June 16, 2010
— Gabriel Malor Eeep!
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
05:10 AM
| Comments (206)
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 05:12 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 05:13 AM (fBRnD)
more hardcore chris christie porn. he does it infornt of a group on people on a stage.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 05:14 AM (wuv1c)
Go to the InstaReynold's site NOW and watch Chris Christie's "Day Of Reckoning" speech.
DO IT NOW!
He gets it.
Palin/Christie 2012
Posted by: Jess at June 16, 2010 05:16 AM (svnZA)
Hey! We have a big disaster! It's still happening. Let's talk about who to sue and who pays for it! How should we clean it up? How should we stop it? Who cares! How do I look? How's my swing lookin'?
See, we can't lift the Jones act and allow other countries ships into our waters because it would upset the unions. Seriously.
Feckless.
Blame america
Blame Bush
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 05:17 AM (fBRnD)
Every time I hear that man speak, I'm tempted to move to New Jersey. Never before in my LIFE have I been tempted to move to New Jersey.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 05:18 AM (z4es9)
Move to NJ? Hell - if it means being able to vote *for* the formidable Gov. Christie I'll walk to NJ!
Posted by: Jess at June 16, 2010 05:20 AM (svnZA)
Posted by: ontherocks at June 16, 2010 05:21 AM (HBqDo)
Posted by: kemp at June 16, 2010 05:22 AM (2+9Yx)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 05:23 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Hatchet Five at June 16, 2010 05:23 AM (rSoCo)
Posted by: USCitizen at June 16, 2010 05:25 AM (xSlwI)
Posted by: maddogg at June 16, 2010 05:28 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Cicero at June 16, 2010 05:28 AM (3Dnuf)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 16, 2010 05:31 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at June 16, 2010 05:32 AM (HaYO4)
Until last night, we always thought that Barack Obama was just an empty suit and a pathological liar and a useless, incredibly incompetent dolt, who doesn't have any qualifications to be POTUS, and who doesn't have any leadership, managerial or executive skills - none whatsoever.
But last night while we were listening to his blatently disingenuous speech and his lame excuses and his feigned bewilderment as to why he is being subjected to criticisms, we had an epiphany; i.e., we realized that he and his administration are creating chaos in this country and around the world deliberately to advance a monstrous agenda.
The odds are so astronomical that it is inconceivable that every single person in an entire group of people could be such chronic fuck-ups, unless, unless Obama and his entire hand-picked administration are creating havoc deliberately; developments from which one must conclude that Obama is a madman and that his administration is comprised entirely of carefully chosen lunatics, also. (Need we remind you of the outrageously irrational and irresponsible stunts which have been pulled by - to name a few - Clinton, Holder and Napolitano, also?)
Argh!!! It continues to gall us that all of those degenerates are living like royalty, while advancing an insane agenda that will prove to be, in the long run, detrimental to everyone in this country, and to the rest of the world, also, but which will continue to empower a clique of degenerates. Obama is the most dangerous threat to ever face this country ...., and, amazingly, he was elected by 52% of the people!!!!!! Oy vey!!!!
Posted by: Are we the only ones who see it? at June 16, 2010 05:32 AM (sYrWB)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at June 16, 2010 05:32 AM (usjNq)
Posted by: steevy at June 16, 2010 05:33 AM (pVbXG)
Posted by: ParisParamus at June 16, 2010 05:34 AM (8NZ+B)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 05:37 AM (UOM48)
During the election I considered Obama's ideology to be the most important reason why he shouldn't be elected. I really didn't care about the executive experience, but I think it is becoming clear that it is his lack of executive experience on any level that is probably more dangerous to this country than his ideology.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 05:37 AM (wuv1c)
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
Posted by: huerfano at June 16, 2010 05:37 AM (rqC5o)
Posted by: Easy Bake at June 16, 2010 05:37 AM (aj4hp)
That works, too. Hell, clone off an army of the guy.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 05:37 AM (z4es9)
Gretchen Carlson: One thing we didn't hear in Obama's speech last night was how he plans to stop the flow of oil.
Axelrod: mumble mumble capture 90% of the oil mumble mumble
which sounds an awful lot like they don't know how they're going to stop it.
Posted by: Anachronda at June 16, 2010 05:38 AM (LD+ZJ)
Just finished off a nice slab of ham and a couple of eggs w/grits and real butter, and of course a couple of my famous cathead biscuits. I'm ready to take on the fucktard libs bring it.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 05:39 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: Joanie (Oven Gloves) at June 16, 2010 09:32 AM (HaYO4)
We love us some JUG-handles.
We love us some Christi!
Posted by: dananjcon at June 16, 2010 05:39 AM (pr+up)
Posted by: Tami at June 16, 2010 05:42 AM (VuLos)
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
Here's an explanation.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 16, 2010 05:43 AM (7+pP9)
Posted by: maddogg at June 16, 2010 05:43 AM (OlN4e)
Maddog,
Remember gassification of coal from the 1970s? They built a pilot plant in NYC that tested as being indistinguishable from natural gas power, but ConEd wasn't allowed to fire it up because as we all know...COAL IS BAD!
Posted by: NJConservative at June 16, 2010 05:43 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at June 16, 2010 05:43 AM (+DsTx)
Me too! It's like the man has his own gravity!
Posted by: kidney:SoCon,Bitches! at June 16, 2010 05:44 AM (ENRGu)
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
that was me. it was ignored. i don't think any of the morons on the ONT are lawyers, i was hoping gabe or drew could answer it. i think they are lawyers
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 05:45 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 05:45 AM (JZpX3)
Mallamutt
Good try. But you gotta shake your shoulders and wave your hands.. try again.
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at June 16, 2010 05:46 AM (JKe0g)
Posted by: Easy Bake at June 16, 2010 05:48 AM (aj4hp)
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 05:49 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 05:49 AM (UOM48)
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae ordered to delist from NYSE by the Federal Housing Finance Agency - AP
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 16, 2010 05:50 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: NJConservative at June 16, 2010 09:43 AM (LH6ir)
You want to know the real reason the leftards hate coal? No, not because it can't be made to burn cleanly. The leftards hate coal because they are afraid coal gasification and associated technologies would encourage us to maintain our current "extravagant" lifestyles. The leftards have determined we are living far too well, and they intend to do something about that. Banning coal and badmouthing oil is part of the plan, because they know they can't just come out and admit they want us poorer, but that is in fact the aim.
Posted by: maddogg at June 16, 2010 05:50 AM (OlN4e)
It is startling to look at the leadership skills of Chris Christie as compared to our President. Look at Christie's speech and then Obama's. Which one was inspirational? Which one motivated you to do the difficult thing now to achieve a greater thing later? Frankly, which one was not political, but practical? They should show these two speeches side by side. My President is not only embarrassed about America, he is embarrassing. Its obvious he has never been in charge of anything other than his own self-promotion.
Posted by: thunderb at June 16, 2010 05:51 AM (Scrz2)
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
What is this shit??
(sorry that's legalese for ripe for a legal challenge)
Posted by: laceyunderalls at June 16, 2010 05:51 AM (pLTLS)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 05:51 AM (UOM48)
God loves all his children but I think he's giving the orion the evil eye right about now, especially since he spent the last 20 years in the house of satan.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 05:51 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 05:51 AM (pM5rL)
Posted by: Nash Rambler at June 16, 2010 05:52 AM (ASdwP)
Of course it's legal! It was DECREED by a federal judge!
Didn't you ever take civics? We are a nation governed by decree. sarc/off
Posted by: kidney:SoCon,Bitches! at June 16, 2010 05:53 AM (ENRGu)
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
that was me. it was ignored. i don't think any of the morons on the ONT are lawyers, i was hoping gabe or drew could answer it. i think they are lawyers
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 09:45 AM (wuv1c)
Click on link at post #45. The reasoning behind it is quite bizarre (but since everything from the left is, don't be surprised).Posted by: Ed Anger at June 16, 2010 05:54 AM (7+pP9)
U.S. home construction plunges 10 percent in May, building permits fall 5.9 percent
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 16, 2010 05:55 AM (9hSKh)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at June 16, 2010 05:56 AM (NurK6)
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 16, 2010 09:55 AM (9hSKh)
Heh.
Wait and see what they do after energy prices skyrocket because Bambi suspended offshore drilling.
THEN wait to see what they do once Crap & Trade hits.
THEN wait to see what they do once the VAT hits.
THEN wait to see....
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 16, 2010 05:58 AM (Iaxlk)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at June 16, 2010 09:56 AM (NurK6) </i>
There is no way on Earth this can conceivably be constitutional.
But then again, "constitutional" is whatever Liberals say it is, right?
Posted by: CoolCzech at June 16, 2010 05:59 AM (Iaxlk)
The jug-eared idiot scheduled 20 whole fucking minutes to meet with the BP execs..
...the he's gotta run because he has a lunch scheduled with his retarded VP Slow Joe
Un-fucking-believable
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2010 05:59 AM (AnTyA)
Don't worry Maddogg. Coal will NEVER go away. we will be using coal until mankind dies.
If not for power, then for the simply fact it is necessary to make steel. And if you use cars, trains, buses, live in a building over three stories, drive over bridges, use roads, eating utencils, planes, piping, chain link fences, cable wire, pylons that carry our power across the nation, steel wool, air conditioners,fridges, dehumidifiers, humidifiers, surgical instruments, dishwashers, dryers, stoves, washing machines, water heater, industrial vehicles made by Catepillar, magenetic cores and whole list of other items, then you need steel. And to get steel you need Coal, Coke and Ore. Without anyone of those three you can't make steel.
Coal will be with us forever.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:00 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: the peanut gallery at June 16, 2010 09:56 AM
I blew my stack when i rerad that story this morning. From the article:
"Latinos made up 46 percent of the villageÂ’s roughly 28,000 people in the most recent census, in 2000, though many were not American citizens."
...so we give then]m 6 votes each?
Seriously...it's time for a revolution. Anyone in?
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2010 06:03 AM (AnTyA)
I noted that it was done by the Bush Justice Department, FTW.
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 06:03 AM (xMSXs)
BREAKING NEWS
Matthews, Feinman, and Olbermann reveal that they have more braincells than the Antichrist-in-Chief.
Posted by: Shep Smith at June 16, 2010 06:04 AM (gbCNS)
Posted by: Lincolntf at June 16, 2010 06:05 AM (TPEo9)
Posted by: eman at June 16, 2010 06:05 AM (aj4hp)
Historically, Hispanic residents, many of whom feel marginalized by the villageÂ’s power structure, have registered and turned out to vote at lower rates than non-Hispanic whites.
OK...so they get 6 votes each...because they're too fucking lazy to get off their fucking asses??
...do I have that right?
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2010 06:06 AM (AnTyA)
If Joe Scarborough had a set, he'd counter the spittle flinging wuss.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 06:06 AM (UOM48)
Cumulative voting has been used in other settings: corporate voting, “where it is mandated by many U.S. states”. But its recent political use has been in furtherance of the Voting Rights Act. “As of November 2009, more than fifty communities in the United States use cumulative voting, all resulting from cases brought under the federal Voting Rights Act.” By allowing a vote to be divided into parts, each of which can be separately cast (the Port Chester system gives each person 6 x 1/6 ballots) the system retains the ‘one man, one vote’ principle in a certain mathematical sense while allowing the expression of “preference intensity”.
Like I said, the reasoning is bizarre -- but the guys wearing the black curtains say that's how it's gonna be.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 16, 2010 06:06 AM (7+pP9)
I'd like to see them sarcastically say something like, "Yes, Mr. President, we created this leak deliberately because we hate the Earth and want to kill her. Soon, all the coastlines in the world will be covered with our icky black good! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!"
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 06:07 AM (z4es9)
I've thought this for weeks...BP never survives this. Having said that, Firestone survived the SUV rollover thing, albiet not in the traditional sense of surviving. Still, BP will be in a pine box when this is all over. The market punishes bad actors and BP f-ed this up from the jump, apparently.
We have passed the time when 1 point person needs to take control of everything in the Gulf until the leak is stopped. We're at mission critical and B to the O is still without a clue. Makes the conspiracy theorist in me think he wants this to continue to really wreck the oil industry for good.
And, I haven't hear the nuke option bandied about in a while...is that off the table?
In that regard, the sideline post of why oil and gas remain the best energy answers is an amazingly succinct and valuable read...click it.
Posted by: The Hammer at June 16, 2010 06:07 AM (YBTwf)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:10 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: Sailor at June 16, 2010 06:10 AM (gbCNS)
Luntz's focus group proved the division in our country, and pointed out who believes what. I saw the way the lines went on the graph, and I know who was pegging the meter. Even Luntz was egging on the "McCain people", when they pointed out Obama's lack of leadership (quoting, "What more do you want?"). Plus hipster idiot logistics boy in the back with his moronic comments. Gah, November can't come fast enough.
And yes, I expect there will still be oil in the gulf at that time.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 16, 2010 06:11 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Justin Camp at June 16, 2010 06:11 AM (nF4Jh)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:11 AM (JZpX3)
Probably doesn't matter if the meeting is 20 seconds or 20 minutes. Barry's gonna be talking, not listening.
The BP execs don't have much to lose with Obama. I hope they say "screw it" and tell him that they don't appreciate him spending a month calling them liars and then walk the eff out on his sorry ass
The meeting will be about one thing and one thing only. The Escrow account. For those of you that don't know, the Obama admin has suggested BP put money into an Escrow account that will be controlled by a "third party" (read:somone chosen by Obama).
Obama wants them to put in 20 billion to start with. That way Obama can spend the money however he wants, not according to the legitimacy of the claims by fisherman, rig workets, and coastal communities. Essentially he is going to tell BP to give him the money or he will step up his PR offensive on BP. He is a thug.
While I agree BP should pay for this, I don't think they should go that route. Why put money in an escrow that the government controls? They don't even have to spend it on the cleanup if they don't want. Also, the government could blow the 20 billion and then blame BP for not making the people on the Gulf coast whole.
It is a terrible idea and an attempt by Obama to get his hands on the wealth of a private company.
If I were BP, I would tell him to f*ck off. They are going to pay for the cleanup and as sad as it is to say, i think BP would do a much better job of allocating the money to where it needs to go over our government.
As the great Warrior Philospher Admiral Ackbar would say, "It's a trap". And if there is one think Ackbar knew, it was when something was a trap.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:11 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Anachronda at June 16, 2010 06:12 AM (LD+ZJ)
96 I'm looking forward to using wind power to drive my car
We may have to put sails on our cars with the stupid shit the jug-eared idiot is doing..
Stop drilling w/o any alternatives?? ...fucking idiot
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2010 06:12 AM (AnTyA)
Ben #31 @ 9:37
We put the blame there squarely on McCain. It was his responsibility to incessantly ram home the dangers of Obama's idealogy and the potential consequences of Obama's lack of any executive experience, and McCain should have harped on those issues relentlessly and emphatically.
But it is the nature of the RHINO that his political correctness and his apprehensiveness about being called a racist led to a situation in which that weakling shirked his responsibilities to the electorate, and, in fact, he couldn't possibly have run a shittier campain; hence, we got that madman and empty suit who now occupies the White House, an intolerable situation that can be attributed mostly to McCain's incompetence.
Posted by: Are we the only ones who see it? at June 16, 2010 06:13 AM (sYrWB)
4 dollar gas.
Related perhaps?
And now we have an executive who wants gas to go back to those prices and beyond.
Posted by: kidney:SoCon,Bitches! at June 16, 2010 06:14 AM (ENRGu)
Posted by: andycanuck at June 16, 2010 06:15 AM (7b1Uc)
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 10:11 AM
The liability cap is $75 million. W/O either criminal charges or congressional initiative to change that, Obama can demand all he wants, but BP is only liable for that amount.
Guess who is going to end up paying
Posted by: beedubya at June 16, 2010 06:16 AM (AnTyA)
Yeah, we need an escrow account for claims against BP. If only we had a mechanism in this country for people to bring grievances against a company or individual to a court, and have a judge render a decision and monetary damages as the judge sees fit.
If only we had that in this banana republic.
(do I need the </sarcasm> tag?)
Posted by: Jay in Ames at June 16, 2010 06:16 AM (UEEex)
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:17 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: palerider at June 16, 2010 06:18 AM (FBj6Z)
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 10:11 AM
The liability cap is $75 million. W/O either criminal charges or congressional initiative to change that, Obama can demand all he wants, but BP is only liable for that amount.
Guess who is going to end up paying
They wouldn't dare. They would know they could never do business in America again if they did that.
Believe me. BP has already paid more than 75 million to plug this leak. It will probably end up paying somewhere in the realm of 20-40 billion over the next few years.
Our government can make all the threats it wants, but the simple fact is they set up the 75 million dollar cap, and they will have to live with it.
America will end up footing some of the bill, without question, but don't think BP is going to say they are only paying 75 million.
Besides, I do not trust Obama or his admin to administer that 20 billion dollars in an escrow account properly. Especially when there are no rules on how he has to spend that money
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:20 AM (wuv1c)
You forgot about the Civil Rights Act, which clearly states that anything is constitutional if you call someone a racist while you do it.
"OK...so they get 6 votes each...because they're too fucking lazy to get off their fucking asses??"
No, it's not like that. But what should really bother you is the basic premise that the government is deciding who "should" be elected. Also that the government (both Republican and Democrat) is on the side of the Latin American invaders over native-born white and black Americans.
Posted by: the peanut gallery at June 16, 2010 06:21 AM (NurK6)
Yeah, we need an escrow account for claims against BP. If only we had a mechanism in this country for people to bring grievances against a company or individual to a court, and have a judge render a decision and monetary damages as the judge sees fit.
If only we had that in this banana republic.
that system has my vote, all six of them.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:21 AM (wuv1c)
At least I might have found a potential career path (instead of working at the local gas station and trying to find a school that will take a non-union teacher).
Yeah, that's right -- I talked to the recruiters. Mama Green still loves me (which makes me very sentimental, suprisingly so).
Posted by: unknown jane at June 16, 2010 06:22 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 06:23 AM (pM5rL)
Posted by: palerider at June 16, 2010 06:26 AM (FBj6Z)
This idiot likely doesn't get the irony of his statement. This ethanol thing is a gigantic scam.
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 16, 2010 06:27 AM (9hSKh)
What makes you think they want him to fuck off? They don't.
They'll trade this $x-billion slush-fund payoff for a regulation-enforced, locked in, $xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-billion position in the post-"cap and trade" pseudo-market— a pseudo-market that was Big Oil's idea. BP led the charge. They pitched cap and trade to governments, as a taxpayer-$-sharing plan.
Not only cops play good-cop bad-cop, y'know. Don't get Alinsky-ed into thinking BP is Obama's enemy, or your friend. It's neither.
Posted by: oblig. at June 16, 2010 06:28 AM (x7Ao8)
Mama Green still loves me (which makes me very sentimental, suprisingly so).
More details, please. What do you plan on doing, and what are your options?
Posted by: HH at June 16, 2010 06:30 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:30 AM (JZpX3)
Escrow account = Dem slush fund
that is my main reason why BP shouldn't do it. What if we find out that the person Obama assigned to allocate the money decides only union fisheries, only unionized beach resorts etc need the money. I would not put that by this administration. It's simply an attempt by the administration to get its hands on the purse strings of BP's payouts. It will just be used as another tool to destroy the non union small businessman.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:32 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: alexthechick at June 16, 2010 06:33 AM (8WZWv)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:34 AM (JZpX3)
47% of Americans trust Democrats to lead the economy to recovery.
42% of Americans trust Republicans to lead the economy to recovery.
64% of Americans say their household budget is sound.
That from the Associated Press, so take it FWIW.
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 16, 2010 06:35 AM (7+pP9)
"Well, in the Asian culture, we do things differently. During the Samurai days, we'd just give you the knife and ask you to commit hari-kari," said Cao, who is Vietnamese-American.
Representative Cao, D-Louisiana speaking to BP about the similarities between Japanese suicide and Vietnamese culture? Yea, the Vietnamese detested the Japanese after the occupation during WWII.
PS - Cao, I whacked your granny!
Posted by: Fish at June 16, 2010 06:35 AM (v1gw3)
when odumbass was on the lying trail and said that he was going to have a civilian army stronger than our military
Reminds me. Whatever happened to that mandatory "civil service" deal of his. Haven't heard about that for a while.
Posted by: HH at June 16, 2010 06:38 AM (6oDXl)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:38 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: palerider at June 16, 2010 06:38 AM (FBj6Z)
Idiot in Chief said that the "last decade of deregulation" is what led to the spill. If that is the case, how can BP be held criminally liable? If BP followed the regs but the regs themselves were inadequate to prevent whatever it was that caused the well to blow, why did O send Holder down to the Gulf to start posturing about criminal investigations? It just seems to me that you can either have a case where the regulations were followed by BP but inadequate to prevent the spill, or BP ignored existing regulations and the spill was the result, but you can't have both. Am I wrong?
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 06:38 AM (xMSXs)
Juggy missing an aha moment here. Thinking he should declare the gulf oil spill as a US strategic reserve.
How come we never hear anything about that venomous little bastard Rahm? How could he miss an opportunity like this?
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:39 AM (uFdnM)
BP and the Obama admin are on the same fucking side.
Their little tiff is just theater for us rubes.
Posted by: MikeO at June 16, 2010 06:39 AM (lBmZl)
how many gallons do you think have to come out before the nuke option gets bandied about?
I put the number at 300 million gallons
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:39 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 06:42 AM (pM5rL)
I pretty sure Obama's pro-coke.
Posted by: andycanuck at June 16, 2010 06:42 AM (7b1Uc)
I'm on the far western side of the Gulf on the Texas/La line and it's all good here shrimpers and oyster guys are out in force and I try to go out and fish at least 3 times a week, having said that my oldest is in Gulf Shores, Ala. (Orange Beach) since last Sat. and he says it's all good there too.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:43 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 06:43 AM (pM5rL)
Oh yeah. I am just absolutely certain that this will work every bit as well as all of the rest of Barry's foreign policies have worked.
Maybe better.
We are absolutely in the best of hands. You know, Carl says that Obama should be ashamed. I think the CEOs of these companies should be ashamed.
I can also smell another bailout coming. This one to refurbish Syria's communication infrastructure.
via Carl in Jerusalem
Posted by: Hussein the Plumber at June 16, 2010 06:43 AM (r1h5M)
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:44 AM (uFdnM)
I thought Cao was a Republican.
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 10:38 AM (JZpX3)
How telling is it that I though he's democrat because of his illogical conclusions?
Your correct, just another asshole republican in democrat clothing. Well Grunt, at least I fucked his sister.
Posted by: Fish at June 16, 2010 06:44 AM (v1gw3)
I thought Cao was a Republican. Oh and Fish I took a few of his relatives too, to bed whenever I got a chance to sneak into Saigon.
You may be his father. He kind of looks like you.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:46 AM (wuv1c)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 06:47 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:48 AM (uFdnM)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at June 16, 2010 06:49 AM (UOM48)
Shrimping season opened here (Georgia) a week ago. You cannot find fresh caught shrimp, unless you're standing on the dock waiting on the boat to arrive. My husband went to three places last weekend, and one guy ahead of him bought 50 lbs. People are hoarding and freezing shrimp because the prices are beginning to skyrocket. It the oil spill makes its way around to the southeast coastal areas, buh-bye fresh shrimp, crab, and seafood.
I've been thinking that shrimp prices would skyrocket. So i bought several tons of shrip and stuffed them in safety deposit boxes for safe keeeping. Once shrimp prices hit their peak, i will go down to the bank, get them out and put them on the open market.
I will make a fortune
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:49 AM (wuv1c)
I've always assumed that pretty much every US president (and every other major world leader for that matter) is fed a pretty steady diet of uppers. I can't imagine how it would be possible to do the job otherwise.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 06:49 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: Anachronda at June 16, 2010 06:49 AM (LD+ZJ)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:49 AM (JZpX3)
How telling is it that I though he's democrat because of his illogical conclusions? Posted by: Fish
Didn't Cao win a special election to replace William 'Cold Hard Cash' Jefferson? He is in a very blue district if so.
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 06:50 AM (xMSXs)
Real butter will be banned in the new food regime.
Who are ya'll trying to fool. That entire breakfast will be banned under the new healthscam rules. UNLESS you belong to SEIU's new food service employee's union which has been exempted under the new executive order #99999+infinity ruling.
Eggs - way too much cholesterol gotta give it up unless you are a 'Pub then eat all the eggs you want. Make sure you eat lots of them biscuits with lard as well.
grits - obvious racist food because it was grown in the Jim Crow South by slaves.
Cathead Biscuits - Obviously made from heart killing lard and kittehs were sacrificed to the mix. Can't have that morons because the ONT will die w/o kittehs.
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 06:51 AM (6taRI)
Didn't Cao win a special election to replace William 'Cold Hard Cash' Jefferson? He is in a very blue district if so.
Yes, as much as Cao bothers me, he is infinitely better than the alternative. I can stomach Cao. The same can't be said about Jefferson or someone like him.
I am willing to accept Cao's in our party if it mean less William Jefferson's in the democratic party.
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:51 AM (wuv1c)
"42% of Americans trust Republicans to lead the economy to recovery."
"47% of Americans trust Democrats to lead the economy to recovery." - Ed Anger
Which implies that 11% are undecided, from which one can extrapolate that ......
Considering that 52% of Americans elected Obama, and now, a year later, 47% still support Democrats and 11% are undecided, that implies that 58% of Americans havn't been paying attention and they haven't learned anything, and they're getting dumber, not smarter. Either that, or the AP pollsters are full of shit. Geezez, I hope it is the latter.
Posted by: Are we the only ones who see it? at June 16, 2010 06:52 AM (sYrWB)
I put the number at 300 million gallons
It'll never happen because you lose the well by nuking it.
And you think Pres Narcissist will ever allow the use of nuclear weapons? Ha, not even if our enemies were to launch a surprise attack!
Posted by: Kratos (missing from the side of Mt Olympus) at June 16, 2010 06:52 AM (9hSKh)
Less meat! Less sugar! Eat local! Fat kids are a threat to national security! Nutrition is not a private matter!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 16, 2010 06:53 AM (mR7mk)
Snip~
On Monday, after what Geller says was a storm of protest, PayPal backed down.
Geller said she received a phone call from PayPal early Monday morning informing her it had all been a “misunderstanding.”
“They called me back and said it was a misunderstanding and we’re all good,” Geller said. “They obviously received an overwhelming response.”
http://tinyurl.com/352eopb
Posted by: Tami at June 16, 2010 06:53 AM (VuLos)
Does anyone know where I can get some high octane shrimp?
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:53 AM (uFdnM)
123 I'm guessing my options would be either flying the Desk360 or working as a mechanic, or in medical, or as a driver -- I'm going to shoot for flying the Desk360 with a top security clearance.
Right now, I've got a couple months to work on some requirements -- which I suprisingly did not do too horribly at but 20 odd years out and I'm not young anymore (heh, back when I was 18 it was all about the oohrah! at exceeding the standards...now it's "the minimum standards are there for a reason") -- this time around I'm pretty sure I'll be sweating my ass off. I do have a couple of degrees and some amount of foreign language/protocol experience to draw from, so that helps...and I had to make a service branch switch.
Quite honestly, it came down to this, or staying as an employee at the gas station making minimum wage as a part timer and then working for the farms on a seasonal basis; it's nearly impossible to get on as a teacher or city/county worker around here because we don't know the right people, private sector jobs are scarce and getting moreso. Relocating is almost out of the question, because the housing market is so bad around here and the expense of relocating is beginning to get beyond our modest means.
So, I did at one time know a fair bit about soldiering...and I can still get in under the requirements. Gotta do something.
Posted by: unknown jane at June 16, 2010 06:54 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: 'Nam Grunt at June 16, 2010 06:54 AM (JZpX3)
Posted by: Ben at June 16, 2010 06:55 AM (wuv1c)
You, of all people, should have been paying sufficient attention to Luntz's focus group last night to notice the wench that wanted the BP CEO thrown in jail for "crimes against nature".
I love how these liberal fucktards who want to extend constitutional protections to terrorists are so free to throw people in jail for offending their libtard values. Remember the duke lax case when the gang of 88 was good with throwing the laxers in jail because they were rich, white, and potentialy racist? Or throw Bush in jail because he "lied". Or here throw the CEO of a company in jail for what? Crimes against nature? Yeah, because that's a law, asshole. Can they grasp the meaning of "political prisioners"? and what that would make us? Probably.
Posted by: dagny at June 16, 2010 06:55 AM (sZJTK)
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 10:49 AM (z4es9)
So you think playing golf and bullshitting requires a lot of stimulants?
Posted by: maddogg at June 16, 2010 06:56 AM (OlN4e)
-------------
You, of all people, should have been paying sufficient attention to Luntz's focus group last night to notice the wench that wanted the BP CEO thrown in jail for "crimes against nature".
Posted by: Anachronda
After living for so many years surrounded by freaks here in SoCal, I automatically tune them out in self-defense.
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 06:57 AM (xMSXs)
And all this time, I thought screwing my pet sheep, Bluebell was normal. I realize now that I have been littering.
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 06:58 AM (uFdnM)
So the assault and battery by Rep. Etheridge is now a non-story? Like it never even happened?
Had this been a Republican, the State Media would make it the main story, competing only with the oil spill. They would harp on it daily until the Republican was both arrested, and driven from Congress. Nothing would make them let it go.
Yet 24 hours after it occurred, nobody talks about it, or seems to care. What gives?
If you want to win the fight, you have to take the gloves off at some point.
Posted by: Phil Jones at June 16, 2010 06:58 AM (I7eYT)
Obama Approval Index: -20
Strongly Approve 24%
Strongly Disapprove 44%
Total Approval 42%
RASMUSSEN
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at June 16, 2010 07:00 AM (mHQ7T)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 16, 2010 07:03 AM (5/yRG)
I think the only way this story gets press is if those kids press charges. If it was my kid it would have already been done, and a visit to an attorney for a civil suit as well.
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 07:03 AM (xMSXs)
Cumulative voting has been used in other settings: corporate voting, “where it is mandated by many U.S. states”. But its recent political use has been in furtherance of the Voting Rights Act. “As of November 2009, more than fifty communities in the United States use cumulative voting, all resulting from cases brought under the federal Voting Rights Act.” By allowing a vote to be divided into parts, each of which can be separately cast (the Port Chester system gives each person 6 x 1/6 ballots) the system retains the ‘one man, one vote’ principle in a certain mathematical sense while allowing the expression of “preference intensity”.
Like I said, the reasoning is bizarre -- but the guys wearing the black curtains say that's how it's gonna be.
OK Morons I thought we put this to bed yesterday. The courts have ruled on this score over 40 years ago. The ruling is one person = one vote. This latest round of crap will be struck down as soon as a "minority candidate is "harmed" by the current rules. The controlling case is Reynolds vs Sims; a case involving minorities being watered down. It seems they are the only ones who can get standing
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 07:04 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: Lincolntf at June 16, 2010 07:04 AM (TPEo9)
It will not happen. There are two sets of rules/law in this country, NG. The laws that apply to peons like us. Those rules don't apply to the powerful and elite. Like that fucktard batterer from SC.
If all law were applied uniformly, half of Goldman would be in jail, that fuck from Countrywide would be in jail, Obama would be in drug court and some ball draggin cop would have hauled off that idiot legislator from SC.
No brother, we all know this. Justice? Just a bullshit term.
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 07:04 AM (uFdnM)
45
Someone on the ONT asked about this six to one voting for hispanics in New York story last night and how it could be legal. I don't know if he ever got an answer. Could someone put us some knowledge?
Here's an explanation.
Thanks, Ed. This proves, once again, that some animals are more equal than others. It also proves that their intentions are bad.
Posted by: huerfano at June 16, 2010 07:05 AM (rqC5o)
So the President's 'Bush deregulation caused this' was just more buck-passing, excuse for more regulation bullshit?
Posted by: Miss Fluffy McNutter at June 16, 2010 07:06 AM (xMSXs)
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 16, 2010 07:10 AM (XdlcF)
Like the execs can't find a way to get the bureaucrats' approval. Cash, drugs, girls, whatever.
Posted by: HeatherRadish at June 16, 2010 07:10 AM (mR7mk)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 16, 2010 10:54 AM (5/yRG)
Sounds pretty cool. Heck, take advantage of it. And let us know what you decide.
Posted by: HH at June 16, 2010 07:19 AM (6oDXl)
And all this time, I thought screwing my pet sheep, Bluebell was normal. I realize now that I have been littering.
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 10:58 AM (uFdnM)
Can you please pull my rear legs out of your b-b-b-b-o-o-o-o-o-ts???
Posted by: Bluebell at June 16, 2010 07:24 AM (Iaxlk)
When I see the Mistress of Disaster Jamie Gorelick doing the perp-walk, then I will believe.
Posted by: damian at June 16, 2010 07:29 AM (4WbTI)
She said that the government, in it's quest for power, could not repeal the Constitution nor the amendments. Or existing law. Therefore, they would pass laws to render those documents useless. Harmless. And over the course of 30 years she has been proven right. Government run Ponzi schemes with no balanced budget amendments, illegal alien reform acts that have gone unenforced, campaign reform unnoticed, patriot acts that have enabled the gov to spy on us, bank bailouts that were illegal and not permitted under existing law. Obamacare. Legalized thievery in the form of continually upward spiraling taxes, with a tax code written in Latin to protect the elite. The list is endless.
The American people have been marginalized and rendered useless as well.
And now we have the supreme leftist, telling business how to run their business. Arbitrarily canning GM CEO's, firing Inspector Generals for doing their jobs, lashing out at BP. Government gone mad. And a few of us know that it's too late. This ship has left the harbor, it ain't coming back, and the only one that makes any sense to me is Kratos.
Posted by: Something Wicked This Way Comes... at June 16, 2010 07:32 AM (uFdnM)
No, but I think looking interested in all those meetings (however short) does.
Posted by: Farmer Joe at June 16, 2010 07:34 AM (z4es9)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 16, 2010 07:50 AM (Gk/wA)
Just now in a lead in to one of their "fair and un-balnaced" debates regarding the Ju-eared asshole's speech yesterday the anchor has this say:
"On to discuss the President's speech on the nation's energy crisis"...
What freakin' energy crisis??? The only crisis we have is caused by the President. Tax the energy and make it harder to get is his policy.
Can you imagin a news anchor who actually leads in with the truth...
"On to discuss the latest pack of lies regarding the oil spill and how it will be used to justify another communist takeover..."
Yeah, as Mad Magazine used to say "Scenes we'd like to see".
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 07:50 AM (6taRI)
Posted by: curious at June 16, 2010 07:50 AM (p302b)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 16, 2010 11:50 AM (Gk/wA)
LOL, yu must be familiar with that POS ripoff that Dow ran in Baton Rouge for years after Jimmeh got that "clean coal" crap passed way back. That plant never made a single drop of clean cost effective stuff. It was a cash cow for Dow right up until the day the law for the tax CREDITs (note that is credit not deduction) expired.
I have it on good authority (employee who was there) that the day after the law for the government tit ran out the D-9's rolled in and the plant went bye-bye.
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 07:54 AM (6taRI)
It says a ship going from a US port to a US port must be US flagged. If a ship from the Netherlands were to sail into the Gulf and skim some oil then pull into a US port, that has nothing to do with the Jones Act okay? Likewise if a British tanker were to leave a US port empty just so it could suck up some free oil then steam off to England that has nothing to do with the Jones Act either.
STOP listening to the IDIOTS on the BOOB TUBE
Posted by: Blacksmith8 at June 16, 2010 07:55 AM (SD+3c)
It says a ship going from a US port to a US port must be US flagged. If a ship from the Netherlands were to sail into the Gulf and skim some oil then pull into a US port, that has nothing to do with the Jones Act okay?
So, is the ship going to sail back and forth between New Orleans and the Neatherlands to clean oil in the gulf.
Get real...DA
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 07:59 AM (6taRI)
What, has it turned into "the zombies are coming"? That's just par for the course. Oh and BUY GOLD!!!1!!!!!1111!!!
Posted by: chemjeff at June 16, 2010 08:01 AM (Gk/wA)
Can Teh Won force BP to set up an escrow account? It seems to me that's kind of pushing the issue. BP is an independent company. Do they have to kowtow to Teh Won?
Also... if it is determined that this problem in the Gulf cannot be fixed, can BP just abandon the well and wash their hands of it? Legally speaking?
Just wondering what our options are here.
Posted by: shibumi at June 16, 2010 08:02 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: chemjeff at June 16, 2010 08:04 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 16, 2010 08:05 AM (1Jaio)
LOL, obviously there was more than one tit.
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 08:09 AM (6taRI)
Also... if it is determined that this problem in the Gulf cannot be fixed, can BP just abandon the well and wash their hands of it? Legally speaking?
With this crew in charge, I have no idea what the word "legal" even means anymore.
Posted by: chemjeff at June 16, 2010 08:14 AM (Gk/wA)
Posted by: NJConservative at June 16, 2010 08:24 AM (LH6ir)
Posted by: hangin on by a thread at June 16, 2010 08:24 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: unknown jane at June 16, 2010 08:26 AM (5/yRG)
Posted by: B.B. at June 16, 2010 08:26 AM (xxgag)
If they walk away, Barry puts SEIU in charge of their assets and runs up a bill larger than their capitalization . that is he bankrupts them
My understanding, although the MFM stuff i have read are not clear on this, is that the 20 billion barry wants will be used for cleanup and economic claims. It is a way for the thugs to force BP to either look bad, or lose 20 billion to Barry, who will then unionize and acornize and sharptonize the cleanup and also spend the money on both categories.
Posted by: hangin on by a thread at June 16, 2010 08:29 AM (DHNp4)
_______________
It seems to be veering into the "using severed human ears as a global reserve currency" territory.
Personally, I think that's a fine idea if it can finally free us from the tyranny of earbuds.
Posted by: Anachronda at June 16, 2010 08:37 AM (3K4hn)
On the cleanup, it is in BP's interests to spend the money carefully, since there is no limit to their exposure. No there are a lot of complaints that guys with yachts are not getting used on the cleanup, but again the coast guard is in charge there. BP is really secondary on the cleanup and I trust BP more than Thas ("blame the corp," "Nobody asked me about he Jones act, " etc,) Allen. BP is going to pay every dime of cleanup so my guess is they are going to minimize it and the damage.
On the economic damages, I think BP is likely to go over the 75 million required, but really it is up to the Feds to give assistance there. Remember any mineral extraction is ultimately up to the owner of the land to oversee. In private deals there are long contracts to define liability. In the gulf, they are limited to 75million by law. this puts a cap on their exposure and makes a potentially risky venture possible. It benefits no one if we can not extract due to our crazy tort system. Also the feds wrote the regs and approve the plans. You can have regulatory oversight, or unlimited liability, but not both. once you have regulatory oversight the safety and environmental groups in the extraction companies are no longer worried about safety, they are worried about getting approval. I have been in situation (not oil) where employees identified unsafe practices and brought them to the "safety" group, and they said "but wer got approval. that is all we need."
Posted by: barely hangin on by a thread at June 16, 2010 08:40 AM (DHNp4)
Posted by: rabidfox at June 16, 2010 09:13 AM (Z/g0m)
The statement in post 85 is not correct. The 2006 DOJ sued because they WERE holding "at large elections" which were ruled illegal long ago.
The DOJ did not call for the idiot judge to violate the one person = one vote rule. Their current solution is just as illegal as the "at large elections".
Posted by: Vic at June 16, 2010 09:19 AM (6taRI)
No word if the sick crewmember was wearing basketball shorts; or if a taxi driver/ex-fighter pilot was also on board....
Strange days indeed. Most peculiar, momma....
Posted by: Rex Cramer at June 16, 2010 09:43 AM (gF4KU)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2345 seconds, 334 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Michael Steele at June 16, 2010 05:12 AM (w9bVp)