December 17, 2010

Top Headline Comments 12-17-10
— Gabriel Malor

Kill da wabbit, kill da wabbit, kill da wabbit!

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at 02:43 AM | Comments (139)
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Elmer Fudd, our hero.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 02:53 AM (6oDXl)

2

I saw over at Insty that the Israelis shot down a UFO near one of their nuclear facililties.

Great. Now Israel is probably going to be at war with the Mysterians.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 02:56 AM (6oDXl)

3 Is that crazy Elmer Fudd still clingin' to his religion and guns?!  Jeez you think he would have signed up for hopenchange by now.

Posted by: Plymouuthmom at December 17, 2010 03:01 AM (O/5X6)

4 Thunderbird schedule:

2011 Show Schedule

February 2011February 20 NASCAR Daytona 500 Fly-By, Daytona Beach, Florida
March 2011March 19-20 Luke AFB, ArizonaMarch 26-27 Tyndall AFB, Florida
April 2011April 2-3 Ceiba, Puerto RicoApril 9 Charleston AFB, South CarolinaApril 16-17 Seymour Johnson AFB, North CarolinaApril 30 Beale AFB, California
May 2011May 1 Beale AFB, CaliforniaMay 7-8 Smyrna, TennesseeMay 14-15 Langley AFB, VirginiaMay 21-22 Andrews AFB, Maryland (the reunion airshow)May 25 USAF Academy, Colorado
June 2011 (European Tour)June 4-5 Cigli AB, Izmir, TurkeyJune 11-12 Jesolo AB, ItalyJune 15 Karup AB, DenmarkJune 18-19 Turku AB, FinlandJune 25 Graf Ignatievo AB, Bulgaria
July 2011 (European Tour continues)July 2-3 RAF, Waddington, UKJuly 6-7 Koksijde AB, BelgiumJuly 9-10 Off Weekend for the TeamJuly 16-17 Off Weekend for the TeamJuly 23-24 Dayton, OhioJuly 27 Cheyenne, WyomingJuly 30-31 Travis AFB, California
August 2011August 6-7 Milwaukee, WisconsinAugust 13-14 Portsmouth, New HampshireAugust 17 Atlantic City, New JerseyAugust 20-21 Chicago, IlinoisAugust 27-28 Waterloo, Iowa
September 2011September 3-5 Cleveland, OhioSeptember 10-11 Niagara Falls, New YorkSeptember 15 Reno, NevadaSeptember 17-18 Mountain Home AFB, IdahoSeptember 24-25 Hill AFB, Utah
October 2011October 1-2 Fort Smith, ArkansasOctober 8 Holloman AFB, New MexicoOctober 15-16 Laughlin AFB, TexasOctober 22-23 Ft Worth, TexasOctober 29-30 Lafayette, Louisiana
November 2011November 5-6 MacDill AFB, FloridaNovember 12-13 Nellis AFB, Nevada

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 17, 2010 03:03 AM (7+pP9)

5 Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd:  My first introduction to Wagner!

This is also what my sister sang when her VW Rabbit conked out on her in 20 below weather and she had to get my husband and son to push it to our house.

Good morning,  all!

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:05 AM (Fo83G)

6 Earmarks were added to that omnibus bill from a wish list composed 10 months ago before the GOP pledged no earmarks.

As I thought.  It was Reid's pathetic attempt to sow dissension and get some pork for his buddies.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:08 AM (Fo83G)

7 Frigging blog losing the formatting. ONE more try:

2011 Show Schedule

February 2011

* February 20 NASCAR Daytona 500 Fly-By, Daytona Beach, Florida


March 2011

* March 19-20 Luke AFB, Arizona
* March 26-27 Tyndall AFB, Florida


April 2011

* April 2-3 Ceiba, Puerto Rico
* April 9 Charleston AFB, South Carolina
* April 16-17 Seymour Johnson AFB, North Carolina
* April 30 Beale AFB, California


May 2011

* May 1 Beale AFB, California
* May 7-8 Smyrna, Tennessee
* May 14-15 Langley AFB, Virginia
* May 21-22 Andrews AFB, Maryland (the reunion airshow)
* May 25 USAF Academy, Colorado


June 2011 (European Tour)

* June 4-5 Cigli AB, Izmir, Turkey
* June 11-12 Jesolo AB, Italy
* June 15 Karup AB, Denmark
* June 18-19 Turku AB, Finland
* June 25 Graf Ignatievo AB, Bulgaria


July 2011 (European Tour continues)

* July 2-3 RAF, Waddington, UK
* July 6-7 Koksijde AB, Belgium
* July 9-10 Off Weekend for the Team
* July 16-17 Off Weekend for the Team
* July 23-24 Dayton, Ohio
* July 27 Cheyenne, Wyoming
* July 30-31 Travis AFB, California


August 2011

* August 6-7 Milwaukee, Wisconsin
* August 13-14 Portsmouth, New Hampshire
* August 17 Atlantic City, New Jersey
* August 20-21 Chicago, Ilinois
* August 27-28 Waterloo, Iowa


September 2011

* September 3-5 Cleveland, Ohio
* September 10-11 Niagara Falls, New York
* September 15 Reno, Nevada
* September 17-18 Mountain Home AFB, Idaho
* September 24-25 Hill AFB, Utah


October 2011

* October 1-2 Fort Smith, Arkansas
* October 8 Holloman AFB, New Mexico
* October 15-16 Laughlin AFB, Texas
* October 22-23 Ft Worth, Texas
* October 29-30 Lafayette, Louisiana


November 2011

* November 5-6 MacDill AFB, Florida
* November 12-13 Nellis AFB, Nevada

I really think the Thunderbirds should stay home during the summer -- especially July4th

Posted by: Ed Anger at December 17, 2010 03:08 AM (7+pP9)

8 6 Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd:  My first introduction to Wagner!

This is also what my sister sang when her VW Rabbit conked out on her in 20 below weather and she had to get my husband and son to push it to our house.

Good morning,  all!

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:05 AM (Fo83G)

HEH...thanks for the morning chuckle!

Posted by: billygoat at December 17, 2010 03:10 AM (5qJM5)

9 5
Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 07:04 AM (yRrAd)

There's just too much transvestatin' goin' on right there!

Posted by: Zombie Fritz Hollings at December 17, 2010 03:12 AM (yRrAd)

10 I e-mailed my Texas Senators yesterday and told them to kill the spending bill or I would tell my friends they put earmarks in it.  They read the email. Abeebada beebada that's all folks

Posted by: Mac Gootbone at December 17, 2010 03:12 AM (XCSw/)

11 Robin of GMA is up nin Alaska interviewing Palin.

Of course,  she gets asked about Boehner's crying,  complete with clip.  I unfortunately do not have a "rolling my eyes" icon to post here.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:13 AM (Fo83G)

12 2

I saw over at Insty that the Israelis shot down a UFO near one of their nuclear facililties.

Great. Now Israel is probably going to be at war with the Mysterians.

Posted by: HH

And the left will condemn Israel's ongoing holocaust against space aliens.

Posted by: CrustyB at December 17, 2010 03:13 AM (qzgbP)

13

Happy Friday, morons!!!

Of course, I am feeling a bit guilty over the victory of the oppressive partiarchy yesterday in denying critical funding to much-needed women's centers at womens' colleges and cool season legume research.  The children!!!  Does anyone think of the children?

Also, Queef is a pussy.  Still.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 17, 2010 03:13 AM (B+qrE)

14 One week 'till Christmas Eve. Everyone got their shopping done? I haven't started.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 03:18 AM (6oDXl)

15 LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.

Nikolas Sarkozy and Carla Bruni ARE invited!

Bwahahahahaha!

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:26 AM (Fo83G)

16

LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.

Nikolas Sarkozy and Carla Bruni ARE invited!

Meh.

There is no right answer concerning the British royals other than "we got it right."

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 17, 2010 03:28 AM (B+qrE)

17

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:26 AM (Fo83G)

Awww, so I guess the 1st Lady won't be the unofficial food advisor?

Wats!

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 03:29 AM (6oDXl)

18 LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.

I guess he'll just mail the ipod with his greatest hits instead of handing it to them.

Posted by: Picky at December 17, 2010 03:30 AM (Dzi/u)

19 Aww, crap, I thought ya2daup was spam and deleted some of your comments when I deleted the spam. My bad.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 17, 2010 03:30 AM (XVaFd)

20 To all who think this wedding thing is small potatoes:  remember that President Bush was invited to stay IN BUCKINGHAM PALACE on his last visit.

Michelle was no doubt planning on a show-stopper outfit of garish colors and weird cut.   I am quite pleased that they are snubbed.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:33 AM (Fo83G)

21 Great, now I don't know where to go for Turkish song lyrics.

Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at December 17, 2010 03:34 AM (HaYO4)

22

From the somali pirate article:

The pirate gangs see the loss of mother ships, their speed boats, weapons and boarding gear, as simply a cost of doing business. Since the pirates are not killed, there is no shortage of volunteers to ship out on the mother ships, and take their chances.

Why oh why is every developed culture so infested with do-gooderism that we can't even deal with this?  How are these pirates not simply shot out of hand and their corpses dumped in the sea?  The day we can't even kill f*cking pirate scum, from a "nation" that produces less than any poorly developed small town in America, is a pretty dark day.  We should be tying those bastards to a mast, flaying the skind off their backs with the lash, then throwing them to the sharks, and it should be recorded and televised.  Every one of them caught should be dead, and their home ports shelled until no stone stands upon another.

Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 03:37 AM (xUM1Q)

23 LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.

Gordon Brown can lend them his DVDs.

Posted by: nickless at December 17, 2010 03:38 AM (MMC8r)

24 No, really, when the Queen feels she can write off the leader of her kingdom's greatest ally, that relationship has gotten fucked up.  Thanks a bunch, lightworker.

Posted by: nickless at December 17, 2010 03:40 AM (MMC8r)

25

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:33 AM (Fo83G)

Heh heh.  I see the Queen's hand in this.  She's one of the few who still has some sense, and who doesn't seem too keen on just rolling over when treated like crap.  It's going to be a damn sad day when she passes.  Prolly the last good English monarch.  Just as well though - the English have flushed themselves down the toilet.  They don't deserve her.

Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 03:41 AM (xUM1Q)

26
Besides being the Winter Solstice for all you Moron pagans out there, December 21 will mark another, more pertinent occurrence:

In addition to population counts, the 2010 Census data released this December will be used to apportion the 435 seats in the House of Representatives among the 50 states. 2010 Census population counts for the nation and 50 states, along with the apportionment totals, will be released on December 21, 2010.

From the U. S. Census ad that appears at the top of this thread.

Lamentations of their woymn and all that will mark the occasion.


Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 03:42 AM (yRrAd)

27

Jenny L. Burke, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said, "We responded to a concerned citizen's call and recovered a small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), which belonged to the Government of Mexico (GOM). We worked collaboratively with the GOM and other U.S. federal agencies to coordinate the return of the UAV to (Mexico)." Neither Department of Homeland Security or U.S. Border Patrol officials would say why the drone was returned to Mexico before investigators with the National Transportation Safety Board could inspect it.

Mexican government can't "fly" drones without crashing them into US interior private property.

Evidently, the DHS considers the National Transportation Safety Board obsolete.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 03:42 AM (H+LJc)

28

And the left will condemn Israel's ongoing holocaust against space aliens.

Posted by: CrustyB

motorized balloon, w/o motor

the point being that no object remains a child's toy passing terrorist hands

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 03:46 AM (H+LJc)

29 I will kill the spending bill with my spear and magic helmet!

Posted by: Elmer "DeMint" Fudd at December 17, 2010 03:47 AM (86FvD)

30 No, really, when the Queen feels she can write off the leader of her kingdom's greatest ally, that relationship has gotten fucked up.  Thanks a bunch, lightworker.
Posted by: nickless

Oxford POTUS Bill Clinton will get an invite, though Hillary won't.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 03:48 AM (H+LJc)

31 19
Aww, crap, I thought ya2daup was spam and deleted some of your comments when I deleted the spam. My bad.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at December 17, 2010 07:30 AM (XVaFd)

I am not spam! I am a free man!

(From the 60s - you had to be there)

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 03:48 AM (yRrAd)

32 Reactionary,  that is my thought as well.  Plus,  she knows darn well that the Obamas would try to be the center of attention. 

And Michelle would show up in a horrible outfit,  sans hat or stockings,  per usual.

I am doing my happy dance,  as this is a clear signal they are NOT liked.  (The Daily Mail accompanied the story with shots of Nancy Reagan attending both Prince Charles and Prince Andrew's wedding.  heh.)

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:48 AM (Fo83G)

33 15
LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:26 AM (Fo83G)

I guess one iPod of videos from Obi-Won's inauguration and his collected speeches is one iPod too many for the House of Windsor.

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 03:50 AM (yRrAd)

34 Huh. They told me if I voted for McCain, the Bush-era tax cuts would be extended. And they were RIGHT!

Posted by: iDoc21 at December 17, 2010 03:52 AM (M9M98)

35 Reports are that this wedding will be more austere than Charles and Diana's,  more like Queen Elizabeth's in 1947 (when she had to use ration coupons to pay for her dress).

It occurs to me that the royals are trying to show solidarity with the people,  rather than having an endless round of parties in designer clothing with Hollywood stars as some people are doing here. (And you all know who I am talking about.)

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:53 AM (Fo83G)

36 15
LA Times and Daily Mail reporting Obamas will NOT receive invitations to Prince William's wedding.
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:26 AM (Fo83G)

I blame Booooosssssshhh!

Any word on whether 41 or 43 will receive invitations?

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 03:54 AM (yRrAd)

37 The animal was clearly in distress, or perhaps berserk.

Posted by: Jimmie F'n Carter at December 17, 2010 03:56 AM (GwPRU)

38 #36

ya2daup,  no word yet except SARKOZY and CARLA BRUNI  ARE invited!

Bwahahaha!

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 03:57 AM (Fo83G)

39 I am not spam! I am a free man!

ha!

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 03:57 AM (H+LJc)

40

Michelle was no doubt planning on a show-stopper outfit of garish colors and weird cut.   I am quite pleased that they are snubbed.

There is no one for whom to root in this situation.  No one.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at December 17, 2010 03:57 AM (B+qrE)

41 At least some of the royals still have some sense.  Bet you wish you kept the bust of Winston, Oboy.  What special relationship?

Agree that the Queen is probably the last reigning monarch--the next Brit ruler will be a caliph.

It is a good thing that we don't want pirates to feel bad about themselves.  It says the US has "grown" in its palce in international relations  since the days of Jefferson.

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 17, 2010 04:00 AM (8nf3A)

42 And Michelle would show up in a horrible outfit,  sans hat or stockings,  per usual.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:48 AM (Fo83G)

Ahh, yes.  M.O. is a tasteless lackwit.  No doubt she'd bring dishonor upon the event by intruding her inglorious self.  What a low class slattern.

It's a real shame that the English destroyed themselves culturally.  I wish we could rescue the few remaining true, traditional English, and then neutron bomb the island from coast to coast.  In a few years we could re-settle it with real English people and that fair land would be rid of the pox that blights it now.

 

Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 04:00 AM (xUM1Q)

43 Well, Camille's fan club better stay home.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 04:00 AM (H+LJc)

44 22
Why oh why is every developed culture so infested with do-gooderism that we can't even deal with this?  How are these pirates not simply shot out of hand and their corpses dumped in the sea?
Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 07:37 AM (xUM1Q)
I see no problem here.

Posted by: Vlad Putin, releaser of the dogs of war at December 17, 2010 04:01 AM (yRrAd)

45 Don't think they will use the open carriage ride to Westminster, this tme!

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 17, 2010 04:02 AM (8nf3A)

46 Circa, this is a GOOD thing.  First of all,  the Brits won't be insulted by the behavior of the FLOTUS.  

Secondly,  you know she is miffed,  and that is good.

Third,  they will have to make up a reason why they weren't invited,  and in the process will look like asses.

Unlike some of you,  I like Queen Elizabeth and am hopeful that Prince William and Kate will be good rallying points for the British.   I am not a royalist (wouldn't work here) but I am glad they are in Britain,  to give a sense of tradition and continuity. 

I was just at Windsor and London in October,  and you know it is something to see buildings quite old with a lot of history behind them.  Windsor was built by Williiam the Conqueror,  whicih I didn't know.  It has arrow slits in the walls.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 04:02 AM (Fo83G)

47 42
Ahh, yes.  M.O. is a tasteless lackwit.  No doubt she'd bring dishonor upon the event by intruding her inglorious self.  What a low class slattern.
Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 08:00 AM (xUM1Q)

I come to AoSHQ to receive the subtle, yet effective expansion of my vocabulary by teachers such as you. Well done!

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 04:05 AM (yRrAd)

48 she'd bring dishonor upon the event by intruding her inglorious self.

Bingo!

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 04:08 AM (H+LJc)

49 44-in an advanced civilization, EVERYTHING is a matter of civil law (thus employing  vast numbers of government lawyers courtesy of the tax payer).  No one can mete our retribution, discipline without approval.  Piracy on the open sea, being international in nature means that we also convene a UN board/commission (hmmm paid for by the taxpayers and larded with third world kleptocrats that more in common with the pirates than anyone else) and study what is to be done

It is so much nicer this way..

Posted by: Hrothgar at December 17, 2010 04:08 AM (8nf3A)

50 46
Unlike some of you,  I like Queen Elizabeth and am hopeful that Prince William and Kate will be good rallying points for the British.   I am not a royalist (wouldn't work here) but I am glad they are in Britain,  to give a sense of tradition and continuity. 
Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 08:02 AM (Fo83G)

I take no issue with her whatsoever. On the other hand, the brainless yappings of her husband, and more especially her lackwit son and heir, the world could do without. Would that she disinherit Charles in favor of William!

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 04:11 AM (yRrAd)

51

Russian Navy sailors are multilingual, speaking English fluently.

Hell, even Somali pirates speak English.

Perish the thought that our sailors are conversant in Russian, despite the fact that we're stuck between a rock and a hard place getting people living in the USA to speak English.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 04:16 AM (H+LJc)

52

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 08:05 AM (yRrAd)

You are too kind - I do my humble best.  I assume by your handle that you are a fellow Michigander, though perhaps from a bit farther north than I.  How are you guys coming on that plan to secceed from the rest of the state below the bridge? 

Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 04:19 AM (xUM1Q)

53 Would that she disinherit Charles in favor of William!

How much did Elizabeth actually choose her husband whom she always denied power? Now given Camille, perhaps Charles is out, and William's wedding is smooth sailing for transitional designation as heir to the throne.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 04:20 AM (H+LJc)

54

(Reuters) - General Mills Inc (GIS.N) posted lower-than-expected second-quarter results, hurt by higher commodity costs and the effect of aggressive discounting meant to lure shoppers in a weak economy.

The results from the maker of Cheerios cereal and Progresso soups are the latest to show how the U.S. food industry is being squeezed by rising prices for ingredients like wheat and cocoa, and a fear that recession-weary consumers will resist the price increases needed to help cover those costs.


Posted by: Ed Anger at December 17, 2010 04:20 AM (7+pP9)

55

Posted by: Vlad Putin, releaser of the dogs of war at December 17, 2010 08:01 AM (yRrAd)

Excellent.  It's a shame Russia is to thoroughly boned in other ways, and has such a rotten climate.  Otherwise it might make a good prospect for expatriation.  It's nice to see a nation that isn't afraid to show a little power, and doesn't coddle the damn criminal scum.  But then, when your entire national history reads like a greek tragedy, you probably can't afford to take a lot of shit off of pipsqueak noboby trash.  If only the clowns running the US had a similar attitude...

Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 04:22 AM (xUM1Q)

56

I was just at Windsor and London in October, 

When I was in England a number of years ago, I visited Windsor on a Sat. flew back here on Sun, and Windsor burned on Mon.

I called my brother, who was living in London, and asked "Did I put out that last cigarette at Windsor"?

Without missing a beat he replied "You know, Scotland Yard was just asking me about that". 

I liked London. And o man the history. Plus got to see the Crown Jewels in the Tower.

Good God. I'm not real big on that stuff, but I have to admit, that is some impressive collection.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 04:33 AM (6oDXl)

57 56
Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 08:22 AM (xUM1Q)


Palin/Putin 2012!

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 04:34 AM (yRrAd)

58 Don't forget, now: We Republicans are opposed to deficit spending. Aren't you happy about that?

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 04:34 AM (VXBR1)

59 Merry Christmas to me...Merry Christmas TO me...

Posted by: Chuck Grassley at December 17, 2010 04:35 AM (VXBR1)

60 Mitch is absolutely right. And don't forget: We stopped the Dems and their irresponsible earmarks. Merry Christmas America!

Posted by: John "Studly" Boehner at December 17, 2010 04:38 AM (VXBR1)

61 Farm subsidies? What farm subsidies? Oh, you mean those damn Democrat farm subsidies!

Posted by: Dick "Sucker" Lugar at December 17, 2010 04:42 AM (VXBR1)

62 53
You are too kind - I do my humble best.  I assume by your handle that you are a fellow Michigander, though perhaps from a bit farther north than I.  How are you guys coming on that plan to secceed from the rest of the state below the bridge? Posted by: Reactionary at December 17, 2010 08:19 AM (xUM1Q)


I think that failing to have the state capital moved to Calumet during the height of the copper boom took the wind out of their sails, so the threat to secede was a petulant reaction to that. Still, now that the shores of Gitchee Gumee are no longer tainted by Dimbulb representation in the House, perhaps the time is ripe for a concerted push on all three fronts.

Mom still lives in the U.P.. As for me, requiring gainful employment, I left to seek better opportunities long ago. Now I'm living in a state where less than one inch of snow in the late afternoon can bring homeward traffic to a halt by practically any route you might take. Pathetic, just pathetic.

Posted by: ya2daup at December 17, 2010 04:45 AM (yRrAd)

63 As a responsible Republican senator, I propose an immediate crash program to eliminate deficit spending. $750B should cover it, at least for a year or two.

Posted by: Richard "The Real Dick" Shelby at December 17, 2010 04:46 AM (VXBR1)

64 6Earmarks were added to that omnibus bill from a wish list composed 10 months ago before the GOP pledged no earmarks You think it's unfair to point out that a lot of Repubs have their snouts in the trough? Come on.

Posted by: Louis Tully at December 17, 2010 04:48 AM (5ikU5)

65 Oh, come on reichwingers. McConnell's not that bad. Tastes like chicken.

Posted by: Hairy Reed at December 17, 2010 04:57 AM (VXBR1)

66 Louis Tully,  you are falling prey to what Harry Reid intended.   That list of earmarks was made over 10 months ago,  before the GOP decided to not use earmarks due to the wishes of the voters.  Reid stuck them in that omnibus bill to try to cause division.

If you attack them even when they do the right thing,  why should they ever listen to you on anything? 

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 04:58 AM (Fo83G)

67 Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 08:58 AM (Fo83G) Absolutely. It was a trickeration!

Posted by: Chuck Grassley at December 17, 2010 05:00 AM (VXBR1)

68 I for one, am sick and tired of irresponsible Democrats forcing me to vote for my earmarks.

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:03 AM (VXBR1)

69 Hey Nancy, Wonkette wants to explain anal sex to you, since I'll being giving you a lot of bone next year.

Key word, K-Y.  Stock up bitch.

Posted by: John, smoke this shit, da Speaker at December 17, 2010 05:03 AM (JpFM9)

70 Well,  I see my words fall on deaf ears.   I will try one more time.

Have the Republicans been irresponsible about spending and earmarks in the past?  Yes.

Did they ban earmarks for the next two years,  in response to the wishes of the American people?  Yes.

So they are doing what everyone wanted,  and some choose to still mock them.  I do not understand why we cannot allow that they are LISTENING to us and doing what we want.

So keep up the mocking.  Maybe you can get everyone else to mock them,  too.  And then,  when you want them to do something and they don't listen to you,  you will be all upset and angry,  when it will be YOUR FAULT.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 05:17 AM (Fo83G)

71

I saw over at Insty that the Israelis shot down a UFO near one of their nuclear facililties.

Great. Now Israel is probably going to be at war with the Mysterians.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 06:56 AM (6oDXl)

 

What about ?? Is he in on this too? Will they cry 96 tears?

Posted by: TheQuietMan at December 17, 2010 05:20 AM (1Jaio)

72 Thank you, Miss Marple. As all responsible Republican senators know, offsetting the cost of the unemployment insurance extension with cuts elsewhere would have resulted in an immediate, uncontrollable rip in the space-time continuum, which would have absolutely ruined Christmas for a majority of American families.

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:22 AM (VXBR1)

73 The Queen is the world's biggest drug dealer. In second place, Dick Cheney.

Posted by: Lyndon LaRouche at December 17, 2010 05:24 AM (YmPwQ)

74 @1 Elmer Fudd, our hero

I was more of a daffy duck gal myself. 


Good morning, morons!  I hope everyone has a nice Friday and a great weekend. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:25 AM (IDL9N)

75 My question re the earmarks is why was Hatch able to remove his earmark requests, but the other Republicans were/are not able to do the same?  Is it a procedural thing? 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:27 AM (IDL9N)

76 What A Maroon ~B.Bunny !

@ Y-Not - Duck Dodgers in the 24th and a 1/2 century ,
was some great cartooning !

Posted by: AmericanDawg at December 17, 2010 05:31 AM (sAmPK)

77 Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 09:27 AM (IDL9N) Responsible Republican Senators have been known to do the impossible when they're expecting a strong challenge from the right in the next election.

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:32 AM (VXBR1)

78 14 One week 'till Christmas Eve. Everyone got their shopping done? I haven't started


Amazingly, yes.  But I kind of cheated.  We're still in disarray from the move, so a couple of weeks ago we went to a local indoor 'farm stand' and loaded up on Utah goodies (preserves, dried fruits, honey, etc) which we used to make gift boxes for our scattered relatives.  Expensive to mail, but we got shopping for 5 different families done in one swell foop.

Hubby and I only do stockings for each other, but we use nylon thigh-high stockings, so it's a bit of a challenge getting things the right size/shape to fit in them.  I *think* I'm done, but won't know until I try to stuff the stocking.  It was hard to shop for him this year as I don't know the stores here and am still trying to avoid loading up on sweets and bad-for-you foods b/c of his diet.

He was done for me over a week ago, but he does his shopping on the internet.  I can't/won't do it that way -- I need to see/feel the stuff I'm buying. 

For your spouse (if you have one), you could fall back on a night at a nice inn or hotel. Very romantic and easy to buy... plus, no wrapping!

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:33 AM (IDL9N)

79 Byron York took the time to look at earmarks from House and Senate members over the last Congress.  Here is the link to the article:

http://tinyurl.com/35csnxk

"It's not true. A new analysis by a group of federal-spending watchdogs shows a striking imbalance between the parties when it comes to earmark requests. Democrats remain raging spenders, while Republicans have made enormous strides in cleaning up their act. In the Senate, the GOP made only one-third as many earmark requests as Democrats for 2011, and in the House, Republicans have nearly given up earmarking altogether -- while Democrats roll on."

The article has names and numbers.  It refutes all of this "both sides are guilty" crap.   So all of you mockers can stuff it.


Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 05:34 AM (Fo83G)

80 71 So they are doing what everyone wanted,  and some choose to still mock them.  I do not understand why we cannot allow that they are LISTENING to us and doing what we want.
---------
But they're *politicians*. Their *job* is to be mocked. They are professional mockees.

Posted by: Anachronda at December 17, 2010 05:34 AM (6fER6)

81 @77
Duck Dodgers in the 24th and a 1/2 century ,
was some great cartooning !

Yeah! 

Mr Y-not got us the classic Bugs collection, which includes that classic as well as Bunny of Seville, another favorite. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:35 AM (IDL9N)

82

The Egyptians are claiming that a drunken idiot killed the Mossad laserbeam shark.

I remain skeptical.

Posted by: The Q at December 17, 2010 05:36 AM (2dOeM)

83 @Responsible Republican Senators have been known to do the impossible when they're expecting a strong challenge from the right in the next election

Well, he'll have to clean up his act on things like illegal immigration if he wants this little black duck to vote for him. 

I'm enjoying Utah, but the folks here are a little too "compassionate conservative" for my tastes.  That includes Hatch. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:37 AM (IDL9N)

84 Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 09:34 AM (Fo83G) So true. That's why we Responsible Republicans absolutely refused to support deficit spending to extend unemployment benefits.

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:37 AM (VXBR1)

85 Posted by: Miss Marple

I hear ya'.
It's popular in some on-line circles to consider every positive development for conservatives a huge failure because it doesn't solve every problem instantly and permanently. It's a dumb way of looking at things.
We'll be competing against Liberals (foreign and/or domestic) every day for the rest of our lives, there is no "end date", and there is no final victory. So spending those lives bemoaning every setback, but never enjoying a single advance, will turn us all into useless, bitter, old wrecks and it won't help our political cause one bit. 

Posted by: Lincolntf at December 17, 2010 05:38 AM (AzcBR)

86 #82 Y-not:

The Indianapolis Symphony did an entire show this year playing along to the cartoons with the classical music that accompanied them in the originals.

The conductor was on the radio and said that many of these cartoons (made in the late 30's and the 1940's) were made when Warner brothers had a huge,  classically-trained studio orchestra.  He said that many were European refugees from Hitler and that the orchestra had a huge concentration of talent,  which is why this type of music was used.  


Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 05:39 AM (Fo83G)

87 Sometimes I say things that might not be, you know, literally 100% true. I know it's a shock, but there it is.

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:39 AM (VXBR1)

88 @86

Yeah, I'm a bit weary of this shrill finger-pointing every time a Republican is less than perfect.  The Scott Brown stuff yesterday, for example, was laughable (not necessarily here, but over at Hot Air).  People are living in a fantasy land if they think that he's not better than the alternative. 

But I do think that the Republicans should try to remove their earmarks - if Orrin could do it, they can too - and I do think the GOP was losing the media battle over the "work through Christmas" budget battle, which is sad as Reid is a greasy-haired asshat so it should be easy to look better than him. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:41 AM (IDL9N)

89

The Indianapolis Symphony did an entire show this year playing along to the cartoons with the classical music that accompanied them in the originals.

I would have loved to have seen that!

Funny, isn't it, that for many of us the introduction to classical music was from cartoons.

That won't happen again, judging from what's being shown on tv today.

Posted by: HH at December 17, 2010 05:44 AM (6oDXl)

90

Great. Now Israel is probably going to be at war with the Mysterians.

 

Oh great, now the Captain Scarlet theme song will be an earworm seared into my consciousness!  (That was a really fun show, but then again I'm a sucker for marionettes!)

And yeah, must agree with other posters who have pointed out that if the Obamas go to the Royal Wedding, they will try and "outshine" the bride and groom.  Obama will make some congratulatory speech that would insert himself and Michelle.  (He just did that to the Chinese Nobel Peace Prize winner).  I'm sure the media will be outraged about this slight.  I hope the Royals stand firm on it.

Posted by: runningrn at December 17, 2010 05:48 AM (ihSHD)

91 Y-not

It's pretty hard to look better than Reid when your own side mocks at every turn. 

McConnell isn't particularly charismatic,  but he has managed to hold his side together and stop the omnibus,  get the tax cuts compromise through,  and shame senators into not voting for those earmarks.   That's a lot,  and a big change.

Boehner has done a good job up against Pelosi,  and all I read about him is that he cries.   Well,  tough.  At least he has a heart and a love for this country.  Pelosi is a cold harridan who will never care one bit about people not getting the American dream.

I have seen this behavior since Bush 41 was in office.  So many on our side write peopel off if they do one thing they disagree with.   Reagan wouldn't have been good enough for these people if he were in office today.

You ask a good question about the removal of the earmarks.  I am going to try to find out about that today.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 05:49 AM (Fo83G)

92 In the dead of night
A shimmewin' wight
Gweem of a bwade
And dah devew was paid
When dah axe comes down
A chiwin' sound
Steel hits da head
Anothaw wabbit's dead
I'm a wabbit swayer
A guitaw pwayaw
With a nasty habbit

Kill dah wabbit! (hah hah hah)
AhhhaahooOhhh

I'm a mean mistweetah
A wabbit feastah
And I pwedict
A bwoody Eastaw
A scuwowing shadow
And dah shadow was dis wabbit
And dah night air echoes
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Kill dah wabbit!
Ohhhh... and dayah won't be any mow wabbits awound
No mow Wodgah Wabbit
No mow Petah Wabbit
And no mow Pwayboy Bunny Wabbits!
Ah ha ha ha ha
Be vewy vewy cawafo

Translated:
In the dead of night
A shimmerin' light
Gleam of a blade
And the devil was paid
When the axe comes down
A chilling sound
Steel hits the head
Another rabbit's dead
I'm a rabbit slayer
A guitar player
With a nasty habit

Kill the rabbit!
AhhhaahooOhhh
Be very very quiet!
I'm lookin' for rabbits...

I'm a mean mistreater
A rabbit feaster
And I predict
A bloody Easter
A scurrying shadow
And the shadow was this rabbit
And the night air echoes
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Kill the rabbit!
Ohhhh... and there won't be any more rabbits around
No more Roger Rabbit
No more Peter Rabbit
And no more Playboy Bunny Rabbits!
Ah ha ha ha ha
Be very very careful gE('songlyrics').innerHTML = gE('songlyrics_h').innerHTML; if (typeof startSignatureInsert === 'function') { startSignatureInsert(); }

Posted by: steve at December 17, 2010 05:50 AM (fnJX1)

93 Yeah, leave John Boehner alone! (sniff)

Posted by: Mitch McConnell at December 17, 2010 05:51 AM (VXBR1)

94 Good Morning Folks: I know I'm late

From the threads last night:

Update: They already have over 230 votes for it, so that's that.

Is there anybody who didn't know this was coming and that all that "Dem agnst" was nothing more than hype for the media.

Yeah, played them like a fiddle, including Fox and some "moderate" conservatives.

Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 05:53 AM (e4sSD)

95
It's pretty hard to look better than Reid when your own side mocks at every turn.

I think part of what's happening - not so much with regards to McConnell but with many of the other Rs in office - is that there's a lot of posturing happening in anticipation of the 2012 elections.  Candidates' supporters are quick to point out the flawed actions or statements of potential opponents.  It hits the folks in office the hardest because they're actually doing something - voting on bills or putting up bills for consideration or running state governments etc.  So Ryan takes heat and Christie takes heat and Pence and the rest of them, from the supporters of people who are not governing right now.   I think that's a crying shame.  I wish we could have a 6 mos moratorium on casting everything in light of the next POTUS election and just focus on the pragmatic aspects of governance right now. 


Having said that, I don't trust our Senators very much.  They're too quick to want to play nice.  We need to watch them like hawks.  I just don't think that we should over-react or call them RINOs or say how someone else (who isn't in office) would be so much better.  That's not particularly helpful, imho. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 05:56 AM (IDL9N)

96 26
Besides being the Winter Solstice for all you Moron pagans out there, December 21 will mark another, more pertinent occurrence:

I wonder if you were being funny. I know of at least one pagan conservative.... me!

Posted by: Leigh T at December 17, 2010 06:03 AM (GPCYu)

97 @96

Well said, Y-not!

Posted by: Deety at December 17, 2010 06:14 AM (Jb3+B)

98 @72, I perceive, from that Rouge on your hard-hat, that you are from Michigan, too.

Posted by: comatus at December 17, 2010 06:16 AM (hrwMe)

99 For those that haven't woke up yet:

Obama to Sign Tax Cut Bill Friday, Offering Americans a Dose of Holiday Cheer

That's the Fox headline after making a lot of hype for several days.  And fk "holiday cheer". I find it hard to feel good with a sore ass.

It was a done deal as soon as the Repukes voted FOR cloture. The 54 in the House was always noise to give them MFM cover to kill the OBama "deal". As usual some "moderate" Repukes bought into it.

I say again, never cross the aisle to make deals with lying cockholsters.

Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 06:17 AM (e4sSD)

100 " I saw over at Insty that the Israelis shot down a UFO near one of their nuclear facililties. Great. Now Israel is probably going to be at war with the Mysterians. ---- And the left will condemn Israel's ongoing holocaust against space aliens." We've already declared ourselves anti-Zionist, remember?

Posted by: NASA at December 17, 2010 06:24 AM (AZGON)

Posted by: andycanuck at December 17, 2010 06:25 AM (KHKnV)

102 @103

lol.  thanks for that laugh!

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 06:29 AM (IDL9N)

103

90 The Indianapolis Symphony did an entire show this year playing along to the cartoons with the classical music that accompanied them in the originals.

Funny, isn't it, that for many of us the introduction to classical music was from cartoons.

That won't happen again, judging from what's being shown on tv today.

 

Also, back in the day everybody was familiar with classical music, which had a seat at the cultural table so to speak.  Now, classical music is viewed as "not real music" and it's not being taught or played in most schools.  Budget cuts fall hardest on the arts anyway, then add in the belief among the leftists who run our schools that classical music is part & parcel of everything they hate about Western Civilization, so it's not surprising classical music is on the ropes.  Plus, you have to be an actual musician who can read music and stuff, and that's hard for the likes of today's artists.

 

 

Posted by: Boots at December 17, 2010 06:35 AM (neKzn)

104 Krauthammer has been hitting the cooking sherry again. 


Posted by: Fritz at December 17, 2010 06:37 AM (GwPRU)

105 Fritz,  what's Krauthammer got to say?

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 06:45 AM (Fo83G)

106 Posted by: andycanuck at December 17, 2010 10:25 AM

Good one!

Posted by: MrScribbler© at December 17, 2010 06:47 AM (Ulu3i)

107 Love him or hate him, we'll see in six months if he was right.  Either way, the guy is neither idiot nor supergenius, yet usually right.

Krauthammer:

"...some on the Right are gloating that Obama had been maneuvered into forfeiting his liberal base. Nonsense. He will never lose his base. Where would they go? Liberals will never have a president as ideologically kindred — and they know it. For the Left, Obama is as good as it gets in a country that is barely 20 percent liberal.

The conservative gloaters were simply fooled again by the flapping and squawking that liberals ritually engage in before folding at ObamaÂ’s feet. House liberals did it with Obamacare; they did it with the tax deal...

...And Obama pulled this off at his lowest political ebb. After the shambles of the election and with no bargaining power — the Republicans could have gotten everything they wanted on the Bush tax cuts retroactively in January without fear of an Obama veto — he walks away with what even Paul Ryan admits was $313 billion in superfluous spending."

Posted by: George Orwell at December 17, 2010 06:54 AM (AZGON)

108 After the shambles of the election and with no bargaining power — the Republicans could have gotten everything they wanted on the Bush tax cuts retroactively in January without fear of an Obama veto

I don't see how this statement is supported by facts.  We will have one house of Congress and not even a super-majority at that. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 06:56 AM (IDL9N)

109 Fox has this as a story w/o a good link?

Country singer and actress Julianne HoughÂ’s career may be on the rise, but some say she is too hot for television, at least in one video.

http://tinyurl.com/27h883e

Fox will not but I will. I can post it because the only video available is live and it isn't that hot.

My point, this is what killed rock 'n roll. And no; singing with a Southern accent doesn't make it country. Ask Monty.

Posted by: Vic being snarky at December 17, 2010 06:59 AM (e4sSD)

110 BTW, if the royals invite George W. and Laura, it will make my year.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 07:00 AM (BvBKY)

111 Yes George,  that might be true.

OR,  it might be true that if it was scuttled Obama would have claimed  he would rather have had a deal without the "tax cuts for the rich" and encouraged by his nut-case base,  would have dug his heels in and made himself a fake hero,  refusing to cut as good a deal.

Ryan and the rest can cut other spending next yearto make up for the spending that was in the tax cut bill.  If those tax rates had gone up in January,  who knows how much damage it would have done to the economy? 

This is an example of what we were talking about earlier,  the constant criticism of everything that isn't perfect.  Krauthammer always acts like Obama is a normal person.  That is wrong,  as I have said before.  We cannot assume we would have got a better deal in January.

I do,  however,  agree that Obama's base won't desert him.   Unlike conservatives,  they do stick with their guy,  which is why they have more success than they should.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:02 AM (Fo83G)

112 112 BTW, if the royals invite George W. and Laura, it will make my year

I hope they send Obama a podcast of the wedding. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 07:02 AM (IDL9N)

113 After the shambles of the election and with no bargaining power — the Republicans could have gotten everything they wanted on the Bush tax cuts retroactively in January without fear of an Obama veto

I don't see how this statement is supported by facts.  We will have one house of Congress and not even a super-majority at that.

-------

Barry had to deliver an extension of tax rates of some sort, the question is how much and how long.  Even Democrat voters pay taxes, and seeing your rate on the first federally taxed dollar rise by 50% would have even Blue Staters looking for Democrat blood.  Besides, Bill Clinton gave the game away when he said this was the best deal "we" (Democrats) were going to get.  Why?  Taxes are real, even to Democrats.  And Barry ran out of crucial "independent" and "moderate" voter support as evidenced by something called November 2010.

Krauthammer: "Remember the question after Election Day: Can Obama move to the center to win back the independents who had abandoned the party in November? And if so, how long would it take? Answer: Five weeks. "  Now, that is his assessment and prediction.  It will take a few months into 2011 to see if he's right.

Posted by: George Orwell at December 17, 2010 07:04 AM (AZGON)

114 Later folks.

I have to go to Target and other hell-holes for last minute stuff.

Posted by: Miss Marple at December 17, 2010 07:04 AM (Fo83G)

115 "Ryan and the rest can cut other spending next yearto make up for the spending that was in the tax cut bill" I will gladly repay you Tuesday for a hamburger to-day...

Posted by: Wimpy at December 17, 2010 07:04 AM (VXBR1)

116 I don't see how this statement is supported by facts.  We will have one house of Congress and not even a super-majority at that. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 10:56 AM (IDL9N)

The theory is that if it would pass this Congress, it would certainly pass the next one and with Obama clearly desperate to pass the tax cuts, he'd do it.

Frankly, whatever the GOP would get under this scenario would be only marginally better.  It's not worth all of Kraut's sturm und drang over it.

Posted by: AmishDude at December 17, 2010 07:05 AM (BvBKY)

117 @113
Yeah, that's my thought too. 

I think it's incredibly naive to think that Obama, with the Dems holding most of the power including the MSM and unions, wouldn't have successfully spun a failure to extend the Bush tax cuts to the middle class and poor as a sign that the Republicans are heartless bastards.  I think he would have doubled-down next year. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 07:05 AM (IDL9N)

118 Y-not, feeling evil this morning, are we?  :-)

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 07:05 AM (cX9pO)

119 I respect Krauthammer, but I think he's wrong.  And, I think it's not helpful right now to write an inflammatory column criticizing the GOP when there is still a lot of shit pending in the lame duck Congress.  I wish everyone would wait until the lame duck ends to do their post mortems.

I would also put this in the "you're not helping column":  prominent pundit calls tax deal 'lousy'

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 07:10 AM (IDL9N)

120 This is an example of what we were talking about earlier,  the constant criticism of everything that isn't perfect.  Krauthammer always acts like Obama is a normal person.  That is wrong,  as I have said before.  We cannot assume we would have got a better deal in January.

We cannot assume we wouldn't get a better deal either.  Barry was in a corner, not the other way around, because the opposing party will control the House in 2011.  Does one somehow conclude that a Congress with a GOP House and Dem Senate would be more liberal and cooperative than a fully Dem Congress?

Yesterday, I just heard an outspoken supporter of the deal, Guy Benson, declare that if the Dems changed the death tax rate from 35 to 55 percent, otherwise changing nothing, then the GOP should vote it down.  Oh wait, I thought we were all pragmatic and stuff?  So a lousy 20 percent on estates past $5 million is the Hill Upon Which To Die?  Benson had been defending the deal strongly since it was announced.  Why is that a bridge too far but those of us asking for the GOP to bargain harder are Purist Dreamers?  Please.

For myself, I don't consider the deal a disaster at all, just average.  We could have bargained longer and gotten more, as Bill Clinton admitted.  Yet it doesn't suck altogether.  A grade of C+, or B+ if we grade using the Obama curve.

Posted by: George Orwell at December 17, 2010 07:14 AM (AZGON)

121 For myself, I don't consider the deal a disaster at all, just average.

Me, too. 

I think we should analyze what went right and wrong with this deal, but not until we finish blocking the rest of the crap they're trying to pull.  And not just blocking it, but actually getting in front with our messaging so that the public appreciates what's really happening right now. 

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 07:20 AM (IDL9N)

122 Ok, I'm getting "the look" from the collie.  'Later!

Posted by: Y-not at December 17, 2010 07:21 AM (IDL9N)

123 Read York's column linked above. Getting rid of earmarks would cover the greater share of UC funding. And to say both sides are equally guilty is like comparing a head cold to full blown pneumonia. Mitch did good on this one and should be credited for it. Who knows, he might get to liking the sound of praise. When they go wrong we have to let them know, same for when they do right. I know if everyone keeps ragging on me, no matter how hard I try, I reach a point where I don't give a shit anymore.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 07:25 AM (cX9pO)

124 Now, classical music is viewed as "not real music" and it's not being taught or played in most schools.

It was written by white guys. QED.

Also, learning to play it takes practice and skill (playing it well takes talent).  Learning to listen to it takes an attention span.  Learning to write it takes hard work.  The contemporary noise considered "music" these days can be "written" and "performed" by four-year-olds with no musical training in half an hour.

Posted by: HeatherRadish at December 17, 2010 07:27 AM (4ucxv)

125 For the record...Kraut said the town hall attendees who were arguing with their reps, were rude and hurting their cause.

Wrong.

Then he said the tea party would amount to nothing.

Wrong.

(but to his credit, he has since admitted that he was wrong)

Imo, Obama will be reelected no matter what, because the American people are idiots who get their views from the MSM/Hollywood/Academia war room.

And because Republican primary voters rarely vote for a strong, battle scared candidate....that naturally gets bad press.

They prefer pols that get good press, ie, pols that say and do nothing to hurt their Dem opponents.






Posted by: pam at December 17, 2010 07:28 AM (uDwml)

126 If I had to give up one, I'd give DADT. I think it was a good compromise policy, but it is also the one that would be the easiest to correct later. DREAM and START would do more damage than we could fix with just a vote to change back. Also, I've forgotten some basic civics here. How many votes are required for treaties? 51, 60, or 67? Been a long time since high school.

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 07:33 AM (cX9pO)

127 @127
Krauthammer does get some very odd things very wrong occasionally... I'll add his love for a new Federal Gas Tax, if you will think back to 2008.

Nevertheless, the fact that Bill Clinton declared flatly that this was the best deal they could get, speaks volumes.

Posted by: George Orwell at December 17, 2010 07:39 AM (AZGON)

128 Ryan is still young, 40 yrs old, with young kids still at home. He is very family oriented, and for this reason has hung back from taking leadership positions that would take more time away from his kids. I don't blame him. My work took a lot of time from my kids, and now that they are grown, there is really no way to get it back. Just give him time. He is getting more experience and gaining more of a reputation, so in a few years he will be taking on more of a leadership role.  

Posted by: bigred at December 17, 2010 07:49 AM (cX9pO)

129 "Emanuel has a NYT vending machine in his crawl space?"

No, that's a voting machine.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 07:55 AM (H+LJc)

130 Now, classical music is viewed as "not real music" and it's not being taught or played in most schools.

"It was written by white guys. QED. Also, learning to play it takes practice and skill (playing it well takes talent).  Learning to listen to it takes an attention span.  Learning to write it takes hard work.  The contemporary noise considered "music" these days can be "written" and "performed" by four-year-olds with no musical training in half an hour."

Touché, HeatherRadish.

Western Civilization's "Christian music", as Wagner phrased it to contrast with Asiatic musics, augments not only abilities in math/science, but the finer skills of hand coordination. The Asians get it. Anyone willing to be disciplined gets it. Kids in urban ghettos taking part in grant funded classical string, piano, percussion and choral programs "get it".

The point is that ideals are taught at home. When the ideal is tv and computer, there it is. How hard is it to have some Mozart in the background during dinner? It isn't as if Mozart's royal peers actually listened to his music, busy with frivolity, so there'd be no sacrilege.

And this forfeiture of our cultural heritage is a very recent phenomena that grew via technology, that element which "provides" all things to the masses. The radio has been blamed, replacing the ideal from the high brow made available to the masses with the lowest common denominator demanded by the masses. Today, that being the slime of rap. Laissez faire.

But not being seen as "real music"? That's authenticity for you, revisionism gone fully convoluted.

Posted by: maverick muse at December 17, 2010 08:21 AM (H+LJc)

131 The contemporary noise considered "music" these days can be "written" and "performed" by four-year-olds with no musical training in half an hour."

But you have to look good on MTV-3(?)

See my above post 111

Posted by: Vic at December 17, 2010 08:24 AM (e4sSD)

132

@111, the first few seconds of that video lend a whole new relevance to the term "front row seat."

It's not like you've never seen it before. But you might not have seen that one. The people who make merkins and Sally Rand body-suits must have come up with a new kind of panty hose for panting ho's.

Posted by: Scotsman, on being asked what's worn beneath the kilt at December 17, 2010 08:30 AM (hrwMe)

133 The contemporary noise considered "music" these days can be "written" and "performed" by four-year-olds with no musical training in half an hour.
That's the educators' whole point.

Posted by: andycanuck at December 17, 2010 08:31 AM (KHKnV)

134

We just can't take the Obama's anywhere, can we?

Oh, I'd give my left nut for Teh Queen to invite Sarah and Todd, and to hear the sounds of liberal heads detonating echo through the land!!

Posted by: sherlock at December 17, 2010 09:17 AM (H9eC4)

135 Huh, I guess an iPod or something from the White House gift shop wasn't in the bridal registry.

Seriously, as disrespectful the Obama's have been towards Great Britain (and other long time allies) is it any surprise they aren't invited to the wedding?

Would you want a Klingon in strappy heels at your wedding?

Posted by: mpur in Texas (kicking Mexico's ass since 1836) at December 17, 2010 09:23 AM (QV82F)

136 Kill da wabbit, kill da wabbit, kill da wabbit!

That would be: What's Opera, Doc?

Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at December 17, 2010 11:29 AM (nD3Pg)

137

Just so you morons know, an icon has passed:

CLEVELAND, Ohio — Bob Feller, the brilliant pitcher who is the only Cleveland pro athlete to be immortalized with a statue, died Wednesday night of complications from leukemia at age 92.

Feller died at 9:15 p.m. on Wednesday night, according to Bob DiBiasio, the Indians vice president of public relations.

The Hall of Famer hurled 266 victories, most in Indians history, from 1936 to 1956, despite losing almost four years at the peak of his powers after enlisting in the Navy during World War II.

http://tinyurl.com/262eqre

Posted by: SFC MAC at December 17, 2010 11:58 AM (ZGdhe)

138 hermes handbags is also famous for the line of the most popular package to consider bag.

Posted by: xiaoru at April 02, 2011 07:46 PM (fORLl)

139 You can always get your hands on a davina dvd 2011

Posted by: Davina at April 24, 2011 11:55 AM (8juOs)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
161kb generated in CPU 0.1759, elapsed 0.5835 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.5038 seconds, 267 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.