December 15, 2010
— Gabriel Malor And, if you know, how do you get up from an all time low?
Update: It's been a while since I bothered to run the old explanation for the top headline post, but since people are asking:
This space is for comments on the stories in the Top Headline sidebar and for other news stories. The link to these comments is stickied at the top of the headline sidebar.
Rather than put that same explanation up every morning, I usually stick a quote in it.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:56 AM
| Comments (70)
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 03:08 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: joncelli at December 15, 2010 03:10 AM (MLQL2)
Posted by: In Exile at December 15, 2010 03:11 AM (8qbfK)
Spend another $1.1 trillion. Yep. That will perk up the national debt right quick. No-labels already melded debt=economy.
Posted by: maverick muse at December 15, 2010 03:17 AM (H+LJc)
Does he know what the test is for entrapment?
Shit he agrees that it is entrapment and wants more of it.
We don't need this kind of epic stupid.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 03:19 AM (e4sSD)
@ $575million/page, Sen. McConnell On 2,000-Page Omnibus Bill:
"No One Has Seen It"
Sounds familiar.
McConnell, why did you "negotiate" with Obama your "agreement"?
Posted by: maverick muse at December 15, 2010 03:21 AM (H+LJc)
Posted by: maverick muse at December 15, 2010 07:21 AM (H+LJc)
The Dem on the Fox panel says McConnell has millions in earmarks in the bill as well.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 03:27 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: nickless© at December 15, 2010 03:29 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 03:41 AM (e4sSD)
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 15, 2010 04:00 AM (jbCcb)
Posted by: connielu at December 15, 2010 04:25 AM (sWrXg)
Posted by: SarahW at December 15, 2010 04:26 AM (Z4T49)
So, the Daily Beast claims that my alma mater, the University of NH, is the druggiest college in the country. I don't think I can agree with that. I went there for four years and yeah, there were drugs around, but I wouldn't say they were everywhere. Though there was this one kid in my sophomore prose writing class who ALWAYS smelled like weed. I couldn't sit next to him, it was too overpowering! Nice guy though.
Now, you want to talk about ALCOHOL, well, that's a different matter entirely.
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 04:34 AM (4df7R)
At Breitbart, via Big Hollywood:
New Ebert movie review show to premiere in January Question: why? Does anyone give a crapshoot about Ebert's movie reviews anymore? All he does in his Sun-Times column anymore is preach leftist ideology in near incomprehensible prose. I pity the man his poor health, but please. He should retire, not go back to TV.Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 04:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Mac The Knife at December 15, 2010 04:40 AM (UAUr6)
Posted by: Y-not at December 15, 2010 04:44 AM (IDL9N)
I'm totally spamming this post. My apologies! But I have to share this. I know yesterday we were all "discussing" (in other words, mocking) the Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery section of the putrid omnibus bill, but I don't recall anyone mentioning this part:
For necessary expenses associated with the restoration of Pacific salmon populations, $80,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2012: Provided, That of the funds provided herein the Secretary of Commerce may issue grants to the States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, California, and Alaska, and Federally-recognized tribes of the Columbia River and Pacific Coast (including Alaska) for projects necessary for conservation of salmon and steelhead populations that are listed as threatened or endangered, or identified by a State as at risk to be so-listed, for maintaining populations necessary for exercise of tribal treaty fishing rights or native subsistence fishing, or for conservation of Pacific coastal salmon and steelhead habitat, based on guidelines to be developed by the Secretary of CommerceÂ…
As Publius writes over at Big Government, how would land-locked little Nevada, which isn't crossed by any major tributary of the Columbia River, let alone the Pacific Ocean, ever be included in a piece of porkulus spending aimed at recovering Pacific Coastal Salmon.
Gosh, I wonder who was behind that...
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 04:46 AM (4df7R)
City power bill hike wins key approval
All that remains now is a "public hearing" which means zero.
The sad thing? All these city council commies in Columbia will be reelected, most will not even have an opponent. This is how cities become "Detroitized".
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 04:46 AM (e4sSD)
Seriously? In California? Los Angeles no less!
Parents demand school choice, and get it.
(Link goes to Big Government)
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 04:52 AM (4df7R)
I pity the man his poor health, but please. He should retire, not go back to TV.
Have you seen what he looks like lately? Literally, the Joker in the Batman comic books.
Creepy weird.
Posted by: HH at December 15, 2010 04:55 AM (6oDXl)
Seriously? In California? Los Angeles no less!
Parents demand school choice, and get it.
(Link goes to Big Government)
LOL, sure, but what are the choices?
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 04:58 AM (e4sSD)
Gov.-elect Jerry Brown said Tuesday that he wants to complete a budget agreement within two months of unveiling his budget, an accelerated timeline that would allow a late-spring special election for potential tax increases or other revenue generation.
The train to Detroitization of a State has just accelerated.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 05:16 AM (e4sSD)
-------
You've forgotten about the secret underground submarine base in Tonopah, NV, haven't you?
Posted by: Anachronda can't get enough Art Bell at December 15, 2010 05:23 AM (6fER6)
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 09:16 AM (e4sSD)
Maybe they can bulldoze it and turn it into grape vinyards?
Posted by: CanaDave at December 15, 2010 05:24 AM (wDCqO)
I'll refrain from discussing meaningless drivel like DWTS or stuff like that.
Posted by: Boris Yeltsin at December 15, 2010 05:35 AM (4sQwu)
13%,? Really? 13%? Isn't that, like, 2% above tar and feathers and 3% above "Is this the way to the Bastille?"
Posted by: bigred at December 15, 2010 05:36 AM (cX9pO)
WASHINGTON – Consumer prices increased slightly last month as food and energy costs ticked up, but there was little sign of widespread inflation.
The Consumer Price Index rose 0.1 percent in November, less than the previous month's rise of 0.2 percent, the Labor Department said Wednesday. In the past year, prices have moved up only 1.1 percent.
The report shows that the sluggish economy is keeping prices in check. Outside of the food and energy costs, core consumer prices rose 0.1 percent, the first increase in four months.
Good news. There is no inflation. As long as you don't count food and energy. And who uses those any way?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 15, 2010 05:39 AM (1Jaio)
Good news. There is no inflation. As long as you don't count food and energy. And who uses those any way?
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 15, 2010 09:39 AM (1Jaio)
You forgot that consumer spending went up 0.8% last month as well. A sure sign that the economy is recovering in a robust manner, or so says Fox repeating what the Obama lackeys said.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 06:04 AM (e4sSD)
I keep posting this here and I think nobody has run with it because there's too much going on because THIS IS REALLY GOOD. A couple nights ago, O'Reilly was on Letterman. They were discussing the infamous "walk-off" of Whoopie and Joy. Letterman made reference to Whoopie and "that other woman". I just think it's such a hoot that Joy, who considers herself a comedian and wants desperately to be relative and recognized doesn't even have a name in Letterman's world.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 15, 2010 06:22 AM (66ev1)
You forgot that consumer spending went up 0.8% last month as well. A sure sign that the economy is recovering in a robust manner, or so says Fox repeating what the Obama lackeys said.
I truly believe the economy will fix itself if THE FRIGGIN' GOVERNMENT WILL STAY OUT OF IT but we all know they can't/won't do that. And that's why we're in trouble.
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 15, 2010 06:23 AM (66ev1)
SPIEGEL: Qatar experiences temperatures of 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in the summer. Your designs foresee the pitch and the seating areas being cooled down to 25 degrees Celsius using heat exchangers. That will require enormous amounts of energy.
Speer: The accusation that we are wasting energy is bigoted. You only need to calculate just how much energy Germany's football leagues consume when they heat their football pitches in winter. It takes the same amount of energy to cool the seats as it does to heat them.
SPIEGEL: But the seats in German stadiums are not heated, even in the winter.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 15, 2010 06:23 AM (4ucxv)
How much of that was increase in gasoline and food prices?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 15, 2010 06:24 AM (4ucxv)
From ZeroHedge:
And the comedy continues. After Best Buy makes it clear that not even liquidation level prices are enough to draw consumers in, the Department of Truth is out with its latest attempt to make Americans believe that even with $10 billion in November credit card and other revolving debt declining $10 billion from October, and home equity loans outstanding falling another $2.6 billion, coupled with a drop in average hourly wages, retail sales actually picked up by 0.8%, better than expectations of 0.6%, a decline from the October reading which was revised from 1.2% to 1.7%. Retail sales ex-autos increased by 1.2%, on expectations of 0.6%, a decline from the revised October increase of 0.8%. Not too surprisingly, the biggest beneficiary in the pick up in spending was at gasoline stations which saw $38.1 billion in spending compared to $36.7 billion last month. Expect much more strength in gas sales going forward as the Chairman's genocide plan becomes appreciated by all: after all the PPI also jumped from 0.4% to 0.8%, beating expectations of 06% by a wide margin.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 15, 2010 06:37 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: katya, the designated driver at December 15, 2010 06:37 AM (66ev1)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 15, 2010 10:23 AM (4ucxv)
Damn, there is so much to unpack in that post.
The Qatarians hiring the son of the Nazi architect.
Said son-of-a-Nazi using the word bigoted faster than Al Sharpton would use the race card.
Comparing World Cup matches to winter soccer in Germany (falsely and how many winter matches do they play anyway?)
I don't think FIFA thought this one through. But I suspect there were serious bribes.
Posted by: AmishDude at December 15, 2010 07:10 AM (BvBKY)
Assange doesn't want his home address disclosed?
Paging openleaks.org.
I belive that the debut content for your web site is available.....
Posted by: Turnabout Fairplay at December 15, 2010 07:13 AM (nd0uY)
Thanks for the explanation, Gabriel. I work for an Oklahoma newspaper and I never found any connection to what I thought the Top Headlines of the day were.
Frankly, I never noticed the sidebar. I tend to overlook all advertising on Web and in print, so I assume that anything on the flanks of what I'm reading is ads and shut it out.
Now I have more to read.
Next question: What in hell are Ugg boots? Who would buy a product with such a pleasant name?
Posted by: Bracket Creep at December 15, 2010 07:14 AM (SC2wl)
At Breitbart, via Big Hollywood:
New Ebert movie review show to premiere in January Question: why? Does anyone give a crapshoot about Ebert's movie reviews anymore? All he does in his Sun-Times column anymore is preach leftist ideology in near incomprehensible prose. I pity the man his poor health, but please. He should retire, not go back to TV.Yeah, that show's gonna be jaw-droppingly bad.
Posted by: Acme Pitchforks and Torches Inc. at December 15, 2010 07:16 AM (6kyQC)
http://tinyurl.com/2c4l299
Posted by: mpfs at December 15, 2010 07:17 AM (iYbLN)
Don't know how busy Mr. Speer is, but I'm wondering if the people in Minnesota can hire him to build a stadium whose roof doesn't collapse every time they have bad weather.
I mean really....
Posted by: HH at December 15, 2010 07:23 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 15, 2010 10:24 AM (4ucxv)
I didn't think about that, probably ALL of it.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 07:27 AM (e4sSD)
Assange doesn't want his home address disclosed?
Paging openleaks.org.
I belive that the debut content for your web site is available.....
Publish his address, security codes, bank account numbers, social security number, any other identification numbers, his birthdate, shoe size, and the date and time of his last bowel movement. Let's see how he likes it.
Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at December 15, 2010 08:04 AM (QV82F)
I only come here for the naked tranny dwarf hookers anyway.
Posted by: West at December 15, 2010 08:07 AM (+RhDN)
????? I have the To Headlines sidebar and I am using Fire Fox.
Posted by: Vic at December 15, 2010 08:18 AM (e4sSD)
Hahaha. You can't trick me into looking for it again, either!
Posted by: West at December 15, 2010 08:20 AM (+RhDN)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 15, 2010 08:23 AM (fLHQe)
????? I have the To Headlines sidebar and I am using Fire Fox.
Ditto! At least at home. I always have the sidebar. West, is your screen resolution low?
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 08:23 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 15, 2010 12:23 PM (fLHQe)
I read the first few and gave up. Oh, boo hoo. The traitor has a crappy cell. Who in their right mind gives a damn?
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 08:24 AM (4df7R)
I read the first few and gave up. Oh, boo hoo. The traitor has a crappy cell. Who in their right mind gives a damn?
Posted by: MWR at December 15, 2010 12:24 PM (4df7R)
They're all defensive of Manning, pulling the "Innocent until proven guilty" line, but ready to condemn the gov't as being cruel and inhumane without knowing for certain if they are. But I'm sure these folks were all fine and dandy with McChrystal getting relieved without investigation of due process because of what a music magazine pubished.
Of course, we don't even have to mention that the guy is essentially a spy in wartime and that "Innocent until proven guilty" is pretty much a laughable concept in the military (not to mention double jeopardy) and that there are thousands of service personnel doing just fine in arguably worse living conditions without feeling the need to fuck over their country because his boyfriend found a new knob to polish.
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 15, 2010 08:50 AM (fLHQe)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at December 15, 2010 08:51 AM (fLHQe)
Q: How long do you suppose it will take a web app called fu|_|kbook.xxx to compete head to head with facebook.com?
My strongly held Christian beliefs prevent me from exploring the option.
Posted by: sTevo at December 15, 2010 09:34 AM (ekY66)
I recognize that this is TOP HEADLINES from nine years ago, but I was poking through the old "Notable Quotables Awards" from 2001 on Media Research, and this stuff seemed too good to not dredge back up:
Picking the Lockbox Award for Denouncing BushÂ’s Tax Cut
First Place
"Adios, surplus. When retired boomers dine on dog food, will they say thanks for that $600?"
– Newsweek’s "Conventional Wisdom" box, assigning President Bush a "down" arrow, Sept. 3 issue.
Runners-up:
"Democrats, collaborating on a smaller tax cut proposal, have vowed to fight the Bush plan, targeting it as a budget buster that caters to the rich....On the Republican side, Mr. Bush faces a different problem. Already theyÂ’re talking up adding more tax cuts to his plan. And then, thereÂ’s the lobbyists who wonder why Mr. Bush gave nothing to corporate America. Critics charge the bill could eventually top $3 trillion....Bob McIntyre of Citizens for Tax Justice canÂ’t forget the last time Congress went on a tax cut spree in 1981. America is still paying the bill."
– CBS White House correspondent John Roberts in a February 5 CBS Evening News story which cited a critic but not a supporter of Reagan’s tax cuts.
"On Capitol Hill, the Republican-controlled House voted mostly along party lines tonight to pass President BushÂ’s federal budget blueprint. This includes his big tax cut plan, partly bankrolled, critics say, through cuts in many federal aid programs for children and education."
– Dan Rather on the March 28 CBS Evening News.
"President Bush tonight outlines his cut-federal-programs-to-get-a-tax-cut plan to Congress and the nation. Democrats will then deliver their televised response, which basically says Mr. BushÂ’s ideas are risky business, endangering among other things, Social Security and Medicare."
– Dan Rather, February 27 CBS Evening News.
"The Bushes held their first state dinner. POTUS served buffalo meat, wore cowboy boots and welcomed Clint Eastwood. Meanwhile, the rest of America priced horse meat."
– Summary of previous week’s events according to Newsweek’s "Conventional Wisdom" in the magazine’s September 17 issue.
"ThatÂ’s whatÂ’s pernicious here, is seizing on this as a way to get a tax cut...he could create something self-fulfilling, talk down the economy because he wants to use that as a tool to get a tax cut that we donÂ’t really need and is a bad idea."
– Newsweek Assistant Managing Editor Evan Thomas on Inside Washington, December 23, 2000.
Posted by: reason at December 15, 2010 10:19 AM (5npD/)
Earlier today, the Holder DOJ filed “United States of America v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al”, Case No. 2:10-cv-04536, before Judge Carl Barbier of the U.S. Eastern District Court for Louisiana, across the street from me. He’s a Clinton appointee, and has previously been chosen by the federal court’s MDL panel to handle hundreds of consolidated cases arising from the BP oil spill filed throughout the Gulf South.
By the way, the filing attorney on behalf of the U.S. is:
Sharon Denise Smith
U. S. Attorney's Office
Hale Boggs Federal Bldg.
500 Poydras St.
Room 210
New Orleans, LA 70130
504-680-3000
Posted by: Brian Sevin at December 15, 2010 11:55 AM (vxuAd)
Now I am never going to look at them again.
But I appreciate the good intentions.
Posted by: West at December 15, 2010 12:00 PM (9PQ6h)
via johngaltfla.com
Posted by: MrTea at December 15, 2010 03:46 PM (ytCsK)
Headline comments is pretty hit-or-miss. It would be more useful to have two per day, since they scroll down fast (and die). Or at least have one everytime Headlines get increased by five.
Or something.
That's my "cigar-butt in a baggie" 's worth.
Posted by: K~Bob at December 15, 2010 06:38 PM (bssbM)
Creeping Sharia alert from the religion of perpetual outrage:
Yodeling in Austria offends Muslims, judge issues fine.
Posted by: Max Entropy at December 15, 2010 10:02 PM (iHd8X)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.656 seconds, 198 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








"And, if you know, how do you get up from an all time low?"
What the hell is Gabe referring to?
Posted by: Sukie Tawdry at December 15, 2010 02:59 AM (jbCcb)