November 30, 2010
— Ace Actually, I believe Assange is a coward who only wishes to preen as a dangerous rebel with states that will not kill him (such as America), and thus capitalize on unearned status -- he likes to play the hunted revolutionary without having to actually be hunted.
When it comes to a state that will in fact kill him, he will fold like a cheap suit. (I realize that makes no sense.)
So I doubt that Captain Ed's belief that Assange is about to provoke the wrong enemy is correct.
I doubt it will happen, I can't help but wanting this dump to occur:
National security officials say that the National Security Agency, the U.S. government’s eavesdropping agency, has already picked up tell-tale electronic evidence that WikiLeaks is under close surveillance by the Russian FSB, that country’s domestic spy network, out of fear in Moscow that WikiLeaks is prepared to release damaging personal information about Kremlin leaders.“We may not have been able to stop WikiLeaks so far, and it’s been frustrating,” a U.S. law-enforcement official tells The Daily Beast. “The Russians play by different rules.” He said that if WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, follow through on threats to post highly embarrassing information about the Russian government and what is assumed to be massive corruption among its leaders, “the Russians will be ruthless in stopping WikiLeaks.”
Although these leaks have been damaging to foreign policy -- especially in Yemen, where a cooperate government was just outed as dishonestly claiming it wasn't cooperative -- there are some upsides.
Revelations about Iran and North Korea should not have been suppressed from the American public. We are entitled to know, roughly, what enemy nations are doing, and how great a danger they pose. In the case of Iran and North Korea, America's official word tends to strongly understate how much danger these states pose.
This is one of the greatest powers of the presidency -- the president may decide what is and what is not a foreign policy threat or crisis. If he wishes to take action against such a state, he outs the information about it (as we did in the case of Iraq).
On the other hand, if he doesn't wish to act, he also doesn't want the public clamoring for action he has no intention of carrying through on, so he simply suppresses information about how much of a threat a nation poses. This doesn't make the threat go away -- it only takes it off the front pages. It removes the threat only from the public debate.
George W. Bush suppressed information about how truly bad-behaving North Korea was, because he was not ready to kick that particular hornet's nest, and Obama has continued doing so.
In this case, WikiLeaks has outed information we should have known all along -- that North Korea is providing advanced missiles to Iran, for example. The reason to withhold this information had little to do with protecting America's foreign policy interest; it had instead to do protecting the current and past administrations' political interest.
No president wants it talked about in the press that there's a pressing foreign threat that he intends to studiously ignore, and that the nation's real policy regarding that threat is to cross fingers and hope for the best.
Assange is a rotten bastard who deserves a bad end. I'm not claiming he's the hero he preens as or anything close to it. He's a villain. But administrations do typically attempt to "manage foreign policy" not by actually managing it, but primarily by managing public opinion about their policy (or lack thereof), and they do so by hiding information from the public.
That's an improper use of the classification system. It's not letting Assange off the hook to say that Obama shouldn't be hiding evidence of Iran's and North Korea's bad behavior from the public just to keep us in the dark about it and keep his poll ratings from dropping another 3 or 4 points.
The ironic thing is that Assange has outed more information about the bad behavior of hostile foreign states than about his true enemy, America. But perhaps that's predictable, since America is a well-behaved state. Perhaps a little too well-behaved for its own good.
By the Way: A spy-type did write to me yesterday, to say that yes, intelligence agents already do prepare multiple versions of their reports in different levels of sensitivity.
The problem, this guy noted, is simply that this idiot private Manning was an intelligence analyst, which he never should have been (indeed, he shouldn't have been in the military at all), and thus had access to secret documents in raw form as part of his job.
Another problem that was noted is that we make too many things secret, which then has a bad effect: Because so many things are secret (or top secret, or above that), many people wind up not being able to do their jobs without secret (or better) clearance, so we grant them that clearance, and inadvertently wind up giving them access to stuff that's unnecessary to do their jobs as well as a lot more sensitive. His suggestion was to make fewer things secret (just make them classified) so that we can give the less-dangerous classified clearance to more people and the more-dangerous secret clearance to fewer people.
Posted by: Ace at
10:17 AM
| Comments (190)
Post contains 906 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: journolist at November 30, 2010 10:21 AM (LwLqV)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at November 30, 2010 10:23 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Wm T Sherman at November 30, 2010 10:23 AM (w41GQ)
What a douchnozzle.
Posted by: TexBob at November 30, 2010 10:24 AM (7cXE7)
Actually, I believe Assange is a coward who only wishes to preen as a dangerous rebel with states that will not kill him (such as America), and thus capitalize on unearned status -- he likes to play the hunted revolutionary without having to actually be hunted.
Like "artists" or other libs who bash religion but say nothing of Islam.
Posted by: AmishDude at November 30, 2010 10:24 AM (BvBKY)
Posted by: JP at November 30, 2010 10:24 AM (ctq0s)
Posted by: Vladimir Putin at November 30, 2010 10:25 AM (b6qrg)
Posted by: AmishDude at November 30, 2010 10:25 AM (BvBKY)
The next dump, supposedly of Bank of America information, is a different story. That's flat-out stealing, and the cock-sucking little prick should go to jail.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 30, 2010 10:25 AM (LH6ir)
The Russians won't fuck around dealing with Julian if they think Asshat is going to leak something damaging to their higher-ups.
Polonium, "car accident", hell, maybe even ricin poisoning.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:25 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: MathMom at November 30, 2010 10:26 AM (tj0rx)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at November 30, 2010 10:27 AM (Amw47)
I have to take some (little) exception to this, Ace. There is a limit to how many fronts of a war we can fight at any one time- and we're kind of busy at the moment.
We can talk about "bomb, bomb, bomb. Bomb, bomb Iran" as much as we want; the truth is that we won't do that- at least, not with any seriousness. I wish that weren't true, but it is.
So, withholding the information makes sense from a National Defense standpoint- if they believe they're under our Radar, they might try to stay there- at least until we're done in Iraq or Afghanistan (troops down to "maintenance" levels only). If we let the general public know about it, however, they're much more likely to decide "F it, they already know, so lets get this dance started." And we really don't need that right now.
I will certainly agree that it is as much political as actual National Defense, but there are legitimate National Defense concerns as well.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 10:28 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Cicero at November 30, 2010 10:29 AM (gEBcK)
Posted by: ingenus at November 30, 2010 10:31 AM (+sBB4)
Ooh, forgot about that! Cut. Jib. Newsletter?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:32 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Discount Polonium-210 Deals at November 30, 2010 02:27 PM (w41GQ)
I know it's early, but that's my "thread winner" vote.
LMAO.
Posted by: s'moron at November 30, 2010 10:32 AM (UaxA0)
It happened in Lebanon. Some crazy group (who knows which; they're all the same) kidnapped a few Russian diplomats. The Russians promptly grabbed some hostages and started chopping. And guess what! It worked.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at November 30, 2010 10:33 AM (LH6ir)
Why do the Russians get to be the baddies all the time? Am I the only one that thinks assholes like this should pee down there leg at the thought of pissing off the CIA. It always "don't mess with Mosad" or "don't mess with the Ruskies".
Hell with that - we need to get our balls back and start taking out the fucking trash. Start with this asshole and instead of denying just step right up and say "Yes, it was us. We will take all of your "thank you's" on a first come first serve basis so please no pushing or shoving just form a neat orderly line".
Posted by: Roadking at November 30, 2010 10:34 AM (uqiMa)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 30, 2010 10:34 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: A.G. at November 30, 2010 10:35 AM (oAVyq)
Posted by: huerfano at November 30, 2010 10:36 AM (QgmBR)
Posted by: Dell at November 30, 2010 10:36 AM (emExD)
Posted by: WikiGlow at November 30, 2010 10:36 AM (+sBB4)
About Manning. A Pfc is an intelligence analyst? Are we sure?
Posted by: Richard Aubrey at November 30, 2010 10:37 AM (yt878)
"Getting our balls back" would require firing 3/4 of the staff at the CIA, worthless pussies who would immediately leak any op-plan not meeting their squishy idea of how things should be done.
Posted by: Hatchet Five at November 30, 2010 10:37 AM (Amw47)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 30, 2010 10:38 AM (0GFWk)
I'll give him such a pinch!
Posted by: The High King Emperor of Keynesia at November 30, 2010 10:38 AM (u5eVT)
Posted by: KGB at November 30, 2010 10:39 AM (+sBB4)
Posted by: Boris Badanov at November 30, 2010 10:39 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Boris "the polonium chef" Chekist at November 30, 2010 10:40 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: MathMom at November 30, 2010 10:40 AM (tj0rx)
You might be thinking of what (supposedly) Gen Perishing did with some Ottoman spies.
Although IIRC, the Russians may have buried the Chechnyan terrorists who took hostages during the Moscow theater hostage crisis back in 2002 in pig skins.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:40 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Sponge © at November 30, 2010 10:41 AM (UK9cE)
...which he never should have been (indeed, he shouldn't have been in the military at all)...
Denounce yourself, Homo-Phobe!
Just because he openly listens to Lady Gaga does not mean he has violated the current DADT policies.
Posted by: garrett at November 30, 2010 10:42 AM (fOo+M)
I don't like this WikiLeaks guy (cough) but I've come to the conclusion that the government should not be allowed to classify any documents other than current military operational info.
I think all this "leaking" has actually blown up in the faces of the leakers, all it really shows is the arrogance, shallowness and pettiness of the World's Ruling Class.
the revolution may begin anytime now...
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 10:42 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: Natasha at November 30, 2010 10:42 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 30, 2010 10:43 AM (0GFWk)
The world will be a better place.
Manning better like being alone. He's going to spend a lot of time in Levenworth by himself. Boo fucking hoo.
Posted by: mpfs at November 30, 2010 10:43 AM (iYbLN)
Only those who aren't paying attention. Like the MFM.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:45 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: nevergiveup at November 30, 2010 10:45 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Natasha
Is simple babushka. We are ordered to be the deathnell to the leakers. Hokay, we kill Nell. Mountie is too stupid to be of value, and horse too smart. Stay clear of horse.
Posted by: Boris Badanov at November 30, 2010 10:45 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: joncelli© at November 30, 2010 10:47 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 30, 2010 10:47 AM (XDeui)
For once I'm glad Putin is around. Vlad baby won't tolerate this kind of shit. Vlad could stand their holding his decapitated head in Red Square and say " Julian who?" "Who's up for a Parade!" and no one would say a word. they would throw him one. I see a Batesville casket and a dirt nap in Julian's future.
Closer to the truth I think.
Posted by: Roadking at November 30, 2010 10:48 AM (uqiMa)
Posted by: 13times at November 30, 2010 10:50 AM (h6XiD)
The first part of analyst is anal.
Posted by: Phillip McKrevis at November 30, 2010 10:50 AM (pRKLf)
Nope. If the info is valid and makes Russia look bad, that would take too long. If they suspect he has more or is capable of releasing other damaging materials....or what he releases is just that bad, I give him 10 days.
Posted by: Sponge © at November 30, 2010 10:50 AM (UK9cE)
My BofA story. Wife was shutting down her business. Had been doing scheduled online payments of a small (few hundred dollar) LC balance. BofA takes over Fleet. Resurrects canceled Fleet personal, not business, credit card and sends mail to a house we haven't lived at in 20 years. Getting no reply, BofA locks online payments for incorporated company and would have for personal online transactions except we didn't use them personally. Immediately we start getting early morning calls from Crapweasel Debt Resolution or some such. They are of course looking for credit card numbers to zero the balance or bank account #s and PINs to do the same. Right. Eventually it is resolved with much time wasted by us and we find thru a little googling that Crapweasels is a Bof A subsidiary. How cute. I hope Assange screws them over. Too big to fail? Time to unwind them into manageable units.
Posted by: chuckR at November 30, 2010 10:51 AM (XLu7l)
Posted by: A.G. at November 30, 2010 10:51 AM (oAVyq)
http://tinyurl.com/6d6jt2
If you want to listen click on the link - Bill Handel - 7am today.
Posted by: mpfs at November 30, 2010 10:52 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: t-bird at November 30, 2010 10:52 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: parisparamus at November 30, 2010 10:52 AM (jtShJ)
1. Russkies
2. Banksters
3. Hillary
.
.
.
2973. Girl Scout Troop #437
2974. Sister Susan, that mean nun from 4th grade Catholic school
2975. Nippy, your neighbor's barking chihuahua
2976. Gomer Pyle
2977. Boss Hogg from Dukes of Hazzard
2978. The CIA
Posted by: chemjeff at November 30, 2010 10:52 AM (i7Wd9)
Posted by: joncelli© at November 30, 2010 10:53 AM (RD7QR)
The Feds need to nab these Wikileaks jerks and rendition them to Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: 13times at November 30, 2010 10:54 AM (h6XiD)
Posted by: Stan at November 30, 2010 10:55 AM (LLZiU)
Because so many things are secret (or top secret, or above that), many people wind up not being able to do their jobs without secret (or better) clearance, so we grant them that clearance, and inadvertently wind up giving them access to stuff that's unnecessary to do their jobs as well as a lot more sensitive
And there's the main rub. I've worked with classified documents before and that was always the biggest problem, is deciding who really needed to know this shit. Too much stuff classified? I don't know. Sometimes the most innocuous seeming info, when put together with other elements, could turn out to be a big fucking deal.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 10:56 AM (HIlgc)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at November 30, 2010 10:57 AM (XDeui)
The world will be a better place.
Sad that we have to look to the Russians for a clear example of badass-ness and initiative. And worse still is that Vlad is one evil son-of-a-bitch.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:57 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Barry Obama, Kicking Ass since.. well, not yet at November 30, 2010 10:59 AM (FcR7P)
No barbed cock of Satan ?
That should be number #2, after the Russikes nail him.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at November 30, 2010 10:59 AM (9hSKh)
I don't like this WikiLeaks guy (cough) but I've come to the conclusion that the government should not be allowed to classify any documents other than current military operational info.
No. If every memo and piece of correspondence is subject to being public, you'll never get honest assessments.
Think of it like the surveys many of us are asked to fill out at work- one is going to be less likely to their boss poor marks if their name is on it than if it's anonymous.
Is there classified information out there that should be made public? Probably. However, there's good reason to keep much of it private- even if it's just an opinion of a particular country's leader.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 30, 2010 11:01 AM (plsiE)
Posted by: wrg at November 30, 2010 11:01 AM (mB2ub)
Posted by: ace © at November 30, 2010 11:01 AM (nj1bB)
Posted by: Beefy Meatball at November 30, 2010 11:02 AM (YYaIP)
RFIFY
Posted by: iknowtheleft®© at November 30, 2010 02:58 PM (G/MYk)
RRFIFY
Now that's green energy I can get behind and he's not worth the fuel.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at November 30, 2010 11:03 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: ace ©
Because announcing that we cannot enter into another military commitment can be an invitation not only to that country, but any other country?
Posted by: Boris Badanov at November 30, 2010 11:05 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: iknowtheleft®© at November 30, 2010 02:31 PM (G/MYk)
Would give us cover to drop him if he disses Russia.
Posted by: hutch1200 at November 30, 2010 11:05 AM (w9uzw)
Mmmm, I prefer lead poisoning. About 230 grain should work fine.
You betcha! That'd work real good there!
Posted by: Sarah Palin at November 30, 2010 11:05 AM (uqiMa)
The government is incapable of explaining "War is not possible right now"?
War - What's it good for?
Posted by: Tolstoy at November 30, 2010 11:06 AM (fOo+M)
Now we're outsourcing our own security; hoping for other countries to take care of our own traitors.
Posted by: Pyrocles at November 30, 2010 11:06 AM (cv5Iw)
Posted by: Dr Spank at November 30, 2010 11:06 AM (LLZiU)
Charles K. got this right: the little puss pocket PFC should be tried for treason and shot. Yesterday.
Posted by: Rightzilla at November 30, 2010 11:07 AM (ujT7B)
Mmmm, I prefer lead poisoning. About 230 grain should work fine.
Way oversized. Unless you are trying for a 1500 yd.+ shot...
You'd only need about 175-185 ft.lb. at impact to turn that milksop inside out.
Posted by: Tolstoy at November 30, 2010 11:09 AM (fOo+M)
Posted by: cali grump at November 30, 2010 11:09 AM (hL0k8)
Posted by: Sponge © at November 30, 2010 11:10 AM (UK9cE)
Incidentally, who pays for WikiLeaks' bandwidth? It's gotta be pretty expensive for all the stuff they're shoving out there.
Posted by: Ian S. at November 30, 2010 11:10 AM (p05LM)
Way oversized. Unless you are trying for a 1500 yd.+ shot...
You'd only need about 175-185 ft.lb. at impact to turn that milksop inside out.
That and a heavy-duty wood chipper.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 11:13 AM (HIlgc)
The image of Jimmy Wales, wiki founder, talks to me.
It tells me to do bad things. Very bad things.
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 30, 2010 11:14 AM (uFokq)
And the MFM are reduced to spinning, coat holders. Not much money or future in that role.
I don't want to think of how screwed we'd be if Algore didn't invent the truth tubes.
Posted by: ontherocks at November 30, 2010 11:14 AM (HBqDo)
Think of it like the surveys many of us are asked to fill out at work- one is going to be less likely to their boss poor marks if their name is on it than if it's anonymous.
Is there classified information out there that should be made public? Probably. However, there's good reason to keep much of it private- even if it's just an opinion of a particular country's leader.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at November 30, 2010 03:01 PM (plsiE)
if our leaders were the kind of people they claimed to be (noble, stalwart guardians of truth and justice) they wouldn't need to hide their words.
if you can't say what you want to say about someone to their face, then don't say it at all.
and that goes for everyone, including the Ruling Class.
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 11:14 AM (ehKDD)
who pays for WikiLeaks' bandwidth?
Mitt Romney. Not directly, of course.
He has a 'Hair Care' Slush-Fund that was passed as part of the Romneycare® legislation package!
It's very hush-hush.
Posted by: Bald Activist Dan at November 30, 2010 11:15 AM (fOo+M)
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 11:16 AM (ehKDD)
Time magazine's Man of the Year 2010 will be: Julian Assange.
Time Magazine's Man's Bitch of the Year 2010 will be: Barack Obama.
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 30, 2010 11:16 AM (uFokq)
All properly drooled over by La Julien, of course.
Posted by: nickless© at November 30, 2010 11:16 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: SecDef Gates at November 30, 2010 11:17 AM (GtDKF)
if our leaders were the kind of people they claimed to be (noble, stalwart guardians of truth and justice) they wouldn't need to hide their words.
if you can't say what you want to say about someone to their face, then don't say it at all.
and that goes for everyone, including the Ruling Class.
That would be true in a noble, unicorn fantasy land, but real world requires secrets and underhanded tactics simply to keep up with the Jones's. Take one look at Russia and if you think that ANYTHING they do doesn't have an underbelly, you're sorely mistaken.
Posted by: Sponge © at November 30, 2010 11:17 AM (UK9cE)
...if being honest embarrasses some other head of state, that's just too bad, they'll just have to get over it.
a funny thing about diplomacy, ol' chum, is...
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 30, 2010 11:18 AM (uFokq)
Sorry, writing a comment on another thread...
Yes, basically. Boris said it in 84- if you tell one country "Sorry, We're too busy right now" how might other countries also respond?
Ronald Reagan once said (paraphrasing, 'cause I don't remember the exact quote): "No recent war has been started because America was too strong." The unspoken corollary to that is this: "Several have started because someone else thought we weren't strong enough."
By being able to pretend that Iran and N Korea were lower priority, we also get to pretend that we could still whoop 'em if we wanted to.
It's like the big burly kid who gets called a coward because he won't fight anybody- eventually someone is going to get very badly hurt because he can't/won't defend himself- until he has to let loose completely to get people to stop bothering him. Well, we're kind of there. The only options we have at the moment are things that are not politically acceptable (as they'd require the deaths of a fair number of civilians), so we're trying not to do anything. We can't really get into a land war, and we won't just bomb their military and government buildings.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 11:18 AM (8y9MW)
When it comes to a state that will in fact kill him, he will fold like a cheap suit. (I realize that makes no sense.)
Um.
He'll fold like a cheap beach towel with pictures of flowers on one side and tigers on the other.
He'll fold like an undercapitalized gopher farm.
He'll fold like the sedimenarty strata near the San Andreas fault.
He'll fold like Meg Whitman's housekeeper.
He'll fold like my dick when Rosie O'Donnell comes over naked.
He'll fold like an errant protein in someone with a genetic disorder.
He'll fold like a Guild Navigator in the wrong galaxy when his wife's water broke.
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 30, 2010 11:19 AM (OVpbA)
Posted by: Julien Assanger at November 30, 2010 11:19 AM (RD7QR)
Bureaucrats being bureaucrats.
This is news?
It is depressing how swallow these cables are.
Posted by: Kemp at November 30, 2010 11:20 AM (JpFM9)
who pays for WikiLeaks' bandwidth?
Wikipedia foundation.
Ah. That explains why that Wales dude had his face plastered all over Wikipedia for the pledge drive this last month.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at November 30, 2010 11:20 AM (DZVrI)
That and a heavy-duty wood chipper.
Thanks to that idiot in Ct., that is no longer an option. Take the rings off the fingers first, you numbskull. Geesh...
According to a friend who worked at the Human ID lab in Tucson, you'd need; 75 Gal of Acid, an industrial grinder (the kind used to cut the pipes off a guy's joint would work fine although a bench style with a dust control system would be ideal...but how many times are you going to do this, really?), and a decent food dehydrator.
He also added that a few bags of Lye might help along with a lot of Bleach for cleanup.
Posted by: Bald Activist Dan at November 30, 2010 11:21 AM (fOo+M)
Posted by: B+rry Ob+owmao at November 30, 2010 11:21 AM (GtDKF)
12 very hungry hogs.
Posted by: Bricktop at November 30, 2010 11:23 AM (h6XiD)
I would say more like, He'll fold like the skin between Rosie O'Donnell's hooha and its tits.
I would NEVER want to admit that it comes over at any point, much less naked.
Posted by: Sponge © at November 30, 2010 11:24 AM (UK9cE)
Posted by: Julien Assanger at November 30, 2010 11:24 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Frankenstein Government at November 30, 2010 11:25 AM (GOG1H)
Thank you pfc Manning for showing us how important it is to have the Ghey's in the military!
I'll come over to your cell again, for Hanuka! Tomorrow night! Heart be still!
Love ya ( don't bite my ear again, PLEASE)!
Barney
Posted by: Barney at November 30, 2010 11:25 AM (JpFM9)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 03:18 PM (8y9MW)
And contrary to what the fucking peaceniks, diry hippies, and liberals think, our nuke option is still our "ace-in-the-hole". (no reflection on our illustrious Ace)
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 11:25 AM (HIlgc)
The Obama admin will ignore this and it will all go away in a few days just like Nadil Malik Hassan's terrorist massacre at Ft Hood last November.
Posted by: Professor Soothsayer at November 30, 2010 11:26 AM (uFokq)
Posted by: joncelli© at November 30, 2010 11:27 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Frankenstein Government at November 30, 2010 03:25 PM (GOG1H)
We have your Diner's Club® Card number on file, Mister.
Posted by: State Department at November 30, 2010 11:27 AM (fOo+M)
Posted by: wrg at November 30, 2010 11:27 AM (mB2ub)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 30, 2010 11:28 AM (OVpbA)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 30, 2010 11:29 AM (OVpbA)
Posted by: joncelli© at November 30, 2010 11:30 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 11:30 AM (ehKDD)
It tells me to do bad things. Very bad things.
There's a Firefox extension that puts Jimmy Wales at the top of every web page you visit. It's hilarious in small doses.
Posted by: Ian S. at November 30, 2010 11:31 AM (p05LM)
Can't say I've ever seen that on Jack Hannah...
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 03:25 PM (HIlgc)
I hope you're right, 'cause a weapon you simply refuse to use is worse than worthless. I'm just afraid that the hippie peacniks have one on that score.
Though, I might like to see a squadron of B-52 (or B-1s or B-2s for that matter) loaded up with munitions set to detonate at altitude: and release leaflets which said (in appropriate native language): "If we really wanted to, you'd all be dead right now," and have them "psy-ops" bomb Tehran, and Pyongyang.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 11:31 AM (8y9MW)
if our leaders were the kind of people they claimed to be (noble, stalwart guardians of truth and justice) they wouldn't need to hide their words.
That's ridiculous.
But do tell us how recess turns out. That kid in your class that's eating paste looks a bit shifty to me.
Posted by: s'moron at November 30, 2010 11:32 AM (UaxA0)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 30, 2010 11:32 AM (OVpbA)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2010 11:34 AM (judfL)
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 03:30 PM (ehKDD)
Of course. Little reindeer games that could get millions of people killed.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 11:34 AM (HIlgc)
The point is that sometimes you need the "slam book" version of advice. It's up to the actual diplomats and so on to make it digestible to their contacts, but sometimes the information you need about Saudi Diplomat so-and-so is "He's a jack-wagon."
A lot of times the stuff underlings need to tell their overlings isn't very nice, and if they believe they're going to be outed for it, they'll stop saying those things- no matter how necessary they might be for said overlings to have the good intel they need.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 11:34 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Will Folks at November 30, 2010 11:35 AM (fOo+M)
Putin will enjoy reading by the light of assange's irradiated corpse.
From behind leaded glass, naturally. The refraction's better that way.
Posted by: s'moron at November 30, 2010 11:36 AM (UaxA0)
speaking up for virtue, expecting it, demanding it from ourselves, the people we surround ourselves with and our leaders is not a childish act.
to quote C.S. Lewis:
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 11:37 AM (ehKDD)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2010 11:37 AM (lnUW/)
Posted by: Frank Zappa at November 30, 2010 11:38 AM (fOo+M)
Hey, that was completely unnecessary. We got our three home games, that's all that matters to us (so says the City of Arlington...)
Besides, if you're going to slam Texas pro sports teams, how about:
He'll fold like the Dallas Cowboys.
Really, I'm proud of what the Rangers did, but my 'boys are hurting me real bad.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 11:38 AM (8y9MW)
He'll fold like the Texas Rangers in the World Series.
He'll fold like the Texas Longhorn football team.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 11:39 AM (HIlgc)
By the Way: A spy-type did write to me yesterday, to say that yes, intelligence agents already do prepare multiple versions of their reports in different levels of sensitivity.
Heh...did this conversation start off with; "Red fox to grey squirrel, come in grey squirrel..."
Posted by: dananjcon at November 30, 2010 11:39 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: rdbrewer at November 30, 2010 11:39 AM (OVpbA)
I swear, the last ten years feel like the setup for a movie that somehow forgot to include a hero. (I originally wrote 'Bond movie', but you could go with Batman or Dirty Harry or what have you.)
There may be something to take away from that fact...
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at November 30, 2010 11:40 AM (GBXon)
Needs citation.
Wouldn't it take dozens of nukes to get the little buzzers outta artillery range of Seoul as our 1st kick & hasn't the Proliferation Security Initiative somewhat caught the stings.
Posted by: Give W a little credit at November 30, 2010 11:42 AM (E8J8N)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 03:38 PM (8y9MW)
Eh...you'll get no sympathy from me, I'm a NY Giants Fan.
Bwahahhaahahaaa!!!
Posted by: dananjcon at November 30, 2010 11:42 AM (pr+up)
I swear, the last ten years feel like the setup for a movie that somehow forgot to include a hero. (I originally wrote 'Bond movie', but you could go with Batman or Dirty Harry or what have you.)
Fuck Bond. This is a Vince Flynn novel.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 11:43 AM (HIlgc)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 03:31 PM (8y9MW)
That would be pretty entertaining - we should test it out next time we have an excuse. Alas, so many of our enemies are illiterate vermin...
I wonder if these wiki-pukes would be useful as a disinformation service. I would love to see them "leak" reports about how the US almost nuked Falujah, how we have a death ray laser that shoots a beam from space that will make your guts explode, or other similar stories that will serve to scare the piss out of our enemies. One of two things would happen - either our enemies would become more fearful (which is good) or the wikitraitors would lose credibility once the stories were found to be false. Either way we win.
Posted by: Reactionary at November 30, 2010 11:44 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: Batman
Nope. You didn't say sticky batbomb. Or should it be, batstickybomb? Batbomb which is sticky?
Get it your damn self.
Posted by: Robin at November 30, 2010 11:44 AM (R2fpr)
No argument here. I'm an A&M / TCU fan. And the Aggies are actually ranked this year.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 11:46 AM (8y9MW)
I swear, the last ten years feel like the setup for a movie that somehow forgot to include a hero. (I originally wrote 'Bond movie', but you could go with Batman or Dirty Harry or what have you.)
Fuck Bond. This is a Vince Flynn novel.
Posted by: Soona at November 30, 2010 03:43 PM (HIlgc)
If not for the loss of our bravest and in honor of the dearly departed Leslie
Nielson. I would say it resembles a Naked Gun movie.
Posted by: dananjcon at November 30, 2010 11:47 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Jean at November 30, 2010 03:37 PM
Might make me think twice about what the crabs eat when I enjoy my next bushell.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at November 30, 2010 11:48 AM (yQWNf)
Hey, now THAT was uncalled for.......
Posted by: Sponge ©
Agreed. They deserve some slack. After all, they were in a place that's very new and strange to them (world series)
Posted by: the rest of MLB at November 30, 2010 11:51 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Zombie Carlo Gambino at November 30, 2010 11:55 AM (xy9wk)
Though, I might like to see a squadron of B-52 (or B-1s or B-2s for that matter)
Yeah, me too. But we don't have a squadron--not a WWII squadron, anyway.
We have 160 strategic bombers, of all types, total.
We're a little short of warheads, too, and have no way to make more.
Posted by: A Liberal Arts Major at November 30, 2010 11:57 AM (hrwMe)
Yes, but when 6 of the things could drop enough conventional munitions to level most of a city, I'm not too worried about that.
And the point is that, every so often, we just have to remind them who they're messing with.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 12:02 PM (8y9MW)
I'll believe it when Wikileaks releases proof.
The NSA is giving the public intel on an intel breech that was released to the public? And we're buying it? WTF?
Really, though, doesn't this sound like the type of misdirection the current administration uses constantly? Blame the other side in advance and then do exactly what you're accusing them of? Or at least muddy the waters so that when he disappears the U.S. isn't the only suspect?
Bush would have had this sack of shit kidnapped and turned over to the U.S. Army for trial. And been proud of it too.
Posted by: xavier at November 30, 2010 12:08 PM (6oW3J)
Looks to me like there's quite a few things you may be "not too worried about."
Are you pretty confident of our conventional munitions stockpile? I am not.
There's no sound as hollow as a saber rattling atop a paper tiger. Just saying.
Posted by: A Liberal Arts Major at November 30, 2010 12:08 PM (hrwMe)
@16: "There is a limit to how many fronts of a war we can fight at any one time- and we're kind of busy at the moment."
Which is why, since WWII at least, that it was always US policy to be able to fight at least two major wars at once. For some reason, Dubya felt the need to abandon that policy. As a result, we can barely fight one decent-sized war and one sideshow, and so major threats go unaddressed as a result.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at November 30, 2010 12:10 PM (xy9wk)
Hey, it could happen.
Posted by: mpfs at November 30, 2010 12:10 PM (iYbLN)
Yeah, actually I am.
Oh, I have no doubt we can't do as much whole-sale damage as we could in WWII, Korea, or even Viet Nam, but we can lay down the hurt on just about anyone we need to. I would be concerned if we were talking about China or Russia- but we're not, and there's some indication than neither would lift a hand if we cut the NORKs down a notch or two. Ditto for Iran.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at November 30, 2010 12:14 PM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Aaron at November 30, 2010 12:20 PM (XUIJ5)
I don't like this WikiLeaks guy (cough) but I've come to the conclusion that the government should not be allowed to classify any documents other than current military operational info.
I think all this "leaking" has actually blown up in the faces of the leakers, all it really shows is the arrogance, shallowness and pettiness of the World's Ruling Class.
the revolution may begin anytime now...
Posted by: Shoey at November 30, 2010 02:42 PM (ehKDD)
Sort of like classifying the US Army bringing all of those Nazi rocket scientists to the US after WWII. That is just coming out in the past few years, and it should have never happened.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at November 30, 2010 12:33 PM (NNrYJ)
Posted by: Ian S. at November 30, 2010 12:42 PM (p05LM)
Uh, Paperclip has been out in public knowledge for at least a decade and a half now. And it's not like there was total ignorance of Von Braun's resume even back in the day, either. Folks just sort of fooled themselves about how far 'in' these people were, papered it over, and pretended it was all on the up-and-up.
Self-delusion is what makes civilization work, often as not.
Posted by: AoSHQ's DarkLord© at November 30, 2010 12:42 PM (GBXon)
“The Russians play by different rules.”
No kidding. Plus, they probably wouldn't have allowed an idiotic 22-year old pouf to have access to their sensitive diplomatic materials in the first place. But then, the Russians aren't nearly as enlightened and progressive as the Obama administration, are they?
Posted by: AZC at November 30, 2010 12:59 PM (P/M3M)
I don't think is strictly true, or that it is true of Bush alone. I am an old broad, I was born in 1951, during the Korean conflict and here I am all these years later and we are still talking about the North Koreans being a threat. I would say this problem goes back way way farther than Bush. NK has been a problem for so long that we just got used to them being a problem and that made it seem less threatening.
Posted by: Terrye at November 30, 2010 01:05 PM (/4D/H)
There's 'classification' and then there's 'need-to-know.'
I'm an Army NCO with a Secret clearance at a somewhat sensitive post in Afghanistan (personnel without Secret or higher clearance can't enter my workplace, period). A Secret isn't particularly uncommon, Army-wide; f'r'instance, every Army MP (my job) gets a Secret, or is supposed to. Even with my clearance, I pretty much have to get specific authorization for each particular database to which I need access (i.e., demonstrate my need-to-know that info in order to do my job).
One of the criteria used in deciding upon classification levels is the potential damage done should the info come out. Given the sensitivity of a lot of this Wikileaks stuff, I'm dumbfounded that so much of it was classified as low-level as it was. The other breathtakingly stupid part is that somebody thought that PFC Manning (for whose firing squad I'll gladly volunteer) 'needed to know' details about State department cables, etc. I'm gonna assume that was passive stupidity (i.e., nobody bothered to make sure that the kind of access Manning needed for his job WASN'T also giving him access to extraneous stuff), rather than active stupidity ("Let's make sure to give him access to extraneous stuff LOL"); in the military, the former is FAR more common.
Posted by: Prayerborne at November 30, 2010 01:21 PM (fL3jn)
"Sort of like classifying the US Army bringing all of those Nazi rocket scientists to the US after WWII. That is just coming out in the past few years, and it should have never happened."
What shouldn't have happened - the classifying, or bringing them over?
The classifying ... well, immediately after WWII, people were a little uptight about Nazis. As for this being a secret, it was never a secret that these guys had worked on the V1 and V2 projects during the war. As Tom Lehrer sang in the early 1960s:
I just send them up
And where they come down
Is not my department!
Says Werner Von Braun.
As for the bringing them over, our alternatives were to shoot them or let the Russians have them. And Von Braun did build the Saturn V.
Posted by: Brown Line at November 30, 2010 01:22 PM (VrNoa)
Posted by: Pewpewpew, your ded. at November 30, 2010 01:40 PM (X67eL)
POTUS Obama is sending his Attorney General Eric Holder to Switzerland to lobby for the World Cup.
You can't make this stuff up.
Posted by: Bitchen Meg at November 30, 2010 01:45 PM (tE8FB)
It's extremely difficult to connect the dots if you don't make the dots available to your analysts. It's also harder to connect those dots if you have to ask your supervisor for access to the dots repository every time you get a hunch about data that may not actually pan out into a legitimate insight.
Oh, and there is a level above the Venti sized classification: compartmented, or what your typical fiction writer calls "code word classified". Which is cool and all... but as this document dump shows, there is a lot of stuff out there that isn't at the highest levels. And if you look at the documents themselves, none of it should be at those higher levels.
Posted by: Darkmage at November 30, 2010 02:04 PM (Iw4ok)
Great.Just great.
Not that I'm unhappy with Tivo and Netflix and Minecraft and Anrgy Birds n' all that but....but...sniff....not gonna cry....*
Posted by: cackfinger at November 30, 2010 02:54 PM (P6dnR)
Did "need to know" access stop being part of the clearance policy since the last time I held a clearance?
Posted by: baldilocks at November 30, 2010 03:05 PM (t2hll)
Posted by: armchair pessimist at November 30, 2010 03:09 PM (mXSth)
And when was the last time you saw the State Department entrusted with the really important stuff?
Posted by: Darkmage at November 30, 2010 03:19 PM (Iw4ok)
Posted by: Uncle Jefe at November 30, 2010 03:20 PM (+3fAP)
There's no bottom age limit on high classified access. I was 25 when I had it, but most get it when they first come into the service, finish boot/basic, finish tech school/AIT. Assuming age 18 at entry, 19 or 20 is the age an analyst has attained upon going to work.
Posted by: baldilocks at November 30, 2010 03:35 PM (t2hll)
Posted by: Taxpayer at November 30, 2010 04:37 PM (NpmCe)
The Russians are thugs. They don't play nice.
Posted by: crosspatch at November 30, 2010 09:38 PM (ZbLJZ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.26 seconds, 318 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: cali grump at November 30, 2010 10:19 AM (hL0k8)