October 20, 2010
— Dave in Texas Humpday. Also I'm getting tired of these dates with nothing but ones and twos and zeroes in them.

Posted by: Dave in Texas at
07:03 AM
| Comments (164)
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2010 07:05 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Tami at October 20, 2010 07:07 AM (VuLos)
Posted by: joncelli at October 20, 2010 07:07 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 20, 2010 07:07 AM (bvfVF)
Also I'm getting tired of these dates with nothing but ones and twos and zeroes in them.
YOU WILL RUE THE DAY YOU POSTED THIS ONCE I HAVE TAKEN OVER THE WORLD!
Posted by: Base - 3 at October 20, 2010 07:08 AM (XiVKO)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 20, 2010 07:08 AM (bvfVF)
Partisan Sample: 46R/46D
Who did you vote last election: 43 Obama/49 McCain. (Even though Obama won by 6. Toomey is under-performing with McCain voters. Sestak seems to have all Obama voters.
More numbers that should favor Toomey big time:
Sestak Favorables: 34
ObamaÂ’s Approval is 42/51.
Congressional Preferred Ballot is 44R/38D
RendellÂ’s Approval is 33/61
I also read that this will become a tracking poll and be updated frequently.
Posted by: Greg at October 20, 2010 07:08 AM (huyI8)
Posted by: eman at October 20, 2010 07:08 AM (GuTnD)
Posted by: The Chicken at October 20, 2010 07:10 AM (Yd5LW)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 20, 2010 11:07 AM (bvfVF)
The peasants and minor nobility have to know their place.
Posted by: Lord Chris Coons at October 20, 2010 07:11 AM (7BU4a)
Caption for that photo: "And I'm gonna Smash that hobbit if he gets anywheres near here"!
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2010 07:12 AM (6oDXl)
When they didn't get it, they lied.
And that is why I hate Democrats with a passion.
Posted by: Horatius at October 20, 2010 07:12 AM (7HKZh)
Every time I see that picture, I recall Glenn Beck going nuclear over it. On his massive monitors, he pulled up side-by-side that picture compared to the image they were trying to recreate of MLK.
It was a very compelling comparison.
Of course, it was mostly used for John Stewart mock-fodder, but for those of us who actually, I dunno...take shit seriously...it was moving and eye-opening.
Posted by: reason at October 20, 2010 07:12 AM (XiVKO)
One of the key things the Republicans better be ready to do is rein in these public sector unions. Abolishing them, which should be a goal, won't be possible in 2010, but the Reps could start putting them on the defensive.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2010 07:13 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 20, 2010 07:13 AM (K6izd)
Posted by: Burger at October 20, 2010 07:13 AM (KUSbc)
Posted by: AE at October 20, 2010 07:13 AM (kSfPT)
Seeing the look on your face when they take that gavel from you is going to be legendary.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 20, 2010 07:14 AM (9hSKh)
They BOMBED on the economy.
They nuked far more jobs than they "saved or created", and they never batted an eye. They have supported intimidation of voters in Philadelphia and harassment of lawmakers in Arizona, and now they are indignant because the stuff they have done for the last two years is now brought right back into their own front yards.
The Democrats' chickens... are coming home... to ROOST!
Posted by: Reverend Right at October 20, 2010 07:14 AM (X2rdt)
Posted by: maddogg at October 20, 2010 07:14 AM (OlN4e)
Yes, any infant death is a tragedy, but why should Graco be shelling out for what is, at bottom, a failure of parents to RTFM?
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:15 AM (8y9MW)
That picture is one of the most arrogant, smug and constitutionally corrupt photos and it keeps me going to throw the dems out.
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:16 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:16 AM (uG7PE)
Make that the 3rd. Should be an epic day. Damn I wish I didn't have to work that night.
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2010 07:16 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 20, 2010 07:16 AM (X2rdt)
Posted by: ChuckOH at October 20, 2010 07:17 AM (0Xt/k)
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 20, 2010 07:17 AM (hRNYI)
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:18 AM (O/NP5)
I'm filling out my CA absentee ballot today. My only question is whether or not I should vote for the marijuana initiative. I have a feeling the next couple of years are going to require some recreational medication to survive.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 07:18 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2010 07:18 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:18 AM (uG7PE)
Posted by: Gregg at October 20, 2010 07:18 AM (K6izd)
Posted by: dogfish at October 20, 2010 07:19 AM (Ncv/n)
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 11:18 AM (O/NP5)
Oh, and before the word police say anything, the "effecting" above should really be "affecting."
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:19 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 20, 2010 07:19 AM (02uN6)
Posted by: The Chicken at October 20, 2010 07:20 AM (Yd5LW)
Dude. Infant death is like hearing a cash register open.
Posted by: Trial Lawyers at October 20, 2010 07:20 AM (6W34m)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:21 AM (uG7PE)
Come on, Nighthawk, that's just beyond the pale. Don't you have any decency? Red Swingline staplers should just be off limits.
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:21 AM (8y9MW)
Nancy darling, that is because you will be in another position. IYKWIMAITYD.
Posted by: dogfish at October 20, 2010 07:21 AM (Ncv/n)
Posted by: maddogg at October 20, 2010 07:21 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Matt at October 20, 2010 07:22 AM (r6SJw)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 20, 2010 11:13 AM (K6izd)
You make it sound like that is something unusual...?
Posted by: Kal Penn at October 20, 2010 07:22 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Dave C at October 20, 2010 07:22 AM (6W34m)
This is what made Anita feel so threatened:
“Good morning Anita Hill, it’s Ginni Thomas,” it said. “I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband.”
Ms. Thomas went on: “So give it some thought. And certainly pray about this and hope that one day you will help us understand why you did what you did. O.K., have a good day.”
There is nothing wrong with the message and nothing threatening about it, particularly given that it was left at Hill's work number.
Anita Hill is a lying sack of shit.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 07:23 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: Gregg at October 20, 2010 07:23 AM (K6izd)
Okay, fellas, call off the BOLO...
Posted by: Word Police at October 20, 2010 07:23 AM (dWFSK)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 20, 2010 07:23 AM (02uN6)
LINK
Posted by: momma at October 20, 2010 07:23 AM (penCf)
@22 - Nancy likely has enough private money to own her own plane, or at least buy into a "timeshare" private jet.
Which is completely fine by me. Knowing my luck, I'd wind up sitting next to her. And of course, that would be the flight where your destination airport is still unwinding from some mechanical-failure delay four hours ago, so your flight is gonna be sent out to do figure-eights for the next two hours...
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi (D - Gavels) at October 20, 2010 07:24 AM (XiVKO)
Bookmark this link for the "we can't cut the budget" Cassandras:
(link to Corner item on New Zealand with bonus snark at the end)
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2010 07:24 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 11:18 AM (osFsP)
You going to tear down our Val-U-Rite vodka industry?
Personally, I'm against it, because they have taken no thought into all the knock-on effects involved with it. And it hurts hippies the most.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 20, 2010 07:24 AM (CN+Qv)
So yesterday, I was driving and flipping around the FM dial here in L.A. and landed on a commercial with Magic Johnson shilling for Jerry Brown.
One of the most pathetic commercials I've ever heard. "We need to elect Jerry Brown so he can save California, he is someone who will work with President Obama. Jerry Brown will save the future of California, because he knows what it will take."
Complete and utter crap but the comedic effect was golden.
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:24 AM (O/NP5)
It may be time for me to step back from politics for awhile.
Posted by: MissTammy at October 20, 2010 07:25 AM (m8uUu)
When they didn't get it, they lied.
And that is why I hate Democrats with a passion.
Posted by: Horatius at October 20, 2010 11:12 AM (7HKZh)
Agree 100%. There's no question that Pelosi et al don't generally arrive at work in the Capitol via the yard. They marched right amongst the protesters with their big gavel in order to rub our faces in their power play.
Slugs. All of them.
Posted by: someone out there at October 20, 2010 07:25 AM (aYSxI)
Posted by: Greggg at October 20, 2010 07:25 AM (Yd5LW)
No. Swinglines are a step too far. If we cross that moral line, what next? I mean, she already has to look in the mirror every morning...
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:26 AM (8y9MW)
Posted by: Olliander at October 20, 2010 07:26 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: Olliander at October 20, 2010 07:27 AM (6uiF7)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 20, 2010 07:28 AM (X2rdt)
Posted by: Concerned Christian Conservative at October 20, 2010 07:28 AM (Yd5LW)
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 20, 2010 07:28 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 20, 2010 07:28 AM (02uN6)
From NJ.com
"A disputed New Jersey congressional candidate is under federal bankruptcy protection.
Republicans and tea party organizations say Peter DeStefano was placed on the ballot in New Jersey's 3rd District with the help of Democrats trying to siphon off conservatives votes for the Republican candidate."
Yea, ain't nothing going on here in NJ-13. Just keep on moving and vote for the Tea Party...
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 20, 2010 07:28 AM (LdYLm)
Yeah, but it's his purse.
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (X2rdt)
So...what is he actually going to do to save CA then? Cut taxes or raise them? Cut state employee payrolls or raise them? Trim public sector pension/health care benefits or raise them...etc.
It would be nice to have a media that actually did its job...
Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (7BU4a)
Posted by: Olliander at October 20, 2010 11:26 AM (6uiF7)
"Yeah that's true but I was referring to Sarah Palin's Vegas speech."
Gwen Ifill
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (O/NP5)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (uG7PE)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: JonGreg at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (Yd5LW)
Posted by: Y-not
Still? So what else is new?
Not to dwelve into someone's psyche but I think Hill has been lying to herself about a her perceived slight it has become her reality.
She really and truly believes she was the 'victim'..
When she was the one who was chasing Justice Thomas and he spurned her for Ginni.
Posted by: Dave C at October 20, 2010 07:29 AM (6W34m)
Posted by: Steve S at October 20, 2010 07:30 AM (XX7YX)
FIFY
Personally, I haven't heard or read about any effects yet of Obamacare on basic science research field. But then again, I'm so focused on finishing my own work at the moment that I have a bit of myopia on the status of the basic science field as a whole.
Logically though, Obamacare will at least decrease the amount of money available for basic research (via federal agencies such as the NIH or NSF).
Y-not, or anybody else acclimated with the science field, will have an infinitely more intelligent answer for you.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 20, 2010 07:31 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Maloderous at October 20, 2010 07:31 AM (w4442)
Posted by: JonGreg at October 20, 2010 11:29 AM (Yd5LW)
Greg, I would like to prescirbe some tricyclic drugs to help combat your depression. I'm thinking iniprimine and thorazine.
Dr. Journolist
Posted by: journolist at October 20, 2010 07:31 AM (O/NP5)
Link
Posted by: momma at October 20, 2010 07:32 AM (penCf)
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 20, 2010 07:32 AM (9hSKh)
Did he have to borrow it from his partner's prostitution ring?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (mV+es)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (uG7PE)
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 11:23 AM (osFsP)
There is significantly more evidence that Bill Clinton sexually harassed multiple women then that Thomas harassed one.
Odd how the media to this date harps on Hill, whose charges were baseless, and yet can write reams about Bill Clinton without discussing his status as a sexual predator.
Posted by: 18-1 at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (7BU4a)
I have got to have those two to dinner. Can't believe it took D'oh so long to tell me.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (f9c2L)
Yeah, basically the consensus I've heard in higher ed is that it is killing research funding. Fortunately, since the Dems' tax policies are aggressively anti-business and anti-private foundations (and the "rich" individuals who fund them), the effect on federal funding is masked by the destruction of private giving to research and education.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 07:33 AM (osFsP)
They're taking over the Senate? If you say so.
Posted by: Greg at October 20, 2010 07:34 AM (huyI8)
By "rein in" you do mean "apply RICO and anti-trust laws to destroy", right?
Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 20, 2010 07:34 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 11:33 AM (uG7PE)
I might be for it if the teachers weren't screwing up the kids in the bargain,
Posted by: Oldcat at October 20, 2010 07:35 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: nerdygirl at October 20, 2010 07:35 AM (uG7PE)
Posted by: jas at October 20, 2010 07:35 AM (ZM2Bn)
Posted by: Coach Associate at October 20, 2010 07:36 AM (YYaIP)
If FASB makes companies accurately account for their union liabilities, there won't be any more companies/unions to rig unions for the Ds. They will pull out all the stops (and your money) to save this little conspiracy.
Posted by: someone out there at October 20, 2010 07:36 AM (aYSxI)
That's one way to clear up the government unions.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 20, 2010 07:36 AM (IuKAf)
Is Toomey in trouble? PPP and some "independent" pollster puts Toomey-Sestak tied, and Sestak ahead by 2 points.
Over-sampling Democrats is fun! All the cool kids are doing it.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (XdlcF)
@AllenG - I think we had one of those strollers. We definitely had a Graco "travel system" for our first-born, and it was a very good piece of equipment. But, like you said, Step One is RTFM on all this stuff.
This part of the story is my favorite:
The recalled strollers were made before the development in 2008 of a voluntary standard that requires a larger stroller opening between the stroller's tray and seat bottom in order to prevent entrapment and strangulation.
So instead of your kid getting trapped between the seat and the snack-tray, where the unattentive parent never notices their child is hung until they suffocate...the solution is to make the hole bigger. That way, the child will slip clean through, and get run over by the stroller, and then trampled by same unattentive parent. Champion!
I've got other issues with the story, and just how many things the parents are doing wrong. Beyond the obvious "not strapping them in" Problem 1, my guess is that they are also using the product other than as-designed for the age of their child. If your child is still an infant (which, to me, says, not yet walking), then you should still have your child in the carrier, not simply in the stroller.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi (D - Gavels) at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (kZVsz)
Lollar statement responding to Steny Hoyer's "I'm coming after you" threat/promise.
He sounds a little tired in this presser (and I wish he either had a light blue shirt on or a tie), but I love this guy.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (osFsP)
No, that's Hoyer's purse. You're right about the contents, though.
Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (IuKAf)
lol jane
those salahi's are living in a world of denial from what i've read about them and watched on real housewives of dc........the female one is like an attack hugger.....and must be on some kind of stimulant the way she jumps around squealing......the husband is just icky....he reminds me of dick morris....all fat and sweaty....
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (y2M8f)
Anyway, darkness will be hovering over our city, in the next 1-2 hours.
Posted by: Editor at October 20, 2010 07:37 AM (pUfK9)
Over-sampling Democrats is fun! All the cool kids are doing it.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 20, 2010 11:37 AM (XdlcF)
First they have to find one. Then they can multiply him up
Posted by: Oldcat at October 20, 2010 07:38 AM (CN+Qv)
I lived there for 10 years, working at an non union companies. I hate the unions.
Had several jobs where I was side by side with them and they can be some of the most condescending SOBs imaginable. Mostly construction jobs.
Some teamsters were decent but most were pricks.
Posted by: Dave C at October 20, 2010 07:38 AM (6W34m)
Posted by: Editor at October 20, 2010 11:37 AM (pUfK9)
Racist.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 20, 2010 07:38 AM (CN+Qv)
Hillary's campaigning for Murray?
Posted by: Rob Crawford at October 20, 2010 07:39 AM (IuKAf)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 20, 2010 07:40 AM (K6izd)
Well, so long as I'm gonna use the Nancy Sock...
"Clearly, the only FAIR solution to Graco's problem is for the company to send out a representative to each customer, who will properly strap the child into the stroller, push them around for the parent, and then safely extract the child from the stroller. All of this should be provided free-of-charge. Frankly, I believe that the disparity between Graco's executives, and those other fat-cats in the Big Baby industry, and their customers in the lower- to middle-class has grown too large, and it is time for these companies to put safety first and profits second."
- Nancy Pelosi (D - Gavels)
Posted by: reason at October 20, 2010 07:40 AM (kZVsz)
It may be time for me to step back from politics for awhile.
Posted by: MissTammy at October 20, 2010 11:25 AM (m8uUu)
My lifelong Democrat grandmother wanted to switch her party affliation to Republican. She passed away just a few weeks ago. Too bad she won't get a chance to vote Republican in the general, but at least now she won't have her medical care in the hands of Obamacare.
Posted by: Book Geek at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (1+OO5)
Of course they are. If they could be that effective at "obstruction" with only 40 senators, imagine what they'd do with 47 (about the minimum number I've heard). Hey, they might even pass something so deviously clever that Obama would commit political suicide by vetoing it -thereby rendering the Presidential Veto ineffective!
Those squirrel-ly Republicans- they have Super-Constitutional Powers they do!!!
---
Really, am I supposed to believe that they're incompetent, or that they successfully "obstructed" Obama's agenda for two years while the Democrats had super-majorities in both houses? Pick one.
If you believe the first, then explain why the Democrats shouldn't be voted out- seeing how they failed miserably to complete their own agenda (yes, Health Care got through- remember Cap N Trade, or Card Check? Hmmm... what happened to those, I wonder?).
If you believe the second, then ANY gains in the Senate would equate to "taking over."
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (8y9MW)
Nancy dear, just Lean Forward. Just a little more. That's it. I'll just put the tip in. I promise.
Posted by: Keeff Olbermann at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (wOGfT)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (LH6ir)
Nevermind this bold-faced lie. Do liberals even know what a tax cut is?
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (X2rdt)
Anita Hill is a lying sack of shit.
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 11:23 AM
True dat, Y-not, but given Anita Hill's current well-deserved obscurity, I can't understand why Ginny Thomas decided now was a good time to stir the shit again.
I've been paying attention to politics for far too long. I can't see anything like this without looking for some motive beyond simply standing up for principles. My immediate reaction was "it has been years since Hill shot off her damn lying mouth. Get over it, Ginny."
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 20, 2010 07:41 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 20, 2010 07:45 AM (K6izd)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 20, 2010 07:46 AM (VW9/y)
I would like to know if there is legitimacy to his claims, or if he's over-the-top.
And the claims are???
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2010 07:47 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Olliander at October 20, 2010 07:47 AM (6uiF7)
Funny, I'm looking forward to 11-2-2010
Posted by: Rocks at October 20, 2010 07:48 AM (Q1lie)
Posted by: Gregggg at October 20, 2010 07:48 AM (DTfXb)
Not Nine thousand, not nine hundred, not ninety. Nine. Four of those were deaths and five were "injuries."
So, for a total of approximately 18 parents' inability to perform the incredibly simple function of strapping a child into a stroller (something I do with fair frequency, and I never did read the manual), Graco now has to be soaked for millions of dollars just so they won't be sued, and if I want a new Graco product, I'm on the hook for that lost money.
Thanks Trail Lawyers!!!
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:48 AM (8y9MW)
A tax cut is when I take your taxes and give them to my friends. See we do know what a tax cut is.
Posted by: Liberal at October 20, 2010 07:48 AM (tf9Ne)
Posted by: Gregg at October 20, 2010 07:48 AM (K6izd)
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 20, 2010 11:41 AM (Ulu3i)
That was my point in bringing this up. Hill is now just filling a space at Brandeis and providing a substandard education to naive students. The chance of her not running to the MFM with something that brings her to the public's attention was zilch.
Posted by: Captain Hate at October 20, 2010 07:49 AM (hRNYI)
I understand your point. And purely from a political point of view, I agree. But she's his wife. There could be any number of reasons she could be motivated to do so now. Hill may be an obscure professor, but he's in the public eye and this stupid story comes up all the time whenever Justice Thomas is in the news.
I'd say Ms. Thomas' phone call, done privately but made public, is no less appropriate than Todd Palin's email defending his wife. (Actually, I think Todd's is less appropriate in some ways.)
Posted by: Y-not at October 20, 2010 07:50 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: Bosk at October 20, 2010 07:52 AM (pUO5u)
Posted by: Roadking at October 20, 2010 07:52 AM (IQeNx)
Errr... that's Trial Lawyers. I'm not even sure what a "Trail" lawyer would be.
*hangs head in shame*
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 07:53 AM (8y9MW)
I'm not even sure what a "Trail" lawyer would be.
*hangs head in shame*
Ransom Stoddard in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance".
Put your head back up...
Posted by: HH at October 20, 2010 07:57 AM (6oDXl)
Errr... that's Trial Lawyers. I'm not even sure what a "Trail" lawyer would be.
*hangs head in shame*
Posted by: AllenG at October 20, 2010 11:53 AM (8y9MW)
I beg to differ, there are Trail Lawyers. I'm working on stealing buying Rock Ridge. There might be legal precedent! Of course, Landsnatching . . . land, land, Land, see Snatch. Ah, Hailie vs. United Sates. Hailie: 7, United States: nothing. You see, it can be done!
Posted by: Hedley Lamar at October 20, 2010 07:58 AM (LdYLm)
*hangs head in shame*
I blame firefox not highlighting the misspelled word with the little squiggly line.
And George W. Bush.
Posted by: Dave C at October 20, 2010 08:00 AM (6W34m)
Posted by: Dave C at October 20, 2010 08:01 AM (6W34m)
I'm not even sure what a "Trail" lawyer would be.
We sue Graco when people take their city strollers off-road and get dirt on the wheels.
Posted by: Trail Lawyers at October 20, 2010 08:03 AM (XdlcF)
Makes 'Leaning Forward' sound a little ridikulus as your promo slogan.
Posted by: Enuff of yer BS, troll! at October 20, 2010 08:04 AM (f0Q++)
I once saw two dudes picking out drapes, one throwing a temper tantrum and the other huffily ignoring his special friend, with periodic eye-rolls and tsk-tsks. Until now, I thought they looked kinda gay. Not sure why.
But that guy makes them look like Marines taking a fortified beach.
Posted by: Socpupit at October 20, 2010 08:05 AM (uiKEv)
Posted by: TheresaD/FirePattyMurray at October 20, 2010 08:05 AM (f0Q++)
Posted by: Have Blue at October 20, 2010 11:33 AM (mV+es)
Why didn't she try some "smart diplomacy"?
Posted by: maddogg at October 20, 2010 08:15 AM (OlN4e)
And the same old 'car driven into a ditch' joke he always tells. They should save the money and just FedEx TOTUS over.
Posted by: Keeff Olbermann at October 20, 2010 08:15 AM (wOGfT)
You have reached BOULDER!
3 people in your party have MEASLES.
1 people in your party have SYPHYLLIS.
Your options are PURCHASE SUPPLIES, REPAIR WAGON, and SUE INDIANS FOR DAMAGES.
> _
Posted by: OREGON TRIAL at October 20, 2010 08:16 AM (kZVsz)
I guess the stress of presidentin' is getting to him. Needs another public ass kissing.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 20, 2010 08:17 AM (UOM48)
Check out the teenage girl who took on mountain lion. She kicked it in the head until it ran away. Ended up with some gashes but she's alive.
We'd like to have a little talk...
Posted by: PeTA at October 20, 2010 08:18 AM (kZVsz)
Here's a question that just occurred to me last night and it made me go, "Hmm." With Obamacare looming, and the inevitable "death panels" and medical rationing it brings, how are life insurance sales faring? Obamacare's going to see to it we all die early, before we become a drain on the system, so you'd think folks might want to invest in life insurance so their families will have a little something put by after their death.
Of course, that's not counting the death tax and inheritance taxes and every other g*ddamn tax the gubment can think of. So perhaps this is really just a stupid question. But it did get me wondering.
Posted by: MWR at October 20, 2010 08:20 AM (4df7R)
That is one creepy-ass picture of Bob Erlich in the ad-rotation, right there...
Posted by: reason at October 20, 2010 08:21 AM (kZVsz)
Posted by: Thea at October 20, 2010 08:22 AM (bN5ZU)
This is why the threat of them taking over the wealth in the 401kplans to bailout union pensions is so very real. (the human events article is linked in the red state article.)
It is time to draw a line in the sand.
Posted by: Derak at October 20, 2010 08:51 AM (gizcd)
If my math is right, there's at 1,999,996 infants (probably more, if parents sold them or handed them down to a friend when the kid got too big) whose parent(s) managed to work the straps properly.
If my math is correct, that's a 99.9998% success rate. I mean...shit.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 20, 2010 09:11 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: Vic at October 20, 2010 09:37 AM (/jbAw)
If my math is correct, that's a 99.9998% success rate. I mean...shit.
*sob* All you care about are profits, you baby-hating money-monger!
Won't somebody please think of the children! Or, at least, the ones that womyn decide to actually burden themselves with!
Posted by: libtard femynyst at October 20, 2010 12:38 PM (F26eZ)
Posted by: fashn at April 11, 2011 05:56 PM (AZmTg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2483 seconds, 292 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ParisParamus at October 20, 2010 07:04 AM (lz929)