February 24, 2010
— Gabriel Malor
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
04:59 AM
| Comments (60)
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
More important, he says insurers made $12.2 billion in profit last year. That's about $42 when divided by 300 million Americans.
Does anyone believe that government-run healthcare would cost less than $42 in overhead per-person? Or that more regulation would lower that cost below $42/person.
Thanks little Robert for making out point.
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 05:06 AM (flcpl)
Posted by: Dr. Amy. Bishop. at February 24, 2010 05:06 AM (wgLRl)
Posted by: J Stack at February 24, 2010 05:07 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: John McLane at February 24, 2010 05:08 AM (9MgYG)
Thanks little Robert for making out point.
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 09:06 AM (flcpl)
You need to do that math using just the people those companies actually ensure. You'll get a bigger number, but it will still be less than the government will be able to manage.
Posted by: A Balrog of Morgoth at February 24, 2010 05:08 AM (wgLRl)
So today, they are going to beat the crap out of a man who runs a company that directly or indirectly employs over 250,000 Americans.
Brilliant.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 24, 2010 05:09 AM (KgFXK)
"I was talking to a friend of mine’s little girl the other day. I asked her what she wanted to be when she grew up and she replied, “I want to be President!” Both of her parents are liberal Democrats and were standing there. So then I asked her, “If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?”
She replied, “I’d give houses to all the homeless people.”
“Wow - what a worthy goal.” I told her, “You don’t have to wait until you’re President to do that. You can come over to my house and mow, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I’ll pay you $50. Then I’ll take you over to the grocery store where this homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward a new house.”
Since she is only 6, she thought that over for a few seconds. “Why doesn’t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?”
And I said, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”
Her folks still aren’t talking to me.“
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 24, 2010 05:09 AM (IfMnA)
Thing "The One" will serve beer?
Enjoy your global warmer blue states!
Posted by: Kemp at February 24, 2010 05:12 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 09:06 AM (flcpl)
Also, their stocks are owned by many tens of millions of Americans in their IRAs and portfolios. We better hope they make a nice profit.
Posted by: TexasJew at February 24, 2010 05:12 AM (KgFXK)
The "New Exceptionalism"
Posted by: Neo at February 24, 2010 05:13 AM (tE8FB)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 24, 2010 05:13 AM (Oan2w)
Posted by: Vet_Missing_Parts at February 24, 2010 05:14 AM (MCHyX)
Dilemma:
Do I continue to cut off a Prius whenever I see one or do I let them in so that they are in front of me and not behind me when they violently accelerate?
Posted by: dagny at February 24, 2010 05:14 AM (NjAB3)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 24, 2010 05:15 AM (Vo2Ef)
I like:
I’m going with a new one. Not sure if it’ll stick, but I like it still the same. Leftist Activist Media Boobs, or LAMBS. I would call them sheep, but sheep are more mature and tend to be independent. “Lambs” seems much more appropriate.
From Ron Futrell at BigJournalism.
But I'd change it to B for Bozos, because nobody 'round here thinks his B-word is a bad thing.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 24, 2010 05:15 AM (Be4xl)
Posted by: kelley in virginia at February 24, 2010 05:16 AM (Oan2w)
I've seen these before. Study examining public's acceptance of scientific consensus. What I'd missed was before - 52% of scientist are self described liberals as opposed to 9% conservative.
http://tiny.cc/ZQuI7
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 24, 2010 05:17 AM (ucq49)
Dilemma:
Do I continue to cut off a Prius whenever I see one or do I let them in so that they are in front of me and not behind me when they violently accelerate?
Posted by: dagny at February 24, 2010 09:14 AM (NjAB3)
A violently accellerating Prius? That's funny dagny
Posted by: robtr at February 24, 2010 05:18 AM (fwSHf)
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 05:19 AM (flcpl)
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 05:20 AM (flcpl)
A violently accellerating Prius? That's funny dagny
Hey, I'm in DC metro. Violently accelerating is 20 mph.
Posted by: dagny at February 24, 2010 05:21 AM (NjAB3)
Congresscritter: Why on earth would we do that?
Toyoda: You're owners of my direct competitors. Or didn't your business educations teach you that?
Congresscritter: uhh uhh
I can dream can't I?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 24, 2010 05:22 AM (erIg9)
More important, he says insurers made $12.2 billion in profit last year. That's about $42 when divided by 300 million Americans.
Yes, the liberals hate profit. What they don't say is that the average hea;th insurance company makes about 3.5% profit. That is one of the lowest profit margins of any buisness sector.
They even were complaining about BCCS on another thread a few days ago. BCBS is non-profit!
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2010 05:23 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: maddogg at February 24, 2010 05:23 AM (OlN4e)
Upon repeat viewing last night, I am upgrading my description of Leonard Nimoy's dentures in the Star Trek reboot from "distracting" to "alarming."
Now back to your regularly scheduled thread.
Posted by: Bat Chain Puller at February 24, 2010 05:24 AM (SCcgT)
Hey, but if they get what they want they will reduce that average profit to 0% and they will all go out of buiness and the onnly thing left will be government.
All things government are always high cost, low value, but they are non-profit!
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2010 05:24 AM (QrA9E)
For years, the Democrats have been saying that the Republicans are in bed with big business.
It's all smoke, mirrors and balony.
To get their contributions, Democrats are now providing socialism for the rich and for big business, and to get their votes, Democrats are providing socialism for the poor ....., and again, the middle class gets the shaft, paying for the government handouts that are given to the poor and to the rich..
Posted by: Some get it, some don't at February 24, 2010 05:24 AM (ITzbJ)
So today, they are going to beat the crap out of a man who runs a company that directly or indirectly employs over 250,000 Americans.
When Obama said he was going to focus on jobs, you didn't believe he meant CREATING them, did you?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 24, 2010 05:26 AM (mR7mk)
What's the margin on their buddies in Hollywood?
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 24, 2010 05:28 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: cbullitt at February 24, 2010 05:28 AM (M/WbE)
Dilemma:
Do I continue to cut off a Prius whenever I see one or do I let them in so that they are in front of me and not behind me when they violently accelerate?
Personally, I think Prius drivers deserve their fate, as long as they don't take any of us with them.
Posted by: maddogg at February 24, 2010 05:28 AM (OlN4e)
is that wrong of me?
Posted by: Unclefacts, Summoner of Meteors, and Buckets of Scorn for the Left at February 24, 2010 05:31 AM (erIg9)
That was too funny....we need to put warning notices on these kinds of posts lol
Posted by: curious at February 24, 2010 05:35 AM (p302b)
What's the margin on their buddies in Hollywood?
LOL, didn't you know NO MOVIE ever makes a profit in Hollywood?
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2010 05:35 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: robtr at February 24, 2010 05:36 AM (fwSHf)
Have a friend who put in money for a film as part of a "syndicate"> Let's just say he got his money back at least twice over.
Posted by: curious at February 24, 2010 05:37 AM (p302b)
"A +5 Holy Avenger Ax."
Posted by: Looking Glass at February 24, 2010 05:41 AM (IfMnA)
Posted by: FreakyBoy at February 24, 2010 05:50 AM (Q41Zh)
Posted by: the graveyard at February 24, 2010 06:02 AM (PD1tk)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 24, 2010 09:28 AM (mR7mk)
Bingo! Those Hollywood clowns live in mansions, have private jets, a fleet of cars etc. yet they are the ones demanding more socialism as long as it doesn't affect them and their tax shelters. Let's tax those fat cats to the tune of 95% just to make everything fair of course.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at February 24, 2010 06:08 AM (1Jaio)
"Happy Birthday to Herr Morgenholz, officially old today."
Don't worry, Herr. Just remember: When you get too old to cut the mustard, you can still lick the jar.
Posted by: yllw stained mouth at February 24, 2010 06:16 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: ParamusParamus at February 24, 2010 09:19 AM (flcpl)
Quick! We've got to get John Edwards on this!
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 24, 2010 06:45 AM (xxgag)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at February 24, 2010 06:53 AM (mR7mk)
Ron Paul is on CNBC talking about auditing the Fed. And he's making sense.
I get so freaked out when I start agreeing with Crazy Uncle Ron.
Posted by: shibumi at February 24, 2010 07:07 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: MDr VB1.0 CS1st at February 24, 2010 07:20 AM (ucq49)
Posted by: naturalfake at February 24, 2010 07:27 AM (+kzvp)
Jose Pinera privatized Chile's entitlement system long ago, and he has something to say about what will happen to us if we don't wake up.
Posted by: George Orwell at February 24, 2010 07:36 AM (AZGON)
Posted by: Dastardly Dan at February 24, 2010 07:52 AM (+SZAJ)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 24, 2010 08:03 AM (xxgag)
Can anybody explain to me what Romney thought the upside of endorsing McCain was?
Hell, one RINO endorsing the other. The only diference is one has slick hair and no jowls.
Posted by: Vic at February 24, 2010 08:13 AM (QrA9E)
"Contrary to popular belief, noted technical analyst Robert Prechter says the extraordinary action taken by the Federal Reserve to bail out the economy will not lead to runaway inflation." Deflation is gaining the upper hand very, very slowly, but it's happening," Prechter the founder of Elliott Wave International tells Tech Ticker. Of course, as anyone familiar with his work knows, he's been saying this for years."
Auto-play video warning! Auto-play video warning! You have been warned.
Text and video
Posted by: Iskandar at February 24, 2010 08:40 AM (/o58C)
(there is another question before the 4chan question)
http://tinyurl.com/yzgrtdd
Posted by: fartbubble at February 24, 2010 10:26 AM (gAmQ1)
Posted by: Ecommerce Fulfillment at March 10, 2010 09:32 PM (H+Eif)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2174 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








There's a good video at Patterico's about Max Blumenthal (just scroll down a bit).
Reminders of some of the things he's done before and a good summary of what he's doing now.
Posted by: Mama AJ at February 24, 2010 05:01 AM (Be4xl)