January 15, 2010
— Ace Ahhh... now this is more like it.
I am less concerned about the detailed particulars of what platform we unite behind than that we do in fact unite behind one.
People might wrongly get the idea I'm a big fan of our current apparatchiks. No, I'm not. But we do need apparatchiks, and we need Indians, and we need Chiefs.
So long as we do have Chiefs and Indians willing to follow those Chiefs, I'm comfortable swapping out most of the old apparatchiks for new ones.
I just don't want a power struggle or third-party spoliers.
So here's three cheers for a newly engaged and activist citizenry.
The Tea Party movement ignited a year ago, fueled by anti-establishment anger. Now, Tea Party activists are trying to take over the establishment, ground up.Across the country, they are signing up to be Republican precinct leaders, a position so low-level that it often remains vacant, but which comes with the ability to vote for the party executives who endorse candidates, approve platforms and decide where the party spends money.
A new group called the National Precinct Alliance says it has a coordinator in nearly every state to recruit Tea Party activists to fill the positions and has already swelled the number of like-minded members in Republican Party committees in Arizona and Nevada. Its mantra is this: take the precinct, take the state, take the party — and force it to nominate conservatives rather than people they see as liberals in Republican clothing.
Posted by: Ace at
09:34 AM
| Comments (106)
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Team America at January 15, 2010 09:39 AM (KSNkY)
Posted by: ace at January 15, 2010 09:39 AM (Fue76)
Posted by: J at January 15, 2010 09:39 AM (T3/qP)
Posted by: CARMEN at January 15, 2010 09:40 AM (XlJ9T)
Posted by: ace at January 15, 2010 09:42 AM (Fue76)
Good news. New life for the tired old GOP.
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 09:44 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Fat Tony Jr at January 15, 2010 09:44 AM (x2W5u)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 15, 2010 09:45 AM (dwpnk)
Wow, Intrade odds have moved 10 points today in Brown's favor. He is now at 40%. That might not seem great but at the end of last week he was in single-digits. This is people actually putting money on him winning.
Posted by: Hongqi at January 15, 2010 09:45 AM (Lz4EE)
And sometimes we need Mau Mau's.
Posted by: SlaveDog at January 15, 2010 09:45 AM (H6Jyg)
@10
Lets hope he continues his string of FAIL. What Croaker needs is a personal appearance by Kos and his ringing endorsement.
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 09:46 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: 141 Driver at January 15, 2010 09:47 AM (JFNQ7)
Posted by: FU52 at January 15, 2010 09:47 AM (gSCDY)
Posted by: nyc redneck at January 15, 2010 09:51 AM (EtrGh)
Posted by: Bill Mitchell at January 15, 2010 09:51 AM (kEBiX)
I have always hoped that the GOP could be changed rather than replaced. I know that it has not happened yet but I like the way the wind is blowing.
Thanks for the post Ace.
Posted by: Roadking at January 15, 2010 09:52 AM (rtDfV)
I contend that all the Tea Party needs to do is be the Tea Party. Becoming a full-fledged 'nother party guarantees Dims a victory, what with the dilution of votes and all. Promote conservative ideas and endorse candidates.
Better to just hold protests, especially in DC where reps can look out their office windows from time to time and see average Americans displaying their contempt for unresponsive government.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 15, 2010 09:53 AM (i3AsK)
I was shat on in 2008 by the RNC when I was a poll observer. Was in the roughest neighborhood in the city, called a cracker, got pushed on numerous occasions and I was begging for them to send someone out to take over or at least come and sit outside.
Their response: Can't you suck it up for the day?
Posted by: laceyunderalls at January 15, 2010 09:53 AM (5jpNc)
Republicans tend to win elections when they can draw a significant difference between themselves and the Democrats - on the presidential level see 80, 84, 88, 00, 04; and they tend to lose when they cannot see 76, 92, 96, and 08.
So, if we can pull the Rep party back to the right a few degrees I think we will see significant electoral gains to go along with it. Hopefully this can be a self-reinforcing process. So a somewhat more conservative party nets big wins in congress in 2010 and we can compare to the 08 debacle. And then we can run as a truly conservative party against the leftwing extremists in 12 and win back all the elected branches.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 15, 2010 09:53 AM (7BU4a)
I was shat on in 2008 by the RNC when I was a poll observer. Was in the roughest neighborhood in the city, called a cracker, got pushed on numerous occasions and I was begging for them to send someone out to take over or at least come and sit outside.
Sounds like you needed an official Tea Party Security detail assigned to you. Sounds like they should haave had better judgement in the first place but leave you there....geez.
Posted by: Roadking at January 15, 2010 09:57 AM (rtDfV)
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 09:58 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Roadking at January 15, 2010 09:59 AM (rtDfV)
I have thought for years that the Libertarian party needs to do the same thing. Don't fucking wallow in obscurity, use the machine that exists, take that motherfucker over from the ground up.
I wonder if it is too late to recruit libertarians to the cause across the nation?
Since they mentioned Nevada and Arizona as active, I wouldn't doubt it if many Tea Party folks are libertarians.
I am liking this.
Solid B+, Nobel Prize worthy cause of action.
Posted by: Uniball at January 15, 2010 10:00 AM (27iEn)
Oh, dear, I wonder what Peggy Noonan will do if Tea Partiers take over the GOP. Mayhaps she'll just have to form a third party.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 10:01 AM (PiZiK)
Posted by: John Galt at January 15, 2010 10:02 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 10:03 AM (PiZiK)
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 10:03 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 15, 2010 10:04 AM (YLnnA)
Posted by: Michael at January 15, 2010 10:10 AM (l7H1O)
Posted by: Your Betters at January 15, 2010 10:10 AM (ehLtp)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 15, 2010 02:04 PM (dcKUM)
I'm trying to fix that loophole with my mop.
Posted by: 1st Citizen Barry at January 15, 2010 10:11 AM (7BU4a)
Oh, dear, I wonder what Peggy Noonan will do if Tea Partiers take over the GOP. Mayhaps she'll just have to form a third party.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 02:01 PM (PiZiK)
How about the "Old Dried-up Cootch" Party.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 15, 2010 10:12 AM (dcKUM)
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 10:13 AM (OlN4e)
I also have always thought the t-party should call themselves federalists.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at January 15, 2010 10:15 AM (DIYmd)
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 10:18 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Texmom at January 15, 2010 10:18 AM (WzN8I)
Posted by: maddogg at January 15, 2010 02:18 PM (OlN4e)
That's Mary Matalin.
Peggy Noonan sleeps with a rolled-up copy of Good Housekeeping.
Posted by: David Brooks at January 15, 2010 10:19 AM (dcKUM)
Posted by: Steve Liesman at January 15, 2010 10:22 AM (dcKUM)
I like that mantra very much.
Posted by: mama winger at January 15, 2010 10:24 AM (Ue9UN)
Posted by: Richard Lugar at January 15, 2010 10:24 AM (dcKUM)
The existing machine is too deeply unlibertarian (structurally anti-libertarian, now) to be put to libertarian ends. They need a re-revolution to get anywhere, and even that wouldn't work. Their helplessness is true.
I think the GOP apparatus is too deeply unconservative (and anti-libertarian) for tea party types to make anything useful of it, too, but...good luck.
(Don't gimme no "That's not helping!" I'm only sayin' things. I'm not a conservative or a libertarian (or lefty). I just don't hate you guys (but I really hate those guys). I'm not even "concerned." I think politics is wrong.)
Posted by: oblig. at January 15, 2010 10:25 AM (FWvuv)
Good hard-working, pro-free-market, pro-America union members should join in opposition to their union bosses’ sweetheart deal. Coming from a union background and living in a world with many union memberships among my family and friends, I know that average members will be embarrassed by their bosses’ deal, which basically only delays the heavy tax on their health care plans until 2018 and in the meantime unfairly leaves many fellow Americans in a much less “enviable” position.
Union members donÂ’t want to stick it to non-union colleagues in the private and public sector. Their union leadership is not helping them in the long run, theyÂ’re certainly not helping the rest of America, and unfortunately some union bosses are making all union members look bad, selfish, and anti-business with this Big Government backroom deal.
I know that ordinary union members don’t want to hurt their fellow Americans, just as ordinary Nebraskans didn’t want to stick it to the rest of the country with a sweetheart deal on Medicaid subsidies. I urge union members to make their voices heard. Please, call your leadership – don’t put up with these special-interest politics – tell them to fight for all Americans who want common sense health care reform, not this flawed boondoggle.
- Sarah Palin
Posted by: Dan at January 15, 2010 10:26 AM (KZraB)
I think politics is wrong.
Posted by: oblig. at January 15, 2010 02:25 PM (FWvuv)
Well, I think oxygen is wrong. Stop breathing.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 15, 2010 10:27 AM (dcKUM)
I have it all on my newmajority.com frumforum.com website about trying to convince my friends in the media that we're nice team players who will lose with grace and not be divisive rabble rousers.
Losing with dignity, that's the ticket!
Posted by: David Frum at January 15, 2010 10:28 AM (sYxEE)
Posted by: David Frum at January 15, 2010 02:28 PM (sYxEE)
Sorry, David, but the Dims have already hired their cockring for the year.
They'll keep your application on file, however.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 15, 2010 10:30 AM (dcKUM)
Are they real?
Posted by: dustydog at January 15, 2010 10:30 AM (XHOAD)
Date January 16th, 2010 Time 3:00 PM - 4:30 PM Sponsor Racine Tea Party and Americans for Prosperity Location 4505 Highway H
Franksville, WI Notes
Joe the Plumber
Google "Fight Back Wisconsin dot com" for more details . Ace says my link is too long and I don't know how to do the tiny thing.
Posted by: mama winger at January 15, 2010 10:30 AM (Ue9UN)
I rest my case, and I know cases because I'm a legal expert too.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at January 15, 2010 10:33 AM (sYxEE)
Posted by: mama winger at January 15, 2010 10:35 AM (Ue9UN)
I'm the voice of the GOP, and don't you forget it rubes!
Posted by: Peggy Noonan at January 15, 2010 10:36 AM (sYxEE)
Posted by: Zimriel at January 15, 2010 01:51 PM (9Sbz+)
Shouldn't be an issue. Since this would require them to do more than just vote constantly in online polls and shout ron paul talking points. God forbid they really do anything
Posted by: buzzion at January 15, 2010 10:36 AM (oVQFe)
I rest my case, and I know cases because I'm a legal expert too.
Posted by: Charles Johnson at January 15, 2010 02:33 PM (sYxEE)
We have such great bonfires.
Posted by: Sen Byrd at January 15, 2010 10:36 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Beezebub at January 15, 2010 10:38 AM (gbCNS)
- Sarah Palin
Once I get me and my submarine shrunk down to microscopic size like Fantastic Voyage, I'll finally have my proof that I need. Please fill out my medical questionnaire, especially the one about menstrual cycles. I'd hate to be flushed out in such a horrible way
Posted by: andi sullivan-johnson at January 15, 2010 10:41 AM (sYxEE)
The existing machine is too deeply unlibertarian (structurally anti-libertarian, now) to be put to libertarian ends. They need a re-revolution to get anywhere, and even that wouldn't work. Their helplessness is true.
Posted by: oblig. at January 15, 2010 02:25 PM (FWvuv)
The reason the Reps moved away from libertarianism is that there weren't many votes to be won with it.
The LP and its allies refused any compromise, purposely picked fights with religious conservatives, focused on the dopetarian segment of the electorate, and overall libertarians did a piss poor job of selling their philosophy.
What libertarians should be focusing on now is dumping the LP and trying to re-tailor their message. Libertarianism can be a popular philosophy again, but focus more on what worked in the 80s and early 90s and stop trying to become liberalitarians.
I really hope they do this too, as now is a golden opportunity to point out the failures of leftist authoritarianism...
Posted by: 18-1 at January 15, 2010 10:42 AM (7BU4a)
Tiny thing : 1) Highlight then copy the long url from the page you want to link, 2) Go to this site and paste the long link you copied to the box under where it says Enter a long URL to make tiny, 3) Click on Make tinyURL! 4) The shorter url will the 2nd bolded link down, shown. That's the link you copy and insert here.
Posted by: Your Betters at January 15, 2010 10:45 AM (ehLtp)
Perhaps not Tea Party set per se, but insurgent conservatives in county RECs seem to have run off Jim Greer (former Republic Party of Florida Chair) and pretty much killed Charlie Crist's Senate campaign (he's lost every county straw poll).
I've joined my county REC, after starting out with a local Tea Party-type club. Most of the tea partiers I've come in contact with are fiscal conservatives. We have our Ronulans, but they are willing to roll up their sleeves and aid in the common cause.
Posted by: niclun at January 15, 2010 10:48 AM (qypmI)
Posted by: Rod Dreher at January 15, 2010 10:52 AM (rf03a)
but focus more on what worked in the 80s and early 90s and stop trying to become liberalitarians
I call them libertinians, ala Bill "hookers and blow for me, autocracy for thee" Maher. The obsessive focus on drug legalization at the expense of much, much more serious curtailments on our liberties and prosperity is akin to Ron Paul's deranged hyper-fixation on "fiat currency".
They have an appealing gameplan, but they've botched it badly on the field.
Posted by: VJay at January 15, 2010 10:53 AM (gQ+XA)
We have our Ronulans, but they are willing to roll up their sleeves and aid in the common cause.
Posted by: niclun at January 15, 2010 02:48 PM (qypmI)
Those Ronulans (Libertarians/Fiscal Conservatives) are a very motivated bunch. Those are the type of foot soldiers that can be very helpful in taking and holding ground.
I would rather see a takeover of the RNC than a third party run. This is a good omen.
Posted by: No Longer Concerned at January 15, 2010 10:58 AM (8KOr6)
Oh, dear, I wonder what Peggy Noonan will do if Tea Partiers take over the GOP. Mayhaps she'll just have to form a third party.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 02:01 PM (PiZiK)
How about the "Old Dried-up Cootch" Party.
***
Perfect. Because that would apply to David Brooks, who is such a woman.
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 11:02 AM (hC6os)
Posted by: Uniball at January 15, 2010 11:03 AM (27iEn)
Posted by: Crowsting at January 15, 2010 11:09 AM (61BD9)
Posted by: Uniball at January 15, 2010 03:03 PM (27iEn)
I don't know. I think he's the perfect example of most libertarians. Actually a full on liberal but wants to make some claim to be outside of the "establishment." Its always how things go with that type of people. They make a claim that they would consider voting Republican if only ______ fill in the blank. But when there is a Republican with that fill in the blank there for them they still vote democrat.
Posted by: buzzion at January 15, 2010 11:13 AM (oVQFe)
Posted by: sliderblaze at January 15, 2010 11:13 AM (nlbTu)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 15, 2010 11:16 AM (I3PoI)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 15, 2010 11:17 AM (I3PoI)
This.
You can do the right thing, or the easy thing. Choose.
Posted by: Kristopher at January 15, 2010 11:19 AM (kCEOg)
Posted by: astonerii at January 15, 2010 11:25 AM (HRKkA)
If this is true, then we should start seeing hysterical, panicked articles about this take-over in the NY Times and other Democrat media outlets.
Well, the Wall Street Journal isn't a Democrat media outlet, but it has Peggy Noonan writing for it, and she's a Democrat outlet. Or inlet. Or something. Anyway, in her column she expressed a sort of frosty disapproval of Obama, explaining that he was "disconnected" from the American people. Like, duh. Without mentioning, of course, that us clodhoppers in fly-over country were saying this before the election.
Is it just me, or do others get a Tracy Flick vibe from Noonan--like she's that insufferable little twit-ette who's running for student council president?
Posted by: Steve (aka Ed Snate) at January 15, 2010 11:26 AM (hC6os)
Posted by: Someone out there at January 15, 2010 11:38 AM (dP8f2)
Here's my definition:
There are varying levels of the do-something disease. I can fully understand arguments over precise allocation amounts, and even what exactly is 'infrastructure' or what deserves consideration.
But. The key question for any of them is: "What is the minimum possible long term governmental involvement to bring this about?"
Spurring development? There's the NASA way and the X-Prize way. One is a hell of a lot more efficient long term. The other had a laudable goal, but is now a high-tech jobs program.
Posted by: Al at January 15, 2010 11:54 AM (0lyUI)
Posted by: dustydog at January 15, 2010 11:59 AM (XHOAD)
"...government of the people by the people for the people.." Someone should write an 'address' about that. Oh, wait!...
You mean he didn't mean 'buy' the people?
Posted by: Ruh Roh at January 15, 2010 12:03 PM (hSLQ9)
I see what's happening here not so much as a rebellion as a counter-infiltration. I'm actually glad to see that conservatives are taking back their party rather than trying to create a new one, because if they just give up and move elsewhere every time the infiltration happens, then it's just a matter of time before -that- party gets infiltrated too.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 15, 2010 12:15 PM (SxA2Q)
Posted by: ward "weren't you a little hard on the Beaver last night?" churchill at January 15, 2010 12:24 PM (2qU2d)
Very interesting, I like this idea. I've been looking for a way to help but every time I contact a local campaign, all they want is money and that's something I can't really spare nowadays.
Thanks for the heads up!
Posted by: ErikW at January 15, 2010 12:27 PM (ha6br)
Going to tea party events is like being stuck inside a blog comments section with all the smartest comments edited out. I mean, jeez, I suppose it's good if they change things and maybe 10 years from now things are somehow going to be better. But I just can't hang with people who get belligerent over modest disagreements (worse yet, imagined ones) and who don't feel comfortable justifying their opinions. Tea partiers could never write a Constitution. They might feel sympathetically towards the Founding Fathers.... but the Founding Fathers were incredibly literate, open-minded, and nuanced thinkers.
Maybe people are just too damned stupid (With all our education, literacy rates today are far below what they were in the 1800s, when people were self-educated).. In any case, populism of any variety freaks me out. I just don't trust people's emotions. I don't even trust my own emotions when it comes to important things.
Posted by: blip at January 15, 2010 12:31 PM (XjICS)
is like being stuck inside a blog comments section with all the smartest comments edited out.
Sounds like you're a fucking expert on that.
Posted by: ward at January 15, 2010 12:48 PM (2qU2d)
"I just don't want a power struggle or third-party spoliers."
Amen, my brother.
I also don't want to support the status quo, so hurray for the tea party training and execution of a successful strategy.
Posted by: PJ at January 15, 2010 12:51 PM (Qpxxz)
1) visit a Code Pink rally.
2) "(With all our education, literacy rates today are far below what they were in the 1800s, when people were self-educated)"
The definition of literacy has also always changed. At one point it was "The ability to sign your name." Even the Founders themselves - highly educated, as you note - are quite flexible in how many variant spellings they're willing to employ.
Posted by: Al at January 15, 2010 12:57 PM (0lyUI)
As a Precinct Chair you will also be invited to a whole passel of parties, the food is often quite good. I was invited into homes I would have normally had to use the service entrance. Anyone who drinks, well, it ain't ValuRite Vodka but it's often free.
I had to go to several training sessions for election judges and alternates, the wealthy Donks always, always, looked down their noses at anyone not driving at least a new Buick or not wearing Armani or one of theose other foreign sissies. Republicans, OTH, cared not about what was in my pocket but only what was in my heart. I then became proud to be a Republican. My wife wasn't so sure, since I was a (election) Judge I tried to make her call me The Honorable Peter.
Posted by: Peter at January 15, 2010 01:22 PM (5ptN0)
Sweet...conservative types work hard to get back in power, and the Republican Main Street/Big Tent types will immediately busy themselves wrapping the foundations of the new power base with dynamite and "reaching out" to the Left.
Old hat, sadly.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at January 15, 2010 02:22 PM (cZtT3)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at January 15, 2010 02:38 PM (NYoCw)
I am less concerned about the detailed particulars of what platform we unite behind than that we do in fact unite behind one.
Welcome, brother!
Posted by: The Democratic Party at January 15, 2010 04:00 PM (FjC5u)
Posted by: Rhymes With Right at January 15, 2010 05:20 PM (NDHz+)
Posted by: doug at January 16, 2010 06:53 AM (dDxif)
Maybe not as difficult as it sounds. Especially with a minority party. A few years ago, after retiring from the US Army in a lovely Army Town in Coastal Georgia, I decided to go to the county Republican Convention. It was scheduled a Saturday morning. I got there a little before the start. It was me and the county Republican Chairman. An hour later, still just the two of us. Finally, about a half-hour/45 minutes prior to the scheduled end, some folks drifted in. We barely met quorum (not that would've really mattered, I think), and we finally wound up with 10 of us. Just enough to be delegates to the district Republican convention in Savannah. All of us. Whether we were currently registered Republicans or not (one fellow didn’t even live in the county, but was “moving there soon”). I was really suprised at how we selected our delegates (pretty much “anyone not wanting to be a delegate raise your hand”). And the thought that if I had collected a half-dozen of my buddies, I could’ve taken over the Republican Party in our county.
Posted by: Unsupervised at January 16, 2010 09:58 AM (c3J00)
I want to be a precinct head for the GOP here in the northeast Cincinnati area.
This is the right strategy, at least at the bottom of the pyramid.
Sarah, Michael, the 168 working with TPM heads at higher level can do their thing too.
Posted by: Sapwolf at January 16, 2010 10:01 AM (gJ6FZ)
Posted by: neomom at January 16, 2010 12:16 PM (PiO8s)
Posted by: Matt O at January 16, 2010 12:38 PM (V+Dqc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1861 seconds, 234 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: franksalterego at January 15, 2010 09:37 AM (GKyIE)