April 07, 2010

The Media's Strange New Respect for the Tea Party
— Ace

We always loved you guys! I guess maybe you got the wrong idea or somethin' that we didn't like you.

There was a time, oh, a week or two ago, when the mainstream media portrayed the tea-party movement as an assortment of crazed angry extremist redneck racist idiots. What changed?

The headline we've given this column is a phrase coined by the conservative writer Tom Bethell to refer to the media's attitude toward conservatives who veer leftward. What we're about to describe is a bit different: more an epiphany on the media's part than a change in the object of coverage. It seems unlikely that the tea-partiers have suddenly become mainstream.

Yet that's what you'd think from reading some of the recent coverage. The Christian Science Monitor, which a month ago baselessly labeled Pentagon shooter John Patrick Bedell a "right-wing extremist," begins a Saturday story by rehearsing the stereotypes but then cautions that "political experts say that many such criticisms are near-sighted, if not outright inappropriate--and ultimately may miss the point[."]

Let's take a look at that Christian Science Monitor article. Before reading it, I assumed that the Monitor would use the passive voice in reporting the slurs against the Tea Party -- saying the Tea Party "have been called" racist, instead of identifying who called them that. As in, "Democrats frequently call the Tea Party racist" or "the media, including this very newspaper, frequently call them racist."

I was right.

Their faces sometimes twisted in anger, 'tea party' followers have been called neo-Klansmen and knuckle-dragging hillbillies.

Note right from the jump the choice of the word "followers" -- one who follows -- over the more generally accepted word "activist" -- one who acts. It's all the stranger a word choice given that there is no person called "Tea Party" to actually follow. One can say "Barack Obama's followers" or "Sarah Palin's followers" -- at least there there is an actual person to follow -- but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?

The word "followers" echoes the Washington Post's notorious description of the religious right -- "largely poor, uneducated, and easy to command."

(Also note that while the media could say "followers of Barack Obama," in fact, they wouldn't -- they'd call them "supporters" or "activists." "Followers" they would reserve for Sarah Palin's supporters. Easy to command, you know. Without independent thought.)

Even as the CSM pretends to play nice-nice they use the least complimentary word choices possible.

Back to the article:

To be sure, angry town halls, the N-word thrown at black congressmen, and signs comparing President Obama to Adolf Hitler play into the hands of the movement's critics. And demonizing tea party activists tends to energize the Democrats' left-of-center base.

There continues to be a $10,000 bounty for anyone producing evidence of these slurs. The CSM assumes them, because the source is impeccable -- a black liberal. Might as well be the Pope of Knowing Stuff.

But political experts say that many such criticisms are near-sighted, if not outright inappropriate – and ultimately may miss the point. Indeed, polls suggest that tea party activists are not only more mainstream than many critics suggest, but that a majority of them are women (primarily mothers), not angry white men.

Here they slip in the "angry white men" stereotype without acknowledging who it was who so stereotyped them. It just seems to have happened without author or agency.

What's more, the release this week of the top three planks of the "crowd-sourced" Contract From America project, to some activists, shows a maturation from sign-wielding protesters to a political reform movement grounded in ideas.

It doesn't really show a maturation of the Tea Party. It shows a maturation of the media's nasty, sneering juvenile reportage of the Tea Party. The Tea Party has always been idea-oriented. But the CSM missed that because they were too busy calling them racists.

...

Still, many critics look at a tea party crowd and just see a "fantasy-based" movement of "angry white people," as Monitor Facebook commentator Bill Downey points out.

Again, no acknowledgement that these "many critics" are exclusively Democratic politicians and flacks and the liberal whore media.

CNN also takes a stab at curing these "stereotypes" which apparently self-organized out of aether and dreamstuff without any human intervention whatsoever:

But hereÂ’s what you donÂ’t often see in the coverage of Tea Party rallies: Patriotic signs professing a love for country; mothers and fathers with their children; African-Americans proudly participating; and senior citizens bopping to a hip-hop rapper.

Last week, I saw all of this during a five-city Western swing as the Tea Party Express national tour made its way across the country. CNN was along for the ride, and I was charged with planning CNNÂ’s coverage for five stops in two states: St. George, Provo and Salt Lake City, Utah; and Grand Junction and Denver, Colorado. Â…

Together, we beamed out images of the anger and the optimism, profiled African-Americans who are proud to be in the Tea Party’s minority and showed activists stirred by “God Bless America” or amused by a young rapper who strung together rhymes against the president and Democrats. …

Being at a Tea Party rally is not quite like seeing it on TV, in newspapers or online. That’s the reason CNN is covering this political movement — and doing so in ways few others can or choose to do.

It is important to show the colorful anger Americans might have against elected leaders and Washington. But people should also see the orange-vested Tea Party hospitality handlers who welcome you with colorful smiles.

"Being at a Tea Party rally is not quite like seeing it on TV, in newspapers or online." -- Um, why is that, exactly? Isn't the goal of reportage to accurately portray the subject? Why is that TV and newspaper coverage has been deficient and skewed?

This guy pretends it was just a procedural glitch -- see, we didn't embed with them before, and now we are; just a mistake of process, you see. We're only guilty of an error of resource allocation!

Nonsense. It was deliberate and calculated decision, made at the highest editorial levels, with the singleminded goal of destroying the movement at the outset in order to increase the political fortunes of Barack Hussein Obama and the Socialist Demcoratic Party.

Taranto sums up:

Reader Taylor Dinerman notes: "Part of the function of a political media operation is to make the other side despair, lose hope, feel bad, etc. It's one of the reasons I gave up reading the New York Times. In one of Isaac Asimov's Empire series, he describes a drug called 'desperance' whose function is to make whoever takes it despair and be ready to kill or commit suicide. The bad guys feed it to someone they intend to use to murder the galactic emperor."

Tales of tea-party racism could have been calculated to demoralize America's anti-ObamaCare majority by presenting them with an ugly choice: accept the fate the Democrats have imposed upon us, or side with (as the Christian Science Monitor puts it) "neo-Klansmen and knuckle-dragging hillbillies." The strange new respect for the tea-party movement suggests that this approach is too invidiously partisan even for the mainstream media.

Taranto's wrong -- that approach is not too invidiously partisan for even the mainstream media (a term, by the way, I don't use anymore, as they're not mainstream at all, as Bernard Goldberg noted, but radical and leftist). The media was more than willing to throw every stereotype and slur at the Tea Party, including graphic sexual ones.

They are walking it back not because they've suddenly developed ethics but because it wasn't working and in fact was costing them audience and influence. Much has been made of a recent poll finding that something like 71% of Tea Partiers get their news from FoxNews, as if that proves some kind of fringe agenda. No -- it proves what is already known (that they lean conservative) and furthermore it proves that people don't like having sexual slurs meaning "ball-sucking" tossed at them by their media sources.

Does that occur to anyone? Maybe they watch FoxNews partly because it's the only news outlet that's not going to unprofessionally accuse them of indulging in deviant sexual habits for shits and giggles.

I think far more likely than Taranto's What Color Are the Skies On Your World thesis of a media suddenly concerned with objectivity is a a simple recognition that the old tactics weren't working.

The media has treated the Tea Party as if the media were a hostile, alien occupying force engaging in psychological operations against an indigenous peasant rebellion. (Which actually isn't far from the actual situation, is it?)

What's the first line of attack? Attempt to contain the "disease" -- the viral outbreak of Tea Party rebellion -- by innocculating the population against it. Feed them every slur about the rebels -- call the queers, deviants, racists, ugly, uneducated, dangerous -- in an effort to make the movement unappealing to the majority. Limit their numbers by painting them with such ugly colors that recruitment becomes difficult for them.

Containment didn't work. So they turn to the next step in the counterinsurgency playbook -- cooptation. Unable to limit the numbers in the resistance, their new strategy is to pretend they were with them all along, and attempt to manipulate the movement to their own ends. If you can't stop a movement, pretend to be an ally of it in order to pervert its goals.

The next step? The media will denigrate the movement less and instead play to its populist discontent -- but will start offering up bogeymen favored by the left wing for the Tea Party to focus its anger on.

Expect the media to start talking up the broad-based anger of the movement, while emphasizing the leftist-bait they hope can turn the Party into a less coherent movement -- hey, look at those damn bankers! If only they hadn't been so greedy, we might never be in this situation. And GM? Its smug, fatcat management sort of forced poor populist Obama to take over a couple of car companies, didn't it?

That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point. I do think the media coordinates these stories, coordinates its angles, coordinates its spin. Some of them engage in this conspiracy halfway oblivious -- they are so stupid and without critical thought it doesn't even occur to them there's another legitimate viewpoint counter to their own -- but most know exactly what they are doing. They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party.

They are nothing short of the disinformation and propaganda organ of a corrupt, hostile, anti-american force. Just as terrorist groups invent "legal" fronts to be their legitimate spokesman -- Yasser Arafat invents the PLO to be the propaganda arm of Black September -- the media is nothing more than the supposedly-independent propaganda arm of Obama's Organizing for America.

But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think.


Posted by: Ace at 12:10 PM | Comments (245)
Post contains 1891 words, total size 12 kb.

1 God damn, an entire post that's one giant hyperlink! I like it.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:12 PM (laMp7)

2 Ace, thanks for the new thread, but this has got to be a record amount of loose shit.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:12 PM (RD7QR)

3 the spitting and racial slurs story convinced me like no other than the lamestream media and the congressional libs are conspiring to silence any opposition from the Tea Party.


fuck em, I will not comply.

Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 07, 2010 12:13 PM (erIg9)

4 Loose shit in aisle 1!

Posted by: Grunt2Jag at April 07, 2010 12:14 PM (Yr6lx)

5 I can has proper HTML coding?

Posted by: taylork at April 07, 2010 12:14 PM (0Hn5w)

6
heh, maybe some of these guys in the media are beginning to realize it's bad business to insult and alienate 50% of the market.

Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:14 PM (uFokq)

7 In the 'Big Tent' spirit, I propose renaming it the 'Mad Hatter's Tea Party' as to attract libertarians, Miss Manners readers, and Tim Burton fans ...

Posted by: Adriane at April 07, 2010 12:15 PM (lzjTy)

8 6: naw. I have that business model down pat

Posted by: Charles Johnson, Bicycle Molesting Pervert And Science Guy at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (ilfw7)

9 Look at me!  I was quoted on the smart military blog, Ace of Spades HQ.  Next thing ya know.. I will be read on the floor of the Congress!

Posted by: IreneFingIrene at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (MFQJZ)

10
You know what else plays into the hands of the critics?

The shit made up by the critics in the first place.

Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:16 PM (uFokq)

11 This shit's looser than our assholes.

Posted by: Loose Change at April 07, 2010 12:17 PM (d52BR)

12 Man, that's just scary. It's like blood spatter for a blog.

Posted by: Rocks at April 07, 2010 12:17 PM (Q1lie)

13

but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?

 

You have to turn around really fast.  Hardly anyone can do it.

Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 12:18 PM (gLSaO)

14
One time I followed a piece of pizza right into a piece of ass.

Posted by: 1st Black Prezident at April 07, 2010 12:19 PM (Oxen1)

15 Since the guy who says En Fuego! is not here... En Fuego!

Posted by: David in San Diego at April 07, 2010 12:20 PM (/U/Mr)

16 "deviant sexual habits"?  I wouldn't call it "deviant."

Posted by: FUBAR at April 07, 2010 12:20 PM (1fanL)

17 My predicted pivot comes true.

Posted by: joeindc44 at April 07, 2010 12:20 PM (QxSug)

18 I feel like such a douchebag Ann Arborite tool quoting Gahndi, but when he (allegedly) said:

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.

He may have had a point...

...we just can't let the subtly redefine the movement as Ace suggests they will.  Populism is a dangerous thing.

Posted by: Fortunate Son at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (trlZM)

19 ace, you on the rag? I only see red.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (pLTLS)

20 but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?

Go back in time two seconds.

Posted by: mesablue at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (jc7YC)

21 oh, and there was racism at the TeaParties after all

Posted by: eddiebear at April 07, 2010 12:22 PM (ilfw7)

22 One time I followed a piece of pizza right into a piece of ass.

Still on the downlow? How do you find the time?

Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (nxUYP)

23 Breitbart's $10K offer was rasied first to $20K and then to $100K at the Searchlight rally.  Still no takers...

Posted by: Fritz at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (0lKCV)

24
btw, can't believe I'm saying this, but...

Rudy Guilliani 2012! Rudy has been on fire this week. And I, for one, appreciate it.

Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:23 PM (uFokq)

25 If you can't beat 'em, co-opt 'em.

Posted by: bergerbilder at April 07, 2010 12:24 PM (2lks9)

26

There continues to be a $10,000 bounty for anyone producing evidence of these slurs

Breitbart upped the ante to $100,000 to the united negro college fund.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:24 PM (cniXs)

27 This is a distraction!!!  While you talking about this, Obama is ruining our economy and, unlike me and only me, NONE OF YOU CARE!!!!!

Posted by: sumyungguy at April 07, 2010 12:24 PM (IHbof)

28

Settle down, settle down. You get this from Fox News?  John Lewis, Emmanuel Cleaver, Barney Frank and Andrew Carson are very nice people.

Get some balance. Read the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Posted by: Senator Tom Coburn (R)-OK at April 07, 2010 12:25 PM (sWZxV)

29 Rudy Guilliani 2012! Rudy has been on fire this week. And I, for one, appreciate it.

Can I run his campaign again?

Posted by: The guy who ran his last campaign. at April 07, 2010 12:25 PM (nxUYP)

30 Well said.

Especially the last several paragraphs of your analysis.

Posted by: Mondo at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (uTRs/)

31 Can I run his campaign again?

Posted by: The guy who ran his last campaign. at April 07, 2010 04:25 PM (nxUYP)


I thought you were already running Romney's?

Posted by: Rocks at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (Q1lie)

32

The strange new love is a result of it no longer being possible to hide the amount of Democrats and Independants in the Tea Party. That was the big reason for the discredit. if every day shlubs knew, they would join too

CNN and media saw the writing on the wall long ago and did everything they could to spin it to keep momentum from building. Epic fail on their part. They know the can no longer hide it from the public. They are now trying to spin a narrative for the huge Dem losss that is coming. The MSM can blow it out their ass. No one watched and read them before, they won't now. I can't wait for them to shutter their doors

Posted by: ex Dem at April 07, 2010 12:26 PM (0cUgO)

33 Since from that last post we are on a music roll about about this for the new media meme for the Tea Party?

"Killing Them Softly With This Song".

Posted by: Vic at April 07, 2010 12:27 PM (QrA9E)

34
I'd like to get all the top advisors to Fred, Rudy, Mitt, and John McCain together and bang their fucking heads together.

Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (uFokq)

35 That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point. I do think the media coordinates these stories, coordinates its angles, coordinates its spin.

Journolist. Only a true idiot would think it was the only of its kind, or that it hasn't been replaced.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (IuKAf)

36

"Killing Them Softly With This Song".

Raaaacist. That's about her affair with Teh Rev. J. Jackson.

Posted by: laceyunderalls at April 07, 2010 12:28 PM (pLTLS)

37 If there are not many white people attending 'black' churches, does that make the parishioners racists like the tea partiers?

Posted by: Countrysquire at April 07, 2010 12:29 PM (rDvlp)

38 Uh-huh. Yep. So? What are you going to do about it, Rethuglican?

Posted by: Smug Media Asshole at April 07, 2010 12:29 PM (xWGQr)

39 Couldn't not have said it better myself, Ace. Would have said it less words.

http://tinyurl.com/yrqwmz

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (LdYLm)

40 3 the spitting and racial slurs story convinced me like no other than the lamestream media and the congressional libs are conspiring to silence any opposition from the Tea Party.


fuck em, I will not comply.

Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Professional Debate Team at April 07, 2010 04:13 PM (erIg9)

I agree. In fact, I believe they're trying to silence opposition no matter where it originates.

Posted by: conscious and telling libs to fuck off on a daily basis at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (YVZlY)

41 I just  hope we don't fall into the trap that "oh great the media really do love us" shit. Any tea-party member has to always have the constant opinion that the media is against them. Use them if you can, but never forget that they are the enemy. Catch that McCain?

Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:30 PM (nxUYP)

42 Still, many critics look at a tea party crowd and just see a "fantasy-based" movement of "angry white people," as Monitor Facebook commentator Bill Downey points out, sez he.

Here's the comment those quotes come from:

Bill Downey Tea Party has introduced something very sour in their blend. And The Tea Party title is just so fantasy based How bout angry white people? April 2 at 3:23pm

It's on some NPR personality's facebook page, not CSM's.

But it's so quotable, isn't it?

And where it comes from isn't important, is it?

And it's the only usage of "fantasy-based" regarding the tea parties anywhere on earth, but it's "many," isn't it?

Eh?

Posted by: oblig. at April 07, 2010 12:31 PM (x7Ao8)

43 Uh-huh. Yep. So?

What are you going to do about it, Rethuglican?

Posted by: Smug Media Asshole at April 07, 2010 04:29 PM (xWGQr

 

I think I will continue not buying your newspapers or watching your shows, thanks.

Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 12:32 PM (gLSaO)

44 Ace, I'm not sure about your analysis. How would the LSM co-opt the tea partiers? They're hostile to the media from the get-go. The best tactic for the LSM is to ignore them completely (or else manufacture some kind of conspiracy or militia movement story -- "key Tea Party leaders found to have militia movement ties!"

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:32 PM (RD7QR)

45 Ace hits another one out of the park!! 

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:32 PM (Kt5vQ)

46 The entire thing was therefore a hoax.

Posted by: Rachel Maddow at April 07, 2010 04:30 PM (BiCQw)


But, the stories surrounding the rumours that I have testicles, sadly are not false.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 12:33 PM (nxUYP)

47 Fine, we love you, now shut up.

Posted by: The MSM at April 07, 2010 12:33 PM (MMC8r)

48 If there are not many white people attending 'black' churches, does that make the parishioners racists like the tea partiers?

I'll have to check the handbook, but I'm pretty sure a) white people with no interested in attending black churches are racists for avoiding blacks, and b) white people who try to attend are racists for thinking they should be allowed to "insert themselves into a black space." Something about "privilege."

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (mR7mk)

49

but how on earth does one "follow" oneself?

You have to turn around really fast.  Hardly anyone can do it.



My dog tries to do that on occasion.  It's pretty hilarious.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (Kt5vQ)

50 Let's take the opportunity to reiterate that the lamestream media is not your friend, will never be, and is in fact not a source of news but propaganda. Conservatives who whine that "we should stop talking about press bias, it's getting old" are a doctor who says prostate cancer is very common, a part of life and nothing to be worried about. Exposing the propaganda emanating from 90% of our media is an indispensable weapon.

Posted by: George Orwell at April 07, 2010 12:35 PM (AZGON)

51 Never fear, the WaPo continues to shill for the haters, and they have found a useful black "conservative" to assist them:

http://tinyurl.com/ye3gfzk

Posted by: Chris R at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (AO4qz)

52 "Rommel you magnificant bastard, I read your book."

Posted by: bman at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (xPqkd)

53 >>> How would the LSM co-opt the tea partiers? I don't think they can, I'm talking about what they will try. They will try to channel Tea Party anger into more productive (i.e., leftist) directions. This is just based on the containment/cooptation paradigm. Usually cooptation is the next tactic attempted.

Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 12:36 PM (i6ROy)

54 Ace, I'm not sure about your analysis. How would the LSM co-opt the tea partiers?


It's worked on the Senate GOP time and time again.  The libs will try it, because it's the only playbook they have.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (Kt5vQ)

55 Come on back to me I finally understand what you're mad about and I also  promise not to c#m in your moth this time.

Posted by: LSM at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (tf9Ne)

56

ACE, you tawk real purty with that mouth'un yurs.

But there's too many notes  

uh..words,that is.  Still real purty.

Posted by: Kelly at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (V7JkK)

57 I faced racial insults and was spat upon....when I came home from Vietnam. One of them looked a lot like a middle aged Nancy Pelosi.

Posted by: Black Tea Partier at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (AO4qz)

58

That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point.

I don't know if it counts as a conspiracy. That requires actual thought. This is more following orders blindly.

Posted by: Mama AJ at April 07, 2010 12:37 PM (XdlcF)

59 What Chris R said.

Posted by: Dr. Spank at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (I1/U/)

60 O/T:  Drudge has someone being arrested for threatening Pelosi over the HC bill.   Yesterday wasn't someone else arrested?   Are people stupid enough to actually threaten public officials or have the laws somehow been changed and anything against what they say is right subjects someone to arrest?

Posted by: curious at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (p302b)

61

If the media really wanted to damage the Tea Party they'd simply stop running stories about them. Limit their exposure. If the negative attacks didn't work, that means that most people are on to their little game.

Not that that would actually damage the party but from their standpoint, that's the most effective thing they could do.

Posted by: ErikW at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (IfNz5)

62

So CNN is now the official.

MOB,

KKK

NAZI,

RACIST,

RIGHTWING,

BITTER CLINGER,

HATER,

NON-DIVERSITY station???

Maybe that Susan Rosegans BITCH can get her shitty job back.

 

Posted by: paul c at April 07, 2010 12:38 PM (Vqruj)

63 "They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party."

Why is that do you think?

I'll give you a hint: It pays better than being an unbiased reporter (or an intellectual bagman for conservatives, if you will).

Say ... I'd like to have a job writing stories or blog posts with a rightward slant. Which paper will hire me? Which conservative websites are hiring right-ward pundits? What salary are they offering?

The Democrats have a captive media working for it because Republicans won't buy the fucking newspaper companies and fire the fucking liberal staff and hire conservative writers and editors. If you're not willing to pay reporters to write unbiased news, they're going to write biased news for the highest bidder.

They got families to feed.

Quit whinging. Start winning by fighting a better fight.

Hire conservative writers and let the best writers win.

How much are you paying the co-bloggers, Ace?

Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (VRJIW)

64 Exposing the propaganda emanating from 90% of our media is an indispensable weapon.

If we are ever to succeed at getting our country back on track, the credibility of the State Propaganda Organs must be destroyed.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (Kt5vQ)

65

"Pelosi in Bethesda for Emergency Surgery"

Washington Post, April 7, 2010

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was admitted shortly after noon today for emergency surgery to remove the testicles she inherited from Senator Ted Kennedy after his death. 

With health care passed, Speaker Pelosi will no longer require Senator Kennedy's wrinkly testicles, and they will be returned to the senator for placement in the Kennedy family crypt. 

Posted by: Fish at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (M5t+h)

66
Never fear, the WaPo continues to shill for the haters, and they have found a useful black "conservative" to assist them:

Let me guess: Pain in my Colin Powell?
brb...

Posted by: Rosie the Jetson's robot at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (uFokq)

67

The MSM may be assholes but they aren't stupid... eh... too much anyway.

Even they can see where shithead is taking this country and they want to make friends with the only people who can stop him.

They want someone to talk to them when the blade falls on the dems disasterous stint at the helm.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 07, 2010 12:39 PM (r1h5M)

68 The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).  I wish the Tea Party would be up front about thinking Social Security is unconstitional and/or socialist and/or communist.  Be open.  Be honest.  And then see how the tepid public opinion on the Tea Party turns ice cold.

Posted by: Sally Ann Cavanaugh at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (FRErk)

69 Excellent fisking and analysis, ace.

One aside that I found very confusing (I had to check it twice) that has nothing to do with anything was this line by Taranto:

"The headline we've given this column is a phrase coined by the conservative writer Tom Bethell to refer to the media's attitude toward conservatives who veer leftward."

"Strange new respect" is phrase coined by someone, lately?  That reminds me of Nike trying to trademark "Just do it" as if it wasn't a popular phrase for many, many, many years.  I don't get these people, sometimes.  I know that Taranto thought the application of this well-known phrase to some specific group might have been a first, but you find firsts of that sort with many words in many sentences.  These claims of laughable originality are the hallmarks of medicre minds.
----------------------------------------------
They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party.

This is true, though one has to stretch the meaning of "information" a bit, but the media is really more about The Precedent than about the democrat party on this.  They will fry the dems in any spat between them and The Precedent.  The Lame streams are worse, in this respect, than Pravda ever was.  The lame streams do all of their propagandizing by choice.  At least, Pravda had the excuse that they were toiling under the boot of the Soviet government.  Our neo-Pravda has no such excuse.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (N49h9)

70 I have an idiot brother in law (true definition: he's the idiot that one of my sister in laws' married). A self proclaimed 'independent' that happens to spew talking points of the DNC. He believes that the I-pad is going to be the salvation of magazines. But then, he takes the Washington Post as gospel. And he still believes in the Texas ANG memo.

To such people, there is no contradiction. it borders on the pathological.

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:40 PM (1O93r)

71 The Media may need to punch down and reconcile with the tea party.

Posted by: DavidM at April 07, 2010 12:41 PM (R/e5b)

72

I think one of the reasons for the new "respect" is that the media threw everything at the Tea Partiers..including the kitchen sink...

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

..first they tried to marginalize us by mis-represnting the numbers..then they tried to mock us by calling us names...all trying to paint us as ignorant white trash..

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

..then the racism charges..based on mis-reporting on the make up of the participants..and deliberate mis-interpretation of things like signage

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

...then they tried to make the claim we were trying to organize as a political party to run candidates in order to incite internal dissent

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

..then they tried to make it seem that any threats and violence..real or otherwise..were by Tea Partiers

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

..then they conspired to propagate the lies of racial name-calling of and the spitting on black congressman..liberal black congressman...civil-rights hero black congressman

..which would only serve to create and inflame racial tension

AND.WE.DID.NOT.BACK.DOWN

We are growing despite all this and more.

Posted by: beedubya at April 07, 2010 12:41 PM (AnTyA)

73 sure some of the teabaggers are soccer moms but they dont know any better, do they ever read? Their husbands bring them to the rallies as props. The media is just reporting, video cameras dont lie. But its a good thing journalists are being friendlier now who wants the savages to get even more violent and racist.

Posted by: palin steele at April 07, 2010 12:42 PM (bN5ZU)

74 But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think.

So you're going to quit telling us to hold our noses and vote for RINOS, Ace?

Posted by: Ken at April 07, 2010 12:43 PM (vT7rz)

75 "Excellent fisking and analysis, ace."

It's kind of a pointless isn't it?

The media is biased towards Democrats? Do fucking tell!

It's not fisking. It's whinging.

They're winning, and we're whining about it. The "fisk" is the equivalent of a schoolyard loser yelling "no fair!" I want to win ... not whine.

Republicans have to put up or shut up. Buy these companies and fire these people. That's the Chicago Way. That's how you get Capone.

You put theirs in the morgue.

Or you can be a crybaby.

Your choice.

Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:44 PM (VRJIW)

76 Remind me to send you some cash, Ace.

Good job.

Posted by: Dianna at April 07, 2010 12:44 PM (qrFCz)

77 If this post was a ham sandwich, Mama Cass would choke to death trying to finish it.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (qYHPu)

78 Sally Ann, baby, Social Security is UNDERWATER. Wait'll public opinion gets a load of that.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (OyTrL)

79

...and furthermore it proves that people don't like having sexual slurs meaning "ball-sucking" tossed at them by their media sources.

I don't get the insult here.

Posted by: Andrew Sullivan (apology to be supplied at a later time) at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (QKKT0)

80 Too funny.

Posted by: mesablue at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (jc7YC)

81

Citizens not engaged in grasping identity politics who demand accountability and common sense from their elected representatives.

That is some dangerous stuff right there.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 07, 2010 12:45 PM (B+qrE)

82 80 If this post was a ham sandwich, Mama Cass would choke to death trying to finish it.

Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 07, 2010 04:45 PM (qYHPu)


If she'd only shared that sandwich with me we'd both be alive today.

Posted by: Karen Carpenter at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (OyTrL)

83 Despite the initial loose shit that's a damn good write-up there Ace.  I agree entirely.  The media has been a willing accomplice for way too long without people throwing it in their faces that we don't only know they are, but putting the examples of how they are doing it out there for the world to see.  It isn't enough to say "The media is in the bag for Democrats", you need people like you breaking it down piece by piece to expose how they are doing it, and why they do it.  Well done.

Posted by: Grunt2Jag at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (Yr6lx)

84 The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).  I wish the Tea Party would be up front about thinking Social Security is unconstitional and/or socialist and/or communist.  Be open.  Be honest.  And then see how the tepid public opinion on the Tea Party turns ice cold. Posted by: Sally Ann Cavanaugh

Oh goodie. Let's see, extreme, right-winger, use of tear down, invocation of Social Security. Nice, compact use of smears, labels and straw-men.A nice test run of the 2010 Democrat' please don't take democracy to its' logical extent' campaign.

As for being honest and open, I defy you to prove that the administration of the manufactured Messiah is more so than a grass roots effort. Idiot.

The 'are what they are' is a dazzling piece of logic. Or bupkas. I'm going with bupkas.

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (1O93r)

85 The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid). I wish the Tea Party would be up front about thinking Social Security is unconstitional and/or socialist and/or communist. Be open. Be honest. And then see how the tepid public opinion on the Tea Party turns ice cold. Posted by: Sally Ann Cavanaugh at April 07, 2010 04:40 PM (FRErk) Do you have any evidence whatsoever to buttress this contention? I think many of the Tea Partiers probably draw SS and Medicaid. It's OBAMA who's destroying these programs in order to form a socialist nation.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (RD7QR)

86 The ewok speaks the truth!  Great post.

Posted by: John Galt at April 07, 2010 12:46 PM (F/4zf)

87 Having a leaderless 'tea party movement' has been a huge plus for the tea party.  The enemies of America haven't been able to isolate the target, freeze it, etc, etc, as ordered by Alinsky.  Just make sure Dick Armey stays the heck away from it for the forseeable future.

Posted by: Boots at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (06JTY)

88

Backing down is for faggots.

Posted by: paul c at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (Vqruj)

89 Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 04:44 PM (VRJIW)

You punch down by posting here.

You're so much better than this blog.

You should start your own.

I will read it and post lots of comments there.

You are teh awesome.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (T0NGe)

90 Sarah Palin has warned over and over again that the tea party movement does not need a leader, it must remain an independent grass roots movement..

So, this latest attack by the MSM is to make the tea party mainstream and therefore part of the system and the latest fad, in hopes that the "followers" will lose interest in it.


Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (tr6Dy)

91 I don't think they can, I'm talking about what they will try. They will try to channel Tea Party anger into more productive (i.e., leftist) directions.


Coffee Party, anyone?

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 07, 2010 12:47 PM (VY5KX)

92

Medicare and Social Security are fucking bankrupt you stupid bitch.

So naturally we start SS and MEDICAID on steroids.  Just what we need.

 

Posted by: gus at April 07, 2010 12:48 PM (Vqruj)

93 tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security (1935), Medicare(1965) and Medicaid(1965))

Math is hard!  Let's go trolling!

Posted by: Barbie Ann Cavenaugh at April 07, 2010 12:48 PM (mR7mk)

94

71

How's that social security thing going? Plenty of money in it to pay out to the elderly who paid in all their lives? How bout Medicare? It's doing well? No. It's bankrupt too? Gee, it looks like these social welfare plans don't work out too well. Since they have such a terrific record, let's put 1/6 of the economy into their hands too......

Oh, and read something besides Kos. The tea partiers are not extreme. They reflect the population of america within one percentage point.

And "social security" is socialist. What part of "social" do you not understand? Do you even know what it means? I doubt it. Look it up you silly girl and then see where it leads.

Idiot

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:49 PM (HbSqq)

95 And then somejerk saves the day by quoting (badly) a mediocre movie. I took this to be an analysis of recent media trends. Given the nature of politics, information and the media, constant analysis is needed.

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:49 PM (1O93r)

96 It's kind of a pointless isn't it?

No.

The media is biased towards Democrats? Do fucking tell!

In this case it isn't Democrats but The Precedent they are working for.  I said that in my comment.

It's not fisking. It's whinging.

Never heard the term.

They're winning, and we're whining about it. The "fisk" is the equivalent of a schoolyard loser yelling "no fair!" I want to win ... not whine.

Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 04:44 PM (VRJIW)

I have to split with you on this.  This isn't whining.  It's analysis, and an excellent analysis, at that.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (N49h9)

97

...informational bagmen

I like it...I almost have the talking points down for most stories before they report on them.

Political Hack is also synonomous

Posted by: Ministry of Fiction at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (sE4Zb)

98 Oh great, it's a chick beat down, and they're the best.  Sic 'um honey. No scratching eyes or smacking hooters.

Posted by: Fish at April 07, 2010 12:50 PM (M5t+h)

99 CSM article: ...tea party crowd... Sound familiar? Could be because one John F. Kerry (D-Traitor) uses the exact same phrase: “imagine what Washington would look like if a bunch of new senators – inspired by Sarah Palin and the tea party crowd – took over.” (December 2009, Kerry fundraising letter).

Posted by: Fresh Air at April 07, 2010 12:51 PM (UUDXo)

100

the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.

Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.

 

Posted by: kallisto at April 07, 2010 12:51 PM (+FkcS)

101 "A hundred years" is anything that happened before they were in middle school. Must be the black jesus math again.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (HbSqq)

102 If the Democrats passed legislation mandating the construction of concentration camps in every state in the nation and it took the Republicans twenty years to overturn it, Barbie Ann up there would be screaming that the extreme right-wingers were trying to "tear down decades of federal law".

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (OyTrL)

103 You are teh awesome.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout at April 07, 2010 04:47 PM (T0NGe)

Heh.  You're not so bad yourself.

Posted by: FUBAR at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (1fanL)

104 That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point. I do think the media coordinates these stories, coordinates its angles, coordinates its spin. Some of them engage in this conspiracy halfway oblivious -- they are so stupid and without critical thought it doesn't even occur to them there's another legitimate viewpoint counter to their own -- but most know exactly what they are doing. They are not reporters, they are informational bagmen for the corrupt Democratic Party.

It's been going on for years and we all know it. That explains almost exclusively why legacy media has lost and continues to lose audience, money, and influence. It took a foreign capitalist, Murdoch, to break the mold and really accelerate the demise of the LSM. The domestic stranglehold of information by liberals and the academia that fed it was so tight that no one could, or even dared, challenge the paradigm and feed the conservative audience. It just wasn't done.

And now we see the doubling down by the LSM to protect their chosen one. It's just not a secret anymore and the cries of "racism" have become so abused as to be the equivalent of "the boy who cried wolf." It was all a lie that no one believes. The Tea Party-ers did not back down because they recognize a) the stakes and b) the truth.

The LSM can FOAD. It cannot - CANNOT - earn back our trust. Oh, sure, conceptually it could, but it would take years of honest reporting to establish credibility. That institution does not have it in them. It is not in its DNA, so that beast must die. Or be killed. Hopefully from orbit with nukes, just to be sure.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 12:52 PM (swuwV)

105 No scratching eyes or smacking hooters. Posted by: Fish

You watch what you wanna watch, and us men will watch what we wanna watch.
Ignore the bucket of cold water ladies; its only here to wet down the shirts.

Get it on!!

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 12:53 PM (1O93r)

106 Actually, one thing the media can do to follow the Alinsky Method (TM) is to CREATE a Tea Party leader or leaders from thin air -- just choose somebody unappealing, set him up to be The Face of the Tea Party Movement and then knock him/her/them down.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 12:54 PM (RD7QR)

107

If SOMEONE FUCKS ME, I STAY FUCKED!

Posted by: paul c's ass at April 07, 2010 12:54 PM (Vqruj)

108

The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).

No sweety, they are just noting what everyone here also does on a regular basis:  We are going to have to pay for all that as currently configured.  And we can't.

Now please go get Circa a sammich.  Adults who can do math are talking.

 

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (B+qrE)

109

promise not to c#m in your moth this time.

Wow, that is some kinky shit you are into there.  Silence of the Lambs fan?

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (cniXs)

110

Eeeesh Ace easy on us people at work who don't have time to read all that, your friigin prolific but c'mon. I think what your saying and I know you morons will correct me if I'm wrong is that the msm is simply changing its tactic from demonizing to mainstreaming the Tea Party in an attempt to make the movement seem old hat and contribed to that point that people just ignore them, like a fad thats run its course. (which is actually something I concern about...often) 

Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 12:55 PM (pr+up)

111 I can sum up Ace's point up in three words.

Posted by: Admiral Ackbar at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (U37Ux)

112 There is nothing more revolting than an unshaved, dope smoking, unlaid hippie chick with her stretched out tramp stamp and organic soy milk lecturing adults about "socialism". She needs to look at the cockroaches skittering around her kitchen and realize she is one.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (HbSqq)

113 110 Actually, one thing the media can do to follow the Alinsky Method (TM) is to CREATE a Tea Party leader or leaders from thin air -- just choose somebody unappealing, set him up to be The Face of the Tea Party Movement and then knock him/her/them down.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 04:54

They tried to annoint Palin as the leader...but they already punched themselves out on her

Posted by: beedubya at April 07, 2010 12:56 PM (AnTyA)

114

The Tea Party people are what they are: extreme right-wingers who want to tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid).

----------------------

Eh...sounds good to me.

Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (pr+up)

115 Wow, no fold on that monumental article. Ace must be really serious about this, "Media is Conspiring to enslave America (For it's own good)" angle.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (0q2P7)

116 Actually, one thing the media can do to follow the Alinsky Method (TM) is to CREATE a Tea Party leader or leaders from thin air -- just choose somebody unappealing, set him up to be The Face of the Tea Party Movement and then knock him/her/them down.

I expect this to be the next step.

Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (tr6Dy)

117 66  Ace, my offer still stands.  Ban fuckity fuck fuck and I hit paypay for $50.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (cniXs)

118 Coffee Party, anyone?

Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 07, 2010 04:47 PM (VY5KX)

That was a pretty short-lived embarrassment, wasn't it?  It was amazing how a group of 5 people sitting at a table at a Starbucks got articles written about their "rally".  I remember, from 9/12 in DC, how there was almost no coverage at all.  Even O'Reilly was babbling about "60,000 to 75,000 in attendance", which he has never bothered to correct or retract.

Also, didn't the dems/Precedent try some "brown" something group before the coffee party? 

I like the way the dems keep trying to say that the Tea Partiers hate everyone and aren't concentrating on dems. Whistling past the graveyard ...  But, the joke's on us, as the left will leave a wasteland in their wake.  The left, and particularly Precedent Hussein, are pulling their Saddam Hussein impression, now, when he intentionally dumped 40,000,000 barrels of oil into the gulf and lit just about every oil well in Kuwait on fire. 

The left is going all-out scorched-Earth on this, since they are strapped to The Precedent, who is a suicide bomber on his run.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 12:57 PM (N49h9)

119 "It's analysis, and an excellent analysis, at that."

What is it analysing? That the media doesn't play fair?

No fair!

What does that sound like to you? How did the pussy yelling "no fair" in the schoolyard come off to you?

My point isn't that the analysis is faulty. It is that it is pointless and wastes time and energy better spent. It doesn't really break any new ground; doesn't convert any undecided voters. And it stands in the place of commentary that could convince voters that America is on the wrong track ... such as a discussion of the media prepping the landscape for a VAT tax by interviewing Paul Volcker.

Or 20% unemployment.

That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..

Posted by: someguy at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (VRJIW)

120

I really liked this post, it's well thought out and right on target.

And the only clowns in evidence are the media.

Posted by: ParanoidGirlInSeattle at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (RZ8pf)

121

Good job, Ace. In retrospect, the election of The Vapid One® was coreographed and coordinated: bash Bush 24-7, claim he stole an election, blame him for hurricanes and mine explosions, call him an idiot and a monkey, mock and deride him every simgle time he speaks, and sure enough, you can turn an entire country against him.

It's not a conspiracy if it's true.

The same thing is being done now to conservatives. The difference is, now we know what the tactics are and the LSM knows that we know. Look at their dwindling ratings. The jig is up.

And yes, I know that's a racist statement.

I denounce myself.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (i3AsK)

122 Americans have many choices to get their news from. During the primetime newshour the only center right outlet Fox News gets less than 10% of the viewers. Most Americans WANT center left news.

Posted by: Math sez at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (mhD2v)

123
What's this?

Randi Rhodes & Joy Behar, together, talking shit about us? Now that's a formula for successful television programming.

Posted by: Uniblab at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (uFokq)

124 Well said Ace. The Media is the enemy. An enemy power couldn't do this much damage if they actually invaded and took us over. I except of course, the few bastions of decent journalism out there like Fox and the WSJ. Fuck the rest and the horse they rode in on.

Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 12:58 PM (tm/sN)

125 I haven't seen any evidence that the n-word was used on Capitol Hill during the final debate, but I still haven't seen any reporters ask Congressman Jesse Jackson if he plans to reveal what he recorded on that day?

He walked through the crowd to Capitol Hill and then back from Capitol Hill holding two Blackberry Curve 8330 models in front of him like cameras.

He might raise the easiest $100K from Breitbart at a time of his choosing.

Say Jackson has the statements on tape.  He can release them whenever he wants.  Like, oh, the first week of October.

Posted by: wtfci at April 07, 2010 01:00 PM (+zo63)

126 It's not a conspiracy if it's true

No it's still a conspiracy it's not a conspiracy theory if it's true.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:00 PM (0q2P7)

127
Posted by: Math sez

STFU, dunce

Posted by: Uniblab at April 07, 2010 01:00 PM (uFokq)

128

"But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think."

If by 'undeducated' you mean, 'lacking in college', then I think you've got things backward: generally, more college implies less-independent-minded.  But if you change that to "unintelligent and easy to command", then I think you've got it right.

Posted by: Mark in Portland at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (BD2Ek)

129 104

the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.

Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.

 posted by: kallisto


I wish them the very best of British luck with that. Really, I do.

Speaking as a small, slightly plump, middle-aged, glasses-wearing woman with a cane.

Posted by: Dianna at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (qrFCz)

130 Actually, one thing the media can do to follow the Alinsky Method (TM) is to CREATE a Tea Party leader or leaders from thin air -- just choose somebody unappealing, set him up to be The Face of the Tea Party Movement and then knock him/her/them down.

They've already tried this -- remember that guy from Texas who's only known to people who hate the Tea Parties, but who apparently organized them all?

(No, not Ron Paul -- the other racist one.)

Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (IuKAf)

131 Good, the post formatting is fixed.  I thought for a while there that I had blinded myself with the Head of Helios.

Just as terrorist groups invent "legal" fronts to be their legitimate spokesman -- Yasser Arafat invents the PLO to be the propaganda arm of Black September -- the media is nothing more than the supposedly-independent propaganda arm of Obama's Organizing for America.

I like this analogy.

But I think the media is going to find out that the right they so despise is not quite so "uneducated and easy to command" as they might think.

As shown by the media's declining ratings.  A thing of beauty.


Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at April 07, 2010 01:01 PM (c0A3e)

132 Isn't there a molerat that needs felching somewhere ?

Posted by: Bill D. Cat at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (a9UO0)

133

Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..

Except everyone knows that Fox News isn't really a news station. 

Their brand of media bias is not recognized...


Posted by: Ministry of Fiction at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (sE4Zb)

134 That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..

You are welcome to go piss on someone else's blog if you don't like the content here.


Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 01:02 PM (tr6Dy)

135
It really is his time and energy.  He can spend it as he likes.

"someguy" is a champion of liberty who spends his time telling other people how they should spend their time.

Rather like "lonewhacko".

Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:03 PM (IuKAf)

136 someguy, Please list the actions you've undertaken on behalf of the movement today. As we each sit here with baited breath waiting for you to instruct us on how we have disappointed and failed you each day, and directed our energies improperly, I would like your sage instruction as to what you've done today, so that I can be JUST. LIKE. YOU.

Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (i6ROy)

137 Most americans don't watch, listen to, or read the news. They "hear" stuff between songs on FM radio, they read a headline through the glass on the newspaper kiosk, they see what's at the top of their home page, they listen to the "smart guy" at the coffee shop, they see CNN scroll by in a bar or an airport. They have no f-ing clue what is going on and the girls are worse than the guys. If "jackass" shouted some news, the informed numbers would skyrocket. However, they do know how american idol is going, what movies are coming out, and stuff about Bradjalina.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (HbSqq)

138 I think the media has become International Pravda long ago.  Thanks to RR, the U.S.S.R fell apart and now we Poland, Czech, Slovakia, Germany, ect.  Unfornately we are stuck with rats and roaches that came out from under the wreakage.  So now the U.S.S.R. is gone, but we know have the U.S.S.A.

Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (pU4D7)

139

That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..

The point is to wake up the brainwashed middle that doesn't know it's being mind fucked every single day. And that's worth repeating. Every fucking day.

Repetition works. Just look at what the left did to Bush through fucking repetition for eight fucking years.

Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (tm/sN)

140 Call the queers! What??

Posted by: jeannie at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (GdalM)

141 I can't believe that anyone would be dumb enough to state that the TPers are angry white people that denigrate SS, Medicare and Medicaid. I've been to two and half the people there were on one or two of these programs. Why would they be protesting them? I'll tell you what I heard and that is that they don't want deadbeats and illegal aliens to take the money from Medicare and Social Security that they have paid into the programs. Is there one looney asshole that thinks fraud and waste in Medicare is going to pay for a cup of coffee? Is there a cousin to the looney asshole that thinks adding 30,000,000 million people to the health care roles is going to make costs go down? If the federal mandate on buying insurance fails at the SCOTUS, then the whole house of cards will fall too. One final thought on why the media are playing nice to the TP is that they are like drug addicts and are crying out for help and sanity. The TP they are finally realizing is the constitutional rock they need.

Posted by: inspectorudy at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (Vo1wX)

142 My first comment ever. Stuff like this is why I read AceofSpades. There is no one like Ace.  Great, insightful, entertaining analysis.

Posted by: dc at April 07, 2010 01:04 PM (jODM8)

143

I do think this is the first time I'm heard the press called an OPFOR of America. I don't disagree.

Tokyo Rose had nothing on these traitors.

Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 01:05 PM (dQdrY)

144 I can sum up Ace's point up in three words.

Sally Cavanaugh......Whore.

Posted by: Samuel Adams at April 07, 2010 01:05 PM (nxUYP)

145 Give me the list, someguy. Because from what I can tell you're just an underemployed jagoff sitting in his parents' basement telling other people to do shit you don't do yourself.

Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:05 PM (i6ROy)

146

Because from what I can tell you're just an underemployed jagoff sitting in his parents' basement telling other people to do shit you don't do yourself.

See? Just like "lonewhacko".

Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:06 PM (IuKAf)

147

141 That's what we should be analyzing today. Not whining about media bias. Everybody who cares about media bias is already aware of media bias..

DUDE...its a blog!! keep it in your pants sparky all will be discussed in time. If you really wanna do somthing call your local rep and give him an earful. We are here to exchange ideas so we can do the same...get it?

  

Posted by: dananjcon at April 07, 2010 01:06 PM (pr+up)

148

the LSM is just playing dead until after April 15 when SEIU goons and anarchists disrupt the planned tea party events.

Then new manufactured incidents will again scream from the headlines.

 

 

That is my fear also.  The unions and Dear Leader's other organized thugs will provoke and push us to a point that the only way to protect our voice is to start pushing back.  I hope it doesn't come to that, but this regime will stop at nothing to remain in power.  Including starting something on a national level that requires canceling the Nov. elections because of a "national emergency".  We must stay awake and stay alert for I fear the worst is coming.

Posted by: Soona' at April 07, 2010 01:07 PM (Kjgld)

149

97 tear down over 100 years of federal law (including but not limited to Social Security (1935), Medicare(1965) and Medicaid(1965))

Math is hard!  Let's go trolling!

 

 

75 + 45 + 45 = over a hundred years.  Hah!

Posted by: Callie Ann Souvenir at April 07, 2010 01:07 PM (gLSaO)

150

Americans have many choices to get their news from. During the primetime newshour the only center right outlet Fox News gets less than 10% of the viewers. Most Americans WANT center left news.


Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for April 6, 2010

P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,153,000 viewers
CNN – 423,000 viewers
MSNBC – 374,000 viewers
CNBC – 187,000 viewers
HLN – 284,000 viewers

P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,270,000 viewers
CNN – 491,000 viewers
MSNBC –891,000 viewers
CNBC – 156,000 viewers
HLN –567,000 viewers

So counting wasn't covered in your Math Classes, Sez? Or is it that new lib counting, that only gives each conservative 3/5ths a person?

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:08 PM (0q2P7)

151 Ace, just pull the trigger on someguy. You know you want to, you know it can only benefit everybody, and you know you don't need our consent.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:08 PM (OyTrL)

152

Say Jackson has the statements on tape.  He can manufacture release them whenever he wants.  Like, oh, the first week of October.

 

 

Except everyone knows that Fox News isn't really a news station. 

Their brand of media bias is not recognized...

Give me an example o how their news is biased.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:09 PM (HbSqq)

153 What is it analysing? That the media doesn't play fair?

It's discussing the recent change in the media's reporting on the Tea Party movement.

Posted by: sandy burger at April 07, 2010 01:10 PM (MT+0i)

154 Boots: "Having a leaderless 'tea party movement' has been a huge plus for the tea party. The enemies of America haven't been able to isolate the target, freeze it, etc, etc, as ordered by Alinsky. Just make sure Dick Armey stays the heck away from it for the forseeable future."

+1

This is so spot on. The. Single. Most. powerful component of the movement. Also, it cannot be allowed itself to be coopted by political opportunists. That would kill its effectiveness because then it would become an aggregation of Men rather than Ideas.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 01:10 PM (swuwV)

155 Most americans don't watch, listen to, or read the news. They "hear" stuff between songs on FM radio, they read a headline through the glass on the newspaper kiosk, they see what's at the top of their home page, they listen to the "smart guy" at the coffee shop, they see CNN scroll by in a bar or an airport. They have no f-ing clue what is going on and the girls are worse than the guys. If "jackass" shouted some news, the informed numbers would skyrocket. However, they do know how american idol is going, what movies are coming out, and stuff about Bradjalina.


This.  This is what scares me.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 07, 2010 01:11 PM (mR7mk)

156 145 Most americans don't watch, listen to, or read the news. They "hear" stuff between songs on FM radio, they read a headline through the glass on the newspaper kiosk, they see what's at the top of their home page, they listen to the "smart guy" at the coffee shop, they see CNN scroll by in a bar or an airport. They have no f-ing clue what is going on and the girls are worse than the guys. If "jackass" shouted some news, the informed numbers would skyrocket. However, they do know how american idol is going, what movies are coming out, and stuff about Bradjalina.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 05:04 PM (HbSqq)


Couldn't have said it better.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:11 PM (OyTrL)

157

160  you know you don't need our consent.

This is a prime opportunity for a fundraising drive.  Tell you what Ace, I'll make it $100 for banning fuckity fuck fuck.  Think of all the cases of pudding that will buy.  Come on morons, you can do it.  Pony up.

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 01:12 PM (cniXs)

158

Go Ace!

 

Posted by: d_Utah at April 07, 2010 01:12 PM (wI3LS)

159

...it's not a conspiracy theory if it's true.

I sit corrected. As for the underline in that comment, it should be "single". Loose shit, indeed.

Still, Ace is spot on. We can't believe a word that the LSM says. They are our enemy and should be treated as such: with contempt and suspicion.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy at April 07, 2010 01:13 PM (i3AsK)

160 and stuff about Bradjalina.

What happened!?!?! Don't hold out on us!

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:13 PM (1O93r)

161

145 dagny  Now you are starting to make sumguy look like an idiot.

They lefty meatheads control the schools, univercities, and media.  But we do not have unicorns to fill them in with how foolish and stupid the lefties are. 

Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:14 PM (pU4D7)

162 Although I don't think it's a media conspiracy, more like group think.  They all take their cues from the NYT

Posted by: d_Utah at April 07, 2010 01:14 PM (wI3LS)

163 You cannot have a free country when the instrument that's tasked with giving people the information they need to make informed decisions is wholly in the bag for one side. That fact is so self evident that it needs no further explanation. And the fact that the journalists who willingly participate in this naked game of propaganda continue to do so is evidence that they are the enemies of a free people. They are the domestic enemies that the Oath to the Constitution talks about.

Posted by: LGoPs at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (tm/sN)

164 It's interesting to note that you can start a new blog at Blogger/Blogspot for the low, low price of free. At this new blog, which you can call anything you like, you are free to blog about anything that catches your fancy. I'm looking at someguy when I note this.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (RD7QR)

165 OF COURSE I WANT TO BAN HIM! And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that.

Posted by: ace at April 07, 2010 01:15 PM (i6ROy)

166 170 and stuff about Bradjalina.

What happened!?!?! Don't hold out on us!

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 05:13 PM (1O93r)

Best joke I heard as the late-night wars were reaching their climax a few months ago: Contrary to published reports, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are not splitting up; Brad is merely being replaced by Jay Leno.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:17 PM (OyTrL)

167 The Tea Party folks know who these people are, and what their purpose is, and who they support. And they are unlikely to forget it. The standard motto: Screw the lamestream media.

Posted by: maddogg at April 07, 2010 01:17 PM (OlN4e)

168
lost big, too

Posted by: Uniblab at April 07, 2010 01:17 PM (uFokq)

169 It's interesting to note that you can start a new blog at Blogger/Blogspot for the low, low price of free. At this new blog, which you can call anything you like, you are free to blog about anything that catches your fancy. I'm looking at someguy when I note this.


Problem is, fuckityfuckfuck.com is already taken.

Posted by: mpur in Texas at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (tr6Dy)

170 OF COURSE I WANT TO BAN HIM!

And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that.

Posted by: ace

Do your Harry Reid imitation. Bribe us, and then hold the vote again. I'm sure that something can be arranged. How does the 'First state set-up' sound? It's a bribe with no sales tax!

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (1O93r)

171 And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that.

Run another poll. After the horseshit legal threats someguy hinted at after the first one, I'll bet you'd see a different result.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:18 PM (OyTrL)

172

This is a prime opportunity for a fundraising drive.  Tell you what Ace, I'll make it $100 for banning fuckity fuck fuck.  Think of all the cases of pudding that will buy.  Come on morons, you can do it.  Pony up.

 

HEY!

Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (Kjgld)

173

Damn it!!!  Maybe we can get the humped one to start a big fundraising effort.  We hit x dollars and it overides the poll?

Pudding.........

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (cniXs)

174 And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that. Poll again, Ace. I think the tide has turned. And it's very chic and European to put settled questions to a vote until you get the result you want.

Posted by: joncelli at April 07, 2010 01:19 PM (RD7QR)

175

Sumguy Action Items Completed April 7, 2010

1. Called Lib brother in law and told him Obama Sucks! Then hung up! HA!

2. Concerned Trolled Daily Kos for 3 hours. HA!

3. Coffee with a nice danish and a change of the colostomy bag.

4. PUNCHED UP FOR TWO FUCKING HOURS!

5. LOL'd at stupid conservatives punching down, EVERYWHERE!

6. Logged onto AofSHQ and gave them the what for!!  HA HA HA!

Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (/iBIN)

176 They lefty meatheads control the schools, univercities, and media.  But we do not have unicorns to fill them in with how foolish and stupid the lefties are.

They control those professions not because it pays better to be a lefty, as some stupid guy thinks, but because none of them pay well=> conservatives look for more monetarily rewarding torture to be a part of. Individuals like Ace, whom take a vow of poverty for conservatism are the exception.

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (0q2P7)

177 O/T - Blue Hen: We may have reached critical mass for a Moron Meet-up somewhere up in New Castle County.  Email me at pinkertonrk1 at gmail dot com.

Posted by: H at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (LNuCm)

178 Ace, someguy was mildly amusing for about twenty minutes last week.  That's done.

Posted by: huerfano at April 07, 2010 01:20 PM (gLSaO)

179 Although I don't think it's a media conspiracy, more like group think.  They all take their cues from the NYT

That's most of it. But thanks to the exposure of "Journolist", we know the collaborate on what to cover, how to cover it, who to talk to, etc.

We also know they routinely recycle activist organization press releases into stories. Pretty much any story about "such-and-such food is horribly fattening" comes from the "Center for Science in the Public Interest" -- which is a couple of vegan losers with a fax machine and a rolodex.

Posted by: Rob Crawford at April 07, 2010 01:21 PM (WWcde)

180 Stupid non-sock sock

Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at April 07, 2010 01:21 PM (LNuCm)

181

Sumguy Action Items Completed April 7, 2010

7.  Tired of chewbacca effect, so shaved palms

Posted by: bebe's boobs destroy at April 07, 2010 01:21 PM (cniXs)

182 188 O/T - Blue Hen: We may have reached critical mass for a Moron Meet-up somewhere up in New Castle County.  Email me at pinkertonrk1 at gmail dot com. Posted by: H

Will do. I say that we fund it with bribes from Ace. We need to deliver the Delaware caucus to sink Somejerk.

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (1O93r)

183

They lefty meatheads control the schools, univercities, and media.  But we do not have unicorns to fill them in with how foolish and stupid the lefties are. 

I'm in favor or our breeding Centaurs or griffins to counteract the unicorns.

I'm also not sure how much influence the lefty professors have--I didn't listen to mine but maybe because that was because of the hangovers.

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (HbSqq)

184 186

Sumguy Action Items Completed April 7, 2010

1. Called Lib brother in law and told him Obama Sucks! Then hung up! HA!

2. Concerned Trolled Daily Kos for 3 hours. HA!

3. Coffee with a nice danish and a change of the colostomy bag.

4. PUNCHED UP FOR TWO FUCKING HOURS!

5. LOL'd at stupid conservatives punching down, EVERYWHERE!

6. Logged onto AofSHQ and gave them the what for!!  HA HA HA!

Posted by: Sgt. Fury at April 07, 2010 05:20 PM (/iBIN)


Thread winner.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States at April 07, 2010 01:22 PM (OyTrL)

185 I haven't seen any evidence that the n-word was used on Capitol Hill during the final debate, but I still haven't seen any reporters ask Congressman Jesse Jackson if he plans to reveal what he recorded on that day?

Posted by: wtfci at April 07, 2010 05:00 PM (+zo63)

Jackson on tape?  Wasn't that where he said he wanted to cut the Indonesian Imbecile's nuts off?  Violence!  Sexual violence!!

Posted by: progressoverpeace at April 07, 2010 01:23 PM (N49h9)

186

Thread winner.

Posted by: The War Between the Undead States

What!?! No respect for inciting girl-on-girl action? Or soliciting bribes from the blog owner while everyone else is trying to bribe him !?!?

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:24 PM (1O93r)

187 I demand a recount on the someguy banning poll!

Posted by: Al Gore hates someguy at April 07, 2010 01:24 PM (oe0sG)

188

 

Did anyone see the link a few threads back to the examiner.com?  I think it might have been in a comment by kdbear.  It was about the msm being told by the WH not to report on "certain stories."   And about finding false things on the Obama resume.  Maybe that is what this is about.  Maybe the MSM realizes it can no longer pretend the Emperor is wearing clothes.

Posted by: fightobama at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (6IV8T)

189 And the bribes are welcome, but unfortunately I fucked up and put it to a poll, and I lost on that.

You didn't poll on that Paulie guy.  Ban him....please!

Posted by: Tami at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (VuLos)

190

Well, this all settles it for me!

*deletes all his DVR'd Glenn Beck*

*flips on Candy Crowley*

Posted by: apparently, who the media thinks I am... at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (kZVsz)

191 We stand ready to ensure an honest count

Posted by: Busted Nut, formerly known as ACORN at April 07, 2010 01:25 PM (1O93r)

192

TeaParty..Coffee Party

..who's up for a Jagermeister Shot Party??????

Posted by: beedubya at April 07, 2010 01:26 PM (AnTyA)

193

TeaParty..Coffee Party

..who's up for a Jagermeister Shot Party??????

Posted by: beedubya

Cough syrup of Satan. Sign my ass up.

Posted by: Blue Hen at April 07, 2010 01:27 PM (1O93r)

194

Well the thing with the schools and  universities are the teachers get long holidays off, summer vacation, etc.  No wonder it fits in!

Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:31 PM (pU4D7)

195 palin steele and someguy and Paulie Carbone shitting on the blog at the same time?  Did the NAMBLA/NAMGLA meeting let out early?

Posted by: IN 8th at April 07, 2010 01:33 PM (tcMQZ)

196

Well, this all settles it for me!

*deletes all his DVR'd Glenn Beck*

*flips on Candy Crowley*

 

 

I agree.  I don't know why Glenn has such a fascination with this piece of shit.

Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 01:33 PM (Kjgld)

197 Ace,

You mentioned "conspiracy" and I don't think anyone would argue that it actually is. Well, Robert Gibbs might. Come to think of it, his protest would prove the point. Anyhoo, as others have pointed out, the modern incarnation was Journolist, so this was not some fevered imagination the Right had.

The point is that the conspiracy has been going on for decades. The concept of a Journolist was just birthed from The NYTimes. That DNC watercooler has been the nexus of red journalism for our entire lifetimes. Only now when we have realtime fact-checking and easy communication that circumvents the classical filters can we appreciate the depth of the deception.

Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 07, 2010 01:35 PM (swuwV)

198 Hey MSM!  CSM!  Go fuck yourselves!  But I say that politely and with the deepest respect I can muster for a bunch of self-serving whores.

Posted by: GarandFan at April 07, 2010 01:36 PM (6mwMs)

199 205

Well the thing with the schools and  universities are the teachers get long holidays off, summer vacation, etc.  No wonder it fits in!


Yeah, and my mom didn't get paid during the summer, unless she arranged for money to be withheld from her salary during the school year - and she didn't earn interest on it, the district did.

I love the teachers unions less than most people, but I get royally tired of the pig-ignorant nonsense I read about teachers.

Posted by: Dianna at April 07, 2010 01:37 PM (qrFCz)

200 Ace: Why waste bandwidth chasing after the concept the MSM has somehow changed and now really loves the Tea Party????? 

Ace sees one highly ambiguous (self-serving) article in the Christian Science Monitor - which doesn't completely trash the Tea Party movement, so now he would have us believe the MSM has 'turned' and not only is on our side, but actually has been all along!

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 01:37 PM (w2++y)

201

I agree.  I don't know why Glenn has such a fascination with this piece of shit.

Posted by: Fuckity fuck-fuck at April 07, 2010 05:33 PM (Kjgld)

 

So, Fuckity.  Are you new here?

Posted by: Soona' at April 07, 2010 01:38 PM (Kjgld)

202 There is a chemist at University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne named David Jones who used to write a column under the pen name "Daedalus" in New Scientist (and Nature I believe) in which he proposed wacky but plausible inventions. My favorite was something called "dithergas," which, when sprayed on a crowd, induced confusion, despair, and hopelessness. As no one has actually invented dithergas (yet), it seems like the Legacy Media has been attempting to substitute psyops to achieve the same effect. That plus a hefty dose of disinformation for the uninformed. Since this doesn't seem to have worked so far, now they are changing their tactics. But that doesn't make them friends of the Tea Parties, and they certainly cannot be trusted.

Posted by: ManeiNeko at April 07, 2010 01:39 PM (TiE76)

203

OMG: Obama Media Gruppenschlok.

Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 01:40 PM (dQdrY)

204

Ever notice so called lefty libs who love unions drive non-union cars?  They even have Comrade Oboma stickers on their cars!

I want to see what happens if they legalise weed in some states when you can go to Walmart or some national drug store to get your prescription for it.  I figure, Bud and Miller may get in the market as well!

Posted by: Hous Bin Pharteen at April 07, 2010 01:43 PM (pU4D7)

205 Sumdumguy and PollyC can both go fuck themselves in the ass with barbed wire dildos.  The rest of us have serious business to tend to.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 01:44 PM (Kt5vQ)

206 Ace: Why waste bandwidth chasing after the concept the MSM has somehow changed and now really loves the Tea Party????? 

Ace sees one highly ambiguous (self-serving) article in the Christian Science Monitor - which doesn't completely trash the Tea Party movement, so now he would have us believe the MSM has 'turned' and not only is on our side, but actually has been all along!

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:37 PM (w2++y)

You need to read what Ace said again.  He's saying the MSM, never on the Tea Party side, is now changing tacts to diminish it.  And, this isn't the first news source that shown its first sign of adapting (their attacks).

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 07, 2010 01:47 PM (ucq49)

207 I think many of the Tea Partiers probably draw SS and Medicaid.

For the record, I think you meant to say Medicare, not Medicaid.

Posted by: sandy burger at April 07, 2010 01:47 PM (MT+0i)

208 Tea party must be freaking out the dems more than I thought.

Posted by: Timbo at April 07, 2010 01:49 PM (7GgDy)

209 Ace: Why waste bandwidth chasing after the concept the MSM has somehow changed and now really loves the Tea Party????? 

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:37 PM (w2++y)

Um, I think you kind of missed the point.  Nobody is arguing the MSM "loves the Tea Party."  Ace is saying that the MSM has failed to turn the majority of the public away from Tea Party principles, so now look for it to foster the appearance of being sympathetic in the hope of manipulating its direction.

You're welcome for the English-to-English translation.  Let me know if there's anything else on the blog that's hard to understand.

Posted by: Cicero at April 07, 2010 01:51 PM (QKKT0)

210 Every sane person knows that the LSM is nothing more than a bunch of pathological liars and propogandists for the Progressive Left (formerly Democrat party).  By cozying up to the Tea Partiers (formerly Tea Baggers) they desire to insert themselves as parasites into this healthy and growing grassroots movement.  As such, under no circumstances are they to be viewed as friendly, no more so than say the Bubonic plague.  By their actions you shall know them.  By their words they expose themselves to be vile and willing to bear false witness.  Case in point of the Dem Senators and media who conspired and sunk to the level of the lying whore and lying whore professors at Duke University.  The one thing they cannot tolerate are the principles that founded this great nation.  That is why they speak over and over of Transformation.  Yes, transformation to a country ruled by an additional 16,000  IRS agents.  Thank you, but no thanks.  Keep your fucking hope and change and any other insane ideas that the Socialists/Marxists have foisted on otherwise free people.  Indeed, by their words you shall know them. "Yesterday the greatest question was decided which was ever debated in America; and a greater perhaps never was, nor will be, decided among men. A resolution was passed without one dissenting colony, that those United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States".  ~ John Quincy Adams

Posted by: Anonymous Guy at April 07, 2010 01:57 PM (UPNlB)

211 All you need to shut down modern media is a pair of wire cutters.

Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 02:08 PM (dQdrY)

212 Little super glue on a lens...

Posted by: Rodent Freikorps at April 07, 2010 02:10 PM (dQdrY)

213 123 That's what we should be analyzing today.

Blogspot's thataway. Knock yourself out.

Posted by: Anachronda at April 07, 2010 02:14 PM (3K4hn)

214

"I didn't make it to the bunk.  Damn."

Excuse me, pardon me, excuse me, pardon...  *makes it to the hallway*

Posted by: paulsey at April 07, 2010 02:18 PM (q/kmn)

215 Cicero: I was born/raised/educated in England and we invented the fucking language. So I don't need any snarky invitation for "English to English translation" from the likes of you.

Ace begins his post by saying: "There was a time, oh, a week or two ago, when the mainstream media portrayed the tea-party movement as an assortment of crazed angry extremist redneck racist idiots. What changed?"

I assume for Ace to ask "What Changed?" means he actually believes the MSM has somehow changed vis-a-vis its perception of the Tea Bag movement.  I wrote to challenge Ace that I do not believe the MSM has changed its opinion of  the Tea Bag movement one iota.

So tell me, Cicero (as in Chicago suburb, I presume) do you have a problem with my conclusion/analysis?

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 02:20 PM (w2++y)

216

We can have repeated votes on the continued existence of someguy around here.

It's like Congress.  Someguy is the current elected representative for douchenozzelry.  Periodic re-election for that position is encouraged.

Posted by: reason at April 07, 2010 02:21 PM (q/kmn)

217

The libtard media may just be playing nicey nice so that they can stand in our midst and hope for a n-word (I feel like an idiot writing that), without getting pushed out?

Kinda like those big bugs on the Orkin commercial

Posted by: dagny at April 07, 2010 02:22 PM (HbSqq)

218 Ace,  I agree they are up to something,  however I have a slightly different take.   All of this niceness is not because they want to be more fair,  or need more viewers, or anything else.

It is an effort to win the confidence of the tea party people,  so that they can get lots of footage to edit at their discretion,  creating the impression that the tea parties are full of fools,  runes,  and racists.

My advice to anyone attending one of these events is to NOT talk to the media.  Do not give them sound bites.   You do not have to talk to them, since you are a private citizen.   Do not even offer them a cup of coffee.

Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2010 02:23 PM (4DwVn)

219 Excellent, Ace.

To the question, "What changed?"

Rasmussen Polls consistently show the Anti-Tea-Party not only the minority, but the out of touch and ignorant minority of voters.


Posted by: maverick muse at April 07, 2010 02:26 PM (H+LJc)

220

"Tea party must be freaking out the dems more than I thought."

They are.  It made for some good reading on DUmmie FUnnies.

Posted by: reason at April 07, 2010 02:26 PM (q/kmn)

221 Luckily, for her, Dianna has never met any pig-ignorant teachers. Try being a GI Bill student and see what flavors of hatred those sweet little educators spew upon you. Hate don't taste like cupcakes. It's nice you love your mommy but your mommy is not every single teacher.

Nice post, Ace.

Posted by: Amanda at April 07, 2010 02:28 PM (MbYz8)

222 So tell me, Cicero (as in Chicago suburb, I presume) do you have a problem with my conclusion/analysis?

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 06:20 PM (w2++y)

Yes.  Because you've completely ignored what I wrote.  I can only refer you back to it in response.

Maybe they ain't speakin' English so good in the UK no more, knowhatimean?

Posted by: SomeDouche at April 07, 2010 02:29 PM (QKKT0)

223 Yeah, I think they're hoping for a slip up. Somewhat related,  I think I blacked out during the Insane Clown Posse thread.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 07, 2010 02:30 PM (mHQ7T)

224 226  Did you actually, oh, say, READ the fucking column?  It appears you didn't.

Posted by: Hatchet Five at April 07, 2010 02:32 PM (YJl4U)

225 Good advice Miss Marple.  Also, may I add that since I am but a lowly moron, it is indeed an honor to be amongst such intelligent, eloquent, and yes, patriotic people.  I don't log on as much as I would like, but have noticed as of late, many commenters who back in the day, were frequenting another blog which I will not name.  I shed my lizard skin long ago, as their "leader" became a living tribute to Walter E. Kurtz of Apocalypse Now fame with his infamous banning.  Then, as now, I give my one fingered salute to the The Iron Fist Rule and the Lizard King.

Posted by: sirsurfalot at April 07, 2010 02:39 PM (UPNlB)

226

Sock OFF.  And Alwyn, its the Tea Party movement, not the Tea Bag movement.  You sound like you're getting your information from Anderson Cooper.

And no, Cicero doesn't refer to the Illinois suburb.  It refers to Marcus Tullius Cicero, consul, senator, exposer of the Catiline conspiracy and opponent of Julius Caesar.  Just for the record.

Posted by: Cicero at April 07, 2010 02:45 PM (QKKT0)

227 Being understood is a luxury.

Posted by: Livy at April 07, 2010 02:46 PM (dQdrY)

Posted by: Alan Smithee at April 07, 2010 03:31 PM (F7GbV)

229 Suckguy -- stop sucking.

Ace's point is that the media is never going to get it. No matter how much everyone realizes the media (like you) sucks, people naturally want to have their beliefs validated, so the suckers now pretend to validate the TP'rs -- only to lie in wait for the day they can blow 'em up with some scandal.

It helps to visualize the media as receiving their daily marching orders from the White House . It's obvious that most of the NYT's copy comes pre-written from there, saving the Times the expense of hiring sentient humans. After that, it gets re-phrased, rewritten and propagated to the world.

The only question is, where are you in that process? Journo student? Wannabe? Or someone in so deep in the media muck that all you can do is wave your arms and trash anyone who calls you out?


Posted by: JBean at April 07, 2010 03:37 PM (6N6FF)

230 sirsurfalot!

Yes,  I am that very same person as you knew in the other place.   I bounce around to several places and always use my same name (unless some philistine has already taken it).   It is nice to run into old friends.

I like this site because I learn what the younger crowd thinks (me being a nice Midwest grandma) and also I learn a lot about military stuff,  which I need educating about.  

Also I have learned about hobos,  Valu-Rite vodka,  and pron.  LOL!

Posted by: Miss Marple at April 07, 2010 03:41 PM (4DwVn)

231

"I was born/raised/educated in England and we invented the fucking language. "

So sorry to learn that.  We Yanks give allowances for XXXXXXXXXX challenged.  Fill in the blanks.

Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at April 07, 2010 03:45 PM (ucq49)

232 I was with you...until you called tea bagging a "deviant sexual habit".

I knew there was a reason I've never told my girlfriend about this joint.

Geez Ace. I'm encouraged to celebrate around here by dipping my balls in various silky food products, but not...

Question: What if she's into it and there's pudding in her mouth at the moment we take back the House? Good to go, not good to go, even more deviant? I'm gonna need a ruling here.

Posted by: Lamontyoubigdummy at April 07, 2010 04:15 PM (skMdM)

233

Wow.... this was a long read..... tough to slog through after a day at work... I didn't have my dinner yet and am on the third glass of wine.... but I like red meat before my red meat.

Nice post ace... spot on.

Personally I'm not as concerned about this nonsense as much as I used to be because more people are catching onto the LSM's nonesense. The state run media are still private corporations for the most part. They are bleeding red ink literlaly and figuratively. It's only a matter of time before they get the Govt. bailout and truely become "State" media. The NYTimes will go first.

On the other hand, conservative online, print & TV media are doing very well. For people like me who still hold the naive view that capatilism works will conclude that conservatism will overcome the marxist message in the end.

But all this doesn't matter.... my opinions ain't worth a ball of shit... what really matters is... what does someguy think about all this?

Posted by: Last Conservative In Brooklyn at April 07, 2010 04:17 PM (7uAeI)

234 NICE! Ace had his coffee today.....

Posted by: JAM2 at April 07, 2010 05:03 PM (DCdSz)

235 Cicero: Unfortunately, this has been a bad week for all of us....

A week where POTUS says:  "Go ahead and annihilate us with chemical or other types of WMDs - and we won't respond."

A week where POTUS claims there is no such thing as 'Islamic terrorism', but we face instead ."Man made disasters" - as though that will suffice to explain 9/11

Truth to tell, I suspect you and I have much more in common than the reverse. I genuinely believe our country has reached a 'tipping point' where the upcoming November election will decide everything. If we can't gain a majority (at least in the House) then we're doomed. Literally - We become a socialist society.

As I related to you previously, I'm from England, and I know first-hand what 'socialism' means. Consequently, I will challenge anybody (including Ace) who gives the impression the MSM  is somehow "coming around" to support the Tea Party point of view. The MSM put Obama in power; the MSM is never going to change sides so as to now champion the cause of  the Tea Party movement.I would like to think you would concur.

Posted by: alwyr at April 07, 2010 05:24 PM (w2++y)

236 Who ordered the spam?

Posted by: adolfo_velasquez at April 07, 2010 07:36 PM (mrK55)

237 the expanded realization of a video converter tool which can convert, split, join, remove commercials, edit, rotate, apply effects, capture, transfer, copy,vlc converter,mod converter

Posted by: sun at April 08, 2010 12:24 AM (tW/S7)

239 That is my belief -- and yeah, I really do think it's a genuine conspiracy at this point. I do think the media coordinates these stories, coordinates its angles, coordinates its spin.

They're called, "Editors" and they control (a) pretty much what kind of people write for them and (b) what gets written in a news office.  Those leftists who entered journalism in the 1970s after Woodward and Bernstein made investigative reporting sexy, showing how to bring down a Republican Administration?  They're in their 50s now and have moved up the corporate ladder to the Editors' desks.  They're still committed socialists and now they get to shape public opinion to suit their philosophies. 

They of course are cutting their own throats doing this.  Readers are being driven away by the incessant ranting from both the editorial page and the news page.  Readership is dropping for all the left-slanted news sources and revenues are falling through the floor.  Their hope lies in consolidation and ultimately nationalization of the media.  Pravda-dization is the key to their survival and the goal of their efforts.  If they can keep Congress and the White House in their grip a few more election cycles they might just make it.

Posted by: Orion at April 10, 2010 09:01 PM (wKWN5)

240 Wondershare iPad Video Converter is currently the best iPad Converter, which enables users to convert almost all SD/HD video formats to iPad, and powerful editing function provided.

Posted by: silence at April 26, 2010 12:30 AM (8PNbT)

241 Good job for writing this brilliant article of pandora. I totally agree with you on the

point of pandora charms. This is a nice article for sure. Excellent point here. I wish there

are more and more New pandora beads articles like that. I totally agree with you on the

point of pandora jewellery. This is a nice article for sure. Thank you so much for sharing

some great ideas of pandora jewellery with us, they are helpful.

Posted by: pandora at October 24, 2010 10:15 PM (t7UbJ)

Posted by: adson at December 27, 2010 04:27 PM (ibe4H)

Posted by: Cinsel sohbet at December 30, 2010 01:35 PM (QQcxn)

244


Do you crazy for NBA games? Have you hold your breath for the exciting moment? Are you one of NBA

super fans? If the answer is YES, COME ON,GUYS!

All kinds of NBA jerseys are designed as authentic styles with High

quality,Competitive price, Fast Delivery and Intimate Customer Service . Choose your favorite jerseys to support your team. Enjoy your free style!

They are all in stock!Welcome to buy!

Posted by: sunny at April 08, 2011 08:06 PM (wakeg)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
230kb generated in CPU 0.2147, elapsed 0.3796 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.3039 seconds, 373 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.