April 12, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Monday. Blargh.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:06 AM
| Comments (80)
Post contains 10 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Government Drone at April 12, 2010 05:11 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Quilly Mammoth at April 12, 2010 05:16 AM (/xEDR)
Posted by: fartbubble at April 12, 2010 05:17 AM (gAmQ1)
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 12, 2010 05:19 AM (wQZEw)
A middle aged Jewish guy is absent-mindedly crossing the road, and gets hit by a car. Onlookers rush to check he's okay, clear his airways and take care of him until the ambo arrives.
"Are you comfortable?" one concerned onlooker asks him.
He shrugs. "I make a living," he says.
Posted by: Klesmer at April 12, 2010 05:19 AM (DBsf8)
Posted by: Grover at April 12, 2010 05:20 AM (sKyvm)
His excellency, ruler of the world, demigod and pond walker, Barry boldly bows to pick up the gauntlet of nonproliferation to rouge terrorists - courageously ignores terrorist Iran - denounces the ever bellicose Israel.
Lefties everywhere swoon.
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at April 12, 2010 05:21 AM (RkRxq)
Posted by: Justin Camp at April 12, 2010 05:22 AM (nF4Jh)
I was expecting something vile, but that's pretty good. Gotta get some glasses so people know I read.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 12, 2010 05:34 AM (mR7mk)
Prediction: The left are going to collectivley lighten up on their HATRED for Sarah Palin, for they know she doesn't attract the independent voter and she would lose to Obama in 2012.
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 12, 2010 05:34 AM (0fzsA)
Oh, and Phil Mickelson rocks!
Posted by: Y-not at April 12, 2010 05:36 AM (Kn9r7)
Posted by: maddogg at April 12, 2010 05:38 AM (OlN4e)
Ahh, good morning. Nothing like a rousing fight on a non-political blog with a raging kool aide drinker (raging -- will defend things they might actually disagree with if it comes from "their side"). On one hand, it's getting the old brain synapse firing, on the other well I have an old brain and the synapse are calling for more coffee.
Any good arguements I could use against her? It's about the Planned Parenthood/Girl Scout kerfluffle. I've already tried to bait her with asking if Margaret Sanger was her hero -- wouldn't bite, but it did piss her off. Now I'm smacking her with plausible deniablity vs. evidence and the stupidity of that defense in this situation.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 05:40 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 05:42 AM (5/yRG)
17 -
You may not have much luck with this one. Strident abortion supporters have usually aborted one or two of their own kids and haven't dealt with the resultant psychic pain and grief - not to mention guilt - of their "choice".
Posted by: kallisto at April 12, 2010 05:44 AM (+FkcS)
unknown jane
Ask her what kind of badge they give out for having an abortion. I also enjoy telling them that Planned Parenthood is a "for profit" organization. They usually don't know that--they think it is some kind of public service or the red cross--coming to the rescue. Ask her if she really approves of corporate propaganda for profit, mind you, being foisted on young girls who don't know they are being "sold".
On top of that, the feds give money to a corporation to help them make profits. It's simply a death mill. Picture the "poor houses" of the 19th century europe who took in the poor and worked them to death for profit. Same thing without the work.
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 05:48 AM (dXpcc)
Posted by: joy to the whirled at April 12, 2010 05:48 AM (EZCyM)
To hell with Socialism!
Well, that is what looks to be happening in Hungary:
http://tinyurl.com/ybufzx4
Posted by: Lemon Kitten at April 12, 2010 05:51 AM (0fzsA)
I actually had to FORCE myself to eat the whole thing, which is disappointing because I was soooo gunning for this when they announced it.
I guess I have to stick with the place that deepfries bacon, twinkies, and bacon-wrapped twinkies instead.
Posted by: conartcritic at April 12, 2010 05:51 AM (lV4Fs)
That would make any difference? Doubtful. By and large I've found that arguing facts, logic and reason to most libs is completely pointless. They are all about emotive arguments and never willing to admit their wrong. You're generally better off shouting at a brick wall, the wall tends to pay more attention that most libs.
It's about the Planned Parenthood/Girl Scout kerfluffle.
Well, I haven't seen any iron clad proof on this one way or the other, but considering the amount of indoctrination that Planned Parenthood and it's allies try to force into public schools sadly I wouldn't be all that surprised. The perversity they try to pass off as sex "education" is just shameful.
Posted by: StuckOnStupid at April 12, 2010 05:51 AM (e8T35)
19 Oh, there is no converting on this one. Hell, I'm not a conservative or a Republican myself (which always makes her head pop, then she starts in with the "yes you are, yes you are, yes you are!!!!"), but at the very least one can learn to think for oneself...this one does not think for herself at all. If you can't think enough to question things that "your side" (I have a problem with that too, but I digress), that you yourself would be against if you didn't know which "side" brought it up well, then you are a hopeless little drone and a sheep; there's no logical reason to waste one's time on such a person.
She likes to go on attack mode though (and I'm now her favorite target -- I can't bring up anything anymore, of a remotely socio-political or economic nature without her trying to start a fight, even if she agrees with the basic premise)...so it's fun to toy with her a lot. Gets a lot of that negative energy out of your system -- and on a worthy target. Silly drip, she always attacks me personally too, usually well before the end of it; is it wrong to get enjoyment out of other people's meltdowns?
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 05:54 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: conscious and hearing that Obama sucks the big one at April 12, 2010 05:55 AM (YVZlY)
22 She tried to get away from that elephant by redirecting to the Girl Scouts -- she isn't completely stupid.
I already brought her back with the one you suggested (and asked why my simple question was, in her words, "vitriol"?).
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 05:56 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 05:59 AM (dXpcc)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 06:01 AM (dXpcc)
Unlike citizensÂ’ tax-filing deadline, CongressÂ’s mid-April benchmark is nonbinding. And members seem to be in no rush to get the process going.
Indeed, some Democratic insiders suspect that leaders will skip the budget process altogether this year — a way to avoid the political unpleasantness of voting on spending, deficits and taxes in an election year — or simply go through a few of the motions, without any real effort to complete the work.
Posted by: Neo at April 12, 2010 06:01 AM (tE8FB)
That means that Barry will get pwned butt-fucked 47 different times in just one week.
Gotta be a record of some sort...
And "unprecedented" to be sure...
*BARF*
Posted by: Nighthawk at April 12, 2010 09:19 AM (wQZEw)
FIFY
Posted by: conscious and hearing that Obama sucks the big one at April 12, 2010 06:03 AM (YVZlY)
25 Well, the Girl Scouts are now denying any association with PP whatsoever, but somebody dug up a quote from 04 where their director publicly stated that they work closely with other groups, and PP was one of the groups explicitly mentioned. Plus, nobody else at that conference was there for anything remotely concerned with the topic of the brochure...but the Girl Scouts.
The Girl Scouts are not really repudiating the brochure at this point, rather they are repudiating any connection to PP...which has been busted. So that is an arguement in favor of there being a connection the GS would not like known -- just following the usual laws of rhetoric and arguement.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 06:03 AM (5/yRG)
Leaders from 47 nations are in DC for the "Nuclear Security" Summit that opens today and will include talks with the US.
That means that Barry will get pwned 47 different times in just one week.
Gotta be a record of some sort...
We need to start a betting pool on how many times he bows. Also, perhaps we can get some side action on Biden gaffes.
Posted by: Blue Hen at April 12, 2010 06:03 AM (R2fpr)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 06:04 AM (mHQ7T)
Agreed. Similar to a recent experience of mine on a blog - the other guy would make whatever argument was convenient to oppose mine, even though it was intellectually lazy and incoherent. His own knowledge of liberalism was shallow at best, and all he wanted to do was oppose every argument I made regardless because I was "the enemy".
Posted by: chemjeff at April 12, 2010 06:06 AM (Gk/wA)
32 To answer my own question: Marketing. PP is in the schools but it likes to market itself in every venue. Sorta like taking ads out in the newspapers, magazines, tv, radio, sides of busses. We wouldn't want a baby to go unaborted. They lose cash with every birth.
I'll never understand a group of people who are anti "big oil" but are pro "big death". These are the same people who are pro smoking laws and transfat laws yet they support corporate propaganda pushing abortion. The idea that these idiots bought the "sham-wow" of abortion for what? The idea that women have the right? Fine but how often is your right sold to you for cash money? It makes the gun lobby/insurance companies look like pikers.
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 06:07 AM (dXpcc)
32 Well, apparently, the GS do work with PP to provide "safe sex information" (ha!) to young girls -- that's taken from the quote from 04; so does the YMCA (apparently it too has connections with PP in distributing safe sex info to young people through brochures).
PP is considered source #1 for any sort of safe sex/contraceptive advice and teaching by most institutions, due to the nondenominational, nonreligious, all encompassing nature of PP (they reach out to everyone and do not discriminate!). Their stuff was the only information provided at a drug/alcohol rehab for teens that I have working knowledge of.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 06:08 AM (5/yRG)
What's notable in this particular conference is who isn't attending...
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:08 AM (p302b)
Posted by: conscious and hearing that Obama sucks the big one at April 12, 2010 06:09 AM (YVZlY)
40 What concerns me most about this new twist isn't the abortion language (although it is there) -- this is condoning (encouraging and inciting even) young people who are HIV positive to not inform their sex partners until when or if they decide it does not impinge upon their "freedom to enjoy sex".
Personally, I don't think it's at all responsible for anyone to encourage young teens to go out and do the bedsheet tango, but this goes beyond that, and this actually has much more deadly and wider implications than encouraging abortions (which at the very least are not an infective agent).
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 06:13 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 06:13 AM (dXpcc)
Heh. I'd love to see that merit badge.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 06:14 AM (mHQ7T)
"Obama Warns of Threat From Nuclear Terrorism"
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:16 AM (p302b)
Hey, the partner wouldn't have sex with them if they knew they were HIV positive. Not having sex greatly reduces the chance of conception and therefore of abortion.
This "safe sex" crap is designed to increase the chance of conception not lower it. There is always contraception failures. They then rush in to "save the day"----for a price.
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 06:16 AM (dXpcc)
38 "Zazi, Al Qaeda pals planned rush-hour attack on Grand Central, Times Square subway stations"
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 10:06 AM (p302b)
Guess what? There are 300 unaccounted for Somalis who were smuggled into America by a guy linked to terrorists roaming our streets.What could possibly go wrong?
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 12, 2010 06:17 AM (7+pP9)
It's one thing when you are seeing articles about pushing some legislation where everyone is singing the same tune. But, when the tune changes to something as serious as nuclear weapons, that worries me.
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:20 AM (p302b)
Posted by: fluffy fears no cholesterol at April 12, 2010 06:20 AM (4Kl5M)
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 09:54 AM (5/yRG)
In that case I might be the wrongest person in the world.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 12, 2010 06:21 AM (V5s1P)
Posted by: Charles johnson at April 12, 2010 06:24 AM (90oki)
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:24 AM (p302b)
As a side note, I'm in the minoirity but I've always contended that General Petraeus's strategy in Iraq would have never worked unless we had first used the big base strategy to decimate the insurgents enough to prevent them from overwhelming maller outposts.
Posted by: polynikes at April 12, 2010 10:23 AM (m2CN7)
Are you sure you're in the minority because I've posted something similar previously (although stated slightly differently) and got no argument from anybody.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 12, 2010 06:27 AM (V5s1P)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 06:30 AM (mHQ7T)
America's first black President thinks he's the butler. And they say Joe Biden's the dumb one.
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 06:33 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:34 AM (p302b)
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 06:35 AM (p302b)
Posted by: Pecos Bill at April 12, 2010 06:40 AM (8WOM0)
Posted by: Randall Hoven at April 12, 2010 06:43 AM (PVAmK)
Posted by: HeatherRadish at April 12, 2010 06:50 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 12, 2010 10:30 AM (mHQ7T)
Great. The next meme from idiots everywhere will be "ZOMG Sarah Palin is a strippah!!!11!!!!!111!!eleventy!!"Posted by: ol_dirty_/b/tard at April 12, 2010 06:54 AM (IoUF1)
bowing politely
Well, at least he's bowing politely.........From superpower to obsequious scrunt country, change you can't stomach
Posted by: dagny at April 12, 2010 06:56 AM (dXpcc)
Please tell me that Mitt Romney is not the best the Republicans can do for 2012.
He's a bitch. 2012 belongs to me, yo!
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at April 12, 2010 07:22 AM (/0Stw)
Strident abortion supporters have usually aborted one or two of their own kids and haven't dealt with the resultant psychic pain and grief - not to mention guilt - of their "choice".
The most strident abortion supporters I know are scary old hags, it's hard to believe that they ever got laid.
Posted by: Cincinnatus at April 12, 2010 07:25 AM (euuyg)
And the funny part is, they think it's a compliment.
Posted by: FUBAR at April 12, 2010 07:27 AM (1fanL)
Please tell me that Mitt Romney is not the best the Republicans can do for 2012.
He's a bitch. 2012 belongs to me, yo!
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at April 12, 2010 11:22 AM (/0Stw)"
no way....you are a progressive....
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010 07:41 AM (p302b)
Please tell me that Mitt Romney is not the best the Republicans can do for 2012.
He's a bitch. 2012 belongs to me, yo!
Posted by: Newt Gingrich at April 12, 2010 11:22 AM (/0Stw)"
no way....you are a progressive....
Posted by: curiouis at April 12, 2010
11:41 AM (p302b)
What about me?
Posted by: Zombie Ted Kennedy at April 12, 2010 07:55 AM (4UFm1)
Posted by: HeatherRadish flies too much at April 12, 2010 07:57 AM (mR7mk)
13Prediction: The left are going to collectivley lighten up on their HATRED for Sarah Palin, for they know she doesn't attract the independent voter and she would lose to Obama in 2012.
WOW, you really should give them a ring at the WH. David Axelrod could use s/o with your insight. They do nothing but sit around all day and game how to beat Palin and get this socialist reelected, and here they've missed two obvious facts about their nemesis.
HATE to break the obvious to you but: they haven't lightened up on Sarah heretofore, and they won't, because they they aren't the clueless nitwits you suppose them to be.
But otherwise, INTERESTING PREDICTION. Got any others? Something involving making millions buying real estate perhaps?
Posted by: Les Grossman at April 12, 2010 09:15 AM (jat5l)
46 Dagny, you're commenting as though I disagree with you. I am not.
My comments were simply stating a fact: right now PP has the monoply on public dissemation of safe sex information -- which is not an encouraging thought imho.
Heh, heh -- the idiot on the other board has dug herself into a hole, and in so doing, took the bait: Prove to me [jane] that PP had its roots in eugenics!
I think I shall oblige her. heh heh heh
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 09:25 AM (5/yRG)
72 The sad thing, for me at least, is that the most strident abortion supporters I've ever met have been young women and men.
I'm on the line with abortion: on one hand, I don't feel as though I have a right to dictate yes or no; it's a grey area for me. Rather, it is the individual's choice -- choose wisely and well, be prepared to live with the consequences either way -- I will support the access to good health care (although that is a moot point now). However, I don't believe it is smart to not know some of the more seedy aspects of the pro choice movement -- and the big one there is PP, an organization I hate like the plague.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 09:34 AM (5/yRG)
79 I think it is a pretty valid prediction, because goodness knows going into full bore attack mode has seriously backfired for them. Whether it would work for them is very much up for debate -- no, she doesn't poll well with most independents, but backing off from her holds it's risks for them as well. They essentially are stuck in a quandary with her -- ignoring her won't work, neither will attacking her (not anymore, not really); and agreeing with her probably is impossible at this point for them, for psychological reasons (plus nobody would believe them at this point, and again, as a tactic it wouldn't work well in the long run).
With that, I seriously question their intelligence.
Posted by: unknown jane at April 12, 2010 09:43 AM (5/yRG)
right now it looks as though sarah palin is doing a very effective job of making axe and poof and the rest of the crew along with ram, stay awake at night wondering what her next move will be.
Posted by: curious at April 12, 2010 09:59 AM (p302b)
It hasn't made the headlines here, but Jack Agnew, one of four surviving members of the 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment's "Filthy 13" Demolitions Platoon, and one of the only members of the 101st to jump at Bastogne with the Pathfinders for the resupply drop has passed away.
Jack was 88 years old, happened on Thursday. The story is now on Fox News and elsewhere. I met Jack a couple times. Great guy. Lifetime NRA member since the 1930s who donated old copies of American Rifleman that the NRA Museum was missing.
Even if you're not a real WWII fan, you have probably seen the 13. The famous picture of the 101st guys with the Mohawk haircuts and the war paint loading the planes for the Normandy jump? That was them.
Posted by: SGT Dan at April 12, 2010 10:32 AM (GgXZc)
Posted by: zirconia-blank at April 12, 2010 11:13 PM (mGDQn)
thank you dear ..
ÃáÃá ãæÇÞÚ ÇáÊÃáÃÉ ÇáÇÞÊÕÇà ÇáãäÒáà ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá ãäÊÃÃÇÊ ßæßÊÃá
Posted by: sultan at April 13, 2010 02:39 AM (WFYoY)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3492 seconds, 208 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: All Ahpund It at April 12, 2010 05:10 AM (s3LK6)