March 21, 2010
— DrewM Conflicting reports this morning about where the Democrats stand.
According to Majority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) on Meet The Press this morning, they are still a couple of votes short.
John Larson (D-CT), head of the House Democratic Caucus says they have the votes.
The Democrats did pick up Marcy Kaptur (D-OH). She was a Stupak group member.
I haven't seen anything about the grand plan to buy off the Stupakers with an Executive Order. If they are going to accept that crap, I bet Stupak winds up giving Nancy something for the privilege of voting yes. An Executive Order is BS and will disappear before any of the real changes go into effect in a couple of years.
Based on nothing but a guess...Nancy doens't have the votes yet but she's playing chicken with 5 or 6 liberal democrats like Stupak and daring them to kill this. They won't man up. Mostly because they want this crap and are just trying to get a fig leaf, any fig leaf to cover them on abortion.
We'll know in a couple of hours.
Update: Via Allah...Stupak is still begging for his cover from Obama
"We are close to getting something done," Stupak said in an interview with MSNBC."We're close but we're not there yet," Stupak said.
Major Garrett just said on FNC that Obama doesn't want to have to sign an EO unless it buys the votes to push it over the top. He won't piss off the pro-choicers unless he has to. Much like Joe Kennedy, he doesn't want to buy a landslide.
Posted by: DrewM at
06:59 AM
| Comments (427)
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: shibumi at March 21, 2010 07:01 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: alans at March 21, 2010 07:02 AM (frMli)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 07:02 AM (QuP9W)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 21, 2010 07:03 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: Barbarian at March 21, 2010 07:03 AM (EL+OC)
It is a fig leaf. They cannot change the Senate Bill at all. They have to vote on it as is. Period.
If Stupak is going to cave, then he was going to cave all along.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (QuP9W)
Posted by: torabora at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (zMVot)
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (YRjsF)
The ones from states with NCAA teams playing/hosting today have to pissed they're not in a free suite swilling free booze this afternoon. Go! Go to the basketball game!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (OkT2m)
The "executive order" is all bullshit. This again falls under "Democrats making up the rules as they go" - corruption.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 07:04 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it vote at March 21, 2010 07:05 AM (Vu6sl)
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said Sunday morning that he is close to
striking a deal with the Obama administration on abortion provisions.
"We are close to getting something done," Stupak said in an interview with MSNBC.
Stupak said he engaged in talks late into Saturday night.
The possible deal would focus on an executive order that would specify there would be no public funding for abortions in the healthcare bill.
"We're close but we're not there yet," Stupak said.
Democratic leaders said Sunday they have the votes on healthcare reform, but Stupak said until there is a deal struck, they don't have the 216 votes they need.
Stupak said "there were eight of us" in the negotiating room, all of them no votes.
------
Fool.
More at link
From The Hill
http://tinyurl.com/yg68yjo
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 07:06 AM (VuLos)
Stupak = DemocRAT
I've always felt that their uncertainty was manufactured...a kubuki dance. This is really a sick method of getting taxpayers to pay for abortion. All the 'health care' is noise. It's Satan's playpen on the Hill.
Posted by: torabora at March 21, 2010 07:07 AM (zMVot)
Posted by: Ed Wallis at March 21, 2010 07:07 AM (/5u0e)
Just remember, the votes are there. There is ZERO chance of this not passing.
Pelosi is a winner (a bitch but a winner). She won't lose a vote like this. If the GOP had some big goal (like social security reform), you know they would fail and did fail.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:08 AM (siar6)
Posted by: kingfisher at March 21, 2010 07:08 AM (RUdpr)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 21, 2010 07:08 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 21, 2010 07:08 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 21, 2010 07:09 AM (9Cooa)
OVERHEARD: Walking into Capitol this morning on phone, Speaker Pelosi tells Hoyer: 'Steny, we have to get to 217. None of these members wants to be the deciding vote'... Developing...
So, as some have said over the past couple of days, they need 217, not just 216. I guess it doesn't bother that pile of crap Pelosi, who is from a far-Left district and can basically keep her seat for life, that members of her caucus feel this way because their constituents don't want it.
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 07:09 AM (ljvjO)
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at March 21, 2010 11:04 AM (YRjsF)
When you're in the theater, you'll see the horrorific mist of ObamaCare slowly making its way across the theater floor, consuming everyone in attendance until there is just a dead silence.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it vote at March 21, 2010 07:09 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: sunny black at March 21, 2010 07:10 AM (lFhqf)
Posted by: mistress overdone at March 21, 2010 07:10 AM (2/oBD)
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:10 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: Sparky at March 21, 2010 07:11 AM (r0u40)
Huh? Get the Diana DeGette(D) pro-abortion vote first, then have Obama swoop in and give Stupak and his gang what they need for cover?
What a corrupt circus.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 07:11 AM (0fzsA)
Down With Health Care!!
Posted by: Rightwing idiot pussy, (a.k.a., ace) at March 21, 2010 07:11 AM (vsoRI)
Spending doesn't start flowing until 2014. The Hyde Amendment can be expanded to cover the new funds the HHS will administer at next time Hyde comes up for a vote. The next time Congress is schedule to appropriate funds for HHS is in 2011. POTUS pledges to expand Hyde to cover the new funds. Stupak accepts. He votes Yes.
99% confident this deal goes down today.
49% confident the deal holds up through 2011.
There is a prolife majority in the House. When the White House is breaking backs left and right he it can get the votes. However, once the arm twisting is over and its a straight appropriations bill then the White House loses all its leverage. At that point the 240 seat prolife majority could pass the expanded Hyde Amendement.
Posted by: wtfci at March 21, 2010 07:12 AM (EbpbH)
Posted by: sunny black
Is anyone else here already breaking a No-News vow today? I am.
Thank God I'll be at an Open House at a local religious institution all day.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:12 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: Dan at March 21, 2010 07:12 AM (1jzSs)
This is, I think, the best position we could have reasonably hoped for given how bad we are outnumbered in the House, and I am proud of Boehner, Ryan and the rest (not to mention the conservative blogosphere and all the tea party folk) for putting up one hell of a fight. We are very close to winning this thing.
Posted by: CAS at March 21, 2010 07:12 AM (Gzb30)
Posted by: jjshaka at March 21, 2010 07:12 AM (NIV6g)
Posted by: FatBaldnSassy at March 21, 2010 07:13 AM (PY1V4)
Posted by: Nancy at March 21, 2010 07:13 AM (3TdgB)
Posted by: Dan at March 21, 2010 07:13 AM (1jzSs)
Front page of this morningÂ’s Los Angeles Times, Michigan Rep. Dale E. Kildee says his priest told him there was nothing in the bill that should keep him from voting for it, and I quote:
“For Kildee, who spent six years in seminary as a young man, support for the bill was contingent on its banning federal funding for abortion. He studied the text. He absorbed criticism for waffling. He consulted like-minded colleagues. <b>But he was not sure what to do until he took the question to his priest, who, despite other church leaders’ opposition, told him the bill was true to his antiabortion commitment.</b>“
Who's this guy's priest, Nancy Pelosi? Kind of answers itself.
Posted by: OCBill at March 21, 2010 07:13 AM (p28Ei)
Posted by: Mjim at March 21, 2010 07:14 AM (mMdWG)
Fuck this decorum BS. Call, Them. Out. fer crissakes.
Posted by: Barbarian at March 21, 2010 07:14 AM (EL+OC)
"So, as some have said over the past couple of days, they need 217, not just 216. ..."
They're beyond brain dead if they think 217 is going to shield anyone. What nervous rep is going to be 216, trusting some other chump will be 217?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 21, 2010 07:15 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: Timbo at March 21, 2010 07:15 AM (7GgDy)
Posted by: The Arnarchist Underground at March 21, 2010 07:15 AM (YCVBL)
Another Democrat shell game. More corrupt fence walking. They have to please the pro-abortion crowd and the pro-life crowd at the same time.
Empty promises that can be flushed away with the passage of time. Stupak - your a sucker if you fall for it.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 07:15 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: sunny black at March 21, 2010 07:15 AM (lFhqf)
Posted by: Damocles at March 21, 2010 07:17 AM (FV5rl)
Posted by: Dan at March 21, 2010 07:17 AM (1jzSs)
Torches? ... check.
Pitchforks? ... check.
Split-rail? ... check.
Feathers? ... check.
Tar? ... TAR? ... crap!
(I guess I'll just have to use super-glue instead...)
Posted by: Warthog at March 21, 2010 07:17 AM (IqL8x)
Posted by: Ken B. at March 21, 2010 07:17 AM (i1Ri2)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at March 21, 2010 07:18 AM (ucxC/)
Posted by: ListKeeper at March 21, 2010 07:18 AM (Dhbqp)
Pelosi has the votes...more than enough votes.
She does not lose.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:18 AM (siar6)
I've heard battery acid gets sticky a few hours after application.
Posted by: Barbarian at March 21, 2010 07:18 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Donna at March 21, 2010 07:18 AM (6heFO)
I don't want to be pessimistic, but, remember how we all hung our hopes on Ben Nelson?
yeah - well, there we go.
Hanging hopes on Democrats is usually a disappointment.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 07:19 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: kingfisher at March 21, 2010 07:19 AM (RUdpr)
Well he did say yesterday that it was Armageddon. When questioned by a reporter seeking more vivid lines he said yes, this bill will destroy the country.
F&F acted like they were surprised and he was over the top. BTW, most of Fox has been on the side of obamacare since the very beginning.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 07:20 AM (QrA9E)
POWER. That's always what these types of "transformative" bills have been about. The power to regulate the individual. The power to rein in the States. The power to tax or subsidize anything, for any reason, if it helps create yet another crises that will require yet another government solution.
If you look at the founding documents, and the rights given to the people from a power higher than ANY government, and then look at the restrictions put upon us by the government, you would be hard pressed to recognise the same country.
Land of the Free?
Posted by: Spitting on hands, hoisting the black flag at March 21, 2010 07:20 AM (/QN+S)
From the looks of her she couldn't get anything hard.
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 07:20 AM (QuP9W)
Pelosi has the votes...more than enough votes.
She does not lose.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:18 AM (siar6)
Instead of just spewing your own personal bullshit, why don't you start posting some links that support what you're saying?
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it vote at March 21, 2010 07:21 AM (Vu6sl)
There's a pretty good read at pjm with some implications of ObamaCare that I hadn't fully considered before - http://tiny.cc/pznsa
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 21, 2010 07:21 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 07:21 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:18 AM (siar6)
I'm not going to debate you on this, but do you really think if she had the votes in the bag 2 days ago that she wouldn't have thrown a big splashy press conference within 2 minutes with that botoxed mug oiling over like she'd just found the cure for cancer?
Posted by: sunny black at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (lFhqf)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 11:20 AM (QuP9W)
Skyrocketing up the rankings.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: beerologist at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (tgXx6)
From the looks of her she couldn't get anything hard.
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 11:20 AM (QuP9W)
I'd hit it!
Posted by: Bob - The know it all concern troll at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Old Sailor at March 21, 2010 07:22 AM (/Ft4q)
With a massive majority she has to lie,cheat and bribe to get a razor thin victory.Why don't you pull your head out of her twat and realize this should have been a cake walk but thanks to her it isn't.
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: sunny black
Heh, maybe I should soak up my fill of news before I leave the house today. If this thing passes, God knows I won't be watching or reading the news for a week. Can't stand to see their triumphant grins.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (BN/2Y)
I still say > 50 in the House (one pundit I read say > 75) and about 5 in the Senate.
If this crap sandwich passes I may have to increase those numbers.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (QrA9E)
Instead of just spewing your own personal bullshit, why don't you start posting some links that support what you're saying?
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it
vote at March 21, 2010 11:21 AM (Vu6sl)
www.bob.com, you peon. Sources are for the hoi polloi.
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: thorax at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (fM91B)
Every 50 ballots I fill out, I gets free money!
Posted by: ACORN volunteer at March 21, 2010 07:23 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: beerologist at March 21, 2010 11:22 AM (tgXx6)
She's been spotted in a white Ford bronco heading down the interstate.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it at March 21, 2010 07:24 AM (Vu6sl)
listkeeper: Ryan credits "Atlas Shrugged" with turning his life to public policy.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel published a profile about Ryan.
http://is.gd/aRFqR
Posted by: wtfci at March 21, 2010 07:24 AM (EbpbH)
So, that makes how many wars and terrorist attacks you slept through, exactly?
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:24 AM (Sz7G2)
Remain calm, my friends.
Get angry but remain calm. The only way this is the end is if it fails to pass. There will be challenges and states like Idaho are already moving to block it. This will get to SCOTUS and it will fail. Hang this pile of shit around every Democrat. There is no blue-dog they are all part of the Democrat party that produced Obama, Reid and Pelosy. I can tell y you, all this "bipartisan", get-along-with-your-neighbors-who-happen-to-think-differently crap ends today.
(And the "I didn't know they'd do that," excuse will not cut it...)
Posted by: Warthog at March 21, 2010 07:25 AM (IqL8x)
Priority #1 indicated by asterisk (*)
PLEASE CALL! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE
Loretta Sanchez (202) 225-2965 Fax: (202) 225-5859 *
Earl Pomneroy (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355 *
Kathy Dahlkemper (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038 *
Paul Kanjorski (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200 *
Nick Rahall (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000 *
John Tanner (202) 225-4714 (731) 885-7070 *
Lincoln Davis (202) 225-6831 (931) 490-8699 *
Marcy Kaptur (202) 225-4146 (419) 259-7500 *
Daniel Lipinski (202) 225-5701 (312) 886-0481 *
Jim Matheson (202) 225-3011 (801) 486-1236
Bart Stupak (202) 225-4735 (989) 356-0690 *
Harry Teague (202) 225-2365 (575) 393-0510
Posted by: sunny black at March 21, 2010 07:26 AM (lFhqf)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:26 AM (aMdQJ)
This will all go away later today when Jack Bauer suddenly shows up on the floor of the House and saves our country from the Evil.
I pity the fools.
Posted by: Musket Man at March 21, 2010 07:26 AM (rAk46)
www.bob.com, bobsuckscock.com. Sources are for the hoi polloi.
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2010 11:23 AM (1fanL)
FIFY
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it at March 21, 2010 07:27 AM (Vu6sl)
listkeeper: Ryan credits "Atlas Shrugged" with turning his life to public policy.
He sure walks-the-walk. His physical features look like the illustrations I've seen of Hank Reardon and John Galt too.
Posted by: ListKeeper at March 21, 2010 07:28 AM (Dhbqp)
Pelosi has the votes...more than enough votes.
She does not lose.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:18 AM (siar6)
Hi, Bob (siar6)! You capitalized your "B" since last night's Axelrod time-on-the-clock. Looks great!
Posted by: reginaldL at March 21, 2010 07:29 AM (k6Tcc)
Posted by: Crusty at March 21, 2010 07:29 AM (qzgbP)
I was never afraid America would be destroyed by al Qaeda after 9/11, because I knew we (especially our military) were stronger and better than they were--and I was right, up until the Obama admin started treating terrorists like shoplifters.
Being destroyed from within by our own citizens' greed and ignorance is completely different.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:30 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: Lib Dummy at March 21, 2010 07:30 AM (5I0Yr)
C'mon, this is a sea change not just in American politics, but for America itself. Creating a new entitlement is not just another vote. Of course, some members know that this will cost them their jobs, but they know this bill is "forever" and that's why it will pass.
I still predict 218 is the number.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:30 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Sparky at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (r0u40)
That all said, please don't say, "The Catholic Church may want..." like we're one big monolithic mass. I'm the Church too, and I'm against it.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (Sz7G2)
As Rush said last week, if this thing passes, "that's when the fun begins." Decisions are reversible.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: ListKeeper at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (Dhbqp)
Posted by: rplat at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (G1ArL)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 07:31 AM (HQzxr)
The National Right to Life Committee just put out a release explaining that an executive order cannot fix the abortion related problems in the health care bill: http://tinyurl.com/ye6dwfq
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it at March 21, 2010 07:32 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 07:32 AM (1SbnG)
That's not the end, either. Pieces of it will be back. They'll tack insurance mandates and taxes and bribes onto military procurements and all kinds of other unrelated stuff, then bash us over the heads with you "you hate soldiers! you hate children!" when we object.
This is a goal-line stand. There's a 99-yd drive next.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:32 AM (OkT2m)
Drudge has a developing story quoting Granny Richtus saying "Steny, we got to get to 217. None of the members want to be the deciding vote."
Posted by: ListKeeper at March 21, 2010 07:33 AM (Dhbqp)
Oh, well if greed and ignorance are your threshold, why the hell are you only getting worried now? People have been greedy and ignorant forever.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:33 AM (Sz7G2)
I love this. "Fight the insurance companies by forcing every American to purchase their product--and at inflated rates!"
Fail. Big fail.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:33 AM (OkT2m)
I don't even understand why you're bitching at us for worrying about this. What's your point? What are you trying to accomplish here?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (tzcjs)
Right this minute, you're seeing the particular brand of Roman Catholicism that provoked all the quiet debates when JFK ran, just saying. The Pope could weigh in on this, but he won't. All those Vatican II social justice liberationists who wormed their way through seminary in the molestation era are now confessors to wavering Congressmen. And they are issuing their absolutions.
Marcy Kaptur has nothing to worry about. She cannot lose her seat. Priests will carry her campaign signs on street corners, if necessary, even if stirrups and specula are discovered mounted on her House office desk. She's a closet nun. This morning, campaign speeches prayers are being uttered for her from lecterns across the diocese. By November, it will be from the pulpits.
Posted by: comatus at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (/VEEI)
Posted by: Sparky
And also, watch all of them clamoring like mad to get "good government jobs" that have secret tunnels to good doctors and resenting the hell out of all the civil "servants" who suck taxes and watch porn all day but get liver transplants and free acne care.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (Sz7G2)
Posted by: Sparky at March 21, 2010 07:35 AM (r0u40)
Again, old news from yesterday.
National Right to Life has made it known that they will not target those who vote for the health care bill. They have given Stupak and his friends a free pass on this issue.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:36 AM (siar6)
They are being kept in a bubble that makes them believe that this bill is good for the country and that opposition is only fringe elements.
They don't really know what is in the bill and even if they did most of them are too stupid to understand it "without a team of lawyers explaining it to them"
They are being confronted by their leadership telling them that this is an historic vote and if they vote against it they will go down in history as traitors, evil, and against helping sick people.
They are also being threatened that if they vote against it the machine will destroy their lives and any chance of reelection. they will lose everything and have to go back to being a working stiff. And if they vote for it they will be heralded and supported by the party, all their associates (unions, bureaucrats, cocktail party set,...)and guaranteed a gravy job even if they lose.
So they can side with the bitter-clingers and go back home busted, or they can make history. Not many people would withstand such pressure, and surely the group that goes to DC is not known for integrity, intelligence, character, etc.
Posted by: nine coconuts at March 21, 2010 07:36 AM (DHNp4)
#24
Anyone who thinks Stupak is this "dumb" is four times dumber than they think Stupak is. There is no such thing as a pro-life Democrat.
Truer words have never been spoken
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 21, 2010 07:37 AM (nDF3N)
Nancy Pelosi is like the Chicago Cubs
they and she does not lose.
Posted by: Bob
Yep boob, we all fondly remember that last Cubs World Series championship 102 years ago... Why are you not fetching your shinebox you fucking worm?
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:37 AM (aMdQJ)
This isn't the loser GOP leadership.
You will be eating crow when Yes vote number 216 is read.
And I'll be here to accept my accolades.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:37 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 11:31 AM (HQzxr)
Monty, that was just incredible. I would like to post it on Facebook if you will grant me your permission. Thanks!
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it at March 21, 2010 07:38 AM (Vu6sl)
My prediction for today: Massive pain for all Democrats.
Even if they get the votes they need to pass it...the pain will be crippling. Bring on the "Motion to Recommit", and every other parlimentary move available.
Then we get to do it again, but that time, in the Senate.
The Des are going to be in a living hell all Spring. And then they get voted out of office.
In the mean time, I recommend you learn to be your own doctor by taking a Red Cross class.
Posted by: ListKeeper at March 21, 2010 07:38 AM (Dhbqp)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:39 AM (OkT2m)
Yep boob, we all fondly remember that last Cubs World Series championship 102 years ago... Why are you not fetching your shinebox you fucking worm?
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 11:37 AM (aMdQJ)
That 'Bob' is a sockpuppet.
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 07:39 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: UGrev at March 21, 2010 07:39 AM (862vz)
This isn't the loser GOP leadership.
You will be eating crow when Yes vote number 216 is read.
And I'll be here to accept my accolades.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:37 AM (siar6)
When the vote is over, will you stop diving on Nancy's muff?
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it at March 21, 2010 07:40 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:40 AM (aMdQJ)
Posted by: ListKeeper
Yup. It's Christmas night. We're cold and starving and outnumbered. Let's go.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:40 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 11:23 AM (BN/2Y)
You're an idiot. This bill will kill Catholic Health care work. Pro-lifers in Congress may cave but the Church doesn't have the option. Witness Mass and DC with gay marriage and adoptions. Catholic hospitals will close before they allow abortions and the federal government will eventually disqualify anyone not offering it from receiving federal funds. The Church will be able to keep some basic clinics open but no hospitals.
Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2010 07:41 AM (Y8smK)
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:41 AM (x89dC)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 21, 2010 07:41 AM (tzcjs)
Don't start being pessimistic now. Nothing happening right now is different from the challenges we faced yesterday. Either you have reason to fear and you've been worrying all along, or you've got the courage to believe we can overcome it. Or maybe both are true at the same time. But to start worrying only now is irrational. We've been fighting since before Hancock signed his name. If you've been ignorant of that, you needed to wake up, big time. Better now than never waking up at all.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:41 AM (Sz7G2)
This will be as bad as when Bush signed off on unfunded Medicare D. Although, I don't remember feeling so bad back then. Hmmm. I guess I'm just a stupid rightwing idiot fuck pussy. Oh well.
Posted by: Rightwing idiot pussy, (a.k.a., ace) at March 21, 2010 07:41 AM (vsoRI)
It's a sign of the times that I'm so jaded by the race-baiting worms on the Left constantly making this crap up that I couldn't care less about the story. Last year at this time I'd be all over it, but now every time a Lib cries "racist Republican", I can't help but chuckle to myself.
Posted by: lincolntf at March 21, 2010 07:42 AM (cGaVN)
America committed suicide back in 2008.
This is just the rigor mortis kicking in.
What the Dems don't understand is rigor mortis doesn't last that long.
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 07:42 AM (QuP9W)
Posted by: the artist formerly known as bob at March 21, 2010 07:42 AM (w9bVp)
Not one member of the GOP is voting for this and the only congresscritters crossing over are Dems. But she's the bestest speaker evah,right?
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 07:42 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 21, 2010 07:42 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 07:43 AM (HQzxr)
Being destroyed from within by our own citizens' greed and ignorance is completely different.
Oh, well if greed and ignorance are your threshold, why the hell are you only getting worried now? People have been greedy and ignorant forever
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 11:33 AM (Sz7G2)
It's normal for an individual to be greedy or ignorant. It's another thing entirely when it is the government that is greedy, and the people who are ignorant.
Posted by: Spitting on hands, hoisting the black flag at March 21, 2010 07:43 AM (/QN+S)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:36 AM (siar6)
Where did you see that?
Posted by: Rocks at March 21, 2010 07:44 AM (Y8smK)
Is that what you kids are calling it these days?
Posted by: Bill Clinton at March 21, 2010 07:44 AM (VcPAo)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 07:45 AM (1SbnG)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 21, 2010 07:46 AM (mhD2v)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 07:46 AM (HQzxr)
While I agree that the people need to be aware, your premise fails on the first point - we wouldn't have a constitution of limited powers if that hadn't always been the case.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:46 AM (Sz7G2)
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2010 07:47 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 11:45 AM (1SbnG)
During the primaries you couldn't pay him to say something nice about Obama. He was a Hillary guy all the way. Now he's 'all in' on Obama.
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 07:47 AM (VuLos)
"Not one member of the GOP is voting for this and the only congresscritters crossing over are Dems. But she's the bestest speaker evah,right?"
She's certainly been more effective with health care reform than the GOP was with social security reform.
Nancy Pelosi won and the GOP lost. End of story.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:47 AM (siar6)
Do you have a link for that? The press releases I've seen from state affiliates say that prolife Democrats that vote for the Senate Bill will not be supported by Right to Life in November.
Posted by: wtfci at March 21, 2010 07:47 AM (EbpbH)
If and when the democrats follow Pelosi and Obama over the cliff with this bill all of our insurance will go up drastically. The bill ends pre existing conditions immediately and postpones the subsidies and extra insureds until 2015 that would help offset the costs of pre existing conditions.
There will be carange for the dems in November.
Posted by: robtr at March 21, 2010 07:47 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Jollyroger at March 21, 2010 07:48 AM (wJMVP)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 11:45 AM (1SbnG)
It's difficult for Juan to concentrate while he's got Obama's dick stuck up his ass.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 07:49 AM (Vu6sl)
I used to hear him before he went national, he had a daytime talk program. The man is dumb as a bag of shit. but he hit the PC lottery being a black Latino and has ridden that as far as he can.
I enjoy watching Krauthamer and Kristol roll their eyes whenever he talks on the Fox panel.
Posted by: nine coconuts at March 21, 2010 07:49 AM (DHNp4)
From Riehl: RT @JannieAlexa: 7 Dems on the fence. Liberty needs 4.
RT @ZanP: GOP will hand deliver emails to 7 holdouts! see comment at: http://tinyurl.com/yzwrj46 #teaparty #gop #killthebill #tcot #sgp
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:49 AM (aMdQJ)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 07:49 AM (1SbnG)
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (x89dC)
Because the tables have tipped. The libs have agitated and agitated, divided people into grievance groups, directed taxpayer money to those that won't take care of themselves in such numbers that it now reaches nearly 50% of our population. Get it? They have successfully breeded generations of people who don't strive for the American dream. They strive to leech the American dream from others. When those people are nearly half our population, it would tend to cause worry...dontcha think?? It's called being destroyed from within. So, yeah, I'm truly scared for my country for the first time in my life.
Posted by: Twinks at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (wRPBa)
Posted by: nine coconuts at March 21, 2010 11:49 AM (DHNp4)
My favorite was when they had CiCi whatshername on the Fox panel. Krauthammer would look at her while she was talking and you could almost hear him think 'CiCi you ignorant slut'.
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (VuLos)
Yesterday, Baracky quoted from Shit Lincoln Never Said, Unexpurgated Edition, Vol. I
...or was his teleprompter fucking with him again?
Posted by: beedubya at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (tzcjs)
Posted by: dr kill at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (w9bVp)
You guys have no clue how politics works, do you?
Right to Life "not supporting" a candidate is much, much different than when they actively campaign against you.
I've volunteered for Wisconsin Right to Life and know how that organization does things. They could have let Stupak and his gang know that they will be specific targets in November if they voted for health care. They haven't done that.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (siar6)
I can understand getting punch drunk stupid on Saturday night, but sniffing glue on Sunday morning?
Posted by: John Galt at March 21, 2010 07:51 AM (Ylv1H)
"Not one member of the GOP is voting for this and the only congresscritters crossing over are Dems. But she's the bestest speaker evah,right?"
She's certainly been more effective with health care reform than the GOP was with social security reform.
Nancy Pelosi won and the GOP lost. End of story.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:47 AM (siar6)
Bob, you're ability to blow Axlerod and post at the same time is quite impressive. I'll give you a B+.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 07:52 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Dan at March 21, 2010 07:52 AM (1jzSs)
I remember when someone (can't remember who) introduced him to the notion that global warmism was a front for government control. His mind was boggled.
Posted by: FUBAR at March 21, 2010 07:53 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 07:53 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Twinks at March 21, 2010 07:53 AM (wRPBa)
Posted by: yarrrrr at March 21, 2010 07:53 AM (9DPQr)
The Democrats are toast in November. Remember, the Republicans will all run on reversing this travesty. It is up to us to see that they keep their promises after they get the majority. A politician is a politician. We have to make sure that they know that breaking their word given during the campaigns is a political death warrant.
Posted by: Nancy at March 21, 2010 07:54 AM (3TdgB)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 07:54 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: eman at March 21, 2010 07:54 AM (3fzoU)
You clearly have a problem with making assumptions.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (Sz7G2)
Posted by: kingfisher at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (RUdpr)
Sir, I go back to your site periodically for more good stuff but your pen has been pretty quiet lately.
Posted by: Old Sailor at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: yarrrrr
The fact that it doesn't spook the pro-choicers one bit will apparently be lost on Stupak.
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (x89dC)
While I agree that the people need to be aware, your premise fails on the first point - we wouldn't have a constitution of limited powers if that hadn't always been the case.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 11:46 AM (Sz7G2
Oh, thank you, superior one, for schooling me on my premise. Perhaps you too, would like to come back later for your "accolades".
Posted by: Spitting on hands, hoisting the black flag at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (/QN+S)
"They have successfully breeded generations of people who don't strive for the American dream. "
Wasn't the "Me Generation" the first large graduating class?
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 21, 2010 07:55 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 07:56 AM (HQzxr)
LOL, you guys think she really said this without it being meant to be heard?
This whole vote is a game. They're playing up the drama and intrigue when the votes are clearly there. She has 4-6 votes in her pocket ready to be called upon if needed.
IMO, you are all just so used to the GOP having no clue how to win crucial votes, twist arms, make deals, etc, that it surprises you when the opposition does it so easily.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 07:56 AM (siar6)
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2010 07:56 AM (1fanL)
I've been worried since January 2007. It's only lately I've been feeling doomed--realizing how much of this shit was started before my parents were even born, and realizing how many people I know in meatspace (former coworkers, cousins, school friends) think this is the way America should be.
My immediate worry is that the civil war/riots* will start while I'm stuck alone in NY (temporarily working here). I'll feel a little better when I'm back in the Midwest near my family.
* Have we worried about the reaction of the people who think they're going to be getting free drugs now if this thing doesn't pass?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 07:56 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:56 AM (siar6)
Psst, Boob. You're starting to repeat yourself. Why not go fellate your father instead?
Posted by: bob at March 21, 2010 07:57 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: Jack Bauer's Dad at March 21, 2010 07:57 AM (bC1MR)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:57 AM (aMdQJ)
THIS IS NOT OVER if the bill passes today. That is just the beginning of the process. This bill is going to galvanize the right, and we have many means available to us to fight it. Those of you who say entitlements never get rolled back are missing the point that this bill is different from social security, etc. Those were BIPARTISAN measures, and the benefits were felt almost immediately. This bill is unilateral and the pain will strike way before the so-called benefits. Man up, you wusses. The feelings of resignation are exactly what they want. Instead, arm yourselves (interpret that how you want) for a long battle.
Posted by: dulce at March 21, 2010 07:58 AM (HFdqI)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 07:58 AM (aMdQJ)
Sometimes I think Kristol is making great efforts to not burst out laughing - face clenched in a smile, then the eye roll. Precious.
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 07:58 AM (BN/2Y)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (tzcjs)
Posted by: FUBAR at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (1fanL)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (1SbnG)
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (Z+qzA)
What? Getting free drugs if it doesn't pass?
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (x89dC)
The executive order isn't worth the paper it's written on. All spending bills originate in the house and are approved by the senate and signed by the president.
The president can't change spending law by executive order. If Stupak goes along with this it's because he wasn't serious anyway. These are democrats we are talking about here. They lie, cheat and steal as a way of life.
Posted by: robtr at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (fwSHf)
Shouldn't you be sneaking into Pelosi's backyard and stealing her undies off the clothes-line?
Please go celebrate your internets awesomeness in a more productive way.
Stupid, stoned, and full of shit is no way to go through life, Bob.
Posted by: sifty at March 21, 2010 07:59 AM (4FAWX)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:00 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 08:00 AM (QuP9W)
The GOP has geniuses like Michael Steele and Mitch McConnell and Pence and Boehner ready to lead the opposition! They've done such a great job so far!
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:00 AM (siar6)
Er, Radish write bad English. Try again: The people who think this bill will give them all sorts of free shit. If it doesn't pass, they're going to be upset. And most of them don't live in great neighborhoods to begin with...
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 08:01 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 11:46 AM (Sz7G2
Sorry, my nerves are just about shot. We're probably on the same side, no good comes from fratricide.
Posted by: Spitting on hands, hoisting the black flag at March 21, 2010 08:01 AM (/QN+S)
Posted by: arhooley at March 21, 2010 08:01 AM (x89dC)
I know...a little skeet shooting, followed by assembling the AR-15 kit I've had sitting around for a while.
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:02 AM (BFqyO)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2010 08:02 AM (1SbnG)
That's a "solar dryer", and upscale neighborhoods have covenants against them because only white trash who can't afford electricity should have to look at them from their breakfast nook.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 08:02 AM (OkT2m)
This is why the GOP loses.
It doesnt' matter if this is bipartisan or not. It will not be rolled back. It cannot be rolled back.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:02 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 12:02 PM (BFqyO)
Did someone say target practice?
Posted by: Bob's Head at March 21, 2010 08:03 AM (1fanL)
"My immediate worry is that the civil war/riots* will start"
Don't worry. That is not going to happen. The mandatory vaccines and food additives will keep us calmed/comatose.
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 08:03 AM (BN/2Y)
Not just lately. I write to vent, and I just haven't bothered venting lately. Ignoring politics is working better for me. Today, not so much.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 08:03 AM (Sz7G2)
Posted by: beerologist at March 21, 2010 08:03 AM (tgXx6)
What purpose does that serve? Does making this vote closer and more controversial help her cause? You are a complete douchebag.
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 08:03 AM (Z+qzA)
The far-left democrats (is there any other kind?) are going to gloat about this if they drag it across the finish line - which will really piss people off.
November cannot get here fast enough.
They cannot hide that this is a party-line-vote. That's the history.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 08:04 AM (0fzsA)
Yup, I love the race baiting.
If it's true, then I am appalled by their stupidity. They are no better than the imbeciles that they hope to degrade (forgive me if I don't really give a crap if they hurt Barney Frank or the other worthless scum congress-critters' feelings). The simple fact is however, that everyone on earth has heard worse things in playgrounds amongst children, on MTV daily, in 3 out of 4 rap songs, and countless other places. That said, if there were people doing this, it's pathetic and inexcusable; but it is not isolated to "tea-baggers" nor otherwise unheard of.
As has been pointed out elsewhere, there's a part of me that is skeptical. With all the iphones, media cameras and other devices around, along with the media's on-going, all-out campaign to paint anyone opposed to Obama/ Pelosi/ Reed/ etc. as a racist, I find the lack of audio or video in this matter surprising.
Assuming that it's all true... was it any worse than Reed's statements? Biden's?
Sigh... I am opposed to paying other people's bills for them, especially when I don't have a choice in the matter. That makes me a racist.
Posted by: Damiano at March 21, 2010 08:04 AM (2tsdE)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:04 AM (siar6)
They have the alleged text of the alleged executive order over at NRO. Does it mean anything that the EO says it applies to the House Resolution but makes no mention of the Senate version of the bill. As worthless as an EO would be, does this make it even more worthlesser?
Posted by: OCBill at March 21, 2010 08:05 AM (p28Ei)
No lie. He's one of my top suspects for Depends® wearing, right after Mike Huckabee.
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:05 AM (BFqyO)
November cannot get here fast enough.
They cannot hide that this is a party-line-vote. That's the history."
Loser talk.
The "history" here is that the bill passed.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 12:00 PM (siar6)
Yeah you're right Bob, you guys kicked our asses and held onto Ted Splash Kennedy's Senate seat that you have held since 1952, oh wait a republican won that.
But you did hold onto the governorship of New frigging Jersey, oh I am sorry you lost that too.
Well you did hold onto The Head of the DNC's governorship in Virginia. What? oh, sorry bob you lost Tim Kaine's head of the DNC governorship in a landslide.
How is that hopey changy stuff working out for you.
Posted by: robtr at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Old Sailor at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: Vet_Missing_Parts at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (MCHyX)
Posted by: Terry at March 21, 2010 08:06 AM (Vui52)
The so-called executive order the fool the Stupak block?
From NRO's The corner: It's a sham.
"The reality of this or any other text, though is: It is meaningless legally. It has no binding effect. I don't know a single lawyer with a working knowledge of the Constitution, Congress, and the Executive, who says otherwise.
And remember how fast the pro-abortion feminists went wild when they heard Pelosi was talking with Stupak about a legislative fix Friday night? I hear no shrieking this morning. There's a reason for that. They know it's meaningless and has no binding effect.
I wouldn't be surprised, though, if, upon reading the above text, legal-abortion supporters do make noise: Because it purports to do more than it actually can. As one reader suggests, maybe they'll just hold their fire until after the vote tonight, when the EO can easily fall to the wayside.
Ed Whelan — who, if we were the Obama administration, would be "Bench Memos" czar — adds: "Totally meaningless because it has no binding force. An utter sham.""
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 08:07 AM (0fzsA)
I must admit that I do picture Bob as an orange disk, moving at 42mph
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:07 AM (BFqyO)
Posted by: eman at March 21, 2010 08:07 AM (3fzoU)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 08:08 AM (QuP9W)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 08:08 AM (9Wv2j)
Reading your posts is like grading my college students' papers. I know even before starting on them that they're full of shit.
Why don't you go play with your Legos? You might be able to put together a bionicle or something, if you work very, very hard.
Posted by: dulce at March 21, 2010 08:08 AM (HFdqI)
Washington D.C., Mar 20, 2010 / 09:41 pm (CNA).- In a final, urgent plea to prevent the passage of the current form of the Senate health care bill, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) on Saturday evening sent a letter to Congressmen asking them to vote “no.”
“For decades,” the letter says, “the United States Catholic bishops have supported universal health care. The Catholic Church teaches that health care is a basic human right, essential for human life and dignity.”
“Our community of faith,” the bishops continue, “provides health care to millions, purchases health care for tens of thousands and addresses the failings of our health care system in our parishes, emergency rooms and shelters. This is why we as bishops continue to insist that health care reform which truly protects the life, dignity, consciences and health of all is a moral imperative and an urgent national priority.”
Nevertheless, they add, “we
are convinced that the Senate legislation now presented to the House of
Representatives on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis sadly fails this test
and ought to be opposed.”
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 08:08 AM (VuLos)
"They have the alleged text of the alleged executive order over at NRO. Does it mean anything that the EO says it applies to the House Resolution but makes no mention of the Senate version of the bill. As worthless as an EO would be, does this make it even more worthlesser?"
My God in Heaven. The most ferociously pro-abortion members are OK with this EO. Doesn't that tell you anything? Do any of you even use your common sense?
It really is no wonder we lose most of the time.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:09 AM (siar6)
Posted by: PaleRider at March 21, 2010 08:10 AM (/JGtb)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 08:10 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:10 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: 1776 Bob at March 21, 2010 08:11 AM (MMC8r)
It is meaningless.
Posted by: mrkwong at March 21, 2010 08:11 AM (G8Eo0)
This whole vote is a game. They're playing up the drama and intrigue when the votes are clearly there. She has 4-6 votes in her pocket ready to be called upon if needed.
IMO, you are all just so used to the GOP having no clue how to win crucial votes, twist arms, make deals, etc, that it surprises you when the opposition does it so easily.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 11:56 AM (siar6)
Please continue posting the same exact thing over and over and ignore evidence that contradicts your idiotic comments. I think the piece of crap bill will likely pass, too, but I don't think they have 216 guaranteed votes as of right now based on the public comments we've seen this morning and the report of Pelosi's phone call to Hoyer. But you ignore that because it contradicts your idiotic pontificating, you douchebag.
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 08:11 AM (ljvjO)
The pro-abortion gang are quiet. Which means they are cool with Stupak's group being tricked and lied-to in order to drag this thing across the finish line.
They know the promises are all fake.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at March 21, 2010 08:12 AM (0fzsA)
250
If this passes today -
IT WILL BE THE LARGEST TAX INCREASE IN AMERICAN HISTORY.
And, like many of our other taxes, will be disproportionately levied. That means that there is not an equal amount of liberty for US citizens. That ain't right and it MUST end.
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 08:12 AM (aMdQJ)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:12 AM (BFqyO)
A lot of pieces had to fall into play.
The only thing you can be sure of with the Democrat party is that they have horrible ideas, they know they do (in the back of their mind), they know they have to rely on corruption, the American people (conservatives, libertarians, Tea party, and independents) are completely united against them, and Democrats at the end of the day, as we've seen this past one year, are reliably bad at what they do. Maybe there's still hope....and if not, then for the first time in American history you will see a populace of committed free-marketeers entirely committed to repealing an entitlement. Conventional wisdom will be wrong on this one.
Posted by: sunny black at March 21, 2010 08:12 AM (lFhqf)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 08:13 AM (aMdQJ)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 08:13 AM (HQzxr)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 08:13 AM (OkT2m)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 12:04 PM (siar6)
FIFY
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 08:14 AM (Vu6sl)
Yeah, she just happened to say it loud enough to be heard!
You guys are classic. I am going to love being here this evening.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:14 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 12:12 PM (BFqyO)
Check out Panama.
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 08:14 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:15 AM (BFqyO)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 12:10 PM (5/yRG)
Wow, what an "inspirational" post. That's the type of passive, defeatist response that got us in this situation. If the standard is that we shouldn't be upset as long as the "world doesn't stop turning," then what the hell is the point of caring about anything as nothing we do or say will cause the world to stop turning?
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 08:15 AM (ljvjO)
And it's what, 5 workers for every retiree? Grammy and Grampy's kids didn't have enough kids.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 08:16 AM (OkT2m)
Apology accepted, as I hope you will accept mine - yes, we're on the same side. I was trying to make a point to Heather, and obviously not doing a very good job of it.
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 08:16 AM (Sz7G2)
You're right Bob she wants us to think she doesn't have enough votes so that we
will just give up...wait,what?
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 08:16 AM (Z+qzA)
Monty I think we are breaking new ground here. I have NEVER in my life seen the average citizen stirred up as they are now. Even during the turbulent 60s they liked to make out that the country was under severe upheaval but it was only a very small minority that was causing the problems then. All that upheaval was really nothing more than press hype.
Truly the last time we had this level of animosity towards Washington was the months leading into the War Between the States. The difference is this time it is not sectional. It is economic and urban vs rural so it makes things even worse.
All that being said, I don't think that it necessarily leads to bloodshed or a civil war. This IS new ground so the outcome is up in the air. The elections this year are what I think will be the determining factor. This country simply can not stand another two years of communist control of all three branches of government.
If the Republicans fail to take at least one of the houses of congress it will be all over. We will collapse economically. That will happen when the Chinese quit buying our debt (already starting) and Moody's downgrades our paper.
If the Republicans take a house and stop the left drift we still may be able to save it, particularly if they follow up in 2012 with the Senate and the President. Perhaps they can actually turn some of it back.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 08:16 AM (QrA9E)
I'm with you, Dan, but there sure are a lot of them here today. Big stakes.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:16 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 08:17 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 12:15 PM (BFqyO)
Posted by: Tami at March 21, 2010 08:17 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: The Black Republican at March 21, 2010 08:18 AM (Sz7G2)
Here in Michigan at least, it's a gorgeous Sunday morning (despite ObamaCare, of course). And yet some sad, lonely individuals see fit to spend their time trolling Ace of Spades. Trolling is an art, when done correctly. But dude, it's Sunday morning. It just makes you look pathetic.
Posted by: Fortunate Son at March 21, 2010 08:18 AM (trlZM)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 12:14 PM (siar6)
FIFY again.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 08:18 AM (Vu6sl)
You guys are classic. I am going to love being here this evening.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 12:14 PM (siar6)
Of course, it's not true because it contradicts what you're saying. Just ignore the man behind the curtain, right numbnuts? You're also showing your intellectual dishonesty by taking one small part of my post and only responding to that, especially when I also wrote I thought the bill would pass today. Did you see I wrote that or was that inconvenient to your idiot retort? How about other public statements from various Democratic members of Congress that said they're not there with the votes yet? As I've said, you're a complete douchebag.
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 08:19 AM (ljvjO)
I got it now--I think we agree more than we disagree.
I'm another "nerves shot"--I'm going for a drive and some ice cream, while private vehicle ownership and sugar/dairy are still legal.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 21, 2010 08:19 AM (OkT2m)
Not necessarily true. I am looking at what I put in vs what I am likely to get out and it is much lower than what I put in.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 08:19 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: robtr at March 21, 2010 08:19 AM (fwSHf)
So let me get this straight... we're bombing the shit out of some bearded psychopath who lives in a fucking shithole somewhere in outer Afghanistan, while our government is destroying our nation and its future like no enemy that we have ever faced before and right on live television with a big "screw you" finger stuck in our faces. And the Constitution - just an old roll of Bounty toilet paper.
And our President is OK with Iranian mullahs having a nuclear bomb to point at s and our allies, but not with our allies building in their nation's capital or Great Britain, etc. They don't get the maximum ass-kiss treatment like a pile of homicidal maniacs in Cairo.
So who are our most dangerous, truly mortal enemies again?
Posted by: TexasJew at March 21, 2010 08:20 AM (KXW8j)
Posted by: Mark at March 21, 2010 08:20 AM (LU36W)
Posted by: Winston Smith at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (BFqyO)
Posted by: Old Sailor at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (/Ft4q)
Posted by: AD at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (vMq5s)
Have a question...I'm not a Catholic..if the Catholics in Congress vote for this, can they be excommunicated or forbidden to take communion?
Posted by: beerologist at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (tgXx6)
Fortunately, it's currently only two out of three.
Posted by: Chief Justice Roberts at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (DCQ0q)
The fact that it has been this hard for a party that held the Presidency, a filibuster proof majority in the Senate and an 80 seat lead in the House shows incredible weakness - not strength like you are trying so desperately to project.
For it to pass with 216 to 220 votes is simply pathetic and it shows how toxic this bill is. You can crow about your victory if you wish, but it will be a Pyrrhic victory and we all know it. Including you.
Posted by: Macaroon at March 21, 2010 08:21 AM (F6+/O)
it is not too late !!!!!! tihs must lead the news today – obama’s deficit savings LIE!!!!!!!!!!!!
UPDATE: Former CBO Director: Obamacare Deficit will be $562 Billion over 10 years http://bit.ly/bO22yh
UPDATE: Former Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, director of the Congressional Budget Office from 2003 to 2005, confirms CentristNet’s claims last night in his NYT column outlining the dodges and gimmicks included by the Democrats to obtain the explicitly false claim of $138 billion in paper deficit “savings” and concluding that Obamacare will actually result in over a half a trillion of increased deficit spending over the next 10 years
Posted by: AHFF Geoff at March 21, 2010 08:22 AM (5r0Tz)
Nancy's toast as a leader. She's as popular as herpes, just like this bill. Even large chunks of rank-and-file democrat voters don't like this bill because of the taxes and the possibility of losing their current insurance (85% of people are satisfied with theirs, mind you). And senior citizen dems never want their medical threatened.
Unless your district is mostly welfare cases in pursuit of more bennies, voting 'no' is going to be more popular with your voters than voting in favor. Is kissing up to a former leader of a future minority party really going to be that big a win for you when you're cutting your throat? Lashing yourself to the mast is not a great idea when the ship is on its way down.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:22 AM (mHQ7T)
I think that would be Russia.
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 08:23 AM (BN/2Y)
Posted by: robtr at March 21, 2010 12:19 PM (fwSHf)
Is this the old 11:00am presser or the later announced 12:00pm presser? Link?
Posted by: reginaldL at March 21, 2010 08:23 AM (k6Tcc)
I don't believe a fucking thing the Cryptkeeper says, in public or private.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 21, 2010 08:23 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:23 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Kent Brockman at March 21, 2010 08:24 AM (cdZd+)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:24 AM (mHQ7T)
We need more guys like Alexander Hamilton.
He got it.
He wrote this in a June 4, 1791 letter to the officers he assigned to command the Treasury Department's Revenue Cutters:
While I recommend in the strongest terms to the respective officers, activity, vigilance and firmness, I feel no less solicitude, that their deportment may be marked with prudence, moderation and good temper. Upon these last qualities, not less that the former, must depend the success, usefulness and consequently continuance of the establishment in which they are included. They cannot be insensible that there are some prepossessions against it, that the charge with which they are intrusted [sic] is a delicate one, and that it is easy by mismanagement, to produce serious and extensive clamour, disgust and odium.
They will always keep in mind that their countrymen are freemen, and, as such, are impatient of everything that bears the least mark of a domineering spirit. They will, therefore, refrain, with the most guarded circumspection, from whatever has the semblance of haughtiness, rudeness, or insult. If obstacles occur, they will remember that they are under the particular protection of the laws and that they can meet with nothing disagreeable in the execution of their duty which these will not severely reprehend. This reflection, and a regard to the good of the service, will prevent, at all times a spirit of irritation or resentment. They will endeavor to overcome difficulties, if any are experienced, by a cool and temperate perseverance in their duty--by address and moderation, rather than by vehemence or violence. The former style of conduct will recommend them to the particular approbation of the President of the United States, while the reverse of it--even a single instance of outrage or intemperate or improper treatment of any person with whom they have anything to do, in the course of their duty, will meet with his pointed displeasure, and will be attended with correspondent consequences.
Barry and Nancy and Harry do not understand this. Which is why they will fail.Stay turgid, Morons
Posted by: SnakePlizzken at March 21, 2010 08:25 AM (LcUPv)
Possibly the best thing to come out of this whole fiasco, whether the bill passes or fails, is that everybody now knows Paul Ryan. He's absolutely amazing.
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 08:25 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 08:25 AM (HQzxr)
268 Uh, I think you misread me, sport. But let me reiterate:
If the damn thing passes, it passes -- there comes a point at which the only people with control over that are the people voting. I (and everybody who is not a representative) are not those people, so it is not in my direct control (sadly, because I think I'd vote correctly here, but that's just a fanciful wish). Now, IF it does pass (which I'm still not certain it will) then you have a few options: one is to be defeatist (a wrong option in my mind); two is to completely lose it (which can be the wrong option, see "defeatist" above); three is to deal with it instead of letting it deal with you (which is not passive, it is proactive). Figure out a way to break it if it should happen.
I refuse to let this keep me up at nights with worry or cause me to binge drink myself into a stupor or freak out. IF it passes, then I find some way to do my little part to break it. That's hardly being passive.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 08:26 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: obamastillsucks at March 21, 2010 08:28 AM (lnrd9)
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:29 AM (5I0Yr)
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 08:30 AM (OfFBH)
Posted by: mpfs at March 21, 2010 08:30 AM (QuP9W)
We need more guys like Alexander Hamilton.
New York's greatest Statesman. Hamilton embodied the American Spirit of Service, Honor and Duty. His work made our Republic possible.
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2010 08:30 AM (tEdoh)
Posted by: jewells at March 21, 2010 08:31 AM (lv7H+)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at March 21, 2010 08:31 AM (tzcjs)
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatreds.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away a man's initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
William J. H. Boetcker, 1916 ( lived from 1873-1962).
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 08:32 AM (Vu6sl)
Costa Rica, that's the place. I have friends and a place to stay there.
I hope you are not Jewish. The Arabs and Persians are already there fomenting hate..
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2010 08:32 AM (tEdoh)
For the first time in my adult life, i'm afraid for my country.
So, that makes how many wars and terrorist attacks you slept through, exactly?
It's one thing to have foreign enemies. But when we have all too many 5th columnists like "Bob" here at home, well, that *is* disturbing.
Posted by: Curmudgeon at March 21, 2010 08:32 AM (tH7KR)
What's up with the anti-Catholicism on this thread? Give that crap a rest, and give the Church a break. She's been against this thing from the beginning, and even now, on a sabbath during Lent, the American bishops are working the phones to defeat this thing.
What are the Mormons doing? The Muslims? The Buddhists? The atheists? The Presbyterians? etc. Just sayin' -- we have one church here sticking out its neck on this in a big public way, on our side no less, and some morons here want to chop it off.
At mass today in my parish you shoulda heard our pastor waxing apoplectic over the thought of this bill's passage. To imply that he may be somehow looking forward to Obamacare is simply a joke. And ignorant.
Posted by: Cowboy at March 21, 2010 08:32 AM (zwrlc)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:33 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: WYatt Earp at March 21, 2010 08:34 AM (cdZd+)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 08:35 AM (HQzxr)
Posted by: nickless at March 21, 2010 08:36 AM (MMC8r)
So who are our most dangerous, truly mortal enemies again?
Obama and his Handlers.
He's making Rascists out of us all!
(my meaning: all of us who 'have' are being punished to achieve the ultimate goal of Affirmative Action - Wealth Re-distribution.)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2010 08:36 AM (tEdoh)
Posted by: Dan at March 21, 2010 08:36 AM (1jzSs)
Slappy, well put. They're trying to break us at the last minute. They would come here to gloat afterward, if they knew it was a sure shot.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:36 AM (mHQ7T)
I want someone to Puch Pelosi in the face and shatter those fucking clackin' dentures of hers!
My vote - Michele Bachmann
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2010 08:38 AM (tEdoh)
Many Congressmen need to visit their local Pizza Inn, like Ben Nelson did and then had to leave to save his idiot life.
Posted by: TexasJew at March 21, 2010 08:38 AM (KXW8j)
By the way, why has every vote on this gone down either on Sunday or on Christmas Eve? And, on Paschal and Advent times?
To certain oldschool Catholic point of view, things are shaping up, well, Demonically.
Posted by: Cowboy at March 21, 2010 08:39 AM (zwrlc)
The Catholic Church may have good reason to want this bill passed. They do so much charity work, have hospitals, and clinics.
They will close before they assist in, perform, or employ anyone who has anything to do with abortion or sex changes or in vitro.
The Pope could weigh in on this, but he won't.
If he is weighing in, it is upwards, not downwards. It is up to the bishops not the pope.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
Ugh, I hadn't seen her before this morning. I think "she" is a man. What an awful awful ugly deep voiced lieing freak.
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 08:39 AM (OfFBH)
Posted by: TexasJew at March 21, 2010 08:40 AM (KXW8j)
Mack Brown wasn't at UT until 98.
Posted by: tachyonshuggy at March 21, 2010 08:41 AM (YRjsF)
Wow, actually, that's correct.
If it was going to fail, the no votes would come out immediately when the count starts and they would flee the Capitol immediately. That's not going to happen, though.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:41 AM (siar6)
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 08:41 AM (OfFBH)
Fair enough and I can't disagree with that. Your original post that I responded to came across to me as you having a lax "You win, you lose some" attitude, which was part of the reason we're in this mess today. The Democrats play for keeps and too often Republicans are too passive with our response.
I don't lose sleep over these issues and I have plenty of things to deal with and worry about in my private life, but I'm not deluding myself to think that changes like the health care bill (if it passes and is signed into law) won't have a negative impact on the country and the type of life all Americans have become accustomed to. It's not just my health care that will be damage, but also my financial standing, which took a lot of effort and time to establish, as policies like the health care bill will hurt me and every American by harming the macroeconomy.
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 08:41 AM (ljvjO)
That's why they've held all these votes right before a recess, and why nobody could go home this weekend until the vote. Ben Nelson is a good reason why Democrats would be fools to accept a bribe from Obama.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:42 AM (mHQ7T)
325 Only one thing wrong: I'm not one of the people who would exactly be gloating if this bill passes. In fact, considering my circumstances, I should be one of the people who goes in for the weeping and passing out in an alcoholic stupor. This bill will run my family into the ground.
But I refuse to get all wee-wee'd up about it; I refuse to let this crap get me down.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 08:42 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 08:42 AM (OfFBH)
LOL, Hamilton was one of the very first big government people. He and Jefferson fought continuously. Hamilton would be at home in the Demonrat Party of today.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 08:42 AM (QrA9E)
Tell that to Loretta Sanchez.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:43 AM (mHQ7T)
UPDATE: Former CBO Director: Obamacare Deficit will be $562 Billion over 10 years http://bit.ly/bO22yh
This is the sad truth of the Obamacare package that is due to be voted on by the House of Representatives just a few hours from now. Democrats continued to make the explicitly false claim that Obamacare will be a “historic” deficit reduction package on all the Sunday shows, and the establishment media continued to second their false claims and refuse to even mention any of the obvious gimmicks and dodges used to create the false paper deficit savings reported by the CBO last week. Should Obamacare pass, the intentional fraud engaged in by President Obama and Democrats regarding the deficit “savings” issue will be seen as one of the most egregious examples of explicit misrepresentations made by federal officials, and sanctioned by the American media, in the history of this country.
Posted by: AHFF Geoff at March 21, 2010 08:43 AM (5r0Tz)
The vote that will be 216 will be Patches Kennedy, with much fanfare and touting that his father is smiling down from heaven.
Posted by: Sue at March 21, 2010 08:44 AM (YiSq/)
Has Gabe given up on the count thing, or are people just being driven nuts? I started trying to make sense out of all that yesterday, and as best I can make sense of it, including Drew's updates, it comes out to:
203 "Yes" votes + 11 "Maybes" = 214, at worst. 8 of those "Maybes" voted "Yes" last time.
HOWEVER, there's 9 in the Stupak block he's counting "No" (incuding Cao), and some of them may go the other way (especially since I thought I heard that Stupak himself say he only had 6 now).
Is that about right? For the "Maybes" I have Capuano, Giffords, Foster, Kanjorski, Mollohan, Pomeroy, Rahall, Tierney, Baird, Boucher, and Tanner.
So it seems pretty damn close, but -hey - it's not like our LIVES depend on it, or anything. Oh, wait! Our lives actually MAY depend on it not passing ... never mind!
Posted by: Optimizer at March 21, 2010 08:44 AM (acVo8)
Posted by: The Dollar Store at March 21, 2010 08:44 AM (MhRrR)
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 12:42 PM (OfFBH)
Irony. It's what's for dinner.
Posted by: TexasJew at March 21, 2010 08:45 AM (KXW8j)
But I refuse to get all wee-wee'd up about it; I refuse to let this crap get me down.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 12:42 PM (5/yRG)
Your concern is appreciated.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:45 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 08:45 AM (Vu6sl)
They are actually in the Capitol now lobbying pro-life members to vote NO.
Posted by: Bob at March 21, 2010 08:45 AM (siar6)
Posted by: Peter North at March 21, 2010 08:46 AM (KXW8j)
Posted by: Mal at March 21, 2010 08:46 AM (Z+qzA)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at March 21, 2010 08:46 AM (5I0Yr)
We are seeing that now only because they are the ones retiring now. I suspect that the next generation will have even less judging by what I have seen.
BTW, I am retired now and not drawing a dime of SS. I am living off dividends and interest for investments made while I was working.
My biggest expense? Taxes and medical.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 08:46 AM (QrA9E)
They are, of course, concerned for the welfare of the poor, but they're effectively willing to let the government take over Christian Charity with the force of a gun. If the government's doing it, it's neither Christian, nor charity. More than that, the recipients become grateful to the state, not to God, and the state begins to supplant God in their minds as the source of all we need. Look at Europe.
I think the 'social justice' that the Church espouses is actually antithetical to the Church itself.
Posted by: nickless at March 21, 2010 08:47 AM (MMC8r)
Paul Ryan destroyed Rep Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on FOX News Sunday. Ryan brought his own chart to show the massive new debt from this horrible bill. The bill means at least $376 billion in new spending federal spending and will raise taxes and premiums: Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said during her appearance on “Fox News Sunday” that democrats don’t have a hard 216 votes right now.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:48 AM (mHQ7T)
336 Well, I'm not a Republican (or an anything actually), but at some point, you have to say: ok, well, let's see if you can break me. I refuse to be broken -- at least, it will take a lot more than this stupid bill to do it.
Take heart, I'm still of the opinion that this bill may be voted down...and then I can't wait to get back on here and see if Bob is around, so I can taste his tears.
Now, that we are all on the right page with each other: I'm out the door; like Pale Rider, I've got some horses to ride. Chin up; it's not over by far, and as said above: keep the faith.
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 08:48 AM (5/yRG)
That is all they ever do. Those "fair and balanced" debates make me puke.
I no longer watch the news except at meal times and then only for the 1st 15 min or so.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 08:48 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:49 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: Little Boomer at March 21, 2010 08:49 AM (FHBgU)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (HQzxr)
I watched the liberal spin this morning that all will be forgotten after November (Howard Fineman, LOL) but I doubt it. Political good times ahead. We just have to undo the fiscal nightmare that this bill will impose.
Posted by: spike at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (oRmZx)
Hamilton was one of the very first big government people. He and Jefferson fought continuously. Hamilton would be at home in the Demonrat Party of today.
You, obviously are as stupid as you are gullible. Jefferson is/was the embodiement of the 'Fortunate Son'. He wrote eloquently from the safety of his estate and from France while men like Hamilton did the Yeoman's work in establishing the new Government.
Read your History instead of having it spoon fed to you.
While Jefferson pontificated and ran away from the fight, Hamilton worked diligently to establish the New Government and ran into the fight.
Also note : Hamilton understood that a Public Servant was someone like himself - Honorable and Dutiful. Jefferson and Madison were opportunists who used their positions to enrich themselves and their friends oin the process.
Hamilton Leveraged their greed against the welfare of the Nation and as such established the Republis through the 3/5 and letting Madison and his cronies profit from the choosing of the permanent Capital.
You, sir, are a moron.
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (tEdoh)
The vote that will be 216 will be Patches Kennedy, with much fanfare
and touting that his father is smiling down from heaven.
I'm sure Barry and Nan think that having a mentally ill drug addict cast the deciding vote is a nice way to spit in our faces one more time.
Posted by: lincolntf at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (cGaVN)
Posted by: Leonidis at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (ympF8)
You're already broken, if you think this bill is stupid or won't grant Democrats absolute control over our lives in every regard. Waterloo, baby.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:50 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: unknown jane at March 21, 2010 08:52 AM (5/yRG)
With all respect to you and the vast majority of Catholics, criticism -- not bashing -- is warranted in this case.
If Pelosi and her gang of thugs prohibited the use of fed money for abortions, the church hierarchy would be supporting this totalitarian piece of shit and ordering their members to beat the bushes to insure passage. They wouldn't give a damn about the dire consequences to the nation. Reading the messages already sent out (and dutifully posted at NRO by KJL) makes this clear.
Moreover, they are giving Catholic members of congress a pass on this. They "urge" defeat (as long as abortion isn't prohibited) but do not offer any serious consequences to senators and representatives who go along with the Obama charade.
Catholicism is uniquely powerful among religions in the USA. That isn't necessarily a bad thing; a moral compass is a necessity for good governance.
But when it is inconsistent -- as in this case, where elected officials get away with what would be excommunicable offenses if committed by regular folks (see Ted Kennedy as a prime example) -- it is damaging.
What most of the "bashers" want -- and I am one -- is to see the Catholic church take a stand, hold to it, and oppose not only abortion but the erosion of liberty this steaming pile of manure will bring.
Posted by: Ray-man at March 21, 2010 08:52 AM (6vilq)
Other than that, I'm not sure what conservative Jews are saying or doing. But in terms of demographics, there are very few of us.(It's not that the majority of Jews are Reform; it's that Jews taken as a group are such a tiny proportion of the population). So I'm not sure what kind of impact we could have in any case.
Posted by: dulce at March 21, 2010 08:54 AM (HFdqI)
It is a real problem that people want to live forever, and live well. There is no way we can pay for all the joint replacements, transplants, and other operations for people living into their 90's. Those procedures are going to have to be denied at some point. Yes, "death panels."
Posted by: lan sing at March 21, 2010 08:55 AM (BN/2Y)
Posted by: Bunker at March 21, 2010 08:56 AM (2MByZ)
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 08:57 AM (ljvjO)
Posted by: lincolntf at March 21, 2010 08:57 AM (cGaVN)
Posted by: dulce at March 21, 2010 08:58 AM (HFdqI)
Posted by: John at March 21, 2010 08:59 AM (90oki)
Posted by: elisa at March 21, 2010 08:59 AM (VcPAo)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 08:59 AM (9Wv2j)
I'm a Christian, and I believe they have incurred God's wrath and this bill will go down in flames. It is no coincidence that Obama has mocked Jesus by first bringing up Matthew 25 during the Saddlewell debate. Then his record with BAIPA. The Mexico City policy overturned. The Christmas Eve Senate vote was probably the straw that broke the camel's back for God. Abortion, more than any other issue, is driving this debate. That is not a coincidence, if you believe God, not Planned Parenthood, has the plan. Arrogance and pride will bring the Democrats down today.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 08:59 AM (mHQ7T)
No kidding. They will all do stories on the IRS, medicare cuts, and the true costs.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at March 21, 2010 09:01 AM (ympF8)
From The Corner:
Sent: Sun Mar 21 10:24:50 2010
Subject: USCCB statement on EO
To: Congressional Aides
We've consulted with legal experts on the specific idea of resolving the abortion funding problems in the Senate bill through executive order. We know members have been looking into this in good faith, in the hope of limiting the damage done by abortion provisions in the bill. We believe, however, that it would not be fair to withhold what our conclusion was, as it may help members in assessing the options before them:
"One proposal to address the serious problem in the Senate health care bill on abortion funding, specifically the direct appropriating of new funds that bypass the Hyde amendment, is to have the President issue an executive order against using these funds for abortion. Unfortunately, this proposal does not begin to address the problem, which arises from decades of federal appellate rulings that apply the principles of Roe v. Wade to federal health legislation. According to these rulings, such health legislation creates a statutory requirement for abortion funding, unless Congress clearly forbids such funding. That is why the Hyde amendment was needed in 1976, to stop Medicaid from funding 300,000 abortions a year. The statutory mandate construed by the courts would override any executive order or regulation. This is the unamimous view of our legal advisors and of the experts we have consulted on abortion jurisprudence. Only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem in the legislation."
Richard Doerflinger
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 09:01 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Loretta "Dirty" Sanchez at March 21, 2010 09:02 AM (Mmw0q)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 09:02 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: 8starsnorth at March 21, 2010 09:02 AM (IqMA6)
http://tinyurl.com/yjc2gvq
Stay turgid, Morons.
Posted by: Snake Plizzken at March 21, 2010 09:03 AM (LcUPv)
game over...Anti-abortion leader Rep. Bart Stupak to vote for health care bill, increasing chances for passage - NBC
Posted by: AHFF Geoff at March 21, 2010 09:03 AM (5r0Tz)
I have stated from the beginning that I do not believe this will pass. I still believe that.
If it does, this will not go away after Nov. As people begin feeling the tax bites, premium increases, and static if not worsening unemployment, their anger will increasing grow against the Dims. 2010 may be hard on the Dims. 2012 will be worse.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 21, 2010 09:04 AM (ucq49)
Monty & Tattoo -- Catholicism does not equate to socialism at all. This is off topic, so I'll be brief and simply lay the claim that since Pope Leo's Rerum Novarum back in the l890's (the foundation of today's Catholic social teaching), socialism has had no greater foe than the Catholic Church. Moscow may not have shot JFK, but they did shoot John Paul. Sure, liberal theology and liberation theology made their runs (and these were gramscian efforts by the leftists), but have been largely thwarted. The last two popes have been particularly influential in this regard.
These two principles, that rights derive from God, not Man and that subsidiarity is the proper approach for meeting social needs, put Catholicism staunchly at odds with the modern statist in all forms: socialist, communist, nazi, transnational asshat.
Posted by: Cowboy at March 21, 2010 09:04 AM (zwrlc)
Posted by: Geronimo80 at March 21, 2010 09:05 AM (vsRFH)
game over...Anti-abortion leader Rep. Bart Stupak to vote for health care bill, increasing chances for passage - NBC
He had a choice between socialized medicine and his soul.
Posted by: nickless at March 21, 2010 09:06 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: davidt at March 21, 2010 09:06 AM (4JjTO)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 09:06 AM (HQzxr)
This isn't about Health Care, dammit!
This is about power and control of the "free" citizens of the USA.
Forget about your money. Forget about the positive or negative impact this will have on the economy or your future health care. Those are the effects of the bill. The cause is an unconstitutional grab for our freedom, through this law and others already passed.
Do tell, would any of you be "for" a fiscally responsible bill that would lower the deficit and covers all Americans, if it explicitly stated that you were to lose your freedom and rights as enumerated in the Constitution?
Because THAT is what this bill does.
It matters not if you stand to lose or gain financially from this bill, if you value your birth-rights as free men.
and if you value your money more than your freedom, you'll eventually end up with neither
Posted by: Spitting on hands, hoisting the black flag at March 21, 2010 09:06 AM (/QN+S)
If it does, this will not go away after Nov. As people begin feeling the tax bites, premium increases, and static if not worsening unemployment, their anger will increasing grow against the Dims. 2010 may be hard on the Dims. 2012 will be worse.
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at March 21, 2010 01:04 PM (ucq49)
--I agree. The fact that the "bennies" don't even kick in until after two election cycles will make this dog's breakfast (relatively) easy to repeal politically.
As Steyn and others have noted, this is the type of entitlement encrustation that has not been rolled back in Europe, and the Dems are betting that the Rs have no spine to roll it back --but its very makeup weakens it on that score.
Posted by: logprof at March 21, 2010 09:07 AM (Mmw0q)
Better to just work around the yard, listen to college hoops on the radio, have a couple cold ones, etc. or sit here and go quietly insane with rage at the destruction of our country?
Posted by: lincolntf at March 21, 2010 09:07 AM (cGaVN)
http://tinyurl.com/yjc2gvq
Stay turgid, Morons.
Posted by: Snake Plizzken at March 21, 2010 01:03 PM (LcUPv)
I would like to ask her to hit me with her best shot!
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 09:09 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 09:09 AM (9Wv2j)
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 01:09 PM (9Wv2j)
Someone needs to live blog it for those of us that don't want to watch it.
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 09:11 AM (Vu6sl)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 09:11 AM (HQzxr)
Put not your hopes in Blue Dogs or "pro-life" Democrats, ye faithful, for ye shall inevitably be betrayed. So it is written, so it shall ever be.
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 01:11 PM (HQzxr)
And what a shock and coincidence that it happens at the very last minute. These people are absolutely the lowest fucking scum of the earth!
Posted by: conscious and waiting for the vote heard around the world at March 21, 2010 09:13 AM (Vu6sl)
FU you ignorant shit. Go get some history from a real source instead of watching the history channel and reading comic books.
You truly are an uneducated dumb ass.
Posted by: Vic at March 21, 2010 09:14 AM (QrA9E)
Cowboy, you're preaching to the choir here. Tell it to Bart (YES) Stupak.
Your Church has done a lot of cleaning up lately, but there are still rats in the basement. Lots of them. Please feel free to point out to me every diocese that openly opposes traditional Catholic Dems when they run for re-election after voting for this bill. I don't believe any of them will, because they do, after all, and in spite of the actual teaching of the Church, endorse socialism.
Posted by: comatus at March 21, 2010 09:14 AM (/VEEI)
Posted by: Andy Rand at March 21, 2010 09:15 AM (mhD2v)
There's a new thread up for that. And, just btw, I do not believe that Stupak's last minute cave necessarily means that it's over.
Posted by: Peaches at March 21, 2010 09:15 AM (9Wv2j)
I intend to hold out hope for a miracle until the last vote is recorded and the last voice is heard, but this may very well be the sour end of the greatest experiment ever conceived or executed by mankind.
Posted by: lincolntf at March 21, 2010 09:16 AM (cGaVN)
Posted by: Countrysquire at March 21, 2010 09:17 AM (aMdQJ)
Posted by: Slappy at March 21, 2010 09:18 AM (ljvjO)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 09:18 AM (HQzxr)
You cannot only be pro-life when it is convenient for you. I'm certain that you will pay sorely for this move at home -- and not just at home in Michigan but at home in Heaven. I hope your bribe was worth eternal damnation.
Posted by: maj at March 21, 2010 09:19 AM (dMRcI)
I understand what you mean but technically they are excommunicated. Excommunication is "as prohibition from receiving the sacraments".
Those people including Teddy Kennedy and Nancy Pelosi are prohibited from receiving the sacraments because they are in a state of mortal sin. Every catholic is prohibited from taking the sacraments in that state. One must be in a state of grace to partake of the sacraments.
The problem arises when a person presents themselves for a sacrament. The administer of the sacrament does not know at that moment if the person presenting themselves has made a confession, has a purpose of amendment and has performed a penance.
I am an extraordinary minister---I administer communion---I could not administer it to a local politician who has an 100% Naral rating. I have told my pries that if he ever presents himself to me, I will step aside. It would be up to the priest to know what to do in that case.
The person receiving the sacrament is the one who is responsible for determining their state of grace or mortal sin. Receiving communion in as state of mortal sin is a grave sacriledge and is often compared to a "rape of Christ."
A few bishops will insist that politicians not receive communion in their dioceses but often they will find a place to take it anyway. That action only puts their soul in greater peril.
Remember that the sacraments are not earthly signs but signs of grace or God's life in us. The purpose of the sacraments are to strengthen us so that we can do as God wishes and be with him forever in heaven. They are not a sign of the Church's approval or disapproval.
In effect, you can "excommunicate" people all day long but Churches do not have a list of those in mortal sin that they check over before communion. It is up to the person who knows they are in a state of mortal sin to not wish to incur a greater sacriledge.
Nancy Pelosi, Jim Moran, John F'in Kerry, et al are on the fast track to hell. Their bishops should be making them aware of that and may be for all we know.
Posted by: dagny at March 21, 2010 09:21 AM (OfFBH)
Yeah, she just happened to say it loud enough to be heard!
You guys are classic. I am going to love being here this evening."
You may be and probably are right about this bill passing. But, please explain why she would do this. It makes no sense at all. It doesn't make her, the President, the Dems or this bill look good at all. On the contrary, it makes it look like one big clusterfuck. You can say (lie) all you want about this (and all these other ridiculous machinations) being "part of the grand sinister plan", but why would they do it? It makes them appear so inept and weak.
Posted by: Macaroon at March 21, 2010 09:24 AM (F6+/O)
Monty, I agree with you on the demographics. Folks might want to check out the excellent film, Demographic Winter (google it).
What a great idea it was to finance grandiose entitlement regimes as giant ponzi schemes, then adopt birth control and abortion as a broad practice. This guarantees the next generations will be too small to keep wheels rolling. And, they'll be mad as hell when they come to realize how much we've "borrowed" against them.
But it gets better. Prosperity and scientific advancement are both imperiled Why should you think otherwise when you realize that increasingly, as we spend more and more money servicing the old, we as a nation are investing in our past, not our future? It takes a lot of resources to build a country, to keep it growing, and we're going to be increasingly misallocating those dollars.
Posted by: Cowboy at March 21, 2010 09:25 AM (zwrlc)
Posted by: Monty at March 21, 2010 09:30 AM (HQzxr)
Essentially, this process just demonstrates what we conservatives have been saying for years.
That a vote for any Democrat is a vote for socialists like Pelosi.
Did anyone not think this was a done deal? That the dem "party animals" wouldn't be true to form? That their public posturing wasn't just a show put on for their stupid constituents?
Well, if you did think any of the above was true, and you are at all persuadable by the facts, then the dems dropping the mask and voting for the Senate HCR bill without any cover whatsoever should convince you otherwise.
They are all, at heart, socialists.
Posted by: Matt at March 21, 2010 09:31 AM (Dj2lv)
Posted by: Recent Non-Catholic at March 21, 2010 09:34 AM (EL+OC)
Posted by: Drider at March 21, 2010 09:36 AM (aZn+0)
Posted by: Macaroon at March 21, 2010 01:24 PM (F6+/O)
I have yet to hear a satisfactory explanation of this, either. Or why any one of the Democrats would trust them to keep their word, if they were open to a bribe, or to commit political suicide "for the good of the party."
The most likely explanation is that Obama and a good chunk of Democrats are beholden to the unions and are doing what they are told. This is a power grab the likes of which this nation has never seen. For all that Obama says his presidency depends on today's outcome, that's an absurd notion. He has staked his presidency to achieving the progressive Holy Grail, but this bill is anything but that. It is just a go-ahead to keep looting the Treasury and selling our hard-won freedoms to their ever-growing list of creditors. It has to be stopped today, and then Obama can move onto something novel like actually upholding his constitutional oath of office.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at March 21, 2010 09:38 AM (mHQ7T)
Oh, wait, that's probably just the abject terror. I think I need a beer.
Posted by: RightWingRedneck at March 21, 2010 10:17 AM (GYfGD)
I'm sick of hoping Democrats -- or liberal Republicans like Grahamnesty -- will do anything good for the country. Our best hope is to drag our heels until the election, vote them out in November and then try to reverse the damage.
The health care boondoggle is going to help destroy the country if we can't reverse it -- and I do mean help. It isn't the only factor by a long shot. Between Medicare, Social Security, the horrendous debt our leaders have run up in the first year of Obama's presidency, (which is continuing as we speak) and health care, the economy is going to collapse eventually -- and maybe a lot sooner than any of us realize.
Obama wants to destroy America. Pelosi and Reid are helping him, and their suicidal followers are headed off the cliff with them, but the damage they have done will remain unless we can do something about it. If we can't, get ready for disaster. It's where we're headed, minus a miracle.
Posted by: Nancy at March 21, 2010 10:24 AM (3TdgB)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.226 seconds, 555 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: conscious and waiting for the end of the world as we know it vote at March 21, 2010 07:00 AM (Vu6sl)