October 19, 2010

Top Headline Comments 10-19-2010
— Dave in Texas

It's a Two-fer Tuesday, I'll add the Moron Pick Results here too.

healthcareremember.jpg

You people have to look like doctors. This is serious stuff.

Remember November via Slublog™


Top Picks from Top Pickers. Top. Pickers.

JCred: 51
Bruin22: 48
joltin' j's: 48
Commando Pete: 47
Titanium: 47
Boone85: 46
Conservative in the City: 46
sTevo: 46
3rd_Bird: 46
Dr.Spank: 46
Portnoy: 46
boniface ballers: 46


The B squad
Ben: 45
DrewM: 41
CDR M: 39
Gabe Malor: 36
Russ From Winterset: 33
Dave in Texas: 33

Thanks as always to Ben and CDR M.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at 05:10 AM | Comments (39)
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Mornin'

Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 05:11 AM (7+pP9)

2 This is the "top headline" of the day. (posted earlier)

Some GOP House Leaders Push Compromise

A number of House Republicans, including some who are likely to be in the leadership, are pushing a post-election strategy aimed at securing concrete legislation, with the goal of showing they can translate general principles into specific action.

Among the ideas is to bring a series of bills to the floor, as often as once a week, designed to cut spending in some way. Longer term, GOP leaders say they recognize they may have to compromise with Democrats in tackling broader problems.

Some of the damn RINOs are already talking aisle crossing. Note no names are mentioned in the story and it says "some in leadership".

All I can say is NOT when the DeMint wing takes over leadership.

Also, the biggest problem we have is TOO MANY LAWS. It doesn't take compromise to repeal BS laws.

Also, I wonder if this story is mostly a lie.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:13 AM (/jbAw)

3 BTW story from Fox and WSJ.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:14 AM (/jbAw)

4 Man, five points is going to be tough to make up if JCred keeps it up...

Posted by: ConservativeintheCity at October 19, 2010 05:14 AM (JourR)

5

As a service to humanity, in particular my fellow commenters, and as I a inclined, and led by karma to do because of my Barry-like benevolence, I have unselfishly spent the last seven minutes and thirty eight seconds scouring the MFM to bring you this synopsis of this mornings news:

Republicans = baaaaaaad!

Democrats = those people with whom you could safely consider leaving your newborn kittensÂ… unless dem offense was piqued by some perceived slight by the right against abortion, gays, government sponsored gay childcare centers for gay toddlers, really odd gay partners of gay senators whose election campaigns are in trouble, etc., in which case your newborn kittens would wind up as the principal ingredient in cat daiquiris.

There you have it, and, as usual, youÂ’re welcome.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 19, 2010 05:15 AM (RkRxq)

6 Thank goodness for DiT. 

This pick 'em stuff is amazingly difficult.  Only 9 teams in my league are above .500.  

Posted by: Y-not is sitting near the bottom of the pile at October 19, 2010 05:15 AM (osFsP)

7

Ommmmmmmmm.

Seek your center...

That's it.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 19, 2010 05:18 AM (RkRxq)

8 All you Morons who bought the "Tiger Woods" sex video got gypped. Its a fake:

http://tinyurl.com/2f2avuv

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:20 AM (/jbAw)

9 Fellow moron(ette)s, you need to see this one, currently headlined on Yahoo:

----------------------------------Compromise on Capitol Hill: Is it really what Americans want?

Most Americans say they want members of Congress to forge compromises to solve the nation's problems, yet many are turning to candidates in this tumultuous election season who are disdainful of compromise.

By a large margin, 57 percent to 37 percent, Americans surveyed in the latest ABC News/Yahoo! News poll say they would rather that political leaders work across party lines, even if it means "compromising on important issues." It's a sentiment heard often across the country — and one that played a critical role in helping Barack Obama win the presidential election.

Yet voters have given the president little credit for the efforts he's made to cut deals with Republicans. At the same time, conservative candidates who are campaigning on the need for more ideological purity are enjoying the support of angry voters who are expected to turn out Nov. 2 in large numbers.

[.......]

"The public is schizophrenic; they say they want compromise, but that flies in the face of the increasingly polarized candidates they vote for," says Greg Valliere, chief political strategist for the Potomac Research Group. "Barack Obama's experience is proof of that; he's been punished for his attempts at cooperation."

[....]

----------------------

It gets very samey after the first ten or so paragraphs, but it does open up "The Narrative"... which is that Republicans will be in an impossible position once they are in power (having to choose between "compromise" and "purity"), and it will cause them to lose heavily in 2012. Lulz.

Oh yeah... number of mentions of ObamaCare in this very accurate 2010 election article? Zero.

http://tinyurl.com/2bjcebk

Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 19, 2010 05:20 AM (XrvQ5)

10 OMG, we've all become the middleman!

Posted by: HH at October 19, 2010 05:25 AM (6oDXl)

12 Phear me bitches!!

Posted by: Portnoy at October 19, 2010 05:28 AM (mT7uC)

13 White House sets Nov. 16 date for Army Staff Sgt. Salvatore Giunta to receive the Medal of Honor

(So I guess Barry is planning on returning from Indonesia after all...)

Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 05:28 AM (Vz9lf)

14

Posted by: runningrn at October 19, 2010 09:26 AM (qY2Vc)

Perhaps some of those wishing to conduct wiretaps could be better put to use by building a fence, if you catch my drift...

Posted by: HH at October 19, 2010 05:30 AM (6oDXl)

15 the "Plain Writing Act of 2010"

Most productive Congress evah!

Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 05:32 AM (Vz9lf)

16 What hooker?!?!?  The vid I got of Tiger has him 'putting from the rough'. 

Posted by: Portnoy at October 19, 2010 05:32 AM (mT7uC)

17 So if Raese wins he's supposed to be seated November 3rd.

Anybody want to bet that if he wins the Democrats try to delay seating him until after the end of the lame duck session?

Remember how long it took to seat Scott Brown?

Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 05:33 AM (7+pP9)

18 Michelle Obama will be stumping for Blumenthal. That's good news for Linda McMahon, who saw her opponent recover after both Bill Clinton and Obama rushed to do damage control last month.

Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 19, 2010 05:34 AM (mHQ7T)

19 Most Americans say they want members of Congress to forge compromises to solve the nation's problems, yet many are turning to candidates in this tumultuous election season who are disdainful of compromise.

That seems to be the meme from the MFM today. Its BS but they are pushing it.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:34 AM (/jbAw)

20 Anybody want to bet that if he wins the Democrats try to delay seating him until after the end of the lame duck session?

Remember how long it took to seat Scott Brown?

Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 09:33 AM (7+pP9)

I thought that the courts had already ruled on that and they must be seated immediately.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:36 AM (/jbAw)

21

I have a solution for this problem, and I feel certain that on some level, the author of the article would find it hard to disagree with me (NYT article):

http://tinyurl.com/29c5ehe

Here's the plan: Instead of continuing this obviously failed experiment in trying to provide the tools and the guidance to young people to excel, to achieve, in our newfound universal understanding that income equality is our ultimate ideal, we should adjust our efforts.  I propose that once a woman finds out that she is pregnant, she should start being paid to do everything in her power to rear her child to be an underachiever - a parasite, if you will, on society.  In this way, in the course of a few short generations, we will have achieved our ideal of income equality.

And look at all the money we will have saved by not having to build and staff schools with the additional parasites on society - piss poor teachers.

Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 19, 2010 05:36 AM (RkRxq)

22 I propose that once a woman finds out that she is pregnant, she should start being paid to do everything in her power to rear her child to be an underachiever - a parasite, if you will, on society.

Don't we already do this now?

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 05:40 AM (/jbAw)

23 Don't we already do this now?

Only for certain demographic groups.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 05:42 AM (Vz9lf)

24

I thought that the courts had already ruled on that and they must be seated immediately.

Posted by: Vic at October 19, 2010 09:36 AM (/jbAw)

Even if they did I'm betting the Democrats will bring another court challenge and hold off seating him until a week or so after the decision -- if it goes against them.

Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 05:44 AM (7+pP9)

25 The Charleston Daily Mail endorses John Raese right before he debates Joe Manchin. Here's a snippet:

Leading Democrats have made it clear that if Manchin were sent to Washington, he would be expected to function as part of the team.

Earlier this month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told  Democratic members that it was fine to distance themselves from the leadership on the campaign trail.

"Go for it," she said. "Just win your election."

Similarly, Sen. Jay Rockefeller recently blessed the anti-Obama tack Manchin has taken of late.

"Whatever he does, I'll support, in order that he be part of the Democratic caucus," Rockefeller told The Washington Post.

Well, why? The answer is obvious:

The liberal wing of the Democratic Party want to keep churning out more of the same - perhaps another bailout, another entitlement program, a 2,000-page energy bill, a big tax increase on Jan. 1.

Voters aren't sure what they are hearing from Manchin - tactics or conviction.


Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at October 19, 2010 05:46 AM (mHQ7T)

26 10 Most Terrifying Places on Earth

They left out FKOTUS's boudoir...but 20% of them are in Ohio, which I can totally believe.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 05:53 AM (Vz9lf)

27 Here's some good news:

Democrats cancel ads in Philadelphia
National party cuts TV support for congressional candidates.


The national campaign arm for Democratic U.S. House candidates has canceled a series of television ads scheduled to begin airing Tuesday in the Philadelphia market.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee had planned to run political commercials for the final two weeks until the Nov. 2 election. It has now scaled back its ad buy to just the final week, which begins Oct. 26.

In the Philadelphia media market there are a number of very competitive or high-profile congressional races, including the seats currently held by U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy, a Democrat, in Bucks County and U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent, a Republican, in the Lehigh Valley. The Philadelphia market also includes northern Delaware and southern New Jersey.

[ . . . ]

The National Republican Congressional Committee, the GOP  counterpart to the DCCC, is planning to air political ads in the Philadelphia market for Fitzpatrick and for Pat Meehan, the Republican running for the Delaware County seat currently held by Joe Sestak, who is running for the U.S. Senate.
------------

The bad news is there's no mention of NRCC support for Christine O'Donnell. But this is an Allentown, PA paper so they may not care.

Posted by: Ed Anger at October 19, 2010 05:54 AM (7+pP9)

Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 19, 2010 06:06 AM (Vz9lf)

29 I wouldn't worry about this bipartisanship idea being floated.  It could be a plant by the Ds to sow dissent within GOP ranks. 

Or it could be something the GOP is pushing to box Obama into a corner by saying "Hey, we wanted to compromise, but you kept pushing your leftist agenda." 

Or it could even be the real deal, but with the wave of outsiders and newbies that will get seats this election, I think the GOP leaders will quickly learn that the old ways are not going to cut it. 

Posted by: Y-not at October 19, 2010 06:16 AM (osFsP)

30

New numbers posted today on the Treasury Department website show the National Debt has increased by more than $3 trillion since President Obama took office.

The National Debt stood at $10.626 trillion the day Mr. Obama was inaugurated. The Bureau of Public Debt reported today that the National Debt had hit an all time high of $13.665 trillion.

The Debt increased $4.9 trillion during President Bush's two terms. The Administration has projected the National Debt will soar in Mr. Obama's fourth year in office to nearly $16.5-trillion in 2012. That's more than 100 percent of the value of the nation's economy and $5.9-trillion above what it was his first day on the job.

Mr. Obama frequently lays blame for soaring federal deficits on his predecessor.

 

What doesn't he blame on his predecessor?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 19, 2010 06:33 AM (1Jaio)

31 The Pick 'Em league is stupid.

You're all stupid.

Posted by: Herr Morgenholz, embittered at October 19, 2010 06:36 AM (5aa4z)

32 Cheney Never Apologized to Harry Whittington
For shooting him. And why should he? You don't get out of line and then return by walking up sneaking up on your fellow hunters without announcing your presence. That's the whole reason for walking in a line, avoiding getting shot. Besides. Cheney don't apologize. [rdbrewer]   When I'm joking about this incident, I say hell yeah, Whittington got what he deserved.  He was "sneaking up" on Cheney, trying to test him for weakness.  Cheney did what his Secret Service couldn't do...take out the attacker.   But in all seriousness, yeah, Cheney is partially to blame.  Cheney ultimately pulled the trigger without clearly identifying the target or what was behind it.

Posted by: ed at October 19, 2010 06:48 AM (Zsqn4)

33 *Hangs head in shame*

The only reason I'm beating Dave is because of the tie breaker...

*sniff*

Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 19, 2010 07:19 AM (0q2P7)

34

The Town Saved By Stimulus

If you wingnuts weren't so irrational due to your fears you'd see what a great president we have.  Love the use of "saved."   

Just in time for the election, CNN touts an unemployment drop from twenty to fourteen percent in Kokomo IN.

So for a mere eight hundred billion stimulus, and the Chrysler bailout of whatever tens of billions, we got a barely-hanging-on mid-size town rocking fourteen percent unemployment.

You ungrateful fearful clingers!    

Posted by: Beagle at October 19, 2010 07:30 AM (sOtz/)

35 Hey get me on that list - 82 House seats gross, at least 75 net. Or are those football picks? Bah.

Posted by: motionview at October 19, 2010 07:39 AM (zRbkQ)

36 Hey Dave (in Texas), Can you add me to the 'B' team? That way I can show I'm beating drew and russ

Posted by: Lord Nazh at October 19, 2010 07:44 AM (zhA4+)

37 PPP continues to throw it's future credibility away in a futile attempt to thwart the inevitable. First in WV, now in PA:

http://tinyurl.com/2ee3ffq

Posted by: Chris R at October 19, 2010 07:53 AM (AO4qz)

38 thnaks a lot

Posted by: cool replica Nur Majan watch at May 15, 2011 11:26 PM (k8dIq)

39 I liked the posts and cool layout you have here! I would like to thank you for sharing your experience and the time it took to post!! Two Thumbs up!

Posted by: inuyasha cosplay at June 08, 2011 01:05 AM (yk1lp)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
90kb generated in CPU 0.111, elapsed 0.3339 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2966 seconds, 167 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.