April 07, 2010
— Ace We always loved you guys! I guess maybe you got the wrong idea or somethin' that we didn't like you.
There was a time, oh, a week or two ago, when the mainstream media portrayed the tea-party movement as an assortment of crazed angry extremist redneck racist idiots. What changed?The headline we've given this column is a phrase coined by the conservative writer Tom Bethell to refer to the media's attitude toward conservatives who veer leftward. What we're about to describe is a bit different: more an epiphany on the media's part than a change in the object of coverage. It seems unlikely that the tea-partiers have suddenly become mainstream.
Yet that's what you'd think from reading some of the recent coverage. The Christian Science Monitor, which a month ago baselessly labeled Pentagon shooter John Patrick Bedell a "right-wing extremist," begins a Saturday story by rehearsing the stereotypes but then cautions that "political experts say that many such criticisms are near-sighted, if not outright inappropriate--and ultimately may miss the point[."]
Let's take a look at that Christian Science Monitor article. Before reading it, I assumed that the Monitor would use the passive voice in reporting the slurs against the Tea Party -- saying the Tea Party "have been called" racist, instead of identifying who called them that. As in, "Democrats frequently call the Tea Party racist" or "the media, including this very newspaper, frequently call them racist."
I was right.
Their faces sometimes twisted in anger, 'tea party' followers have been called neo-Klansmen and knuckle-dragging hillbillies.
Note right from the jump the choice of the word "followers" -- one who follows -- over the more generally accepted word "activist" -- one who acts. It's all the stranger a word choice given that there is no person called "Tea Party" to actually follow. One can say "Barack Obama's followers" or "Sarah Palin's followers" -- at least there there is an actual person to follow -- but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?
The word "followers" echoes the Washington Post's notorious description of the religious right -- "largely poor, uneducated, and easy to command."
(Also note that while the media could say "followers of Barack Obama," in fact, they wouldn't -- they'd call them "supporters" or "activists." "Followers" they would reserve for Sarah Palin's supporters. Easy to command, you know. Without independent thought.)
Even as the CSM pretends to play nice-nice they use the least complimentary word choices possible.
Back to the article:
To be sure, angry town halls, the N-word thrown at black congressmen, and signs comparing President Obama to Adolf Hitler play into the hands of the movement's critics. And demonizing tea party activists tends to energize the Democrats' left-of-center base.
There continues to be a $10,000 bounty for anyone producing evidence of these slurs. The CSM assumes them, because the source is impeccable -- a black liberal. Might as well be the Pope of Knowing Stuff.
But political experts say that many such criticisms are near-sighted, if not outright inappropriate – and ultimately may miss the point. Indeed, polls suggest that tea party activists are not only more mainstream than many critics suggest, but that a majority of them are women (primarily mothers), not angry white men.
Here they slip in the "angry white men" stereotype without acknowledging who it was who so stereotyped them. It just seems to have happened without author or agency.
What's more, the release this week of the top three planks of the "crowd-sourced" Contract From America project, to some activists, shows a maturation from sign-wielding protesters to a political reform movement grounded in ideas.
It doesn't really show a maturation of the Tea Party. It shows a maturation of the media's nasty, sneering juvenile reportage of the Tea Party. The Tea Party has always been idea-oriented. But the CSM missed that because they were too busy calling them racists.
...Still, many critics look at a tea party crowd and just see a "fantasy-based" movement of "angry white people," as Monitor Facebook commentator Bill Downey points out.
Again, no acknowledgement that these "many critics" are exclusively Democratic politicians and flacks and the liberal whore media.
CNN also takes a stab at curing these "stereotypes" which apparently self-organized out of aether and dreamstuff without any human intervention whatsoever:
But hereÂ’s what you donÂ’t often see in the coverage of Tea Party rallies: Patriotic signs professing a love for country; mothers and fathers with their children; African-Americans proudly participating; and senior citizens bopping to a hip-hop rapper.Last week, I saw all of this during a five-city Western swing as the Tea Party Express national tour made its way across the country. CNN was along for the ride, and I was charged with planning CNNÂ’s coverage for five stops in two states: St. George, Provo and Salt Lake City, Utah; and Grand Junction and Denver, Colorado. Â…
Together, we beamed out images of the anger and the optimism, profiled African-Americans who are proud to be in the Tea Party’s minority and showed activists stirred by “God Bless America” or amused by a young rapper who strung together rhymes against the president and Democrats. …
Being at a Tea Party rally is not quite like seeing it on TV, in newspapers or online. That’s the reason CNN is covering this political movement — and doing so in ways few others can or choose to do.
It is important to show the colorful anger Americans might have against elected leaders and Washington. But people should also see the orange-vested Tea Party hospitality handlers who welcome you with colorful smiles.
"Being at a Tea Party rally is not quite like seeing it on TV, in newspapers or online." -- Um, why is that, exactly? Isn't the goal of reportage to accurately portray the subject? Why is that TV and newspaper coverage has been deficient and skewed?
This guy pretends it was just a procedural glitch -- see, we didn't embed with them before, and now we are; just a mistake of process, you see. We're only guilty of an error of resource allocation!
Nonsense. It was deliberate and calculated decision, made at the highest editorial levels, with the singleminded goal of destroying the movement at the outset in order to increase the political fortunes of Barack Hussein Obama and the Socialist Demcoratic Party.
Taranto sums up:
Reader Taylor Dinerman notes: "Part of the function of a political media operation is to make the other side despair, lose hope, feel bad, etc. It's one of the reasons I gave up reading the New York Times. In one of Isaac Asimov's Empire series, he describes a drug called 'desperance' whose function is to make whoever takes it despair and be ready to kill or commit suicide. The bad guys feed it to someone they intend to use to murder the galactic emperor."Tales of tea-party racism could have been calculated to demoralize America's anti-ObamaCare majority by presenting them with an ugly choice: accept the fate the Democrats have imposed upon us, or side with (as the Christian Science Monitor puts it) "neo-Klansmen and knuckle-dragging hillbillies." The strange new respect for the tea-party movement suggests that this approach is too invidiously partisan even for the mainstream media.
Taranto's wrong -- that approach is not too invidiously partisan for even the mainstream media (a term, by the way, I don't use anymore, as they're not mainstream at all, as Bernard Goldberg noted, but radical and leftist). The media was more than willing to throw every stereotype and slur at the Tea Party, including graphic sexual ones.
They are walking it back not because they've suddenly developed ethics but because it wasn't working and in fact was costing them audience and influence. Much has been made of a recent poll finding that something like 71% of Tea Partiers get their news from FoxNews, as if that proves some kind of fringe agenda. No -- it proves what is already known (that they lean conservative) and furthermore it proves that people don't like having sexual slurs meaning "ball-sucking" tossed at them by their media sources.
Does that occur to anyone? Maybe they watch FoxNews partly because it's the only news outlet that's not going to unprofessionally accuse them of indulging in deviant sexual habits for shits and giggles.
I think far more likely than Taranto's What Color Are the Skies On Your World thesis of a media suddenly concerned with objectivity is a a simple recognition that the old tactics weren't working.
The media has treated the Tea Party as if the media were a hostile, alien occupying force engaging in psychological operations against an indigenous peasant rebellion. (Which actually isn't far from the actual situation, is it?)
What's the first line of attack? Attempt to contain the "disease" -- the viral outbreak of Tea Party rebellion -- by innocculating the population against it. Feed them every slur about the rebels -- call the queers, deviants, racists, ugly, uneducated, dangerous -- in an effort to make the movement unappealing to the majority. Limit their numbers by painting them with such ugly colors that recruitment becomes difficult for them.
Containment didn't work. So they turn to the next step in the counterinsurgency playbook -- cooptation. Unable to limit the numbers in the resistance, their new strategy is to pretend they were with them all along, and attempt to manipulate the movement to their own ends. If you can't stop a movement, pretend to be an ally of it in order to pervert its goals.
The next step? The media will denigrate the movement less and instead play to its populist discontent -- but will start offering up bogeymen favored by the left wing for the Tea Party to focus its anger on.
Expect the media to start talking up the broad-based anger of the movement, while emphasizing the leftist-bait they hope can turn the Party into a less coherent movement -- hey, look at those damn bankers! If only they hadn't been so greedy, we might never be in this situation. And GM? Its smug, fatcat management sort of forced poor populist Obama to take over a couple of car companies, didn't it?
That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point. I do think the media coordinates these stories, coordinates its angles, coordinates its spin. Some of them engage in this conspiracy halfway oblivious -- they are so stupid and without critical thought it doesn't even occur to them there's another legitimate viewpoint counter to their own -- but most know exactly what they are doing. They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party.
They are nothing short of the disinformation and propaganda organ of a corrupt, hostile, anti-american force. Just as terrorist groups invent "legal" fronts to be their legitimate spokesman -- Yasser Arafat invents the PLO to be the propaganda arm of Black September -- the media is nothing more than the supposedly-independent propaganda arm of Obama's Organizing for America.
But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think.
Posted by: Ace at
12:10 PM
| Comments (245)
Post contains 1891 words, total size 12 kb.
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:12 PM (RD7QR)
fuck em, I will not comply.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 07, 2010 12:13 PM (erIg9)
heh, maybe some of these guys in the media are beginning to realize it's bad business to insult and alienate 50% of the market.
Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:14 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: Adriane at April 07, 2010 12:15 PM (lzjTy)
Posted by: Charles Johnson, Bicycle Molesting Pervert And Science Guy at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (ilfw7)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (MFQJZ)
You know what else plays into the hands of the critics?
The shit made up by the critics in the first place.
Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (uFokq)
but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?
You have to turn around really fast. Hardly anyone can do it.
Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 12:18 PM (gLSaO)
Posted by: David in San Diego at April 07, 2010 12:20 PM (/U/Mr)
Posted by: FUBAR at April 07, 2010 12:20 PM (1fanL)
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.
He may have had a point...
...we just can't let the subtly redefine the movement as Ace suggests they will. Populism is a dangerous thing.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (trlZM)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: mesablue at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (jc7YC)
Posted by: eddiebear at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (ilfw7)
Still on the downlow? How do you find the time?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: Fritz at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (0lKCV)
btw, can't believe I'm saying this, but...
Rudy Guilliani 2012! Rudy has been on fire this week. And I, for one, appreciate it.
Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (uFokq)
There continues to be a $10,000 bounty for anyone producing evidence of these slurs
Breitbart upped the ante to $100,000 to the united negro college fund.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:24 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: sumyungguy at April 07, 2010 12:24 PM (IHbof)
Settle down, settle down. You get this from Fox News? John Lewis, Emmanuel Cleaver, Barney Frank and Andrew Carson are very nice people.
Get some balance. Read the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Posted by: Senator Tom Coburn (R)-OK at April 07, 2010 12:25 PM (sWZxV)
Can I run his campaign again?
Posted by: The guy who ran his last campaign. at April 07, 2010 12:25 PM (nxUYP)
Posted by: Mondo at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (uTRs/)
Posted by: The guy who ran his last campaign. at April 07, 2010 04:25 PM
(nxUYP)
I thought you were already running Romney's?
Posted by: Rocks at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (Q1lie)
The strange new love is a result of it no longer being possible to hide the amount of Democrats and Independants in the Tea Party. That was the big reason for the discredit. if every day shlubs knew, they would join too
CNN and media saw the writing on the wall long ago and did everything they could to spin it to keep momentum from building. Epic fail on their part. They know the can no longer hide it from the public. They are now trying to spin a narrative for the huge Dem losss that is coming. The MSM can blow it out their ass. No one watched and read them before, they won't now. I can't wait for them to shutter their doors
Posted by: ex Dem at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (0cUgO)
"Killing Them Softly With This Song".
Posted by: Vic at April 07, 2010 12:27 PM (QrA9E)
I'd like to get all the top advisors to Fred, Rudy, Mitt, and John McCain together and bang their fucking heads together.
Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (uFokq)
Journolist. Only a true idiot would think it was the only of its kind, or that it hasn't been replaced.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (IuKAf)
"Killing Them Softly With This Song".
Raaaacist. That's about her affair with Teh Rev. J. Jackson.
Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Countrysquire at April 07, 2010 12:29 PM (rDvlp)
Posted by: Smug Media Asshole at April 07, 2010 12:29 PM (xWGQr)
http://tinyurl.com/yrqwmz
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (LdYLm)
fuck em, I will not comply.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 07, 2010 04:13 PM (erIg9)
I agree. In fact, I believe they're trying to silence opposition no matter where it originates.
Posted by: conscious and telling libs to fuck off on a daily basis at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (YVZlY)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (nxUYP)
Here's the comment those quotes come from:
Bill Downey Tea Party has introduced something very sour in their blend. And The Tea Party title is just so fantasy based How bout angry white people? April 2 at 3:23pm
It's on some NPR personality's facebook page, not CSM's.
But it's so quotable, isn't it?
And where it comes from isn't important, is it?
And it's the only usage of "fantasy-based" regarding the tea parties anywhere on earth, but it's "many," isn't it?
Eh?
Posted by: oblig. at April 07, 2010 12:31 PM (x7Ao8)
What are you going to do about it, Rethuglican?
Posted by: Smug Media Asshole at April 07, 2010 04:29 PM (xWGQr
I think I will continue not buying your newspapers or watching your shows, thanks.
Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 12:32 PM (gLSaO)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:32 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at April 07, 2010 04:30 PM (BiCQw)
But, the stories surrounding the rumours that I have testicles, sadly are not false.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:33 PM (nxUYP)
I'll have to check the handbook, but I'm pretty sure a) white people with no interested in attending black churches are racists for avoiding blacks, and b) white people who try to attend are racists for thinking they should be allowed to "insert themselves into a black space." Something about "privilege."
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (mR7mk)
but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?
You have to turn around really fast. Hardly anyone can do it.
My dog tries to do that on occasion. It's pretty hilarious.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (Kt5vQ)
Posted by: George Orwell at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (AZGON)
http://tinyurl.com/ye3gfzk
Posted by: Chris R at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (AO4qz)
Posted by: bman at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (xPqkd)
Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (i6ROy)
It's worked on the Senate GOP time and time again. The libs will try it, because it's the only playbook they have.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (Kt5vQ)
Posted by: LSM at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (tf9Ne)
ACE, you tawk real purty with that mouth'un yurs.
But there's too many notes
uh..words,that is. Still real purty.
Posted by: Kelly at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (V7JkK)
Posted by: Black Tea Partier at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (AO4qz)
That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point.
I don't know if it counts as a conspiracy. That requires actual thought. This is more following orders blindly.
Posted by: Mama AJ at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (XdlcF)
Posted by: curious at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (p302b)
If the media really wanted to damage the Tea Party they'd simply stop running stories about them. Limit their exposure. If the negative attacks didn't work, that means that most people are on to their little game.
Not that that would actually damage the party but from their standpoint, that's the most effective thing they could do.
Posted by: ErikW at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (IfNz5)
So CNN is now the official.
MOB,
KKK
NAZI,
RACIST,
RIGHTWING,
BITTER CLINGER,
HATER,
NON-DIVERSITY station???
Maybe that Susan Rosegans BITCH can get her shitty job back.
Posted by: paul c at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (Vqruj)
Why is that do you think?
I'll give you a hint: It pays better than being an unbiased reporter (or an intellectual bagman for conservatives, if you will).
Say ... I'd like to have a job writing stories or blog posts with a rightward slant. Which paper will hire me? Which conservative websites are hiring right-ward pundits? What salary are they offering?
The Democrats have a captive media working for it because Republicans won't buy the fucking newspaper companies and fire the fucking liberal staff and hire conservative writers and editors. If you're not willing to pay reporters to write unbiased news, they're going to write biased news for the highest bidder.
They got families to feed.
Quit whinging. Start winning by fighting a better fight.
Hire conservative writers and let the best writers win.
How much are you paying the co-bloggers, Ace?
Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (VRJIW)
If we are ever to succeed at getting our country back on track, the credibility of the State Propaganda Organs must be destroyed.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (Kt5vQ)
"Pelosi in Bethesda for Emergency Surgery"
Washington Post, April 7, 2010
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was admitted shortly after noon today for emergency surgery to remove the testicles she inherited from Senator Ted Kennedy after his death.
With health care passed, Speaker Pelosi will no longer require Senator Kennedy's wrinkly testicles, and they will be returned to the senator for placement in the Kennedy family crypt.
Posted by: Fish at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (M5t+h)
Never fear, the WaPo continues to shill for the haters, and they have found a useful black "conservative" to assist them:
Let me guess: Pain in my Colin Powell?
brb...
Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (uFokq)
The MSM may be assholes but they aren't stupid... eh... too much anyway.
Even they can see where shithead is taking this country and they want to make friends with the only people who can stop him.
They want someone to talk to them when the blade falls on the dems disasterous stint at the helm.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Sally Ann Cavanaugh at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (FRErk)
One aside that I found very confusing (I had to check it twice) that has nothing to do with anything was this line by Taranto:
"The headline we've given this column is a phrase coined by the conservative writer Tom Bethell to refer to the media's attitude toward conservatives who veer leftward."
"Strange new respect" is phrase coined by someone, lately? That reminds me of Nike trying to trademark "Just do it" as if it wasn't a popular phrase for many, many, many years. I don't get these people, sometimes. I know that Taranto thought the application of this well-known phrase to some specific group might have been a first, but you find firsts of that sort with many words in many sentences. These claims of laughable originality are the hallmarks of medicre minds.
----------------------------------------------
They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party.
This is true, though one has to stretch the meaning of "information" a bit, but the media is really more about The Precedent than about the democrat party on this. They will fry the dems in any spat between them and The Precedent. The Lame streams are worse, in this respect, than Pravda ever was. The lame streams do all of their propagandizing by choice. At least, Pravda had the excuse that they were toiling under the boot of the Soviet government. Our neo-Pravda has no such excuse.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (N49h9)
To such people, there is no contradiction. it borders on the pathological.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: DavidM at April 07, 2010 12:41 PM (R/e5b)
I think one of the reasons for the new "respect" is that the media threw everything at the Tea Partiers..including the kitchen sink...
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
..first they tried to marginalize us by mis-represnting the numbers..then they tried to mock us by calling us names...all trying to paint us as ignorant white trash..
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
..then the racism charges..based on mis-reporting on the make up of the participants..and deliberate mis-interpretation of things like signage
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
...then they tried to make the claim we were trying to organize as a political party to run candidates in order to incite internal dissent
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
..then they tried to make it seem that any threats and violence..real or otherwise..were by Tea Partiers
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
..then they conspired to propagate the lies of racial name-calling of and the spitting on black congressman..liberal black congressman...civil-rights hero black congressman
..which would only serve to create and inflame racial tension
AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN
We are growing despite all this and more.
Posted by: beedubya at April 07, 2010 12:41 PM (AnTyA)
Posted by: palin steele at April 07, 2010 12:42 PM (bN5ZU)
So you're going to quit telling us to hold our noses and vote for RINOS, Ace?
Posted by: Ken at April 07, 2010 12:43 PM (vT7rz)
It's kind of a pointless isn't it?
The media is biased towards Democrats? Do fucking tell!
It's not fisking. It's whinging.
They're winning, and we're whining about it. The "fisk" is the equivalent of a schoolyard loser yelling "no fair!" I want to win ... not whine.
Republicans have to put up or shut up. Buy these companies and fire these people. That's the Chicago Way. That's how you get Capone.
You put theirs in the morgue.
Or you can be a crybaby.
Your choice.
Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:44 PM (VRJIW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (qYHPu)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (OyTrL)
...and furthermore it proves that people don't like having sexual slurs meaning "ball-sucking" tossed at them by their media sources.
I don't get the insult here.
Posted by: Andrew Sullivan (apology to be supplied at a later time) at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (QKKT0)
Citizens not engaged in grasping identity politics who demand accountability and common sense from their elected representatives.
That is some dangerous stuff right there.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (B+qrE)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 07, 2010 04:45 PM (qYHPu)
If she'd only shared that sandwich with me we'd both be alive today.
Posted by: Karen Carpenter at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (OyTrL)
Posted by: Grunt2Jag at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (Yr6lx)
Oh goodie. Let's see, extreme, right-winger, use of tear down, invocation of Social Security. Nice, compact use of smears, labels and straw-men.A nice test run of the 2010 Democrat' please don't take democracy to its' logical extent' campaign.
As for being honest and open, I defy you to prove that the administration of the manufactured Messiah is more so than a grass roots effort. Idiot.
The 'are what they are' is a dazzling piece of logic. Or bupkas. I'm going with bupkas.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Boots at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (06JTY)
You punch down by posting here.
You're so much better than this blog.
You should start your own.
I will read it and post lots of comments there.
You are teh awesome.
Posted by: Kilgore Trout at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (T0NGe)
So, this latest attack by the MSM is to make the tea party mainstream and therefore part of the system and the latest fad, in hopes that the "followers" will lose interest in it.
Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (tr6Dy)
Coffee Party, anyone?
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (VY5KX)
Medicare and Social Security are fucking bankrupt you stupid bitch.
So naturally we start SS and MEDICAID on steroids. Just what we need.
Posted by: gus at April 07, 2010 12:48 PM (Vqruj)
Math is hard! Let's go trolling!
Posted by: Barbie Ann Cavenaugh at April 07, 2010 12:48 PM (mR7mk)
71
How's that social security thing going? Plenty of money in it to pay out to the elderly who paid in all their lives? How bout Medicare? It's doing well? No. It's bankrupt too? Gee, it looks like these social welfare plans don't work out too well. Since they have such a terrific record, let's put 1/6 of the economy into their hands too......
Oh, and read something besides Kos. The tea partiers are not extreme. They reflect the population of america within one percentage point.
And "social security" is socialist. What part of "social" do you not understand? Do you even know what it means? I doubt it. Look it up you silly girl and then see where it leads.
Idiot
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:49 PM (HbSqq)
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:49 PM (1O93r)
No.
The media is biased towards Democrats? Do fucking tell!
In this case it isn't Democrats but The Precedent they are working for. I said that in my comment.
It's not fisking. It's whinging.
Never heard the term.
They're winning, and we're whining about it. The "fisk" is the equivalent of a schoolyard loser yelling "no fair!" I want to win ... not whine.
Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 04:44 PM (VRJIW)
I have to split with you on this. This isn't whining. It's analysis, and an excellent analysis, at that.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (N49h9)
...informational bagmen
I like it...I almost have the talking points down for most stories before they report on them.
Political Hack is also synonomous
Posted by: Ministry of Fiction at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (sE4Zb)
Posted by: Fish at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (M5t+h)
Posted by: Fresh Air at April 07, 2010 12:51 PM (UUDXo)
the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.
Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.
Posted by: kallisto at April 07, 2010 12:51 PM (+FkcS)
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (HbSqq)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (OyTrL)
Posted by: Kilgore Trout at April 07, 2010 04:47 PM (T0NGe)
Heh. You're not so bad yourself.
Posted by: FUBAR at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (1fanL)
It's been going on for years and we all know it. That explains almost exclusively why legacy media has lost and continues to lose audience, money, and influence. It took a foreign capitalist, Murdoch, to break the mold and really accelerate the demise of the LSM. The domestic stranglehold of information by liberals and the academia that fed it was so tight that no one could, or even dared, challenge the paradigm and feed the conservative audience. It just wasn't done.
And now we see the doubling down by the LSM to protect their chosen one. It's just not a secret anymore and the cries of "racism" have become so abused as to be the equivalent of "the boy who cried wolf." It was all a lie that no one believes. The Tea Party-ers did not back down because they recognize a) the stakes and b) the truth.
The LSM can FOAD. It cannot - CANNOT - earn back our trust. Oh, sure, conceptually it could, but it would take years of honest reporting to establish credibility. That institution does not have it in them. It is not in its DNA, so that beast must die. Or be killed. Hopefully from orbit with nukes, just to be sure.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (swuwV)
You watch what you wanna watch, and us men will watch what we wanna watch.
Ignore the bucket of cold water ladies; its only here to wet down the shirts.
Get it on!!
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:53 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:54 PM (RD7QR)
The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).
No sweety, they are just noting what everyone here also does on a regular basis: We are going to have to pay for all that as currently configured. And we can't.
Now please go get Circa a sammich. Adults who can do math are talking.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (B+qrE)
promise not to c#m in your moth this time.
Wow, that is some kinky shit you are into there. Silence of the Lambs fan?
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (cniXs)
Eeeesh Ace easy on us people at work who don't have time to read all that, your friigin prolific but c'mon. I think what your saying and I know you morons will correct me if I'm wrong is that the msm is simply changing its tactic from demonizing to mainstreaming the Tea Party in an attempt to make the movement seem old hat and contribed to that point that people just ignore them, like a fad thats run its course. (which is actually something I concern about...often)
Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (pr+up)
Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (U37Ux)
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (HbSqq)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 04:54
They tried to annoint Palin as the leader...but they already punched themselves out on her
Posted by: beedubya at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (AnTyA)
The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).
----------------------
Eh...sounds good to me.
Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (pr+up)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (0q2P7)
I expect this to be the next step.
Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (tr6Dy)
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 07, 2010 04:47 PM (VY5KX)
That was a pretty short-lived embarrassment, wasn't it? It was amazing how a group of 5 people sitting at a table at a Starbucks got articles written about their "rally". I remember, from 9/12 in DC, how there was almost no coverage at all. Even O'Reilly was babbling about "60,000 to 75,000 in attendance", which he has never bothered to correct or retract.
Also, didn't the dems/Precedent try some "brown" something group before the coffee party?
I like the way the dems keep trying to say that the Tea Partiers hate everyone and aren't concentrating on dems. Whistling past the graveyard ... But, the joke's on us, as the left will leave a wasteland in their wake. The left, and particularly Precedent Hussein, are pulling their Saddam Hussein impression, now, when he intentionally dumped 40,000,000 barrels of oil into the gulf and lit just about every oil well in Kuwait on fire.
The left is going all-out scorched-Earth on this, since they are strapped to The Precedent, who is a suicide bomber on his run.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (N49h9)
What is it analysing? That the media doesn't play fair?
No fair!
What does that sound like to you? How did the pussy yelling "no fair" in the schoolyard come off to you?
My point isn't that the analysis is faulty. It is that it is pointless and wastes time and energy better spent. It doesn't really break any new ground; doesn't convert any undecided voters. And it stands in the place of commentary that could convince voters that America is on the wrong track ... such as a discussion of the media prepping the landscape for a VAT tax by interviewing Paul Volcker.
Or 20% unemployment.
That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..
Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (VRJIW)
I really liked this post, it's well thought out and right on target.
And the only clowns in evidence are the media.
Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (RZ8pf)
Good job, Ace. In retrospect, the election of The Vapid One® was coreographed and coordinated: bash Bush 24-7, claim he stole an election, blame him for hurricanes and mine explosions, call him an idiot and a monkey, mock and deride him every simgle time he speaks, and sure enough, you can turn an entire country against him.
It's not a conspiracy if it's true.
The same thing is being done now to conservatives. The difference is, now we know what the tactics are and the LSM knows that we know. Look at their dwindling ratings. The jig is up.
And yes, I know that's a racist statement.
I denounce myself.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (i3AsK)
Posted by: Math sez at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (mhD2v)
What's this?
Randi Rhodes & Joy Behar, together, talking shit about us? Now that's a formula for successful television programming.
Posted by: Uniblab at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (uFokq)
Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (tm/sN)
He walked through the crowd to Capitol Hill and then back from Capitol Hill holding two Blackberry Curve 8330 models in front of him like cameras.
He might raise the easiest $100K from Breitbart at a time of his choosing.
Say Jackson has the statements on tape. He can release them whenever he wants. Like, oh, the first week of October.
Posted by: wtfci at April 07, 2010 01:00 PM (+zo63)
No it's still a conspiracy it's not a conspiracy theory if it's true.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:00 PM (0q2P7)
"But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think."
If by 'undeducated' you mean, 'lacking in college', then I think you've got things backward: generally, more college implies less-independent-minded. But if you change that to "unintelligent and easy to command", then I think you've got it right.
Posted by: Mark in Portland at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (BD2Ek)
the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.
Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.
posted by: kallisto
I wish them the very best of British luck with that. Really, I do.
Speaking as a small, slightly plump, middle-aged, glasses-wearing woman with a cane.
Posted by: Dianna at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (qrFCz)
They've already tried this -- remember that guy from Texas who's only known to people who hate the Tea Parties, but who apparently organized them all?
(No, not Ron Paul -- the other racist one.)
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (IuKAf)
Just as terrorist groups invent "legal" fronts to be their legitimate spokesman -- Yasser Arafat invents the PLO to be the propaganda arm of Black September -- the media is nothing more than the supposedly-independent propaganda arm of Obama's Organizing for America.
I like this analogy.
But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think.
As shown by the media's declining ratings. A thing of beauty.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (c0A3e)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (a9UO0)
Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..
Except everyone knows that Fox News isn't really a news station.
Their brand of media bias is not recognized...
Posted by: Ministry of Fiction at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (sE4Zb)
You are welcome to go piss on someone else's blog if you don't like the content here.
Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (tr6Dy)
It really is his time and energy. He can spend it as he likes.
"someguy" is a champion of liberty who spends his time telling other people how they should spend their time.
Rather like "lonewhacko".
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:03 PM (IuKAf)
Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (i6ROy)
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (HbSqq)
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (pU4D7)
That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..
The point is to wake up the brainwashed middle that doesn't know it's being mind fucked every single day. And that's worth repeating. Every fucking day.
Repetition works. Just look at what the left did to Bush through fucking repetition for eight fucking years.
Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (tm/sN)
Posted by: inspectorudy at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (Vo1wX)
Posted by: dc at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (jODM8)
I do think this is the first time I'm heard the press called an OPFOR of America. I don't disagree.
Tokyo Rose had nothing on these traitors.
Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 01:05 PM (dQdrY)
Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:05 PM (i6ROy)
Because from what I can tell you're just an underemployed jagoff sitting in his parents' basement telling other people to do shit you don't do yourself.
See? Just like "lonewhacko".
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:06 PM (IuKAf)
141 That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..
DUDE...its a blog!! keep it in your pants sparky all will be discussed in time. If you really wanna do somthing call your local rep and give him an earful. We are here to exchange ideas so we can do the same...get it?
Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 01:06 PM (pr+up)
the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.
Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.
That is my fear also. The unions and Dear Leader's other organized thugs will provoke and push us to a point that the only way to protect our voice is to start pushing back. I hope it doesn't come to that, but this regime will stop at nothing to remain in power. Including starting something on a national level that requires canceling the Nov. elections because of a "national emergency". We must stay awake and stay alert for I fear the worst is coming.
Posted by: Soona' at April 07, 2010 01:07 PM (Kjgld)
97 tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security (1935), Medicare(1965) and Medicaid(1965))
Math is hard! Let's go trolling!
75 + 45 + 45 = over a hundred years. Hah!
Posted by: Callie Ann Souvenir at April 07, 2010 01:07 PM (gLSaO)
Americans have many choices to get their news from. During the primetime newshour the only center right outlet Fox News gets less than 10% of the viewers. Most Americans WANT center left news.
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for April 6, 2010
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,153,000 viewers
CNN – 423,000 viewers
MSNBC – 374,000 viewers
CNBC – 187,000 viewers
HLN – 284,000 viewers
FNC – 2,270,000 viewers
CNN – 491,000 viewers
MSNBC –891,000 viewers
CNBC – 156,000 viewers
HLN –567,000 viewers
So counting wasn't covered in your Math Classes, Sez? Or is it that new lib counting, that only gives each conservative 3/5ths a person?
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:08 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:08 PM (OyTrL)
Say Jackson has the statements on tape. He can manufacture release them whenever he wants. Like, oh, the first week of October.
Except everyone knows that Fox News isn't really a news station.
Their brand of media bias is not recognized...
Give me an example o how their news is biased.
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:09 PM (HbSqq)
It's discussing the recent change in the media's reporting on the Tea Party movement.
Posted by: sandy burger at April 07, 2010 01:10 PM (MT+0i)
+1
This is so spot on. The. Single. Most. powerful component of the movement. Also, it cannot be allowed itself to be coopted by political opportunists. That would kill its effectiveness because then it would become an aggregation of Men rather than Ideas.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 01:10 PM (swuwV)
This. This is what scares me.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 07, 2010 01:11 PM (mR7mk)
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 05:04 PM (HbSqq)
Couldn't have said it better.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:11 PM (OyTrL)
160 you know you don't need our consent.
This is a prime opportunity for a fundraising drive. Tell you what Ace, I'll make it $100 for banning fuckity fuck fuck. Think of all the cases of pudding that will buy. Come on morons, you can do it. Pony up.
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 01:12 PM (cniXs)
...it's not a conspiracy theory if it's true.
I sit corrected. As for the underline in that comment, it should be "single". Loose shit, indeed.
Still, Ace is spot on. We can't believe a word that the LSM says. They are our enemy and should be treated as such: with contempt and suspicion.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 07, 2010 01:13 PM (i3AsK)
145 dagny Now you are starting to make sumguy look like an idiot.
They lefty meatheads control the schools, univercities, and media. But we do not have unicorns to fill them in with how foolish and stupid the lefties are.
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:14 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: d_Utah at April 07, 2010 01:14 PM (wI3LS)
Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (tm/sN)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (RD7QR)
Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (i6ROy)
What happened!?!?! Don't hold out on us!
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 05:13 PM (1O93r)
Best joke I heard as the late-night wars were reaching their climax a few months ago: Contrary to published reports, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are not splitting up; Brad is merely being replaced by Jay Leno.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:17 PM (OyTrL)
Posted by: maddogg at April 07, 2010 01:17 PM (OlN4e)
Problem is, fuckityfuckfuck.com is already taken.
Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (tr6Dy)
And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that.
Posted by: ace
Do your Harry Reid imitation. Bribe us, and then hold the vote again. I'm sure that something can be arranged. How does the 'First state set-up' sound? It's a bribe with no sales tax!
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (1O93r)
Run another poll. After the horseshit legal threats someguy hinted at after the first one, I'll bet you'd see a different result.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (OyTrL)
This is a prime opportunity for a fundraising drive. Tell you what Ace, I'll make it $100 for banning fuckity fuck fuck. Think of all the cases of pudding that will buy. Come on morons, you can do it. Pony up.
HEY!
Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (Kjgld)
Damn it!!! Maybe we can get the humped one to start a big fundraising effort. We hit x dollars and it overides the poll?
Pudding.........
Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (cniXs)
Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (RD7QR)
Sumguy Action Items Completed April 7, 2010
1. Called Lib brother in law and told him Obama Sucks! Then hung up! HA!
2. Concerned Trolled Daily Kos for 3 hours. HA!
3. Coffee with a nice danish and a change of the colostomy bag.
4. PUNCHED UP FOR TWO FUCKING HOURS!
5. LOL'd at stupid conservatives punching down, EVERYWHERE!
6. Logged onto AofSHQ and gave them the what for!! HA HA HA!
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (/iBIN)
They control those professions not because it pays better to be a lefty, as some stupid guy thinks, but because none of them pay well=> conservatives look for more monetarily rewarding torture to be a part of. Individuals like Ace, whom take a vow of poverty for conservatism are the exception.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (0q2P7)
Posted by: H at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (LNuCm)
Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (gLSaO)
That's most of it. But thanks to the exposure of "Journolist", we know the collaborate on what to cover, how to cover it, who to talk to, etc.
We also know they routinely recycle activist organization press releases into stories. Pretty much any story about "such-and-such food is horribly fattening" comes from the "Center for Science in the Public Interest" -- which is a couple of vegan losers with a fax machine and a rolodex.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:21 PM (WWcde)
Will do. I say that we fund it with bribes from Ace. We need to deliver the Delaware caucus to sink Somejerk.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (1O93r)
They lefty meatheads control the schools, univercities, and media. But we do not have unicorns to fill them in with how foolish and stupid the lefties are.
I'm in favor or our breeding Centaurs or griffins to counteract the unicorns.
I'm also not sure how much influence the lefty professors have--I didn't listen to mine but maybe because that was because of the hangovers.
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (HbSqq)
Sumguy Action Items Completed April 7, 2010
1. Called Lib brother in law and told him Obama Sucks! Then hung up! HA!
2. Concerned Trolled Daily Kos for 3 hours. HA!
3. Coffee with a nice danish and a change of the colostomy bag.
4. PUNCHED UP FOR TWO FUCKING HOURS!
5. LOL'd at stupid conservatives punching down, EVERYWHERE!
6. Logged onto AofSHQ and gave them the what for!! HA HA HA!
Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 07, 2010 05:20 PM (/iBIN)
Thread winner.
Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (OyTrL)
Posted by: wtfci at April 07, 2010 05:00 PM (+zo63)
Jackson on tape? Wasn't that where he said he wanted to cut the Indonesian Imbecile's nuts off? Violence! Sexual violence!!
Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 01:23 PM (N49h9)
Thread winner.
What!?! No respect for inciting girl-on-girl action? Or soliciting bribes from the blog owner while everyone else is trying to bribe him !?!?
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:24 PM (1O93r)
Posted by: Al Gore hates someguy at April 07, 2010 01:24 PM (oe0sG)
Did anyone see the link a few threads back to the examiner.com? I think it might have been in a comment by kdbear. It was about the msm being told by the WH not to report on "certain stories." And about finding false things on the Obama resume. Maybe that is what this is about. Maybe the MSM realizes it can no longer pretend the Emperor is wearing clothes.
Posted by: fightobama at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (6IV8T)
You didn't poll on that Paulie guy. Ban him....please!
Posted by: Tami at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (VuLos)
Posted by: Busted Nut, formerly known as ACORN at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (1O93r)
TeaParty..Coffee Party
..who's up for a Jagermeister Shot Party??????
Posted by: beedubyaCough syrup of Satan. Sign my ass up.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:27 PM (1O93r)
Well the thing with the schools and universities are the teachers get long holidays off, summer vacation, etc. No wonder it fits in!
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:31 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: IN 8th at April 07, 2010 01:33 PM (tcMQZ)
Well, this all settles it for me!
*deletes all his DVR'd Glenn Beck*
*flips on Candy Crowley*
I agree. I don't know why Glenn has such a fascination with this piece of shit.
Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 01:33 PM (Kjgld)
You mentioned "conspiracy" and I don't think anyone would argue that it actually is. Well, Robert Gibbs might. Come to think of it, his protest would prove the point. Anyhoo, as others have pointed out, the modern incarnation was Journolist, so this was not some fevered imagination the Right had.
The point is that the conspiracy has been going on for decades. The concept of a Journolist was just birthed from The NYTimes. That DNC watercooler has been the nexus of red journalism for our entire lifetimes. Only now when we have realtime fact-checking and easy communication that circumvents the classical filters can we appreciate the depth of the deception.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 01:35 PM (swuwV)
Posted by: GarandFan at April 07, 2010 01:36 PM (6mwMs)
Well the thing with the schools and universities are the teachers get long holidays off, summer vacation, etc. No wonder it fits in!
Yeah, and my mom didn't get paid during the summer, unless she arranged for money to be withheld from her salary during the school year - and she didn't earn interest on it, the district did.
I love the teachers unions less than most people, but I get royally tired of the pig-ignorant nonsense I read about teachers.
Posted by: Dianna at April 07, 2010 01:37 PM (qrFCz)
Ace sees one highly ambiguous (self-serving) article in the Christian Science Monitor - which doesn't completely trash the Tea Party movement, so now he would have us believe the MSM has 'turned' and not only is on our side, but actually has been all along!
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 01:37 PM (w2++y)
I agree. I don't know why Glenn has such a fascination with this piece of shit.
Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 05:33 PM (Kjgld)
So, Fuckity. Are you new here?
Posted by: Soona' at April 07, 2010 01:38 PM (Kjgld)
Posted by: ManeiNeko at April 07, 2010 01:39 PM (TiE76)
Ever notice so called lefty libs who love unions drive non-union cars? They even have Comrade Oboma stickers on their cars!
I want to see what happens if they legalise weed in some states when you can go to Walmart or some national drug store to get your prescription for it. I figure, Bud and Miller may get in the market as well!
Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:43 PM (pU4D7)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 01:44 PM (Kt5vQ)
Ace sees one highly ambiguous (self-serving) article in the Christian Science Monitor - which doesn't completely trash the Tea Party movement, so now he would have us believe the MSM has 'turned' and not only is on our side, but actually has been all along!
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:37 PM (w2++y)
You need to read what Ace said again. He's saying the MSM, never on the Tea Party side, is now changing tacts to diminish it. And, this isn't the first news source that shown its first sign of adapting (their attacks).
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 07, 2010 01:47 PM (ucq49)
For the record, I think you meant to say Medicare, not Medicaid.
Posted by: sandy burger at April 07, 2010 01:47 PM (MT+0i)
Posted by: Timbo at April 07, 2010 01:49 PM (7GgDy)
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:37 PM (w2++y)
Um, I think you kind of missed the point. Nobody is arguing the MSM "loves the Tea Party." Ace is saying that the MSM has failed to turn the majority of the public away from Tea Party principles, so now look for it to foster the appearance of being sympathetic in the hope of manipulating its direction.
You're welcome for the English-to-English translation. Let me know if there's anything else on the blog that's hard to understand.
Posted by: Cicero at April 07, 2010 01:51 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Anonymous Guy at April 07, 2010 01:57 PM (UPNlB)
Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 02:08 PM (dQdrY)
Blogspot's thataway. Knock yourself out.
Posted by: Anachronda at April 07, 2010 02:14 PM (3K4hn)
"I didn't make it to the bunk. Damn."
Excuse me, pardon me, excuse me, pardon... *makes it to the hallway*
Posted by: paulsey at April 07, 2010 02:18 PM (q/kmn)
Ace begins his post by saying: "There was a time, oh, a week or two ago, when the mainstream media portrayed the tea-party movement as an assortment of crazed angry extremist redneck racist idiots. What changed?"
I assume for Ace to ask "What Changed?" means he actually believes the MSM has somehow changed vis-a-vis its perception of the Tea Bag movement. I wrote to challenge Ace that I do not believe the MSM has changed its opinion of the Tea Bag movement one iota.
So tell me, Cicero (as in Chicago suburb, I presume) do you have a problem with my conclusion/analysis?
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 02:20 PM (w2++y)
We can have repeated votes on the continued existence of someguy around here.
It's like Congress. Someguy is the current elected representative for douchenozzelry. Periodic re-election for that position is encouraged.
Posted by: reason at April 07, 2010 02:21 PM (q/kmn)
The libtard media may just be playing nicey nice so that they can stand in our midst and hope for a n-word (I feel like an idiot writing that), without getting pushed out?
Kinda like those big bugs on the Orkin commercial
Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 02:22 PM (HbSqq)
It is an effort to win the confidence of the tea party people, so that they can get lots of footage to edit at their discretion, creating the impression that the tea parties are full of fools, runes, and racists.
My advice to anyone attending one of these events is to NOT talk to the media. Do not give them sound bites. You do not have to talk to them, since you are a private citizen. Do not even offer them a cup of coffee.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2010 02:23 PM (4DwVn)
To the question, "What changed?"
Rasmussen Polls consistently show the Anti-Tea-Party not only the minority, but the out of touch and ignorant minority of voters.
Posted by: maverick muse at April 07, 2010 02:26 PM (H+LJc)
"Tea party must be freaking out the dems more than I thought."
They are. It made for some good reading on DUmmie FUnnies.
Posted by: reason at April 07, 2010 02:26 PM (q/kmn)
Nice post, Ace.
Posted by: Amanda at April 07, 2010 02:28 PM (MbYz8)
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 06:20 PM (w2++y)
Yes. Because you've completely ignored what I wrote. I can only refer you back to it in response.
Maybe they ain't speakin' English so good in the UK no more, knowhatimean?
Posted by: SomeDouche at April 07, 2010 02:29 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 02:30 PM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: sirsurfalot at April 07, 2010 02:39 PM (UPNlB)
Sock OFF. And Alwyn, its the Tea Party movement, not the Tea Bag movement. You sound like you're getting your information from Anderson Cooper.
And no, Cicero doesn't refer to the Illinois suburb. It refers to Marcus Tullius Cicero, consul, senator, exposer of the Catiline conspiracy and opponent of Julius Caesar. Just for the record.
Posted by: Cicero at April 07, 2010 02:45 PM (QKKT0)
Posted by: Alan Smithee at April 07, 2010 03:31 PM (F7GbV)
Ace's point is that the media is never going to get it. No matter how much everyone realizes the media (like you) sucks, people naturally want to have their beliefs validated, so the suckers now pretend to validate the TP'rs -- only to lie in wait for the day they can blow 'em up with some scandal.
It helps to visualize the media as receiving their daily marching orders from the White House . It's obvious that most of the NYT's copy comes pre-written from there, saving the Times the expense of hiring sentient humans. After that, it gets re-phrased, rewritten and propagated to the world.
The only question is, where are you in that process? Journo student? Wannabe? Or someone in so deep in the media muck that all you can do is wave your arms and trash anyone who calls you out?
Posted by: JBean at April 07, 2010 03:37 PM (6N6FF)
Yes, I am that very same person as you knew in the other place. I bounce around to several places and always use my same name (unless some philistine has already taken it). It is nice to run into old friends.
I like this site because I learn what the younger crowd thinks (me being a nice Midwest grandma) and also I learn a lot about military stuff, which I need educating about.
Also I have learned about hobos, Valu-Rite vodka, and pron. LOL!
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2010 03:41 PM (4DwVn)
"I was born/raised/educated in England and we invented the fucking language. "
So sorry to learn that. We Yanks give allowances for XXXXXXXXXX challenged. Fill in the blanks.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 07, 2010 03:45 PM (ucq49)
I knew there was a reason I've never told my girlfriend about this joint.
Geez Ace. I'm encouraged to celebrate around here by dipping my balls in various silky food products, but not...
Question: What if she's into it and there's pudding in her mouth at the moment we take back the House? Good to go, not good to go, even more deviant? I'm gonna need a ruling here.
Posted by: Lamontyoubigdummy at April 07, 2010 04:15 PM (skMdM)
Wow.... this was a long read..... tough to slog through after a day at work... I didn't have my dinner yet and am on the third glass of wine.... but I like red meat before my red meat.
Nice post ace... spot on.
Personally I'm not as concerned about this nonsense as much as I used to be because more people are catching onto the LSM's nonesense. The state run media are still private corporations for the most part. They are bleeding red ink literlaly and figuratively. It's only a matter of time before they get the Govt. bailout and truely become "State" media. The NYTimes will go first.
On the other hand, conservative online, print & TV media are doing very well. For people like me who still hold the naive view that capatilism works will conclude that conservatism will overcome the marxist message in the end.
But all this doesn't matter.... my opinions ain't worth a ball of shit... what really matters is... what does someguy think about all this?
Posted by: Last Conservative In Brooklyn at April 07, 2010 04:17 PM (7uAeI)
A week where POTUS says: "Go ahead and annihilate us with chemical or other types of WMDs - and we won't respond."
A week where POTUS claims there is no such thing as 'Islamic terrorism', but we face instead ."Man made disasters" - as though that will suffice to explain 9/11
Truth to tell, I suspect you and I have much more in common than the reverse. I genuinely believe our country has reached a 'tipping point' where the upcoming November election will decide everything. If we can't gain a majority (at least in the House) then we're doomed. Literally - We become a socialist society.
As I related to you previously, I'm from England, and I know first-hand what 'socialism' means. Consequently, I will challenge anybody (including Ace) who gives the impression the MSM is somehow "coming around" to support the Tea Party point of view. The MSM put Obama in power; the MSM is never going to change sides so as to now champion the cause of the Tea Party movement.I would like to think you would concur.
Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:24 PM (w2++y)
Posted by: sun at April 08, 2010 12:24 AM (tW/S7)
thank you ...
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ßæßÊÃá ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 09, 2010 11:24 PM (WFYoY)
They're called, "Editors" and they control (a) pretty much what kind of people write for them and (b) what gets written in a news office. Those leftists who entered journalism in the 1970s after Woodward and Bernstein made investigative reporting sexy, showing how to bring down a Republican Administration? They're in their 50s now and have moved up the corporate ladder to the Editors' desks. They're still committed socialists and now they get to shape public opinion to suit their philosophies.
They of course are cutting their own throats doing this. Readers are being driven away by the incessant ranting from both the editorial page and the news page. Readership is dropping for all the left-slanted news sources and revenues are falling through the floor. Their hope lies in consolidation and ultimately nationalization of the media. Pravda-dization is the key to their survival and the goal of their efforts. If they can keep Congress and the White House in their grip a few more election cycles they might just make it.
Posted by: Orion at April 10, 2010 09:01 PM (wKWN5)
Posted by: silence at April 26, 2010 12:30 AM (8PNbT)
point of pandora charms. This is a nice article for sure. Excellent point here. I wish there
are more and more New pandora beads articles like that. I totally agree with you on the
point of pandora jewellery. This is a nice article for sure. Thank you so much for sharing
some great ideas of pandora jewellery with us, they are helpful.
Posted by: pandora at October 24, 2010 10:15 PM (t7UbJ)
Do you crazy for NBA games? Have you hold your breath for the exciting moment? Are you one of NBA
super fans? If the answer is YES, COME ON,GUYS!
All kinds of NBA jerseys are designed as authentic styles with High
quality,Competitive price, Fast Delivery and Intimate Customer Service . Choose your favorite jerseys to support your team. Enjoy your free style!
They are all in stock!Welcome to buy!
Posted by: sunny at April 08, 2011 08:06 PM (wakeg)
Posted by: aziz at May 04, 2011 11:04 AM (mQ7gk)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3039 seconds, 373 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:12 PM (laMp7)