October 04, 2010
— Dave in Texas Monday.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at
04:41 AM
| Comments (258)
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
I'd have thought this was a no-brainer on his part:
McCain stumps for Ayotte, says he won't run again
NASHUA (NH) – In a campaign stop for U.S. Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte in her hometown Saturday, former presidential candidate and U.S. Sen. John McCain announced he's done running for President.
"My friends, this may surprise you, but I will not be running for President again," the Arizona Senator said.
Thanks for the heads up, Johnny.Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 04:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 04:52 AM (/jbAw)
It's 48 degrees. W T F ? This is not the South I signed up for.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 04:54 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: TC at October 04, 2010 04:56 AM (DYJjQ)
That means the WH is hiding something.
I hid the sausage all last week.
I am pretty sure that Barry is going to miss me.
Sorely.
Posted by: Rahm Emmanuel at October 04, 2010 04:57 AM (7gszR)
WSJ: Obama Likely to Scale Back Legislative Plans
Don't do us any favors or anything, Barry. Seriously, don't.
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 04:57 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 04, 2010 04:58 AM (0GFWk)
We need to know if we have a lot of that.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 04:58 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: garrett at October 04, 2010 05:01 AM (7gszR)
The rest of America thinks stealing all of America's wealth, liberty and prosperity and feeding it into the corrupt union/socialism big government machine is destructive.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 04, 2010 05:01 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: Hexenkessel at October 04, 2010 05:02 AM (mI11M)
And for a shot of some localized foolishness:
Man Stabbed After Baseball Argument Escalates
One guy's in critical condition and the other one's under arrest... because they were arguing about the BoSox vs. the Yankees.
*pinches bridge of nose* Sometimes it's hard being from New England.
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 05:02 AM (4df7R)
Did you see a couple people at the Corner making fun of Kate Zernike?
Okay, it's not exactly hard, but it's funny. Put down your coffee before reading what she wrote:
Ron Johnson, who entered politics through a Tea Party meeting and is now the Republican nominee for Senate in Wisconsin, asserted that the $20 billion escrow fund that the Obama administration forced BP to set up to pay damages from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill circumvented “the rule of law,” Hayek’s term for the unwritten code that prohibits the government from interfering with the pursuit of “personal ends and desires.”
BRB with the links.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 05:02 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:05 AM (SB0V2)
Seriously, I'll stop after this. I just saw this headline on Drudge and...
Honestly, BHO. If you've lost the Dog Whisperer, how can you look at yourself in the mirror?
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 05:07 AM (4df7R)
Link to making fun of what I quoted above:
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 05:07 AM (XdlcF)
I have not seen too many cases of a conservative R moving to liberal D. Usually it is the other way around.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:08 AM (/jbAw)
CHICAGO (Reuters) – Predatory lending aimed at racially segregated minority neighborhoods led to mass foreclosures that fueled the U.S. housing crisis, according to a new study published in the American Sociological Review.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 04, 2010 05:08 AM (IzuWw)
Gallup poll:
The good news for President Obama is his popular support among blacks is holding steady at 91%.
The bad news is no other group of potential voters likes him that much.
In fact, 29 days before his first midterm elections, the Democrat's approval ratings remain mired below 50%.
Democrats (79%) and liberals (75%) still like Obama a lot.
But after that, his approval percentage goes to the deep south. Support among even young people is down: 57%. Hispanics: 55%. Moderates: 54%. Unmarrieds: 53%. Easterners: 52%. Women: 47%. Midwesterners and Westerners: 45%.
Men: 43%. Southerners: 41%. Independents: 40%. Marrieds: 39%. Seniors: 38%. Whites: 36%. Conservatives: 23%.
Amazingly, among Republicans Obama still manages to hold the support of 12%.
23% of conservatives support Barry? That must be the David Frum kind of conservatives
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 04, 2010 05:09 AM (1Jaio)
This is the link.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 09:02 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 05:09 AM (LH6ir)
Arizona Republicans should be put to sleep like a decerebrated cat.
What a fucking collection of sunbaked shitheads.
Posted by: TexasJew at October 04, 2010 05:09 AM (AkSLF)
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:09 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 04, 2010 05:09 AM (0GFWk)
I'm a social-lib/fiscal-con - supposedly this doesn't exist.
Sez who? I think that describes a lot of us here. Well, depending on what you mean by social-lib. I'm not very socially conservative, but I don't want to spend a bunch of tax money like the social liberals do.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 05:10 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 09:05 AM (SB0V2)
So does he take it in the ass?
Posted by: TexasJew at October 04, 2010 05:10 AM (AkSLF)
I would think just reading the obvious lies in the article would be enough to tell you where they stand. However, if you read their page on advocacy it ties it all pretty well.
They are just another mindless collection of liberal "useful idiots".
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:13 AM (/jbAw)
This is the link.
Thanks, your fingers are moving much faster than mine this morning.
<yawn>
My husband was libertarian when I met him. I was liberal, but moving toward the center. Now he's registered Repub. and I'm independent but always vote Republican.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 05:13 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:13 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 09:09 AM (/jbAw)
Me too.
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 05:14 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 04, 2010 05:14 AM (IxMaC)
surprise!
Posted by: curious at October 04, 2010 05:15 AM (p302b)
Ouch.
Posted by: looking closely at October 04, 2010 05:15 AM (KNy97)
I'm a social-lib/fiscal-con - supposedly this doesn't exist. but hell, if it doesn't break my legs or pick my pocket, I'm good, as they say.
Except social libs do pick your pocket and break your legs. It's all the same thing. I'm assuming you mean you like gay marriage and abortion. See if you still like them if the govt is paying for the abortions, the culture that goes with it which produces babies without fathers, federally funded planned parenthood. Think about whether you like the idea of gay service members and providing their partners housing/medical/pensions. All of the left's "social" stands have redistribution of wealth behind them. That's the point. The marxists/communists/socialists introduce the cultural decay in order to facilitate taking your money, but you go ahead and believe there's a difference. BTW, I said the same thing in my 20s.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:16 AM (jS7i0)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:16 AM (SB0V2)
Oh, the other day I mentioned that I haven't received any info about where to vote, a sample ballot, anything. There have been 2 elections this year, tho' I couldn't vote in the closed primary.
There was another election Saturday! I have got to start reading the local newspaper...
And I guess I'd better figure out where to vote in Nov. and double check that hubby and I are actually registered. Signed up when we got our licenses...not the same day or anything, so I don't think they lost paperwork for both of us.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 04, 2010 05:17 AM (XdlcF)
"My friends, this may surprise you, but I will not be running for President again," the Arizona Senator said.
Did you really run the first time?
Posted by: Mallamutt at October 04, 2010 08:57 AM (OWjjx)"
yes, he did, he ran the other way
Posted by: curious at October 04, 2010 05:17 AM (p302b)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 04, 2010 05:18 AM (Jf6LL)
Yeah, I didn't even need to read more than headline before I had a good sense of what I would find there. I 'm sure those idiots receive a comfortable level of funding by way of our tax dollars.
There is hope, change is coming in November.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 04, 2010 05:18 AM (IzuWw)
Amazingly, among Republicans Obama still manages to hold the support of 12%.
Bullshit. Those people are the ones registered Republican to fuck up primaries.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:18 AM (jS7i0)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:18 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:20 AM (jS7i0)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 09:18 AM (SB0V2)
So why then do you classify yourself as 'socially liberal'?
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 05:21 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:22 AM (jS7i0)
13 "My friends, this may surprise you, but I will not be running for President again," the Arizona Senator said.
You know who this helps....don't you?
Seriously, I get a worse knot in the gut over Romney than I did with McCain.
I cannot stand that greasy phony.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at October 04, 2010 05:22 AM (SCcgT)
The MFM is the enemy. While people *should* read the body of the article, most won't because of time constraints or sheer laziness.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 04, 2010 05:22 AM (9hSKh)
-----------
Emmanuel would be one of the better choices. Who would you prefer? Jesse Jackson Jr? His wife?
Apparently you have no clue as to the demographics in Chicago. 42% White and most of those solid Democrats. You figure out the rest..
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at October 04, 2010 05:23 AM (dz+QL)
"I'm a social-lib/fiscal-con - supposedly this doesn't exist."
I think most independents are this way, actually they are more libertarian when it comes to social items,
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at October 04, 2010 05:24 AM (ACkhT)
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 09:09 AM (/jbAw)
Me too."
I think I've only dated one conservative in my life, sadly. I'm a magnet for Che Guevara worshippers for some reason. Any other ladies get men saying they've always wanted to sleep with a Republican? Like it's some weird fetish akin to amputee porn? I don't want your Hate-Sex!
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 04, 2010 05:26 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 04, 2010 05:26 AM (Jf6LL)
The headline read, "McMahon: Congress Should Consider Lowering Minimum Wage." From the comments following the article it was obvious that most simply read the headline.
I hate these fuckers.
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 04, 2010 09:18 AM (Jf6LL)
This morning I went to a little convenience store that is nestled among 3 other businesses....a dry cleaners, sandwich shop and pizza place. As I approached the entrance to the parking lot, I noticed the strip of grass along the street in front of these stores was think w/ political signs....all republicans, including a HUGE Linda McMahon sign. I was shocked....this is in lower Fairfield county. I have no idea if the owner of the buildings allowed it or someone just stuck them all there. But all the business were opened and no one had removed them.
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 05:27 AM (VuLos)
32 21 My husband is a former conservative R, now liberal-ish D. It's the milieu he's in, the people he's around. He's very buddy-buddy with local Dems, so he tends to hear their side of things, plus he likes them a lot!
Texasjew said: So does he take it in the ass?
I said: If my husband started going lib, I would assume he had realized he was gay or had picked up a drug habit.
East coast vs. Texas. Even I prefer the Texas. Point clarified.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:27 AM (jS7i0)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 04, 2010 05:28 AM (0GFWk)
link
Posted by: curious at October 04, 2010 05:28 AM (p302b)
Posted by: real joe at October 04, 2010 05:29 AM (w7Lv+)
Posted by: Annabelle at October 04, 2010 05:29 AM (pWgNR)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 04, 2010 05:30 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 09:18 AM (SB0V2)
So why then do you classify yourself as 'socially liberal'?
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 09:21 AM (VuLos)
This is why I dislike all these various "xx-con" labels. One of the writers at Beitbart said it best I think; "we should just say believers in small government vs believers in big government".
I have found on here at least, most of the people who profess to be "social cons" are also believers in small government but that is not always the case. I also believe that what most "social cons" see as issues are really "religious issues".
There are a lot of people out there like corn-pone Huck who the press classifies as "conservative" while he is anything but. He is a tax and spend liberal to the core who has "religious beliefs".
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:31 AM (/jbAw)
I think a more reasonable description would be "fiscal con/social libertarian."
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 05:32 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:32 AM (jS7i0)
As most all intelligent people do.
FIFY
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 05:33 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:34 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: Napoleon at October 04, 2010 05:34 AM (pmAXX)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 09:32 AM (jS7i0)
I have a daughter like that. More conservative than her brother....and he's in the military.
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 05:34 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: Tami at October 04, 2010 09:27 AM (VuLos)
Technically they can't remove them. If they were on the "strip of grass next to the street" they were on public property.
But then again, the signs were placed there illegally as well.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:34 AM (/jbAw)
Two nights ago, I heard the bowdlerized TV version of "motherfucker": "my old friend." "Die screaming, my old friend." "You can't kill me, my old friend."
Recall that the TV version of "suck each other's dicks," according to Mr. Wolfe, is "soap each others backs."
Soap my back, my old friend.
Posted by: rdbrewer at October 04, 2010 05:36 AM (dQPW4)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:37 AM (SB0V2)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 05:38 AM (SB0V2)
I really don't care about what people of self-agency do in their homes and bedrooms,
I think you mean you don't care about what responsible people of self-agency do in their homes and bedrooms.
Social libs will cost you money in the long run. Random hookups, drugs, and veneral disease cost society money.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:38 AM (jS7i0)
#55
Emmanuel would be one of the better choices. Who would you prefer? Jesse Jackson Jr? His wife?
Apparently you have no clue as to the demographics in Chicago. 42% White and most of those solid Democrats. You figure out the rest..
Compelling retort. If I don't want Emanuel, I must want Jesse Jackson Jr. or his wife. Logic so thick I can cut it with a scimitar. Also, I did not realize that it was up to me to 'figure out the rest...'.
Hollywood Ricky Hendon is my guy. He wants to get rid of all red light cameras. He calls them nothing but a stick-up. Good enough for me. I just work in Chicago. I had the brains to move out.
Posted by: Hexenkessel at October 04, 2010 05:39 AM (mI11M)
Posted by: The Outlaw in the Heavenly Hall at October 04, 2010 05:40 AM (Jf6LL)
Cob-Loggers; how about a column on "mixed marriages" amount the Morons from the ONT last night?
We got a lot of sheepshaggers around here?
Posted by: rdbrewer at October 04, 2010 05:41 AM (dQPW4)
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 05:43 AM (4df7R)
Why thank you, I will now endorse cellophane, scotch tape, and tupperware parties. C'ya in '12.
Posted by: Mitt Romney at October 04, 2010 05:43 AM (Jx0x6)
Social libs will cost you money in the long run. Random hookups, drugs, and veneral disease cost society money.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 09:38 AM (jS7i0)
"Social libs" are not costing the money, its the big government liberals who believe in all those socialist welfare schemes who are costing you money.
I like to apply the 100 year rule to a lot of these things (or maybe the 150 year rule). What would they have done 150 years ago. There were no "anti-drug" laws and there were no socialist welfare laws. If someone abandoned their life for the "opium parlors" of the day they were left to die of their own fatal actions.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 05:43 AM (/jbAw)
I'm a social-lib/fiscal-con - supposedly this doesn't exist. but hell, if it doesn't break my legs or pick my pocket, I'm good, as they say.
Except social libs do pick your pocket and break your legs. It's all the same thing. I'm assuming you mean you like gay marriage and abortion. See if you still like them if the govt is paying for the abortions, the culture that goes with it which produces babies without fathers, federally funded planned parenthood. Think about whether you like the idea of gay service members and providing their partners housing/medical/pensions. All of the left's "social" stands have redistribution of wealth behind them. That's the point. The marxists/communists/socialists introduce the cultural decay in order to facilitate taking your money, but you go ahead and believe there's a difference. BTW, I said the same thing in my 20s.
Under that argument, we should have only one religion that the state recognizes so that the others have to pay income taxes. The problem is not gay partners or abortion, the problem is social benefits or the idea that someone can demand that the government pay. Hell, why is the military paying for the benefits of heterosexual partners? (Answer- job benefit, just like any other job offers when it needs workers badly enough)
Accepting homosexuality or abortion (which I consider to be an evil but one that cannot be legislated away) is NOT the same as accepting Marxism. Remember when the acceptance of inter-racial marriages was supposed to lead to societal decay?
Posted by: Leigh T at October 04, 2010 05:44 AM (UwAO5)
Posted by: Lady in Black at October 04, 2010 05:44 AM (M6enm)
When my oldest was 8 we had to go to a "new age" family wedding. When it was over, he whispered in my ear, "What was that crap?" I was so proud.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:45 AM (jS7i0)
Well, they better hold on to him like a winning scratch-off ticket, because there will not be another black Democrat president for a long time.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 05:47 AM (Jx0x6)
Kris Kringle on a cracker. What next, take away their vodka?
Russia unveils plan to ban public smoking by 2015
As Howie Carr says, "How many more, Mr. Speaker? How many more!"
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 05:47 AM (4df7R)
When my oldest was 8 we had to go to a "new age" family wedding. When it was over, he whispered in my ear, "What was that crap?" I was so proud.
Best. Story. EVER.
Posted by: MWR at October 04, 2010 05:48 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 04, 2010 05:49 AM (Ly+aE)
When we moved back to the US, her father's biggest concern was the lack of socialized medicine here. Some years later, my wife was hospitalized by a rare, life-threatening virus infection. My in-laws came and were shocked to find that the care she received was far superior to anything they could have expected at home.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 04, 2010 05:50 AM (IzuWw)
Posted by: CAC at October 04, 2010 05:52 AM (lV4Fs)
Posted by: maddogg at October 04, 2010 05:54 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 09:49 AM (/jbAw)
Fat nude lesbians, testicle inflation guy, overly tattooed women, anarchists. Plus, the bride gets gang-banged by ten transgendered Asian dyslexics wearing Samurai costumes.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 05:54 AM (Jx0x6)
Thing is, people on this blog think the SoCon wants to keep them from their pervy fun. In most cases I just don't care as long as you don't put it in my face.
I don't care if Chuck and Larry do the turd burglar masquerade or the pillow biter tango just as long as they don't try to force me to accept them as good role models for my sons.
Posted by: kidney at October 04, 2010 05:55 AM (ENRGu)
"My friends, this may surprise you, but I will not be running for President again," the Arizona Senator said.
You know who this helps....don't you?
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at October 04, 2010 08:58 AM (OWjjx)
If the SOB had actually run for President...instead of fawning over The Won, he WOULD be President. What a choad.
Posted by: torabora at October 04, 2010 05:56 AM (6azTi)
Eh, you'll get 7% of the population who believe that Elvis Presley is still alive.
And right now there are plenty of individuals who self identify as "Republicans" who really aren't in any meaningful political sense.
If there is any subgroup worth looking at with respect to Obama's support, I'd suggest its "likely voters".
Posted by: looking closely at October 04, 2010 05:56 AM (KNy97)
"Social libs" are not costing the money, its the big government liberals who believe in all those socialist welfare schemes who are costing you money.
Absolutely true. However, the big govt libs know and have always known that breaking down the family makes people dependent on the state. I'd like to see the 150 year rule but the normal construct of civilization has been so twisted at this point that even the most stalwart would balk at the level of starvation and death that would ensue. The "great society" effectively destroyed the african american urban family and provided the big govt libs with generations of liberal votes to keep the money coming in. Imagine the stupidification if suddendly the fatherless child didn't receive support? Is there anyway to turn back the clock and make the idea of not having children that one cannot support even shameful or untenable? I don't think it has anything to do with religion per se. Do you have to be very relgious to see irresponsible sex and abortion as, at the very least, destructive not only to yourself but to society at large?
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 05:57 AM (jS7i0)
So does he take it in the ass?
T. Jew is like our very own Dr. Phil.
Posted by: garrett at October 04, 2010 09:22 AM (7gszR)
+10
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 05:57 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: CAC at October 04, 2010 05:58 AM (lV4Fs)
One reason and one reason only. Hell, Matthew Shepherd thought he was going to be involved in a threesome. ( I know, he still did not deserve to be murdered.) I knew this Rutgers kid was going to be a poster boy when I saw Ellen denounce it.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 05:58 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: toby928™ at October 04, 2010 09:33 AM (S5YRY)
Being that it's a rainy, Monday morning, do you think we could start looking at the flip side, like 623 down ### to go? Thanks!
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:02 AM (a3Z62)
99 What is a "new age family wedding"?
Civil marriage with no attendees, then on the beach with all the wedding guests, a friend stands up and delivers a "blessing" calling the groom "the worker" and the bride (a nurse) the "earth goddess". All the guests, gathered in a circle around them were invited to touch the rings to impart "good energy" into them. Kurt Vonnegut came up, I don't remember how. Oh, and the bride was pregnant and had fitted her dress to show it off. BTW, the groom's parents had paid for the beach house, the reception, flowers, booze, et al. Everyone asked to raise their arms and impart good energy to the couple. There was a brief speech from a wiccan.
Divorce 5 years and 2 kids later.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 06:03 AM (jS7i0)
People may "balk" at it but it is coming whether they like it or not. We have finally ran out of "other people's money". The laws of economics are much like the laws of physics, you can only ignore them for so long. Eventually they do catch up.
All of these social welfare schemes are going to collapse soon one way or another. The key will be how we allow it to collapse. Under the typical liberal scheme of ever increasing tax and spend it will all come to a sudden halt at once.
Think how that would effect their core base in the slums of the inner cities. When those checks stop coming to support the dozen illegitament children of the average slum queen what is she and her drug addled live-in going to do?
What they normally do at the drop of a hat is have a big party that involves fire and breaking windows. When all the grocery stores are looted clean they will then head for the suburbs. Yes, mass starvation and killoff in the first year.
If you live in a suburb of a large city with a population over 100,000 I advise you to move at least 20 miles from said city.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 06:05 AM (/jbAw)
Yes. Too harsh. He lived in my town, and one of my kids knew him. That his death is being used as a club by others doesn't detract from the sadness of the situation.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 06:05 AM (LH6ir)
what are you insinuating?
Posted by: real joe at October 04, 2010 06:06 AM (w7Lv+)
File this under blind dog finds a bone, stopped calendar, etc.
[Ted Rall] gets how stupid the Stewart rally is.--Warthog
The moderate rally that was organized, sponsored and attended by dozens of socialist, Marxist and communist groups? That moderate rally?
Posted by: jwpaine at October 04, 2010 06:07 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 04, 2010 06:07 AM (Ly+aE)
I call that a "slow Thursday afternoon."
Posted by: real joe at October 04, 2010 06:09 AM (w7Lv+)
Hey! Don't dis amputee porn!
Posted by: Long Jean Silver at October 04, 2010 06:10 AM (g4J4S)
It's always fucked up when one commits suicide. One friend and two cousins did this. Plus all the suicide scenes I made as a cop. Singling this one out for the express purpose for a cause and possible hate-crime charges is bullshit.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 06:11 AM (Jx0x6)
"My friends, this may surprise you, but I will not be running for President again," the Arizona Senator said.
What would surprise me more is if any of the people there were actually McCain's friends. Outside of Democrats and the main stream media, assuming of course he's not running for office against a favored democrat.
But if he's just pushing some uber-liberal bill or useful to point to as the Republican who of course disagree's with his party, then McCain is aces in their book. McCain isn't a "Maverick", if anything he's probably much closer to a "Mole".
Naturally they know two faced Johnny will most likely go right back to his tried and true behaviour of carrying democratic water and kissing MSM asses just as soon as the election is over.
Until then, stand back baby! It's coyote choking illegal immigrant hawk until then. Hard to believe that had enough complete and total idiots involved in the Republican primary in Arizona to fall for it, yet again. It's like watching Charlie Brown trying to kick that damn football.
But on the upside if Arizona is finally annexed by Mexico or completely overwhelmed with illegals to the point where the drug lords pretty much run the state anyway I won't have to feel bad. The idiots did it to themselves, after all, by putting McCain back in the Senate.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 06:11 AM (e8T35)
OMG
John Cena lost last night and he has to join the Nexus!
I'd give you a link, but I'm sure you've all heard about it already.
Posted by: Truman North at October 04, 2010 06:13 AM (HLGCA)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 10:11 AM (Jx0x6)
I don't know what the law in NJ or NY is but under the federal statute it can not be classified as a "hate crime". And even if the NJ or NY law allowed that the current ruling by the SC would strike the conviction down.
The current court ruling AND the federal law require some type of violent act as part of the underlying crime. The people who wired the kid's dorm room invaded his privacy but did not commit a violent act.
So all these cries for "hate crime" prosecution are either the mouthings of the uneducated or the blather of idiots just seeking attention.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 06:15 AM (/jbAw)
Magnitude 6.3 earthquake in southwestern Ryukyu islands, Japan – USGS http://bit.ly/dClIty
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 04, 2010 06:16 AM (9hSKh)
I think that in this case the issue is the lack of respect for the privacy of another. Our digital social media overload has created the attitude that all activity should be public, and privacy is archaic.
The two spoiled little brats who did this should be punished. I have no idea whether they did it because he was gay; and frankly I don't care (I think hate crime legislation is anti-democratic), but what they did was illegal, and certainly caused this poor young man incredible pain.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 06:17 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Lady in Black at October 04, 2010 09:44 AM (M6enm)
I think the worm is beginning to turn on this, albeit slowly. I'm noticing more and more black people at Tea Parties and being quite vocal when they're videotaped about the stupidity of blacks voting dem.
With the elections of Allen West, the guy from SC whose name slips my mind, and the TX reverend whom I hope wins, more blacks are going to be exposed to the conservative message. The Richmond Times-Dispatch had a front-page story about the upcoming Viginia Tea Party Convention that included profiles of Tea Party members. One was an older black man who was brutally honest about the stupidity of blacks voting for liberals and being those most harmed by liberal policies.
As for the state convention itself, this weekend, slated speakers include Herman Cain and E.W. Jackson (dynamite - he spoke at our local patriot mtg a couple weeks ago).
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:17 AM (a3Z62)
So all these cries for "hate
crime" prosecution are either the mouthings of the uneducated or the
blather of idiots just seeking attention.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 10:15 AM (/jbAw)
So you're saying that after this story broke, major media outlets and my local fishwrap hinting at this means they are uneducated and idiots. Redundant, I know. But they did lead with "possible hate crime prosecution."
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 06:19 AM (Jx0x6)
Tim Scott
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 06:20 AM (/jbAw)
So you're saying that after this
story broke, major media outlets and my local fishwrap hinting at this
means they are uneducated and idiots. Redundant, I know. But they did
lead with "possible hate crime prosecution."
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 10:19 AM (Jx0x6)
Reporters with a degree in Journalism are by definition uneducated in the law and are usually too lazy or stupid to look it up.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 06:21 AM (/jbAw)
Totally agree. Tragedy all-around. I've been on the GWB bridge both ways several times, long fucking way down.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 06:21 AM (Jx0x6)
And right now there are plenty of individuals who self identify as "Republicans" who really aren't in any meaningful political sense.
Like, what are you talking about, like? *pops chewing gum* I'm republican. A progressive reublican, but, like, a republican.
Posted by: Megyn "Buttercheeks" McCain at October 04, 2010 06:22 AM (a3Z62)
Reporters with a degree in Journalism are by definition uneducated in the law and are usually too lazy or stupid to look it up.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 10:21 AM (/jbAw)
Well remember, they were given journalism degrees because their respective Deans felt sorry for them after they failed womens studies and underwater basket weaving.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 06:23 AM (Jx0x6)
Regarding the 10-2 rally: The snake flag belongs to us because we are the philosophical descendents of those who created that flag. The libtards got hammer/sickle and Che. We win.
Posted by: Hexenkessel at October 04, 2010 06:23 AM (mI11M)
Well, I'd certainly watch a lot more network tv.
Posted by: jwpaine at October 04, 2010 06:26 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 09:57 AM (jS7i0)
On FOX, iIt was either Greece or Spain that was trying to convince grandparents to go on strike for add'l govt money. It's estimated that 75% of the children were cared for by grandparents. And with the end of the gravy train facing the rabble-rousing commies, they figure they can incite the old folks to join the riots with gimmee, gimmee, gimmee.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:26 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: CAC at October 04, 2010 06:27 AM (lV4Fs)
Realistically, I did not detect any hate crime angle to it. It was a thrill crime. I think the assholes who posted his encounters on the internet would have done the same had the date been a woman.
I do think there should be some criminal penalty for cyber bullying, in addition to whatever civil recourse the family chooses to pursue. And Rutgers should expel the students.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 06:28 AM (osFsP)
What they normally do at the drop of a hat is have a big party that involves fire and breaking windows. When all the grocery stores are looted clean they will then head for the suburbs. Yes, mass starvation and killoff in the first year.
If you live in a suburb of a large city with a population over 100,000 I advise you to move at least 20 miles from said city.
Posted by: Vic at October 04, 2010 10:05 AM (/jbAw)
I've heard Gerald Celente, Dir. of Trends Research, say this IS what's coming. He said it'll be like the zombie movies. All of the urban dwellers will fan out in search of food and come to the suburbs. He suggested a farm in the country and firearms would be the best bet. Since I'm not in the country, I'm thinking sheets of plywood would be a good investment for the first-floor windows.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:33 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 06:34 AM (SB0V2)
Here's the conundrum, imo, if you tell the truth about Islam, it is going to be perceived as hate speech. There is no escaping it. Impossible to do otherwise.
The implications of that are incredibly profound. Again, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 04, 2010 06:36 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 04, 2010 06:38 AM (gMzAL)
Nonsense; bring 'em along. We need a pinata/pudding holder.
Posted by: Blue Hen at October 04, 2010 06:41 AM (R2fpr)
The implications of that are incredibly profound. Again, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 04, 2010 10:36 AM (RkRxq)
Unfortunately, I kinda expected that. He's getting more and more people to his side though in Europe. Of course the hate-speech fascist court systems in Europe and Canada will never give him a fair trial.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 06:42 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 04, 2010 10:16 AM (9hSKh)
Does Ebola consider Japan an oppressor or the oppressed? If it's the former, he won't be sending billions of dollars we don't have anyway. Although, I hear he hasn't sent a dime of the US pledge to Haiti yet.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:45 AM (a3Z62)
More than $69 million in California welfare money, meant to help the needy
pay their rent and clothe their children, has been spent or withdrawn outside
the state in recent years, including millions in Las Vegas, hundreds of
thousands in Hawaii and thousands on cruise ships sailing from Miami.
State-issued aid cards have been used at hotels, shops, restaurants, ATMs and
other places in 49 other states, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam, according to
data obtained by The Times from the California Department of Social Services.
Las Vegas drew $11.8 million of the cash benefits, far more than any other
destination.
Posted by: PoconoJoe at October 04, 2010 06:48 AM (KzdKx)
The implications of that are incredibly profound. Again, imo.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 04, 2010 10:36 AM (RkRxq)
Your comment and link prompted me to search for Geert's recent speech in Berlin. I found it very worthwhile reading.
For anyone interested, here's a link to the speech.
Posted by: NM Hick at October 04, 2010 06:50 AM (IzuWw)
Unfortunately, I kinda expected that. He's getting more and more people to his side though in Europe. Of course the hate-speech fascist court systems in Europe and Canada will never give him a fair trial.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 10:42 AM (Jx0x6)
It isn't just about Wilders. It is everywhere. That is why confronting Islam is so difficult. If one tries to describe what it is about Islam that must be resisted it comes off as hate speech. People say that only the radicals hold to that "interpretation" of Islam when in reality, Islam isn't being interpreted at all. The aspect of hatred are codified.
Here's the proof, imo. One can read it themselves, but that not withstanding, if one listens to virtually any Muslim preacher, they are invaribly assaulted with hatred for non-Muslims. Why? Because it is in the book! But if one points that out, they are guilty of hate speech. There is no escaping it.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 04, 2010 06:51 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: curious at October 04, 2010 06:52 AM (p302b)
Wha??!! What happens in mother-fuckin' Vegas is 'sposed to stay in mother-fuckin' Vegas, mother-fuckers!
Posted by: ADC on a Plane at October 04, 2010 06:53 AM (g4J4S)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 10:34 AM (SB0V2)
Wonder if this kid was "out" yet, or that caused him additional angst? It must've gotten to him over time, 'cause he committed suicide three days after his video went public.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:55 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: eman at October 04, 2010 06:55 AM (Zi5DB)
Wha??!! What happens in mother-fuckin' my old friend Vegas is 'sposed to stay in mother-fuckin' my old friend Vegas, mother-fuckers my old friends!
FIFY.
Posted by: rdbrewer at October 04, 2010 06:56 AM (dQPW4)
A sign from the libtard union communist rally:
"More education means less Republicans"
I guess grammar is oppressive to educators.
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 06:56 AM (jS7i0)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 04, 2010 10:55 AM (OtQXp)
He's got kids who are true believers to his "cause" and billionaire business friends who helped him "buy" the demonrat party.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 06:57 AM (a3Z62)
-----------
Emmanuel would be one of the better choices. Who would you prefer? Jesse Jackson Jr? His wife?
Apparently you have no clue as to the demographics in Chicago. 42% White and most of those solid Democrats. You figure out the rest..
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at October 04, 2010 09:23 AM (dz+QL)
And apparently 100% retarded.
Posted by: Unclefacts, AoSHQ Pro Debate Team at October 04, 2010 06:57 AM (eCAn3)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 04, 2010 10:51 AM (RkRxq)
I denounce myself for searching "Jews" in an online Quran.
Wilders' judges stated early on that truth is not a defense in his case. Kafka must be proud.
Posted by: Beagle at October 04, 2010 06:57 AM (sOtz/)
A sign from the libtard union communist rally:
"More education means less Republicans"
I guess grammar is oppressive to educators.
Yeah, more or less.
Posted by: PoconoJoe at October 04, 2010 06:59 AM (KzdKx)
@169 - Hopefully I can be forgiven for wishing for a tragic limousine accident enroute to the cemetary.
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 04, 2010 07:00 AM (OtQXp)
As William F. Buckley once said, you must support the most conservative candidate you can elect.
Thus, supporting anyone but Rahm Emmanuel would be ruinous.
Posted by: Charles Krauthammer at October 04, 2010 07:00 AM (FkKjr)
Are you stuck in the Twentieth Century? People get entertained by the internet. The internet was made to get porn to us despite a nuclear war.
Network TV is on its way out. BTW, the SCOTUS denied the censorship crowd the right to censor porn on cable or satellite TV on first amendment grounds ... and with current levels of competition, the FCC insisting on censoring broadcast TV is starting to look truly buggy-whip-ish.
Okay , are you against anti-monopoly laws?Posted by: polynikes
Real monopolies require government support. Constructive monopolies get broken up by market forces. Standard Oil and Ma Bell were better at buying legislators than competing.
Posted by: Kristopher at October 04, 2010 07:02 AM (aAof6)
I know. Doesn't mean it has to stop us. You have to remember, granted they are powerful in Europe and Canada, they are still in the minority. Hopefully it is not too late, but some Euro's are starting to grow balls. And hell, push us Americans, we know we have the balls. Shit! I forgot about the draw Mo day lady who is basically in witness protection and of course the cowards at Comedy Central. Man, we're fucked.
Oh well, fuck Pisslam and Mohammad is a pedophile.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:03 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Jean at October 04, 2010 07:03 AM (UqSuH)
Anyway the guys watching would leave him messages.....and by Friday they were leaving him RIPs.
So, this kid was obviously not a private person, altho his roommate will prob still be charged.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 07:05 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: Jean at October 04, 2010 07:05 AM (S3pdb)
Anyway the guys watching would leave him messages.....and by Friday they were leaving him RIPs.
So, this kid was obviously not a private person, altho his roommate will prob still be charged.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 11:05 AM (h8R9p)
Did not know this. Fuck him then.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:08 AM (Jx0x6)
The last two sentences in the threaded quote of B.O. say it all. If he disagrees, with something, that something is destructive.
Posted by: journolist at October 04, 2010 07:09 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: teej at October 04, 2010 07:09 AM (GGS/R)
But it should serve as a reminder that our political enemies are going to pull out all the stops in trying to avert the Red Tide. Let's not start soaping each others' backs yet and get the job done.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 04, 2010 07:09 AM (9hSKh)
He got the idea from Hugo just after they had their little "bro" handshake.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:10 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Jean at October 04, 2010 07:13 AM (dK0WB)
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 11:05 AM (h8R9p)
is this true? this is the same rutger's kid who committed suicide? I did not know this.
Posted by: johnc_recent_EX-dem at October 04, 2010 07:14 AM (ACkhT)
Same here, I have no lib friends. There is no common ground.
Posted by: Berserker at October 04, 2010 07:15 AM (gWHrG)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:16 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Jean at October 04, 2010 07:16 AM (omcBI)
Posted by: curious at October 04, 2010 07:18 AM (p302b)
He's got kids who are true believers to his "cause" and billionaire business friends who helped him "buy" the demonrat party.
Posted by: RushBabe at October 04, 2010 10:57 AM (a3Z62)
There is still hope for a salmonellae outbreak from potato salad at the family reunion..
Posted by: Dave C at October 04, 2010 07:23 AM (yZDkF)
The revelation that he was broadcasting homemade pron is an interesting wrinkle, to say the least.
As you rightly point out, the parents still deserve our sympathy, but it makes one wonder why he killed himself.
We don't know anything about his partner, so perhaps when he found out about the broadcast he became upset and that, in turn, led to the suicide.
I still think this is a criminal act by the two students and they should be severely punished, but I'm not sure if the parents will have as good a case in civil court now.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 07:25 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: Jean at October 04, 2010 07:25 AM (OsAaC)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 07:27 AM (jS7i0)
Boy did I laugh. Here's a story from California:
LAGUNA HILLS -- Police have arrested an 81-year-old man on
suspicion of killing his 94-year-old roommate at a nursing home in Laguna
Hills.
Here's one of the comments:
It's news like this that makes one wonder -- WHERE ARE THE PARENTS?!?!?
Posted by: PoconoJoe at October 04, 2010 07:27 AM (KzdKx)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 07:28 AM (jS7i0)
Back to work, Ace.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 04, 2010 07:29 AM (NjYDy)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at October 04, 2010 07:29 AM (SB0V2)
Yes it is a criminal act and yes they should be severely punished. But it is not something we haven't dealt with before. Outing people via extortion has been the Advocate's plan from the get-go, so the parents do not have a civil case. I'm just saying it should not be a cause celebre.
By the way, his partner is probably upset because his wife might see the video as well as the craigslist or manhunt ad. Just saying.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:31 AM (Jx0x6)
Back to work, Ace.
Posted by: Jeff B. at October 04, 2010 11:29 AM (NjYDy)
Jeff, I have wine, here have some and calm down.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:32 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at October 04, 2010 07:33 AM (Snu7z)
I agree.
I'd hate to be the parents of those predatory "kids" who arranged all this. Scumbags.
Do we know that the other guy was in the closet? They've referred to him as a "man" a lot which always throws me off when I hear it used in the context of college students, but I have not gotten a sniff about who he is.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 07:33 AM (osFsP)
Nothing like a little coin to help cheer someone up.
Posted by: Dave C at October 04, 2010 07:34 AM (yZDkF)
Well the funny thing is that remember earlier this last week (I think the day after his radio gig) he said he had the "flu"? heh. My last boss was a drunk. She used to have "food poisoning" a lot.
But, really, I am amazed by the pace some of these good bloggers keep up. I wouldn't be able to do it.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 07:36 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: RIAA at October 04, 2010 07:38 AM (Snu7z)
"More education means less Republicans"
I guess grammar is oppressive to educators.
Traditional English grammar is racist. I wish I was being flip, but that's straight outta Black Studies 101: Multiculturalism Credit Requirement Fulfillment for White Kids in Other Degree Programs.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 04, 2010 07:38 AM (Vz9lf)
Can you provide a link? Otherwise it's just a rumor.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 07:38 AM (LH6ir)
Hey, Jeff B., soap my back, my old friend.
Posted by: rdbrewer at October 04, 2010 07:39 AM (dQPW4)
Posted by: The head ewok at October 04, 2010 07:40 AM (Snu7z)
Air compressor. Nutsack. San Francisco. Some assembly required. (Zombie has pictures, of course. You won't be able to eat lunch once you've seen them though).
Posted by: Ian S. at October 04, 2010 07:45 AM (p05LM)
A cam4.com account for "cit2mo" (NSFW)
This is from the article at Gawker.
Last Thursday that link had his vids, and comments on his vids, with the RIPs.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 07:46 AM (h8R9p)
Traditional English grammar is racist. I wish I
was being flip, but that's straight outta Black Studies 101:
Multiculturalism Credit Requirement Fulfillment for White Kids in Other
Degree Programs.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 04, 2010 11:38 AM (Vz9lf)
I guess Samuel Jackson has the answer to that...
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 07:51 AM (Jx0x6)
He's dead. His roommate did a despicable thing. That's the important stuff. Is his life less important because he's gay? If that is the implication, then fuck you!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 07:53 AM (LH6ir)
On Gawker.com...the article title.
"Is This Webcam Spying Victim Tyler Clementi"s Last Call For Help?"
(I know, I know, I must learn how to post links here!)
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 07:56 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at October 04, 2010 07:57 AM (Snu7z)
He's dead. His roommate did a despicable thing. That's the important stuff. Is his life less important because he's gay? If that is the implication, then fuck you!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 11:53 AM (LH6ir)
No, read my posts more carefully. His roommates should be punished, and it is a fucked up tragedy. But if the tables were turned and this kid quoted scripture on his facebook page about the evils of homosexuality and by his own doing he posted vids of himself and partners engaged in gay sex acts, the Advocate would have a field day with this, and even if the kid committed suicide, he would not be considered a victim by any stretch.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 08:00 AM (Jx0x6)
I think the point is that the student was actually uploading pornographic material of himself and sharing it on some site(s), not that he was into gay pron. That behavior argues against the idea being promoted in the MSM and by some advocacy groups that it was the act of exposing his homosexuality - or his homosexual acts - that drove him to suicide.
I think it is always a tragedy when someone commits suicide. I understand how some people feel anger towards people who do it, but I don't feel that. I simply am saddened by the unnecessary loss of life.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 08:00 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: andycanuck at October 04, 2010 08:01 AM (oLT/p)
Posted by: Navycopjoe on his IPhone4 at October 04, 2010 08:04 AM (DOzDZ)
Air compressor. Nutsack. San Francisco. Some assembly required. (Zombie has pictures, of course. You won't be able to eat lunch once you've seen them though).
Not an air compressor. The guy injects saline solution into his scrotum. And yes, I know far more about this than I ever wanted to.
Posted by: jwpaine at October 04, 2010 08:04 AM (g4J4S)
Go ahead, tell me I'm a horrible person, but I was bullied consistantly from grade 3 through 12 and actually got as far as making a plan and writing notes when I was 15, before realizing how fucking stupid it would be to kill myself to spite people who didn't give a shit about me.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 04, 2010 08:07 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at October 04, 2010 08:07 AM (Snu7z)
I'm old school when it comes to suicide, in that I blame the individual who committed the act. Trying to make sense of suicide or lay blame is fruitless because suicide is, existential musings notwithstanding, an irrational act. Like the Denver Broncos receiver who apparetly couldn't tolerate being on IR and doing rehab on his leg. It's not the events, which thousands of people have survived, but the reaction to events. Improper recording of sex acts does not ineluctably lead to suicide.
I think there's a lesson here for cartoon, book, or Quran jihads.
Posted by: Beagle at October 04, 2010 08:09 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: jwpaine at October 04, 2010 12:04 PM (g4J4S)
Ewwwww! I'm the one who posted the pics and I didn't even know he injected saline solution into his scrotum to achieve that look. The only question I had in regards to why, was where in the fuck did his penis go?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 08:09 AM (Jx0x6)
I think that anyone who kills them self by definition lacks the coping mechanisms that healthy people have (save, I suppose, for acts of martyrdom on the battlefield or people who jump from burning buildings or that sort of thing). Whatever the person's age, they for whatever reasons just aren't able to step back and get perspective. It's a weakness and I guess you could see it as a flaw, but to me it's still tragic.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 08:10 AM (osFsP)
Read on for a ways Dags, they haven't laid a glove on ya. Most of the "social libs" are pro-abortion. Nevermind how it has devalued human life in this country since Roe. Hmmm, maybe a definition will help take it out of the "religion realm".
See if they can com up with two words that fit the following;
The pre-meditated taking of an innocent, defenseless(sp?) human life. hint one starts with an m and the other with an a.
Posted by: teej at October 04, 2010 08:15 AM (GGS/R)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 04, 2010 12:07 PM (Vz9lf)
As an ex-cop, you would not believe how lonely a suicide scene really is. I could stand over a guy who blew off his head off with a shotgun and think what a fucking idiot this guy is. Usually, the grieving family is fucked up, but even they will roll their eyes at this selfish act. Homicide scenes, I have had to rightfully restrain family members. Suicide scenes, not so much.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 08:15 AM (Jx0x6)
Take a walk thru a hospital that has men in their late 30s and 40s, who cannot even hold in their feces anymore. Not to mention the extremely high suicide rates, aids, and other medical problems.
This deathstyle is no place for kids...but yet Hollywood and DC promotes it as something normal and natural.
So no, it is the liberals who just LOVE kids to DEATH.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 08:15 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: dagny at October 04, 2010 08:17 AM (jS7i0)
That is stupid beyond all measure.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 08:17 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 12:15 PM (h8R9p)
I'm the one who took criticism over this issue, but I cannot even abide and agree with your assertion. Gays are gays. They have been with us since the dawn of humankind. And, since there is a penis and a place to put that penis, your assertion that they cannot hold their feces may be correct in some instances, but not all and is extremely callous. Aids was not invented by gay people, just perpetuated by it. Ease up on the side effects of homosexuality. It may not be in your "book", but it's a reality that humans have experienced forever.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 08:24 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: Dan at October 04, 2010 08:26 AM (1jzSs)
Posted by: Dan at October 04, 2010 12:26 PM (1jzSs)
Lived there two years in the mid 80's and always liked that paper. Now I know why.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 08:30 AM (Jx0x6)
Posted by: archie bunker at October 04, 2010 08:47 AM (0YS61)
Of course perversion will always be a part of ADULT humans worldwide. But that is no reason to pretend it is just find and dandy to partake, and lie to children as if this is a normal and natural "gay lifestyle". This of course is done to make it sound inocuous.
There was a recent article about the Swiss having alarming growth in teen/adult suicide rates amonst homosexuals, bisexuals......so now they are starting more programs starting in Kindergarden promoting this perversion as A-OK!
And Canada's homosexuals are demanding NEW medical policies for their special issues. And religious clergy, bloggers, journalists, etc, in Canada now face hate crimes tribunals for speaking of these issues.
So, giving a sex act new civil rights protections opens all kinds of issues for us all. A new protected class for those who engage in anal sex, really??
Of course there will be pushback from parents, and all kinds of people who disagree.
We did not start this fire....they did.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 09:02 AM (h8R9p)
Hey, I have to ask: you think there's any fucking chance Ace might actually return to POSTING ON HIS OWN DAMN BLOG? I'm really, really getting tired of co-bloggers and stupid ringading Open Threads. You people are just not interesting enough to justify that.
Sure, but he's vowed not to do so until all of the mental midgets who aren't smart enough to figure out that you don't bold an entire post leave. Once we get rid of those idiots Ace will be back posting away like mad.
Until then I guess he figures it's just best to wait until they get frustrated enough to leave, because I think the last thing in the world he wants to deal with right now is some arrogant, childish miscreant who can't even understand a simple concept like bolding text for emphasis.
But in the meantime, try the scones. Their delish.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 09:13 AM (e8T35)
But points made with BIG BOLD FONTS are always better
Lol.. I guess I'm old school. If you can't make your point without screaming, just how good was your point to begin with?
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 09:21 AM (e8T35)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at October 04, 2010 11:08 AM (Jx0x6)
That is your comment in its entirety. It's not difficult to understand. When you discovered that this kid participated in some sort of on-line sex thing (I have no interest in the details), you cast him off.
I wonder if you would have said the same thing about a heterosexual kid?
Don't judge so quickly and harshly.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 09:23 AM (LH6ir)
For those fighting about the gays, the truth is a gay man has a life expectancy of 20 years shorter than heteros. This is the reason it must be discouraged. However, if you can't discourage, just except.
Posted by: madamex at October 04, 2010 09:25 AM (jChrK)
A majority of those who vote consider your, your very own, point of view, disagreeable and dangerous.
Howzzat?
Will this point of view rambling be your mantra for the 24 months following next month's elections?
Posted by: Boris Yeltsin at October 04, 2010 09:27 AM (4sQwu)
He probably committed suicide because the mechanisms a person has to deal with this event are very much construed. Back in the old days, like 19th century, such an act could be dealt with in the gentlemanly manner of an honorable duel to the death. Even 50-100 years ago, severe beatdowns would have went uncharged by the criminal court.because of justification.
Not anymore with a touchy feely culture.
Posted by: Holger at October 04, 2010 09:32 AM (QLmzi)
Or maybe I missed their parades, or their convention...ie, Folsom Street Fair, where they simulate and commit those anal sex (and others) for the public, in the street.
Besides, no one that I know of has asked anything be "done" with them, except to tell them no thanks...please keep this to yourself, leave our kids alone.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 09:34 AM (h8R9p)
For those fighting about the gays, the truth is a gay man has a life expectancy of 20 years shorter than heteros. This is the reason it must be discouraged. However, if you can't discourage, just except.
Umm.. why? Why accept? Where is that written?
We are gauranteed the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Nowhere does it say we have a right to be accepted, or not to be offended, or that everybody has to like us and be happy with our choices.
So if someone has a "alternative lifestyle", well that's their business. I just wish they'd keep it their business. I don't talk about my sex life at work, or in public, and I'd just appreciate the same courtesy from others.
In short, I don't have to accept jack.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 09:38 AM (e8T35)
What should we do about heterosexuals who engage in anal sex?
Stop inviting them to parties?
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 01:23 PM (e8T35)THAT WAS FUNNY!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 09:41 AM (LH6ir)
You spend an awful lot of time thinking about and being offended by the sex acts of others.
If you want to debate gay marriage or gay adoption or teaching gay relationships are ok in schools, fine. But I simply do not see what the insertion of the particular positions people use in the bedroom has to do with public policy.
My point being: men have penises and the world is full of holes. It has been my observation that if there's a hole somewhere, there's probably a man who wants to stick his johnson in it. That's just reality. I'm not sure how any of your points apply to lesbian couples, but I haven't done the detailed research on this subject that you apparently have.
And you can bet your bippy that if the country returned to legislating positions in the bedroom (old laws on the books notwithstanding), heterosexuals would be lobbying against that move.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 09:43 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 04, 2010 01:41 PM
Yeah, but StuckOnStupid can't be a regular, can he? If he were, wouldn't he have written "Start inviting them to parties?"
;-)
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 09:44 AM (osFsP)
Yeah, but StuckOnStupid can't be a regular, can he? If he were, wouldn't he have written "Start inviting them to parties?"
;-)
Lol.. well, been on hiatus for a while but I guess you could call me a regular. As to the merits of inviting such folks to parties, I guess some people like the ranch dip and some don't I suppose.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 09:49 AM (e8T35)
Anyway, I'm Roman Catholic. We have a lot in common with Mormons in terms of our code of conduct and morals. I'm sad to say the RC Church in the U.S. has not shown much leadership in some of those areas, preferring to focus on the 'social justice' end of the spectrum over difficult issues like abortion and gay marriage. The LDS Church has been extremely leaderly, imho, and has borne the brunt of abuse for doing so.
But you know what? Not once during Saturday's lessons or prayers did the LDS Church leaders feel the need to demean gays or promiscuous people or immoral people by going into gory detail about their sex acts or other sins. They made their points while respecting the dignity of people with whom they strenuously disagree.
This Rutgers student was screwed up. No doubt about it. But he was still treated cruelly in the last days of his life and although what he did was not right, I see no reason to use his death as a platform for expressing my disgust with his sex life. If nothing else, I don't think his parents need to be dealing with that right now.
Just my two cents.
Posted by: Y-not at October 04, 2010 10:00 AM (osFsP)
As much as I hate a generalization, it does seem to me that gay men, especially young gay men, are pretty thinned-skinned. I wouldn't be surprised if it were the sheer cruelty of what the roommates did that drove him to kill himself.
We assume it was the outing or the invasion of privacy, but even if none of those things were the crux of the matter, he may have been distraught over just how vicious kids can be to one another.
I can tell you that the community he grew up in is not one for sending kids to the College of Hard Knocks. We've had anti-bullying rules strictly enforced around here for ages.
I guess it's a little late to tell him to Rub some dirt on it, Nancy!
Posted by: spongeworthy at October 04, 2010 10:10 AM (rplL3)
:-) Yep, I know you're a fellow moron. Just teasing!
But the Constitution says I have the right not to be offended, or teased.. or.. oh, wait. Ok.. nevermind.
Hey, I know.. I'll just reach into the deck and pull out the bully card. What? What do you mean were all out of bully cards. Crap. Ok.. hmm.. how about the hateful conservative card? No? Seriously? We played all those too?
Ok.. that's it. Your a racist!
Lol.. sorry, couldn't resist.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at October 04, 2010 10:11 AM (e8T35)
Again...it is THAT lobby the "National Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Trangender", who PUBLISHES information about their penies, holes, bedroom positions, johnsons, in DETAILED RESEARCH, for the purposes of PUBLIC POLICY.
This is a group of people who choose to join, pool their VAST wealth, (they are not oppressed) to advertise to us and our children. They also are invited (mandatory) to speak at public schools and Universities....to promote the dangerous falsehood that anal sex is normal and natural.
Again...we did not start the conversation, they did.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 10:14 AM (h8R9p)
I'm going to give Pam a couple of points for actually taking a true social conservative viewpoint. I'm not saying I agree, but maybe I will later. Social conservatives would be saying that the real "hate criminal" is whatever person or persons seduced this boy into his grim "lifestyle" in the first place, not those who mocked him [in an illegal fashion I guess, until we all get a chance to check out his broadcasts]. We're presuming--and like to presume in all cases now--that all such subjects came to a realization of their sexuality, found themselves, and a lot of other blah blah that's pretty assailable.
A strong social conservative argument would be that even now, most converts to the other team are coerced into it, if not by force then by drugs, access to forbidden venues, an untrustworthy adult accomplice, or a dare, followed by blackmail. My own argument is that 90% of self-reporting "gays" (offensive misnomer) are surface-level rebels, anxious to associate with a ready made circle of friends or thumb their noses at their background. Fifty years ago they'd have grown a mustache. And that's why so many can't keep it in the bedroom or bar, but have to engage in unrelenting social crusades for more "rights."
I'll go Pam one better: corpus dilecti. There is no body. He may have eloped. Tell you one thing, if that "older guy" was faculty, he just had a real interesting weekend I would not have cared to share, and the two frosh perps will walk.
Posted by: zooey at October 04, 2010 10:43 AM (hrwMe)
I have no brief whatsoever for them...if their attorney thinks that the boy who committed suicide's not so private life is a mitigating factor then so be it, but not sure how his lifestyle would mitigate the fact that they taped him. So who knows, if this goes to a jury in a criminal case or a civil case it may matter.
Of course the MSM coverage is typical, I never expect them to report in any context about their protected groups.
But yes, my concern is the dangerous lifestyle of homosexuals is promoted as normal and natural to younger and younger children. (a 13 year old who thought he was "gay" recently committed suicide too)
Not to mention the new laws coming down the pike giving them special and protected status.
It is a sight to behold, a truly upside down and false narrative being woven for decades on this subject, a propaganda coup to be sure.
Posted by: pam at October 04, 2010 11:09 AM (h8R9p)
Posted by: Designer handbag at November 16, 2010 12:50 AM (EeEYj)
Posted by: data recovery at November 25, 2010 09:18 PM (BGJWd)
Posted by: porno izle at February 04, 2011 03:07 PM (Y5W2W)
Our company is specialized in manufacturing laser equipments, such aslaser cutting machines, laser engraving machines, laser dieboard cutter, laser metal cutter, CNC router, laser mark, etc. Since establishment, we have been devoting to researching, developing, producing and marketing of laser equipments.
Posted by: laser cut at May 08, 2011 07:54 PM (2gSgT)
Posted by: laser engravers at May 17, 2011 11:53 PM (0uOHt)
Posted by: promotional items at May 20, 2011 04:34 PM (2zq4R)
in Japan.
Posted by: wholesale Drum at May 20, 2011 04:34 PM (2zq4R)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2635 seconds, 386 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








again.
what grim vision, this?
Posted by: Oderus at October 04, 2010 04:48 AM (7gszR)