January 05, 2010
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:17 AM
| Comments (171)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: ParisParamus at January 05, 2010 05:21 AM (Hv1Cx)
Headline at Fox this morning from Michael Steele:
GOP Chief: Republicans 'Screwed Up' After Reagan
In new book, Michael Steele says the GOP should acknowledge where "we most glaringly compromised our principles" in the past decade and hold its elected officials accountable.
Is he finally getting the message from the polls that people prefer a non-existent Teaparty to Republicans now?
Does this mean the end of the “big tent”?
Funny, from the description in the artoicle it sounds exactly like something Jim DeMint said over a year ago after which all the big tenters from the Mclame camp started stabbing him in the back.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 05:22 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 05:26 AM (2qU2d)
If we're lucky (and smart) this could be the beginning of the trend we've been waiting for. No need to expunge the ranks if the current office holders can quietly sidle back to the right. Retain what incumbent advantage we can, etc.
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 05, 2010 05:27 AM (rwlcW)
Posted by: RM at January 05, 2010 05:29 AM (GkYyh)
Posted by: Justin Camp at January 05, 2010 05:29 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 05:31 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 05:32 AM (QrA9E)
God I hate liberals. How can these imbeciles even attempt to prove their cult when the entire globe is suffering from freezing weather.
Seriously.. right in the face
Posted by: MelodicMetal at January 05, 2010 05:33 AM (x4S2a)
Posted by: naturalfake at January 05, 2010 05:34 AM (HylJ6)
Jan. 5 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. Democrats will likely drop the idea of setting up a new government-run insurance program as they try to quickly resolve differences between House and Senate health-care bills, party members in both chambers said.
Democratic leaders may also bypass a House-Senate conference, the normal route for reconciling legislation, in favor of more informal talks to wrap up in a “few weeks,” said New Jersey Representative Frank Pallone, who heads the House Energy and Commerce panel’s health subcommittee.
“I don’t think the public option survives,” Pallone told state lawmakers in Trenton yesterday. “There is nowhere near 60 votes on that.”
Lawmakers will also forge some compromise that satisfies both sides of the abortion debate and prohibits the use of federal funds for the procedure, Pallone said.
“Everyone understands we can’t have federal dollars used in any way, or subsidies in any way, to pay for abortions,” said Pallone, an abortion-rights supporter.
Durbin said he’s not “assuming a thing,” and said leaders would work hard to keep the 60 votes controlled by Senate Democrats together.
“We’ll never have another chance like this in my political lifetime,” Durbin said. “This is it.”
Posted by: TheQuietman at January 05, 2010 05:36 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 05:37 AM (ouk5a)
A repost from last night, because it's important, IMHO.
293 Now for some actual science. The impact theory of dinosaur extinction is being called into serious question by an inconvenient set of non supporting facts. This is good because I never bought into that simplistic theory anyhoo. It is (or was) accepted science (settled) except that not everyone bought in. Link.
Posted by: maddogg at January 05, 2010 05:37 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 05:39 AM (6Njk9)
Posted by: naturalfake at January 05, 2010 05:39 AM (HylJ6)
We need to move our chairs closer together to stay warm.
27 degrees? Which is still warmer than the predicted high for Friday.
I need to explain to someone that I'm in the SOUTH...is Al Gore at home or something?
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 05, 2010 05:39 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 05:40 AM (tJF9l)
Democraps have zero chance of passing ANY new sweeping bills during the upcoming election year.
Personally what I see is the Dems running from Obama as fast as they can. He is about to be thrown under the bus.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 05:43 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 05:43 AM (tTdaQ)
Posted by: eddiebear at January 05, 2010 05:43 AM (wnU1W)
Just a thought. Is Obama purposely attempting to take everything into a deep dive so that, at the last moment, he can "pull up," which would make things look good in time for elections? (2010 or 2012 or both)?
This assumes a president can play the fortunes of this country like Paganini on a Stradivarius.
Not something conservatives believe. Not this one, anyway.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at January 05, 2010 05:46 AM (SCcgT)
I can't accept that dinosaur article, maddog. It doesn't mention the dinosaurs' SUV use that really led to their extinction.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 05:47 AM (2qU2d)
Personally what I see is the Dems running from Obama as fast as they can. He is about to be thrown under the bus.
Doesn't really matter, the bastards threw America under the bus already.
Posted by: maddogg at January 05, 2010 05:49 AM (OlN4e)
Did anyone see the Guardian article about how people are freezing to death in Peru? (Drudge linked it yesterday -- http://tinyurl.com/yb7sojx.) Note that it is, in fact, summer in Peru, most of that country being in the southern hemisphere.
And yet the article yammers about how "In a world growing ever hotter, Huancavelica is an anomaly" and that "Climate change campaigners and development NGOs say that the failure of Copenhagen has signed the death warrant for hundreds of thousands of the world's poorest and that a quarter of a million children will die before world leaders meet again to try to thrash out another deal at the United Nations next climate change conference in Mexico in December." Except they're, you know, dying from cold weather conditions, not drowing in the rising ocean.
Drink, drink, drink, drink the AGW Kool-Aid.
Posted by: Joanna at January 05, 2010 05:50 AM (gJQTg)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 09:43 AM (tTdaQ)
Just read it. I can't imagine any sane person NOT being upset. It's bad enough that we have an immigration policy that is focused on balkanizing the US. That alone is intolerable bullshit. Far worse is that it is apparently designed to bring terrorists into the US. For all their talk and all the dollars/efforts expended in the GWOT, it seems like a substantial portion of the government is working for the other side. First, bringing in as many damn enemies as possible. Then, tolerating Muslim "compounds" known by the locals nearby to be far more shady and dangerous than the Brach Davidians could ever have been. Liberal infiltrators are tireless in their efforts to undermine and destroy the US. May each one die in a fire!
Posted by: Reactionary at January 05, 2010 05:50 AM (xUM1Q)
"Diversity Visas" are only a symptom of the overall bankruptcy of the State Department. It doesn't matter who is in charge, that section of the governemnt has been taken over by the communists and American haters since the FDR admin.
The next Republican president needs to fire every one of them and start over from scratch.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 05:51 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 05, 2010 05:53 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Joe Bidenmytime at January 05, 2010 05:56 AM (4Yg7r)
The WWF (World Wildlife Fund not World Wrestling Federation which is not WWE) is running these hysterical (in both senses) ad extoling the plight of the polar bear. It shows a mama and a baby polar bear on a little tiny ice floe. Mama jumps off and baby eventually follows. They are dying, dying I tell you! And, as my sons ask, so what if they do die. The seal population explodes? Then we can go back to hunting baby seals.....
Speaking of: What do a dead baby seal and Tiger Woods have in common? They were both clubbed by a Norwegian.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 05:57 AM (2q+GC)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 05:57 AM (QFzyw)
"Diversity Visas" are only a symptom of the overall bankruptcy of the State Department... The next Republican president needs to fire every one of them and start over from scratch.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 09:51 AM (QrA9E)
Amen. And really, that's the only way to fix it. Even Condi couldn't make a dent in the beast using the existing staff. A total purge would be best. America-loving amateurs would do a better job than America-hating professionals. Hell - the current admin is destroying our credibility so fast that nothing the new blood could do would make it any worse, so there'd be nothing to lose. A few young go-getters might even be tempted to speak the truth and risk offending some of our enemies/false-allies - imagine that! A few might even be idealistic enough to resist foreign bribes.
Posted by: Reactionary at January 05, 2010 05:58 AM (xUM1Q)
Posted by: maddogg at January 05, 2010 05:59 AM (OlN4e)
Joan Rivers bumped off flight in Costa Rica when Continental gate agent finds passport suspicious.
Ha-ha.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 06:00 AM (2qU2d)
Wait.
The arctic is no longer cold and the equator is no longer hot. Why, that can only mean one thing...
Man has caused the Earth to shift from its axis!
OMG anthropogenic climate change is worse than we thought. What have we done? O what have we done?!?!?
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:01 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:02 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 05, 2010 06:02 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: kansas at January 05, 2010 06:02 AM (mka2b)
Joan Rivers bumped off flight in Costa Rica when Continental gate agent finds passport suspicious.
Ha-ha."
Well considering she probably looks nothing like her passport picture I am not surprised. I think she is wearing a Hannibal Lecter style human facemask to be honest.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 05, 2010 06:02 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Cliff polynikes Clavin at January 05, 2010 09:59 AM (m2CN7)
Umm, Lake Erie?
Posted by: ol_dirty_/b+/tard at January 05, 2010 06:02 AM (IoUF1)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:03 AM (5ddCw)
All those mammoths in SUVs...google it!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 05, 2010 06:03 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:04 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:05 AM (QECjC)
Yes, maddog. We were just mocking the AGW types and not the point you were making by linking the story.
At Tim Blair's MSM Aussie blog, he's currently running a few posts about "proven scientific facts" that the NYT has claimed over its history and that have turned out to be wrong that make the same point you have in #43.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 06:05 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 05, 2010 06:06 AM (ucxC/)
I was watching the weather this morning and the weather homo says we're in for frigid weather on account of the jet stream bringing us cold arctic air. I thought it wasn't cold in the Arctic, anymore?
How can it be still so cold in the Arctic to literally freeze the lands thousands of miles away when Algore said the planet has a fever?
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:06 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Rob in Katy (Racist Cajun) at January 05, 2010 06:06 AM (PiTBB)
What's "Thunderbird"?
Just make sure you're not staffing the State Department with the idiots who let Major Hasan stay in for the multi-cultural diversity.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 05, 2010 06:08 AM (mR7mk)
Serious question: How long until the Warmists tel us we have indeed caused the Earth to shift its axis?
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:08 AM (z37MR)
It occurred to me this morning that, despite Napolitano's reassurances, that in the case of the "underpants bomber" the system not only failed, but likely failed more than once.
Some guy on FoxNews this morning pointed out that terrorists are not dumb, and that concentrating on flights from "suspicious" countries would do nothing because terrorist know enough to take flights from "friendly" countries.
Terrorists also often perform dry-runs. So it is possible, if not likely, that Abdulmutalib had taken that very same flight before. It's even possible that he had several potential routes laid out, and chose the one that he did because a dry run convinced him that it was the least secure.
Either way, has anyone looked into what other flights the "underpants bomber" had also taken in the past year?
Posted by: Uriel at January 05, 2010 06:08 AM (kBCcJ)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:10 AM (QECjC)
Well considering she probably looks nothing like her passport picture
Apparently the problem was her passport was issued to "Joan Rosenberg AKA Joan Rivers" and that confused the airline staffer. [Rosenberg being her married name.]
Posted by: andycanuck at January 05, 2010 06:10 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at January 05, 2010 06:10 AM (ucxC/)
I'm deeply disturbed to learn that the WWF doesn't know polar bears can swim.
It's a bitch catching seals to eat when you can't swim. We need to give the polar bears some guns. A thought: If pets leave a big carbon footprint does a polar bear leave an even bigger carbon footprint?
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:10 AM (2q+GC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:11 AM (QECjC)
I was watching the weather this morning and the weather homo says we're in for frigid weather on account of the jet stream bringing us cold arctic air. I thought it wasn't cold in the Arctic, anymore?
Duh, because your use of electricity and cars 'n stuff has pulled the cold air away from the poor polar bears. Why do you hate them so?
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 05, 2010 06:11 AM (Be4xl)
I mean, they're running out of explanations and excuses. The axis is the next logical step, right?
They remind me more and more of the Jehova's Witnesses who have 'faithfully' predicted the rapture since, oh, the late 1800's, and when it doesn't arrive on their predicted dates, they simply change the date.
Someone told me they stopped making specific predictions on the date and now just say it's coming soon.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:11 AM (z37MR)
>>The great thing about the United Nations, the worlds poorest always die from whatever cause de jour exist.
Mallamutt,
A frog in water
Doesn't feel it boil in time.
Dude, we are that frog.
Posted by: sickinmass at January 05, 2010 06:13 AM (Dxfei)
Some idiot in Switzerland is already arguing the reason the winter is so cold now is because the previous month had been too warm.
Well, that's logical! Wait. What?
Gaia needs balance? Equilibrium?
I know! Gaia is the god of karma.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:14 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:14 AM (6Njk9)
Chuckie Schumer wants the federal government to pay for it all.
Right, because that money comes from elves and fairies, not New Yorkers.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 05, 2010 06:17 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:17 AM (mtAmx)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 05, 2010 06:19 AM (5qLa5)
Well finally, it just crossed 32°F here. My heat pump thanks you.
As for the dinasaur die-off there have always been competeing theories for that. The single impact in Mexico was just one of many. That linked article sort of glazes over the other stuff and it doesn't really change things much.
Yes, the generally accepted by most theory was the impact, but the Princeton woman (no bia there) only trades that single theory for a multiple impact theory.
Personally I do not think it was an impact at all. I think that is the warmies pushing that because they refuse to admit that the climate does goe through natural swings. My feeling is that an impact would not produce a cooling event that would last long enough to drastically alter the climate long term.
And IS what killed off the dinasuars. The reason they died and not the smaller animals is the vegitation required to support huge animals dissapeared. A lot of the small animals died as well but it did not kill off 100% of them.
Thankfully for us or we wouldn't be here.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 06:20 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:21 AM (2q+GC)
"My teenage boys agreed and when he got to the office the gay guy across the hall had a scarf. Are scarves really a sexual preference indicator?"
Yes scarves are teh gey I would agree but unless the dude is wearing a pink hello kitty scarf I wouldn't assume he is gay. I wouldn't think of them as an indicator other than the fact the guys that wear them are more effeminate, metrosexual, or whatever word of the week you wanna use.
Posted by: Mr. Pink at January 05, 2010 06:25 AM (SqAkN)
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 06:26 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:26 AM (2q+GC)
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 05, 2010 06:27 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:27 AM (QECjC)
If a scarf is used as an accessory to daily attire, then, yeah, it's gay.
But if the scarf is being used out of necessity, sort of like a tool, then it's not gay at all. So it really depends on the temperature.
Also applies to earmuffs. Any man who wears earmuffs when the temp is above 0 degrees is a flamer.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:28 AM (z37MR)
The spambots have achieved human-like speech and are addressing us directly. We are DOOMED!!!
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at January 05, 2010 06:30 AM (lhxhu)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:30 AM (PjevJ)
Has anybody else noticed how the latest meme coming out of the legacy media is, "Let's be more civil in 2010?"
I think it started with Harry Reid channeling Rodney King on the Setate floor. Some genius picked it up and decided, "Yeah, that's the ticket." My local rag wrote an editorial about it yesterday claiming that 2009 was the "year of rudeness." They provided examples of Joe Wilson (incorrectly identifying him as a Senator) shouting, "You lie!" and Rush's wish that the Precedent would fail. Personally, I believe that they were really wishing that citizens wouldn't attend any more Tea Parties.
Hell, they even offered up a pledge:
"I will be civil in my public discourse and behavior.
I will be respectful of others whether or not I agree with them.
I will stand against incivility when I see it."
I commented that the editorial staff was retarded. Obviously, I didn't take the pledge.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 05, 2010 06:30 AM (E0EDC)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 05, 2010 06:31 AM (ubVcw)
So under that theory, Vic, why did the small dinosaurs die out?
One of the other theories concerning the smaller one was that they became the birds and didn't die out.
They are all just theories. Hell, we have historians arguing about what happened on the grassy knoll a few decades ago. How we expect people to come up with stuff millions of years ago is beyond me.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 06:31 AM (QrA9E)
90 Typically my husband and boys take the extreme view. Some long assessory scarves are gay so we will f-ing freeze because, apparently, freezing is heterosexual.
The spambots have achieved human-like speech and are addressing us directly. We are DOOMED!!!
Yeah, I thought that when I wrote it. Next thread--lace wigs.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:33 AM (2q+GC)
#89 I'm skeptical of any single cause for "why the dinosaurs went extinct."
I'm not. I'm sure it was due to giant amoeboid shape-shifting creatures.
/Read it in Dean Koontz's "Phantoms".
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 05, 2010 06:33 AM (9hSKh)
Well, that's logical! Wait. What?
Gaia needs balance? Equilibrium?
I know! Gaia is the god of karma."
I always count on a reversion to the mean. Some times that reversion can be a real crusher. The Swiss idiot doesn't realize how his statement falsifies AGW.
Posted by: tmitsss at January 05, 2010 06:33 AM (V4Pya)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:33 AM (5ddCw)
It's a clever way of suppressing free speech. When they can't do it with the weapon of political correctness, they trick people into being 'polite,' which means you shut up while they ram through their agenda.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:33 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: koopy at January 05, 2010 06:34 AM (XllG0)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:36 AM (tJF9l)
It also depends how long you're gonna be outdoors. If you wear a scarf and gloves to walk out of a building and into a car and then into another building, you're not only gay, you're a pussy.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:37 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:37 AM (2q+GC)
Doesn't feel it boil in time.
Dude, we are that frog."
Frogs are not that stupid, really. Al Gore might stay in the pot, but a frog will get his butt out of that pot if he can. Therefore we can assume that Al is dumber than a frog.
Posted by: tmitsss at January 05, 2010 06:37 AM (V4Pya)
I take it that's a Freudian concept?
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 05, 2010 06:37 AM (ubVcw)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:38 AM (2q+GC)
It's explained in mathematics.
Here, I show you: The amount of clothing you wear is a function of the duration one will be exposed to the elements.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:39 AM (z37MR)
If you wear a scarf and gloves to walk out of a building and into a car and then into another building, you're not only gay, you're a pussy.
That and you're a cheap bastard for not paying for a parking garage.
Posted by: Dang Straights at January 05, 2010 06:40 AM (fx8sm)
I need the headlines thread so I can say that AP has KSU sitting at #11. The coaches and ESPN/USA Today at #10 and, wait for it, Fox sports at #9. Frickin' AP.
To go along with KU at #1 and Texas at #2. Yes, we know how to play more than just football here in Big 12 flyover country.
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 06:40 AM (QdUKm)
Unless you're fighting off hordes of Chinese at the Chosin Reservoir in sub-zero temps, no on the scarf.
Posted by: Dang Straights at January 05, 2010 06:41 AM (fx8sm)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2010 06:42 AM (0GFWk)
All right, the headlines thread now
Brought that from an earlier post and hadn't fixed it, sorry.
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 06:42 AM (QdUKm)
Posted by: CUS at January 05, 2010 06:43 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: Ostral B Heretic at January 05, 2010 06:43 AM (Tr9MG)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2010 06:44 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 05, 2010 06:44 AM (ubVcw)
117
Unless you're fighting off hordes of Chinese at the Chosin Reservoir in sub-zero temps, no on the scarf.
I had a friend who was there. A machine gunner. He allowed that it was unpleasant.
Posted by: maddogg at January 05, 2010 06:44 AM (OlN4e)
I'm skeptical of any single cause for "why the dinosaurs went extinct.
The reason they like to point to a “single event” scenario is the KT layer issue. You have plentiful dinosaurs fossils found above the layer and none below the layer. (or at least none documented)
What I have never heard an adequate explanation of is the actual length of time represented by that KT layer. It would seem to me that a one inch layer of sediment would take a long time to build up so it would not have been like an on-off switch.
I still think the most likely explanation was a long term change in climate caused by natural cycles of the sun. That shrank the available food supply which had the largest impact on the large animals. I think it is a coincidence that we had the meteor strikes at the same time and that the meteor strikes on their own would not have done the trick.
So I guess you could say I am not in the “single event” camp either unless you count a long term climate shift as a single event.
Posted by: Vic at January 05, 2010 06:44 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2010 06:44 AM (0GFWk)
Scarves are not nearly as effective as a hat. Keeping the top of one's head warm is the key to enduring the cold.
Posted by: Posted by: Huge, Quickly at January 05, 2010 06:45 AM (z37MR)
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 06:46 AM (2q+GC)
Posted by: fluffy, 11B at January 05, 2010 06:47 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:47 AM (Z7GrA)
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 05, 2010 06:47 AM (ubVcw)
And they get caught on your earrings.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 05, 2010 06:51 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Jean at January 05, 2010 06:51 AM (7K04W)
101 Most coats these days are made so the collar can zip up around the neck, so a scarf really isn't necessary. Plus, they're kind of cumbersome.
This conversation is veering from teh gay to teh stupid.
In New England men always wear scarves tucked into their coats when (a) it's really cold, and (b) their coats don't have zip-around-the-neck design, such as trenchcoats. It's not a matter of fashion, but of keeping warm.
You might as well argue that using an umbrella when it's raining is gay too --- I can find quite a few high school guys who think that, but they grow out of it when they find themselves soaked to the skin in a cold spring rain.
Plus, cumbersome is one of those things you wear around your waist with formal wear. Or so I am told.
Posted by: effinayright at January 05, 2010 06:52 AM (lQRmV)
Has anybody else noticed how the latest meme coming out of the legacy media is, "Let's be more civil in 2010?"
I think it started with Harry Reid channeling Rodney King on the Setate floor. Some genius picked it up and decided, "Yeah, that's the ticket." My local rag wrote an editorial about it yesterday claiming that 2009 was the "year of rudeness." They provided examples of Joe Wilson (incorrectly identifying him as a Senator) shouting, "You lie!" and Rush's wish that the Precedent would fail. Personally, I believe that they were really wishing that citizens wouldn't attend any more Tea Parties.
Hell, they even offered up a pledge:
"I will be civil in my public discourse and behavior.
I will be respectful of others whether or not I agree with them.
I will stand against incivility when I see it."
I commented that the editorial staff was retarded. Obviously, I didn't take the pledge.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 05, 2010 10:30 AM (E0EDC)
I see you get the New London day also. The Norwich Bulletin is a bit better IMO.
Posted by: Johnnyreb at January 05, 2010 06:53 AM (y67bA)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 05, 2010 06:53 AM (E0EDC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:53 AM (QECjC)
I heard Steele on Sean Hannity's show yesterday. He talked like a conservative Republican on the show from what I heard, but of course, he could have been playing to his audience.
I suspect this will be a big dividing line between conservatives and republicans. Or at least between some conservatives and the republicans. Just because an incumbent sounds conservative doesn't entitle him/her to my vote. Hell, Obama was talking conservative-ish during the campaign, and I'm not voting for anyone just because they can parrot Rush's talking points.
At this point, I don't really care what any incumbent has to say. I'm going to base my vote on what the incumbent has done. And I'm not going to just be looking at the final vote for legislation, but also votes to move the legislation out of committee, cloture votes, etc. These crapweasels are trying to play a game with us ("Hey look! I didn't vote for this bill! I mean, sure, I voted for it when I had to, but I didn't vote for it on the final vote...") that I'm not interested in playing.
For non-incumbents, of course, I don't have that option; but I'll be looking at whether they've had a career in politics, had a real job, what their job performance was, etc.
I hate to say it, but I'm thisclose to just condemning the GOP as a whole, and I'm fighting against the idea of a republican vote being a wasted vote. But I'm damn sure not voting for a republican candidate just because of the R.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 05, 2010 06:53 AM (pZEar)
I cruise through time and space with hot wenches. Who's gay now?
Posted by: Doctor Who at January 05, 2010 06:53 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:55 AM (QECjC)
22 Mr. Pink, if you go back to yesterday's post I cleared up my commute for you and Kemp.
Holy shit they keep these comments over 24 hrs? They must be getting pretty ripe by now!
Posted by: Kemp at January 05, 2010 06:57 AM (2+9Yx)
One of my big pet peeves in life is women who go out in the snow and the cold wearing short skirts or capris, and sandals, and no hat, and a little fashion coat, and then bitch about the weather. Adding insult to injury, they're always with men. Why is "stupid" considered desirable?
I console myself (undesirable but toasty in waterproof Gore-Tex boots, down jacket, and fur-lined hat with earflaps) with the knowledge that I will have all my toes come summer.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at January 05, 2010 06:58 AM (mR7mk)
I would argue for wheretherum, on account of the indisputably dark powers she possesses. Besides, I've seen her German Beer Wench outfit pic and can think of worse things to be queened by...
Which thread was that on?
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 06:58 AM (QdUKm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 06:59 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: Snoopy at January 05, 2010 06:59 AM (4Kl5M)
Lake Erie is the border of Ohio. Not in Ohio.
I mean you should know what I meant even If I don't say it. Do I always have to be coherent for you to understand. Sheesh.
Don't start now, it will just confuse us!
Posted by: Kemp at January 05, 2010 06:59 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: nevergiveup at January 05, 2010 07:00 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 07:00 AM (QECjC)
Johnnyreb,
I do. My wife insists on subscribing to it. Speaking of the Norwich Bulliten, I was listening to the radio on my way into work and the editor (his name escapes me) announced that they're going release different editions for New London and Windham Counties.
Might be a winner, since The Day sucks.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at January 05, 2010 07:01 AM (E0EDC)
Posted by: T-Rex at January 05, 2010 07:01 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 10:59 AM (QECjC) -
Like I said, there is one. Thing is, you have to approach it with an open mind.
Try Binging (or whichever you prefer) creation science and spend some time on a few sites. I'd put a pretty good one up for ya but I don't do the tiny url thing. I consider it an unnecessary pain in the ass.
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 07:03 AM (QdUKm)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 07:04 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 07:05 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 07:05 AM (QdUKm)
Scarves? It's never consistently cold enough in Texas to bother having one. That's what the collar is for on a coat. But if it were consistently below 30 or something, then I'd at least consider wearing a scarf, though it'd be one of those non-descript grey woolen scarves with a trench coat that are so popular with the mafia. And I'd get a fedora while I was at it. Though I draw the line at having the coat, scarf, and hat color coordinated with each other. I mean, why not just wear ass-less chaps and march in the Pride parade while I'm at it?
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 05, 2010 07:07 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 07:09 AM (QECjC)
OK, OK
I think we've covered the scarf thing. It's also obvious that the dinos died because they invented scarves, turned gay, and ceased to reproduce.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 07:11 AM (2q+GC)
There were plenty of cat-sized and chicken-sized dinos, too. And I don't remember the Bible excluding dinosaurs, either. -
It gets quite involved, but imagine the climate change from a cataclysmic world wide flood. Especially one where the water not only came from above but also below. An enormous geyser if you will spewing dirt and water high into the atmosphere. Gives rise to ice "years" instead of ice "ages". So much snow in a 24 hour period that mammoths get buried and preserved (yes, even mammoths can walk fast enough to keep ahead of a glacier). The sites are there if you're interested in taking a look. Oh, and the scientists, have doctorates from places like MIT so they're not all total idiots like me.
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 07:13 AM (c459z)
Is this the real reason the Weblog Awards were called off?
Posted by: eddiebear at January 05, 2010 09:43 AM (wnU1W)
I would say that's half the story. The other half was their knowledge that the voting is completely riggable and seeing the nominations, like RealClinate for Best Religion Blog, they were powerless to stop it winning. I literally voted many hundreds of times for AoSHQ last year. Their whole vaunted scheme of weeding out repeat voting amounted to them hoping people do not know how to clear their Flash Cache. Sure they could also check voting for large numbers from a certain IP or bank of IPs and throw those out but that would drop the total vote count drastically. They are apparently happy to allow the situation normally but when it will produce something controversial or they don't like then they had little choice but to can it.
Posted by: Rocks at January 05, 2010 07:15 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 05, 2010 07:16 AM (QECjC)
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 07:17 AM (c459z)
"Diversity Visas" are only a symptom of the overall bankruptcy of the State Department. It doesn't matter who is in charge, that section of the governemnt has been taken over by the communists and American haters since the FDR admin."
And here I thought ol' tailgunner Joe was dead
Posted by: JEA at January 05, 2010 07:20 AM (a+kMW)
Actually a little Brandy works good also.
Driving to work with brandy in your coffee, manly.
Scarf...not so much.
This is such an educational blog.
Posted by: Mama AJ at January 05, 2010 07:23 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: runningrn at January 05, 2010 07:27 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 07:29 AM (kwNGE)
Oh, and WSJ had a funny article today "Who's the NFL's Worst Team? Our Inaugural Misfit Bowl, Losers Advance and Winners Go Home; Our Simulator Tells All" by Jason Gay. They had AccuScore help make the call. Seattle didn't make the cut--got edged out by Buffalo--ha! The Winners (or the biggest losers), perennial faves, The Lions!
Posted by: runningrn at January 05, 2010 07:31 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2010 07:32 AM (kwNGE)
But . . . If you do find Chuck with a scarf, I relent.
Posted by: dagny at January 05, 2010 07:39 AM (2q+GC)
Posted by: toby928 at January 05, 2010 08:10 AM (PD1tk)
Flood Geology is nonsense. Learn he actual science of Geology and you will see. -
Hmmm, you mean like the geology that teaches that all the coal comes from trees etc. that died over millions of years, got covered up and turned into coal. Funny, I'm in the outdoors a lot and every time I see a dead tree, it's rotting and being turned into top soil. Now, imagine huge masses of tangled vegitation and animals floating around, setteling and being covered up. It has been shown that it doesn't take "millions" of years for coal to form. There's a lot more where that came from.
check out creation dot com / age of the earth.
Not all "geologists" agree with your view. And not all are afraid (or refuse due to their "worldview") to look outside the box of accepted, setteled (can you say AGW?) science.
Posted by: teej at January 05, 2010 08:12 AM (QdUKm)
Posted by: denziens of polar bears, currently controlling the weather at January 05, 2010 08:18 AM (q/kmn)
<a href="http://bestrelaxationtechniquesforanxiety.net">Relaxation Techniques for Anxiety</a>
Posted by: Garmin Forerunner 305 Review at July 28, 2010 11:16 AM (6N5wn)
Posted by: Garmin Forerunner 305 Review at July 28, 2010 11:17 AM (6N5wn)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2036 seconds, 299 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: jcjimi at January 05, 2010 05:20 AM (XSikc)