January 21, 2010
— Ace In a Hitler Poll.
Again, the caveat: This is based partly on the health care issue, which may not be an issue for too much longer.
Republican Roy Blunt now holds a six-point lead over Democrat Robin Carnahan in MissouriÂ’s race for the U.S. Senate.A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in the state finds Blunt ahead of Carnahan 49% to 43%. Three percent (3%) prefer some other candidate, and five percent (5%) are undecided.
The latest numbers mark a shift in BluntÂ’s favor from last month when Carnahan had a narrow 46% to 44% edge over her Republican rival. The candidates, both members of prominent Missouri political families, were tied at 46% apiece in September. As it has for other Democrats throughout the nation, the health care issue appears to be creating challenges for Carnahan. Just 37% of Missouri voters favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats, but 62% oppose it.
More at Hot Air.
Oh: A Field Poll finds Tom Campbell has jumped ahead of DeVore and Fiora, but trails Boxer by 10, 48-38.
The others are further behind.
Posted by: Ace at
09:17 AM
| Comments (86)
Post contains 207 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 09:21 AM (p302b)
If the Democrats drop health care "reform" corruption, as they should, we must not let them off the hook.
The Republicans need to beat the democrats over the head with what they tried to do to this nation.
WE WILL NOT FORGET.
Posted by: pre paid sex monster at January 21, 2010 09:21 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Vic at January 21, 2010 01:19 PM
My sac is a shriveled prune. I really need to work on the whole room temperature thing. Then again...It's so cooool. It's like a York Peppermint Patty for my boys.
Posted by: jcjimi at January 21, 2010 09:22 AM (NEj2I)
Maybe I'm just being hopeful. Because while 41 is good, 51 would be even better.
Posted by: Scout at January 21, 2010 09:26 AM (GiUTT)
Check out his Reaction to Brown winning MA!
Hilarious!
http://tinyurl.com/ybm95sz
Posted by: MelodicMetal in MA at January 21, 2010 09:28 AM (x4S2a)
Jesus christ can we stop please. 2 weeks ago everthing I read on here made me wanna punch the wall. Now everything I read makes me wanna go teabag a snackpack.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 09:28 AM (SqAkN)
Consider the irony here:
Obama is called black but he is really brown
Brown is white but called Brown.
If Brown's name where White and the story was "The Whiting of America", you would have a racial controversy on your hands.
Posted by: Moon Doggy at January 21, 2010 09:29 AM (jFzcV)
Politics as seen through the post Brown eyes.
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2010 09:30 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at January 21, 2010 09:30 AM (P33XN)
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2010 09:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jean at January 21, 2010 09:32 AM (IcVGZ)
I think some people are waking up to see that others feel the same way about hopenchange that they do. They wouldn't get that idea from the media, that's for sure.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 21, 2010 09:32 AM (T0NGe)
I think the urgency is gone, but unemployment is not going to go down to any reasonable level and the Dems will push something dumb. They're also not unified. That's important. The Congressional Dems are not going to indulge Obama anymore and it's every lib for himself.
Posted by: AmishDude at January 21, 2010 09:34 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 21, 2010 09:34 AM (U37Ux)
15
Well that is why they wanted it done in August. Get it off the table quick so then people aren't as mad. This issue was never going to stick around until November. The point is they lost and in doing so they have now not only handed people that dislike this crap a huge victory, but the hippy tears are so sweet they taste like Ambrosia straight from Mount Olympus.
Conservative enthusiasm+Liberal dissatisfaction=Land-f-king-slide
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 09:34 AM (SqAkN)
Amen, and that's why Blunt's going to have a very difficult time with this race. He's not going to garner much of the "anti-incumbent" vote, after his prior stint as Representative/Majority Whip.
Posted by: angler at January 21, 2010 09:36 AM (SwjAj)
15
Think about Dems election strategy now in Red districts. "Yeah I am a Democrat but I really dislike Obama and his policies."
Yeah good luck turning out the base on that.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 09:36 AM (SqAkN)
Bitch, ever hard don't count your chickens before they are hatched?
One year later, where is her "future", In one year the messiah of hope has managed to turn the voters against his party that made major gains in the election. Rush is correct Obama is ruining his entire party with no small help from the dems in congress.
Lets Ponder this for a second, the DEMS lost a governor ship in Virgina and New Jersey, then ted Kennedy's seat. Even if the dems still held that seat by a slim margin it still would be a bad sign. NJ and MASS are supposed to en their HOME TERRITORY, a safe zone. They managed to LOSE IT. It means they are vulnerable EVERYWHERE even in the bluest of places. A year ago people were calling the GOP dead and out of power.
DEMS really screwed up bad for this to happen, they made big gains then managed to shoot themselves in the foot. This shows compared tot eh GOP the DEMS are just incapable of leading period. This has nothing to do with their ideology, They have the WH, had a supermajoirty Congress and still cannot get anything done.
There is one cause for all of this Obama. The DEMs and his most ardent supporters are starting to come down to reality, they nominated a bum candidate or a candidate who was not ready for office. Now the party is paying the price.
Do you think all those wide eyed 18-20 year old supporters will be there for him in 2012 when they are out of college and cannot find work?
Expect to see the DEMS gets smeared in NOV, and if Obama loses by landslide expect major LULZ charlie foxtrot int the media, the DNC, OPRAH and all the leftist groups.
I'll have to ask Gloria Steinem, where is you future now? Bitch!
Posted by: Gary B at January 21, 2010 09:37 AM (1gWfF)
Here's an idea: let's quit electing people from prominent political families.
Yeah. I am getting tired of Bushes, Clintons, Kennedys, etc.
However, I do think the Republican party and people who tend to vote that way, should start thinking about who will run in 2012. Nothing in stone, but have it in the back of their minds.
2012 could be a lot like 1980. Clinton could run against Obama in the primaries in 2011, like Ted Kennedy against Carter. Economic, political and foreign policy factors could bein play too. In 1980 you have 10%+ unemployment, stagflation, and a general view that the president was seen as weak in the middle east. Well we have the unemployment, Obama was seen as weak on foreign policy in Massachusetts, and I am willing to bet that inflation or stagnation hit America in 2011 due to the unsustainable deficits and spending.
That said. Paul Ryan 2012.
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2010 09:37 AM (wuv1c)
Sure, Carnahan tried to fuck me over but if she really, and I mean really, promises to not do that again - she's got my vote.
Posted by: Idiot Voter at January 21, 2010 09:38 AM (UA4gE)
Posted by: Bob T at January 21, 2010 09:38 AM (RHIwS)
Not exactly a long time ago, 59-41 was still considered a massive Senate majority.
Posted by: looking closely at January 21, 2010 09:40 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2010 09:40 AM (RkRxq)
It may be "off the table (wink, wink)" but I don't think it will cease to be an issue for any but the braindead zombie electorate.
Posted by: Peaches at January 21, 2010 09:40 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Gary B at January 21, 2010 09:41 AM (1gWfF)
All things considered, he should win. Missouri went (narrowly) for McCain in '08.
Posted by: angler at January 21, 2010 09:42 AM (SwjAj)
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 21, 2010 09:43 AM (1Jaio)
28 Dip my ball in fondue? Can do!
Kiddie Fondue™ would be awesome for that, if it didn't have the word "Kiddie" associated with it. But it does, so it's just wrong. (sigh)
Posted by: Dang at January 21, 2010 09:45 AM (UA4gE)
Posted by: Ben at January 21, 2010 01:32 PM (wuv1c)
I disagree. Obamacare is only a rallying point for opposition to Obama/Reid/Pelosi. If Obamacare is pulled, then there is still the crippling deficit and the floundering economy.
There is no bill that Reid and Pelosi can send to Obama that helps the economy without violating their core marxist ideology.
There is no bill that Obama could sign that helps the economy without violating his core marxist ideology.
If the democrats in Congress split over what they think Brown's election portends, then the democrat leadership will have no means to push their lefty agenda. This will leave nothing but battles over the debt ceiling if McConnell plays it right to keep that in the news until November.
Posted by: MikeO at January 21, 2010 09:46 AM (Ce+tv)
use. Be smart. Build an effective minority till we can become the majority.
Then don't fuck it up.
Simple.
Posted by: McLovin at January 21, 2010 09:46 AM (RwvN1)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 21, 2010 09:46 AM (SqAkN)
15 & 19, look for the left to go to one of its favorite fallback issues: gun control.
HR-45, S-1317.
It's coming.
Posted by: Scott J. at January 21, 2010 09:47 AM (NY7mQ)
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 21, 2010 09:48 AM (/Q5al)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 21, 2010 09:48 AM (0GFWk)
34 Even after this election, Health care is not coming off the table, Obama and HC is like the guy they cuffed on American Idol. He just cannot realize he cannot sing, because he had every sycophant giving him false reinforcement. Obama has the media, his party telling him that this bill is what the public wants and his detractors are just a small nuisance.
Posted by: Gary B
What would the American Idol judges know about "singing"? Two words for ya - "Tom Fucking Petty"
Posted by: That Dude Taken Away In Handcuffs On American Idol at January 21, 2010 09:48 AM (UA4gE)
Something tells me the results of this one aren't going to lead off the 6 o'clock news anytime soon. (Hint: It's no B+)
Posted by: Peaches at January 21, 2010 09:49 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 21, 2010 09:50 AM (muUqs)
If she's bailing you can bet her people know something's brewing in Missouri, and it ain't Anheuser Busch (or the Scandi company that now owns it).
Posted by: angler at January 21, 2010 09:50 AM (SwjAj)
Peaches at January 21, 2010 01:49 PM (9Wv2j)
LOL! Barry's failing in nearly every category. Afghanistan was the only one that was close. I still gave him an F there because the guy dithered so long before he made a decision.
F's in every other category. This guy is EPIC FAIL. Hell, he's COSMIC FAIL.
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at January 21, 2010 09:54 AM (P33XN)
I can't believe Boxer is still leading in polls. That pretty much sums up what's wrong with California. Mental illness.
It's time for a Boxer Rebellion.
Posted by: LGoPs at January 21, 2010 09:55 AM (v/rEn)
Posted by: Catherine at January 21, 2010 09:56 AM (dc4hq)
Still trying to make certain that his record for abject dishonesty can never be broken, the jackass in chief attempts to absolve democratic politicians of any responsibility for forcing banks into making risky loans that triggered the meltdown of '08.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at January 21, 2010 09:56 AM (RkRxq)
That's a little weird, because last week they were all within 6 points of her. Honestly, though, I think Campbell's the only one who has a prayer here. DeVore is too conservative for the general population in California and Fiorina, jeez, I just wish she'd go away. I'd like the chance to something other than vote against Boxer and Fiorina won't provide that opportunity.
Posted by: Peaches at January 21, 2010 09:56 AM (9Wv2j)
And didn't I see something about them still wanting to raise the national debt ceiling aby another trillion-odd dollars? Like they're still thinking about going back for another round of stimulating shit-sammiches?
I'm confident enough that they (meaning the Democrat leadership) will continue find new, innovative tone-deaf ways to piss off the electorate...it's what they're good at.
Posted by: Chainsaw Chimp at January 21, 2010 09:57 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: curious at January 21, 2010 09:57 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Catherine at January 21, 2010 09:58 AM (dc4hq)
Posted by: eddiebear at January 21, 2010 09:58 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: Dave at January 21, 2010 10:03 AM (Xm1aB)
Thereby proving that it is possible to up the ante on douchebagginess. Frankly, I'm still surprised IndyMac didn't institute a black ops on his sorry ass.
Posted by: Peaches at January 21, 2010 10:04 AM (9Wv2j)
I recall the Minority Leader campaign. Blunt was heavily involved with DeLay's K Street Project, and the blogosphere on the Right run an "Anyone But Blunt" campaign as a result. That's why Boehner is Minority Leader now.
One worry we should have over Blunt is that he has skeletons in his closet. He needs to come clean about those because, if I can remember why he's not Minority Leader, then so can the Democrats.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 21, 2010 10:04 AM (9Sbz+)
Let me know how the Cemetery vote is breaking, and I'll get back to you.
I got ACORN on my speed-dial.
Posted by: Always Back A Winner at January 21, 2010 10:05 AM (J5x8g)
It's Missouri. There probably isn't a single resident who doesn't. And a good portion of those "skeletons" are likely to be livestock.
Posted by: Peaches at January 21, 2010 10:06 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Dave at January 21, 2010 10:07 AM (Xm1aB)
15 & 19, look for the left to go to one of its favorite fallback issues: gun control.
HR-45, S-1317.
It's coming.
I doubt the dems are quite that stupid. It's been said that gun control cost Gore the Presidency. With the recent boom in gun sales, pushing gun control right now would be suicidal for all but those in the most liberal districts- and it's those in red / purple districts who have the most to fear in 2010. Hell, even Obama tried to (falsely) portray himself as pro-2nd Amendment.
I'm about as pro-gun as anyone, but I'm not terribly worried about HR-45, S-1317. People have been talking about it for a long time, but it's been stuck in committee for so long for a reason. I don't think it'll ever even see a floor vote.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 21, 2010 10:08 AM (rf03a)
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 10:11 AM (l/N7H)
OT but...John Edwards is in Haiti with a group of doctors trying to "help."
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that botox treatments and hair styling tips are what the Haitians are most in need of right now.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 21, 2010 10:13 AM (rf03a)
OT but...John Edwards is in Haiti with a group of doctors trying to "help."
And Sean Penn is there with George Clooney, both with backhoes, but they forgot to gas them up?
Posted by: Gunslinger at January 21, 2010 10:14 AM (Zi+FQ)
Hollowpoint 67, agreed. Gun control would be absolutely suicidal this year; and even if it did pass, the next Congress (which, guaranteed, would be more pro-gun) would repeal it. It's not going anywhere.
Gun control is for comfortable Democratic majorities in good economic times, which they use to drive Republicans nuts and to scare soccer moms.
Posted by: Zimriel at January 21, 2010 10:16 AM (9Sbz+)
Posted by: JamesLee at January 21, 2010 10:18 AM (lqUju)
Please don't associate us with Robin Carnahan. We have higher standards than that.
Posted by: Dirty Whores Local # 669 at January 21, 2010 10:22 AM (CoKwa)
You do know how they practice safe sex in Missouri, don't you?
They mark the ones that kick.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at January 21, 2010 10:25 AM (CoKwa)
Hey JamesLee. I was Jacob's neighbor for 22 years. He's a GREAT guy and his wife is just a joy. We are working hard this campaign to get Cleaver out of office. Jacob's only problem and I hate to even call it a problem, but he is very very low key. He's no Marco Rubio for sure, but he knows the issues and could wipe the floor with Cleaver in a debate. He just needs to get some national attention!
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 10:26 AM (l/N7H)
@77
I was hoping that! Dont' know much about him yet, but a couple weeks ago when Darla interviewed him, I thought he really sounded like the Real Deal. I'm going to have to hit the website and try to do what I can for him.
Might have more help too, we have a newly-minted US Citizen friend who has heard us talking about all this for years, and she's really excited to be able to take part in it.
Any bets the plans on the Tea Party involve the Speedway?
Posted by: JamesLee at January 21, 2010 10:29 AM (lqUju)
James, it's so appreciated. Anything you can do and your friend also, would be great.
Don't know about a tea party at the speedway.
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 10:39 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Catherine at January 21, 2010 10:41 AM (dc4hq)
Posted by: Jewells at January 21, 2010 10:45 AM (l/N7H)
Posted by: Catherine at January 21, 2010 10:48 AM (dc4hq)
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at January 21, 2010 10:56 AM (cniXs)
-----------------
Come November, there will be no intensity either way. Obama will be an afterthought.
The only out is if there's another terror attack, and in that case the anti-Obama intensity will be back up.
Posted by: arhooley at January 21, 2010 12:18 PM (6GjHP)
Carn is already struggling trying to advertise himself though. His latest campaign comments are talking about how we residents want a "Outsider" and that Blunt is not that person. If thats the case then how does Carn figure himself in the running given his status? heh
Posted by: BloodSpite at January 21, 2010 12:23 PM (gp0Qr)
Posted by: Chi Hair Straightener on sale at January 31, 2010 05:31 PM (/NRfc)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2087 seconds, 214 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: jcjimi feeling his spell-checking oats at January 21, 2010 09:19 AM (NEj2I)