January 02, 2010
— Ace A piece that's now a week old and a week late.
I don't get this bit:
6. The Dark Knight ( Christopher Nolan, 2008 )Christopher NolanÂ’s global mega hit raked in over $1 billion worldwide, and itÂ’s not hard to see why. Featuring some of the most striking set designs since Blade Runner, NolanÂ’s towering vision of Gotham City looked glorious in IMAX...
I concede there is some set design work in The Dark Knight. But it was the original Batman movies (the Burton ones) that featured the in-your-face (and I think excessive) set design stuff. Gotham was a mostly fake city, a mix of models and matte paintings and the occasional quasi-fascist sculpture.
The Dark Knight's whole schtick -- set-design-wise -- was to take Batman out of the realm of fantasy and set it in an entirely real-world context. Which is why the "Gotham City" is a not-disguised-at-all Chicago, and why so many sets are actually real locations.
Were there sets? Of course. But "the most striking set design since Blade Runner"? The whole point of the sets was to be not all that striking, and to look pretty real, real enough that you can't tell the real locations from the sets.
This Batman didn't even have the Batcave. This Batman didn't even have the Gothic castle called Wayne Manor. This Batman didn't even have Arkham Asylum. This Batman didn't have the "City of the Future" CGI simulation of Gotham City the last one did.
All big locations requiring a lot of set design to create heft and mood. Here? Well, there was a restaurant... there was a bank or two... there was a dingy basement... there was a penthouse apartment (that I'm pretty sure was a genuine space)... there was... Well, I can only really think of Bruce Wayne's not-the-Batcave secondary underground space as an example of notable set design, and that seemed deliberately understated.
Not saying that those aren't sound directorial choices. Just wondering how the heck that's "the most striking set design since Blade Runner."
I don't really know what the hell this guy is talking here. I guess he could mean "so understated it's actually striking!," but who the hell uses the word "striking" to mean understated?
You know what movie had really striking set design? Annie Hall. I mean -- wow! They created the fantasy city "New York" out of nothing but models and dreamstuff! (Annie Hall's cluttered apartment was achieved through a combination of matte painting, layered compositing, and a technique called "greenscreening"... )
Other Mentions: Alexthechick wonders how the conservative fave The Incredibles failed to make the list.
There are three movies I want to mention too, as coming entirely from left right field and clubbing you over the head with a strongly conservative message you never in a thousand years would have expected.
Blast from the Past. Okay, this was actually released in 1999, but close enough. (I'm sure it was on cable in 2000.) A weirdly in-your-face and strident manifesto of a movie basically stating that the values of the 50s are far superior to the "values" that came later.
Representative line:
"And were does he get all this [useful information about manners]?"
-- "From the oddest place. His parents."
Kate & Leopold. Savaged by critics as anti-feminist, basically the same idea as Blast from the Past but now going even more old-school with it, positing the manners and decorum and values of the 1870s are superior to today's mores.
17 Again. I know some people think I'm crazy in recommending this one, but a lot of people who gave it a chance reported back, "Hey, you were right -- I thought it was going to be stupid but it's actually a very funny movie!"
Another weirdly, strongly conservative movie. The "conservative values" part of it comes due to the fact that a near-40 Matthew Perry is magicked back into his 17-year-old former body (played by Zac Efron, who's very good), and attends the same high school as his kids.
But see, he's still an adult in his mind, and furthermore, very protective of his children. This leads him to say hilariously fuddy-duddy things as a 17-year-old -- for example, when a bully tries to pick on him, and asks (as bullies do) "What are you gonna do about it?," he says without embarrassment or shame: "Well, first, I'm going to call your father." Hey, he's 40 -- he doesn't buy into this "no telling" rule kids have; he's not screwing around. Step out of line and he's going to have a discussion with your dad about it. And if you call him a tattle-tale, well, maybe he'll tell on you about that, too.
But the really conservative scene is when he's in class with his daughter, being taught about safe sex (by Margaret Cho, no less) and, to combat the go-have-sex-everyone's-doing-it message the teacher is pushing, he basically gives a three minute speech about the virtues of abstinence and that the real point of having sex is to have a baby, a tiny thing "you never imagined you could love so much."
This conservative personally found his jaw dropping a little bit.
Oh, and the whole conflict is that Matthew Perry hates his life and resents his wife and even his kids. See, as a 17 year old, he was a basketball super-stud with a big college career ahead of him... but he walked away from that when his girlfriend surprised him by announcing she was pregnant. So he married her, took a job, and began supporting his young family, rather than pursuing his (self-oriented) dreams.
So, in the end, will he learn that far from ruining his life, this was the best thing that could have happened to him, and far from making all the wrong choices, he in fact made all the right ones? Well, I don't want to give away any spoilers so I won't say.
Posted by: Ace at
08:16 AM
| Comments (285)
Post contains 1002 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 08:28 AM (6Hbvd)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at January 02, 2010 08:30 AM (tzcjs)
You know what movie had really striking set design? Clerks.
You know what movie had really striking set design? Diner with Andre.
You know what movie had really striking set design? Safe Room.
You know what movie had really striking set design? Castaway.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 02, 2010 08:31 AM (cs6jm)
Posted by: Vic at January 02, 2010 08:31 AM (QrA9E)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 02, 2010 08:33 AM (muUqs)
I can see your point except that it's not supposed to be an accurate portrayal. It's a movie of 300 by Frank Miller which is a completely and totally different animal entirely.
And I'm going to give up major geek girl cred here, but is Miller still working on his Batman as anti-terrorism crusader book? Shamefully, I haven't kept up to date on that.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 08:34 AM (6Hbvd)
Posted by: Tommy Gunnar at January 02, 2010 08:35 AM (rQTdM)
I'm looking forward to Inception, just because of Nolan.
Posted by: Cincinnatus at January 02, 2010 08:36 AM (f4sLg)
Gosh...it's just so gosh-darned surprising that the movie that is the focus of this thread is one based on a cartoon
Posted by: rum, sodomy and the lash at January 02, 2010 08:41 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 02, 2010 08:41 AM (PQY7w)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 08:42 AM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: keyboard jockey at January 02, 2010 08:45 AM (YB60l)
Amen, ATC! I loved that whole storyline about the superheros getting sued by an ungrateful American public. Also, Syndrome's unforgettable line:
Syndrome (to Mr. Incredible): "I'll give them the most spectacular heroics anyone's ever seen. And when I'm old and I've had my fun, I'll sell my inventions so that everyone can be superheroes. Everyone can be super. And when everyone's super, no one will be." [evil laughter]
Sound familiar?
Posted by: runningrn at January 02, 2010 08:45 AM (CfmlF)
And I say that in all seriousness. I only watched the movie on your recommendation.
But I'll never forgive you for The Wicker Man.
Posted by: JohnJ at January 02, 2010 08:48 AM (V9YTn)
Posted by: runningrn at January 02, 2010 08:48 AM (CfmlF)
Posted by: keyboard jockey at January 02, 2010 08:48 AM (YB60l)
300 was great as was Master and Commander. I always thought 300 was an homage to soldiers and was really based on Gates of Fire.
But, being from Alabama, I also thought the Dukes of Hazzard was a documentary.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy at January 02, 2010 08:48 AM (i3AsK)
Posted by: Locus Ceruleus at January 02, 2010 08:49 AM (tzcjs)
Posted by: LtE113 (Mike in Chicago) at January 02, 2010 08:51 AM (heNM3)
...still a great conservative film though.
Posted by: g at January 02, 2010 08:52 AM (oEdB3)
Posted by: LtE113 (Mike in Chicago) at January 02, 2010 08:54 AM (heNM3)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:00 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:05 AM (5EsuI)
Man, this guy is boring. If I was a chick I wouldn't date him.
Posted by: Ace's liver at January 02, 2010 09:05 AM (LtIsn)
I believe I've read that is now shelved.
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 01:00 PM (5EsuI)
A lot of us are shelving ani-terrorism anti-man-caused-disaster related projects nowadays.
Posted by: Barry O. at January 02, 2010 09:08 AM (baXkL)
Posted by: PJ at January 02, 2010 09:11 AM (Qpxxz)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:12 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: Dang at January 02, 2010 09:12 AM (UA4gE)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:13 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 09:13 AM (Vl5GH)
Film is utterly inimical to rightwing "values" because great art always addresses social pathology. The rightwing rejects art because it categorically rejects society. All that remains for the "conservative" are representations of the hero-monad assaulted on all sides by structures of meaning invented by freedom-destroying liberals, with the crucial exception of the capitalist corporation, which is the perfected person.
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 09:14 AM (YFV+t)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:15 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 02, 2010 09:16 AM (UOM48)
Green Revolution refers to the transformation of agriculture that began in 1945, largely due to the life work of Norman Borlaug.
A true hero.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 02, 2010 09:17 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:18 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 02, 2010 09:19 AM (UOM48)
Serious question: How is Gladiator a conservative movie?
(And we all know by now that
is really an eight followed by a closing parenthesis, right?)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 09:19 AM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:20 AM (5EsuI)
Posted by: FUBAR at January 02, 2010 09:22 AM (J5Srq)
I'd say "Shackleton" with Kenneth Branagh, but that was a TV flick.
Still, far better than almost all this other shit.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:23 AM (3Uz3f)
Serious question: How is Gladiator a conservative movie?
Bread and Circuses are a sign of societal decay?
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 02, 2010 09:23 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:23 AM (5EsuI)
Vi and Dash are in the cave and she's explaining things to him. The line goes something like:
"...and Mom and Dad's lives may be in terrible danger. Or, worse yet, their marriage."
Damn, that's good.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 09:24 AM (89RxY)
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 02, 2010 09:24 AM (UOM48)
Posted by: Aaron at January 02, 2010 09:25 AM (TxQvv)
Serious question: How is Gladiator a conservative movie?
Bread and Circuses are a sign of societal decay?
Honor, moral strength, and noble character un-ironically protrayed as good?Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 09:26 AM (89RxY)
Napolitano: "Everybody played an important role here. The passengers and crew of the flight took appropriate action."
Gold stars for everyone!
Posted by: PJ at January 02, 2010 09:27 AM (Qpxxz)
The Brits are a wee bit testy about this film because of its way-over-the-top portrayal of the British army as bloodthirsty monsters. I actually agree with them on this.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 09:30 AM (89RxY)
The slightest public political miscalculation, for example when George Lucas lightly ridicules GW Bush, is cause for a rightwing death sentence.
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 09:31 AM (YFV+t)
62 Why the hell isn't "The Patriot" being mentioned!!??
The Brits are a wee bit testy about this film because of its way-over-the-top portrayal of the British army as bloodthirsty monsters. I actually agree with them on this.
Back when they had an Empire, there was some truth to that portrayal. Now they're a bunch of Euro-weenies.
Posted by: FUBAR at January 02, 2010 09:32 AM (J5Srq)
Posted by: A.G. at January 02, 2010 09:35 AM (jBPzC)
This is the one of the few aspects of my life that I don't view through a political lense.
If I go to shell out $10 for a movie (which I rarely do anymore), I'm doing so out of escapism. I don't really give a flying Fig Newton about the message (of course I don't have kids so it's not a worry for me).
Bottom line: if someone says "hey let's watch Fireproof", I'm going to say, "umm, hell to the naw, let's watch The Hangover instaed".
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 09:36 AM (pwHTT)
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 01:31 PM (YFV+t) And what, pray tell, is a "system film"?
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:36 AM (3Uz3f)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 02, 2010 09:36 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: koopy at January 02, 2010 09:37 AM (XllG0)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 02, 2010 09:38 AM (PQY7w)
Posted by: ace at January 02, 2010 09:39 AM (5EsuI)
No, the prequels wrote their own death sentence. And do you really think quoting the "you're with us or against us" line almost verbatim is "lightly" ridiculing Bush? Seems pretty heavy handed from where i stand.
Posted by: koopy at January 02, 2010 09:39 AM (XllG0)
Honor, moral strength, and noble character un-ironically protrayed as good
OK, I'll buy that regarding Gladiator.
Must say, though, that those traits came through clearer in Mean Girls (2004).
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 09:40 AM (Vl5GH)
I'd say that "The Day After Tomorrow" was a great conservative film because Mr. CO2 really kicked their ass.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:40 AM (3Uz3f)
Unless it's childish dualism of the most banal Superhero, the comic book adaptation must be rejected by the rightwing mind.
Alan Moore cannot be read or watched by the conservative, unless he's massively misread.
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 09:40 AM (YFV+t)
Posted by: ExUrbanKevin at January 02, 2010 09:41 AM (toqoX)
**BREAKING**...
Get the flaming skull out!!!!
Tapper is reporting that Barky and The First Wookie took the kids out for Hawai'in Shave Ice yesterday!!!!
The media finally has something to report on for the next week
Posted by: rum, sodomy and the lash at January 02, 2010 09:43 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 02, 2010 09:46 AM (muUqs)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 02, 2010 09:47 AM (HKfde)
I thought Daniel Day Lewis in "There Will Be Blood" was portraying someone with a metal plate in his head.
I do a lot of oil and gas leasing, and I have never seen a stranger collection of mineral interest owners in my life. I could get a one-eighth ten year lease from those dumbasses for a Chiclet.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:48 AM (3Uz3f)
Oh, Dear God...Carhles Jhonson is now claiming that Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit is calling him a child molestor or something..
...slow motion train wreck
Posted by: rum, sodomy and the lash at January 02, 2010 09:48 AM (AnTyA)
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 01:40 PM (YFV+t)
How's that Thorazine working out for you, Sunshine?
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:50 AM (3Uz3f)
Stark was a dick. But when he was showing off that super weapon, at the beginning of the film, I sprouted oak.
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 02, 2010 09:50 AM (dQdrY)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 02, 2010 09:52 AM (dQdrY)
Oh, Dear God...Carhles Jhonson is now claiming that Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit is calling him a child molestor or something..
...slow motion train wreck
Posted by: rum, sodomy and the lash at January 02, 2010 01:48 PM (AnTyA)
I don't think that a shaved and lubed-up cocker spaniel would qualify as a "child". Other than that, sure..
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:53 AM (3Uz3f)
Look how totalizing is your reduction of culture to the zero-point of monomaniacal "conservative" dogma. You're a fucking lunatic zealot, no different from the cultural narcisism of bin Laden.
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 09:54 AM (YFV+t)
Posted by: Rodent Liberation Front at January 02, 2010 01:52 PM (dQdrY)
"My name is Gandhi Mohandas K. Gandhi."
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 09:54 AM (3Uz3f)
Caught the 1st half of "Invictus" (Morgan Freeman, Matt Damon, director - Clint Eastwood) last night which tells a sliver of the story of Nelson Mandela first months as President of South Africa.
The comparisons with the 1st year of the Obama Presidency end with Obama's words ... "I Won." Mandela is portrayed as a real post-racial president, while Obama is hyper-partisan.
Given the current situation of President Obama, I expect Progressives will hate "Invictus" because by contrast, it makes Obama look bad.
Posted by: Neo at January 02, 2010 09:56 AM (tE8FB)
I thought it was freaking hysterical. A good conservative film in my eyes.
Plus there are zombie ACLU lawyers.
Posted by: shibumi at January 02, 2010 09:57 AM (OKZrE)
Posted by: mokimoki at January 02, 2010 09:59 AM (IrV7s)
Posted by: The Great Satan's Ghost at January 02, 2010 10:04 AM (Pk5cf)
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 10:05 AM (ZvwTS)
Posted by: Dave C at January 02, 2010 01:58 PM (qmecx)
He was the most believable character in the movie.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 10:06 AM (3Uz3f)
I did see Incredibles and War of the Worlds at the drive-in. Both of which should have been listed, even though I hate the little bastard Cruise
Posted by: Eric at January 02, 2010 10:07 AM (Qc/s6)
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 01:54 PM (YFV+t)
What is "totalizing" and "zero-point"? Is that English, or are you really laptop guy trying to find a backdoor through the spam filter?
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 10:09 AM (3Uz3f)
Posted by: HowardDevore at January 02, 2010 10:10 AM (yxfok)
Posted by: HowardDevore at January 02, 2010 02:10 PM (yxfok)
I agree. Life is like a box of Pizza Rolls.
And too short to waste on lowbrow Star Wars crap.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 10:14 AM (3Uz3f)
That was a great review of The Phantom Menace. 'What is wrong with your face??'
Posted by: kefka at January 02, 2010 10:14 AM (n1uMU)
The Batcave is there -- it just looks like a technological, modernized version of the TV series' Batcave.
Posted by: Richard Romano at January 02, 2010 10:16 AM (jlgjV)
Sorry, but any movie where Mel Gibson avenges his dead children by slow-motion spearing the bad guy with the American flag goes right in the "schmaltz" bin for me. It wasn't about conservative principles, it was about stroking the American ego with blatant emotional manipulation (and I say that as a person who doesn't mind having her American ego played to).
Posted by: Joanna at January 02, 2010 10:17 AM (EQg+C)
If you can stomach it (and I refuse to link it here) Kos has something similiar--top 25 liberal movies compiled earlier this year.
Here are the top five. Commence eye rolling
5. Bowling for Columbine
4. Shawshank Redemption
3. Goodnight and Goodluck
2. Farenheit 9/11
1. An Inconvenient Truth
But let's break it down--it's a real hoot. 2/5 are Michael Moore. Enough said. #1 is, well inconvient from what we know now. #3 is ironic considering we're now living in an era of modern day McCarthyism. #4 is on the list why? Who knows other than the lefts love affair with Tim Robins.
Sadly, Che didn't make their top 25. Wonder why. They love Soderbergh. Oh and despots too.
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 10:18 AM (pwHTT)
I'd like to see more of a discussion of what makes these movies "conservative" beyond things like "good vs. evil" and "families are important" and stuff.
In the ones on these lists that I've seen, I don't recall a lot of pro-small governmentery or anti-tax screeds.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 02, 2010 10:19 AM (Gsep6)
If we go foreign films, District B13 has an incredibly brutal view of where the French government is going to go with dealing with the ghettos. I wouldn't say it's conservative, per se, but it does support Steyn's view that Europe will deal with these issues in the way that Europe always does. It's more striking to me because it's in a stupid action movie.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 10:19 AM (6Hbvd)
Posted by: moviegique at January 02, 2010 10:20 AM (1y5Vr)
Posted by: progressoverpeace at January 02, 2010 10:21 AM (A46hP)
Posted by: lancewing plover at January 02, 2010 10:21 AM (Gsep6)
Great googly moogly, the man is delusional.
Ergie, if you think that's what ace is doing, then you really are a pathetic idiot.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 10:21 AM (89RxY)
And then there's the fantastic misreadings in which a film or book is entered into the rightwing calculus of acceptable puritanical fictions. Ace as I recall thought "The Prisoner" was a parable of rightwing emancipation from the state, which of course is wrong. It was Kafka, not Ayn Rand. But now that I think about it, I think Ace just rejected the thing as "weird," a word discounting anything "intellectual."
What a fucking bleak world that is rightwing culture. Just horrible.
Posted by: John Cassavetes at January 02, 2010 10:24 AM (YFV+t)
I love that movie up until the last 25 minutes or so when it all goes to hell. Actually Chris Evans' character could be read as the "conservative" one since he's the only one who is intent on making sure the mission succeeds, no matter the consequence to himself.
Also, I think Live Free or Die Hard should be on there as well. The That Guy discussion is one of the best summations of who Americans are that I've seen onscreen.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 10:25 AM (6Hbvd)
How about Rambo? I haven't seen it, but the talk I've heard indicates that apart from things getting blowed up good, it drives home a message that diplomacy and being non-threatening is useless in the face of evil, and the only real way to deal with evil successfully is to shoot it with a 50 cal jeep mounted machine gun.
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 02, 2010 10:25 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 10:26 AM (6Hbvd)
Posted by: Ingmar Fucking Bergman at January 02, 2010 10:26 AM (WbRO8)
Posted by: someone at January 02, 2010 10:28 AM (njJQD)
See, I'm trying to take heed the criticism of a guy who pick John Cassavetes as his screen name, but it's just not working. I like my movies not to be boring and overrated as hell.
Posted by: AD at January 02, 2010 10:28 AM (AC4Q0)
4. Shawshank Redemption
1. An Inconvenient Truth
#4 is on the list why? Who knows other than the lefts love affair with Tim Robins.
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 02:18 PM (pwHTT)
Actually, as a geologist, I enjoyed Shawshank's discussion of obsidian - the forgotten non-mineral and Fort Hancock, Texas (which does not really have a bus station) is right next door to where I live, and the computer enhanced swimming polar bears in An Inconvenient Truth made for much mirth.
In War of the Worlds, Cruise gets to kill Tim Robbins, who is as annoying stupid in the movie as he is in real life, and (most important) that Dakota Fanning in the movie is an absolute deadringer for my little daughter, so - +58 stars!
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 10:30 AM (3Uz3f)
(Describing a brilliant-but-odd-but-hot scientist with a dead arm played by Summer Glau): "Imagine John Cassavetes from The Fury as a hot chick."
And while I'm citing Whedon, let's not forget Serenity as being at least strongly libertarian if not conservative.
Posted by: Ian S. at January 02, 2010 10:30 AM (pg/HS)
Ergboy, the world isn't *actually* all about your daddy buggering you when you were young.
Posted by: someone at January 02, 2010 10:31 AM (njJQD)
Uh, I don't know if you noticed, but most the last decade involved some slightly more pressing issues.
Posted by: someone at January 02, 2010 10:33 AM (njJQD)
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at January 02, 2010 02:32 PM (0lYjp)
His grammar and use of spelling is better than I remember. Are you sure?
Posted by: AD at January 02, 2010 10:35 AM (AC4Q0)
And for the movies I haven't seen, I have to guess in a lot of the cases, so.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 02, 2010 10:36 AM (Gsep6)
PIXY!!
Comments broken on Charles Post, won't go passed 122!!
Get those hamsters off the booze and back to work!
Posted by: Kemp at January 02, 2010 10:37 AM (2+9Yx)
That's just a cinematic purity test.
Posted by: andycanuck at January 02, 2010 10:41 AM (2qU2d)
Uh, I don't know if you noticed, but most the last decade involved some slightly more pressing issues.
Posted by: someone at January 02, 2010 02:33 PM (njJQD)
Fiscal conservatism, economic freedom and small government are always the number one concerns. Otherwise, you wind up with W's big-government "compassionate conservatism" domestic agenda, which got us here..
As far as national defense - no bucks, no Buck Rogers. Nations with broken economies cannot defend themselves, unless they go all North Korea...
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 10:42 AM (3Uz3f)
Hello, "Blindside"!
Christian Republicans helping an underpriveleged brother to fulfill his dreams (as well as his own hard work and initiative). Gubamint programs failed him.
Posted by: runningrn at January 02, 2010 10:42 AM (CfmlF)
I enjoyed Shawshank as well but am not seeing the overtly "liberal" tone in it.
It was filmed here in Ohio-Mansfield. It's no longer operational but you can tour it. You can even spend the night there to get the feel. Umm, no thanks.
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 10:43 AM (pwHTT)
Well, let me join in. The Dark Knight sucked. Or, more to the point, Bale as Batman was JarJar Binks level bad. The Joker was spectacular and Gary Oldman as Gordon was superb. But every time Bale opened his mouth as Batman I had to slap my hands over my mouth to keep in the laughter.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 10:44 AM (6Hbvd)
I had the same reaction at first, but then I found this book which references the war in the South—something we don't study much in school.
Walter Edgar is a great historian even if he is somewhat of a liberal. Of course one can not be a History Professor at a modern college without being a liberal.
Posted by: Vic at January 02, 2010 10:44 AM (QrA9E)
So, tell me, erg, do you and your friend Charles like movies about gladiators?
Posted by: erg's dad, reaching for the KY at January 02, 2010 10:45 AM (2qU2d)
Of course one cannot be a History Professor at a modern college without being a liberal.
Just like the historian who reported Lincoln sucked dick, based on an activist's claims, was a liberal. [Via five feet of fury.]
Posted by: andycanuck at January 02, 2010 10:50 AM (2qU2d)
Posted by: koopy at January 02, 2010 10:51 AM (XllG0)
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 02, 2010 10:52 AM (pZEar)
Posted by: John Connor at January 02, 2010 10:55 AM (cMo6P)
And we have quite the monomaniacal troll today, don't we?
Posted by: A.G. at January 02, 2010 10:56 AM (jBPzC)
What the hell. It's Saturday and I'm bored. I won't say The Dark Knight sucked. It didn't. But Batman Begins was better. For starters, all the weapons and action in the first one was at least believable, stretching the bounds a bit, but believable. In Dark Knight, there was a real deux ex machina quality to it--the way the security system of an entire building was shut down, the tapping into everybody's cell phone simultaneously, the rest of the swooping in, capturing, and abducting of the Chinese banker, it just wasn't believable. Yeah, I know, it's a Batman movie, but the first one was still better in this area.
There was also a philosophical aspect to Batman Begins that stretched the entire movie and touched on much more lightly and only really at the end of The Dark Knight. I also don't think I really buy Harvey Dent not just killing the Joker the second he sees him. Anyway, it's fodder. Let the attacks commence.
Posted by: AD at January 02, 2010 10:57 AM (AC4Q0)
the Warden is religious, corrupt, and evil
- The Right Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
with his thugs/guards being violent psychopathic tax cheats on a long leash - Tim Geitner and Bruno Napalitano.
More leftist projection.
Posted by: Dang Straights at January 02, 2010 10:57 AM (sHYWJ)
Posted by: Inspector Asshole at January 02, 2010 10:59 AM (o5sYk)
Posted by: AD at January 02, 2010 11:00 AM (AC4Q0)
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at January 02, 2010 11:02 AM (/h1LN)
Posted by: Christian Bale at January 02, 2010 11:04 AM (cMo6P)
Ah, yeah that's probably it Cautiously. The details are vague. I'd say I'd go back and re-watch it, but then again maybe not.
The comments at the Kos page were a laugh riot. Some were pissed Schindler's List didn't make their list. You know, all those hawkish anti-isolationism Dems were really gung ho over the US involvement in WWII prior to Pearl Harbor. Nyuk nyuk nyuk1
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 11:04 AM (EWwXK)
I agree that Dark Night didn't suck, but that is mostly because of Ledger. Bale's Batman was a caricature, not a real character. And that fucking raspy voice became intolerable after a few minutes. However , I thought that the technostuff was fine. It is, after all, a movie.
Posted by: NJConservative at January 02, 2010 11:05 AM (/Ywwg)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at January 02, 2010 11:06 AM (muUqs)
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 11:07 AM (EWwXK)
Just like the historian who reported Lincoln sucked dick, based on an activist's claims, was a liberal. [Via five feet of fury.]
Actually according to that article a “gay activist” is the one who said Lincoln was gay, not the historian.
Posted by: Vic at January 02, 2010 11:07 AM (QrA9E)
Something Wonderful: Why Beauty is Important
http:// americandigest.org/ mt-archives/grace_notes/ why_beauty_is_important.php#011359
(remove spaces; I reject tinyurl)
Posted by: butch at January 02, 2010 11:12 AM (myCYQ)
"The Lives of Others" got its Oscar because the Beautiful People thought it was an allegory for Bush's Amerika, and not about real life in Communist East Germany.
Remember that next time Cassavetes/erg tells you how nuanced the Left is.
Posted by: effinayright at January 02, 2010 11:13 AM (lQRmV)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 11:14 AM (6Hbvd)
Remember the Titans (2000) was a great film that merged playing for a team with judging people by their nature, rather than with prejudice.
And it's about football.
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 11:18 AM (PD1tk)
I'd like to see more of a discussion of what makes these movies "conservative" beyond things like "good vs. evil" and "families are important" and stuff.
I mentioned Joe Dirt and Mean Girls because each, in its own way, emphasizes character and self-destiny. That's not to say that these films are devoid of liberal values; I just don't see them as mutually exclusive. But neither one has any of that progressive preaching.
I'd say a "conservative movie" focuses on characters, tells a story and has a moral to the story. The opposite would be a movie where general themes are more important than character development with the point of challenging your assumptions or confidence in a certain aspect of traditional society. In short, they're preachy and annoying.
I'd say Joe Dirt fits my description of a conservative film because its main point is to celebrate the character of Joe: his integrity, his demeanor, his perseverance, and his triumph -- not to convince us that his non-traditional family is a legitimate family. (Which it is, by the way, and if you got something to say about it Christopher Walken might stab you in the eye with a soldering iron.)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 11:22 AM (Vl5GH)
Oh, we can watch. Watch and laugh. And laugh, and laugh.
And then laugh at the dipshits like erg who think he's a genius.
Posted by: Waterhouse at January 02, 2010 11:32 AM (Rtdhx)
I'd like to see more of a discussion of what makes these movies "conservative" beyond things like "good vs. evil" and "families are important" and stuff.
Individual responsibility and self reliance is a good conservative theme, I think. But really, if the left is willing to cede the idea of "good vs. evil" to us, why not mine that rich vein for all it's worth? I mean, it's not like there's an excessive number of conservative films out there...
Posted by: Cautiously Pessimistic at January 02, 2010 11:45 AM (pZEar)
A conservative film is one where they kill a bunch of furriners and hippies. And they don't feel bad about it no how.
Posted by: harry mellon at January 02, 2010 11:48 AM (6UPPZ)
I find your script ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 11:51 AM (PD1tk)
Rorschach is the only character (properly) horrified by Ozymandius's plot. If Moore intended that to demonstrate that Rorschach was uncompromising and unreasonable and the plot was an acceptable way to deal with impending world war (or liberal's hysterical reaction to the possibility), well, I'd say he failed spectacularly. Since history proved that mass-murder and manipulation was unnecessary to end the Cold War peacefully, the conservative Rorschach comes out looking like the only sane one out of the bunch and the liberal-minded characters that were willing to go along with the plot come out looking like monsters. What's in that for a conservative to not enjoy?
Now, V for Vendetta is shit on a stick. No redeeming value whatsoever. Utter crap. Same for most of his other works, but V was probably the most insipid.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 11:51 AM (SxA2Q)
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 11:54 AM (PD1tk)
I find your script ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter
Pilgrim, you just have to watch the Western Channel. They just had a Have Gun Will Travel marathon.
Posted by: harry mellon at January 02, 2010 11:56 AM (6UPPZ)
I was just going to mention this. Now I want Christopher Walken to stab me in the eye with a soldering iron.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 11:56 AM (89RxY)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 01:13 PM (Vl5GH)
It wasn't that bad. Had some good laughs in it and goes straight at lefties. From the ACLU to Hollywood nit wits.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at January 02, 2010 11:58 AM (65d/h)
Posted by: Spurwing Plover at January 02, 2010 12:02 PM (3//V4)
Posted by: laceyunderalls (is a girl damn it!) at January 02, 2010 03:07 PM (EWwXK)
I thought that movie was high comedy. Read the book, it has a way creepier edge.
Posted by: Jim in San Diego at January 02, 2010 12:03 PM (F09Uo)
This is a very good movie. It really gives you an idea of what it was like to live in a liberal paradise.
They all speak East German in it, but it is well worth watching.
Posted by: Rickshaw Jack at January 02, 2010 12:04 PM (/h1LN)
Posted by: knife at January 02, 2010 12:05 PM (mg/vv)
Posted by: harry mellon at January 02, 2010 12:06 PM (6UPPZ)
You thought Burton's Batman flicks were excessive? Hmmm... I thought the Batman sets got really excessive with Batman Forever and Batman and Robin (which were both Joel Schumacher flicks).
Posted by: Kratos (on the back of Gaia, scaling Mt Olympus) at January 02, 2010 12:13 PM (otlXg)
Posted by: dr kill at January 02, 2010 12:14 PM (tGYpf)
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 12:16 PM (SxA2Q)
And 'splodey things in general.
I saw a film sometime in the last twenty years that ended with the terrorist a prisoner of the hero on an overpass (bridge?) with a grenade stuffed in his mouth. Confronted with some dispute over authority or something, the protagonist pulls the pin and walks away, (wide eyed terrorist and splody head follow). I thought it was an Ahnuld film but nothing in his IMDB rings a bell?
Anyone remember what this was?
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 12:17 PM (PD1tk)
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 12:18 PM (SxA2Q)
Posted by: dri at January 02, 2010 12:22 PM (qLZ+x)
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 12:23 PM (SxA2Q)
Remember I mentioned the new Ted Raimi series SPARTCUS?
I watched the first two (pre-aired) episodes and I think it's gonna be a big hit. Rumor has it that it has already been renewed for a 2nd season.
Why is it good? Two words: boo & bies.
Seriously, lot's of T'nA. And dingalings.Which isn't cool, but...
Okay, it's pretty much a complete ripoff of 300 and Gladiator.
The best way to describe SPARTACUS is it's 300 meets GLADIATOR meets CALIGULA.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, and LUCY LAWLESS shows her ta-tas. They're smaller than I though, to be honest. But pretty fly for an older big chick.
Posted by: Posted by: Posted by: at January 02, 2010 12:26 PM (z37MR)
A conservative film should ignore or expose liberal lies, should show characters being rewarded for work, values, or perseverance. A typical conservative scenario would include pulling one's self up by bootstraps, going outside a welfare/government handout entitlement.
I think the Barbarian Invasions was awesome in this respect because a bunch of elderly, Canadian, hippy dippy academic elites had to face up to the crumbling of civilization that their ideals brought about and face the shitty, Canadian health care system when the gauche wealthy son has to save the day and break the liberal rules to get his lefty POS dad the care he needs.
Dark Knight and 300 also worked in part, not because of militaristic tones (the socialist totalitarians also have a history of celebrating their military, after all), but for their depiction of hard moral choices.
BlackHawk Down was a super duper awesomely awesome war movie but that doesn't mean it's conservative. Hell, Any Given Sunday would be more conservative than BHD.
The Incredibles, on the other hand, was amazing, and conservative. Go out and achieve. Don't be middle of the road just to fit in. Sometimes the rules need to be broken.
Similarly, the LotR would also be superficially conservative with its good versus bad but it also has a lot of lefty style elfs with their intrinsic goodness and knowledge (remember lefties seem to wallow in the self-delusion that they are the beautiful, elite, intelligent owners of secret knowledge). But in the end, a dopey hobbit saves the day because he dug deep down, and pushed for friends, family, good over evil, etc.
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 12:28 PM (ZvwTS)
A good Rohrshach test of liberalism versus conservatism would be "Forrest Gump".
I do agree with a couple of posters about the national defense angle being pushed too hard. The real question of liberal versus conservative often has to do with economic, personal freedom and constitutional issues far more than basic national defense.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 12:29 PM (3Uz3f)
People helping people.
Importance of family even when the shit hits the fan.
The damn scene that makes me cry all over my beer.
Complete Vindication of the Second Amendment.
The importance of a healthy lifestyle. Rule 1.
The double tap.
Twinkies.
It has it all.
Oh, and ESAD Mr. J.C.
Posted by: sifty at January 02, 2010 12:30 PM (gyoAZ)
Rorschach / Comedian 2012
Posted by: sifty at January 02, 2010 12:34 PM (gyoAZ)
I think we should make another list for "most outrageous shameless leftist propaganda films" of the 2000's. And I think the refurbed "The Manchurian Candidate", one of the only actively anti-communist films ever produced by Hollywood remade so that the bad guys are, of course, corporate big wigs, should be at the top of any such list.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 12:35 PM (SxA2Q)
So, is there a movie like how Pursuit of Happyness looks (never saw it, but it seemed to be an up by bootstraps kinda film)?
I would also say that if you want a military style, conservative film the BSG miniseries and seasons 1-3 would be conservative, despite the fact that its creators hated that it went that way. There was no way to do it otherwise, a desperate struggle, a need to carry on your traditions but fight and claw your way to a new life, and having the moxie to meet and beat all challenges.
I liked There Will Be Blood because the protagonist seemed to be a hard core, survivor type that willed the modern world into existence around him, despite his personal problems. I was drunk and missed all the capitalism is bad stuff...I must've walked out of the room for that.
Maybe Almost Famous too. Sure, they're a bunch of dirty hippies but, in the end, Mom was right.
Also, consider these as conservative films? Unbreakable? Billy Elliot? Ratatouille? Juno? Taken? Man on Fire? Gran Torino?
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 12:41 PM (ZvwTS)
We really gotta raise our standards here. Fox News isn't conservative, it gives the liberal viewpoint all the time, but we -think- it's "conservative" because you actually get to hear a conservative on there once in a while too.
Same with these selections. Just because a conservative thought is allowed to be uttered amidst a cacophony of liberal bullshit doesn't mean it's conservative. It just means it's not insipidly liberal.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 12:46 PM (SxA2Q)
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 04:41 PM (ZvwTS)
In short, it was Snidley Whiplash as eeeevil oilman.
Posted by: TexasJew at January 02, 2010 12:46 PM (3Uz3f)
Indeed, we need a film that celebrates individualism, achievement, and personal charity.
Include personal integrity and Legally Blonde fits.
(Right decade, too.)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 12:48 PM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 12:50 PM (ZvwTS)
Crusading Journalist? Check
Man with the truth? Check
Big bad government institution? check?
and that's just from the preview, a bunch of masturbatory lefty signifiers.
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 12:52 PM (ZvwTS)
Posted by: William "One-Take" Beaudine at January 02, 2010 12:52 PM (GQhsP)
Last Decade
T.V. mini series...."Winds of War" and "War and Remembrance"........These two should be shown in all junior high and high schools....Nudity, but it is hard to show concentration camps without it....It is available on netflix and both can be bought at Amazon for about one hundred dollars...
Posted by: non_dhimmie at January 02, 2010 12:54 PM (zACGu)
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 12:56 PM (Vl5GH)
What about Ransom? The bad guy was a crypto lefty upset at rich people? right decade?
I think in the first seasons of BSG, the message was "we have to live" and also "start having kids." anyone who questioned that got pushed out an air-lock.
The creators, in the commentary, noted that their typical lefty positions did not work in their show.
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 12:56 PM (ZvwTS)
I maintain my position that Kill Bill is one of the most stridently pro-life movies made. Look, the entire motivation of the film is The Bride getting vengeance on those she believes have killed her child. I mean, there's a scene where The Bride explicitly states that the second she realized she was pregnant her entire life became about her child. Those she slaughters after that? Deserve it.
I would say yes to Ratatouille. That's all about judging based on nothing but talent.
Taken, naturally. There's no attempt to "understand" why the hell anyone would be a white slaver.
If we're doing tv shows, then My Name Is Earl would be at the top of my list along with the first half season or so of Jericho before that went off the rails.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 12:58 PM (6Hbvd)
I've noted earlier that the left tries to make their dystopias a result of America's failings but all the world's real (reality based community much?) dystopias are owned by the left, from Detroit to Zimbabwe to the USSR.
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 01:00 PM (ZvwTS)
5. The Pursuit of Happyness (Gabriele Muccino, 2006)
I saw this with my then 8yo son. The central message of TPoH is this:
Once freed of a woman's negativity, a man can achieve anything.
Seriously. It's the must-see movie for any man who's trying to make something of himself, but can't because babe's just isn't buying into it - whatever "it" might happen to be.
The balance of the movie is inspiring - raising a kid while living in a shelter, getting through Dean Witter's school, landing accounts, et cetera.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 02, 2010 01:02 PM (ruzrP)
The Path to 9-11
So, suck it, all you libs who think that they're the victims of censorship when their piece of shit films don't do well.
Posted by: joeindc44 at January 02, 2010 01:06 PM (ZvwTS)
She cleans the room.
Makes her own clothes.
Gets herself all dolled up for a date.
Gets herself hitched to a guy with a job.
Oh, and, animals serve the needs of humans.
the only vaguely "non" conservative scene is when Giselle (Amy Adams) goes out and spends a couple of grand on a fashion makeover, a makeover which manages to make her less attractive than when she was making clothes out of slipcovers.
Posted by: BumperStickerist at January 02, 2010 01:14 PM (ruzrP)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 01:15 PM (6Hbvd)
>>202 William @ 200: Not to nitpick, but you spelled Conservatives correctly.
Firehorse = thread winnah.
Posted by: sickinmass at January 02, 2010 01:15 PM (Dxfei)
Posted by: moviegique at January 02, 2010 01:20 PM (1y5Vr)
Satan getting Saddamised, morality police causing the Apocalypse, an American invasion of Canada, Streisand's name taken in vain.
So much to love in that flick.
Posted by: AntonDomi at January 02, 2010 01:24 PM (uzQi+)
Posted by: geoffd at January 02, 2010 01:29 PM (hs64b)
Posted by: alexthechick at January 02, 2010 05:15 PM (6Hbvd)
Exactly! And Swordfish came out right before 9/11, emphasizing how utterly detached the left was from reality. As with Sunshine, Swordfish suffered from more than a few silly technical idiocies in the plot, but all told the movie lays out the correct approach (though the movie thinks it's the wrong way) and is good fun.
Posted by: progressoverpeace at January 02, 2010 01:35 PM (A46hP)
Word. In any sane world we would already have had five movies about the Twin Towers. It has everything, shock, bravery and sacrifice, and an almost unbelievable pathos. Like watching Titanic, now matter how much we inwardly screamed Turn!, Turn!, they will always hit the iceberg, and the towers will always fall.
Not to mention the almost superhuman exploits of our troops in the Middle East. Tell me a movie about the Fall of Kabul wouldn't make money.
Hollywood: the biggest bunch of cowards on the planet.
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 01:37 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: Zombywolf at January 02, 2010 01:44 PM (49VBN)
FILMS about savig the whol PLANET like The Happpennning and Teh Day tha Erath Stood Stilll.
STRONG WOMON Ccharechters lik Basic Intsinct 2 & Catwomnan.
The TERUE FACE of CAPTIANLISM in Batlefeild Eorth & Gigli.
All REAL ART is trannsegressissive & you clastropohbec crishtan ronad reaygun wwhosrhipars just CANT COMPERHAND it!
Posted by: William "One-Take" Beaudine at January 02, 2010 01:46 PM (GQhsP)
Posted by: arhooley at January 02, 2010 01:46 PM (GKXA7)
Posted by: av at January 02, 2010 01:48 PM (rG4O2)
O/T: I'm looking forward to The Pacific on HBO in March. Yeah, it's a Spielberg/Hanks production, but the trailers look amazing and three of the lead characters are based on (still living) Marines.
Carry on.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 02, 2010 01:51 PM (UOM48)
Posted by: Hoss Fuentes at January 02, 2010 01:53 PM (cDS2t)
Hoss, I loved that movie, too. And I got spanked earlier for mentioning Taking Chance because it was an HBO movie. Everyone can bite me, it's still great.
Posted by: Jane D'oh! at January 02, 2010 01:57 PM (UOM48)
Beginning of a century or millenium, sure, there's no Year Zero; A.D. starts at 1. But the 1900's (the hundred-year period, not the decade, which doesn't have a decent name) started with 1900 and go all the way through 1999, and then stop.
WTF, mate? This isn't even math-math.
(Okay, it goofs up the First Decade A.D. no matter how you slice it, but it's a semantic convention, not a numerical one.)
I mean... The Eighties. Eighty through Eighty-Nine. This isn't hard.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 02, 2010 02:00 PM (Gsep6)
Don't know how conservative it is but it's a great war film
That reminded me that there's an old Jan Michael Vincent movie from '80 also called Defiance which could be added to this list. Here's the IMDB page for it for those who are interested, always been a favorite of mine.
Posted by: koopy at January 02, 2010 02:05 PM (XllG0)
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 02, 2010 02:07 PM (Gsep6)
Posted by: butch at January 02, 2010 02:18 PM (myCYQ)
Posted by: Lance McCormick at January 02, 2010 02:19 PM (Gsep6)
Posted by: eman at January 02, 2010 02:19 PM (IWCtH)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 02:20 PM (QECjC)
Funny, but I pretty much remember -everyone- celebrating Dec. 31 1999 as the end of the millenium, and Dec 31 2000 as being one of the most boring new years eve's in living memory.
Yes, there was a couple of pedants screaming "no no you must wait another year!" but the fact that they were pretty much completely ignored by everyone is hardly irrelevant.
Qwinn
Posted by: Qwinn at January 02, 2010 02:22 PM (SxA2Q)
Not so much off-topic as tangential:
Anything Disney has made lately for younger audiences is conservative-friendly. Pixar movies and Disney Channel programs affirm for traditional values: Telling lies is bad, have a can-do approach to everything, and even if your parents don't know everything they're still your parents so show some respect. They're not so much instilling values as they're reinforcing the values parents are presumably passing down. Anyone here could probably trust these two brands with pre-teen children.
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 02:26 PM (Vl5GH)
Posted by: eman at January 02, 2010 02:28 PM (IWCtH)
How about these fantastic conservative movies of the aught's?
The Once and Future King. An elite group of 200 CIA and Special Operators take Afghanistan in 150 days.
The Scam. About how being defeated by a "village idiot" for president drove a proud man to madness, with the twist that the world Left finds Chauncey Gore the most useful of idiots. Hilarity ensues as the Hook is set, and the world fete's our delusionist with money, power, Ocars, Grammy's, even a Nobel!
With a Velvet Touch. The sweeping biopic of Lech Walesa, how a simple Catholic electrician grew into a World Statesmen, lead the world through the eye of a nuclear needle, leading the workers of the "Workers Paradise" in revolution against the Communist Left. The role of a lifetime for .....
Posted by: motionview at January 02, 2010 02:30 PM (aQ4nw)
Hold your ground, hold your ground! Sons of Gondor, of Rohan, my brothers! I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day. An hour of woes and shattered shields, when the age of men comes crashing down! But it is not this day! This day we fight! By all that you hold dear on this good Earth, I bid you *stand, Men of the West!*
Posted by: Miss'80sBaby at January 02, 2010 02:32 PM (ubVcw)
I reject your semantics and substitute my own. The first decade only had nine years in it but that doesn't matter since no one at the time used that dating anyway, preferring to use The 753th Year Since the Founding of Rome.
Posted by: toby928 at January 02, 2010 02:34 PM (PD1tk)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 02:35 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 02:38 PM (QECjC)
Why isn't the popular culture addressing contemporary issues anymore?
My guess is that back in the old days, people saw the movie theater as a place to get information, whereas nowadays people go there to escape.
As to the rest of popular culture, I don't know. Same reason, I suppose, to a degree.
Or that the popular culture has itself become a battleground of sorts. I mean, we're over 200 comments into a thread about "conservative movies." Fifty years ago, they were just called "movies."
Posted by: FireHorse at January 02, 2010 02:38 PM (Vl5GH)
To the commenter who believed it was a response to the Bush presidency: um, no. I understand your point and I react strongly to the usual anti-Western, anti-capitalism themes in much of what passes for entertainment now, but wrong, wrong, wrong. If there were a superlative form of wrong, I'd write it here. The Lives of Others was about East Germany, the Stasi, and the people who had to live under those conditions. Any other interpretation is complete and utter night soil.
Posted by: Iskandar at January 02, 2010 02:40 PM (doEqS)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 02:40 PM (QECjC)
The Roman Calender was a little, umm... flexible...
Posted by: Shannow at January 02, 2010 02:41 PM (LJcef)
Bingo.
It's somewhat pathetic that this is more or less all -we've- even got left to fight for nowadays.
Same for the guy who says this is more of a neo-Conservative list, rather than a true all-aspect limited government riff. Woohoo, good and evil exist, and should be fought. What a statement. That isn't something that even most leftists would deny, they just think we're the evil ones.
I actually once knew Nile personally, and he's a great guy, but a lot of these are basically last gasp sorts of stretches.
There's something uncouth about Conservatives (correctly) shitting on Hollywood, and then desperately trying to find something out of it to justify themselves.
Posted by: MlR at January 02, 2010 02:42 PM (M7wme)
And then there's the fantastic misreadings in which a film or book is entered into the rightwing calculus of acceptable puritanical fictions. Ace as I recall thought "The Prisoner" was a parable of rightwing emancipation from the state, which of course is wrong. It was Kafka, not Ayn Rand. But now that I think about it, I think Ace just rejected the thing as "weird," a word discounting anything "intellectual."
What a fucking bleak world that is rightwing culture. Just horrible.
This guy reminds me of my lefty troll sock puppet days. This is a schtick, right? I'm mean it's a total self parody.
Posted by: Max Power at January 02, 2010 02:42 PM (q177U)
Posted by: eman at January 02, 2010 02:44 PM (IWCtH)
Same with these selections. Just because a conservative thought is allowed to be uttered amidst a cacophony of liberal bullshit doesn't mean it's conservative. It just means it's not insipidly liberal.
Agree 100% Quinn. After decades of this stuff, we've got really, really low expectations.
Posted by: MlR at January 02, 2010 02:49 PM (M7wme)
Posted by: dr kill at January 02, 2010 02:52 PM (tGYpf)
Posted by: eman at January 02, 2010 02:53 PM (IWCtH)
Here's one everyone forget: MINORITY REPORT
You know, for the thought-control nonsense.
Hate crime, anyone?
Posted by: Posted by at January 02, 2010 02:55 PM (ouySy)
oh, and TEARS OF THE SUN was a great film that had no leftwing message in it at all; Bruce Willis shoulda got an Oscar for it.
Posted by: Posted by at January 02, 2010 02:57 PM (ouySy)
I dunno about you anal apertures but I'm defining 'conservative movies' as movies without douchebags as the heroes or without some leftwing preaching in it that isn't mocked.
Posted by: Posted by at January 02, 2010 02:59 PM (ouySy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 02:59 PM (QECjC)
btw, I mentioned boobies and Lucy Lawless and not a single one of you made a comment about it.
You are all homos.
Posted by: Posted by at January 02, 2010 03:01 PM (ouySy)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 03:05 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 03:06 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: CoolCzech at January 02, 2010 03:10 PM (QECjC)
Posted by: Comrade "other" at January 02, 2010 03:27 PM (AsApV)
Ol' Creeky Mcknucklejoints
A libertarian perspective on the futility of attempting to govern in a paternalistic way. An old pot smoker takes us on a journey the helps us examine laws aimed at victimless crimes. During the course of that journey, we come to examine ourselves at the drug-law-crime nexus and to love an old man who rolls bumpy, misshapen joints.
That movie should've made the list.
Posted by: Guy Fleegman (rdb) at January 02, 2010 03:42 PM (fKN4G)
Posted by: Frank at January 02, 2010 04:02 PM (rAhTW)
Heh. Our local B-movie channel which came online after the broadcast switch to digital (does every metropolitan area get one of these?), has been playing this 2-3 times per week during the holidays. That and the remade Babes In Toyland with Drew Barrymore and Keanu "I Can't Act For Shit" Reeves.
Bleah.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 02, 2010 05:09 PM (89RxY)
Posted by: Hurricane Mikey at January 02, 2010 05:20 PM (TJoID)
Posted by: Blackford Oakes at January 02, 2010 05:52 PM (qyKoF)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at January 02, 2010 05:59 PM (AsApV)
Posted by: Cpl. Hudson at January 02, 2010 06:25 PM (Bs8Te)
Posted by: HowardDevore at January 02, 2010 06:47 PM (yxfok)
@62: The Brits are a wee bit testy about this film because of its way-over-the-top portrayal of the British army as bloodthirsty monsters. I actually agree with them on this.
Actually, in the South, they were pretty ruthless. Not quite burning-villagers-in-the-church bad, but they weren't exactly easy on the civilian populace.
Posted by: Fa Cube Itches at January 02, 2010 07:07 PM (8MuSQ)
Posted by: Simon at January 02, 2010 08:33 PM (/d/hV)
Posted by: Simon at January 02, 2010 08:41 PM (/d/hV)
That was totally a conservative movie. Buncha guys go from working in a university after bilking it to make a living for so many years and then end up in the private sector doing marketable work. And nailing Sigourney Weaver.
The Princess Bride. Totally conservative in that it's a manly story about a man who totally wants to bang this hot princess by becoming a pirate. Now while piracy isn't something that could be labeled conservative, nailing hot princesses while being backed up by Mandy Patinkin and Andre the Giant puts it 'round that orbit.
Armageddon. Well, okay, not really conservative but it does have Bruce Willis being awesome for two and a half hours.
Iron Eage. F-15s. Louis Gosset Jr. Shit getting blowed up. I don't care where this movie is it's just plain ole good.
Posted by: Robert at January 02, 2010 11:36 PM (4ixH5)
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned Secondhand Lions yet. The movie is entertaining with a strong conservative message. I can't wait until my son is old enough so I can watch it with him.
Here's the money line from the movie, delivered by Hub (played by Robert Duvall): Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good; that honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil; and I want you to remember this, that love... true love never dies. You remember that, boy. You remember that. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in.
Posted by: NJHawk at January 04, 2010 12:21 PM (+q3dR)
Funny original article, even if it didn't make any sense. I suppose in reference to the Blade Runner line that prompted Ace's comment, and regarding the entire intent of the original article, I cannot resist the compulsion to paraphrase:
In the land of the lib-stained morons, fatuous hyperbole is king.
(It works for the current administration, too...feel free to use as necessary.)
Posted by: Ragnarokpaperscissors at January 04, 2010 03:49 PM (l8HqE)
<a href="http://www.italygucci.com">gucci handbag</a>.
<a href="http://www.italygucci.com">gucci</a>.
Posted by: discount gucci handbags at May 12, 2010 06:13 AM (QkPnA)
Posted by: discount gucci handbags at May 12, 2010 06:15 AM (QkPnA)
Posted by: liss at June 21, 2010 10:01 PM (hK/tL)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3052 seconds, 413 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: g at January 02, 2010 08:27 AM (oEdB3)