polling at. So, what I took away from that, is that Medina was pulling votes from Perry.

Perry has never trailed Medina, not even in her wildest dreams.

Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 12:18 PM (946fl)

217

Oh, it's honest cloud!

Hi, honest cloud! Or should I just call you John?

Is your dad still practicing law? Nice place he's got there on Marco Island.

Posted by: Warden at February 11, 2010 12:21 PM (QoR4a)

218

I love this game...  It never gets old!

"ACORN is comprised of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."

"The Progressive Movement is comprised of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."

"Barney Frank's anus is chock-full of a lot of crazy bastards have jumped on the bandwagon, a bunch of disaffected fringey malcontents who have been frustrated for their whole lives as a result of sucking at earning a living."

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:25 PM (+hPIb)

219 Remember that Palin said it was "legitimate question" for people to inquire regarding O's citizenship. Beck has completely misrepresented the entire legal issue and the labelling on this is a real shame. We are being ruled as if by an enemy of state by a guy with a moslem name and Islamic training. The real legal question is whether Obama is a "Natural Born Citizen" not whether he is a citizen. The issue needs to be cleared up by our courts so we as American voters know whether the pool of choice for POTUS are allowed to hold more than one citizenship. There are tons oh holes in Obama's entire story carefully laid out but if one strays away what Beck lays out he will shut down any further discussion. It really is disturbing to see the cynicism on the right.

Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 12:25 PM (Jpn2p)

220 Yeesh, all the goofballs are coming out of the woodwork.

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 12:28 PM (jc7YC)

221 Iskandar: yes, but you may want to keep your distance so that no truther blood gets on you or my coat.

Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (AO4qz)

222

I just checked the reader comments under the Dallas newspaper story and Medina's retraction.

It's 50-50, with half of the comments attacking Beck for exposing Medina.

Texas - wtf?

Posted by: kallisto at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (+FkcS)

223 Posted by: Rocks at February 11, 2010 04:05 PM (Q1lie)

It's scary though, that there are people like this who exist and believe as they do and since it is a free country they are entitled to that belief but, until the other day, I had no idea these nuts doesn't cover it, existed.  I mean i knew about the truthers and the birthers and some of the others mentioned but I didn't know about this group.  And the website they mourned is back and it is worse than this one.  At first my friends and I had a couple of good laughs but then you start thinking about people actually reading and believing this stuff and it give you a stomach ache and a head ache.

Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 12:29 PM (p302b)

224

Thank goodness - I was afraid KBH would win the nomination if Medina pulled votes away from Perry! 

 

Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at February 11, 2010 12:31 PM (NxLEp)

225

The Democrats.  The Democrats just recently started to trail Medina.  She's always been last in the Republican lineup, but she just recently got her leg up over Bill White, or whatever his name is.

(and man, was that White / Shami debate last week a snoozer...basically an hour or White spouting the standard Democratic stance, and Shami following up with a "me, too."  And really, nothing is creepier than listening to Farouk Shami talk about how "a lady is a human being and all human beings have rights and that lady has a right as a human being to choose what is best for her life as a human being."  Gave me the jibblies.)

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 12:31 PM (+hPIb)

226

176 -- Oh, that sort of industrial strength crazy has been around for quite a while now and is pretty prevalent on a lot of sites.

For instance: did you know that Barbaro (yep, the dead racehorse) is an enlightened being and messenger from God?  And he even manifests in photos as spiritual "orbs" (aka. dust particles on your camera lens, but that's only the explanation from people who don't "see" because we're souless or something).  And Barbaro (according to his devotees) went overwhelmingly for teh o-ster in '08.  Barbaro not only sends them messages about who to vote for, but also comes to these people and tells them to spend a hell of a lot of money on "rescuing" animals (what we lesser beings usually call hoarding) and giving to the humane society (spit) and peta (double spit).

I shit you not -- some of them have left their families in order to "follow Barbaro"...and there are a lot of them (more than a  hundred at least that I know of) -- and they vote...and they stalk uppity unbelievers who dare to question them (or their idols) too.  How scary is that?

Let's face it: the world is going to continue to go down the drainpipe for as long as batshit crazy people are given much of a forum to spread their batshit craziness.

Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 12:37 PM (5/yRG)

227 OK, so where are those f*cking f*cks who slammed Palin for endorsing Perry over the "true" tea party candidate?

Posted by: osbourne cox at February 11, 2010 12:40 PM (Vc/xe)

228 I am going to vote for the candidate that I'm campaigning for in Congress and leave the other spots blank. There really is noone to get excited over. A suck day for Texas.Its better to buy more ammo than donate to politicians they are all working for something we have no control over.

Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 12:42 PM (Jpn2p)

229 Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 04:37 PM (5/yRG)
I follow horse racing so this was doubly funny to me.  but, stuff like this is scary.  I mean at least they could have chosen to follow the greatest race horse of all time, Secretariat.

Posted by: curious at February 11, 2010 12:42 PM (p302b)

230 Medina - Burns
Beck - Blinky the three-eyed fish

Posted by: Happy Fun Ball at February 11, 2010 12:46 PM (fDGAU)

231

Bill Clinton in Hosprital in NY

Former President Bill Clinton Rushed to N.Y. Hospital Clinton Had Quadruple Heart Bypass Surgery in 2004

Clinton, 63, was transported to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital in Manhattan for a condition related to his heart.

ABC News' chief political correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported that sources said he was taken to the hospital "likely for a stent procedure

Posted by: willow at February 11, 2010 12:47 PM (7FgWm)

232 Texas - wtf?


Well, we are the home of Ron Paul and Alex Jones.

But, seriously, don't hold that against us!

Posted by: mpur at February 11, 2010 01:00 PM (946fl)

233 ABC News' chief political correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported that sources said he was taken to the hospital "likely for a stent procedure

I've had one of those. Angiogram thingy into the femoral artery up into the artery near the heart. Not a biggie. He should be out in a day or two.

Posted by: OregonMuse at February 11, 2010 01:00 PM (JkUVD)

234

osbourne - right here.  I was one of them.

Either Palin had this ace up her sleeve, or she got really lucky.

Posted by: reason at February 11, 2010 01:02 PM (+hPIb)

235 WOW, I THINK I MIGHT JUST HAVE TO SEND THIS LADY A CONTRIBUTION.  ASSUMING THAT HAARP DOESN'T HACK MY CREDIT CARDS, CAUSING THEM TO BE REJECTED.

Posted by: DBOOTS, Rainbow Czar at February 11, 2010 01:04 PM (+hPIb)

236

176 -- Oh, that sort of industrial strength crazy has been around for quite a while now and is pretty prevalent on a lot of sites.

For instance: did you know that Barbaro (yep, the dead racehorse) is an enlightened being and messenger from God? 

Please tell me that you made that up.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 01:05 PM (plsiE)

237

231 -- I've got good friends in the racing industry (and possibly a couple of job prospects) and trust me, the Barbaro fans are a fairly sizeable group that are not only batshit crazy, they're also politically active (and for the most part don't know $%ck about horses or racing).

Don't get me wrong, the horse was a decent racer and it was sad what happened to him, but these people just take the cake (and they are for the most part, not pro-horse owning in the traditional sense).  It had a lot to do with  a guru type who started a blog about the horse; the rest is history.

And they are certifiable: they'll stalk your ass if they think you are a danger to their cult (threaten your kids, animals, and property too).

 

Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 01:06 PM (5/yRG)

238 Take all the 9/11/ Troofers (such as this moron douchebag  Debra Medina and Alex Jones) and all the Birthers (such as Orly Taitz) and flush them down the toilet bowl (along with their LaRouche and Ron Paul allies). They're a bunch of scumbuckets.

Posted by: Gramercy Infidel at February 11, 2010 01:16 PM (5jnES)

239

I didn't interpret what she said, as meaning she's a Truther.  BUT, I did interpret it as not wanting to pissing off/giving cover to the Truthers among her supporters.  She must have quite a few, if that's the case.  Whether she's a Truther, or just wants to enable them, the end result, for me, is the same.

She's lost my vote, and I've emailed my various networks (in TX) regarding this.  Her previous association w/ Ron Paul (who I loathe) wasn't enough to turn me off.  This however, drive the spike thru her heart.

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 11, 2010 01:18 PM (ucq49)

240 In my mind, her mortal sin isn't being a Truther, but admitting it.  A reasonable person with certain... odd... non-mainstream beliefs can still be a good politician, if they just SHUT THE FUCK UP about the crazy parts.  For example, I love Pat Buchanan and I suspect he agrees with me on things that neither of us would say in public, but I love him even more because he has the sense to respect the boundaries of polite discourse.

Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 01:33 PM (l71WL)

241 I love Pat Buchanan and I suspect he agrees with me on things that neither of us would say in public, but I love him even more because he has the sense to respect the boundaries of polite discourse.

Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 05:33 PM (l71WL)

So, you too think Hitler was a nice guy who was tricked by the World Jewry into WWII?

And we're supposed to adore you for your smartipantiness to shut up about it?

Posted by: Robert Gibbs at February 11, 2010 01:46 PM (Q+1PV)

242 I am one of the Texas tea party people.  I listened to the debates by the three candidates.  Too bad  no one asked that question in those debates because with the questions she had and answered she looked so good against Hutchinson and Perry.  Must be the MSM's fault again. She doesn't have a chance now.  I had hoped she would be around to take control after the next Perry administration, but now she has definitely been outed.  At least she was honest about her views, that is about all I can say about this. Except buh-bye.

Posted by: Ruth H at February 11, 2010 01:49 PM (KLwh4)

243 "So, you too think Hitler was a nice guy who was tricked by the World Jewry into WWII?"

That's exactly the issue that I can tolerate Pat Buchanan believing in, since I agree with him on virtually everything else, as long as he doesn't embarrass me by talking about it or acting on it.

Posted by: the peanut gallery at February 11, 2010 02:02 PM (l71WL)

244 OK, I delete him from the DVR in utter frustration sometimes, but... Glenn looking kinda yummy in that clip there.

Posted by: Filly at February 11, 2010 02:03 PM (FDfio)

245 Now JD Wells on KLIF is getting pissy about Glenn Beck "ambushing" Medina with the question.  Okay, I know it's crappy to find out your candidate is a froot loop.  I wasn't a Medina supporter, so much as a Perry/Hutchison detractor, and this really sucks.  But come on!  "Was the federal government complicit in bringing down the two towers" is an ambush question?  It's a freakin' softball!  Or should be.  I'm glad Medina was either honest enough to out herself, or didn't have the sense to lie, but thinking this was an unfair question is ridiculous.  So, who's the 4th highest candidate running?

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 11, 2010 02:06 PM (Pc9mH)

246

"So, you too think Hitler was a nice guy who was tricked by the World Jewry into WWII?"

That's exactly the issue that I can tolerate Pat Buchanan believing in, since I agree with him on virtually everything else, as long as he doesn't embarrass me by talking about it or acting on it.

Such a surprise that our resident neo-Nazi is a Pat Buchanan fan.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 11, 2010 02:11 PM (plsiE)

247 Michael Berry (Houston talk radio) is tearing Medina's staff apart calling them "amateur hour."

Apparently, Medina is avoiding the media because she is "very busy with appearances."

Busy watching her campaign implode, more likely. 

She should be on every news station doing damage control -- instead she's hiding.

Posted by: mesablue at February 11, 2010 02:32 PM (jc7YC)

248

Where did honest cloud John go?

I guess trolling is more fun when you think you're anonymous.

 

Posted by: Warden at February 11, 2010 03:04 PM (QoR4a)

249 HPV vaccine is the best thing to come along since sulfa drugs.  My mom died of cervical cancer and mine was caught just before it began to metatasize.  This vaccine, should be included as one of the normal childhood vaccines.  What's with this "injecting virgins" nonsense?  You make it sound like Perry's going use the HPV vaccine to deflower them personnally.

Posted by: rabidfox at February 11, 2010 03:27 PM (4KPcZ)

250 238 -- Sadly no, and a couple of horsemen friends of mine have been victims of their stalkage.

Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 03:29 PM (5/yRG)

251

They sure did get out and rock the vote for bammy though -- they'll do just about anything for Barbaro.

 

**in fairness, I don't think the real Barbaro gave two plops about politics, and since he was a fairly classy horse I would like to think if he did, he wouldn't have shilled for teh owe.

Posted by: unknown jane at February 11, 2010 03:31 PM (5/yRG)

252 <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo">There's plenty of stuff about 9/11 that's been covered up just ask Brit Hume and Carl Cameron</A>

Beck is a fraud.  He's in bed with Rick Perry and this just proves Governor Rick is running scared!!!

Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 04:25 PM (C1Trn)

253 Well damn, this blog isn't HTML

Brit Hume Carl Cameron on 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo

Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 04:26 PM (C1Trn)

254 You don't think that just maybe, just maybe, the government might be trying to cover up some of their ineptness.  Bureaucracies, naturally, screw things up.  Maybe the intelligence was there staring the government in the face but they were too 'governmnet like' (useless) to connect the dots, as they say.  Maybe someone needed to get fired.  Does asking these types of questions classify me as a "truther"?  Give me a break.  When the establishment feels threatened, the attack dogs come out.  Glenn Beck has lost credibility in my eyes.  I just hope when the government forces their Green fascism on us, that some of you people will stop sniff the government bunghole and question them? 

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 04:36 PM (/bomj)

255 Rob, you're an idiot. And of course in your idiocy missed the point.

Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:47 PM (X1fsj)

256 Thanks for the challenging argument, mare.  What is 'the point'?

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 04:49 PM (/bomj)

257 How did Beck loose credibility when it's Medina that's back peddling like a maniac? She told the truth and it exposed her. Her fans are mad and they take it out on Beck. It's juvenile.

Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:53 PM (X1fsj)

258 And it's hard to fire Clinton when he was already out of office.

Posted by: mare at February 11, 2010 04:54 PM (X1fsj)

259 Beck loses credibility because he was clearly bent on painting this lady with the negative term, "truther"... knowing the hoi polloi will eat it up when all she is doing is questioning the government account. 

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:06 PM (/bomj)

260 Is Fox news full of a bunch of truthers for posting this video? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo  (posted above by William R) 

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:06 PM (/bomj)

261 261 Rob, there are no rational reasons to ask questions about this. We don't treat people who want to ask questions about the Holocaust like that, do we? Truthers are scumbags, trutherism is evil and no truther can be allowed to persist with their truthosity unmolested.

Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 05:14 PM (AO4qz)

262 Uh Oh, the Holocaust card!!  Must have cut to close to the bone!!

Posted by: William R at February 11, 2010 05:15 PM (C1Trn)

263

I saw this post at Patterico and thought it made a great point.

I wouldnÂ’t have much confidence in an elected (or appointed) official who was a Truther. But I just started wondering what the difference is between someone who holds such out-of-the-mainstream, contrary-to-the-evidence beliefs and one who holds beliefs that can be similarly categorized, except that they are religious in nature.

In other words, if I consider Medina a weirdo whoÂ’s unworthy of the public trust, and thatÂ’s acceptable, why is not not acceptable to consider as a weirdo whoÂ’s unworthy of the public trust someone who, oh, letÂ’s just say, believes Jesus walked the American southwest?

-Diffus

Posted by: Trogdor at February 11, 2010 05:16 PM (k6ceA)

264

First off, she didn't ask any questions about it.  She answered a question, and expressed her distrust.  It's not rational to let emotions fly off the handle whenever the words "911" are spoken.  The government is not sacred.  It is mostly full of a bunch of bumbling idiots.  Rudy Guiliani knows all too well that the masses react this way when they hear the magic words.  That's why he uses it to his advantage to limit his vocabulary to "September 11th". 

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:26 PM (/bomj)

265 The bitch is a committed Truther:

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9443/medinak.jpg

Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 05:34 PM (AO4qz)

266 Let's try this again. The bitch attended a 911truther conference in San Antonio just two months ago. She's a committed Truther, not someone "merely asking questions".

http://tinyurl.com/y9ljgf8




Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 05:37 PM (AO4qz)

267 Chris R, come on!  That is a picture of a meet-up group called San Antonio 911 Truth going to the Town Hall meeting where Medina is speaking.  Notice that only 1 person attended.  Come back with something of substance.  Not some 911 truth follower that started a meet-up "group" of 1 person.    

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:49 PM (/bomj)

268 You should work for the media, Chris R.  I must admit, you do good work.

Posted by: Rob at February 11, 2010 05:54 PM (/bomj)

269 I listened to the audio again. I think Glen was quick to label her for his buddies Pat Grey,Dan Patrick & the Gov. Nice job Beck! It was a hatchet job. The Immigration sites are not prepared to jump to Perry. Perry is all about immigration sob stories.Kay voted for Americorps for Birdie Obama. Medina is still the best candidate in this race. She is not a truther.He asked her if she would disavow anyone on her campaign that was a truther...I would have said hey Glen..you come on down and purge my campaign for me and I'll be out tellin folks about getting the government off my property.QUESTION BOLDLY BECK! Why do you want voters corralled into voting for the guy who tried to imminent domain the largest land grab in history! That is scary!

Posted by: noislamocommie at February 11, 2010 08:00 PM (Jpn2p)

270 There's a disturbing amount of conspiracy theorists amongst self-described libertarians, so I can't say I'm surprised.
Posted by: brak

Self-described is the word.

Big "L" Libertarians are too nice to loons. They won't kick out loons who claim to support Non-Aggression, so loons have learned that as long as they give lip service to such, they can rant about damned near any conspiracy crap and get away with it.

At least Republicans aren't shy about giving joo-haters and conspiracy loons the boot, no matter how much they claim to support the platform.

Posted by: Kristopher at February 11, 2010 10:14 PM (kCEOg)

271

And now the morning guy on KLIF took the same tack as the afternoon guy.  "Beck set Medina up, is in a secret cabal with Perry and Palin, it was an unfair question to ask of Medina, it was sexist , Beck was too quick to label her a truther, etc." 

This is quite disturbing.  Medina clearly danced around her first response the question of whether she was a truther, and Beck threw her a lifeline by clarifying and specifying his question, "Do you think the Federal government was complicit in bringing down the towers?"  And she still couldn't bring herself to say no.  This wasn't a simple "Oops, that was a bad answer, let me try again," or "I thought you were referring to whether the government did everything it could to prevent 9/11."  She doubled down on her response that there were "unanswered questions" and "missing evidence" to arrive at a reasonable conclusion about whether the government was complicit in bringing down the towers. 

Now, if you want to make the case that's a valid response for a Republican candidate, that's one thing.  But to suggest this was a Gotcha question that was unfair or too difficult for a yes/no answer is nonsense. 

Crap, I'm disappointed.  And no, neither Perry nor Hutchison has my vote now.  I'll do a write in for "Hypothetical Conservative Candidate" before I vote for either of those political vermin.

Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at February 12, 2010 04:53 AM (pZEar)

272

By all means, "conservatives," let's go out of our way to twist the words of a candidate who is dedicated to upholding the United States Constitution so that she doesn't interfere with the "fight" between two establishment Republicans. This isn't Massachusetts. Texas is a state where a true Conservative can win, but let's make sure we elect a Democrat Lite candidate instead.

Medina is not a truther. She didn't answer the question well, but Beck demonstrated his clear intent. Isn't  it ironic that the CEO of Conspiracies-R-Us wants to smear a true limited government candidate at a conspiracy nut? At times Beck is no better than Big Dumb Ed Schultz. 

But, let's say Medina is a "truther." You have two Big Government "non-truthers" who have been a part of the problem vs. a "truther" who recognizes the legitimate function of government. Personally, I would vote for the conspiracy nut over the two who I know will be lying as they take an oath to uphold the Constitution.

Posted by: edgycater at February 12, 2010 07:20 AM (+Rp97)

273

Ace, shame on you. Where is your explication regarding the Perry kickback PAC corruption that is what our Texas governor's race is attempting to rescind.

What a lame easy reader piece you wrote. By all means, take Glenn Beck's word at face value--as if he's never dead wrong and he's always totally reliable.

Debra Medina is not a truther, and trutherism has absolutely NOTHING to do with her conservative Tea Party GOP campaign and platform in the Texas governor's race. Medina's initial response to Beck's initial question was that she was not a truther, and despite her clear and detailed responses to Beck, it was clear that Beck had it in mind to paint her as a "truther" from the onset.

At one point, Beck probed, saying, "is that a yes?" that she believes in some U.S. involvement in the attacks. 

As a matter of fact, within the intelligence community and Bush's "bipartisan" administration that retained many officials from the Clinton administration in his Cabinet, the obvious disconnect was intentional (designing 9/11 is NOT the issue, enabling it to occur IS the issue) and sabotaged our national security. Furthermore, the Bush/Cheny "solution" has become the nightmare of abusive federal powers; the "solution" that created the Department of Homeland Security only took one transfer of administrations to completely mutate into the very Big Brother's Nanny that the Constitution never permitted.

The Other McCain took issue with the Tea Party Convention, as others who actually BUILT the Tea Party have also noted.

What forced the failure of Newt's Contract With America that convinced conservatives to support new candidates? THE RNC GOP ESTABLISHMENT ASSASSINATED THOSE YOUNG CONSERVATIVES NEWLY ELECTED.

Deja vu. The GOP usurpers promise the Tea Party conservative movement that the career politician network establishment is the ONLY acceptable and trustworthy means to police themselves and convert themselves into good Tea Party people. 

Glenn Beck has claimed to be a Libertarian. So does Sean Hannity. Totally believable if you trust corrupt career politicians.

Sarah Palin has endorsed Rep. Ron Paul the official Libertarian Republican. So whatever problem critics have with Medina's distrust of government propaganda, they have with Sarah Palin on the same grounds that Beck claims is Trutherism.

Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:36 PM (H+LJc)

274 Dig back years ago, after 9/11/01 you'll find charges against Glenn Beck that he was a truther.

What a weasel.

Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:39 PM (H+LJc)

275 Posted by: Chris R at February 11, 2010 09:34 PM (AO4qz)

Who the hell are you to call a conservative woman that word?!

You're a loser with mommy issues.

Posted by: maverick muse at February 12, 2010 01:43 PM (H+LJc)

276 Whew!  Thank goodness that Beck and Stu weren't questioning me and Ron Paul.  That was a close one.

Posted by: Judge Napalitano at February 12, 2010 08:35 PM (d7Px0)

277

Gov. Goodhair is looking better and better. Dunno about KBH...There's allot to be said about not changing horses in the middle of an Apocalypse.

Posted by: LaFemmeGordita at February 13, 2010 07:01 AM (k4Eh2)

Posted by: ömer akbaba at February 18, 2010 12:13 AM (Ft3Kx)

279 cscs

Posted by: fgdfds at March 08, 2010 04:08 AM (5g7JG)

280 gfdsgfd

Posted by: fgdfds at March 08, 2010 04:09 AM (5g7JG)

Posted by: moubcsx at March 23, 2010 09:33 AM (5g7JG)

282

If not PARMIGIANI Watch,Wholesale ED HardyWholesale ED Hardy you will lose your hard earned money. It is only buying from reliable sources will get you the right replcia Swiss watch. Surely you want to be more stylish with your new watch. InED Hardy Women Clothing

Posted by: ED-hardy at March 29, 2010 01:06 AM (mpih4)

Posted by: puma shoes at August 02, 2010 01:09 AM (y2XSP)

285 The world-famous Camel cigarettes, with its excellent quality, full of mysterious Oriental exoticism camel cigarette brand's unique design, the tobacco industry renowned, camel Advent has been in operation for more than 80-year history, it has become a world famous cigarette and evergreens. Only a little knowledge on cigarettes should know camel (camel), and Marlboro, Hilton, and other well-known brands, is in the heart of all smokers to high ideals. At the same time,camel is a veteran of the senators, it is a leader in the creation of the American blend cigarettes, and the taste until today also occupies a dominant position in the world.camel cigarettes news

Posted by: camel cig at August 19, 2010 01:07 AM (dORov)

286 <a href=" http://wwww.watchfordream.com">swiss replica watches</a>

Posted by: Watchfordream at August 26, 2010 09:52 PM (Wtbbj)

Posted by: Chat at September 16, 2010 08:36 PM (Cmwet)

Posted by: Chat at September 16, 2010 08:38 PM (Cmwet)

289 <a href="http://www.dressingworld.org/" title="dressingworld">dressingworld </a> is very good.
<a href="http://www.zistyle.com/" title="zistyle">zistyle</a> is very good.
<a href="http://www.hotuggs.org/" title="hotuggs">hotuggs</a> is very good.  
<a href="http://www.newstation.org/">Enthusiast</a> is very good.

Posted by: nsrgf at September 26, 2010 10:46 PM (Kkvi2)

290 http://www.edhardysydney.com

Posted by: nsrgf at September 26, 2010 10:47 PM (Kkvi2)

291 It you have an unusual approach to writing

Posted by: ask siirleri at November 19, 2010 10:21 PM (UX7zh)

292 <a title="ÓÚæÏí ßÇã" href="ÓÚæÏí">ÓÚæÏí'>http://www.966cam.com/">ÓÚæÏí ßÇã</a>

Posted by: mmm at November 26, 2010 08:07 PM (OExcC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
263kb generated in CPU 0.1492, elapsed 0.3103 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2507 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.