October 21, 2010
— Dave in Texas Nothing but ones, twos, zeroes.
Gah.

Artwork by Slublog!™ with creative consultation from LauraW.
They're like an evil team or something.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at
04:28 AM
| Comments (317)
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 04:35 AM (osFsP)
The muslims now have us afraid of even mentioning that they belong to a terrorist culture. And we're (libs) are afraid because they belong to a terrorist culture.
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 04:37 AM (tG9CK)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at October 21, 2010 04:37 AM (3WlaW)
Solidarity my brother! Long live the glorious people's revolution!
That picture should be a millstone around his scrawny neck.
Posted by: Mr. Dave at October 21, 2010 04:37 AM (OBDWE)
Posted by: Anonymous at October 21, 2010 04:38 AM (28ewA)
During the 1st great depression a meme among the news media and the movie industry was established that portrayed the evil bankers dispossessing poor farmers in the dust bowl (always the dust bowl) and auctioning away their farm and meager belongings for non-payment of the mortgage. Yes, the fairy tale of the modern evil wizard was born. He was given a name; Snidely Whiplash.
http://tinyurl.com/ctjdpp
Then they had to regurgitate this old 1920 chestnut to come up with a meme that has made it through history and is currently used by the Democrat Party:
http://tinyurl.com/29aqxgq
"Ain't We Got Fun"
In the winter in the Summer
Don't we have fun
Times are bum and getting bummer
Still we have fun
There's nothing surer
The rich get rich and the poor get children
In the meantime, in between time
Ain't we got fun?
That rich lyric in the modern versions is changed to "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" From the Doris Day version:
There's nothing sur - er: the rich get rich and the poor get poorer.
But even as we have huge stories about the poor unfortunate soul who got no money down interest only mortgages and are now being foreclosed because they can't afford to pay (the modern Nell and evil Snidely) we have this story from the Washington Examiner:
Cash-strapped governments ramping up tax-collection efforts
http://tinyurl.com/2flaafg
So the point of all this is the "missing meme" from then AND now. There was just as many of those "sheriff's auctions" in the 30s all over the country where people were thrown out of their homes not because of mortgages (a lot of people did not have mortgages as those are more of a modern invention). They were thrown out because they had been long unemployed and could not pay their damn property tax.
Yes, there were just as many evil Snidely Whiplashes in the County Tax office as there were in the local banks. People were thrown in the street because they couldn't pay a $200 tax bill.
Why do we not have movies and songs about that?
And will the modern MFM show poor old Nell and her sickly mother being thrown out of their home because of non-payment of property taxes?
Somehow I doubt it.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 04:38 AM (/jbAw)
Talking about imaginary "concerns of violence and racism" at Tea Parties: OK
Admitting that the hideous deaths of 3,000 Americans and over 16,000 acts of Islamic terrorism in the years since makes you nervous around Muslims: Grounds for termination.
Posted by: CrustyB at October 21, 2010 04:44 AM (qzgbP)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 21, 2010 04:46 AM (PLvLS)
Like Britain, another failed government-dependency state, the police keep looking for safer and safer targets to 'police.'
Posted by: nickless at October 21, 2010 04:48 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at October 21, 2010 04:50 AM (HaYO4)
Posted by: Krazy Jerry's House of Hotpants at October 21, 2010 04:51 AM (8lCJT)
How about 6/8/9 words:
You keep fucking, I'[ll just watch.
You took my cash you ain't getting my ass.
Hugo, he can't pitch, better let him catch
Hugo, can he call you Moochelle?
Posted by: momma at October 21, 2010 04:53 AM (penCf)
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 04:53 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 04:54 AM (yNyGC)
Oh, that's easy:
- Tungsten
- Squirrel
- Lawnmower
- Aperture
What do I win?
Posted by: Gran at October 21, 2010 04:55 AM (xmjMj)
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 04:55 AM (tG9CK)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 21, 2010 04:57 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 04:58 AM (tG9CK)
Posted by: Rachel Maddow at October 21, 2010 04:58 AM (Gpm4m)
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 05:00 AM (tG9CK)
Posted by: NM Hick at October 21, 2010 05:00 AM (IzuWw)
Posted by: The Incredibly Boring Drone On Lake Wobegone Days at October 21, 2010 05:01 AM (yNyGC)
Man pleads guilty in human trafficking case
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A man from Uzbekistan who was accused of running a 14-state human trafficking ring in Kansas City has pleaded guilty to four charges under a plea agreement in which he will serve at least 10 years in federal prison.
Whoopy as do; he gets a total of 10 years. If you look at the U.S. code he should have got 20 years for each count! i.e. 2000 years in the slammer.
http://tinyurl.com/2ud6fov
Where's the outrage from the NAACP? Oh, the Tea Party is racist, never mind.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:01 AM (/jbAw)
Clinton lost the nuclear launch codes while President
Posted by: momma at October 21, 2010 05:02 AM (penCf)
Even that "whisper tone" they use irritates me.
And I suppose you don't like that little 'jazz music' they use as bumbers.
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 05:03 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: The Chicken at October 21, 2010 05:03 AM (yNyGC)
Posted by: NM Hick at October 21, 2010 09:00 AM (IzuWw)
Barry has the world view of a 1970s blaxplotation movie
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 05:04 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 21, 2010 05:04 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 21, 2010 05:07 AM (RokLs)
Posted by: B+rry Ob+owmao at October 21, 2010 05:08 AM (yNyGC)
32 ABC radio is pushing the opposite stat of what I've read on the webs, that the early voting is primarily dem in "key" states. I don't know which states are "key" in the midterms but whatever, libtards.
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 09:00 AM (tG9CK)
What I saw at Drudge is the early voting is dominated by white men. Seeing how they're all unemployed, I'm sure they have plenty of time to get to the polls.Posted by: Ed Anger at October 21, 2010 05:09 AM (7+pP9)
http://tinyurl.com/3ak9lj7
Candidates ignore media, but it's voters who stand to lose
By David Lightman | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON — Many major candidates are treating the news media as enemies this year, refusing to release schedules, admit the press to campaign events, give interviews or answer routine questions.
Waaaaaa! They won't listen to me mama, waaaa, they won't answer our loaded questions, waaaa we are growing broke.Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:09 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 21, 2010 05:10 AM (0GFWk)
Posted by: Some Homeless Fella On A D.C. Street Corner at October 21, 2010 05:11 AM (yNyGC)
Posted by: nevergiveup at October 21, 2010 05:15 AM (0GFWk)
good morning all
Secret Service Officer: I Almost Shot LBJ
ahh how things might have been different
Posted by: chemjeff at October 21, 2010 05:16 AM (E97ku)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at October 21, 2010 05:16 AM (PLvLS)
Posted by: les grossman at October 21, 2010 05:17 AM (K/USr)
How's smart diplomacy going, Obama?
North Korea 'planning new nuclear test'
Images gathered from US satellites indicate that work is under way at the same site where Pyongyang carried out its first two atomic tests, in 2006 and 2009.The Chosun Ilbo newspaper reported that surveillance has detected activity at the site in the northeastern province of North Hamgyong, including work to restore tunnels that were destroyed in the first two test blasts.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 21, 2010 05:17 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Greggy Weggy at October 21, 2010 05:17 AM (E97ku)
New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits fell more than expected last week, government data showed on Thursday, pointing to some improvement in the labor market.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits fell 23,000 to a seasonally adjusted 452,000, the Labor Department said.
Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims falling to 455,000 from the previously reported 462,000. The government revised the prior week's figure up to 475,000.
Great plan. Come out with lower new numbers this week and then revise them up the next week.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 05:17 AM (1Jaio)
A woman giving away $100 in quarters in a Racine Wisconsin laundromat is beaten and strangled to death by a mentally ill man who wasn't committed to a psych ward by the then-State's Attorney General. The AG happened to be now-governor Jim Doyle (D)
see the Tribune today
Posted by: Chicago Joe at October 21, 2010 05:18 AM (AkXGz)
"and yes ariana, that does include you"
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 05:20 AM (p302b)
Vic...McClatchy spent itself broke leveraging itself to buy all those papers at the height of the boom. Now they want a buck for a skinny weekday hated Sacramento Bee. I go online and read Dan Walters who regularly schools the DemocRATS for their insane governance practices. It's the one ray of sunshine in a grey cloud of drivel. I don't know why they let that guy get print.
The rest of the newspaper is good for local crime (if you can suffer the abominable journalism) obits and an occasional special investigative story.
Posted by: torabora at October 21, 2010 05:20 AM (yNyGC)
http://tinyurl.com/28nkm77
Sanford says SC pension fund in trouble
Notice the headline "Sanford says"; trying to imply its either Sanford's fault or somehow or another he is lying.
COLUMBIA — Experts say the pension fund for state employees in South Carolina is underfunded, but they disagree on how much more money is needed.
The State newspaper reported Gov. Mark Sanford called a summit to discuss the problem Wednesday.
OK, now its those old ubiquitous "experts" and not Sanford.The Budget and Control Board estimates the shortfall at $12 billion. Sanford thinks itÂ’s much higher.
Aiken Sen. Greg Ryberg says he thinks the shortfall is between $20 billion and $30 billion. He expects lawmakers to work on the problem next year.
So, they still try to blame Sanford in one sentence and then give a different source in another sentence. Personally, I suspect the bigger number is more accurate and that it is actually low.So what's the solution?
Alternatives include cutting benefits, raising the number of years for workers to retire from 28 years to 30 years. Lawmakers could also change the way benefits are calculated.
So nowhere do they actually propose fixing the damn system to where it is paid for as the benefits are accrued. You know, the way the government makes private companies do it.
The final solution if it goes like they have been doing for the last ten years is they will enact another one or two cent sales tax hike.
Soon SC will have the nation's only 20% VAT.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:20 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Troll Feeder at October 21, 2010 05:20 AM (Jrg5J)
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is crediting its anti-recession stimulus plan with creating up to 50,000 jobs on dozens of wind farms, even though many of those wind farms were built before the stimulus money began to flow or even before President Barack Obama was inaugurated.
It's all Bush's fault!!!
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 05:21 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Greggy Weggy at October 21, 2010 05:21 AM (E97ku)
Yeah, I have a physical reaction to NPR. It's like a severe allergic reaction. I can't listen to it for more than a minute or two without losing it.
That chick Helen whatshername from the bizarro young conservatives panel a couple of days ago had the NPR voice thing going. She must have worked hard to lose her Southern accent so she could sound like that and fit in with all of the "intelligentsia" at Yale.
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 05:21 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 05:22 AM (3wPsb)
the other day I read a little blurb from the "poor put upon" wife saying he was still seeing the foreign girlfriend and I knew something big was coming out from his office. Funny, she appears to be and probably has always been his political enemy.
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 05:23 AM (p302b)
"Alternatives include cutting benefits, raising the number of years for workers to retire from 28 years to 30 years."
The only people who receive taxpayer funded pensions that should be allowed to retire in the 20-30 year range are career military.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at October 21, 2010 05:27 AM (fLHQe)
Clinton lost the nuclear launch codes while President
That's probably for the best...we might have ended up with radioactive asprin.
You know you've been spending too much time in the Headlines thread when...you dream about usingTiny Url.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 05:28 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Greg's Mom at October 21, 2010 05:28 AM (RokLs)
Keith is next?
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 05:29 AM (p302b)
And now he's playing Arianna "Ava Gabor" Huffington going after Ginny Thomas.
Sigh. Crazy times.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 05:29 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Monty at October 21, 2010 05:29 AM (4Pleu)
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 09:23 AM (p302b)
She probably does feel "put upon". Sanford IS somewhat of a McCain in that it was her money that put him in office originally.
I don't know the personal details of their marriage but she does have a good case for a grudge. I don't support him at all in his cheating, but I don't fault his political views because of that. They are two separate issues.
My view on that kind of shit is (a) If you want to play the field, don't get married and (b) If you are married and you want to play the field, then get "un-married" first.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:29 AM (/jbAw)
oh he already freaked me out last night. I wasn't paying that close attention as I was multi tasking but he said something about "if something should happen to me" and he was serious as a heart attack...it was freaky and scary and worrisome to say the least.
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 05:32 AM (p302b)
"Peters leads Republican challenger Andrew (Rocky) Raczkowski 48% to 43% in the 9th District, while Schauer leads former Rep. Tim Walberg 45% to 39% in the hotly contested 7th District race, according to the poll conducted by EPIC/MRA of Lansing.”"
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 05:32 AM (huyI8)
Yeah, that Beck sure is a crazy lunatic, right?
Posted by: Achmed at October 21, 2010 05:32 AM (7PT3B)
Gosh, can any of you guys understand the at least the very basics of sarcasm? Just a little? Possibly? Sheesh. Stop acting like liberals.
Posted by: Achmed at October 21, 2010 05:34 AM (7PT3B)
here's some polls for ya:
KY: Paul up by 5 (registered voters!)
AR: Boozman up by 14 (a CNN poll no less!)
FL: Rubio up by 14 - in a 3-way race!!!
and in CA and WA, both within MOE
Posted by: chemjeff at October 21, 2010 05:35 AM (E97ku)
I can't believe they fired Juan.
I wonder if they have Jesse Jackson on, i recall him saying something about feeling safer around white people.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 05:35 AM (wuv1c)
Good morning Jane! Sorry for talking at ya and then disappearing yesterday. Everything went crazy...which you'd think I'd be used to.
We'll be in ATL the second week of Nov. I'm trying to find things to keep the kids busy...but my parental types aren't up for much walking around, so I don't know how to work that out. Stone Mountain looks like a good place for everyone...the aquarium better be damn good for the $$$$$.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 05:36 AM (XdlcF)
Barry has the world view of a 1970s blaxplotation movie
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 09:04 AM (1Jaio)
Well, Halloween is coming up.
Posted by: Blackula at October 21, 2010 05:36 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Monty at October 21, 2010 05:37 AM (4Pleu)
I guess I felt that she was pushing him towards more power, ie, the presidency and he didn't know how to tell her that wasn't what he wanted. I had no idea it was her money funding the whole shibbang. Guess he revolted in the only way he knew he could get rid of her, by embarrassing her with an affair, in another country no less. I don't think she was the type of woman who would take kindly to "honey I want a divorce". Caged animals react without thinking.
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 05:37 AM (p302b)
If the incumbent is also under 50 that is usually a sign of dead meat. It isn't certain, but it means that people who voted for the incumbent are very unsure that they will again.
Which mostly means they won't.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 05:41 AM (3wPsb)
'Rent' guy damn liar
Wait, we ARE seeing it, that IS the actual headline!
http://tinyurl.com/2b9t6lb
Wouldn't it be nice if they had a similar headline for the Dems?
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:42 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: . at October 21, 2010 05:43 AM (p302b)
Oh Noes! The R's might lose a D+5 district in Michigan where the R candidate uttered some stupid birther statements on camera!!!! Cancel the parties, the wave is over!!!!!!
(of course, the R's are a lock to pick up Stupak's seat, hold all their open seats, and pick up the governorship - all that means nothing!!!)
Posted by: chemjeff at October 21, 2010 05:43 AM (E97ku)
I can't believe they fired Juan.
I wonder if they have Jesse Jackson on, i recall him saying something about feeling safer around white people.
I feel bad for Juan, but I think the list of quotes that are going to be used to make fun of NPR is going to be loooong.
His role on Fox News Sunday was always to take the liberal side and wear a big bullseye for Brit to aim at. I wonder if, free of NPR, we're going to hear a little more of what he actually thinks.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 05:46 AM (XdlcF)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 05:46 AM (nOq8U)
And DO NOT miss the DeKalb Farmer's Market (also not far from the area). It's supposedly the world's largest indoor market, and has veggies, fish, meats (even goat heads...brrr) from all over the world. Oh, and beers, too. You can buy fresh ground spices, baked breads, and there's a cafe there as well. The store employees all wear name badges with the many languages they speak. Damn, I love that place!
I'll think of some other stuff and get back to you after another cup of coffee.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 05:46 AM (UOM48)
Are they deliberately trying to be stupid and pretend they don't know that "man up" means "be a man," or (for their poor brains) "have some guts?"
Is the whole stupid victimhood mentality finally coming full circle so that now rich white men should be a protected class?
Kathleen Parker even goes so far as to say that Harry Reid riposting to Sharon Angle's comment that he should "man up" with "I'm glad you got that off your chest," would have been anything other than hilarious.
I guess I'm just not PC enough...
Posted by: AllenG at October 21, 2010 05:47 AM (8y9MW)
"here's some polls for ya:
KY: Paul up by 5 (registered voters!)
AR: Boozman up by 14 (a CNN poll no less!)
FL: Rubio up by 14 - in a 3-way race!!!
and in CA and WA, both within MOE"
The Republican was favored in all these races. If this is your idea of a "wave" election, then go ahead and celebrate. BTW, the latest poll out of CA (public policy institute of ca) has Boxer up 6. That race is toast.
The important races are in PA, CT, CA, WA, IL, WI, WV
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 05:48 AM (huyI8)
Now this is getting spooky.
They've controlled mens minds for centuries, not they're out to control the world!
But I'm good with that.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 05:48 AM (RkRxq)
If you apply old "simple explanation" rule you get what I think. He made that first trip to S.A. as part of a trade delegation with no intent on anything other than business. He met her and it was "lust at first sight" with a younger hawt woman. He fell into an affair.
He had an acute attack of "middle-aged crazy" and is still having it. After she dumps him when he is no longer Governor he will wake up and realize what a mess he has made.
Based on what I know now, I do not blame her for anything. (of course usually when something like this happens the "bed" is to blame but I don't know that now).
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:49 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Fritz at October 21, 2010 05:49 AM (GwPRU)
I can't believe they fired Juan.
I wonder if they have Jesse Jackson on, i recall him saying something about feeling safer around white people.
I feel bad for Juan, but I think the list of quotes that are going to be used to make fun of NPR is going to be loooong.
His role on Fox News Sunday was always to take the liberal side and wear a big bullseye for Brit to aim at. I wonder if, free of NPR, we're going to hear a little more of what he actually thinks.
I like Juan. He is a reasonable Democrat. He represents an older type of Democrat who simply has a different view of how America should be run, wrong in my opinion, but he isn't offensive, vitriolic, or scheming to radically change america.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 05:50 AM (wuv1c)
It's supposedly the world's largest indoor market, and has veggies, fish, meats (even goat heads...brrr) from all over the world. Oh, and beers, too. You can buy fresh ground spices, baked breads, and there's a cafe there as well.
Ohhhh. And we were just happy about being able to hit a Trader Joe's!
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 05:51 AM (XdlcF)
-------------
I have the same combination on my luggage!
Posted by: President Screwb at October 21, 2010 05:51 AM (6fER6)
Clinton lost the nuclear launch codes while President
Yeah but he swore under oath that he didn't.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 05:53 AM (RkRxq)
Barak Obama and (T)Hugo Chavez wake up in jail next to you. What four words do you say?
Welcome to Fantasy Island.
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie at October 21, 2010 05:54 AM (1hM1d)
Rich democrats and leftists don't pay taxes - see what I mean.
Why is it that so many ultra rich are on the left?
Warren Buffet, Ted Turner.. Big leftist capitalists don't pay their fair share.
Taxes are for the little people.
Posted by: Juji Fruit at October 21, 2010 05:55 AM (0fzsA)
Posted by: pitythefool at October 21, 2010 05:55 AM (wVIR1)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 05:56 AM (tvzaO)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 21, 2010 05:56 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: momma at October 21, 2010 09:02 AM (penCf)
And so did Carter. Must be a democratic thing?
Not to worry. Bammy has them stored safely away on his Blackberry.
Posted by: Lady in Black at October 21, 2010 05:57 AM (M6enm)
Yeah, they are gearing up hard.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 05:57 AM (/jbAw)
Rich democrats and leftists don't pay taxes - see what I mean.
Why is it that so many ultra rich are on the left?
Warren Buffet, Ted Turner.. Big leftist capitalists don't pay their fair share.
Taxes are for the little people.
Indeed. So are electioneering in polling place laws.
They not only hire the best CPAs to find every possible loop hole, but they donate money to congressmen to create said loopholes.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 05:58 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 21, 2010 05:58 AM (RokLs)
LOL, no linky, but looking at that shitty AK newspaper I count 7, yes that is SEVEN, anti-Miller stories.
Yeah, they are gearing up hard.
I am really worried about that race. Clearly the media is owned by Murkey.
Also something that no one seems to be able to answer.
What qualifies as a Merky vote.
I have a feeling any thing will end up counting as a vote for her whether is it mispelled, her initials, or the dreaded "intent of the voter" which they may claim by saying the person chose the write in slot therefore it had to be for Merky.
I think she might pull this out. I honestly believe that has national intention not been drawn to alaska immediately after the primary that she would have tried to steal the election.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:00 AM (wuv1c)
I'm sure Wicket will be all over this soon enough, but Sunshine State News.com has Allen West up over Ron Klein, 47-44.
I would link, but Minx keeps rejecting it everytime I try to, sorry.
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at October 21, 2010 06:00 AM (+tRwn)
Posted by: Another Greg Sockpuppet at October 21, 2010 06:01 AM (YmPwQ)
Yellow River Game Ranch would be gorgeous this time of year. The trails meander through the woods (and you're constantly followed by a herd of young deer....like hungry hobos only with hooves, and cuter). Stone Mountain is cool, you can hike to the top (wheeze) or ride the whatchmacallit to the top. A train circles it as well. Haven't been in years.
Go to the World of Coca Cola. Free samples of the products they sell around the world....funky stuff you can only taste there.
Zoo Atlanta is great, but don't miss the Cyclorama next door. Billed as the world's largest painting, you sit in the center and move toward each section (Civil War battlefield).
I miss Atlanta when our boy was young. Glad to be down here, however, a few hours away from the in-laws.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 06:01 AM (UOM48)
I don't understand why they didn't strip her of her republican stuff the minute she lost the primary with the excuse that they need the new person to be acclimated by the time the lame duck session started. That was really a sign of republican weakness and it makes you wonder if they are just going to roll over for all this dem stuff coming down the pike. Then you wonder if rush is right in being concerned.
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:01 AM (p302b)
What are these guys up to?!
An honest headline... something doesn't fit... some kind of trick, obviously... but what?
Sneaky bastards!
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 06:02 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Another Greg Sockpuppet at October 21, 2010 06:03 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 21, 2010 06:03 AM (VW9/y)
The following people have to get into the Senate for there to be any real change.
Toomey, Angle, Miller, Buck, Rubio, Paul.
We need them in the Senate.
I would be happy with everyone winning, but these people need to win. Demint needs more allies, and McConnell less.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:03 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: ParisParamus at October 21, 2010 06:06 AM (gMzAL)
Posted by: The Mega Independent at October 21, 2010 06:06 AM (RokLs)
Thanks, Jane! Will check it all out. If we all survive the time together, I hope to be able to make the trip a couple times a year. I need to stop fussing that we're splitting the drive over two days...the extra time and money are bugging me, but ten hours in one day is probably too much for our gang. Eventually, maybe, but not this year.
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 06:06 AM (XdlcF)
I'm glad you are so optimistic. Living here in this blue blue bluest of states i'm not quite seeing the "socialism is dead thing".....I'm seeing the "can't wait until we gain even more power so we can do even more damage to capitalism and the democratic republic, what else can BO do?" thing
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:07 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 06:10 AM (UOM48)
An honest headline... something doesn't fit... some kind of trick, obviously... but what?
I swear it said "suck" not "stuck" the first time I looked at it. Now that would have been honest...
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 06:11 AM (XdlcF)
Of course anything can happen because ALL polls including the RAS are based on what people "say" ot on what they "do".
We will see that in a few more days. Anyway, out for the walk.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 06:12 AM (/jbAw)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 06:12 AM (UqSuH)
There will be a lot of salty liberal tears on Nov. 2. I will use them to flavor my margarita.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 21, 2010 06:12 AM (ruu60)
Every time you open your mouth people remember why they stayed home in 2008.
Posted by: John Galt at October 21, 2010 06:14 AM (F/4zf)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at October 21, 2010 06:15 AM (kJXs1)
I feel nervous on planes with Islamic men. After 9/11 No way in hell I'd sit on the same plane with one. Fire me! Off with my head. I must be a racist.
Politically correct speech will force us all to whisper and hide. That's why the folks at NPR do it. To teach us. The future of free speech in America: whisper, hide and don't you dare speak your mind.
Posted by: Juji Fruit at October 21, 2010 06:15 AM (0fzsA)
I've always been sceptical about that whole "hundred monkeys in a room typing and over a long enough time they would recreate the works of Shakespeare", meme.
This only ads to my scepticism: http://tinyurl.com/2ft8kwf
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 06:15 AM (RkRxq)
Ben, the real killer would be for someone to get 2 or 3 Lisa M.'s; maybe even a Lisa Murkowski to run radio ads a couple of Alaskan media markets. Then the board of elections would be unable to allocate all of the write in votes to the incumbent Senator.
I agree. I think her father probably controls or knows most of the people who will be making the decision on which votes count and which don't.
I don't think we'll know the election results until a few weeks later, because they can't just count up the write in votes like they do the Republican and Democrat votes, they have to decide if they are legitimite or meet the requirments, if there are any.
Jean, I completely forgot about Lee because he is a lock to win in Utah. I like him a lot, but in my mind I already consider him a Senator, so it didn't even occur to me.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:15 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: RushBabe at October 21, 2010 06:16 AM (a3Z62)
Didn't she succeed in convincing the media to not run any ads from miller or something.
I feel that the left thinks this is a "palin purity test" and this is why lisa, lisa, lisa will win no matter what they have to do to secure the win. After all, she's one of them, a professional politician who was promised her seat, she can't lose, I'd bet on her, right?
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:18 AM (p302b)
Williams may not find it funny -- he's now closer to getting a real welfare check since NPR won't be sending him any more of their welfare checks -- but I loved seeing the comments over at TepidAir this morning. Everyone from "Poppin' Fresh" and "the Boss Emeritus" to the lurkers suddenly thinks pore ol' Juan is being mistreated, that's he has really been a Good Guy all along.
Nuts to that. Williams is a hack, nothing more. Worse, he's an uninteresting hack. His ass should have been fired for stupidity, not because he dissed Our Muzzie Friends.
I'm sure Fucks News will keep him on. After all, the bar there is pretty low: they've got The Newt, Jerry Rivers, Bob Beckel and Hannity....
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 06:19 AM (Ulu3i)
Typical liberals. Always wanting others to pay higher taxes while they exploit every tax loop-hole they can find.
Not that I have a problem with people trying to keep every last penny they can, but the liberal's hypocrisy on this is astounding.
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 21, 2010 06:19 AM (9hSKh)
Hey Mitch McConnell, STFU!
Every time you open your mouth people remember why they stayed home in 2008.
Why can't we get new leadership?
I know Demint has no chance of winning the Sentate Majority or Minority leader position, but I wish he did.
Also, I am not the biggest fan of Boehner, he doesn't strike me as an ideologue, however I think he is more intuned with what the voters of his party want and therefore will be more willing to do what they want.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:19 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 21, 2010 06:20 AM (VW9/y)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 06:20 AM (bJevO)
the pres chose boner so to me he's an automatic no....the republicans need someone with a brass set....not a casper milqtoastyness..
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:21 AM (p302b)
I don't think we'll know the election results until a few weeks later
Unless the total number of write-ins is less that the votes for the winner. Then it's moot, because Meercowskank's battling for second place, at best.
good point, but I think it will be close enough that we won't have an answer on Wednesday.
I think she will probably be within the margin of mail in and absentee ballots.
I think miller would win it outright at 40-45 percent, because the democrat is almost certain to get 20% of the loyal democrats in alaska, which leaves 80 split between Merkscozzafava and Miller.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:22 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 10:19 AM (wuv1c)
the pres chose boner so to me he's an automatic no....the republicans need someone with a brass set....not a casper milqtoastyness..
Milton Freidman once said that the way America will change for the better isn't when we have good people in office, it's when we make it politically profitable for the bad people in office to do the right thing.
I think Boehner is the type who will do what is politically profitable. And right now, it seems to me, it is politically profitable to shrink government, stop deficit spending, repeal or at the very least defund obamacare, scale back the EPA's dictatorial edicts, and shrink the national debt.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:25 AM (wuv1c)
I hear what you are saying. You aren't alone, there are more people in your camp than the other camp and that camp knows what is going on but still thinks they can right the ship and keep it from sinking.
If you listened to beck yesterday you would get the underlying current of the psychology of the market which he was alluding to. Perhaps that is important as regard our economic conditions.
What's that quote you guys always say "something about the land of the blind and the one eyeed man"....you need to hope against hope that some young quant in Harvard or yale or somewhere can figure out a way to get us out of this mess.
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:25 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 21, 2010 06:25 AM (ruu60)
I think Boehner is the type who will do what is politically profitable. And right now, it seems to me, it is politically profitable to shrink government, stop deficit spending, repeal or at the very least defund obamacare, scale back the EPA's dictatorial edicts, and shrink the national debt.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 10:25 AM (wuv1c)
and that's just for starters......
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:27 AM (p302b)
It's a third of a trillion, ok?
It's not like it's a lot of money! It's only about a grand apiece for crying out loud.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 06:27 AM (RkRxq)
Keep fuckin' that chicken!
Posted by: ya2daup at October 21, 2010 06:28 AM (yRrAd)
Posted by: curious at October 21, 2010 06:29 AM (p302b)
Barak Obama and (T)Hugo Chavez wake up in jail next to you. What four words do you say?
"We were that close!"
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at October 21, 2010 06:30 AM (RkRxq)
That right there is the mind-set of the liberal. Free speech for me, but not for thee.
Heh. When we were newlyweds, I offered to bring the sweet potato dish to the lib in-law's Thanksgiving dinner. I made a dish with bourbon in it (yum!) and one for the kids without. When we arrived, m-i-l was horrified I'd brought a dish with booze in it because she'd invited two Muslim students. Guess which dish they went to for seconds and thirds?
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 06:30 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 21, 2010 06:31 AM (9Cooa)
Oooooh! Scary!
I checked the methodologies of the the two PPIC California polls that were posted by RCP yesterday (late). Both surveys, CA Senate and CA Gubernatorial, were "CA adult residents" samples- the samples were NOT filtered for "likely voters" or even "registered voters". A poll of "adult residents" is next to useless this close to the election.
Posted by: mrp at October 21, 2010 06:32 AM (HjPtV)
Can "yourself" count as two words?
Posted by: AE at October 21, 2010 06:33 AM (1bZ96)
So? How does one not mean the other?
Posted by: dagny at October 21, 2010 09:09 AM (tG9CK)
If the choice is between "madly enthusiastic" or "enthusiastically mad", I'll take the former.
Posted by: ya2daup at October 21, 2010 06:33 AM (yRrAd)
Mark Levin is in a snippy mood this morning (via his FB page).
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 21, 2010 06:35 AM (V/C0X)
This is why I find the Flat Tax interesting, at least is theory.
Income after expenses less a smaller, fixed, no-loophole/no exemptions percentage = profit.
Companies and individuals that cheat use loopholes and gimmicks will pay more than they do now. Others will pay less.
I'm all for "soaking the rich" if they have been paying less than their fair share. Obviously, I'm not talking about the ones Osama Obama wants to grab more money from: those who work hard, earn the big bucks and play it straight.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 06:36 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 06:38 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 21, 2010 10:35 AM
This is different from the "normal" Levin in some way?
The Kermit the Frog Rage Boy is always "in a snippy mood."
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 06:39 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 06:39 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: News Bullshit at October 21, 2010 06:39 AM (6ShUh)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 21, 2010 06:40 AM (9Cooa)
Posted by: Anachronda at October 21, 2010 06:41 AM (6fER6)
Re Juan Williams and NPR, my libtard older b-i-l is a huge NPR fan, and stated a few years ago that Fox needed to be "removed" from the air.
And because it is 'Faux News'? Oh, that is ever so witty...
Guess which dish they went to for seconds and thirds?
Now that's just plain funny.
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 06:43 AM (6oDXl)
I like his schtick, I just wish he'd save up the insults for a while. Though I still laugh almost every time I hear "shut up ya big jerk!" directed at Obama, Biden, whoever...
He's a character.
Posted by: Lincolntf at October 21, 2010 06:43 AM (V/C0X)
It's probably nothing- some stupid college kids using the bomb threat tactic to get out of a midterm?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 21, 2010 06:47 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 10:30 AM (UOM4
You evil infidel temptress!
Posted by: ya2daup at October 21, 2010 06:48 AM (yRrAd)
They're like an evil team or something.
Teamevil.
Wait, who? Barry & Hugo or Slublog & LauraW? Could you clear that one up, for us?
Posted by: Editor at October 21, 2010 06:48 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: dr. lizardo at October 21, 2010 06:48 AM (bz+co)
Posted by: CDR M at October 21, 2010 10:43 AM (5I8G0)
Those words always give me chills.
Posted by: Editor at October 21, 2010 06:49 AM (pUfK9)
In MichiganÂ’s seventh congressional district, Republicans are all frowns this morning. The Detroit Free Press has released a poll of 400 likely voters, in which the Democratic incumbent, Rep. Mark Schauer, leads his Republican opponent, former Rep. Tim Walberg, 45 to 39 percent. (The margin of error is 5 percent.) Voters are splitting their tickets between the popular Republican gubernatorial candidate, Rick Snyder, and the Democrat.
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 06:49 AM (huyI8)
Google won't be helping out, but other tax payers you will have to shell out more to help save Barney Frank's babies.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 21, 2010 06:50 AM (0fzsA)
195 Whee!! Just listened to a Democratic shill on Fox News who kept insisting that voters are angry because change isn't happening fast enough.
Posted by: Anachronda at October 21, 2010 10:41 AM (6fER6)
Earlier on Fox they said something like "Obama is unpopular because overproducing legislation that people don't like". How's that for an explanation?Posted by: Ed Anger at October 21, 2010 06:50 AM (7+pP9)
I don't know what the exact rate should be, dear. It would certainly be lower than the rates paid by those who don't have overseas tax havens and specially granted exemptions (thanks to their buddyroos in D.C.) available to them.
Personally -- and I say that to separate my own feelings from what I would want to see in law -- I would put an especially heavy tax rate on people who get rich while producing nothing: Players of the derivatives game and other leeches who make huge sums of money from stock manipulation and "financial instruments" could be tagged at a 75% rate for all I care. Same for executives who get huge bonuses for "leading" failing companies.
We will always need taxes, despite the Ayn Rand-type "first we end all taxes" bullshit. But a combination of government austerity and a fair tax system could make it easier on people who are overburdened now.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 06:51 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: Editor at October 21, 2010 06:52 AM (pUfK9)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 06:52 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: mrp at October 21, 2010 10:32 AM (HjPtV)
Or at any other time, for that matter.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 06:52 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 21, 2010 06:54 AM (xxgag)
I think Boehner is the type who will do what is politically profitable. And right now, it seems to me, it is politically profitable to shrink government, stop deficit spending, repeal or at the very least defund obamacare, scale back the EPA's dictatorial edicts, and shrink the national debt.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 10:25 AM (wuv1c)
and that's just for starters......
we can't set out sights too high. Keep in mind Obama can veto anything, and the we probably won't get the senate. So the best they can do on Obamacare is defund it. It will be impossible for them to repeal in in the 2010-2012 congress.
The best we can hope for is to make Obama a lame duck, prevent any major initiatives of his going through, and slowly turning back some of his "work". specifically getting out the the car industry and most importantly preventing the union bailout or 401K grab.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:54 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 10:52 AM (Vz9lf)
Don't you know? It's a national volunteer!
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 06:55 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 10:51 AM (Ulu3i)
Don't think you can pin that kind of talk on Ayn.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 06:55 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: mrp at October 21, 2010 10:32 AM (HjPtV
But the University of Eastskabumfuk has polled all adults with blue eyes and has Sestak up by eleventy!
Some wave reichwingers!!!
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 06:56 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: mrp at October 21, 2010 06:56 AM (HjPtV)
Hedging their bets?
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 21, 2010 06:56 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 06:56 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 06:57 AM (Vz9lf)
FKOTUS using unpaid underage workers to bring in her sweet potato harvest.
Labor laws? Pfeh!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 10:52 AM (Vz9lf)
Is the next picture the potatoes going to a hazardous waste dump?
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 06:58 AM (CN+Qv)
It's quite simple. The rich should be taxed until they are not rich anymore.
Posted by: WalrusRex
Except for rich democrats. There is a loophole for rich democrats.
It's only fair.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 21, 2010 06:58 AM (0fzsA)
Fannie and Freddie, the federally-controlled mortgage finance giants, will likely need at least another $73 billion and perhaps as much $215 billion from taxpayers in the next three years to meet their financial obligations, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said.
Posted by: Jose Extranjero at October 21, 2010 06:58 AM (tE8FB)
And the non-rich should be taxed so that they may never become rich...which is what we've got now.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 06:59 AM (Vz9lf)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:00 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 07:00 AM (bJevO)
Is it true that Anita Hill contacted the FBI after Clarence Thomas' wife called her?
Typical. Eeeek free speech - call the police!
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at October 21, 2010 07:00 AM (0fzsA)
Labor laws? Pfeh!
And they seem to be predominately minority kids.
Slavery!
Posted by: Kratos (Ghost of Sparta) at October 21, 2010 07:01 AM (9hSKh)
Jebus, the shrivel multiplier has just gone exponential.
Posted by: Fritz at October 21, 2010 07:01 AM (GwPRU)
If that was the case, people sucking on the government teat would be the richest in the world.
Posted by: Holger at October 21, 2010 07:02 AM (V9Q+f)
By election day, i don't even think it will be much of a surprise that the GOP underperformed. Republicans don't close out races well (nationally or locally), and this is what we're seeing again this cycle. PA is collapsing. WI is collapsing. KY is only five pts when it should have been a blowout. There is no momentum for ANY GOP Senate candidate in a toss-up race. Somebody name a single battleground Senate race where the Republican is trending upward.
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 07:02 AM (huyI8)
I'm fine with the flat-tax. But something has to go along with that. The Feds would of course try to be exempt from any such thing.
So we decrease their salary at the same rate we tax the working people.
Seems fair to me...
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:04 AM (6oDXl)
The CONference Board announced its Leading Indicators increased 0.3 percent in September to 110. This was in line with expectations. What was also in line with expectations is the ongoing revisionist lie that has permeated every single government statistic: the August number was lowered from 0.3% to 0.1%. Of course, at the time it was a beat to the consensus estimate of 0.1% and likely resulted in an other mad rush to cover stocks. Now that it has been fully priced in, the true number can be revealed.
And
Jobless claims "fell" to 452k with the story as usual being in the revision. Last week's 462K number which was originally expected to be 445K is now revised to 475K! But of course it is so much more palatable to get the BLS lie piecemeal instead of in one place. We are now on 25 out of 26 sequential upward revisions
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 21, 2010 07:04 AM (ruu60)
Sarah Jessica Parker and Michelle Obama on the same stage?
What is a miniature pony and a cow?
Sorry I thought it was a game.
I denounce myself.
Posted by: Roadking at October 21, 2010 07:05 AM (IQeNx)
Posted by: Greg on election night at October 21, 2010 07:06 AM (5usKd)
Posted by: Jean at October 21, 2010 07:08 AM (LpqRt)
Posted by: logprof at October 21, 2010 07:10 AM (BP6Z1)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:11 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: A Premonition at October 21, 2010 07:12 AM (yRrAd)
Ginny Thomas is melanin-challenged, so picking up the phone could be a hate crime.
If that was the case, people sucking on the government teat would be the richest in the world.
Pelosis are rich, Clintons are rich, Obamas are rich, shall I go on? Anyway, the point is that no one is allowed to be rich except, as Lemon Kitten pointed out, the folks in the ruling class.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 07:13 AM (Vz9lf)
The readings in the control room look fine but this Greg guy and the MFM keep calling saying there's something wrong.
Posted by: Buzzsaw at October 21, 2010 07:13 AM (tf9Ne)
If the GOP gains 50 House seats and 7 Senate seats, the Dems will breathe a huge sigh of relief, and Republican's will be dissapointed (not publically).
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 07:14 AM (huyI8)
Posted by: A guy with a common monosyllabic name at October 21, 2010 07:14 AM (BP6Z1)
Yes, I know he's just reaping what the lib policies he usually defends sowed, but I still feel compassion for the guy.
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 07:14 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 21, 2010 07:16 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 11:14 AM (huyI
While Greg will remain as spelling- and grammar-challenged as ever ... aren't BA degrees in Humanities grand?
Posted by: ya2daup at October 21, 2010 07:17 AM (yRrAd)
Wouldn't it just be easier to have Chris Christie jump into the pool?
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 07:17 AM (osFsP)
...and no one at this paper noticed the bias in the first sentence there. Of course.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 07:17 AM (Vz9lf)
Reporting from Washington — Andrew McLaughlin built Google Inc.'s public policy operation and helped craft its government lobbying strategy. Now he works for the White House on Internet policy — and that has some Google rivals crying foul as federal officials prepare to rewrite the rules governing high-speed Internet.
Posted by: CDR M at October 21, 2010 10:43 AM (5I8G0)
It's a good thing that self-righteous Barry's administration will have nothing to do with those lobbyist types
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 07:17 AM (1Jaio)
To go along with that the federal government would be limited to a total budget for the year of absolutely no more than the total revenue collected the previous year minus any deficit that had accumulated from the previous year due to lower tax collection. Surplus wuld be allowed to be spent in the following year for "capital projects" only.
The ONLY exception to this would be in the event of a declared war. In which case, after the war was over, the accumulated debt would be divided up into 10 segments. A special tax based on 1/10 of the pre-war tax income would be levied. That revenue would be dedicated for the sole purpose of paying off the defficit accumulated due to the declared war.
All other federal taxes would be repealed. That is no luxury tax, no road tax, no gasoline tax, no sales tax, no telephone fees et al. A tax would be defined as any money that is collected by the government that flows into the general fund.
All of this would be locked in by a Constitutional Amendment called for by an Article V convention called for by the States.
Any violation of this by any branch of the government would call for automatic impeachment or other removal from office. This to be enforced by a special commission formed by the individual States.
Posted by: Vic at October 21, 2010 07:19 AM (/jbAw)
Yes, I know he's just reaping what the lib policies he usually defends sowed, but I still feel compassion for the guy.
Fine, as long as he wakes up and smells the coffee. He's a lib who has just been mugged. By his own party. Let's see what lessons he learns from this.
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:19 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: First Black President at October 21, 2010 07:19 AM (xxgag)
And the non-rich should be taxed so that they may never become rich...which is what we've got now.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 10:59 AM (Vz9lf)
But comrades that only applies to certain rich and non rich. Some in our workers' paradise appear to be more equal than others
Posted by: TheQuietMan at October 21, 2010 07:21 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:21 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: ya2daup at October 21, 2010 11:17 AM
I doubt Greg is out of high school.
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 07:21 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 07:22 AM (Vz9lf)
Are you kidding me? That is a pudding dipping ass-kicking. Just taking the house by 1 vote majority stops Odipstick in his tracks.
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 21, 2010 07:23 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: Dems on election night at October 21, 2010 07:24 AM (5usKd)
Despite Liberal Polls- Rasmussen Still Has Penn Senate Race in the Solid GOP Column
Liberal polling organizations the past couple of days have reported the senate race tightening in Pennsylvania. A new Quinnipiac poll out today suggests the race is down to a two point lead for Republican Pat Toomey over Pelosi-Democrat Joe Sestak.
However, Rasmussen Reports, the most accurate polling service hated by liberals, still has Toomey with a convincing lead over his far left rival.
Rasmussen still lists the Pennsylvania race in the “Solid GOP” column.
From the NY Daily News:
“There is still a mood in the likely Pennsylvania electorate for change, which appears more likely to help Toomey than Sestak,” said Brown. “Among the 33% of likely voters who say they are angry with the federal government, Toomey leads 77 – 17%.”
And finally, from the nation's premier authority, THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Our forecast yesterday evening, which did not yet include the Rasmussen poll (nor the internal polls; we do not use them in our Senate predictions), showed a projected 7-point victory for Mr. Toomey and gave him a 92 percent chance of emerging as the victor. None of the new information would lead me to deviate greatly from that forecast.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 21, 2010 07:24 AM (7+pP9)
Is that on all income, or is there a minimum?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 21, 2010 07:25 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 11:02 AM (huyI
If the Dem;s aren't trending upward, its not a battleground anymore. Its taken.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 07:25 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 11:21 AM (eOXTH)
I'm betting he's starting to now! Sunday morning ought to be interesting...
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:26 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 11:14 AM
Why? (or should that be Y?) Ol' Juan still has that "fair and balanced" check coming in...it's not as if he's one of the 475,000 or so who got pink-slipped for realz this week.
Let's face it: NPR had every right to broom him if they didn't like what he said, just as, say, NRO would have the right to dump someone who dared speak ill of William F Buckley, or Rash Fatblob could fire someone who disagreed with him.
"Free Market," right?
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 07:27 AM (Ulu3i)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:27 AM (eOXTH)
Fine, as long as he wakes up and smells the coffee. He's a lib who has just been mugged. By his own party. Let's see what lessons he learns from this.
And Mara Liassen is up next. Media Matters started their campaign against her this morning for her appearances on Fox.
Posted by: Annabelle at October 21, 2010 07:27 AM (Zeljq)
Oh, Monty...are you still here? A sci-fi writer who is being targeted for her un-PC remarks. I think we need a book thread to support her.
link to Insty
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 07:27 AM (XdlcF)
and no one at this paper noticed the bias in the first sentence there. Of course.
that's not as bad as the highschool in cinicinnati who used buses to take kids to the polls for early voting during the school day.
Posted by: Ben at October 21, 2010 07:28 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Y-not is Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 11:14 AM
Why? (or should that be Y?) Ol' Juan still has that "fair and balanced" check coming in...it's not as if he's one of the 475,000 or so who got pink-slipped for realz this week.
Let's face it: NPR had every right to broom him if they didn't like what he said, just as, say, NRO would have the right to dump someone who dared speak ill of William F Buckley, or Rash Fatblob could fire someone who disagreed with him.
"Free Market," right?
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 11:27 AM (Ulu3i)
except NPR is funded, partially, by the taxpayers.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 21, 2010 07:28 AM (LdYLm)
Posted by: logprof at October 21, 2010 11:10 AM (BP6Z1)
I think it's gay for GLAAD to think that line is gay.
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 21, 2010 07:29 AM (LdYLm)
They think this kind of purging will keep liberals in line, but what it will do is keep liberals off of Fox -- the most watched network.
They are so used to having already marched through the institutions, the forget how to march.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:31 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Guy Fawkes at October 21, 2010 07:31 AM (ruu60)
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 11:27 AM (XdlcF)
Elizabeth Moon is a damned fine writer. Everything I have read by her is good - and its hard military SF with strong female characters.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 07:31 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 21, 2010 07:31 AM (0q2P7)
Absolutely not. You do realize who pays for NPR? That is a government entity.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 21, 2010 07:31 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: SGT Dan at October 21, 2010 07:32 AM (QUuUE)
i wonder what mara will say....or even if she'll sit next to him!
I hadn't thought of that. Even better!!!
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:32 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: Mama AJ at October 21, 2010 11:27 AM (XdlcF)
I wonder if I would recognize the name of those trying to silence her? Somehow I doubt it.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 07:32 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: The armies of handicapable people...uh...marching for respect. at October 21, 2010 07:32 AM (T0NGe)
I would prefer a lower rate; I want my government to scramble for every penny. No surplus for a very long time until the debt is reduced to almost nothing. Surpluses tempt the bastards too much. They simply can't resist.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 21, 2010 07:33 AM (LH6ir)
Yeah don't you hate waking up with a non-hangover headache? It's like getting punished for a good time you didn't have.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 21, 2010 07:33 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 21, 2010 07:33 AM (xJVlJ)
Neither do I. Sat next to a nice Kuwaiti man on an international flight just this Sunday. Too nice. I don't like to talk on the plane.
What's pathetic is the hijab-wearing girls in London. They wear more makeup than a $2 whore, but then wear that ridiculous headgear.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:34 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:34 AM (eOXTH)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 21, 2010 11:33 AM (xJVlJ)
Thats a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 07:35 AM (CN+Qv)
Too damn many liberals and squishes on Fox as it is. Not enough conservatives.
And I'd guess Fox pays better than NPR.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 07:35 AM (Ulu3i)
I think it means that the men will throw a hissy fit and the women will go into roid rage.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:35 AM (T0NGe)
Okay, so they are $3 whores. What's the problem?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo ( NJConservative) at October 21, 2010 07:35 AM (LH6ir)
Yeah, but it's a credential-maker. Mara and Juan wouldn't get the fat Fox paycheck if they weren't NPR drones.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:36 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 11:34 AM (eOXTH)
--I thought that the line "Don we now our gay apparel" meant putting on ridiculous sweaters with reindeer or jingle bells on them.
Posted by: logprof at October 21, 2010 07:37 AM (BP6Z1)
Oh, Monty...are you still here? A sci-fi writer who is being targeted for her un-PC remarks. I think we need a book thread to support her.
link to Insty
Oh that SO annoys me! Liberal female authors (Connie Brockaway, Pamela Clare) are 'just writing their opinions or their view of the world'. Or at worst, using lazy tropes. Crap......
Posted by: EZB at October 21, 2010 07:37 AM (Ty06w)
And the alternative is...?
Unless you think we'd be better of with no government at all, some kind of revenue-generation is necessary.
Posted by: MrScribbler at October 21, 2010 07:37 AM (Ulu3i)
I feel compassion for him because he generally comes off as a guy who is wrong-headed but not mean-spirited, because he seemed genuinely shaken by being dumped by his employer over the phone, and because I know what it's like to be treated shabbily by an employer. The fact that millions of people have lost or are losing their jobs does not lessen my compassion for one individual being shit-canned by his employer.
I think it's a shame when someone tries to speak from their heart about a delicate subject and gets slammed for it. And, as others pointed out, it is particularly disgusting when a publicly-funded media outlet that is supposed to be objective and balanced dumps a long-time, valued employee for expressing an honest opinion about a topic of such importance to the nation.
Posted by: Y-not at October 21, 2010 07:38 AM (osFsP)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at October 21, 2010 07:38 AM (eOXTH)
The problem is that it's only about 1 pound 70. Damned exchange rate.
But seriously, it's only social pressure that makes them do it and it's a token thing. It has nothing to do with religion or piousness, it's an attempt for the men that own them to stick a middle-finger in the face of the prevailing culture.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:38 AM (T0NGe)
What cracks me up is when someone complains about this, people say "only about 2%", like it's such small amount it's not really a big deal it's being abused...but when someone suggests a cut in that funding, they go into a full "ZOMG WE'RE LOSING OUR VALUABLE GOV'T SUPPORT CUZ OF THE EVIL REPUBS" freakout.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at October 21, 2010 07:40 AM (Vz9lf)
Nope. KY is the only one where the Republican is under-performing, but is still likely to win.
But my question still stands. Name one Republican Senate candidate in a battleground race (CA, WA, WI, PA, CT, IL) that is trending upward. And, yes, those are all Dem states, but that's what happens in off-year elections.
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 07:40 AM (huyI8)
Muslim women in a mixed society have it rough when it comes to finding a husband. Islam allows a woman to only marry a Muslim man, while a Muslim man can marry any woman. So they do have to compete.
Just one more way Islam gives women the short end of the stick.
Posted by: MikeTheMoose at October 21, 2010 07:41 AM (0q2P7)
Posted by: Y-not at October 21, 2010 11:38 AM (osFsP)
Yes, but Juan has to have known the groupthink at NPR - he has been a participant of it for years. The respect others have for him was a shield NPR used to go after others. Whether he thought he would be immune or didn't think at all, its just him reaping a whirlwhind after sowing the wind for years..
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 07:43 AM (CN+Qv)
What's pathetic is the hijab-wearing girls in London. They wear more makeup than a $2 whore, but then wear that ridiculous headgear.
Hair is a really big deal culturally (all over the world). It's a marker of health and wealth; poor and starving? Ratty hair. Rich and well fed, long shiny hair. Which it's why it's covered (no I don't agree with it, I do understand the concept though).
Even here--- how many men say "I hate it when my wife cuts her hair". And forcably cutting a woman's hair is as bad as raping her in many cultures. Make-up isn't that big a deal..... it's addition to the foundation.
Posted by: EZB at October 21, 2010 07:44 AM (Ty06w)
Not only that, most of them in England are Pakistani and are from the same stock as the gorgeous Hindu-descent women who walk around without the don't-touch-me on their heads and wear modest but form-fitting clothes. Sometimes, less than modest, too!
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:44 AM (T0NGe)
I think it's a shame when someone tries to speak from their heart about a delicate subject and gets slammed for it.
Hell, he got canned!
NPR, your friends, unless you disagree or speak from the heart.
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:44 AM (6oDXl)
But it's cultural, not religious. 20 years ago, only the most backwoodsy Muslim woman wore a hijab. Certainly in Western countries, they wouldn't. Steyn talks about dating a Muslim woman and they compared it to the Russian babushka -- for old women.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:46 AM (T0NGe)
Whoops.
Posted by: AmishDude at October 21, 2010 07:46 AM (T0NGe)
Therefore, there is no wave.
It's no wave if it isn't 435 R-0 D.
Posted by: Gweggy Stardust at October 21, 2010 07:48 AM (+i3tl)
Posted by: maddogg at October 21, 2010 07:48 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: logprof at October 21, 2010 11:10 AM (BP6Z1)
Hope GLAAD never thries to bum a cigarette in the smoking area of a bar in England.
"hey, can i bum a fag?"
Posted by: todler at October 21, 2010 07:48 AM (fPOY0)
Just one more way Islam gives women the short end of the stick.
Sorry, but you mispelled 'dick'.
You're welcome.
Posted by: HH at October 21, 2010 07:50 AM (6oDXl)
The Democrats only avoid obliteration in off-year elections. It's settled science.
Posted by: toby928™ at October 21, 2010 11:48 AM (S5YRY)
Added something. Because once something is settled, it NEVER can be discussed EVER again - Coons
Posted by: Radioactive Satellite Of LOVE at October 21, 2010 07:51 AM (LdYLm)
But it's cultural, not religious. 20 years ago, only the most backwoodsy Muslim woman wore a hijab. Certainly in Western countries, they wouldn't. Steyn talks about dating a Muslim woman and they compared it to the Russian babushka -- for old women.
I don't disagree that it's being pushed religiously/culturally. I have a friend who has traveled to the ME annually since the 60's and she saw the changes starting 15 years ago and talked about it extensively. The push and influence of the fundy's into all avenues of arabic life as started in the most basic ways....
Like the Mafia...if your town flooded, your business burned, a family member was deathly ill--- in came the the Fundys with the Funds. Saving your home, yout business, your loved one. Then came the payback...
"You're a good man Ali, but don't you think your wife should be showing respect to Allah." Was a common drone--- shame and coercsion and often pure blackmail ("none of my family feels comfortable coming into your shop knowing your women dont' keep their heads covered.") Or simply "You own us honor."
As an aside--- 20 eyars ago, all the nightclub dance 'stars' in Cairo were Egyptian. Now the industry has been taken over by Russians and Israelis (yes odd) Few muslim/arabic women dare perform in public anymore because of public censure and harrasment. The arts 'police' are hell, and getting worse.
Posted by: EZB at October 21, 2010 07:56 AM (Ty06w)
"Republicans make minor gains after five days of early voting; no sign of huge GOP turnout yet"http://tinyurl.com/2cyl3f3
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 08:00 AM (huyI8)
GOP Has Absentee Ballot Advantage in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania voters have requested nearly 127,000 absentee ballots so far. Of that total, Republican voters made up 50 percent and Democrats made up 42 percent, according to figures collected Tuesday afternoon.
The state records show Republicans are returning their absentee ballots in greater numbers as well. The state has received about 40 percent of requested ballots, and Republican registrations outpace Democrats by 19 points, 56 percent to 37 percent, according to the state data. Absentee ballots made up 5 percent of total turnout in 2008.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 21, 2010 08:17 AM (7+pP9)
Unless you think we'd be better of with no government at all, some kind of revenue-generation is necessary.
A poll (capitation) tax is the only form of taxation compatible with the foundations of this country, but that ship sailed long ago.
We now have the technology needed to cost-effectively meter service usage at the micropayment level. We have financial markets (like the ones you attacked with your cheap shots upthread) that can model expected future returns on large infrastructural projects that will operate in the red for years before turning a profit and shape instruments for forward-looking investors.
We have the tools to implement a government restricted to providing for the common defense and protecting citizens from one another.
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 21, 2010 08:19 AM (xJVlJ)
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 08:20 AM (huyI8)
"Obama's skipping a Sikh temple visit because wearing a hat that could be mistaken for Muslim garb makes him nervous. Over to you, Juan..."
Posted by: TheresaD/FirePattyMurray at October 21, 2010 08:24 AM (f0Q++)
Oct. 15, 2010 | A former employee of an embattled community organizing group pleaded guilty Friday to voter fraud in connection with the 2008 presidential election. Kevin Clancy, 27, of Milwaukee admitted submitting multiple voter registration applications for some people and scheming with other workers for the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now, or ACORN, to sign people up several times in an effort to meet the organization's voter registration quotas.
Clancy entered his plea to a charge of falsely procuring voter registration.
He faces up to 3 1/3 years in prison at his sentencing Nov. 18. Clancy and fellow ACORN staffer Maria Miles, 37, of Racine were charged in March. She pleaded guilty in August to a similar charge and is scheduled to be sentenced Dec. 6.
Posted by: Jose Extranjero at October 21, 2010 08:25 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at October 21, 2010 08:25 AM (bvfVF)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 21, 2010 12:19 PM (xJVlJ)
The Democrats cheated on that one, too. Remember the 3/5 compromise?
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 08:36 AM (CN+Qv)
Posted by: Greg at October 21, 2010 12:20 PM (huyI
Now that's funny. We have lots of real votes, to offset pretend votes in a poll. Guess which one counts in the end.
Posted by: Oldcat at October 21, 2010 08:37 AM (CN+Qv)
The episode that featured Angela Dorian was "Assignment: Earth", not "Catspaw".
Posted by: Gran at October 21, 2010 09:28 AM (xmjMj)
Posted by: Designer handbag at November 16, 2010 12:48 AM (EeEYj)
Posted by: data recovery at November 25, 2010 09:14 PM (BGJWd)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3084 seconds, 445 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Juan Williams at October 21, 2010 04:30 AM (MMC8r)