Watching Morning Joe. Sorry to see the Eugene Robinson has recently suffered a divorce."

Did he blame it on race? That is what every single piece he writes for the post does.

Arrrgggg;

We MUST have Megyn back for the 9 o clock slot. AFter 3 hours of liberal crap from F&F must have an offset.

Gregg Shitasss and ALL of the reporters are liberals.

What's the weather like in Mass. today?

More important, maddogg: What's the sunspot count?

Hope "the powers that be" here keep us as updated as possible during the day on exit polls.  Go get 'em Mr. Brown.

And for you college basketball fans;  their two fine guards have absolutely horrible offensive games and yet, KSU defeates #1 Texas last night. Oh yeah!!

We are - We are - KSU

More important, maddogg: What's the sunspot count?

Sun spot count is one.

Weather in Boston????

Shitty

So far:
Me:  Brown by 6
Jean:  Brown by 12
LikeATimeBomb:  By 8
arhooley: 8
enoxo:  7
Truman North:  4
Country Squire:  7
Mr. Pink:  Kennedy, 25
SiM:  Brown, 9
dagny:  2
Big Fat Meanie:  5

Mallamut: 4.3

An Independent Voter : Coakley +3 (your poll rdbrewer--include or not)

Who knows: 7

Michel Graham on Fox is awesome!

WOW!!!!!

Fox Dem talker: Healthcare not lost by MA race. Healthcare lost last summer because WH let Republicans define the bill.

Of course fair and balanced debate tries to refute him.

Well, let's give some credit to this CNN crew (CNN story, linked at HotAir Headlines):

Earthquake victims, writhing in pain and grasping at life, watched doctors and nurses walk away from a field hospital Friday night after a Belgian medical team evacuated the area, saying it was concerned about security.

The decision left CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta as the only doctor at the hospital to get the patients through the night....

Gupta -- assisted by other CNN staffers, security personnel and at least one Haitian nurse who refused to leave -- assessed the needs of the 25 patients, but there was little they could do without supplies....

At 3:45 a.m., he posted a message on Twitter: "pulling all nighter at haiti field hosp. lots of work, but all patients stable. turned my crew into a crack med team tonight."

Of course fair and balanced debate tries to refute him.

oops, they try to refute Graham, not the Dem talker.  Post did not come out as I intended.

I have NEVER seen the 'fair and balanced" debate try to refute a liberal.

How times have changed.

In his belief that the end justifies the means, yesterday, in a subtle way, of course,  MSNBC's Chris Matthews encouraged Democrats in Massachusetts to steal the election by any means possible.

This poster was incredulous. His ilk think that it's cutesy, chic and trendy to be sleazy and dishonest, and they brazenly admit it, thinking that's cutesy, too.

I usually don't bother to watch Matthews, but I remember that when I watched his show for its full hour one evening several months ago, I counted the number of lies that he told in that hour, and as I recall, it was in the 30's. What a sleaze.

Burn the witch: 4

Me (rdbrewer):  Brown by 6
Jean:  Brown by 12
LikeATimeBomb:  By 8
arhooley: 8
enoxo:  7
Truman North:  4
Country Squire:  7
Mr. Pink:  Kennedy, 25
SiM:  Brown, 9
dagny:  2

Mallamut: 4.3

Big Fat Meanie:  5

Who Knows: 7

Vet Missing Parts: 20

DNCC: brown +4

This is off topic here but I just found out Beyonce flew to the Carribean and did a show for Quadafi's son for 2.5 million for his birthday. Never been a fan of her, now I have another reason not to be. I hope she enjoys her blood money.

46

New Years eve I think. I just heard about it.

Weather in Boston????

Shitty

Good. The Coakley voters can stay home where it is nice and toasty.

Michael Graham from Boston's 96.9?

Yeah, he's clever.

Don't know about 96.9 'cause can't get it in SC even with a 100 ft antenna. But he is the one who wrote the column in the Boston Herald that compared Coakley to the Titanic crashing into the Hindenberg.

I'm wicked psyched about today, gotta hit the road for a few hours. I'll be back...

31

I usually don't bother to watch Matthews, but I remember that when I watched his show for its full hour one evening several months ago, I counted the number of lies that he told in that hour, and as I recall, it was in the 30's. What a sleaze.

So you're the one who doubled his audience that day.

Weather on the South Shore of Boston is also "craptacular" a messy wintry mix of snow and rain, slippery too.

Went to vote this am but line was too long for me to wait - we do have a town question to repeal the special town meal tax that our selectman added ... right after the state upped the state sales tax by 25%.  People are angry and they are voting!

Many more Brown people out in force at a few of the polling stations I drove by. 

I think it's going to be a great day.

Anyone see the clip of Matthews where he was incredulous that the fact that Brown was a Protestant hadn't been brought up by anyone in the campagin. 

How pathetic is that!  He was lamenting the end of tribal politics in MA.

Ha, ha, ha. 

... and as far as Eugene Robinson's divorce goes, all I have to say is;

Cu cu cachoo, Mrs. Robinson!

anyone here from the Philly area?

Lived there a long time, but not lately...

I started my coffee, but then I went to JammieWearingFool (.blogspot.com) and was frightened awake by the first picture. Damn.

dagny:  2

Xoxotl: 2.5

Burn the witch: 4

Bat chain : 4

Truman North:  4

DNCC: brown +4

Mallamut: 4.3

Jcjimi: 4.5

Joy to the: 5

Big Fat Meanie:  5

Johnny I: 5.5

Me (rdbrewer):  Brown by 6

Doc J: 6

enoxo:  7

Country Squire:  7

Who Knows: 7
LikeATimeBomb:  By 8
arhooley: 8
SiM:  Brown, 9

Jean:  Brown by 12

Vet Missing Parts: 20

Mr. Pink: Coakley 4

Republicans (and Independents) should strive to pick up enough seats in Congress in 2010 that they will be able to impeach Obama for the good of the country.

Impeach. Impeach. Impeach.

Smerconish is the 'conservative' who supports Obama.

Then I probably wouldn't be listening to him even if I could!

Dear Mr. President:

You had a year to prove yourself. What you got, in return for your efforts, was the nearest thing to open revolt this country's seen in decades.

Consider yourself fortunate that your opponents are so civilized. They didn't throw tantrums on campuses or commit violence against their fellow citizens; instead, they voted legally and supported candidates with their own labor and money.

Maybe, if you're competent under all that false perfection you project, you can learn to govern as Clinton did, and survive with a reputation better than that of the only other Democrat president you remember, Carter.

Election results - right pundits!

Silly prediction: Brown will win by a ton because they people Martha hired to fix the vote are secretly Brown supporters.

Just like the people at the ad agency that added the "e" and used the Trade Center pic).

How does Olbermann make it through his show without thinking the camera is out to get him?

"In short, in Scott Brown we have an irresponsible, homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman and against politicians with whom he disagrees."

Weather in Boston is a wintery mix of snow and freezing rain according to the Weather channel.

Put me down for Brown at 11+.  You've got to be pretty committed to go out into freezing rain.

I'll take Brown by 6.

Hopefully, that's outside the margin of fraud, ACORN, lawyers, error.

Anyone see the cookies that have Scott Brown's face on them - hilarious.  National Review Online Bay State report has the story.  I need some of those cookies!

dagny:  2

Xoxotl: 2.5

Burn the witch: 4

Bat chain : 4

Truman North:  4

DSCC: brown +4

Mallamut: 4.3

Jcjimi: 4.5

Dang Straits: 5

Joy to the: 5

Big Fat Meanie:  5

Johnny I: 5.5

Me (rdbrewer):  Brown by 6

Backwardsboy: 6

Doc J: 6

enoxo:  7

Country Squire:  7

Who Knows: 7
LikeATimeBomb:  By 8
arhooley: 8

Never give up: 8

Aerofanatic: 8
SiM:  Brown, 9

Kemp: 11

Jean:  Brown by 12

Vet Missing Parts: 20

Mr. Pink: Coakley 4

92

Did he really say that?

92

Did he really say that?

Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 19, 2010 09:51 AM (SqAkN)

Yes; Laura Ingraham has run the sound byte at least twice

OK my 2 cents

Brown by 10

Martha McCallum;   - 10 for being a liberal scrunt who just can not hold back today.

Dirty tricks being used: Washington D.C. phone making anti-Brown election calls falsely claiming to be from genuine Mass. pro-life group.

I think Brown's proton torpedo might be about the size of a star destroyer. 

I hate the word progressive too but we are using it in the historical sense. In the late 1800s early 1900s there were some fantastically misguided intellectuals who thought that social theory could fix the problems caused by the industrial revolution. They called themselves progressive. Among their ranks were Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Dorothy Day, Eugene Debs, Margaret Sanger. They were dangerous. Many of the later ones were communists and most respected the communist revolutions. Most were also eugenicists. The progressives loved dictators because the people are too stupid to understand social theory and they paved the way for Hitler. We are still fixing the disasters created by Woodrow Wilson. They haven't changed at all.

However, now we know what the progressive policies lead to---death, poverty, war---and we have to recognize it and stop it.

Posted by: polynikes at January 19, 2010 10:02 AM (m2CN7)

You really think so?  Every credible poll I've seen has Brown by at least 4.  Anyway, Even if he loses, I understand that Kirk loses his seat as soon as the polls close, so they won't have enough votes for cloture until somebody is certified anyway.

Ford: if it's medicinal, you can start anytime

Johnny I: Thomas Sowell has been saying this stuff for 25 years. He has a new book out :Intellectuals and society which traces the progressives

Vic - Why watch if they drive you crazy?

Because the alternatives are even worse. The 9 o:clock slot used to be good with Megyn but since she got pregnant it has turned to crap.

 But you are right; I am about to turn it off. I'll get my news today from the 'net. TV news totally sucks now.

How much of the Democrat implosion is due to having an essentially uncontested seat for 40+ years?  If Mass never needed the election-shenanigan machinery in place, it could be the flaming crater of what's-er-name's campaign is the result of not having the normal (for Dems) trickery well established. 

Or I could be completely wrong.  It's not like I know anything about MA.

102 Mallmutt: You are on there. They are now arranged in ascending order with Coakley pessamists at the bottom

Well then put me down for Brown by 85%.  Now what did I do with that bottle? 

@123 Posted by: dagny at January 19, 2010 09:59 AM (cG9YA)

Yesterday Glen Beck said his tv show on Fri. is going to be about the "progressive" movement of the early 20th century.  Said he was told to warn folks about it because of how shocking it is going to be.  A patriotic friend said he'd tape it for me.  Fire up your DVR's and TIVO's or whatever all that stuff is morons.  Might be worth having for your library to educate libs.

# 147  We know that the quality of the product directly results in the impression given to people.

wow, replica handbags is right - that quote screams Marcia Coakley!

or they will be"throwing coakley under the bus as a non representative, wishy washy candidate but crying in silence alone". 

Bawney Fwank has already prepared the ground for this.

[And how about cleaning up the #147 spam spill?]

Here is what we are up to now:

I am going to stop and do some actual work. I will soon become distracted by the election and return. Personal responsibility vs voyeurism.

dagny:  2

Jay in ames: 2

Xoxotl: 2.5

Rawmuse: 3

Burn the witch: 4

Bat chain : 4

Truman North:  4

DSCC: brown +4

Mallamut: 4.3

Jcjimi: 4.5

Sassypants: 5

Dang Straits: 5

Joy to the: 5

Big Fat Meanie:  5

Johnny I: 5.5

Me (rdbrewer):  Brown by 6

Backwardsboy: 6

Doc J: 6

Naturalfake 6.5

Abdominal: 7

Ford: 7

enoxo:  7

Country Squire:  7

Who Knows: 7

LikeATimeBomb:  By 8

arhooley: 8

Never give up: 8

Aerofanatic: 8

SiM:  Brown, 9

Vic: 10

Libertarian Jim: 11

Kemp: 11

Jean:  Brown by 12

Vet Missing Parts: 20

Mr. Pink: Coakley 4

An Independent Voter: Coakley 3

Why has Coakley moved up 10 and Brown dropped 10 on Intrade?

the label "progressive" I think comes from the early 1900s or even 1890s.  Everything in peoples' lives was becoming better through the application of science and technology,  Imagine the revolutions of the car, the electric lightbulb, penicillin! Scientific thinking was all the rage.

Applied to politics, a scientific, top-down approach was called Progressivism- because it literally promised to remake a society in the same way science and technology had remade the world around us.

It did not promise any particular direction of progression...

Why has Coakley moved up 10 and Brown dropped 10 on Intrade?

Probably because people are cashing out, if I understand InTrade (big if).

they are saying if Brown wins it is because coakley was a bad candidate to begin with and that the pres did not do a good job of getting his message out and framing the argument for healthcare

That has been the dem talking point for several days now.  The commies are in a state of total denial on the healthscam issue.  Some of them actually think the "people" want this piece of crap.

160 Is it because of the high turnout?

Apparently there is a week old Rasmussen poll just outwith Coakley up 2. Most people don't know about how old it is. It also may be intrade itself. Now, I'm upset and can't work

From legal insurrection live:

Early exit polls in the Gardner, Fitchburg and Peabody areas show Brown leading by 14, 17, and 15% points http://bit.ly/6VQh0D

Early exit polls in the Gardner, Fitchburg and Peabody areas show Brown leading by 14, 17, and 15% points http://bit.ly/6VQh0D

Totally teh f' awesum!

Mark Steyn, briefly, on the special election. (And The One's role in it.)

can you imagine if Sarah Palin had a political ad that misspelled Alaska?

Hell, us people in Kansis would be laughing our asses off.

Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 19, 2010 10:42 AM (SLZ0z)"

Your life will be forever changed. 

they are saying if Brown wins it is because coakley was a bad candidate to begin with and that the pres  Press did not do a good job of getting his message out and framing the argument for healthcare

FIFY. 

Turnout here in Seekonk was bigger than 2008.  370 voted cast at 835, which is more than what we had cast in that election. 

Two turdy old people with Coakley signs at the entrance and a little SEIU sign.  I gave them a smile, and the finger.

http://tinyurl.com/yjs2t96

Handing out blank absentee ballots

dagny:  2

Jay in ames: 2

Xoxotl: 2.5

Rawmuse: 3

Burn the witch: 4

Bat chain : 4

Truman North:  4

DSCC: brown +4

Mallamut: 4.3

Jcjimi: 4.5

Sassypants: 5

Dang Straits: 5

Joy to the: 5

Big Fat Meanie:  5

Johnny I: 5.5

Andy: 6

Guy Fawks: 6

Me (rdbrewer):  Brown by 6

Backwardsboy: 6

Doc J: 6

Naturalfake 6.5

Abdominal: 7

Ford: 7

enoxo:  7

Country Squire:  7

Who Knows: 7

Outlaw: 7

LikeATimeBomb:  By 8

arhooley: 8

Never give up: 8

Aerofanatic: 8

SiM:  Brown, 9

AJ Mama:10

Miss Factcheck: 13

Vic: 10

Libertarian Jim: 11

Kemp: 11

Jean:  Brown by 12

Vet Missing Parts: 20

Mr. Pink: Coakley 4

Reality check : Coakley 4

An Independent Voter: Coakley 3

I take this as a good omen.  Call it the Luck Of The Irish!

This Day In History

January 19, 1974

On January 19, 1974, the University of Notre Dame menÂ’s basketball team defeats the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) 71-70, in South Bend, Indiana, snapping UCLAÂ’s record-setting 88-game winning streak.

The Irish entered the game undefeated for the season and ranked No. 2 in the country. UCLA, coached by John Wooden and led by the future Hall of Fame center Bill Walton, held the No. 1 ranking. Despite injuring his back in a fall the previous week against Washington State, Walton played all 40 minutes of the game, wearing an elastic brace. He performed impressively, scoring 24 points and grabbing nine rebounds.

With three and a half minutes left in the game, the Irish were trailing by 11 points when they began an aggressive press that caught UCLA off guard. Notre Dame won the next 12 points, spurred by the play of center John Shumate (24 points), guard Gary Brokaw (25 points) and Dwight Clay, who scored the winning two points on a jump shot from the right corner, with 29 seconds remaining. When Walton missed a 12-foot shot in the final seconds, the game was over--as was UCLAÂ’s long streak of wins. Many in the stunned crowd of 11,343 at Notre DameÂ’s Athletic and Convocation Center rushed onto the court to congratulate Coach Digger Phelps and the victorious players. "This was great for college basketball," Phelps told the press. "IÂ’m sure everyone was rooting for us the way they used to root against the New York Yankees." It was the second big Irish upset that season, coming just three weeks after Notre DameÂ’s football team beat Alabama in a thrilling Sugar Bowl to gain the No. 1 spot.

The Irish played a pivotal role at several points in UCLAÂ’s historic streak. The BruinsÂ’ last loss had been on January 23, 1971, in South Bend. The previous year, the Bruins had broken the collegiate record for consecutive wins with their 61st straight victory--over Notre Dame. A week after their streak ended, the Walton Gang would get revenge, beating PhelpsÂ’ squad 94-75 in a return game at Pauley Pavilion in Los Angeles to regain the No. 1 ranking.

Poll Watchers

http://tinyurl.com/yzqsfy9

Think about it:

According to this administration and the Democrats in Congress themselves, here we are in such a terrible recession that it comes close to the depression of the 1930's, and yet they're trying to impose an enormously expensive healthcare package that most people don't want, just to provide coverage for about 4% of the people who already receive indigent care, and they're sending 11,000 troops to Haiti, although a fraction of that number would suffice. (Never mind the failed so calloed Stimulus package, etc. etc.)

Somehow the words, extravagant and wasteful and extremely irresponswible, don't adequately describe those slimy Democrats, who are now allowing the Black Caucus, to take over control of this country's domestic and foreign policies; i.e., on phony pretexts, they're now providing reparations for people of color all over the world, determined to revengefully turn the USA into a Third World country, also.

The words, evil and slimy and very sick, don't adequately describe those mean, vicious and hateful miscreants either - all of whom are ingrates, also. 

But that's just our opinion. You are entitled to disagree.

Soooo....  11am on the east coast, and not a single update or exit poll. 

I guess I'll have to go troll some MSM sites and try to find out whats going on. 

Man, AoS is not only my go-to blog for all important info, but I've let myself expect that all info will magically appear here in real time, as if there is a big staff of people keeping the blog up to date.  That's my bad.  Sorry Ace and co-bloggers.

Boston Herald.com:

A fast-circulating e-mail yesterday by the conservative Washington News Alert stoked fraud fears, suggesting liberal groups such as ACORN and Coakley supporters could pose as one of more than 100,000 dead people supposedly on voter rolls to cast ballots for the attorney general.

But Secretary of State William F. Galvin, whose office oversees elections, said there is no problem with dead voters: TheyÂ’re removed from the voting lists sent to cities and towns, he insisted.

Beck talks about this and posts Galvin's photo in his hard-hitting and wide-ranging show yesterday.  The Galvin segment starts near the end of clip 1.  From glennbeckclips.com:

http://tinyurl.com/y9wte5z

Today is January 19. On this date exactly ten years ago, in 2000, Michael Skakel was charged with the 1975 bludgeoning death of Martha Moxley.

It don't get no more prophetic than that, right there.

But Secretary of State William F. Galvin, whose office oversees elections, said there is no problem with dead voters:

I don't know why, but that just cracks me up. In so many ways.

http://tinyurl.com/ykm9mkw
This is a long list of comments by poll watchers. One of the Coakley supporters who ran into traffic wants to know why they can't vote on-line?

Yeah, that wouldn't be a problem

Dead voters are never a problem. They always vote the way Democrats want them to.

not so much for whatsername.
Marcia

Palin tweet:

MA Senate Race: HereÂ’s Hoping Mr. Brown goes to WashingtonÂ… In a pick-up truck,no less!
MA please vote tomorrow & elect a hardworking independent.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of Massachusetts today.
Help keep this country free.

#199 Posted by: maddogg at January 19, 2010 11:09 AM (OlN4e)

Good. I was afraid the idiot might wise up or go all Slick Willie after 94. Barry's arrogance will be his undoing. I HOPE that he nevers loses it.

Which one was the taxpayer's biggest expense this month?

A. Financing the war in Afganistan to protect Americans against terrorists.

B. Financial aid to Haiti to prop up and to protect a Communist regime,

C. Buying votes for Democrats in Massachusetts.

D. Skimming money from government projects to put that money in the    pockets of politicians and their campaign contributors. 

199, 210

He will just issue an executive order on HC and make himself Emperor for life at the same time .

Philly born, bred, adn still captive. I do not listen to Smerconish, too whiny for me, even before his "growth" into an Obamabot.

Overall, in town, there's nothing at all being discussed about Mass. It may as well not even be happening.

If this does happen, get ready for more Chicago Machine Politics.  From PajamaMedia.Com:

The Politico reports its sources indicate that President Obama will up the ante if Scott Brown wins the Massachusetts Senate seat. There will be no retreat, no watering down of the agenda.

The strategy will be a militant campaign to blame all future problems on the past administration by casting the Republicans as the architects of disaster and the protectors of the banking industry: wreckers and saboteurs standing in the way of Hope.

A couple of days ago I wrote that the President had a tendency to raise the stakes whenever he was losing. It was always all or nothing. And now if nothing, then his tendency will be to put the blame on the opposition.

Governance will probably be a low priority in the coming year. The fundamental theme of 2010 will be a struggle for power. If it is already evident that unemployment numbers are not going to decrease and that the New Year will be more challenging than 2009 then the strategy of pushing the Promised Land into a future where Republicans have been eliminated from the scene is a viable one. It is also a semi-revolutionary one.

Obama's ideas are old in the worst of ways; not as in validated by long weathering but as in repeatedly rejected by history. But they are all he has. And the really scary thing about his aloofness and indifference is that he may really live in a place that you canÂ’t go.

So my guess is that while he has no money and no prospect of getting any, the President knows only one move: double down again.

@ 215

Soooo...business as usual then?

The strategy will be a militant campaign to blame all future problems on the past administration by casting the Republicans as the architects of disaster and the protectors of the banking industry: wreckers and saboteurs standing in the way of Hope.

So wat else is new?  That was the Coakley campagn in a nutshell AND her speech just before Bambi came on Sunday. Let them keep on with that message, if it killed them in MA it will destroy them everywhere else.

Keep on runing against the evil Bush/Cheney that everyone wishes we had back.

So much for a post-partisan partum president bringing us all together.

Fify.

the protectors of the banking industry

Coming from someone who is totally in the back pocket of "the bankers"...

LOL, Boston TV-5 on-line poll rfor how many phone calls did you get?

Overwhelming vote > 10.

So many people are on the legal insurrection live blog that he has to suspend it for awhile. That probably means nothing in state but sure means a lot of people are paying attention.

I wonder how many people outside the belt way grasp the 60 seat fillibuster proof majority and how many don't give a shit. It's not much of a platform on which to run.

Snips from the WSJ today:

Tomorrow marks the anniversary of President Obama's Inaugural, and it's worth recalling the extraordinary political opportunity he had a year ago...

Twelve months later, Mr. Obama's approval rating has fallen further and faster than any recent President's, Congress is despised, the public mood has shifted sharply to the right on the role of government, and a Republican could pick up a Senate seat in a state with no GOP Members of Congress and that Mr. Obama carried by 26 points.

What explains this precipitous political fall? Democrats and their media allies attribute it to GOP obstructionism, though Republicans lack the votes to stop anything by themselves. Or they blame their own Blue Dogs, who haven't stopped or even significantly modified any legislation of consequence.

Or they blame an economic agenda that wasn't populist or liberal enough because it didn't nationalize banks and spend even more on "stimulus." It takes a special kind of delusion to believe, amid a popular revolt against too much government spending and debt, that another $1 trillion would have made all the difference. But that's the latest left-wing theme.

The real message of Massachusetts is that Democrats have committed the classic political mistake of ideological overreach. Mr. Obama won the White House in part on his personal style and cool confidence amid a recession and an unpopular war. Yet liberals in Congress interpreted their victory as a mandate to repeal more or less the entire post-1980 policy era and to fulfill, at last, their dream of turning the U.S. into a cradle-to-grave entitlement state.

(The most powerful democrats) are all creatures of the Great Society and what was called the New Left of the 1960s and 1970s. They have spent their lives in government and know almost nothing about the private sector or how to grow an economy. They view the Reagan era as an historical aberration, and they have stayed in Washington for decades precisely in wait of this moment to realize 40-years of pent-up policy ambition. They believe this is their 1965, or 1933.

It is the combination of all of these and other policies that has ignited the political revolt we are now seeing in Massachusetts, and first saw last November in Virginia and New Jersey. Had Democrats modified their agenda to nurture a fragile economy and financial system, they could now claim their policies worked and build on them later.

Instead, their frenetic agenda has frightened voters and businesses about the vast expansion of government power and enormous tax increases to come. The resulting uncertainty and the anticipation of higher costs for labor, taxes and energy have undermined what ought to be a more robust pace of job creation and overall recovery.  

The polling place video Fox is looping while that the news actors babble over the pictures is perplexing. We see one woman's legs standing at a voting booth for like ninety seconds. Lady, there's three names and three boxes! No complicated propositions you need to read through. No multi-page butterfly ballot. Three. Freaking. Names.

This IS the same state that re-sent and re-sends lumiaries like Teddy Kennedy and Bawney Fwank.

Everybody now goes to the very far extremes to either drive home their viewpoint that either: everyone else in the planet is wrong, or two that everyone but them does not really understand the situation. Many thanks for your succinct.

comfortable shoes. Shoes with style radii 2011  shoes that reflects the relaxed attitude of everyone. And you will be super smart and casual Fridays are. The new design makes causal, and perhaps more fun. The color is cute. It shoes are worn with trousers.

Our online store recommend onitsuka tiger sale with best price at Asicsrunningshop,Inc..