November 17, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Six House races and one Senate race are still undecided, in case you were wondering. Math is hard.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:54 AM
| Comments (47)
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: AmericanDawg at November 17, 2010 03:12 AM (/7WLO)
VP Bite Me is crying wolf, that without START we have no national security.
Obama realizes that Russia sees him as an impotent naked lame duck emperor incapable of delivering on promises requiring Congressional approval.
Don't be surprised if a new executive order "ratifying" START is issued from the Oval Office in time for Christmas this year.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 17, 2010 03:16 AM (H+LJc)
Damn, what happened??? Is the world coming to an end? A Republican won in an election in a blue State by less than a 1000 votes?
There must be some kind of "secret agreement" in place.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2010 03:22 AM (e4sSD)
Miller isn't to be swept away silently. I don't begrudge him his recount demand, though scanners are more accurate than "by hand" except on the write-in ballots.
Posted by: maverick muse at November 17, 2010 03:23 AM (H+LJc)
btw, I saw the left marginal link to Chicago's Blago Blog. AG Holder is working overtime to exonerate Jesse Jackson Jr. by evading trial. As if Charlie Rangel's problems occupy the entire Congressional Ethics Committee capacity to function properly, they're begging off involvement exposing JJJ as well. Plenty obstruction of justice for charges against Holder.
Citing Rod Blagojevich's upcoming retrial -- and a request by the U.S. Department of Justice -- a congressional ethics panel has once again stalled its inquiry into U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., as requested by the committee today. "A retrial of former Governor Blagojevich has been set for April 20, 2011," the statement reads. "The Department of Justice has asked the Standards Committee to continue to defer consideration of this matter and the Standards Committee, following precedent, agreed to defer consideration of this matter at this time."
Posted by: maverick muse at November 17, 2010 03:33 AM (H+LJc)
Somehow I don't think that cutting these things down to so little is necessarily a good thing. And I sure as hell do not trust Obama in any treaty with the Russians what-so-ever.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2010 03:35 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Steve L. at November 17, 2010 03:47 AM (Gkhxf)
2 My precious....
Posted by: Gollumurkowski at November 17, 2010 07:01 AM (MMC8r)
Top prize winning comment of all time.
Posted by: Beto at November 17, 2010 03:51 AM (j5CHE)
Bullying dispute erupts at Wayne school over ‘Taliban’ comment
http://tinyurl.com/3ajmra2
It seems that we are rapidly becoming the same as the UK here with overboard PC crap trying not to offend muzzies.
My question is would the school have done the same thing if someone had mentioned some other group of people? How can the mere mention of "the Taliban" be considered insulting? To me this is some serious WTF crap. If it was up to me I would fire the school administration and anyone who had anything to do with developing this stupid PC policy.
Perhaps it is time for the rest of us to start fighting back. Sure it is stupid to hire lawyers and sue the school for a one day suspension, and besides, that only punishes the tax payer unless a condition of your suit is to fire the people involved.
Instead how about normal people start being offended everyday by "comments" made by the "protected classes". We need to start using their own tactics against them. Overload the system with protests and grievances because we were insulted over some chickenshit comment.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2010 04:00 AM (e4sSD)
The Biggest Loser In California
http://tinyurl.com/2bxsznb
The biggest loser in California elections wasnÂ’t even on the ballot: Mitt Romney. Meg WhitmanÂ’s 12-point defeat in the race for California governor foretells what would happen if Republicans nominate the mirror image of Whitman for president in 2012.
[snip]
The fable of the businessman-turned-successful-government-executive is as old as it is illusory. The theory goes that someone who is successful at running a large corporation can run government like a business. This was the storyline behind Ross PerotÂ’s failed 1992 bid for the White House, among countless other instances.
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2010 04:06 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at November 17, 2010 04:15 AM (QvjLC)
Well, Blago is gonna have to present a defense this time around, and he'll be able to bring out all the JJ Jr stuff he wants.. the feds have the tapes and Blago can present them as well.
I hope to see Jesse Jr and Valerie Jarret and Rahm Emmanuel all on the stand! Should be fun! (all around the time Rahm is running for mayor! hee hee)
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at November 17, 2010 04:18 AM (Do528)
Posted by: Vic
Vic - Melissa Bean kept stalling for the last few votes to be counted.. And I thought for sure they were going to "discover" enough votes to get her the win.. I guess they lost them in someone's trunk!
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at November 17, 2010 04:19 AM (Do528)
Ironically, I just had a gander at the latest set of Air Force guidelines for dealing with fat lecherous Soviet colonels Russian START inspectors. They always required a wide berth when they came to my base.
Maybe we should just sneak our nuclear weapons through security.
Posted by: Big Fat Meanie at November 17, 2010 04:25 AM (8lCJT)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2010 04:40 AM (wgkZv)
And, apparently, they are willing to give out special celebrity treatment.
Posted by: Gollumurkowski at November 17, 2010 04:50 AM (MMC8r)
Farenthold is going about the business of winning while Ortiz is trying to be a bitter clinger clinging to power - recount so far hasn't changed the result
http://tinyurl.com/23p335k
NY-25 update:
Buerkle's lead holds as recount continues
http://tinyurl.com/29qv92e
NY-1 update:
Altschuler(R) clings to very narrow lead, Bishop will demand hand recount
http://tinyurl.com/2c8ttol
NC-2 update:
Ellmers has big lead, Etheridge still wants recount though
http://tinyurl.com/2dalguy
The other two are CA-11 and CA-20 where, guess what, the Republicans are boned
So it's looking like the R's will pick up 4 more
Posted by: chemjeff at November 17, 2010 04:53 AM (PaSAU)
Posted by: Jean at November 17, 2010 08:40 AM (wgkZv)
*rubs hands together and affects Mr. Burns' voice*
Excellent.
Posted by: RushBabe at November 17, 2010 04:54 AM (a3Z62)
Posted by: Vic at November 17, 2010 08:00 AM (e4sSD)
Vic,Vic, Vic....now you already know that only us can call the Rethuglikkkans Nazis and the President Bushitler. Now go to your room, sit in the corner, and there won't be any supper for you today.
..and no iPod either!
Posted by: Typical Duplicious DemocRAT at November 17, 2010 04:56 AM (mBQu8)
"We're gonna stick our hands in your pants to check for bombs,"
I freely admit to having a rocket in my pants and I insist on being searched by an opposite sex TSA minion.
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2010 05:06 AM (9IOHF)
Only the little people have their cooter's touched by TSA.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi, House Bitch at November 17, 2010 07:17 AM (v1gw3)
Even today, the memory haunts me. I remember touching the member of a Member of Congress ... and she wasn't a man, baby!
Posted by: TSA groper, emotionally scarred and in therapy at November 17, 2010 05:07 AM (yRrAd)
Posted by: Bugler at November 17, 2010 05:22 AM (VXBR1)
Posted by: chemjeff at November 17, 2010 05:24 AM (PaSAU)
How
much control should the government have over your paycheck? As Congress
gears up for the lame duck session, they are planning on tightening
their grip on business by revisiting the Paycheck Fairness Act, S. 3772.
This bill would give the federal government and the courts
unprecedented power to second guess routine pay-setting decisions that
employers make every day.
Under
current law, employers have wide latitude to establish compensation
systems that make sense for their business as long as they donÂ’t violate
anti-discrimination laws. The Paycheck Fairness Act would significantly
expand the reach of the pay equity laws and make it much more difficult
for employers to justify legitimate pay differences. For example, it
would no longer be permissible to pay employees differently based on
market forces, negotiating ability, or even the amount of revenue they
generate for the employerÂ’s bottom line unless the employer could prove
it was a "business necessity."
Proponents support the bill based on the "pay gap"---which assumes that any gap in pay must be due to unlawful discrimination. This assumption is being used to justify radical rewrites of pay equity laws and put expansive regulation in place. The only parties that benefit from this are the trial lawyers.
Write to your Senators now and tell them to oppose this bill.
Posted by: Y-not at November 17, 2010 05:32 AM (UcOiF)
Sorry about that. That's from the US Chamber of Commerce. I was trying to send it as a tip to HQ but pasted into the wrong window.
http://tinyurl.com/26vj2fz
Posted by: Y-not at November 17, 2010 05:33 AM (UcOiF)
I freely admit to having a rocket in my pants and I insist on being searched by an opposite sex TSA minion.
Posted by: Nash Rambler at November 17, 2010 09:06 AM (9IOHF)
Great! Now that I've been forced to "retire", I love my new job!
Posted by: Helen Thomas at November 17, 2010 05:50 AM (1+OO5)
Since September the Coptic Christians in Egypt have been under attack by the Muslims: murder, kidnapping, buring people alive. No real coverage to speak of unless you go to boutique anti-jihad blogs.
Egypt is a typical example of what happens to a non-Muslim (once-majority) minority given enough time. Whatever you do, don't apply this lesson to uncontrolled immigration of Muslims to the US. That would be racism!
Raymond Ibrahim explained what was going to happen a couple weeks ago. First the Muslims project onto their intended victims what they themselves intend to do.
If Christians in the US decided to systematically oppress and murder Muslims, I'll bet a headline or two would be generated. Not so for our new official state religion.
Posted by: Beagle at November 17, 2010 05:51 AM (sOtz/)
Six House races and one Senate race are still undecided, in case you were wondering. Math Fraud is hard.
Posted by: Flammenwerfer at November 17, 2010 05:58 AM (FIDMq)
It is easier for an undocumented person to illegally cross the Mexican border today than it is for a law abiding American to get on a plane in his/her own country.
What is wrong with this picture?
Posted by: hughie at November 17, 2010 05:59 AM (v6JKx)
It is easier for an undocumented person to illegally cross the Mexican border get in-state tuition at a California university today than it is for a law abiding American to get on a plane in his/her own country.
fify
Posted by: Y-not at November 17, 2010 06:01 AM (UcOiF)
Alvin Greene for Pres in 2012. He wants to run against Obama... and may run as a Republican.
Heard it from Alvin's mouth on WBT radio 1110am with Keith Larson www.wbt.com
Posted by: SnowSun at November 17, 2010 06:11 AM (UAUr6)
Posted by: seninle at November 17, 2010 06:17 AM (d2uuZ)
Posted by: bigred at November 17, 2010 06:17 AM (cX9pO)
Sasha: Momma, have you ever had that 'less than fresh' feeling?
Mommy: Yes, I have. [wavy lines for a flashback montage] http://bit.ly/cBAklI
Posted by: Dave C at November 17, 2010 06:27 AM (poJjg)
I thought that, too when my son was suspended for "insensitive" remarks while in 6th grade. We just told him that sometimes life isn't fair and just to suck it up. Then he was denied admission to the all boy Catholic school that his 4 older brothers had gone to because of that suspension. (They had a new "touchy feely" liberal principle and board.) If I had to do it over again, I would sue the grade school, the board, the teacher, the offended student and his douche bag liberal parents, I would go to the press, whatever, I would not let it pass.
Posted by: marine mom at November 17, 2010 06:29 AM (frIH8)
What is wrong with this picture?
The Mexican should be flying-in, first class.
Posted by: barack obama at November 17, 2010 06:29 AM (eQPq+)
_____________
Oh, my!
Posted by: George Takei at November 17, 2010 06:33 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Dan at November 17, 2010 07:05 AM (1jzSs)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6WP624hvPY&feature=fvwk
Posted by: dave Clark at November 17, 2010 04:19 PM (VFYKw)
<a href="http://www.topusbdrive.com">Branded usb drive </a>
Posted by: oem usb at November 20, 2010 01:26 AM (K6svw)
Come un flash card precoce, R4 standard massimo sostegno da 4 GB TF card. Standard non supporta SDHC TF, questo ¨¨ dispiaciuto. Tuttavia, un ampio gruppo di utenti R4, sono le risorse pi¨´ rilevanti. Archivio gioco R4 ¨¨ memorizzato direttamente alla carta di TF, eliminando i passaggi manuali di archivio di backup Arresto. R4 ¨¨ un archivio di. 512k ¨¨ il file Sav.
R4 per homebrew, patch DLDI pu¨° automaticamente giocare, e integrato nel software kernel Moonshell multimediali, al fine di realizzare il film, ascoltare musica e delle funzioni di lettura e-book.
<a href="http://www.scheda-r4.com/">R4i SDHC</a>
<a href="http://www.scheda-r4.com/">ds Nintendo</a>
<a href="http://www.scheda-r4.com/">M3 ds real</a>
<a href="http://www.scheda-r4.com/">micro sd</a>
Posted by: DSTTi at December 23, 2010 06:16 PM (KgoFi)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.1918 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








http://tinyurl.com/2a92kzw
Posted by: Chitown Jerry at November 17, 2010 03:01 AM (Do528)